HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 7F_6/8/2000 . F rt,04,
/6-0.L.1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Post Office Box 3273 • 250 Tequesta Drive • Suite 300
e Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (561) 575-6200
;' 0N7'- i Fax: (561) 575-6203
c0
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
MAY 25, 2000
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Village Council held a meeting sitting as the
Stormwater Utility Board, at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta
Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Thursday, May 25, 2000. The
meeting was called to order at 7 : 00 P.M. by Mayor Joseph N.
Capretta. A roll call was taken by Betty Laur, Recording
Secretary. Councilmembers present were: Mayor Joseph N.
Capretta, Vice Mayor Elizabeth A. Schauer, Councilmember
Geraldine Genco, and Councilmember Sharon Walker. Also in
attendance were Acting Assistant Village Manager Richard
Diamond, and Department Heads . Councilmember Basil E.
Dalack was absent from the meeting.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Capretta requested addition under ANY OTHER MATTERS
of discussion of the process of choosing a new Village
Manager.
Vice Mayor Schauer made a motion to approve the Agenda as
amended. Councilmember Walker seconded the motion. The
vote on the motion was:
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Geraldine Genco - for
Sharon Walker - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Agenda
Recycled Paper
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 2
was approved as amended.
III. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS)
There were no communications from citizens.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES & REPORTS
A) Stormwater Utility Board; April 27, 2000
Vice Mayor Schauer made a motion to approve the minutes
for the Stormwater Utility Board meeting of April 27,
2000 as submitted. Councilmember Genco seconded the
motion. The vote on the motion was:
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Geraldine Genco - for
Sharon Walker - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
V. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND PROPOSED FY 2001 STORMWATER UTILITY
BUDGET
Utility Director Josef Grusauskas highlighted this year' s
budget versus last year' s budget . This year' s budget
included approximately $38, 000 in hurricane costs which
would be paid by the State; however, the Village had to pay
those expenses up front, which impacted the budget.
Unplanned expansion of the budgeted Tequesta peninsula
project as a result of a $235, 0000 grant had also changed
the original budget. Mr. Grusauskas explained that the
Stormwater Utility was approximately five years old, and at
inception a drainage study had been done and a 10-year plan
developed. The goals of this ten-year plan, which had
established an approximate $1 million budget over the ten-
year period, were to make the Village as stormwater
protected as possible during the ten-year period without
over burdening the residents, and to provide a funding
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 3
mechanism through seed money and planning to get additional
grant monies . Mr. Grusauskas reported that with completion
of the Tequesta peninsula project, six of the 20 miles of
roads within the Village would have been improved, and that
the plan had been to fix ten road miles within ten years .
This acceleration had been possible due to increased
capital received from grants totaling over $400, 000 . Mr.
Grusauskas referred to the budget summary of this year' s
and next year' s revenues and expenditures, which took the
ten-year plan and moved it forward from the current date to
the end of its creation. Stormwater Utility revenues were
shown at $250, 000 to $300, 000 per year, with actual
expenditures much more than that due to getting mitigation
grants of $273, 000+, as well as other related project
monies. In the 2000-2001 budget, reserves would be
depleted in order to make the scheduled projects happen;
therefore, a slight increase in stormwater assessment rates
was proposed in order to replenish reserves and position
the Village for additional grants in the future. The
operating budget was roughly half the revenues from
assessments and the other was half made up of capital
projects with a bond repayment of $60, 000 annually. The
remainder of the ten-year plan was noted, which showed
that the original monies planned for infrastructure had
been met or exceeded.
Mayor Capretta commented that this plan when added to the
original plan would increase the $1 million expenditure
over ten years to approximately $3 million, and
approximately $300, 000 per year instead of $100, 000 . Mr.
Grusauskas noted that about ten roadway miles would still
be completed at the end of the ten-year period, as
originally planned. The original plan had been to resolve
all drainage projects identified to that point within the
ten-year period, and the current plan was to attack any
newly identified problems at the end of the original ten
years . Mr. Grusauskas commented that with completion of
the ten-year plan, residents should be protected from a 25
or 50-year flood. Mayor Capretta commented that the
October 1995 storm had been a 100-year storm. Mr.
Grusauskas explained that the Village was saving money on
the Tequesta peninsula project by installing new water
lines and making stormwater improvements in conjunction
with ENCON' s sewering project. Mayor Capretta commented
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 4
that the water pipes being replaced in the Tequesta Country
Club were 40-50 years old. Mr. Grusauskas explained that
at this time there was no plan to replace all the water
pipes in the Village, and that present policy for the
future was to upgrade water pipes on an as-needed basis.
