HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 9G_5/10/1990 joK
41101 ASSOCIATES
6\ Wain.
planing & zoning • permitting • site planning • land development research k QF
ki4},
villAn1
MEMORANDUM g �O f�A' c�
TO: VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Jack Horniman, JLH Associates
Village Planning and Zoning Consultant
RE: Downtown Development Task Force Recommendations to
Village Council Regarding the Town Center Master Plan
DATE: May 1, 1990
The Downtown Development Task Force was established by official
action of the Village Council in March, 1989. The initial charge
and responsibility of the Task Force was to investigate and address
the condition of the two (2) major shopping centers in Tequesta
(Lighthouse Plaza and Tequesta Plaza Shopping Centers) . It was
concluded by the Task Force, that vacancies created by the moving
of major tenants to other centers in the Village were not being
filled for various reasons. It became obvious to the Task Force,
however, that the shopping centers had no relationship or linkage
to each other. Also, the Dorner landholdings represented
approximately fifty-five (55) acres of vacant land adjacent to and
surrounding the Lighthouse Plaza Shopping Center; and the St.
Jude's Church land that was vacant and available for future
development was situated adjacent to Village Boulevard and in close
proximity to the center of the Dorner property. Additionally, the
Church could become a focal point of a redevelopment effort.
Therefore, it became clear that perhaps an interrelationship of
uses and a cohesive linkage between the four (4) major properties
was essential to developing a more identifiable downtown business
district core area. In an effort to identify a direction for the
Task Force to pursue in regard to this matter, the Task Force,
adopted the following Mission Statement in July, 1989:
"The primary purpose of the Task Force is to formulate
a Master Plan for the future development of the Tequesta
central business district. A primary goal of the Master
Plan should be to integrate the existing improved
properties with the remaining vacant land areas. The
Master Planning process should stimulate interest from
existing owners to upgrade existing facilities while
stimulating the interest of potential developers and
224 Doturo Street, Suite 1001 •West Pam Bench, R.33401 (407) 655-0024
s
2
investors to become active participants within the
Tequesta central business district. The Master Plan
should provide a blue print for architectural changes to
existing buildings, architectural requirements for future
proposed buildings, with land use and zoning changes
necessary to entice developers to build viable upscale
mixed-use facilities (shops and housing) which will serve
to further enhance the Tequesta central business
district. A primary consideration to be included within
the Master Plan shall be the provision of a centerpiece.
This centerpiece shall serve two primary functions.
First, it will serve as a magnet which will attract
people to the heart of the planning area or central
business district. Secondly, the centerpiece shall serve
as a focal point for the Village of Tequesta providing
an appropriate statement as to what constitutes the
essence of the Village of Tequesta, a modern day Village
with a community orientation. Centerpiece possibilities
include a cultural center, community center, Village
Square, Village Common (Open Space) or combination of
these and other appropriate attractions. All existing
and future uses within the confines of the study area for
the Master Plan should maximize pedestrian orientation
to capitalize on the proximity of existing residential
clusters outside of the planning area and to further
accentuate a feeling of community through planned
pedestrian access.
The primary goal of the Task Force shall be the
provision of a Master Plan to the Village Council for
review and implementation which will provide for a
beautiful and financially viable Tequesta central
business district. "
It was suggested by the Task Force that an intensive workshop
effort, or design charrette, be held for purposes of developing a
Master Plan for the downtown area. The Village Council accepted
the idea and authorized the Task Force to organize this activity.
The Village of Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force sponsored
the Design Charrette; a five (5) day intensive effort held on
September 7, 1989 through September 11, 1989 at the Lighthouse
Gallery. The design area for the Charrette was generally described
as an area encompassing approximately ninety (90) acres from the
FEC Railroad on the west to U.S. Highway 1 on the east, from Bridge
Road on the south to New Road "Village Boulevard" (and an area just
north of New Road) on the north. The area comprised the four (4)
major landholdings: the Lighthouse Plaza Shopping Center; the
Tequesta Plaza Shopping Center; the Dorner landholdings and the St.
Jude Church property.
