HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 5F_3/8/2001 TE. T f
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Post Office Box 3273 • 250 Tequesta Drive • Suite 300
�r2 �• t
o Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (561) 575-6200
.; iNZ7 of Fax:(561) 575-6203
i
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 2001
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Redevelopment Committee held a regularly
scheduled meeting at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive,
Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, February 21, 2001 . The
meeting was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Chair Joseph
Capretta. A roll call was taken. In attendance were :
Chair Joseph Capretta, Co-Chair Basil Dalack, and Co-Chair
Sharon Walker. Also in attendance were : Village Manager
Michael R. Couzzo, Village Clerk Joann Manganiello, Police
Chief Steve Allison, Assistant Police Chief Robert Garlo,
and Fire Chief James Weinand.
II . APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Co-Chair Dalack made a motion to approve the agenda as
submitted. Co-Chair Walker seconded the motion. The vote on
the motion was:
Joseph Capretta - for
Basil Dalack - for
Sharon Walker - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the agenda
was accepted as submitted.
Recycled Paper
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 2
III . COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
There were no communications from citizens regarding non-
agenda items.
IV. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
A) Preliminary Plan
Village Manager Couzzo indicated it would take four
months for Gee & Jenson to prepare a plan and
optimistically 12 months to complete construction. Fire
Chief Weinand presented a colored diagram of the proposed
Police/Fire/Common area which would be adequate for
current needs and would provide for growth. Police Chief
Allison indicated security and safety were priorities for
the Police Department and a sally port was of prime
importance . Chief Allison reported the holding cells
were closed 18 months ago because they did not meet the
requirements of State agencies such as the Health
Department and others, and were being used as storage
areas . Chief Allison advised there was currently no
place available for holding arrestees, that dispatch
needed a secure area, that more storage was needed than
the one closet currently used, and that more space was
needed but that the need for security was foremost .
Chief Allison reported he had thoroughly reviewed the
plans with Assistant Chief Garlo, Village Manager Couzzo,
Assistant Village Manager Manganiello, and Fire Chief
Weinand. Chief Allison guided the Committee through the
plan, which included extra hurricane hardening in the
central part of the building which included dispatch and
the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) . Fire Chief
Weinand explained that the hurricane hardened area to be
used as an Emergency Operations Center and classrooms for
CPR and other training was originally too small and that
the increase from 17, 000 square feet to 18, 360 square
feet was required to accommodate our needs . The
EOC/classroom was now equipped to handle 45 people . All
critical operations would be located in the hurricane
hardened area which would be built to a hurricane level
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 3
5 specification. Co-Chair Walker requested that Chief
Weinand walk through the Fire/Rescue plans . Chief
Weinand indicated there was adequate future space planned
and that hazardous materials storage had been addressed.
Chief Weinand indicated that the new Public Safety
Facility would be a great asset to the community. Co-
Chair Dalack requested square footage comparison to the
North Palm Beach facility, to which the response was that
the proposed Village facility was 18 , 360 square feet
compared to 24 , 500 square feet for the North Palm Beach
facility.
Communications from •citizens for this agenda item were as
follows :
Arnold Blum asked what is a TLT room, as indicated in the
preliminary plan. It was noted that it stood for
restrooms for the public (toilet) . Police area community
room, and communications storage room in the holding area
were explained. Mr. Blum questioned how the sally port
would operate and how arrested parties would be prevented
from escaping. The fire code requirements for steel
doors were discussed. Mr. Blum questioned the difference
between a community Police room and Code Enforcement ,
which was explained that we currently had a community
policing officer/unit .
Geraldine Genco, 7 Country Club Circle, questioned why in
the preliminary plan only the central portion of the
building was hurricane hardened, commented there was no
public space for shelter. Chief Weinand explained the
status of grant money for hurricane hardening and that
$50, 000 had been received for flood areas . Ms . Genco
questioned the use of the area between the Police and the
Fire/Rescue personnel . Chief Allison commented dispatch
must be kept locked for security purposes and there would
be no free roaming from side to side of the building.
Chair Capretta indicated that the Fire and Police Chiefs
had thoroughly reviewed the plans and had kept costs down
while providing for a huge expansion. Village Manager
Couzzo indicated that award of the contract for the plan
drawings would be placed on the agenda for the Special
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 4
Village Council meeting to be held next week.
Co-Chair Dalack commented that as far as he knew there
was no public opposition to the proposed Public Safety
facility. Co-Chair Dalack asked whether the Sheriff' s
Department facility on Gun Club Road would be available
to use for processing arrested parties . Chief Allison
responded that facility was used now and that transport
to that facility was fine for a simple arrest, but other
processing must be done at the Village of Tequesta.
