HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Environmental Advisory Committee_Tab 03_1/11/2023Agenda Item #3.
Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC)
STAFF MEMO
Meeting: Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC) - Jan 11 2023
Staff Contact: Thomas Bradford, EAC Chair Department:
TITLE
Draft Recommendations to the EAC on the Capital Improvements Element of the VOT Comprehensive
Plan for Consideration of the Village Council and Staff.
This document and any attachments may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by
completing our Accessibility Feedback Form, sending an e-mail to the Village Clerk or calling 561-768-
0443.
BUDGET INFORMATION:
PROJECT NAME: n/a BUDGET: n/a ENCUMBERED: n/a
Proposed: Projected Remaining:
n/an/a
PROJECTED TOTAL: n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
Backup Memo Capital Improvements Element 011123 (Merged) copy
Page 11 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Village of Tequesta
Environmental Advisory
Committee
Environmental Advisory Committee Members
To:
Thomas G. Bradford, Chair, EAC
From:
NA
Cc:
January 4, 2023
Date:
Draft Recommendations to the EAC on the Capital Improvements Element of the
Re:
VOT Comprehensive Plan for Consideration of the Village Council and Staff
VOT Resolution No. 24-
develop recommendations for
goals, objectives and policies relative to sustaining and improving the environment of the
now reviewing the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element of the VOT Comprehensive Plan in one EAC review. In order to
keep the review process manageable only one of the versions will be reviewed at each EAC
meeting if the Element requires multiple reviews in order to reach completion.
TGB comments are my thoughts on the item. EAC proposed Options are my suggestions
of what we should tell the Village about the item.
You are encouraged to review the Element or sub-element and propose where you see
environmental issues requiring EAC review potentially overlooked in this memorandum
or make suggestions on how to modify or add to the comments and options provided herein
to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff. The link to the VOT
Comprehensive Plan is as follows:
http://tequesta.org/84/Community-Development
1
Page 12 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Pertinent sections pertaining to environmental issues within the CapitalImprovements
Element of the VOT Comprehensive Plan and my comments are as follows:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 - Undertake actions necessary to: (1) keep present public facilities in good condition;
(2) accommodate new sustainable development and redevelopment; (3) maximize the use of
existing facilities and promote orderly sustainable municipal growth, and; (4) achieve adopted
Level of Service Standards. Further, decisions to finance public facilities improvements shall be
based upon the use of sound fiscal policy oriented to minimizing Village debt service liabilities.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Objective: 1.1.0 - Capital Improvements will be provided to: (1) correct existing deficiencies; (2)
accommodate desired future growth; and/or (3) address consideration of sea level rise impacts.
TGB Comment to EAC: The VOT has begun a Vulnerability Study to assess climate change
impacts. Therefore, no need for amendment as item (3) has been budgetarily addressed for now,
but future capital improvements will likely be needed to address identified infrastructure
vulnerabilities listed in the Vulnerability Study or in future studies.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written.
Policy: 1.1.1 - The Village shall include all projects identified in the policies of the various
elements of this Comprehensive Plan as capital improvements projects for inclusion within the 5-
Year Schedule of Improvements. Provision of capital improvements so defined shall be
implemented through procedures outlined in policies 1.1.2, 1.1.4 and 1.4.1, 1.4.4 of this Element.
A capital improvements project is defined to include land and/or improvements, plus any studies
oriented to defining the initial need for land and/or facilities.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written
2
Page 13 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.1.2 - The Village shall, as a matter of priority, schedule for funding any capital
improvement projects in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule (CIS) which are designed to
correct existing public facility deficiencies, and or that are needed to maintain or meet adopted
Level of Service Standards. In addition, the CIS shall list projects funded and implemented by
other agencies that will impact the ability to meet its Level of Service standards.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.1.3 - The Village shall annually evaluate and rank proposed capital projects in order of
priority for inclusion in the 5-Year CIS.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.1.4 - Proposed capital projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority
according to the following guidelines:
o Whether the proposed project is financially feasible;
o Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, fulfill the
legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to achieve
the full use and efficiency of existing facilities;
o Whether the project prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides
service to developed areas lacking full service, or promotes in-fill
development;
o Whether the proposed project is consistent with plans of State agencies and
the South Florida Water Management District.
3
Page 14 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
TGB Comment to EAC: The wellfield protection programs are overseen by Martin and Palm
Beach counties. Therefore, re-write the last bullet of this policy. It is also redundant because
SFWMD is a state agency.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Rewrite the last bullet of Policy 1.1.4
project is consistent with plans of State agencies and, where applicable,
other local governments such as the Martin and Palm Beach counties and
their respective wellfield protection programs, federal governmental
agencies and all provisions of law.
Policy: 1.1.5 -The Village, in conjunction with Palm Beach County, other municipalities and
partner agencies, shall coordinate and implement strategies that adaptation to sea level rise is
incorporated into the planning, siting, construction, replacement and maintenance of public
infrastructure in a manner that is cost-effective and that maximizes the use of the infrastructure
throughout its expected life span.
TGB Comment to EAC: What are partner agencies? Otherwise, this is good, but very little, if any
coordination of anything seems to be going on.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written, but the Village should be prepared upon receipt of the
Vulnerability Study to start coordination efforts with the sanitary sewer
district and others for adaptation of infrastructure to provide protection from
the impacts of sea level rise.
Policy: 1.1.6 - The Village in conjunction with Palm Beach County, other municipalities and
partner agencies shall make the practice of adapting the built environment to the impacts of sea
level rise an integral component of all planning and capital improvement processes.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. Requires attention and implementation.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. Requires attention and implementation.
4
Page 15 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Policy: 1.1.7 -The Village, in coordination with Palm Beach County, shall consider designating
Adaptation Action Areas (AAA), per Florida State Law, in order to:
a) Identify areas that are vulnerable to the impacts of rising sea level;
b) Identify and implement adaptation policies to increase community resilience;
c) Enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written, but will designating a location an AAA negatively impact
property values or be deemed a sign of proactive property value protection? The key words in this
policy
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written.
Objective: 1.2.0 - Village expenditures in high hazard coastal areas shall include those post-
disaster improvements costs for facilities over which Tequesta has operational responsibility (e.g.:
potable water systems and public streets and recreational facilities).
TGB Comment to EAC: -disaster
improvements to that we do not own.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written.
Policy: 1.2.1 - The Village shall expend funds in high hazard coastal areas for the replacement and
renewal of public facilities over which the Village has operational responsibility.
TGB Comment to EAC: This seems redundant in light of the previous Objective 1.2.0, but this is
a policy which implements the stated Objective.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written.
5
Page 16 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Policy: 1.2.2-The Village shall continue to expend funds to maintain existing facilities and
services under the jurisdiction or Tequesta at their existing Levels of Service.
TGB Comment to EAC: We have no intention of expanding the LOS during a post-disaster repair.
But what if that which needs post-disaster repair was on the books to be upgraded to the adopted
level of service and the funds to do it are available?
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Re-write Policy- The Village shall continue to
expend funds to maintain existing facilities and services under the
jurisdiction or Tequesta at their existing Levels of Service unless said
Village owned infrastructure was planned for a LOS upgrade and the funds
are available to do so in a post-disaster scenario
Policy: 1.2.3 - The Village shall coordinate with other agencies providing infrastructure and
services in the programming and implementation of projects that impact the achievement of its
adopted Level of Service standards.
TGB Comment to EAC: Coordination makes sense.No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Objective: 1.3.0 - Future development and redevelopment shall bear a proportionate cost of facility
improvements in order to maintain adopted Tequesta Level of Service standards. Proportionate
costs are defined to mean 100% of that amount necessary to assure that Tequesta Level of Service
standards are maintained as a result of development approval for those facilities over which
Tequesta has operational control.
TGB Comment to EAC:
development or re-development pays impact fees or builds or re-builds the impacted facilities so
that there is no degradation of service or adopted levels of service (LOS) by virtue of the
development activity.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
6
Page 17 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Policy: 1.3.1 - The Village shall require new development to provide for local streets, drainage,
sewage collection, and potable water distribution system, recreation open space, and other capital
improvements required to address their Level of Service impacts.
TGB Comment to EAC: They left out underground facilities, a necessary component of a resilient
development.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Re-
to provide for local streets, drainage, sewage collection, and potable water
distribution system, recreation open space, underground utilities and other
capital improvements required to address their Level of Service impacts.
Underground utility requirements are pursuant to Sec. 78-302 and Sec. 66-
343 of the Tequesta Code of Ordinances
Policy: 1.3.2 - Defined Recreation Facility needs may be met by any of the following means: (1)
on-site provision of public or private facilities; (2) dedications; or (3) fees in lieu thereof. Planned
expansion for potable water and sewer systems shall be accommodated by charges administered
by the Village and the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District. Major road
improvements shall be accommodated by participating in the Fair Share Road Impact
Fee program. Solid waste collection and disposal improvements shall be accommodated by the fee
schedule annually levied by the private hauler (Note: Tipping fees are levied by the Palm Beach
County Solid Waste Authority).
