Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 09B_4/11/2002INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MR. MICHAEL R. COUZZO, JR.; VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: JEFFERY C. NEW`E-LL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: PROPOSED TEQUESTA CAY SITE PLAN REVIEW DATE: 3/29/2002 CC: The proposed Tequesta Cay Site Plan consist of 3.52 acres. It is located within the Mixed Use land use area of the Village of Tequesta and is so designed on the Future Use Map of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. It is similarly zoned for Mixed Use development. Tequesta Cay is bordered on the north by Village Boulevard; bordered on the east by Tequesta Terrace A.L.F.; bordered on the south by Tequesta Commerce Center; and bordered on the west by vacant Preserved area. Tequesta Cay will be developed as a planned mixed use development (PMUD). The proposed development consists of fifty-eight, fee simple, residential town -homes; each with a front -loading garage and driveway. There are two (2) building types; an eight unit and ten unit buildings. Tequesta Cay also provides a recreation facility for its residents consisting of a pool, cabana and an open grassed area. The project will be accessed directly and exclusively from Village Boulevard via a divided, non -gated entry. The proposed Tequesta Cay site Plan was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC), and the application is complete. All requirements of the Mixed Use district have been met, and the property development standards of the district have been satisfied. The applicant has also provided letters assuring that utilities are available to the site. An Environmental Assessment and analysis has been submitted as part of the application, which indicates that there will be little, if any, detrimental impacts to the site as a result of its development. A Traffic Statement and analysis has also been provided which indicates levels of service standards on affected roads will be maintained. All fee applicable to this application have been paid and received by the Village. It is recommended that the proposed Tequesta Cay Site Plan be approved, as submitted, by the Village Council. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPARTMENT OF CONfMumy DEVELOPMEW Post Office Box 3273 250 Tequesta Drive - Suite 305 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (561) 575-6220 - Fax: (561) 575-6224 RECEIPT: CHECK NO.: AMOUNT: SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION & CHECKLIST PROJECT: Tequesta Cay - A Centex Homes Development LOCATION: South side of Village Blvd.,± 350' west of US Highway One. PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER 60-43-40-30-00-002-0010 ADDRESS: A. DRC REPORT & APPLICANT RESPONSE: see attched exhibit A B. STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP: see attached exhibit B C. D. STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE: see attached exhibit C STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMP PLAN & CONCURRENCY. REQUIREMENTS: see attached exhibit D E. STATEMENTS OF PRELIIVIIlVARY REVIEW BY OTHER AGENCIES:see attached _ Pxh; b; . F. GENERAL LOCATION MAP: see attached exhibits F G. ENVIRONMENTAL R*APACT ANALYSIS/STUDY: see attached exhibit G H. TREE SURVEY: see attached survey I. SITE PLAN: I. ARCHITECT-ENGMER-SURVEYOR-PLANNER-DEVELOPER: x 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION: (a) BOUNDARIES & TOPOGRAPHY x (b) EXISTING STREETS x (c) ADJACENT BUILDING &/OR STRUCTURES x (d) ACCESS (INGRESS & EGRESS) x (e) TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT see attached exhibit H (fl TOTAL PAVING WITHIN PARKING AREAS (SQ. FT. & %) x (9) OFF STREET PARKING/LOADING AREAS x (h) TABULATION OF PARKING/LOADING SPACES x Recycled Paper r) (i) RECREATION FACILITIES & LOCATION interior of pro? ect 6) SCREENS & BUFFERS 15'-25' landscape buffers (k) REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS curb side pick-up (1) AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES : POWER X WATER x SEWER X TELEPHONE x CABLE TV x FIRE HYDRANTS X (m) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS OR GRANTS x (n) PROPOSED RIGHTS -OF -WAY none 3. GROSS ACREAGE / ACRES & SQ. FT. 3.52 (a) TOTAL OPEN SPACE (SQ. FT. & %) 4 7, 3 5 0 s . f . 3 0 _ 8 % (b) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (STRUCTURES)(SQ. FT. & %) 54,164 s.f. - 35.3% (c) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: ALL PAVING, WALKWAYS, PATIOS, DECKS, ETC.) (SQ. FT. & %) 108,510 s.f. - 70.7$ (d) LOT COVERAGE (GREEN AREAS) (SQ. FT. & I . WITHIN ALL PAVING AREAS 9 0 0 7 s . f . - 5.9 % 2. REMAINDER ALL AREAS 36,028 s . f . - 2 3.4 % 3. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 45,035 s . f . - 2 9.3 % (e) UNITS PER ACRE 16.48 (fl TOTAL SQ. FT. AREA ALL BUILDINGS, ALL FLOORS 1 0 7 0 6 6 9 s . f . J. PROPERTY & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS (AGREEMENTS / SURVIVABILITY BONDS) ----- K. PRELIMINARY PLANS AS FOLLOWS: 1. STORM DRAINAGE see attached engineering plans 2. SEWER LAYOUT see attached engineering plans 3. WATER DISTRIBUTION & SYSTEM LAYOUT see attached (INCLUDING BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS) engineering plans 4. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LAYOUT (INCLUDING TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS) r1 5. TELEPHONE & CABLE UNDERGROUND LAYOUT (INCLUDING ABOVE see final GROUND JUNCTION & DISTRIBUTION BOX LOCATIONS) P n g i n a ca r i n r7 drawings L. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS (ALL ORIENTATIONS) see a t t a c g edp l a n s M. BUILDING APPEARANCE & LANDSCAPING x N. SIGNS (PROPOSED NUMBER, TYPE, SIZE & LOCATIONS) 1 , 6 ' OA . . O. PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS (DREDGING, FILLING, SLOPE, DRAINAGE PATTERNS, NATUIRAL VEGETATION, ACCESSIBILITY, RETAINING WALLS, BERMS, PRIVACY WALLS AND/OR FENCES) P. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS: 1. ZONE DESIGNATION 2. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION 3. PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 22.75 min. 4. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Q. DEVELOPMENT STAGES (PHASES) � none 23 COPY SETS REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: 2 Sets- Full Size, Engineered Signed and Sealed(Used for permitting) 8 Sets -Full Size 13 Sets -Reduced to 11 z 17 ONLY if legible DATE 4 GENTLE George G. Gentile, FA51LA HOLLOWAY M. Troy Holloway. A5LA O'MAHONEY, Emily 0•Mahoney, AHA d A 5 5 0 L I A. T E5. INC' Land5cape Archjtect5 Planners and Environmental Consultfant5 • LC-0000177 i l I March 27, 2002 _ Mr. Jack Horniman, Consulting Planner Village of Tequesta 357 Tequesta Drive -Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: Tequesta Trace — Centex Homes DearMr. Horniman: Please . find attached hereto, 10 full size ,revised sets of vthe site, landscape. and engineering plans, as per the comments generated during the DRC . meeting held Monday, January, 28, 2002, for the above. referenced project. We have also provided 13 sets of the revised plans, at 11 x 17 sizes, for your, use, as well. In addition to the above. mentioned plans, we have also provided all plans and documentation, as required'on the attached Site Plan Review Application. Should you have any questions, and/or require any additional information,•. please do not hesitate to call.. We appreciate your Lonsideration and assistance on the Tequesta Cay application. 1 Sincerely, t TToyollowa Sr. Vice=President 1907 Commerce Lane. Suite 101 Jupiter. Florida 33458 561-575-9557 561-575-5260 FAX www.lanci5Glpe-arc;hitects.com Exhibit `A' M-17-2ee1 13t; b 1--304848 OFM l e7--.. Pp I a4a Can 678 714.40 Doc 14,751.60 JPrepared by/ntum to: INgINN19�INNNNMNNNNNNN�INNNIIpI A.R. Girvin, Esquire Douglas Rawls Girvin, FA state M Oceanside Professionsi Building uE. Indianloim Road Jupiter, ter, Florida 33477 (This space reserved for neordln9) TRUSTEE'S THIS INDENTURE made this clay of July, 2001, by and between FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, successor by merger to t�a Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Company, acting as trustee pursuarit to, and by virtue of, the powers vested in it by that certain Trustee's Deed dated the 1st day of June, 1984, and recorded in Official Records Book 4258, Pages 77 to 82, Inclusive, public records of Palm Beach County. Florida, and that certain Trust Agreement designated as Land Trust No. 200, governing the premises herein conveyed and dated the 1st day of June, 1994, and every other power and authority to Grantor vested thereunder, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, and CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general partnership, whose mailing address is 8198 Jog Road, Suite 200, Boynton Beach, Florida. hereinafter referred to as Grantee. WITNESSF-TH, that said Grantor, for and In consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof Is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being In Palm Beach County, Florida, to -wit: A parcel of land lying In the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 40 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said Southwest quarter and the Easterly rlght-of-way line of Old Dixie Highway, as recorded in Road Plat Book 5, Pages 144 -148, Palm Beach County, Florida, public records; thence bear S 22" 41' 51" E (bearing base), along said Easterly right-of-way line, a distance of 1,048.16 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue S 22' 41' 51" E along said easterly right of way line a distance of 674.86 feet to the Intersection with the North line of Tequesta Drive, as recorded In Official Record Book 6016, Page 1264, public records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence S 67° 34' 48" E, along said North right-of-way line, a distance of 35.28 feet; thence N 57" 32' 15" E, along said North right-of-way line, a distance of 318.51 feet; thence N 220 34' 45" W, a distance of 205.01 feet; thence N 670 32' 15" E, a distance of 100.0 feet; thence S 220 34' 45" E, a distance of 205,00 feet to the Intersection with said North right-of-way 11ne of Tequesta Drive; thence N 67° 32' 15" E, along said North right-of-way fine, a distance of 11.84 feat to the point of curvature of a curve concave to the South having a radius of 301.00 feet; thence Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 5' 40' 140, a distance of 39.09 feet to the intersection with the West line of Tequesta Oaks, as recorded In Plat Book 79, Pages 93 - 97, public records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence, N 220 64' 08" W, along sold West Line, a distance of 703.73 feet; thence S 67.18' 09" W, a distance of 491.75 feet to the Point of Beginning. SUBJECT TO: restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to December 31. 