HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 5A_4/7/1993 2 A
•, . .4
._ ,
ri VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
A' 1",:wt� BUILDING DEPARTMENT
f*".".4' � Post Office Box 3273 . 357 Tequesta Drive
•elf '�.!N A Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (407) 575-6220
FAX: (407) 575-6203
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 1 8 , 1 9 9 3
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL -
The Village of Tequesta Board of Adjustment held a regularly
scheduled Public Hearing at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta
Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on. Monday, January 18, 1993. The
meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman William
Kirkland. A roll call was taken by Fran Bitters, the
Recording Secretary. Boardmembers present were: Chairman
William Kirkland, Vice Chairman DeMott, Edwin Nelson, Kenneth
Northamer and Ray Schauer. Scott D. Ladd, Clerk of .the Board
and Attorney Pam McNierney sitting in for Village Attorney,
John C. Randolph were also in attendance.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Vice Chairman DeMott asked that Agenda Item IV, BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT REORGANIZATION, take place after all other Board
business had been taken care of.
Vice Chairman DeMott moved that the Agenda be approved as
amended. Boardmember Northamer seconded the motion. The vote
on the motion was:
•
William Kirkland for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Agenda was
approved as amended.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 2
III. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES (Meeting of December 21,
1992) .
Vice Chairman DeMott moved to approve the December 21, 1992
Meeting Minutes as submitted. Boardmember Nelson seconded
the motion. The vote on the motion was:
William Kirkland - for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted. -
V. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business before the Board.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
i. Tabled from the November 16, 1992 meeting, reconsider-
ation of the application of Richard DeWitt, owner of
property located at 11 DeWitt Place, Lot 2, Noit Gedacht
Subdivision, requesting a variance to the terms of the
Official Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Village
of Tequesta, Ordinance No. 355, as amended, Section XVI,
Uniform Waterway Control, Subsection (B) , Dock and Pier
Length, Width and Configuration, Paragraphs (1) & (6) ,
to allow the construction of a 31 x 1251 dock with a 51
x 281 terminal platform, in lieu of no dock or pier being
constructed which extends waterward from the mean high
water line in excess of seventy-five feet (751 ) and all
sections or areas of any dock or pier which intersect at
any angle with the main portion of a dock or pier
extending from the shoreline, may not exceed a total
combined length of twenty feet (20' ) , as required by the
Zoning Ordinance.
Gordon Ripma, representative for Richard DeWitt, reiterated
for the Board, the status of the application, stating that it
was tabled at the last meeting of the Board of Adjustment in
order to allow interested parties to negotiate and come to a
compromise. November 18: Mr. Ripma called Don Kern, Head of
DNR, to determine criteria for meeting with him without formal
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 3
application. Mr. Kern suggested a re-filing of the
application. A package was prepared and delivered to Scott
Ladd, Department of Community Development, Tequesta; sealed
surveys were obtained; discussions with Carolyn Hanes, DER,
took place. Jim Cates was kept abreast of all of the
foregoing activities.
Chairman Kirkland explained that this original application was
for a 150.' dock with a 40' T which was denied. Re-application
was made for 138' , negotiated to 125' , but the Board of
Adjustment approved only a 108 ' dock with a 20' T at the end,
which applicant felt was unacceptable.
Three sounding/surveys have been done: one by DNR, one by
Lindahl Browning who was hired by local neighbors, and one by
Marine Construction which was done for applicant. All three
sounding/surveys, done at 125 feet, came within six-tenths of
an inch of each other. Mr. Ripma stated that if the grace of
the State could be won, applicant would agree to 108 ' dock.
Larry Shaw, Marine Construction, explained how measurements
are taken, i.e. , which is not an actual measurement of the
depth of the water but a measurement of the elevation of the
river floor.
Several neighbors (Debra Namath, Tim Basquill, Dan Freeman,
Michael Dyer, Jim Ryan, June and Michael Leonard, Mark
Hermann, Janet Rosmarin, Jim Cates, Jim Rooney, Ross Dudley)
in opposition of the application were in attendance.
Jim Cates stated that for some 36 months a dock permit has
been the quest of Mr. DeWitt. Docks which surround the
property in question are 75' with 20' terminals extending
eastward. Mr. Cates felt a larger dock would create more
boating activity with larger boats and be destructive to the
environment. Mr. Cates, as representative of the above-named
homeowners in opposition, requested that the application be
granted. allowing a 75' length with a 20' eastward terminal,
but would be supportive if the Village granted a 108 ' dock
with a 20' terminal eastward, as long as the dock was
positioned parallel to the Cates' dock and perpendicular to
the DeWitt seawall. Mr. Cates displayed plans showing the
shoreline, homes, and dock positions, as well as proposed
positions of the dock of the above-referenced application.
