Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 16F_4/13/2000 • MEMORANDUM To: Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager From: Scott D. Ladd, Director of Community Development Kara L. Irwin, Planner Date: April 5, 2000 Subject: Development of an Overlay Zoning District Applicable to the U.S. Highway One and Old Dixie Highway Corridors The Department of Community Development solicited proposals for a Zoning and Land-Use Consultant for the purpose of developing a potential multi jurisdictional overlay zoning district applicable to the properties adjacent to U.S. Highway One and Old Dixie Highway corridors from Alternate A1A to County Line Road from seven vendors. Two vendors responded: Duncan Associates and Keith and Schnars, PA_ Keith and Schnars, a consultant firm in West Palm Beach developed a proposal contract for $26,775.00 in order to develop an overlay-zoning district along the Old Dixie Highway and U_S_ Highway One corridors. The Department of Community Development recommends the contract with Duncan Associates, 390 South Juno Lane, Juno Beach, Florida 33406 for the development of an Overlay Zoning District within the target area for$12,000.00. The Old Dixie Highway and U.S. Highway One corridors fall within three separate jurisdictions, unincorporated Palm Beach County, Jupiter and the Village of Tequesta. This presents a problem of continuity of development of parcels since there are different regulations for use, landscaping, development standards and aesthetics within the three jurisdictions_ A consultant would provide recommendation for creating an overlay district within the applicable area to provide continuity in the existing land use regulations that are in effect along applicable corridors within the Town of Jupiter, Palm Beach County and the Village of Tequesta_ Attached are nineteen (19) sets of packets, including an original, for the above referenced subject. Please place this item on the April 13, 2000, Council agenda. Staff recommends approval. /kli RESOLUTION NO. 58-99/00 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AWARDING A ZONING SERVICES CONTRACT TO DUNCAN ASSOCIATES OF JUNO BEACH, FLORIDA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $12, 000.00 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT APPLICABLE TO THE U.S. HIGHWAY ONE AND OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDORS, WITH SAID FUNDS BEING APPROPRIATED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING SERVICE ACCOUNT HAVING A FISCAL YEAR 99/00 BUDGET ALLOCATION OF $29, 000 . 00, AND AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE APPLICABLE CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE VILLAGE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Contract for the Development of an Overlay Zoning District Applicable to the U. S . Highway One and Old Dixie Highway Corridors with Duncan Associates of Juno Beach, Florida, in the Amount of $12 , 000, Attached Hereto as Exhibit " I" and Incorporated by Reference as Part of this Resolution is Hereby Approved and the Village Manager is Authorized to Execute the Applicable Contract on Behalf of the Village. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED by Councilmember , who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Councilmember , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows : FOR ADOPTION AGAINST ADOPTION The Mayor thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of April, A.D. , 2000 . MAYOR OF TEQUESTA ATTEST: Joann Manganiello Village Clerk EXHIBIT"I' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA AND DUNCAN ASSOCIATES This Professional Services Agreement is made as of April ,2000,by and between the Village of Tequesta, a political subdivision of the State of Florida(Village)and James Duncan and Associates, Inc., a professional corporation located in Austin, Texas (Consultant). WHEREAS, Village desires to engage Consultant to perform certain services relating to the preparation of recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County, including the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County; NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter provided, Village and Consultant agree as follows. I. Scone of Agreement. Consultant's relationship to Village shall be that of independent contractor,at all times this relationship shall be governed by and be in strict compliance with the terms of this Professional Services Agreement. 2. Professional Services. Consultant shall furnish services to Village as set forth in Exhibit"A,"which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Period of Service. Consultant shall begin its services promptly after receipt of an executed copy of this Agreement and will complete the services pursuant to the timeline set forth in Exhibit"A." Times for performance shall be extended for periods of delay resulting from circumstances over which Consultant has no control. 