HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution_58-99/00_04/13/2000•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 58-99/00
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AWARDING A ZONING SERVICES CONTRACT
TO DUNCAN ASSOCIATES OF JUNO BEACH, FLORIDA,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,000.00 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
AN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT APPLICABLE TO THE
U.S. HIGHWAY ONE AND OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
CORRIDORS, WITH SAID FUNDS BEING APPROPRIATED
FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING SERVICE ACCOUNT HAVING
A FISCAL YEAR 99/00 BUDGET ALLOCATION OF
$29,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE APPLICABLE CONTRACT ON
BEHALF OF THE VILLAGE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF
THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Contract for the Development of an Overlay
Zoning District Applicable to the U.S. Highway One and
Old Dixie Highway Corridors with Duncan Associates of
Juno Beach, Florida, in the Amount of $12,000, Attached
Hereto as Exhibit "I" and Incorporated by Reference as
Part of this Resolution is Hereby Approved and the
Village Manager is Authorized to Execute the Applicable
Contract on Behalf of the Village.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS
Walker who moved
was seconded by Councilmember_
being put to a vote, the vote
OFFERED by Councilmember
its adoption. The motion
Schauer and upon
was as follows:
FOR ADOPTION
Joseph N. Capretta
Basil E. Dalack
AGAINST ADOPTION
Geraldine A. Genco
Elizabeth A. Schauer
Sharon D. Walker
•
The Mayor thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed
and adopted this 13th day of April, A.D., 2000.
MAYOR OF TEQUESTA
ATTEST : , {, ~~ /. t ~~ ~ J~ ~ ~ .
s: ,...,.~ :...~'
.,.~.---
oann Mangan llo ,.~~:
Village Clerk ~ ~ ~" '~ ` ~'~" "'
• EXi OBIT "I"
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA AND DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
This Professional Services Agreement is made as of April ~ 2000, by and between the Village of
Tequesta, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (Village) and James Duncan and Associates,
Inc., a professional corporation located in Austin, Texas (Consultant).
WHEREAS, Village desires to engage Consultant to perform certain services relating to the
preparation of recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County,
including the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and portions of unincorporated Palm Beach
County;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter provided,
Village and Consultant agree as follows.
• 1. Scope of Agreement. Consultant's relationship to Village shall be that of independent contractor; at all
times this relationship shall be governed by and be in strict compliance with the terms of this
Professional Services Agreement.
2. Professional Services. Consultant shall furnish services to Village as set forth in Exhibit "A," which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Period of Service. Consultant shall begin its services promptly after receipt of an executed copy of this
Agreement and will complete the services pursuant to the timeline set forth in Exhibit "A." Times for
performance shall be extended for periods of delay resulting from circumstances over which Consultant
has no control.
4. Compensation. For services provided by Consultant as described in Exhibit "A", Consultant shall
bill Village, payment of each such invoice shall be due to Consultant within thirty (30) days of
receipt by Village. Consultant shall be compensated for work completed that is in conformance with
the duties set forth in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES" portion of this AGREEMENT for the sum of
twelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00). Consultant shall invoice the Village on or before the fifth (5``')
day of each month for services rendered during the previous month. Consultant shall receive
payments on or before the fifteenth (1ST') of each month
5. Subcontracting. It is understood that the Consultant may use the legal services of John C. Randolph in
the performance of certain services as presented in Exhibit "A." The Village must first approve any
• other subcontractor relationships.
•
•
EXHIBIT "I"
6. Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees that it has no interest and shall acquire no interest, direct or
indirect, that would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services hereunder. Consultant
further agrees that, in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be
employed.
7. Termination. The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by
either party upon written notice in the event of failure by the other parry to perform in accordance with
the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination, Consultant
will be paid for all services rendered to date of such termination.
8. Ownership of Documents. All documents prepared in the performance of this Agreement shall be
delivered to Village before fmal payment is made to Consultant.
9. Amendments. No amendments or modifications of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and
signed by each of the parties to the Agreement.
