HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 11_11/08/2018 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
�:
`� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Staff Report— Village Council Public Hearing—11-8-18
1. PETITION DESCRIPTION-SPR 1-18
APPLICANT: Gentile, Glas, Holloway, O'Mahoney&Associates Inc.
1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101
Jupiter, FL 33458
OWNER: Turnberry Beach Road LLC.
REQUEST: Application of Turnberry Beach Road LLC. for a site plan review to build an eleven
(11)story 21-unit multi-family 210,028 sq.ft. condominium building including one
(1) monument sign, one (1) swimming pool, and a new landscaping plan. This
application includes the renovation of an existing building into a pool cabana and
a 10,500 sq.ft.outdoor amenity space.The address of the property is 1550 Beach
Road,Tequesta, Florida, 33469.
LOCATION: 1500& 1550 Beach Road
Tequesta, FL 33469
LOCATION MAP
............................ , s�. -
=�::
: Proposed Building Site : - K
� .
1500& 1550 Beach ; ;� ,
:.........................r� -- � , ,:
•� r` �� ,��,,�rs�� 1 ..
�ti�¢ �°� ...��.. k
. �+"
_.. . � . .
.., Lt, , ,, .
. _. .. - . ., . ` L . .
�L
. . . ', �� �..
i.. �, r� �?^, r. .Y:�. f, _. -' � .a
�` ��,,,� ♦
K 4 lN ` .
�--�-'-� � `�r���. ����,, --
� � '�C ,� ��� ;;� ,« -
.�f,,L�4„ '4 �1 +��y.���- ..�t ' �� ��'.1'. : .
a �� c
_Y`. .�t�5���M �. ui e.�_. a` ,'" 's„b rY. �!l.t; ^ .C- }-:
.'�"'•��.,' ,.`��' . , y >+�� ';;! �':-"�� �,^ .:,. fi ;
f A
i � � "i.. y.l � ��1� . (J�_ '
` �- �� ,t + �r��}'�y�u 1_ •� }�y(
�.+1 y ,Y ,� ,�.S:r �� La�'� .
.. ���:'4 � ���e �;�
:. T k�`�t. �:-
' ;�� � �t � ` � ,-,� ,.�c. k i �.�- i�
� � �' ��I 1�} ly,�� (� -�'f s, *�j.+��� �t ,� A
, d ��`_�
y' ��}�� 'i �.+ �1�vZ A } Yn' ,� �..:� '�:' �
� �R. N k ��� r ,�� ,� �
' �, '` ''1'� "�,j `��' x>s �� i, �� �� ''F� � ;
r;.�r r� ��� �-• �
,�' ' �; '��`�'�,• "f•` �"•,,����::u� "� ,f � ` �,.
�,{.. ;"�: ,--s-..
' � � Y �1 "��,»t'�3�'�`t��ti�, ��.qlft�. .� �;�
T`)R� '�� � �� t�} j�f� ,�.��i� �
t� yi�' ��J}+1" M�-' � "� � ��..Ws.' � 'i'� V� .
.� . � � � -. . 1 � .
,�� uFr',��..� . 7
' .t -,��� 1�'t,i.'��, �'"`;i 1�»i� �'�` .o� .�.. r .,�i
`��..r `^ 4x�1 kt�r� *. �,� r �r.'�
.l...�- r� .+ .7,t�'�t�f�,G,�`.����? .r I �,4., }� i7���T,.
���•� Q s��-
�+ ',Y �.�.y4. �;:+ Q�'i.; �:� Y..- �
r^�� � •� ��'��� �V«�1�t� .:ti i G 1� .�.
� t,.� �• F. ��1� _' � n �•,� �,,�' �{�' .�Y-,
��; .} ' � * � .'J�, � � y , �
��� }
,�
'i4�'.y r+ `., ��7 (' � � �;7'�'4'[�'�;
i w f,
�.Z. _,r...7+r� ��r� ,� . � ,!l• �x ��:��'r�
1
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
Figure 2
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION......................................................................................... 1
Figure 3
1.2 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................. 1
2.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................1
Figure 5
2.1 SOILS.................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER ........................................... 2
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS ............................................. 3
3.0
ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.3
3.1 OBJECTIVE.......................................................................................................... 3
3.2 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................ 3
3.3 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................4
4.0
ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES ........................................... 5
5.0
GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES ................................................. 5
6.0
PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION............................................................... 5
7.0
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION....................................................... 5
7.1 VEGETATION......................................................................................................5
7.2 WILDLIFE.............................................................................................................6
7.3 WETLANDS......................................................................................................... 6
7.4 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................6
FIGURES
Figure 1
Location Map
Figure 2
Soils Map
Figure 3
FLUCFCS Map
Figure 4
Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5
Proposed Landscape Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Soils Report
Appendix B FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Appendix C Drainage Statement for Blowing Rocks
Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
FIGURES
Figure 1
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION......................................................................................... 1
Figure 2
1.2 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................. 1
2.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................1
Figure 4
2.1 SOILS.................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 5
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER...........................................2
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS ............................................. 3
3.0
ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.3
3.1 OBJECTIVE.......................................................................................................... 3
3.2 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................ 3
3.3 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................4
4.0
ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES ........................................... 5
5.0
GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES ................................................. 5
6.0
PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION............................................................... 5
7.0
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION.......................................................5
7.1 VEGETATION......................................................................................................5
7.2 WILDLIFE.............................................................................................................6
7.3 WETLANDS......................................................................................................... 6
7.4 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................6
FIGURES
Figure 1
Location Map
Figure 2
Soils Map
Figure 3
FLUCFCS Map
Figure 4
Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5
Proposed Landscape Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Soils Report
Appendix B FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Appendix C Drainage Statement for Blowing Rocks
Page i
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The 1.78± acre -property covered by this Environmental Impact Report is located in
Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida (Figure 1).
The property is bordered to the north by Coral Cove Park, to the south by undeveloped
lands owned by the State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
(TIITF), to the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and to the west by the Intracoastal Waterway.
Surrounding uses beyond the immediate park and undeveloped property consist of
condominiums.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report documents and characterizes the natural resources found on-site, discusses the
current regulatory status, and identifies potential impacts that may result from the
construction of the proposed residential development.
This report has been prepared in accordance to Chapter 50, Article II of the Code of
Ordinances, Village of Tequesta, Florida.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property located at 1500 Beach Road is currently developed as a condominium with
associated parking and pool. This property is fully developed on the east side of Beach
Road to the seaward edge of the existing dune and contains two beach boardwalks with a
small area of native dune vegetation (sea oats) near the south beach boardwalk. The
section of the property located on the west side of Beach Road contains a dock and a mix
of native and exotic vegetation.
The property located at 1550 Beach Road appears to be currently developed as a single
family residence. The majority of the property is developed on the east side of Beach
Road with a small area of dune vegetation. The section of the property on the west side
of Beach Road contains a mixture of native vegetation.
Both properties are bordered by surface waters on the east (Atlantic Ocean) and west side
(Intracoastal Waterway). A narrow fringe of mangrove wetlands is present on the west
side of both properties immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway as shown in
Figure 2.
2.1 SOILS
Project soils were mapped according to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, December 1978, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service. A copy of the Soil Survey Map depicting the project boundaries and soil type(s)
is included as Figure 3 and a copy of the Soils Report is included (see Appendix A). The
Page 1
two properties contained three soil mapping units, all of which traverse both properties.
A general description of the soil types are as follows:
Arents - Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes (4)
This complex consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly drained, sandy soils and
urban land. The soils formed in thick layers of sandy fill material that were placed
over low, wet mineral soils to make the areas suitable for urban use such as golf
courses, subdivisions, condominium developments, roadways, etc. The soil material
is generally rapidly permeable in all layers. The available water capacity is low or
very low.
Beaches (9)
This mapping unit consists of narrow strips of tide -washed sand along the Atlantic
coast line. As much as half of the beach may be covered by water during daily high
tides, and all of the beach may be covered during storm periods. Most areas have no
vegetation, but the inland areas may be covered with moonvine, railroad vine, sea
oats, and seashore bermudagrass. Depth to the water table is highly variable and
ranges from 0 to 6 feet or more, depending on the distance from the water, the height
of the beach, etc.
Palm Beach - Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes (2 7)
This complex is nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, and consists of Palm
Beach sand and urban land. The majority of this complex is open land such as lawns,
vacant lots, and undeveloped areas however about 30 to 50 percent is covered by
sidewalks, streets, parking lots, building and other structures.
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The following is a summary of the land cover and vegetation communities found on the
two properties. Land cover and vegetative communities were mapped based on the
Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) developed by the
Florida Department of Transportation. Field reconnaissance and aerial photograph
interpretation were utilized in mapping the vegetative communities on the project site.
There are five different FLUCFCS classifications currently present on the site. A land
cover map of the observed community types is included as Figure 2.
Fixed Single Family Units (111) — 0.53± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property at 1550 Beach Road which
appears to be a single family residence with associated driveways and landscaping
including sod. The majority of the landscaping is exotic and ornamental vegetation
including java plum, coconut palms, and a ficus hedge.
Residential High Density (130) — 0.78± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property located at 1500 Beach Road
which is condominiums with an associated pool, parking areas and landscaping,
including sod.
Page 2
Coastal Scrub (322) — 0.077± acres
Small areas on the east side of the project site adjacent to the beach and on the west
side of the project site adjacent to Beach Road fall into this category and contain a
mixture of sea grape (Coccoloba uvifera), half flower (exotic) (Scaevola taccada),
coin vine (Dalbergia ecastaphyllum), cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto), buttonwood
(Conocarpus erectus) and sea oats (Uniola paniculata).
Mangrove Swamps (612) — 0.091± acres
A mangrove fringe exists on the western side of the project site adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway. The mangrove fringe extends landward of mean high water
and consists of red, white and black mangroves. Mangroves extending waterward of
mean high water are not considered to be within the boundaries of the property (those
would be on state owned submerged lands) therefore they are not included in the
acreage identified.
Beaches Other Than Swimming Beaches (710) — 0.31± acres
A beach exists on the eastern side of the project site adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean
between the remnants of the dune line and mean high water.
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS
The presence or absence of wetlands was determined using the State Unified
Methodologies identified in Chapter 62-340, FAC and 1987 Corps of Engineers Field
Guide for Wetland Delineation. Based upon this methodology, the mangrove fringe on
the western side of the project site adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway would qualify as
jurisdictional wetlands. These wetlands have been flagged and located by survey for the
purpose of this Environmental Impact Report. The wetland line will be reviewed and
verified by the appropriate state permitting agency (South Florida Water Management
District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection) as part of the overall
permitting process for the proposed residential development. This verification will not
affect the overall proposed site plan since no activities are proposed on the west side of
Beach Road within the mangrove fringe other than maintenance/repair of the existing
dock access for the purpose of the future docking facility.
3.0 ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
3.1 OBJECTIVE
Review Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) to determine the likelihood of
occurrence of federal and state protected species on the project site, conduct a systematic
survey for flora and fauna that may occur on-site, and note the presence of any
endangered, threatened, and species of special concern as identified by Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
Biologist conducted pedestrian transects which meandered through the project site.
During the pedestrian transects, the biologist recorded and noted sightings, tracks, scat,
tree markings, nests, cavities, and burrows.
Page 3
3.3 CONCLUSION
Review of the information obtained from FNAI indicated the potential presence of the
following habitat; scrub, scrubby flatwoods, and beach dune. FNAI indicated the
potential presence of the following listed species; four -petal pawpaw (Asimina
tetramera), perforated reindeer lichen (Cladonia perforate), leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea) and martial scrub-hairstreak (Strymon martialis). The FNAI
Biodiversity Matrix also indicated the likelihood of 9 other species and the potential of 36
other species, all of which are listed in Appendix B.
Field review of the project site revealed no evidence of the following:
• Scrub
• Scrubby flatwoods
• Listed plant species by either the state or federal agencies
• Other species identified in the FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Based upon field observations beach dune habitat was present.
There is the potential that the following would utilize the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands for foraging and/or nesting:
• Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)
• Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
• Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata)
• Snowy egret (Egretta thula)
• Wood stork (Mycteria Americana)
• Piping plover (Charadrius melodus)
The field observations revealed no evidence of the above listed species nesting or
foraging within the existing beach dune and mangrove wetlands. The proposed
residential development does not contain new impacts to the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands. The proposed new dune crossing location replaces one of the existing dune
crossings and the dock access within the mangrove wetlands is to remain in the same
location as what currently exists.
No Bald Eagle nests were located within the boundaries of the project site. A review of
the FWCC Eagle Nest database indicated there are no Bald Eagle nests located within
one (1) mile of the project.
The FNAI Biodiversity Matrix indicates there is a likelihood of Johnson's seagrass
(Halophila johnsonii) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) on the project site
however these species would not be located within the actual project boundaries. They
would occur waterward of mean high water and would be taken into account as part of
the review by the state and federal permitting agencies for any in -water work associated
with the project.
No wildlife was observed during the site reconnaissance other than curly tailed lizards.
Page 4
4.0 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES
The properties are currently developed therefore the presence of archeological or historic
features is highly unlikely. A request for review of the site for archeological and/or
historic resources has been submitted to Florida Department of State, Division of Historic
Resources to confirm this aspect. The result of that review will be provided upon receipt.
5.0 GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES
The properties do not contain any geologically significant features.
6.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION
The Site Plan is included as Figure 4 (due to the detail, it is not at the same scale as the
FLUCFCS Map included as Figure 2). The project site is located in Flood Zone AE and
Flood Zone X with current elevations varying from 4.17 feet to 15.75 feet. The proposed
first floor elevation of all buildings is 8.5 -feet NAVD so all floor elevations will be meet
the minimum required.
The project is a residential development and as such, is not proposed to have operations
which deal with harmful substances or emit pollutants.
The project has been designed to provide more than double the minimum open space
requirement — 30 -percent required and 64 -percent proposed. A Planting Plan is included
as Figure 5. Also, the site currently has no pre-treatment of surface water run-off which
drains off-site onto the adjacent state-owned lands. The project provides an improvement
in water quality treatment by means of a surface water management system designed to
provide pre-treatment prior to discharge as identified in the Drainage Statement included
as Appendix C.
Other approvals will be necessary for the proposed development, including state (Florida
Department of Environmental Protection or South Florida Water Management District)
approval and U.S. Army Corps approval for the proposed docking facility.
7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION
7.1 VEGETATION
The majority of the project site has been impacted by the previous activities. Based upon
the Site Plan, the majority of the existing native vegetation (Sabal palmetto) will remain
and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative communities on the
project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). In addition, the Planting Plan
provides open space and native plant material in excess of the requirements for the site.
Page 5
7.2 WILDLIFE
The wildlife which may utilize the project site would be within the mangrove area or the
dune area in which no impacts are proposed; therefore impacts to wildlife are not
anticipated as a result of the project.
7.3 WETLANDS
No impacts to wetlands are proposed for the project.
7.4 CONCLUSION
State, federal, and local requirements have been considered during the preparation of the
Site Plan (Figure 4). Building setbacks, zoning, landscape, and buffering requirements
have been considered based upon the Village of Tequesta, Code of Ordinances.
The proposed development has been designed to preserve the majority of the existing
native vegetation and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative
communities on the project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). The Planting
Plan (Figure 5) demonstrates an improvement to the existing conditions on the project
site.
The Site Plan demonstrates avoidance of wetland impacts.
In review of the existing conditions compared to the proposed conditions for the project
site, no alternatives or mitigation would be necessary. The Site Plan (which includes pre-
treatment of storm water) along with the Planting Plan demonstrate an avoidance of
impacts and an improvement from the existing site conditions.
Page 6
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The 1.78± acre -property covered by this Environmental Impact Report is located in
Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida (Figure 1).
The property is bordered to the north by Coral Cove Park, to the south by undeveloped
lands owned by the State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
(TIITF), to the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and to the west by the Intracoastal Waterway.
Surrounding uses beyond the immediate park and undeveloped property consist of
condominiums.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report documents and characterizes the natural resources found on-site, discusses the
current regulatory status, and identifies potential impacts that may result from the
construction of the proposed residential development.
This report has been prepared in accordance to Chapter 50, Article II of the Code of
Ordinances, Village of Tequesta, Florida.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property located at 1500 Beach Road is currently developed as a condominium with
associated parking and pool. This property is fully developed on the east side of Beach
Road to the seaward edge of the existing dune and contains two beach boardwalks with a
small area of native dune vegetation (sea oats) near the south beach boardwalk. The
section of the property located on the west side of Beach Road contains a dock and a mix
of native and exotic vegetation.
The property located at 1550 Beach Road appears to be currently developed as a single
family residence. The majority of the property is developed on the east side of Beach
Road with a small area of dune vegetation. The section of the property on the west side
of Beach Road contains a mixture of native vegetation.
Both properties are bordered by surface waters on the east (Atlantic Ocean) and west side
(Intracoastal Waterway). A narrow fringe of mangrove wetlands is present on the west
side of both properties immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway as shown in
Figure 2.
2.1 SOILS
Project soils were mapped according to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, December 1978, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service. A copy of the Soil Survey Map depicting the project boundaries and soil type(s)
is included as Figure 3 and a copy of the Soils Report is included (see Appendix A). The
Page 1
two properties contained three soil mapping units, all of which traverse both properties.
A general description of the soil types are as follows:
Arents - Urban land complex, 0 to S percent slopes (4)
This complex consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly drained, sandy soils and
urban land. The soils formed in thick layers of sandy fill material that were placed
over low, wet mineral soils to make the areas suitable for urban use such as golf
courses, subdivisions, condominium developments, roadways, etc. The soil material
is generally rapidly permeable in all layers. The available water capacity is low or
very low.
Beaches (9)
This mapping unit consists of narrow strips of tide -washed sand along the Atlantic
coast line. As much as half of the beach may be covered by water during daily high
tides, and all of the beach may be covered during storm periods. Most areas have no
vegetation, but the inland areas may be covered with moonvine, railroad vine, sea
oats, and seashore bermudagrass. Depth to the water table is highly variable and
ranges from 0 to 6 feet or more, depending on the distance from the water, the height
of the beach, etc.
Palm Beach - Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes (2 7)
This complex is nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, and consists of Palm
Beach sand and urban land. The majority of this complex is open land such as lawns,
vacant lots, and undeveloped areas however about 30 to 50 percent is covered by
sidewalks, streets, parking lots, building and other structures.
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The following is a summary of the land cover and vegetation communities found on the
two properties. Land cover and vegetative communities were mapped based on the
Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) developed by the
Florida Department of Transportation. Field reconnaissance and aerial photograph
interpretation were utilized in mapping the vegetative communities on the project site.
There are five different FLUCFCS classifications currently present on the site. A land
cover map of the observed community types is included as Figure 2.
Fixed Single Family Units (111) — 0.53± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property at 1550 Beach Road which
appears to be a single family residence with associated driveways and landscaping
including sod. The majority of the landscaping is exotic and ornamental vegetation
including java plum, coconut palms, and a ficus hedge.
Residential High Density (130) — 0.78± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property located at 1500 Beach Road
which is condominiums with an associated pool, parking areas and landscaping,
including sod.
Page 2
Coastal Scrub (322) — 0.077± acres
Small areas on the east side of the project site adjacent to the beach and on the west
side of the project site adjacent to Beach Road fall into this category and contain a
mixture of sea grape (Coccoloba uvifera), half flower (exotic) (Scaevola taccada),
coin vine (Dalbergia ecastaphyllum), cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto), buttonwood
(Conocarpus erectus) and sea oats (Uniola paniculata).
Mangrove Swamps (612) — 0.091± acres
A mangrove fringe exists on the western side of the project site adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway. The mangrove fringe extends landward of mean high water
and consists of red, white and black mangroves. Mangroves extending waterward of
mean high water are not considered to be within the boundaries of the property (those
would be on state owned submerged lands) therefore they are not included in the
acreage identified.
Beaches Other Than Swimming Beaches (710) — 0.31:t acres
A beach exists on the eastern side of the project site adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean
between the remnants of the dune line and mean high water.
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS
The presence or absence of wetlands was determined using the State Unified
Methodologies identified in Chapter 62-340, FAC and 1987 Corps of Engineers Field
Guide for Wetland Delineation. Based upon this methodology, the mangrove fringe on
the western side of the project site adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway would qualify as
jurisdictional wetlands. These wetlands have been flagged and located by survey for the
purpose of this Environmental Impact Report. The wetland line will be reviewed and
verified by the appropriate state permitting agency (South Florida Water Management
District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection) as part of the overall
permitting process for the proposed residential development. This verification will not
affect the overall proposed site plan since no activities are proposed on the west side of
Beach Road within the mangrove fringe other than maintenance/repair of the existing
dock access for the purpose of the future docking facility.
3.0 ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
3.1 OBJECTIVE
Review Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) to determine the likelihood of
occurrence of federal and state protected species on the project site, conduct a systematic
survey for flora and fauna that may occur on-site, and note the presence of any
endangered, threatened, and species of special concern as identified by Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
Biologist conducted pedestrian transects which meandered through the project site.
During the pedestrian transects, the biologist recorded and noted sightings, tracks, scat,
tree markings, nests, cavities, and burrows.
Page 3
3.3 CONCLUSION
Review of the information obtained from FNAI indicated the potential presence of the
following habitat; scrub, scrubby flatwoods, and beach dune. FNAI indicated the
potential presence of the following listed species; four -petal pawpaw (Asimina
tetramera), perforated reindeer lichen (Cladonia perforate), leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea) and martial scrub-hairstreak (Strymon martialis). The FNAI
Biodiversity Matrix also indicated the likelihood of 9 other species and the potential of 36
other species, all of which are listed in Appendix B.
Field review of the project site revealed no evidence of the following:
• Scrub
• Scrubby flatwoods
• Listed plant species by either the state or federal agencies
• Other species identified in the FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Based upon field observations beach dune habitat was present.
There is the potential that the following would utilize the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands for foraging and/or nesting:
• Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)
• Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
• Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata)
• Snowy egret (Egretta thula)
• Wood stork (Mycteria Americana)
• Piping plover (Charadrius melodus)
The field observations revealed no evidence of the above listed species nesting or
foraging within the existing beach dune and mangrove wetlands. The proposed
residential development does not contain new impacts to the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands. The proposed new dune crossing location replaces one of the existing dune
crossings and the dock access within the mangrove wetlands is to remain in the same
location as what currently exists.
No Bald Eagle nests were located within the boundaries of the project site. A review of
the FWCC Eagle Nest database indicated there are no Bald Eagle nests located within
one (1) mile of the project.
The FNAI Biodiversity Matrix indicates there is a likelihood of Johnson's seagrass
(Halophila johnsonii) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) on the project site
however these species would not be located within the actual project boundaries. They
would occur waterward of mean high water and would be taken into account as part of
the review by the state and federal permitting agencies for any in -water work associated
with the project.
No wildlife was observed during the site reconnaissance other than curly tailed lizards.
Page 4
4.0 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES
The properties are currently developed therefore the presence of archeological or historic
features is highly unlikely. A request for review of the site for archeological and/or
historic resources has been submitted to Florida Department of State, Division of Historic
Resources to confirm this aspect. The result of that review will be provided upon receipt.
5.0 GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES
The properties do not contain any geologically significant features.
6.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION
The Site Plan is included as Figure 4 (due to the detail, it is not at the same scale as the
FLUCFCS Map included as Figure 2). The project site is located in Flood Zone AE and
Flood Zone X with current elevations varying from 4.17 feet to 15.75 feet. The proposed
first floor elevation of all buildings is 8.5 -feet NAVD so all floor elevations will be meet
the minimum required.
The project is a residential development and as such, is not proposed to have operations
which deal with harmful substances or emit pollutants.
The project has been designed to provide more than double the minimum open space
requirement — 30 -percent required and 64 -percent proposed. A Planting Plan is included
as Figure S. Also, the site currently has no pre-treatment of surface water run-off which
drains off-site onto the adjacent state-owned lands. The project provides an improvement
in water quality treatment by means of a surface water management system designed to
provide pre-treatment prior to discharge as identified in the Drainage Statement included
as Appendix C.
Other approvals will be necessary for the proposed development, including state (Florida
Department of Environmental Protection or South Florida Water Management District)
approval and U.S. Army Corps approval for the proposed docking facility.
7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION
7.1 VEGETATION
The majority of the project site has been impacted by the previous activities. Based upon
the Site Plan, the majority of the existing native vegetation (Sabal palmetto) will remain
and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative communities on the
project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). In addition, the Planting Plan
provides open space and native plant material in excess of the requirements for the site.
Page 5
7.2 WILDLIFE
The wildlife which may utilize the project site would be within the mangrove area or the
dune area in which no impacts are proposed; therefore impacts to wildlife are not
anticipated as a result of the project.
7.3 WETLANDS
No impacts to wetlands are proposed for the project.
7.4 CONCLUSION
State, federal, and local requirements have been considered during the preparation of the
Site Plan (Figure 4). Building setbacks, zoning, landscape, and buffering requirements
have been considered based upon the Village of Tequesta, Code of Ordinances.
The proposed development has been designed to preserve the majority of the existing
native vegetation and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative
communities on the project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). The Planting
Plan (Figure 5) demonstrates an improvement to the existing conditions on the project
site.
The Site Plan demonstrates avoidance of wetland impacts.
In review of the existing conditions compared to the proposed conditions for the project
site, no alternatives or mitigation would be necessary. The Site Plan (which includes pre-
treatment of storm water) along with the Planting Plan demonstrate an avoidance of
impacts and an improvement from the existing site conditions.
Page 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
Figure 2
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION......................................................................................... 1
Figure 3
1.2 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................. 1
2.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................1
Figure 5
2.1 SOILS.................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER...........................................2
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS ............................................. 3
3.0
ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.3
3.1 OBJECTIVE.......................................................................................................... 3
3.2 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................ 3
3.3 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................4
4.0
ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES ........................................... 5
5.0
GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES ................................................. 5
6.0
PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION............................................................... 5
7.0
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION....................................................... 5
7.1 VEGETATION......................................................................................................5
7.2 WILDLIFE.............................................................................................................6
7.3 WETLANDS......................................................................................................... 6
7.4 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................6
FIGURES
Figure 1
Location Map
Figure 2
Soils Map
Figure 3
FLUCFCS Map
Figure 4
Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5
Proposed Landscape Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Soils Report
Appendix B FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Appendix C Drainage Statement for Blowing Rocks
Page i
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The 1.78± acre -property covered by this Environmental Impact Report is located in
Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida (Figure I).
The property is bordered to the north by Coral Cove Park, to the south by undeveloped
lands owned by the State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
(TIITF), to the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and to the west by the Intracoastal Waterway.
Surrounding uses beyond the immediate park and undeveloped property consist of
condominiums.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report documents and characterizes the natural resources found on-site, discusses the
current regulatory status, and identifies potential impacts that may result from the
construction of the proposed residential development.
This report has been prepared in accordance to Chapter 50, Article II of the Code of
Ordinances, Village ofTequesta, Florida.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property located at 1500 Beach Road is currently developed as a condominium with
associated parking and pool. This property is fully developed on the east side of Beach
Road to the seaward edge of the existing dune and contains two beach boardwalks with a
small area of native dune vegetation (sea oats) near the south beach boardwalk. The
section of the property located on the west side of Beach Road contains a dock and a mix
of native and exotic vegetation.
The property located at 1550 Beach Road appears to be currently developed as a single
family residence. The majority of the property is developed on the east side of Beach
Road with a small area of dune vegetation. The section of the property on the west side
of Beach Road contains a mixture of native vegetation.
Both properties are bordered by surface waters on the east (Atlantic Ocean) and west side
(Intracoastal Waterway). A narrow fringe of mangrove wetlands is present on the west
side of both properties immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway as shown in
Figure 2.
2.1 SOILS
Project soils were mapped according to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, December 1978, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service. A copy of the Soil Survey Map depicting the project boundaries and soil type(s)
is included as Figure 3 and a copy of the Soils Report is included (see Appendix A). The
Page 1
two properties contained three soil mapping units, all of which traverse both properties.
A general description of the soil types are as follows:
Arents - Urban land complex, 0 to S percent slopes (4)
This complex consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly drained, sandy soils and
urban land. The soils formed in thick layers of sandy fill material that were placed
over low, wet mineral soils to make the areas suitable for urban use such as golf
courses, subdivisions, condominium developments, roadways, etc. The soil material
is generally rapidly permeable in all layers. The available water capacity is low or
very low.
Beaches (9)
This mapping unit consists of narrow strips of tide -washed sand along the Atlantic
coast line. As much as half of the beach may be covered by water during daily high
tides, and all of the beach may be covered during storm periods. Most areas have no
vegetation, but the inland areas may be covered with moonvine, railroad vine, sea
oats, and seashore bermudagrass. Depth to the water table is highly variable and
ranges from 0 to 6 feet or more, depending on the distance from the water, the height
of the beach, etc.
Palm Beach - Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes (27)
This complex is nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, and consists of Palm
Beach sand and urban land. The majority of this complex is open land such as lawns,
vacant lots, and undeveloped areas however about 30 to 50 percent is covered by
sidewalks, streets, parking lots, building and other structures.
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The following is a summary of the land cover and vegetation communities found on the
two properties. Land cover and vegetative communities were mapped based on the
Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) developed by the
Florida Department of Transportation. Field reconnaissance and aerial photograph
interpretation were utilized in mapping the vegetative communities on the project site.
There are five different FLUCFCS classifications currently present on the site. A land
cover map of the observed community types is included as Figure 2.
Fixed Single Family Units (111) — 0.53± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property at 1550 Beach Road which
appears to be a single family residence with associated driveways and landscaping
including sod. The majority of the landscaping is exotic and ornamental vegetation
including Java plum, coconut palms, and a ficus hedge.
Residential High Density (130) — 0.78± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property located at 1500 Beach Road
which is condominiums with an associated pool, parking areas and landscaping,
including sod.
Page 2
Coastal Scrub (322) — 0.077± acres
Small areas on the east side of the project site adjacent to the beach and on the west
side of the project site adjacent to Beach Road fall into this category and contain a
mixture of sea grape (Coccoloba uvifera), half flower (exotic) (Scaevola taccada),
coin vine (Dalbergia ecastaphyllum), cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto), buttonwood
(Conocarpus erectus) and sea oats (Uniola paniculata).
Mangrove Swamps (612) — 0.091± acres
A mangrove fringe exists on the western side of the project site adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway. The mangrove fringe extends landward of mean high water
and consists of red, white and black mangroves. Mangroves extending waterward of
mean high water are not considered to be within the boundaries of the property (those
would be on state owned submerged lands) therefore they are not included in the
acreage identified.
Beaches Other Than Swimming Beaches (710) — 0.31± acres
A beach exists on the eastern side of the project site adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean
between the remnants of the dune line and mean high water.
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS
The presence or absence of wetlands was determined using the State Unified
Methodologies identified in Chapter 62-340, FAC and 1987 Corps of Engineers Field
Guide for Wetland Delineation. Based upon this methodology, the mangrove fringe on
the western side of the project site adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway would qualify as
jurisdictional wetlands. These wetlands have been flagged and located by survey for the
purpose of this Environmental Impact Report. The wetland line will be reviewed and
verified by the appropriate state permitting agency (South Florida Water Management
District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection) as part of the overall
permitting process for the proposed residential development. This verification will not
affect the overall proposed site plan since no activities are proposed on the west side of
Beach Road within the mangrove fringe other than maintenance/repair of the existing
dock access for the purpose of the future docking facility.
3.0 ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
3.1 OBJECTIVE
Review Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) to determine the likelihood of
occurrence of federal and state protected species on the project site, conduct a systematic
survey for flora and fauna that may occur on-site, and note the presence of any
endangered, threatened, and species of special concern as identified by Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
Biologist conducted pedestrian transects which meandered through the project site.
During the pedestrian transects, the biologist recorded and noted sightings, tracks, scat,
tree markings, nests, cavities, and burrows.
Page 3
3.3 CONCLUSION
Review of the information obtained from FNAI indicated the potential presence of the
following habitat; scrub, scrubby flatwoods, and beach dune. FNAI indicated the
potential presence of the following listed species; four -petal pawpaw (Asimina
tetramera), perforated reindeer lichen (Cladonia perforate), leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea) and martial scrub-hairstreak (Strymon martialis). The FNAI
Biodiversity Matrix also indicated the likelihood of 9 other species and the potential of 36
other species, all of which are listed in Appendix B.
Field review of the project site revealed no evidence of the following:
• Scrub
• Scrubby flatwoods
• Listed plant species by either the state or federal agencies
• Other species identified in the FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Based upon field observations beach dune habitat was present.
There is the potential that the following would utilize the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands for foraging and/or nesting:
• Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)
• Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
• Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata)
• Snowy egret (Egretta thula)
• Wood stork (Mycteria Americana)
• Piping plover (Charadrius melodus)
The field observations revealed no evidence of the above listed species nesting or
foraging within the existing beach dune and mangrove wetlands. The proposed
residential development does not contain new impacts to the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands. The proposed new dune crossing location replaces one of the existing dune
crossings and the dock access within the mangrove wetlands is to remain in the same
location as what currently exists.
No Bald Eagle nests were located within the boundaries of the project site. A review of
the FWCC Eagle Nest database indicated there are no Bald Eagle nests located within
one (1) mile of the project.
The FNAI Biodiversity Matrix indicates there is a likelihood of Johnson's seagrass
(Halophila johnsonii) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) on the project site
however these species would not be located within the actual project boundaries. They
would occur waterward of mean high water and would be taken into account as part of
the review by the state and federal permitting agencies for any in -water work associated
with the project.
No wildlife was observed during the site reconnaissance other than curly tailed lizards.
Page 4
4.0 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES
The properties are currently developed therefore the presence of archeological or historic
features is highly unlikely. A request for review of the site for archeological and/or
historic resources has been submitted to Florida Department of State, Division of Historic
Resources to confirm this aspect. The result of that review will be provided upon receipt.
5.0 GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES
The properties do not contain any geologically significant features.
6.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION
The Site Plan is included as Figure 4 (due to the detail, it is not at the same scale as the
FLUCFCS Map included as Figure 2). The project site is located in Flood Zone AE and
Flood Zone X with current elevations varying from 4.17 feet to 15.75 feet. The proposed
first floor elevation of all buildings is 8.5 -feet NAVD so all floor elevations will be meet
the minimum required.
The project is a residential development and as such, is not proposed to have operations
which deal with harmful substances or emit pollutants.
The project has been designed to provide more than double the minimum open space
requirement — 30 -percent required and 64 -percent proposed. A Planting Plan is included
as Figure 5. Also, the site currently has no pre-treatment of surface water run-off which
drains off-site onto the adjacent state-owned lands. The project provides an improvement
in water quality treatment by means of a surface water management system designed to
provide pre-treatment prior to discharge as identified in the Drainage Statement included
as Appendix C.
Other approvals will be necessary for the proposed development, including state (Florida
Department of Environmental Protection or South Florida Water Management District)
approval and U.S. Army Corps approval for the proposed docking facility.
7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION
7.1 VEGETATION
The majority of the project site has been impacted by the previous activities. Based upon
the Site Plan, the majority of the existing native vegetation (Sabal palmetto) will remain
and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative communities on the
project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). In addition, the Planting Plan
provides open space and native plant material in excess of the requirements for the site.
Page 5
7.2 WILDLIFE
The wildlife which may utilize the project site would be within the mangrove area or the
dune area in which no impacts are proposed; therefore impacts to wildlife are not
anticipated as a result of the project.
7.3 WETLANDS
No impacts to wetlands are proposed for the project.
7.4 CONCLUSION
State, federal, and local requirements have been considered during the preparation of the
Site Plan (Figure 4). Building setbacks, zoning, landscape, and buffering requirements
have been considered based upon the Village of Tequesta, Code of Ordinances.
The proposed development has been designed to preserve the majority of the existing
native vegetation and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative
communities on the project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). The Planting
Plan (Figure 5) demonstrates an improvement to the existing conditions on the project
site.
The Site Plan demonstrates avoidance of wetland impacts.
In review of the existing conditions compared to the proposed conditions for the project
site, no alternatives or mitigation would be necessary. The Site Plan (which includes pre-
treatment of storm water) along with the Planting Plan demonstrate an avoidance of
impacts and an improvement from the existing site conditions.
Page 6
FLUCFCS CODES:
FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS (111) — 0.53t ACRES
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (130) — 0.78t ACRES
COASTAL SCRUB (322) — 0.077t ACRES
MANGROVE SWAMPS (612) — 0.091f ACRES
BEACHES OTHER THAN SWIMMING BEACHES (7101 — 0.31f ACRES
T
Environmental FLUCFCS Map
I-SServices, Inc. Blowing Rocks
1901 Sw Yellowtail Avenue 1500 Beach Road and 1550 Beach Road
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 Tequesta, Florida
Phone:772-215-3997 Fax:772-879-4520
www.dlsenvironmentalservices.com I SCALe
N.T.S. MAY 2018 FIGURE 2
Source: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.govlappIWebSoilSurvey.aspx Viewed on May 25, 2018
SOILS:
ARENTS-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES (4) — NON-HYDRIC
BEACHES (9) — NON-HYDRIC
PALM BEACH -URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES (27) — NON-HYDRIC
T
Environmental Soils Map
IS Services, Inc. Blowing Rocks
19ol Sw Yellowtail Avenue 1500 Beach Road and 1550 Beach Road
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 Tequesta, Florida
Phone:772-215-3997 Fax:772-879-4520
www.dlsenvironmentalservices.com SCALE
N.T.S. MAY 2018 FIGURE 3
322 .,q .o�
OJT . •w • '/ .-\.
6
—NOTES—
SITE BLOWING ROCKS SITE PLAN
PLAN PROVIDED BY BC ARCHITECTS AND CARLOS ZAPATA STUDIO
SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE TO PROVIDE CLARITY FIGURE 4
SIZE DATA
mncuom Tvmmsnmsanm
mote
aErwuErawnmx
rur¢e.
nsvrEieE im
xuratarn
nramvE.aoq
nam®n
nurmourel
auEuuavaa
are
mmr®raa
r¢
�mmrro
irsi
asaiav
sr1Yr
,.aifaw
earesE�
Esrvar
watamaevasrrEm
rr
worxmveaax
xrvgnr
last®
avasaosrn
aialli101ra
¢NM9r ¢iaaa
aesrspl
1 aHalara: E aRrafaEif
Ilr�®i
■Mq nE1Bf
ai aYaa•q Elp®
rao
rersavnr
�4
�e
sr.u.e au- • rr
BLGMQ# RaGcS WOlLIR DATA
'^t.:1.G1S S46Yh..p.:..
CAiC.!:2`^S�i✓b'L �4:iisLi:
_w.-.9e..v r.�''e ,�x
_
�.•,. +.., cep--o.�.. masa.o �s •cam' n+a':.
•aCiq,4K:tx<iva 4'G�J'J Yid lJC-K JJG "ACC
•�
•-4 N%eT4
'Vm1Y'C
nJlU J•Z•!`.•
sV.KY../.0 YLf .SJ xaJ.•ru•cv
. u-.: �'®^•s sC�' .Y III: • .
Ya!•s �mJ.•LJ2tl � ST. Y' YOss »• Yid ~••
VM["�.J.!L .9a +'a_ lcs
� �.1C .n• -Cis dQJ
—NOTES'— PLANT
- PLANTING PLAN PROVIDED BY BC ARCHITECTS AND DS BOCA BLOWING ROCKS PLANTING PLAN
- PLANTING PLAN NOT TO SCALE TO PROVIDE CLARITY FIGURE 5
APPENDIX A
Soils Report
Soil Map --Palm Beach County Area, Florida
- sr as• I,
z srarN
3 3
Map Sde: 1:1,990 tp tlmd m A brKbcape (11" x 8S) sheaL a
McIDs
N 0 25 50 100 150
ePt
0 50 100 20D 300
Map, j I : Web Me alo CORBmad'eles: WCSE4
1our Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/2512018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Soil Map —Palm Beach County Area, Florida
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AO f
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that Comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOp
0
stony spot
1:20,000.
Soils
"�
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
.�
Soil Map Unit Lines
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Soil Map uric Points
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Special
Point Features
scale.
VO
Blowout
water Features
Streamsand Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
®
Borrow Pit
measurements.
Transportation
Clay Spot
t-r-t
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
C�
Closed Depression
Web Soil Survey URL:
�y
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3657)
X
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravely Spot
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
i�
Landfill
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Lava Flow
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
Marsh or swamp
■
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Mine or Quarry
Soil Survey Area: Palm Beach County Area, Florida
®
Miscellaneous Water
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Oct 6, 2017
Q
Perennial Water
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
7W
Rock Outcrop
1:50,000 or larger.
+
Saline Spot
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 13, 2014—Dec
11, 2014
Sandy Spot
°
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Severely Eroded Spot
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
sinkhole
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
�y
Slide or Slip
�qf
Sodic Spot
t_mA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/25/2018
!I" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Soil Map --Palm Beach County Area, Florida
Map Unit Legend
UM Sp*M EW Wft H� ftm In ADI F*cw of ADI
4
Arents-Urban land complex, 0
4.1
to 5 percent slopes
2.8
9
Beaches
27
Palm Beach -Urban land
2.8%
complex, 0 to 8 percent
100.0%
slopes
99
Water
100
Waters of the Atlantic Ocean
Totals for Area of Interest
5.3
30.7%
4.1
23.4%
2.8
16.2%
4.7
27.0%;,
0.5
2.8%
17.41
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/25/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX B
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
5/25/2018 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
1018 Thomasville Road
sui
Florida Natural
Tate ms0.
Tallahassee, FL 32303 Areas Inventory
-
850.224.820i
-
810-681-9364fm Biodiversity Matrix Query Results
— _
www.fnai.org
UNOFFICIAL REPORT
Created 5/25/2018
MAFL�ORII DA t(Contact the FNAI Data Services Coordinator at 850.224.8207 or
'""j" rA" Aram kbrinegar@fnai.fsu.edu for information on an official Standard Data Report)
INVENTORY
NOTE: The Biodiversity Matrix includes only rare species and natural communities tracked by FNAI.
Report for 2 Matrix Units: 69107, 69108
us i
FL 811
)5 = FL 700 Jupiter US 1 a
l
Us 1
CR 809 — -
-_
g R' 9e16turoI
Matrix Unit ID: 69107
6 Documented Elements Found
Descriptions
DOCUMENTED - There is a documented occurrence in the
FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix
Unit.
DOCUMENTED -HISTORIC - There is a documented
occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community
within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been
observed/reported within the last twenty years.
LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this
vicinity, and is considered likely within this Matrix Unit
Uc�a
1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent
Matrix Units, but the documentation isn't precise
enough to indicate which of those Units the species or
community is actually located in; or
2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and
there is suitable habitat for that species or community
within this Matrix Unit.
POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or
predicted range of the species or community based on expert
knowledge and environmental variables such as climate,
soils, topography, and landcover.
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Asimina tetramera
G1
S1
LE
E
Four -petal Pawpaw
Beach dune
G3
S2
N
N
Cladonia perforata
Perforate Reindeer Lichen
G1
S1
LE
E
Dermochelys coriacea
Leatherback Sea Turtle
G2
S2
LE
FE
Scrub
G2
S2
N
N
Scrubby tlatwoods
G2
S2?
N
N
2 Documented -Historic Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State
http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatdx/GridSearch.cfm?sel_id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000, 333071.43290000,789781.10980000,333071.432900
5/25/2018
Ctenogobius stigmaturus
Spottail Goby
Okenia hypogaea
Burrowing Four-o'clock
9 Likeiv Elements Found
FNAI Biodiversity Matdx
Rank Rank Status Listing
G2 S2 N N
G3? S2 N E
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
L4phelocorna coerulescens
G2
S2
LT
FT
Florida Scrub -Jay
G2
S2
LE
FE
Caretta caretta
G3
S3
T
FT
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
G3G5
S2S3
N
N
Chelonia rny�Las
G3
S2S3
LE
FE
Green Sea Turtle
Geopsammodius fuscus
G1
S1.
N
N
Dark Tiny Sand -loving Scarab
HalgpLila j.ohnsonii
G2
S2
LT
E
Johnson's Seagrass
Jac uemontia reclinata
GI
S1
LE
E
Beach Jacquernontia
Melanoplus indicifer
G1
S1
N
N
East Coast Scrub Grasshopper
�jy�teria arnericana
G4
S2
LT
FT
Wood Stork
Trichechus manatus
G2
S2
LE
FE
,West Indian Manatee
Matrix Unit ID: 69108
3 Documented Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Usting
Qerrnochely� coriacea
G3
S3
T
FT
Leatherback Sea Turtle
G2
S2
LE
FE
Scrubby flatwoods
G2
S2?
N
N
Strymon martialis
G3G5
S2S3
N
N
Martial Scrub-Hairstreak
G2
S2
N
N
0 Documented -Historic Elements Found
7 Likeliv Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Caretta caretta
G3
S3
T
FT
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
Chelonia rnygLas
G3
S2S3
LE
FE
Green Sea Turtle
Ctenogobius stigmaturus
G2
S2
N
N
Spottail Goby
lacguemontia reclinata
G1
S1
LE
E
Beach Jacquernontia
�IySteria americana
G4
S2
LT
FT
Wood Stork
LepLrosia angustissima var. curtissu
G1T1
S1
N
E
Coastal Hoary -pea
Trichechus manatus
G2
S2
LE
FE
West Indian Manatee
http://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrixlGddSearch.cfm?sel—id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,789781.10980000,333071.432900
5/25/2018
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Matrix Unit IDs: 69107, 69108
36 Potential Elements Common to Any of the 2 Matrix Units
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus
G3T3
S1
LE
FE
Atlantic Sturgeon
t4phelocoma coerulescens
G2
S2
LT
FT
Florida Scrub -Jay
Chamaesyce cumulicola
G2
S2
N
E
Sand -dune Spurge
Charadrius melodus
G3
S2
LT
FT
Piping Plover
Cladonia perforata
G1
S1
LE
E
Perforate Reindeer Lichen
Coelorachis tuberculosa
G3
S3
N
T
Piedmont Jointgrass
Conradina grandiflora
G3
S3
N
T
Large -flowered Rosemary
Dicerandra immaculata
G1
S1
LE
E
Lakela's Mint
2ryMarchon coupfri
G3
S3
LT
FT
Eastern Indigo Snake
Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia
G4T2
S2
N
N
Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem
Eretmochelyf imbricata
G3
S1
LE
FE
Hawksbill Sea Turtle
Falco columbarius
G5
S2
N
N
Merlin
Falco peregrinus
G4
S2
N
N
Peregrine Falcon
Forestiera segregata var. pinetorum
G4T2
S2
N
N
Florida Pinewood Privet
Glandularia maritima
G3
S3
N
E
Coastal Vervain
2op erus p /y emus
L_ _L.pA_
G3
S3
C
ST
Gopher Tortoise
HaloDhila johnson
G2
S2
LT
E
Johnson's Seagrass
Heterodon simus
G2
S2
N
N
Southern Hognose Snake
Lechea cernua
G3
S3
N
T
Nodding Pinweed
Lechea divaricata
G2
S2
N
E
Pine Pinweed
Linum carteri var. smalfli
G2T2
S2
N
E
Small's Flax
Lithobates cap to
L_
G3
S3
N
SSC
Gopher Frog
Manatee Aggregation Site
GNR
SNR
N
N
Microphis brachyurus
G4G5
S2
SC
N
Opossum Pipefish
NeMastylis f7oridana
G2
S2
N
E
Celestial Lily
Peromygcus polionotus niveiventris
G5T1
S1
LT
FT
Southeastern Beach Mouse
Podomy� r7oridanus
G3
S3
N
SSC
Florida Mouse
Lolyggla smalln
G1
S1
LE
E
Tiny Polygala
Rallus longirostris scottii
G5T3?
S3?
N
N
Florida Clapper Rail
Rivulus marmoratus
G4G5
S3
SC
SSC
Mangrove Rivulus
Roystonea elata
G2G3
S2
N
E
Florida Royal Palm
)://data. labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch. cfm?selid=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,78978
1.10980000, 333071
.432900
5/25/2018
�jcelQPgrUS woodi
Florida Scrub Lizard
SchizachyCium niveum
Scrub Bluestern
Setophaga discolor paludicola
Florida Prairie Warbler
Tolumnia bahamensis
Dancing -lady Orchid
Trichomanes punctatum ssp. floridanum
Florida Filmy Fern
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
G2G3
GlG2
G5T3
G3
G4GST1
S2S3
N N
SlS2
N E
S3
N N
S1
N E
S1
E E
Disclaimer
The data maintained by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of information
available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the data are not always
based on comprehensive or site-specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be regarded as a final statement on
the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for on-site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable
for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance
on these data. Inventory data are designed for the purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not
intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Unofficial Report
These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data RegUest option for those needing certifiable data.
http://data.labins.org/mappingIFNAI_BioMatrixIGridSearch.cfm?sel—id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,789781.10980000,333071.432900
APPENDIX C
Drainage Report
I EiHAVAICZ
ASSOCIATES
Drainage Statement for:
Blowing Rocks
Project No. 17-1179
Location
The 1.78 acre project site is located between the Atlantic Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway
immediately south of Coral Cove Park. Beach Road bisects the project site with the majority of
the project site located east of Beach Road. The project site is bounded on the north by Coral
Cove Park, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, on the south by undeveloped lands owned by the
State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (TIITF) and on the west by the
Intracoastal Waterway. The project site is located within the Intracoastal basin of the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
FEMA Flood Data
The western portion of the project site behind the dune line is located within flood zone AE,
elevation 7.0' NAVD based upon the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) effective July 2, 2018 for
the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 12099C0179F, effective October
15, 2017.
Existing Conditions
The site is currently developed and in use as a residential multi -family development on the south
side and a single building (church parcel) on the north side. There are minimal stormwater
management facilities located onsite consisting of a drainage system within the pool area of the
multi -family development. Currently, stormwater runoff generated onsite sheet flows directly
offsite primarily to the west to Beach Road, as well as to Coral Cove Park (north), the Atlantic
Ocean (east) and the undeveloped parcel (south).
Beach Road does not have a formal stormwater conveyance or stormwater management system.
Stormwater runoff from Beach Road sheet flows off the roadway onto the adjacent properties.
There is a culvert system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage and this
system allows surface water runoff north of the project site along Beach Road and stormwater
runoff from this site to discharge south into the undeveloped state-owned land south of the
project site.
There are no existing water quality treatment facilities located on -site.
7I IN Dixie Hirhi%ay. Suite 201 • We;l Palm Beach. Ft, 33,101 • .561-689-8600 • www.keshavam.com
Promsed Imarovements
The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the site for a multi -story condominium.
The finished floor elevation will be raised to meet the current building department finished floor
elevations associated with current FEMA elevation (listed above). The proposed minimum
finished floor elevation is 1.5' above the FEMA elevation or elevation 8.50' NAVD.
The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the
South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -
development conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater
runoff prior to discharge. Legal positive outfall will occur west onto Beach Road and ultimately,
to the undeveloped property to the south via bubble up structures or a hard pipe connection to the
drainage system on Beach Road.
It should be noted that the Village of Tequesta typically requires new development and
redevelopment to retain 95% of the runoff from a 25 year — 1 day storm event. Due to the
geographic location of the project site being located on the Barrier Island and elevated
significantly higher than the adjacent properties, this regulation should not apply to this site as
there will be no adverse impacts to any Village stormwater management system or any off -site
properties. The proposed stormwater management system will be an overall improvement to
water quality treatment and stormwater runoff from this site.
Preliminary Surface Water Management System Calculations
The drainage area associated with the redevelopment of the site is 1.32 acres which is the area
east of Beach Road and west of the existing dune line. The existing site is currently developed
with 0.96 acres of impervious area generating 1.23 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72
hour design event (13.5 inches of rainfall). The proposed site plan contains 1.11 acres of
impervious area that would generate 1.33 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72 hour storm
event. The proposed drainage system will be designed to provide 0.23 acre-feet of water quality
treatment which will be retained within a proposed exfiltration trench system. Therefore, there
will be an overall reduction in runoff generated from the 25 year — 72 hour design event.
Existing Site Runoff (ac-ft) 1.23
Proposed Site Runoff (ac-ft) 1.33
Proposed Water Quality Treatment (ac-tt) 0.23
Net Runoff (ac-ft) (-)0.1-
RaneJyo �e p}i ; P I ' ;(F;Iorida License No. 72504)
`l&a°rch 14�';
K-0havarz.& Associate s;.Inc.
eetrtiOcate/df Authorization No. 4897
��,• Iit!e. • .,Way. Suite 201 • West Palm [leach. Fl. 33401 • ib1-689-861N1 • ��ww,keshevarz.com
KE, SHAVARZ
ASSQ�'
Drainage Statement for:
Blowing Rocks
Project No. 17-1179
Location
The 1.78 acre project site is located between the Atlantic Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway
immediately south of Coral Cove Park. Beach Road bisects the project site with the majority of
the project site located east of Beach Road. The project site is bounded on the north by Coral
Cove Park, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, on the south by undeveloped lands owned by the
State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (TIITF) and on the west by the
Intracoastal Waterway. The project site is located within the Intracoastal basin of the South
Florida Water Management District / Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
FEMA Flood Data
The western portion of the project site behind the dune line is located within flood zone AE,
elevation 7.0' NAVD based upon the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) effective July 2, 2018 for
the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 12099CO179F, effective October
15,2017.
Existing Conditions
The site is currently developed and in use as a residential multi -family development on the south
side and a single building (church parcel) on the north side. There are minimal stormwater
management facilities located onsite consisting of a drainage system within the pool area of the
multi -family development. Currently, storinwater runoff generated onsite sheet flows directly
offsite primarily to the west to Beach Road, as well as to Coral Cove Park (north), the Atlantic
Ocean (east) and the undeveloped parcel (south).
Beach Road does not have a formal stormwater conveyance or stormwater management system.
Stormwater runoff from Beach Road sheet flows off the roadway onto the adjacent properties.
There is a culvert system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage and this
system allows surface water runoff north of the project site along Beach Road and stormwater
runoff from this site to discharge south into the undeveloped state-owned land south of the
project site.
There are no existing water quality treatment facilities located on-site.
7 11 N Dixie Highway, Suite 201 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 - 561-689-8600 - wwNv.kcshavarz.coiTi
Proposed Improvements
The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the site for a multi -story condominium.
The finished floor elevation will be raised to meet the current building department finished floor
elevations associated with current FEMA elevation (listed above). The proposed minimum
finished floor elevation is 1.5' above the FEMA elevation or elevation 8.50'NAVD.
The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the
South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -
development conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater
runoff prior to discharge by way of depressed swale areas and 100 linear feet of proposed
exfiltration trench (please see exfiltration trench calculations on the next page). Legal positive
outfall will occur west onto Beach Road and ultimately, to the undeveloped property to the south
via bubble up structures or a hard pipe connection to the drainage system on Beach Road.
It should be noted that the Village of Tequesta typically requires new development and
redevelopment to retain 95% of the runoff from a 25 year — I day storm event. Due to the
geographic location of the project site being located on the Barrier Island and elevated
significantly higher than the adjacent proper -ties, this regulation should not apply to this site as
there will be no adverse impacts to any Village stormwater management system or any off-site
properties. The proposed stormwater management system will be an overall improvement to
water quality treatment and stormwater runoff from this site.
PreUminary Surface Water Management System Calculations
The drainage area associated with the redevelopment of the site is 1.32 acres which is the area
east of Beach Road and west of the existing dune line. The existing site is currently developed
with 0.96 acres of impervious area generating 1.23 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72
hour design event (13.5 inches of rainfall). The proposed site plan contains 1.00 acre of
impervious area that would generate 1.26 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72 hour storm
event. The proposed drainage system will be designed to provide 0.21 acre-feei of water quality
treatment which will be retained within a proposed exfiltration trench system. Therefore, there
will be an overall reduction in runoff generated from the 25 year — 72 hour design event.
Existing Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.23
Proposed Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.26
Proposed Water Quality Treatment (ac -ft) 0.21
Net Runoff (ac -ft) (-)0.18
711 N Dixie Highway. Suite 201 - W'est Palm Beach, FL 33401 - 561-689-8600 - www.keshavarz.corn
KESIL4 VARZ & ASSOCL4 TES, INC -
711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 200 KESHAVW
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ASSQA-;kTES
phone: (561) 689-8600
H2 =
5.00
Project Name: Blowing Rocks Condominium
Project Number: 117-11179
EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS
TRENCH CROSS SECTION
TRENCH WIDTH (FT)
8.0
DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
1. Exfiltration Trench Depth (FT)
2. Saturated Trench Depth, Ds (FT)
3. Un -Saturated Trench Depth, Du (FT)
4. Exfiltration Trench Width, W (FT)
5. Head acting on Trench, H2 (FT)
6. Factor of Safety
7. Hyd. Conductivity, K (CFSIFT.SQ.-FT. HEAD)
OVERFLOW EL = 6.00 FT
TOP OF
TRENCH= 4.00 FT
PIPE SIZE = 18" PERF. HDPE
PIPE
INVERT 1.00 FT
BOTTOM OF
TRENCH= -1.00 FT
WATER TABLE
ELEVATION = 1.00 FT
5.00
2.00
3.00
8.0
5.00
2.00
2.84E-04
Vwq
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOL. (AC -IN)
2.520
Vadd
ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOL. (AC -IN)
0.000
%WQ
50%
L
REQUIRED LENGTH OF TRENCH (FT):
95.82
PROPOSED LENGTH OF TRENCH (FT)�
100
PROPOSED VOL. TO BE TREATED (AC -FT):
0.219
PERCENT OF REQUIRED PROVIDED:
104.4%
L = (F.S. *((%WQ * Vwq) + Vadd))/(K*(H2*W+2*H2*Du)-(DUA 2)+(2*H2*Ds)+(.000139*W*Du))
COMMENTS:
• THIS IS CONSIDERED DRY PRETREATMENT
• REFERENCE: Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Ver. 2014
`6'��ti6:7eS5pp171
y"�°' GpTT w� JPad
•,2`4
jAo 72504 .�
. •k
R yAnda License No. 72504)
July 11 `h, 2018
Keshavarz & Associates, Inc.