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.3.3 - Determination of needed public facility improvements shall be made prior to the
time that a Building Permit is issued.
TGB Comment to EAC: Logical.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
7
Page 18 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Objective: 1.4.0 - The Village shall manage its fiscal resources to ensure the provision of needed
capital improvements at a level equal to, or exceeding, the adopted Tequesta Level of Service
standards.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.4.1 - Prior to the issuance of certificates of Occupancy, the Village shall require that all
public facilities are available to serve development for which development orders were previously
issued. Development orders for future development and redevelopment shall not be issued unless
the Village has demonstrated either of the following: (1) Compliance with Tequesta Level of
Service Standards; or (2) Provision of needed public facilities in compliance with the adopted 5-
Year Capital Improvement Schedule.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.4.2 - In providing capital improvements, the Village shall limit general obligation debt
to an amount equal to or less than 5% of the property tax base.
TGB Comment to EAC: This policy is unnecessary and is in contravention with the Village Charter
which at Section 5.02. which limits outstanding indebtedness from all forms of debt to 10% of the
assessed value of taxable real property within the Village at the time the indebtedness or
indebtednesses are incurred.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
8
Page 19 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
o Eliminate this policy. It is in contravention with Section 5.02of the Village
Charter as of the date of this memorandum.
Policy: 1.4.3 - The Village will continue updating annually the 5-Year capital Improvement
Schedule, in accordance with Florida Statutes. Modifications to update the 5-year capital
improvement schedule may be accomplished by ordinance and may not be deemed to be
amendments to the local comprehensive plan.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written, but the 5-Year CIP needs to be readily available wherever
the Comprehensive Plan is kept and made available to the public.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written, but the 5-Year CIP needs to be readily available wherever
the Comprehensive Plan is kept and made available to the public.
Policy: 1.4.4 - Efforts shall be made to secure grants or private funds, whenever available, to
finance the provision of capital improvements.
TGB Comment to EAC: No kidding?
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
Policy: 1.4.5 - Appropriate mechanisms will be developed and adopted with the South Florida
Water Management District, the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District, Palm Beach
County, Martin County, Jupiter Inlet Colony, Jupiter Island, Rolling Hills Subdivision and
Jonathan Dickenson State Park in order to assure that adequate water supplies are available to all
water users. Prior to approval of the building permit or its functional equivalent, the Village of
Tequesta shall consult with the Water Utilities Department to determine whether
adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the
anticipated date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Furthermore, the Village will be
responsible for monitoring the availability of water supplies for all water users and for
implementing a system that links water supplies to the permitting of new development.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
9
Page 20 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Policy: 1.4.6 - The Village shall incorporate capital improvements affecting Village levels of
service by referencing the Capital Improvements Schedules of Palm Beach County, Martin
County, Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District, State agencies, regional water supply
authorities and other units of government providing services but not having regulatory authority
over the use of land into its 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule. The Schedule shall be
maintained and updated annually.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Objective: 1.5.0 - Decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits shall be
based upon coordination of the development requirements included in this Plan, the Village land
development regulations, and availability of necessary public facilities needed to support such
development at the time needed.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Policy: 1.5.1 - Prior to issuing a development order or building permit, the Village shall use Level
of Service (LOS) Standards adopted in the various elements of this Comprehensive Plan to review
the impacts of new development and redevelopment on public facility provision. The Village shall
not issue a development order or building permit which results in a reduction in service for affected
public facilities below these Level of Service Standards. The Village of Tequesta LOS Standards
are listed on Table CI-1(on top of next page).
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. Last time I checked, VOT was way over the adopted LOS
for potable water residential gallons per capita per day
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
10
Page 21 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
o Fine as written, but the latest SFWMD records for VOT indicate residential
gallons per capita, per day consumed is much higher than the Adopted LOS
in Table CI-1and the VOT needs to step up programs to reduce residential
water consumption to meet the adopted LOS for potable water consumption
gallons per capita, per day.
Policy: 1.5.2 - The Village shall maintain a Concurrency Management Ordinance requiring that,
at the time a development order is issued, adequate facility capacity is available, or will be
available upon occupancy of the development, based upon the application of the Tequesta Level
of Service Standards.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Policy: 1.5.3 - Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and requests for new development or
redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed
action would:
11
Page 22 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
o Contribute to any condition of public hazard as described in the UTILITIES and
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS;
o Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits, as described in the
TRANSPORTAION ELEMENT; UTILITIES ELEMENT; and RECREATION AND
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT;
o Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned
in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements; and
o Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use Map of the FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT, and public facility availability as described in UTILITIES
ELEMENT.
