HomeMy WebLinkAboutHandouts_Special Meeting_Tab 02_07/19/2018 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: -� .. �,�, � ��
��
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Alleguez Architecture Inc.
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score n�ax score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 25 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames& budget; current & projected work loads 7 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS gg 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: •-� _ ���_.�'�
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Synalovski Romanik Saye, LLC
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score MaxScore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 23 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current& projected work loads 7 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 86 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: �� , � �_, ���a
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Stephen Boruff, A1A Architects & Planners
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 2� 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads g 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 91 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: � , c,�
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Song & Associates, Inc.
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score Max score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 22 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 2� 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames& budget; current & projected work loads g 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 9p 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: .�„ � 9_ � �1
,,
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
R.J. Heisenbottle Architects
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 21 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 21 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 21 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS gp 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
REG Architects
EVALUATION CATEGORI ES weighted score Max score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 24 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 28 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 9 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 94 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: , �
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Ohlson Lavoie Collaborative
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score n/�aXscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 23 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads g 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS gg 100
v/ ,
�
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: �, � �, �f
Evaluators Name:
Doug Chambers
Firms Name:
Jacobs Facilities, Inc.
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 22 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 22 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 24 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 85 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: � 1�-� � ���•,�
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
c� 1 �
!��� 1�� � -- �°� ����1�,
�
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy �i� p 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services � � p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects �� c� � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise J� p 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current& projected work loads �� p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
i�US U C GC t� 5��
R=.����s�,� 5�.���'
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7l�� z� ���
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
1�'�✓J V^ �
� �
EVALUATION CATEGORIES Weighted Score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy Z � 0 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services Z 3 p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects �� � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise u ,g— 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current& projected work loads �' p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: �� �� z���
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
_, ;�
J lr� • _ -f�};�;�k, �� �
_, s
� �.
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score �naxscore
�:� ,,
�j z
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Phil_ o�sop'hy " '' �j�` ' ��j�� �r� � 25
��
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services L y p 25 �,;�
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � :� 0 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current& projected work loads `'/ p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
� V _- � �.�
�� ��� ��
;n��� ;vt v
�'� G^-e,�lG.�
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: � � � � ��-����
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
,����-� C,;'�;�- �?���
—�
EVALUATION CATEGORIES Weighted Score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy �� p 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services .�N p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects �c� � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise ' U p 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames& budget; current & projected work loads �� p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: � � ����
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
-� -,- � ^ , ;
--r�, _i J�� � :��.�., �,i i� ���k�: �.z� ' ,��.,� S
,�
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy ��i � 25 .
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services -L;� p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects �, �-� � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise � ,�� 10
,
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads �� p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
t�� �=,,� -�.u
� ��.c��-��-� .
;� i6� � 5;.,� e����-�
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: � +� �� ��
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
�.:.y�;, C i�}%-c .�'-��> - ��;�,'��,n��
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score MaXscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy ^U p 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services �� p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects �, 0 30
- �
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise /�, p 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads -�;� 0 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
/ ry,� I) } /�_ �'i w�
I�1•,���� ��(�i�' i� V t(`���"�-�'1 (T�CJ)1���I 1�'"�'C�'
U `
������ �Fst, ��lf��,
"' tS� ��L�k �-""'
''�.c�-S � �(:� i�'
���;� ►�o✓e�5' r 115�����
J e�G �1`r��
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: �-� �� ���
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
�^1'�;�} �J� �_;-� .,J��'
,
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score MaXscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy _ � p 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 1�� p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects `-; � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise �-,� , 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads ;';; p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
Y�+y� <<c�
,� 5�� � ,��� � � �
4 1����� ���/1�}
��� ,�;�J � s /
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: ,
�7 �N �i
Evaluators Name:
Steve Fowler
Firms Name:
�i� � - �`�� ��: -�r � y- ��:
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score n/�axscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy z � � 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services � Lf- p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects Z� 0 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise �� p 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current& projected work loads / p 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
_S�l�s�
�,� �lz��, �e���.
Top 3 Choices
--- -- _ , ._- -- -- —
rt--—�— .
S � —
' cobs . — —
--- -_ __ I _-- �_
I _— + - _ �
' i_---
_� SRS REG Jacobs Max Score
A Proposers Organization,Structure and Philosophy 25 18 15 25
B Qualifications of Proposers staff to be assigned to provide professional serivices 25 23 20 25
C Proposers references,past experience and performance on comparable projects 30 25 20 30
D Certified Miority Business 10 10 10 10
E Commitment to meeting Village time frames&budget;current and projected workloads 10 8 10 10
Grand Total points=100 100 84 75 100
So
�
t�o
"'�.' - �-� C
�
+ _
Firm Name:
Synalovski �
S C Completely laid out as requested with no drawings
- _ ___
Llmpressive RFP organization and presentation
IConsistent project sheet layout and content
IGreat attention to detail!!! Proposal and designs
Neat and organized RF-easy to read and
understand detail
Project Portfolio shows a ton of creativity and
shows the most diverse architectural styles(not
stuck in one style)
Feels client friendly
YMCA-Ft.Lauderdale very relevant current project
West Broward YMCA-complete
'Lot of relevant experience shown in submission
This is a Ft.Lauderdale based architect but really is
only an hour way and in this day and age available
via video and collaborative internet meetings. They
did bring some local subcontractors to the team.
Great references and reference letters provided in
_ _ -----__
RFP
_ _ -
page 36 Cultural Center-great example
page 43 PM High School Gym is awesome
page 46 Multi purpose-nice building
Children's Council Building-nice too
Designs are well thought out
Fresh design-really cool looking
t -
Firm Name:
��+ Ohlson Lavoie no kitchen first floor as requested
-- _
outdoor fitness-don't want that with residents nearby
+ -
Alleguez ArChiteCture meets requested spaces and then some outdoor playground
- -
Layout nice with no road around building 2 buildings
Elevator at front of building
— ______
East entrance good
Nice walking path around building
Running track second floor
Smaller footprint-less to air condition
��.