The opposing neighbors did their own survey while waiting for
the results on the professional survey. Their own survey
consisted of putting PVC pipes in the water at 25' increments
from the bulkhead out into the water, marking each checking
the depth of water.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 4
Mr. DeWitt, displeased, voiced unpleasantries, demanding that
the pipes be removed or a bill of $250 would be charged. Two
days later someone removed the pipes and placed them on the
Cates' dock. One 44" long pipe located at the 100 ' marker was
not removed since it was covered by water and not obvious.
Mr. Cates stated that he felt any hardship Mr. DeWitt feels
he is experiencing is self-imposed since he subdivided the 2.2
acres. The 2 .2 acres had more than enough property to
construct a dock, but with the self-imposed restriction, it
would appear that there is not a real hardship displayed.
A letter opposing the application, from a neighbor (Jack
Eldon, 16 Yacht Club Place) who could not be in attendance at
this Hearing, was read into the Record. The objection was to
the excess size of the dock. Mr., Dyer of 216 W. Riverside
Drive read into the Record a letter of objection he had
written, with similar objections.
For clarity, Scott Ladd read the Village Ordinance, Section
B, under Dock and Pier Length Configuration, which determines
the allowed length of a dock.
Don Kern, of the DNR, observed the diagrams presented by the
opposing neighbors as a suggestion to what was acceptable with
them. Mr. Kern's comments were that he would approach the DNR
for reduction of dock length from 125' to 108 ' , restricting
vessel draft, and realignment, pivoting the dock to the left,
with a 20' terminal, but could not make any guarantees.
Debra Namath stated that when she and her husband purchased
their home, one of the greatest selling points was the view
of the River, which has, since their purchase, been impaired
on the east side by the new dock which has been constructed,
and a 'tanker' docked at the end; the view is now, once again,
threatened by the above-referenced application, intended to
• service three houses, which should be qualified as a 'bridge'
rather than a dock. Her plea to the Board was, who is
responsible for protecting her rights.
Attorney McNierney, reminding. the Board of what their
responsibility is, read into the Record the criteria stated
in the Ordinance, to clarify the basis for a decision by the
Board. Attorney McNierney also pointed out that any motion
made to approve a dock must state that a Deed Restriction is
required which states this dock will only be used as an
accessory use for the particular property on which it is
located. This would prevent the dock from being leased for
dock space for any other property. Also, any motion to
J
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 5
approve should be subject to obtaining a variance on the
second lot.
It was Mr. Kate's suggestion to the Board, that if the Board
restricted the draft of the boat from 24" to 22" , the issue
would be resolved.
Vice Chairman DeMott moved that the Board:
o approve a 108 ' dock, at a revised angle, with a 23 ' T;
o subject to a variance on the second lot;
o subject to a Deed Restriction stating that this dock will
only be used as an accessory use for the particular
property on which it is located; and
o that the Board be notified, through another meeting, of
any changes that are made after tonight's meeting.
There was no second to the motion.
Attorney McNierney pointed out that the variance at 108 ' has
already been approved and that issues which remain are the
issues with the agencies involved since these agencies would
not approve the 108 feet. The only need for a motion would
be the need to continue the application, based on further
studies by the DNR to review a re-alignment, doing their best
to see how much shorter they can make the dock.
Boardmember Schauer moved to continue the application, pending
evaluation of further data, to February 22, 1993. Boardmember
Nelson seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was:
William Kirkland for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 6
IV. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REORGANIZATION
1. Appointment. of Chairman: Vice Chairman DeMott moved to
nominate Ken Northamer as Chairman of the Board of
Adjustment. Boardmember Kirkland seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
William Kirkland - for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted.
2. Appointment of Vice Chairman: Boardmember Nelson moved
to nominate Alfred DeMott as Vice Chairman of the Board
of Adjustment. Boardmember Kirkland seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
William Kirkland for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted.
3. Appointment of Clerk of the Board: Boardmember Kirkland
moved to nominate Scott Ladd as Clerk of the Board of
Adjustment. Vice Chairman DeMott seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
William Kirkland - for
Edwin Nelson - for
Ray Schauer - for
Alfred DeMott - for
Kenneth Northamer - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
January 18, 1993
Page 7
VI. ANY OTHER MATTERS
There were not other matters before the Board.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other matters before the Board the meeting was
adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Fran Bitters •
Recording Secretary
DATE APPROVED:
Attest:
hitt 0, A.dd
Scott D. Ladd
Clerk of the Board