Chief Allison indicated that in the majority of cases the
Sheriff' s office is not a viable alternative.
Co-Chair Dalack asked about the possibility of separating
Fire from Rescue operations . Co-Chair Dalack said that
it seemed apparent there was an absolute mandate that the
Village have our own rescue facility. Chief Weinand
111 explained the Village cross trained these employees, and
that separating these operations would increase cost .
Chief Weinand noted that if the Village wanted to do away
with Fire Rescue, the County provides Fire-Rescue, as do
most other municipalities . Co-Chair Walker questioned
whether lease agreements had been reviewed and modified,
to which the Vil. age Manager responded that was already
in process . Co-Chair Walker questioned if the design
plans were approved per the pert chart . Village Manager
Couzzo responded that we are at that point now. The
Village Manager explained that staff had been involved in
order to keep efficiency and economy of scale and
perspective. The wish list had totaled 20 , 000 square
feet and the plan was now down to 18, 360 square feet
which provides for the future and would not have an
adverse impact at this time .
Chair Capretta commented that temporary facility plans
were already in process and work had been done to develop
plans, locations, a foreseeable time when the Village
would start the project, and now options were being
looked at . Chair Capretta explained that space at County
Line - Plaza could accommodate Police and Fire
Administration and that Fire personnel and equipment
• could work from a portable building on the present site.
Leases were intact . A demolition proposal from the Palm
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 5
Tequesta Plaza was ready. An RFP for renovations to
County Line Plaza was reported being received and opened
that day. Chief Weinand indicated the move from the
present building would take place in early April
depending on when renovations at County Line Plaza could
be completed. Police Chief Allison reported the
communications center would be moved to County Line
Plaza, with the antenna placed at 100 Beach Road
condominium per agreement with the Condominium
Association. Co-Chair Dalack commented moving cost of
$131, 000 plus rents of $72 , 870, totaled $223 , 870 and
questioned why that had to be spent and why operations
could not continue at the present site during
construction. Village Manager Couzzo indicated that was
the plan and to do otherwise would mean the plan would
have to be re-done from scratch. Co-Chair Dalack
expressed his opinion that Ms . Genco' s suggestion to
build to the east of the present site should be
thoroughly investigated. Mr. Couzzo responded that in
order to do so the plans would have to be delayed and
green space would be lost . Chair Capretta commented
possible problems of that suggestion had been discussed.
Discussion ensued.
B) FINANCING
Village Manager Couzzo presented all costs associated
with the Public Rescue Facility, which would require a
total of $2 , 850 , 000 for construction. The Village
Manager expressed his opinion that the contingency could
be reduced, and that the total for the project was
estimated at $3 , 631, 205 using projections to date.
Financing options were discussed. It was pointed out
that rates were now attractive and $6 million for a 30-
year bond issue was feasible .
Geraldine Genco questioned why the items regarding
finance were being discussed since they were not posted.
Village Clerk Manganiello noted that adequate posting had
been made and read aloud for the record the Notice of
Redevelopment Committee Meeting and noted when and where
II
it had been posted and noticed.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 6
Chair Capretta noted that this proposal would go to the
Special Village Council Meeting on February 27, 2001 .
Jim Humpage asked if hurricane hardening of $100, 000 was
included in the figures, commented that $3 . 7 million for
Public Safety left $2 . 3 million for a municipal center,
and asked why not include money already spent, $2
million, in the bond issue. Mr. Humpage discussed the $6
million bond issue and requested a Finance Committee
meeting to determine where the Village was going.
Geraldine Genco requested a Finance and Administration
Committee meeting. Ms . Genco expressed her opinion that
a number of capital expenditures as well as Public Safety
Facility and Municipal Center expenses should be
considered and that the Village should not float bonds at
this time .
Arnold Blum noted that landscape and lighting figures had
not been included in previous estimates, to which the
Village Clerk responded landscaping had been included in
previous estimates . Chair Capretta explained that all
projects had been considered in the financing by staff
who had worked on the projects and commented that Public
Safety was the number one priority.
V. ANY OTHER MATTERS
There were no other matters to come before the Committee.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Co-Chair Walker made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Chair
Capretta seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was :
Joseph Capretta - for
Basil Dalack - for
Sharon Walker - for
` The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 2001
PAGE 7
was adjourned at 10 :55 A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Joann Manganiello
Village Clerk
DATE APPROVED:
p
6