4. Compensation. For services provided by Consultant as described in Exhibit"A",Consultant shall bill Village,payment of each such invoice shall be due to Consultant within thirty(30)days of receipt by Village. Consultant shall be compensated for work completed that is in conformance with the duties set forth in the"SCOPE OF SERVICES"portion of this AGREEMENT for the sum of twelve thousand dollars($12,000.00). Consultant shall invoice the Village on or before the fifth(5th) day of each month for services rendered during the previous month. Consultant shall receive payments on or before the fifteenth(15th)of each month 5. Subcontracting. It is understood that the Consultant may use the legal services of John C.Randolph in the performance of certain services as presented in Exhibit"A." The Village must first approve any other subcontractor relationships. EXHIBIT"I" 6. Conflict of Interest. Consultant agrees that it has no interest and shall acquire no interest,direct or indirect,that would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services hereunder. Consultant further agrees that, in the performance of this Agreement,no person having any such interest shall be employed. 7. Termination. The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice in the event of failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination,Consultant will be paid for all services rendered to date of such termination. 8. Ownership of Documents. All documents prepared in the performance of this Agreement shall be delivered to Village before final payment is made to Consultant. 9. Amendments. No amendments or modifications of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by each of the parties to the Agreement. 10. Severability. Any provision in this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable under state or federal law shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibitions or unenforceability,without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof. Also, the non-enforcement of any provision by either party to this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it effect the enforceability of that provision or the remainder of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Village and Consultant have caused this instrument to be signed by theirrespective duly authorized officers,all on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DUNCAN ASSOCIATES By: James B. Duncan,President ATTEST: VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA By: Joann Manganiello,Village Clerk Thomas G. Bradford,Village Manager • EXHIBIT "A" prmposa/todevelop I Overlay Zoning District submitted to TEQUESTA, FLORIDA to • 4 �R F v., s M Yap Aiwa 101 } subnitted by duncanlassociotes April 4, 2000 Table of Contents FIRM DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH SCOPE OF SERVICES 4 Task I\Background and Reconnaissance 4 Task 2\ Issue Identification and Policy Direction 5 Task 3\ Recommendations 5 DELIVERABLES AND SCHEDULE 7 BUDGET 8 USER REFERENCES 9 DEVELOPMENT CODE CLIENTS Palm Beach, FL: Neighborhood Design Guidelines Palm Beach Gardens, FL: Land Development Regulations Highland Beach, FL: Zoning Code Update Lake Park, FL: Park Avenue Downtown Development Code Weston, FL: Sign and Landscape Regulations Fort Lauderdale, FL: Sign Ordinance and Urban Design Guidelines Jacksonville, FL: Zoning Regulations Cooper City, FL: Land Development Regulations RESUMES James B. Duncan, FAJCP Eric Damian Kelly, Esq., FAICP L. Martin Hodgkins,Jr.,AICP Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations Firm Description and Approach OUR FIRM Duncan Associates is an award-winning planning and growth management consulting firm that specializes in the revision of land development regulations. From our offices in Juno Beach,Austin, Muncie, and Chicago, we serve a growing clientele that includes many of the nation's most progressive cities and counties. Since its initial establishment in Fort Lauderdale in 1977, Duncan Associates has successfully revised and updated land development codes for over 75 communities in 26 states. Codes drafted by the firm have received awards from the Texas, Louisiana and Florida chapters of the American Planning Association. Unlike most consultants, Duncan Associates specializes in plan implementation work; drafting land development regulations is our primary business. If Duncan Associates is selected for this assignment to provide recommendations for a potential multi-jurisdictional overlay zoning district for the Village, Martin Hodgkins of our Florida office, will serve as our on-site, day-to-day project manager. In addition, firm president James B. Duncan from our Austin office will provide assistance on an as-needed basis. Legal counsel, if necessary, will be provided by Eric Damian Kelly, Esq. Typical Corridor Problems CORRIDOR CONFLICTS--A COMMON PROBLEM • Lack of unifying elements to provide The Oki Dixie Highway and U.S. Highway One corridors represent a identity or character to the corridor rather common problem found throughout much of Palm Beach County • Multiple jurisdictions with varying and South Florida: urban commercial corridors located in more than one planning