Certificate of Authorization No. 4897
711 N Dixie Highway, Suite 201 • West Palm Beach, FL 33401 • 561-689-8600 • www-.kesliavarz.com
No Text
;�
,�
,� �
*'
���.�.
M�
SHEETINDEX
LH-1 OVERALL LOCATION PLAN
LH-2 HARDSCAPE PLAN
LH-3 HARDSCAPE DETAILS AND ELEVATIONS
TD-1 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
LP-1 PLANTING PLAN
LP-2 PLANT LIST AND SPECIFICATIONS
marchitects BLOWING ROCKS TwMsww llLm.uc LH-1
19B�.A W. LOUNLRY - IXt V E
rxoAo—UESTA FL 1R SURE IW AVENRMA, FL 1l1B0 OVERALL LOCATION
DSBOCA__'_'__ PLAN
��� -•-- i
,....a _ ti
F _
ml
i � 8
�AT�LINE
I ART
i
i I ��INTRAGOASTAL
NOTE - vcsr l OF "'A. ROAD To � ^ATERAAY'
BE DEVELOPED AT A LATER DATE
NOT PART OF THIS 9A1 IONS
{
__ _ —
marchitects BLOWING ROCKS ROMM EACH � RO"D,"" LH-2
V����>• 'T� p,,,. 18B'iO W. C—TV CLUB DRIVE S
�laraww�—OOie_ UJ'OU.S— wr,— I500 BEACH ROAD.—LE5TA. FL—DA SUITE IW AVEl—FL 3]180 HARDSCAPE PLAN
n ENTRANCE GATE CHARACTER ELEVATION
5ECTION THRU SOUTHWEST
n RETAIININ6 WALL
SECTION THRU 5MT14EA5T SECTION THRU NORTHWEST
/1 RETAINING AAU (p RETAINING WALL
Rocks
PNIYAI'li IUL51U1.7J(:L'S
.o..o � <aoee.00 gory � � meww� a.l� xi n
i
..e �m '"� y»e d N.+a ,•.. ooca...me we .w•. _ avo.,na. _ .f.
�e1 ENTRANCE 516N ELEVATION
n PORTE COCHERE WATER FEATURE AND WATERWALL CHARACTER ELEVATION wa ee.lc'^'a
sw+ra
Maarchitects BLOWING ROCKS
_ _ .E LH-3
Yn"�'"�AO1°"D'"L a, o _ W ' 1Bi:0 W. COUNLRY CLUB IXtIVE I
Mou—.M imBBFwalrsaoJEo STA.RORa surf IMAvEN ,FL xTrm i HARDSCAPE DETMM
AND ELEVATIONS
40�
�le
A
reE DtsposrnON TAEU
0
Marchitects
......
DSBOU-
BLOWING ROCKS
R04 LLC
-W��=BMVE
SUI—A��RMM
TD -1
TREE DISPOSITION PLAA
(V
Li
'07 �51 51� OF qc�- "0*0 -0
MOV" V=" LAMMAM 12ATA F�_ OF 5 �J�ON
L
marchitects BLOWING ROCKS T� BEACH AM, LLC �L IMCM LP -1
DSBOCA- 1�A MSTA, F�� SU� 1WA�� 1 .1.
PLANTING PLAN
-y—
=.7
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS --WAALLC LP -2
I�W W�U�M�E -Paw LIST, DETAItS AND
�AD MQ�STA, ft�M SUI� IM - FL MlM
DSBOU--- SPICInCATIONS
2=-
=-=,f ff 0 �-
o:
-y—
=.7
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS --WAALLC LP -2
I�W W�U�M�E -Paw LIST, DETAItS AND
�AD MQ�STA, ft�M SUI� IM - FL MlM
DSBOU--- SPICInCATIONS
KSTSM�TO
BE�L�D-�MR�M
WTPWTOF�W�
OF
77
77 L 0
A � A T A BLOWING ROCKS TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
S T U 0 1 0 1-- -
IW �H RO�. MQUESTA, FLORDA AW-, 1 .1.
'73.
77- 1 1 fl \ ':'!
LL3LJ
mm—mn
Z1.01
UNCOVERED
5681 SF
ll
LOTeov6+uaE
®I •-_
NEW BULDING
75557 SF
UNCOVERED
- I _ I4636 SF
DUSTING B�
1161 SF
ME
_
-
6�. �018
Z1.02
marchitects
Z P °
BLOWING ROCKS
TIRNBERRYBEACHRGA ,
� �
6ti �. R w�
S T U D I O
tSDp 6EAUR ROAD. TEOIIESTA.:LQADA
19A50 W. COIIM ' CLUB URINE
SURE 100 AVEMUiA, R SJ1B0
A
__-
WTCOYERA0E60PBIWP
CF)
----------------
T
T
T
T.1
-------------------
-
-------------------------------- ----------
------------------- -------------------------
---
--j
41 ----
- ----------
----------
--] ---------------------
--- - - -------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
---------------------
-
- -- - -- - -- - --
-
-- - -- - -- - -- --
'T
BLOWING ROCKS
TU.
Z2.01
=Z="=-
1�M�ROAD,MO�TkFL�VA
SUn 1M AW�. MIM
GARAQE&E�D�l�
FLOOR PLM
C) s S s
- — -- — -- — -- — --
0 -1 s 0 0 1) �i) 0 0 00 ) S 0
........... . ............................ ...... ................. ..............
0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------
----------
---------------
-------- ----------------------- -- --------- -------
7-1"N LEVEL2
LLC Z2.02
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS ---ROAD,
-Lj� !-_2 1�M�.ROWM�STkFL�VA SU� 1. AW�, R 331W M � PLAN
c C.) 0
— — - — — - —
s
— - — —
0 S CD (M�
3 8
Um I Z:l
UMFr A
4m
(D
run --m
c
tna c
—4r
0
7 -AR
L 0 S
—R—RY B—EACH ROAD, LLC
Z2.03
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
1� M— RO�. M�Tk FLMVA
I�W C�YGL
SU� IM A��,
0 0 0
0 (D S �D (n) 0 S 8 8
ZZ04
7 -AR
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
TuRNBERRY BEAcH ROAD. LLc
C�l a
Z
1� M�H RO�. M�ST& FL�DA
SU� I M AW� MMI'w�
ZZ04
0
0
(k)
0
C)
a) s (D �D �D 0 (AD
s �s 8 0 El fl�
S 8
UWT
UWT C
— — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — ---
7 -AR L 0 S
'C--
Z2-05
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
ROAD, LLC
—M-0�.M�STAFL�DA
1) 0 14� �9
(s) �4) 08
0 (li) (D
8
PR US Ell C'St)RE
�RE.OUS Bli-CW
UPU A
MT
u�0-9
1/1,
LL�
------ ---------------
L
ILL
:ZN
- - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
I I L
'T
JZ2.06
t-Oect,S
Z A P A
BLOWING ROCKS
LLC
lWl)W�ROACl M�ST&F—VA
SUIM IN AIAE�. I'L MI.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Z2.0
7 7,
g-
BLOWING ROCKS
1�w�yu ml�
1� M�H RO�. M�T& F -0A
su� im Aw� � mim
Z2.0
f
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7—AR L 0 S
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS Z7-08
ni M FWM P�
—W�RO�.M�T&FL�VA S�
�d) 3
v,
-uwr
rA
14-2-
f
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7—AR L 0 S
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS Z7-08
ni M FWM P�
—W�RO�.M�T&FL�VA S�
7—AR L 0 S
Z2.09
a,cri*ec-,S
Z A I A
BLOWING ROCKS
Tu-B-Fty BEAcm ROAD, LLC
I RO�, MQUEST� FLORVA
M FLOOR
A R
7-
Z2.10
a, ct 'I, ec"��
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
'rurmBERRY sEAcH mo, LLC
RO�, M�STA, F—VA
I—W �la
S U M AW � ��
(D
C,
0
w
3 (D (D s (D 3� � 00(i) 0 s
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
A
ox
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D &
Z2.11
ROM FLOOR
7 7,
Marchitec-s
Z A P �L T �'
BLOWING ROCKS
TU..MY LLC
1�W C—L -�
R—, MQ—T& FLORDA
SU� 1M AW� R
(D &
Z2.11
ROM FLOOR
I
I
O
Eft
rWF,7___
i
S�
9�
•
a
e�
1'
WEST
ELEVATION
-�
p1l 11i..
flil
of
FAST
ELEVATM
_
ma
D�R
L T
BLOWING ROCKS
Tu_
-ereEAui noao•LLc
"'01B
zs.oz d
"
Z A V A
A T A
O
"'""
erchitects
cwA�G.aee.Mii1M�
t50p BEACH ROAD, TEOUESTA, ROfiDA
issw w. couriTriv clue oravE
3URE ttb AVENMiA, FL 331B0
FAST AND WEST ELEVATIONe
y
4A ERTT I.INE, '' /' .. • _ %,. - ` i / _ I
�EM59 urt T_ \�
} �� fL..OIEIICENT LIOXnNO WTMiN irrt - -_ -_- L®LgMRMO.KWIY5 Q1.
PiNATE OARAOFS *MERE LKWTII ARE /fNOMOIIIN AX AYERARE w s _
•wweoaN AXO Gff vw accuvANCY r// ar�FlooEuruesff
IIENerns'�M NANUK a�moE uuOrna+WEw��
O O O O O
_AVERAGE Of � �OOTCANGLES Of 1
ILLUA9NA'tON �uRINO GENERAL OVEaA"oN 9TANDSY FOYER.
`AN01 cOOTCANOIF'f.HEN ON S'ANG9r -
r—•f _ ,�-- ,� rfwwr aan ELevATaRro ►/�/v/�
�.,�� � ty �r •' (/AccofoGSTE efooT STRE><aeR O I •//
_. _ �.. _ _ . _ � �_ � _,� _ • _ � �� - � a i//i �� .. � �� - Imo'
O ..,
F
®rlArgA��i..BE TIE FIEVATOR GLLL eunw4 O O - - - - -
Ral1NG GTE wd1IIE ON AN 1 I I r
' EYERGEYCr CIRCUR AND
THEREFORE LY}IECIED ro THE - 1
SrAwer GENERATOR a _ -
___
TERE WLLEAMMANLL �•.
marchitects
BLOWING ROCKS
N�BEACH � "M"ROAD•
�.oi
R4 FIIYN YYf
19050 W COUNTRY CLUB DRNE
c��Nw
uNY RN1�
1599 REIGN ROAD, TEOUESTA. FLCAM
SURE 100 AVENTURA. FL 311N1
Naga-
GRADE
9II {ENCLOSED ARFJL tIIT
�.m
Opt
r. FLOOR PLAN
10' HT. RAISED COPPER LETTERS
PINNED TO WALL - BACKLIT FOR
ILLUMINATION
W-O'
10' I T-4' 10'
ipwino Rocks
PR1VAn RFADENM
MAXIMUM SIGN DIMENSIONS TO BE 30 50. FT.
3" HT. RAISED REQUIRED SIGN
COPPER LETTERS FOUNDATION PLANTING
PINNED TO WALL
ENTRANCE 516N ELEVATION
(FAUX WOOD MARBLE VENEER - COPPER LETTERS)
SCALP: 3/4"=I'-0" IOA5.18
A.
,, >`+r♦\ + '� � � 0'`� r.r� u.vrr _ r •..\> � :7 >- +.• F > r �,\�a' _ s
,.,�-rya \ `�.;°" >„; - ,.�,= > ., •� I �, �� '�.' � � �
�� \� \ pppp \.. _.rTr + >...r�--i ! L�rG.-i.� ♦ r
PloPose ca I o EULE
LG19 EBELI.I.EL®. 18o•o KEA
�. �.
ra
m
®d ate- n,vmve.'n` Nn°. ,M\r a. a ♦ \ ^ A:� w. mr.R .0 nn w�wT r� , + > • >
Z>,�,me 6`, i.'`wnn`• ^ . �,aL GRAPHIC SCALE'
E
5 ..'[M'.Y. gt�agip@yty\'\ �..c.o� 1 ;} �15.
LOCATION MAP LEGEND
V = PROPOSED WY GAR VALVE r� = PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED FlRE HYOPHlT -- - ----------= PROPOSED GROUND CONTOUR ERE •� .0 si
a/ ICI = PROPOSED n GATE VALVE o.r
OCATI - = PROPOSED S10RY CATCH BAGN O O
® - PROPOSED STORM CURB INLET a a C
PROPOSED SANDARY "MILE
�g PROPOSED INTER YEIER 8 GPI
PROPOSED OVERIAND FLOW PATFERR �G
PROPERTY LIE AND R/'N LINE PIIW [ [llf [fOIY SAM AND CONf[OL BiMICTI[! 0.RAL m
EX. WAIEIE ANN A.4crN.
iy ♦ - EX SE10 FORGE IAAgI VERTICAL DAT�g Ef's T� SAW ! ® 17-1179
d i - - - - - • - c.. Ra.s..n _
<� = E%. STpiW CRAWYDE ® A .LVIBIIA®
AINiSF$4E 811 P.E D99A9 C'�I
Aug Ig. Z01g
k
-J
-MAP,
- ----------
KTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
zmp
17
-------------- --------
- ------- - - --------- mw- ------------
wiiiofi,"— ---- --- 'Irlwni -4
-14
I --
ATLANTIC OCEAN
57
RG LAND ALTAINGPS LAND TMA SURVIV
1508 a ISH DMACN
'EYING. INJ
TURNBERRY SEACH ROAD LL
2. PETITION FACTS
a. Total Gross Site Area: 77,366 Sq. Ft. (1.776 Acres)
b. Total Building Footprint Area: 26,165 sq. ft.; existing structure 1,487 sq. ft. (to remain as a pool
cabana)
c. Total Building Square Footage: 210,028 sq.ft. (main building)
d. Density: 12 D.U./Acre Total: 21 Units
e. Building Height: 101'-0"Above Top of Dune
f. Land Use and Zoning
EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING
Multiple Family Medium Density R-3
SUBJECT PROPERTY Residential(5.4-12.0 (Multiple Family
Residential/Residential
DU per acre) Dwelling District)
NORTH R-OP(Recreation And R-OP(Recreation And R-OP(Recreation And
Coral Cove Park Open Space) Open Space) Open Space)
SOUTH RH Multifamily
Coral Cove Preserve Park Park Residential High
Unincorporated Palm (Unincorporated PBC) (Unincorporated PBC) Density
Beach County (Unincorporated PBC)
EAST N/A N/A N/A
Atlantic Ocean
W EST
Intracoastal N/A N/A N/A
Waterway
3. BACKGROUND
Turnberry Beach Road LLC. applied for a Site Plan Review to build a eleven (11) floor 210,028 sq. ft.
residential condominium building (Blowing Rocks Condominiums) on two parcels located on Beach
Road. The subject application includes a replat to combine both parcels into one (1). The replat
application will be herd by the Village Council concurrent with the Site Plan Review. The application
proposes to demolish both the existing condominium units and the single story residence. It also
proposes to renovate an existing structure into a pool cabana building.
� '� �.
� CORALCOVEPARK _
'� �
R, +
}� . �..:r:� ��y'
SUBJECT PROPERTIE5 1 e,i
� , � _
CORAL C�VF PARK
' y �.
Z
Department of Community Development-Stoff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
4. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
The proposed residential development "Blowing Rocks Condominium" included the following
applications that were reviewed by Village staff, heard by the Village Council, and the Planning and
Zoning Board:
Future Land Use Map Amendment—Ord. 12-18
A small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use (FLU) Map of the Village Comprehensive Plan from
Residential Low Density to Residential Medium Density. The subiect Future Land Use Mop amendment
was heard and approved by the Villaqe Council(4-0) on September 13, 2018(see attached Ordinance
12-18 .
Variance—VAR 02-18
Application from Turnberry Beach Road, LLC for a Variance from the level of service requirement of
Sec. 62-92 (3) requiring to maintain 95 percent(9.5"of rainfall)of all stormwater runoff on-site from a
25 year-1 day storm event. The applicant indicated that will comply with Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and South Florida Water Management District surface water management
criteria, as well as Palm Beach County's requirements as the receiving body for the site's stormwater
discharge,by retaining approximately 30 percent of a 25 year-1 day storm event's runoff(3"of rainfall).
This amounts to an overall improvement of S00 percent from the site's current runoff retainage,which
could be approximated at a maximum of 5 percent(0.5" of rainfall).
The application was in compliance with the requirement to notify(legal notices)to all 300 feet radius
property owners. Village staff received communication (phone call and e-mail) from Mr. Ben
Williamson, [Project Manager, Facilities Development & Operations Dept.; Property & Real Estate
Management Division] from Palm Beach County. Also, the opplicont met with PB County to provide
additional information and clarification, please see attached email copy from Mr. George Gentile that
summarizes the subject meeting. The subiect variance application was heard and approved by the
Vill�e Council(4-0)on September 13, 2018(see attached development order).
Site Plan Review—SPR 03-18
The Planninq&Zoninq Board recommended approval of the subiect application at the October 18,
2018 meetinq by 4-0 vote.
The following graphic depicts the approval process for the subject application:
FLU Map Amendment
First Reading-ORD 12-18
�'� Heard by Village Council Site Plan
, FLU Map g_g_lg Variance Site Plan
Amendment Application Review
ORD 12-18 VAR 02-18 SPR 01-18 Review
Recommended Approved by Planning and SPR O1-18 y
by LPA FLU Map Amendment Village Council Zoning Board— Village Council
Second Reading-ORD 12-18 —11.8.18
7.19.18 Approved by Village Council _ —9•13.18 10.18.18 �
� 9.13.18
__ _ 3
Department of Community Development-Stoff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
5. SITE PLAN REVIEW
The proposed site plan for the residential development "Blowing Rocks Condominium" was reviewed
by the Development Review Committee (DRC) for compliance with Village Code, State and Federal
applicable regulations. The DRC includes Community Development, Law Enforcement, Landscaping,
Building, Fire Safety,the Water Department,Civil and Traffic Engineering. Please see the following final
DRC comments:
ZON/NG REVIEW
R-3 Zoning REQUIRED BY CODE PROPOSED COMMENTS
District
Minimum 10,000 sq.ft.for the first multifamily 77,366 sf(1.776 In compliance
Lot Size dwelling unit,plus 3,356 sq.ft.for each acres)
additional dwelling unit to a maximum of 12 21 dwelling units
dwelling units per acre.
Minimum 80 ft. Lot Width 167'-0" In compliance
Lot Width 200 ft.3
3 Minimum buildable lot depth cannot
include submerged lands,conservation Lot Depth
easement areas, protected wetlands, 404'8-1/8"
mangrove stands or similar protected areas.
Accessory structures,not exceeding one
story/ten feet in height,may be constructed
on lots with less than the minimum lot
depth.
Setbacks(R-3)
Front Yard Main Strudure:20 ft. 21'7" In compliance
Accessory:0 ft.for an accessory structure
not exceeding one story/10 ft. in height used
for the parking of vehicles only(covered
parking)and provided that the design of the
front of the covered parking structure
includes fully landscaped grade and/or raised
planters that provide a minimum of 10 ft.of
landscaped width along the full frontage of
the covered parking structure.
Rear Yard Main Strudure:20 ft. plus 2 ft.for each 132' 1 3/8"
additional 10 ft.or portion thereof over 50 ft.
in height of the main building or structure. In compliance
Accessory: 10 ft.for any accessory one-story
building or structure. Plus 2 ft.for each 54'%"(pool cabana)
additional story of the accessory building or
structure.
Side Yard- Main Structure:20 ft. plus 2 ft.for eoch 20'1" In compliance
North additional 10 ft.or portion thereof over SO ft.
in height of che main building or structure.
Side Yard- Main Structure:20 ft.plus 2 ft.for each 20' 1" In compliance
South additional 10 ft.or porfion thereof over 50 ft.
in height of the main building or structure.
4
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
Lot Max 35% 34.9% in compliance
Coverage
Building I1 stories/101 ft.measured from the averaqe 101'Above Top of In compliance
Height heiQht of the crest of the sand dune line,for Dune
main buildinQ or structure easi of Beach
Road,and measured from grade west of
Beach Road.4 2 stories/20 ft.for any
accessory building or structure.
Parking Sec. 78-705(81: Total Number:46 In compliance
c. Multiple-family:Two spaces per dwelling spaces(4 exterior,
unit. 42 spaces at the
REQUIRED:42 spaces(for 21 residential garage-2 per unit)
units) ADA:(1 exterior and
2 interior)
landscape Min 30% 45% In compliance
Open
Space
PerSec. 78-331(h)(7):Pedestrian walkways
idewalks must be a minimum of 5 ft.wide,parallel to 8'sidewalk In compliance
roadways and a min of 4'from edge of
roadway.
Signage
The application includes one monument sign, which complies with Village's Code Sec. 78-740 (b)
"Freestanding sign: One freestanding sign shall be allowed,not to exceed 30 square feet in total area,
with a maximum height of seven feet above finish grade.The sign shall meet the setback requirement
of section 78-739. Up to SO percent of the approved sign may be used as a changeable letter reader
sign. Landscaping and irrigation at the base of any such signage shall be required." See drawing LH-
3 that provides the following information: square footage, material, color, and font.
Level of Service
Per Division 2, Sec. 78-331, the subiect application was reviewed for compliance with Level of Service
standards. The applicant applied for a variance from the level of service requirement of Sec.62-92(3)
requiring to maintain 95 percent(9.5"of rainfall)of all stormwater runoff on-site from a 25 year-1 day
storm event. The applicant indicated that will comply with Florida Department of Environmental
Protection and South Florida Water Management District surFace water management criteria, as well
as Palm Beach County's requirements as the receiving body for the site's stormwater discharge, by
retaining approximately 30 percent of a 25 year-1 day storm event's runoff(3"of rainfall).This amounts
to an overall improvement of 500 percent from the site's current runoff retainage, which could be
approximated at a maximum of 5 percent(0.5"of rainfall). The subiect variance application was heard
and approved bv the VillaQe Council(4-0)on Sepiember 13, 2018(see attached development order).
Development Phases
Infrastructure and building will be developed in one phase.
Agency Approvals
5
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
Per Division 2, Sec. 78-331 (g), the Applicant provided agency letters and statements as follows:
(1) Palm Beach County Health Department. Applicant provided statement.
(2) Tequesta Fire-Rescue Department(Fire Marshal).Applicant provided statement.
(3) Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District(ENCON�.See attached letter
(4) Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Applicant: Applicant provided
statement.
(5) South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD).Applicant provided statement.
(6) Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).Applicant provided statement.
(7) Reserved.
(8) Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County(MPO). N/A
(9) Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division.See attached letter
(10) Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization. N/A
(11) Martin County Traffic Engineering Department. N/A
(12) Florida Power&Light Company.See attached letter
(13) Telephone service provider,as applicable.See attached letter
(14) Solid waste purveyor.See attached letter
(15) Tequesta Water Department.Applicant provided statement.
F/RE S4FETY REVIEW
The Village of Tequesta's Fire Safety consultant, Mr.James Weinand and Fire Chief Joel Medina as
members of the Development Review Committee, provided comments that have been addressed
by the applicant. Further review will be conducted at the time the applicant submits construction
drawings for permitting to the Fire Safety Department.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT REV/EW
The Village of Tequesta's Building Official, Mr. lose Rodriguez,as a member of the Development
Review Committee, provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. Further
review will be conducted at the time the applicant submits construction drawings for permitting
to the Building Department Also, the applicant provided a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)issued by
FEMA regarding the location of the proposed development(see attached letter).
LAW ENFORCEMENT REV/EW
Chief Jim McGrew as part of the Development Review Committee review the application and has no
comments at this time.
LANDSCAPE REV/EW
See attached final review letter from Mr.Stephen Parker,ASLA,consulting landscape architect.
TRAFF/C ENGINEERING REVIEW
Please see attached final review letter from Mr.William Grieve, P.E.from McMahon Associates, Inc.
SEWER,DRA/NAGEAND WATER REVIEW
6
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
The applicant applied for a variance from the level of service requirement of Sec. 62-92 (3) requiring to
maintain 95 percent(9.5"of rainfall)of all stormwater runoff on-site from a 25 year-1 day storm event.
The applicant indicated that will comply with Florida Department of Environmental Protection and
South Florida Water Management District surface water management criteria, as well as Palm Beach
County's requirements as the receiving body for the site's stormwater discharge, by retaining
approximately 30 percent of a 25 year-1 day storm event's runoff(3" of rainfall). This amounts to an
overall improvement of 500 percent from the site's current runoff retainage, which could be
approximated at a maximum of 5 percent(0.5"of rainfall). The subiect variance application was heard
qnd approved by the Villaqe Council(4-0)on September 13,2018(see attached development order).
Please see attached final review letter from Mr. Spencer M. Schroeder, P.E. from Mock Roos &
Associates. Also, Mr.Thomas Jensen, P. E.from Kimley Horn, reviewed the subject application relative
to the water distribution system improvements; and the proposed conceptual engineering plans are in
compliance with Mr.Jensen's comments, please see attached his final review letter.
6.FINAL REMARKS
This development application met the requirements set on Section 78-334 notice of hearing.The
notice of hearing was advertised on October 29,2018.
The PlanninQ&Zoninq eoard recommended approval of the subiect application at the October 18,
2018 meetinq by 4-0 vote.
Please note that the subiect application, SPR 1-18 does not include a marina on the West side of eeach
Road. The anplicant indicated that an application for a marina would be submitted in the future.
7
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
Existing Site Conditions of 1500 Beach Road
''� �{-� -� � - I
�IY � P:y �
� !- G -
- . � `�� �� ,
- J 1 `��_�..
`-" "•�,F,,•� ' '�^. e"-�1•r
�r ;,� _
- x -
.
,-; . • ,
� ",.�"�� - -
�: �.� J�le�'�Ii� ,,, � , -a---• �. � �
�` � _�_ _ `�` a :�i� . :,- .
�
Y,y,�' '.�',
• , ,
� �jiG� 1500 Beach Road Site Map
_ ,.
� �' � �" -�,�
� : �.��
� - -
._ *�i�
°�: �
Existing Building to be Demolished
�( , � i
, ��--- I �
�� � � �I� ��
� '���►�q,���. ' � ?�: I
,, �
. , .
. _ .� _ .
,- . � _ a. .. � .�� .
�, � - ..
.;�, � ,�,� • ,�- --
.+��
_ ,^�:,,} �.-_
d
i ^
' ' _
� � � ��:a.. ..,
�
� _
��
`;1 � �.
�' ` i'� �;,i..
� „
.�� �..� � ■ . . �
. . , . - ,, ,,.
.�. -� �..- �;�,�,����iiii���i�„,,
�'''�[��Af'�ii,'IUniu� �,,.�:min�i: �- � � ., -. � ��-. �• -.:� ,�ll!�i„ ,�
�..._ � _
; ,,
_:, .� �. -- � ���
1""1 - _ __.__
� .
_ _
� ,� � �
_� _
_ -� � �.
-
. � _
_.._ ___ , �
�� 4•-.0:.. _ . . .., ..�` ; `_. .. '_.
� 1
Existing Building to Remain and be
Renovated
8
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
Existin�Site Conditions of 1550 Beach Road
�
� f
4 •e . ,,�. .. ,/ �c � � '.��
,� � ,�� _..y1�,L� /� �.� 4; 1 �`.,
t�� q :': _,�� � '`'
:� 1� a�_��:,'
1 ;. y►
t�p� �"`
�n .�"�`�' �
: ' ! -- i
�y� ,� „ ,�� �� �.
l�, � --
�.
.,.. 7"
�
„. _ ' '^l[,( �
1550 Beach Road Site Map .-1.� .�.,
>.,._.,.,� . :�.t x,rr:�. � _I "_
ti� .` i,.,� --•- .,�
�, _� �
�� _
,�; '� ��. - �,-�
. ,
r k�r ��� �.1� �*,�.
��`� r S l',� ��, Z�1 ,��\��\ '\ 1.. _
t`
���� � �
e� �°"'� � • �, .�.. '
.._ __ _ � -'�
�'�.' '
. .. ... _ :Li, .cfa���
� y� �•
,�, ,�. ��
Y .
-+.s.�,,.._ ��-
_ '1
��,.:,�,:- - - • �
�
r..♦ ':�."'.'��' --
Existing Building to be D�malished
� .;�.� �, ' � --�,R,.4+.r►'^"�,':� � ,
� t � �
.�� £.���F�� ��, ;�
P'
.
tt ��-„ � � �..