2000, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above -described premises in fee simple forever, with all of Exhibit `B' ORD 127:_.a Pg >la4-9 DMTRV IL IIIUA CLERK P8 MOM, FL (This space reserved for recording) its rights, easements, appurtenances, tenements and hereditaments to Grantee, their heirs, successors and assigns, to their use and behalf forever. The conveyance of the above -described real property Is made without warranties of title. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and yearfirst above written. 4 STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF PALM BEACH: FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, as trustee under L-T. No. 200 By: J v �7in&.Prfisldeni and Tnust Officgr,,.,,. (Corporate Seal) The foregotng instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of July. 2001 by a , as Vice -President and Trust Officer of the FIRST UNION ZONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, who did not take an oath - (Notary Seal) Y�1� oc Notary Public State of Florida Personally Known ^ OR Produced Identification , Type of Identification Produced Page 2 GENTILE, - + HOLLO WAY 0VAHONEY d Ass OL IA iE S. IN.C. Tequesta Cay STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE March 27, 2002 The 3.52-acre - subject parcel of land is found on the south side of Village Boulevard, approximately 350' west of U.S. Highway One. , The parcel is borde>ed on,the north property boundary by Village Boulevard, bordered on the east by the mixed -use zoned Tequesta Terrace, A.L.F., bordered on the south by the Tequesta Commerce Center and bordered on the west by vacant Preserve area. The proposed development consists of 58, fee simple, residential townhomes; each with a front - loading covered garage and driveway. There are two building types," an 8 unit building and a 10 unit building. Tequesta Cay also provides a recreation facility for its residents consisting of a . pool, cabana and an'open grassed area. The project will be accessed directly and exclusively from Village Boulevard, via a •divided, non -gated entry. Mail distribution will occur through the use of cluster mailboxes located throughout the project. Refuse and recycle collection will "be provided by Nichols Sanitation through curbside pick-up services. Tequesta Cay provides each building and unit with . ample landscaping to provide . the neighborhood with a harmonious landscape theme through the use of Laurel Oak street trees, Cabbage Palm and Queen Palm . driveway plantings and lush building foundation plantings to unify the buildings and Walkways Exhibit `C' GENTILE HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY & A 5 5 P. C 1 A 1 E 5. 1 N C Tequesta Cay STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & CONCVRENCY REQUIREMENTS The proposed Tequesta Cay project is located on the south side of Village Blvd., approximately 350'.west of U.S. Highway One, within the corporate limits of The Village of Tequesta. The project will have8 units on 3.52 Acres for a maximum density of 16.48 units pefacre. The project is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive plan, as follows: • The project's density is below the maximum density of the Mixed Use District, (18 d.u./ac.), of the Village of Tequesta and is consistent with the density maximum as stipulated within the Comprehensive Plan. • The project is further consistent with the Comprehensive plan, as well as the Foncurrency requirements in that .it is located within the urban service area of the Village and has all the municipal services available including water, sewer, electrical power and other utilities that are found in other developed areas of the Village. • The project is consistent with the , Traffic element of the Comprehensive, plan in that the mixed use district is exempt from meeting the service levels as established by Palm Beach County, so as to concentrate development in the mixed use district and revitalize the Village Center. • The project is within the service area of the Village of Tequesta's police and fire rescue services. • The project will provide on site recreation amenities including a pool, cabana, walkways and other open space that will minimize impacts to the Villages recreation facilities. Exhibit `D' Loxahatchee River District 2500 Jupiter Park Drive, Jupiter, Florida 33458-8964 Telephone (561) 747-5700 Fax (561) 747-9929 e-mail: osprey@loxahatcheeriver.org Celebrating Richard C. Dent, Executive Director 3 0 Years January 14, 2002 M. Troy Holloway, Sr. Vice Pres. Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 Jupiter, Florida 33458 RE: Tequesta Cove, Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida Dear Mr. Holloway: VlRON1KE\ 9f 1971 Award Winning Regional Wastewater Facility Best in Nation, E.P.A. Best in State, D.E.P. This letter is provided in response to your recent request concerning sanitary sewer service availability for the subject project. Please be advised that, as of this date, sanitary sewer service can be made available to the subject property upon the joint execution of a Developers Agreement and the payment of certain costs in accordance with the District Rules. Copies of the Developer Agreement and Chapter 31-10, F.A.C., are available for your review. Consistent with District policy, the Developer will be responsible for all costs associated with connecting to the existing wastewater system of the District. Please be advised that the plan submitted with your letter of January 4, indicates tying into a sewer line which is outside of the public right of way, on Tequesta Plaza property. Your client will be responsible to obtain the required easements to access this line. Should you require additional information on this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, in o es Deputy Dir4cto J:/dev/proj/tegcw/avaiftr.wps Loring E. "Snag" Holmes Matt H. Rostock Joseph O. Ellis Richard C. Sheehan ' ' G9 Board Member Board Member Chairman Board Member Exhibit E 03J27/2002 06:48 561-575-6245 PUBLIC WORKS FAC PAGE 01 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 3474 • 136 Bridge Road ' 0 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0474 • (561) 575-6234 Fax: (561) 575.6245 March 27, 2002 SENT VIA FAX & US MAIL Mr. Troy Holloway Gentile, Holloway, & G'Mahoney 1907 Commerce Lane Suite 101 Jupiter, Florida 33458 RE: TEQUESTA CAY Dear Mr, Holloway. In response to your recent request, this is to advise that the Tequesta Utilities Department is the purveyor of water service to the above referenced. Service to be provided will be in accordance with the Tequesta Utilities Department Water Service Policy and appropriate Water Service Agreement as required. This is a letter of service availability only and not a commitment of service. As of this date, The Tequesta Utilities Department has capacity to serve this project and a fum commitment will be established when the Water Service Agreement and the Tequcsta Utilities Department have executed the appropriate agreements and connection fees have been paid. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. t 1 , f, /Z Russell K. White Public Services Supervisor c: Michael Couzzo Jr. Village Manager Jeffrey Newell, Director of Community Development W n 10435 Ironwood Rc,_ Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Adelpia Fax Phone h(561) 627-11266 January 10, 2002 Mr. M. Troy Holloway Sr. Vice President Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 Jupiter, FL 33458 Re: Tequesta Cove, Village of Tequesta Dear Mr. Holloway: This letter is to confirm Adelphia's availability of service to the above -mentioned property. Upon availability, please send a set of proposed or approved plats that would indicate where utility easements are located for our design staff. Thank you and we look forward to serving your property. Since ely, on E. Benson Construction Supervisor CAMy Documents\ Documents\ New Construction\LETTERS\Don Benson\Cable Availability\Tequesta Cove.cloc Equal Opportunity Employer WJVV1/UV1 r'1 0 FPL January 30, 2002 Troy Holloway 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 Jupiter, FI., 33458 Re- Tequesta Cove_ Dear Mr. Holloway Florida Power & Light Company Thank you for contacting FPL early In your design process this will help you achieve your desired schedule for your project "request Cove'. At the present time, FPL has sufficient capacity to provide electric service to the above captioned properly. This service will be furnished in accordance with applicable rates, rules and regulations. Please provide the final site plan, site survey, paving, drainage and electrical load data as soon as possible so the necessary engineering can begin. Early contact with FPL is essential so that resources may be scheduled to facilitate availability of service when required. Sincerely, Ik i oe Dragon 561 j 676"342 Service planner an FPL Group Company Tuesday 26 of Mar 2002, 561 640 3400 —>561 575 5260 Page 1 of 2 a From: Donna Sayles OBO: Donna Sayles Date: 03/26/02 Time: 3:53 pm 7501 North Jog Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 Telephone : (561)640-4000 Fax:(561)640-3400 To: Troy Holloway Company: Location: Fax Number: "575-5260" Subject: mailfax.tif Total t# of Pages: 2 Contents: Here is the standard letter which was sent to all the municipalities. This identical letter was sent to Mr. Michael Couzzo of the Village of Tequesta. W Tuesday 26 of Mar 2002, 561 640 3400 —>561 575 5260 Page 2 of 2 a December 18, 2001 Mr. Charles Wu YOUR PARTNER MR Interim Growth Mgmt. Director SOLID WASTE SOL1710Y S City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Subject: Availability of Solid Waste Disposal Capacity Dear Mr. Wu: The Solid Waste Authoriry of Palm Beach County hereby provides certification that the Authority has disposal capacity available to accommodate the solid waste generation for the municipalities and unincorporated county for the cowing year of 2002. This letter also constitutes notification of sufficient capacity for concu n=cy management and comprehensive planning purposes. Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J-5.005(4). As of September 30, 2001, the Authority's North County Landfills had an estimated 32,721,759 cubic yards of landfill capacity remaining. Based upon the existing Palm Beach County population, the most recently available population growth rates published by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business and Research (BEER), and projected rates of solid waste generation, waste reduction and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the year 2021, assuming the depletion of the Class I and Class III landfills is approximately balanced. The Authority continues to pursue options to increase the life of its existing facilities and to provide for all the County's current and fugue disposal and recycling needs. As part of its responsibility, the Authority will provide an annual statement of disposal capacity, using the most current BEBR projections available. Please provide copies of this letter to your plan review and concurrency management staff. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Marc C. Bruner, Ph.D. Director of Planning and Environmental Programs 7501 North Jog Road, West Palm aeach, Florida 33412 1561 j 640.401l0 F1lX (561)640,34o0 N«.;C.« Teque,sta Cry Centex Home g Village of Tequcata (1) Location Map11 Zoning: wifi—A., Land Use: Exhibit `F' Tcque,gta Cry Centex Home g V i l l a g e o f T e q u ea t a N LEGEND mA'SMETRMWOOD COJgISRCIAL DJ34mm-r com".VITY colwewRCIAL DISTRICT Q¢"JR-4L COAf"ACZAJ: DISTRICT .,.,, JfZWP VS.V SINC,LS rAwzzr DII'SLLINa DISTRICT SZN=&Z AAJmr .VWWrLINc DISTRICT^ '7t:.R'. J=rZPLS AAmmr pDJ zwmc DISTRICT MEJIVLm" AAJ[ILY DwirzzIc DISTRICT EmRSClt U 47OX AND OPEN SAKE MAXSPORTAT70N •ocam rt rArZil FIZFZNXNCM /7GyRi O-i X F4�Zoning Map Zoning: Land Use: i ct 6re a 1VOK011R:Sw: MR No ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CENTEX 3.52 ACRE PARCEL VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA DECEMBER 2001 For Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney & Associates 1907 Commerce Lane Suite 101 Jupiter, FL 33458 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1001 North U.S. Highway 1, Suite 304 Jupiter, Florida 33477 561-743-5141 EP01094 Exhibit `G' TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... I II. METHODS..................................................................................................................... l III. RESULTS.......................................................................................................................3 A. Soils.....................................................................................................................3 B. Vegetative Communities.....................................................................................3 C. Listed Species.....................................................................................................6 D. Wetlands.............................................................................................................6 IV. SUMMARY....................................................................................................................6 A. Vegetative Communities.....................................................................................6 B. Listed Species.....................................................................................................7 C. Wetlands............................................................................................................7 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 Location Map......................................................................................................2 Figure2 Soils Map............................................................................................................4 Figure 3 Vegetative Communities Map............................................................................5 PHOTOGRAPHS ii ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CENTEX 3.52 ACRE PARCEL VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA I. INTRODUCTION Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) conducted an environmental assessment of the 3.52-acre parcel on 4 December 2001. The parcel is undeveloped land in the central portion of Section 30, Township 40, Range 43, Village of Tequesta, Florida (Figure 1). The parcel is located south of Village Boulevard, west of U.S. Highway 1, and east of Old Dixie Highway. The parcels' frontage on Village Boulevard is approximately 245 linear feet and its western boundary is approximately 479 linear feet. The area to the east, Tequesta Terrace Assisted Living, was built after 1995, after the most recent Palm Beach County aerial photograph was taken. To the south of the property is a block storage facility, and to the west is St. Jude Catholic Church's natural area preserve. II. METHODS Prior to the site visit, the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Jupiter Quadrangle and the Soils Survey of Palm Beach County, Florida (USDA, 1978) were reviewed to determine topographic features and site soil mapping units. Copies of the most current (1995) Palm Beach County 1" = 200' scale blueline aerial photographs of the parcel were obtained and reviewed to determine potential locations of environmental features. A pedestrian survey of the parcel was conducted to map approximate locations and boundaries of significant environmental resources, vegetative associations, exotic vegetation, wetland areas, occurrence of listed plant or animal species, specimen -size trees, and vegetation associations which would require protection or identification. Vegetation protection in the Village of Tequesta is mandated under Section 14 Article II, of the Land Development Ordinance (Ordinance). The purpose of the Ordinance is to preserve and protect the values and functions of environmentally sensitive or significant lands. The Ordinance requires review for lands deemed environmentally significant (Section 14-19). The Ordinance includes provisions for mitigation in areas where in -place preservation of native trees is not possible. Options regarding specimen trees and other native trees include relocation (i.e., tree -spading to landscape buffer areas or adjacent to preserves) and/or tree -for -tree replacement, or monetary mitigation. The Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida (Florida Natural Areas Inventory 1990) provides classification of natural communities of Florida, and was used in this investigation. Approximate location of vegetative community cover type boundaries and other features were mapped on the 1995 aerial photograph of the site. Vegetation associations were identified in accordance with Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classifications Systems Handbook (Florida Department of Transportation 1999) (FLUCFCS). _ � 1 t >24 } Jupiter Cem I, . �; i J P i"l �.r .+;�,.• I BM ', • � ,,� •� 1. ,Ilx�t r iv ��' I I is � ' . t . \ • , � � t ;; ;�_ \� r . t C' t i i � � \ � PROPERTY, 4 1 uLOCATION ,'' yY1� uerQ 30 !`�, J .�• .1I /, . ' z \ '.1 1� i —a !met' l � 1 � � � f, ,�.. fir•_• — J ff , .."' � •1,t' „- - , s iz � �! , .� l . \, `�. � i i •. - � .a • �' 'ki •f F�T tf'1�\ 1 �}{.�, '• j•L _� ,ii 1 ��.�' It �I�l,�'i, �L +� tl �•`'� i 'i \ I, \J � 31 d .,;: it •I t � �I�'� I. k �; t,i C�: �` 1 \ ' i f • 'Ix Brat JlJI!1C t. R.1, ( y + 0.t ` ,G tt 1 usAV - - 3.��,��1�'� !s 31. /. as j f • f. y ' ti piie r y�fi i� etch 'mot t -- •� Y \.p fidfc N,4 I t i z { +,� yl J©, ` ♦ \. is • z..., I _, _T• .f i •'�� _._`�, "\\�c�4`. ,. / , .i• � 11� 32 *Jupiter Quadrangle - USGS 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Section 30, Township 40, Range 43 Scale: F' = 2000' Location Ma ENVIRONMENTAL CENTEX Figure 1 SERVICES, INC. 3.52-ACRE PARCEL Date: December 2001 N Jupiter, Florida Project No. EP01094 Village of Tequesta, Florida Wetland protection is mandated under both federal and state regulations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CE) regulates activities in Waters of the United States pursuant to the Clean Water Act (PL92-500 Section 404) as further defined in the CE regulatory program (33 CFR 320-330). The State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has established wetland identification and permitting processes at Chapter 62-330, 62-340, and 62-312 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Current federal and state wetland definitions are derived from the original definition found in 33 CFR 328.3, identifying wetlands as "those areas that are inundated, or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated soil conditions". Delineation of federally regulated jurisdictional wetlands is determined by the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (USAE Waterways Experiment Station Environmental Laboratory 1987). Delineation of wetlands regulated by DEP and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) is done according to Chapter 62-340 FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters. The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual (Gilbert et al. 1995) serves as a guide to Chapter 62-340. Both manuals, which emphasize the identification of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrologic conditions in making wetland determinations, were used in this investigation. Listed species of plants and wildlife are found in Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, Official Lists (Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission 1997) and Preservation of Native Flora of Florida, Chapter 5B-40 (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry. October 2000). Any observed or evidenced occurrences of listed species were recorded. III. RESULTS A. Soils Soils on the entire site are mapped as St. Lucie sand, 0-8 percent slopes (Figure 2). This soil is excessively drained, and found on long narrow dune -like coastal ridges and on isolated knolls. The water table is below a depth of six feet. Typical natural vegetation for this soil is sand pine, sand live oak (Quercus geminata), saw palmetto (serenoa repens), rosemary (Ceratiola ericoides), cacti (Opuntia spp.), and sparse clumps of natalgrass (Rhynchelytrum repens). Current soil conditions on the property exhibit evidence of disturbances by off -road vehicles or heavy equipment. B. Vegetative Communities Vegetative associations (Figure 3) on the parcel were mapped using FLUCFCS. The vegetative communities comprise disturbed sand pine and disturbed coastal scrub communities. Most understory on this site has been removed, leaving bare soil in places, with a diminished herbaceous and shrub layer. 