Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 16_10/13/2022Agenda Item #16. Regular Council STAFF MEMO Meeting: Regular Council - Oct 13 2022 Staff Contact: Nilsa Zacarias, Director of Department: Community Development SPR 2-22: Application from 300 BEACH ROAD DEVELOPER LLC for a site plan review to build a ten (10) story 26-unit multi -family 178,320 sq. ft. condominium building including one (1) monument sign, three (3) swimming pools, and a landscaping plan. The subject property is located at 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469. This document and any attachments may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by completing our Accessibility Feedback Form, sending an e-mail to the Village Clerk or calling 561-768- 0443. PROJECT NAME: BUDGET: N/A ENCUMBERED: N/A Proposed: Projected Remaining: N/A N/A final - SPR 2-22 Savoy Staff Report w attach FPL CONFIRMATION TO SERVE WM PBC Traffic Division AT&T CONFIRMATION TO SERVE V.O.T. Water Service Availability LRECD CONFIRMATION TO SERVE C;nn.qPnt Application Justification Statement (22-05-11) EAA Components Summary (1) 21 09 16 300 Beach Road LOMR Report 300 S Beach Rd WM Figure Savoy Hydrant Flow Test Application 2012 Fire Flow Area PART 1 174 RE 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta 22 01 10 PBC Meeting Summary Savoy Drainage Report S & S 5 11 22 Location Map Page 175 of 478 Agenda Item #16. D21071 Survey Signed 2022-06-07 22.9.28 Savoy Architectural S&S LH-1 LH-2 LH-3 LP-1 LP-2 LP-3 CONCEPTUAL ENG PLAN S & S 5 11 22 Pavement Section Page 176 of 478 Agenda Item #16. f&0731% VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '3 Staff Report — Village Council Hearing—10-13-22 1. PETITION DESCRIPTION -SPR 2-22 APPLICANT: Gentile, Glas, Holloway, O'Mahoney & Associates Inc. 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 Jupiter, FL 33458 OWNER: 300 Beach Road Developer LLC. REQUEST: Application from 300 BEACH ROAD DEVELOPER LLC for a site plan review to build a ten (10) story 26-unit multi -family 178,320 sq. ft. condominium building including one (1) monument sign, three (3) swimming pools, and a landscaping plan. The subject property is located at 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469. LOCATION: 300 Beach Road Tequesta, FL 33469 LOCATION MAP 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 177 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 2. PETITION FACTS a. Total Gross Site Area: 98,263 Sq. Ft. (2.26 Acres) b. Total Building Footprint Area: 34,296 sq. ft. c. Total Building Square Footage: 178,320 sq. ft. (main building) d. Density: 11.5 D.U./Acre Total: 26 Units e. Building Height: 10 stories / 101'-0" Above Average Crest of Dune f. Land Use and Zoning EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING Multiple Family Medium Density R-3 SUBJECT PROPERTY Residential Residential (5.4-12.0 (Multiple Family DU per acre) Dwelling District) NORTH Multiple Family Medium Density R-3 350 Beach Road Residential Residential (5.4-12.0 (Multiple Family DU per acre) Dwelling District) SOUTH Multiple Family Medium Density R-3 250 Beach Road Residential Residential (5.4-12.0 (Multiple Family DU per acre) Dwelling District) EAST N/A N/A N/A Atlantic Ocean WEST Multiple Family Medium Density R-3 325 Beach Road Residential Residential (5.4-12.0 (Multiple Family DU per acre) Dwelling District) 3. BACKGROUND The subject site includes an existing four (4)-story multifamily condominium building "Island House South East" that was built in 1967. This building consists of twenty-seven (27) units and one (1) swimming pool. In March 2022, 300 Beach Road Developer LLC. applied for a Site Plan Review to build a ten (10) story 26-unit multi -family condominium building on the subject site including one (1) monument sign, three (3) swimming pools, and a landscaping plan. The applicant has proposed to demolish the existing building. 4. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the subject application for compliance with Village Code, State, and Federal applicable regulations. The DRC includes Community Development, Law Enforcement, Landscaping, Building, Fire Safety, the Water Department, Civil, and Traffic Engineering. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the site plan review at the July 21, 2022 meeting, by a 5-0 vote. The subject recommendation included one (1) condition of approval presented on page 7 of this report. The subject application was scheduled to be heard by the Village Council at the August 11, 2022 meeting. However, at the subject meeting, the applicant requested their application be postponed to 2 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 178 of 478 Agenda Item #16. revise the aesthetics of the building. On September 8, 2022, the applicant displayed a Conceptual Presentation of their revised architecture to the Village Council to obtain their feedback. The applicant resubmitted their application for the October 13, 2022, Village Council meeting. ZONING REVIEW R-3 Zoning REQUIRED BY CODE PROPOSED COMMENTS District Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. for the first multifamily 98,263 sf (2.26 In compliance Lot Size dwelling unit, plus 3,356 sq. ft. for each acres) additional dwelling unit to a maximum of 12 26 dwelling units dwelling units per acre. Minimum 80 ft. Lot Width: 239.37' In compliance Lot Width 200 ft. 3 'Minimum buildable lot depth cannot Lot Depth: include submerged lands, conservation 445.81' easement areas, protected wetlands, mangrove stands or similar protected areas. Accessory structures, not exceeding one story/ten feet in height, may be constructed on lots with less than the minimum lot depth. Setbacks(R-3) Front Yard Main Structure: 20 ft. Main Structure: In compliance Accessory: 0 ft. for an accessory structure 36' — 0" not exceeding one story/10 ft. in height used for the parking of vehicles only (covered Accessory: 30' — 3" parking) and provided that the design of the front of the covered parking structure includes fully landscaped grade and/or raised planters that provide a minimum of 10 ft. of landscaped width along the full frontage of the covered parking structure. Rear Yard Main Structure: 20 ft. plus 2 ft. for each Main Structure: In compliance additional 10 ft. or portion thereof over 50 ft. Garage 164'-0" in height of the main building or structure. Accessory: Accessory: 10 ft. for any accessory one-story Pool & Spa 154'-2" building or structure. Plus 2 ft. for each additional story of the accessory building or structure. Side Yard - Main Structure: 20 ft. plus 2 ft. for each Main Structure: 20'- In compliance North additional 10 ft. or portion thereof over 50 ft. 0" in height of the main building or structure. Accessory: 10 ft. for any accessory one-story Accessory: building or structure. Plus 2 ft. for each Egress Stairs 15'-2" additional story of the accessory building or structure. Side Yard - Main Structure: 20 ft. plus 2 ft. for each Main Structure: In compliance South additional 10 ft. or portion thereof over 50 ft. 20' — 0" in height of the main building or structure. Accessory: Stairs: 15' -0" 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 179 of 478 Agenda Item #16. R-3 Zoning REQUIRED BY CODE PROPOSED COMMENTS District Accessory: 10 ft. for any accessory one-story building or structure. Plus 2 ft. for each additional story of the accessory building or structure. Lot Max 35% 34,296 sf (34.90%) In compliance Coverage Building 11 stories/101 ft. measured from the average 10 stories / 101' In compliance height of the crest of the sand dune line, for Height crest of the Dune main building or structure east of Beach Road, and measured from grade west of Beach Road. 4 2 stories/20 ft. for any accessory building or structure. Parking Sec. 78-705 (8): Total Number: 57 In compliance c. Multiple -family: Two spaces per dwelling spaces (5 exterior, unit. 52 spaces in the REQUIRED: 52 spaces (for 26 residential garage - 2 per unit) units) ADA: (2 exterior and 1 interior) Landscape Min 30% 49.0% (48,157 sf) In compliance Open Space Per Sec. 78-331 (h)(7): All development New 6' sidewalk In compliance Sidewalks and/or maior redevelopment shall provide a (Applicant will minimum five -foot -wide continuous sidewalk provide a new for pedestrian travel sidewalk) Signage The application includes one monument sign, which complies with Village Code Sec. 78-740 (b) "Freestanding sign: One freestanding sign shall be allowed, not to exceed 30 square feet in total area, with a maximum height of seven feet above finish grade. The sign shall meet the setback requirement of Section 78-739. Up to 50 percent of the approved sign may be used as a changeable letter reader sign. Landscaping and irrigation at the base of any such signage shall be required." See drawing LH-4 for square footage, material, color, and font. The applicant is proposing a sign that is three (3) feet nine (9) inches in height and the sign copy area is 29.25 sf. Level of Service Per Division 2, Sec. 78-331 (h), the subject application was reviewed for compliance with Level of Service (LOS) standards. The subject application meets the LOS for traffic, sanitary sewer, drainage, and potable water. Development Phases Infrastructure and building will be developed in one phase. Agency Approvals Per Division 2, Sec. 78-331 (g), the applicant provided agency letters and statements as follows: 4 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 180 of 478 Agenda Item #16. (1) Palm Beach County Health Department. APPLICANT PROVIDED STATEMENT. "Letter/Copy of permit to follow, when a permit is obtained." (2) Tequesta Fire -Rescue Department (Fire Marshal). APPLICANT PROVIDED STATEMENT. "Letter/Copy of permit to follow, when a permit is obtained." (3) Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District (ENCON). PROVIDED (4) Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). The Applicant shall provide permits from this agency at the building permit phase. (5) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). APPLICANT PROVIDED STATEMENT. "Letter/Copy of permit to follow, when a permit is obtained." (6) Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The Applicant shall provide permits from this agency at the building permit phase. (7) Reserved. (8) Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County (MPO). (9) Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division. PROVIDED (10) Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization. N/A (11) Martin County Traffic Engineering Department. N/A (12) Florida Power & Light Company. PROVIDED (13) Telephone service provider, as applicable. PROVIDED (14) Solid waste purveyor. PROVIDED (15) Tequesta Water Department. PROVIDED (16) Other municipal, county, state and/or federal agencies as may be applicable. • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Per Section 161.053, F.S., the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) is a line of jurisdiction, which defines the landward limit of the DEP authority to regulate construction seaward of the CCCL, is subject to DEP permitting. The applicant shall provide permits issued by FDEP at the building permit phase. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REVIEW The Village of Tecluesta's Building Official, Mr. Jose Rodriguez, will further review the project once the applicant submits construction drawings for permitting to the Building Department. The applicant provided an Environmental Assessment Analysis (EAA). TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW Mr. William Grieve, P.E. from McMahon Associates, Inc. provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. Please see attached review letter. 5 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 181 of 478 Agenda Item #16. SEWER, DRAINAGE, AND WATER REVIEW Mr. Matthew Hammond, P.E., Village of Tequesta Utility Director provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. Please see attached review letter. Further review will be conducted at the time the applicant submits construction drawings for permitting. LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW Assistant Police Chief Jim McGrew, as part of the Development Review Committee, provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. FIRE SAFETY REVIEW Captain William Newbern, Village of Tequesta Fire Captain, as a member of the Development Review Committee, provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. Further review will be conducted at the time the applicant submits construction drawings for permitting to the Fire Safety Department. LANDSCAPE REVIEW Mr. Stephen Parker, RLA, consulting landscape architect, provided comments that have been addressed by the applicant. Please see attached review letter. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT The applicant submitted the School Capacity Availability Determination (SCAD) form to the Palm Beach School District. The School District reviewed the application and provided their analysis and recommendation, see attached SCAD form. The following table presents the impact review and recommendation provided by the School District on the attached SCAD form: Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter Elerrerilary SLI"LX:sl _ Middl* Schonl Higl, StYiuul Impact Review New Students Generated 1 2 2 Capacity Available -lag 157 1-- Utilization Percentage 112% 91% i Based an the findings and evaluation of the proposed development, there will be a negative impact on the public —"howl system. Therefore, if the propose$ development i5 approved by the Town Council, School District staff recommends the following condition to mitigate such Impacts. in order to address the school capacltydeficlency generated by this proposed dF,:c-lopriprit School District staffs at the District elementary school level, the property owner shall contribute $15,594.00 to Recommendation the School District of Palm Beach County prier to the issuance of first building permit. This school capacitycorntribution is intended to supplement the required school impact fee (Impact fee credit has already been appliedl_ Please note that the school impart fee creel it is calculated based on the Net I pact Cost per Student, as calculated in the Caunty's latest Impart Fee ordinance, which was adapted on April 16, 2019. Based on the above table, the School District is recommending a $15,594 contribution. This amount is a voluntary contribution intended to supplement the required school impact fee that the developer will pay to Palm Beach County. 11 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 182 of 478 Agenda Item #16. FEMA LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) The applicant is requesting to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) a revision of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS). The subject FEMA application consists of the Letterof Map Revision (LOMR) amending the 2017 FIRMs from the VE10 Zone to a proposed AE7 Zone (see attached application). The applicant shall provide the Village with the subject letter issued by FEMA prior to applying for a Building Permit. 5. FINAL REMARKS This development application met the requirements set in Section 78-334 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised in the Palm Beach Post on October 3, 2022. Per Village Code Sec. 78-334, the applicant posted the subject property with a public notice sign, see the below image. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the site plan review at the July 21, 2022 meeting, by a 5-0 vote with the following condition of approval suggested by Village Staff: 1. The applicant shall provide the Village with the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) issued by FEMA for the site prior to applying for a Building Permit. 7 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 183 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Existing Site Conditions of 300 Beach Road 8 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 184 of 478 Agenda Item #16. M Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 185 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Beach/Atlantic• -_ 10 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Savoy Condominium SPR 2-22 Page 186 of 478 Agenda Item #16. To: From CC: Date: Re: Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 Lance Lilly - Planner 561-768-0700 www.tequesta.org Matthew Hammond - Utilities Director Nilsa Zacarias -Community Development Director June 6, 2022 Savoy - Application for Site Plan Review & Application for Variance The Utilities Department has reviewed the proposed site plan for the Savoy project for conformance with utility requirements. The review included the following documents: • Site Plan Review Justification Statement by Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney & Associates dated February 8, 2022 - Revised May 15, 2022 • Preliminary Drainage Report by Keshavarz & Associates dated January 25, 2022 - Revised May 11, 2022 • Conceptual Engineering Plans by Keshavarz & Associates dated January 19, 2022 (Sheet No. 1) • Application for Variance dated January 27, 2022 Withdrawn Based on review of the items above, the following comments are offered: Site Plan Review Justification Statement No Comments. Preliminary Drainage Report 1) „ff-;g+ +e the County ""S^ Addressed Conceptual Engineering Plans 2) p.FepaFedby WFight PieFee,the exist+eg_8 *Prah ;.yatP_r MaOR R B RR;4 d . ,;l fee the p „Fty. Acknowledged 3) Acknowledged 4) ster.m..vater r eff . ,;ll met be p .Aitted- t „n+„F adjae„"`^ ++^^'^���^� Acknowledged Vice -Mayor Kyle Stone Mayor Frank D'Ambra, III Council Member Laurie Brandon Council Member Bruce Prince Council Member Molly Young Village Manager Jeremy Allen Page 187 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Application for Variance 5) . Addressed 6) Addressed Page 188 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Village of Tequesta Department of Fire -Rescue Services 4� O' 7._ 357 Tequesta Drive Y����'-� 561-768-0500 Tequesta, FL 33469 A��,�j* www.tequesta.org 9* Ant1, James Trube, Fire Chief To: Nilsa Zacarias, Planning and Zoning Fm: Chief James Trube, Fire -Rescue Date: July 13, 2022 Re: DRC Review- 300 Beach Rd, Teq a (Savoy Condominium) The following comments are provided regarding the Development Review of the proposed condominium at 300 Beach Road, Tequesta in reference to the 3' response letter dated July 11, 2022. • FIRE SAFETY REVIEW: The applicant has indicated they are providing a Fire Department access road open to clear sky that meets NFPA 1 and that the canopy will have a minimum clear height of 11 feet. While not a fire code violation, we would prefer to see the applicant increase the height of this canopy to better accommodate our Rescue trucks as they respond to emergencies during inclimate weather. Our Rescue trucks are currently 10 ft. 11 inches in height and that does not leave any margin for error should the next vehicle be larger or should any equipment be changed out on the existing Rescues such as the housing of rooftop A/C, etc. Can the applicant increase this height? Additional signage indicating the height may also be appropriate. Kesponse: Signage indicating clearance height will be provided and clearance is intended to be 12'-0" as revised, refer to Z-2 and A-14. The Fire Department approves the applicant's revision of Z-2 and A-14 that has raised the canopy clearance height to 12 feet with signage provided. This will accommodate our current and future rescue trucks. Vice -Mayor Kyle Stone Mayor Molly Young Council Member Frank D'Ambra III Council Member Laurie Brandon Council Member Aaron Johnson Village Manager Jeremy Allen Page 189 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Lance Lilly From: James McGrew Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 11:43 AM To: Lance Lilly Subject: Savoy Good day The Tequesta Police Department has no more questions/statements in reference to the Savoy project. Thankyou Jim McGrew Page 190 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Lance Lilly To: steve@pydg.com; Nilsa Zacarias Email Cc: 'Lance Lilly' Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Savoy Review From: steve@pydg.com <steve@pydg.com> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2022 5:41 PM To: Nilsa Zacarias Email <nilsa@nzconsultants.net> Cc: 'Lance Lilly' <lance@nzconsultants.net>; Lance Lilly <Ililly@tequesta.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Savoy Review **This Email was sent from an external source. Please be mindful of its content** Hi Nilsa, I reviewed the revised landscape plans for the Savoy, dated 6/13/22, and find the applicant has addressed all of my previous comments. I approve the plan as submitted. Best Regards, Stephen J. Parker, ASLA PAMER • YANNETTE design group,inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING • GRAPHICS 4425 Military Trail, Suite 202 Jupiter, Florida 33458 Office: (561) 747-5069 Fax: (561) 747-2041 License Number LA-0001347 Please visit us on the web: http://www.pVdq.com Page 191 of 478 Agenda Item #16. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS & I.McMAHON ni nniite400McMahon Associates, Inc. 2090 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 P. 561.840.8650 mcmahonassociates.com TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Nilsa Zacarias, AICP Village of Tequesta CC: R. Trent Ebersole, P.E. Natalia T. Lercari, P.E., LEED McMahon Associates, Inc. FROM: William A. Grieve, P.E. McMahon Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: Savoia McMahon Project No. M11172.22 DATE: June 15, 2022 McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has completed a review of the following: 1) Site Plan Ground Level Sheet SP-1, prepared by Robert M. Swedroe Architects Planners, Inc., revised date June 3, 2022. Traffic Analysis Review 1. McMahon has no comments regarding the Traffic Impact Statement. Applicant's Response: Comment acknowledged. (2022-05-31) No further comment,. 2. Provide a copy of the letter from Palm Beach County Traffic indicating that development meets Traffic Performance Standards. Applicant's Response: A TPS Letter from PBC has been included in this resubmittal. (2022-05-31) Letter provided -Comment addressed. Engineering I Planning I Design I Technology Transportation Solutions Building Better Communities Page 192 of 478 AgendaAce rm #16. June 15, 2022 Page 2 of 4 Site Plan Review (Traffic Circulation and Parking) McMahon conducted a review of the above -mentioned documents regarding parking and traffic circulation. The following issues did not meet the Village codes: Per Village Code, Section 78-300: "All dumpsters in the village shall be located on the property serviced so as to be reasonably accessible for trash collection by the sanitation vehicles." "The sufficiency of the access of the dumpster shall meet the concurrence of the village and the franchised sanitation company." Provide concurrence of the access from the franchised sanitation company. Applicant's Response: Please refer to service confirmation letter from Waste Management. (2022-05-31) Letter provided -Comment addressed. Improvements such as sidewalk, driveways, etc. within SR 707 right-of-way will require a FDOT permit. Provide a copy of the FDOT permit, when received. Applicant's Response: Comment acknowledged. '2022-05-31) Applicant acknowledges the comment. 3. Per Village Code, Section 78-694: "Parking spaces for the handicapped" "parking spaces for the handicapped shall be provided in all required parking lots, garages or other similar facilities, as required by applicable state, county and municipal handicapped parking regulations." Site Data indicates two (2) ADA space, which is insufficient for 57 spaces. Per ADA, minimum required number of ADA parking spaces is three (3). Applicant's Response: The exterior parking has been reconfigured to provide (2) 12' x18' ADA parking spaces, refer to SP-1. There is (1) ADA parking space within the garage for a site total of three ADA spaces. Refer to the enlarged parking space detail on Z-2. (2022-05-31) Comment addressed. 4. Per Village Code, Section 78-303: "Aisles and driveways" Minimum radius is required to be 25 feet. Plans indicate 20 feet on the driveway radii, revise plans. Applicant's Response: Plan have been revised as requested, refer to SP-1. (2022-05-31) Comment addressed. 5. Per Village Code, Section 78-691: "Minimum standards (parking spaces)" spaces are to be "marked with double striping." Revise plans and provide a striping detail for parking spaces. Page 193 of 478 AgendaAce rm #16. June 15, 2022 Page 3 of 4 Applicant's Response: Plan have been revised as requested with a parking space pavement striping detail provided on Z-2. (2022-05-31) Comment addressed. 6. Provide traffic control devices i.e., stop signs and stop bars at the driveway locations. Applicant's Response: Plan have been revised as requested, refer to SP-1. (2022-05-31) Please clearly indicate location of stop signs. Applicant's Response (Dated June 13, 2022): SP-1 revised to indicate stop sign locations at the driveways. (2022-06-15) Comment addressed. 7. Provide pavement specification on the driveways and paver specification on the driveway/area outside the garage. Applicant's Response: Please refer to Paver Detail, provided in this resubmittal. (2022-05-31) Comment addressed. 8. Indicate elevations and slopes inside the garage on the plans. Applicant's Response: There are to be no garage slopes other than drive aisle slopes to drains to be located with slopes at or below 2%. The garage elevation is 8.0' NAVD88. (2022-05-31) Comment addressed. 9. Per City Code Section 66-336, sidewalks, pathways, and crosswalks shall be five feet in width or greater. Clearly dimension proposed sidewalk/pathway and the handicap crosswalk on the Conceptual Engineering Plan. Applicant's Response: Plan have been revised as requested, refer to SP-1. 2022-05-31) Comment addressed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, William A. Grieve, P.E. Page 194 of 478 AgendaAce rm #16. June 15, 2022 Page 4of4 Project Manager WAG/cec F:\FL\11172M_Village_Of_Tequesta_TransportationServices\11172M_22_Savoia\Correspondence\Comments\TechMemo_Savoia 05_31_22.docx Page 195 of 478 Agenda Item #16. ti00L D/S THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF KRISTIN K. GARRISON JOSEPH M. SANCHES, MBA co PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DIRECTOR CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER W ~ PLANNING AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS $E 3661 INTERSTATE PARK RD, N., STE 200 �^reEAcxcoin RIVIERA BEACH, FL. 33404 PHONE: 561-434-8020 / FAx: 561-357-1193 W W W.PALMSEACHSCHOOLS.ORG/PLANNING SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) Submittal Date 07/07/2022 SCAD No. 22070601D — D. O. FLU /Rezoning/D.O. No. SPR 2-22 —Town of Tequesta Application PCN No. / Address See PCN list on file / 300 Beach Road Development Name Savoy Owner / Agent Name 300 Beach Road Developer, LLC / George G. Gentile & 2GHO SAC No. 009 Proposed Unit No. & Type Twenty -Six (26) Multi -Family Units Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter Elementary School Middle School High School 3 2 2 Impact Review New Students Generated Capacity Available -105 157 10 Utilization Percentage 112% 91% 100% Based on the findings and evaluation of the proposed development, there will be a negative impact on the public -school system. Therefore, if the proposed development is approved by the Town Council, School District staff recommends the following condition to mitigate such impacts. In order to address the school capacity deficiency generated by this proposed development School District Staffs at the District elementary school level, the property owner shall contribute $15,594.00 to Recommendation the School District of Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of first building permit. This school capacity contribution is intended to supplement the required school impact fee (impact fee credit has already been applied). Please note that the school impact fee credit is calculated based on the Net Impact Cost per Student, as calculated in the County's latest Impact Fee Ordinance, which was adopted on April 16, 2019. 1) This determination is valid from 07/18/2022 to 07/17/2023 or the expiration date of the Validation Period site -specific development order approved during the validation period. 2) A copy of the approved D.O. must be submitted to the School District Planning Dept. prior to 07/17/2023 or this determination will expire automatically on 07/17/2023. School age children may not necessarily be assigned to the public school closest to their Notice residences. Students in Palm Beach County are assigned annually to schools under the authority of the School Board and by direction of the Superintendent, public school attendance zones are subject to change. 97c4- `--""" July 18, 2022 School District Representative Signature Date Joyce C. Cal, Senior Planner joyce.cai@palmbeachschools.org Print Name & Title Email Address CC: Nilsa Zacarias, Community Development Director, Town of Tequesta Joyell Shaw, PIR Manager, School District of Palm Beach County The School District of Palm Beach County, Florida A Top High -Performing A Rated School District An Equal Education Opportunity Provider and Employer Page 196 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Florida Power & Light Company FPL February 10, 2022 300 S Beach Rd, Jupiter Re: 300 S Beach Rd, Jupiter Dear Customer: Thank you for contacting FPL early in your planning process. At the present time FPL has sufficient capacity to provide electric service to your property. We have the ability to provide new service and different voltage, plans permitting, but 3 phase 120/240v is currently available at this location. Please advise me early in the planning process once the final plans have been approved. This information will help us to provide you with the best service in accordance with applicable rates, rules and regulations. You may also respond to us through www.fpl.com. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert Horn Associate Engineer A NEXTera ENERGY Company Page 197 of 478 Agenda Item #16. JEFF SABIN GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA 7700 SE BRIDGE RD HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 PH: (772) 545-1327 MOBILE: (772) 263-0017 May 5t" 2022 Alec R. Dickerson 2GHO, Inc. 1907 Commerce Lane Jupiter, FL 33458 Re: Savoy — 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL Mr. Dickerson: Please find this letter in response to your request for confirmation of service availability for the above location. Waste Management of Martin County can adequately accommodate the prescribed services at this location as provided for in our Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials Collection Services Agreement with The Village of Tequesta. • Please Note: Customer will be required to roll the cans out to the tip of the driveway by 6:00 A.M. on service days. The cans will need to be positioned on an angle, facing South to allow our trucks to safely service the cans. We appreciate the opportunity to service this location and look forward to working with the developers and builders in making it an environmentally friendly project. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Sales Manager Robert Holden at 561-662-9988, or me at 772-263-0017. JEFF SABIN Government Affairs Cc: Robert Holden Page 198 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 300 S Beach Rd 0L REQUESTING FIRE FLOW nn lni, J >r "TEST FOR THIS HYDRANT f 300 S Beach Rd to r Savoy Condominium R� REQUESTING FIRE FLOW I `5 TEST FOR THIS HYDRANT 12/22/2021, 11:21:30 AM Fire Hydrants Potable Water Valves Potable Water Backflows Potable Water Main Palm Beach County - Service Area Parcels 1:1,128 0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi i . I. 1�7 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 km Esri, HERE, Garmin, PC, State of Florida, Maxar, Microsoft Village of Tequesta! @gi@s J$Jrp e478 State of Florida, Maxar, Microsoft I Esri, HERE, Garmin, iPC I Agenda Item #16. UR19t' March 24, 2022 John M. Donaldson, PE, PTOE JMD Engineering, Inc. 12773 Forest Hill Blvd, Suite 204 Wellington, FL 33414 Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 RE: 300 S Beach Road West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 Project #: 220312 (561) 684-4000 Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) Review FAX: (561) 684-4050 Dear Mr. Donaldson: wWW.pbcgov.com The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the above referenced project Traffic Impact Statement, dated March 10, 2022, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County (PBC) Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). The project is summarized as follows: Palm Beach County Municipality: Tequesta Board of County Commissioners Location: East side of Beach Road, about 0.1 miles north of Old AIA Robert S. Weinroth, Mayor PCN: 60-43-40-30-10-000-0270/0010 Gregg K. Weiss, Vice Mayor Access: Access driveway connections onto Beach Road (As used in the study and is NOT necessarily an Maria G. Marino approval by the County through this TPS letter) Existing Uses: Mid -rise Multi -Family Residential = 27 DUs Dave Kerner Proposed Uses: Demolish existing development and build: . Maria Sachs Mid -rise Multi -Family Residential = 26 DUs New Daily Trips: (6) Melissa McIiinlay New Peak Hour Trips: -1 (-1/0) AM; -1 (0/-1) PM Mack Bernard Build -out: December 31, 2025 Based on the review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed development generates less trips compared to that from the existing development, and therefore, meets the TPS of Palm Beach County. County Administrator Verdenia C. Baker Please note the receipt of a TPS approval letter does not constitute the review and issuance of a Palm Beach County Right -of -Way (R/W) Construction Permit nor does it eliminate any requirements that may be deemed as site related. For work within Palm Beach County R/W, a detailed review of the project will be provided upon submittal for a R/W permit application. The project is required to comply with all Palm Beach County standards and may include R/W dedication. No building permits are to be issued by the Village after the build -out date specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The approval letter shall be valid no longer than one year from date of issuance. "An Equal Opportunity unless an application for a Site Specific Develo ment Order has been approved, Affirmative Action Employer- an application for a Site Specific Development Order has been submitted or the printed on sustainable Page 200 of 478 and recycled paper Agenda Item #16. `-4GRIV John M. Donaldson, PE, PTOE March 24, 2022 Page 2 approval letter has been sup2rseded b�, another approval letter for the same ro e If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561- 684-4030 or email HAkif@pbcaov.org. Sincerely, Hanane Akif, E. Professional Engineer Traffic Division QB:HA: qg ec: Nilsa Zacarias, Village Planner, Village of Tequesta Quazi Bari, P.E., PTOE, Manager — Growth Management, Traffic Division File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review F:\TRAFFIC\HA\MUNICIPALITIES\APPROVALS\2022\220312 - 300 S BEACH ROAD.DOCX Page 201 of 478 Agenda Item #16. AT&T North Palm January 28, 2022 KESHAVARZ 7 ALLOCIATES Attn: Carolina Zuluaga 711 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dwight Thomason 120 N K Street 614-477-8073 dt2985@att.com Fax-772-692-9937 at &t RE: 300 South Beach Road — Jupiter, FL, Lot 195 of Jupiter Island Book 1 Page 80 Dear Ms. Zuluaga, This letter is in response to your request for information regarding availability of service at: Near 300 South Beach Road — Jupiter, FL, Lot 195 of Jupiter Island Book 1 Page 80 This letter acknowledges that the above -referenced development is in an area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for this development will be subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT&T. Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT&T to provide service to the above -referenced project. Thank you for contacting AT&T. Sincerely, `17url�ift .11fam�an Dwight Thomason AT&T Page 202 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Village 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 1/21/2022 of Tecluesta S s � COO Carolina Zuluaga — Permit & Utility Coordinator Keshavarz & Associates 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Via Email: carolina@keshavarz.com 561-768-0700 www.tequesta.org RE: 300 South Beach Road —Service Availability PCN's: 60-43-40-30-10-000-0010 through 60-43-40-30-10-000-0270 Dear Ms. Zuluaga, This letter confirms that the referenced property is located within the Village of Tequesta Potable Water Utility Service Area. The Village of Tequesta Public Water System has available capacity to serve the redevelopment of the existing 28-unit condominium with a 27-unit High Rise Condominium with pool and common area based on the potable water demands provided in your January 21, 2022 letter (attached). Offsite improvements may be required to serve the proposed developed based on the final design. A GIS figure of the known Village infrastructure is attached for your reference (note the sanitary sewer infrastructure is owned and operated by the Loxahatchee River District). The piping depicted is pictorial in nature only and may not be in the exact locations or sizes shown. Please note that this letter does not constitute a commitment for service until a Developers Agreement has been fully effectuated. Sincerely, Matthew Digitally,igned by Matthew Hammond Hammond Date: 2022.01.211336:00 05,00, Matthew Hammond Utilities Director Cc: Nilsa Zacarias— NZ Consultants Attachments Vice -Mayor Kyle Stone Mayor Frank D'Ambra, III Council Member Laurie Brandon Council Member Bruce Prince Council Member Molly Young Village Manager Jeremy Allen Page 203 of 478 I Jos I-- Ali L 44 00 C) C) U) co co � 8 } { � U) U) C) (0 co co C: co U) C: U) co E co 0- co C: co U) C: 0- co Q) co (D U) -0 CO (D CD N cz 0 a_ C: m— U) 0 N —pgg-e 204 0 478 Agenda Item #16. Village of Tequesta Water Utilities Department 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 KESHAVARZ —& ASSOCIATES — CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I CONSULTING January 21, 2022 K&A Project No. 21-1393 Attention: Mr. Matt Hammond, P.E., Utility Director Re: Village of Tequesta Availability Letter Re -development of property located at 300 South Beach Road, Jupiter, Florida This letter is to request a Village of Tequesta service Availability Letter for the referenced property. The current plan is to re -develop the property by constructing a new 27 unit High Rise Condominium. See attached ground level conceptual site plan for the property and a copy of the recent survey depicting the existing site. Please provide a Water Service Availability letter confirming the Village of Tequesta has adequate capacity/availability for the proposed 27 unit Condominium with an approximate average domestic water consumption of 12,737.50 gallons/day. This demand is based on the following estimates at this time. Pool area: 27 units @ 2.5 people/unit x 10 GPD/person = 675 GPD Common Area: 250 GPD Residential Units: 27 units @ 2.5 people/unit x 175 GPD/person = 11812.50 GPD Total Demand = 12737.50 GPD Should you have any questions or require any additional information, kindly contact our office. Sincerely, KESHAVARZ & ASSOCIATES, INC. Carolina Zuluaga Permit and Utility Coordinator p:\21-1393 300 s beach fontainebleau\utility coord\service availability request ltr_tequesta.docx 711 N Dixie Highway, Suite 201 • West Palm Beach, FL 33401 • 561-689-8600 • www.keshavarz.com Page 205 of 478 69tf f dQRIO-H `VJLSgnag L QVO2I HDV99 HLnOS ON1� J♦` NV-ld xoo-H UNnOWD'W L IRONOD siiaxNvaa &Oa.LIHDNV aoxaaMs *w ixaaoa ell d a a a a U zYwI �¢o< N ¢ \ Z F > W949 M.ZOO L l.66S ,66'lS M030.66N 11 1 lir— rg IT 1y � ,I 1 I J � Io o ril _ 11 ■ (--- \\ F 0 o 0 0 - r - --------- o 4 u a AV a ....,........._.....,... _...._.._......,.. { �ff Agenda Item #15. gg Wag 5 O.' y 45 _ Kilo N she'. J 5g555�;i = Q s S 295.00 b G - - `225.00r b1�5 Z O � r ca6lkWOS.YwW'!:��' Z a � Aso LV cc CO C y y 0 a Ha 7 4 \r pi Z. z w w " - oi r W m \ � \ 9z � w � Yig2 0 ------------ Go ZO Y deg^ �r r e o IA_ a^g_e \o : +i A; M r gifi �a eg-j g .� pp a - a $.1 h pfi -. Agenda Item #16. LOXAHATCHEE RIVER DISTRICT 2500 JUPITER PARK DRIVE, JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 TEL: (561) 747-5700 FAX: (561) 747.9929 D. Albrey Arrington, Ph.D. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR February 2, 2022 300 Beach Road Developer LLC 19950 W Country Club Drive FL 10 Miami, FL 33180 4601 Email: carolina@keshavarz.com Re: 300 Beach Road, Jupiter FL Sanitary Sewer Service Availability To Whom It May Concern: loxahatcheeriver.org This letter is provided in response to a recent request by Carolina Zuluaga, of Keshavarz & Associates, concerning sanitary sewer service availability for the subject property. Please be advised that this property has one 6" gravity sewer service. Should you require additional information on this matter, please contact District Engineering Department at (561) 747-5700 Ext. 4052 Very truly yours, Kris Dean, P.E. Deputy Executive Director/Director of Engineering Services Cc: carolina@keshavarz.com M:\ENGINEER\FORMS\SEWER AVAILABILITY LETTERS\300 Beach Road Development_20220201_Sewer Availability Letter.docx Gordon M. Boggie Stephen B. Rockoff Dr. Matt H. Rostock CHAIRMAN BOARD MEMBER BOARD MEMBER James D. Snyder BOARD MEMBER Water Reclamation - Environmental Education - River Restoration Page 208 of 478 Agenda Item #16. January 24, 2022 Village of Tequesta Community Development Department 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta FL, 33469 RE: 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 To Whom It May Concern: The undersigned Owner hereby grants 2GHO, Inc. to act as their agent to prepare and submit documents, attend all meetings, and perform any other actions necessary in connection with the land development approval process for the property 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469. Should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at skas; T m, ,— r — . Sincerely, 300 Beach Road Developer LLC By: - — — Sheryl k:ass, Authorized Signatory STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DARE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me via 0 physical presence OR ❑ online notarization this day of January, 2022 by Sheryl Kass, as Authorized signatory of 300 Beach Road Developer LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. My Commission Expires: Notary Publi: Notary Public State of Florida Blanea J Cesar MyHH i807g4ion EXp.9+30+2025 Page 209 of 478 Agenda Item #16. VILLAGE OF TEQUES°II'. Department of Community Development 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Ph: 561-768-0451 / Fax: 561-768-0698 www.tequesta.org APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW DRC PLANNING & ZONING BOARD VILLAGE COUNCIL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS: ❑ Meeting Date: ❑ Meeting Date: -----------------------, DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY ; Ck. # ; Fee Paid: ; Intake Date: i PROJECT M L-----------------------� 1. Please complete all sections of this application. If not applicable, indicate with N/A. 2. Provide all required documents as shown on the attached checklist. If not applicable, indicate with N/A. All construction, additions, and/or alterations within the Village, except in districts R-1A and R-1, must be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board. The Planning & Zoning Board meets the third Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m., as needed in the Village Hall Council Chambers, 345 Tequesta Drive. The applicant will be informed by letter of their scheduled meeting date. The Planning and Zoning Board shall have general authority as outlined in Sec. 22.53. After review and recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Board, applications will be heard by the Village Council for final approval. The Village Council meets regularly on the second Thursday of every month at 6:00p.m., in the Village Hall Council Chambers. 1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & OWNER/AGENT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Savoy PROJECT ADDRESS: 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Development of 26 unit multifamily project Property Control Number (PCN), list additional on a separate sheet: See attached Sheet Estimated project cost: Property Owner(s) of Record: 300 Beach Road Developer LLC Address: 19950 W Country Club Drive, 10th Floor, Aventura, FL 33180 Phone No.: Fax No.: E-mail Address:- Applicant/Agent (if other than owner complete consent section on page 3): Name: 2GHO, Inc. - George G. Gentile _ Address: 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101, Jupiter, FL 33458 Phone No.: 561-575-9557 Fax No.: 561-575-5260 E-mail Address: george@2gho.com/alec@2gho.com 1 Page 210 of 478 Agenda Item #16. II. LAND USE & ZONING A) ZONING DESIGNATION R-3 MF Residential B) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION Residential Med Density C) Existing Use(s) Existing Condo D) Proposed Use(s), as applicable Redvelopment for 26 multifamily condominium units. III. ADJACENT PROPERTIES Name of Business/ 1 I Land Use I Designation i Zoning Designation I Existing Use(s) i Approved Use(s) Subdivision ----------------------a------------------ -- NORTH Island House tRM Density -_ { -- - ( R-3 —--------------------------------------- 'Residential I-- — — — -- — 'Island House Condo ----------------i------------------------------"------t-------------t-----------V-----------------------------------# SOUTH Regency House I RM Density — --- ----- ! R-3 --- — Residential ----..... ......