- .�J �
_< 4 1 � - '
� . �,,:r•�x, � C `�. _ .a.. I
� �, � �
��:�.. � �
_`� ��' �,`��" _ , � �;� +
�- ._ „ � �
..� - --
- ' F-__:
� � -
:�x-t ��¢ �
9
Department of Community Development-Staff Report—Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
Existing Site Conditions
a���t��q .,�� ' , f (�!!h; `� ��
�;o` a �� ' a`"n
�• `�� I�' .i� ���
r � ��� �����,,�� �.�9 � 1, i �.�� '
�. ��i ,
�,����� i' � ' ,�, :���� ��,
"" 4� �,Z ��
�'� ��` � � �
f.,i.
c �� � �+- �': ,y
\}r„ � ` �� �,�,�
1 �� �� —
>.�
� � a. � �vk�Sr,.1 {, ,
� =� +v��`�:..m�,�..�;w :.��_ '� -�a.
�q�'n � �'� �� 3� '�� �
r. ;
_ .`_
�'"�,�,3 4 �"�r '� -
_ �..
i'�
# �" JF ��.� ..: � � � �''� ..y
'te�• a..�:9�- }!�'�'.:..'u�' � �� � t�r �' �-dOt•� ,k':
_ . _. ... - ��. .�, . -t»
. . _ , ,�. ..�„ -
� '�{- �'-__- � ..---.._r- �. . . . .
,"'�. -':^-���*
.' , yY': .
� � b
i+�.vd :`� �„"'ty.�"' .s+i.
Intracoastal Waterway '� ��. �"� .
� � . �
\ v M
._ ``� \
{/�
J . . ��.T�:�.
/ .5f.�� .. . . .'!_.i�. .. � - _ .
' .. __.. .- �. � . . _ , ...,. . . , . 'e .
i , P_ � 'f ` -
_ �=w�� ,_ - ��� 9�h��` �`^�,�,I,��
�.a„�' _ _ — _ — '�''''�'''`y�`�'�`�` "�=_�,
!�� ��Y;;;�.=,`.;_ - _ -c- -_�,i �,���k
'��'--: � 3��• " �`
r�"yea��'.��`-'�>`��. _ � - �i� , , j �_
���5 . � � ' -- ��j � � �, ��:,�� �.� ��'"R`W--
� �` � � .. � '. �+��yr ��`1
�;.�� \ \y , i , y � � ��r., .� f r � `+7�,a�? `�';�.�" �e
. �\ \ � . ,` \ � � �� ,�♦
� �� ,, �.v
����'��.�������,
Beach/Atlantic Ocean
10
Department of Community Development-Staff Report-Blowing Rocks Condominium SPR 1-18
ORDINANCE NO. 12-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF
TEQUESTA,FLORIDA,ADOPTING A SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT TO ITS
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANDATES SET FORTH IN SECTION 163.3184, ET SEQ., FLORIDA
STATUTES, PURSUANT TO A PRNATELY-IIVITIATED APPLICATION
WHICH PROVIDES FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE
MAP,DESIGNATING ZERO POINT SEVEN ONE NINE(0.719)ACRES,MORE
OR LESS, OF REAL PROPERTY AS RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY;
WHICH PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1550 BEACH ROAD, INFORMALLY
KNOWN AS THE"NORTH PARCEL";PROVIDING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
ALL REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 163,FLORIDA STA"TUTES;PROVIDING
A CONFLICTS CLAUSE AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTNE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS,the State Legislature of the State of Florida has mandated that all municipalities
draft and adopt comprehensive development plans to provide thorough and consistent planning with
regard to land within their corporate limits; and
WHEREAS, all amendments to the comprehensive development plan must be adopted in
accordance with detailed procedures which must be strictly followed; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Tequesta, Florida, has received privately-initiated application
#LSC 1-18 requesting a small-scale amendment to the Comprehensive Development Plan of the
Village of Tequesta to designate one (1) parcel of land amounting to zero point seven one nine
(0.719)acres located at 1550 Beach Road as"Medium Density Residential"on its land use map;and
WHEREAS, the Village of Tequesta, Florida, has carefully prepared an amendment to its
comprehensive development plan in order to amend the Future Land Use Map relating to the
Medium Residential Density future land use designation for the pazcel located at 1550 Beach Road;
and
WHEREAS,the Village of Tequesta has held all duly required public hearings;both prior to
submission of the proposed amendment of the plan to the State Department of Economic
Opportunity and after the proposed amendment of the plan was retumed to the Village of Tequesta,
in accordance with Chapter 163.3187,Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Village Council desires to adopt the amendment to the current
- 1 -
comprehensive development plan to guide and control the future development of the Village,and to
preserve, promote and protect the public health, safety and welfaze.
NOW, TI�REFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: T'he Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Florida, hereby adopts the
amendment to its current comprehensive development plan; by providing for the land use
designation of"Medium Density Residential" for one (1)parcel of property comprising a total of
approximately zero point seven one nine (0.719) acres, more or less, and amending the Village's
Future Land Use Map accordingly;as attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof and of the
current comprehensive development plan.
Section 2: A copy of the comprehensive development plan,as amended,is on file in the
office of the Village Clerk,Village of Tequesta,Florida.
Section 3: The Village Clerk is hereby directed to transmit one (1) copy of the
amendment to the cutrent Comprehensive Development Plan to the State Land Planning Agency
along with a letter indicating the number of acres for the amendment submitted, the cumulative
number of acres involved in small scale developments within the Village of Tequesta that the Village
Council has approved during the past calendar yeaz,a copy of the executed adopting ordinance and
the Future Land Use Map,in color format,depicting the subject property,and the ordinance effective
date.
Section 4: Each and every other section and subsection of the Village of Tequesta
Comprehensive Plan shall remain in full force and effect as previously adopted.
Section 5: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict be and the same are hereby
repealed.
Section 6: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof,any
paragraph, sentence or word be declazed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 7: The effective date of this plan amendment shall be thirty-one (31) days
-2 -
following adoption of this Ordinance by the Village of Tequesta. No development orders,
development pernuts,or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before
it has become effective. If the Ordinance is timely challenged by an"affected person"as defined in
Chapter 163,Florida Statutes,the amendment dces not become effective until a final order is issued
finding the amendment in compliance.
- 3 -
ORDINANCE Date
12-18 09/13/2018
Upon Second Reading
Motion Council Member Vince Arena Second Council Member Kristi Johnson
VOTE
FOR ADOPTION AGAINST ADOPTION ABSENT
Mayor Abigail Brennan a � �
Vice-Mayor Tom Paterno � � a
Council Member Vince Arena � � �
Council Member Laurie Brandon a � �
Council Member Kristi Johnson Q � �
The Mayor thereupon declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted.
MAYOR OF TEQUESTA ATTEST:
. 3.,�''�E��1F ITF�Gj°--,,
�- � Q,. �RP O�q�.(i��=
� ��l.c�l,Q,I�EA�-�;'� ���-.N=
Abigail renn Lori McWilliams, MMC = � SEAL :D=
Village Clerk ; `:INCORPORATED:' ;
, '•. :
�, ��_ 19�;P```,
�'�,�jF�4 . ��p`,,,
"ry�„ OF FL� ,,,°,
�,,,,,,,�n������„�„�,,,,,.,,,
ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
FILED: Ylla e of Tequesta
CASE NO.: VAR-02-18 pa�; �I�I�'
IN RE: Turnberry Beac6 Road, LLC, Owner
Tlme: ' p�''
Gentile, Glas, Holloway, O'Mahoney &Associates, Inc.,Applicant
PROPERTY LOCATION: 1500-1550 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469
LEGALDESCRIPTION: BLOWING ROCK CLUB CONDOMINIL�M IN UR1682 P16�2;
AND CLm'NINGHAM COURT TRACTS A �, B: AND CliNNINGHAi�1 COLiR"I' LOTS 1 - 6.
PARCELCONTROLNUMBERS:60-43-40-30-21-001-0000, 60-43-40-30-21-001-0010, 60-43-
40-30-13-000-1010 THRU 1050 AND 2010 THRU 2050.
VARIANCE REQUESTED:
Variance from Sec. 62-92(3) to allow site re-development that will retain 30 percent of a 25 year 1
day storm event (which will amount to a 500% increase in current site stormwater retention) in
compliance with Palm Beach County, SFWMD and FDEP surface water management criteria,
where the code requires 95%retention for new development.
ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION
This cause came on to be heard upon the above application and the T'equesta Village
Council having considered the evidence presented by the applicant and other interested persons at a
hearing called and properly noticed, and the Tequesta Village Council, being otherwise duly
advised,
THEREUPON, THE TEQUESTA VILLAGE COUNCIL FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The subject property is located in the R-3 Zoning District in the Village of Tequesta.
2. The applicant has submitted all documents required by the Village's Code of
Ordinances for variance review.
3. The application and all supporting documentation and presentation materials as
reviewed by the Village Council at its September 13, 2018 meeting, and as kept on
file by the Village, are made a part hereof and are hereby incorporated by reference.
4. According to Section 62-94 a development order or pernlit may be issued if it is
conditioned on providing the public facilities and services necessary to serve the
Page 1
pmposed development, and if provided by the applicant for the development order or
pernut.
5. The applicant has applied for a variance from Sec. 62-92(3) to allow site re-
development that will retain 30 percent of a 25 year 1 day storm event (which will
amount to a 500% increase in current site stormwater retendon) in compliance with
Palm Beach County, SFWMD and FDEP surface water management criteria, but
where Village code requires 95%retention for new development.
6. The Applicant has established, by competent, substantial evidence, that the proposed
re-development of this site will not only provide necessary dra.inage facilities for the
site, but will be in compliance with Palm Beach County, SFWMD and FDEP
requirements, and will result in a 500% increase to current drainage retention
capabilities on the site as currently developed. The Applicant has further
demonstrated, by competent, substantial evidence, the impossibility of this site to
ever comply with Village Code on this requirement due to the geographic limitations
of the site.
7. Under the provisions of the Village Code of Ordinances,the Village Council has the
right,power and authority to act upon the request herein made.
IT IS THEREUPON CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE VILLAGE
COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
The application for Variance, Case No. VAR-02-18 with reference to the above described
property within the Village of Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida, to allow site re-development
that will retain 30 percent of a 25 year 1 day storm event (which will amount to a 500% increase in
current site stormwater retention) in compliance with Palm Beach County, SFWMD and FDEP
surface water management criteria, but where Village code requires 95% retention for new
development, in accordance with the variance application attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby
APPROVED since the Village Council hereby finds that the applicants have established, by
competent, substantial evidence, that the proposed re-development of this site will not only provide
necessary drainage facilities for the site, but will be in compliance with Palm Beach County,
SFWNID and FDEP requirements, and will result in a 500% increase to current drainage retention
Page 2
capabilities on the site as currently developed.
* The term applicant(s)as used herein shall include all successors and assigns.
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 13 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.
. •
A OR IGA L B AN,
VILLAG OF TEQUESTA
� `a��,,,uaa��O��Fii„T,,,,,,,,,..,,,,�,
�,t,Y�I�(,t�LQ�,�t� �a E..............FQ
G��..
LORI McWILLIAMS, MMC ���,:�v� �T'��•:�''--,
VILLAGE CLERK �� � �'�'.-i:
_ . SEAL �D:
_ ':INCORPORATED` ;
' �I/E 4,19�''Q',,
��"°`�j�....... •O�\p\,,'°�,
�,,,,,,,,,�,F�����,,,,,,.,.,
Page 3
Lance Lilly
From: George Gentile <george@2gho.com>
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 10:17 AM
To: Nilsa Zacarias
Cc: Lance Lilly; Michael Gilbert(mgilbert@turnberry.com); Mark Williams
(mark@Keshavarz.com);Amir Keshavarz
Subject: Blowing Rock Condominium meeting with PREM of Palm Beach County
Ms.Zacarias :
As we discussed on the phone this week, Mark Williams and myself inet with Mr. Ross Hearing, Director of PREM, Mr.
Ben Williamson, PREM,and Jean Mathews, Parks and Recreation Palm Beach County,The purpose of the meeting was to
discuss the Blowing Rocks Condominium site plan and drainage plans.The following is a summary of the meeting:
1. Mr.Williams and Mr.Gentile went over the site plans,architectural plans and the proposed storm water
management plans. It was discussed with the County Representatives the process we have gone through with
the Village,the purpose of the Variance for the Drainage and that the project is reducing the amount of drainage
entering the State property to the south. It was also discussed that the historic drainage flow from the two
parcels of Blowing Rocks have discharged to the south along the Beach Road Right of Way, and that the County
right of way department had reviewed the plans and conceptually agreed.
2. Mr. Herring and other County staff members discussed the future plans for the State Park Property,and showed
a parking lot plan and beach access for future development.They were concerned with the possible impact of
drainage on their future plans on the park site.
3. Mr. Williams expressed that historic drainage flows are protected by Florida Regulations and that the
Development of the property would actually lessen the discharge to the south that is currently taking place.
4. Mr.Williams also showed the County staff that there may be an existing discharge for the State Park site mid-
way along the property on the Beach Road side.The County is verifying this and will look into the possible
maintenance of this pipe going under Beach Road to the Intracoastal Waterway.
5. We also discussed with the County the potential to use the north Park site or the south park site for construction
parking.The County indicated that they have worked that out on other County properties before and would be
willing to discuss this further as the project gets close to permitting.
6. Mr. Herring thanked us for the update and they will continue to review their potential options on the State Park
Site to the South.
Sincerely
George G. Gentile
Sr. Partner, FASLA, PLA, LEED�AP, BD&C
Cel I: 561-718-4320
George@2gho.com
/ �
l.cn�+cspr�Irth;tn.� G'C�rxun tm�n.�rt.il(,mwt��.n[.
GENTILE GLAS HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY& Associates,Inc
1907 Commerce Lane,Suite 101 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-575-9557 x102
1
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s)named above.If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,dissemination,distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.If
you are not the intended recipient,please contad the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
All attached drawings,specifications and other documents,including those in electronic form,prepared by the consultant and the Consultants Sub-consultants are
Instruments of Service for use exclusively to this Project.The Consultant and the Consultants Sub-consultants shall be deemed the authors and owners of their
respective Instruments of Service and shall retain all common law,statutory and other reserved rights,including copyrights.
2
� A��� AT&T Florida T:561.540-9262
d 120 N K Street
�� Lake Worth, FI 33460
May 22nd, 2018
Keshavarz Associates
Joan Sopczak
711 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 201
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Blowing Rocks, 1500 and 1550 Beach Road, Tequesta, Florida
Dear Ms. )oan Sopczak
This letter is in response to your request for information regarding availability of
service at Blowing Rocks, 1500 and 1550 Beach Road, Tequesta, Florida
This letter acknowledges that the above-referenced development is located in an
area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for this development will be
subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT&T.
Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT&T to provide
service to the above-referenced project.
The projected land use does not appear to encroach into any AT&T easements
nor does it appear that it will interfere with the provisioning of services.
However, should any of the adjacent aerial/buried/inside communication
facilities need to be relocated/adjusted those expenses incurred by ATT Florida
to accommodate the improvements will be the financial responsibility of the
property owner.
Please contact me with any comments regarding this response.
Thank you for contacting AT&T.
Sincerely,
��//f l"/�r r���
Eddie Herron
MGR OSP PLNG & ENGRG DESIGN
�SA
c�y ,«���d��uo�,o,��.�,__.�.��,��u��,..,��
�/'� Florida Power&Light Company
,�.��°`�
�
FPL
May 23, 2018
Joan Sopczak
711 N Dixie Hwy, Suite 201
West Palrr� Beach, FL 33401
Re: Service Availability for Blowing Rocks (1550 & 1500 Beach Road)
Dear Joan:
This is to confirm that, at the present time, FPL has sufficient capacity to provide electric service to the above
captioned property. This service will be furnished in accordance with applicable rates, rules and regulations.
Preliminary analysis of your request has indicated that a line extension will be required and will most likely
require a Contribution in Aid of Construction to be paid in order to provide service.
Please provide the final site plan, site survey and electrical load data as soon as possible so the necessary
engineering can begin.
Early contact with FPL is essential so that resources may be scheduled to facilitate availability of service
when required.
Sincerely, ,
Mic�rael Baldwin �
Associate Engineer
a NEXTera ENERGY Company
Loxahatchee River District ��V,R°"�F�`T
���.� �
°�
VVater Reclamation ; Em��ronmerta! Edu� .3r�_.:� '���;��� � .�� _. , . W �- _ i�
i�i:.- - ..ti- .• o
2500 Ju iter Park Drive,Ju iter, Florida 334 .t o ,._'�r'
P P
Telephone (561)747-5700 •Fax(561) 747-y�w:- • ,,-� r, s ��3� ,_ , _ rs � � �'d
t ,..�_ .ati.
��� y7� .
1971
� ,� n Fx���,_i*��tF -� _ �''�
March 14, 2018
Gentile Glas Holloway 0'Mahoney&Assoc., Inc.
2907 Commerce Lane,Suite 101
iupiter, FL 33458
Attn:Alec Dickerson
Re: BLOWiNG ROCKS CONDOMINIUMS
1500 and 1550 Beach Road,Tequesta
SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
This letter is_provided in response to your recent inquiry concerning sanitary sewer service
availability for the subject property.
Please be advised that,as of this date,sanitary sewer service can be made available to the subject
property upon payment of certain costs in accordance with the District Rules. Copies of District
Rules Chapter 31-10 are available for your review on our web site at
Consistent with District policy,the developer will be responsible for all costs associated with
connecting to the existing wastewater system of the District
As discussed with the project engineers the nearest available sewer main is located in the Beach
Road (SR A1A) right of way.
Should you require additional information on this matter,please contact our Engineering
Department at(561)747-5700 Linda at xt 110,or Diane at x� 123.
Sin�:e�ely,
��'�c�G""' /� �ii�
�
Clinton 2 Yerke,�
Depury Execut4ve Director
v:ldev�proj�blowiag rocks condosl Avail Itr.doc
_ ..�.... _ _Lc ,L�f:i.cr: i�. ,..��_.. . .... ,. . � ._ �� .J1 ...1 .. .. ...;1��� , .. , y _ ...�i�,-iii
Board Member Board 1�lemher C hairn�an Board vlember B��ard ti]ember
�tiACl�C
� �°2
March 28,2018
a �
s •
�LORI�4, Ms. Nilsa Zacarias
Village Planner
Village of Tequesta
345 Tequesta Drive
Department of Engineering Tequesta,FL 33469
and Public Worhs
P.O.Box 21229 RE: Blo�ving Rocks Condos
West Palm Beach,FL 33416-1229 PCO]8Ct#: 1g�3�8
(561)684-4000 Traf�c Performance Standards Review
FAX:(561)689-4050
Dear Ms. Zacarias:
www.pbcgov.com
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the Blowing Rocks Condos
Concurrency Statement, dated March 13, 2018, pursuant to the "Traffic Performance
� Standards in A�ticle 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code
(ULDC). Tl�e project is summai•ized as follows:
Palm Beach County Municipality: Village ofTequesta
Board of County
Commissioners Location: East of Beach Road
PCN#: 06-43-40-30-21-001-0000; 60-43-40-30-21-000-0010;60-
tv�et�ssa rotcx�n�ay,mayor 43-40-30-13-000-1010; -1020; -1030;-1040;-1050;-2010;
Mack Bernard,Vice tilayor -ZOZO; -2030; -2040;-2050
Access: Full access on Beach Road(project p�•oposed,not necessarily
Hal R.Valeche implies approval by County through this TPS letter,see later)
Paulette Burdick Existing Uses: Single Family Residential= 1 DU
Residential Condos= 10 DUs
Dave Kerner proposed Uses: Residential Condos=21 DUs
Steven L.Abrams New Daily Trips: 63
New Peak Hour Trips: 6(2/4)AM; 6(4/2) PM
Mary Lou Berger Build-out: December 31, 2020
Based on o�u�review,the Traffic Division l�as determined the proposed development does
not liave significant peak hour traffic i►npact(as defined in PBC TPS) on the roadway
County Administrator IlEtW01'IC 111CI,therefore,meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Verdenia C.Baker Please note the receipt of a Traffic Performance Standards(TPS)approva)letter does not
constitute the review and issuance of a Palm Beacll County Right-of-Way (R/W)
Construction Pecmit nor does it eliminate any requirements that may be deemed as site
related. For work within Palm Beach County R/W,a detailed review of the project will
be provided upon submittal for a R/W permit application. The project is required to
comp(y with all Palm Beach County staildards and may include R/W dedication.
A discussion with Palm Beach County, involving at a minimum Traffic Division, Land
Development Division,and Roadway Production Division,is advisable for access related
issues of the site plan on County maintained roadways before a site plan is submitted to
the municipality for consideration.
,An Equnl Oppm nmit�,
Ajfir•mntire Actim�Emplo��er"
printed on sustainable
and recycled paper
Ms.Nilsa Zacarias
��tiACH�oG March 28, 2018
y 2 Page 2
a �
. •
� No building permits are to be issued by the Village after the build-out date specified
�LpRI04' above. The County tcaffic concucrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation
Rules set forth in the Tcaffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
The approval letter shall be valid no lon�er than oue year from date of issuance,unless an
application for a Site Specific Development Order has been approved,an application for a
Site S�ecific Develo�nent Ordec has been submitted, or the appcoval letter has been
superseded bv another approval letter for the same propectv.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at
561-684-4030 or email QBari��Uc�ov.org.
Sincerely,
���G�' ��l�li/�,
Quazi Bari, P.E.
Senior Yrofessional Engineer
Traffic Division
QB/DS:bc
ec: Addressee:
Linda Riccardi,P.E.,Pinder Troutman Consulting,Inc.
Dominique Simeus,E.I.,Project Coordinator II,Traffic Division
Steve 13ohovsky,1'echnical Assistant lll, I'raffic llivision
File: General-TPS-Mun-Trallic Sludy Revie�v
N:\TRAFFIC�DS\MUN[CIPALITIESWPPROVALS�?018\I80308-BLOWING ROCKS CONDOS.DOC
�w
WAETF MANA[iEMEIYT
JEFF SABIN
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.OF FLORIDA
7700 SE BRIDGE RD
HOBE SOUND,FL 33455
PH:(772)545-1327
Mosi�e:(772)263-0017
May 29, 2018
Mr. Alec Dickerson
Gentile, Glas, Holloway, O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc.
1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101
Jupiter, FL 33458
Re: Blowing Rocks (1500 Beach Road, Tequesta, Florida)
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
In response to your request for confirmation of service availability for the above
development, Waste Management of Martin County can adequately accommodate the
prescribed services as provided for in our Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials
Collection Services Agreement with Martin County. Arrangements will need to be made
by the owner to have equipment rolled out, allowing our trucks to have access from the
frontage road on service days.
We appreciate the opportunity to service the new community and look forward to
working with the developers and builders in making it an environmentally friendly project.
Please contact our Sales Specialist as your project proceeds, her contact information is
below, or myself.
Sales Specialist: Amanda Mindell — 561-351-8658
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact us.
Sincerely,
JEFF SABIN
Government Affairs
Cc: Amanda Mindell
MOCK• ROOS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Septembcr 6.20 I S
Nilsa "Lacarius. AICP
Community Development Director
V illage of"I�equesta
3�� Tequesta Drive
Tequesta, FL 33469
Rcf. No.: E3603�4.OS
Subject: E31o�vin�, Rocks Condominiums— Site I'lan Re-Submittal Final Revie��
I;n��ineerin; Review Comments
Dear Nilsa:
Mock•Roos has completed e�ur revie�� of the RC-SU�Ill1II�I �Of fllC �'1111I A�)�)Ill'dI1011 t01'S11e PI111
Re�ic�� and suppurtin`�documentation for the proposecl Blo��in�, Rocks Condoininiums De�elopment,
submitted b�'Gentile Glas 1l0llo��ay 0��lahone��& Associates. dated Au��ust ?9. 2018.
I he suUmitted tlo�� test inturmation for lhe exislin; h�drants in the area oFthe project confirms
[he distribution system is capable of ineeting the pro��osed tire tlo�� clemand. I�his satisfies our only
outstandin��comment fre�m thc previous submittals. �Ve h���e no additional comments.
I f you have an��questions. plcase call me at 6�i;-i I 13.e�tension �99.
Sincerelv.
�IUCK,,KUUS R nS ' )C'Ii�1L-S. IVC.
�
��Sce;,' I�S roe�er. I'.E:.
Seniur Prc�ject Vlana��er
SMS:jeh
Enclosure
Copies: Lance Lill�
John N. Cairnes
L:\tequ\86034.05\IOOSssjh docx
Mock,Roos&Associates,Inc.
5720 Corporate Way,West Palm Beach,florida 33407-2066,561-683-3113,www.MockRoos.com
Kimley>>>Horn
October 4, 2018
Nilsa Zacarias, AICP
NZ Consultants
1851 W. Indiantown Road
Suite 100
Jupiter, Florida 33458
Re: Village of Tequesta
Blowing Rocks Condominium
Conceptual Engineering Plan
Dear Ms. Zacarias:
We are in receipt of the revised conceptual engineering plan for the above from the Developer's
Consulting Engineer, Keshavarz&Associates. The ConsultanYs revised plan addresses my comments
made on July 16, 2018 relative to the water distribution system improvements,fhat include replacement
of the existing cement asbestos water main on the west side of A1A in front of this property. This main
is currently located within the mangroves and is the best long term solution for this development.
We understand that prior to acceptance of the water main improvements noted herein, the Developer
will provide to the Village the following;
• A utility easement for the proposed fire hydrant on the west side of A1A.
• A utility easement for the water main on the property, and language added to it that the Viliage
is not responsible for any surface restoration due to the specialty driveway treatment on the
property.
Please review and advise if you should have any questions.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
�--
' � .
Thomas C. Jen�n P.E. �'�
�
Enclosure: Conceptual P an Sheet
`��
. � ��
v,�e.r � 1 � � � F
1`�
� ��`""� � I I 1 � ` ' ' ��r_
i ,.�. , , ', , , .�
'� �� 1il ���� '', � �'y a r ne rM �� �� �°i�r�"°iw iora �� �� ��'i'�� �
�` ♦ 1 1��,� \VI 0,,�DIMO � �� wr IAm ,euesa�..r � .r�u � w'e �
(` � � � .�'.' ���:�r �` ��`� �� ,�� � ' '�
�' � 1 1� ' � �� �s►. w.�.a�o»+ao �� r �_J r r,J • `f,,, �
•7 e
�na0
� - '" � _— __"' . __2_ _ I � �'� � 1 J� i � !.
�� i i r�S!. ♦ _ r ��'�r � '�7r_� _"��-7^---�i � � ♦ � '��' ���s
,% �� �'� ��• � 1 �`'. ♦ �--�'_"�—r.f�'^'�_�T_ -- ---�-�-+-�;.�� � � S I � ��'e� �
� i ; �ti � i�, e�i - i �Mw�[ ♦ _.-, l � �;-��ti?� '. v G
a r ia w l+ r. , :L=:;i � � Z
^�' \ � �-�r—r—-a.— -i., �'1
m,1R `i ��' � �� ` � � '' ��,� � I`' L� ��..� � � �' �c+
� � '�' r no�s MA oa iY a a s• i� L7 `"-' C� P
1 , � , �t ,.j•: O . _..'` I q
,i1: i� .+�;t\w��{' r � 5 ie•r�e r �� -�-..-.... L ��._�1����j�> ,� r + " .rii J �1 �� i � i
� � s 1 •• '": q � u-_•'�r�—:�a •, �+.{� � . . . ,�, ,:: _
}`��-� ��. •ay. y N ti, M o�ojs�— ,� .._'e�;°�.`�.�' 'y
l di"�� � '��.f. �� y^'°i wn �� �'iw�id�omor� ' '�� �t ._ _ i_,1.
waR f MOR { ,' 4�w . .i;; .—.."_'
ee�,�,�m+ l{ ,,., a _ - `F ' .,-. � � '' q _ � J ..p ;i�:t� ,
. 1
i
�
'""`.�Etx�IS.",� `� � 00� r ti l _ _ .�_-�_ - , r � r.'� �;� i
,.....4.ia.� � ,,:= _,.< L . „ .. . .. _ _ _c
t . .;;.:�_ f::F.. .f. .' _ Y
�ww�rrw1ruM : �" '� !� _ ' : '��_' �?-..'�� .. � �
+^-'' �1 . ,!'•� - — �
� { \ � � ��I,. PROP06EDLONOqMNIUM _�—� —�
t P� '" ntr.sasw�,, ` _ �..� l LOYIERIEVaEF.ELEV..85'NAVD. � r:,�,•.�- ' -�:���.•_' � •
i � ..=. .::. . .: �z` F i.:.;.,• '�,: I ,
,ns, i_ � , ' , .... _;y.r ' L. r ,• 1 r '� .