The Charrette involved design professionals; Village staff,
consultants, and officials; and a long list of "participants" who
3
could potentially have input to the development of the downtown
area. The result of the Charrette was a Village of Tequesta Town
Center Master Plan and Development Standards that included Urban
Standards, Street Standards and Architectural Standards.
Upon review and further discussions of the Master Plan following
the Charrette, in October, 1989, the Task Force endorsed the
Village Town Center Master Plan "in concept" . This recommendation
was made to the Village Council, who in turn, adopted the Master
Plan conceptually. Subsequent to this action the Village Council
instituted "zoning in progress" which, in essence, would disallow
development within the Town Center area that is in contravention
of the proposed uses in the Master Plan, while at the same time
allowing Village staff to develop a strategy to implement the
Master Plan.
The Task Force also studied and reviewed alternative ways to
implement the Master Plan. It was determined that one approach
would be to look toward the private development sector to redevelop
the downtown area. The ideal situation would be to get a master
developer to develop the entire area. In an effort to lure large-
scale developers, the Task Force suggested that an advertising and
marketing scheme be developed to solicit local as well as
nationally known developers. As a result, the Village Council
authorized the expenditure of $1, 350. 00 to prepare a professional
marketing package. The marketing packages were sent out in
January, 1990 to fifty (50) Florida and nationally known
developers. The Village received interest from various developers
as a result of this effort, and those interested parties are being
kept informed on progress of the Master Plan. Also, in January,
1990, the Task Force recommended to Council that the Village
advertise the Town Center Master Plan in Palm Beach Life magazine.
Expenditure of funds for this purpose was authorized by Council,
and the advertisements were published in the March and April issues
of the magazine.
As an alternative to depending entirely on the private sector to
implement the Master Plan, the Task Force determined it should
explore initiatives that the public sector could take to be the
facilitator of the Master Plan. The Task Force has investigated
two (2) public alternatives; 1) Community Redevelopment Agency
(CRA) and 2) Special Taxing District under the Northern Palm Beach
County Water Control District (NPBCWCD) .
In March, 1990, the Task Force invited Mr. Doug Ballard, Director
of Development for Ft. Pierce, Florida, to explain the Community
Redevelopment Agency as instituted in the City of Ft. Pierce. As
a follow-up to his presentation the Village organized a trip to Ft.
Pierce in April, 1990, to see their CRA district and to learn more
about this type of redevelopment structure from Ft. Pierce
officials. The Village of Tequesta staff and officials learned
about the CRA's condemnation powers and its ability to institute
4
tax increment financing to fund redevelopment projects. The
Village was also informed about the "Mainstreet" program that Ft.
Pierce is involved with, and finally, the Village learned that the
City is always searching for alternative funding sources and
programs to institute redevelopment projects.
The Task Force also invited Mr. Peter Pimentel, Executive Director
of NPBCWCD to speak to them on Special Taxing Districts, and the
ability to fund infrastructure in the Master Plan area via this
mechanism. It has been recognized that if the drainage, roadways,
water, sewer, streetscape and lighting could be provided by public
sector involvement, that this might provide the stimulus to get
development of the Master Plan area started. Mr. Pimentel
explained what Special Taxing Districts can and cannot do, and the
potential applicability of the same to the Master Plan area.
With regard to Tequesta' s downtown area, Mr. Pimentel explained
that the infrastructure can be done in one of two, and possibly,
three ways:
1) Amend NPBCWCD's boundaries to include this downtown
area as an independent district. NPBCWCD does not have
to have contiguous boundaries. It is possible to have
isolated areas because it is an independent unit that
does not rely on anyone else to provide its needs.
NPBCWCD would work with Tequesta ' s Master Plan to provide
the infrastructure. The taxes would be levied against
that piece of property. There would be a special
assessment that appears on Tequesta's tax roll,
collectable along with ad valorem taxes. This is what
gives NPBCWCD the strength to sell tax-exempt bonds. In
the case of water and sewer, NPBCWCD would build the
water and sewer system. Probably ENCON would be assigned
the sewer system. NPBCWCD would give ENCON the sewer
system and possibly the water system would go to
Tequesta. NPBCWCD does not have to own it because the
pledge to pay for it is the land. NPBCWCD continues
levying the special assessment to pay off the bonds.
