The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Planning and Zoning_Tab 2_12/20/2018_Site Plan Review _ Zoning -r�.- - �� `�� Landscape Architects Pianners Environmental Consulfanis G�NTILE GLAS HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY&a��K��,inr. GeorgeG.Gendlet�SV, M.Troy Hulloway Acu kmiiv M.O'Mabonev iUtA D«li Buclunaster Glas Ai�_P November 1, 2018 Nilsa Zacarias Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: Pelican Square Dear Ms. Zacarias: Pursuant to comments received from staff on October 17, 2018 based on our resubmittal of September 26, 2018 please accept this letter as our written response. Also, included with this letter are the revised plans, which address the comments where applicable. Please note, this response letter only contains the OUTSTANDING comments made by the Village of Tequesta. For your convenience we have prepared our responses in bold ifalics. Site Plan Review—Zoninq General Comments • Provide response to 818/18 e-mail about R-O-W coordination with Palm Beach County (see attached e-mail) Response: P/ease note, on 70/19/18, the applicant provided the Community Deve/opment Director an emai!from PBC Land Development Division which states that there is no objecfion to the driveways as shown. A copy of fhat email has a/so been provided with this submittal. • Label compact parking spaces on Sheet SP-1 Response: The sjte p/an contains six 9'x18' parking spaces, which have been indicated on the sife plan and within the Site Data. • Revise Building Lot Coverage to state Professi�nal Office rather than Commercial Use Response: The building Ivf coverage fab/e has been revised, as requested. 5. Provide color chips and sample material of all exterior finishes including buildings and hardscape, including covered pavilion. Provide color board for covered pavilion. Color board provided is for the main structure(s). F'��>vi�iF f��mG,le rn��terial �f �xteriar Firiishes {Pav�:rs, etc.) Response: As discussed, paver samples in addifion to a roof sample have been provided with this submittal. 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 )upiter, �lorida 33458 561-575-9557 Sht-S75-5260 Fax www.2ghc>.cnm Pelican Square Response Letter November 9, 2098 Page 2 of 6 ' �0. Provide elevation, floor plan, material and finishes for covered pavilion. Provide color baard for covered pavilion. Color board provided is for the main structure(s). ` �� ,�i � � � �: i � ;: , �i : ; Response: As discussed, paver samples, in addifion fo a roof sampte have been provided wifh this submfttal. 18. Continue communication with surrounding neighbors. ` ��; � !�� Response.• On September 27, 2018, the applicanf inet wifh 8obbie and Dennis Pilia (3463 lnlet Court) and Tony and Leslie Hawker (3480 Cana! Court) to discuss the project details, to which they showed no opposition the proposed project. The applicanf has given the neighbors his contact informatian, and has repeatedly sfated that he is availab/e to address any concerns the residents may have. Site Plan Review- Division 2 Comments Sec. 7&331. - Required; development standards; required facilities and infrastructure. By the terms of this chapter, all permitted uses in all zoning districts except R-IA and R-1, all special exception uses as approved by the village council, all planned residential development (PRO), planned commercial development (PCD), and planned mixed-use development (PMUD), al( miscellaneous development and redevelopment, all subdivisions, and all uses or construcfion lying partially or entirely in special flood hazard areas shall comply with the following: a) Site plan review is required. SPR APPLICATION UNDER REVIEW b) Conceptual review of the overall development, if phased, is required. Response: The project is not�infended to be phased. c) The development shall conform to all minimum requirements of this chapter and any other applicable laws and regulations. SPR APPLICATION UNDER REVIEW d} The development shall be compatible with the intent of the zoning district wherein it is proposed to be located and compatible with adjacent land uses. Response: This proposal also includes a rezoning map amendment fo the Mixed Use zoning district. The development has been designed fo meet a1! sfandards of the Mixed Use district. e) No building permit shall be issued for the purpose of erecting any structure or building, or for structural alterations in any existing structure or building, until after the planning and zoning advisory board has reviewed and made recommendations to the village council, and the village council shall have finally approved the site plan in accordance with this section. However, for the items specified in section 22-53(b), the planning and zoning advisory board has final approval authority, and those items do not require further approval by the village council. SPR APPLICATION IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW. NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL VILLAGE COUNCIL APPROVAL IS OBTAINED. Response: The above provision is acknow/edged. O:\Pelican SquarelApplicationslSite PIanlAgency CorrespondencelPelican Square Response Letter 