HomeMy WebLinkAboutPresentation_Regular_9/12/2024 (5)KEY ESTATES DEVELOPMENT 1 Conceptual Presentation
INTRODUCTION 2 setbacks of 20 feet. 2 Zoning District has a maximum building height of 2 stories or 30 feet, with rear -The R•maximum allowed densityMedium Density allows up to 12 dwelling
units per acre. Proposed project is at the •2, and is in the Medium Density Land Use-Property is 8 acres, zoned R•Landscaping propertyommunity at the former Rood cownhome tunit -Applicant
desires to build a 96•
PROPERTY HISTORY 3 has more than 50 dwelling units and/or is taller than 2 stories. has to modify or rescind it in order for a developer to construct anything other than an adult living
facility project that The Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is currently recorded in the Palm Beach County records. The Village Council •living facility was not built. The minutes
from meetings indicate there was some discussion about limiting height and density for the site if an adult •more than 50 dwelling units and a maximum height of two stories if an adult
living facility is not built. no On July 7th 2009, the previous owner executed a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants that limits the property to •-exception use in the Rproperty Medium
Density Residential and a Zoning Text Amendment, which added “adult living facilities” as a special On July 9th 2009, the previous owner was approved for a Future Land Use Map Amendment,
which designated the •Property was annexed into the Village in 1992•
4
5
2016 APPROVAL 140’ from the south property line.buildings were setback a little under The three story portion of the •south property line.buildings were setback 87’ from the The two
story portion of the •There was a 30’ landscape buffer •43 feet and 10 inches.The project had a building height of •congregate living facility. unit adult -approved to construct a 96In
2016, the current applicant was •6
7
8
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 9 chapter”.in order to maintain the spirit and intent of this require adherence to established zoning district requirements within certain portions of
the site if deemed necessary village council may, at its discretion, Additional height and reduced setbacks do not have to be granted in a PRD. "The •50’ and the rear setback can be
reduced.District. Additional height and reduced setbacks are able to be granted in a PRD. Height can be up to four stories or 2 -PRD’s are required to provide 35% open space, which
is more than the standard requirement of 30% in the R•.”within the development, establish neighborhood identity and focus, and be consistent with values of the villageconsumption by
roads while separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic, integrate open spaces and recreation areas alternative should allow a variety of architectural styles, preserve natural features
and scenic areas, reduce land environment through the application of enlightened and imaginative approaches to community development. This The purpose and intent of PRD's is "to encourage
the accomplishment of a more complete residential living •taller than 30’ and reduced setbacks.The proposed project appears to need to utilize the Planned Residential Development (PRD)
process for buildings •(PRD)
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS 10 Planning and Zoning Board and Village Council. Once the Development Review Committee has ironed out any issues with the project, it can then go forward
to the •etermination (SCAD) by Palm Beach County Schools. Dvailability Aapacity Ctraffic, sewer, drainage, potable water, and recreation. The project will have to undergo a School
The project will be required to meet adopted Level of Service standards within the Village’s subdivision code for •with contract landscape, environmental, traffic, and engineering reviews.
Committee. It will be reviewed by Police, Fire, Building, Utilities, Public Works, and Community Development; along If the Applicant decides to move forward with the project, it will
go through the Village’s Development Review •input”.council for site plan to the village conceptualaRoad….shall submit Drive, Old Dixie Highway, Cypress Drive, and Bridge on Beach Road,
US Highway 1, Tequesta The Applicant is not required to hold a conceptual presentation. “Projects •
COMMUNITY MEETING 11 resolve concerns. Representatives from the HOA have been put into direct contact with the property owner to attempt to •more substantial landscape buffer in the
rear of the property. Some attendees expressed concerns about environmental issues, drainage into their lake, and the need for a •ommunity meeting was attended by 17 residents. cThe
•was not required by code.. This th The Applicant held a community meeting with residents of the Riverside Oaks project on August 27•