3 Soil Map Units• ScB = St. Lucie Sand, 0-8 percent slopes *Soils Survey Palm Beach County, Florida, 1978. Scale: 1" = 833' n1N V 1KVNMtN 1 AL CENTEX SERVICES, INC. 3.52-ACRE PARCEL Jupiter, Florida Village of Tequesta, Florida Figure Date: Project No. Soils Map 2 December 2001 EP01094 �w.'t,`�'�n.S Z i, �n e> �a.}tt'� � � �� t3•e ��xr�^.c s �; � :i,_ rt�. 4W, al r �+. a ask ; I o y�, w a a fI °W*� � a ' - i�,s•' :t, �'�- ^J'` ;>i P .gyp.. " a^'¢ ;x '.a F� '�4,,g� "�� � ` ,N, 3w -^Gt nk 4v� Yi F' pz' sk K Two vegetative communities occur on the property and are described as follows: 1. Disturbed Coastal Scrub (322). Although the southeastern section of the site has been disturbed, some of the scrub vegetation found in natural coastal scrub communities can be found in the herbaceous layer. Running oak (Quercus pumila), myrtle oak (Q. myrtifolia), beach sunflower (Helianthus debilis) (Photo 1), and jointweed (Polygonella spp.) are native scrub vegetation. The site's native herbaceous plants within the coastal scrub cover type have been invaded in some areas by grape (Vitis spp.), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), and a variety of exotic grasses. 2. Disturbed Sand Pine (413). The sand pine community grows on infertile marine deposits with excessively drained soils. The majority of the property comprises this cover type (Photo 2). Dwarf live oak (Q. minima), sand live oak (Photo 3), tallow wood (Ximenia americana), and jointweed are patchily distributed throughout the shrub layer and ground cover, which has been disturbed. The only tree found in the canopy is sand pine. C. Listed Species Playback tapes with recorded scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) vocalizations were played while walking a transect along the western portion of the property to determine potential territoriality of the jays in the neighboring preserve. A family of four banded scrub jays responded to the playback tape (Photo 3). Two of the four birds perched on the fence separating the property from the preserve, one bird flew over the fence and began foraging on the ground (Photo 4). Other non -listed species of wildlife observed while on the property include the yellow- rumped warbler (Dendroica coronata), palm warbler (D. palmarum), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), and gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). D. Wetlands No jurisdictional wetlands occur on the property. IV. SUMMARY A. Vegetative Communities The Village of Tequesta Ordinance defines vegetation associations and trees that require preservation, protection, or mitigation. Coastal scrub and sand pine associations may be considered environmentally significant lands, however, the level of past disturbance to the site has rendered the herbaceous and shrub layer void of the typical natural vegetation associated with these cover types. Proposed development on the property, therefore, should not be restricted by the Tequesta Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance (Section 14-19). 0 a The Village of Tequesta may require preservation or relocation of individual native trees and plants. Native upland trees that cannot be preserved or relocated require mitigation in accordance with Tequesta Preservation Regulations. Additionally, in accordance with local government rules, all exotic plant species occurring on the property must be eradicated. However, there does not appear to be any invasive exotic species on the property. ESI can assist in addressing all of the above topics by conducting pre -permit application meetings with environmental regulatory agencies, preparing permit applications in cooperation with planners and engineers, and defining options, such as conducting scrub jay surveys to delineate territories, to assist in the development of a site plan for the parcel. B. Listed Species The Florida scrub jay is both Federally and State listed as a Threatened species. Although scrub jays were observed on site, past disturbance has destroyed the oak species imperative for scrub jay foraging and breeding. However, if left for a period of five to 10 years, oak mast likely would increase, rendering the property suitable habitat for the scrub jays. The scrub jays may be currently defending territory on a small portion of the property adjacent to the St. Jude preserve on the west. We recommend a scrub jay survey be conducted to define any scrub jay territory located on the property. C. Wetlands No jurisdictional wetlands exist on the property. VA a a REFERENCES Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry. October 2000. Preservation of Native Flora of Florida, Chapter 513-40. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover & Forms Classification System Handbook. Tallahassee, Florida. 91 p. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 1997. Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, Official Lists. Tallahassee, Florida. 15p. Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Department of Natural Resources. 1990. Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida. 11 Ip. Gilbert K., J. Tobe, R. Cantrell, M. Sweeley and J. Cooper. 1995. The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, St. Johns River Water Management District, Suwanee River Water Management District, and Northwest Florida Water Management District. 197 p. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Soils Survey of Palm Beach County Area, Florida. 132 p. + maps. 8 5w PHOTOGRAPHS n n No Text jd 4 i. ". .. v ��ft ' •� t .._. � L? t i?y j M1- �yt�� - _ � ti: d x �� � +s .�PSVya'L 4 ��. .�J� � 4g�,� �" '1 .per a T k k �� � � t°" �� ,T r __�_ ,.� i=. I 2 �� �� � � �� l�j � y�. °� T 11� r. .... � i-n ,. � . � wry' "li ,rn, __.._ '--. �_, s � yN_y _. _ ..r ' 1 r --. -_ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1001 NORTH US HIGHWAY 1, SUITE 304 JUPITER, FLORIDA 33477 561-743-5141 Scrub -jay Survey and Habitat Evaluation Project Name: Centex 3.52-acre Parcel Project No: EP01094 Work dates: 26-29 December 2001 Site location: The Centex parcel is undeveloped land in the central portion of Section 30, Township 40, Range 43, Village of Tequesta, Florida (Figure 1). The parcel is located south of Village Boulevard, west of U.S. Highway 1, and east of Old Dixie Highway. Technical Staff: Jessie Schillaci, Project Scientist Objective of The project objectives were to survey the approximately 3.52 acres of work: vacant land for the presence and territorial limits of the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Vegetative cover types (Figure 2) within the parcel were also observed, recorded, and assessed in terms of scrub jay habitat quality. Although existing vegetation on the Centex parcel is poor in quality for scrub jay foraging habitat, it is located within 0.25 mile of the St. Jude Catholic Church's natural area preserve, which contains at least two groups of scrub jays within its boundaries. Site description: The Centex parcel falls into the category of Type III habitat as described in Technical Report 8 Ecology and Development -related Habitat Requirements of the Florida Scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescens) Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 8 (FFWCC 1991). Type III habitat is defined as native and improved uplands and seasonally dry wetlands within 0.25 mile of Type I or Type II habitat. The survey area comprises 3.52 acres of disturbed coastal scrub and sand pine habitat types that abuts St. Jude Catholic Church's natural area preserve along the entire western property boundary. A review of aerial photographs shows the site was cleared of the majority of understory vegetation prior to 1995. The property has since been maintained in this condition with dwarf live oak (Quercus minima) and myrtle oak (Q. myrtifolia) saplings less than 18 inches high, sand pine (Pinus clausa) and bare ground. Methodology: Three transects were set up prior to the first day of scrub jay surveys. Transects one and two (T 1 and T2) both contained three alpha -numeric survey "stations" (A,t C,), spaced a distance of approximately 150 feet apart. Transect 3 contained only one survey station (C3) in the southeastern portion of the property. Surveys were conducted each morning from approximately 7:30am to 8:30am. Measurements of wind speed, temperature, visibility, and cloud cover present on the site were recorded at the start of each survey day. Using a variable speed playback mini -cassette recorder, scrub jay territorial calls were broadcast at each station, facing each of the cardinal directions, for one minute, for a total of four minutes at each survey station. Data were recorded at survey stations using 1 inch = 200 feet aerial photographs of the survey area. Bird location, flight path, age (adult or juvenile), color bands (when present and visible), and association with other scrub jays (grouped or single) were recorded on data sheets. Findings: Scrub jays responded to playback recordings on three of the four survey days (Figure 4). The maximum number of scrub jays visiting the property on a single day was five, on 27 December 2001. These five birds appeared to be from two different family groups, and they converged on the extreme southwestern portion of the Centex property from the neighboring preserve to the west to engage in a territorial dispute. The scrub jays from the neighboring preserve stayed within 40 feet of the western -most boundary fence while on the Centex property. Understory vegetation on this portion of the Centex property is almost nonexistent, with young dwarf live oak and sand live oak saplings less than one foot in height, and approximately 30 to 50 percent bare ground. It is our opinion that by flying over the Centex parcel's western property boundary fence, the scrub jays responding to the playback recordings on the Centex property were defending their easternmost territory along St. Jude's Preserve boundary. We do not believe that they rely on the Centex property for a significant portion of their daily foraging or annual nesting activities, as there is no suitable nesting or foraging habitat on the Centex property. References: Fitzpatrick, J. W., G. E. Woolfenden, and M. T. Kopeny 1991. Ecology and development -related habitat requirements of the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescens). Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 8. Tallahassee, Florida. Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2- Vegetative Communities Map Figure 3- Scrub Jay Survey Points Map Figure 4- Scrub Jay Location Map Under penalty of law, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, after appropriate inquiries of all relevant persons involved in the preparation of this report, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. x6 *Jupiter Quadrangle - USGS 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Section 30, Township 40, Range 43 Scale: 1" = 2000' Location Ma ENVIRONMENTAL CENTEX Figure 1 N SERVICES, INC. 3.52-ACRE PARCEL Date: December 2001 Jupiter, Florida Project No. EP01094 Village of Tepuesta. Florida E t w 14� � %trt r r 4 ��g�,s � k � ,dev�. ��..;xr ,� �''a'z �; `` t ✓ter' . Lit''x asap„ rFn , aa,t Pa=ay .`� a 3 ai may I; lay, , w �"s �q q 4,t e a i �4 i y ! Yid I +� yam' m r ,r ter. nri IS U A AR Wn T i # rAOL q n tWN 4 f ' t x } v �� � {. +a � a..�-, z �� �x ��. � � d� 4 � e ✓ a� ij 5 C� { ' m 'n`x e:�. � �x '�� � �:, �-$s ��, six. Legend: T=Transect Identification Number A-C= Point Identification Number Palm Beach County Aerial Photograph, 1995 Section 30, Township 40, Range 43 Scale: F' = 100' Scrub Jay Point Location Map ENVIRONMENTAL CENTEX Figure 3 SERVICES, INC. Date: Jan 2002 N 3.52-ACRE PARCEL �' Jupiter, Florida Village of Te uesta, Florida Project No. EP01094 Legend: ,'= scrub jays observed 12/26/01 + =scrub jays observed 12/27/01 *= scrub jays observed 12/28/01 @=scrub jays observed 12/29/01 Palm Beach County Aerial Photograph, 1995 Section 30, Township 40, Range 43 SQ&: 1" =100' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Jupiter, Florida CENTEX 3.52-ACRE PARCEL of Tequesta, Florida Scrub Jav Location Figure: 4 Date: January 2002 Project No. EP01094 PINDER TROUTMHN CtJNSULTING, INC. Transportation Planners and Engineers 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email: pindertroutman@msn.com October 24, 2001 Mr. Michael Nisenbaum Centex Homes 8198 Jog Road, Suite 200 Boynton Beach, FL 33437 Re: Village Boulevard Residential - #PTC01-156 Dear Mr. Nisenbaum: The purpose of this letter is to provide a traffic statement for the above referenced project to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards (TPS), of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). It is proposed to develop 58 single family residential units east of US 1 in the Village of Tequesta. Per Section 15.(I)L, Coastal Residential Exception, of the Countywide TPS, in order to promote urban infill, residential developments in this area are exempt from the level of service requirements of TPS. The proposed residential development is within this Coastal Residential Exception area; therefore no further traffic analysis is required. However, for information purposes for the Village of Tequesta, a traffic impact analysis of the directly accessed roadway links is provided. Attachment 2 provides the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. Project access is via one (1) driveway to Village Boulevard, which connects to both Old Dixie Highway and US 1. The directly -accessed two (2) lane link of Old Dixie Highway south of the County line has a current (2000) annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume of 6,365 and a peak hour volume of 592 (9.3% of 6,365). Historic traffic data for the last two (2) years shows a growth rate of -2.33% per year on this link. Data was unavailable for the three (3) years time frame. With application of 1% growth rate, to provide a conservative analysis, the projected 2004 volumes are shown below. No Major Project is projected to have a 10% impact on this link by buildout of this project. Existing (2000) Background Growth Project * Total (2004) LOS D Service Volume Level of Service Old Dixie Highway South of County Line Daily AM Peak 6,365 5,92 258 203 6,826 14,900 C 24 19 635 1,390 C * Project traffic is based on a maximum assignment of 50%. PM Peak 592 24 24 640 1,390 C LetterNisenbaum 01-156 10-24-01 Exhibit `HI Mr. Michael Nisenbaum Re: Village Boulevard Residential - #PTC01-156 October 24, 2001 Page 2 The directly -accessed six (6) lane divided link of US 1 south of the County line has a current (2000) annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume of 22,370 and a peak hour volume of 2,080 (9.3% of 22,370). Historic traffic data for the last three (3) years shows a growth rate of —0.04% per year on this link. With application of 1 % growth rate, to provide a conservative analysis, the projected 2004 volumes are shown below. No Major Project is projected to have a 10% impact on this link by buildout of this project. Existing (2000) Background Growth Project * Total (2004) LOS D Service Volume Level of Service US 1 South of County Line Daily AM Peak 22,370 2,080 908 142 23,420 48,900 C 84 13 2,177 4,550 C * Project traffic is based on a maximum assignment of 35%. PM Peak 2,080 84 17 2,181 4,550 C This analysis shows that, although the project is exempt from TPS, the directly -accessed links are projected to operate at adopted level of service standards. This development is in compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Attachment 3 provides the driveway volumes for the site. Based on the project peak hour turning movement volumes, auxiliary turn lanes along Village Boulevard would not be required per County Standards. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. rea M. Trout an, 4 F/ldr Attachments LetterNisenbaum 01-156 10-24-01 M& H-. , I ---- H to r r r Ln O O r O N O r N r U C d r N r O C 0 o_ Y :j O Y O co u M O F— Q L y co F— I= N ra O i O F— Fl O td v O ❑ L � ICi = O N U F— y C 00 C Ln E N LL C _ J C jw 41 7 O Y fb N d a c O Q J O O --C O U 3 C N aJ F- O_ - O fn N N N N O U Q� M ^ c L J C � � O ❑ c ro ` M C 'D :3 6 co u w O U U M d OJ C m O R v 0- C N v o C F v m w En LL f- 'v1 Q m ate.+ 00 C C Ln p CCO o w ce- C � O N tt� s L N N H LL• O o r c tb cd dic Ln J y� C � U U � 7 � lO N f Tequesta Cove Village of Tequesta, Florida Schnars Engineering Corporation Project No. 01158 EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS I. Water Quality Calculations A. Calculations 1. The water quality volume will be stored in the exfiltration trench and dry retention areas. a. Exfiltration trench. V = Wa Volume = 4.32 Ac-In L = trench length = ? feet W = trench width = 5 feet Kavg = hydraulic cond. = 9.15 x 101 cfs/ft2/ft. H2 = depth to water table = 5.0 feet Du = Non -saturated depth = 4.0 feet Ds = Saturated depth = 0.0 feet FS = Factor of Safety = 2 L = V/(K(H2W + 2H2Du - DU2 + 2H2Ds) + (1.39x10-4)WDu)) L = 91 feet of exfiltration trench required (850' provided). 2. Calculate available storage at specific elevations to be used in stage -storage a. Exfiltration trench. V = Storage Volume = ? Ac-In L = trench length = 850 feet W = trench width = 5 feet Ka,,a = hydraulic cond. = 9.15 x 10' cfs/ft2/ft. Hs = depth to water table = 2.0 feet, at elev. 17.50' Du = Non -saturated depth = 2.0 feet, at elev. 17.50' Ds = Saturated depth = 0.0 feet FS = Factor of Safety = 1.5 L = V/(K(H2W + 2H2Du - Du' + 2H2Ds) + (1.39x10-4)WDu)) V = 8.05 Ac-In tt 0.67 Ac-Ft at elevation=17.50' NGVD. pW.Ma/�JA�! 0 9 p hannah, P.E. FL Reg. No. 47066 (FOR THE FIRM) Tequesta Cove Village of Tequesta, Florida SEC PROJECT NO. 01158 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 1) SITE DATA: 2) STAGE ELEVATIONS: ACREAGE Percent: From: To: Building: 1.14 Ac. 32.3% 22.75 Pavement: 1.17 Ac. 33.1% 21.00 24.00 Lake 0.00 Ac. 0.0% 18.00 up Green Lineal: 1.04 Ac. 29.5 jo 21.50 23.50 Green Lineal: 0.15 Ac. 4.2% 18.00 23.00 Green Lineal: 0.00 Ac. 0.0% 19.50 22.00 Green Vertical: 0.03 Ac. 0.8y, 18.00 up TOTAL AREA: 3.53 Ac. 100.0% Total Impervious: 2.31 Average Existing Grade: 22.50 65.44% Average Proposed Grade: 22.50 Ground Water Table: 3.00 Total Pervious: 1.22 34.56% 3) FLOOD AND RAINFALL CRITERIA: 24 Hour Rainfall: SFWMD, Technical Publication #81-3 5 Year 6.75 in. Min. Road Crown (NGVD): 21.00 25 Year 9.00 in. 100 Year 11.00 in. Min. Floor Elev. (NGVD): 22.75 Maximum Available Soil Storage, SFWMD: 4) COMPUTE STAGE STORAGE: 8.18 in. (Applied soil storage for depth up to 4') Stage: Pavement: Green Lineal: Green Lineal: Lake Green Lineal: Green Vertical: French Drain Total: 15.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 16.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 17.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 17.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 18.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 18.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.07 1.09 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 1.29 1.34 19.50 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.69 1.77 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 1.96 2.08 20.50 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.18 2.35 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.09 2.4 2.63 21.50 0.05 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.11 2.4 2.74 22.00 0.20 0.07 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.12 2.4 3.02 22.50 0.44 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.14 2.4 3.54 23.00 0.78 0.59 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.15 2.4 4.29 WATER QUALITY: Greater of the following (5A. & 5B.) Store the first inch for the entire site or the amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness. Page 1 Tequesta Cove Village of Tequesta, Florida SEC PROJECT NO. 01158 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS A. First Inch: V= 1 in. x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Total (Ac.): V = (ac-ft) 3.53 0.29 B. 2.5 Times Percent Impervious: 1. Site Area = Total Area - (Lake Area + Bldg. Area) Total (Ac.): Lake: BI& Site Ac. : 3.53 0.00 1.14 2.39 2. Impervious Area = Site Area - Pervious Area Site Ac.: Pervious: Imperv.: 2.39 1.22 1.17 3. 2.5 in. x Imperv./Site x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Im erv.: V= ac-ft 1.17 0.36 C. Total Required Detention: 1. The total required detention is either the first inch or 2.5 times the percent impervious, whichever is greater. The total required detention is: Wt) (ac-ft): 0.36 2. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between... 17.00 17.50 0.00 0.67 Stage: 17.27 6) RUNOFF (ZERO DISCHARGE) A. Soil Storage 1. Avg. Depth to Water Table = Avg. Proposed Grade - Water Level Avg. Grade: Water Level: D=(ft.): 22.50 3.00 19.50 2. Soil Storage (S) = Available Soil Storage x Pervious Area/Total Area (See C-35, SFWMD VoI.IV) Av. Soil St. Pervious: Total (Ac.): S = (in.): 8.18 1.22 3.53 2.83 B. 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm Event Finished Floor Elevation: 22.75 NGVD Page 2 Tequesta Cove Village of Tequesta, Florida SEC PROJECT NO. 01158 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24 = 11.00 in. P72 = 14.95 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q=((P-0.2xS)^2}/(P+0.8xS) P72 in.: S = in.: (in.): 14.95 2.83 12.02 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V= Q x Total Area x 1 ft. /12 in. in. Total (Ac.): V= ac-ft: 12.02 3.53 3.54 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... 22.00 22.50 Interpolate Runoff between... 3.02 3.54 Stage: 22.50 The proposed Finish Floor Elevation is adequate. C. 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm Event 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24 = 9.00 in. P72 = 12.23 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q={(P-0.2xS)^2)/(P+0.8xS) P72 in.: S = in.: (in.): 12.23 2.83 9.39 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V= Q x Total Area x 1 ft. /12 in. in.: Total Ac.): mac-ftZ 9.39 3.53 2.76 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... 21.50 22.00 Interpolate Runoff between... 2.74 3.02 Stage: 21.54 D. 5 Yr.-1 Day Storm Event (Minimum Road Grade) Min. Road Elevation: 21.00 NGVD 1. Rainfall - 1 Day Duration (P): P24 = 6.75 in. Page 3 Tequesta Cove Village of Tequesta, Florida SEC PROJECT NO. 01158 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q=((P-0.2xS)^2}/(P+0.8xS) P72 in.: S = in.: (in.): 6.75 2.83 4.24 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V= Q x Total Area x 1 ft. /12 in. On.): Total (Ac.): V = (ac-ft): 4.24 3.53 1.25 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... 18.50 19.00 Interpolate Runoff between... 1.09 1.34 7) SUMMARY Required Storage: moil Storage: ZERO DISCHARGE 5Yr.-1 Day Storm: 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm: 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm: DATE PRINTED: 09-Jan-02 Stage: 18.82 The stage is at or below the Minimum Road Crown Elevation. 0.36 ac-ft 2.83 in 1.25 ac-ft 18.82 NGVD Stage Elevation 2.76 ac-ft 21.54 NGVD Stage Elevation 3.54 ac-ft 22.50 NGVD Stage Elevation PREPARED BY: REVISED BY: DATE: JWM 10/12/00 Page 4 March 27, 2002 Mr. Jack Horniman, Consulting Planner Village of Tequesta 357 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: Tequesta Cay — Centex Homes Request for approval to have a sales trailer On the site and a Waiver to Article II of the subdivision Code Dear Mr. Horniman: Please accept this letter as our request for Village Council approval to have a temporary sales trailer on the site and a waiver for the following item on our request for Site Plan Review. As you are aware the Village of Tequesta Code allows the Village Council to grant waivers to specified items when reviewing the proposed site plan. 1. Request a waiver to the subdivision code, Article II, Section V, Paragraph 5, which requires the plat to be approved prior to the issuing of a building permit. Our request is to allow a building permit to be issued after review and approval of the preliminary plat and prior to final plat approval by the Village Council. Commentary: This is to allow for the development of the proposed sales trailer/office for the subject property. This has been waved on previous projects reviewed by the Village Council. The Village Council has also approved the use of temporary sales trailers on sites within the Village. We appreciate your consideration on these waivers. Sincer*, George G. Gentile, FASLA President Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes January 28, 2002 Page 4 Mr. Gentile advised that the applicant had gone over 2-3 pages of Mr. Horniman's notes and incorporated all the items into the plans, which Mr. Horniman could verify. Willow Glen Sketch Plan — North of Riverside Drive, west and adjacent to Tequesta Pines and Chapel Court Subdivisions. Spear Group, Jeff Spear Applicant. George Gentile, Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney and Associates, Agent Mr. Newell indicated most of the items had been addressed. Mr. Gentile verified that Mr. Horniman had addressed the sketch plan with the applicant. Mr. Newell advised the sketch plan was conceptual and would go before the Village Council, then the process would move on to preliminary plat, and that preliminary and final could be done at the same time. coy Tequesta 4Wo*e Site Plan, South of Village Blvd., west of Tequesta Terrace ALF. Centex Homes, Applicant. Troy Holloway, Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney and Associates, Agent Richard Reese and Mike Nissenbaum were present on behalf of Centex Homes. Mr. Holloway advised the applicant had not met with Mr. Horniman. Mr. White indicated the same standard DOT road detail would be needed, and questioned whether the stormwater system would be private or turned over to the Village. Mr. Nissenbaum responded it would be done the same way they did Tequesta Trace, that this was basically the same project only a little smaller, and that the road would be private. Mr. Nissenbaum clarified that they had submitted a waiver request for Tequesta Trace and that it was a public access road but the Homeowners Association would maintain the roadway. Mr. White reported he had spoken regarding some items to the applicant's engineer, who was not present. Mr. White indicated the plan was not very detailed at this point, that the applicant had a stormwater drainage system in the back but it was not shown behind building 6, which probably had just been missed on the plan. Mr. White point out that between buildings 6 and 3 the stormwater line just stopped and possibly a structure was missing. Mr. White commented 850' was Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes January 28, 2002 Page 5 required for the exfiltration trench and 715' were shown. Mr. White advised this backed up to the Tequesta Commerce Center and the Village would like the system linked into their system. Mr. White commented that the Village Boulevard water main was close to the edge of pavement and the Village did not like open cutting of the road, but preferred jack and bore. If open cutting was required the Village would require the road to be overlaid and a couple of butt joints 20' each way from the center line at the end of the project, and Mr. Preston would give the applicant a letter allowing that. Applicant verified the same size meters would be used as in Tequesta Trace. Mr. White indicated he would go out to look to see if there was room to do a jack and bore, but there was an as built on it. Mr. White advised he had attached the calculations for connection fees. Applicant verified all correspondence should be sent to Mr. Reese. Police Lieutenant Rick Ricciardi advised that the name of the project must be changed since there was already a Tequesta Cove. Mr. Nissenbaum indicated he would coordinate with Lt. Ricciardi regarding the name. Lieutenant Ricciardi requested that the house numbers be changed so they would flow concurrently. Mr. Newell reported that in Tequesta Trace the applicant had coordinated the address system with Chief Weinand and Chief Allison, and that same system could be used for this project. Applicant verified no landscaping would interfere with the street lighting. Mr. Nissenbaum indicated there would be directional signs and lighting above addresses. Mr. Nissenbaum indicated he did not know if the buildings would be pre -wired for alarm systems. Lieutenant Rick Ricciardi provided the applicant with a copy of his comments. Mr. Preston verified with the applicant that there would be curbside pickup of trash the same as in Tequesta Trace and that roadway standards would be met. Sidewalks were discussed. Mr. Holloway advised that the sidewalk on Village Boulevard stopped. Mr. Preston responded that the Village would require the applicant to bring the sidewalk across the property, and there must be a curb and sidewalk along Village Boulevard because it was so close to the edge of the road. Mr. Preston advised the curb was already there, and the applicant would need to provide the sidewalk. Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes January 28, 2002 Page 6 Chief Trube indicated there was only one access road into this development and that a nice, wide, flared entrance would be needed. Chief Trube advised that a sprinkler system was required. The applicant advised that the buildings would not exceed 21'-6" in height. Hydrants were pointed out on the plans —by #6, #4, and #4, which Chief Trube indicated would suffice. Mr. Nissenbaum indicated the fire department connections were at the ends of the buildings, but could not answer whether there were siamese fittings. Chief Trube advised hydrants must be no more than 500' apart. Fire service was next to the water and at the ends of the buildings. Mr. Newell referred to Mr. Horniman's notes, which indicated this project was in a mixed -use district, the traffic report was in process, a full set of plans was needed for review, and uses and densities were provided. Mr. Holloway indicated that Mr. Horniman should now have the landscaping specifications. Mr. Newell indicated items Mr. Horniman was looking for included sign sizes, lot coverage, and landscape specs, and that open space requirements and landscaping requirements could be discussed with Mr. Horniman. Mr. Holloway responded they would talk to Mr. Horniman on those issues. Applicant indicated they would change the sign size from 6'-8" to meet the 6' requirement. Mr. Newell advised that the applicant needed to make an appointment with Mr. Horniman, that the sketch plot review would go before Village Council, and after their approval the applicant would move to preliminary or preliminary/final plat. It was verified that the plans contained the temporary sales trailer. Mr. Gentile indicated they would submit a request to waive preliminary, following the steps as in Tequesta Trace. Tequesta Pines Road RO.W. Landscape Plan — Pine Tree Trail East and Seabrook Road; and Riverside Drive and Pine Tree Trail West. Tequesta Pines H.O.A., Applicant. Emily O'Mahoney, Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney and Associates, Agent. Emily O'Mahoney was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. White advised that on both Riverside and Seabrook Road there was an A/C water main, and requested no large plantings or buildings on top of that main, Applicant indicated Mr. White would be called to field locate plantings. Ms. O'Mahoney indicated this project ec. VII TEQUESTA CODE Sec. VII reational needs of village residents which con- serve certain environmentally sensitive areas, and which permit limited recreational uses while con- serving the environment and natural features of those areas. (b) Permitted uses: 1. Golf courses. 2. Neighborhood and community public recreational facilities. 3. Cultural and civic centers. 4. 'Conservation areas. 5. Access easements. 6. Other similar recreational uses. (c) Accessory uses: 1.. Any accessory use customarily incidental to a per- mitted use. (d) Special exceptions: 1. Required for all permitted and accessory uses. (e) Prohibited uses and structures: 1. Any use or structure not specTcally or by reason- able implication permitted herein as a permitted use, accessory use or permissible by special excep- tion. (9) MU Mixed -use District. (a) [Purpose of district.I The purpose and intent of the mixed -use district is to establish a village center which creates a vital, diverse core for the principles which utilize mixed -use development concepts and which permit a combination of usually separated uses within a unified development district area. Natural features should be enhanced and environmental -conditions care- fully assessed. Commercial uses are intended to be lim- ited to specialty small wale retail sales and services, business services and professional services primarily Supp. No. 24 1138.2 Sec. VII APPENDIX A —ZONING Sec. VII designed to serve residential neighborhoods of the vil- lage. Orientation to and compatibility with neighbor- hoods to be served are essential. Residential uses are intended to encourage the accomplishment of a more complete residential living environment through the application of imaginative approaches to community development which establish neighborhood identity and focus consistent with values of the Village of Tequesta. It is further the purpose and intent of this area to provide lands for a range of residential uses from lower density single-family to higher density residential uses. Traffic circulation should not only accommodate vehic- ular traffic, but provide for the efficient movement of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. (b) Scope of district. 1. Although mixed -use development produced in com- pliance with these provisions and requirements and other regulations as set forth and detailed in this zoning ordinance may depart from the strict application of property development regulations expressed in this ordinance, such developments are to be in compliance with the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Development Plan and platted of record in accordance with the procedures for ap- proval of subdivision plats in the. Village of Te- questa Subdivision Regulations. The mixed -use de- velopment provisions set forth in this section shall be utilized in the review of all future development proposals for the special planning area as identi- fied in Policy 1.12.1 of the Future Land Use Ele- ment, as designated on the Future Land Use Map contained in the Ville of Tequesta Comprehen- sive Development Plan and as identified on the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Zoning Map as District MU. (c) Conflict with other applicable regulations. 1. Where conflicts exist between these mixed -use dis- trict special regulations and general zoning, sub- 1 Snpp. Na 24 1138.3 (Iec. VII TEQUESTA CODE Sec. VII division and other applicable ordinance provisions, these special regulations shall apply. (d) General requirements and special regulations. 1. The following general requirements and special regulations shall apply to planned mixed -use de- velopment within the mixed -use district: a. Location. A planned mixed -use development is permitted only in the special planning dis- trict identified by Policy 1.12.1 of the Future Land Use Element, as designated on the Fu-. ture Land Use Map contained within the Vil- lage of Tequesta Comprehensive Development Plan and as identified on the Village of Te- questa Comprehensive Zoning Map as Dis- trict MU. b. Configuration of site. Any tract of land for which a planned mixed -use development ap- plication is made shall contain sufficient width, depth, and frontage: on a publicly ded- icated arterial or major street or appropriate access thereto to adequately accommodate its proposed use and design. c. Unity of title. All land included for purpose of development within a planned mixed -use de. velopment shall be under unity of title of the petitioner for such zoning designation, whether that petitioner be an individual, part- nership or corporation, or a group of individ- uals, partnerships or corporations. The peti- tioner shall present firm evidence of the unity of title of the entire area within the proposed planned mixed -use development and shall state agreement that, if he proceeds with the proposed development, he will: (1) Do so in accord with the officially ap- proved site plan of the development, and such other conditions or modifications as may be attached to the approval. Supp. No. 24 1138.4 } Sec. VII APPENDIX A —ZONING Sec. VII (2) Provide agreements, covenants, contracts, deed restrictions or sureties acceptable to the village for completion of the under- taking in accordance with the approved site plan as well as for the continuing op- eration and maintenance of such areas, functions, and facilities as are not to be provided, operated or maintained at gen- eral public expense. (3) Bind his development successors in title to any commitments made under (1) and (2) above. d. Density. For the purpose of this provision, if dwelling units are to be developed as part of a proposed development within the mixed -use district, the total number of dwelling units permitted in the mixed -use district shall be }} computed on the basis of eighteen (18) dwelling J units per gross acre for all residential uses with the exception of ACLF's which shall be computed on the basis of twenty-four (24) dwelling units per gross acre. e. Building height. The' maximum building height allowed shall be six (6) stories or eighty- four (84) feet above average finish grade. (e) Site plan review. In adherence to Policy 1.12.1 of the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Development Plan Future Land Use Element, all proposed development plans for the mixed -use district shall be subject to re- view and approval by the village council. M Urban design principles. 1. The following urban design principles shall be con- sidered as guidelines in all development proposals of the mixed -use district. a. That mixed -use promotes economic and social well-being. b. The streets serve the needs of the pedestriar and the automobile. Supp. No. 24 1138.5 ec. VII TEQUESTA CODE Sec. VU c. That proposed squares and plazas provide col- lective identity and a place for social activity and recreation. d. That public buildings, facilities, and spaces are symbols of the community and convey iden- tity and pride through their architectural clarity and civic functions. e. That carefully placed buildings delineate and define public spaces and lots and blocks. f. That streets are designed and act as ameni- ties to the development and as quality public space. (g) Urban design objectives. 1. The following urban design objectives shall be con- sidered as guidelines in all development proposals of the mixed -use district. a. To bring many of the activities of daily living, including dwelling, shopping and other activ- ities, within walking distance. b. To reduce the number and length of automo- bile trips to relieve traffic congestion. c. To provide internal vehicular circulation to relieve traffic impact on arterial roads. d. To provide defined public spaces and streets that allow the citizens to observe and watch over the collective security. e. To provide sites for civic buildings. f. To provide flexibility for the development strategies that evolve over time. (h) Permitted uses. 1. Single-family dwellings. 2. Two-family dwellings. 3. Multiple -family dwellings. . 4. Small-scale retail sales and service.* 5. Business services.* 6. Professional services.* 7. Personal services.* Supp. No. 24 1138.6 - l Sec. VII APPENDIX A —ZONING Sec. VII r 8. Recreation/open space. *Maximum three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet gross leasable area allowed for each tenant area or individually owned unit. W Special exception uses. 1. Restaurants (including carry -out)_ 2. Public buildings and facilities. 3. Church/house of worship. 4. Civic/cultarzUinslhnsal ' titutional. 5. Private schools/schools of instruction. 6. Bed and breakfast. 7. Hotel. 8. Adult congregate living facility (ACLF). 9. Gasoline service station (only fronting on U.S. Highway One). 1 j10. Private clubs. 11. Railway station. 12. Planned residential development (PRD). 13. Planned commercial development (PCD). 14. Permitted uses numbers 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in excess of three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet (large scale retail sales and service) which are in conformity with the intent and integrity of the district. 15. Restaurants, fast food, subject to the following conditions: a.. • 'Each drive -up window stacking lane must be clearly designed and marked so as not to conflict or interfere with other vehicle or pedestrian traffic utilizing the site. b. A by-pass traffic lane shall be provided if a one-way traffic flow pattern is utilized in the parking lot design. C. All restaurants, fast food, shall be re- stricted to U.S. Highway One frontage. Supp. No. 26 1138.7 Sec. VII TEQUESTA CODE Sec. VII d. A minimum fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer shall be provided at all public road rights -of -way, in addition to the require- ments set forth in Section X(H) Landscap- ing: General requirements. (j) Accessory uses. 1. Any accessory use customarily incidental to a permitted use. 2. Private garages, swimming pools, spas and hot tubs, cabanas and saunas, greenhouses, tennis courts, clubhouses, utility buildings, gazebos, and any other similar use deemed appropriate by the building official. (k) Planned mixed -use development MMUD). 1. Required for all permitted, special exception, and accessory uses within the mixed -use dis- trict except lots or parcels of less than three (3) acres. (1) Prohibited uses. 1. Wholesale. 2. Warehouses. 3. Car wash (that is not an accessory use). 4. Motel. Supp. No. 26 5. Motor vehicle dealer. 6. Pawn shop 7. Full -service fuel station/gasoline service . sta- tion. 8. Flea markets, indoor or outdoor. 9. Automobile repair facilities, _including garages and body shops. 10. Kennels or pet hospitals with boarding facih- ties. 11. Any ether use or structure not specifically or by reasonable implication permitted herein as a permitted use, special exception use or acces- sory use. 1138.8 Sec. VII APPENDIX A —ZONING Sec. VII (m) Property development standards. Property develop- ment standards for the mixed -use district shall be as set forth below. However, as part of the review. and approval process by the village, the village council may modify the property development standards, at its discretion, provided the spirit and intent of the regulations and standards are complied with in the development of the mixed -use district. Supp. No. 26 1. Parking requirements. On -street and off-street parking shall be allowed within the mixed -use district. The minimum number of required parking .spaces to be provided shall be deter- mined from Section VIII(H), off-street parking space requirements, and may include a combi- nation of on -street and off-street spaces. When using on -street parking to meet a portion of the required parking for a proposed project, only those spaces that lie within the street frontage areas of the property may be included in the total calculations for meeting the minimum required parking requirements. 2. Streets/rights-of-way. The minimum width of rights -of -ways within the MU district are as follows: a. Major street (collector) 50 feet b. Minor street (collector): Two-way street 50 feet One-way street 42 feet 3. Drainage (streets/rights-of-way). Raised curb and gutter drainage systems shall be the pre- ferred method utilized within the MU district. Alternate drainage systems shall be approved at the discretion of the village council during the site . plan review process for a proposed planned mixed -use development (PMUD). 1138.9 Sec. VII TEQUESTA CODE Sec. VII 4. Schedule of site regulations. a. Minimum lot size: 3200 square feet b. Minimum lot width: 40 feet C. Maximum lot coverage: Residential 62% Commercial For a single mini- 60% mum sized lot For two or more lots 70% or parcels in excess of the minimum sized lot under unity of title d. Minimum front yard set- back: Residential 10 feet Commercial 0 feet e. Minimum side yard set- back: Residential On one side 0 feet On remaining side 7 feet Commercial On both sides where 0 feet commercial abuts commercial Where commercial 7 feet abuts residential f. Minimum rear yard set- back: Residential 10 feet Commercial Where commercial 0 feet abuts commercial Where commercial 10 feet abuts residential g. Minimum living area re- Not applica- quirements: ble Supp. No. 26 1138.10 n Sec. VII APPENDIX A —ZONING Sec. VII h. Minimum landscaped/ open space: Residential 25% Commercial 25% 5. Landscaping requirements. Off-street parking facilities and all properties within the MU District shall be landscaped in accordance with Section X (H), Landscaping: General Require- ments. 6. Signage requirements. All wall, free-standing, monument, ceiling -mounted walkway, project identification, composite, changeable letter and similar signs and/or signage shall be in keeping with the purpose and intent of the Mixed -Use District and shall be subject to review and approval by the Village of Tequesta. Subsec- tions (A), Intent; (C), Permits Required; (D), Application and Permit Requirements; (E), Is- suance of Permit; (F), Permit Fees; (G), Paint- ing Requirements; and (H), Wind Pressure and Dead Load Requirements, as set forth in Sec- tion XII, Sign Regulations, of the Zoning Ordi- nance shall apply within the MU, Mixed -Use District. (Ord. No. 370; § 4, 8-11-88; Ord. No. 375, § 1, 10-13-88; Ord. No. 379, §§ 2, 3, 12-13-88; Ord. No. 390, § 1, 9-14-89; Ord. No. 415, § 2, 10-25-90; Ord. No. 417, § 1, 1-24-91; Ord. No. 453, §§ 1-4, 5-27-93; Ord. No. 454, §§ 1), 2, 5-27-93; Ord. No. 465, §§ 3, 4, 2-10-94; Ord. No. 479, §§ 2-4, 11-10-94; Ord. No. 499, §§ 1-4, 9-28-95; Ord. No. 510, § 2, 1-11-96; Ord. No. 516, §§ 1-3, 6-27-96) Supp. No. 26 1138.10.1 1.8.3 The Village should discourage high intensity land uses in hurricane flood zones. Objective: 1.9.0 Create regulations in existing building codes requiring new construction in the hurricane flood zone to utilize the latest wind damage and flood prevention techniques. Policy: 1.9.1 The Village should study special building standards for the 100-year hurricane flood zone, with provisions for utilization of these latest techniques. Objective: 1.10.0 Encourage local residents within the hurricane flood areas to utilize the flood insurance programs developed by the Federal Insurance Administration. Policies: 1.10.1 All structures in the hurricane flood zone should be protected by flood insurance in an effort to ensure that the financial burden from flooding is borne by those desiring to live in such areas. 1.10.2 The Village should continue to support the Federal Flood Insurance Program. Objective: 1.11.0 Adopt land development regulations, including Planned Unit Development, overlay zoning, mixed -use development or 9ther innovative development and redevelopment concepts. Policy: 1.11.1 The Village shall continue to define and plan the Downtown area and develop a Village Center concept which promotes the integration of land uses, pedestrian and vehicular movement and mixed -use development. Objective: 1.12.0 Special land use Policies shall be developed by the Village of Tequesta when necessary to address site specific land development issues related to implementing the Future Land Use Goal Statement. Special Policy: 1.12.1 Utilize the mixed -use provisions of the Mixed -Use regulations or develop new Special District Urban Standards (e.g. urban design standards, architectural standards, street design standards) and utilize them in the development and/or re -development of the Village cgnter Development of the property or properties shall be subject to Village Council approval of the specific site plans and subject to the land development regulations cited above. Policies: 1.12.2 The Mixed -Use land use areas shall provide for a variety of residential and non-residential land uses; however, commercial uses shall be limited to small-scale retail sales and services, business services and professional services primarily designed to serve residential neighborhoods. Mixed -use areas shall provide for a range of residential uses from lower density single-family uses to higher density multiple family uses. Maximum density for residential uses shall be limited to 18 dwelling units/acre with the exception of Assisted Living Facilities (ALF's), which can have a maximum density of 24 dwelling units/acre. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 62% in residential areas while non-residential areas with single FLU-5 29 04/01/02 15:02 FAX 5618823703 U 002 r=F.1 Kimley-horn = and Associates, Inc. April 1, 2002 W 4431 Errbareadero Drive West Palm Beeoh, Florida 33407 Mr. Jeffrey C. Nowell Director, Community Development Village of Tequesta Post Office Box 3273 Tequesta, Florida 33469 Dear Mr. Newell: At your request I have reviewed the traffic statement prepared for the Village Boulevard Residential site, dated October 24, 2001. There is some confusion about the location of the site, I assume that the project is located as shown in the graphic attached to the statement, and not as described in the letter. Also, I assume that the development will include multi family units as calculated, not the single fancily described in the letter. Accordingly, I present the following finding: ■ The project is expected to generate 406 daily trips and 48 afternoon peak hour trips. ■ Future traffic volumes, including project traffic on Village Boulevard will be within the standards in the Village's Comprehensive Plan. ■ Similarly, neither US 1 nor Old Dixie Highway will be adversely impacted by the project. ■ Turning movements at the project driveway connection to Village Boulevard will not warrant additional turn lanes. Based on its location in the Coastal Residential Exception Area the project is excepted from the provisions of the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (TPSO). The project also meets the provisions of the Village concurrency management system since it is within the limits of the Village Center Master Plan, 0 TEL bet 846 0886 FAX 881 883 8175 04/01/02 15:02 FAX 561.8823703 Z 003 +� KlmleyHorn Mr, 7affory C. Newoll, April 1, 2002, Page 2 `1 and Associates, Inc. The traffic analysis summarized in the letter are based on traffic counts taken last year, Although there are more current data the conclusions remain unchanged, Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. I will be available to answer questions you may have about these issues. Please feel free to call, Very truly yours, KIMLEY-HORN AN ASSOCIATES, INC. rick W. Schwartz, P.H. Senior Vice President FWSllem 1LKYLE\VOL1\PROJBMATPIOM00#7010\VII* BodavM1 Ree1,16nt1a11a60102 N.,61d- W