HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Memorial_Tab 01_01/08/2008TEQUESTA VILLAGE COUNCIL AND TEQUESTA MEMORIAL
COMMITTEE
WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 2007
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Memorial Committee held a workshop meeting in the Tequesta Village Hall, 345
Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Tuesday, January 23, 2007. The meeting was called to
order at 4:29 p.m. Village Council Members present were: Mayor Jim Humpage, Vice Mayor
Tom Paterno, Council Member Geraldine A. Genco, Council Member Pat Watkins. Committee
Members present were: Former Mayor Carl Hansen, Former Mayor Elizabeth Schauer, Former
Mayor Carlton Stoddard. Also present were: Village Manager Michael R. Couzzo, Jr. and
Village Clerk Lori McWilliams.
INVOCATION
Committee Member Schauer gave the invocation.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Council Member Watkins made a motion to approve the agenda as submitted. Committee
Member Schauer seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote.
DISCUSSION ON CONSTRUCTION OF A CITIZEN'S MEMORIAL
Mayor Humpage thanked the Committee Members for their diligence over the year; and
remembered Former Mayor Colonel Edward D. Resnik, who was the driving force. He stated the
Village appreciated the Committee's endeavors, and thanked them for their helpful information.
He remembered when the Memorial Committee was formed; the Village left everything in their
hands to decide what to do. He stated the Village Council initially began with a Public Safety
venue, and explained as they moved forward, the idea was sidetracked, and was turned to a
Public Memorial, rather than a Public Safety Memorial.
Mayor Humpage pointed out there was a funding issue. He recalled all the funding that had been
collected was earmarked as the Public Safety Memorial; and those who donated money, had
donated under this premise. He mentioned Colonel Resnik wanted to offer something to the
public. He stated that was when they had the split; and the Public Safety Memorial remained as it
was, but an Ad Hoc committee came forward for a Public Memorial. He pointed out this was
evident in the minutes. He asked where they would go from here. He stated Council had to take
the cost into consideration. He mentioned the money was all privately donated, and there were
no public funds used in the Public Safety Memorial; and pointed out the only tax payer dollar
being used for the Public Safety Memorial was for its maintenance. He stated the reason they
were having this workshop was to see how Council felt about the Public Memorial, and how it
should be funded.
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 23, 200
Page 2
Council Member Genco wanted to make sure it was recorded that there were two proposed
memorials; one was the Public Safety Memorial, which was independent, and would come back
come back to Council. The other was the Public Memorial, which the Ad Hoc committee worked
on over a year. She explained this was something Council was addressing for the first time in a
workshop, and they would address exactly what it would be, how much it would cost, and
approval of the Public Memorial. Committee Member Stoddard stated that was correct. He
recalled it was agreed by the Memorial Committee that they were not to be involved in the
Public Safety Memorial, because they had their own funds. He stated they had to start the Public
Memorial.
Committee Member Hanson stated he heard of two different committees from citizens, and he
had a hard time understanding what the Public Safety Memorial would be. He suggested they
should also be looking at Village employees who have served for a long time, and also past and
present Council Members. Vice Mayor Paterno stated he understood what Mr. Hansen was
saying, and pointed out they should not be concentrating on the Public Safety Memorial. Council
Member Genco explained Mr. Hansen was speaking of the Public Memorial, and not the Public
Safety Memorial. She explained when September 11`" happened, they had decided to focus on
artwork, or a sculpture to memorialize the people who had fallen in the line of duty on that day.
Council Member Genco stated Colonel Resnik put a committee together to try to find an artist,
who would build this concept. She stated for some reason that was changed to a Public
Memorial, which the Memorial Committee pursued vigorously. She stated they had to determine
the funds, and the location of the Memorial. She pointed out there were also recommendations
for who might be memorialized in the Public Memorial. Committee Member Schauer stated
Colonel Resnik told them there would be one for Public Safety, and they should work on another
memorial for the public. She specified they agreed as a committee, that at the height of season,
the Village Manager would write letters to all Home Owners' Associations in Tequesta, to ask if
they wanted to participate in giving money for a Public Memorial. She thought that was one
thing to start. She stated in the past, they did not have time to discuss that, but they felt that was
one avenue to raise funds. She explained the best time to send the letters out was during the
height of the season, when most community members were in the Village.
