HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 4A_5/25/1989 ,,, VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
o• ` o Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive
b
:'Alik?
�� t Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (407) 575-6200
$ FAX: (407) 575-6203
V '
T EQL7E 8 TA D OWNT OWN D EVEL,O PMENT
TASK F ORC E MEET=NG M=NUT E 8
MAY S p. 1 9 8 9
I. The Tequesta Downtown Development Task Force held a meeting at
the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on
Friday, May 5, 1989. The meeting was called to order at 9:36
A.M. by Carlton D. Stoddard, Chairman. Task Force' members
present were: Dr. Stanley B. Jacobs and Edwin J. Nelson.
Members Jim Pilz and James Stergas were absent. Village
officials present were: Earl L. Collings, Village
Councilmember; Joseph N. Capretta, Mayor; Edward C. Howell,
Vice-Mayor; Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager; Wendy K.
Harrison, Administrative Assistant to the Village Manager and
Village Planning Consultant, Jack L. Horniman. Other persons
present were: Susan Emley, Jupiter Civic Theater; Gary Van
Brock, Sir John Van Kesteren, Harry Enderlein, Mac Goodner,
Fred Martin, Peter Leonard and reporter Jeff Alexander.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
o The following modifications were made to the Agenda:
1 ) Carlton Stoddard requested to discuss holding a Workshop
Meeting with the Village Council under ANY OTHER
MATTERS.
2 ) The Village Manager requested time on the Agenda to
present the video presentation of Princeton Forrestal
Village located in Plainsboro, New Jersey. It was
agreed that this would be the first item on the Agenda.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
o The Minutes of the Task Force Meeting of April 25, 1989
were approved as submitted.
IV. PRINCETON FORRESTAL VILLAGE
o The Village Manager presented a video from the Urban Land
Institute about Princeton Forrestal Village in Plainsboro,
New Jersey. This Village concept is a Mixed-Use Complex
designed in a neoclassical style that includes over 100
shops, several restaurants, 225,000 square feet of office
space located above street-level stores, and a full-
service, 300-room hotel. The 67-acre (Phase 1 ) project was
designed and marketed as an alternative to typical suburban
shopping malls. Special features of the project were:
r l
Tequesta Development Task Force Meeting
May 5, 1989
Page 2-
o Open-air, Village-scale shopping environment in a suburban
setting.
o Vertical mixed-use
o Shared parking
o Pedestrian orientation
The Village Manager indicated that the concept was not
necessarily entirely applicable to the circumstances of the
Village, but that certain ideas and concepts should be
considered, such as the Village Square concept and those items
listed above under Special Features. Lessons to be learned
from the Princeton Forrestal Village project are:
o Visibility/image from the road is important
o In a mixed-use project, timing of completion is crucial.
All components should be completed simultaneously.
o Any project desired to be a regional attraction requires a
"anchor" whether it be an athletic club, typical major
anchor tenant, community/cultural/center or other people
attracting magnet. Gary Van Brock reiterated problems with
Princeton Forrestal Village to be noted by the Task Force,
this being specifically signage and density. Ed Howell
noted that the Tequesta Commercial area under study by the
Task Force required activities needed to attract people
with an emphasis on recreation. Ed Nelson noted that an
anchor need not necessarily be a Publix or other typical
major tenant. Dr. Jacobs stated that the key here is a
cultural center to attract people. Therefore, the anchor
need not be another commercial entity for development
recommended by the Tequesta Task Force.
V. DISCUSSION RELATIVE TO TEQUESTA PLAZA
Chairman Stoddard opened the floor to Peter Leonard, the
Manager of Tequesta Plaza for the Fehlhaber Corporation. Mr.
Leonard stated that the Publix lease expires in October 1992.
Further, Fehlhaber would desire to coordinate renovation of
Tequesta Plaza with adjacent activity. Any major tenant
brought in for the vacated Publix space may require design
standards that Fehlhaber may have to adhere to. Therefore,
it would be premature to redesign the Plaza currently. Mr.
Leonard noted that the existing parking of the Plaza was.
inadequate pursuant to Tequesta Code requirements. Cross
Tequesta Development Task Force Meeting
May 5, 1989
Page 3-
parking agreements were in effect with adjacent east and west
property owners. Mr. Leonard noted that a grocery store is
the best tenant. The potential for drawing people to the
Center is the key to the value of a tenant. In conclusion,
Mr. Leonard noted that both parties were not likely to agree
to a deal that excludes grocery stores because such a tenant
would be potentially desirable from the Fehlhaber
prospective. Dr. Jacobs expressed concern with the on-going
problem between Publix and Fehlhaber desiring that the problem
be concluded by somehow terminating the existing lease. If
need be, Publix should be boycotted by the people of
Tequesta.
Additional questions revealed that Publix standard needs
require 50,000 square feet. The former Publix space within
Tequesta Plaza was approximately 20,000 square feet. Mr.
Leonard indicated that Fehlhaber has given consideration to
approaching Publix for provision of a satellite location of
some description whether specialty shop or otherwise to be
located in the former Publix vacated space in Tequesta Plaza.
VI. LIGHTHOUSE PLAZA
Chairman Stoddard asked the Village Manager to update the Task
Force and persons present relative to activity at Lighthouse
Plaza. The Village Manager referenced previous discussions
with Roebling of New York, Inc. previously represented by a
Gregory Boyson, no longer with the company, who indicated to
Mr. Bradford that Roebling was actively seeking Wal-Mart as
the major tenant to take over the vacated space within
Lighthouse Plaza. Additionally, Mr. Boyson had indicated to
Mr. Bradford that the Minneapolis based Dayton-Hudson economy
retail subsidiary Target Stores was being pursued as a tenant
as well. The Village Manager also referred to previous
statements of Mark Pantlin relative to potential interests
that he may have within Lighthouse Plaza by virtue of assuming
existing leases of Winn-Dixie and possibly others in order to
effectuate their moving to County Line Plaza.
The Village Manager was asked to invite Mark Pantlin to
attend the next meeting of the Task Force on May 19, in order
to discuss his interest in Lighthouse Plaza.
VII. DISCUSSION RELATIVE TO PROVISION OF CULTURAL/CIVIC/COMMUNITY
CENTER WITHIN VACANT LAND OF THE DORMER TRACT.
Chairman Stoddard informed the Task Force of recent plans
revealed to him by Gary Van Brock relative to development of
the Dorner lands. Plans now call for the Library to be south
of the Post Office and the Cultural Center consisting of
.
Tequesta Development Task Force Meeting
May 5, 1989
Page 4-
amphitheater and Lighthouse Gallery to be located south of the
new Library. Chairman Stoddard indicated that he was informed
that contacts have been made with the Jupiter Civic Theater
and Lighthouse Gallery in this regard. Dr. Jacobs stated that
the situation is a golden opportunity for provision of a
Cultural, Center with an amphitheater and auditorium within the
confines of the Village. Sir John Van Kesteren agreed
wholeheartedly. Chairman Stoddard stated that he was desirous
of providing a regional Cultural Center and that Mr. Van
Brock had informed him that there were ways of providing long
term financing to accomplish a means of moving Lighthouse
Gallery to the Dorner lands.
VIII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
o At the suggestion of Earl Collings the Task Force agreed that
an updated aerial photo of the area within the Golden Circle
was needed for proper planning purposes.
o Discussion revealed that the land holdings of the St. Jude's
Catholic Church (Archdiocese of Miami) were a major factor in
Task Force . consideration. Chairman Stoddard agreed to
initiate contact with appropriate officials of the Catholic
Church in order to ascertain their land plans.
o Chairman Stoddard indicated that the Village Council had
expressed a desire to hold a Workshop Meeting with the Task
Force early-on so that proper direction and understanding can
occur. Village Manager Bradford indicated that he had
scheduled the same for the upcoming Village Council Meeting
scheduled for May 11. Task Force members present agreed that
at least one additional meeting was necessary in order to
achieve a proper prospective on the potential scope of
activity needed by the Task Force. Task Force members present
concluded that the Workshop should be held with the Village
Council at the Council Meeting scheduled for May 25th. Earl
Collings indicated that he would relay this information to the
Village Council if needed.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Task Force, the
meeting was adjourned at 12:17 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas G. Bradford
Village Manager
TGB/mk