Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 06F_10/10/2002I. II. IV. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPARTNIF_NT OF COMMUNFIY DEVELOP,%jrNI Post Office Box 3273 250 Tequesta Drive • Suite 305 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (561) 575-6220 • Fax: (561) 575-6224 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Tequesta Community Appearance Board held a meeting in the Village Manager's Office at 250 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, August 14, 2002. The meeting was called to order at 8:35 A.M. by Chair Vic Strahan. The roll was called by Betty Laur, Recording Secretary. Boardmembers present were Chair Vic Strahan, Boardmember Richard Sterling, and Vice Chair Steve Parker. Also in attendance was Clerk of the Board Jeff Newell. Boardmember Robert Stein and Boardmember Gerald Wenta were absent from the meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the agenda as amended by switching the order of items C (A) and V (B). Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS There were no communications from citizens. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 10, 2002 Community Appearance Board meeting as submitted. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. RccI"/0d Alper COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 2 V. NEW BUSINESS L An application from The Spear Group for a 4' x 8' temporary subdivision development sign for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta. 1. Swearing -In of Witnesses, if Required Clerk of the Board Jeffery Newell swore in those present who planned to speak. 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications: Boardmember Sterling reported he had visited the site and had spoken to no one. Chair Strahan and Vice Chair Parker reported they had had no exparte communications 3. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination, if any Diane Leonard, representative for the applicant, identified the location for the requested sign at the south end of the Rood Nursery property. Mr. Newell verified that the sales trailer had been approved by the Village Council. Mr. Newell advised that in error the landscape plans had not been brought to the Community Appearance Board for review and that the Board could review the landscaping for the sales trailer at this time. The Board discussed the location of the new development and the Rood landscape business. It was noted that 53 homes would be built. Retention areas were pointed out on the plans. It was explained that the county was involved in the drainage system and was making improvements because of flooding, so on the strip of land beside the entry there might be only grass. Boardmember Sterling commented that adding more paving around the sales trailer would cause water to flow out into the flood area. Mr. Newell pointed out on the plans a second retention area and explained how the plan would divert water flow from the road. Mr. Newell explained that the sales trailer was temporary and would be removed after a dry model could COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 3 be constructed. Vice Chair Parker requested the Sago palms be changed to crinum lilies because of problems with Asian scale, and stated other than that the landscape plan looked good. The landscaping would be removed when the retention pond went in. Mr. Newell added that the sign under review today was temporary and the monument sign would be submitted for review at a later date. Mr. Parker requested the back of the trailer be softened by adding a tree on the back and letting the applicant place it. Ms. Leonard advised that steps and a temporary walkway would be added to that side of the trailer. MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the landscape plan for the temporary sales trailer for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta, changing the Sago palms to crinum lilies, and adding a laurel oak tree with overall height of 14' on the west side of the trailer. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. The timing of installing the trailer and sign were discussed. Mr. Newell advised that a permit had been issued for the sales trailer and the contractor was in the process of putting it in. Ms. Leonard advised that the sign had not been fabricated and that might take a week or two, that the trailer would probably open mid -September, and if the sign was up before the trailer was completed a contact phone number would be added. Ms. Leonard clarified that the blue of the sign was not exactly as shown on the computer printout, and noted that a slight change might be made in the copy. Chair Strahan advised that the Board was not concerned with what the copy said. Ms. Leonard advised that the sign would be off the ground approximately one foot. It was clarified there was no landscape requirement for the sign The subdivision density and annexed areas were discussed. 4. Finding of Fact Based Upon Competent Substantial Evidence MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the application from the Spear Group for a 4' x 8' temporary subdivision development sign for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta as submitted. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 4 B. An application from Gary Preston, Village of Tequesta, for review of three concepts for proposed Village kiosks (presentation by Roy -Fisher Associates) 1. Swearing -In of Witnesses, if Required Those present to speak were sworn in by Clerk of the Board Jeff Newell. 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications: The members of the Board reported no ex-parte communications. 3. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination, if any Gary Preston explained that several years ago the Village had started a beautification program for the main roads in the Village, which would be completed within the next few weeks on Country Club Drive and Main Street. The kiosks would enhance those beautification projects on the major roadways and within developments if desired by the homeowners. The intent was to add 2 to 3 each year throughout the Village. Present on behalf of Roy -Fisher Associates were Brice Whittenborn and Connie Roy - Fisher. Mr. Whittenborn provided an overview of three concepts and reported he and Ms. Roy -Fisher had met with Mr. Preston and Mayor Genco to discuss the concepts and materials. The goal was to achieve landmarks with materials related to the project on Main Street and the new public safety building regarding colors, etc. Concept # 1 was described by Mr. Whittenborn as a minimal bench landmark designed to go under a large tree which included a column of stucco in a color to be agreed upon. The town identifier medallion concept was possibly to match the medallions in the public safety building, which were green. Plastic lumber was proposed to be used, with a stone veneer along the bottom of the bench seat. The bench seat was long enough to accommodate three people. Concept #2 was the trellis landmark, consisting of a trellis made of plastic lumber with vines growing on it to provide overhead structure with a lightweight feeling. Stucco columns, muted colors, and a bluestone identifier were proposed. This concept had an 8' long bench and was basically taking the bench landmark concept and adding four columns plus overhead structure. This concept could be built to straddle a sidewalk, with the trellis over the entire structure. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 5 The next concept shown was doubling the size of the trellis concept. The same colors were proposed for all the kiosks rather than colors to match the surroundings of different locations. Mr. Preston proposed the first kiosks be located on Seabrook Road, on Tequesta Drive at Point Drive, and by the south gate of the Country Club. Mr. Preston suggested one of each design and inviting homeowners associations to go to each location to view them to see if they would like one of these designs. Another suggested location was at the Village Green. The kiosks would be erected by the Village at Village expense. Today's presentation was verified to be conceptual and the real plans would be presented to the Community Appearance Board for review. Concept #3 was the park landmark which was a 14' x 14' square and contained game tables, making it possible to interact with more than one �• person. Mr. Whittenborn explained that this was meant to be a comfortable space and would utilize the same colors and keys as the other designs. Mr. Whittenbom showed materials samples. Ms. Roy -Fisher noted that kiosks were used in West Palm Beach along Flagler, on Quadrille, and in Northwood. Plastic lumber samples were shown in soft green and khaki. The Village identifier plaque samples were from Pineapple Grove, a company that made plaques. The medallion design on the public safety building was described as rosettes. Something that would closer identify the Village, such as the Tequesta Indian logo, was suggested for these kiosks. Chair Strahan noted that Councilmember von Frank was proposing the sale of fire marks with the Tequesta Indian design as a fundraiser for a fire and police memorial. The history of fire marks was discussed. Mr. Whittenborn presented a sample of the blue stone proposed to be used for bench fronts. The Boardmembers expressed their feelings that the blue stone did not blend in and would compete with the other colors. Consensus was that painted stucco was preferred over a stone veneer bench front. Boardmember Sterling advised that he lived in Tequesta Pines and their Board had submitted the idea of a kiosk on the corner, but the homeowners had objected strenuously because it would be a place for kids to gather. Mr. Preston indicated that no public opinion had yet been sought. Chair Strahan commented this could be an idea everyone thought was good but they might not want it near them. The Board was advised that they were being asked to approve the concept and then when a site was actually selected they would review those plans. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 6 Vice Chair Parker requested photos of the kiosks in other areas mentioned to see what was working and not working. Ms. Roy -Fisher commented that the kiosks along Flagler Drive had been there eight years and had poured concrete columns, wood trellises, and a Pineapple Grove medallion; that the ones on Quadrille had barrel tile roofs and had been there 4-5 years; and the ones in Northwood had been there 3-4 years and were similar to those on Quadrille, which were used for bus stops. West Palm Beach had wanted neighborhoods identified within the City, which could also be done in Tequesta, and this would provide personality or character to the Village, giving it more of a community feeling. Chair Strahan commented if a kiosk was to be used as a bus stop, it might be a good idea to have a roof. Ms. Roy -Fisher commented it had been the consensus in their meeting with the Mayor not to get into the expense of a roof or lighting. Mr. Newell asked if this would attract pigeons and if this idea had been generated from the possibility of a Tri Rail station in Tequesta. Mr. Preston indicated that had never been discussed. Chair Strahan indicated he would rather have Palm Tran return to Tequesta. Vice Chair Parker commented he agreed the blue stone did not fit and he wanted something more indigenous. Mr. Parker indicated he preferred a stucco base for the bench instead of stone veneer. Vice Chair Parker suggested eliminating the stone veneer and the proposed flagstones and going to cast stone in coral for a lighter look. Vice Chair Parker suggested changing the flagstones to concrete pavers or cast stone. Mr. Parker commented the concepts were nice proportionally, but cautioned that the design must have some kind of really strong feature using the Village logo to identify with Tequesta. Boardmember Sterling suggested having the same concrete pavers cross the sidewalk when a kiosk incorporated a sidewalk, to add unity. Chair Strahan cautioned not using too rough a surface because of people in wheelchairs, skateboards, etc. Mr. Sterling suggested a simulated limestone surface in larger sections could be used. Mr. Whittenborn suggested using concrete but in a different finish. Mr. Sterling agreed that would be cheaper. Mr. Parker commented it needed to be something different than plain concrete where flagstones were shown on the concepts, and stated he was not comfortable with the flagstones. Suggestions were not to use flagstones at all but to do the surface distinctive to the area, that cast stone or concrete pavers could be used or a concrete surface to the whole thing with a design that would not cause problems. Vice Chair Parker commented that Juno Beach required flat pavers set in their sidewalks and he did not know of any problems, and commented he would not let that hold back a design. Ms. Roy -Fisher COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 7 commented that stone had been proposed for a sense of permanence and to pick up the stone veneer used on the public safety building, and that using stone on the base of the benches would not show wear so much, but that cast stone could be a possibility. Mr. Preston indicated that residents near proposed locations would have to be notified before sites were selected, and there was no specific site targeted as yet. Mr. Preston noted it would be difficult to put a kiosk into some locations, that there could be objections, and that the Village's intent was not to place these where they were not wanted. It was suggested that a simple design be built in some location on Seabrook so that residents could see what these would be like. It was noted that the Village had changed the gradient on sidewalks along Seabrook Road to help a resident who used a motorized wheelchair, and now should not do something to hurt that resident. 10011NChair Strahan commented that overall, the Board liked the concept. Vice ' Chair Parker explained the consensus was that the blue stone was foreign and suggested imitation cast stone that looked like coral, which Mr. Parker and Mr. Sterling both indicated they really liked. Photographs of other kiosks were requested to be brought to the Board. The Board asked to be sure there was a Tequesta tie-in on the medallions and indicated it was okay to change colors for different locations, but have something to unify them. Alternatives to stone veneer were proposed by Vice Chair Parker to be either stucco painted or cast stone. Different types of vines that might be appropriate for the trellises were discussed. It was noted that some might attract birds or aggravate people's allergies. Ms. Fisher recommended pandora vine since it had no pest problems or thorns and seemed to be a good all around choice. 4. Finding of Fact Based Upon Competent Substantial Evidence MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the concepts presented for proposed Village kiosks for the benches and trellises, with the following comments: Stone veneer on base of benches shall be either painted stucco, cast stone, or indigenous stone alternative. Surface to be walked on shall be indigenous stone alternative, concrete pavers, cast stone, or concrete colored and textured differently. The blue stone shown on the trellises shall be changed to one of the alternates of indigenous stone alternative, cast stone, or stucco painted. The identifier medallion shall be of a design that really identifies the COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 8 Village of Tequesta. Colors shall change with soft variations to tie in with the individual neighborhood locations. It was noted that the Board liked the soft green color of the plastic lumber sample as presented. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. Chair Strahan inquired regarding the cost. Mr. Preston responded that Concept #1 would cost approximately $8,000-$10,000; the trellis concept approximately $20,000, and the double trellis and the park landmark would cost from $35,000-$45,000. Constitution Park was suggested as a good site for the first kiosk. It was noted that Concepts 1 and 2 would be much more visible at Village Green. Mr. Preston explained that the kiosks would be located in areas patrolled by the police. It was suggested they be concrete because of vandalism problems. VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Vice Chair Parker advised that the fronds for the newly planted palms in the circle on Main Street could be cut loose at any time. Mr. Newell commented he did not know what plant materials had been approved for the landscape islands. Discussion ensued regarding the Board's discussion of the Town/Village Center concept at the meeting where the Board had approved the concept for the building that had been built, for the landscaping of that building, for the parking lot for the proposed Village Hall, for the landscaping for Main Street, and signage for the building that had been built. So much time had been spent on the political aspects and arguments at that meeting that the landscaping had slipped through without much discussion. Chair Strahan requested that the Bridge Road and Main Street landscaping be checked to see if it had been approved by the Community Appearance Board, how much had been reviewed by the Board, and how much just slipped through. Boardmember Sterling commented that landscaping at the corner of Pinehill Trail East a whole plan for re -doing the right-of-way had been submitted to Village Council, but it had never come before the Community Appearance Board. Mr. Newell advised that when final plans were completed it would be presented to the Board. Chair Strahan commented the right-of-way had been reduced and there were new signs. The Village Council had approved the changes to the right-of-way. Boardmember Sterling noted the entire budget of their Homeowners Association was for maintenance of the right-of-way. Vice Chair Parker stated the Village needed to infill more oaks on Tequesta Drive where there were gaps, to make it consistent with the other streets. Mr. Preston advised that some residents had objected originally to having trees in their yards, but things may have COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 9 changed. Mr. Parker indicated he would bring a list of locations that needed trees to the next meeting. Mr. Newell asked if the Board should review lift stations, since he had found one that had come before the Board and two others that had not. Discussion ensued, and lift stations were located on the zoning map. Mr. Newell indicated he had researched the code and found that lift stations required special exception and review by CAB, and advised that he would bring the one for Dover Circle before the Board, and from now on lift stations would be presented to the Board. Chair Strahan commented the other highly visible lift station was inside the Centex Homes development and the landscaping was taken care of by Centex. Chair Strahan noted he was really sorry the Board had not insisted on different colors. Boardmember Sterling indicated he had heard complaints that the development looked like a barracks. Vice Chair Parker commented the process was backwards and projects should come before CAB first and then go on to the Village Council. Chair Strahan commented the Board should have objected more strongly on the colors, and he had asked them to do their new project, Tequesta Cay, different from the one on Tequesta Drive and they had said they wanted the colors the same to tie the developments together, which was fine from their point of view, but he felt they should have had a variety of 3-4 colors and alternated them within their development the way DiVosta had done in Tequesta Oaks. Boardmember Sterling reported the planting along the wall was going to be a maintenance nightmare because it would get too much heat from the sidewalk and the wall and it would be hard to keep it alive. VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS There were no other matters to come before the Board. VHL ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Vice Chair Parker, seconded by Boardmember Sterling and unanimously carried 3-0, the meeting was adjourned at 10:13 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Betty Laur ATTEST: Recording Secretary COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page�10 ........... 4fL of tW Board DATE APPROVED: cl I. II. IV. VILLAGE OF IEQUESTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUvTIY DEVELOPMENT Post Office Box 3273 250 Tequesta Drive • Suite 305 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (561) 575-6220 • Fax: (561) 575-6224 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Tequesta Community Appearance Board held a meeting in the Village Manager's Office at 250 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, August 14, 2002. The meeting was called to order at 8:35 A.M. by Chair Vic Strahan. The roll was called by Betty Laur, Recording Secretary. Boardmembers present were Chair Vic Strahan, Boardmember Richard Sterling, and Vice Chair Steve Parker. Also in attendance was Clerk of the Board Jeff Newell. Boardmember Robert Stein and Boardmember Gerald Wenta were absent from the meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the agenda as amended by switching the order of items C (A) and V (B). Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS There were no communications from citizens. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 10, 2002 Community Appearance Board meeting as submitted. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. Reci ded Paper COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 2 V. NEW BUSINESS 1. An application from The Spear Group for a 4' x 8' temporary subdivision development sign for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta. 1. Swearing -In of Witnesses, if Required Clerk of the Board Jeffery Newell swore in those present who planned to speak. 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications: Boardmember Sterling reported he had visited the site and had spoken to no one. Chair Strahan and Vice Chair Parker reported they had had no exparte communications 3. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination, if any Diane Leonard, representative for the applicant, identified the location for the requested sign at the south end of the Rood Nursery property. Mr. Newell verified that the sales trailer had been approved by the Village Council. Mr. Newell advised that in error the landscape plans had not been brought to the Community Appearance Board for review and that the Board could review the landscaping for the sales trailer at this time. The Board discussed the location of the new development and the Rood landscape business. It was noted that 53 homes would be built. Retention areas were pointed out on the plans. It was explained that the county was involved in the drainage system and was making improvements because of flooding, so on the strip of land beside the entry there might be only grass. Boardmember Sterling commented that adding more paving around the sales trailer would cause water to flow out into the flood area. Mr. Newell pointed out on the plans a second retention area and explained how the plan would divert water flow from the road. Mr. Newell explained that the sales trailer was temporary and would be removed after a dry model could COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 3 be constructed. Vice Chair Parker requested the Sago palms be changed to crinum lilies because of problems with Asian scale, and stated other than that the landscape plan looked good. The landscaping would be removed when the retention pond went in. Mr. Newell added that the sign under review today was temporary and the monument sign would be submitted for review at a later date. Mr. Parker requested the back of the trailer be softened by adding a tree on the back and letting the applicant place it. Ms. Leonard advised that steps and a temporary walkway would be added to that side of the trailer. MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the landscape plan for the temporary sales trailer for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta, changing the Sago palms to crinum lilies, and adding a laurel oak tree with overall height of 14' on the west side of the trailer. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. The timing of installing the trailer and sign were discussed. Mr. Newell advised that a permit had been issued for the sales trailer and the contractor was in the process of putting it in. Ms. Leonard advised that the sign had not been fabricated and that might take a week or two, that the trailer would probably open mid -September, and if the sign was up before the trailer was completed a contact phone number would be added. Ms. Leonard clarified that the blue of the sign was not exactly as shown on the computer printout, and noted that a slight change might be made in the copy. Chair Strahan advised that the Board was not concerned with what the copy said. Ms. Leonard advised that the sign would be off the ground approximately one foot. It was clarified there was no landscape requirement for the sign The subdivision density and annexed areas were discussed. 4. Finding of Fact Based Upon Competent Substantial Evidence MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the application from the Spear Group for a 4' x 8' temporary subdivision development sign for Riverside Oaks at Tequesta, 600 Riverside Drive, Tequesta as submitted. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 4 B. An application from Gary Preston, Village of Tequesta, for review of three concepts for proposed Village kiosks (presentation by Roy -Fisher Associates) 1. Swearing -In of Witnesses, if Required Those present to speak were sworn in by Clerk of the Board Jeff Newell. 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications: The members of the Board reported no ex-parte communications. 3. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination, if any Gary Preston explained that several years ago the Village had started a beautification program for the main roads in the Village, which would be completed within the next few weeks on Country Club Drive and Main Street. The kiosks would enhance those beautification projects on the major roadways and within developments if desired by the homeowners. The intent was to add 2 to 3 each year throughout the Village. Present on behalf of Roy -Fisher Associates were Brice Whittenborn and Connie Roy - Fisher. Mr. Whittenbom provided an overview of three concepts and reported he and Ms. Roy -Fisher had met with Mr. Preston and Mayor Genco to discuss the concepts and materials. The goal was to achieve landmarks with materials related to the project on Main Street and the new public safety building regarding colors, etc. Concept # 1 was described by Mr. Whittenbom as a minimal bench landmark designed to go under a large tree which included a column of stucco in a color to be agreed upon. The town identifier medallion concept was possibly to match the medallions in the public safety building, which were green. Plastic lumber was proposed to be used, with a stone veneer along the bottom of the bench seat. The bench seat was long enough to accommodate three people. Concept #2 was the trellis landmark, consisting of a trellis made of plastic lumber with vines growing on it to provide overhead structure with a lightweight feeling. Stucco columns, muted colors, and a bluestone 01 identifier were proposed. This concept had an 8' long bench and was basically taking the bench landmark concept and adding four columns plus overhead structure. This concept could be built to straddle a sidewalk, with the trellis over the entire structure. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 5 The next concept shown was doubling the size of the trellis concept. The same colors were proposed for all the kiosks rather than colors to match the surroundings of different locations. Mr. Preston proposed the first kiosks be located on Seabrook Road, on Tequesta Drive at Point Drive, and by the south gate of the Country Club. Mr. Preston suggested one of each design and inviting homeowners associations to go to each location to view them to see if they would like one of these designs. Another suggested location was at the Village Green. The kiosks would be erected by the Village at Village expense. Today's presentation was verified to be conceptual and the real plans would be presented to the Community Appearance Board for review. Concept #3 was the park landmark which was a 14' x 14' square and contained game tables, making it possible to interact with more than one person. Mr. Whittenborn explained that this was meant to be a comfortable space and would utilize the same colors and keys as the other designs. Mr. Whittenborn showed materials samples. Ms. Roy -Fisher noted that kiosks were used in West Palm Beach along Flagler, on Quadrille, and in Northwood. Plastic lumber samples were shown in soft green and khaki. The Village identifier plaque samples were from Pineapple Grove, a company that made plaques. The medallion design on the public safety building was described as rosettes. Something that would closer identify the Village, such as the Tequesta Indian logo, was suggested for these kiosks. Chair Strahan noted that Councilmember von Frank was proposing the sale of fire marks with the Tequesta Indian design as a fundraiser for a fire and police memorial. The history of fire marks was discussed. Mr. Whittenborn presented a sample of the blue stone proposed to be used for bench fronts. The Boardmembers expressed their feelings that the blue stone did not blend in and would compete with the other colors. Consensus was that painted stucco was preferred over a stone veneer bench front. Boardmember Sterling advised that he lived in Tequesta Pines and their Board had submitted the idea of a kiosk on the corner, but the homeowners had objected strenuously because it would be a place for kids to gather. Mr. Preston indicated that no public opinion had yet been sought. Chair Strahan commented this could be an idea everyone thought was good but they might not want it near them. The Board was advised that they were being asked to approve the concept and then when a site was actually selected they would review those plans. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 6 Vice Chair Parker requested photos of the kiosks in other areas mentioned to see what was working and not working. Ms. Roy -Fisher commented that the kiosks along Flagler Drive had been there eight years and had poured concrete columns, wood trellises, and a Pineapple Grove medallion; that the ones on Quadrille had barrel tile roofs and had been there 4-5 years; and the ones in Northwood had been there 3-4 years and were similar to those on Quadrille, which were used for bus stops. West Palm Beach had wanted neighborhoods identified within the City, which could also be done in Tequesta, and this would provide personality or character to the Village, giving it more of a community feeling. Chair Strahan commented if a kiosk was to be used as a bus stop, it might be a good idea to have a roof. Ms. Roy -Fisher commented it had been the consensus in their meeting with the Mayor not to get into the expense of a roof or lighting. Mr. Newell asked if this would attract pigeons and if this idea had been generated from the possibility of a Tri Rail station in Tequesta. Mr. Preston indicated that had never been discussed. Chair Strahan indicated he would rather have Palm Tran return to Tequesta. Vice Chair Parker commented he agreed the blue stone did not fit and he wanted something more indigenous. Mr. Parker indicated he preferred a stucco base for the bench instead of stone veneer. Vice Chair Parker suggested eliminating the stone veneer and the proposed flagstones and going to cast stone in coral for a lighter look. Vice Chair Parker suggested changing the flagstones to concrete pavers or cast stone. Mr. Parker commented the concepts were nice proportionally, but cautioned that the design must have some kind of really strong feature using the Village logo to identify with Tequesta. Boardmember Sterling suggested having the same concrete pavers cross the sidewalk when a kiosk incorporated a sidewalk, to add unity. Chair Strahan cautioned not using too rough a surface because of people in wheelchairs, skateboards, etc. Mr. Sterling suggested a simulated limestone surface in larger sections could be used. Mr. Whittenborn suggested using concrete but in a different finish. Mr. Sterling agreed that would be cheaper. Mr. Parker commented it needed to be something different than plain concrete where flagstones were shown on the concepts, and stated he was not comfortable with the flagstones. Suggestions were not to use flagstones at all but to do the surface distinctive to the area, that cast stone or concrete pavers could be used or a concrete surface to the whole thing with a design that would not cause problems. Vice Chair Parker commented that Juno Beach required flat pavers set in their sidewalks and he did not know of any problems, and commented he would not let that hold back a design. Ms. Roy -Fisher COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 7 commented that stone had been proposed for a sense of permanence and to pick up the stone veneer used on the public safety building, and that using stone on the base of the benches would not show wear so much, but that cast stone could be a possibility. Mr. Preston indicated that residents near proposed locations would have to be notified before sites were selected, and there was no specific site targeted as yet. Mr. Preston noted it would be difficult to put a kiosk into some locations, that there could be objections, and that the Village's intent was not to place these where they were not wanted. It was suggested that a simple design be built in some location on Seabrook so that residents could see what these would be like. It was noted that the Village had changed the gradient on sidewalks along Seabrook Road to help a resident who used a motorized wheelchair, and now should not do something to hurt that resident. Chair Strahan commented that overall, the Board liked the concept. Vice Chair Parker explained the consensus was that the blue stone was foreign and suggested imitation cast stone that looked like coral, which Mr. Parker and Mr. Sterling both indicated they really liked. Photographs of other kiosks were requested to be brought to the Board. The Board asked to be sure there was a Tequesta tie-in on the medallions and indicated it was okay to change colors for different locations, but have something to unify them. Alternatives to stone veneer were proposed by Vice Chair Parker to be either stucco painted or cast stone. Different types of vines that might be appropriate for the trellises were discussed. It was noted that some might attract birds or aggravate people's allergies. Ms. Fisher recommended pandora vine since it had no pest problems or thorns and seemed to be a good all around choice. 4. Finding of Fact Based Upon Competent Substantial Evidence MOTION: Vice Chair Parker made a motion to approve the concepts presented for proposed Village kiosks for the benches and trellises, with the following comments: Stone veneer on base of benches shall be either painted stucco, cast stone, or indigenous stone alternative. Surface to be walked on shall be indigenous stone alternative, concrete pavers, cast stone, or concrete colored and textured differently. The blue stone shown on the trellises shall be changed to one of the alternates of indigenous stone alternative, cast stone, or stucco painted. The identifier medallion shall be of a design that really identifies the COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 8 Village of Tequesta. Colors shall change with soft variations to tie in with the individual neighborhood locations. It was noted that the Board liked the soft green color of the plastic lumber sample as presented. Boardmember Sterling seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 3-0 vote. Chair Strahan inquired regarding the cost. Mr. Preston responded that Concept # 1 would cost approximately $8,000-$10,000; the trellis concept approximately $20,000, and the double trellis and the park landmark would cost from $35,000445,000. Constitution Park was suggested as a good site for the first kiosk. It was noted that Concepts 1 and 2 would be much more visible at Village Green. Mr. Preston explained that the kiosks would be located in areas patrolled by the police. It was suggested they be concrete because of vandalism problems. VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Vice Chair Parker advised that the fronds for the newly planted palms in the circle on Main Street could be cut loose at any time. Mr. Newell commented he did not know what plant materials had been approved for the landscape islands. Discussion ensued regarding the Board's discussion of the Town/Village Center concept at the meeting where the Board had approved the concept for the building that had been built, for the landscaping of that building, for the parking lot for the proposed Village Hall, for the landscaping for Main Street, and signage for the building that had been built. So much time had been spent on the political aspects and arguments at that meeting that the landscaping had slipped through without much discussion. Chair Strahan requested that the Bridge Road and Main Street landscaping be checked to see if it had been approved by the Community Appearance Board, how much had been reviewed by the Board, and how much just slipped through. Boardmember Sterling commented that landscaping at the corner of Pinehill Trail East a whole plan for re -doing the right-of-way had been submitted to Village Council, but it had never come before the Community Appearance Board. Mr. Newell advised that when final plans were completed it would be presented to the Board. Chair Strahan commented the right-of-way had been reduced and there were new signs. The Village Council had approved the changes to the right-of-way. Boardmember Sterling noted the entire budget of their Homeowners Association was for maintenance of the right-of-way. Vice Chair Parker stated the Village needed to infill more oaks on Tequesta Drive where there were gaps, to make it consistent with the other streets. Mr. Preston advised that some residents had objected originally to having trees in their yards, but things may have COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 9 changed. Mr. Parker indicated he would bring a list of locations that needed trees to the next meeting. Mr. Newell asked if the Board should review lift stations, since he had found one that had come before the Board and two others that had not. Discussion ensued, and lift stations were located on the zoning map. Mr. Newell indicated he had researched the code and found that lift stations required special exception and review by CAB, and advised that he would bring the one for Dover Circle before the Board, and from now on lift stations would be presented to the Board. Chair Strahan commented the other highly visible lift station was inside the Centex Homes development and the landscaping was taken care of by Centex. Chair Strahan noted he was really sorry the Board had not insisted on different colors. Boardmember Sterling indicated he had heard complaints that the development looked like a barracks. Vice Chair Parker commented the process was backwards and projects should come before CAB first and then go on to the Village Council. Chair Strahan commented the Board should have objected more strongly on the colors, and he had asked them to do their new project, Tequesta Cay, different from the one on Tequesta Drive and they had said they wanted the colors the same to tie the developments together, which was fine from their point of view, but he felt they should have had a variety of 3-4 colors and alternated them within their development the way DiVosta had done in Tequesta Oaks. Boardmember Sterling reported the planting along the wall was going to be a maintenance nightmare because it would get too much heat from the sidewalk and the wall and it would be hard to keep it alive. VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS There were no other matters to come before the Board. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Vice Chair Parker, seconded by Boardmember Sterling and unanimously carried 3-0, the meeting was adjourned at 10:13 a.m. Respectfully submitted, l Betty Laur Recording Secretary ATTEST: COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 10 ev,T Wiz. • is