Firm Name: + '
REG AfC � 5 PM(ives local PM-no community centers
Appealing design PM-Resident of Tequesta in Martin County
Great renderings,drawings Is there enough parking?
WPB based firm Long schedule for design-Construction documents 12 months
. __
East facing entrance Juice/Coffee bar-leased out or Village operated?
Project Examples lack detail and consistency. Values,costs...
East parking lot with building to west some don't make sense.Attention to detail?
kitchen downstairs Organization of RFP and description lack detail
running track 2nd floor Related project experience-weak
Sub consultant ONMJ and others shows all schools as
experience
__ -__ _
Question: What is the SF cost for this type of design?
+ -
Elevations are very old Spanish Revival Mission Style-not
Stephen Boruff Local WPB firm really fitting for this project.
Entry on east side no bathroom first or second floor as requested
parking on east side no elevator
Construction documents ready in 5 months
Question: What is the SF cost for this type of design?
__ ___ __
__ _ -
t -
Jacobs ilities Lot of community centers just not in FL closed design,not open as desired
___ _
design needs work but appears like they are mimicking the
_--- - _ _
Previous experience with Tequesta-Village Hall Village Hall which is not necessary
One stop shop-A/E all in house No Florida community centers
—__ __
Where is the project run from Orlando? Palm Beach Gardens?
In house cost estimator Seems like Orlando from RFP
Central fitness court#9 is outdoors. Why? This is a waste of
Schedule-finished ahead on Tequesta Village Hall space,not necessary and too big.
__
on budget for Village Hall Don't like buildi�g right on Seabrook Road
Is Jacobs using the Palm Beach Gardens office? Don't like#1 event plaza on Seabrook Road
Same PM who worked on the Village Hall North side windows overlook resident back yards
_._ _ --- _ _
Pg 41-Compressing design schedule 4-6 months--
great idea North side front entrance not favorable
_____
No view from office
Design looks massive for site
Question: What is the SF cost for this type of design?
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Greg Corbitt
Firms Name:
l�
U �-�
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score ►v�axscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy � 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services � 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � l 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise p��� 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
�
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Greg Corbitt
Firms Name:
S o �1
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score ►v�axscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 0 a D 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � 1 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise p � 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 0 � 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Greg Corbitt
Firms Name:
�
e
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy � � 25
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services � � 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � 1 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise � f 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 0 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Greg Corbitt
Firms Name:
6n
s
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted Score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy � 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services p 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � � 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise p O 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 0 � 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 0 100
�
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date:
Evaluators Name:
Greg Corbitt
Firms Name:
� V
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score ►v�ax score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 25
B Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services � � 25
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects � �O 30
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise � 10
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work �oads 10
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS p 100
�
� � EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
Alleguez Architecture Inc.
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted weighted weighted weighted Maxscore
Score Score Score Score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25 24 72 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 20 24 6� 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 25 15 29 69 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 5 10 25 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 5 9 21 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 88 70 96 254 300
� � EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
Jacobs Facilities, Inc.
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
Weighted Weighted Weighted
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted score ►v�axscore
Score Score Score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 22 15 21 58 75
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 22 20 23 65 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 24 20 26 �p 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 0 2p 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 10 8 25 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 85 75 78 23H 300
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/18/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
Ohlson Lavoie Collaborative
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
Weighted Weighted Weighted
EVALUATION CATEGORIES Score Score Score Weighted Score n�axscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 20 23 66 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 23 24 �p 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 23 15 29 67 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 0 2p 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 8 10 9 27 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 87 78 85 25O 300
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Uate: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
REG Architects
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted weighted weighted weighted MaXscore
Score Score Score Score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 24 18 24 66 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 23 24 �p 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 28 25 29 82 gp
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 10 30 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 9 g 9 26 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 94 84 96 274 300
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
R.J. Heisenbottle Architects
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted weighted weighted weighted Maxscore
Score Score Score Score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 21 15 24 60 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 21 20 24 65 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 21 15 29 65 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 0 2p 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 g 9 24 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 80 68 86 234 300
\
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
Song & Associates, Inc.
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
EVALUATION CATEGORIES score score score score MaXscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 22 20 24 66 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 15 24 62 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 27 15 29 71 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 10 30 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 8 10 10 2g 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 90 70 97 ZS7 300
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Total of all 3 Evaluators
Firms Name:
Stephen Boruff, A1A Architects & Planners/Benjamin Moore & Co.
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
EVALUATION CATEGORIES weighted weighted weighted weighted Maxscore
Score Score Score Score
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25 24 72 �S
g. Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 20 24 67 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 27 20 29 76 90
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 5 0 15 30
E. Commitment to meeting Vil�age time frames & budget; current& projected work loads 8 10 10 2g 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 91 80 87 ZS8 300
� EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Community Center
Date: 7/19/2018
Evaluators Name:
Tota I of a I I 3 Eva I u ato rs
Firms Name:
Synalovski Romanik Saye, LLC
Chambers Corbitt Fowler
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
EVALUATION CATEGORIES score score score score Maxscore
A Proposer's Organization, Structure and Philosophy 23 25 24 72 �5
g Qualifications of Proposer's staff to be assigned to provide professional services 23 25 24 72 75
� Proposer's references, past experience & performance on comparable projects 23 30 29 82 gp
D. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 10 10 10 30 30
E. Commitment to meeting Village time frames & budget; current & projected work loads 7 10 10 27 30
GRAND TOTAL OF POINTS 100 POINTS 86 100 97 283 300