11.1.18.docx � Pelican Square Response Letter November 1, 2018 Page 3 of 6 f) No building permits or development orders shall be issued unless public facilities and services which meet or exceed the adopted level of service standards are available concurrent with the development impacts. Compliance with this requirement may be accomplished through one or more or a combination of the follawing processes: 1) Installation of all required public facilities/infrastructure/services prior to or concurrent with the development impacts. SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN URBAN SERVICE AREA OF VILLAGE &HAS ALL MUNICIPAL SERVICES AVAILABLE 2) Phasing of all required public facilitieslinfrastructure/services: PROVIDE STATEMENT a) By local government (capital improvements element). b) By the developer(development agreements). Response: As stated above, fhe sife is located within the urban service area of the Village and has all municipal services available. 3) Phasing of the development. PROVIDE STATEMENT. Response: The proposed development will not be phased. g) All proposed development and or redevelopment shall be coordinated with andlor obtain approvals and/or permits from the following agencies: 1) Palm Beach County Health Department. PROVIDE LETTER Response:A letter or permit will be provided when the design for this project has been completed, and the permif applicafion has been approved. The Owner would like to have assurance with the Site Plan layouf prior fo proceeding with complete Construction Plans 2} Tequesta Fire-Rescue Department (Fire Marshal). PROVIDE LETTER Response:A /efter or permif wil!be provided when the design for this project h�s been complefed, and the permif application has been approved. The Owner would like to have assurance wifh the Site Plan layout prior to proceeding wifh comp/efe Construcfion Plans 4) Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Applicant: PROVIDE LETTER OR STATEMENT Response: This proper�y has NO environmentatly sensitive lands or vegetation, as it has been previously developed and is mowed& maintained on a regular basis. 5) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). PROVIDE LETTER Respanse:A letter or permit wil!be pr�vided when the design for this project has been complefed, and fhe permif application has been approved. The Owner would like to have assurance with the Site Plan layout prior to proceedfng with complefe Construction Plans 6) Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). PROVIDE LETTER Response:A letter or permif will be provided when the design for fhis project has been complefed, and the permit application has been approved. The Owner would like to have assurance wifh the Site Plan layout prior fo proceeding with complefe Construction Plans 0:1Pelican SquarelApplicationslSite PIanlAgency CorrespondencelPelican Square Response Letter 11.1.18.docx Pelican Square Response Letfer November 9, 2098 Page 4 of 6 15)Tequesta Water Department. PROVIDE LETTER Response:A letter or permit will be provided when the design for this projecf has been completed, and fhe permit application has been approved. The Owner would like to have assurance with the Site P/an layouf prior to proceeding wifh complete Construction Plans h) All new development and/or redevelopment must provide the necessary infrastructure to meet the following level of service standards. Each appfication submitted pursuant to this section shall be required to provide a certification from a licensed engineer in the state that the proposed development and/or redevelopment meets or exceeds the level of service standards for the listed infrastructure as follows: 1) Traffic (roads and righfs-of-way). TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT TRAFFIC STATEMENT Roadway Type LOS Standard (LOS� Peak Coliector� C D, *Except Country Club Drive and Seabrook Road which are C -- - -- --_ -- Urban minor arteria(s C D - Princi al arterials C D ----� ----- --- _ - __ 2} Sanitary Sewer. A central wastewater level of service standard of 108 gallons per capita per day is hereby adopted, and shall be used as the basis of estimating the availability of capacity and demand generated by a proposed development project. PROVIDE STATEMENT Response: See attached Concurrency Analysis 3) Drainage. A public drainage facilities level of service standard of a 25-year frequency, 24- hour duration storm event is hereby adopted, and shall be used as the basis of estimating the availability of capacity and demand generated by a proposed develapment project.As a general drainage requirement, each proposed project and/or site must maintain 95 percent of all stormwater runoff on-site. PROVIDE STATEMENT Response: See aitached Drainage Statement 4) Potable water. The following potable water level of service standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis for estimating the availability of facifity capacity and demand generated by a proposed development project: PROVIDE STATEMENT a. Average day wafer consumption rate: Residential: 175 gallans/capita/day b. Maximum day water consumption (including irrigation): Residential: 180 gallons/capita/day Nonresidential*: 3,030 gallonslacre/day Response: See aftached Concurrency Analysis 5) Recreafion level af service standards fable. PROVIDE STATEMENT. — — - -- _-_ _-- --- Area/activity_(unit/po�aulation�__;_ Classification standard _ � Nei�hborhood parks I 2 acres/1,OOQ ; - --- --- - � Communit� park 1 _ 2 acres11,000 Beaches � 1 mile/31,250 -- -- —_ --- - -- --- Golf courses ! 