Mayor Capretta commented that the water system was in bad
condition in the area where approximately 900 Jupiter
residents lived who bought their water from Tequesta, that
the contract with Jupiter was up in 2004, and that the
Village needed to look at that area and decide what to do
about it. Mayor Capretta recommended looking at areas of
the water system instead of individual water pipes, and
commented that the whole Country Club area of pipes would
be replaced. In response to Mayor Capretta' s question
regarding asbestos in the old water pipes, Mr. Grusauskas
explained that it was safe to drink the water, but it would
not be safe to breathe in the asbestos.
Councilmember Genco questioned the deficit shown in the
budget, to which Finance Director Connie Holloman responded
that budget amendments had not yet been made to bring in
grant revenue which had been received, and that total
receipts would actually exceed the deficit currently shown.
Vice Mayor Schauer commented that former Utility Director
Matthew Morrison had reviewed individual property owners
who had made improvements to their parcels and had been
able to bring more money into the Stormwater Utility. Vice
Mayor Schauer questioned whether Mr. Grusauskas had been
able to update that review. Mr. Grusauskas responded that
he was currently working to identify all the improvement
which had been made. The Vice Mayor suggested the
possibility of increasing the rate assessment to handle
future projects since no more funding would be done from
the General Fund; which might also provide enough money for
a full or part-time assistant for Mr. Grusauskas, since he
was handling two functions-Water Department Director and
Stormwater Utility Director. Vice Mayor Schauer expressed
her opinion that this was too much for one person to
handle. Mayor Capretta commented that 3-4 years ago there
had been separate directors for these two functions, and at
the suggestion of former Village Manager Tom Bradford the
positions had been combined after the resignations of Tom
Hall and Al Oslund. Both functions had subsequently been
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 5
handled by Matthew Morrison and now by Mr. Grusauskas .
Mayor Capretta commented that the first issue was the
proper way to handle the departments-whether to have two
separate functions as in the past or one combined function
with only one director and possibly an assistant under that
director to work either full-time or part-time. Mayor
Capretta explained that it was Mr. Grusauskas' job to tell
the Village Council the best way to manage the two
departments, and suggested that he consider bringing a
proposal to the Village Council--after which discussion
could be held by the Village Council regarding how to get
the money to pay for an additional person if one was
recommended. Mayor Capretta commented that the Vice Mayor
had brought up the issue of how to get the money first, but
that deciding how the departments should be managed should
be the first step. Councilmember Genco commented that if
grant money was received for projects, then the money
currently budgeted could be used to accommodate another
person. Mayor Capretta posed the question of whether work
could be done faster on the stormwater projects if there
was another person, and stated that the Village wanted to
go as fast as possible. Mayor Capretta advised Mr.
Grusauskas that if he had any thoughts on this matter that
he should present a proposal to the Village Council and
indicated that they would be willing to consider his
proposal and could probably get the money that would be
required. Mr. Grusauskas responded that he would work with
the Village Manager on a proposal. Vice Mayor Schauer
commented that this was the beginning of the hurricane
season and that Mr. Grusauskas had a large responsibility.
Mr. Grusauskas commented that a weak spot in the department
was lack of GIS computer networking and planning, which
could be improved, and that with automated information the
current staff could do more. Mr. Grusauskas commented that
how to coordinate the departments needed to be discussed
with the Village Manager.
Vice Mayor Schauer commented that the Village had hired a
firm to help with applying for grants, and questioned
whether staff must tell them the types of grants needed or
whether the firm would make suggestions . Assistant Village
Manager Diamond responded that the firm was meeting with
various Department Heads to look at needs so that they
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 6
could then solicit grants . Councilmember Walker commented
that tied in with her long-term project to develop the
Integrated Action Strategy Plan, which was a portion of the
Tequesta Sewer Agreement with ENCON. Councilmember Walker
reported she had been meeting with Mr. Dent regarding this
matter and would provide a report to the Village Council in
June. Councilmember Walker explained that she hoped
information regarding stormwater collection, how to
maintain stormwater collection systems, updating
requirements, and how to retrofit a neighborhood would be
presented in a public information program; and that South
Florida Water Management Systems had indicated to her that
grant money for this effort might be available from the
Indian River Lagoon. Councilmember Walker questioned
whether there was an extra $7, 000-$8, 000 in the current
budget to begin to develop this type of program. Mr.
Grusauskas indicated that finding the money would not be a
problem. Mayor Capretta commented that it was up to Mr.
Grusauskas to decide how much management was needed, by
looking at how much time grants took, how much engineering
was needed, and how much supervision was needed to get the
right balance in the Stormwater function; and that the
Village Council was interested in accelerating the
stormwater improvements for the Village.
VI. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND PROPOSED FY 2001 NON-AD VALOREM
STORMWATER UTILITY ERU ASSESSMENT RATE.