�. ; ��� .t✓+ �.�9 .-� �-�,u �
�, , �,-, ..n �.M. �-,.��-. �. � .,��• :�-�:�r_�,..°-� — �,I" � e ::•�:,; :._��,:.::i;:.. �. �
1`' ��AM�IR{l3 .�� J�Ri/1y . �. R/l/MM11i �.'• �'' .�:' ' ;
,�.1LL�WIMI�YR 11 � * �l 1, _. �.?tl�ur.we�r' r.��4 ,y� �\ M'�AU l
+ � :.f�� ' d'..
• :.
INaI a1Ot wwnm0,,, ,j' . � ,!.� ,. , . � _ r.r - + 'r
,�... ' .
� ♦l, ��1 f�. � � : „ � '> ��—�,�' �. •i) . -#,;� - "
. .� .
� � � , �1 .�.:' .. : :.- : 'M.
.:._
_...
.
..
�;Y�� 1�' �' �� S 1��j�, ' 1 r � . 'r _ � ._-.. - -—- '�
f
_.� �.r'm�v�r.waa 1�'v1 �;' � �` i s�rP'� �•y ns.wruo ra h�a�rl 1 ��I� r • O I � '
� ar�nq-iss �`�ap'au S� � � � � nw� t� n t .
� �� , 1 mwie'�r � 1 ��' �` �� n�my nc e rm aw�� � � „
� �� �� 1 �Pr enw �n�i-o�w s �, � �°,d t Mer mry � �er�wr�1 �: �
�.� t s {�_�
� �� '� �1, � +1 � . �{�^ �� � r■�q � GRAPHIC SCALE ��
g �,,,, � ��r.•.,o a t._ � tin� �t�a �}a � .�.�, � r c�
� 'p" � t�ra«.n' � � islr�' ��� �� �
� ' � �
1�,\�r ne w� ` S �� q` tr
Rti �. : \( "'.oww� , ` � "1. �� i Q�
� m � .PRaPO8E0 WN GIiE� �`�RIOPO5ED BfiFOE �� .r
� �PROPO�fD 11A!MlMN1f _�___.__..�.�RICP09m OROUW CONIOUP UNE �a
� �MIOPO�D fAI IMTE 11U.rE v�
OCATi � =PIIOPOlm STd91 dfTCX 9NN s�w �q � <
V
� � .rxovoam sm�aam.+�, a �
Y� e 'pnoros�n w�rutr wwHo� � � 1
�� ■ .��,�� — �
�� ----_�m���,,,� —=— �• $
�' ---- °
—PROPERtI'lR7E AtO R/IP WE RIOr E 1'6tf DTOIMit�AfN!Vm OON71101.�TIWQ�lA4�fAW.
�� ars
a� -----s—. �IX.Y/f1El!NAII nciecrw
qe ------ -oc se�ai�unM wtnGu.u,�n�t ITS 77�WW � 17-1179
l'� ___- tl' NL98rA7qNilf101MMLM �W
�D�510pA�I�ISU6! N011l!iYdCAM�R7t'.Y. Nuk W91m af1�Ne.
wnia as aw iw.wa SUNSfiINE 811 ►.e.aaaaa C'Q 1
�g�+*n'�+ �e aa ao�e
�,o�"�:��:�1
`,,[:����a���.��`��u3`�_-e--�.-�- C
■��
!'�Ithl k• 11\\! I I I
i. �_� _ �,i, �,��
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nilsa Zacarias,AICP
lance Lry
Vilape�Tequesta
Departrnent of Canmunity Devebpment
FROM: Stephen J Parker,ASLA
DATE: September 10,2018
RE: Bbwing Racks Condomimum
I have reviewed fAe revised landscape plans for Bbwing Rodce Condominium,1500 Beach
Roed,as prepa�ad by DS Baca Landscape Art�it�s a�d Planners,dated August 23,2018,
and approve the pWns as submRfed
Pkase conlad me with any questions.
Sincerely.
�� _
St .Pa r,ASLA
SJ cry
� �„ I
.��� A HO� u1c�1AHOV ASSOCIAiES, INC.
� � 2090 Palin Beach Lakes Boulevard,Suite 400
West Palm Beach,FL 33409
� ' p 561-840-8650 I f561-840-8590
PRINC[PALS
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM �oseph W McMahon,P E.
Juseph J.DeSantis,P.E.,PTOE
John S.DePalma
William T.Steffens
T0: N11Sd ZdCdtldS f�ICP Casey A.Moore,P.E.
r Gary R McNaughton,P.E.,PTOE
Village of Tequesta Assoc iA�s
John J.Mitchell,P.E.
Christopher J.Williams,P.E.
CC: Natalia T. Lercari, P.E., LEED R.Trent Ebersole,P.E.
Matthew M.Kozsuch,P.E.
McMahon Associates, ITlG Maureen Chlebek,P.E.,PTOE
Dean A.Carr,P.E.
FROM: R. Trent Ebersole, P.E.
McMahon Associates, Inc.
SUBJECT: Blowing Rocks Condos—Traffic Review
McMahon Project No. M11172.12
DATE: September 4, 2018
McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has completed a review of the Site Plan, Sheet Z1.01, prepared
by BC Architects, Inc., dated August 24,2018 and applicant's comment response letter, dated August
29, 2018. All of McMahon's comments have been satisfactorily addressed with the acknowledgement
of FDOT permit requirement. McMahon has no further comments.
Sincerely,
��
William A. Grieve, P.E.
Project Manager
WAG/cc
F:\FL\11172M_Village_Of_Tequesta_TransportationServices\I 1172M_12_BlowingRocksCondos\TechMemo\TechMemo_NZ_090418docx
I�_n�in� , �ine Plan�iin�� Ilc<i=n iu � ��n�� l�,.� ni � ni ,� �,, ,� :at�, �,,ni
� � ti I L1.AC1E O F TE t�L E S TA � DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY ;
ll�partment of Comraunity Developmenc ; ck.� _ �
� Fee Paid:
,�' 345 Tequesta 1}rive � Intake Date: ;
' 'I'eque5ta,Florida 334b9 � ,
�h�ifal-7G8-C45;./ Fa;�:5��-7fiK-U�'�* � PROJECT ii: �
anva c>sces'<.o�w � � �
� i
� �
' �
�------------------------
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVtEW
DRC �
PLANNING &ZONING BOARD � Meeting Date:
VILLAGE COUNCIL � Meeting Date:
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS:
1. Please complete all sections of this application. if not applicable,indicate with N/A.
2. Provide all required documents as shown on the attached checklist.If not applicable,indicate with N/A.
A!1 construttion, additions, ond/or atterations within the Village, except in distric[s R-2A and R-1, must be reviewed by the Planning&
Zoning Board. The Planning&Zoning Board meets the third Thundoy of every month at 5:3Q p.m.,as needed in the Village Hall Counci/
Chambers,345 Tequesto Drive. The appticont wi/l be informed 6y/etter of their scheduled meeting date. The Plonning and Zoning eoard
shall have general authoriiy os outlined in Sec.22.53. After review and recommendation by the Plannrng&Zoning Boord, opplicotions
wi!l be heard by the Villoge CounciJ for frnal approval. The Village CounciJ meets reguforly on the second Thursday of every month at
6:OOp.m.,in the Village Halt Council Chombers.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION&OWNER/AGENT iNFORMATION
PROJECT NAME: Blowing Rocks Condominiums
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1500 and 1550 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Site Plan Approval Request for 21 Condominium Units
Property Control Number(PCN),list additional on a separete sheet: See AttBChed Sheet
Estimated project cost: NA
Property Owner(s)of Record: Turnberry Beach Road, LLC c/o Michael Gilbert
address: 19950 West Country Club Drive, 10th Floor, Aventura, FL 33180
Phone No.: 305-682-1142 FaX No.: E-ma�i adares5:mgilbert@turnberry.com
Applicant/Agent(if other than owner complete consent section on page 3):
rvame: George G. Gentile of Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc.
Adaress: 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101, Jupiter, FL 33458
Phone No.: 561-575-9557 Fax No.: 561-575-5260 E-mail Address:9eorge@2gho.com,alec@2gho.com
1
I1. LAND USE&ZONING
R-3 Multifsmily Residential Density Residential Medium Density
A) ZONING DESIGNATION B) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
c) Existing use(s� Residential Condos
�) Proposed Use(s},as applicable Infill Redevelopment including 21 multifamily units on two
combined lots
III. ADJACENT PROPERTIES
Name of Business/ Land Use Zoning Existing Use(s) Approved Use(s)
Subdivision Designatbn Designation
--_._._..._..- - ------ — ----------_..._...._------------- ------
NORTM Coral Cove Park Recreation R-OP Park Park
......_.------- ----- _...__.. _ ._.._...--------------�---- ---�_
sou�rH Coral Cove Park Recreation RH Park Par1c
_...._._...._---- ------���---- ------�------ ------•-•-------------------------- —
F'°'sT Atlantic Ocean NA �NA Atlantic Ocean Atlantic Ocean
- ----__._..._...- ---.__.__.__-�_- ------ -__--_..__._..---------•----•- ----
WEST i�t���i w NA NA Intracoastal Wtwy Intracoastal Wtwy
IV. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION
Provide a statement of use from the applicant that the submitted site plan is consistent with the goals, objectives, and
all other provisions of the village comprehensive development plan, and further that the projected use is specifically
authorized by development ordinances and regulations. The statement shall include, but not be fimited to, specific
references to those sections of the comprehensive plan relating to the proposed development. Attach additional sheets
if necessary.
See attached justification statement included in this package
z
� --- - --
V• �111�LR/lllPL�AN� llll�G011�lNT �
�-- ---
Caw�t�talmrwe(to we co��pls'�i if owNr I�n��n�ww
Vw�, d�e owneA, tw�eb�►I�w aorr�t ts �•••��ru►.rww�w.�.�vw�.�sa�.�s.�.c b �ec on nry/our
�hM to auam�iMk�ppbdn�,aN rpuMed n�l and do�w��nd�Ou�d and e�ep�e�■t��t ar�
�d P���P�s�el�e appicatbn a�d P�P�ti U'we owa d�bed In tlie app/ntloe,
sU��d�Il�w alllnn dwt lhre�nd�r�bnd�nd wlr e�nplr wi�M�e avrlsbns and�ul�tloe�s of tM
1Ah/�oF b4u�a. Florfd� Cod� af OnMao�s. y�e fwfl���erWy fMt�M ot t!r M�nn�tlen ooMtaY�d N� thii
ap�tlon�nd�d fha dsarrnn4tlon s�6�aRbd i�bua b Uie ba�t o!my/our knowY�.
�e..��e.a uc �,.a a��u►
ow�.r:�tpa�a�f - �pro.n�1� r: Ip�e,i.aen�
� .�---�..� � - — �� -
ow�ers�--- - �Pp�+yAj��CsS�m�
-- --- - - ---- -- - - — -----
orb p� -- -
---- -- --
--- ---- -- - - VI. A�NJ�ATIQN F� --- !
11� A�p�o� �NY A p�ppliatlo� submlttal � sha� be beld with the ownK and/or
appNcsnt�ad hbV1�d��n bs�n and ehe ao�nnwnlq dawlopnw�t�re��nd h1s/her derdoPment
statf.
��S'OD.O�iN�ppqr.
1�1 �►ay ar.O�eMs�t�►eamn�ri(�71i.cbmmuni�y u�►e�oNnerrt d�a ae�nee
�11 wbn�t wd�app�eion tnr depuq�entr�alf�ad aoewR�nt�eWa+r witlih 30 dws of�eoelpt of�
��PP�•
��S��M appi�.
1�) �br�Nb�O��toand.The Cannau�tt�r Derelopn�x DMaca or d�a�e tl�a�bmt�
llteh IIppllGti011 fOf PI�IIff�1s�Ild Z01111�60i1d flVkW 11YIl11�1{4S d/yf Of 1lOL�R Of M WOlp�d�pp�d011-
�t� $i0o.00 1i�t(�ol o1PA�0 � � 3�D.00 iN/ritea+rnendadbn ro v�bpe Co�IJ�pPpN
HI ���R Cop�a�Widdn 45 ds�af ra+rlew by tM M�ninE�nd zanin�Bw�,the Cana�ih►
QawbPm�nt Dh�cta or d�nee�tt�en whnit such a�iption,hidudins the�eeonln�Nons of
tAe PlanNa�and Zonir�Baad.to�IA�C�dl nerlew.
�,a�OO.Ob tw�d�u an addkla�i 1�bawd oe du�tl�rt�d ee�d wa�ic apppes.
t+s con.►ar .+�u.�l wnia�rsw.aaa. aaw+ or.�N��,�nc�t nn�u m,,«�i�r,
ooa�lb�t tea�nd sp�dN�!M�/1ilrNt�M m�qMwEe th��i�e Aerali�ueh tab pAor 10 t�poaol��f
M�a+p�Ra�tlon ar aot hMr Mrn id/r�a rMr#nd�Iotl�+'P�ord,Nldd�eier b�elawl�d�s a�eM1�6Y ehe
��e.FNlwa 10�weh p�n�et mh►be raa��ar esc fw�q�tn4w ar a�i�nrlt,oNu�o�of 000�p�
ortanpNqoa
Co�t�aoel�o�d rAtl�N�r�lns ior pAie IyeL�p�ad otl�er puYr�olf�e r�rfra�w�s an U�e responYNlqr d 11r
�p�lea�t.The fi�du1 b�'N/p�brl�M�e!►�p/Yalb�b�U���I�IbRLN��dpu�y rp�iN�nMlp.
v+--• � fi� !`.��
OIMI�i�10�IIOM�t�
3
VII.APPUCATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND REVIEW PROCESS
The applicant will submit to the Village of Tequesta Department of Community Development the following
documents for review by the Development Review Committee (DRC), forty-five business (45) days prior to the
meeting date:
1) Seven(7)1Ix17 sets and Three(3)ful/size sets of professionally prepored site plons showing all existing and
proposed structures, setbacks, parking and loading layout, ingress and egress, sidewa/ks ond walkways, exterior
lighting layout, dimensions of street frontages,property lines and otl signoge.
2f Fourteen (14J Iix17 sets and Two (2J full size sets of Landscaping Pfans in aaordance with Vi!lage of
Tequesta Code of Ordinances, Oivision/V,Landscoping.
3) Fourteen (14)11x17 sets of multi-dimensionai color renderings and/or photographs are to be provided. The
Planning&Zoning Board requires an exact rendering of the proposed modification, consiruction or addition. Color
photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to 6e used must be supplied. Since rolor printers often do noc
disp/ay the correct color, ii is recommended that sampJes of ihe paint chips, as well as a sampte of the support
materials(i.e., canvas, wood, metal,etc.)be provided.
4J One(IJ CD disk wrth PDF files induding the compJered application.
5J Any other documents, mops, photographs,or drawings that may he/p clarify the poslt/on of the applicont.
NOTE: All rendeNn�s,models,drowings,photos,etc.,will become the property o/tNe Vil►pge of Tequesta.
Pre-application meeting �
1
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
Deadline is 45 business days prior to P&Z Meeting date
DRC Meeting
Held within 2 weeks of application
submittal
�
DRC comments provided to Applicant
within 1 week of DRC meeting
1
Re-submit application Planning&Zoning Board Meeting—
Deadline is 2 weeks following receipt of —� recommend approval
DRC comments (3'�Thursday of each month)
1
Village Council Meeting—final approval
(2"a Tfiursday of each month}
4
VIII. SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
GENERAL
(1) A completed application signed by owner, agent/applicant. Authorization must be attached if applicant
is other than owner.
(2) Required application fees.
(3) Statements of unity of title,warranty deed,or purchase contract of the subject property.
(4) General location map, showing relation of the site for which site plan approval is sought to major
streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the
projed,and the like.
(5) A recent aerlal photograph of the site.
SURVEY
(1) A signed and sealed boundary survey(not more than one year old)and legal description of the property,
including any and all easements of record as well as existing topographical conditions of the site.
(2) Existing streets and roadway improvements (medians, driveways, signage, etc.) and existing structures
within 100'of the project boundary.
(3j Existing utilities within 100'ofthe project boundary.
(4) Existing trees identified by calipe�and species.
SITE PLAN
(1) A site plan rnntaining the title of the projed and names of the architect, engineer, project planner
and/or developer, date,and north arrow, and based on an exad survey of the property drawn to a scale
of sufficient size to show:
a. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buitdings, watercourses, easements, section lines,
and water and sewer lines, well and septic tank locations, and other existing important physical
features on the site a�d on property adjacent to the site.
b. Tabular project data to include:
Total gross site area in acres&square feet 1.776 aC/77,366 Sf
.�—_� .___ ,� _�_ _...__....
Totat number of units(multi-family) 21 multifamily units
Total square feet of each primary structure Main tower= 210, 028 Sf
Totai square feet of accessory structures Existing Building - 1,481 sf
Total footprint of each building in sq ft&% �� �;,,euib�r�y 2s,557(33%)Exist.Pavilion 1,aaasF��.s%�
Overall mean building hefght�number of stories �Q1' Above top of dune--- 11 stories
�Flnlshed fl�r elevation for all structures �� Main Building+g.5'Existing Pavilion+14.49'
Total project density in units per acres,if applkable 21 Ut11tS @ 12 du'S/8C
Total proposed off-street parking�aces ^ �46
Hefght and location of proposed fences and/or walls �e.,,+,,, ��
�Mro ww w.own.ia d wawM,uiqiq 7 wooe t«icM CBS wan on naN W�
Proposed drive aisle width �� 2� p�at project Entry
Proposed sidewalk width � �� i g�l Sidewa�k on east and west sides of property.
S
c. Provide site data and setbacks:
�Lot wverage � Impervious area � Open space area
— ----�---- — ---�----
�A«� �_�� 25,038 sf 27,980 sf I 34,993 sf__
PEI�ENT(%)OF SITE ; 34.9% ��� 36% � 45°l0
� Fro�t j Side ' Side � Resr
` -�----_—_-----+.- -- G
Primarystruclure � i 21'7"(tower) i 20'1"(tower) 20'1"tower �132'13/8"tower
-----T—
ACtessory structure ' � Y � � �� � �� i 6arova•exbti
NA � 14 3 10 0 � � �re•��
d. Plans and location for recreation facilities,if any,including buildings and strudures for such use.
e. All mechanical equipment and dumpster locations,screens and buffers.
f. Refuse collection and service areas.
g. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups and location of all fire hydrants close enough for
fire protection.
h. Plans for signage including size, location and arientation.
i. Project information on beds, employees, seating, etc. as necessary depending upon the type of
development.
j. Exterior lighting of all buildings, parking areas and the overall site,addressing glare,traffic safety,
economic effect and compatibility and harmony with adjacent properties.
k. Proposed topographic considerations including natural vegetation,berms, retaining walls, privacy
walls,and fences.
(2► Required floodplain management data:
a. Flood zone designation
b. Base flood elevation
c. Coastal high hazard design considerations
ENGINEERING PLANS
(1) Proposed access (ingress/egress) to project, drive aisles, driveways, streets and sidewalks with
dimensions and turn radii for internal and external vehicular traffic.
(2) Proposed traffic control signs.
(3) Preliminary storm drainage and sanitary sewage plans or statements. If the viUage determines that the
drainage and/or sewage plans require independent review,the applicant shall pay for such review by
an independent engineer.
(4) Plans for the extraction of fill and minerel resources and alterations or modifications to the slope,
elevation,drainage pattern,natural vegetation and accessibility of the development.
(5) A comprehensive traffic study, provided by an engineering firm. The study shall be paid for by the
applicant and shall include but not be limited to the following:
a. Future right-of-way dedications.
b. Intersedion improvements.
c. Traffic control devices.
d. Traffic generation analysis.
e. Distribution and assignment of t�affic access.
f. Additional roadway needs.
6
g. Traffic safety standards, including the separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
h. Compliance with Palm Beach County Performance Standards Ordinance.
LANDSCAPE PLANS
(1) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and
showing provisions for irrigation systems. Plans shall also provide delineatbn of existing trees and
information as to which trees will be reused or removed. Landscaping plans shall compiy with section
78-4�. In addition, landscaping plans shall include irrigation plans in accordance with section 78-398,
and shall demonstrate compliance with Florida Friendly Landscaping design standards as required by
section 78-394,as applicable(See sedion 78-392 for applicability).
(2) Plans shall provide clear sight lines.
(3) Location of light poles.
(4) Provide landscape plan data:
� Required � Provided
Number of trees(indudir�percent native) —r o � —{� ��
E 52 (50Io native) � 69 (42 native)
-----T-- —+-------- --
Number of shrubs(including perceM native) i
733 shrubs i 1,481 shrubs(1,360 native)
AmouM of groundcover(induding perixnt �--A � —� `���
naii,►e) i 1,223 groundcovers� �,223 groundcovers
i
— �--_---------------� -----
Total percent of native vegetation ; o
� 50/o �s,w T��B ssx sn�,���e�.
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
(1) Architectural elevations and color renderings for buildings in the development, and exact number of
units,square footage and types,together with typical floor plans of each type.
(2j Type of construction of a!I buildings per Florida Building Code.
(3) Color finishes and material examples and/or samples for all structures including roof, walls, trim,
pavers,etc.
ADDI170NAL REQUIREMENTS
(1) Environmental impad study/assessment. All proposed new development and major redevelopment, as
part of the site plan review and subdivision review process, shall submit a environmental statement
describing how the proposed development will affect the estuarine water quality of the class III waters
of the village, and also an environmental impact assessment study prepared by a qualified ecologist or
other professianal qualified to do such an assessment. The study shall meet the requirements Ch. 50
Article II,pertaining to environmentaily sensitive(ands.
(2) Notification of neighboring jurisdictions of any external impacts that a proposed project might have
within those jurisdictions and assessment and mitigation of those impacts shall be required.
(5) If common facilities (such as recreation areas or structures, common open space, etc.) are to be
provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and
permanently maintained. Such statements may take the form of proposed deed restrictions, deeds of
trust,surety arrangements,or other legal instruments providing adequate guarantee to the village that
such common facilities will not become a future liability for the village.
(6) If development is to occur in phases, those phases should be clearly delineated on the site plan and
identified in the plans and requirements appurtenant to that site plan, and each development phase
shall be subject to site plan review by the village.
7
(7) The substance of covenants, grants of easements or other restrictions proposed to be imposed upon
the use of the land, buildings and structures, including proposed easements or grants for public utilities,
if applicable.
(8) A statement that the development/redevelopment will provide the necessary infrastructure to meet
the following level of service standards pursuant to the criteria outlined in Sec. 78-331(ht:
a. Traffic(roads and rights-of-way)
b. Sanitary sewer
c. Drainage
d. Potable water
e. Recreation
f. Fire flow requirements
g. Pedestrian walkways
(9) A statement from the applicant or landowner that all pertinent permits are concurrently being sought
from the applicable county, state, and federal agencies listed below. Include a copy of the
letter/document with the application. Such permits shall be secured prior to the issuance af a building
permit for any deve{opment on property included within the site plan.
a. Palm Beach County Health Department
b. Palm Beach County School Distrid
c. Tequesta Fire-Rescue Department(Fire Marshal)
d. Loxahatchee River Environmental Control Distrid(ENCON)
e. Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources
Management(DERMj
f. South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)
g. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
h. Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County(MPO)
i. Palm Beach Traffic Engi�eering Division
j. Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization
k. Martin County Traffic engineering Department
I. Florida Power&light
m. Telephone seroice provider, as applicable
n. Solid Waste purveyor
o. Tequesta Water Department
p. Other municipal, county,state and/or federal agencies as may
be applicable.
8
PCN Numbers for Units at 1500 Beach Road, Tequesta FL
60434030130001010
60434030130001020
60434030130001030
6Q434030130001040
60434030130001050
60434030130002010
60434030130002020
60434030130002030
60434030130002040
60434030130002040
60434030130002040
60434030130002040
60434030130002050
PCN Numbers for 1550 Beach Road
60-43-40-30-21-001-0000
TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
January 9,2018
V i I lage of Tequesta
Community Development Department
345 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta FL, 33469
RE: Blowing Racks Candominium
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is to serve as permission for Gentile Glas Holloway 0'Mahoney& Associates,
Inc. to act as the agent to prepare and submit all documentation regardin� a preliminary
master site plan, a final site plan and attend ail meetings for such reasons that pertain to
the referenced condominium project, as it specificaily reiates to the land development
approvals process.
TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD,LLC,a
Delaware limited liability company
gY: �'�.,, �s/�--�
Name: Mario Romine
Its: Authorized Siener
STATE OF �LORIDA .�—�J
COUNTY OF . WI�Q�'��� �G�-- �
r�
1 hereby certify on the ��day of,y��'�,,: 2018, N�,vtO A. ��onally
appeared before me and produced identiFcntion, or i�rsonally known to me, to be the
persan described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal in the slate and county,the day and year aforesaid.
� :�• BONNEY ROSA5
Notary _� � Cr.r:�m�ssion M Ff fl595�e
My Coo�mi�siOn Exp��rs
�"'mti„„,'.��� FebruCry 10. 2020
Commission Expires: Z�lv�
f1/1
Landscape Architects � Planners Environmental Consultants
GENTILE GLAS HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY&As�c�ates,��c. `':�"�:o:N��i„a:;:�;
Fmilv.�t.U'�lahnnev�`.[i
I).xli Iturkm.�<Mr[�I.is i;c�
BLOWING ROCKS CONDOMINIUMS
'I�'v' 00 BEACH ROAD
TEQUE3TA, FLORIDA
SITE PLAN REYIEVY
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
MARCH 16, 2018
REYISED SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Introduction/Request:
On behalf of the Owner, Turnberry Beach Road, LLC, Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney &
Associates, Inc. respectfully requests review and approval concerning the properties located at 1500
and 1550 Beach Road, in the Village of Tequesta. The subject proposal will bring a unique one of
kind design (inspired bv internationallv known design architect Carlos Zapata) into the Village
of Tequesta, which will be marveled for years to come. The Owner's overall development program
consists of the following:
1. Replat to combine both parcels;
2. Small scale comprehensive plan map amendment from Residential Low Density to Residential
Medium Density for the North Parcel; 1550 Beach Road (approved by Village Council on
September 13, 2018);
3. Site plan for an infill redevelopment consisting of 21 multi-family, condominium units, and
amenities area located on f1.78 acres. (Note, the amenity area will use most of the existing
amenities on the existing 1500 Beach Road parcel).
4. Variance Request regarding stormwater management facility systems (approved by �llage
Council on September 13, 2018).
Note, this Narrative ONLY addresses Site Plan Review portion of the applicant's proposal.
About The Owner:
Turnberry has a world renowned reputation in transforming ordinary into extraordinary. For more
than 50 years, the owners have continually imagined and realized what many can only dream. From
buildings, to cities, to world-class entertainment and hospitality experiences, Turnberry has always
had the unrelenting vision to go above and beyond. The owners are committed to cultivate culture and
build communities; while being driven by their beliefs which are quality, integrity, and family. It is
with this mindset that they intend to deliver an exceptional product to the Village of Tequesta.
They have partnered with Perko Development Partners,Phillip Perko,a Jupiter resident who has more
than 20 years of experience delivering quality residential projects. His knowledge of the local
communities in the northern end of Palm Beach County and his twenty years of experience with the
Turnberry brand makes for an exceptional development team to bring the proposed project to reality.
Conceptual Presentation:
On February 8,2018,at the request of Village staff,Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney&Associates,
Inc.presented the applicant's proposal for Blowing Rocks Condominiums to the Village Council. The
feedback received was positive. As such, the project team has finalized the drawings and documents
� 1907 Commerce Lane,Suite 101 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-575-955i 561-.575-5260 Fax www.2gho.com
Blowing Rocks Condominiums
Tequesta,Florida
Site Plan Review
March 16,2018
rev September 24,2018
to technical standards and with this submittal, starts the process of bringing the Village of Tequesta a
highly desired,thoughtfully designed, infill redevelopment project.
Compatibility with Surrounding Properties:
The subject properties are uniquely situated on Beach Road, bordered on the east and west by the
Atlantic Ocean, and Intracoastal Waterway respectively, and by Coral Cove Park to the north and
south. With this location, it allows the owner and design team a mechanism to truly design around
nature. Below is a chart showing the surrounding Land Use and Zoning. As previously mentioned,the
land use map amendment to residential medium density will increase the compatibility between the
two properties.
Subject Properties Residential Low R-3 Multifamily Residential
Existing Residential Densities/Medium Density
Residential
North Recreation R-OP- Public Ownership
Coral Cove Park
South Recreation RH Multifamily Residential
Coral Cove Park Hi h Densit
East N/A N/A
Atlantic Ocean
West N/A N/A
Intracoastal Waterw
Project Justification:
Over the last few years, the owner has diligently researched the housing market in the Village of
Tequesta, and has determined that the current market trends are excellent to offer a well-designed
"infill" redevelopment project that provides a modest impact to growth and services in the area. The
proposed infill development will not have significant traffic impacts on the sunounding roadway
network, and will bring an increase to the taxes and values of both parcels. Further, the project will
have no impact to the existing surrounding land uses. As Tequesta continues to distinguish itself as a
premier destination in northern Palm Beach County for locals and visitors alike,the applicant is excited
to bring this project for consideration by the Village Council's for approval.
