Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 5B_9/13/2001 J OF re. '''''V e li3i 'v P G�% VILLAGE OF TE CUESTA 0, Post Office Box 3273 ° 250 Tequesta Drive ° Suite 300 ; r-s 11 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (561 575-6200 w, `3: klt��� �<''` o Fax (561) 575-6203 ) 4.4 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2001, 7:01 TEQUESTA RECREATION CENTER 399 SEABROOK ROAD PRESENT: • Agency Member von Frank Agency Member Walker Acting Chair Capretta Agency Member Dalack I ALSO PRESENT: - Village Manager Couzzo Village Attorney Randolph Village Clerk Wolcott Department Heads ABSENT: Agency Chair Genco I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Village of Tequesta's Local Planning Agency held a meeting at 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida, on Thursday, August 9, 2001. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Acting Chair Capretta. Village Clerk Wolcott called the roll with all members present except for Agency Chair Genco. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Consensus of the Agency approved the agenda. III. PUBLIC HEARING Recycled Paper Page two August 9,2001 Local Planning Agency ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF TILE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED VILLAGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CHAPTERS 9J-5 AND 9J-11, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AMENDING TEXT WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR POLICIES RELATED TO A NEW ELEMENT (PSFE); CREATING A NEW ELEMENT, PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT (PSFE) ACCORDING TO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE, COUNTY AND PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR - CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Cngta aRe announced the public hearing was open. Jack Horniman, with JLH Associates Local Planning Agency stated this is a Comp plan amendment the Village has to make due to the terms of the interlocal agreement we made with the municipalities of Palm Beach County and the School District of Palm Beach County to establish school concurrency. He stated that we would adopt it now to allow DCA time to review. This amendment must be adopted by January 25, 2002. Mr. Horniman said what constitutes the amendment is a number of things. The element is in the submittal package. Also, under public school concurrency, anything proposed has to be considered jointly. It is suggested to adopt a six year program. It obligates you to no expenditures. We had to change the format some, but the agreement is perfectly acceptable. I think we have met our obligation under the interlocal agreement. .gone Aa ' ',asked what percentage of students Tequesta has in the overall concept. Mr. Horniman replied there are approximately 175,000 students in the County. There are no projections for short term or long term planning for the School Board. Under the state planning rules, you do have to make amendments. I can tell you there are no facilities planned for Tequesta in the short or long term Acii #iz� pxeit requested Mr. Horniman give a one or two minute brief to the public to explain. Page three August 9,2001 Local Planning Agency Mr. Horniman explained we have all heard about the problems we are having at school today. In their perceptions, we have 110 percent capacity in all the schools in Palm Beach County. They can effectively and efficiently run their schools and run their curriculum with the established 21 concurrency service areas. et "`'"eet i�'"'' ` stated when we go to build somewhere, before we can do it we have to look at, for instance, traffic. If the roads aren't adequate to provide for traffic, you build more roads. Mr. Horniman state there are so many caveats built into this interlocal, put in their primarily because of the cities. The question is about who is really creating the impact. ' . r. e nberaT, , mentioned there has been a continuing conversation with regards to the overcrowding of Limestone Creek. How will this plan effect where our children would go to school? Mr. Horniman stated this is to ensure the capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth. MOTION: Agency Member von Frank motioned to adopt the Ordinance, seconded by Agency Member Walker. Peggy Verhoeven, Point Drive, stated she had the occasion in the past 10 days to be down on Congress in West Palm Beach,just compare it to being in New York City and then come back to Tequesta, it is absolutely scary—overcrowded and populated, I hope that it never happens here. Dana Anderson asked how soon could this effect Limestone Creek. Mr. Horniman responded the projection is to obtain that 110 percent no later than 2004, and everybody is going to have to beat that. The goal is for everyone to meet that 110 percent by 2004. Motion carried 4-0. Meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m.