ENCON would charge the people the sewer rates, and
Tequesta would charge them the water rates.
The Village does not lose control over anything NPBCWCD
does, because anything they do, the Village has to
permit. NPBCWCD has no authority to do anything, except
that which is authorized by the local government.
2) A second option would be a district controlled by
landowners. Under NPBCWCD there is a 1 acre - 1 vote
situation; if you own 1000 acres of land - you get 1000
votes from that NPBCWCD Board member. That has been a
controversial issue for some time. NPBCWCD is not
interested in having that changed right now, because
5
there is a lot of land that needs to be developed. This
concept represents a case where the landowner maintains
control to do what he needs to do to develop the land.
The control lies with the municipality, since they don't
have to issue a building permit. If the Village goes the
route of its own independent district, obviously there
are not any registered voters who own land within that
area. Therefore, there could not very well be a popular
referendum vote. It would probably be a case where it
would be a 1-acre, 1-vote situation. The Village could
appoint the Board members, along with the landowners, to
work together to carry out the Master Plan. The Village
can mold the Act to meet its needs.
3) The third approach that might be available to the
Village is to have a dependent district where the Board
members and/or the Budget are controlled by the Village
Council. Some bonding counselors have said that's not
the intent of State law; however, the law does not
stipulate that the local government cannot form their own
dependent district to do these kinds of things. If the
Village wants more control, a dependent district is a
viable alternative; however, a dependent district would
require creation by the Village of Tequesta with an
administrative staff to run the program.
Mr. Pimentel approached the NPBCWCD Board relative to expanding the
Districts boundaries to include the Master Plan area (or portion
thereof) , and he received a favorable response from them. Mr.
Pimentel also produced a report (dated April 20, 1990) regarding
Special Taxing Districts and the NPBCWCD. It is attached to this
Memorandum. Two (2) specific timeframes are identified in the
report for implementation of a Special Taxing District in the
Master Plan area.
Downtown Development Task Force Recommendations to the Village
Council Regarding the Village of Tequesta Town Center Master Plan
On April 30, 1990, the Village of Tequesta Downtown Development
Task Force met to make its final recommendations to the Village
Council regarding the Village of Tequesta Town Center Master Plan.
After months of study and review, the following recommendations are
presented:
o The Task Force recommends and reiterates "conceptual"
approval of the Village of Tequesta Town Center Master
Plan. The Master Plan area is defined by the four (4)
major properties of the Lighthouse Plaza Shopping Center,
the Tequesta Plaza Shopping Center, the Dorner
landholdings, and the St. Jude's Church property. Both
the north and south sides of Bridge Road are included in
the Master Plan area.
t
6
o The final mechanism utilized by the Village Council to
implement the Master Plan should have adequate
flexibility to allow for changes in market conditions and
developer/owner proposals that may be alternatives to the
Master Plan so long as the basic urban design principles
inherent to the Master Plan are not violated and that any
changes or amendments to the Master Plan and its
implementation are considered in consultation with the
professional staff and consultants of the Village.
o The Task Force recommends that the Village Council
request that the Master Plan area be incorporated into
the NPBCWCD and the Village should begin an appropriate
process with the District to implement the development
of infrastructure within the Master Plan area, and to
secure necessary rights-of-ways and/or easements that may
be needed for providing said infrastructure.
o The Task Force recommends that the Village Council should
closely review the extent of the administration
involvement with the NPBCWCD to determine the amount of
additional Village staff assistance that may be required,
if any.
o Since the NPBCWCD has the ability to deal with
infrastructure problems in other areas of the Village
(outside of the Master Plan area) , it is recommended that
the Council review the benefits of utilizing the NPBCWCD
specifically toward solving stormwater drainage problems
(e.g. Cypress Drive Drainage Project) existing within the
Village.
o The Task Force recommends to the Village Council that it
instruct staff, in concert with the Village Attorney, to
investigate ways and means to acquire the Lighthouse
Plaza Shopping Center, or portions thereof, to promote
the furtherance of the Master Plan in a financially
feasible manner. The Council should reserve these same
processes for any other purposes or properties that may
prove to be necessary to facilitate development of the
Master Plan area. A potentially viable process could be
the creation of a CRA or through other appropriate
municipal powers of the Village of Tequesta.
o It is recommended that the Village Council authorize
Village staff to meet with concerned property owners and
development interests within the Master plan area and
with the Village's planners and consultants in Coral
Gables to review specific site concerns and roadway or
rights-of-way concerns to determine alternative street
network and/or site specific modifications within the
Master Plan area.
t
7
o The Task Force recommends that the Village Council
vigorously pursue an annexation policy to incorporate
outlying parcels, enclaves or pockets into the Village
corporate limits by utilizing existing and potential
water service and fire rescue cost variables to
facilitate annexation for the purpose of expanding the
Village tax base.
Members of the Downtown Development Task Force greatly appreciate
the opportunity to work on the assignment given to them by the
Village Council to deal with the problems of its downtown area.
The Task Force feels that it has lived up to this formidable
challenge and has carried out its duties through the actions
expressed in this Memorandum.
The individual members of the Task Force are willing to work with
the Village Council and staff, either on a formal or informal
basis, and at the direction of the Council, as may be needed in the
future to help further implementation of the Village of Tequesta
Town Center Master Plan.
Res ectfully submitted,
d"�-u cti
ack L. Horniman
Planning and Zoning Consultant
cc: Downtown Development Task Force Members
Thomas Bradford, Village Manager
•
• • C/(,or'&ern galm each aunty Wafer @on?rol gis�ricl
357 HIATT DRIVE
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418
TEL: (407) 624-7830
FAX: (407) 624-7839
April 20, 1990
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
Village of Tequesta
P.O. Box 3273
Tequesta, Florida 33469-0223
Re: Town Center Unit of Development
Gentlemen:
This letter will serve as our formal introduction to the Village of
Tequesta and will set forth the method and time frame for the
Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District to crate a Unit of
Development for the Tequesta Town Center. The Unit of Development
will be the mechanism which the District would utilize in providing
the necessary public infrastructure (i .e. roads, water, sewer,
drainage, street lights, landscaping, etc . ) to implement the Town
Center concept.
The Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District was created by
the Florida Legislature in 1959 for the purpose of reclaiming the
lands within its boundaries for water control and water supply
purposes and to protect the land within its boundaries from the
effects of storm and drainage water. In 1987, the District received
additional authority from the Legislature to provide infrastructure
such as potable water facilities, wastewater management facilities,
street lights and landscaping.
The District is a governmental entity with special taxing authority
and has only those specific powers granted to it by the Legislature.
It has no police powers (i.e. zoning authority, land use authority or
subdivision approval authority) . It is a service provider and is
subject to all development requirements of the local government in
which it is located. Revenues are generated from special assessments
,C _1...
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
April 20, 1990
Page Two of Six
levied against only those lands where service is provided. The
special assessments are included on the landowners ' property tax bills
and are collected by the Palm Beach County Tax Collector.
The District is located in the northeast portion of Palm Beach County
and its boundaries extend generally to the Lake Worth Drainage
District on the south, Alternate AlA on the east, the Palm Beach
County line on the north and the L-8 Canal on the west, excluding,
among others, all municipalities and other water control districts in
existence at the time the District was created (see enclosed map) .
The District is governed by a five-member Board of Supervisors elected
by the landowners in the District. Ownership of each acre or fraction
of land thereof entitles the owner to one vote. Each Supervisor holds
office for a three-year term. The terms are staggered so that no more
than two Supervisors come up for election in any year. If there is a
vacancy on the Board, the remaining Supervisors fill such vacancy
until the next annual election, which is held in June of each year.
All of the Supervisors are presently residents of Palm Beach County
and landowners within the District.
The present members of the Board of Supervisors, their occupations,
length of time in office and current terms of office are set forth
below:
TERM
BOARD EXPIRES
NAME MEMBER SINCE IN JUNE OCCUPATION
William L. Kerslake, 1962 1992 Real Estate Broker
President
Arthur J. Poisson 1972 1992 Real Estate Broker
Vice President of
Philip D. Lewis, Inc.
Riviera Beach, Florida
Clair G. Andersen 1975 1991 Real Estate Broker and
Attorney
Richard G. Orman 1976 1990 Planning Consultant
rn_,,._ ,(7)1 ! 1 w , nr, w , rm , . ,
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
April 20, 1990
Page Three of Six
NAME MEMBER SINCE IN JUNE OCCUPATION
Robert D. Norris 1987 1990 President, Robert D.
Norris Associates (Real
Estate Development and
Finance)
A more detailed resume of each Board Member follows:
WILLIAM L. KERSLAKE - Mr. Kerslake has been a Board Member
continuously since 1962 . During his tenure, he has served as
President of the Board on several occasions . He has been a real
estate broker in Palm Beach County for over thirty years, and is
keenly aware of the real estate market and property values in northern
Palm Beach County. He has been a valuable member of the Board of
Supervisors to provide strong leadership.
ARTHUR J. POISSON - Mr. Poisson has been a Board Member continuously
since 1972 . He has a strong management background in the semi-
conductor field. More recently he has served as Vice President of the
Philip D. Lewis Real Estate firm and is currently President of
Vacation Inn Properties, Inc . , the developer of one of the top
recreational vehicles parks in the nation. Mr. Poisson has a working
knowledge of the industrial community and understands the necessity
for governmental efficiency.
CLAIR G. ANDERSEN - Mr. Andersen has been a Board Member since 1975.
He has a long history of experience in the utility business, dating
back to 1962 . He has been involved at the upper-management level for
several water and sewer systems in both California and in Florida. He
has managerial experience in the disposal of treated effluent through
spray irrigation on golf courses . In 1968, he joined the John D.
MacArthur organization and served as either President or Vice
President for several water and sewer utilities owned by Mr.
MacArthur. He was involved in the negotiations with the owners of the
predecessors of Seacoast Utilities and was instrumental in combining
the systems into a single entity.
RICHARD G. ORMAN, PhD - Dr. Orman has been a Board Member since 1976.
He has a strong background in urban planning, community development
and governmental management. In addition, he is a former Assistant
CP., ,r._.. ,(P, i D , nay, w , rn ,
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
April 20, 1990
Page Four of Six
Professor at Florida Atlantic University, where he taught courses in
Urban Planning, Public Finance and Budgeting, Public/Private
Enterprise, Housing and Public Administration. Dr. Orman is a former
City Manager of Riviera Beach and is currently engaged as an urban
planning consultant for several local governments in Palm Beach
County. He is thoroughly familiar with governmental regulations and
requirements, and has previously served as a gubernatorial appointee
to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
ROBERT G. NORRIS - Mr. Norris is the newest member of the Board of
Supervisors, having served in this position since 1987 . However, he
came to the District with twenty-seven years of professional
involvement in the real estate and finance industry. He has
specialized in the production of mortgage loans, management of
construction loans and administration of real estate transactions . In
1978, he became associated with Florida Realty Building Company, the
developer of PGA National Resort Community. As Executive Vice
President of the company, he became actively involved with the
District in the formation of our Unit of Development No. 11 (PGA
National Resort Community) .
In summary, the Board of Supervisors demonstrates cohesiveness,
longevity, ability and capability to provide the leadership to manage
the affairs of the District, now and into the future. The Board is
supplemented with a highly-technical organization of consultants and
staff . The qualifications and background for this portion of the
District Team is as follows:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY - Caldwell & Pacetti are the legal counsel to the
District, having served in this capacity since its inception. Mr.
Madison Pacetti, senior partner of the firm, was instrumental in
writing the District's enabling legislation and has served
continuously in the role of District Attorney since 1959 . Mr. Pacetti
is also counsel to several water control districts throughout the
state and has often been referred to as the state's leading expert in
water control district law. His office has a full team of attorneys,
well versed in Special District law, who serve and advise the
District.
DISTRICT ENGINEER - Mock, Roos and Associates, Inc. are the
engineering consultants to the District. The firm has served in this
capacity since 1959, when the District was created. Mr. Tracy 0.
Bennett represents the firm as District Engineer under the provisions
of Chapter 298, Florida Statutes. Mr. Bennett is a Registered
CY) ..,1._.... ?l. ra_ ,. Or,_ , l (l1 , . ,
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
April 20, 1990
Page Five of Six
Engineer in the State of Florida and has a broad background in
engineering and governmental management. He is the former Executive
Director of the Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning and Building
Department and Development Coordinator for Palm Beach County Airports.
The firm has a broad support base consisting of fifty-two engineers,
surveyors and other support personnel .
ADDITIONAL CONSULTANTS - In addition to the District Attorney and the
District Engineer, the District has several other consultants under
contract, including Florida Municipal Advisors, who serve as Financial
Advisor; Joyce Environmental Consultants, Inc. , who provide
consultation on environmental matters; Presas and Haas, who serve as
Certified Public Accountants to the District; Moyle, Flanigan, Katz,
FitzGerald & Sheehan, P.A. , who serve as Bond Counsel; and a team of
Underwriters comprised of William R. Hough & Company, PaineWebber and
Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Company, Inc .
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - Peter L. Pimentel is the District 's Executive
Director and has served in that capacity since May 1, 1979 . Mr.
Pimentel was the Executive Director of the Loxahatchee River
Environmental Control District (ENCON) from March, 1973 through April,
1979 . Prior to that time, he served as Senior Planner for the Palm
Beach County Area Planning Board. Mr. Pimentel holds a B.A. Degree in
Urban Studies from Florida Atlantic University.
Because of the manner in which the original boundaries of the Northern
Palm Beach County Water Control District were established, a portion
of the Village of Tequesta is located within the boundaries of the
District. However, the area encompassed by the Town Center is not
located within the District boundaries . As a result, the Florida
Legislature will need to be petitioned in order to amend the
boundaries to include the Town Center site. This will necessitate
amending the District's enabling legislation by Special Act to include
the Town Center. This can only be accomplished while the Legislature
is in session and it is too late to introduce such legislation this
year. Therefore, the Town Center site cannot be annexed into the
District until the next session of the Legislature. Assuming this
will occur during the 1991 Legislative Session, the Town Center site
would be included within the District boundaries by mid-June 1991.
This does not mean that all activity will cease until June 1991. On
the contrary, if the Village of Tequesta and the landowners within the
Town Center area are in agreement that the project is to proceed,
rn_,l___ ,CP 1_. £R 1 , nA9,
Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force
April 20, 1990
Page Six of Six
there are mechanisms available for the process to continue until such
time as the area is annexed into the District. This process will
include certain financial commitments on the part of the Village
and/or the landowners; however, these costs are reimbursable upon the
sale of tax-exempt bonds by the District. The minimal risk involved
is that the District will not be successful in completing the process.
If the parties are dedicated to proceed with the project, such funds
will need to be expended in either event.
In order to consider the options, I have included two scenarios to
achieve the end result. Example One anticipates proceeding
immediately with necessary planning and design of the required
infrastructure (i.e. roads, water, sewer, drainage, street lights,
landscaping, etc. ) . Funds expended for this program will need to be
advanced by the landowners, the Village of Tequesta or both. Such
funds would be reimbursed upon sale of tax-exempt bonds by the
District. Example Two delays District activity until June 1991, at
which time the District would begin the process of forming the Unit of
Development.
In conclusion, I would like to express my appreciation for the
opportunity to explain our program to the Task Force. I remain
available to discuss this matter in more detail with you at your
convenience.
Very truly yo s,
Peter L. Pimentel
Executive Director
PLP/ac
Enclosures
m_..,r...... ,CA_r _1 (....,. nA9_,_. ra..,
EXAMPLE ONE
5/31/90 * Expression of Interest from Village
of Tequesta
7/31/90 * Identification of Lands to be Included
in District
8/22/90 * Formalized Agreements with Landowners
and/or Village of Tequesta for
Funding of Advance Planning and
Engineering
* Planning and Engineering Programs
Authorized (Subject to Funding)
11/30/90 * Finalization of Conceptual Master
Plan for Infrastructure
12/31/90 * Local Bill Submitted to Legislative
Delegation
6/15/91 * Local Bill Becomes Law
6/26/91 * Formation of Unit of Development
7/24/91 * Public Hearing for Objections to Unit
Formation
* Approval of Water Management Plan
8/01/91 * File with Circuit Court for
Appointment of Commissioners
8/20/91 * Commissioners Meeting to Assess
Benefits
9/02/91 * File Commissioner's Report with
Circuit Court and Serve Notice to
Mandated Parties
10/15/91 * End of Appeal Period for Receipt of
Objections to Commissioner's Report
10/23/91 * Adopt Bond Resolution & Tax Resolution
* File for Validation Hearing
11/15/91 * Validation Hearing
12/15/91 * End of Thirty-Day Appeal Period
12/30/91 * Closing and Bond Sale
, (1A9, , , ,
EXAMPLE TWO
5/31/90 * Expression of Interest from Village
of Tequesta
7/31/90 * Identification of Lands to be Included
in District
12/31/90 * Local Bill Submitted to Legislative
Delegation
6/15/91 * Local Bill Becomes Law
6/26/91 * Formation of Unit of Development
7/24/91 * Public Hearing for Objections to Unit
Formation
* Formalized Agreements with Landowners
and/or Village of Tequesta for
Funding of Advance Planning and
Engineering
* Planning and Engineering Programs
Authorized (Subject to Funding)
11/27/91 * Finalization of Conceptual Master
Plan for Infrastructure
* Approval of Water Management Plan
12/09/91 * File with Circuit Court for
Appointment of Commissioners
12/31/91 * Commissioners Meeting to Assess
Benefits
1/15/92 * File Commissioner's Report with
Circuit Court and Serve Notice to
Mandated Parties
2/28/92 * End of Appeal Period for Receipt of
Objections to Commissioner's Report
3/25/92 * Adopt Bond Resolution & Tax Resolution
* File for Validation Hearing
4/20/92 * Validation Hearing
5/20/92 * End of Thirty-Day Appeal Period
6/01/92 * Closing and Bond Sale
n ,„_
,..-N-•-- 7-
f,.. .
• itt vst
• i . ., . . .
... ..... -
. . , it li•
- ‘... .... ...milk
. ,
...,
........,.. . .
. .....
• - 111 .4111 .•. ...."
. .
, II lim\ ••••
•
SOUTH IND I AN RIVER
IIIIII
PI NTROL I I SIR I.
------11111'
' 7.....:,•
.. ..., t.s'
. i
1
111111— . r -.. ..
- - i?.
mmaHir ...... ;
. _ .4 t
..•' ir. I ' 1.__ •To
I
Vii\ • .:\
.r,:.
1 -- ,1 TY 0
'
CORBET AREA .__•5- - •
\ I • 7.1
....; i
.
. ,.I cN oT rNI AT RN TRAILL D 1 s r 1 c i
I PALM 8
\ ..• • ''---'I I
I ' CATCH
1.
ARiA
Alillion i g .
. \m,.......
Ig MI .
...,
SEMI OLE MA ER W _Ia
1111in
1111111 - -1. j
nl.
CONT'OL DIST'ICT
I I II
' 11111111111 .1 1 1• 11 ( 1 '
“
____, _ Ill 1
I I
k, ‘
I"-"S-1 1 ; •
.
.,. A 6 1
• IIMI 11111111 1111 . mu . imi 4 1
nii
• • 1 1 , • ., , •
mail . limuniv
. : 44 '
:K, ROOS & ASSOC I ATES, I NC. FIELO: N/A
GRAMM: THE NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY DAFE: 0o6LIST71111
WATER CONTROL DISTRICT 0 A MO NOOS ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PI ANNFAS