SITE PLAN REVIEW:
Section 78-331 states that all permitted uses, development and redevelopment activities are required
to go through the Site Plan Review process. The submitted application package contains all necessary
documents as stipulated in the development application and zoning code. The project scope is
consistent with Section 78-175(a) of the Village's zoning code as it provides lands within the Village
of Tequesta for a higher density range of multi-family residential uses.
Project Overview:
The vision behind the proposal is to infuse the surrounding elements of nature to create a tropical
modern nautical-themed structure that �ows from the ground up that will take advantage of the
unmatched views of air and light. The proposed project consists of 21 units with enclosed private
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-0513\Applicadons\Site Plan 2018\Submittals\Sch Subrzuttal\Site Plan Review Jusuficauon 9.19.18.Docx
Blowing Rocks Condominiums
Tequesta,Florida
Site Plan Review
March 16, 2018
rev September 24,2018
garage space. Each units will feature floor to ceiling glass and are surrounded by expansive balconies,
and has been designed to pay respect to the neighboring units.
The owner and design team have continuously worked together through the conceptual phase,and will
now demonstrate how each of the following site elements are incorporated into this dynamic infill
project.
Drainage:
Beach Road does not have a formal stormwater conveyance or stormwater management system.
Stormwater runoff from Beach Road sheet flows off the roadway onto the adjacent properties. There
is a culvert system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage and this system allows
surface water runoff north of the project site along Beach Road and stormwater runoff from this site
to discharge south into the undeveloped state-owned land south of the project site.
There are no existing water quality treatment facilities located on-site.
The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the South
Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre-development
conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater runoff prior to
discharge. Legal positive outfall will occur west into Beach Road and ultimately to the undeveloped
property to the south via bubble up structures or a hard pipe connection to the drainage system on
Beach Road.
Please see submitted Drainage Statement for additional information. Additionally, as previously
mentioned,the applicant has applied for and received a variance for stormwater management facilities
systems, which was approved on September 13, 2018 by the Village Council.
Traffic:
As this is a residential infill redevelopment project, the proposed project will generate fewer than 20
peak hour trips, and as such a traffic, study is not required. It is anticipated that the proposed project
will have an insignificant impact on the surrounding roadways, and will be in compliance with Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. Please refer to the Traffic Report prepared by PTC
Transportation Consultants, Inc. for additional information.
Traffic Report prepared by PTC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Landscaping:
Since 1985, Raymond Jungles, Inc. (RJI), under the leadership of Raymond Jungles, has developed a
dynamic practice inspired by the ethic of stewardship of the land. The firm's work is innovative yet
timeless, proposing design solutions that respond to surrounding natural systems while restoring
nature's balance and harmony on a micro-scale. RJI's completed gardens personify timelessness and
beauty,with verdant spaces that entice participation and soothe the psyche.
The landscape design intent is to provide a lush tropical oceanfront setting for the intended residents
to enjoy the various amenities provided for them. The intent is to provide the living and play
experience in a more residential scale than typically found in a condominium project.
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Tumberry 17-0513\Applications\Site Plan 2018\Submittals\Sth Submittal\S�te Plan Rev�ew Jusuficauon 9.19.18.Docx
Blowing Rocks Condominiums
Tequesta, Florida
Site Plan Review
March 16, 2018
rev September 24,2018
The owner's plan on accomplishing this is by providing a picketed sculptural entrance gate opening
onto a palm lined motor court with a water feature as the focal point. The motor court driveway will
feature large coral rubble flagstone pavers. All access walkways will have a coral stone finish. The
motor court area will feature a water wall and wire trellises that will screen the garage wall.
The ocean frontage will feature a renovated pool cabana building with a pool terrace on the south side
and a fire pit/social terrace and private beach on the north side. The pool terrace will feature a zero
edge swimming lap pool with an `infinity' edge on the east side to capture the reflected ocean views
beyond. The swimming pool will be framed by chaise day beds. The fire pit and social terraces will
feature a sculptural bench and social seating in close proximity to the pool terrace's water feature. The
private beach will allow residents to enjoy the oceans views from the seating areas provided. These
areas will be surrounded by coconut palm groupings. The garden shrub and groundcover beds will be
wind and salt tolerant and will blend in with the restored dune vegetation.
The above landscape will be provided within the confines of the Village of Tequesta's landscape
provisions.
Architectural Design and Influence:
The Owner is proposing to redevelop Blowing Rocks condominiums as a multi-family residential
structure consisting of 21 residential units, for a total of 151,552 square feet of A/C saleable area
(inclusive of the units, terraces penthouse roof and private cabana building). Twenty-one enclosed
private garage spaces will be provided for the main tower which is proposed to have an overall gross
area of 210,028 square feet. A generous 10,500 square feet of outdoor amenity space will be provided
for the end user to aid in creating a sense of place. The main building draws its inspiration from its
spectacular site located at 1500-1550 Beach Road in the Village of Tequesta in Palm Beach County.
As mentioned elsewhere in this narrative,the site, a two parcel assembly(lots# 1500 Beach Road and
lot# 1550 Beach Road), is surrounded by the Atlantic Ocean to the east, the Intracoastal Waterway to
the west,Coral Cove Park to the north and Coral Cove Park to the south. It is a site surrounded entirely
by nature with no other structures in the immediate surroundings. The main structure is positioned to
follow the geometry of the site, stretching from east to west, with 13 units facing north, east and west,
7 units facing south, east and west, and a spectacular full floor penthouse of over 9, 500 square feet.
The building leans gently to the east, responding to the receding movement of the ocean waves,
providing an elegant nautical presence. Both the base and the building are tapered at the south west
side of the site to allow for the lush landscaped car courtyard that gives access to the private parking
areas, and to the ground floor lobby from which the residents start their upwards journey to their
residences. The landscaped courtyard is populated by native plants that transition visually into Coral
Park south, creating a continuous green canopy that ties the modern nautical glass structure with the
lush green site.
The residences are enclosed with floor to ceiling glass and surrounded by expanding balconies that
shift gently from west to east as they ascend, creating a water ripple effect. The balconies slice the
building horizontally,articulating the diagonal nautical movement of the main structure and grounding
it to its site.
N:\Blowinp,Rock-Condorrurnums Turnbeiry 17-0513\Applicauons\Site Plan 2018\Submittals\Sth Submittal\Site Plan Review Jusaficauon 9.19.18.Docx
Blowing Rocks Condominiums
Tequesta, Florida
Site Plan Review
March 16, 2018
rev September 24,2018
The result is a dynamic structure that incorporates itself into the existing landscape of nature.
Site Plan Considerations
The owner would like to stress that the proposed redevelopment project is not a detriment to the
community and aims to provide the Village of Tequesta with a valuable asset for years to come. The
propose developments provides for the following:
l. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Village of Tequesta's Comprehensive
Plan;
2. Consistency with applicable countywide land development regulations. The applicant will be
submitting a School Concunency Application, in addition to a traffic study to the appropriate Palm
Beach County agencies for their review. Additionally, through the review process the applicant
will seek permits from the other jurisdictional agencies.
3. Designed to comply with all of the applicable provisions set forth in the Village of Tequesta zoning
code. Where the project doesn't comply, a variance has been requested(and approved) for relief;
4. Compatible with the existing character of the area. As the site is surrounded by nature on all sides,
the proposed property will not be a deterrent to the surrounding areas;
5. Insignificant impact on traffic, as shown on the submitted traffic statement prepared by PTC
consultants;
6. Use of the existing facilities/infrastructure on site, holding to the true essence of infill
redevelopment. Prior to this submittal, we have requested confirmation of availability of service
letters from the applicable utility and service provider agencies in the area•,
7. Will not reduce light and air to the adjacent properties;
8. Expected increase in property values in the adjacent areas, and stimulation of the Village of
Tequesta's tax base;
9. Will not create any noise or visual pollution to the adjacent areas;
10. Will work in synergy with the surrounding parks and water, and will not have a negative impact
on the adjacent natural systems or public facilities;
11. A development which will include approximately 4,500 square feet of indoor amenities and 10,500
square feet of outdoor amenities.
12. The proposed redevelopment will provide the necessary infrastructure to meet the following level
of standards pursuant to the criteria outlined in Sec. 78-331(h).
Conclusion:
To recap, the applicant, who is responsible for building several high end products domesticaily, and
internationally, are proposing; 1) a replat to combine two parcels; 2) small scale comprehensive plan
map amendment from Residential Low Density to Residential Medium Density(approved September
13, 2018); 3) Site plan for an infill redevelopment consisting of 21 multi-family, condominium units,
and amenities located on f 1.78 acres. 4) Variance Request regarding Stormwater Management
Facilities (approved September 13, 2018 by Village Council); Note, the other portions of the
applicant's proposal have been submitted under separate cover.
The owners have been extremely diligent in working with Village staff, and the design team; even
being considerate enough to use local consultant's familiar with the area to ensure that the final product
is sensitive and respectful to the existing community. This narrative has demonstrated that the proposal
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnbezry 17-0513\Applicauons\Site Plan 2018\Submittals\Sth Submmal\Site Ptan Review Jusdficadon 9.19.18.Docx
Blowing Rocks Condominiums
Tequesta,Florida
Site Plan Review
March 16,2018
rev September 24,2018
is consistent with particular elements of the Village Comprehensive Plan, and will not be a detriment
to any goals, objectives, and policies. Additionally, the submitted site plan shows compliance with
the R-3 zoning district, and other portions of the code, and where it isn't,justification for relief has
been requested.
With the approval of this dynamic project, Tequesta will further their mission in establishing itself as
premier destination in northern Palm Beach County,and with that,Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney
&Associates, Inc.,respectfully request review and approval of the submitted application package.The
project team at Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney& Associates, Inc. consists of George G. Gentile,
PLA, Patricia Lentini, and Alec Dickerson.
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Tumberry 17-0513\Applicadons\Site Plan 2018\Submittals\Sth Submittal\Site Plan Review Jusuficaaon 9.19.18.Docx
. ���
��� � ��dscape,arciitects P!anners �rv�ronmenta�C�nsultants i.r,vex�i;,
GEfv Tl LE GLAS HOLLOWAY O'MAHON EY�n�w����,Inc. George G.Gen61e u+U
M.Iroy Holloway ASU
Emilv M.O'Mahonev�A41�
,.,, g ,�;�� ,
August 29, 2018
Nilsa Zacarias
Village of Tequesta
345 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta, FL 33469
RE: Blowing Rocks; SPR 1-18
Dear Ms. Zacarias:
Pursuant to comments received from staff on August 5, 2018 based on a submittal of July
12, 2018 please accept this letter as a written response. Also, included with this letter are the
revised plans, which address the comrnents where applicable. For your convenience we
have prepared our responses in bo/d italics. Additionally, as this staff report keeps a running
list of comments made throughout the site plan review process, we have highlighted the
comments that have been satisfied, as stated by the applicable DRC reviewer.
Future Land Use Map Amendment Application Comments — All the followins�
comments were ADDRESSED.
1. Change title from "Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment"to Future Land Use(FLU) Map
Amendment. SAT/SFIED
2. Provide current FLU map and proposed FLU map of both parcels. SAFISFIED
3. Provide zoning map of both parcels. SATISF/ED
4. Include on Justification Statement that both parcels have R-3 zoning designation.
SATISFIED
Variance Application Comments — All the followinq comments were ADDRESSED
1. Justification Statement indicates that proposed development is consistent with the
Village's Comprehensive Plan. Please note that currently one parcel requires FLU map
amendment; so, the proposed development as proposed is not consistent with FLU map
designation. SATISFlED
2. Based on the site plan review comments additional variances will be required unless
proposed development complies with Village code. The applicant reviewed the site plan
and only one variance is proposed at this time,
a. Provide evidence of site hardship and data regarding other developments in the
same area that are not in compliance with Code (since the application is indicating
this). SATISFIED
b. See review letter of Spencer Schraeder, P.E. from Mock Roos. SATISFIED
Blowing Rvcks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 2 of;4
Site Plan Review Comments —Zoninq
1 . Provide full size drawings �n scale. Architectural drawings indicate scale 1"=20', this is
not accurate. PROVIDED
2. Revise all other plans/drawings affected by revisions to Site Plan. PROV/DED
1. Select address for proposed development. Currently, development has two (2)
addresses. PROV/DED
2. Provide color chips and sample material of all exterior finishes including buildings and
hardscape. Exterior finishes include monument sign: PROVIDE FINISHES- outstanding
with regard to entry monument sign. What color are the metal letters? What font are the
letters? Provide logo information: material and color. Will this entry sign be illuminated?
Provide information.
Response: The proposed monument sign wil! have a marble veneer with a light
wood grain texfure (samp/e provided). The 3" and 8" raised bronze letters (font:
book antiqua) wilt be pinned to the sign wal/. Project logo, if any, is undetermined
at this time. The sign wilJ be illuminated by an FWC approved ground flood light.
3. Relocate entry monument sign to provide 10 ft. setback. Now is encroaching the front
setback.
Response: Entry sign relocated outside of 1 U'front setback.
4. Provide landscaping on base of entry monument sign.
Response: Ground cover provided at base of entrance sign.
5. Adjust entry monument sign dimensions to 30 sq. ft. Now is 36 sq. ft.
Response: Sign has been redesigned to be a maximum of 30 sq. ft. (3'-3"in height
x 9'in length).
6. Add setback dimension to the ramp located on the north west area fordumpsters removal.
Response: Dimension added.
7. Provide sign wall drawing. LH-1 Hardscape Plan indicates sign wall at the entrance.
SATISF/ED
8. Provide color elevation of building and entrance wall fence including green wall and gates.
SATISFIED
9. Provide setback dimensions to ALL structures including accessory structures and
swimming pool.
SATISFIED
10.Remove shadescape umbrellas on side setbacks.
SA TISFIED
11_Provide loading and dumpster area. Clarify trash removal from property
SATISFIED
N:161owing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131Applications\Site Plan 20181Agency Correspondence\Blowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
` Biowing Rocks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 3 of 14
12.With rega�d to proposed marina: provide DEP approval, demonstrate compliance with
Code Section 76-20; provide utility services. The applicant indicates that DEP approval is
in process. The Special Exception Use cannot be reviewed without DEP and Army Corps
approvals. Also, see review comment letter of Spencer Schroeder from Mock Roos.
Response: Comment previously acknow/edged.
_ .- ------ —
R-3 Zoning REQUIRED BY CODE PROPOSED COMMENTS
District
--�------ --
Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. for the first 77, 366 sf(1.776 ' !N COMPLIANCE
Lot Size multifamily dwelling unit, plus acres)
3,356 sq. ft. for each 21 dwelling units
additional dwelling unit to a ,
maximum of 12 dwelling units
per acre.
� —__ _-- --- .---
Minimum 80 ft. Provide overall sife Provide overall
Lot Width 200 ft.* dimensions on site site dimensions
* Minimum buildable lot depth plan: width and on sife p/an: width
� cannot include submerged length and/engfh.
', lands, conservation easement SATlSFIED
areas, protected wetlands,
mangrove stands or similar ;
protected areas. Accessory �
structures, not exceeding one I,
story/ten feet in height, may
be constructed on lots with
less than the minimum lot
depth. See the definition for lot I
depth in section 78-4 for ,
additional requirements. _ �_ _
._ _ - -_ , —___ _
Front Yard Main Structure: 20 ft. 20 TIN COMPUANCE
Accessory: 0 ft. for an ' !
accessory structure not
exceeding one story110 ft. in
height used for the parking of
vehicles only(covered
parking) and provided that the i
design of the front of the �
covered parking structure
includes fully landscaped
, grade and/or raised planters
�' that provide a minimum of 10
ft. of landscaped width along
the full frontage of the covered
; parkin�_structure.
N:IBlowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-0513WpplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency Correspondence161owing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Btowing Rocks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 4 cf 14
' Rear Yard Main Structure: 20 ft. plus 2 Not provided. Provide setback
ft. for each additional 10 ft. or dimensions to
portion thereof over SO ft. in Main and
height of the main building or Accessory
structure. structures.
Accessory:10 ft. for any
accessory one-story PROVIDED !
building or structure. Plus 2 ft.
for each additional story of the '
accessory building or ;
structure.
. . _ ---- --__— - --
Side Yard - Main Structure: " ' .
North 20 ft. plus 2 ft. for each E��aQe-a�e IN COMPL/ANCE
additional 10 ft. or portion easFea�i+ag-e��9
! thereof over 50 ft. in height of #:
� the main building or structure. �lpqlis�a�
�r� �eqaes�ed
; Accessory: 10 ft. for any . �
' accessory one-story building tN COMPL/ANCE
or structure. Plus 2 ft. for each ��e+�k►
additional story of the ' .
Iaccessory building or IN COMPLIANCE
structu re. eflsfeasMir�g-ec�
i s�e�:
Side Yard - Main Structure: 20 ft. plus 2 '',� Not in compliance.
South , ft. for each addifiona! 10 ft. or 6araQe�e ' lN COMPUANCF
! portion thereof over 50 ft. in easfeasqf�-e�� A�is.a�
height of the main building or #� feq�es�e.d
' structure. ' �afiar�s�-/N
i '� COMPL/ANCE
�, Accessory: 10 ft. for any
accessory one-story building Two (2) staircases .
or structure. Plus 2 ft. for each and �a�p-efl IN COMPUANCE
additional story of the set�asl�-9'-9'-' ',
accessory building or ''
structure. One staircase is still .
- - - _. _ _ ___ _
on setback. CLARIFIED
Lot Max 35%
Coverage ' ►�e�-�i+�sl+�e-greer� ��e€�n�ie�
, �ee�a���� .
' 34.9% 1 N COMPLIANCE
I Breakdown sq. ft.
Green roof, canopy,
building footprint
. __ - -- -- - --- .
Building i 9 9 stories✓109 ft. measured 116'6" Indicate in
Hei�ht _ j from the averape height of the � drawin A3.01
N:1Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-0513Wpplications\Site Plan 20181Agency CorrespondencelBlowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
� Blowing Rocks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 5 of 14
crest of the sand dune line. for ge ' height according
main buildinq or strucfure east ' ' ' i to code (STILL
of Beach Road. and measured ! w+�q-�ei� ! MISSING)
from grade west of Beach Penthouse was �
Road 4.2 stories/20 ft. for any , removed. �I .
accessory building or IN COMPLlANCE.
structure.
-- ;I----- - _ .
Parking Sec. 78-705 (8): � 45 spaces (4 Number of parking
c. Multiple-family: Two ' exterior, 42 garage) spaces in
spaces per dwelling unit. compliance.
REQUIRED: 42 spaces
' Provide
dimensions IN
��
COMPLIANCE.
� ADA: (1 exterior ADA Compliance is
and 2 interior) reviewed by Traffic
Engineer and
' _ Buildin� Official.
_-----_—� —
Landscape , Min 30% �a�#y-� (2) See definition '
Open ' of Open Space
Space ; �8�-�p�
�� .
Clarify how ! A VARIANCE
applicant provides �j MIGHT BE
64% NEEDED.
___ _ _ _ _ _ __---- ---- - .
PROVIDED 45% lN COMPLIANCE.
Sidewalks Per Sec. 78-331 (h)(7): Provide width of i Provide width of
;' Pedestrian walkways must be concrete walk ' sidewalk on east
a minimum of 5 ft wide, No Sidewalk on � side.
parallel to roadways and a min West side. IN COMPL/ANCE
of 4' from edge of roadway.
Provide sidewalk
on west side.
� STILL MISSING.
I
! PROVIDED.
PROVlDED
N:IBlowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-0513�ApplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency Correspondence\Blowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
� 8/owrng Rocks Response Zefter
Augusf 29, 2018
Page 6 of;4
Site Plan (A0.02a) Drawing Comments
Revise site data to include correct information:
1. Revise lot coverage calculation per following Village Code definition: Sec.78-4. -
Definitions. "Lot coverage means that portion of the area of a /ot, plot, or building site,
expressed as a percentage, occupied by a!I buildings or structures which are roofed or
are otherwise covered, exclusive of its eaves, and any portion of such building covered
by a roof which qualifies as open space or any covered terrace, ba/cony, breezeway or
porch or portion thereof not included in the floor area of a building shall be included in /ot
coverage. For example, a lot confaining 10,000 square feet has principal and accessory
buildings planned or existing whose ground -floor area (footprint) is 2,500 square feet;
thus lot coverage is 25 percent. Unscreened patios or swimming pools shall not be
considered in computing/ot coverage. Screened-in pools or patios shall be considered in
computing lof coverage, but shall be computed as only 50 percent of their actual
coverage."— SAT/SFIED
2. Provide open space calculation per follow Village Code definition: Sec. 78-4 —
Definitions: "Open space means fhaf parf of a /ot, including courts or yards, which is
open and unobstructed and is available for entry and use from its lowest level to the sky,
and is availab/e for entry and use by the occupants of the buildings on the premises and
may include space located and treated to enhance the amenity of the developmenf by
providing /andscaping and/or screening for fhe benefit of the occupants or neighboring
areas. Open space may rnclude water surfaces that comprise not more than fen percent
of tota! open space; however, required parking shall not be computed as required open
space."— SATlSF/ED
3. Revise proposed building height data. Still missing. Penthouse Lounge is not up to code.
Penthouse was removed. PROVIDED.
Site Plan Review — Division 2 Comments
Sec. 78-331. - Required; development standards; required facilities and infrastructure.
By the terms of this chapter, all permitted uses in all zoning districts except R-IA and R-1, all
special exception uses as approved by the village council, all planned residential
development (PRO), planned commercial development (PCD), and planned mixed-use
development (PMUD), all miscellaneous development and redevelopment, all subdivisions,
and all uses or construction lying partially or entirely in special flood hazard areas shall
comply with the following:
a) Site plan review is required. SPR APPLICATION UNDER REVIEW
b) Conceptual review of the overall development, if phased, is required.
c) The development shall conform to all minimum requirements of this chapter and any
other applicable laws and regulations. SPR APPLICATION UNDER REVIEW
d) The development shall be compatible with the intent of the zoning district wherein it is
proposed to be located and compatible with adjacent land uses.
N:161owing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 2018�Agency CorrespondencelBlowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
8/owing Rocks Response Lefter
August 29, 2018
Page 7 of 14
e) No building permit shall be issued for the purpose of erecting any structure or building,
or for structural alterations in any existing structure or building, until after the planning
and zoning advisory board has reviewed and made recommendations to the village
council, and the village council shall have finally approved the site plan in accordance
with this section. However, for the items specified in section 22-53(b), the planning
and zoning advisory board has final approval authority, and those items do not require
further approval by the village council. SPR APPLICATION IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW. NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL VILLAGE COUNCIL
APPROVAL IS OBTAINED.
f) No building permits or development orders shall be issued unless public facilities and
services which meet or exceed the adopted level of service standards are available
concurrent with the develapment impacts. Compliance with this requirement may be
accomplished through one or more or a combination of the following processes:
1) Installation of all required public facilities/infrastructure/services prior to or
concurrent with the development impacts. SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN URBAN
SERVICE AREA OF VILLAGE 8� HAS ALL MUNICIPAL SERVCIES AVAILABLE
2) Phasing of all required public facilities/infrastructure/services:
a) By local government (capital improvements element).
b) By the developer(development agreements).
3) Phasing of the development. THE APPLICANT DID NOT RESPONSE TO THIS
ITEM. PROV/DED
g) All proposed development and or redevelopment shall be coordinated with and/or
obtain approvals and/or permits from the following agencies:
1) Palm Beach County Health Department. PROVIDE LETTER—
Applicant provided sfatement.
2) Tequesta Fire-Rescue Department (Fire Marshal). PR�VIDE LETTER —
Applicant provided stafement.
3) Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District(ENCON). PROVIDE LETTER-
PROVIDED.
4) Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Applicant:
PROVIDE LETTER OR STATEMENT—CLARIFY FOR MARlNA APPLICATION.
Response: Please note, the applicant will submif an application for the
marina after the current applicafion receives site plan approval. The permits
that are required for the marina are in the process of being requested, and
the current application wi!l not impact the FDEP approvals process af this
time.
5) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). PROVIDE LETTER —
Applicant arovided statement.
N:161owing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency Correspondence161owing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
� 8/owing Rocks Response Letter
Augusf 29, 2018
Page 8 of 14
6) Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). PROVIDE LETTER. SEE TRAFFIC
ENGINEER REVIEW COMMENT.
7) Reserved.
8) Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County (MP4)._. N/A
9) Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division. TPS LETTER WAS RECEIVE'D
FROM PBC.
10)Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization. N/A
11)Martin County Traffic Engineering Department. N/A
12)Florida Power& Light Company_ PROVIDE LETTER- PROVlDED.
13)Telephone service provider, as applicable. PROVIDE LETTER- PROV/DED
14)Solid waste purveyor. PROVIDE LETTER- PROVIDED.
15)Tequesta Water Department. PROVIDE LETTER—
Applicant provided stafemenf.
16)Other municipal, county, state and/or federal agencies as may be applicable.
Evidence of final acceptance of the development or redevelopment project by
agencies listed in this subsection must be submitted to the village prior to review
by the village council pursuant to section 78-334(d).
h} All new development and/or redevelopment must provide the necessary infrastructure
to meet the following level of service standards. Each application submitted pursuant
to this section shall be required to provide a certification from a licensed engineer in
the state that the proposed development and/or redevelopment meets or exceeds the
level of service standards for the listed infrastructure as follows:
1) Traffic (roads and rights-of-way). TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT TRAFFIC
STATEMENT
__
Roadway�pe ; (LOS) Standard (LO�Peak _ ''
' Collectar*—� C D, *Except Country Club Drive and
; Seabrook Road which are C
Urban minor arterials C � D
_ . ___ �--____ _ __---- _
_-- - - _ ---
Principal arterials C � � D
2) Sanitary Sewer. A central wastewater level of service standard of 108 gallons per
capita per day is hereby adopted, and shall be used as the basis of estimating the
N:1Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 2018Wgency Correspondence\Blowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Blowing Rocks Respanse Letfer
Augusf 29, 2018
Page 9 of 14
availability of capacity and demand generated by a proposed development project.
PROVIDE STATEMENT. Applicant provided statement
3) Drainage. A public drainage facilities level of service standard of a 25-year
frequency, 24-hour duration storm event is hereby adopted, and shall ba used as
the basis of estimating the availability of capacity and demand generated by a
proposed development project. As a general drainage requirement, each
proposed project and/or site must maintain 95 percent of all stormwater runoff
on-site. PROVIDE STATEMENT. APPLICANT IS REQUFSTlNG VAR/ANCE.
4) Potable water. The following potable water level of service standards are hereby
adopted and shall be used as the basis for estimating the availability of facility
capacity and demand generated by a proposed development project:
PROV/DE STATEMENT. Applicant provided statement.
a. Average day water consumption rate:
Residential: 175 gallons/capita/day
b. Maximum day water consumpfion (including irrigation)�
Residential: 180 gallons/capita/day
Nonresidential"`: 3,030 gallons/acreJday
5) Recreation leve/of service standards table.
PROVlDE STATEMENT. -ApQlicanf provided statement.
■ I
Area/activity (unit/population� Classification standard
--_ - - -
� --- -- - --
Nei hbofiood arks 2 acres/1,000
�_ �_ p -_ -
Communit park ' 2 acres/1,000
~Beaches 1 mile/31,250
Golf courses 9 holes/30,000
_ ___ _--_______ __--- ----___—
, Tennis 1 court/2,500
----- - ------
Basketball 1 court/2,500
� Baseball/softball I 1 field/7,200 I
�-- -- -- , __ _- -__-.__---- -
Football/soccer I 1 field/4,800 �
- --- -- -------- _ __�- ;
Pla��round areas j 1 acre/3,600 �
Beach access easements 1 per '/� mile of developed or ;
_ __ , redeveloped beach frontage ;
6) Fire f/ow requirements. All development and/or major redevelopment must provide
the necessary infrastructure improvements for fire suppression, including
adequate fire hydrant placement, to meet the development's fire flow requirements
in accordance with NFPA #1, Uniform Fire Code, Florida edition. PROV/DE
STATEMENT.
Response: As discussed with fhe Village of Tequesta City's Life Safety
Consultant, "The proposed building will provide a �re suppression system
and a fire pump (750 GPM) fo meet the NFPA requirements for the structure.
The building's �re flow area wil! be between 912,701 s.f, and 127,000 s.f.
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 2018�Agency CorrespondencelBlowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29_18.docx
� Blowing Rocks Response Lefter
August 29, 2018
Page 10 of 14
Per NFPA Table 18.4.5,1.2 and NFPA 18.4.5.3.2 the building wil! need a �ire
flow rate of(3,750 gpm reduced by 75%) 1,0�4 gpm".
7) Pedestrian walkways. All development and/or major redevelopment must provide
a minimum five-foot wide continuous path of travel for pedestrians (sidewalks).