10. Severability. Any provision in this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable under state or federal
law shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibitions or unenforceability, without invalidating the
remaining provisions hereof. Also, the non-enforcement of any provision by either party to this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it effect the enforceability of that
provision or the remainder of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Village and Consultant have caused this instrument to be signed by their respective
duly authorized officers, all on the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
.-
ATTEST:
' da1~~:~C1
Joann Manganiello, illage Clerk
DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
ames B. Duncan, President
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
~ ~ z~~~~
Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager
•
EXHIBTT "I>,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA AND DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
This Professional Services Agreement is made as of April ~, 2000, by and between the Village of
Tequesta, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (Village) and James Duncan and Associates,
Inc., a professional corporation located in Austin, Texas (Consultant).
WHEREAS,. Village desires to engage Consultant to perform certain services relating to the
preparation of recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County,
including the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and portions of unincorporated Palm Beach
County;
NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter provided,
Village and Consultant agree as follows.
• 1. Scope of Agreement. Consultant's relationship to Village shall be that of independent contractor; at all
times this relationship shall be governed by and be in strict compliance with the terms of this
Professional Services Agreement.
2. Professional Services. Consultant shall furnish services to Village as set forth in Exhibit "A," which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Period of Service. Consultant shall begin its services promptly after receipt of an executed copy of this
Agreement and will complete the services pursuant to the timeline set forth in Exhibit "A." Times for
performance shall be extended for periods of delay resulting from circumstances over which Consultant
has no control.
4. Compensation. For services provided by Consultant as described in Exhibit "A", Consultant shall
bill Village, payment of each such invoice shall be due to Consultant within thirty (30} days of
receipt by Village. Consultant shall be compensated for work completed that is in conformance with
the duties set forth in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES" portion of this AGREEMENT for the sum of
twelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00). Consultant shall invoice the Village on or before the fifth (5~')
day of each month for services rendered during the previous month. Consultant shall receive
payments on or before the fifteenth (15~') of each month
5. Subcontractine. It is understood that the Consultant may use the legal services of John C. Randolph in
the performance of certain services as presented in Exhibit "A." The Village must first approve any
• other subcontractor relationships.
• r EX~IIBIT "I"
6. Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees that it has no interest and shall acquire no interest, direct or
indirect, that would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services hereunder. Consultant
further agrees that, in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be
employed.
•
7. Termination. The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement maybe terminated by
either party upon written notice in the event of failure by the other parry to perform in accordance with
the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination, Consultant
will be paid for all services rendered to date of such termination.
8. Ownership of Documents. All documents prepared in the performance of this Agreement shall be
delivered to Village before fmal payment is made to Consultant.
9. Amendments. No amendments or modifications of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and
signed by each of the parties to the Agreement.
10. Severability. Any provision in this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable under state or federal
law shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibitions or unenforceabiliry, without invalidating the
remaining provisions hereof. Also, the non-enforcement of any provision by either party to this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it effect the enforceability of that
provision or the remainder of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Village and Consultant have caused this instrument to be signed by their respective
duly authorized officers, all on the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
.-
(~,~• 1,
ATTEST:
Joann Manganiello, illage Clerk
DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
By: ~ ~
ames B. Duncan, President
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager
•
• EXHIBIT "P'
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA AND DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
This Professional Services Agreement is made as of April ~, 2000, by and between the Village of
Tequesta, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (Village) and James Duncan and Associates,
Inc., a professional corporation located in Austin, Texas (Consultant).
WHEREAS, Village desires to engage Consultant to perform .certain services relating to the
preparation of recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County;
including the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and portions of unincorporated Palm Beach
County;
NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter provided,
Village and Consultant agree as follows.
1. Scope of Agreement. Consultant's relationship to Village shall be that of independent contractor; at all
times this relationship shall be governed by and be in strict compliance with the terms of this
Professional Services Agreement.
2. Professional Services. Consultant shall furnish services to Village as set forth in Exhibit "A," which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Period of Service. Consultant shall begin its services promptly after receipt of an executed copy of this
Agreement and will complete the services pursuant to the timeline set forth in Exhibit "A." Times for
performance shall be extended for periods of delay resulting from circumstances over which Consultant
has no control.
