HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 7A_5/8/1997 �,
7 .
A
•` v'4 'F Tf.Gf� .
,11�� VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
"�. t �''� Post Office lux 273 • 357 " equesla Drive
70.�` M1 ` o Tequesta. Florida 34iO-03T • t5(f1) 575-62(X)
s .y �_, 0 nix: N61) 575 6203
Of
'CI COU 1 •
•
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
• MEETING MINUTES
• MARCH 24, 1997
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Redevelopment Committee held a regularly
scheduled meeting at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive,
Tequesta, Florida, on Monday, March 24, 1997 . The meeting
was called to order at 8 : 35 A.M. by Chairman Carl Hansen.
A roll call was taken by Betty Laur, the Recording
Secretary. In attendance were: Chairman Carl C. Hansen,
and Co-Chairs Joseph Capretta and Ron T. Mackail. Also in
attendance were: Village Manager Thomas G. Bradford,
Village Clerk Joann Manganiello, and Department Heads .
•
II . APPROVAL OF AGENDA
• Co-Chair Capretta requested a discussion under ANY OTHER
MATTERS regarding how to sell the facilities expansion to
the citizens and the process that would be taken to do so,
so that a plan could be formulated. Chair Hansen stated
that he also had items to discuss under ANY OTHER MATTERS.
Co-Chair Mackail made a motion to accept the agenda as
revised. Co-Chair Capretta seconded the motion. The vote
on the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Ron T. Mackail - for
. The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the agenda
was accepted as revised.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 2
III. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
There were no communications from citizens .
IV. REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS FOR FIRE-
RESCUE/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND POLICE FACILITIES, AND
COST ESTIMATES FOR THE SAME .
Chairman Hansen commented that he would like to see these
meetings become effective by proceeding as soon as possible
with Fire and Police facilities after due consideration of
costs and space. Chairman Hansen noted that the new budget
process would begin in July and suggested that if a decision
regarding how facilities would be financed had been made
that this might need to be a part of the 1998 budget.
Co-Chair Capretta commented that the need for facilities
must be sold to the residents before the budgeting process,
and suggested that discussions with the Fire Chief and
Police Chief should take place to determine their space
needs, and that the reasons expansion was needed should be
listed so that a traveling road show could be created. The
person doing research to put the presentation together would
become very knowledgeable on the subject. Co-Chair Capretta
explained that all the Homeowner Associations, Chamber of •
Commerce, and other key people could be invited to Village
Hall to hear the presentation and tour the facilities .
Small focus groups could be created, and a core support
group was needed. The cost and alternatives for financing
could be discussed. The presentation could be offered in
the morning, in the afternoon, and in the evening so that
more people could attend. Mr. Capretta explained that the
Committee was aware of all the reasons new facilities were
needed, but the residents were not, and some would probably
oppose expansion. Mr. Capretta stated that Mayor Schauer
also should be advised, and that both facilities expansion
and reverse osmosis should be discussed and the public
advised regarding why they were needed.
Chairman Hansen stated his agreement, but commented that he
believed the process was still in an overview stage, and
that the process could be broken into two phases : (1) Public
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 3
Safety first, and (2) Village Hall at a later date. Mr.
Hansen explained that he believed details and financing
alternatives should be discussed now for Public Safety
facilities, and that plans for a new Village Hall should be
put on a back burner. Chairman Hansen questioned whether it
would be cheaper to do all facilities at once or if Village
Hall could wait.
Co-Chair Mackail expressed his opinion that because the
upcoming charette would focus on a specific area of the
Village, decisions must be made about the location of
Village Hall, and agreed that a presentation must be put
together so that it could be presented when needed. Co-
Chair Capretta commented that one day there would be a
newspaper article regarding proposed facilities which would
make it an emotional issue, and the Village must be prepared
with answers. One anticipated controversy might be that the
only reason new facilities were needed was because services
had been expanded which required hiring more employees. Co-
Chair Capretta stated that the following decisions should be
made: (1) how shall we communicate this to the public; and
(2) prepare details of the plan itself. Mr. Capretta
commented that the staff should prepare the content of the
presentation, and an item should be placed on a Village
Council meeting agenda to discuss how to communicate this
issue to the public.
Village Clerk Manganiello introduced Gee & Jenson architects
Lisa Lemanowicz and Phil Crannell, who had been working to
see if space needs and programs for both Police and Fire
Rescue could be accommodated in the conceptual site plans
which had been previously reviewed by the Committee.
Conceptual floor plans had been prepared, which had been
reviewed by both Police Chief Allison and Fire Chief
Weinand. Architect Lemanowicz responded to Mr. Capretta' s
question regarding square footage that present facilities at
this site totaled approximately 10, 000 square feet and her
plans called for 50% expansion. Village Clerk Manganiello
explained that Public Safety renovations would cost $1 .7 to
$1 . 9 million, and that Village Hall cost was estimated at
$1 . 9 million. Chair Hansen pointed out that the present
building had code violations which would cost $100, 000 to
remedy. Co-Chair Capretta suggested that Village
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 4
administration offices could stay at their present location
indefinitely and that meetings could be held at the youth
center. Co-Chair Mackail commented that once the results of
the charette and the Palm Beach Cultural organization had
been received that location of a Village Hall could be
discussed. Co-Chair Capretta discussed the financial
disaster .of BRITT and whether Lighthouse Gallery was solvent
and had sufficient leadership to raise funds for a new
facility.
Architect Lemanowicz reviewed two conceptual floor plans, A-
1 and A-2, one of which included a new exterior facade while
the other did not. The importance of a primary and distinct
entrance for the Fire Department was pointed out. In one
plan, the Community Development Department remained at this
site, which made the plan very tight and would not allow
future growth.
Co-Chair Capretta discussed reasons the public came to
Village offices, which Village Manager Bradford commented
were (1) water department, (2) building department and (3)
police . Mr. Capretta pointed out that if those services
were moved to the Village Hall that everyone would need to
go there and therefore the public would tend to support a
new Village Hall more than if those services remained at the
present site. Chair Hansen expressed his opinion that it
would be better to have the Community Development Department
at Village Hall.
Architect Lemanovich reviewed schemes B-i and B-2 . Chair
Hansen favored B-1 because of the public entrance on the
east. Scheme C involved the Police Department located in the
present building. The purpose of the watch room was
discussed.
V. REVIEW OF FIRE CHIEF' S AND POLICE CHIEF' S COMMENTS RELATIVE
TO PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS
Chief Weinand expressed his opinion that Scheme B-1 provided
the best public access and that a visible point of access
was very important. Chief Weinand expressed concern with
the possibility that the Community Development Department
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 5
might be left at this location; stated that -the footprint of
the buildings were adequate for Public Safety operations but
interior arrangements needed to be changed; and commented
that he preferred a bunk room with Murphy beds so that the
room could be used for meetings during the day. Chair
Hansen questioned whether the estimated cost would change
dramatically after the architects had incorporated comments
made by Chief Allison and. Chief Weinand regarding the floor
plans, to which the answer was that it would not change very
much, since they would basically be rearranging within the
footprint. Architect Crannell commented that the architects
needed direction as to which floor plan was preferred. It
was the consensus of the Committee that scheme B-1 was the
preferred plan of those offered. This plan would relocate
the Community Development Department to Village Hall .
In response to Chair Hansen' s question regarding which costs
of Fire and Police projects could be done concurrently,
Village Clerk Manganiello responded that it had been
recommended for cost effectiveness and speediness to do both
at once; however, Fire Rescue facilities could be done first
and the Police department renovation afterwards (using the
same contractor) which would allow meetings to be held for
a longer period in the present Village Council chambers.
Chief Weinand explained that the present living quarters for
Fire Department personnel were in a modular house that could
be moved during the construction period, and that apparatus
could sit outside during that time.
During discussion of financing options, Village Manager
Bradford listed the following possibilities :
1 . Revenue bonds
2 . General obligation bonds
3. Cash
4 . Combination of options 1-3 .
Chief Allison pointed out that no training room was included
in the floor plan. The function of the training room was
discussed, and discussion ensued regarding making revisions
within the footprint to meet the specific needs of the
Department. Architect Crannell explained that he
anticipated numerous revisions until the requirements were
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 6
met. Scheme B-1 would allow expansion into the patio areas
to the north or south. Further discussion ensued regarding
the use of Murphy beds to allow a multi-purpose room for
fire department personnel . Architect Lemanovich explained
that furniture would be arranged to create a corridor so
that personnel would not be running from beds through a room
full of furniture, which would be dangerous. In response to
how privacy was created for opposite sexes, Chief Weinand
explained that the dress code for sleeping apparel allowed
multi use of space and a team-oriented environment. Co-
Chair Capretta pointed out that if a prominent public
entrance was desired and if the public was to be allowed to
come to get emergency service, then scheme B-i met those
needs .
Co-Chair Hansen listed the following functions of the
Village:
1 . Village Manager and staff
2 . Village Hall
3 . Water Department
4 . Building Department .
5. Police and Fire
6. Public Safety
Mr. Capretta explained that decisions must be made regarding
which of those functions should be located together; for
instance, the Village Manager and staff with the Village
Hall, which could be located almost anywhere. Other
functions were used daily. Mr. Capretta explained that
looking at the situation this. way led him to group
everything on one site, which he had never favored; however,
this was a possibility. Mr. Capretta commented that picking
where functions should be located would help pick the
scheme.
Chairman Hansen commented that at the last meeting removal
of the tank on the present site had been discussed. Village
Manager Bradford explained that Water Department Manager Tom
Hall had obtained bids and that the low bid to dismantle and
remove the tank was $8, 000, which would be on the Village
Council meeting agenda in April or May.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 7
VI. DISCUSSION OF PREFERRED OPTIONS AND SCHEDULING
Co-Chair Mackail discussed financing alternatives as listed
earlier in the meeting by the. Village Manager and types of
phasing, pointed out that the Village was almost debt-free
at the present time, and questioned the impact of phasing on
the tax base and cash flow. Village Manager Bradford
explained that one type of phasing was related to
construction and another could be related to financing.
Village Manager Bradford commented that as an example, if
the Fire Rescue were done first, he would have the following
financing options :
1 . Revenue bonds
2 . General obligation bonds
3. Cash
4 . Combination of options 1-3
5. Refinancing the debt into the existing 1994 bond
• issue.
Another option would be to obtain a bank line of credit
which could be drawn against as needed; and yet another
option would be to raise the utility tax from 9% to 10% .
Village Clerk Manganiello clarified that the $1 . 9 million
was the complete Public Safety package, including the
renovation of the Police Department.
Co-Chair Capretta proposed a 3-year plan in the following
phases: (1) phase 1 - Move Village Hall and the Water
Department downtown; (2) phase II - Renovate the youth
center to accommodate Village meetings; (3) phase III -
Renovate the present site and build a Public Safety
facility. Village Manager Bradford stated that another
phase could be the new garage and its offices which would
open in April or May. Architect Crannell responded to Co-
Chair Mackail' s question regarding designs they had done for
other municipalities by indicating that most had located
Public Safety facilities in one location and administration
functions at another location, and that he believed this'
configuration would provide the best management control and
flexibility for expansion. Co-Chair Mackail agreed that
separation of those functions would make sense, expressed
his opinion that plans should allow for future expansion,
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 8
and commented that it was important to focus on public
safety. Discussion ensued regarding where various Village
functions could be located. Village Manager Bradford
suggested proceeding with Public Safety now on this site,
drawing the plans so that the location north of the fountain
would be left open to reserve a future option to place the
Village Hall on this site, and at a future date the decision
could be made whether to locate the Village Hall there or at
another location. Village Clerk Manganiello explained that
she had researched relocating the Department of Community
Development and had found they could be housed on the same
floor of the United Bank building where the Village Manager
and the Water Department were currently located for
approximately $18, 000 annually. Another location on Old
Dixie Highway would cost approximately $12, 000 annually.
Preliminary cost estimates would be received shortly for
renovation of the interior of the youth center; and a
collapsible stage could be purchased for approximately
$3, 600 to accommodate public meetings in that facility. Co-
Chair Capretta referred to the three-year plan he had
discussed earlier in the meeting, and agreed that the
decision of where to locate the Village Hall could be made
at the end of that time period. Co-Chair Capretta expressed
his opinion that the Old Dixie Highway location would be
better for the Department of Community Development because
of the constant traffic to that department.
Co-Chair Mackail stressed the importance of working with
local businesses, and commented that he believed a lot would
be learned from the charette .
Co-Chair Mackail made the following suggestion: to focus
strictly on the current location as a Public Safety
Facility, with Village Manager Bradford to handle the
financing by obtaining a bank line of credit where the money
could be borrowed in stages; and that within that period of
time, which could be three to five years, all options and
resources be recognized so that a final decision could be
made in regards to a facility for Village Hall and
administrative offices, as well as facilities for other
departments. Village Manager Bradford commented that if the
Public Safety Facility were done in two stages there was a
possibility that the Village would have enough money without
•
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 9
borrowing. Co-Chair Mackail stated that if this concept was
agreed upon then Vice Mayor Hansen could begin work on a
presentation to sell this idea to the residents . Chairman
Hansen expressed his opinion that work on the Public Safety
Facility should proceed, with plans for a Village Hall to 'be
placed on a back burner.
Co-Chair Capretta made a motion to select the conceptual
plan with the public entrance, scheme B-1; to move the
Department of Community Development off-site; and to develop
this site as strictly Public Safety. Co-Chair Mackail
seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Ron T. Mackail - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Co-Chair Mackail made a motion that the Village Manager and
staff research the financing options to determine the best
economic decision and to present the findings to this
Committee and then to the Village Council . Co-Chair
Capretta stated that he wished to change the motion to
summarize the decisions made at this meeting. Discussion of
the motion ensued. Chair Hansen requested a perc chart be
prepared when feasible,` and to include financing for this
project in the 1998 budget if possible. Mr: Mackail
requested that financing options be presented before a perc'
chart was' prepared. Architect Crannell verified with the
Committee that plan B-1 had been chosen and - that also
included renovations for the Police Department. The final
motion was as follows:
Co-Chair Capretta made a motion to instruct staff to proceed
with the development of detailed plans to implement a Public
Safety facility on the current site basically using plan B-1
plus renovations to the Police Department; that a plan •be
formulated to . find a facility at the proper time for the
Building Department to move off-site; that a plan be
formulated--including costs--to renovate the youth center to •
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 10
be used for a temporary period for the Village Council
Chambers; that the Police Chief and Fire Chief work out a
detailed plan for B-1 plus the Police Department and to
optimize it internally working with the architects; that the
Village Manager prepare a financial plan to finance phase
one of this Public Safety plan at the least cost; and that
staff begin work on a communications program to sell the
whole plan to the public through a series of meetings with
community leaders. Co-Chair Mackail seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Ron T. Mackail - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
Chairman Hansen commented that although the Committee would
be discussing redevelopment of municipal facilities at
future meetings, they should not forget the original intent
of this committee which' was redevelopment of the community,
and proposed that future agendas include discussion of
Tequesta Plaza and other community items. Co-Chair Capretta
commented on current events concerning the downtown area,
including the lack of parking at McCarthy' s and The Flame,
and a plan by Mr. Van Brock to place a shopping plaza at the
corner of Old Dixie Highway and Tequesta Drive in return for
his making available a strip of land to provide parking for
both restaurants.. Mr. Van Brock also wanted to build
another Sterling House. Mr. Capretta commented that
although the Village had not wanted another ECF, the
proposed location made it feasible since it would be behind
the present facility on land which would be useless for any
other purpose. Mr. Van Brock was also renovating the old
Fashion Mall. Coming events included the charette, and Mr.
Capretta commented that the key link to decisions for that
area was whether Lighthouse Gallery planned to move there
and whether the gallery had the ability to raise the
necessary funds. Chair Hansen commented that the Committee
•
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 24 , 1997
PAGE 11
should be concerned about the Village, not just the
municipal facilities. Co-Chair Mackail commented that the
Village had provided an expedited site plan process, .
however, no one was taking advantage of it to begin
development. Mr. Capretta commented that when Tequesta Oaks
was finished that he believed emergency exits should be
provided.
VIII . ADJOURNMENT
Co-Chair Mackail made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Co-
Chair Capretta seconded the motion. The vote on the motion
was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Ron T. Mackail - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting
was adjourned at 10:31 A.M.
Re pectfully submitted,
Betty Zaur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Joann Manganiello
Village Clerk
DATE APPROVED: •