and zoning requirements jurisdiction. Between them, the two corridors are located in three - I ark of prevailing architectural style separate jurisdictions:the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter, and - Lack of overall landscape themes unincorporated Palm Beach County. Old Dixie Highway is a two-and • Lack of common standards for signs four-lane road, while U.S. Highway One is a six-lane median-divided • Compatibility issues between uses highway. On the north, both roads end at the Palm Beach- Martin allowed throughout the corridor County line. On the south, both roads connect to the northern portions of the Town of Jupiter. The character of Old.Dixie Highway is mixed: bounded on the west by the Florida East Coast Railroad(FEC), and on the east are a variety of commercial, industrial, residential, and governmental uses. The U.S. Highway One corridor also is mixed, but contains primarily strip commercial and multifamily residential uses. There are differences between median landscaping, landscaping on private property, signs and billboards, and overall architectural design of structures located within the various portions of the corridor. These differences reflect the contrasting planning and zoning policies of the three jurisdictions. The differences also are reflective of the period when the buildings, signs, and landscaping were approved and installed. Also visible in certain areas are potential limitations for improvements to property, including landscaping, parking, and additions to buildings, caused by past expansion of the two roads. Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 1 a OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND ENHANCEMENTS A cooperative effort between Tequesta,Jupiter, and the County provides a long term opportunity to enhance and improve the two corridors to the benefit of all residents. The following joint actions represent the basis for such long term improvements: • changes to comprehensive plans to adopt complementary goals, objectives, and policies; • adopting common standards for permitted uses, site planning, • landscaping, and signs; and • providing overall architectural standards for new or renovated structures. The cooperative effort also could positively affect adjacent residential areas, through prohibiting or ultimately eliminating uses detrimental to such neighborhoods. The corridor study also could provide an opportunity to review policies and judicial trends affecting billboards. As a nearby example, the benefits of adopting overlay zoning techniques are demonstrated by the Indiantown Road Overlay Zoning District(I0Z). The 10Z, approved by the Town of Jupiter in 1990, restricts uses, implements general design standards, limits uses, and provides area specific landscape requirements. The long term success of the IOZ is largely due to the consistent support by the Town Council for the district, the specificity of the regulations, and funding for r landscaping enhancement programs for the corridor. In 1996, to further extend the zoning policies of the 10Z, the Town and the County entered into an interiocal agreement to allow Jupiter to exercise planning and zoning authority in unincorporated areas east of 1-95. UNIQUE COMMUNITY NEEDS Duncan Associates is familiar with the need to apply zoning and design techniques that reflect the specific character of the corridor and the communities • affected. As indicated previously, our Florida office is located in northern Palm Beach County, and is familiar with the land use, landscaping, and design problems associated with the Old Dixie/U.S. One corridors. Our firm also is familiar with the elements of implementing urban corridor plans via overlay districts. In fact, Mr. Hodgkins, has drafted or assisted in drafting several overlay districts: • in his former position as Community Development Director for I the Town of Jupiter, he drafted the original lndiantown Road Overlay Zoning District(10Z); • while Zoning Administrator in the City of West Palm Beach, he assisted in drafting language for the Lakefront Preservation Overlay Zoning District(LFPOD); and • while serving as Palm Beach County Zoning Director, he assisted in the drafting of the Turnpike Aquifer Protection Overlay District(TAP-0). Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 2 3 Pragmatic Approach Duncan Associates is well known for its pragmatic and individualized approach in dealing with land development issues. Our approach to any land development issue draws upon our years of experience in developing regulations tailored to unique local needs. ft stresses on-going and meaningful interaction with local participants and structured, independent work by members of our firm--working alone or as part of a team. Having successfully updated many codes and addressed a variety of code-related issues, we know the pitfalls to avoid. Two primary objectives guide us in addressing land development and zoning issues. First, the response need to mirror desired community policies and objectives. Second, the response should be