If public facilities are developer-provided, they shall accommodate public facility demands based
upon adopted LOS standards.
If public facilities are provided, in part or wholly, by the Village, financial feasibility shall be
demonstrated subject to this element.
Effects upon appropriate State agency and/or Water Management District facilities plans shall be
evaluated.
TGB Comment to EAC: This makes no mention of what happens if there is insufficient capacity
to serve a proposed new development or redevelopment. However, this is not an environmental
issue.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Objective: 1.6.0 - The Village shall maintain a concurrency management system to ensure that
public facilities services to support development are available concurrent with the impact of
development.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
12
Page 23 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Policy: 1.6.1-For sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water facilities, the Village
shall meet the following standards to satisfy the concurrency requirements:
o A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities
are in place ad available to serve the new development; or
o At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220,
Florida Statutes, or an agreement and development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes, to be in place and available to serve a new development at the time of
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
o A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities
and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under
actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or
its functional equivalent as provided in the adopted local government 5-year capital
improvement schedule; or At the time the development order or permit is issued, the
necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent; or
o At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220,
Florida Statutes, to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
Policy: 1.6.2 - For transportation facilities (roads and mass transit designated in the adopted
Village Comprehensive Plan), at a minimum, the Village shall meet the following standards to
satisfy the co
section.
o At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are in place or under construction; or
13
Page 24 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
o A development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities and services to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under
construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent as provided in the local government five-year capital improvement
schedule. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation
projects included in the first three years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of
Transportation five-year work program. The Capital Improvements Element must include
the following policies:
a. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated
date of project completion.
b. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay
construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to
maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year
schedule of capital improvements; or
o At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are the subject of a binding, executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and
services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more
than three years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent;
or
o At the time a development order of permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220,
Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
TGB Comment to EAC: Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Fine as written. No direct environmental concerns
o
Objective: 1.7.0 - The following Capital Improvement Schedule, as it is annually updated in
accordance with Florida Statutes, includes all projects scheduled to meet or improve the adopted
Level of Service Standards during the five-year planning period, and other projects that further
implementation of this Comprehensive Plan and its goals, objectives and policies. (See Next Page)
14
Page 25 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
TGB Comment to EAC: The updated Capital Improvement Schedulehas not been readily available
in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan or the CIP Element.
EAC Proposed Options: Options to consider for recommendation to the Village Council and staff
are:
o Find a way to either incorporatethe annually updated 5-Year CIP either into the CIP
Element or have an adjacent link to the latest edition of the CIP Schedule for the public to
access or download
SEE NEXT PAGES
15
Page 26 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Qsfwjpvt!6.Zfbs!DJQ
16
Page 27 of 46
Agenda Item #3.
Plan
Tequesta
Improvement
of
Capital
Village
2027
2023
Page 28 of 46
Owner
Agenda Item #3.
Allen
TrubeTrubeTrubeMcGrewMcGrew
McKayMcKayMcKay
ChambersChambers
Chambers
Corbitt
GombergGomberg
Gomberg
Rodriguez
Greg
&
WorksDougWorksDougWorksDoug
ControlTessaControlJamesControlTessaControlJamesControlJamesControlTessa
PoliceDepartmentJamesPoliceDepartmentJamesBuildingZoningJose
Capital
FY2027CostsDepartmentRequest
Capital
FY2026Costs
2027
Capital
2027
FY2023
FY2025Costs
Plan
FY2023
Plan
Capital
Improvement
Capital
FY2024Costs
Fund
Capital
Building
Capital
Infrastructure
FY2023Cost
Drive
Club
Vehicle$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$55,000.00Fire
Country
Support
on
Tahoe
Plan$75,000.00$75,000.00$75,000.00$130,000.00$75,000.00Public
Plan$773,285.00$680,000.00$680,000.00$680,000.00$680,000.00Public
Chevy
Department$0.00$0.00$162,000.00$171,000.00$273,964.00
Roundabout
2011
Park$0.00$400,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Leisure
Device$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$40,000.00Fire
Police
of
Install
Improvement
Improvement
and
Replacement$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$50,000.00ITBrad
TequestaBuilding$33,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
Devices$55,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Fire
SCBA$46,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Fire
Replacement$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$30,000.00ITBrad
Capital
Capital
Design
for
Compression
the
Replacement
Replacement$120,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00ITBrad
Host
Truck
Rememberance
Enhancement$75,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00ManagerJeremy
Year
for
Year
2027
Emption
Auto
Controller
5
5
ESXi
Title
Place$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Public
Monitor$73,837.00$73,837.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Fire
Totals$1,218,122.00$1,228,837.00$951,000.00$1,381,000.00$1,203,964.00
Vehicle$0.00$0.00$0.00$400,000.00$0.00Fire
Grant
System
Pre
Units
Year
Page 29 of 46
SAN
Explorer
Canopy
Compressor
LUCAS
North
Request RoadwayPhoneTreeSidewalkCardiacTrafficAir(2)FordRescuePureVMwarePatrolTasers$0.00$0.00$34,000.00$0.00$0.00Fiscal&FRDAP Annual Replacement
Owner
Agenda Item #3.
HammondHammondHammondHammondHammond
WaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterHammond
Storm
Capital
FY2027CostsDepartmentRequest
Capital
FY2026Costs
2027
Capital
FY2023
Plan
FY2025Costs
Capital
Improvement
FY2024Costs
Capital
Fund
Capital
Water
FY2023Cost
Storm
Project$300,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Storm
Restoration$0.00$172,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Storm
Lining$52,000.00$53,000.00$54,000.00$55,000.00$0.00StormReplacements$26,000.00$26,000.00$27,000.00$27,000.00$28,000.00Storm
PipePipe
Bank
Title Stormwater
Totals$404,000.00$277,000.00$108,000.00$109,000.00$56,000.00
Ditch
Restoration$26,000.00$26,000.00$27,000.00$27,000.00$28,000.00Storm
Page 30 of 46
Portal
Request ElStormwaterStormwaterSwaleDover Annual
Agenda Item #3.
Owner
HammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammondHammond
CostsDepartmentRequest
Capital
CostsFY2027
Capital
CostsFY2026
2027
$53,000.00$54,000.00$55,000.00Water
Capital
FY2023
Plan
CostsFY2025
Improvement
Capital
Capital
Fund
CostFY2024
$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$41,000.00Water$0.00$0.00$0.00$40,000.00$0.00Water$0.00$0.00$39,000.00$0.00$0.00Water
$38,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
Utility
Capital
Water
Lift$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$50,000.00Water
Utility
w/
w/Utilityw/w/Utilityw/Utility
2$1,785,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
Replacement$0.00$375,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
(South)$3,645,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
North$50,000.00$4,162,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
Improvements$74,000.00$739,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
Neighborhood$0.00$0.00$0.00$128,000.00$1,259,000.00Water
Pickup
PickupPickupPickupPickup
Pines
Phase
Drive
FlowBridge
Pickup$0.00$0.00$0.00$37,000.00$0.00Water
Point
Duty
the
Drive$0.00$0.00$0.00$156,000.00$1,550,000.00Water
sizesizesizesize
Fire
Club
size
in
Road2009)$128,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water2011)$128,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water2011)$0.00$130,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
FullFullFullFull
Federal
inin19in
HeavyFull
Van$0.00$46,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
18,
JupiterBeachCountryRiversideAnchorage
Jupiter
Work
3217,587
(Installed(Installed(Installed
Relocations$152,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
S18$612,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00WaterS20$128,000.00$624,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
DistributionDistributionTreatmentTreatmentDistributionDistribution
Improvements$5,650,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
WMWMWMWMWMWM
FDOT
No.No.
for
RWM
WaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterElectrician
&
WellWell
ProgramProgramProgramProgramProgramProgram
ReplacementReplacementReplacement
WM
(2008)$0.00$41,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
Tanks$102,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
(2011)(2015)(2015)(2014)(2014)(2013)(2003)
Relocation
Energy/Resource
Bridge
UD65UD69UD62UD61UD67UD66UD58
Storage
and
MembraneMembraneMembrane
Rehabilitation$0.00$0.00$0.00$162,000.00$0.00Water
Excavator
ReplacementReplacementRehabilitation$51,000.00$52,000.00
Disposal
Replacement$450,000.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Water
ReplacementReplacementReplacementReplacementReplacementReplacement
Road
#2#1#3
TitleFY2023
Well
WellWellWellVehicleVehicleVehicleVehicleVehicleVehicleMiniVehicle
Totals$12,993,000.00$6,169,000.00$92,000.00$577,000.00$2,955,000.00
Line
Ground
MainMainMainMainMainMain
Page 31 of 46
Media
UpgradesTrainTrainTrain
Request WTPWaterWaterSurficialFilterCountyWTPSurficialWTPRecoatWaterSurficialWaterReplaceStorageReplaceStorageReplaceConcentrateWaterWaterWTPReplaceReplaceStorageReplaceStorageReplaceReplaceFloridan
Annual