-- !Regency House Condo ----------------------------------------------- EAST ;Atlantic Ocean -- — NA :NA ! NA ; ! NA WEST ! Island House SW !! RM Density ! R-3 ---------- ! Residential '; Island House Condo I IV. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION Provide a statement of use from the applicant that the submitted site plan is consistent with the goals, objectives, and all other provisions of the village comprehensive development plan, and further that the projected use is specifically authorized by development ordinances and regulations. The statement shall include, but not be limited to, specific references to those sections of the comprehensive plan relating to the proposed development. Attach additional sheets 2 Page 211 of 478 Agenda Item #16. V. oyy Slmp{JCAN'f ACUtOWLEDGEtAENT AND CDNUW Consult ataterr nt (to be cmapleteditownerhusingen awe) Ilwe, the owners, hereby give consent to gNeryl Kass _ _ to act on rnyiour behalf to submit this application, all required material and documents, and attend and represent me/us at all meetings and public hearings pertalningto the application and property 1/we own described In the application. By signing this document, Uwe @farm that Uwe undenxand and will comply w4h the provisions and regulations of the Vglage of TequesM Florida Code of Ordinances. Ijwe furdw cw* that all of the infrmation contained In this apppation and all the documentulon submitted is true to the best of my/our lmowkdge. 3M Beach Road Developer LLC Qaor#pr G. Genfpe owns same (phwse prlrlt) Appkm*All a t_MOOVQ 0100 Ownees swg wtuw rrt/Ag Nf S�tnature MWO22 1f2412022 Data Date Vi. APPLICATI M FEES 11) A pre4WplicatIon submittal •meeting shall be held with the owner and/or applicant and his/her design team and the eommurdty development director and his/her development staff. MA $300.00 See applies. (2) Review by the oevafopmw Redoes Cornnrlmea (E11 . The Commnky Development Director or designee shall submit such application for departmental staff and consubrot review within 30 days of receipt of a comph:ted apptlatlrn, f;a$400.ODUae, dbf. (3) Revkw hY the J7ombp andZOftMORAL The Community Development pir+ector ordesi$nee shall submit such appOcatfn for Planning and Zoning Board review wMhIn 45 days of ream of a completed appliatlam jVj e $MLOO fee ffiWepPMMg gR a $MAD be (mao nwndffdw to VfikW CounayJ N-Ord 14) Revkw by 1IMlRga C mmA Within 45 days of review by the Phnni ng and Zoning Board, the Community Development Director or designee shell then submit such application, Including the recommendations of the Planning sad Zoning Bond, for Village Council review •f,a $3" fee plies an additional he based an the e6111MU d Coat of wokappBaf, To corer ali ad HIM Pl adatlniMatire mate, aetud or areldpated, including, but not limited t6 embiastIrd ftft carnalbntfeas end aped) strdles the aMIMR ahN aoriperrn1 the rlbP for a1 web owu plor to the pmm trrf of the spoWallon or oat later then 9a days diem fl nd applleaaion aP mvm1 wNdeaRr b determlred es epproprbte br the Fallureto rake ouch p%wm%* naalr b0 {rotaads for not a bulldkil a ra ft Pamdk certikelie of OCCUP my oroompletim. Oats asaodatad wMh aMrilsing for puble hadW and other public Mc raqubamenla an the resparsib>IiIY of the applicant The fee shad be paid pow to such appflaaon being sywdubd fora public harhrf requMm �OMnrefdSigrrature to Acimowiedga ' Page 212 of 478 Agenda Item #16. VII. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND REVIEW PROCESS The applicant will submit to the Village of Tequesta Department of Community Development the following documents for review by the Development Review Committee (DRC), forty-five business (45) days prior to the meeting date: 1) Seven (7)12x17 sets and Three (3) full size sets of professionally prepared site plans showing all existing and proposed structures, setbacks, parking and loading layout, ingress and egress, sidewalks and walkways, exterior lighting layout, dimensions of street frontages, property lines and all signage. 2) Fourteen (14) 11x17 sets and Two (2) full size sets of Landscaping Plans in accordance with Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances, Division IV, Landscaping. 3) Fourteen (14) 11x17 sets of multi -dimensional color renderings and/or photographs are to be provided. The Planning & Zoning Board requires an exact rendering of the proposed modification, construction or addition. Color photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to be used must be supplied. Since color printers often do not display the correct color, it is recommended that samples of the paint chips, as well as a sample of the support materials (i.e., canvas, wood, metal, etc.) be provided. 4) One (1) CD disk with PDF files including the completed application. 5) Any other documents, maps, photographs, or drawings that may help clarify the position of the applicant. NOTE. All renderings, models, drawings, photos, etc., will become the property of the Village of Tequesta. Pre -application meeting 1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DEADLINE Deadline is 45 business days prior to P&Z Meeting date DRC Meeting Held within 2 weeks of application submittal 1 DRC comments provided to Applicant within 1 week of DRC meeting 1 Re -submit application Deadline is 2 weeks following receipt of ► DRC comments 4 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting — recommend approval (31 Thursday of each month) 1 Village Council Meeting —final approval (2nd Thursday of each month) Page 213 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Vill. SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST GENERAL (1) A completed application signed by owner, agent/applicant. Authorization must be attached if applicant is other than owner. (2) Required application fees. (3) Statements of unity of title, warranty deed, or purchase contract of the subject property. (4) General location map, showing relation of the site for which site plan approval is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. (5) A recent aerial photograph of the site. SURVEY (1) A signed and sealed boundary survey (not more than one year old) and legal description of the property, including any and all easements of record as well as existing topographical conditions of the site. (2) Existing streets and roadway improvements (medians, driveways, signage, etc.) and existing structures within 100' of the project boundary. (3) Existing utilities within 100' of the project boundary. (4) Existing trees identified by caliper and species. SITE PLAN (1) A site plan containing the title of the project and names of the architect, engineer, project planner and/or developer, date, and north arrow, and based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: a. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements, section lines, and water and sewer lines, well and septic tank locations, and other existing important physical features on the site and on property adjacent to the site. b. Tabular project data to include: Total gross site area in acres & square feet ---- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total number of units (multi -family) Total square feet of each primary structure Total square feet of accessory structures ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Total footprint of each building in sq ft & % --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Overall mean building height & number of stories ---- --- ----- - -- ---- -- ----------- -- ----- -- --- Fin ished floor elevation for all structures Total project density in units per acres, if applicable Total proposed off-street parking spaces ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Height and location of proposed fences and/or walls -------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed drive aisle width Proposed sidewalk width 2.26 or 98,263 sf -------------------------------------- 26 -------------------------------------- 178,320 sf Included in number above ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34,392 sf or 34.9% of total gross site ar ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 stories - 101' TBD 11.5 units/acre --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 Garage Spaces +5 Exterior Spaces ------------------------------------------------------------- 6' @ side yards & 4' at rear ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24' Driveway, 26' Garage Drive Aisle --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6' to match existing 5 Page 214 of 478 Agenda Item #16. c. Provide site data and setbacks: Lot coverage I Impervious area I Open space area TOTAL SQ FT 34,296 sf 150,009 sf 48,254 sf -------------------------------- --- `-------------------- `-------- PERCENT (%) OF SITE 34.90% i 50.9% 149% Front Side I Side I Rear ----------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------- --------- ----------- Primary structure 95' 6" tower r--------------------------------------- 32' -0 tower ------------------------------- 132'-0" tower ------ ---------------------------- ' 164'2" tower ----------------- ------------------------ ------------- '------------------------ ---- --------r--------------------------------------r------------------------------------+ Accessory structure 1 60'-2" garage 20'-0" garage 20'-0" garage ----- ------- ---------------------- ' 164'-0" garage d. Plans and location for recreation facilities, if any, including buildings and structures for such use. e. All mechanical equipment and dumpster locations, screens and buffers. f. Refuse collection and service areas. g. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups and location of all fire hydrants close enough for fire protection. h. Plans for signage including size, location and orientation. L Project information on beds, employees, seating, etc. as necessary depending upon the type of development. j. Exterior lighting of all buildings, parking areas and the overall site, addressing glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with adjacent properties. k. Proposed topographic considerations including natural vegetation, berms, retaining walls, privacy walls, and fences. (2) Required floodplain management data: a. Flood zone designation b. Base flood elevation C. Coastal high hazard design considerations ENGINEERING PLANS (1) Proposed access (ingress/egress) to project, drive aisles, driveways, streets and sidewalks with dimensions and turn radii for internal and external vehicular traffic. (2) Proposed traffic control signs. (3) Preliminary storm drainage and sanitary sewage plans or statements. If the village determines that the drainage and/or sewage plans require independent review, the applicant shall pay for such review by an independent engineer. (4) Plans for the extraction of fill and mineral resources and alterations or modifications to the slope, elevation, drainage pattern, natural vegetation and accessibility of the development. (5) A comprehensive traffic study, provided by an engineering firm. The study shall be paid for by the applicant and shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Future right-of-way dedications. b. Intersection improvements. c. Traffic control devices. d. Traffic generation analysis. e. Distribution and assignment of traffic access. f: Additional roadway needs. 6 Page 215 of 478 Agenda Item #16. g. Traffic safety standards, including the separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. h. Compliance with Palm Beach County Performance Standards Ordinance. LANDSCAPE PLANS (1) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation systems. Plans shall also provide delineation of existing trees and information as to which trees will be reused or removed. Landscaping plans shall comply with section 78-400. In addition, landscaping plans shall include irrigation plans in accordance with section 78-398, and shall demonstrate compliance with Florida Friendly Landscaping design standards as required by section 78-394, as applicable (See section 78-392 for applicability). (2) Plans shall provide clear sight lines. (3) Location of light poles. (4) Provide landscape plan data: Number of trees (including percent native) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of shrubs (including percent native) ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Amount of groundcover (including percent native) ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total percent of native vegetation ARCHITECTURAL PLANS Required Provided ---------------- ----- -------------------------------------- T--------------------- ------------------------------ 28 trees/palms (48 trees/6 palms) 74% 375 ` 1,398 (73%) 5,289 (100%) 50% 82% (1) Architectural elevations and color renderings for buildings in the development, and exact number of units, square footage and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. (2) Type of construction of all buildings per Florida Building Code. (3) Color finishes and material examples and/or samples for all structures including roof, walls, trim, pavers, etc. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS (1) Environmental impact study/assessment. All proposed new development and major redevelopment, as part of the site plan review and subdivision review process, shall submit a environmental statement describing how the proposed development will affect the estuarine water quality of the class III waters of the village, and also an environmental impact assessment study prepared by a qualified ecologist or other professional qualified to do such an assessment. The study shall meet the requirements Ch. 50 Article Il, pertaining to environmentally sensitive lands. (2) Notification of neighboring jurisdictions of any external impacts that a proposed project might have within those jurisdictions and assessment and mitigation of those impacts shall be required. (5) If common facilities (such as recreation areas or structures, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Such statements may take the form of proposed deed restrictions, deeds of trust, surety arrangements, or other legal instruments providing adequate guarantee to the village that such common facilities will not become a future liability for the village. (6) If development is to occur in phases, those phases should be clearly delineated on the site plan and identified in the plans and requirements appurtenant to that site plan, and each development phase shall be subject to site plan review by the village. 7 Page 216 of 478 Agenda Item #16. (7) The substance of covenants, grants of easements or other restrictions proposed to be imposed upon the use of the land, buildings and structures, including proposed easements or grants for public utilities, if applicable. (8) A statement that the development/redevelopment will provide the necessary infrastructure to meet the following level of service standards pursuant to the criteria outlined in Sec. 78-331(h): a. Traffic (roads and rights -of -way) b. Sanitary sewer c. Drainage d. Potable water e. Recreation f. Fire flow requirements g. Pedestrian walkways (9) A statement from the applicant or landowner that all pertinent permits are concurrently being sought from the applicable county, state, and federal agencies listed below. Include a copy of the letter/document with the application. Such permits shall be secured prior to the issuance of a building permit for any development on property included within the site plan. a. Palm Beach County Health Department b. Palm Beach County School District c. Tequesta Fire -Rescue Department (Fire Marshal) d. Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District (ENCON) e. Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) f. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) g. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) h. Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County (MPO) i. Palm Beach Traffic Engineering Division j. Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization k. Martin County Traffic engineering Department I. Florida Power & Light m. Telephone service provider, as applicable n. Solid Waste purveyor o. Tequesta Water Department p. Other municipal, county, state and/or federal agencies as may be applicable. 8 Page 217 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Landscape Architects ■ Planners ■ Environmental Consultants GENTILE I HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY& Associates, Inc. SAVOY TEQUESTA, FLORIDA SITE PLAN REVIEW JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FEBRUARY 8, 2022 REVISED MAY 4, 2022 REvISED -- JULY 7, 2022 LA 0000330 George G. Gentile FASLA M. Troy Holloway ASIA Emily M. O'Mahoney FASLA Introduction/Request: On behalf of the Owner, Beach Road Developer, LLC, 2GHO, Inc. respectfully requests review and approval concerning the properties located at 300 Beach Road, in the Village of Tequesta. The subject proposal will bring another one of kind design into the Village of Tequesta, which will be marveled for years to come. The Owner's overall development program consists of a site plan for an infill redevelopment consisting of 26 multi -family, condominium units, and amenities area located on f2.26 acres. About the Developer Fontainebleau Development has a world-renowned reputation in transforming ordinary into extraordinary. For more than 50 years, the owners have continually imagined and realized what many can only dream. From buildings, to cities, to world -class entertainment and hospitality experiences, Fontainebleau Development has always had the unrelenting vision to go above and beyond. The development team's residential philosophy is a recipe that gets at the heart of exclusivity - with enviable locations, innovative design, forward -thinking amenities, state-of-the-art technologies, personalized service, quality construction, as well as curated materials and finishes. They have partnered with Phil Perko, a Jupiter resident who has years of experience delivering quality residential projects. His knowledge of the local communities in the northern end of Palm Beach County and the Fontainebleau experience makes for an exceptional development team to bring the proposed project to reality. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties: The subject properties are uniquely situated on Beach Road, bordered on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and by other residential condominiums to the north south, and west. With this location, it allows the owner and design team a 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-575-9557 561-575-5200 Fax www.2gho.com Page 218 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 7 mechanism to truly design around and with the environment. Below is a chart showing the surrounding Land Use and Zoning. Property Future Land Use Zoning Subject Properties Residential Low R-3 Multifamily Existing Residential Densities/Medium Residential Density Residential North Residential Medium R-3 Multifamily Island House Density Residential South Residential Medium R-3 Multifamily Regency House Density Residential East N/A N/A Atlantic Ocean West Residential Medium R-3 Multifamily Island House SW Density Residential Project Justification: Over the last few years, the owner has diligently researched the housing market in the Village of Tequesta, and has determined that the current market trends are excellent to offer a well -designed redevelopment project that provides a modest impact to growth and services in the area. The proposed redevelopment will not have significant traffic impacts on the surrounding roadway network, and will bring an increase to the taxes and values of the parcels. Further, the project will have no impact to the existing surrounding land uses. As Tequesta continues to distinguish itself as a premier destination in northern Palm Beach County for locals and visitors alike, the applicant is excited to bring this project for consideration by the Village Council's for approval. CONSISTENCY WITH THE VILLAGES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN By proposing the land use map amendment, the owner will remain consistent with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Village of Tequesta's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element. GOAL: 1.0.0 — PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUITABLE AND COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH WILL PRESERVE, ENHANCE. AND ARE WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED CHARACTER OF THE VILLAGE OF TEOUESTA. Response: The proposed redevelopment of the property not only aims to ensure consistency with the existing zoning designation, it will also provide for a development that is compatible with the surrounding areas. NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 219 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Policy 1.1.2 - Table FLU - 1. Future Land Use Districts, Density and Intensity Standards Response: The proposed development is consistent with the maximum density standards indicated in the Medium Density Residential category. The proposed development does not exceed the allowed 12 dwelling units/acre. Objective: 1.2.0. - Continue to monitor conditions in the Village in order to identify and evaluate renewal or redevelopment Response: The proposed project is directly consistent with the above objective. The owner has a unique opportunity to redevelop an existing residential community into a high-class residential product that will enhance the Beach Road corridor. This proposal qualifies as a redevelopment project as the site will efficiently use the existing land, and infrastructure resources, promoting a more compact form of land use and development. The owners are reinvesting in the area, by providing the mechanism for a higher economic return to the Village of Tequesta, which will in turn, promote a quality delivery of services to the potential end users, and general public. Policy 1.3.1 - Through the implementation of planned unit development, mixed -use and other innovative regulations, encourage the development of housing types within a physical setting that permit both comfortable and creative living, while affording both privacy and sociability. Response: The foundation of the proposed project is to provide a high-class, extraordinary, creative design that will foster comfortable and creative living, while affording both privacy and sociability. The overall design, which will be discussed in more detail elsewhere in the narrative, aims to create a luxurious floor plan as well as amenity area for the future owners. Policy 1.3.5. - Maintain residential densities in accordance with the standards prescribed in Table FLU-1 and the Land Development Regulations. Response: As previously stated, the proposed project maintains a residential density in accordance with Table FLU-1. Policy 1.3.6 - Require adequate parking, suitably arranged and attractively landscaped, in all developments. Response: With this submittal, the applicant has provided a site and landscape plan. The site and landscape plans show full compliance with all sections of the code. NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 220 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 7 Policy 1.3.7 — Strive for compatible developments that will benefit the Village and compliment the aesthetic character of the community. Response: The proposed development is consistent with surrounding existing area and aesthetic character of the community. The design plays to the existing nature (Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, and nearby Coral Cove Park), and only aims to compliment, as the development is expected to become a highly valued asset in the Village of Tequesta. The multi -story residential building is compatible with similar multifamily buildings to the north and south of Beach Road. Policy 1.3.12 — As part of the Site Plan Review process, compatibility with adjacent land uses shall be demonstrated. Compatibility is defined as consistency with the Future Land Use Map and compliance with Village land development regulations. Response: As the site is surrounded by water to the east and, and residential to the north and south, this development is consistent with the adjacent land uses. Moreover, the existing uses are residential, and the applicant is proposing to redevelop the subject property with residential in a multistory condominium building. Policy 1.5.7 — Ensure that adjacent land uses are protected by strictly enforcing setback, height, landscaping and signage provisions within the Village land development regulations. Response: The proposed development will not be a detriment to the adjacent land uses to the north and south, as they are both residential uses. SITE PLAN REVIEW: Section 78-331 states that all permitted uses, development and redevelopment activities are required to go through the Site Plan Review process. The submitted application package contains all necessary documents as stipulated in the development application and zoning code. The project scope is consistent with Section 78-175(a) of the Village's zoning code as it provides lands within the Village of Tequesta for a higher density range of multi -family residential uses. Project Overview: The vision behind the proposal is to infuse the surrounding elements of nature to create a tropical modern nautical-themed structure that grows from the ground up that will take advantage of the unmatched views of air and light. The proposed project consists of 26 units with enclosed private garage space. NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 221 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Each unit will feature floor to ceiling glass and are surrounded by expansive balconies, and has been designed to pay respect to the neighboring units. Drainage: The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the South Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -development conditions. Legal positive outfall will be provided by a bubble up sheet flow connection of the on -site drainage system to a swaled drainage system along South Beach Road. Please see the attached Drainage Report for more detailed information. Traffic• As this is a residential redevelopment project, the proposed project will generate fewer than 20 peak hour trips, and as such a traffic, study is not required. It is anticipated that the proposed project will have an insignificant impact on the surrounding roadways, and will be in compliance with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. Landscaping: The landscape design intent is to provide a coastal hammock environment along the Beach Road frontage that will provide privacy for future residents. The pool terrace will feature a zero -edge swimming lap pool that will provide unobstructed views of the ocean. An aluminum shade trellis will provide opportunity for shaded seating as well as offering a summer kitchen for the residents. The plant palette was selected to offer a lush tropical environment with emphasis for wind and salt tolerant plant material. The above landscape will be provided within the confines of the Village of Tequesta's landscape provisions. Architectural Design and Influence: The Savoy Oceanfront Condominium will feature private terraces with summer kitchens and private air-conditioned, two -car garages for every residence. The 26 private entry units with 3 or 4 bedrooms offer east and west balconies and views with summer kitchens. Residence sizes range from 3,915 square feet to 5,695 square feet. There are three penthouse units with oceanfront roof terraces with plunge pools and spas and two lanai units with roof terraces also with plunge pools and spas. NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 222 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Community amenities will include an infinity -edge heated swimming pool with a heated relaxation spa, a beachside summer kitchen and outdoor oceanfront terrace as well as a club room with oceanfront terrace and kitchen, an expansive fitness center with weight training and cardio equipment, and a motion/private training studio. Site Plan Considerations The owner would like to stress that the proposed redevelopment project is not a detriment to the community and aims to provide the Village of Tequesta with a valuable asset for years to come. The propose developments provides for the following: 1. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Village of Tequesta's Comprehensive Plan; 2. Consistency with applicable countywide land development regulations. The applicant will be submitting a School Concurrency Application, in addition to a traffic statement to the appropriate Palm Beach County agencies for their review. Additionally, through the review process the applicant will seek permits from the other jurisdictional agencies. 3. Designed to comply with all of the applicable provisions set forth in the Village of Tequesta zoning code. 4. Compatible with the existing character of the area. As the site is surrounded by the Ocean on one side, and residential on three sides, the proposed property will not be a deterrent to the surrounding areas; 5. Insignificant impact on traffic, as shown on the submitted traffic statement prepared by JMD Engineering; 6. Use of the existing facilities/infrastructure on site, holding to the true essence of infill redevelopment. Prior to this submittal, we have requested confirmation of availability of service letters from the applicable utility and service provider agencies in the area. The confirmation letters will be forwarded to the Village of Tequesta Community Development Department upon our receipt; 7. Will not reduce light and air to the adjacent properties; NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 223 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Savoy Site Plan Review February 8, 2022 Revised May 4, 2022 Revised July 6, 2022 Page 7 of 7 8. Expected increase in property values in the adjacent areas, and stimulation of the Village of Tequesta's tax base; 9. Will not create any noise or visual pollution to the adjacent areas; 10. Will work in synergy with the surrounding parks and water, and will not have a negative impact on the adjacent natural systems or public facilities; Conclusion: To recap, the applicant, who is responsible for building several high -end products domestically, and internationally are proposing a site plan for infill redevelopment consisting of 26 multi -family, condominium units, and amenities located on 2.26 acres The owners have been extremely diligent in working with Village staff, and the design team; even being considerate enough to use local consultant's familiar with the area to ensure that the final product is sensitive and respectful to the existing community. This narrative has demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with particular elements of the Village Comprehensive Plan, and will not be a detriment to any goals, objectives, and policies. Additionally, the submitted site plan shows compliance with all elements of the Village's code. With the approval of this dynamic project, Tequesta will further their mission in establishing itself as premier destination in northern Palm Beach County, and with that, 2GHO, Inc., respectfully request review and approval of the submitted application package. The project team at 2GHO, Inc. consists of George G. Gentile, PLA, and Alec Dickerson. NA300 Beach Road\Applications\2022 Site Plan Review\Application Materials\Justification Statement.docx Page 224 of 478 Agj Il 1 6d--C)ASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 464 South Dixie Highway • Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 • Fax: 305-661-1914 CQASTALSYSTEMS w�'J�T.coastalsystemsint.com INTERNATIONAL 411200 May 11, 2022 Mr. Eric Cohen FONTAINEBLEAU DEVELOPMENT, LLC 19950 West Country Club Drive, loth Floor Aventura, Florida 33180 Via e-mail: eeohen(a Ibdev.coni ; mramosgfbdev.com RE: SUPPORTING MATERIALS IN FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS (EAA) FOR THE PROPOSED 300 BEACH ROAD PROJECT (PROJECT), TOWN OF JUPITER, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Dear Mr. Cohen: Please find enclosed a set of documents that fulfill components of the required EAA for the Project, related to the EAA requirements shared with Coastal Systems International, Inc. (Coastal Systems) on April 13th, 2022. The documents are in order of their associated Village Code number within Section 50-39 of the EAA requirements document: • 2a — Site Location Map • 2b — Aerial Photograph • 2c — Map of Existing Vegetation • 2d — Soil Types and Conditions • 2e — List of Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species • 2h — Geologically Significant Features • 2j — Surrounding Land Uses and Environmental Features • 3b — Existing Zoning Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (305) 661-3655 ext. 267 or azenonekcoastalsystemsint.com or Taylor Scheuermann at (305) 661-6230 or tscheuermann&costalsystemsint.com. Sincerely, COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Aubree Zenone Environmental/Permitting Project Manager �COASTALSYSTEMS Page 225 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 2a — Site Location Map ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 226 of 478 Jupiter, Island NTS ►� Jonathan Dickinson State Park G ` _ PRO ECT J LOCATION Tequesta 300 S Be h Rd Jupiter Inlet Colony Limestone Creek d \'_ u 9s �� Jupiter 2 95 s VIGNITY MAP ^ Juno`Beach u V V �.' IIRIA11 1.1 �} -• 00 B o _ \i\\ 11 � } - CALE IN FEET . 206' Agenda Item #16. 2b — Aerial Photograph ,e-Sw%, COASTALSYSTEMS Page 228 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 229 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 230 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 2c — Map of Existing Vegetation ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 231 of 478 Agenda Item #16. e�N _I I •' r Agenda Item #16. 2d — Soil Types and Conditions ,,*� COASTALSYSTEMS Page 233 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 234 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 235 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 236 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 2e — List of Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 237 of 478 Agent! I}am16. COASTALSYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 464 South Dixie Highway • Coral Gables, FL 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 • Fax: 305-6 C1-1914 w�,,�v.coastalsystemsint.com ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND RARE SPECIES LIST PROJECT: 411200 DATE: April 27, 2022 BIOLOGIST: Ms. Aubree Zenone, Coastal Systems International, Inc. (Coastal Systems) RE: ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND RARE SPECIES LIST POTENTIALLY FOUND ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 300 BEACH ROAD (PROJECT), VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA (VILLAGE), FLORIDA 1. INTRODUCTION This letter addresses a Village Code requirement on the completion of an Environmental Assessment Analysis (EAA) to include a "list of endangered, threatened and rare species or species of special local concern found on the site" (Section 50-39). To identify species of concern that may potentially reside on the Project site, a review of local species of concern, as well as any designated critical habitat, was conducted using preliminary data from several online resources. The online resources highlighted any: (1) critical habitats in the Project area, (2) recorded occurrences of species of concern, and (3) identified the likelihood of the presence of each potential species of concern. Web -based tools used for these efforts included: • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species Portal • The FWS list of Federally Threatened or Endangered Species in Florida Counties • Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) database • FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Query Information on the species of concern identified in the online available resources, above, can be found in Appendix A. Note that the area selection tool for the FNAI database only allows for a selection in a large area (1 square mile) of potential habitat (Figure 1). For this reason, species may be identified in the list that could not occur, or have not occurred, on the Project site. Colonial bird species, their nesting or roosting areas, or areas in which migratory species of bird are known to concentrate were not considered in this analysis. No critical habitat was identified for this Project site. Page 238 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species List April 27, 2022 Page 2 Water y Rd Coral PI Re 1E PI C e Ptl CacOnN l c-1 cove lliodivorsity M.tnx Sq Mile Unit ID: 69107 ZOOT lO Jupiter Inlet Colony - o Cave PI f00 Figure 1. Grid size of the FNAI database query. Actual project site highlighted in the small blue box. The Project area consists of one lot containing a total of approximately two (2) acres of upland property, which is currently a multi -family condominium, a series of parking lots, and a pool area (Figure 2). Figure 2. 300 Beach Road property. Blue area highlights the Project area used for the FWS Critical Habitat and list of Federally Threatened or Endangered Species database. �.� C OA S TA L S YS TEMS Page 239 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species List April 27, 2022 Page 3 2. ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND RARE SPECIES LIST In fulfillment of the Village requirements for an EAA, please find a list of endangered, threatened, and endangered species identified by our source databases. Common Name Scientific Name American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis hartrami Beach Jacquemontia Jacquemontia reclinata Burrowing Four-o'clock Okenia hypogaea Celestial Lily Nemastylis floridana Coastal Vervain Glandularia maritima Dancing -lady Orchid Tolumnia bahamensis Dark Tiny Sand-lovin Scarab Geopsammodius fuscus East Coast Scrub Grasshopper Melanoplus indicifer Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus Florida Clapper Rail Rallus longirostris scottii Florida Filmy Fern Trichomanes punctatum ssp. floridanum Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis Florida Mouse Podomys floridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Florida Pinewood Privet Forestiera segregata var. pinetorum Florida Prarie Warbler Setophaga ddiscolor paludicola Florida Prarie-clover Dalea carthagenesis floridana Florida Royal Patin Roystonea elata Florida Scrub Lizard Sceloporus woodi Florida Scrub -jay Aphelocoma coerulescens Four -petal Pawpaw Asimina tetramera 1000e6lyll� COASTALSYSTEMS Page 240 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Species List April 27, 2022 Page 4 Gopher Frog Lithobates capito Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Johnson's Seagrass Halophila johnsonii Lakela's Mint Dicerandra immaculata Large -flowered Rosemary Conradina grandiflora Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Mangrove Rivulus Rivulus marmoratus Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia Nodding Pinweed Lechea cernua Opossum Pipefish Microphis brachyurus Perforate Reindeer Lichen Cladonia perforata Piedmont Jointgrass Coelorachis tuberculosa Pine Pinweed Lechea divaricata Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Sand -dune Spurge Chamaesyce cumulicola Scrub Bluestem Schizachyrium niveum Small's Flax Linum carteri var. smallii Southeastern Beach Mouse Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris Southern Hognose Snake Heterodon simus Spottail Goby Ctenogobius stigmaturus Tiny Polygala Polygala smallii West Indian Manatee Trichecus manatus Wood Stork Mycteria americana File, AZ:TS F:AData-2\Project\411200AResearch\ESA Swvey\(22-04-22) ESA Survey 300 Beach Road.docx ,/ COASTALSYSTEMS Page 241 of 478 Agent! I}am16. COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 464 South Dixie Highway • Coral Gables, FL 33146 Tel: 305-661-3655 • Fax: 305-661-1914 COASTALSYSTEMS .,oastalsysternsi11t.com INTERNATIONAL FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT PROJECT: 411200 DATE: April 22, 2022 BIOLOGIST: Ms. Aubree Zenone, Coastal Systems International, Inc. (Coastal Systems) RE: THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY RELATIVE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 300 BEACH ROAD (PROJECT), VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA (VILLAGE), FLORIDA 1. INTRODUCTION Coastal Systems International, Inc. conducted a biological survey (Survey) for the presence of listed threatened and endangered species at the Project site, located at 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, Florida, on April 21", 2022. It is our understanding that the Project proposes to construct a residential tower on the oceanfront parcel with a garage, landscape, hardscape, exterior lighting, and excavation and fill activities. The Village Code requires the completion of an Environmental Assessment Analysis (EAA) that includes a "list of endangered, threatened and rare species or species of special local concern found on the site" (Section 50-39). The results in this Field Observation Report (Report) highlight the efforts taken by Coastal Systems to identify these endangered, threatened and rare species (ESA Species) and the site survey conducted to identify the presence of any such species. No ESA Species were detected during the survey. 2. METHODOLOGY To identify species of concern that may potentially reside on the Project site, a review of local species of concern, as well as any designated critical habitat, was conducted using preliminary data from several online resources. The following sections describe the study methodology used for identification of protected species occurrence or potential for occurrence, and then the Project site characteristics observed during the on -site survey. 2.1 SPECIES OF CONCERN IN PROJECT LOCATION Using online resources, the approximate boundaries of the Project site were drawn and used to reference several databases containing critical habitat and species of concern location information. The online resources then highlighted any critical habitats in the Project area, any recorded occurrences of species of concern, and identified the likelihood of the presence of each potential species of concern. Page 242 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 2 Web -based tools used for these efforts included: • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species Portal • The FWS list of Federally Threatened or Endangered Species in Florida Counties • Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) database • FNAI Biodiversity Matrix Query Information on the species of concern identified in the online available resources, above, can be found in Appendix A. Note that the area selection tool for the FNAI database only allows for a selection in a large area (1 square mile) of potential habitat. For this reason, species may be identified that were not actually present or documented on the actual project site. The FNAI database showed three documented ESA species that included the Four -petal Pawpaw (Asimina tetramera), Perforate Reindeer Lichen (Cladonia perforate), and Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea). Two historically documented ESA species had been noted in the surrounding region, and nine ESA species were considered likely to be documented within the square mile region (Appendix A). The documented ESA species included the Spottail Goby (Ctenogobius stigmaturus) and the Burrowing Four- o'clock. The likely species included the Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta), Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas), Dark Tiny Sand - loving Scarab (Geopsammodius Ascus), Johnson's Seagrass (Halophila johnsonii), Beach Jacquemontia (Jacquemontia reclinate), East Coast Scrub Grasshopper (Melanoplus indicifer), Wood Stork (Mycteria americana), and West Indian Manatee (Trichecus manatus) (See Appendix A for FWS Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species Map and FNAI Matrix Query Results). As the Project site is located within the uplands and is not connected to tidal waters, the Biologist determined that there was no potential habitat for the Spottail Goby, Johnson's Seagrass, and West Indian Manatee. Given that the project will not affect overall beach width or quality, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC) regulations ensure that the proposed tower uses appropriate turtle -safe lighting, the Biologist determined that there is no effect to habitat for the Loggerhead, Leatherback, and Green Sea Turtles. There was no critical habitat identified in the area surrounding the Project from the FWS Portal. Twenty-two species of concern were identified on the FWS list of Federally Threatened or Endangered Species as occurring in the Project area and forty-four were identified by the FNAI Query Matrix. Of the total species identified from each list, thirty-six were able to occur in the site uplands habitat: Beach Jacquemontia (Jacquemontia reclinata), Burrowing Four-o'clock (Okenia hypogaea), Celestial Lily (Nemastylis floridana), Coastal Vervain (Glandularia maritima), Dancing -lady Orchid (Tolumnia bahamensis), Dark Tiny Sand -loving Scarab (Geopsammodius fuseus), East Coast Scrub Grasshopper (Melanoplus indicifer), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarehon couperi), Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus), Florida Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris scottii), Florida Filmy Fern (Trichomanes punetatum ssp. floridanum), Florida Leafwing Butterfly .04� COASTALSYSTEMS Page 243 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 3 (Anaea troglodyte floridalis), Florida Mouse (Podomys floridanaus), Florida Prairie Warbler (Setophaga discolor paludicola), Florida Prairie -clover (Dalea carthagenesis floridana), Florida Scrub Lizard (Sceloporus woodi), Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Four -petal Pawpaw (Asimina tetramera), Gopher Frog (Lithobates capito), Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Lakela's Mint (Dicerandra immaculata), Large -flowered Rosemary (Conradina grandiflora), Miami Blue Butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri), Narrow -leaved Carolina Scalystem (Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia), Nodding Pinweed (Lechea cernua), Perforate Reindeer Lichen (Cladonia perforata), Peidmont Jointgrass (Coelorachis tuberculosa), Pine Pinweed (Lechea divaricata), Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus), Sand -dune Spurge (Chamaesyce cumulicola), Scrub Bluestein (Schizachyrium niveum), Small's Flax (Linum carteri var. smallii), Southeastern Beach Mouse (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris), Southern Hognose Snake (Heterodon simus), Tiny Polgyala (Polygala smallii), and the Wood Stork (Mycteria americana). These species were added to the field cards for the Survey. For a full list of species of concern reported by the FWS and FNAI, please see Appendix A. 2.2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURVEY METHODOLOGY The Project area consists of one lot containing a total of approximately 2 acres of upland property, which is currently a multi -family condominium, a series of parking lots, and a pool area (Figure 1). The proposed site improvements will not exceed the footprint of the existing upland development and intends to maintain the seawall demarcation between the upland landscaping and beach area. Figure 1. 300 Beach Road property, blue area highlights the Project area and Survey area. The property is easterly adjacent to Beach Road and is bounded to the north by the Island House Condominium, and to the south by the Regency Condominium. The Survey was conducted on Thursday, April 21 st, 2022, at 10:30 am by a biologist familiar with Florida habitats and protected species. The Survey consisted of a thorough visual inspection of the property, using reference materials to aid in identifying species of concern. ,,,A&~ COASTALSYSTEMS Page 244 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 4 3. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Figure 2. Area and Direction of each report photo. Photo 1. Looking north from east grass. Photo 2. Looking north from southern beach end. COASTALSYSTEMS le Page 245 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 5 u I��Ei���3����Nllllllllllllilllllllllllllll' , �� T�� � " �,'J �� , � 1 Av, Photo 3. Facing west from eastern center. Photo 5. Facing south from northern beach. Photo 7. Facing west from north center. Photo 4. Facing west from not beach. n.+ ' *! -10I AM, r ,a 6115?911!I Photo 6. Facing south from northern grass Photo 8. Facing south from northwest of property. COASTALSYSTEMS Page 246 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 6 Photo 9. Facing east from northwest of property. Photo 11. Facing east from southwest of property Photo 13. Facing pool from northern end of pool area. Photo 10. Looking east from west center of property. Photo 12. Looking north from south center of property. --- x Photo 12. Facing southwest from northern end of pool area. -w � COASTALSYSTEMS Page 247 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 7 4. CONCLUSIONS On the date of the Survey, the Project area consisted of approximately 33% permeable area, 55% impervious area (residential structure, parking lot, pool), and 12% vegetated sandy dune. The vegetation on site consisted of a mixture of native and exotic plants and trees used for landscaping. The dunes were vegetated with native species. The Project area is surrounded by a developed urban area of Tequesta, which consists of commercial, recreational, and residential opportunities. The developed and frequently manicured status of the landscape presents few opportunities for ESA species. No species of concern or evidence thereof was observed during the time of the Survey. Photos of the Project area and potential habitats for the species of concern were taken during the Survey and are visible on pages 4 through 6 of this Report. Filc, AZ:TS F:AData-2VProjcct\411200ARcscarch\ESA Survcy\(22-04-22) ESA Snrvcy 300 Reach Road.docx ,/ COASTALSYSTEMS Page 248 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 411200 Field Observation Report - ESA April 22, 2022 Page 8 APPENDIX A COASTALSYSTEMS Page 249 of 478 Agenda Item #16. United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Florida Ecological Services Field Office ,FL Phone: Fax: In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2022-0033059 Project Name: 300 Beach Road April 18, 2022 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may Page 250 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat maybe affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List Page 251 of 478 Agenda Item #16. ■ USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries ■ Migratory Birds ■ Marine Mammals ■ Wetlands Page 252 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Florida Ecological Services Field Office , FL Page 253 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 9 Project Summary Project Code: 2022-0033059 Event Code: None Project Name: 300 Beach Road Project Type: New Constr - Above Ground Project Description: Project proposes to demolish an existing multi -family tower and construct a new multi -family tower, with landscape and hardscape features. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https: www. google.com/maps/(a)26.954552800000002,-80.07611102314016,14z i IIi c. 9 Dr ylAI— 1Cf Colony Counties: Palm Beach County, Florida Page 254 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 22 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8630 Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp. except coryi) Population: FL No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 Southeastern Beach Mouse Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3951 West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional consultation requirements. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 STATUS Endangered Endangered Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) Threatened Threatened Page 255 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 Birds NAME STATUS Florida Scrub-jayAphelocoma coerulescens Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6174 Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Wood Stork Mycteria americana Threatened Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 General project design guidelines: https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws. gov/prof ect/UMYWAIXOVBAH7DWYVGDJLXDR2Y/ documents/generated/6954. pdf Reptiles NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened) American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus Threatened Population: U.S.A. (FL) There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6604 Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656 Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 Page 256 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 5 Insects NAME STATUS Bartram's Hairstreak Butterfly Strymon acis bartrami Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4837 Florida Leafwing Butterfly Anaea troglodyta floridalis Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6652 Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclorgus (=Hemiargus) thomasi bethunebakeri Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797 Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Beach Jacquemontia Jacquemontia reclinata Endangered Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1277 Florida Prairie -clover Dalea carthagenensis floridana Endangered Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300 Four -petal Pawpaw Asimina tetramera Endangered Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3461 Tiny Polygala Polygala smalhi Endangered Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/996 Lichens NAME STATUS Florida Perforate Cladonia Cladonia perforata Endangered Population: No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7516 Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. Page 257 of 478 Agenda Item #16. USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. Page 258 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treated of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found hPl nw_ For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587 American Oystercatcher Hoematopus palliates This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935 BREEDING SEASON Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31 Breeds Apr 15 to Aug 31 Page 259 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 NAME Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. Black Skimmer Rynchops niger This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5234 Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias occidentalis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magni ficens This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA BREEDING SEASON Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 Breeds May 20 to Sep 15 Breeds Jan 1 to Dec 31 Breeds Oct 1 to Apr 30 Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31 and Alaska. Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation elsewhere Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Willet Tringa semipalmata Breeds Apr 20 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 5 and Alaska. Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia Breeds Apr 1 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 20 and Alaska. Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence (■) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. Page 260 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 3 How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. ■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Kestrel ++ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i l l l 1 1 1 1 +-'++' -1-4-1---+ BCC -BCR --- ---- ---- ---- ---- American Oystercatcher—+— +­++ 4-4-4-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i l l l 1 1 1 1 -+—+'+ -,++ ---+ BCC Rangewide (CON) Page 261 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 4 Bald Eagle I I I I I I I I I III I I I I Non -BCC Vulnerable — — — — — — — — ---� Black Skimmer BCC Rangewide i +1 (CON) Great Blue Heron BCC -BCR Magnificent --1— 1� " ' a+11 ++++ 1+++ +++ +,+, +1 1 " Frigatebird + + + +—+� �+ — ++ -- BCC -BCR Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide+++ +. ++++ + (CON) Ruddy Tnrnstnne �1111111 ���� 1111111111�1+111111111� 11111111 IIII BCC -BCR Willet � �-""�^ " r —+� �+" Jill —"'BCC Rangewide _11— 1++ 4-1-4- 11IIII (CON) Wilson's Plover BCC Rangewide—+— +—++ ++ i I I I I I I I I I I I I+++ —+++ ---+ (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: ■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species ■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoidinu-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mig-ratorv-birds ■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide- standard- conservation-measures.pdf Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? Page 262 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) Page 263 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 04/18/2022 potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Page 264 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Marine Mammals Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected under the Endangered Species Act! and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website. The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office shown. 1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. 2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in the wild. 3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. NAME West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 Page 265 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED. PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Page 266 of 478 Agenda Item #16. IPaC User Contact Information Agency: Coastal Systems International Name: Aubree Zenone Address: 464 South Dixie Highway City: Coral Gables State: FL Zip: 33146 Email azenone@coastalsystemsint.com Phone: 3056613655 Page 267 of 478 Agenda Item #16. K M O m Q Z LL O .O N 4i ct bq y O 0 N N O �.d o lyl W W cC N O w 0 .O O � o � �n v. F-zz 3 i� L O '� O .E O � !E � -0 N •C o�E a 3 •T u E� a to E O U N� � 0.2 � >- t6 O L O � L � J-� - � L � .� N Q � C t0 a)N +.+ L O (O l/1 L In O � \ L -p E U � � o N� O Q � � -O U of � U N O' r0 N v7 O +� p_ O � N OU f0 N ui w In L C 7 L N � O O Z p -O j E� fn LL C C � � � O f6 a)f6 O O N aU+ LA CC C O C � O .Ln @ U -O C U � X N � a) Q Z U U1 Cru > N L f6 U L LL a)� � f0 O_ 'p U }' U C a (A O� •� L C L U (0 U v •C U -O � � U f0 JUI- N � C !p U O U U O C C O C O O � OD -a .0 > O M C> N E � N c cn v � t U p U L O � -O > f6 C � 0 N +' C E C O Q U Cj2 C L •fn !ED E v }; a� 3 � •� v c > v u aci _0 i X E U U � C (0 � N+ � C 'p � � � v c +�+� x a) � O L O L O 7 N C L � +� N H.� � u � E t M3 2: s c (A -r- v .. o� v� O i =� U 7 O O -O >. t� � U � � fA W r0 W T E m� J d 2 Z Z u.) c '- U a) E Q v M L o. i� $�v Y� N - N C .a 0 � =I0 M I 0I o co W rn 0 rn _ o IO cco co co 06 o V 0 co co M r c 0 _o N C V t U t6 N a X H Q d m !6 Q Z Z C � Page 268 0 Agenda Item #16. N 01 C N J W Z W LWL Z Z y 3 N .1 Vl J Z J J Z Z Y = n� U) U) M ul ul U) X a N 0 O � [D C LL c U U ro }, L N d ro N rO p i ru C d O( V U O O w a s N [n O 4J a)N N U U co Q LL m U a p J V) Vt W O1 N � M (h J Z W R y L 7 }1 Q 4� LL (A Z Z C fn W Ln Ul) M O C rr. (D w u u E M Z C t @ o O u V rq o i � O LL V Z O Q c 3 0 U i d -4 7 V1 U cn O m O1 N � M � y (! J LL LL LWL Z W W Z L~L LWL L = }I LU LL V1 J J Z J J Z J J w% M C +M+ M N M N 1-i N -4 1-1 N N W U) w (n (n Ln Ul) U) U) U) -i � .0c M N M M 1-i N -4 1-1 V N Q w u U 0 0 u u U (D u EL Z E a Q O u N j 21 L E r) +� m U C ro � Ln O N 4.1 O � � v� p '� rn 'e Q, (D t i �' O oto 6 -o M E � c u1 l�° u ro� JJ V u U p U= r0 r6 L >, 1 (n to C O u U z in ro i 0 o O r_6 _ w OU roM O C H mlC O O E O r6 D, ro O U ro+� L UO G% �G c O i UJ v C rron a o Q o n 0, aai ro U v r, O 'L N W QILL U J U (7 U' O i 1I m w �I Page 269 of Agenda Item #16. M G1 C w U U U J LWL W LLLL W LLLL Z LWL Z W Z W W (n Z Z W LLLL (n W Z U1 y 7 a+ f0 (n J Z J Z Z J J Z J Z Z U Z Z Z Z Z Z (n Z J Z J Z (n N N M M -4 M N 1-i N M M N M N N M Z N N -1 M -4 M M C) U) U) Ln Ln U) M M (n U) U) Ln Ln U) U') U') (f) U) U) U) U) Ln U) U) U') U') � O O O 7 Cl) X M W M O O _a n ao > fC M N M M M .--i M M M M N M N N M N Ln M .--i Ln 00 o OG C7 C7 C7 o 0 C7 C7 0 U C7 CD C7 CD C7 C7 C7 u 0 0 0 u u 0 C7 C7 � ca N _ M Q � Z W O Cl) Cf) M O O O O 00 r c a) N 06 O CA O I a �I Cl. E v t O t6 a) a U � X Ln E i o ate) c m c pi N v v QI C r C 4 > W L L (n (n o v U fu � o u vl� ° L v �a E E v L� c �.�co c 0) a p c v ra p p� O Ln to p N i p C E L p v J (n U v O N + dt o a) C L 'L ° O 7 .p C O L O tp C O. a) O c N > I v 'C l O CO N ` 4., L O 27 kL ��v O N U O dt O �.� N O U Q L u v O Q v O EL ?._ LLB o, oa) �v v3 Em oo .E�° i as a mQ� oc Lv m o a O 7 u a) O Cr v c C 'O Ln to v N I i = E c N v N X U O 0) -UO L � c o C+ nz 3 m Z c u v vC = n3 c v o c v a > v L° n L Q = u T o n N v u c c o a u- L d ro> o c u 3 n3 LL v LL — U g _T E m In u v L a nz w c N L c .m u v i L L °, C u V7 N L c na >> ro Q U c} o o L o r o m L i 3° m i m c v v p a) m e v 12 p ,n (A- v ra M° v c E-o `L° 6 o E m y L a) m o � E2 V)-o '13 LL v- va a m s E a m c N E +� L L .a., a) ._ C to Z s +t 'O t E p L N O to EO �, p T ` j C\i4 C: N c N- N c a' N Y > n L 3 L na O o +. c o N O a C O E c N U +-+ -C �Ci -C .�- O .� O �p U rp L r0 � fu M p 0 � p O O v 0 Quj O ,� ,C E ,+�� O N U O_ v v v O O O p c ip OZZ Q Q U U1 U a U CL U J O J oI W W Z W 2 W LL U U �I (3 _ U) J Z J d J (n J U O Z U (n a Page 270 of 47E� Agenda Item #16. K LU Z LU Z LU LU z z z z z LU M N U) M U) U) Ln Ln U) U') Cl) M N M Ln N N .--i Ln M 7 0 0 C7 C7 C7 C7 O G m a L _O � r0 O � Tj Ll N L O _0 Ln E y ra E! .� O O (6 O UZ5 N t; L 7 > ti p J E u 0 C, U- °C N T IL j , a, � .� ra a T a a rn T E N > M C 0 U) -C C d> a m' N LL OL O ra 'O_ Cl O ra -O N N m -�C ra 4 -O .0 ra -O N C N L L [ L O L C 2: Q� LL LL L in V) LL � LL L O L N � O ru LLn 6 C Ln p N C2 •2 N a ru L rn E N Q2 L � O + to w 'C C fa 0 _ _0 C a L _ O O L Q C ra R Z LL > O C N L >T v �V;_c o >, c o w zr) ul ._ � ira Ln fu -0 C C T > N O O LO L N J O U 0 C ra M u .� L L Q- Y+ L 2 L M W > L O L C N L VC)-0a� L L N O U 7 .> C T Ln L V) C '� ra O 7 E >s oQ L L�U)LQ C a L N EO O C a0-i Lam.+ U O A C, C O r0 E O 2 N O N 7 L In w L 0-0 O E E Ln U 0-0 T C, w rli 0C C 6 C1 ru — LU V) v ra c _0 L C '�n- (n O a--� N N O a) fu N LA r6 7 6 N O U -O O- _0 N O ra L L L a 00 O i O i to v (6 C W W C W > O > H O V Q U t6 O O C N N.2 O _N Q -0 9 U N a V) a0 � C � ru C N MLn O N 0) Z Ln L c C C E O ra O O0 w V Q c w n c O N _U _N > _O E N O O O C O U U O C N t6 U f�a U Ln L w 6 U N a7 Eca�rLao E rc, a N V U C V M Q y O N N G O C aL aL V Page 271 of 47E� Agenda Item #16. 2h — Geologically Significant Features ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 272 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 273 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 2j — Surrounding Land Uses and Environmental Features ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 274 of 478 Agenda Item #16. -r�_ ' '" - - v o " IIWWd 310NIS NIS �NIS AlIWV3 310NIS\ IIVW VW — �Z� DNI-S-�AIIWb� v AIAI�IWV3�3111DNIS A11WV3 31DNIS � — �O \ AII WVAIIWb� 3lDNIS 3FJNI5 \AlIWW3 310NIS\ T — AIIWW AIIWV — 31DNIS IDNI'S AlIWV3 31DN15 \Wf11NIWO4NOJ I AIIWV NdIJ t i (f VNIbWW 'jJr — \31�NI5 INfI� A\lIWV3 3lJNIS�—�-- — \ WnINIWOaNOD — — — — Wf11NIWOaNO: Wf1INIWOGNOD Cie Q �Z \ \ I Wf11NIWOaNOJ I Wf11NIWO4NOJ O \ \ N O v m \\ Wf11NIWO4NOJ II s WfIINIWO4NOJ� \ Wf11NIWO(INOJ \ \ Wf11NIWO4NOD \ \ Wf11NIWOdNOD \ NOI1V3bJ311 V A VN 0 1 MAD 3d SWd `1S3110d S)I'IVd 1S30d �OI1V3bJ3 NOI1V3bJ3S V �_S)Ilffd `1STI03 Wd `1SRI� 00 NOI1V3b:)3b V \ S)111Vd `1S3'dOJ N 0 O LU \ \ \ b-p dvw3sve-3snavn isix3 aonvs\aaoaadvAb NVooz wA��al�"dGd Page 275 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 3b — Existing Zoning ./0�COASTALSYSTEMS Page 276 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Page 277 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 300 Beach Road FEMA FIRM Investigation Revised Coastal Analyses Prepared for: Mr. Phil Perko 300 Beach Road Holdings, LLC 19950 West Country Club Drive, 10th Floor Aventura, FL 33180 Prepared by: Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5906 Center Street Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-575-3910 September 2021 Richard S. Toinasello P.E.# 15233 Page 278 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 300 Beach Road FEMA FIRM Investigation Revised Coastal Analyses 1. Report 2. MT-2 Form 1 3. MT-2 Form 4 4. Maps 1, 2, 3 5. Appendix A — CHAMP Outputs and Primary Frontal Dune Assessment 6. Appendix B — GIS and Imagery 7. Appendix C - LiDAR Page 279 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc (TCE) was contacted by the Mr. Phil Perko concerning the Effective Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) published October 5, 2017 for the subject property. The subject property is generally located at 300 Beach Road Tequesta, FL 33469 and is currently within the FEMA Coastal High Hazard Area (VE-zones). TCE was asked to investigate site -specific data and conduct site -specific coastal hydraulic modeling for the possibility of amending the 2017 Effective FIRMs VE-zones. 300 Beach Road CHAMP Inputs TCE setup the FEMA CHAMP model analyses based on using 2017 aerials (www.labins.org) and 2018 National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Topobathy LiDAR for the subject property. The CHAMP model, CHAMP WHAFIS card inputs, WHAFIS charts, WHAFIS input and outputs for the transects can be found electronically in Appendix A. General Conditions In the setup of the general conditions, the parameters used in the CHAMP model were taken from the Effective FIS. The General Inputs are as follows: Table 10: Summai-• of Coastal Stillwater Elevations ELEVATION (feet NAVD 88) FLOODING SOURCE AND LOCATION 10-PERCENT 2-PERCENT 1-PERC'E\T 0.2-PERCENT ATLANTIC OCEAN Along the coastline from the Martin County/Palm Beach County boundary extending south to Jupiter Inlet 2_8 4.6 .41 6.7 Significant Wave Height: 39.4' Significant Wave Period: 13.8 sec. Transect Location and Topography Three (3) transects were setup for the CHAMP model for the subject property. The transect locations were chosen to represent the local features of the subject property. The transects includes the building, topographic and vegetation for inputs into the WHAFIS portion of the CHAMP model for the subject property. In addition to the CHAMP model, the transect inputs were assessed to help better determine the location of the Primary Frontal Dune (PFD). Three .xls spreadsheets and a map with the LiDAR portrayed in hillshade are included in Appendix A. The topographic information used in the CHAMP analyses is from 2018 NOAA NGS Topobathy Topobathy Lidar. The 2018 LiDAR metadata can be found in Appendix C. Page 280 of 478 Agenda Item #16. CHAMP Results The results of the WHAFIS analyses for the three (3) transects show that the velocity zone (3-foot wave) shifts seaward a maximum of approximately 175 feet. A signed and sealed topographic work map (Map 2) is included with this submittal showing the following information: effective, existing conditions, and proposed conditions 1 %-annual-chance- floodplain-boundaries, location and alignment of all transects, boundary of the subject property, certification by a State of Florida professional engineer, and the referenced vertical datum. The proposed revised FIRM is provided as Map 3. The CHAMP results for proposed subject property V/A Zones with tiebacks to Effective FEMA zones are shown on Map 2 (also see CHAMP results in Appendix A). Map 3 is an annotated FIRM which displays the revised 1 %-annual-chance-floodplain boundaries that tie-in with the effective I %-annual-chance-floodplain boundaries along the entire extent of the area of revision. Conclusion The three (3) transect analyses provides scientifically correct data that should be used to revise the effective FIRM panel. Appendix A contains the CHAMP, WHAFIS Model and Primary Frontal Dune Assessment Appendix B — GIS and Imagery Appendix C — LiDAR and Metadata 2 Page 281 of 478 Agenda Item #16. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY OVERVIEW & CONCURRENCE FORM PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE O.M.B No. 1660-0016 Expires February 28, 2014 Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 1 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA 20958-3005, Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448, as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93- 234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0 § 552a(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) February 15, 2006, 71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE: The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however, failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a NFIP Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). A. REQUESTED RESPONSE FROM DHS-FEMA This request is for a (check one): ❑ CLOMR: A letter from DHS-FEMA commenting on whether a proposed project, if built as proposed, would justify a map revision, or proposed hydrology changes (See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60, 65 & 72). ® LOMR: A letter from DHS-FEMA officially revising the current NFIP map to show the changes to floodplains, regulatory floodway or flood elevations. (See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60, 65 & 72) B. OVERVIEW 1. The NFIP map panel(s) affected for all impacted communities is (are): Community No. Community Name State Map No. Panel No. Effective Date Example: 480301 City of Katy TX 48473C 0005D 02/08/83 480287 Harris County TX 48201 C 0220G 09/28/90 120228 Village of Tequesta FL 12099C 0179F 10/05/17 2. a. Flooding Source: Atlantic Ocean b. Types of Flooding: ❑ Riverine ® Coastal ❑ Shallow Flooding (e.g., Zones AO and AH) ❑ Alluvial fan ❑ Lakes ❑ Other (Attach Description) 3. Project Name/Identifier: 300 Beach RoadLOMR 4. FEMA zone designations affected: VE, AE, (choices: A, AH, AO, Al-A30, A99, AE, AR, V, VI-V30, VE, B, C, D, X) 5. Basis for Request and Type of Revision: a. The basis for this revision request is (check all that apply) ❑ Physical Change ❑ Improved Methodology/Data ❑ Regulatory F000dway Revision ❑ Base Map Changes ® Coastal Analysis ❑ Hydraulic Analysis ❑ Hydrologic Analysis ❑ Corrections ❑ Weir -Dam Changes ❑ Levee Certification ❑ Alluvial Fan Analysis ❑ Natural Changes ® New Topographic Data ❑ Other (Attach Description) Note: A photograph and narrative description of the area of concern is not required, but is very helpful during review. FEMA Form 086-0-27, (2/2011) Previously FEMA Form 81-89 MT-2 ForPagea�%'Qo[ 478 Agenda Item #16. b. The area of revision encompasses the following structures (check all that apply) Structures: ❑ Channelization ❑ Levee/Floodwall ❑ Bridge/Culvert ❑ Dam ❑ Fill ❑ Other (Attach Description) 6 ❑ Documentation of ESA compliance is submitted (required to initiate CLOMR review). Please refer to the instructions for more information. C. REVIEW FEE Has the review fee for the appropriate request category been included? ❑ Yes Fee amount: 5 ❑ No, Attach Explanation Please see the DHS-FEMA Web site at htti :l/www.fema. ;ov/, lard revent/fhm/frm fees shtm for Fee Amounts and Exemptions. D. SIGNATURE All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Name: Jeffrey Soffer Company: Mailing Address: Daytime Telephone rQP5) 937-6262 Fax No E-Mall Address: bhussey@fbdev.com Signature of Requester (required): Date: 9/3/21 ` As the community official responsible for floodplain management, I hereby acknowledge that we have received and reviewed this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or conditional LOMR request Based upon the community's review, we find the completed or proposed project meets or is designed to meet all of the community floodplain management requirements, including the requirements for when fill is placed in the regulatory floodway, and that all necessary Federal, State, and local permits have been, or in the case of a conditional LOMR, will be obtained. For Conditional LOMR requests, the applicant nas documented Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance to FEMA prior to FEMA's review of the Conditional LOMR application. For LOMR requests, I acknowledge that compliance with Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA has been achieved independently of FEMA's process. For actions authorized, funded, or being carried out by Federal or State agencies, documentation from the agency showing its compliance with Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA will be submitted. In addition, we have determined that the land and any existing or proposed structures to be removed from the SFHA are or will be reasonably safe from flooding as defined in 44CFR 65.2(c), and that we have available upon request by FEMA, all analyses and documentation used to make this determination. Community Official's Name and Title: Jose Rodriguez. Building Director Community Name: Village of Tequesta Mailing Address: Daytime Telephone No.: 561-768-0450 Fax No.: 345 Tequesta Drive -- - Tequesta, FL E-Mail Address Jrodriguez®tequesta.org 33469 Community Official's Signature (required): Date: CERTIFICATION BY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ANDlOR LAND SURVEYOR This certification Is to be signed and sealed by a licensed land surveyor, registered professional engineer or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information data, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and any other supporting information as per NFIP regulations paragraph 65.2(b) and as described in the MT-2 Forms Instructions. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowedge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code. Section 1001. Certifier's Name Richard S. Tomasello License No.: FL P.E. 15233 Expiration Dale: 02/28/2023 Company Name: Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. Telephone No.: 561-575-3910 Fax No.: Signature: / Date: uj /7 Zf E-Mail Address: dixietom®aol.com FEMA Form 086-0-27, (212011) Previously FEMA Form 81-89 MT-2 Form 1 Page 2 of Page 283 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Ensure the forms that are appropriate to your revision request are included in your submittal. Form Name and (Number) Required if ... ❑ Riverine Hydrology and Hydraulics Form (Form 2) New or revised discharges or water -surface elevations ❑ Riverine Structures Form (Form 3) ® Coastal Analysis Form (Form 4) ❑ Coastal Structures Form (Form 5) ❑ Alluvial Fan Flooding Form (Form 6) Channel is modified, addition/revision of bridge/culverts, addition/revision of levee/floodwall, addition/revision of dam New or revised coastal elevations Addition/revision of coastal structure Flood control measures on alluvial fans Seal (Optional) FEMA Form 086-0-27, (2/2011) Previously FEMA Form 81-89 MT-2 ForPageaBBAoif 478 Agenda Item #16. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY O.M.BNo. 1660-0016 COASTAL ANALYSIS FORM ExpiresPebruary28,2014 PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 1 hour per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless a valid OMB control number appears in the upper right corner of this form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington VA 20958-3005, Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448, as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0 § 552a(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) February 15, 2006, 71 FIR 7990. DISCLOSURE: The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however, failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a NFIP Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). Flooding Source: Atlantic Ocean Note: Fill out one form for each flooding source studied. A. COASTLINE TO BE REVISED Describe limits of study area: 300 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 B. EFFECTIVE FIS The area being revised in the effective FIS was studied by detailed methods using (check all that apply): ❑ Storm surge modeling ❑ Wave setup computations ® Wave height computations ❑ Wave runup computations ❑ Wave overtopping computations ® Dune erosion computations ® Primary Frontal Dune Assessment ❑ N/A (area not studied by detailed methods) C. REVISED ANALYSIS 1. Number of transects in revised analysis: 3 2. Information used to prepare the revision (check all that apply): ❑ Wave setup analyses (complete Items 3, 4, and 5 below) ❑ Wave overtopping assessment (complete Items 4 and 5) ❑ Stillwater elevation determinations (complete Item 3) ® More detailed topographic information (complete Section E) ® Erosion considerations (complete Item 4) ❑ Shore protection structures (attach completed Coastal Structures Form - Form 5) ❑ Wave runup analysis (complete Items 4 and 5) ® Primary frontal dune assessment (complete Item 5) ® Wave height analysis (complete Items 4 and 5) ❑ Other, attach basis of revision request with explanation 3. Stillwater Elevation Determination a. How were stillwater elevations determined? ❑ Gage analysis (If revised gage analysis was used, provide copies of gage data and revised analysis.) ❑ Storm surge analysis ® Other (Describe): Effective FIS b. Specify what datum was used in the calculations: NAVD If not the FIS datum, have the calculations been adjusted to the FIS datum? ❑ Yes ❑ No Conversion factor: c. Was the storm surge analysis revised? ❑ Yes ® No d. If a new storm surge model was used, attach a detailed description of the differences between the current and the revised analyses, and why the revised analysis should replace the current analysis. FEMA Form 086-0-27C, (2/2011) Previously FEMA Form 81-89C MT-2 Form 4 Page 1 of 2 Page 285 of 478 0 W. C. REVISED ANALYSIS (continued) e. If wave setup was computed, attach a description of methodology used. Amount of wave setup added to stillwater elevation: PJA feet 4. Revised Analysis (i.e., erosion, wave height, wave runup, primary frontal dune, and wave overtopping) If DHS-FEMA procedures were utilized to perform the revision, attach a detailed description of differences between the current and the revised analyses, and why the revised analysis should replace the current analysis. If DHS-FEMA procedures were not utilized to perform the revision, provide full documentation on methodology and/or models used; including operational program, detailed differences between methodology and/or models utilized and DHS-FEMA's methodology and/or models. Also, attach an explanation of why new methodology and/or models should replace current methodology and/or models. If revision reflects more detailed topographic information and fill has been/will be placed in a V Zone, and is not protected from erosion by a shore protection structure, provide a detailed description of how the fill has been treated in the revised analysis. 5. Wave Runup, Wave Height, And Wave Overtopping Analysis Wave height analyses along a transect are greatly affected by starting wave conditions that propagate inland. Wave runup and overtopping analyses are typically considered when wave heights and/or wave runup are close to or greater than the crest of shore protection structures or natural landforms. a. Was an analysis performed to determine starting wave height and period for input into WHAFIS? If Yes, attach an explanation of the method utilized. If No, explain why these analyses were not performed. ❑ Yes ® No - Starting wave height and period for input into WHAFIS was obtained from Table 16 of the Preliminary FIS. b. Was wave setup included in wave height analysis and removed for erosion and wave runup analyses? ® Yes ❑ No c. Was an overtopping analysis performed for any coastal shore protection structures or natural landforms that may be overtopped? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, attach an explanation of the methodology utilized and describe in detail the results of the analysis. If overtopping was not analyzed, attach an explanation for why these analyses were not performed. D. RESULTS 1. Stillwater storm surge elevation: 7_4 feet NAVD Datum 9. As a result of the revised analyses, the V Zone location has shifted a maximum of a feet seaward and 0 feet 2. Wave setup: N/A feet (Included in stillwater) landward of its existing position. 3. Starting deep -water significant wave condition: 10. Does this revision reflect the location of the primary frontal dune? ® Yes ❑ No height: 24.6' period: 13.8 sec 11. The Base Flood Elevations have: 4. Maximum wave height elevation: 11.39 feet ® increased ® decreased 5. Maximum wave runup elevation: 0 feet a. What was the greatest increase? 7 feet 6. Estimated amount of maximum overtopping: 0 cfs/feet b. What was the greatest decrease? 3 foot 7. Has this revision changed the Limit of Moderate Wave Action 12. The special flood hazard area has: (LiMWA)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A ® increased ❑ decreased ❑ both 8. The areas designated as coastal high hazard Attach a description where it has increased or decreased. areas (V Zones) have: ❑ increased ® decreased ❑ both Please see Map 2 of this submittal. Attach a description where they have increased and/or decreased. E. MAPPING REQUIREMENTS A certified topographic map must be submitted showing the following information (where applicable): effective, existing conditions, and proposed conditions 1%-annual-chance floodplain boundaries, revised shoreline due to either erosion or accretion, location and alignment of all transects, correct location and alignment of any structures, current community easements and boundaries, boundary of the requester's property, certification of a professional engineer registered in the subject State, location and description of reference marks, and the referenced vertical datum (NGVD, NAVD, etc.). Note that the existing or proposed conditions floodplain boundaries to be shown on the revised FIRM must tie-in with the effective floodplain boundaries. Please attach a copy of the current FIRM annotated to show the revised 1 %-annual-chance floodplain boundaries that tie-in with effective 1%-annual-chance floodplain boundaries along the entire extent of the area of revision. FEMA Form 086-0-27C, (2/2011) Previously FEMA Form 81-89C MT-2 Form 4 Page 2 of 2 Page 286 of 478 Agenda Item #16. W p I W I A � W � y LU 1 i W d Y ku 0 CC . zd y r CC 1 Lu y a, IIi�w ; 3coo. p K = a, !! z CL . }. E U ♦ Vl V M OyM' �i 7 l rMa�+aRi v �p.ndwe�! � ttop o Page 287 of 478 R ■ y A e8 81 ff� 9 • b �i 6 9 4 a � 9 A• ® ® T] Q® mm 90-9 9 O C @ 4 A 9 � 4 B FT XX i a > w _ U � N � O w a 9 ® ®e e m• Agenda Item #16. M rL� H N U ct c� 0 w I id z f � rat t io a RR r it 6 x x Pill 1111,111 MGU d Ra"WMH0 aoolb IWWJLWN Page 289 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 300 S Beach Rd 12/22/2021, 11:21:30 AM 1:1,128 Fire Hydrants 0 0.01 0.02 0.04 n i Potable Water Valves Potable Water Backflows Potable Water Main Palm Beach County - Service Area Parcels 0.02 0.04 0.07 km Esri, HERE, Gamin, PC, State of Florida, Maxar, Microsoft Village of Tequesta! gi@s ZeQrqfe478 State of Florida, Maxar, Microsoft I Esri, HERE, Garmin, iPC I Agenda Item #16. FIRE FLOWS The effective date for this requirement was January 1, 2013. The Florida Fire Prevention Cade (FFPC) now requires that a newly constructed or substantially improved buildings, including one and two-family homes, must be built within the parameters of the fire flow capability provided to that property. These flows and durations are important to ensure that there is a sufficient water supply to extinguish a fire in the building and to keep it from spreading to nearby buildings. The Code requires a minimum of T,000 gallons per minute (GPM) fire flow for duration of two hours for homes having a fire flow area of 5,000 square feet or less. Fire flows commercial construction and homes with a fire flow area exceeding 5,000 square feet shall not be less than that specified in the Florida Fire Prevention Code, NFPA 1, Chapter 18, Table 18.4.5.1.2. This table calculates the needed fire flow (GPM) based on the fire flow area and construction type of the building. If the size of the proposed building or home design exceeds the water system capabilities, the Florida Fire Prevention Code provides the owner with a the means for meeting and/or reducing the fire flow requirements. These options are listed below and may be incorporated in the building design either individually, or in combination with others. DESIGN OPTIONS • A 50% reduction in the required fire flow can be attained with the installation of a fire sprinkler system. Installation requirements can be found in the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2010, NFPA 13D or the Florida Building Code 2010 Residential Chapter 29, Section P2904. The reduction shall not reduce the required fire flow to less than 500 gallons per minute (GPM). • A 25% reduction in the required fire flow can be attained for homes with a fire area of 5,000 square feet or less when separated from other buildings by a minimum of 30-feet. • Based on Table 18.4.5.1.2 in NFPA 1, reductions in the required fire flow can be attained using different construction types and/or fire resistive materials. • Adding a fire hydrant and/or increasing the size of the water main distribution system to provide for a greater gallon per minute (GPM) flow. Is The Fire -Rescue Department will accept any other recognized fire flow calculation method as an equivalency to the FFPC, i.e. Insurance Services Office (ISO) Method, Iowa State University (ISU) Method, Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute Method. Page 291 of 478 1 Agenda Item #16. COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS What is fire flow? It's the amount of water available from a fire hydrant available for fire fighting. The fire hydrant must be within 1000' of the building being constructed, What is fire flow area? The fire area includes the total of all floor areas within the building, in square feet, is used to determine the required fire flow. This generally means the area within the surrounding exterior walls. Areas of the building without surrounding exterior walls should be included in the fire area if such areas are within horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. How do I determine the available fire flow for construction site? Complete the attached "Fire Hydrant Flow Test Application Form" and submit it to Tequesta Fire Rescue Administrative Office. Fire Rescue personnel will be scheduled to conduct the fire flow test of the water system nearest your proposed construction site. When the test is completed you will be provided with documentation of the test and an approval letter for Building Permit Application, if the water is available for your project. Is there a fee charged for a fire flow test? Yes, Fire Rescue administration will provide you the current rate for this test. Fee's need to be collected prior to the test being performed; you can call 501-768-0550 to check on the cost of this test. Page 292 of 478 Agenda Item #16. FIFE HYDRANT FLOW TEST APPLICATION REQUESTED BY: Amir J. Keshavarz, P.E. ADDRESS: 711 N. Dixie Hwy. Ste 201, —West Palm Beach FL 33401 PHONE NUMBER: 561-689-8600 FAX NUMBER: N/A PROJECT ADDRESS: 300 S. Beach Rd. Tequesta, FL 33469 FIRE FLOW AREA, if applicable 176,885 sg {t (Per definition on Fire Flow information Sheet) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: (use Florida Building Code type) TYPE OF PROJECT n Residential Building ❑ Commercial Building • Fire Protection System 0 IS THIS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EQUIPPED WITH A FIRE SUPPRESSION SPRINKER SYSTEM? YES FULLY SPRINKLERED ❑ NO YOUR RESULTS WILL BE FAXED TO YOU IF REQUESTED Attach the Fire -Rescue Department approval letter and a copy of this worksheet with the building's permit application. Submitted by: Name: (print) _ Company Signature: Cell # Page 293 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 1-166 FIRE CODE 19.1.6.2 The AHJ shall be responsible for designating the areas that require hazardous location electrical classifications and shall classify the areas in accordance with the classification system set forth in NFPA 70. 19.1.7 No Smoking. 19.1.7.1 No smoking or open flame shall be permitted in any area where combustible fibers are handled or stored or within 50 ft (15 m) of any uncovered pile of such fibers. 