Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 10G_7/20/2000 X G l'r rt : MEMO RAND UM To: Village Council From: Joann Manganiello, Acting Village Managed . Date: July 13, 2000 0^` Subject: Response to PalmTran Request for Expression of Interest in Municipal Funding of Transit Services with Local Option Gas Tax Funds; Agenda Item The Village has received correspondence from the Executive Director of PalmTran dated June 5, 2000, copy attached, requesting an expression of interest from the municipalities of Palm Beach County in exploring options for funding of public transit services. The suggested options for municipal consideration are: 1 . Designation of funding from the municipal share of the` Local Option Gas Tax to fund specific services in its jurisdiction. 2 . Creation of a community based transit system. In regard to the idea of a community based or local based transit system, there are many reasons to fund and not fund local transit systems, whether operated by a municipality of other entity. A local transit service operated by the Village of Tequesta would not be effective or warranted since there has been little use of or interest in public transit bus service by our community. Any such transit service could negatively affect the financial position of any such operation. In fact, PalmTran has not had much success with its provision of passenger bus service in the North County. Surveys have indicated very little use of the bus service north of Indiantown Road and Village of Tequesta ridership is extremely poor. In fact, PalmTran has just recently altered its northernmost bus route cutting out Tequesta entirely. There are numerous federal regulations that the local transit operator would have to comply with. For example, there is a federal requirement that mandates the local public transit service provider to give front door to point of destination transport service to any disabled person requesting same and residing within a certain radius of the transit routes of the local public transit service provider. This requirement is often a major contributor to the red ink experienced by public transit service providers and is one example of the complexities of operating public transit services in this day and age. Local governments are authorized, by statute, to levy up to 13 cents of local option gas taxes in the form of three separate levies . The first is a tax of 1 to 6 cents on every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold in a county. See F. S . 336. 025 (1) (a) . The second tax is a 1 to 5 cents levy on every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county. See F.S. 336. 025 (1) (b) . Diesel fuel is not subject to this tax. The third tax is referred to as the Ninth- Cent Fuel Tax and was adopted by Palm Beach County Ordinance number 93-18 dated August 17, 1993 . These local option fuel taxes may be authorized by a majority vote of a county' s governing board or voter approval in a countywide referendum. The proceeds collected from these gas taxes are distributed by the Florida Department of Revenue according to distribution factors determined at the local level by interlocal agreement between the county and municipalities within the county' s boundaries . The proceeds received from the 1-to-6-cent local option gas tax may be used only for transportation expenditures (operating and capital) . The proceeds from the 1-to-5-cent local option gas tax must be used only for transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital improvement element of the local government' s comprehensive land-use plan. The Village participates in two separate and distinct Interlocal Agreements, one that imposes a six-cent gas tax, and another that exacts a five-cent gas tax, as follows : 1) In 1986, an Interlocal Agreement was signed, which imposes a six-cent gas tax. It establishes the following distribution formula: one-third of the net proceeds collected by the county from the state is redistributed to municipalities and the county retains two-thirds of these proceeds . 2) A second Interlocal Agreement was signed in 1993, which exacts a five-cent gas tax. It fixes the following distribution formula: 21% of the net proceeds collected by the county from the state are redistributed to municipalities and the county retains 79% of the proceeds . The third tax (the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax) is distributed, in whole, to the County. No agreement exists between the County and any of the municipalities . The tax levy expires December 31, 2003 . Palm Beach County has designated the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax to specifically fund mass transit and paratransit costs (PalmTran and SpecTran) . As you can see on the table on page 4, the current gas tax formula just adequately covers the eligible transportation expenditures undertaken by the Village on an annual basis. It is important to note that the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax is already designated to public transit services in Palm Beach County. When this additional gas tax was imposed, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners greatly expanded the routes and services of PalmTran. The cost of expanding this service was to be covered by this gas tax. Apparently, this funding source has proved to be inadequate to meet the revenue needs of PalmTran in light of their request for additional municipal funding. Based upon the foregoing it is evident that the current gas tax structure just adequately covers the eligible transportation expenditures of the Village of Tequesta and that Palm Beach County has unilaterally designated 100% of the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax proceeds for the specific benefit of transit services denying the Village and other municipalities of any benefit from this revenue source. Additionally, it would not seem feasible to operate a local transit service within the jurisdiction of the Village of Tequesta. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Village of Tequesta authorize the Mayor to execute the attached letter in response to the PalmTran letter of June 5th indicating that the Village of Tequesta is not interested in providing additional funding for public transit in that the current Local Option Gas Tax just adequately covers the eligible transportation expenditures incurred by the Village and in light of 100% of the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax being allocated to public transit by Palm Beach County. Word\Manager\PalmTran Agenda Item to Council 7-13-00 • The revenue the Village receives from each tax sources is indicated in the table appearing below: Tax Actual FY 1999 Estimated FY 2000 Local Option Gas Tax Six 113,351 104,560 Cents Local Option Gas Tax Five 52,322 49,058 Cents Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax 0 0 TOTAL 165,673 153,618 The following is a list of eligible expenditures that can be funded with these tax revenues in the Village of Tequesta's FY 2000 operating budget: 1. Street repair and maintenance: $39,350 + $39,350 carry over= $78,700 2. Street Cleaning $1,620 3. Street lighting: $26,800 4. Storm Sewer Maintenance: $14,000 5. Medians: $17,970 Total: $139,090 page 4 v' • 4,G VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA �, , Post Office Box 3273 • 250 Tequesta Drive • Suite 300 ;�� ` a Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (561) 575-6200 mot' = t Fax: (561) 575-6203 cN cou July 21, 2000 Mr. Perry J. Maull Executive Director PalmTran 3201 Electronics Way West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 RE: Request for Expression of Interest in Municipal Funding of Transit Services with Local Option Gas Tax Funds Dear Mr. Maull: The following is in response to your letter dated June 5, 2000. At their July 20, 2000, Village Council Meeting, the Tequesta Village considered your above referenced request and authorized me to respond to you on behalf of the Village Council. The Village of Tequesta is not interested in providing additional funding for public transit for the following reasons: 1) the current Local Option Gas Taxes just adequately covers the eligible transportation expenditures incurred by the Village, and 2) Palm Beach County has already designated 100% of the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax to public transit provided by PalmTran in Palm Beach County. Should you have any questions, please contact Joann Manganiello, Acting Village Manager. Sincerely, Joseph N. Capretta Mayor Village of Tequesta C: Joann Manganiello, Acting Village Manager JNC/mmt Word\Mayor\Maull letter re PalmTran 7-21-00 Recycled Paper PalmTran 3201 Electronics Way Village of Tequesta West Palm Beach,FL 33407 June 5, 2000 Phone: (561)841-4200 A000 FAX: (561)841-4290 JUN 0 8 www.palmtran.org Pam,J.),,,,,,,,R Village Manager's Office Executive Director z x Attn. Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager Village of Tequesta 357 Tequesta Drive Palm Beach County Board of County Tequesta, FL 33469 Commisslonexs Maude Ford Lee,Chair Warren H.Newell Dear Mr. Bradford: Vice Chairman Karen T.Marcus Carol Mary McCarty I am writing to municipal managers at the direction of the Board of County Burt Aaronson Commissioners(BCC). At the BCC's budget workshop on May 30,2000 there was a discussion by the Commissioners regarding municipal participation in County Administrator funding public transit.The County and all municipalities share in the proceeds Robert Weisman of the local option gas tax. The local option gas tax can only be used to fund transportation projects,including public transit.To date with a few exceptions, such as Lake Worth,Boynton Beach,and Wellington,municipalities have not used their shares of the local option gas tax to fund public transit. As a result the BCC has requested me to ask if your municipalities would provide funding from your share of the local option gas tax to preserve public transit service in your jurisdiction. There are at least a couple of options that are available to municipalities to help preserve public transit services. 1. Through an interlocal agreement with the BCC, a municipality may designate funding from its share of the local option gas tax to fund specific services in its jurisdiction. This could be for such services as: regular Palm Tran routes, community circulatory routes, Tri-Rail connectors, or ADA Complementary Paratransit Services. The village of Wellington already designates funds for ADA Complementary Paratransit Services for its residents. 2.A municipality may wish to set up its own community based transit system. The cities of Lake Worth and Boynton Beach already have their own community circulatory systems. Through an interlocal agreement between the BCC and the city/town, Palm Tran can also provide buses and/or financial assistance to set up community based public transit system. Neighboring municipalities may want to form partnerships to provide community circulators An Equal Opportunity-Affirmative Action Employer that would be mutually beneficial. Community circulators can be operated directly or under a contract with a private provider. Palm Tran can also provide technical assistance in the planning and marketing of community circulators. If you have any interest in pursuing these options or any other options for public transit, please give me a call at 841-4210. If your municipality is not interested in funding public transit in any manner, I would appreciate a letter from you so indicating your position on public transit funding. Si cerely, f\i" Perry J. Maull I/Lk, cc: Honorable Maude Lee, Chair, and Members of Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Bob Weisman, County Administrator Jamie Titcomb, Executive Director Palm Beach County League of Cities, Inc. Vince Bonvento, Assistant County Administrator Bus route changes e but ridership remains: low By Jim Turner very stringent requirement for a Staff Writer minimum ridership of 35 riders per day." JUP1 R -- Palm Tran has The single line travels north altejelLatt northern st from Mangoni #h north- cutting out Tequesta and adding ern terminus of Tri- ail, which a park-n-ride to Carlin Park, as has agreed to split the cost of it continues to try to build pas- the tine,.Tri-Rail agreed to split sengger;number. the cost as long as ridership However, area officials; say would top 35 a day, which has the service is a ways from reach- yet to be, met. The county iinngsits'projected ridership num- planned last year to eliminate all "Palm Tran has continued to service north of PGA Boule- do some surveys and found yard,due to low ridership: there is very little use of the bus Officials of the bus system are expected speak at a ch north of Indiantown Road,'," co to coffee Murtaughambe said, r said Louise Murtaugh,president and stalk about ways to promote of the Jupiter-Tequesta-Juno the service. Beach Chamber of Commerce, Jupiter officials, Monday,which has been working with y, de- Palm Tran to increase passenger cided not to share their part of service in the north county. the local-option gas tax to help The route change,.took effect fund Palm Tran.Palm Iran had. June 19. asked the Town Council to help . The ridership on this route Pay for the service. hat been poor and is subject to Our ridership may be down, review, within the-next three to but it's due to the routes we four months, whether it should have," said Jupiter Councilor continue," noted Bernie Barbara Henderson,, `•`I still Schattner, the town's director of think we have to be looking at engineering and public works, Abacoa, the university and the , , "This route is currently primar- town center for buses to be ac- ily funded by Tri-Rail, with a cessing." V