4. Compensation. For services provided by Consultant as described in Exhibit "A", Consultant shall
bill Village, payment of each such invoice shall be due to Consultant within thirty (30) days of
receipt by Village. Consultant shall be compensated for work completed that is in conformance with
the duties set forth in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES" portion of this AGREEMENT for the sum of
twelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00). Consultant shall invoice the Village on or before the fifth (5`~)
day of each month for services rendered during the previous month. Consultant shall receive
payments on or before the fifteenth (15`!') of each month
5. Subcontracting. It is understood that the Consultant may use the legal services of John C. Randolph in
the performance of certain services as presented in Exhibit "A." The Village must first approve any
other subcontractor relationships.
• EXHIBIT "I"
6. Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees that it has no interest and shall acquire no interest, direct or
indirect, that would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services hereunder. Consultant
further agrees that, in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be
employed.
•
7. Termination. The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by
either party upon written notice in the event of failure by the other party to perform in accordance with
the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination, Consultant
will be paid for all services rendered to date of such termination.
8. Ownership of Documents. All documents prepared in the performance of this Agreement shall be
delivered to Village before final payment is made to Consultant.
9. Amendments. No amendments or modifications of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and
signed by each of the parties to the Agreement.
10. Severability. Any provision in this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable under state or federal
law shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibitions or unenforceability, without invalidating the
remaining provisions hereof. Also, the non-enforcement of any provision by either party to this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it effect the enforceability of that
provision or the remainder of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Village and Consultant have caused this instrument to be signed by their respective
duly authorized officers, all on the day and yeaz first above written.
ATTEST:
C,~,~ -~-~ ~--
ATTEST:
Joann Manganiello, illage Clerk
DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
sy: ~~
awes B. Duncan, President
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
~'~' ~ O
Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager
w
EX~IIEIT "A"
proposal todeve%p ~ pverlay Zoning District
submitted to ~ TEQU ESTA, FLOF~I DA
. -~~~3:rs~;~
~'~
submdtedby I duncanlassOClai'es
April 4, 2000
s
s
s
s
s
s
r
s
s
Table of Contents
FIRM DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH ....................... I
SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................... 4
Task I \ Background and Reconnaissance . .... . ...... . ........ 4
Task 2\ Issue Identification and Policy Direction .... . . .... . .... . . 5
Task 3\ Recommendations .. . ............................ 5
DELIVERABLES AND SCHEDULE ........................... 7
BUDGET ............................................. 8
USER REFERENCES ..................................... 9
DEVELOPMENT CODE CLIENTS
Palm Beach, FL: Neighborhood Design Guidelines
Palm Beach Gardens, FL: Land Development Regulations
Highland Beach, FL: Zoning Code Update
Lake Park, FL: Paris Avenue Downtown Development Code
Weston, FL: Sign and Landscape Regulations
Fort Lauderdale, FL: Sign Ordinance and Urban Design Guidelines
Jacksonville, FL: Zoning Regulations
Cooper City, FL: Land Development Regulations
RESUMES
James B. Duncan, FAICP
Eric Damian Kelly, Esq., FAICP
L. Martin Hodgkins, Jr., AICP
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
i
0
_~
Firm Description and Approach
~~
OUR FIRM
Duncan Associates is an award-winning planning and growth management
consulting firm that specializes in the revision of land development regulations..
From our offices in Juno Beach, Austin, Muncie, and Chicago, we serve a
growing clientele that includes many of the nation's most progressive cities and
counties. Since its initial establishment in Fort Lauderdale in 1.977, Duncan
Associates has successfully revised and updated land development codes for over
75 communities in 26 states. Codes drafted by the firm have received awards
from the Texas, Louisiana and Florida chapters of the American Planning
Association. Unlike most consultants, Duncan Associates specializes in plan
implementation work; drafting land development regulations is our primary
business. If Duncan Associates. is selected for this assignment to provide
recommendations for a potential mufti-jurisdictional overlay zoning district for the
Village, Martin Hodgkins of our Florida office, will Serve as our on-site, day-today
project manager. In addition,. firm president James B. Duncan from our Austin
office will provide assistance on an as-needed basis. Legal counsel, if necessary,
will be provided by Eric Damian ,Kelly, Esq.
i
r~
M
Typical Corridor Problems
• Lack of unifying elements to provide
identity or character to the corridor
• Multiple jurisdictions with varying
planning and zoning requirements
• Lack of prevailing architectural style
• Lack of overall landscape themes
• Lack of common standards for signs
• Compatibility issues between uses
allowed throughout the comdor
CORRIDOR CONFLICTS -- A COMMON PROBLEM
The Old Dixie Highway and U.S. Highway One corridors represent a
rather common problem found throughout much of Palm Beach County
and South Florida: urban commercial corridors located in more than one
jurisdiction. Between them, the two corridors are located in three
separate jurisdictions: the Yllage of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and
unincorporated Palm Beach County. Old Dixie Highway is a two- and
four-lane road, while U.S. Highway One is a six-lane median-divided
highway. On the north, both roads end at the Palm Beach -Martin
County line. On the south, both roads connect to the northern portions
of the Town of Jupiter: The character of Old Dixie Highway is mixed:
bounded on the west by the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC), and on
the east are a variety of commercial, industrial, residential, and governmental
uses. The U.S. Highway One corridor also is mixed, but contains primarily strip
commercial and multifamily residential uses.
There are differences between median landscaping, landscaping on private
property, signs and billboards, and overall architectural design of structures
located within the various portions of the corridor. These differences reflect the
contrasting planning and zoning policies of the three jurisdictions. The differences
also are reflective of the period when the buildings, signs, and landscaping were
approved and installed. Also visible in certain areas are potential limitations for
improvements to property, including landscaping, parking, and additions to
buildings, caused by past expansion of the two roads.
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND ENHANCEMENTS
A cooperative effort between Tequesta, Jupiter, and the County provides a long
term opportunity to enhance and improve the two corridors to the benefrt of all
residents. The following joint actions represent the basis for such long term
improvements:
^ changes to comprehensive plans to adopt complementary
goals, objectives, and policies;
^ adopting common standards for permitted uses, site planning;
landscaping, and signs; and
^ providing overall architectural standards for new or renovated
structures.
The cooperative effort also could positively affect adjacent residential areas,
through prohibiting or ultimately eliminating uses detrimental to such
neighborhoods. The corridor study also could provide an opportunity to review
policies and judicial trends affecting billboards.
As a nearby example, the benefits of adopting overlay zoning techniques are
demonstrated by the Indiantown Road Overlay Zoning District (IOZ). The IOZ,
approved by the Town of Jupiter in 1990, restricts uses, implements general
design standards, limits uses, and provides area specific landscape requirements.
The long term success of the IOZ is largely due to the consistent support by the
Town Council for the district, the specificity of the regulations, and funding for
landscaping enhancement programs for the corridor. In 1996, to further extend
the zoning policies of the IOZ, the Town and the County entered into an
interiocal agreement to allow Jupiter to exercise planning and zoning authority in
unincorporated areas east of I-95.
UNIQUE COMMUNITY NEEDS
Duncan Associates is familiar with the need to apply. zoning and design
techniques that reflect the specific character of the corridor and the communities
affected. As indicated previously, our Florida office is located in northern Palm
Beach County, and is familiar with the land use, landscaping, and design
problems associated with the Old Dixie/U.S. One corridors. Our firm also is
familiar with the elements of implementing urban corridor plans via overlay
districts. In fact, Mr. Hodgkins, has drafted or assisted in drafting several overlay
districts:
^ in his former position as Community Development Director for
the Town of Jupiter, he drafted the original Indiantown Road
Overlay Zoning District (IOZ);
^ while Zoning Administrator in the City of West Palm Beach, he
assisted in drafting language for the Lakefront Preservation
Overlay Zoning District (LFPOD); and
^ while serving as Palm Beach County Zoning Director, he
assisted in the drafting of the Turnpike Aquifer Protection
Overlay District (fAP-O).
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 2
Pragmatic Approach
Duncan Associates is well known for its pragmatic and individualized approach in
dealing with land development issues. Our approach to any land development
issue draws upon our years of experience in developing regulations tailored to
unique local needs. It stresses on-going and meaningful interaction with local
participants and structured, independent work by members of our
firm-working alone or as part of a team. Having successfully updated many
' codes and addressed a variety of code-related issues, we know the pitfalls to
avoid.
Two primary objectives guide us in addressing land development and zoning
issues. First, the response need to mirror desired community policies and
objectives. Second, the response should be clear, concise, and provide solutions
that can be easily implemented and administered. We accomplish these
objectives by preparing responses that reflect current and anticipated trends, and
responses that address substantive land use and development issues of
importance to each community.
s
s
Local Perspective
Thorough analysis of existing regulations, land use policies and community
conditions-distilled through discussions with local staff, citizens and stakeholders,
independent analyses and field work-forms the foundation for our work. The
local perspective that emerges from this background is complemented by our
national experience, which we call upon to offer workable format, organizational
and regulatory alternatives for consideration by the community.
Successful completion of any project requires a blend of big picture thinking,
meaningful local participation, and "Witty-gritty" detailed drafting and organizational
work. Each of our answers is customized. We do not use a "cookie-cutter" or
"boiler-plate" approach in our recommendations to local problems.
Common Sense Solutions
"flavor-of--the-day" concept.
The professionals at Duncan Associates have the experience required to provide
common sense solutions to both simple and complex land use issues. As former
public-sector planners and zoning administrators, we have actually administered
regulations and know about the real-life problems and issues that can arise on a
daily basis. Duncan Associates proposes regulatory solutions for individual
communities that truly work. They are not abstract applications or some fleeting
COrpOrate: JAMES DUNCAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
d/b/a DUNCAN ASSOCIATES
390 South Juno Lane
Juno Beach, Florida 33408
tel: 56 I /626-2420 fax: 561 /630-9852
email: mhodgkinsCa~mindspring.com
website: www.duncanplan.com
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 3
Scope of Services
Duncan Associates proposes a straightforward scope of services for the Village of Tequesta "multi-jurisdictional
overlay zoning. district" project. Our proposed scope of services outlines a series of tasks culminating in a series of
recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County. Preparation of the
recommendations will be carried out with direction from the Village staff and other participants that may be
identified as beneficial to the overall process.
TASK I\BACKGROUND AND RECONNAISSANCE
The initial task of our work program will focus on organizational and substantive issues. We will identify
information sources, refine responsibilities, discuss overall goals and reach agreement on a number of
other project issues. This task will also serve as a forum for addressing specific topics and issues to be
explored during our data analysis and meetings with other jurisdictions. By conducting these. tasks right
away, we'll be able to identify issues that have a direct bearing on the project.
A. Data Gathering
We will identify data and information needs, including ordinances, plans, studies, permits and
other development-related documents.
B. Document Review
We will conduct preliminary review of existing zoning, subdivision and related regulations. We
will also conduct a thorough examination of all available planning documents, including the
~,,,~ comprehensive plans for all three jurisdictions.
C. Organizational Meeting
We will attend an initial meeting with Village staff in Tequesta to discuss project organization and
logistical issues. Individual meetings with representatives from other jurisdictions also would be
discussed at this time.
D. Key Person Interviews
We will conduct interviews with 3 - 5 key persons, identified by the Village, to discern
development trends and issues of local importance. Interviewees should be knowledgeable of
issues the Village faces with respect to long term development within both corridors.
E. Other Jurisdictional Meetings.
We will meet with key officials and staff of other jurisdictions to determine how best to implement
a unified approach to resolve common issues and concerns within the two corridors.
F. field Surveys
We will conduct field surveys of existing development patterns, including both land uses and
structures, within the two corridors to better understand the applied cumulative effects of past
and current codes and regulations.
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 4
-~
~~
TASK 2\ISSUE IDENTIFICATION
The purpose of this task is to gain insight into key regulatory policy issues that wilt need to be addressed in
the recommendations regarding the two corridors,
A. Analysis of Existing Regulations/Policies
We will continue our analysis of pertinent regulations, procedures, permits, plans and policies
e within the three jurisdictions.
B. Comprehensive Plan Consistency
Any conflicts between the three comprehensive plans will be identified, and will be included in the
final recommendations.
C. Land Development Regulations
The land development regulations (LDRs) of the three jurisdictions will be reviewed. Both
common elements and conflicts between the three sets of regulations will be identified. Among
~_ items to be reviewed are the following:
^ signs
^ property development regulations (building height, lot coverage, setbacks, floor area ratio,
minimum lot size, etc.)
^ landscaping
^ architectural standards
^ permitted, conditional/special exception, and prohibited uses
^ nonconformities
^ definitions
^ site planning
TASK 3\RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Issue Identification/Policy Memorandum
We will prepare a report containing recommendations based upon key regulatory issues and problems
identified during the first two tasks. The report will also include the following specific recommendations:
"~ ^ a list of permitted, conditional/special exception, and prohibited uses that should be
utilized throughout both corridors
^ one or more recommendations for common architectural to be utilized within both
corridors
^ one or more recommendations for common landscaping standards, themes, and
materials to be installed on private property within both corridors,
^ one or more recommendations for common landscaping standards, themes, and
materials to be installed on public property within both corridors
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
5
a~
s
s
i
r
l
^ recommendations to achieve a unified approach to the two corridors, including adoption
of common comprehensive planning policies, adoption of common zoning policies,
adoption of a common overlay district, adoption of a joint planning agreement, use of
interlocal agreements, or other less formal means of cooperation
^ recommendations for providing appropriate public notice to achieve the recommended
courses of action
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
6
[~
s
s
4~
Deliverables and Schedule
Deliverables
Task Deliverable
I\ Background and Organizational Meeting
Reconnaissance Field Surveys (I day)
Ke Person Interviews 3-5
2\ Issue Identification and Village Staff Meeting
Poli Direction Meetin with Officials from Other urisdictions
3\ Draft Recommendations. Draft Recommendations
~Ila e Staff Meetin
Schedule
Our proposed time schedule complies with the schedule included within the Request for Proposal (RFP). The RFP
calls for a delivery period. of sixty (60) days upon signing of the contract to perform the services identified herein.
This schedule is acceptable to our firm.
`T`ask ~-lours
I \ Background and
Reconnaissance 25
2\ Issue Identification and
Polic Direction 25
3\ Draft Recommendations 50
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
7
r
t
Ir
sr
r
s
s
r
s
s
s
s
s
s
Budget
We will perform the work described in this proposal for slump-sum, fixed-fee budget of $ 12,000. This figure
includes all of our direct and indirect expenses. The budget is based on $ I I ,000 for our services and $ I ,000 for
expenses. Additional project time, beyond the scope of our proposal, can be contracted as follows: James B.
Duncan at $ 125 per hour; Eric D. Kelly at $ 150 per hour; and, Martin Hodgkins at $95 per hour.
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
8
s
s
s
User References
Town of Palm Beach -October 1999 to Present
' Paul W, Castro, AICP
Zoning Administrator
561 /835-4614
Town of Highland Beach -May 1999 to Pn=sent
Robert S. Dawson, CBO
Building Official
56 I /278-4540
City of Palm Beach Gardens -May 1999 to Present
Roxanne M. Manning, AICP
Growth Management Director
561/799-4243
Village of Wellington -July 1999 to Present
James R. Kuzdaz, Jr., AICP
Planning, Zoning and Building Director
561/753-2430
Town of Lake Park -April 1999 to October 1999
David Thatcher, AICP
Community Development Director
56 I /848-3458
Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations
9
APR 06 '00 03~04PM JONES FOSTER JOHNSTON &STUBBS
Joys
Foss
~~17.L V X71 Vl V
$~ STUBS, P.A.
Attorneys and Counselors
Flagler Cettter'1'ower, Suite 1100
505 Sou[h Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone (561) 659-3004
John C. Randolph, Esy.
Direct Dial: (561) G50-0458
irmaiL- jraz~dolpli@Sjones-foster.cona
Apri16, 2000
VIA FA7~: 575-6239
Kara L. ]'twin, Planner
Village of Tequesta
Post pflxce Box 3273
Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273
RE: Village of Tequesta
01d Di~cie ~Tighway Overla~r
Our 1a'i1e No. 13153.1
Hear Kara:
P.1i1
Mailing Add~ss
Post Office Box 34'75
West Palm Beach, -}-orida 33402-3475
1;ACSimile (561) 832-1454
• Y have reviewed your fax of yesterday regarding the above refezenced subj ect, Please be advised that
Z approve of the Resolution and the Professional Services Agreement between Village of Tequesta
and Duncan Associates.
Sincerely,
JONES, FOST R, JOHNSTON &STUBBS, P.A.
John C. Randolph
JCR/ssrl~
C:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
DEPAR'I1~IENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Post Office Box 3273 357 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 0561) 575-6220
Fax: (561) 575-6239
Kequest for Proposal for lleveloping a Potential Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay
Zoning District
The Village of Tequesta, Florida is seeking proposals for a Zoning and Land-Use Consultant for
the purpose of developing a potential multi jurisdictional overlay zoning district applicable to
those properties adjacent to U.S. Highway One and Old Dixie Highway comdors from Alternate
AlA to County Line Road. The following information and guidelines should be considered for
all proposals submitted.
Proposal Due Date
The deadline for the submission of proposals in response to this request is 2:00 p.m. local time on
Tuesday, April 4, 2000, at the office of the Village of Tequesta, Department of Community
Development, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469. Normal Village business hours are
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p,m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Questions relating to this
request should be directed to Scott D. Ladd at (561) 575-6220.
Proposal Acceptance
The Village reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, in whole or in part, with or without
• cause, to waive any informalities or technicalities, and to make awards as it considers to be in the
best interest of the Village of Tequesta.
Acceptance of Proposal Content
The contents of the successful proposal will become a contractual obligation if a contract ensues.
Failure of the successful respondent to accept this obligation may result in cancellation of the
award.
Legal Requirements
Federal, State, County and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations that in any manner affect
the items covered herein apply. Lack of Knowledge by the respondent will in no way be a cause
for relief from responsibility.
1. Vendors doing business with the Village are prohibited from discriminating
against any employee, applicant for employment or client because of race, creed,
color, ancestry, religion, national origin, sex or age with regard to, but not
limited, to the following: employment practices, rates of pay or other
compensation methods and training selection.
2. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following
a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid contract to provide
y o u i ~ y u i on chi. tit~~~ --------------
public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work,
may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be
awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant
• under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any
public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, for
Recycled Paper
CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on
the convicted vendor list.
3. The obligations of the Village under this award are subject to the availability of
funds lawfully appropriated for this purpose.
Drug-free Workplace
Preference shall be given to businesses with adrug-free workplace program.
Public Records Law
In conformance with the Florida Public Records law, all proposal documents or other material
submitted in response to this request other that financial statements submitted, shall upon opening
of the responses, be available for public inspection by any person.
Term of the Contract
The Village Council shall provide selected consultant sixty (60) days to deliver the desired work
product upon bid award.
User References
Please provide a list of at least five paying customers of your company, preferably municipalities
in the State of Florida, who are using the proposed services. The list should provide a contact
name, telephone number and length of time using your services.
Scope of Services
- Review of the existing land use regulations within Palm Beach County, Town of Jupiter
• and the Village of Tequesta for those lands adjacent to the U.S. Highway One and Old
Dixie Highway corridors from Alternate AlA to County Line Road.
- Identify the land use regulations similarities and disparities.
- Preparation of written recommendations relative to land use regulations to be applicable
in the identified corridors in order to provide for continuity and uniformity in appearance
of properties within the corridor over time.
- Written recommendation relative to legal means of accomplishing uniform land
development regulations within identified comdors such as:
o Overlay zoning districts applicable within the identified corridors and
administered by one entity, such as Tequesta, and formalized by Joint Planning
Agreement authorized in F.S. 163.3171.
o Separate adoption of the same uniform land use regulations to be administered by
each entity separately.
- Confer with the affected local government entities in order to receive their local input
relative to the recommended uniform land developmenrt regulations to be drafted and
their preference for the administration of the regulations.
- Outline of the adoption, public notice requirement and procedures for the recommended
course of action.
Fees
_.
maters estunates or sernces vF`ees wig be~paid withiiirnthirty (3fi) days after invoicing:
I'-1
U
i
• Suggested Vendors:
L. Martin Hodgkins, A.LC.P.
Duncan Associates
390 South Juno Lane
Juno Beach, Florida 33406
Kimley-Horn & Associates
4431 Embarcadero Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
Keith and Schnars, PA
901 Northpoint Parkway
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc. Community Planning
222 Clematis Street, Suite 200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dover, Kohl & Partners
5879 Sunset Drive, Suite 1
South Miami, Florida 33143
JLH Associates
• Jack L. Horniman
8557 SE Coconut Street
Hobe Sound, Florida 33455
Carney-Neuhaus Inc.
11911 U.S. Highway One
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33408
•