The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Local Planning Agency_Tab 4A2_11/20/1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT • Goal: 1.0.0 Undertake actions necessary to:(1)keep present public facilities in good condition;(2)accommodate new development,using sound fiscal policies;and (3)maximize the use of existing facilities and promote orderly,compact municipal growth. Further,decisions to finance public facilities improvements shall be based upon the use of sound fiscal policy oriented to minimizing Village debt service liabilities. Objective: 1.1.0 Capital Improvements will be provided to: (1)correct existing deficiencies;(2) accommodate desired future growth;and/or(3)replace worn-out or obsolete facilities. Policies: 1.1.1 The Village shall include all projects identified in the policies of the various elements of this Comprehensive Plan and determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost($10,000 or greater),as capital improvements projects for inclusion within the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. Provision of Capital • improvements so defined shall be implemented through procedures outlined in policies 1.1.2- 1.1.4 and 1.4.1 -1.4.4 of this Element. A capital improvements project is defined to include land and/or improvements,plus any studies oriented to defining the initial need for land and/or.facilities. 1.1.2 The Village shall,as a matter of priority,schedule for funding any capital improvement projects in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements which are designed to correct existing public facility deficiencies. 1.1.3 A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee is hereby created,composed of the Village Council Finance and administration Committee,the Village Manager and the Finance Director for the purpose of annually evaluating and ranking in order of priority projects proposed for inclusion in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. 1.1.4 Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines: a) Whether the proposed project is financially feasible,in terms of its impact upon local budget potential; b) Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety,to fulfill the Village's legal commitment to provide facilities and services,or to preserve,achieve full use of or increase the efficiency of existing facilities; c) Whether the project prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service,or promotes in-fill development; d) Whether the proposed project is consistent with plans of State agencies and the South Florida Water Management District. Objective: 1.2.0 Village expenditures in high hazard coastal areas shall be limited to 100%of those post disaster improvements costs for facilities over which Tequesta has operational responsibility(e.g.:potable water systems and public streets and recreational facilities). CI-1 s. • Policies: 1.2.1 The Village shall expend funds in high hazard coastal areas for the replacement and renewal of public facilities over which Tequesta has operational responsibility. 1.2.2 The Village shall continue to expend funds to maintain existing facilities and services under the jurisdiction of Tequesta at their existing Levels-of-Service. Objective: 1.3.0 Future development shall bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements in order to maintain adopted Tequesta Level-of-Service standards. Proportionate costs are defined to mean 100%of that amount necessary to assure that Tequesta Level-of-Service standards are maintained as a result of development approval for those facilities over which Tequesta has operational control. Policies: 1.3.1 The Village shall require local street,drainage,sewage collection and potable water distribution systems improvements,as required by the application of the Tequesta Level-of-Service Standards,of any new development necessitated by such development. 1.3.2 Defined Recreation Facility needs may be met by any of the following means: (1)on-site provision of public or private facilities;(2)dedications;or(3)fees in lieu thereof. Plan expansion for potable water and sewer systems shall be accommodated by charges administered by the Village and the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District. Major road improvements shall be accommodated by participating in the County's Fair Share Road Impact Fee program. Solid Waste collection and disposal improvements shall be accommodated by the fee schedule annually levied by the private hauler(Note: Tipping Fees are levies by the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority). 1.3.3 Determination of needed public facility improvements shall be made prior to the time that a Building Permit is issued. Objective: 1.4.0 The Village shall manage its fiscal resources to ensure the provision of needed capital improvements at a level equal to,or exceeding,the adopted Tequesta Level-of-Service standards. Policies: 1.4.1 Prior to the issuance of certificates of Occupancy,the Village shall require that all public facilities are available to serve development for which development orders were previously issued. Development orders for future development shall not be issued unless the Village has demonstrated either of the following: (1)Compliance with Tequesta Level-of-Service Standards;or(2)Provision of needed public facilities in compliance with the Tequesta Level-of-Service Standards within the adopted 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. 1.4.2 In providing capital improvements,the Village shall limit general obligation , debt to an amount equal to or'less than 5%of the property tax base. 1.4.3 The Village shall annually update the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. The results of this update shall be incorporated within a capital budget as part of the annual Village budgeting process: 1.4.4 Efforts shall be made to secure grants or private funds,whenever available,to finance the provision of capital improvements. CI-2 • • Objective: 1.5.0 Decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits shall be based upon coordination of the development requirements included in this Plan, the Village land development regulations,and availability of necessary public facilities needed to support such development at the time needed. Policies: 1.5.1 Prior to issuing a development order or building permit,the Village shall use Level-of-Service(LOS)Standards adopted in the various elements of this Comprehensive Plan to review the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility provision. The Village shall not issue a development order or building permit which results in a reduction in service for affected public facilities below these Level-of-Service Standards. A listing of LOS standards is exhibited on Table CI-1. 1.5.2 The Village shall adept maintain an adequate fames Conc urrency Management Ordinance dung-1990 requiring that,at the time a development permit is issued,adequate facility capacity is available,or will be available upon occupancy of the development,based upon the application of the Tequesta Level-of-Service Standards to the proposed development. 1.5.3 Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would a) Contribute to any condition of public hazard as described in the SANITARY SEWER,SOLID WASTE,DRAINAGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,POTABLE WATER,and NATURAL GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ELEMENT,and COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; b) Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits,as described in the TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; SANITARY SEWER,SOLID WASTE,DRAINAGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,POTABLE WATER and NATURAL GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ELEMENT;and RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT; c) Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements;and d) Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use Map of the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,and public facility availability as described in the SANITARY SEWER,SOLID WASTE,DRAINAGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,and NATURAL GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ELEMENT. If public facilities are developer-provided,they shall accommodate public facility demands based upon adopted LOS standards. If public facilities are provided,in part or wholly,by the Village,financial feasibility shall be demonstrated subject to this element. CI-3 • Effects upon appropriate state agency and/or Water Management District facilities plans shall be evaluated. Objective: 1.6.0 • The Village shall designate an Urban Service Area as a means of: (1) Implementing future land use designations,as per the Future Land Use Map; and(2)limiting potential Village post disaster redevelopment expenditures. Policies: 1.6.1 That portion of the Village not located within the Coastal High Hazard Area,as defined in the Coastal Management Element,shall be designated as the Tequesta Urban Service Area. 1.6.2 The Coastal High Hazard Area,as designated in the Coastal Management Element shall be designated as a Limited Urban Service Area where the level of facilities and services provided by Tequesta shall be limited to those currently provided. 1.6.3 Consideration of the expansion of the Village Urban Service Area shall be made coincident with any annexation actions. CI-4 • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION S-Year Schedule of Improvements The 5-Year Schedules of Capital Improvements for Fiscal Years 1998-2002 is are presented on Tables CI-2 and.CI-3. A review of other Comprehensive Plan Elements leads to the conclusion that the Goal,Objectives and Policies and 5-Year Schedule of Improvements of the Capital Improvements Element are internally consistent with the remaining Elements. Operational Impacts of Proposed Capital Improvements A review of proposed capital improvements,as presented on Tables X CI-2 and CI=3 in relation to projected increases in Village operating expenses leads to the conclusion that little or no increases in Village staffing levels should result from programmed projects. • • • Program Time Frame(Fiscal Year) • ementfi Coordinating'Committee 1990 • • • Objectives -1, 0 and e 0 • Ti'ew,-radopt amend, eces a Palm Be.,c C..0 ty 1 070 • per ObJ five 1,6.0 • • CI-5 • TABLE CI-1 TEQUESTA LEVEL OF SERVICE(LOS)STANDARDS FACILITY LOS STANDARD Sanitary Sewer Max.Month Daily Sewage Generation Rate Residential-734 93 gallons/capita/day Non-Residential-434 478 gallons/acre/day Maximum Daily Flow Residential-7878 100 gallons/capita/day Non-Residential-46479 516 gallons/acre/day Solid Waste Average Generation Rate Residential: Single Family-6.01 lbs/capital/day Multi-Family-3.41 lbs/capita/day Non-Residential: Total -125 lbs/acre/day Restaurants-75 lbs/acre/day All Other-50 lbs/acre/day Potable Water Average Day Water Consumption Rate Residential-236 20 gallons/capita/day Non Residential 2,020 gallons/km/day Maximum Day Water Consumption Rate Residential-354 180 gallons/capita/day Non-Residential 3,030.gallons/acreS/day Storage Capacity System-4,840 3.75 million gallons Dfainage Stormwater Management Design Storm Public Facilities-425:Year,24-Hour Duration Storm Transportation Collector Roadways-LOS Standard C,Peak D Urban Minor Arterials-LOS Standard C,Peak D Urban Principal Arterials-LOS Standard C,Peak D Recreation and Open Space Unit/Population Neighborhood Parks 2 acres/1,000 Community Parks 2 acres/1,000 Beaches 1 mile/31,250 Golf Courses 9 holcc/30,004 Tennis 1 court/2,500 Basketball 1 court/2,500 Baseball/Softball 1 field/7,200 Football/Soccer 1 field/4,800 Playground areas 1 acre 3,600 *Non Residential includes the following land use types:Commercial;Public Buildings and Grounds;Educational; and Other Public Facilities. Source: Village of Tequesta; 11/97 CI-6 r a TABLE CI-2 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PROPOSED 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FY 1998-FY 2002 Project Description Status FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 PUBLIC WORKS/ TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES County Line Road Sign PN $25,000 Seabrook Paving C Seabrook Road Landscape Improvement(N) B $35,000 Eastwinds Landing Roadway R $5,000 $5,000 $145,000 FEC Improvements B $28,000 - Tequesta Drive Bridge Repair ED $40,000 $20,000 Seabrook Road Curbs&Landscaping Engr. PN/B $5,000 Seabrook Road Curbs&Landscaping Improv. (S) PN/B $50,000 $50,000 Landscape Architect Fee-Country Club Dr. B $25,000 Country Club Landscape Improvement B $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Village Blvd.Landscape Improvement B $12,500 Village Roadway Overlay(2.13 miles) R $40,700 Village Roadway Overlay(2.42 miles) R $43,800 Village Roadway Overlay(4.11 miles) R $86,500 Village Roadway Overlay(4.17 miles) R $92,150 Village Roadway Overlay(4.29 miles) R $86,000 TOTALS $128,800 $141,700 $226,000 $186,500 S257,150 SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES Not Village Responsibility N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CI- 7 TABLE CI-2 (Continued) VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PROPOSED 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FY 1998-FY 2002 Proiect Description Status FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 SOLID WASTE FACILITIES Serviced Franchise N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A STORMWATERI MANAGEMENT FACILITIES Tequesta Drive Diversion PN $54,000 Fairview East Drainage Modification R $90,000 Golfview Drive Drainage Modification R $50,000 Country Club Drive Drainage Expansion PN $48,000 Bridge Road Drainage Improvement PN $90,000 Riverside Drive Drainage Improvement PN $85,000 Video Drainage System PN $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Drainage Study PN $15,000 TOTALS $69,000 $100,000 $108,000 $100,000 $85,000 RECREATION FACILITIES Tequesta Park Basketball Court Resurface R $6,200 Constitution Park Basketball Courts Resurface R $6,000 Constitution Park Pathway Resurface R $20,000 Tequesta Park Tennis Courts Resurface R • $10,000 Tequesta Drive Pathway(Willow to Seabrook) PN $52,000 TOTALS $0 $6,200 $52,000 $16,000 $20,000 • CI- 8 TABLE CI-2 (Continued) VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PROPOSED 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FY 1998-FY 2002 Proiect Description Status FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 HOUSING FACILITIES None Scheduled N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CONSERVATION MEASURES Not Applicable N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A COASTAL MEASURES Not Applicable N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND IMPROVEMENTS $197,800 $247,900 $386,000 $302,500 $362,150 *Key: PN-Projected Need ED-Existing Deficiency R-Repair/Replacement B-Beautification C-Complete CI- 9 • TABLE CI-3 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WATER DEPARTMENT FY 1997-FY 2002 Project Description Status FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 POTABLE WATER FACILITIES Machinery&Equipment PN $16,250 $7,600 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 PC Programs PN $1,800 $1,800 $1,000 Vehicle Purchase PN Paint Bridge Crossings PN $25,000 • Distribution Improvements: ED Seabrook Road $44,000 Beach Road $187,000 $187,500 Turtle Creek $12,500 $12,500 Mona Road $9,000 $9,000 Bridge Road $14,000 $14,000 Tropic Vista $80,000 $80,000 CADD Mapping ED $12,000-> $10,000 Garage Facility PN $522,645-> $10,000 Well 28 PN $200,000 Cypress Drive Drainage PN $52,600-> $52,600 Telemetry at Remote Sites: ED Design/Bid,Engineering $25,000 Construction $29,500 $157,500 ESDC $7,500 $7,500 RO Reject Disposal: PN DesignBid,Engineering $25,000 Permitting $5,000 Construction $145,750 $580,000 ESDC $40,000 CI- 10 TABLE CI-3 (Continued) VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WATER DEPARTMENT FY 1997-FY 2002 Project Description Status FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 POTABLE WATER FACILITIES RO Plant: PN Design/Bid,Engineering $355,000 Construction .$475,500 $3,550,000 $2,243,000. ESDC $150,000 $225,000 Start-up Engineering $10,000 $25,000 RO Wells/Piping: PN Design/Bid,Engineering $20,000 Construction $142,940 $470,000 Bond Total:FY98/99/00 ESDC $15,000 $7,535,000 • TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUND WATER IMPROVEMENTS $1,818,485 $4,887,000 $2,546,000 $420,000 $308,000 $308,000 *Key: PN-Projected Need ED-Existing Deficiency • R-Repair/Replacement B-Beautification C-Complete —>-Carryover • CI- 11