Sidewalks shall be parallel to all roadway surfaces and be at least four feet from
the edge of the roadway pavement. All sidewalk improvement s shall be installed
and maintained by the adjacent property owner. Location, set back, width and
material shall be approved by the village. PROVIDE COMPLETE SIDEWALK ON
SITE PLAN. The proposed sidewafk is only on east side, provide sidewalk on
the west side. STILL MISSING. APPLICANT PROVIDED SIDEWALK ON THE
WEST SIDE TOO.
i) Reserved.
j) The development shall project for the reservation and preservation of existing and
future rights-of-way as may be determined by the village and in conformance with the
county and village right-of-way protection plan. PROV/DE STATEMENT. PROV/DED.
k) Site plans shall be required which incorporate innovative urban, architectural, and/or
engineering design of impervious areas (e.g., parking lots) to maximize the retention
of rainfall to these areas which will increase the recharge of groundwater while
reducing stormwater runoff. PROVIDE STATEMENT. PROVIDED.
I) All new developments shall be required to limit post-development surface water runoff
rates and volumes to predevelopment conditions.
PROV/DE STATEMENT—APPL/CANT IS APPLYING FOR A VARlANCE.
m) Afl proposed new development and major redevelopment within the coastal building
zone of the village must provide for the dedication of public access easements meeting
the adopted level of service standards. N/A
n) All proposed new development and major redevelopment, as part of the site plan
review and subdivision review process, shall submit a drainage/environmental
statement describing how the proposed development will affect the estuarine water
quality of the class III waters of the village, and also an environmental impact
assessment study prepared by a qualified ecologist or other professionaf qualified to
do such an assessment. The study shall meet the requirements of chapter 50, article
II, pertaining to environmentally sensitive lands.
PROV/DE STATEMENT— PROV/DED.
o) New development and redevelopment shall not be permitted within the coastal high-
hazard area of the village as defined in section 78-832 except in accordance with the
mandates of chapter 78 article X II. PROVIDE STATEMENT — REVIEWED BY THE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
N:1Blowing Rock-Condominiums Tumberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency CorrespondencelBlowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Blowrng Rocks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 11 of 14
p) Notification of neighboring jurisdictions of any external' impacts that a proposed
project might have within those jurisdictions and assessment and mitigation of those
impacts shall be required. PROVIDE STATEMENT. VAR/ANCE AND MAR/NA
SPEC/AL EXCEPTION USE APPLICATION WILL BE NOT1FlED TO
SURROUND/NG RESIDEl1lTS.
q) Determination of needed public facility improvements shall be made during the site
plan and/or subdivision review process and prior to the issuance of a development
order and building peRnit. PROVIDE STATEMENT. Applicant provided statement.
r) Stormwater management facilities including curbs, gutters, piping, culverts, ditches,
etc., shall be provided based on engineering calculations and design standards to
ensure that all drainage improvements are in conformance with chapter 74, article IV.
SPR APPLICATION UNDER REVIEW. APPL/CANT /S APPLY/NG FOR A
VARIANCE.
(Ord. No.42-13, § 9,2-13-2014)
Buildinq Department Review Comments
Mr. Jose Rodriguez, Village of Tequesta Building Official, has no comments at this time
Traffic Enqineerinq Review Comments — Trent Ebersole, P.E. from McMahon
Associates, Inc.
Concurrencv Statement
McMahon agrees that the proposed development is in compliance with the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards, as stated. Applicant provided a copy of Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standard (TFS) approval letter.
Site Plan Review (Traffic and Parking) Comments
1. A gate queuing analysis should be provided based on the methodology outlined in
Transportation and Land Development, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE). Gate analysis should use peak hour of generator trips per ITE.
RESOL VED
2. Provide autotum for vehicle path in the front entryway/Fire and EMS staging area.
RESOLVED
3. Indicate on the site plan which lane is for visitors. If visitors cannot gain access, how do
they turn around? It appears the gate is between the visitor kiosk and the turnaround area
in the driveway. RESOLVED
4. Provide an Engineering Plan for garage level or indicate elevations and slopes inside the
garage on Architectural Plan. RESOLVED
5. Site Data indicates four(4) extra spaces, but only three (3) spaces are labeled on the site
plan. RESOLVED
N:161owing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency Correspondence\Blowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Blowing Rocks Response Leffer
August 29, 2018
Page 12 of 14
6. Site Data indicates one (1) ADA space, which is insufficient for 46 spaces. Is the interior
ADA garage parking included? RESOLVED
7. Indicate the driveway radii on site plan. RESOLVED
New Site Plan Review Comments
8. Improvements such as sidewalk, parallel parking, driveways, etc. within SR 707 right-of-
way will require a FDOT permit. Provide a copy of the FDOT permit, when received.
Applicant acknowledged providing the FDOT permif, once obtained.
Sewer, Drainaqe and Water Review — Spencer M. Schroeder, P.E. from Mock Roos �
Associates.
1. Our previous comment regarding the level of detail in the Conceptual Engineering Plan
and the Drainage Statement has been satisfied with this re-submittal. — SAT/SF/ED
2. Our previous comment regarding utility connections to the proposed marina facility is
withdrawn now that the proposed marina is no longer included in this site plan application.
The requirements will stand with the Phase 2 submittal for the marina. — SATISFIED
3. We take no exception to the findings and analyses presented in the "Existing
Developments Drainage Study." The analyses presented would also appear to be
supported by a search of the SFWMD permitting archives, which indicate that none of the
other developments in the area appear to have ever been issued an ERP for construction
of a surface water management system.
Response: Comment acknowledged.
4. Please provide documentation-through flow test or other means - that the potable water
distribution system is capable of ineeting both now and pressure (minimum pressure at
fire pumps) requirements of the fire flow demand as calculated per NFPA #1 and
referenced in Section "Site Plan Review- Division 2 78-331 {h)(6)"of your response letter.
Response: The attached Tequesta Fire Rescue Fire Hydranf Tesf Reports and
Hydrant Information Sheet with calculated Flow in Ga//ons per Minute (GPM) at 20
PSl indicate that fhe existing system provides approximately 2248 GPM at fhe
project site af 20 PS1. This flow and pressure meets the listed Fire flow demand
referenced in section "Sife Plan Review—Division 2 78-331(h)(6)"of this Response
Letter.
See attached blue mark-u�s from Mr. Tom Jensen. P. E. from Kimlev Horn, on behalf of
the Water Department. The subiect department is requestinq relocation of 10"water pipes
as shown on the mark ups.
Response: The requested replacement and relocation of the existing 8"Asbestos
Cement water main with a 10"PVC water main for the limits of the project's frontage
has been reflected on the Conceptual Engineering Plans. Whaf was shown on Mr.
Tom Jensen, P.E. from Kimley Horn's mark-ups was coordinated further to leave
the proposed �re hydrant (part of the Phase 2 Marina lmprovements, under a
separate application) on the West side of South Beach Road within a proposed
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131ApplicationslSite Plan 20181Agency Correspandence161owing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Blowrng Racks Response Lefter
August 29, 2018
Page 13 of 14
Utility Easemenr as previously shown. A!! of Mr. Jensen's red nofes were also
discussed, verifying that they were matters that could be resolved further in the
design process.
Law Enforcement Review Comments - APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE FURTHER
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE BELOW PREVIOUS COMMENTS. NO ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS. APPLICANT PROVIDED INFORMATION.
1. Provide entrance method to site (Knox key, electronic gate code, etc.) for law
enforcement. — SATlSF/ED
2. Provide lighting plan for garage.- SATISFIED
3. Clarify access system to exterior doors and service elevator (physical keys, electronic,
etc.) — SATISFIED
Fire Safetv Review Comments. NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. APPLICANT PROVIDED
INFORMATION.
1. Provide height of canopy in front entry.-PROVIDE Height from driveway to canopy-
SATISFIED
2. Provide radio of circular driveway for ambulances and other public safety vehicles.
SATISFIED
3. Provide dry pipe fire protection for dock/marine area.
SATlSFIED
4. Provide 4500 service elevator. SERVICE ELEVATOR NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH THIS
REQUIREMENT.
SATISFIED
5. Provide fire hydrants.
SATISFIED
6. Provide entrance code for entry to the site. CLARIFICATION PROVIDED.
SATISFlED
7. Clarify if power is off how does the gate open
SATISFIED
Landscape Review Comments —Stephen Park. RLA
Perimeter Landscapinq
1. South Property Line: The two (2} parallel parking spaces encroach in the 5' wide
landscape buffer. Shift spaces out of buffer. Tree and shrub requirements have been met.
Response: Parking spaces have been modi�ed and are now/ocafed outside of fhe
5' wide landscape buffer
2. West Property Line: There is still an overlap of the lift station in the 10' wide landscape
buffer. Per discussion with DS Boca, during the permitting process every effort shall be
made to shift the lift station out of the buffer. Currently, a 4' height Dwarf Pitch Apple
hedge (2'taller than required) has been proposed to buffer the station. This is acceptable
at this point. Tree and shrub requirements have been met. — SATISFIED.
N:1Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-0513�Applications\Site Plan 20181Rgency CorrespondencelBlowing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
Blowing Rocks Response Letter
August 29, 2018
Page 14 of ?4
3. North Property Line: East Property Line: All requirements have been met. SATlSFIED
4. East Property Line: 5' wide landscape buffer has been met (except at existing structure).
Tree requirement has not been met, shrub requirement has been met. Per discussion
with OS Boca, trees have not been provided in the landscape buffer due to view
considerations. Instead palms have been provided west of the buffer, still situated on the
east side of the building. Additional Sabal Palm groupings have been added on the north
and south sides of the building. This provides an acceptable solution. SATlSFIED
General Landscaqe Comments
1. The three (3) Sabal Palm groupings on the north and snuth sides of the building are a
welcome addition to the plans. Recommend adding three (3) more groupings of three (3)
palms to fill in gaps. These should be a different variety (e.g. Coconut Palms or Thatch
Palms) to add to the diversity of species.
Response: Three groupings of(3) Thatch Palms have been added along fhe north
property line.
2. The portion of property on the west side of Beach Road has been noted to be developed
at a later date, therefore is not a part of this review.
Response: Acknowledged
Fire Rescue — Chief Weinand
Third submittal meets Fire Department requirements.
Should you have any questions regarding the resubmittal please do not hesitate to contact
me at 561-575-9557 or email me at �;, �
Respectfully,
Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney 8 Associates, Inc.
.
.--/--. -. ,
� , �
_.
.;
--- ---- -- __-- —
;�'J ,
George G. Gentile, PLA, FASLA, LEEDC�AP, BD8�C
Senior Partner
N:\Blowing Rock-Condominiums Turnberry 17-05131Applications\Site Plan 20181Agency Correspondence161owing
Rocks Response Letter 8 29.18.docx
�1�
��� .
GENTILE GLAS HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY������,Int, GeorgeG.Gentile�a+ia
M.Iroy Holiowav,�SU
Emily M.O'Mahonev'rA5L4
- ,-.a� {i.�r�kre?a5:!!�.�,1,: 7.,�,
September 17,2018
Village of Tequesta
Attn:Ms.Nilsa Zacarias—Community Development Director
345 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta FI_,33469
Re: Blowing Rocks Condominiums(SPR 1-18)
Deaz Nilsa:
Pursuant to comments received on September 10, 2018, based on a submittal of August 29, 2018, please accept the
following application package needed to allow the development of a 21 unit multifamily condominium building. Note as
the outstanding comments are minor in nature, we have provided a responses to the staff s issues raised below.
Additionally,we have provided ONE SET needed for review.
1) Provide statement indicating the applicant will pay for the new water main along beach Road.
Response: The applicant acknowledges this will be a condition of approval placed on the project,however,
the applicant is still engaging in conversations with the water deparhnent to determine if any credits are
associated with the upsizing of the water main along Beach Road.
2) Re�nse Open Space Calculauons on page Z1.01
Response: Sheet Z1.01 has been revised to contain the correct open space number.
3) Revise entire justification statement document after Variance Council Hearing.
Response: The Site Plan Review Justification Statement has been revised to indicate the approval of the
stormwater management facility variance,as approved by Village Council on September l7,2018.
4) Revise Description of work on the site plan review application.
Response: Acknowledged. The description of work on the site plan review application form has been
revised to only include site plan approval for 21 condominium units.
5) Remove unity of title from all documents and replace with replat.
Response: The documents have been revised accordingly.
6) Providing landscaping at the base of the entry sign.
Response: The previously submitted landscape plan provides for landscape at the 6ase of the entry sign.
Tlus area has been highlighted oo the landscape plan. Please note,the Village landscape consultant has
approved the landscape plans as previously submitted.
With the exception of the comments addressed above, all other comments with regards to the site plan application have
been addressed and approved by the other consultants. Should you have any questions or need any additioual information,
do not hesitate to contact us at 561-575-9557 or
Respectfully,
Gentile Glas Hol/�.1u•D'Mahoney&Associates,Inc.
,
.���'=-- --_
' r
�rge r,.Gentile,PLA,FASLA,LEED�AP,BD&C
Senior Partner
S 9t17 C��mmcrcc Lane, Suiic 1 i)1 Jupiicr, f I<�rida .33458 i67-i75-9557 561-575-5260 Fax wwwlgho.com
Environmental ►�ervices, Inc.
BLOWING ROCKS
1500 Beach Road & 1550 Beach Road
Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East
Palm Beach Cou�ty, Florida
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Prepared For:
Turnberr�'Beach Road, LLC
19950 W. Countn� Club Drive, FL 10
Miami. FL 33180
Prepared by:
DLS Environmenta!Services.Inc.
1901 SW Yellowtail Avenue
Port St. Lucie, Florida 34953
(772)215-3997
Fax: (772)879-4520
Er►zail: dann�c�dlsenvironmentalservices.com
phone: 772-215-3997 • fax: 772-879-4520 • email: danna@dlsenvironmentalservices.com
address: 1901 SW Yellowtail Avenue, Port St. Lucie, FL 34953
web: www.dlsenvironmentalservices.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... I
FIGURES
Figure I
1. 1 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................... 1
Figure 2
1.2 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................. 1
2.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. 1
Figure 4
2.1 SOILS .................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 5
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER ........................................... 2
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS ............................................. 3
3.0
ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN. 3
3.1 OBJECTIVE .......................................................................................................... 3
3.2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 3
3.3 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 4
4.0
ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES ........................................... 5
5.0
GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES ................................................. 5
6.0
PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION ............................................................... 5
7.0
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION ....................................................... 5
7.1 VEGETATION ...................................................................................................... 5
7.2 WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................. 6
7.3 WETLANDS ......................................................................................................... 6
7.4 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 6
FIGURES
Figure I
Location Map
Figure 2
Soils Map
Figure 3
FLUCFCS Map
Figure 4
Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5
Proposed Landscape Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Soils Report
Appendix B FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Appendix C Drainage Statement for Blowing Rocks
Page i
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The 1.78± acre -property covered by this Environmental Impact Report is located in
Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida (Figure 1).
The property is bordered to the north by Coral Cove Park, to the south by undeveloped
lands owned by the State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
(TIITF), to the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and to the west by the Intracoastal Waterway.
Surrounding uses beyond the immediate park and undeveloped property consist of
condominiums.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report documents and characterizes the natural resources found on-site, discusses the
current regulatory status, and identifies potential impacts that may result from the
construction of the proposed residential development.
This report has been prepared in accordance to Chapter 50, Article 11 of the Code of
Ordinances, Village of Tequesta, Florida.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property located at 1500 Beach Road is currently developed as a condominium with
associated parking and pool. This property is fully developed on the east side of Beach
Road to the seaward edge of the existing dune and contains two beach boardwalks with a
small area of native dune vegetation (sea oats) near the south beach boardwalk. The
section of the property located on the west side of Beach Road contains a dock and a mix
of native and exotic vegetation.
The property located at 1550 Beach Road appears to be currently developed as a single
family residence. The majority of the property is developed on the east side of Beach
Road with a small area of dune vegetation. The section of the property on the west side
of Beach Road contains a mixture of native vegetation.
Both properties are bordered by surface waters on the east (Atlantic Ocean) and west side
(Intracoastal Waterway). A narrow firinge of mangrove wetlands is present on the west
side of both properties immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway as shown in
Figure 2.
2.1 SOILS
Project soils were mapped according to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, December 1978, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service. A copy of the Soil Survey Map depicting the project boundaries and soil type(s)
is included as Figure 3 and a copy of the Soils Report is included (see Appendix A). The
Page I
two properties contained three soil mapping units, all of which traverse both properties.
A general description of the soil types are as follows:
A rents - Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes (4)
This complex consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly drained, sandy soils and
urban land. The soils formed in thick layers of sandy fill material that were placed
over low, wet mineral soils to make the areas suitable for urban use such as golf
courses, subdivisions, condominium developments, roadways, etc. The soil material
is generally rapidly permeable in all layers. The available water capacity is low or
very low.
Beaches (9)
This mapping unit consists of narrow strips of tide -washed sand along the Atlantic
coast line. As much as half of the beach may be covered by water during daily high
tides, and all of the beach may be covered during storm periods. Most areas have no
vegetation, but the inland areas may be covered with moonvine, railroad vine, sea
oats, and seashore bermudagrass. Depth to the water table is highly variable and
ranges from 0 to 6 feet or more, depending on the distance from the water, the height
of the beach, etc.
Palm Beach - Urban land comolm 0 to 8 percent slopes (2 7)
This complex is nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, and consists of Palm
Beach sand and urban land. The majority of this complex is open land such as lawns,
vacant lots, and undeveloped areas however about 30 to 50 percent is covered by
sidewalks, streets, parking lots, building and other structures.
2.2 NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The following is a summary of the land cover and vegetation communities found on the
two properties. Land cover and vegetative communities were mapped based on the
Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) developed by the
Florida Department of Transportation. Field reconnaissance and aerial photograph
interpretation were utilized in mapping the vegetative communities on the project site.
There are five different FLUCFCS classifications currently present on the site. A land
cover map of the observed community types is included as Figure 2.
FixedSingle Family Units (111) — 0.53± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property at 1550 Beach Road which
appears to be a single family residence with associated driveways and landscaping
including sod. The majority of the landscaping is exotic and ornamental vegetation
including java plum, coconut palms, and a ficus hedge.
Residential Hi -ah Density (130) — 0.78± acres
This land cover accounts for the majority of the property located at 1500 Beach Road
which is condominiums with an associated pool, parking areas and landscaping,
including sod.
Page 2
Coastal Scrub (322) — 0.0 77± acres
Small areas on the east side of the project site adjacent to the beach and on the west
side of the project site adjacent to Beach Road fall into this category and contain a
mixture of sea grape (Coccoloba uvifera), half flower (exotic) (Scaevola taccada),
coin vine (Dalbergia ecastaphyllum), cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto), buttonwood
(Conocarpus erectus) and sea oats (Uniola paniculata).
Manzrove Swanws (612) — 0.091± acres
A mangrove fringe exists on the western side of the project site adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway. The mangrove fringe extends landward of mean high water
and consists of red, white and black mangroves. Mangroves extending waterward of
mean high water are not considered to be within the boundaries of the property (those
would be on state owned submerged lands) therefore they are not included in the
acreage identified.
Beaches Other Than Swimming Beaches (710) — 0.31± acres
A beach exists on the eastern side of the project site adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean
between the remnants of the dune line and mean high water.
2.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS
The presence or absence of wetlands was determined using the State Unified
Methodologies identified in Chapter 62-340, FAC and 1987 Corps of Engineers Field
Guide for Wetland Delineation. Based upon this methodology, the mangrove fringe on
the western side of the project site adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway would qualify as
jurisdictional wetlands. These wetlands have been flagged and located by survey for the
purpose of this Environmental Impact Report. The wetland line will be reviewed and
verified by the appropriate state permitting agency (South Florida Water Management
District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection) as part of the overall
permitting process for the proposed residential development. This verification will not
affect the overall proposed site plan since no activities are proposed on the west side of
Beach Road within the mangrove fringe other than maintenance/repair of the existing
dock access for the purpose of the future docking facility.
3.0 ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
3.1 OBJECTIVE
Review Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) to determine the likelihood of
occurrence of federal and state protected species on the project site, conduct a systematic
survey for flora and fauna that may occur on-site, and note the presence of any
endangered, threatened, and species of special concern as identified by Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
Biologist conducted pedestrian transects which meandered through the project site.
During the pedestrian transects, the biologist recorded and noted sightings, tracks, scat,
tree markings, nests, cavities, and burrows.
Page 3
3.3 CONCLUSION
Review of the information obtained from FNAI indicated the potential presence of the
following habitat; scrub, scrubby flatwoods, and beach dune. FNAI indicated the
potential presence of the following listed species; four -petal pawpaw (Asimina
tetramera), perforated reindeer lichen (Cladonia perforate), leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea) and martial scrub-hairstreak (Strymon martialis). The FNAI
Biodiversity Matrix also indicated the likelihood of 9 other species and the potential of 36
other species, all of which are listed in Appendix B.
Field review of the project site revealed no evidence of the following:
• Scrub
• Scrubby flatwoods
• Listed plant species by either the state or federal agencies
• Other species identified in the FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Based upon field observations beach dune habitat was present.
There is the potential that the following would utilize the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands for foraging and/or nesting:
• Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)
• Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
• Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata)
• Snowy egret (Egretta thula)
• Wood stork (Mycteria Americana)
• Piping plover (Charadrius melodus)
The field observations revealed no evidence of the above listed species nesting or
foraging within the existing beach dune and mangrove wetlands. The proposed
residential development does not contain new impacts to the beach dune or mangrove
wetlands. The proposed new dune crossing location replaces one of the existing dune
crossings and the dock access within the mangrove wetlands is to remain in the same
location as what currently exists.
No Bald Eagle nests were located within the boundaries of the project site. A review of
the FWCC Eagle Nest database indicated there are no Bald Eagle nests located within
one (1) mile of the project.
The FNAI Biodiversity Matrix indicates there is a likelihood of Johnson's seagrass
(Halophilajohnsonii) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) on the project site
however these species would not be located within the actual project boundaries. They
would occur waterward of mean high water and would be taken into account as part of
the review by the state and federal permitting agencies for any in -water work associated
with the project.
No wildlife was observed during the site reconnaissance other than curly tailed lizards.
Page 4
4.0 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC FEATURES
The properties are currently developed therefore the presence of archeological or historic
features is highly unlikely. A request for review of the site for archeological and/or
historic resources has been submitted to Florida Department of State, Division of Historic
Resources to confirm this aspect. The result of that review will be provided upon receipt.
5.0 GEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES
The properties do not contain any geologically significant features.
6.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATION
The Site Plan is included as Figure 4 (due to the detail, it is not at the same scale as the
FLUCFCS Map included as Figure 2). The project site is located in Flood Zone AE and
Flood Zone X with current elevations varying from 4.17 feet to 15.75 feet. The proposed
first floor elevation of all buildings is 8.5 -feet NAVD so all floor elevations will be meet
the minimum required.
The project is a residential development and as such, is not proposed to have operations
which deal with harmful substances or emit pollutants.
The project has been designed to provide more than double the minimum open space
requirement — 30 -percent required and 64 -percent proposed. A Planting Plan is included
as Figure 5. Also, the site currently has no pre-treatment of surface water run-off which
drains off-site onto the adjacent state-owned lands. The project provides an improvement
in water quality treatment by means of a surface water management system designed to
provide pre-treatment prior to discharge as identified in the Drainage Statement included
as Appendix C.
Other approvals will be necessary for the proposed development, including state (Florida
Department of Environmental Protection or South Florida Water Management District)
approval and U.S. Army Corps approval for the proposed docking facility.
7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES/MITIGATION
7.1 VEGETATION
The majority of the project site has been impacted by the previous activities. Based upon
the Site Plan, the majority of the existing native vegetation (Sabalpalmetto) will remain
and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative communities on the
project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). In addition, the Planting Plan
provides open space and native plant material in excess of the requirements for the site.
Page 5
7.2 WILDLIFE
The wildlife which may utilize the project site would be within the mangrove area or the
dune area in which no impacts are proposed; therefore impacts to wildlife are not
anticipated as a result of the project.
7.3 WETLANDS
No impacts to wetlands are proposed for the project.
7.4 CONCLUSION
State, federal, and local requirements have been considered during the preparation of the
Site Plan (Figure 4). Building setbacks, zoning, landscape, and buffering requirements
have been considered based upon the Village of Tequesta, Code of Ordinances.
The proposed development has been designed to preserve the majority of the existing
native vegetation and no new impacts are proposed within the natural vegetative
communities on the project site (Coastal Scrub and Mangrove Swamp). The Planting
Plan (Figure 5) demonstrates an improvement to the existing conditions on the project
site.
The Site Plan demonstrates avoidance of wetland impacts.
In review of the existing conditions compared to the proposed conditions for the project
site, no alternatives or mitigation would be necessary. The Site Plan (which includes pre-
treatment of storm water) along with the Planting Plan demonstrate an avoidance of
impacts and an improvement from the existing site conditions.
Page 6
11111111[1111112
PROJECT SITE
%
......................... . ...................... ..........
Jeqtiiewts
Jupiter
Inlet
Colony
Center St
PALM BEACH COUNTY
LU II II
C/)
ub br County Line Rd II
EF Tequesta Dr
T
N
A It I a n t i c
0 c e a n
Blowing
Hal Rocks PROJECT SITE
' 6 �ii
Dr
F
=Wlllow 0
N Dover Rd jequests
,,,.9con St
cn
SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 40 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST
_0 Environmental
is Services, Inc.
1901 SW Yellowtail Avenue
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953
Phone: 772-215-3997 Fax: 772-879-4520
www.disenvironmentalservices.com
At
A t I a n t i c
0 c e a n
Jupiter Inlet
'cak-y
ID 7
Location Map
Blowing Rocks
1500 Beach Road and 1550 Beach Road
Tequesta, Florida
SCALE:
N.T.S. MAY 2018
FIGURE 1
FLUCFCS CODES:
FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS (111) — 0.53f ACRES
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (130) — 0.78t ACRES
COASTAL SCRUB (322) — 0.077f ACRES
MANGROVE SWAMPS (612) — 0.091f ACRES
BEACHES OTHER THAN SWIMMING BEACHES (7101 — 0.31t ACRES
T
Environmental FLUCFCS Map
usServices, Inc. Blowing Rocks
1901 Sw Yellowtail Avenue 1500 Beach Road and 1550 Beach Road
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 Tequesta, Florida
Phone:772-215-3997 Fax:772-879-4520
www.disenvironmentalservices.com I SCALE
N.T.S. MAY 2018 FIGURE 2
Source: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.govlappIWebSoilSurvey.aspx Viewed on May 25, 2018
SOILS:
ARENTS-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES (4) — NON-HYDRIC
BEACHES (9) — NON-HYDRIC
PALM BEACH -URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 0 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES (27) — NON-HYDRIC
L) Environmental Soils Map
isServices, Inc. Blowing Rocks
1901 sw Yellowtail Avenue 1500 Beach Road and 1550 Beach Road
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 Tequesta, Florida
Phone:772-215-3997 Fax:772-879-4520
www.dlsenvironmentalservices.com SCALE
N.T.S. MAY 2018 FIGURE 3
322
MU
LIP ?F_ 1�
it
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM pp
'' •9 ,:...,.va .,,. .e 6 �ai �i� as
a
a. • �r
w!r _
SfIE DATA
—"NOTES"' BLOWING ROCKS SITE PLAN
- SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY BC ARCHITECTS AND CARLOS ZAPATA STUDIO
- SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE TO PROVIDE CLARITY FIGURE 4
otltsuo�s
seariemia
fa<IIQAIf
MtRWIYIQpIIYI
rouRrt•e,
nsw�aier Ym,Qn
QiR•r[®n
nurtlmoumq
n•cmmm
nutln<wmo
tlu •�uRMur
tlrQ
b�otlncNm
>K
IpiN.QYH AA
WY04
CpTW
BiRMGQ
MMIII
IOQIIRfldQ6
11�ar
Il�ll®tlS1511QR0/�
w�
VBII®W51YII1Q.4e
Qi/M4
tlIOiAL�
Q010fR�1
IMOIIP®IOW
QHfl6RQYMYI
1•i11P®1W
IR911M:i•IBOfl1l8
ADO)Z®��
Q 6{tl1194
tlE4 w1.1®
o•anotl
Qaewmavmnm
w[%
15 —
.rr
�
r_K _eu-w426�c6�4:5-.90.:- ¢0,��._�'^' d1'1`d.ublVr•�lS1�K� _ _
t•�..+vn^�.x ..as .+cs !ems
•KQc!4<'Ci x^'<wb r;Lf wets MC -MC O%>tG �t%C�T'eD
a saef� eL•tP'-0� L" Z� e'tRS.• W'}�..t�Y� .4l! ♦L �u<
•u �: r6.�_'�M.Tw�[ .<!e a c_s : V
"'NOTES"' BLOWING ROCKS PLANTING PLAN
- PLANTING PLAN PROVIDED BY BC ARCHITECTS AND DS BOCA
- PLANTING PLAN NOT TO SCALE TO PROVIDE CLARITY FIGURE 5
APPENDIX A
Soils Report
z'nitN
Soil Map —Palm Beach County Area, Florida
3 3
Map sole: 1:1,980 t prnaad m A brxbmpe (11" x 9.5) %Meet e
N MOes
a 25 SJ 100 150 B
Feg
0 50 1m 2J0 Oes
Map ptojadim: Vkb Mermfu CIXflel madFNlPs: NKa594
L&A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/25/2018
Page 1 of 3
xr sr as��.
za sivN
Soil Map —Palm Beach County Area, Florida
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
�
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that Comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI)
o
Stony Spot
1:20,000,
Soils
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
rN
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
.y
Soil Map Unit Lines
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Soil Map unit Points
J
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
�
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Special
Point Features
scale.
V
Blowout
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
®
Borrow Pit
measurements.
Transportation
Clay Spot
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q
Closed Depression
Web Soil Survey URL.
ti
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravely Spot
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
0
LandfillLocal
distance and area . A projection that preserves area, such as the
Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
A.
Lava Flow
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
Marsh or swamp
■
Aenal Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
.�.
Mine or Quarry
Soil Survey Area. Palm Beach County Area, Florida
®
Miscellaneous Water
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Oct 6, 2017
®
Perennial Water
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
y
Rock outcrop
1:50,000 or larger.
+
Saline Spot
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 13, 2014—Dec
11, 2014
Sandy Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
g
Severely Eroded Spot
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Sinkhole
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Y
Slide or Slip
,f
Sodic Spot
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/2512018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Soil Map—Palm Beach County Area, Florida
Map Unit Legend
-I
W* S1 1h Ew U" H� Acm In F* c*AO I
4
Arents-Urban land complex, 0
5.3
30.7%
to 5 percent slopes
9
Beaches
4.1
23.4%
27
Palm Beach -Urban land
2.8
16.2%
complex, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
99
i Water
4.7
27.0% i
100
f
Waters of the Atlantic Ocean
_t
0.5:
i
2.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
17.4
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/25/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX B
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
5/25/2018
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
1018 Thomasville Road
suite 200-c
Tallahassee, FL 32303
850-224-8207
850-681-9364 fax
www.fnai.org
FLPRIDA
VA Mt Areas
INVENTORY
Florida Natural Areas Inventory
Biodiversity Matrix Query Results
UNOFFICIAL REPORT
Created 5/25/2018
(Contact the FNAI Data Services Coordinator at 850.224.8207 or
kbrinegar@fnai.fsu.edu for information on an official Standard Data Report)
NOTE: The Biodiversity Matrix includes only rare species and natural communities tracked by FNAI.
Report for 2 Matrix Units: 69107, 69108
36
- FL 706
r�
us 1
FL 811
fl
�.
Jupiter-=- - == us i
i
U51
C R 809
)upper.,
Ridge Naluro!
Matrix Unit ID: 69107
6 Documented Elements Found
Descriptions
DOCUMENTED - There is a documented occurrence in the
FNAI database of the species or community within this Matrix
Unit.
DOCUMENTED -HISTORIC - There is a documented
occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community
within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been
observed/reported within the last twenty years.
LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this
vicinity, and is considered likely within this Matrix Unit
because:
1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent
Matrix Units, but the documentation isn't precise
enough to indicate which of those Units the species or
community is actually located in; or
2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and
there is suitable habitat for that species or community
within this Matrix Unit.
POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or
predicted range of the species or community based on expert
knowledge and environmental variables such as climate,
soils, topography, and landcover.
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Asimina tetramera
G1
S1
LE
E
Four -petal Pawpaw
Beach dune
G3
S2
N
N
Oadonia perforata
G1
S1
LE
E
Perforate Reindeer Lichen
Dermochelys coriacea
G2
S2
LE
FE
Leatherback Sea Turtle
Scrub
G2
S2
N
N
Scrubby flatwoods
G2
S2?
N
N
2 Documented -Historic Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names Global State Federal State
http://data.labins. org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch. cfm?sel_id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000, 333071.43290000, 789781.10980000, 333071.432900
5/25/2018
Ctenogobius stigmaturus
Spottail Goby
Okenia hypogaea
Burrowing Four-o'clock
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Rank Rank Status Listing
G2 S2 N N
G3? S2 N E
9 Likely Elements Found
Global
State
Federal
State
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Dermochelyl corlacea
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Aphelocoma coerulescens
G2
S2
LT
FT
Florida Scrub -Jay
G2
S2?
N
N
Caretta caretta
G3
S3
T
FT
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
G3G5
S2S3
N
N
Chelonia mylas
G3
S2S3
LE
FE
Green Sea Turtle
GI
S1
LE
E
Geopsammodius fuscus
GI
S1
N
N
Dark Tiny Sand -loving Scarab
G4
S2
LT
FT
Halophila iohnsonii
G2
S2
LT
E
Johnson's Seagrass
G1T1
S1
N
E
lacguemontia reclinata
GI
S1
LE
E
Beach Jacquernontia
G2
S2
LE
FE
Melanoplus indicifer
G1
S1
N
N
East Coast Scrub Grasshopper
MySteria arnericana
G4
S2
LT
FT
Wood Stork
Trichechus manatus
G2
S2
LE
FE
,West Indian Manatee
Matrix Unit ID: 69108
3 Documented Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Usting
Dermochelyl corlacea
G3
S3
T
FT
Leatherback Sea Turtle
G2
S2
LE
FE
Scrubby flatwoods
G2
S2?
N
N
Strymon martialis
Martial Scrub-Hairstreak
G3G5
S2S3
N
N
0 Documented -Historic Elements Found
7 Likeiv Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Caretta caretta
G3
S3
T
FT
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
Chelonia mygas
G3
S2S3
LE
FE
Green Sea Turtle
Ctenogobius stigmaturus
G2
S2
N
N
Spottail Goby
lacguemontia reclinata
GI
S1
LE
E
Beach Jacquernontia
�jycteria americana
G4
S2
LT
FT
Wood Stork
LepLrosia angustissima var. curtissii
G1T1
S1
N
E
Coastal Hoary -pea
Trichechus manatus
G2
S2
LE
FE
.West Indian Manatee
hftp://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatdxlGridSearch.cfm?sel—id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,789781.10980000,333071.432900
5/25/2018
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
Mabix Unit IDs: 69107, 69108
36 Potential Elements Common to Any of the 2 Matrix Units
Scientific and Common Names
Global
State
Federal
State
Rank
Rank
Status
Listing
Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus
G3T3
S1.
LE
FE
Atlantic Sturgeon
44phelocoma coerulescens
G2
S2
LT
FT
Florida Scrub -Jay
Chamaesyce cumulicola
G2
S2
N
E
Sand -dune Spurge
Charadrius melodus
G3
S2
LT
FT
Piping Plover
Cladonia perforata
G1
S1
LE
E
Perforate Reindeer Lichen
Coelorachis tuberculosa
G3
S3
N
T
Piedmont Jointgrass
Conradina grandiflora
G3
S3
N
T
Large -flowered Rosemary
Dicerandra immaculata
G1
S1
LE
E
Lakela's Mint
2yMarchon coupgri
G3
S3
LT
FT
Eastern Indigo Snake
Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia
G4T2
S2
N
N
Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem
Eretmochely� imbricata
G3
S1.
LE
FE
Hawksbilf Sea Turtle
Falco columbarius
G5
S2
N
N
Merlin
Falco peregrinus
G4
S2
N
N
Peregrine Falcon
Forestiera segregata var. pinetorum
G4T2
S2
N
N
Florida Pinewood Privet
Glandularia maritima
G3
S3
N
E
Coastal Vervain
Gopherus p ly emus
.L.pL__
G3
S3
C
ST
Gopher Tortoise
Halophila iohnsonii
G2
S2
LT
E
Johnson's Seagrass
Heterodon simus
G2
S2
N
N
Southern Hognose Snake
Lechea cemua,
G3
S3
N
T
Nodding Pinweed
Lechea divaricata
G2
S2
N
E
Pine Pinweed
Linurn carteri var. smaffii
G2T2
S2
N
E
Small's Flax
Lithobates ca -pito
G3
S3
N
SSC
Gopher Frog
Manatee Aggregation Site
GNR
SNR
N
N
Microphis brachyurus
G4G5
S2
SC
N
Opossum Pipefish
Nemast lis t7oridana
G2
S2
N
E
Celestial Lily
Peromy1cus polionotus niveiventris
G5T1
S1
LT
FT
Southeastern Beach Mouse
Podomy�2 t7orldanus
G3
S3
N
SSC
Florida Mouse
Polvqala smallii
G1
S1
LE
E
Tiny Polygala
Rallus longirostris scottii
G5T3?
S3?
N
N
Florida Clapper Rail
Rivulus marmoratus
G4G5
S3
SC
SSC
Mangrove Rivulus
Roystonea elata
G2G3
S2
N
E
Florida Royal Palm
)://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrix/GridSearch.cfm?sel—id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,789781.1
0980000,333071
.432900
5/25/2018
Scelo orus woodi
Florida Scrub Lizard
Schiza yLium niveum
Scrub Bluestern
Setophaga discolor paludicola
Florida Prairie Warbler
Tolumnia bahamensis
Dancing -lady Orchid
Trichornanes punctatum ssp. floridanum
Florida Filmy Fern
FNAI Biodiversity Matrix
G2G3
GlG2
G5T3
G3
G4GST1
S2S3
N N
SlS2
N E
S3
N N
S1
N E
S1
E E
Disclaimer
The data maintained by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of information
available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the data are not always
based on comprehensive or site-specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be regarded as a final statement on
the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for on-site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable
for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance
on these data. Inventory data are designed for the purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not
intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Unofficial Report
These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data Reggest option for those needing certifiable data.
hftp://data.labins.org/mapping/FNAI_BioMatrixIGridSearch.cfm?sel—id=69107,69108&extent=788171.76680000,333071.43290000,789781.10980000,333071.432900
APPENDIX C
Drainage Report
KEUSFt�1VAIV,
ASSQMTES
Drainage Statement for:
Blowing Rocks
Project No. 17-1179
Location
The 1.78 acre project site is located between the Atlantic Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway
immediately south of Coral Cove Park. Beach Road bisects the project site with the majority of
the project site located east of Beach Road. The project site is bounded on the north by Coral
Cove Park, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, on the south by undeveloped lands owned by the
State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (TIITF) and on the west by the
Intracoastal Waterway. The project site is located within the Intracoastal basin of the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
FEMA Flood Data
The western portion of the project site behind the dune line is located within flood zone AE,
elevation 7.0' NAVD based upon the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) effective July 2, 2018 for
the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 12099CO179F, effective October
15,2017.
Existing Conditions
The site is currently developed and in use as a residential multi -family development on the south
side and a single building (church parcel) on the north side. There are minimal stormwater
management facilities located onsite consisting of a drainage system within the pool area of the
multi -family development. Currently, stormwater runoff generated onsite sheet flows directly
offsite primarily to the west to Beach Road, as well as to Coral Cove Park (north), the Atlantic
Ocean (east) and the undeveloped parcel (south).
Beach Road does not have a formal stormwater conveyance or stormwater management system.
Stormwater runoff from Beach Road sheet flows off the roadway onto the adjacent properties.
There is a culvert system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage and this
system allows surface water runoff north of the project site along Beach Road and stortnwater
runoff from this site to discharge south into the undeveloped state-owned land south of the
project site.
There are no existing water quality treatment facilities located on-site.
I I %-',V es a
711 N Dixie Highway Suite 201 - West Palm Beach. Ft. 33401 - 501-689-860() - % w.k. It varz.coln
Promed Improvements
The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the site for a multi -story condominium.
The finished floor elevation will be raised to meet the current building department finished floor
elevations associated with current FEMA elevation (listed above). The proposed minimum
finished floor elevation is 1.5' above the FEMA elevation or elevation 8.50' NAVD.
The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the
South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -
development conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater
runoff prior to discharge. Legal positive outfall will occur west onto Beach Road and ultimately,
to the undeveloped property to the south via bubble up structures or a hard pipe connection to the
drainage system on Beach Road.
It should be noted that the Village of Tequesta typically requires new development and
redevelopment to retain 95% of the runoff from a 25 year – I day storm event. Due to the
geographic location of the project site being located on the Barrier Island and elevated
significantly higher than the adjacent properties, this regulation should not apply to this site as
there will be no adverse impacts to any Village stormwater management system or any off-site
properties. The proposed stormwater management system will be an overall improvement to
water quality treatment and stormwater runoff from this site.
Preliminary Surface Water Manazement System Calculations
The drainage area associated with the redevelopment of the site is 1.32 acres which is the area
east of Beach Road and west of the existing dune line. The existing site is currently developed
with 0.96 acres of impervious area generating 1.23 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year – 72
hour design event (13.5 inches of rainfall). The proposed site plan contains 1. 11 acres of
impervious area that would generate 1.33 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year – 72 hour storm
event. The proposed drainage system will be designed to provide 0.23 acre-feet of water quality
treatment which will be retained within a proposed exfiltration trench system. Therefore, there
will be an overall reduction in runoff generated from the 25 year – 72 hour design event.
Existing Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.23
Proposed Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.33
Proposed Water Quality Treatment (ac -ft) 0.23
Net Runoff.,( (-)0.13
J.,
S
-W� ..A--(Vorida License No. 72504)
WK-A—ch 4 18'0,,
c
..A��ihat9a;��*A ssoc i at4'�,'A
ac.
�Zdtioh No. 4897
�te &f Author."
D 1".
a Stsite 201 West Palm Beach. F1, 33401 361-689-80K) www.keshavarz.com
y
KESHAVARZ
ASSO TES
Drainage Statement for:
Blowing Rocks
Project No. 17-1179
Location
The 1.78 acre project site is located between the Atlantic Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway
immediately south of Coral Cove Park. Beach Road bisects the project site with the majority of
the project site located east of Beach Road. The project site is bounded on the north by Coral
Cove Park, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, on the south by undeveloped lands owned by the
State of Florida Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (TIITF) and on the west by the
Intracoastal Waterway. The project site is located within the Intracoastal basin of the South
Florida Water Management District / Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
FEMA Flood Data
The western portion of the project site behind the dune line is located within flood zone AE,
elevation 7.0' NAVD based upon the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) effective July 2, 2018 for
the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel number 12099CO179F, effective October
15,2017.
Existing Conditions
The site is currently developed and in use as a residential multi -family development on the south
side and a single building (church parcel) on the north side. There are minimal stormwater
management facilities located onsite consisting of a drainage system within the pool area of the
multi -family development. Currently, stormwater runoff generated onsite sheet flows directly
offsite primarily to the west to Beach Road, as well as to Coral Cove Park (north), the Atlantic
Ocean (east) and the undeveloped parcel (south).
Beach Road does not have a fonnal stormwater conveyance or stormwater management system.
Stormwater runoff from Beach Road sheet flows off the roadway onto the adjacent properties.
There is a culvert system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage and this
system allows surface water runoff north of the project site along Beach Road and stormwater
runoff from this site to discharge south into the undeveloped state-owned land south of the
project site.
There are no existing water quality treatment facilities located on-site.
7 . 11 N Dixie Highway, Suite 201 - West Palm Beach. FL 33401 - 561-689-8600 - www.keshavarz.com
Proposed Improvements
The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the site for a multi -story condominium.
The finished floor elevation will be raised to meet the current building department finished floor
elevations associated with current FEMA elevation (listed above). The proposed minimum
finished floor elevation is 1.5' above the FEMA elevation or elevation 8.50'NAVD.
The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the
South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -
development conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater
runoff prior to discharge by way of depressed swale areas and 100 linear feet of proposed
ex.filtration trench (please see exfiltration trench calculations on the next page). Legal positive
outfall will occur west onto Beach Road and ultimately, to the undeveloped property to the south
via bubble up structures or a hard pipe connection to the drainage system on Beach Road.
It should be noted that the Village of Tequesta typically requires new development and
redevelopment to retain 95% of the runoff from a 25 year — I day storm event. Due to the
geographic location of the project site being located on the Barrier Island and elevated
significantly higher than the adjacent properties, this regulation should not apply to this site as
there will be no adverse impacts to any Village stormwater management system or any off-site
properties. The proposed stormwater management system will be an overall improvement to
water quality treatment and stormwater runoff from this site.
Pretindnary Surface Water Management System Calculations
The drainage area associated with the redevelopment of the site is 1.32 acres which is the area
east of Beach Road and west of the existing dune line. The existing site is currently developed
with 0.96 acres of impervious area generating 1.23 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72
hour design event (13.5 inches of rainfall). The proposed site plan contains 1.00 acre of
impervious area that would generate 1.26 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 72 hour storm
event. The proposed drainage system will be designed to provide 0.21 acre-feet of water quality
treatment which will be retained within a proposed exfiltration trench system. Therefore, there
will be an overall reduction in runoff generated from the 25 year — 72 hour design event.
Existing Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.23
Proposed Site Runoff (ac -ft) 1.26
Proposed Water Quality Treatment (ac -ft) 0.21
Net Runoff (ac -ft) (-)0.18
711 N Dixie Highway, Suite 201 - West Palm Beach.. FL 33401 - 561-689-8600 - www.keshavarz.corn
KESM VARZ & ASSOM TES, INC.
711 North Dbde Highway, Suite 200 MHAVAM
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
ASSOM
phone: (561) 689-8600
H2 =
5.00
Project Name: Blowing Rocks Condominium
Project Number: 17-1179
EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS
TRENCH CROSS SECTION
TRENCH WIDTH (FT)
8.0 1
DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
1. Exfiltration Trench Depth (FT)
2. Saturated Trench Depth, Ds (FT)
3. Un -Saturated Trench Depth, Du (FT)
4. Exfiltration Trench Width, W (FT)
5. Head acting on Trench, H2 (FT)
6. Factor of Safety
7. Hyd. Conductivity, K (CFSIFT.SQ.-FT. HEAD)
6.00 FT
TOP OF
TRENCH= 4.00 FT
PIPE SIZE = 18" PERF. HDPE
PIPE
INVERT 1.00 FT
BOTTOM OF
TRENCH= -1.00 FT
WATER TABLE
ELEVATION = 1.00 FT
5.00
2.00
3.00
8.0
5.00
2.00
2.84E-04
Vwq
Vadd
%WQ
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOL. (AC -IN)
ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOL. (AC -IN)
2.520
0.000
50%
L
REQUIRED LENGTH OF TRENCH (FT):
95.82
PROPOSED LENGTH OF TRENCH (FT)�
100
PROPOSED VOL. TO BE TREATED (AC -FT):
0.219
PERCENT OF REQUIRED PROVIDED:
104.4%
L = (F.S. *((%WQ * Vwq) + Vadd))/(K*(H2*W+2*H2*Du)-(DUA2)+(2*H2*Ds)+(.000139*W*Du))
COMMENTS:
• THIS IS CONSIDERED DRY PRETREATMENT
• REFERENCE: Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Ver. 2014
j"%J1131111C J,,
OT Vv& .
T No 72504
-10
0
Ra
p&j' ' V Ohda License No. 72504)
11111111110
jUly I I Ih, 2018
Keshavarz & Associates, Inc.
Certificate of Authorization No. 4897
711 N Dixie Highway. Suite 201 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 - 561-689-8600 - www.kesitavarz.com
0
Wate way
Beac
ilk'
Seawatch:
A
Site
rl
Ar
r
67
SHEETINDEX
LH -1 OVERALL LOCATION PLAN
LH -2 HARDSCAPE PLAN
LH -3 KARDSCAPE DETAILS AND ELEVATIONS
TD -1 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
LP -1 PLANTING PLAN
LP -2 PLANT LIST AND SPECIFICATIONS
NOTE �S' SIDE a' BEAf� �Aj -0
BE AT A.
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS nwmmo'A=wAuc LH -1
�w �um�E
1� m�sTA 'Lmm WTIMA��,Rmlw UEItALL LOCATION
I)SBOU PLAN
— — — — — — — — — — — — — -
- - -- ------ J
T
-0;0
�5e
=Zz—
J —RA4� —AL
N OAS
�TE I.C5,51PE ol H �f TO
T,
'BE V�L� A- A LAT� -7 AA7F-R^A"r
�T IMT 1 4��
it
- mmk
P1,
t 1,
77"
Marchitects rMEMM V" MAD, UZ LH -2
7 BLOWING ROCKS
1� w MIVE
1��CHR�D,nQUESTA,FLORIM s— 1M AW� FL .1.
DSBocA--- HARDSCAPEPLAN
z'4) EN RANCE 6A7E '-�ARAC,7EF ----!EVA- ON
QE -A NiN5 AA-
5EG-ION T-R� 50�7-4EA57 57-C - 0�, 7�R� NOR-HAES'
RE7A \N6 AA-- N -N6 AALL
�lpwing Rocks
-�N N
Ll�� CE 5 6\� �-�,/A 0
-OR-E AA�-R �r-A-,RE A\r, AA--ERAALL C-ARAL-:R E-E\/A' ON
LH -3
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS T
i�"SCAPE DET�IL
DSBOCA--_ M�STA, FLMM SUMIMA��.FL-W IL
AND ELEVAMNS
TMM PK#VNTIM TABLE
K
T,
4-
2
TME PROTWrOh DETAIL
TD -1
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS TUR99M BEACH ROAA UIC
1�w
M�STA. R�� WM IM A�. R MIM TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
DSBM
-a
-�5T51DE�5E-ROA�TO
DE� AT A -A�, DA7
�T PART OF 5 WWI� Oh
U.OY#* ROW.5 LWWAPE DATA
C
u
1=911
-AT-
Marchitects BLOWING ROCKS TUMMEM BEAM MM, U.0 LP -1
1�w ��Yu�mwE
DSBOrA- 1� MACH �AD, mQ�STA. F�Rl� SU� IM A��, R m1w PLANTING PLAN
M.
Marchitects
c
BLOWING ROCKS
TUMBERRY BEACH ADAD, UIC
-- -2
LP
DSBOCA-
SU�lMA�N�FLMM
q�NT LIST, DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
ftST
K�L�DATA��R�M
�—TOF�
wooll
�7
L-1
77, L 0 '
I A T A BLOWING ROCKS TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
—T 1� �H R�. MQ�STA. F -0A SU� IM A�� � MlW
-T--T4-
Vo
V ---J,6 ------ J6 -
Z1.01
MAN. DATA AND WASIE
--- ---- ---- -
NEWBUIDWS1
UNCOVERED
I 44636SF
` XAZ�
OWNS BLDG
W.F
'14
�'4 J
T=! -
it
7 7 L . S
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
iNw w C�y aue � w
SU� IM AW�� � MIN
.02
C,
0 1� C.) 0
38
. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..
------------------------------------
-------- -- --------------------------------
--------------
-------------------- -------- - I I
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
c
---------- :)-
i
------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------- ----------- ---------------------
- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - --
C A R L 0 S
te, Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS ----CHROAD,LLC Z2.01
I�WW�YCL MlW
1� M�H RO�, M�T& FLORDA SU� 1M A��, � MlW GARAGE &
f
Z A' P' A' T' BLOWING ROCKS TuAw-RRY LLc
M�H RO�. M�ST& FL�OA SU� 1M A��, n—
Ea f
-'� 3 PA��2
qD S 0 s 3 --
.................... .
7 L:
7.7
71, " I ,
----------------- -----
----------
---------------------
----- --- ---- ------------------ ------- ---------
- - ------- ---- ------------ ------------ ---- ------- - .. ................
7T� LEvEL2
C A R L 0 S �is Z2.02
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS ---,LLC
M FLOOR PLXN
I�M�HRO� MO-ST&FL�RVA su� im—,
I
(m) �D (E) �D 0 0 s
a
c
uwr
c
r
— —
— — — — — —
— — — — —
C
7—AR L 0 S
le
Z2.03
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
TUMMEM BEACH ROAD, LLC
RO� M�STA, FL�UA
1�W C�YCLW
SU� I . Alle.Tl. � �l w
0 0 0
0
7-L
BLOWING ROCKS
M�M RO�. MO�STA FL�VA
Tu--FIRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
SU� W C�y .1.
C) 0
0 0-
Z2.04
FWM PLAN
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7-L
BLOWING ROCKS
M�M RO�. MO�STA FL�VA
Tu--FIRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
SU� W C�y .1.
Z2.04
FWM PLAN
0 �) 8 �) �) 0 9 "Do 0 �� 0 908 C) (3
77, , . S
Z2.05
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROC KS
nHDMRRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
1�M�HRO�,MOmST&FL�DA
1�w c�y am m1w
M FLOOR PLAN
C) nn o , o* r 08 or� u�*w *
————|——————— |—�/——��———`—T——
| |t
n o ns o * w* n oa s a *
_ ______
z A
BLOWING ROCKS
MIMBEMY BEACH RW, LLC
o o �Ds e
T
CD
Loud
� /
w|
#
Im IM
sfl
im
...
9 3
UNT C
7 -AR L
0 S
Z2.09
Z A P A
T A
BLOWING ROCKS
TU-- MACH ROAD, LLC
M�ST& FL�OA
SU� 1W A��, � -M
T4
M � PLAN
0 0 0 C.) 0 (�) � 1) 1)
7 -AR L 0 S
M. 10
I I I A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
TUFAMMY MACH RW. LLC
77
T .
1�M�RO�r M�ST& FL�DA
1�w �Ya�
SU� 1M A��. � MI.
s 0 �D (D 8 1)
(D 0
S
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- -----------
x
LL�
- — — — — — —
— — — — —
—
----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
-I-
7—AR t c s
Z2.11
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
-- —CH ROAD, LLC
1� M� RO�. M�ST& FL�UA
1�wc�yu m1w
SU� — A��.
ROOFF�P�
r
ar
mr
NOR�
SoLnH
ELEVATM
7 71 L 0 s I I
Z A P A T A BLOWING ROCKS TumaEmywAcmRw,LLC Z3.01
!—T � i-1.2 1� M�H RO�, MQ�STA, ��DA SU� IM AW� SM� ELEVATICM
WEST
EAST
�1"AT"t
77, L 0 s
Z3.02
Z A P A T A
BLOWING ROCKS
TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC
1� M- RO�. ��STA. ��VA
�AMMVELEVAUM
- - - - - - - - - -
�S
T-N—AN-1— —�OF
SEN— W
o o o
ff, f
171
�Y�A�
-------------------------- ------ ---------
MHOMMMENWAVANAME
Cl) tnL.1" Lowy
architects TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD, LLC F2.01
BLOWING ROCKS
1� W —NTRY CL B
SUME—A�NTU",F-- �RAG &ENCL�A�15T
8— R—, TEQUESTA, F-1— PUN
10" HT. RAISED COPPER LETTERS
FINNED TO NALL - BACKLIT FOR
ILLUMINATION
0. 10,
*a nigr Ro&s
PRWATE MIDENCES
MAXIMUM 5I&N DIMENSIONS TO 5E 50 50. FT.
3" HT. RA15ED REGUIRED SI&N
COPPER LETTERS FOUNDATION PLANTIN6
PINNED TO NALL
ENTRANr,E 516N ELEVATION
(FAUX �NOOI�) �1ARBLE VENEER - COFFER LETTERS)
9 -ALE: 3/4"=I'-0" 10.05.18
To-:) Its 'IMUSNfIS 3— W� U
UTULT i MV -1 3MI S.11 WfUVG TV3UIMA NIM 3MO3 H�S X]
4a. u
W_ a 3Nn AV� aW Wl �3�d -
w� �iiw a-
8�im �ft 0�
z
TN_
WN d
NIS* HOlr O� 03=
M- h� � U3— W
33�WIW 3.11 -1 116
m 3&NO 03SW� 3m 03��
z
C) r,
0
"64
lit"
9 0 M3 I �13GMI G
Va W Z 100 8&DdO &d
_21
e
wl mfimi
-------- ME-
- - - -----------
IF I \ .—I — ,
_V6
�-,-7 T-7
------------
- --------- -- ------- - ---------- �-Muwdw
ATLAN71C OCEAN
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
Ly T-
7
, 7
bF
-------- -- waw%rw
------------ - - ---------- Nmw-
- — ----------- -
amkw—;- --------- ! ----------- ---------
IT
ATLANTIC OCEAN
Ear.
a Sir
�-,-7 T-7
------------
- --------- -- ------- - ---------- �-Muwdw
ATLAN71C OCEAN
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
Ly T-
7
, 7
bF
-------- -- waw%rw
------------ - - ---------- Nmw-
- — ----------- -
amkw—;- --------- ! ----------- ---------
IT
ATLANTIC OCEAN
Ear.
% fdl%.
k�'v
�y ff�
WZ1 ----------------
ffllln tij,
77
I%
T- awxb
2 MR.
MA.
----------
- --------- -------- al -A
44 --------- 4aN
4R. tt
is
LIDBERG LAND AL IJUNSPS LAND T"ll BURVIEY
S@o A I WSO BEAM ROAD
MSURVEYIN
�—G INC.
TURNBERRY BEACH ROAD LLC