clear, concise, and provide solutions that can be easily implemented and administered. We accomplish these objectives by preparing responses that reflect current and anticipated trends, and responses that address substantive land use and development issues of importance to each community. Local Perspective Thorough analysis of existing regulations, land use policies and community conditions distilled through discussions with local staff,citizens and stakeholders, independent analyses and field work—forms the foundation for our work. The local perspective that emerges from this background is complemented by our national experience, which we call upon to offer workable format, organizational and regulatory alternatives for consideration by the community. Successful completion of any project requires a blend of big picture thinking, meaningful local participation, and "nitty-gritty'detailed drafting and organizational work Each of our answers is customized. We do not use a"cookie-cutter"or "boiler-plate" approach in our recommendations to local problems. Common Sense Solutions The professionals at Duncan Associates have the experience required to provide common sense solutions to both simple and complex land use issues. As former public-sector planners and zoning administrators,we have actually administered regulations and know about the real-life problems and issues that can arise on a daily basis. Duncan Accnciates proposes regulatory solutions for individual communities that truly work. They are not abstract applications or some fleeting "flavor-of-the-day" concept. Corporate: JAMES DUNCAN AND AssoQATES, INC. d/b/a DUNC AN ASSOCIATES 390 South Juno Lane Juno Beach, Florida 33408 tel: 56I/626-2420 fax: 56 I/630-9852 email: mhodgkinsPmindspring.com website: www.duncanplan.com Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 3 I, • Scope of Services Duncan Associates proposes a straightforward scope of services for the Village of Tequesta "multi-jurisdictional overlay zoning distract" project. Our proposed scope of services outlines a series of tasks culminating in a series of recommendations for adopting an overlay district for this portion of the County. Preparation of the recommendations will be carried out with direction from the Village staff and other participants that may be identified as beneficial to the overall process. TASK I\BACKGROUND AND RECONNAISSANCE The initial task of our work program will focus on organizational and substantive issues. We will identify information sources, refine responsibilities, discuss overall goals and reach agreement on a number of other project issues. This task will also serve as a forum for addressing specific topics and issues to be explored during our data analysis and meetings with other jurisdictions. By conducting these tasks right away, we'll be able to identify issues that have a direct bearing on the project. A. Data Gathering We will identify data and information needs, induding ordinances, plans, studies, permits and other development-related documents. B. Document Review We will conduct preliminary review of existing zoning, subdivision and related regulations. We will also conduct a thorough examination of all available planning documents, induding the comprehensive plans for all three jurisdictions. C. Organizational Meeting We will attend an initial meeting with Village staff in Tequesta to discuss project organization and logistical issues. Individual meetings with representatives from other jurisdictions also would be discussed at this time. D. Key Person Interviews We will conduct interviews with 3 - 5 key persons, identified by the Village, to discern development trends and issues of local importance. Interviewees should be knowledgeable of issues the Village faces with respect to long term development within both corridors. E. Other Jurisdictional Meetings. We will meet with key officials and staff of other jurisdictions to determine how best to implement a unified approach to resolve common issues and concerns within the two corridors. F. Field Surveys • Ir We will conduct field surveys of existing development patterns, including both land uses and r structures, within the two corridors to better understand the applied cumulative effects of past and current codes and regulations. Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 4 TASK 2\ISSUE IDENTIFICATION The purpose of this task is to gain insight into key regulatory policy issues that will need to be addressed in the recommendations regarding the two corridors. A. Analysis of Existing Regulations/Policies 1 We will continue our analysis of pertinent regulations, procedures, permits, plans and policies within the three jurisdictions. r B. Comprehensive Plan Consistency Any conflicts between the three comprehensive plans will be identified, and will be included in the final recommendations. 