Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Pension Joint_02/24/2009JOINT TEQUESTA PENSION BOARp OF TRUSTEES MEETING GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND AND TEQUESTA PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS PENSIONTRUST FUND SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES February 24, 2009 Call To Order And Roll Call A joint meeting of the Tequesta General Employees' Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees and the Tequesta Public Safety Officers' Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees was held at the Tequesta Village Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Tuesday, February 24, 2009. The meeting was called to order at 8:31 a.m. A roll call was taken by Pension Coordinator Lori McWilliams. In attendance at the meeting were: Public Safety Officers' Pension Board Members: Secretary David Cooper, Board Member Ken Nielson, and Board Member Robert Young. Chair Ed Sabin, and Board Member Ray Giblin were absent from the meeting. General Employees' Pension Board Members: Chair Michael Rhodes, Secretary Carl Hansen, Board Member Archie C. Mangum, Jr., Board Member Deanna Mayo and Board Member Michelle Gload. Also in attendance were Senior Accountant Monica Rahim, Finance Director JoAnn Forsythe representing Village Management, and Pension Coordinator and Village Clerk Lori McWilliams. 1. Approval of Minutes MOTION: General Employees' Pension Board Secretary Hansen made a motion to approve the minutes of the joint meeting of both boards held on February 2, 2009. Board Member Young seconded; motion carried by unanimous 8- 0 vote. 2. Public Safety Pension Board Approval of Proposed Actuarial Study Not to Exceed $4,500 and. 3. General Employees Pension Board Approval of Proposed Actuarial Study Not to Exceed $3,500 General Employees' Pension Board Chair Michael Rhodes referred to the second paragraph of the proposal from Gabriel Roeder Smith and Company dated February 9, 2009, and expressed his concern with the recommendation that changes be made in the assumed rate of interes# return since the purpose of the study was to determine if it should be changed. Chair Rhodes requested this be noted in the meeting minutes, and commented he had hoped Mr. Palmquist would be present today to address that. Pension Coordinator Joint Meeting Minutes of Board of Trustees of Public Safety Officers' Pension Trust Fund and General Employees' Pension Trust Fund February 24, 2009 2 McWilliams explained that since this meeting had been called to consider approval of Mr. Palmquist's proposal, and would have involved costs, she had not asked him to attend; but offered to telephone him. Chair Rhodes indicated it would be sufficient to note this in the minutes. Public Safety Officers' Pension Board Member Ken Nielson asked that the mortality rates be specific to police and fire in the study done for the Public Safety Officers' plan. Board Member Nielson asked the meaning of asset smoothing and using market value as the actuarial value of assets. Chair Rhodes expressed his opinion that Mr. Palmquist's intention was to use the census as of 10!1/08 and the asset values as of 12/31/08 because of the downturn in the market from October through December, 2008, in order to be more conservative. Board Member Nielson commented he did not know how that would relate to asset smoothing; Chair Rhodes advised that should be clarified by Mr. Palmquist. Board Member Nielson commented regarding pensionable pay items that he would like a survey on funding methods to find out what other municipalities were including in pensionable pay items. Pension Coordinator McWilliams clarified that the Public Safety Board had already approved the table, and it was on this agenda as Item 4 because a mistake had been found in the table in the minutes. Chair Rhodes asked that Mr. Palmquist go back five years #or each plan to show what the amount of the annual contributions would have been if asset smoothing had been used, versus what actually occurred. Hearing no further comments regarding the proposal, Pension Coordinator McWilliams advised the requests that had been made would be forwarded to Mr. Palmquist, and called for a motion from each Board to approve the actuarial study with their recommendations. The amount of estimated costs for the actuarial study of $4,500 for Public Safety Officers' Pension, and $3,500 for the General Employees Pension, and the not to exceed amounts of $5,000 for Public Safety Officers' Pension and $4,000 for the General Employees' Pension were discussed. Consensus was to approve the not to exceed amounts. Public Safety Officers' Pension Plan: MOTION Secretary Cooper made a motion to approve the proposed actuarial study by Gabriiel Roeder Smith and Company as outlined in their proposal dated February 3, 2009, at a cost not to exceed $5,000, to include the following: The actuarial study should show mortality rates specific to police and fire; Joint Meeting Minutes of Board of Trustees of Public Safety Officers' Pension Trust Fund and General Employees' Pension Trust Fund February 24, 2009 3 An explanation of using an asset smoothing method using market value as the actuarial value of assets; A comparison going back 5 years to show the amount of annual contributions using the asset smoothing method versus what actually occurred. Motion was seconded by Board Member Young and carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. General Employees' Pension Plan: MOTION: Board Member Gload made a motion to approve the proposed actuarial study by Gabriel Roeder Smith ~ Company as outlined in their proposal dated February 3, 2009, at a cost not to exceed $4,000, to include the following: An explanation of using an asset smoothing method using market value as the actuarial value of assets; A comparison going back 5 years to show the amount of annual contributions using the asset smoothing method versus what actually occurred. Motion was seconded by Chair Rhodes and carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. 4. Total Cash Remuneration Determination Pension Coordinator McWilliams explained the Public Safety Officers' Pension Board had approved the table shown in the meeting minutes from August at their August 2008 meeting; however Attorney Jensen had included the career service benefit item, and it did not get transferred into the table. This was an error because more than one table had been created leading up to the meeting, and the wrong one had been inserted into the meeting minutes. Ms. McWilliams noted she had distributed a memo from Attomey Jensen explaining that the career service benefit should be included in the total cash remuneration paid to police officers for services rendered, and that it should be included in the chart. Because the Finance Department needed minutes with the correct chart, the Board was asked to make a new motion to amend the minutes with the correct chart. Joint Meeting Minutes of Board of Trustees of Public Safety Officers' Pension Trust Fund and General Employees' Pension Trust Fund February 24, 2009 4 Board Member Nielson stated he did not know what Attorney Jensen used for her basis or if it was just her opinion, and it was his understanding some things were bargained into the contract. Board Member Gload advised the career services benefit was in the new PBA contract. Pension Coordinator McWilliams recalled that Attorney Jensen had advised it was the Board's responsibility to interpret total cash remuneration, which the Board did in 2008, and in doing so had interpreted that these items should or should not be considered total cash remuneration. The career service benefit had been included; it had just not been placed into the table. The actuary or Attorney Jensen could still provide comparisons, if that was what the Board wanted. Board Member Nielson requested the comparison be done. Pension Coordinator McWilliams clarified for the Board that right now, the items listed in the chart were considered pensionable pay because those had been approved. Pension Coordinator McWilliams commented if the Board wanted to table this item, she could bring the comparison to the May meeting. MOTION: Secretary Cooper made a motion to table the total cash remuneration determination to the May 2009 meeting. Board Member Nielson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. V. Adjournment There being no further business, upon motion by Secretary Cooper, seconded by Secretary Hansen, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Betty Laur Recording Secretary