19.1.7.2 "No Smoking" signs shall be posted. Table 18.4.5.1.2 Minimum Required Fire Flow and Flow Duration for Buildings Fire Flow Area fe (x 0.0929 for m=) Fire Flow gpmt (X 3.785 forUmin) Flow Duration (hours) 1(443), 1(332), I1(222)* 11(111), 111(211)* IV(2HH), V(111)* 11(000), III(200)* V(000)* 0-22,700 0-12,700 0-8200 0-5900 0-3600 1500 2 22,701-30,200 12,701-17,000 8201-10,900 5901-7900 3601-4800 1750 30,201-38,700 17,001-21,800 10,901-12,900 7901-9800 4801-6200 2000 38,701-48,300 21,801-24,200 12,901-17,400 9801-12,600 6201-7700 2250 48,301-59,000 24,201-33,200 17,401-21,300 12,601-15,400 7701-9400 2500 59,001-70,900 33,201-39,700 21,301-25,500 15,401-18,400 9401-11,300 2750 70,901-83,700 39,701-47,100 25,501-30,100 18,401-21,800 11,301-13,400 3000 3 83,701-97,700 47,101-54,900 30,101-35,200 21.801-25,900 13,401-15,600 3250 97,701-112,700 54,901-63,400 35,201-40,600 25,901-29,300 15,601-18,000 3500 112,701-128,700 63,401-72,400 40,601-46,400 29,301-33,500 18,001-20,600 3750 128,701-145,900 72,401-82,100 46,401-52,500 33,501-37,900 20,601-23,300 4000 4 145,901-164,200 82,101-92,400 52,501-59,100 37,901-42,700 23,301-26,300 4250 164,201-183,400 92,401-103,100 59,101-66,000 42,701-47,700 26,301-29,300 4500 183,401-203,700 103,101-114,600 66,001-73,300 47,701-53,000 29,301-32,600 4750 203,701-225,200 114,601-126,700 73,301-81,100 53,001-58,600 32,601-36,000 5000 225,201-247,700 126,701-139,400 81,101-89,200 58,601-65,400 36,001-39,600 5250 247,701-271,200 139,401-152,600 89,201-97,700 65,401-70,600 39,601-43,400 5500 271,201-295,900 152,601-166,500 97,701-106,500 70,601-77,000 43,401-47,400 5750 Greater than295,900 Greater than 166,500 106,501-115,800 77,001-83,700 47,401-51,500 6000 115,801-125,500 83,701-%,600 51,501-55,700 6250 125,501-135,500 90,601-97,900 55,70140,200 6500 135,501-145,800 97,901-106,800 60,201-64,800 6750 145,801-156,700 106,801-113,200 64,801-69,600 7000 156,701-167,900 113,201-121,300 69,601-74,600 7250 167,901-179,400 121,301-129,600 74,601-79,800 7500 179,401-191,400 129,601-138,300 79,801-85,100 7750 Greater than 191,400 Greater than 138,300 Greater than 85,100 8000 *Types of construction are based on NFPA 220. tMeasured at 20 psi (139.9 kPa). 19.1.8 Vehicles or Conveyances Used to Transport Combustible Waste or Refuse. 19.1.&1 Vehicles or conveyances used to transport combustible waste or refuse over public thoroughfares shall have all cargo space covered and maintained fight enough to ensure against ignition from external tin: sources and the scattering of burning and combustible debris that can come in contact with ignition sources. 19.1 S 2 Transporting burning waste or refuse shall be prohibited 19.1.83 Trucks or automobiles, other than mechanical handling equipment and approved industrial trucks as listed in NFPA 505, Fire Safety Standard for Powered Industrial 7racl s Including Type Designations, Areas of Use, Conversions, Maintenance, and Operations, shall not enter any fiber storage room or building but shall be permitted to be used at loading platforms. 19.2 Combustible Waste and Refuse. 192-1 Rubbish Containers. 192-1.1 General. Rubbish containers kept outside of rooms or vaults shall not exceed 40S ft (1.15 m') capacity. �1 19.2.1.1.1 Containers exceeding a capacity of 51i; ft' [40 gal (0.15 m')] shall be provided with lids. (401� 1" 7 2012 Edition Page 294 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Lance Lilly From: Scott Cantor B. <SCantor@pbcgov.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:27 PM To: Amir Keshavarz; Morton Rose; Olive Bailey T.; Kathleen Farrell Cc: Bryan Hussey; Debbie Slutak; Mark Williams Subject: RE: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta Hi Amir — Your notes are consistent with what was discussed. I would like to stress that everything at this point has been conceptual. A detailed review of the engineering plans and calculations will take place during the permitting process. Thank you, Scott Cantor, P.E. Director of Land Development Department of Engineering and Public Works Land Development Division 2300 N Jog Rd, 3W West Palm Beach FL 33411 Phone: 561-684-4090 Olt, Land Development Web Site http://discover.pbcgov.org/engineering/Pages/Land-Development.aspx From: Amir Keshavarz <amir@keshavarz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:01 PM To: Scott Cantor B. <SCantor@pbcgov.org>; Morton Rose <MRose@pbcgov.org>; Olive Bailey T. <OBailey@pbcgov.org>; Kathleen Farrell <KFarrell@pbcgov.org> Cc: Bryan Hussey <BHussey@fbdev.com>; Debbie Slutak <DSlutak@pbcgov.org>; Mark Williams <mark@keshavarz.com> Subject: RE: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta * * * * * * Note: This email was sent from a source external to Palm Beach County. Links or attachments should not be accessed unless expected from a trusted source. ******* Good Afternoon, I'm following up on the below email and attached summary with exhibits related to our conference call on 1/10/2022 for the 300 South Beach Road Condominium project — now formally called "Savoia" Oceanfront condominium. Could the attendees of the teleconference meeting please confirm acceptance of the attached Meeting Summary and receipt of all included items? Page 295 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Thank you very much, Amir J. Keshavarz, P.E. Senior Project Manager YA KESHAVARZ m2 � —& ASS0('11ATES ChVIIL 9"HINIMIN4 1101var iac I CausutiTiam 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: (561) 689-8600 Mob: (561) 236-7592 Amirkkeshavarz.com I LinkedIn flinkedin.coml Keshavarz.com fkeshavarz.coml This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. GO GREEN- Please do consider the environment before printing this email. It takes an average of 5 liters of water to produce an 8.5"xll"sheet of paper. From: Amir Keshavarz Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 11:59 AM To: 'Scott Cantor B.'; 'Morton Rose (mrose pbc_ oq v org)'; 'Olive Bailey (OBailey(&pbc_ oq v org)'; Kathleen Farrell Cc: Bryan Hussey; Debbie Slutak; Mark Williams Subject: RE: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta Good Morning, Please see the attached meeting summary for our teleconference meeting on Monday 1/10/22 related to the upcoming 300 S. Beach Road Condominium project in Tequesta. Also attached are the documents referenced in the summary that were reviewed during the teleconference. Please notify us directly with any comments, additions, or corrections you believe are necessary based upon your recollection of the meeting. Please also forward this email with all attachments to any and all other recipients who will likely be involved in the project's upcoming coordination and permit review process. Thank you to everyone who attended the very constructive meeting. We are all looking forward to working together on yet another successful project here in Palm Beach County. Have a nice weekend, Amir J. Keshavarz, P.E. Senior Project Manager (�_s KESHAVARZ —& A ,w - () O I A►T E 8 — OVIi INGIN1119hf. I iuMTINQ I CONSULTING 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 Page 296 of 478 Agenda Item #16. West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: (561) 689-8600 Mob: (561) 236-7592 Amire,keshavarz.com I LinkedIn [linkedin.coml Keshavarz.com [keshavarz.coml This email nuty contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Anv review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. GO GREEN- Please do consider the environment before printing this email. It takes an average of'S liters of'water to produce an 8.5"x11"sheet of paper. From: Scott Cantor B. [maiIto: SCantor@pbcgov.org] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:57 AM To: Mark Williams Cc: Amir Keshavarz; Bryan Hussey; Kathleen Farrell; Debbie Slutak Subject: RE: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta Hi Mark — Sorry for the delayed response, I'm a little behind and still catching up. I will ask Debbie (copied) to set something up virtually. The Roadway employees involved in the last project may not be available this time around, but I'll leave it to Kathleen to determine who should be involved from Roadway. Thank you, Scott From: Mark Williams <mark@keshavarz.com> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:41 AM To: Scott Cantor B. <SCantor@pbcgov.or> Cc: Amir Keshavarz <amir@keshavarz.com>; Bryan Hussey <BHussey@fbdev.com> Subject: RE: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta * * * * * * Note: This email was sent from a source external to Palm Beach County. Links or attachments should not be accessed unless expected from a trusted source. ******* Good Morning Scott, Following up on my email below. Please advise when you can. Thank you. Mark A. Williams, P.E. Senior Vice President E H AVARZ —& ss� - A-ri:s— p..y 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: (561) 689-8600 Mob: (561) 389-8401 marknkeshavarz.com Page 297 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Keshavarz.com fkeshavarz.coml This email may contain confidential and privileged infarmation for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If You are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. GO GREEN- Please do consider the environment before printing this email. It takes an average of'S liters of'water to produce an 8.5"xll"sheet of luiper. From: Mark Williams Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:00 PM To: Scott Cantor B. <SCantor@pbcgov.or> Cc: Amir Keshavarz <amir@keshavarz.com>; Bryan Hussey <BHussev@fbdev.com> Subject: FW: 300 So Beach Road - Village of Tequesta Scott, Hope you are doing well. You may remember a few years ago we had a meeting with your office to discuss a project named Blowing Rock (Sea Glass) on South Beach Road on Jupiter Island in the Village of Tequesta. We are now engaged on another project at 300 South Beach Road and the plan is to demolish the existing building and construct a new condominium building. Attached are various documents from the Blowing Rocks project as described below. 1. Drainage variance report — Explains the various development projects in the area and their drainage patterns. The project we are involved with now is circled in red in the report and called Island House Southeast. 2. Survey —Topographic survey of the existing Island House Southeast property (subject property). 3. PBC meeting summary — Email Notes from our previous meeting on the Blowing Rocks project. These notes indicate that PBC allowed the Blowing Rocks project to discharge directly to South Beach Road using pre -post analysis and providing water quality treatment prior to discharge off -site. The criteria in Section 600 of the PBC LD manual would not be applied to this project. 4. Copy of email regarding the meeting summary —This indicates that PBC Roadway Production was agreeable to the drainage design approach as indicated on the summary provided above. The Ground 11-9-21 PDF is a preliminary ground cover site plan layout for the new project. We would like to discuss this new project with your office and Roadway Production to further define the existing drainage system and the requirements for this new project. We anticipate a similar approach to this new project as what was developed and required for the Blowing Rocks project. Please advise regarding a time we can either meet in person or discuss this new project via a zoom or go to meeting. Thank you and look forward to hearing back from you soon. Mark A. Williams, P.E. Senior Vice President —HAVARZ & rkSS C}#:frkrliS— ,�r cm.......... ' . ! a.n* loo.aw.ir. 7 . 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: (561) 689-8600 Page 298 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Mob: (561) 389-8401 mark(a�keshavarz.com Keshavarz.com fkeshavarz.coml This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. Tf you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. GO GREEN - Please do consider the environment before printing this email. It takes an average of 5 liters of water to produce an 8.5 "xlI "sheet of paper. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. Page 299 of 478 Agenda Item #16. X'I KESHAVARZ A ASSOCIATES 300 South Beach Road Island House Southeast Condominium Village of Tequesta PBC Meeting Notes January 10, 2022 A WebEx teleconference was held with Palm Beach County Engineering (PBCE) on January 10, 2022. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce PBCE personnel to the proposed project and specifically discuss drainage related items, criteria and permit requirements for the project. Attendees: • Scott Cantor, P.E. — PBCE Land Development • Olive Bailey, P.E. - PBCE Land Development • Morton Rose, P.E. — PBCE Roadway Production • Mark Williams, P.E. — Keshavarz and Associates • Amir Keshavarz, P.E. - Keshavarz and Associates The following items were discussed. Project Description: Existing Island House Southeast condominium site is to be demolished and redeveloped with a new multi -story condominium building. Sea Glass Project: As background on a similar project on Jupiter Island (Barrier Island) fronting South Beach Road, Sea Glass Condominium (F.K.A. Blowing Rocks) was discussed relative to pre-existing conditions and site topography and drainage criteria that the Village of Tequesta and Palm Beach County applied to the development. Specific discussion regarding the following: • History of the drainage permitting / review with Palm Beach County (PBC) and relief from the PBC section 600 drainage criteria. • PBCE Land Development Permits required for the project relating to a drainage review as part of the right of way permit and a pre versus post development stormwater runoff analysis with an overall reduction in the discharge from the site and providing water quality within the new drainage system. 1 Page 300 of 478 Agenda Item #16. Existing Drainage Patterns for six (6) existingdvelopments along the east side of South Beach Road adiacent to and includine, this broiect was discussed as follows: • A Drainage study previously prepared for the 6 properties was reviewed. The drainage study described how all 6 properties drained unrestricted to the South Beach Road right- of-way (R/W). • All 6 developments in this area, including this project area, drain via "bubble -up" structures and overland flow to the South Beach Road R/W, which then flows north within the swale along the east side of the R/W. • The runoff enters the PBC park site to the north and then discharges through a culvert to the Intracoastal Waterway. • All overland flow either percolates in the ground or makes its way ultimately to the intercostal waterway. • All 6 properties' topography slopes from the Dune line on the eastern boundaries of the sites to the west with significant elevation differences. Upcoming Proposed 300 South Beach Condominium Project: • A topographic survey for the site was reviewed and indicates an elevation difference from the dune line on the east side of the site to South Beach Road ranging from elevation 15.0 +/- to elevation 7.0 +/- on South Beach Road. • A preliminary Site Plan for the project was reviewed depicting the building footprint and the driveway locations. • A preliminary drainage plan superimposed on the site plan was reviewed on a conceptual basis and depicted catch basin locations on site, various piping and exfiltration system locations on -site and options to accommodate the roadside drainage on South Beach Rd. o Options related to South Beach Road roadside drainage were reviewed: ■ Option #1: to install pipe (under proposed driveways) along the frontage in the road R/W and connect to the existing driveway culvert to the North. ■ Option #2: a swaled section along the frontage in the road R/W. ■ It was decided that the frontage would be designed as a swaled section at this time consistent with existing conditions) and no additional piping within the R/W. o Discharge from the proposed on -site drainage system to the roadway was discussed: ■ PBC does not want any new drainage structures installed in the R/W that are connected to the on -site drainage system. ■ The on -site drainage system will be designed to "bubble up" into the roadway drainage system or roadside swales via sheet flow at the driveway connections. Page 301 of 478 Agenda Item #16. • A preliminary drainage report was reviewed and included pre and post development stormwater runoff rates. o The reduction in runoff for the 25 year — 3 day storm events was 0.375 acre-feet, based on a preliminary drainage plan with approximately 110 LF of proposed exfiltration trench. • Relief from PBC's Section 600 drainage design criteria was discussed. o Based on the above described existing conditions with unrestricted storm water runoff from the existing site and the proposed net reduction in runoff from the site with the addition of water quality storage and attenuation, it was agreed by PBC that the criteria in Section 600 of the Land Development Standards would not be applied to this project. o The net reduction in runoff and provingthe he required water quality detention would be acceptable. • Permitting was discussed and it was agreed that the drainage review for this project would be part of the right of wqy permitting efforts and submittals. • Access management was discussed - Scott Cantor indicated that we need to check the access management standards and discuss the proposed driveway locations with PBCE Traffic Division. • The location of the replaced sidewalk within the swaled section of the R/W was discussed o Mark Williams recommended the replaced sidewalk be located in line with the adjacent sidewalks to the north and south. • The need for a PBC Removal Agreement depending on the driveway material was discussed. Please notify the writers regarding any comments, discrepancies or misunderstandings of the items discussed, agreed to and indicated herein. Meeting notes prepared by: Mark Williams, P.E. and Amir J. Keshavarz, P.E. Attachments to these meeting: • Previous drainage analysis of the 6 properties on South Beach Road. • Topographic Survey of the proposed project. • Preliminary site plan. • Preliminary drainage plan. • Preliminary drainage report. Page 302 of 478 Agenda Item #16. KESHAVARZ —& ASSOCIATES— *iiA CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I CONSULTING Preliminary Drainage Report for: SAVOY - Proposed Condominium Project (300 South Beach Road) Date: January 25, 2022 (Revised May 11, 2022) Project No. 21-1393 Location The 2.26 acre project site is located at 300 South Beach Road between the Atlantic Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway in the northern end of Palm Beach County. The project site is bounded on the north by the Island House Northeast Condominium development and on the south by the Regency Condominium development. The project site is located within the Intracoastal drainage basin of the South Florida Water Management District / Florida Department of Environmental Protection. FEMA Flood Data The western portion of the project site behind the dune line is presently located within flood zone VE10 NAVD. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) is presently under review by FEMA for this area proposing a change from VE10 to flood zone AE7 NAVD. Existing Conditions The site is currently developed and in use as a residential condominium development. There are no formal stormwater management attenuation or water quality facilities located onsite. There is a drainage system within the pool area but this system only drains the pool deck into adjacent grass areas. The site survey and topography indicates that the developed portion of the site is west of the dune line. Of the 2.26 acre parcel of land, only 1.44 acres drains to the west and into South Beach Road. Site grades range from 15.0' NAVD +/- at the dune line to 7.16' NAVD at the western Property line (South Beach Road right of way line). The remainder of the site is east of the dune line and drains to the Atlantic Ocean. Page 303 of 478 Agenda Item #16. South Beach Road is a crowned roadway and sheet flows to the east and west sides of the road. There is no drainage culvert or collection system along the east side of Beach Road along the project frontage. There is a swale that conveys roadway drainage and the adjacent property (300 South Beach Road) drainage to the north. This swaled drainage system along the project frontage allows surface water runoff from this property and properties to the south to drain north along Beach Road and to discharge ultimately to the undeveloped land to the north of the Tequesta Towers Condominium building at 400 South Beach Road. Proposed Improvements The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the site for a multi -story condominium. The finished floor elevation will meet the current building department finished floor elevations associated with current FEMA elevation (listed above). The proposed minimum finished floor elevation is 1.0' above the proposed FEMA elevation (7.00' NAVD) or elevation 8.00' NAVD. The proposed stormwater management system will be constructed to meet the standards of the South Florida Water Management District and the Village of Tequesta. Stormwater runoff will be reduced from the pre -development conditions. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed to treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge by way of depressed swale areas and proposed exfiltration trench (see exfiltration trench calculations attached and calculations on the next page). Legal positive outfall will be provided by a bubble up sheet flow connection of the on -site drainage system to a swaled drainage system along South Beach Road. The bubble up inlet(s) will be located east of the property line outside the road right of way along the frontage of the property. Drainage control structure(s) will be installed on site to regulate discharge to the swaled drainage system on South Beach Road. It should be noted that the Village of Tequesta requires new development and redevelopment to retain 95% of the runoff from a 25 year — 1 day storm event. Stormwater retention is proposed to be provided by installing a combination of storm drainage exfiltration trench and gravity drainage wells for attenuation of the 25 year storm. The proposed stormwater management system will be an overall improvement to water quality treatment and a reduction of stormwater runoff from this site. There will be no adverse impacts to any Village owner or operated stormwater management system or to adjacent off -site properties. Surface Water Management System Calculations The drainage area associated with the redevelopment of the site is 1.44 acres which is the area east of South Beach Road and west of the dune line drainage divide. The existing site is currently developed with 0.93 acres of impervious area generating 0.86 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 1 day design event (10 inches of rainfall). The proposed site development will remain within the 1.44 acre landward portion of the site west of the dune. The site is proposed to contain Page 304 of 478 Agenda Item #16. 1.148 acres of impervious area that will generate 0.99 acre-feet of runoff during the 25 year — 1 day storm event. The proposed drainage system will be designed to provide a minimum of 0.24 acre-feet of water quality treatment which will be retained within a proposed exfiltration trench system. Minimum required Water Quality Treatment Volume (ac-ft) = 0.24 (see calculations below). The land use breakdown and calculations are as follows. EXISTING SITE: Existing site drainage area 1.44 ac Existing impervious area 0.93 ac Existing pervious area 0.51 ac Percent impervious 64.6 % Percent pervious 35.4 % Note these percentages are for the drainage basin only and do not depict the percentages for the overall site area. Runoff Calculation (25 year — 1 day storm) Q= (P-0.2S) (P-0.2S)/ (P + 0.8(S)) P = 10" S = 8.18 x 0.354 = 2.9 Q = 7.19" Existing site runoff (25 year storm) 0.86 Ac-Ft (7.19/12) x 1.44 Ac PROPOSED SITE: Proposed site drainage area 1.44 ac Proposed impervious area 1.148 ac Proposed pervious area 0.292 ac Percent impervious 79.72 % Percent pervious 20.28 % Note these percentages are for the drainage basin only and do not depict the percentages for the overall site area. Runoff Calculation (25 year — 1 day storm) Q= (P-0.2S) (P-0.2S)/ (P + 0.8(S)) k] Page 305 of 478 Agenda Item #16. P = 10" S=8.18x0.2028= 1.66 Q = 8.25" Proposed site runoff (25 year storm) 0.99 Ac-Ft (8.25"/12) x 1.44 Ac SUMMARY OF PRE AND POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: 25 YEAR— 1 DAY STORM EVENT Land Use/Discharge Comparison Table Existing Site Drainage Boundary (1.44 ac) Proposed Site Drainage Boundary (1.44 ac) Building Area (Impervious) 0.305 ac 0.86 ac (includes pool deck) Impervious Area (Beyond Building) 0.625 0.29 ac Total Impervious Area 0.93 ac 1.15 ac Pervious Area 0.51 ac 0.29 ac Water Quality (minimum required) None 0.225 ac-ft Site Runoff 0.86 ac-ft 0.99 ac-ft Site Discharge Volume 0.86 ac-ft 0.05 ac-ft The above analysis is a comparison considering typical site soil storage and retention requirements meeting the Village code for 95% retention of the 25 year — 1 day storm event. Considering the use of exfiltration trench and gravity drainage wells for stormwater attenuation, the following analysis assumes the retention requirement of 95% of the 25 year — 1 day storm event is equal to 9.5" of retention volume (95% of 10" of rain) over the site without consideration for soils storage other than what is utilized and calculated into the design of the exfiltration trench systems. 95% site runoff retention requirement for the 25 year — 1 day storm event (per Village Code) equates to 1.14 ac-ft (13.68 ac-in) of stormwater volume. Exfiltration system calculations have been prepared assuming the 13.68 ac-in of required retention is provided in the exfiltration trench. This equates to 236 linear feet of exfiltration trench. Refer to attached exfiltration calculations. The plans have been prepared at this time based on providing 250 linear feet of exfiltration trench. Based on the results of the test wells that will be installed to determine the capacity of the proposed drainage wells, the retention proposed to be provided in the exfiltration trench system will be reduced by the volume of discharge that the gravity wells will provide. The length of exfiltration trench will be adjusted accordingly following the analysis of the results of the test wells. The total volume of storm water retention (13.68 ac-in) will be provided based on the capacity of the drainage wells and the capacity of the exfiltration trench combined. 4 Page 306 of 478 Agenda Item #16. WATER OUALITY: Based on the 1.44 ac site drainage area west of the dune line and the 1.15 acre of impervious area, the site is 75% impervious. Water quality treatments will be provided based on 2.5 times percent impervious or 2.5 x 0.7972 which equals 1.99 inches over 1.44 acres or 2.87 ac-inches or 0.24 ac-feet. Refer to exfiltration trench calculation provided for trench lengths and sizing. Additional exfiltration trench and storage volume has been provided that exceeds the minimum for water quality. Note that a meeting was recently held with Palm Beach County Land Development and Palm Beach County Roadway Production departments regarding this project and the proposed drainage system design criteria for discharge to South Beach Road (PBC owned roadway) drainage system. The Palm Beach County (PBC) representatives indicated that the drainage design considering a pre and post development runoff analysis was acceptable assuming that the post development discharge from the project was less than the pre development discharge. Also, PBC indicated that the standard PBC drainage connection criteria will not be applied to this project. W� � Digitally signed by Mark A �•QhP'• ••tt/,9 �.� Williams Mark A. Williams, P.E. (Florida License No. 34944) ��P' JGENsF '�'cn', DN: c=US, o=KESHAVARZ * NO. 34944 '.,t : AND ASSOCIATES, * = dnQualifier=A01410C000001 May 112022 9 . STATE OF : W 7CEOF48E8D00003F7F, =C)T . �tOR`pP, �,, - cn=MarkAWilliams Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. ;,6`' S/ONAL ��. Date: 2022.05.11 17:16:20 ��. Certificate of Authorization No. 4897 04'00' Mark A. Williams, State of Florida, Professional Engineer, License No. 34944. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Mark A. Williams on the date indicated here using a SHA authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and scaled and the SHA authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Page 307 of 478 � 0 a • C y S�R 7[Ot7 S. BeSach Ro�a�d T M' Air � " 3 Agenda Item #16. 11 � n E 124 y6\}yI •, •, s� _ - st eO�Ho ------------- W 19 29509' 225M' _ - _ _ ❑ �, �0 2 -C a6 C1 J m W Q — Po - -- ._. - m C7 - w - g oy� araa bsY.,J - - a------------- o +— 1 o ..`'• �\ i ` ............... �'— /. ✓ ROPE Np lo,,.,. o 1 p9"W �10 ` pg s s %4��n.�"esY'g_�gEe'=v¢g P— Rn—a2R Agenda Item #16. 1 I I I - - 1 I = I I - 1 I mm�P I I '.I I ' I '.I 1 3 335 I^ I 3Nn IYJ1 I I ............. IN ............... 1 la Y I& I W I =o I > �g .tee 3j 1 W Q J =r ¢ ua+ a I x=mom IR J a0 � W y NSoH I yo d in I I as co) o I 1 I a I I F I I I J 1 1 a I I I IP I I^ I I ffg J Z a I I« jI I w m W m I o� I � I o � x 13 z F g=g I - In o 1 R5 " $ - SI ------------- Ir 1 I IN I � W 1 I m I, 1 I; 1 I I _ 1 I I gm I J 4, I��ild�r ' N �3i Hal 33s i¢ ............... \ I 92 I e I F='mm yoo _Wa I aq�n I I @g�.u'= 3>,gsm"ln WIN H _3=ys.x�3§2z@Da.. na:.^ Paoa @iP of 4]R 69tH WIRIO-Id'VISHAO31 UVO'd HJVJU H1110S OW IN 0 AIMINOUNOD 1NOU4NV9D Wr XHGNI NIA�VdCl 28 VLVQ DNIG 6 tSNRNN-Vld SLDHIIHJ'dV AOAVS AOUCHANS'IN IUAHON 199HS NgAOD - - 69b££ VQRIO'Id `VZSHAO3Z QN02I HJV3ff HZROS OU£� IN 1NNOOjN3NdaJ0 TD • �W 0 - -- 6IVG ONINOZ I3A�I L/1 S2I3NNtl'Id SZJHZIHJ2I'Z �OL V S aoxaamS 'IN I UAHON QNfloug NF 1(1 glIS u z O W h a a 15= u z u o _ > v v. F 6 ;✓� v�"i C: F � � m zx p U O x ¢ a a ¢ � F � 2 Q F o r v � z a ccoa`� zwgw�a$ +�1 W F F F g Q L Q 0 � ✓ NQI20'I3`NLSHR,HL QN02HJNHff HIIIOS Off, IIINIINOQNOJ SNONdNNRJO O SLfi9rfIflIHX INAflOdNdAISV�M A1D DVdS NgdO `� 3i0 ry S2I"M. , dNNId SLJHLIHJ2d o♦� 7 AOUCS'NIAHONAOAY ZOINF Id3LIS JNINOZ g_ d c q< P� \yPRA EpEaEI� / �/ ! WPSGA2vvee--.. / i � I M i F-E'JPtw is / i ED % � F Y 6M1�' ha�ry6 � / U� � tE0. aS ' wr, \\NP a��gAaPo S'0t�, III I �Pw I II I i II II 'III I U I N w I o° o w z 0 w w 0 0 ❑ L) El El❑ �Izz e� o ❑❑oi E -? ° E �� I b ❑ - — r /- ❑ / ------------------------------------------------------------ r' I v r � y -- z_o E w sib = who WIR10Id`VdSHA03L QV02HJVJU HLROS OW A,% O rIV6yb£ .L'3Q �dIii.Ls }gd N SWVdDvlQ�SRINYYOQNOJLNON3NVa0 SNOIias ",�a S2dNNId SLJ3LIHJ2Z ,O,HS aS'N �O0 SSO?ID ONIQ IIf1g o3 IMAVN PT'11+'7R3 lN31VN HIM Nt3W o_.., ______________________________ a _ - _ 3M-I AldONd lSVa - fl"_IflV_i11_O_"I1_V_ < f--r--r A5Vfl,L9S NV32i �o r-- ___ z a OH dO d A Vfld S CIS F I z zllz ca ° x d Q W Ia O qI " W a �a o v y W W O vZ z .------------------------------------_----__� ~ +' 6L6i'IJJJ IN U + cG 3 3 a z w I W w z z Z 0 - as ox xDgaa s a s � son u -- r SNDVHdHIS 3QIS Q a r _ - - ---- r" �w "' � ]M"1 AlN1dONd ILLNON '� � I 1 W F _________________________ kC = I J,HDiIIR DiUI(I'IIDII QIISOdONd �e ..0-,I01 _ U P I I O w'U U z I F I , 0 I Q w W G N W m &�& U N i U J Q J 0)0 Z— p„ Cd� ?1JV fldfl.LS ,LN 213 yp t p -- x - o � G W i N J W F ___________________ rc eea� ( m N - 3Ml AlNHdONd lS3,t1 ++- +� JQJa fA _ =a 69t6£ VGR10-IL1'VISHAO31 UVO'd HJVJU HIIIOS OW AIMINOUNOD INOU4NVgD IN 0 Wr 6 RNX—VId SLDHIIHJ'dV AOAVS AOUCIAMS'N IUAHON NVId IaAHI QNfiouD. - - �1121- I w IN I C)o 7/7777777777� 0 4 -11, Lo d o o V6 -------- ------ ---------- — -------- ------- - - 69b££ VQR10'I3 `VISHIIOY3.L QV02I HJVJU HIIIOS OW IIIQLYOQNOJLNON3NVaJ �'°�. �T�' ♦�/ - -- _ N Q S2"dNNId SLJ3LIHJ2dYQ AOAVS AOUCHS'IN �UAO0 NVId Z I3A3I A LIN3InIF �z ' rZ rrcarm ziNnaoxa c � I e I I I Q IED s z O (II "17VNV!J Z U(jIS {Ii1MOI � �I c`© i I p, s Ntl`J P a � N =— o a 00 L I I ® � II I � 1 J 7aI l � I C Q {) I g G -= - W P 4 1 _ - „ - - - TY 5i FI Bey �2 y - YµOY Ef RpP� - - - 69b££ VQRIO'Id `VISHAO3.L QV02I HJVHH H1110S OW YQRIIQILYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 6 - -- 1��%-d OI M Q S2I"d_[(ja S,LJ'3,LIHJ2I'd AOL �VS aOUCHANS'V IUAHON 9-i TdAH"I"IVDldAL s w r �o a� _ M C/) a a�y i 1 om �_ J'-- _�= �a �_ / _ ----------- -- —"-- _ YftOYtil 0.Ef 69b££ vanfO7d `VJ.SdIIZY3.L QVO2I HJVJU HIIIOS OU£ YQIIIIQILYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 �� '* 6 °o,,,°�� - -- " NV'Id (-(, Q S2I"dNNtl'Id S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd AOL �VS lr aoxaamS'vu�aaaoa SI3A3I IVDIdAL - - 69b££ VQR10'I3 `VISHAO3.L QVO2I HJVJU HIIIOS OU£ YQIIIIQILYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 0 - -- Q S2I"dNNV'Id S,LJ'31IHJ2I'd �����'°�. o,,,o�� lr aoxaamS 'IN � UAHON NF Id 3002I 69b££ VQRIO'Id `VISHAO3.L QVO'd HJVJU H.LIIOS OW YQRIIQILYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 0 - -- Q S2I"dNNV'Id S,LJ'3,LIHJ2I'd �����'°�. o,,,o�� lr aoxaamS 'IN � UAHOa N6 Id 3002I 2ldddll 69tH tl`V Y3L UV02HJVJU H1110S OW IMWOQOD 1NONV0 _ - qJ _ S2H,5N� NtlId S.LHLI-H- J'dV NFId��200 73 Q 1OAVS aoxaams'vu aaa0aYQ QNRO?IO Q302I� INd i n9 yDkl R �� �lb"1ti� I � 1 I = - 1 O 1 I ---'�- to n r` �c I O F ----- ---- - _= C) I L�J IJ _ S4 as ---I DR I Per a FF o IF -�-r- ' x a L 11OII z I 3 Z ` fly ----- 4 ^ 3 yy �_ _ ClD � � g /R�N��R '•➢ 0 ow s o o " z� �z QN02I HJV3ff H.LROS OU£� IN INON3NdHJ0 AOAVS x- �»r�T' / - -- NV -Id I3n3I ` Q S2IHNNtlId SLJHLIHJ'dV c q xr ma F-I _ a 69tH VGR10-IL['VISHAO31 UVO'd HJVJU HIIIOS OW IN AIMINOUNOD INOU4NV9D0 su RNX-VId SLDHJIHJ'dV NVICI NO AOAVS OUCIAMS'IN IUAHON 0 IN 9-£ S-IHAH-I -IVDldkL 6t'££ VQRIO'I3 `b'.Ls3R(iH.L QVO'd HJVJU HZIIOS OW YQf1IMWOQNOJ ZNON3NV9D T OAT TS „��"' ° s ��� 6 '°�. ✓' ^�• NVICI BOO' m S2I3N'Id SZJHZIHJ2I'Z Ntl LA1 VH aoxaamS'NIUAHOa I 6 L SI3A3I ��IdAL E8 w°a w 411 Hill III iiii lip Y �F z ------------- - ---------- — w N n O ? x x €r f- i w a 0. H �+ z =a 69b££ dQI2O'lA-VJ SHRZYH,L UVON HJdHH H.LROS O(1£ LQRINIYYOQNOJ.LNONHNdHJO TT AA �T C+ a ezO �♦� �» �T' ♦ •.. .^ ..- _ S2iHNXVld S,LJHIIHJZId AOL 1 V S °»�o�>' l� aOaaaMS 'In l aaaOx Nb 1d d0OH NIVIN r. zz, z w (� +x 6v q ro� wam Ca +a dr wQ x 2 z ® ❑ ❑ ❑ O _ 3� �a £ VQ1N07d`VJ.SdRZY3.LQV02I HJVJUH1f1OSOU£J�69tl MINOQNOD 1NON3NV9DO ����� s �♦� �'o.�md ♦ / ao,,�o�>a lr i S2I"dNNV'Id S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd AOxas:�S vu l xaaOx NVICI 3002I 2ldddll 3 ram, 694££ VOINO"Id'V.LM09,I. QVOU HOVAH HIfIOS OO£ YQf1INIWOQNO�.LNON3NV300 a `°a �♦� �.— < •�•"tlTMYO• °"'�"s""."11OAdN'`•'S10°" �cam' d S $ S sd3NNV'Id S. DaJIHJNV. A 7 AOL S Yy �02IQ�MS'W LiI�gO�I NOUVAH IH DNIGMEI s Q ] V asaOjo3 (LN02L3 19EI2ILS) Mt41 e yak 1�\1 F-� y w Fi H =R goy vv�� o Pq gill 'rHMMOMMIneaasoaoaa" •< '° e. <Q r, a. E g� 69tH VG1N0-IL['VIS3AO31 UVO'd HJVJU HIIIOS OW IN 0 AIMINOUNOD INOU4NVgD AOAVS 6}may. Wr N011VAa'13 9N I(FIL19 NRNX-VId SLDHIIHJ'dV AOUCIAMS'N IUAHON (9(IIS) HLnOS —4 ti ti nmm rc IM IHD13H DKTC]ITne ausojowd M-Jol 69t'££ dQRIO'I3 `d.LSHR(iH.L UVO'd HJVJU H.LROS OW YQRINIYYOQNOJ,LNON3NdaJ0 AOAVS „��"' °s �O �♦� 6 °o,,,o�� lr ^�• NO11,�i na73 DQ$ `y _ SNRNN-Vld S,LJHIIHJ'dV aoxaams'vu aaaoa (2IvLSa pxo'48Q- a�e El 0 17, 3 _ 1 w -- 1F �V - z T, i i rz7� a sb � c _ �- I LE _i I I li II lid I I i i I I I __ i I I II II I I i i II II II _ i i i I I I __ i 111DIJII WO IIf1N(14SOAONA'e =a fiyh££ VQ1N0'IdVZS3RU31 QVO'd HJVJU HZIIOS OW YQIMINOQOZNONVgD 6}may. �♦� ♦ 1111L NoiiVAH�a IIngJNIG _ ¢i tSNRNN-Vld SZJHZIHJ2 1,VS °��°e 7�♦ OUCH MS INIUAHON i3QIS) HL2ON r �f - __ x I 0 W 1 w R V N 1M�I ^ z - z Ll S - - - Of ynoian owa�nna aasodoaa H � . _ems m«�sill o mcaaam,» +mmaoa«en AQAV\ ��� \� �� ___ _ _. 2�w�xll&3 \ ^ �xNa »cw m�� vw�wmw 2s q�i w� msn � Jd2jj \ ) \, } k \ }} co g @ \}\ \// . §co .` § , \ } ) � \ ( / . . .. . .-. \ \& \ ) ƒ / \ \ ` 9 / r- §Lu _ ! . ` ( ONO (If R § |§| |§ \ o§ INN&= \ � |.| 2 |) , !( / � : •| § \\ ( \} R ®` §j} §| § \ } 69b££ WIRIO'Id `VJ.SHAO3.L aV02i HJV3ff H.LROS OU£� YQRIMINOQNOO•LNON3NVa00 x— ��� •'°�.r�T' 6 ° - -- " Q S2I"dNNtl1d S,LD'31IHJ2I'd AOAVS o,,,°�� lr aoxaams 'vu aaaoa S�NI2I3aN32I DNIG IIfla UM J6_9lIItl£ VQ1N07d`VJ.SdRZYH.LpQVOHHJVHHHlilOSOO£ Y VLYOQNOJ,LNONHNVHJO 6"*�.w�"' �� NV-ldAIIS ALH.AVS V� SBMNNV7d S.LJfl,LTJZ[V AOL �VS aq ao�''�� AOHCIIMS Vu.L2lHfl02l HHI'I'IHAH'I SSH DH wa - z >m m =0�y0 3>w od, wma wLL° mmw V - a„ ��,zw z p oma ",a/' i wz owo3oo aU o`w' LL°zz mm mN - e I Z J ma w mowoa LL w¢z� ZK pFFmO° mxa� �mZQw z�z ao Fwm NPyPi NP�o� /� W a'a' Q y p� ttoazraOw� xJ�O D 6 ~ mil- w}� J wm ozw� (nix i S.��xw"WP�xnvoea� pox JW W oe�o�rwzn � L cwi >��axm°`np ° °� mMQ z�o�o iwti �raao ttzm�p 8� -8. _ PI ,.], F W �UzwwO�im wtt0" w yUm w o- wN� r rvN w" f4w KWQ W wU =~OU °wu� OUQwO ttiOwX� ¢o�wNr~n0 xmmWW� U m�5 U x° wwN 4W w0 K txJ wtn J o i l WJ(n W=u) O==r zaa Ow�V;0a00 zz � p z - z w z0 -- z _ _ 2 Z Z K +� ', m r wU' �w Qm O Joy w� zU - omwowrc - _ wCrcw K I J xxm w w�¢ o?a> mLLzm3 wwop ��wox tiFaz zzmLLr a •, m LL l _ � .1 z I m z = t oo�zF J a¢aaa`.o wo � z � zaa -� a Na°+ w o xo �°->� r a 4 w n o > � � r °waoJ o�az ��aw w aa imoLL°>� pmLL 0 �wawp oJy�� pz¢m a oFQ�W o°�� wmLL� m¢ wy o°xz zn'� a0 gU�3 a°mOi avpiO� Sao Opxm Wza�� �pzi wa4z .n 6 4 E o O w g m ` °m°d K w6w pQ0 iLL Ow vii mQx0- Qx m0 wz J°d OLLO W.'. O¢Na °U wjuw w3�x imzQ zCQ �j moz� --_ -_- 0 z'.,I aZ Wpprij0 pr ww�F Oozaw i z°a om ttZO-,2 OOp> _ti�N O a�zaUU x6T Y�w~ I am�LLx� >p00 °w F U=o wozGaG� mm° LL v��Qd wx UO(�96 >6ry El o 9 °a vLL { w _ owJw ' 1 / h•.4\ �LL m as p og�=� yy m> ./ ,. m m E c x pox w vnt m3'd wiz>m 1 �w oap zQLLmw �2 3worcwa o?wO2m po z w oo�wz o _ _ - 1. E rya wax m °O - Ez°'o- voa�awiF,--- OjFaY w¢mZY w¢z�o�OawaFpzwp~z- �b >p¢-O °K¢ ' _> LL°OUm n 0 OO d oo Wv3o=WE, xQ¢ � �' zz �z� FIw xO¢00 Um�m w o _ ° wLL o�mtt wuwwwo�oa 5 ��g z o 0 w Q� ac mE LL9¢ -�3��agOmwp mod(a��_ou��w oo a?>�a- o Nnp o 0— w e LL J O Z LLU Z oo� N and z'sm� oio3���a�¢i amw�°gym w��Ka� °w�� °2� oy °a °Y CL' i 0 W W zo O �m�E�v "�¢¢"➢-� H °oLLRaxo roo -¢ w wn oi$ LL J CL U` "wz CY mm wwaw �rc and o tea- as NE o�waw��mriF Q SwLLx°zmm Fo °�" oowzrry ac�� zawu�� gLL wWa> ®ao y> mmw�s �= moo om g CO Z = °orca a ° ,dr p m? oza�ppOzo wok woo-a'o szpz `�rc¢o gip¢ - W H Y U mop o� mo3" "g °o" fn mw 2 o-z g.p r x �LL Om°s a ° �Ny7 pwo ma -oom -� >� w o w C� Z W !Y W Y d In _ a _ggo Nz pa°�N�a w= __ F mo �F°zpa M - w a;���a O w momw3 gw g>u°aw Os, oa�zpLL wo p wood 9� EQ w zmJ ° w => p ��`-' yw F Z � H aoF° X oo� °U pry -wma rc" - and-= _ Z do,2N p�Fw'w z�a�+ _ mzQ3-�LL,py¢w �a;�?.�zs��o -OLLwmao =c� as ma3 wF¢g yz °w �==a > aU p= �' - dOCCOW (L m wT n� °Qm�� W a �w °w vaio [�Qsw?r woa BOO mQ Dwwm Qdr Ow ova �� ��� wjLL m� _ Q UJO rm 3E-�N- LLo nQrvur pmQwj��wpw-zz wO °w-3— z w� m m m VO- JJ J oo ¢o = d - o°pm�w� Q m'z -LL? d�o��~°m�w�M1 W-a�sM .. wza°ozmc�awLL °woLLom rFxQci w °o 000zWLL°° o0 °°°°mw>a �oaa¢o°� 0 °z-pxw� -W u �m1 o�° _ LL UnQ a3=°ten -' �°O�ozz LL rKm� awJwrvQ�QOmzx 000zm�o� m p °G~m°LLLL 0000�o °Z 2woo m 2 LL �au`�° 3 - �aa- m w - a�pzzQ�n-�mm�Jx�xEO05 mpmUz> p�wwaaw -_oo�a�Q tiF ozyymFvatij oMeo - - ¢LL°-oQ° o _ Jowm tiww wm< � z z d O z���zmm �oaao°��zy��az r� aJ<=zzNLL z adaaodad'.11a 7 w �o�^w Q w°aw=moo 'ow oLL��wzw�zo xo p,�-°zQwoaQ w°o w o zzzzazzzv,zzm�Wa� - z a - (n aa��w°a °� zzwwaLL� = o� Jf 6yba vanfO7d `VJ.SdRZYd.L YQRINIYYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 T O T .O �♦� ♦ ♦ NdZd �i J, r�,r1V5' 'r1,r1I'1 'j'r11�H'j ry L/� S2I"dNNtl'Id S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd L ,T °zydo SS3d9l 3Qv'w ix s i z w imO II r C7 aLu> o l J W an N - sOtiop �p�n UrO000 "III Z W 00 w@7�Opw a oO�Fp oi�w�w "o I Y W o`�� of J rn p Qz 0 o=o w oo� gawk c�i�a Tw=m N�� a w�m� woN oozw Quo �LL wz ow�w �aw� omN� wo wiOtOw �¢ viozi fGQ Jdz Z�=p � w vrijw� _f9 g mom`-r o000 � °mom _ �w H -n r KLLKyW U' �uQi 2aWwK �WR p -- _ wro dW6� w �oawp° o 0 PA — T ---- Z, ,ol i- - J. ; © -; -r-; I ; Lt�_il'' ------------- 3 w -----= 58 z I - 1 - ¢ /GROE �00, ii--iiillll £ VQ1N07d `VJ.SdRZY3.L' QVO'd HJVJUH111OSOU£ MWOQNOJ,LNON3NVHJ0 J�69t,l T OL T� HV y ��� ♦ ♦ ,1 11L.L'3t3�s S S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd ,T LA, °vdo 7I� 0"[Ctl'Id HONUHMS'Vu L213fl021 Z'IHAH"I N`�N oP4ENpVt pROPER��� N�""04 R31l to d�� SeNSO"I II i E�,E i Z 4 Y } Q _ WI I J � N r J W W Q J (n ll n � l � m o � J tt i� J I z v � W O LEE a 3 �a a 0 „ EI �II g z r 9� 'III w o w o , U � O Oil UO too o > 1was n mamd �_wa¢ �cJyyaF azw NN Kwzu U 01 JOKwwxjr, O � �6011�033° A fit wuU G 5 ttH O0 >>O' M m1Ug ooilQ t 4 0t01 - aPz - Him, w� aJ DN,� 9FPVR�GON6P� -_� m 1111 •�R2'�anP"W x Uoz Qp UUYOwzFw - rowQ �KOZwZ�F� wWNONF vio?SuxU'xwwUw S F \\ ww�/ w� / -� � -ww N�Opztxiim Qm_uw_>zu0 OF R�AO/� K OOzt90Ud dttrxiiwttuwi�¢� �QF QN02I HJV3ff H.LROS OW YQRIIQILYOQNOD1NON3NV9D0 AOA` T�7 6 °o lr NVId A,Ld3VSHAII - I-INaNNvld szDHilxJxe �/ °�� aoxaamS'NIaaaoa oI 9£SIJAHII6DIdAL r LL w w Z Ky c m zoW ZOO Z Q U -Ji a i�Q I I aLw;F [O d Q}� a I I w� J o w LL J � U � LL a w Q LL F J (n EA0 z 4 II rp 4 �w II � Il w� 0 e --------------- 0 x XI x x x Lj Ell i i ❑ � 3 .. ❑ I I' I ❑ I 6 ❑ FEC C' FEC ❑ F ® ® g 0 b 1 b Nz m •• r I m 1 � _ RR74,�I 1 g77 R L� iJl ------------ � =a 69b££ VQRIO'Id `VISHAO3.L HJV3ff H QN02I .LROS OW- YQRIIQILYOQNOJ,LNON3NVaJ0 T HV OL T� � ' 4 �� 6 °ov,o�s ,r�M . q _ 1�I�rld �.L�.3�SI'I V� S2I"dNNtl'Id S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd ,T LA, 7r aoxaamS'INIUAHON 6 L SI3A3I I��IdAL $ ~l M d $a L.L 0 LZ > m cw) W w Z zow r Z Q Op u -Ji t1 a F77 Of Q}of w� J o w J LL D U< L�j LL a w Q LL F J (n �x 0 z -------------- ------------- �w ----- ---------------- w a=a M x x x x x x ❑ �„ ❑ I ❑ FEC 6 ❑ FEC El C' 0 � ggg a FIe_ v� �I x� =a . ii--iiillll . .L . J69tls ValxoIL`vIsanaHI QVO'd HJVHa HIfIOS OU£ YQRll WOQNOJ,LNON3NVHJ0 6� ��� ;r` �q - -- Nv-I.1 AIH-3vs'. ai - V� SURNX—VId S,LJH,LIHJ2I'd T OL,T TS HV 6 ov,o�� l r Hoxaams 'vu aaaoa LN mom ~l r ar TIM -- J do q s too a" - co Ea too x x Y w w I I P Z aIL a d J o LL J LL � LL J O Q OU �U x °z T=95' only appg O \ _ - sy Cf II — - u�o. a� � r FED 0 FED � 0�000 _ EAIMEW _y _ Im- N ° j wig =a Agenda Item #16 a q q 6917U VQRIO-m,V.LSHflou UVONHDVHHHznosOo� WfIINH�OQNOO .LNON3NVHDO �� \/ .., m., S'UNNVId SIDHJIHDdV �OA�S fl021QHA�S Lti L21Hfl021 Agenda Item #16 6917U VGINO-m,v LSHf1d3.L UVONHDVHHHznosOo� Wf1INH1iOQNOO ,LNOu4mvHOO T ' ��...,_ �� „.. m- ��a �w.,�� S,LJ3,LIHO2Id,w,wPqA,VH tm,,Ncl,,�, ,• ...... F)OSSQ w N s Ll O L ,T MS L4INHHoa �e 0 _ o� oxw wog _ xwm I I a� ao�m a a<�� w dp asp I w� awl w"a �oaJ < gg oo�woB� � a I �° Agenda Item #16, a a w V HDVE[ a ` ICIOS daL avoxx�aaaxznosool WfIINII�OQNOO .LNONHNVHOO T '� ` �♦` �f ,.m�.,�„ ,m-�,��a ,w.,�� F�oSSQ w o M S'UNNv Id S,LJ3,LIHDdV A VH O�T aoNUAMS L4INHHoa f A... da Item IN 6, a ro 69tU vQINo-m v.LsHHd3L UVONHwaaHznosOo� Wf1INH�OQNOO .LNON3NvHO0 ` �` � 1l m�., m- °a F�oSSQ v e FBI o S'UNNv1d SIDIIIHMV �L4INHHO2l AOAV S AONGAAkS a a 7r �7 — �ry g Q Ka 4 Erc _ r - o 6 Y K o a+^R o 9 I N I ®� / UI a ^m Qe r o z F a • o ,o K N I by xr.EFxIT • • G P] w x r LL � P 0 O K aa S o �eloil S N UNE , : �ry , s �l ' d a °aW a / w m? a wrss VGINOIj,visHflO avoxxwaaxznosOOl WfIININOQNOO,LNOu4mvHOO T j J ` or* ♦ �� �'� ^^' S2IHNNF"Id S,LJH,LIHO2Pd F)OSSQ o N L1OA V S 30NGAAkS'L4INHHO2l s E s { x 359ay Eo. , uct'�' TSMV HJWH HMORW flININOUXOD INOU4XVaDo INN S'UNNvId S13111 HDdV AOAVS GA Ak S 4111 N H 8 0 M M I I I L13-0TNZ:1'Nc_1�1 ZI 111111 It J�, 9 H auh tin 1 1 1 PIN I AN fit IN 00 t11 o d w�u toll 1 Hit 1 1 M, it my yfa put H; N 10— ANTate; mot no Qo�6 it! Q N! j pig iw till a W ip 0 1 HUN 1 PH 1M Mu N! Mar I M a N Ems 1 11 a. "Ji a 'mjt F .1 all Q My t 2-1 M Hu! PEI pu t , Q_'� , Hit M out NOR till N Y IN! up 01 loci MAN Mil Nq OR% Hju Q N_ pit! it HP 0% HOW pin UM, 1 01 into a a I oa OWN all" areaw, Hug %Nogg j� Hp 112 Qm I s.A 11,w "Will Q! ims .0-M 1101 In CHI! IM!l �vau_,'Lui't E" gag aE M 1 H A h fall 1111h 11 UH HHH 1U IN Hum! , IM! M", H QUM olu Agenda item #16. 696££ VGRlO7d'VIS911NJ, M UVOy HOVHB H,L(10500£ � LUTE' L9_°sfuS'Sv,.yliH xiaVl 4uuti LLL 'IVAOUddV IWllNIINOUNOO IN0MANVA0O am,faemg prxe7 • saaouu9rx� JIOI� N'V'ld d.LIS 2I0d [�OAVS 6�ZVIJ0S F Z2IYAVHBd�I SN`d'ld DNINEIRNIDN� �t �o�,a,��aa aaoo ' c iW �m 3 5 3 x z o -�Wti 3 w < Q 3 �n tZ�i O [> 00 �{ N. 0 0 0 0 0 W II II II II II II II � � W. � H 4 _ -21 o e� z ry I - „ � 4 8 4 - n e, g gg o I o 8$ y, g 11 M. 3 � �4^ I i �o .� d �pc'•sr�stera p5 '.y6b FFv'�o: y01 .I B ss` I w � o, a' RA- za XX x 0 gggg W e r a Q a N 1 x e � B® o ■Q � 9 i 2 � yy " d t� U v 3 d o a i _ Q a _ s" a ``,'tea CL F / Agenda Item #16. s" 111 L 2.5TWO" OVER 1.5' SP 9.5 ASPHALT PAVEMENT) IILTACK COAT BETWEEN ASPHALT q 0.05 GAL/SY; RC-70 PRIME COAT ON BASE • 0.10 GAL/SY IL__14" COMPACTED LIMEROCK BASE (LBR 100) OR CRUSHED CONRETE (LBR 150) IN 8" MAX. LIFTS 98% DENSITY PER A.A.S.H.T.O. T-180. —12" COMPACTED SUBBASE, 98X DENSITY PER A.A.S.H.T.O. T-180. TYPICAL PAVING SECTION MUD SET, RAISED PAVER BLOCK MTU CURB OR HEM CURB � TYPICAL 111 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ELEVATION OF BASE AND SUBME IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAVER THICKNESS LAYER PER MKIF. SPECS. W COMPACIED LYERD% BASE (UBR 100) OR RCA (CRUSHED MNREIE—LBR 150) N C MAX. UFTS 9K DENSITY PER AASH.T.O. T-180. 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 98X AASHTO T-180 TYPICAL PAVER SECTION BEACH ROAD RIGHT OF WAY NOTE: ALL PAVEMENT MARIONG WITHIN THE LNTTS OF THE PAVERS SHALL BE COLORED PAVERS. ALL EDGES SHALL BE SET WITH CONCRETE PAVER PATTERN, SELECTION AND SPECIAL BANDING, ETC. SHALL BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS MUD SET, RAISED CURB OR OONCREIE TY r PINIER BLOCK S1f5w CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ELEVATION OF BASE AND SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAVER THWESS LAYER PER MANUF. SPECS. /L 11- COMPACTED LArEROCSc BASE (LBR 10D) OR RCA (CRUSTED COHIiEIE—LBR 15O) IN r MAX LIFTS 98X DENSITY PER AAS.H.T.O. T-180. MIN. 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 98X AASHTO T-180 PAVER SECTION DETAIL NOTE ALL PAVEMENT MARIONG WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PAVERS SHALL BE COLORED PAVERS. ALL EDGES SHALL BE SET WITH CONCRETE. PAVER PATTERN, SELECTION AND SPECIAL BANDING. ETC. SHALL BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS PROPOSED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Page 346 of 478