9 holes/30,000 0:1Pelican SquarelApplicationslSite PIanlAgency Correspondence\Pelican Square Response Letter 11.1.18.docx Pelic�n Square Response Letter November 1, 2018 Page 5 of 6 Tennis 1 court/2,500 _ _ _ ---- -- ----— -- Basketball 1 court/2,500 Baseball/softball 1 field/7,200 ____ _ _ — — -- -- — Football/soccer 1 field/4,800 -- --__ - ---- Playground areas I____ 1 acre/3,60Q Beach access easements ' 1 per%2 mile of developed or ! � � redeveloped beach frontage _� Response: As stated in the accompanying justification statement, the applicant will be providing an 890 s.f. community recreafion room in building A along with a community gathering Open Space area with a 12'x 14'covered pavilion. There will be /VO BBQ grills provided on site. 6) Fire flow requirements. All development andlor major redevelopment must provide the necessary infrastructure improvements for fire suppression, including adequate fire hydrant placement, to meet the development's fire flow requirements in accordance with NFPA#1, Uniform Fire Code, Florida edition. PROVIDE STATEMENT Response: Du1y Noted. AI! applicable frre flow infrastructure will be improved to meef NFPA#9. j} The development shall project for the reservation and preservation of existing and future rights-of- way as may be determined by the village and in conformance with the county and village right-of-way protection plan. PROVIDE STATEMENT Response: Comment nofed. Building Department Review Mr. Jose Rodriguez, Village of Tequesta Building Official, has no comments at this time Traffic Engineerinca Review Comments - William Grieve, P.E. from McMahon Associates, Inc. Traffic Statemenf No traffic comments. Sewer, Drainage, and Water Review Comments — Spencer M. Schroeder, P.E. from Mock Roos & Associates General Most of our previous comments have satisfied with the re-subrnittal. The ApplicanYs respanses appear to demonstrate the feasibility of these areas of the proposed design. Our remaining comments are below. Utilities 2. Show the proposed watermain connectians on either side of the develapment to be connected to the existing watermain along US1 and not the existing mains within Canal Ct. and Inlet Ct. Connection to these mains would cause an unacceptable disruption of service for the residents on these streets. Also, since the watermain along US1 is larger and the connections would no longer be "size on size", tapping sleeves and valves may be used for these connections. O:1Pelican SquarelApplicationsl5ite PIanlAgency GorrespondencelPelican Square Response Letter 11.1.18.docx Pefican Square Response Letfer Novernber 1, 2018 Page 6 of 6 Response: "Per an agreement with Jay Wickham, the proposed water/fire line connections and locations will be designed per VOT standards for permitting during the Construction plan phase." 5. Original comment 5: "The submitted 'Concurrency Analysis' satisfies the level of service requirements for sanitary and potable water. However the Analysis does not address fire flow demand. Please provide#ire flow demand as calculated per NFPA#1, Uniform Fire Code, Florida Edition. Also, please provide documentation—through flow test or other means—that the potable water distribution system is capable of ineeting the calculated fire flow and pressure demands." The Applicant's response and submitted flow test only addresses part of the comment. While the submitted "Hydrant Report" confirms the available system flow and pressure, no proposed fire flow demand calculations are included with the resubmifted materials. Please provide proposed fire flow demands as calculated per NFPA #1. Also, please note, some of the preliminary information included in the Hydrant Test application does not appear to be consistent with the other submitted design information. Response: P/ease see the included sfatement which addresses �re flow demand for the proposed project. Law Enforcement Review Comments Mr. James McGrew, Village of Tequesta Assistant Police Chief, has no additionaf comments. Fire Safetv Review Comments Fire Dept. is satisfied with the applicant's response dated 8/13/2018 regarding Fire Hydrants, Sprinkler System, and Elevator. Landscape Review Comments- Stephen Parker, RLA, consulting landscape architect Perimeter Landscapinq Per the October 15, 2018 memo from Mr. Parker, the landscape plans have an updated revision date to be consistent with the other plans. Should you have any questions regarding the resubmittal please do not hesitate to contact me at 561-575-9557 or email me at ��. RespectFully, Gentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney 8 Associates, lnc. �� \; . M. Troy Holloway, PLA, ASLA, LEEDUAP, BD&C Partner O:1Pelican SquarelApplicationslSite PIanlAgency Correspondence\Pelican Square Response Letter 11.1.18.docx