Mayor Humpage stated the Public Safety Memorial had a funding source, a recovery funding
source, and was a year from completion. Mayor Humpage felt Council needed to decide at this
workshop, if they would choose to build the Public Memorial that the Ad Hoc Committee has
worked on. He stated he did not have a problem with doing it, but his concern was the funding of
this Public Memorial. He stated another concern was what the Public Memorial would look like,
and how much space it would occupy. He commented he did not think the memorial proposed
was unattractive, but he felt it was extravagant. He stated before they did anything, they had to
have a funding source. Committee Member Stoddard stated he had no exception to what has
been said thus far. He commented it seemed it was straight forward, and they should get the job
done. He felt the committee did the job they were assigned, which was sizing up what the Public
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 2g, 200
Page 3
Memorial should look like. He stated it was in the back up material provided. He commented it
was excellently done by the Lake Worth Monument Company.
Committee Member Stoddard commented the President of the Company, Mr. Menor, was not
present, but he thought he did a marvelous job. He hoped they did not have to start all over again,
because it was achieved by a lot of hard work. He stated the cost was not exorbitant, and
suggested it could partly be paid for by the people who authorized their family members' names
to be inscribed. He recommended the Village keep it at a nominal cost. He stated in addition to
working with the Associations, it was important to keep the Public Memorial very attractive for
the people who would authorize the inscription of the names. He felt that was achievable.
Council Member Watkins appreciated the time the Committee Members put into this. She stated
it took a long time to get to this. She mentioned she looked at the rendering, and had a few
questions. She stated she spoke to residents who had a concern about having a tall large
monument in the green space. She suggested it be done in cast bronze, it not be on the lawn, and
suggested it be positioned under the amphitheatre. She stated it would be protected and lit at
night, and it would be a focal point for those passing by the south wall. Council Member
Watkins commented this was just a thought.
Mayor Humpage stated the first thing they needed to decide was the funding, no matter how it
looked or the location. Committee Member Hansen stated it sounded like the Public Safety
Memorial was a go. He stated from what he understood, the Public Safety Memorial did not just
include anyone from the Village, but was also in honor of those who lost their lives on
September 11, 2001. He stated that would be a separate Memorial, and the Village had funding
for that. He summarized what they were discussing now was the Public Memorial, which would
be in honor of the people who served Tequesta in one form or another. He asked if all the money
was going for the Public Safety Memorial, or would there be some money left over for a Public
Memorial. Mayor Humpage stated all the money in the account was earmarked for the Public
Safety Memorial, and had been donated under that premise. Council Member Genco stated those
who donated the money expect it to be spent on the Public Safety Memorial.
Vice Mayor Paterno stated the Public Safety Memorial was separate from the Public Memorial,
and if they kept that in mind, they could go further. Committee Member Hansen stated this
committee could leave all the decisions about the Public Safety Memorial to the Public Safety
Memorial Committee. Mayor Humpage stated that was always separate. Council Member Genco
stated she has been approached by residents asking why the money for the Public Safety
Memorial was going for the other Memorial. Council Member Genco stated she tried to explain
that the money was not being spent for the Public Memorial. Committee Member Schauer asked
if anyone had any other ideas, because the only idea she had was to write letters to Homeowners
Associations.
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 2g, 200
Page 4
Vice Mayor Paterno commended the committee for the job they did to put it together. He stated
he heard people did not envision the memorial being composed of plaques. He suggested people
buy bricks, and the Village put bricks into the sidewalk. He explained this would allow the
Village to raise funds, and would be funded by the people who wanted to do this. Committee
Member Schauer explained the proposed Memorial was Colonel Resnik's idea. She explained
the Committee stated the two side plaques were not necessary. She pointed out other
Municipalities have done the bricks, and it has been a success. Council Member Genco pointed
out they would acknowledge the people who served the Village, and the people who made a
donation for the brick.
Mayor Humpage mentioned that the bust of the Tequesta Indian, was on the south portico, and
they could have a walkway to the bust from the Public Safety Memorial; that would bring the
two memorials together. He stated most of the resistance to this proposed Memorial was about
the size; he felt like they were opening a mausoleum on the property; and pointed out there was
also a taxpayer money issue. He explained some taxpayers were resistant to the idea of the
Village's tax money being spent on it. He pointed out the Village would have to contribute
anyway in the maintenance of the Memorial, but it would generate cost to the Village. He
summarized the Finance Department would have to track some of these things, and someone
would have to do the ordering, so it would also be a burden to the Village. He stated if they could
come up with something subdued and attractive that they could all agree on, they would be
where they needed to be.
Committee Member Stoddard thought they were closer to a resolution. He stated, first, the size
was not immoderate. He specified it was 38 feet, and that included landscaping. He stated he
studied the park where it would be, and there was ample room for it. He felt to make it smaller
was not necessary. He stated second, the job that was not done yet, was to fully inform the
people of Tequesta. He stated they should be shown a picture of the proposed Memorial. He
pointed out the newspapers have not done it, nor has television. He stated they needed to get it
out clearly, forcefully, and beautifully to the people in order to show them what it was all about.
He commented this would give them an opportunity to immortalize their family members. He
stated the project needed to be done. He referred to the report he submitted, he specified it stated
what the Village needed to do to sell this to the people of Tequesta. He commented they needed
to see what it meant historically to do something in a commemorative way. He felt there would
be reception to the idea. He added they had to keep costs moderate, and thought it was a sellable
idea.
Vice Mayor Paterno referred to the Tequesta Indian Plaque on the south side, and suggested they
compromise by putting a plaque under it in dedication to all residents of Tequesta. He explained
it would be a dedication, which symbolized that the Village Hall represented all residents of
Tequesta. He stated this would avoid any controversy over spending tax payer money. Mayor
Humpage stated that sounded good to him. Committee Member Schauer stated they could move
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 2g, 200
Page 5
forward with the brick. Council Member Genco suggested the bricks go out to the water
fountain.
Vice Mayor Paterno stated the plaque could say dedicated to all Tequesta residents, and the
bricks would be individually based. He suggested someone could buy the brick, mark it, and
place it where the person wanted it to be. Committee Member Stoddard stated they were getting
off track; and commented Vice Mayor Paterno's point and purpose of method was not correct.
He stated they could do it if they wanted, but they did not want to have a bunch of bricks. He
suggested they focus on having those names for the beautiful planning as provided. He stated
they would be charged a reasonable cost. Vice Mayor Paterno specified each person could buy
more than one brick, but not too many bricks. Mayor Humpage did not think residents wanted a
memorial as elaborate as proposed, with the granite and the names. He stated the consensus was,
they thought a low key Public Memorial in a location of reflection was fine. He stated they were
objecting to the magnitude.
Committee Member Schauer pointed out Colonel Resnik suggested the granite, but now what
was being said was true. She stated the proposed Memorial was big, and if they went with the
bricks, people could buy the bricks, it would still be done in a dignified way, and would still
honor all of the people who have served the Village of Tequesta. She pointed out they would also
have a dedication to residents underneath the bust. She stated everyone would be happy, because
they thought the proposed Memorial was too big. She pointed out the bricks could be put all
around. Committee Member Stoddard asked where the bricks would be. Committee Member
Schauer specified it would be paver bricks. Mayor Humpage stated it would be in the walkway
up to the portico. Committee Member Stoddard asked if that would replace the proposed Public
Memorial. Committee Member Schauer stated he needed to understand the proposed Memorial
would cost close to $40,000, and they did not have the money; in order to keep everyone happy
they would put it on the wall along with the paver bricks. Vice Mayor Paterno suggested they
have a nice sign made of bronze. Committee Member Stoddard commented he did not buy it.
Committee Member Stoddard expressed all his work, hope, and prayer was being torn apart. He
did not agree that the people of Tequesta voted against it. He stated it was not told to them, nor
has it been shown. Mayor Humpage stated the residents he has spoken to were well aware of
what it looked like; they have seen the documentation. He stated since the committee has been
meeting, he saved everything from the meeting. He stated what drove him to do this was the rift
they had regarding the Public Safety Memorial. He pointed out the Public Safety Memorial
would cost approximately $90,000. He advised the Public Safety Memorial was small compared
to the proposed Public Memorial. Committee Member Stoddard pointed out the Memorial
company estimated it to be $40,000 not $90,000. Vice Mayor Paterno stated if he remembered
correctly that estimate was given four years ago, and construction costs have probably doubled.
Council Member Watkins pointed out they had the marble from the old building, and suggested
they made a plaque out of that. Mayor Humpage stated on top of the Memorial, was the bronze
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 23, 200
Page 6
head which was already in place. Committee Member Stoddard asked if it was already used.
Mayor Humpage stated it was on the south portico. Committee Member Stoddard asked if it was
taken away from them. Mayor Humpage stated they could take all the information on the
proposed memorial, put it in the portico, and on the paver bricks towards the Public Safety
Memorial. Council Member Genco suggested the plaque under the Indian head be dedicated to
the residents. Mayor Humpage asked if he has seen the Indian head. Committee Member
Stoddard stated no, and expressed he wanted to see the bronze Indian plaque on the south
portico. Village Manager Couzzo offered to show him. Council Member Genco stated she also
wanted to hear what Mr. Hansen wanted to say, because he spent as much time on it.
Village Manager Couzzo and Committee Member Stoddard left the room to see the Indian Head
on the south portico.
Committee Member Hansen stated he understood Mr. Stoddard's point, because it was not what
they talked about. He stated they might have been misled. He referred to the procedures and
policies of the Memorial. He stated he understood Mr. Stoddard's objection, and also understood
the funding issue. Committee Member Schauer asked Mr. Hansen if he agreed the bricks would
be nice. Committee Member Hansen stated yes, but Mr. Stoddard was not out of line for
objecting.
Council Member Genco referred to the Memorial Committee's Final Report of June 2004, where
it stated "In January, 2004 Village Manager Couzzo proposed to then Mayor Resnik that the
Village might be better served if the concept was expanded to a Village of Tequesta Memorial."
Council Member Genco stated the Council never approved any of that. Committee Member
Schauer stated Mr. Couzzo was never at any of their meetings. Council Member Genco stated
this was read into the record by Colonel Resnik at a Council meeting. Committee Member
Hansen wished Mr. Bob Garlo, former Assistant Village Manager, was here because he was at
the meetings.
Council Member Genco explained her point was the concept was off base, and unknowingly the
committee worked hard on achieving an objective without guidance from Council as a whole.
Committee Member Schauer commented it would be hard to keep the peace with Mr. Stoddard,
but she could honestly say, if they had the sign, they should do the bricks. Vice Mayor Paterno
stated the whole wall would have the bust with something nicely said underneath it. He
explained instead of putting names on the wall, they would use the bricks. He pointed out it
would be self funded, the Village would not have to worry about money, and it could be done as
they go. Council Member Watkins mentioned they still had to do maintenance.
Vice Mayor Paterno stated that would be relative, and they would have to do that anyway with
bricks already being there. Committee Member Schauer pointed out they could use the same
guidelines that they already had. Vice Mayor Paterno stated it would be the same, except, instead
of the names being on the wall, they would be on the bricks. Council Member Genco suggested
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 23, 200
Page ~
no bricks be on the edge, because the bricks on the end usually chip and crumble. She stated they
would put a frame of other bricks to make sure the inside bricks stayed nice. Council Member
Watkins suggested in consideration of Mr. Stoddard, they take the Granite, and cut it to a brick
size with a name engraved.
Vice Mayor Paterno stated it would be 3/4 inches thick, and something would have to be built
underneath it such as sand or concrete. He pointed out it would also be slippery which would be
a hazard. Vice Mayor Paterno suggested bronze would be beautiful and elegant. He pointed out
in 50 years they would still see it. Mayor Humpage mentioned the Village would fund inscription
verbiage on the portico. Vice Mayor Paterno stated they could have it funded for the wall, if they
voted on it in February. He stated the bricks would come as people wanted them. Council
Member Watkins pointed out the brick idea was something people were familiar with, because
schools did it to raise funds.
Village Manager Couzzo and Committee Member Stoddard returned to the room.
Committee Member Stoddard expressed thanks to Village Manager Couzzo for taking him to see
the Indian head, and commended the planners of the portico. He commented it was a good thing.
He noticed there was ample space to effectively reproduce what was proposed. He asked for the
possibility to use the marble from the old Village Hall to inscribe names. Vice Mayor Paterno
stated they were trying to come to some consensus. He commented personally, he did not want to
create a mausoleum effect. Committee Member Stoddard asked if that was his opinion. Vice
Mayor Paterno stated that was his opinion. Committee Member Stoddard stated that was Vice
Mayor Paterno's opinion, and he had his. He commented he did not think Vice Mayor Paterno's
opinion was good. Vice Mayor Paterno commented that was fine.
Vice Mayor Paterno explained if they could use the bust, and put the sign underneath, the Village
would subsidize this memorial information, and the bricks coming to it would be a good idea. He
stated he was not in favor of the names being on the wall. Committee Member Stoddard stated if
names were inscribed on the bricks that people walked on, as if it were Hollywood, he would
withdraw his $100 check, which he wrote to have his wife's name on the Memorial. He stated he
would not allow his wife's name to be walked on. Mayor Humpage stated they were trying to
come to a consensus, for the sake of the constituents, despite what they felt personally.
Committee Member Stoddard stated he came a long way, and he would like it done beautifully.