Utility Director Josef Grusauskas distributed copies of a
proposed Resolution which contained an increase in the ERU
assessment rate. Mr. Grusauskas reviewed the rates for
past years, and requested that the Village Council consider
a 10% increase in the base ERU rate this year to $6. 82 per
month for a medium size single-family residence. Mr.
Grusauskas explained that this increase would accommodate
a 2% increase for the mandatory public notification of
change in rates required by Florida Statute, and that the
additional 8% would bring reserves back up to a minimum
10%, and that reserves would level out at the desired 20%
after two years . Mr. Grusauskas recommended that this
increase be proposed to the Village Council at their
meeting scheduled for June 8, 2000 . Mayor Capretta
commented that at origination of the Stormwater Utility,
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 7
three ways of financing stormwater costs had been
considered-to include a stormwater assessment in the
property taxes, to base an assessment on the impervious
area found on each property (which was the method adopted
by the Village) , or a mixture of the two methods. Mayor
Capretta questioned whether there was any doubt among the
Village Council as to whether the Village had chosen the
right method. Councilmember Genco questioned whether Mr.
Grusauskas had researched rates charged by other
municipalities, to which Mr. Grusauskas responded he had
researched Palm Beach County and surrounding counties and
found the Tequesta program to be in line with others .
Mayor Capretta commented that completing projects too fast
could cost double because there would not be time to obtain
grant money, and that going too slow could result in
flooding. Mayor Capretta commented that the worst area was
the Country Club, which needed to be improved before the
rainy season. Mr. Grusauskas responded that project was to
be completed in November.
Vice Mayor Schauer questioned whether the video of the
drainage system had found any unforeseen problems. Mr.
Grusauskas responded that postponement of the video project
until 2002 to plan for replacement pipes to be installed in
2004 was currently under discussion. Mr. Grusauskas
reported that the Tequesta Peninsula Project drainage
system had been videotaped or surveyed and would be
replaced, which would use all the budgeted money for this
year and next year.
Vice Mayor Schauer made a motion to recommend to the
Village Council approval of $6.82 as the base ERU rate.
Councilmenber Genco seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Geraldine Genco - for
Sharon Walker - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Mayor Capretta complimented Mr. Turner from the Jupiter
Courier on a recently well-written article regarding the
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 8
Tequesta stormwater charges .
Mr. Shepard, 195 River Drive, questioned when the swales on
River Drive would be installed. Mr. Grusauskas responded
that Phase I would be beginning June 5 with completion
anticipated in November. Mr. Shepard indicated his street
was probably in Phase II, which Mr. Grusauskas explained
was just being designed to go for permitting. Mr. Shepard
questioned whether this was a two-step process instead of
all of the work being done when the roads were torn up to
install the sewers, to which Mayor Capretta responded that
after installation of the sewers a rough coat of paving
would been done, and then the Village could come in to do
their work which included the swales . Mayor Capretta
explained ENCON' s problems with their paving contractor,
which had delayed the project, and that the Village had
wanted to do everything at one time. Mr. Shepard explained
that his was the only property that already had a swale, so
that there was a lake in his yard when it rained, and he
would be very glad to see the other swales completed.
VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
Mayor Capretta commented that the Village was in the
process of trying to hire a new Village Manager, and that
the 44 resumes which had been received had been distributed
to each member of the Village Council. As a way of
accelerating the process, Mayor Capretta suggested each
Councilmember narrow the field down to a few which they
considered the top candidates, to be considered by the
whole Village Council. It was the consensus of the Village
Council that each Councilmember choose their top five
candidates to be presented to Acting Assistant Village
Manager Diamond in random order, from which a list of the
top 3-5 could be chosen at a workshop meeting. Mayor
Capretta explained that the final meeting when the top 3-5
would be interviewed would be a public meeting, and he
assumed it would be a long meeting since he expected
residents to also ask the candidates questions . Following
the interviews, the Village Council could decide on a first
and second choice, and offer the position to the number one
candidate. If the offer was not accepted, the position
could be offered to the number two candidate . Discussion
STORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
May 25, 2000
PAGE 9
ensued regarding a deadline to give the top five to the
Acting Assistant Village Manager, and Monday, June 5 was
indicated as the final date for each Councilmember to
present their list to Mr. Diamond, since the Vice Mayor
would be out of town until May 31. Councilmember Walker
suggested that a date for the workshop be set at the June
8 Village Council meeting, since all of the Councilmembers
had been requested to bring their calendars to that
meeting.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Genco moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Vice Mayor Schauer seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Geraldine Genco - for
Sharon Walker - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting
was adjourned at 7:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
45tf
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Joann Manganiello
Village Clerk
DATE APPROVED: