The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes_Development Review_7/13/2001 07/19/2001 09:01 4076941591 PAGE 01 n VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI7"'fEE MEETING MINUTES JULY 13, 2001 The Development Review Committee held a meeting in the Village Manager's Office at 250 Tequesta Drive, 1'eeluesta, Florida, on Friday, July 13, 2001. he meeting was called to order at 10:10 .A.M. by Director of Community Development Jeffrey Newell. Also in attendance were Public Services Supervisor Russell White, Dirt,ctor of Public Works and Recreation Gary Preston, and Police Lieutenant Rick Ricciardi. 1. Sketch Plan review for the replat of Yacht Club Point (Tract D, Tequesta Country Club) from a three (3) lot subdivision to a. four (4) lot subdivision. Jim Burg, Jim Burg Custom Homes, Inc. applicant, Prese nt on behalf of the applicant were Jim Burg and Attorney Joseph D. Grosso, Jr. Mr. Newell read into the record the following comments from Fire Chief James We;inand: (1) Roadways exceeding 300' in length are required to have an approved turn around for fire apparatus. (2) A, fire hydrant must be within 500 feet of the furthest portion of the most remote building. Mr. Newell indicated the Community Development Department comments were that the existing wood dock would be removed as discussed with Mr. Burg, and questioned what would happen to the existing wall. Mr. Burg indicated on the 07/19/2001 09:01 4076941591 PAGE 02 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES July 139 2001 Page 2 plans the portion of the wall he proposed to remove; and indicated that his neighbor, Steve,wished to retain a portion of the wall,for which a variance would have ,o be requested. Mr. Newell indicated square footage and floor elevation requirements had been satisfied. Mr. Burg clarified the existing concrete steps were part of the seawall and remained from a prior dock. Mr. Preston indicated Public Works had no concerns. Police Sgt, Rick Ricciardi commented his concerns regarding the dead end for emergency vehicles had been addressed. Sgt. Ricciardi advised there had been a lot of criminal activity along the waterfront,and qucstio rted whether there were any previsions for lighting along the seawall to allow view by the marine unit of the property from the sea. Mr. Burg commented the residents would want lighting; that there was one streetlight and he did not plan for more because each home woulra have a post light and gates at the front door with wrought iron lights in front, patterned after lighting in Harbor Isles in North Pa.m Beach. Sgt Ricciardi indicated if that was the case he had no problem, and explained that there needed to be sufficient light for the police to read address numbers, and stated he would not mandate an additional streetlight but would appreciate it if one could be added- Mr. Burg stated he would do what he could to provide an additional streetlight. Mr. Newell commented the people would probably like a light at the seawalls to protect their boats, and the applicant indicated light would be provided. Sgt. Ricciardi commented most of the people who had been victims had not had lighting. that he was now addressing them as a group, ind that lighting was cheap insurance. Mr. Freston questioned and received confirmation from the applicant that roadways would meet Village standards, Mr. Burg indicated the roadway locations on the plank. Mr. White commented he had previously discussed water connections with the applicant, that two meters had been installed, and a third would be added. Mr. Burk;indicated on the plans the location desired for the third meter. It was clarified that :he Village road would be maintained by the four property owners. Mr. Burg regtwsted Mr. White wally the site with him. Mr. Waite indicated the meter size M „07/19/2001 09:01 4076941591 PAGE 03 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES July 13,2001 Page 3 needed to ,accommodate the farthest house. Mr. Burl; indicated the size of the meter would be increased if necessary. Mr. Burg indicmted he and Paul Brienza had met ai the site regarding sanitary, and that there was adequate sanitary connection. Mr. White commented the roads were l;oing to be overlaid with asphalt during the next week so any necessary work needed to be done before that, and commented that connection fees would be worked out prior to service. The water meter size was discussed, Mr. Burg and Mr. White were to work out the appropriate size. Mr.Burg indicated plans were for a 1.1/2" to 2" line sized down to I inch at the property line to accommodate the house size. Mr. Presioii commented the Village had a standard type of street light which was the traditional type from FPL on an individual black pole and the applicant needed to be sure. to use that type. Mr. Burg commented he world meet the specifications. Mr. Newell commented the plumbing code for house service required 3/4" minimum line but 1"would be needed to get a little more volume. Mr,Burg stated he would meet Standard Building Code and probably would exceed it because of the size of the farthest house; and that he would upgrade the meter if he had to but would have pipe sizes installed to accommodate that. Mr. Newell commented a 1-1 i2" met.er would feed at 2" line. Mr. Burg inquired about a fire hydrant to which Mr. White responded the existing hydrant was within the 500' Chief W,.-inand was requiring. Mr. Burg commented he wanted to be sure that would be okay for the farthest point. Mr. Ncwcl I announced that concluded the item regarding replatting of Yacht Club Point. 2. Sprint PC'S Telecommunication Facility, 901 Old ]Dixie Highway (Tequesta water treatment plant.) Pat Lentini,Agent for Applicant. Pat Lentini, agent, was present. Memorandum To: Mayor/Council/Village Manger Subject:Replat of Yacht Club Point From: Jeffery C.Newell,Director of Community Development Date: August 2,2001 Re: Sketch Plat Review. In accordance with Article H,Procedures for Plat Approval of the Subdivision Regulations,the sketch plan that comes before the Council is for review and comments. Please review the code section-that is attached. .... ...... Also attaci ........... ............. are the minutes of the DRC review. The issues that were discussed are as follows" ................. ............... ...................... .......... ....... ............. ................. ay Is> An roadway that exceeds three hundred feet ' required to have a turn around for fire ...... ... .... ............ tus. .............. .... .............. .............. ............. ............... .............. ........... required............ Afire is requi within five hundred feet from the furthest portion of the most ................... ... ...... ........ ...... . .............. budding. ............. rewrite........... ............ ...... ............ .......... ........ ...-.......... ............ ........... );- .The existing wooden dock would be demolished. > The removal of an existing wall at the entrance of the subdivision. > Security lighting was a concern of the Police Department. > Roadway would meet Village's standard. > Correctly sized meters and piping would be installed. The applicant has made the necessary changes and addressed the concerns of the review. Staff recommends the approval of the sketch plan and to grant permission to proceed with the Preliminary Plat approval. ................................... ............... ..............X......I.- ................... ........................ .................... .. .. ... ....................... ............................................. ................... ....... ..................... .. .... ... . . .. .......... .................................. . ..... ............... ... ...... ................................ ..... ..... . . ........... ....... ....................... .. ...... ... .... :... �:............. ........... : .... ..... ... .... ............................................... . .................. ....... ... ................. ........ ..................... .......... . ......... ... ......... ... . ............ ............... ..... ............ --.,...........-.- ...........X . ... ............ .... ........... ....................... .... ........... .... .. ....... ..............0............................... ...... . . ..... Art. II,§ 1 APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISION Art.II, §2 shopping or commercial centers, schools, parks and playgrounds or any other physical features that will enable the council to determine how the subdivision will fit into the pattern of the community as a whole. 6. Tentative lot and block lines, including proposed lot areas. 7. Where a small or irregular tract of land will be created or may remain due to the development of a proposed subdivision, the council may require that a practical plan for the development of said tract be submitted. Where a practical layout cannot be made the council may require revision of the proposed subdivision layout. (4) After review by the village staff, copies of the sketch plan I ill be forwarded to the village council for consideration. 1. If the sketch plan is disapproved, the village shall re- tain one (1) copy and instruct the subdivider not to proceed with the subdivision unless and until a plan has been approved by the village council. (5) Following the approval/approval with changes of the sketch plan the subdivider may proceed to prepare a preliminary plat in accordance with the instructions hereinafter con- tained. The subdivider may elect to combine the prelimi- nary and final plat procedures. Section 2. Preliminary plat procedure. (1) Any person desiring to subdivide land,who has fulfilled the pre-application procedures set forth in section 1 of this article, shall prepare a preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision in accordance with the specifications and requirements as set forth in Article III, section 1 hereof. (2) Provide certification that the proposed subdivision meets the level of service standards and concurrency requirements of the Village of Tequesta. Certification is to be provided by a pro- fessional engineer, registered in the State of Florida, and be pre. pared in a format that can be verified by the village. (3) The land owner and/or representative shall schedule a meeting with the building official, providing him with one (1) Supp. No. 21 1223 Ci Y 2 �LL H i N0O j n _ > j= _m a� LJ - o� LD W ry I LLI CsI.Zzmu u:a: __- 2 O m ,0 OF A'Of LL ¢ I I a ZE O Cc 0 _ J I d 0 o w wI m Ib J¢o >I — wr=s a— JI -- U cr o cr II ¢ o'Nntim 0 3 0 n l O N I ION 10 V 8 1 0 3 0 N I VN3N Z O L— ———— nn oe. �.ox a. a m Oe, 2Aa,o6.66s x•or,zF,6rs os ao' _ m M a 6_�� •a� ®� _- `_"'°mmn 0 9/oStS 3m JS � aea I W U z I _ O I a 0I$ O a L——f lol to T— • LL N m ail eF w w>� c I ~ U z W a e6 f � O — a aN s g@ o o wes g� I 0 CC M QI ¢w LLW — m¢ w ml m zo zpo - I 'U Q N O-_ --- --- I ¢ m =1 1 = ~ o ?I w¢w Q Lu L.0 W o 3 e �I g:yu x LLI J _ e c/�J �$ H LL 0 llad ��vnwmn mn _ 210]_ I U� (-1 1 101 �!— LLj Q LL oji , .6A 5t 6� 9 L -__-__- ___J (�Q _ e Q O _ L �� m .6f"651 M95.BE.205 O - J -- � I L I i W I I I > _sA I I WEffi m q5e / _ = m�a f'--- CD m _ m- < - _ yy z N07"25'53"W 90.00'[M) d ePNhw o¢ U UO _ ino.n3 Q a� f O U E - LL]y- ��_ - c F"W ~(n O.. nna u.vn rm LLB a ono d3A18 33HOIVHVXG1 61 m O T ¢a¢ w