Mayor Humpage stated he had visions of the Public Safety Memorial being 8 feet high. He stated
for $90,000 they would have a basic Memorial. Vice Mayor Paterno suggested they come up
with a couple of renderings as to what they could do with the portico, and then reconvene so they
could come to a resolution. Council Member Watkins asked if it was possible to present the
renderings at a Council meeting, so they could get some feedback from the public before another
workshop.
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 23, 200
Page 8
Mayor Humpage thought they should have some alternatives. Council Member Watkins stated
they had two so far; one being the names on the wall, and the other being the names on the brick.
Council Member Genco pointed out they should not forget the cost of getting the marble
engraved, which might be based on a letter by letter cost. Vice Mayor Paterno stated the bricks
would be more economical, because they would have to pay people to come to the Village Hall
and engrave the names in the marble; while bricks could be engraved in a certain place then
taken to the site.
Council Member Genco suggested benches or something in different areas, because if the portico
was used for entertainment, they would not want something high immediately around it. She
pointed out benches could be on the side. She stated the marble could be used for the benches,
and the names could be underneath the benches. Committee Member Schauer suggested the
engravings of the church be on the benches. Council Member Watkins suggested bricks go in a
certain direction to avoid anyone stepping on them, to accommodate that issue.
Committee Member Schauer stated the man who did it for the church was not taking any more
costumers; but she would ask who he would recommend. She explained they could get the
recycled benches. She specified the plaque would go on the side; it was relatively nice. Mayor
Humpage stated they had to work with the portico. Council Member Genco pointed out the back
of the bench, or the underside could have granite with engravings. She commented there were so
many places the names could be inscribed on the benches. She indicated the benches could be
used for people to sit down on during entertainment. Committee Member Stoddard did not like
the idea of people sitting on names. Committee Member Schauer specified the names could be
on the sides of the benches. Mayor Humpage felt they needed to get away from the idea of a free
standing Memorial. Committee Member Stoddard stated the idea of drafting would have to be
artistically done. He stated it had to be done in a manner that would be beautifully recorded, and
not a cheap by the dozen idea. He stated there was a nice place for names, with space at the
portico, which could be beautifully done and inscribed. He stated if this was done, it would be
nice looking, and appreciated for its value. He pointed out people would want to pay for their
names to be inscribed.
Council Member Genco suggested they come up with three ideas, present them at the meeting,
see what the feedback would be, and what or who would be entitled to be memorialized. She
stated they would have an idea of what the public wanted. Vice Mayor Paterno stated they could
put the concepts in the next Smoke Signals. He stated the only disadvantage was it would take
longer, and they needed to get it done, while doing it in a tasteful manner. Mayor Humpage
stated they did not want to rush. He explained they have been planning for 13 months, and just
now had a call to artists who would take back renderings. Mayor Humpage stated he agreed with
Council Member Genco to get different renderings of what they would do, get it to the public,
and get feedback at the Council Meeting. He felt rushing to get an account opened to get it done
was a mistake. Committee Member Schauer stated they have always done things they were
proud of, and they did not want to rush it; then regret it. Committee Member Hansen mentioned
Tequesta Village Council and Tequesta Memorial Committee
Workshop Minutes
January 23, 200
Page 9
the committee was started by Colonel Resnik, and he was chairman of the committee, and a
memorial which was more than just a break in the ground would be suitable for him. Mayor
Humpage stated he did not have a problem with that.
Committee Member Stoddard suggested Colonel Resnik's name be first on the Memorial,
because he was the originator. He stated it would be an appropriate recognition. He expressed
opposition to his name being inscribed on the bricks that were walked on. Mayor Humpage
asked who would do the renderings. Village Manager Couzzo stated a graphic artist would do it
as opposed to sketching it. He stated hopefully they could do a graphic presentation at the
Council Meeting.
Mayor Humpage mentioned an artist, and said she was a part of the memorial team. He
suggested she and Mr. Couzzo communicate and come up with something. Committee Member
Stoddard stated he would be happy if they did a beautiful job with just one, which would be
sellable to the people. Vice Mayor Paterno stated they had to give the public a choice.
Committee Member Stoddard stated as long as it was -done beautifully. Vice Mayor Paterno
promised he would not use his own pen and paper.
Consensus of Council was to get renderings, which would be shown to Council and the
Memorial Committee before being presented to the public.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Ms. Schauer made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion was seconded by Mr.
Stoddard and unanimously carried. Therefore, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Lori McWilliams, CMC
Village Clerk