1 C. Land Development Regulations r The land development regulations (LDRs)of the three jurisdictions will be reviewed. Both common elements and conflicts between the three sets of regulations will be identified. Among items to be reviewed are the following: • signs • property development regulations(building height, lot coverage, setbacks, floor area ratio, minimum lot size, etc.) • landscaping • architectural standards • permitted, conditional/special exception, and prohibited uses • nonconforrruties • definitions • site planning TASK 3\RECOMMENDATIONS A. Issue Identification/Policy Memorandum We will prepare a report containing recommendations based upon key regulatory issues and problems identified during the first two tasks. The report will also include the following specific recommendations: • a list of permitted, conditional/special exception, and prohibited uses that should be utilized throughout both corridors • one or more recommendations for common architectural to be utilized within both corridors • one or more recommendations for common landscaping standards, themes, and materials to be installed on private property within both corridors, • one or more recommendations for common landscaping standards, themes, and materials to be installed on public property within both corridors Village of Tequesta/Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 5 • recommendations to achieve a unified approach to the two corridors, including adoption of common comprehensive planning policies, adoption of common zoning policies, adoption of a common overlay district, adoption of a joint planning agreement, use of interlocal agreements, or other less formal means of cooperation • recommendations for providing appropriate public notice to achieve the recommended courses of action • • • Village of Tequesta/Mutti-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 6 3 Deliverables and Schedule Deliverables Task Deliverable I\ Background and Organizational Meeting Reconnaissance Field Surveys(I day) Key Person Interviews(3-5) 2\ Issue Identification and Village Staff Meeting Policy Direction Meetings with Officials from Other jurisdictions 3\ Draft Recommendations Draft Recommendations Village Staff Meeting Schedule Our proposed time schedule complies with the schedule included within the Request for Proposal(RFP). The R.FP calls for a delivery period of sixty(60)days upon signing of the contract to perform the services identified herein. This schedule is acceptable to our firm. Task -{ours I\ Background and 25 Reconnaissance 2\ Issue Identification and 25 Policy Direction 3\ Draft Recommendations 50 Village of Tequesta/Mutti-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 7 Budget We will perform the work described in this proposal for a lump-sum, fixed-fee budget of$12,000. This figure includes all of our direct and indirect expenses. The budget is based on$11,000 for our services and $1,000 for expenses. Additional project time, beyond the scope of our proposal, can be contracted as follows:James B. Duncan at$125 per hour; Eric D. Kelly at$150 per hour; and, Martin Hodgkins at$95 per hour. { Village of Tequesta/Mutti-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 8 mommimmin User References Town of Palm Beach-October 1999 to Present Paul W. Castro, AICP Zoning Administrator 561/835-4614 Town of Highland Beach - May 1999 to Present Robert S. Dawson, CBO Building Official 561/278-4540 City of Palm Beach Gardens - May 1999 to Present Roxanne M. Manning,AJCP Growth Management Director 56I/799-4243 Village of Wellington -July 1999 to Present James R. Kuzdaz,Jr., AICP Planning, Zoning and Building Director 561/753-2430 Town of Lake Park-April 1999 to October 1999 David Thatcher, AICP Community Development Director 561/848-3458 Village of Tequesta/Multi-Junsdictional Overlay Zoning District Recommendations 9 RPR 06 '00 03:04PM JONES FOSTER JOHNSTON & STUBBS P. 1/1 JNES )FOSTER T Flagler Center Tower,Suite 1100 Mailing Address �11IV1v 505 South Flagler Drive Post Office Box 3475 &STUBBS, P.A.. West Palm Beach,Florida 33401 West Palm Beach,Florida 33402-3475 Telephone(561)659-3000 Facsimile(561)832-1454 Attorneys and CnunSelors John C.Rudolph,Esq. Direct Dial;(561)650-0458 E-maik Jrandolph@jones-foster.core April 6,2000 VIA FAX: 575-6239 Kara L. Irwin,Planner Village of Tequesta Post Office Box 3273 Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 RE: Village of Tequesta Old Dixie Highway Overlay Our File No. 13153.1 Dear Kara: I have reviewed your fax of yesterday regarding the above referenced subject. Please be advised that I approve of the Resolution and the Professional Services Agreement between Village of Tequesta and Duncan Associates. Sincerely, JONES,FOS JOHNSTON&STUBBS,P.A. John C. Randolph JCR/ssm e; . VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA `` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �.; ''' Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive ;,� Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (561) 575-6220 Fax: (561) 575-6239 Request for Proposal for Developing a Potential Multi-Jurisdictional Overlay Zoning District The Village of Tequesta, Florida is seeking proposals for a Zoning and Land-Use Consultant for the purpose of developing a potential multi jurisdictional overlay zoning district applicable to those properties adjacent to U.S. Highway One and Old Dixie Highway corridors from Alternate A IA to County Line Road. The following information and guidelines should be considered for all proposals submitted. Proposal Due Date The deadline for the submission of proposals in response to this request is 2:00 p.m. local time on Tuesday, April 4, 2000, at the office of the Village of Tequesta, Department of Community Development, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469. Normal Village business hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Questions relating to this request should be directed to Scott D. Ladd at(561)575-6220. Proposal Acceptance The Village reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, in whole or in part, with or without cause, to waive any informalities or technicalities, and to make awards as it considers to be in the best interest of the Village of Tequesta. Acceptance of Proposal Content The contents of the successful proposal will become a contractual obligation if a contract ensues. Failure of the successful respondent to accept this obligation may result in cancellation of the award. Legal Requirements Federal, State, County and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations that in any manner affect the items covered herein apply. Lack of Knowledge by the respondent will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. 1. Vendors doing business with the Village are prohibited from discriminating against any employee, applicant for employment or client because of race, creed, color, ancestry, religion, national origin, sex or age with regard to, but not limited, to the following: employment practices, rates of pay or other compensation methods and training selection. 2. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid contract to provide —any goods or services to a iiblic entity, may not submit-a bid on a contract w a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 3. The obligations of the Village under this award are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for this purpose. Drug-free Workplace Preference shall be given to businesses with a drug-free workplace program. Public Records Law In conformance with the Florida Public Records law, all proposal documents or other material submitted in response to this request other that financial statements submitted, shall upon opening of the responses, be available for public inspection by any person. Term of the Contract The Village Council shall provide selected consultant sixty(60)days to deliver the desired work product upon bid award. User References Please provide a list of at least five paying customers of your company,preferably municipalities in the State of Florida, who are using the proposed services. The list should provide a contact name,telephone number and length of time using your services. Scope of Services > Review of the existing land use regulations within Palm Beach County,Town of Jupiter and the Village of Tequesta for those lands adjacent to the U.S. Highway One and Old Dixie Highway corridors from Alternate A1A to County Line Road. > Identify the land use regulations similarities and disparities. > Preparation of written recommendations relative to land use regulations to be applicable in the identified corridors in order to provide for continuity and uniformity in appearance of properties within the corridor over time. > Written recommendation relative to legal means of accomplishing uniform land development regulations within identified corridors such as: o Overlay zoning districts applicable within the identified corridors and administered by one entity, such as Tequesta, and formalized by Joint Planning Agreement authorized in F.S. 163.3171. o Separate adoption of the same uniform land use regulations to be administered by each entity separately. > Confer with the affected local government entities in order to receive their local input relative to the recommended uniform land development regulations to be drafted and their preference for the administration of the regulations. > Outline of the adoption, public notice requirement and procedures for the recommended course of action. Fees Fees ,monthly,perdiem, or hourly hasisr-P1e-asr include time and estimates for all services_ Fees will be paid within thirty(30)days after invoicing. Suggested Vendors: L. Martin Hodgkins, A.I.C.P. Duncan Associates 390 South Juno Lane Juno Beach, Florida 33406 Kiniley-Horn&Associates 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Keith and Schnars, PA 901 Northpoint Parkway West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc. Community Planning 222 Clematis Street, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dover, Kohl&Partners 5879 Sunset Drive, Suite 1 South Miami, Florida 33143 JLH Associates Jack L. Horniman 8557 SE Coconut Street Hobe Sound, Florida 33455 Carney-Neuhaus Inc. 11911 U.S. Highway One Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33408