HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Community Appearance_Tab 4-1_11/19/1997 i
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive
,,�. �
� o
1 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (561) 575-6220
Fax: (561) 575-6239
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 15, 1997
I. CALL TO 'ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Community Appearance Board held a meeting in
the Village Council Chambers at 357 Tequesta Drive,
Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, October 15, 1997. The
meeting was called to order at 9 :30 A.M. by Chair Leslie
Cook. Boardmembers present were: Chair Leslie Cook, Vice
Chair Vic Strahan, Paul Coben, Claudette Dalack, Steve
Parker, and Alternate Molly McCormick. Also in attendance
was Scott D. Ladd, Clerk of the Board.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chair Cook announced that the agenda was approved as .
submitted.
III. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
There were no communications from citizens.
IV. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
Recycled Paper
ti
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 2
The Board approved the minutes of the September 17, 1997 and
the October 1, 1997 meetings.
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. An application from the Village of Tequesta for review of
the proposed R/O water treatment plant facility to be
located at 901 Old Dixie Highway.
Those present on behalf of the Village were Water System
Manager Tom Hall, and Bill Reese and Tom Jenson of Reese
Macon and Associates, consulting engineers.
Chair Cook announced that the landscaping portion of the
application would be reviewed first so that Boardmember
Parker could be present, since he had to leave the
meeting at 10:30 A.M.
Boardmember Parker presented some proposed changes to the
landscape plan. Mr. Parker suggested that the green
buttonwood trees be changed to live oaks, which would
grow larger and would be cold hardy. Another suggestion
was to change the eugenia myterfolia hedge to viburnum
suspensium, which would not grow as tall and therefore
maintenance would be reduced. Boardmember Parker
suggested that another high maintenance plant, pampas
grass, be replaced with a plant requiring less care such
as thyrallis, ilex, or wax jasmine. Other minor changes
suggested were to include trees within planting beds,
moving sabals which were too close to oaks,
redistributing lirope plants more evenly in the planting
beds and placing some lirope under the mahogany street
trees in the front. Mr. Parker also suggested
articulating the bed line with sod, and explained that
the changes he had suggested would not alter the number
of native plants. In response to Chair Cook' s comment
that she thought there was a lot of landscaping,
Boardmember Parker commented that the site was not over
r
•
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 3
landscaped. Discussion ensued. Mr. Parker commented
that the pine trees in front were the biggest issue and
that he wanted to be sure those trees absolutely must be
removed. Mr. Reese responded that elevations required
were three to four feet higher than the current height,
therefore the pine trees must be removed. Mr. Parker
suggested saving some of the palmetto and as many pines
as possible. Mr. Reese explained that plants could be,
tagged for selective clearing and if they died then they
could be removed later. Mr. Reese explained that because
roots grew around water pipes, he supported less
landscaping. Boardmember Dalack commented that this ,
information was an important consideration. General
discussion ensued regarding dressing up the entries by
placing more plant material there instead of in other
areas, whether palmettos could be saved, the option of
using trees versus a hedge, and replacing the proposed
mahogany trees with oaks and sabals since mahoganies were
very susceptible to web worms and would have to be
sprayed annually. Mr. Reese explained that in order to
meet the required elevations that the elevation would be
changed right up to the property line and there would be
a sharp drop Off which would be covered with sod. Vice
Chair Strahan commented that some of the existing pines
were on the property to the south and would remain there
for some time. Mr. Reese explained that in the future
when the owner of the adjacent property decided to
develop, he might have a plan that would not require
changing the elevation up to the property line, so that
existing pine trees could remain.
Boardmember Parker made a motion to accept the Landscape
•
Plan for the proposed R/O water treatment plant facility
to be located at 901 Old Dixie Highway as per revisions
he had noted on the plan, which included:
1. Recommendation for a waiver along the south
property line to reduce the number of trees to
five.
•
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 4
2. Redistribute dollars to be spent by purchasing
larger trees for the front of the site on Old Dixie
Highway using five oaks 20' tall with 5-1/2"
caliper and 12 sabal palms 14' to 18' tall.
3. Refer to Landscape Plan for sizes of beds,
redistribution of plants, and plant material
changes.
Boardmember Dalack seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
Leslie Cook - for
Vic Strahan - for
Paul Coben - for
Claudette Dalack - for
Steve Parker - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Chair Cook questioned the approximate cost of the
landscaping, which Mr. Reese estimated at between $40, 000
and $45, 000 including irrigation.
Chair Cook called for discussion of the building.
Boardmember Dalack presented sketches which she had drawn
depicting possible changes to the building exterior.
Boardmember Dalack explained that her only problem was .
the columns, although the roof was an issue, and
suggested using arches instead of columns with a metal
barrel tile roof as suggested by Vice Chair Strahan.
Another suggestion made by Boardmember Dalack was that if
the present standing seam metal roof must be used, to
use scoring above and below the shutters, and replace the
columns with more shutters; also possibly to use a
decorative pediment instead of the porte cochere. During
ensuing discussion, Chair Cook inquired whether the
engineers had researched using a barrel tile metal roof.
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 5
Mr. Reese responded that the standing seam metal roof was
warranted with a watertight membrane and he did not
believe other types of roof would have such a warranty.
Mr. Reese discussed disadvantages of concrete tile as
being subject to mildew and requiring maintenance. The
natural air circulation and heat generated within the
building was discussed. Mr. Reese explained that the
biggest heat producer was a 1200 h.p. generator which was
placed outside the building. Vice Chair Strahan
questioned whether the Village Council had accepted this
building. Mr. Reese responded that they had.
Boardmember Coben commented that it could go back to the
Village Council. Vice Chair Strahan commented that the
Village had forced Starling House to change from this
type of roof to concrete tile, and that using a standing
seam metal roof on this building would destroy the
Village' s credibility and establish a bad precedent. Mr.
Reese commented that the standing seam metal roof would
have a 20-year warranty against color fading, and that in
2-3 years concrete tile would need cleaning. Mr. Hall
commented that this roof would be too high for staff to
clean and any cleaning would have to be done by outside
contractors. Mr. Hall related that Wellington' s water
plant originally had barrel tiles and they had replaced
that roof with metal because of tiles lost in storms.
Boardmember Coben commented that a standing seam metal
roof had been used on the maintenance garage, but that no
one saw that roof; that a big fuss had been made to force
Sterling House into a tile roof; and that using a
standing seam metal roof on this building close to
Sterling House would establish a precedent that would
really hurt the Village. ] r. Reese responded that the
cost would be $15, 000 to $20, 000 more for concrete tile
because an impenetrable membrane would be required under
the tile. Vice Chair Strahan questioned the cost of a
barrel tile shaped metal roof, to which Mr. Reese
responded he had not researched that because of no
weather tight warranty. Boardmember Dalack commented
•
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 6
that the Board had approved a combination metal and
barrel tile roof for the Catholic church, to which Vice
Chair Strahan responded that Sterling House had not been
allowed to do that when they made that request. Mr.
Reese commented that he was looking at the initial cost.
Boardmember Coben stated that he should look at the life
cycle cost. Mr. Reese explained that in theory there
would be no additional cost over the life of the standing
seam metal roof. Boardmember Coben questioned the
comparison with other roof types. Mr. Reese explained
that a flat tar and gravel roof had a typical 15-20 year
life, clay tile had a typical 50 year life, and standing
seam metal had a 40-50 year life. Boardmember Coben
suggested that the building design might be changed to
have two or three levels so that a conventional flat roof
with parapets would be possible, and that it seemed the
initial cost other than redesign costs would be a lot
less.
Boardmember Parker left the meeting at 10:30 A.M. and
Alternate Boardmember Molly McCormick was seated on the
Board.
Mr. Reese reviewed the building floor plan and pointed
out the areas which could have a low roof and the areas
which required a high roof in order for the equipment to
operate, and suggested that it would not be possible for
the building to be designed in more than one level.
Boardmember Coben commented there were many buildings
with a large square box design, which would allow use of
a tar and gravel type flat roof with much lower initial
cost and maintenance that the Village knew how to do.
Boardmember Dalack agreed. Chair Cook commented that a
new shopping center was under construction at the corner
of Alternate AlA and Indiantown Road with a square box
building for Albertson' s that she had thought would be
ugly; however details were added and the building was
beautiful. Boardmember Coben expressed his opinion that
the standing seam metal roof was ugly, would be seen from
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 7
the road, that a poor precedent would be established,
that there must be another way to do this without
violating all the precedents that the Community
Appearance Board had fought for for so long.
Vice Chair Strahan commented that at the time the color
scheme had been presented, the Community Appearance Board
had expressed their objection to a standing seam metal
roof, and had requested arches instead of columns, and
nothing had been changed. Mr. Reese explained that they
had consulted with staff and consensus had been that from
maintenance and cost standpoints this was the roof
desired by their client, the Village. Boardmember Dalack
expressed her opinion that there had been a
misunderstanding because these types of buildings were
usually hidden, but the Community Appearance Board wanted
a beautiful building since it would be seen by the
public. Mr. Reese pointed out other RO plants that were
not hidden. Mr. Hall produced photographs of typical RO
plants, which Chair Cook commented looked like the new
Albertson' s without the details. Boardmember Coben
stated that was the design the Board wanted. Mr. Reese
objected that it would take a substantial redesign.
Boardmember Dalack reminded him that the Community
Appearance Board had not asked for the design presented.
Mr. Reese stated that all of the structural design from
the top of the walls would need to be redone. Vice Chair
Strahan commented that when Mr. Reese had first appeared
before the Community Appearance Board he had heard the
Board' s objections to the design and it would have been
much simpler to have done a reconfigured design at that
time. Mr. Reese objected that at the time they appeared
before the Board for color selection that the plans were
well over 90% complete. Chair Cook expressed concern
that this happened over and over, with designs presented
that had not gone through the Boards. Mr. Reese stated
that he believed he had followed established procedure.
Boardmember Dalack stated that what she heard at the last
meeting was that Mr. Reese had commented it would be no
4
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 8
problem to redesign, that they had a special machine with
which they could alter plans, and they wanted to hear the
Board' s desires. Mr. Jenson commented that changing the
arches was a simple matter, but not changing the roof.
Boardmember Coben commented that the procedure was
backwards, and this should not have gone to Village
Council and he would like to send it back to the Village
Council. Vice Chair Strahan commented that the Board had
to send it back to the Village Council since the. Board
agreed that a standing seam metal roof could not be used
since the Village had not allowed Sterling House to use
that type of roof. Chair Cook commented that the Board
wanted Mediterranean style buildings, and asked if a
terra cotta color was available for the metal roof.
Boardmember Dalack commented that there was a strip
center on Mona Road with standing seam metal roof in
terra cotta. Discussion ensued about the colors
discussed at the last meeting. Vice Chair Strahan
pointed out that at the last meeting the engineers had
promised to return before the Community Appearance Board
with a black and white sketch so that the Board could
fill in colors. Chair Cook quoted from the minutes of
that meeting: "Mr. Hall described the existing color as
sandy beige. Mr. Reese stated that he and the architect
would come back at the next meeting with black line
drawings and color could be added later." Vice Chair
Strahan commented that he had been amazed that a complete
plan was now being presented. Chair Cook°looked at the
color chart from the standing seam metal roof company and
commented that they had no terra cotta color.
Boardmember Coben questioned whether Chair Cook wanted
this application to return to Village Council with a
request to change the roof color. Chair Cook responded
affirmatively. Vice Chair Strahan commented there was no
point in discussing color.
•
Village Manager Bradford, who was present in the
audience, commented that at the Village Council meeting
where they had approved this plan he had told them that
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 9
the Community Appearance Board had a problem with the
roof design and architectural style of the building; but
the Village Council had problems in that the Village was
running out of water and must meet deadlines. Village
Manager Bradford explained that Mr. Reese had been told
repeatedly that he must stay within the $7.4 million
budget on this project. Village Manager Bradford
discussed the issue of precedent which was a concern to
the Community Appearance Board, and explained that the
standard applied to this building was industrial use, and
compared to other industrial operation facilities this
was a beautiful building, and staff believed that the
precedent would not apply to, other uses such as
commercial or residential. Discussion ensued regarding
a square box design that could be dressed up with
architectural features similar to the Albertson' s
building. Mr. Reese responded that two months would be
needed for redesign. Boardmember McCormick commented
that would mean additional cost and cautioned that the
Community Appearance Board was only an advisory board.
Vice Chair Strahan commented that the. Community
Appearance Board was an advisory board whose advice was
not heeded--that the applicant had an opportunity to make
changes but had not bothered. Chair Cook commented that
the Community Appearance Board had done a lot of
important things in the Village, that the Boardmembers
lived in the Village and cared about this, and the
engineers were working for the Village residents who were
paying them. Boardmember McCormick stated that she also
cared, but this design had been approved by the Village
Council. Chair Cook commented that the Community
Appearance Board had been told they were going to look at
drawings before plans were drawn. Boardmember Coben
commented that the Community Appearance Board' s problem
was with staff, and questioned what options were
available to the Community Appearance Board at this
point. Boardmember Coben commented that the Community
Appearance Board was again being pressured just like with
the library, which was also "our money", and to now send
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINCTPES
October 15, 1997
Page 10
the engineers back to the drawing board the Community
Appearance Board would be blamed.
Village Manager Bradford stated that in spite of his
previous comments, he believed the Community Appearance
Board should do what they thought was right. The Village
Manager explained that he had shared the thinking of the
staff and Village Council with the Community Appearance
Board. Village Manager Bradford commented that if this
building was the new Village Hall that it would not have
a metal roof, and that 99* of the time the Village
Council did what the Community Appearance Board
recommended. Vice Chair Strahan commented that he had
not realized this design would be included at the last
Village Council meeting, or he would have attended. Vice
Chair Strahan explained that the Community Appearance
Boardmembers were volunteers and devoted their own time
to Village aesthetics, that most of what the Board said
was accepted, that the Board had given waivers and
objected when they felt people were not making enough
effort to meet code, that he thought that staff and the
engineers had had enough notice from the Board that they
wanted to see the design before it was completed, and he
believed the Board would be selling themselves down the
river if they accepted this design. Village Manager
Bradford commented that if that was how the Board felt
they should send the design back. Vice Chair Strahan
commented that if this design was accepted then Gary Van
Brock could ask for asphalt shingles for his next project
and the Village would have no defense. Village Manager
Bradford stated that the Community Appearance Board
should not back down from what they felt was right.
Chair Cook discussed the columns on the building. Mr.
Reese explained they were non-structural columns, and
that he had not used arches because he thought arches
would not go with the standing seam metal roof.
Boardmember Dalack suggested that the columns could be
replaced with shutters. Vice Chair Strahan suggested
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 11
. adding fake louvers at each end of the existing louvers
and using the scoring at top and bottom as shown on
Boardmember Dalack' s drawing; to which Boardmember Dalack
responded that if the top scoring was made to match the
bottom scoring that would produce a Key West look. The
scoring was discussed further, and removing the columns.
The color of the garage facility roof was clarified to be
Satin Gray, and a comment was made that a roof in that
color would be providing continuity in village
facilities, and if the Village Council did not approve a
design change that at least Satin Gray would be a better
roof color than green. During a discussion of cost, Vice
Chair Strahan commented that he had attended a Village
Council meeting where large amounts of money for the
budget had been discussed and residents who had attended
had talked about how much they appreciated improvements
which had been made and how happy they were to live in
the Village, and no one had questioned the amounts of
money budgeted for various items. Clerk of the Board
Scott D. Ladd commented that redesigning the building
would mean spending the engineering fees all over again.
After further discussion, the following motion was made:
Vice Chair Strahan made a motion to accept the
application with the condition that all columns would be
removed from the front of the building and replaced with
concrete scoring along the top of the building to match
the scoring that exists along the bottom; an artificial.
shutter would be installed at either end of the four
large vertical louvers, the porte cochere would be
removed, and the standing seam metal roof would be
replaced with any color concrete tile roof or a terra
cotta barrel tile metal roof. Boardmember Coben seconded
the motion. During discussion of the motion, Chair Cook
raised a question of whether a concrete tile roof or
barrel tile shaped metal roof would go with the shutters.
Vice Chair Strahan revised his motion as follows: In lieu
of deleting columns, adding fake shutters and doing
scoring along the top, to replace the top scoring with
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 12
concrete scored arches as per Boardmember Dalack's
drawing. During discussion of the revised motion Village
Manager Bradford questioned what the objection to terra
cotta Spanish S tile would be, to which Vice Chair
Strahan responded there would be none, and he would be
happy with terra cotta Spanish S tile. Mr. Reese
explained that cement tile would cost $15, 000-$20, 000
more and clay tile would cost an additional $20,000-
$25, 000. Village Manager Bradford stated he would advise
the Village Council of the cost differential, but that it
might not be that much when amortized. Mr. Reese
commented that clay tile roofs could not be stepped on,
but a person could step on cement tiles. After further
discussion, Vice Chair Strahan re-stated his motion:
Vice Chair Strahan made a motion to approve the
application from the Village of Tequesta for the proposed
R/O water treatment plant facility to be located at 901
Old Dixie Highway as submitted with the following
changes:
1. Scoring on concrete on base of front will be
deleted.
2. Vertical columns along front wall will be deleted
and columns will be replaced with scored arches
over each pair of large louvered windows as per
Boardmember Dalack's sketch.
3 . The standing seam metal roof shall be deleted and
replaced with a flat or curved concrete tile roof
in a color as close to terra cotta tile as
possible.
During discussion of the motion, Mr. Reese verified that
the current design was strong enough to hold up a
concrete tile roof, so that only roof details would need
to be changed. Timing for advertising and bidding of the
project was discussed.
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 13
Boardmember McCormick seconded the restated motion. The
vote on the motion was:
Leslie Cook - for
Vic Strahan - for
Paul Coben for
Claudette Dalack - for
Molly McCormick - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Discussion ensued regarding the possibility that the Village
might not accept the Community Appearance Board' s proposal.
Village Manager Bradford commented that this might be bid
the way Community Appearance Board wanted and not taken back
to the Village Council; that he and the engineers and Mr.
Ladd would confer immediately following the meeting to make
a decision, and the one landscape waiver requested could
happen any time.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business to come before the Board.
VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
Vice Chair Strahan questioned Village Manager Bradford
regarding whether it would be possible to have a discussion
regarding procedures, and stated that he believed input from
the Community Appearance Board would be more valuable to the
Village Council if done ahead of time. Village Manager
Bradford responded there had never been a question regarding
whether the Community Appearance Board made good decisions
regarding aesthetics, but that the change had been made
because of developers complaining to the Village Council
that they had to go before the Community Appearance Board
when they did not know whether their use would be approved,
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 14
and if the use did not receive approval from the Village
Council then they had lost the money spent on plans. Vice
Chair Strahan suggested an alternative: That a developer go
to the Village Council with only a sketch plan, then go to
the Community Appearance Board with plans of how their
project would look. Another possibility would be to go to
the Community Appearance Board for suggestions before going
to Village Council. The point would be to do conceptual
drawings first. Vice Chair Strahan explained that the
Community Appearance Board had been pressured to accept what
was presented for the St. Jude project because the applicant
had spent an enormous amount of money, and that it was hard
to give advice when a project was already in final stages.
Other past pro7ects were discussed. Village Manager
Bradford commented that everyone could work together to come
up with a better procedure, and that the Village Council was
not spending a lot of time on aesthetics. Tequesta Plaza
was discussed. Chair Cook suggested that the Felhabers
could look at the new Albertson' s building for a design.
Village Manager Bradford explained the family situation and
that Mr. Felhaber was unsure whether he wanted to spend the
money necessary to renovate and whether his daughter could
manage the property, or whether he should sell. Village
Manager Bradford explained that if no response was
forthcoming by the November Village Council meeting that
Tequesta Plaza would go to Code Enforcement.
Village Manager Bradford advised the. Community Appearance
Board that they should pass on to him any ideas they had as
a group or individually, and that everyone would work to
make the process better.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:46 A.M.
r
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
October 15, 1997
Page 15
Respectfully submitted,
n
4
14°I;C(t C4.1LAD
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Scott D. Ladd
Clerk of the Board
DATE APPROVED: