Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Documentation_Regular_Tab 16_1/8/2026
Agenda Item #160 Regular Council STAFF MEMO A-1 Meeting: Regular Council - Jan 08 2026 Staff Contact: Allyson Felsburg Department: Utilities Consider Tequesta Trace Condominium Association (TTCA) Stormwater Fee Credit Appeal The purpose of this memorandum is to present for Village of Tequesta Stormwater Management Utility Board (Village Council) consideration the full factual record, timeline, applicable Code provisions, staff analysis, and recommendation regarding the proposed 50% stormwater utility fee credit for the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association (TTCA, Tequesta Trace), and TTCA's formal appeal of that proposed determination pursuant to Chapter 74, Article IV, Division 2 of the Village Code. On August 12, 2025, the Village Council adopted Resolution No. 13-25, Attachment 1, establishing stormwater utility fees for Fiscal Year 2026. During the public comment portion of the meeting under Agenda Item #23, Mr. Michael Tomes, Director of TTCA, addressed Council, asserting that the 134 residential condominium units within Tequesta Trace should not be subject to stormwater utility fees because the community maintains a privately owned stormwater drainage system. The Resolution was subsequently adopted unanimously by Council in accordance with Village procedures, with the Village Attorney present. Following adoption of the Resolution, TTCA submitted a written Request on August 16, 2025, for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment, asserting that TTCA receives no benefit from the Village's stormwater system and therefore stormwater fees should not be assessed (Attachment 2). TTCA asserts, in summary, that: - Tequesta Trace is a perimeter-walled community served by a privately owned stormwater drainage system consisting of internal inlets, piping, manholes, and dry retention areas. - There is no direct physical pipe connection between the TTCA stormwater system and the Village's stormwater infrastructure. - TTCA's stormwater system was properly permitted and approved at the time of development and has been maintained by TTCA at its sole expense. - TTCA therefore contends that its units receive no stormwater services or benefits from the Village and should not be assessed stormwater utility fees, or alternatively, should receive a full (100%) cred it. Tequesta Trace was developed in multiple phases beginning in 2001-2002. Village records confirm that: - Development approvals and Certificates of Occupancy were issued by the Village based on approved engineering plans that included an on-site stormwater management system. - The system includes multiple dry retention areas designed to retain and treat stormwater generated within the community. - The Village did not construct internal stormwater infrastructure within the TTCA perimeter. Page 331 of 572 Agenda Item #16. In response to TTCA's request, Village staff conducted a site visit and engineering review to verify drainage conditions. Staff confirmed: - There is no direct pipe connection between TTCA's internal stormwater system and the Village's stormwater system. - A Village-owned stormwater grate is located immediately outside the TTCA entrance, which receives runoff from the public roadway and entrance drive area to TTCA. - In the event of an extreme rainfall event or a structural failure of the TTCA system, stormwater could overflow from the TTCA property into adjacent Village-owned stormwater infrastructure. The Village's stormwater utility is governed by Chapter 74, Utilities, Article IV, Division 2 - Stormwater Utility, including but not limited to: • • Sec. 74-201 (Findings): Declares that elements of the stormwater management system provide benefits and services to all property within the Village, including property not directly served by system elements. • • Sec. 74-206 (Fees Authorized): Authorizes the imposition of stormwater utility fees on all property within the Village. • • Sec. 74-207 (Classification of Property): Establishes property classifications for purposes of stormwater assessments. • • Sec. 74-209 (Adjustment of Fees): Allows property owners to request an adjustment or credit to stormwater fees where application of the standard rate would be inequitable and provides an appeal process to Village Council for final determination. Village staff carefully reviewed TTCA's submissions, historical permits, engineering documentation, and applicable Code provisions. Staff acknowledge that TTCA: - Retains and treats the majority of stormwater generated within the community on-site. - Independently funds and maintains its private stormwater infrastructure. However, staff also find that: - The Village's stormwater system provides area-wide and indirect benefits to all properties, including TTCA, such as flood protection, groundwater regulation, emergency overflow capacity, and protection of adjacent public rights-of-way. - TTCA residents, guests, and service providers utilize Village streets and infrastructure that rely on the Village stormwater system. - Complete exemption from stormwater utility fees would be inconsistent with the findings and intent of Sec. 74-201 and could undermine uniform application of the stormwater utility. Based on these considerations, staff determined that partial credit rather than a full exemption is appropriate and equitable. On November 12, 2025, Village staff met with Mr. Tomes to discuss staff's findings and proposed resolution. On November 13, 2025, the Village issued a written determination, Attachment 3, offering: • • A 50% stormwater utility fee credit for each TTCA unit; • • Retroactive application of the credit for the most recent tax bill and ongoing eligibility for the credit conditioned upon TTCA submitting an annual signed and sealed inspection report by a licensed professional engineer confirming: - Structural integrity of the private stormwater system; and - The system's continued ability to retain and treat at least the first 1.0 inch of runoff from the post-development 100-year/24-hour storm event. Page 332 of 572 Agenda Item #16. In determining an appropriate and equitable stormwater fee reduction, Village staff conducted extensive research into statewide stormwater utility practices, including review of the Florida Stormwater Association (FSA) 2024 Stormwater Utility Report (Attachment 7, page 25). The FSA report, which includes survey data from 138 stormwater utilities across Florida, indicates the following: - 72 utilities do not offer stormwater rate reductions or credits of any kind; - Among utilities that do offer credits, the average rate reduction is 25.61%, inclusive of credits granted to government facilities, schools, and federal and state-owned properties; and - The utilities surveyed reported approximately 361,821 total stormwater utility accounts, of which only 3,092 accounts receive any form of credit, representing less than one percent of all accounts statewide. This benchmarking demonstrates that stormwater fee reductions are not common practice statewide and, when offered, are generally limited in scope. When viewed in this context, the Village's proposed 50% stormwater utility fee credit for TTCA exceeds the statewide average by a substantial margin, while remaining consistent with the Village's benefit-received framework and the intent of Chapter 74 of the Village Code. Staff emphasizes that this level of credit reflects a reasonable balance between recognition of TTCA's privately maintained stormwater system and the continued indirect benefits provided by the Village's stormwater infrastructure. The proposed credit also preserves the financial stability of the stormwater utility and ensures equitable treatment among all stormwater ratepayers.Staff believes this benchmarking further supports the defensibility, fairness, and appropriateness of the proposed 50% credit and reinforces the recommendation to deny any request for a greater reduction or full exemption. Based on the full record, staff recommends that the Village of Tequesta Stormwater Management Utility Board: 1. Uphold the staff determination granting a 50% stormwater utility fee credit to TTCA units; 2. Deny the appeal to the extent it seeks a greater credit or full exemption; and 3. Affirm the requirement for annual inspection documentation as a condition of continued eligibility for the credit. This document and any attachments may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by completing our Accessibility Feedback Form, sending an e-mail to the Village Clerk or calling 561-768-0443. This document and any attachments may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by completing our Accessibility Feedback Form, sending an e-mail to the Village Clerk or calling 561- 768-0443. BUDGET • - • BUDGET AMOUNT NA AMOUNT AVAILABLE NA EXPENDITURE AMOUNT: NA FUNDING SOURCES: NA IS THIS A PIGGYBACK: ❑ Yes 0 N/A DID YOU OBTAIN 3 QUOTES? ❑ Yes 0 N/A Page 333 of 572 Agenda Item #16. COMMENTS/EXPLANATION ON SELECTIONNA POI&NTIAL MOTION / DIRECTION REQUESTED: MI Motion to uphold the staff determination granting 50% stormwater utility fee credit to TTCA and to deny the appeal to the extent it seeks a greater credit or full exemption and to affirm the requirement for annual inspection documentation as a condition of continued eligibility for the credit. 1) FY26 SW Rate Resolution 2) TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment 3) Village Written Determination 4) FSA 2024 SW Utility Report 5) TTCA appeal of VOT's Determination regadinq Credit Proposal 6) TTCA's Site Plan Sheet 1 of 9 7) Residential Units List Page 334 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 13-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE STORMWATER UTILITY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, AND AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE MANAGER TO PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE'S ADOPTED PROCEDURES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the Village council of the Village of Tequesta is required to annually set sufficient levels of stormwater utility fees to ensure adequate revenues are generated; and WHEREAS, the Village Council adopts the annual stormwater utility rates as specified in the attached "Exhibit A" for the fiscal year ending September 30t" 2026; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year ending September 30t", 2026, rates represent a 5% increase from the prior year; and WHEREAS, the stormwater rates are to be adopted by resolution and transmitted to the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser as part of a uniform method of assessment of these rates by the Village of Tequesta; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Village Council of the Village of Tequesta hereby adopts the rates attached to this Resolution as "Exhibit A" to be effective October 1st, 2025, for the fiscal year ending September 301", 2026, and authorizes the Village Manager to proceed on behalf of the Village in order to provide for their uniform assessment. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 'ct O 00 N t.D vl- r-I r-I r-1 r-i a W'; rnLn ono rn 0 o a 0 cit; �t a 0 0 bLO 0 0 r-I QD N m a) m m m M � 00 0o w w � a w Q n N �D w) m oo n rn r-+ n n n r• 0 0 a 0 %i.. lD � N N E ❑ m E °�' ._ m Al uj 0 C L re to N Q) Q c r1i V'r oa L.L•.- U. wLA wCr Q w tw n j LD w ,� FLU N w w Q} CL _ V m ro (0 m m m �n cn to 0 cn o cn cn ul 0 cm 0- C37 Cs- 0- 0- C;- Cy CT Cr 0- C- a) v a.r v CJ a.s QJ v as aU QJ CL w V) Ln Ln � u z > �t m U ❑ N m :zi, i-n �.o n oo r o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 �o �o to �o � � � � KT (.0 0 0 a o 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 u., 0 0 0 0 0 o a a o o a Page 336 of 572 Agenda Item #16. S RESOLUTION DATE 13-25 08/12/25 MOTION Vice-Mayor Rick Sartory SECOND Council Member Jayson E. French FOR AGAINST ABSENT CONFLICT Mayor Molly Young Vice-Mayor Rick Sartory Council Member Laurie Brandon Council Member Patrick painter Council Member Jayson E. French The Mayor thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted. MAYOR OF T EQU E STA: Molly Young ATTEST. :-- � COripor TED Lori M cWi Iliarns, M M C ''''���i;���ririr i'�t �;,:k,`' Village Clerk Agenda Item #16. Attachment 2 From: Michael Tomes To: Marjorie G.Craig Cc: David Tinoco; Dennis Rick;Christina Vanderwesthuizen Subject: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Date: Tuesday,October 21,2025 3:54:26 PM Attachments: 1. Emails between Tomes and VoT.pdf 2.Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 812-2025.pdf 3.a 1st VoT Letter 7-11-2025.pdf 3.b 2nd VoT Letter 7-11-2025.pdf 5.TTCA Documents Recorded.pdf 6. Builder"s Application,VoT"s Permits,FOR"s Letters&VoT"s COs.pdf 7.Tequesta Trace Residential Units.pdf Your attachments have been security checked by Mimecast Attachment Protection. Files where no threat or malware was detected are attached. Marjorie G. Craig, PE Director—Utilities Department Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Email: mcraigaa,teauesta.org Phone: (561) 768-0459 Cell: (561) 529-1453 RE: Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Parcel ID: 60-443-40-30-51-001-1020 (TTCA Unit 1102) and 133 Remaining TTCA Units Dear Director Marjorie Craig, It was a pleasure speaking with you following the Village of Tequesta Council Meeting on August 12, 2025, where I provided comments under Agenda Item#23 (Resolution No. 13-25 and Memo #25-167) regarding the adoption of Stormwater Utility Fees for FY 2026. The item was subsequently approved unanimously by Council in accordance with VoT procedures with Council Attorney present. During my comments, I explained why my unit, along with all 134 Tequesta Trace Condominium Association (TTCA)units (see Attachments: Tequesta Trace Residential Units and Tomes'Notes), should not be subject to stormwater assessment fees under Division 2, Sec. 74-209 of the Village Code along with the two different VoT letters (see Attachment: Two different VoT July 11, 2025 letters) which were followed with an email to and a response from your department(see Attachment: Emails between Tomes and VO). TTCA maintains its own independent stormwater drainage system, which is not connected to, nor serviced by, the Village's stormwater infrastructure. TTCA's Independent Stormwater Drainage System • All runoff from TTCA's 16 residential buildings and associated unit impervious areas within its perimeter walls flows exclusively into TTCA's stormwater drainage system Page 338 of 572 Agenda Item #16. (see Attachment: TTCA Site Plan, Sheet I of 9). • TTCA's system consists of its own drain points,piping, manholes, and dry retention areas, which are self-contained and not tied to VoT's stormwater system. • Accordingly, the Village's stormwater infrastructure does not provide collection, disposal, or groundwater regulation services to TTCA properties. Development History and Classification • TTCA was developed in 17 phases (see Palm Beach County Records OR 1413 7/77, dated 0911112002), with Certificates of Occupancy (COs) issued by the Village for each phase (see detailed list below plus Attachments: TTCA Recorded Documents and Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs). • While classified under Sec. 74-207 as "Residential Developed Property," TTCA units function as a sub-class of residential units. They do not meet VoT's technical definition of ERUs (Equivalent Residential Units), as their impervious areas are exclusively managed within TTCA's own system. • Thus, no "fee in lieu" for VoT stormwater construction, debt service, or maintenance should apply to TTCA, as approvals and COs were granted contingent on TTCA's self- contained drainage infrastructure. Ongoing Maintenance TTCA has continually maintained its stormwater system at its own expense: • 2013: Shenandoah Construction performed cleaning, repairs and inspection. • July 2025: Above All Plumbing completed cleaning, confirmed system integrity, and verified no unauthorized connections to VoT's system. (I personally reviewed findings on site with the project manager and crew on August 1, 2025.) All costs of maintenance, repair, and management are funded directly by TTCA through assessments to its 134 owners, without reliance on Village services. Acknowledgment of External Benefits We recognize that the Village's stormwater infrastructure benefits TTCA owners, residents, and visitors outside the perimeter walls of the property. However, within Tequesta Trace, the system is fully self-sustaining and separate from VoT's infrastructure. Supporting Documentation For your review, please find attached: 1. Emails between Tomes and VoT 2. Notes used during the Agenda Item#23 comment period (Tomes'Notes) 3. Two different VoT July 11, 2025 letters (comments noted in Tomes'Notes) 4. TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (with drainage summary noted in Tomes' Notes) 5. TTCA Recorded Documents Page 339 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 6. Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs 7. Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing Request Given this history and supporting documentation, I respectfully request that TTCA's 134 residential units be granted an adjustment to exclude them from the VoT Stormwater Assessment Fee. Please let me know if you would like to review these documents in more detail with me or schedule a site visit to Tequesta Trace. I would also appreciate any update or status on TTCA's stormwater fee adjustment review. Regards, Michael J. Tomes, Owner Parcel 60-43-40-30-51-001-1020 (TTCA Unit 1102) 110-D Lighthouse Circle, Tequesta, FL 33469-2781 and Michael J. Tomes, Director Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell: (561) 310-3329 Email: semotnbellsouth.net Final Records—Palm Beach County & Village of Tequesta COs PBC OR Book Entry Date/Time Phase Pages VoT CO Date 14137 09/11/2002 09:43:04 2 013 6-0143 09/20/2002 14166 09/19/2002 08:18:19 3 1559-1568 09/23/2002 14202 09/30/2002 08:24:56 4 0575-0584 10/11/2002 14202 09/30/2002 08:24:58 12 0585-0594 10/01/2002 14339 11/01/2002 08:11:3 7 5 093 4-0943 11/21/2002 14339 11/01/2002 08:11:3 7 13 0944-0953 10/28/2002 14339 11/01/2002 08:11:3 7 14 0954-0963 11/08/2002 14426 12/03/200213:03:28 7 1289-129812/16/2002 14426 12/03/200213:03:28 6 1299-130812/05/2002 14676 01/16/2003 10:00:08 8 0080-0089 01/14/2003 14749 02/04/2003 10:03:29 16 0410-0419 02/12/2003 14749 02/04/2003 10:03:29 9 0420-0429 02/03/2003 14807 02/18/2003 09:53:51 10 0831-0840 02/25/2003 14868 03/04/2003 09:33:16 15 0210-0219 10/07/2002 Page 340 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 14905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 8 0663-0672 01/14/2003 14905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 15 0673-0682 10/07/2002 14905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 16 0683-0692 02/12/2003 14961 03/24/2003 10:05:40 11 1000-1009 03/24/2003 15220 05/14/2003 09:28:03 17 0445-0463 09/20/2002 15422 06/24/2003 10:03:35 1 1974-1983 06/23/2003 Page 341 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment 3 1 From: Allyson Felsbura To: Michael Tomes Cc: Christina Vanderwesthuizen;Albert Caradonio;Jeremy Allen Subject: RE:[EXTERNAL]Re:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Date: Thursday,November 13,2025 7:54:59 AM Attachments: imaae001.pna imaae002.r)na image003.png imaae004.pna imaae005.pna image006.png imaae007.pna imaae008.r)na colorlogotiny a3d7ecec-e837-4cdf-915a-5a109417db6e.png 079 sm fb d4769f35-474f-4861-a58e-099aa5cfa8d3.g_ng 079 sm in d806ld26-6el7-45d8-b821-e3b73de5d846.pno 079 sm twitter 73f8f4e9-8864-400f-9100-349a7b839898.png 079 sm y2 8e8fd 116-3061-4bcc-bfeb-34352c4232ba.g_ng 079 sm insta b9829f39-ea7b-4ffb-9e4e-dla11d6e4972.png 174-1743848 nextdoor-app-icon 88013509-cd7f-4264-b513-6061eec36bba.png Hello Mr.Tomes, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us on November 12,2025.As discussed,the Village provided a document outlining the applicable Village Code that supports our determination to grant a 50%stormwater fee credit to the residents of the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association(TTCA).The Village acknowledges that TTCA retains the majority of its stormwater on-site,which reduces the burden on the Village's system.However,all Village-owned and Village-maintained stormwater infrastructure provides benefits to every property and resident within the Village,regardless of location or ownership of private stormwater system.As such,every property and resident—including those within TTCA—must contribute to funding its ongoing operation and maintenance. In accordance with Sec.74-209,Adjustment of Fees,and in an effort to provide a fair and reasonable credit,the Village is prepared to issue retroactive credits to TTCA residents.Upon mutual agreement and receipt of the required documentation,individual checks will be issued to each resident for 50%of the stormwater fees paid with their most recent tax bills.Moving forward,TTCA will be required to submit a signed and sealed inspection report each year verifying the structural integrity of its privately owned stormwater system and documenting the system's ability to retain and treat at least 1.0 inch of runoff from the post-development 100-year/24-hour storm event.This documentation must be received by June 1 of each year to maintain eligibility for the 50%credit. This inspection requirement is essential.It ensures that TTCA's stormwater system is functioning as designed and that no failures exist that could cause overflow into the Village's system.This is not a unique requirement for TTCA;rather,it is the standard process that will be consistently applied to any community seeking stormwater fee credits now or in the future.The Village must adhere to its codes and procedures to ensure fairness,consistency,and the protection of public infrastructure. At the conclusion of our meeting,you advised that you would present this proposed resolution to your Board for consideration.Should the TTCA Board choose not to accept the Village's proposal,you may pursue the appeal process outlined in Sec.74-209.Please note that a formal appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the Village's written determination. If you have any questions or require additional clarification,please do not hesitate to reach out.The Village remains committed to working with TTCA within the framework of all applicable codes,and we look forward to hearing from you. Allyson Felsburg Deputy Utilities Director The Village of Tequesta Utilities Department p.561-768-0497 1 c.561-919-5888 a.901 N Old Dixie Hwy,Tequesta,FL,33469 w.www.tequesta.org e.afelsburg(cDtequesta.ora 01311100113 From:Jeremy Allen<jallen@tequesta.org> Sent:Monday,November 3,2025 3:34 PM To:Michael Tomes<semot@bellsouth.net> Cc:Christina Vanderwesthuizen<Christina.Vanderwesthuizen@fsresidential.com>;Allyson Felsburg<afelsburg@tequesta.org>;Albert Caradonio <a Ica radon io@gmail.com> Subject:RE:[EXTERNAL]Re:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Thursday afternoon 2:30pm work for everyone? Page 342 of 572 Agenda Item #16. r. - ,�- L .11 '—- - — — — -—_ ��-—_ __—__ __-__ _.�• '��,;.r}•y __1 - -- .��- —�i�r:�=—ate -- - -- _ -_ i A •'YR � �� � ������ � — _— — --- �—_J _— —— —__ _ -_ _ - — _ _—_�. { �-.,��- —- - � 'T � '� I .n�� •'�'� '�'ti �I 1 M�I�i,I¢, ,Y �I�' •7 L'' Ir�+l' �, t�4' h 1 I 4 4 +I 1 _ -- _ 'F` '� r ,F�. �}i� fj,y, r �F u' �''{ I�,' �• ,1 �� Y' {Ii�, r„ _�-- — _ _k ,� r,.x. 1�•'� � �i .T� `,�.��tr2'.� i'l,:�F l.� �: rl��s 'L i 1.ti�i�'Fti �r�*{L •+:YI,.� �' ��+;1�ri+�1.41��•h��k, y4.��I� 1��`+ i�� + + , S' r^ yF' '., L�!�{� I 1hl I', j ,yyp 1 '.�4'.kkFk `',F+` y+,,l + I+r'�-' 1�'�:ir•�,I.•�'+��I�.�. �,IrJ !�{''�]I''i�•i�Y. II'11'1',h}�+ �� "±� �'i+�{�''j'� �il�'kT I�y��l�^ �.i� .i�''I+1 I"� '�•+I'F Y+L���{��_f+li� �I _� �, ?�?. � ••{ Lj�4 i R It ,' �r s�' � 7 f I $ir, 1;�F 4 , ! .it ,�. "-'- - S�� - I••� 'I.If'.iYl� '.�!.yl. S'r',, 'k#.� � a r 4 r�i� ' '�`�I '��•I{ ii����+��5,1 �I �}.q. •'.�„LIiY 4� � tf.� ,.i. rll: i'II h �'k IF Ir'' I• .I� �}, � r� �},. �,I _ + Ii I `` y n ��yR•k ,t y -{dry ry, '1:��� - '4 -1 •i, 'i� 5 '�� •i Irl q.y. f,y �G'� L4� � ` � i :',i��F �. k �!� 1 I' i .1,. r 4 11 L f 7 `p` t 4 't� i � r�;.F.�.+1�`. 1k ���.�.41 ��,�1i, 1 �Y,}r}'�Fd r��' '�1�,�. .1 �I`•i }f 'r a� �i�1 i� ��f�7}',��I' fly �J��, ,�,�,�1,�4 4�L�'r•� WI( .!r . ,l t IA h F Y'.1 a ' r 1'', I t �Ir�.� c° �i■:7. .i s �T` .i5+ ����}{:,I.��F, s �* F f� r� -� i.;.�.�1' ��• ^�'{#'1'f r� f F � ���y .js '1��I�.��,� �F ''I M 4 ..�'r� �f1 ,;3 ,'h 1!� Lei l \ i.'::R: i r t �F.�., � �' •I �� /T.�! Y I r ,'{r��.'.# �. 11 I � �ti , ]�y � S'�. y,i ti �'''i:�.1 I '• y� r "'''• ''� {'� 'I' ','Y�r. �r` F III �� }�L■ '4Y r ',�� 71 " i '� ,. y .}j f ,�u !.5�.L :��y � H �' i Y 5{ *1 .�,':'�• �{ �.�,5a r i Ly]'�'r,•r f + y�'Y �* s '11� ` i, .� .+i��•ti• I �1 S y 'Y 'Sy" '.1 1 1 ' •�. 1 . l.r+ 7 + y Yi '1 ! ` 'i 1y ! �i 5, !r_ ` , - L _ � i i �4 i � '� �ii 5 'i-' r'II h 7! F II ! t rYs .t•� I F.. L_'F If _ } +��}.�. '.�{+ ;��., Il qS, +r•ti r'i rp1 t�?I;.' :. i�, � .' II+ !. w, 4 ti 1 5 ,��,�� �,,�•� '�? �, t !fix li�14�� + y �� �� y f[F.�t���' y f1�4t�� r';■:3�" T�`1�' i�4F��ti .�.;a~� �� • r 4 + r 1 1 I � L ! r •t '� k f ti 1 VVVVV 4 a r , � I i F 1 i r 1 I I'A � I R* Agenda Item #16. - -. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Acknowledgements The Florida Stormwater Association wishes to express its appreciation to the following 2024 Stormwater Utility Report sponsors. The distribution of this document would not have been possible without their support. Elie Araj, PE, D.WRE,CFM PPLIED Applied Sciences Consulting 1000 N Ashley Drive,Ste 500 CIENCES Tampa, FL 33602 813-228-0900 1 earaj@appliedfl.com Riley O'Brien 1"h Advanced Drainage Systems 115 NW Crown Point Road //fi[)0TM Advanced Drainage Systenns,Inc. Winter Garden, FL 34787 407-922-1846 1 riley.obrien@adspipe.com Peter Moore, PE, F.ASCE FACEC Chen Moore and Associates 500 W Cypress Creek Road,Ste 600 chen moore and associates Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 954-730-0707 1 pmoore@chenmoore.com Vinny Penichet Cu Itec 878 Federal Road CULTEC Brookfield,CT 06804 813-524-5660 1 vinny.penichet@cultec.com Mark Ellard, PE, CFM, BC.WRE, ENV SP Geosyntec Consultants Geosynteccl 3504 Lake Lynda Drive,Ste 155 consultants Orlando, FL 32817 321-249_9360 1 mellard@geosyntec.com Dikran Kalaydjian, PE, ENV SP, LEED AP � Land &Water Engineering Science 04N &%VW4!MA--4q1PM K 8950 Dr. M LK Jr.Street N,Ste 205 LNINEERING SCIENCE St. Petersburg, FL33702 727-202 8958 1 dikran@lwes.net Jeff McInnis NPDESPro GNPDES])ro 13650 Fiddlesticks Blvd,Ste 202-110 Fort Myers, FL 33912 800-204-1598 1 jeff@npdespro.com Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. Page 344 of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report The Florida Stormwater Association Leadership in Stormwater Management and Utilities FSA was organized in 1993 to assist professionals in the public and private sectors as they confront the problems associated with stormwater management, permitting and finance. FSA provides three core services to its members: ♦ Training and Education - FSA conducts two statewide conferences, one seminar, and two webinars annually. In addition, FSA offers over 25 training events a year for Stormwater field staff through our Fogarty Training Center. The Fogarty Training Center was created in response to the need for in house, up-to-date, high-quality training. Training Center courses fulfill most of the training requirements of your MS4 permit. Visit the Fogarty Training Center for a complete listing of courses. ♦ Communications and Information Sharing - The FSA Stormwater Utilities Survey is conducted and distributed every two years. An abbreviated listing of current stormwater rates is updated frequently. FSA's e-newsletter YastTRACKS" is published ten times a year. FSA's website contains previously published editions of the newsletter, a membership directory, communications tools, regulatory information, and an order form to purchase our manual on Establishing Stormwater Utilities in Florida. ♦ Advocacy-The Association is actively represented during the Legislative Session, in front of agencies, and in state and federal courts. We support legislation that is of benefit to stormwater utilities and local governments in the areas of stormwater management and finance. The Association monitors the activities of FDEP, EPA, and other state and federal regulatory initiatives, and challenges to stormwater utilities. As appropriate, the Association participates in cases that are of statewide or national importance. Not a Member? Please contact us if you would like more information about FSA or membership. Florida Stormwater Association PO Box 13688,Tallahassee,FL 32317- www.florida-stormwater.org info@florida-stormwater.or - (888) 221-3124 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater AssociatiorPage 345 of 572 1 4 '�, �� � + 'f• �' --ice - .� e 1 �i ,tea_ - J+•R.. '• f I __ .'• .�_ `I jr 1 ,5or -%bdl4L- ` + -_ -31 ce ��}.::'•'�•ice �: { •�_ � _ rf ui r �■ r . 2+ ! _ r �J � i�. •.r '� IL 4 - ri,.v ' Ir r' r •'�J�Y s ( r F t+ + � r +9 �� .M! }* �f+' �� -� _`�' �I •��' + _ .� i"�r~v � * 1 ti M1 ��•ry} •fit• .�.� dip I. �yy 1 .. fr ,Ty'Lt - , ti4 -q _;* } 7i� f♦ . - , i y .�y#,/ .I y Ji zw Ilk- " T 41' ." • fit •^ r •h •_ 'N {• 1 *' r _ : _ _' a # J Ye I 49 M1 yM1M1 . */ � � 4''�L J ti� i r•� r IF i�40` ''7 ty���} Rom•� =� * 'L��}'F •' k' yy}f ���� Y` {{" 'SET: � _ ' 11� + I _ _ � � . �+ •l Q•,�4. • - ;'* + 91, ri Md 3. Ile VUL Ammi AIL 40 _ r low L =� i + + l ' A' •� Z ,y ' i •- 1 4. r # 1 t A� f�yy�• �_*� � I•�Lv• S �xiAf• 5 }L ,x I? - r., Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Table of Contents Introduction 2 1 - Utility Characteristics 3 2 - Utility Fees and Rates 9 3 - Stormwater Program 30 4 - Public Information Effort 41 , Appendix 43 Survey Respondents 44 More About FSA 54 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted,in any form or by any means,electronic, mechanical,photographically or otherwise,without the prior written permission of the Florida Stormwater Association,PO Box 13688,Tallahassee,FL 32317. Page 347 of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Introduction This Report presents the results of the Association's 15th biennial Stormwater Utilities Survey in Florida. Its purpose is to provide information to both managers and policy- makers in state and local government. Trends in the characteristics of the stormwater programs, utility rates and other practices within local governments can now be observed by comparing survey results through 2024. Florida has 67 counties and over 400 cities. Short of surveying every local government, it is difficult to determine exactly how many stormwater utilities exist in the state. FSA's best estimate is that there are now approximately 171 local governments that have established stormwater utilities pursuant to Chapter 403,Florida Statutes or their own home rule powers. The 2024 survey questionnaire received 137 stormwater utility responses. We expect the demand for stormwater utilities to continue for several reasons: The Florida Supreme Court has consistently upheld the validity of such fees; there is (generally) more public support for funding programs with user fees as opposed to ad valorem or other general taxes; and, the process of implementing Numeric Nutrient Criteria and the multi-billion dollar Water Quality Restoration Program in Florida continue to drive costs higher. As one might assume, service areas dedicated exclusively to cities constitute a significant majority of stormwater utilities - in part reflecting the relative ease of attaching a user charge onto an existing billing mechanism. Most stormwater utilities are located within a department of public works and have used impervious area as the basis for calculating the fee. As in earlier surveys, revenue generated from stormwater utilities represents a significant source of funds to address stormwater pollution and flooding problems. Most jurisdictions report that utility charges are adequate to meet most administrative costs but not for needs associated with capital improvement programs. Whether stormwater utility fees can be raised at a rate to keep pace with the costs of expanding state and federal water related requirements remains to be seen. The Association appreciates the assistance of those who completed the survey instrument. We hope that you find this Report to be of value. 2 age 348 of 572 Copyright©2024 by the Florida stormwater Associatic�ir, Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Utility Characteristics Page 349 of 572 \'. ",_ Agenda Item #16. Geosyntecl> consultants NATIONAL LEADE S IN STO MWATE AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT r ARE JLR) I . AROUND THE CORNER Geosyntec Consultants provides engineering and consulting services to solve complex problems involving the environment, natural resources, and civil infrastructure. F 6 INFRASTRUCTURE q WATER QUALI 0 i dkb • Basin Studies • Drainage Design • Watershed Management • Pollutant Load Modeling • Stormwater Retrofits • Integrated Water Resources • BMP Retrofits&Monitoring • Sediment Assessment • Stormwater Utility • Capital Improvements • Low Impact Design • Lake Management Master Plans Planning • Green Infrastructure • Erosion &Sediment • Inventory&Assessment Control 9 TMDL&NPDES Support NATURAL RESOURC HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC � o0 MANAGEMENT MODELING • Environmental Resource • Geomorphology • Surface Water • Compound Flooding Level Permitting • Conservation & Restoration • Groundwater of Service • Natural Systems • Living Shorelines • Floodplain Management • GIS Visualization • Hydromodification • Integrated Modeling T - COASTAL ENGINEERING _ RESILIENCY M;1 FeNumerical astal/Marine Structures • Inlet Management Planning • Vulnerability Assessments • Sea Level Rise Projections Modeling • Post-Construction • Coastal Risk Assessments • Integrated Planning& ur Analysis Monitoring • Flood Hazard Risk Design • Beach Renourishment • Dredging Support Services Assessments • Adaptation Planning • Shoreline Stabilization • FEMA Cost Reimbursement • Coastal Management Support Planning Based in Florida for more than 40 years, the firm has over 2,200 engineers, scientists, and support personnel in more than 100 offices throughout the U.S. and abroad. Orlando I Tampa Clearwater I Jacksonville I Boca Raton I Gainesville I Titusville I Pensacola I Tallahassee I St.Augustine I West Palm Beach CONTACT Mark Ellard, PE Florida Water Resources Lead 1 (407)321-7030 1 mellard@geosyntec.com eos ntec.c `,•- I 0 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 1-1 How is your SWU organized? 3 17 16 7 Separate Department of Local Government- 12% Combined with Department of Public Works-69% Combined with Wastewater Utility-5% ■Combined with Other Department* - 12% Authority or District Separate from Local Government- 2% 94 *"Other Department"examples provided by survey respondents included:Engineering, Environmental Services, Natural Resources, Transportation, and Water. 1-2 What year was your SWU established? 14 12 12 11 10 99 8 7 7 6 5 5 55 4 4 444 4 4 333 33 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 1-3 What jurisdiction does your SWU serve? 11 4 City Only-89% City & Unincorporated County- 3% Unincorporated County Only-8% . Other-0% 122 4 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater1014.18"nlfof 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 1-4 What is the physical area served by your SWU? Average area of respondents is 63,036 acres.(2022 reported average area was 66,071) Jurisdiction Acres Jurisdiction Acres Jurisdiction Acres Alachua County 451200 City of Key Colony Beach 285 City of South Pasadena 384 Bay County 408,960 City of Key West 3,378 City of St.Augustine 81900 Brevard County 5531634 City of Kissimmee 131580 City of St. Cloud 26 City of Altamonte Springs 6,207 City of Lake Alfred 3,200 City of St. Pete Beach 1,408 City of Auburndale 121P887 City of Lake Mary 61P324 City of St. Petersburg 37,920 City of Aventura 21P048 City of Lake Worth Beach 41480 City of Stuart 41200 City of Boynton Beach 10,605 City of Lakeland 47,955 City of Sunny Isles Beach 11140 City of Bradenton Beach 640 City of Largo 121383 City of Sunrise 111597 City of Callaway 61128 City of Longwood 31000 City of Sweetwater 21797 City of Cape Canaveral 11472 City of Madeira Beach 192 City of Tallahassee 1421306 City of Cape Coral 771000 City of Marathon 51555 City of Tamarac 81000 City of Casselberry 4,812 City of Margate 5,868 City of Tampa 75,299 City of Clearwater 16,000 City of Mascotte 1,800 City of Tarpon Springs 111480 City of Clermont 121238 City of Melbourne 36,606 City of Tavares 4,620 City of Cocoa 91P440 City of Miami 221F754 City of Titusville 21,958 City of Cocoa Beach 31840 City of Miami Gardens 141F080 City of West Melbourne 61886 City of Coconut Creek 71200 City of Miami Springs 21240 City of West Miami 453 City of Cooper City 5,146 City of Minneola 7,341 City of West Palm Beach 35,424 City of Coral Gables 81384 City of Mulberry 41176 City of Wilton Manors 21496 City of Daytona Beach 421240 City of Naples 81000 City of Winter Garden 141492 City of DeBary 161000 City of New Port Richey 21880 City of Winter Haven 261349 City of Deerfield Beach 10,250 City of New Smyrna Beach 26,816 City of Winter Park 6,509 City of Deland 121486 City of Niceville 5,400 Hillsborough County 5611268 City of Delray Beach 10,573 City of North Lauderdale 2,976 Leon County 37511040 City of Doral 961000 City of North Miami 61P400 Marion County 5601000 City of Dunedin 61814 City of North Miami Beach 31385 Miami-Dade County 112791P700 City of Edgewater 15,977 City of Oakland Park 5,268 Pasco County 476,800 City of Eustis 18,139 City of Ocala 29,028 Pinellas County 65,641 City of Fernandina Beach 101240 City of Ocoee 101048 Polk County 1/170/000 City of Fort Lauderdale 231240 City of Oldsmar 31200 Town of Cutler Bay 61720 City of Fort Meade 21880 City of Orange City 41653 Town of Jupiter 141797 City of Fort Myers 31,360 City of Orlando 711489 Town of Lake Park 1,362 City of Fort Pierce 22,307 City of Ormond Beach 23,217 Town of Lantana 11920 City of Fort Walton Beach 41P848 City of Palm Bay 561189 Town of Malabar 71P200 City of Fruitland Park 21600 City of Palm Coast 471458 Town of Melbourne Beach 832 City of Gainesville 411312 City of Pensacola 161000 Town of Pembroke Park 960 City of Green Cove Springs 4,700 City of Pinellas Park 10,709 Town of Redington Shores 235 City of Gulf Breeze 11740 City of Pompano Beach 16,051 Town of Surfside 361 City of Gulfport 2,129 City of Port Richey 11920 Village of Indian Creek 259 City of Hialeah 141604 City of Port St. Lucie 751600 Village of Key Biscayne 800 City of Homestead 9,986 City of Riviera Beach 7,000 Village of Palm Springs 2,455 City of Indian Harbour Beach 1,920 City of Safety Harbor 3,200 Village of Royal Palm Beach 71P488 City of Jacksonville 537,664 City of Satellite Beach 1,890 Village of Wellington 15,294 5 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater1014.18"n'2:'Of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 1-5 What is the population served by your SWU? Average population of respondents is 90,831.(2022 reported average population was 90,455) Jurisdiction Population Jurisdiction Population Jurisdiction Population Alachua County 100,000 City of Jacksonville 9821080 City of St.Augustine 151000 Bay County 711345 City of Key Colony Beach 41500 City of St. Pete Beach 91346 Brevard County 226,092 City of Key West 26,444 City of St. Petersburg 250,000 City of Altamonte Springs 47,420 City of Kissimmee 60,375 City of Stuart 16,173 City of Auburndale 16,865 City of Lake Alfred 5,120 City of Sunny Isles Beach 23,869 City of Aventura 441P500 City of Lake Mary 171F499 City of Sweetwater 21,781 City of Boynton Beach 801380 City of Lake Worth Beach 371000 City of Tallahassee 193.0551 City of Bradenton Beach 1,500 City of Lakeland 110,000 City of Tamarac 671P269 City of Callaway 151216 City of Largo 841431 City of Tampa 3771P165 City of Cape Canaveral 91987 City of Longwood 161876 City of Tarpon Springs 251937 City of Cape Coral 2201000 City of Madeira Beach 31865 City of Tavares 171385 City of Casselberry 30,061 City of Marathon 81500 City of Titusville 481789 City of Clearwater 117.0292 City of Margate 58,023 City of Umatilla 4,000 City of Clermont 46,000 City of Mascotte 7,980 City of West Melbourne 28,127 City of Cocoa 191P041 City of Melbourne 85,064 City of West Miami 811257 City of Cocoa Beach 111733 City of Miami 4641544 City of West Palm Beach 150,000 City of Coconut Creek 581000 City of Miami Gardens 1091#000 City of Wilton Manors 121P662 City of Cooper City 34,031 City of Miami Springs 141231 City of Winter Garden 471P245 City of Coral Gables 49,248 City of Minneola 18,354 City of Winter Haven 50,000 City of Daytona Beach 72,647 City of Mulberry 41609 City of Winter Park 301522 City of DeBary 21,000 City of Naples 251000 Hillsborough County 9051007 City of Deerfield Beach 80,000 City of New Port Richey 17,828 Leon County 94,650 City of Deland 35,500 City of New Smyrna Beach 30,515 Marion County 312,317 City of Delray Beach 67,000 City of North Miami 63,000 Miami-Dade County 1,102,955 City of Doral 701000 City of Oakland Park 431390 Pasco County 470.0391 City of Dunedin 361381 City of Ocala 57,586 Pinellas County 2751P535 City of Edgewater 231855 City of Ocoee 471F295 Polk County 407,963 City of Eustis 23,407 City of Oldsmar 15,000 Sarasota County 328,991 City of Fernandina Beach 13,199 City of Orange City 12,862 Town of Belleair 41217 City of Fort Lauderdale 186,219 City of Orlando 2801832 Town of Cutler Bay 451101 City of Fort Meade 51800 City of Ormond Beach 431475 Town of Jupiter 65,000 City of Fort Myers 98,500 City of Palm Bay 119.1000 Town of Lantana 12,000 City of Fort Pierce 46,000 City of Palm Coast 86,768 Town of Malabar 31061 City of Fort Walton Beach 22,525 City of Pensacola 52,000 Town of Melbourne Beach 31100 City of Fruitland Park 41000 City of Pinellas Park 541202 Town of Pembroke Park 61700 City of Gainesville 1471865 City of Pompano Beach 1131144 Town of Redington Shores 21400 City of Green Cove Springs 101000 City of Port Richey 21781 Town of Surfside 61200 City of Gulf Breeze 6,800 City of Port St. Lucie 212,015 Village of Indian Creek 86 City of Gulfport 12,407 City of Riviera Beach 35,000 Village of Key Biscayne 13,182 City of Hialeah 242,000 City of Rockledge 271123 Village of Palm Springs 23,250 City of Holmes Beach 41F459 City of Safety Harbor 17,072 Village of Wellington 60,000 City of Homestead 83,750 City of Satellite Beach 101617 Volusia County 122,633 City of Indian Harbour Beach 81500 City of South Pasadena 51000 6 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater1014.18"n'3:'Of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 1-6 How many accounts does your SWU serve? Residential Average is 32,995 accounts:27,733 are single family and 5,431 are multi-family. Non-Residential Average is 3,050 accounts:1,338 business,159 institutional,1,272 commercial and 173 industrial. Jurisdiction Residential Non-Residential Jurisdiction Residential Non-Residential Alachua County 33,894 41582 City of Lake Worth Beach 21,022 3,096 Bay County 39,369 11501 City of Lakeland 48,403 21923 Brevard County 120,500 911618 City of Largo 151502 21372 City of Altamonte Springs 11,154 2,100 City of Longwood 6,040 605 City of Auburndale 61796 2,491 City of Madeira Beach 1,655 131 City of Aventura 12,000 275 City of Maitland 41622 432 City of Boynton Beach 321494 1,923 City of Margate 12,828 11074 City of Bradenton Beach 11521 65 City of Mascotte 21839 61 City of Callaway 61837 248 City of Melbourne 321741 31865 City of Cape Canaveral 21642 238 City of Miami 751452 71112 City of Cape Coral 91,099 21952 City of Miami Gardens 23,404 61933 City of Casselberry 8,810 417 City of Miami Springs 3,705 602 City of Clearwater 28,209 311042 City of Minneola 5,670 211268 City of Clermont 321#875 21412 City of Mulberry 1,859 284 City of Cocoa 61825 111609 City of Naples 151630 21607 City of Cocoa Beach 31071 247 City of New Port Richey 6,539 802 City of Coconut Creek 111280 845 City of New Smyrna Beach 18,025 11523 City of Cooper City 111862 11335 City of Niceville 81771 11122 City of Coral Gables 131110 11175 City of North Lauderdale 101468 209 City of Daytona Beach 271874 41435 City of North Miami 101141 11502 City of DeBary 91100 NR City of North Miami Beach 7,908 486 City of Deerfield Beach 31,509 1,666 City of Oakland Park 6,984 4,670 City of Delray Beach 291376 21967 City of Ocala 261P615 411685 City of Dunedin 101959 745 City of Ocoee 161272 704 City of Edgewater 101020 494 City of Oldsmar 41686 417 City of Eustis 101537 864 City of Orange City 31138 569 City of Fernandina Beach 71057 594 City of Orlando 821259 81120 City of Fort Lauderdale 451533 61392 City of Ormond Beach 161893 909 City of Fort Meade 11596 259 City of Palm Bay 791546 11259 City of Fort Myers 25,151 2,401 City of Palm Coast 421000 433 City of Fort Pierce 14,364 211259 City of Pensacola 20,660 3,512 City of Fort Walton Beach 10,027 1,159 City of Pinellas Park 13,237 61647 City of Fruitland Park 21145 184 City of Pompano Beach 201,727 21547 City of Gainesville 611947 21#615 City of Port Richey 11286 236 City of Green Cove Springs 31200 250 City of Port St. Lucie 1051294 21#283 City of Gulf Breeze 21332 261 City of Riviera Beach 101693 11085 City of Gulfport 51041 129 City of Safety Harbor 71559 300 City of Hialeah 48,831 10,454 City of Satellite Beach 51002 442 City of Holmes Beach 41329 NR City of South Pasadena 602 NR City of Homestead 271F995 1,380 City of St.Augustine 141690 2,209 City of Jacksonville 2941984 17,698 City of St. Cloud 191425 11137 City of Key Colony Beach 11439 127 City of St. Pete Beach 3,993 3,915 City of Key West 91181 1,093 City of St. Petersburg 741483 61164 City of Kissimmee 271882 31190 City of Stuart 31019 NR City of Lake Alfred 21800 NR City of Sunny Isles Beach 141069 11908 City of Lake Mary 51262 471 City of Sunrise 421539 381709 7 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater014.18"n'T'of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 1-6 How many accounts does your SWU serve? (continued) Residential Average is 32,995 accounts:27,733 are single family and 5,431 are multi-family. Non-Residential Average is 3,050 accounts:1,338 business,159 institutional,1,272 commercial and 173 industrial. Jurisdiction Residential Non-Residential Jurisdiction Residential Non-Residential City of Sweetwater 21753 274 Pasco County 2121216 10,363 City of Tallahassee 88,102 71916 Pinellas County 118,440 41283 City of Tamarac 33,780 331 Polk County 274,646 18,822 City of Tampa 101.1747 11,643 Sarasota County 183.1611 71F258 City of Tarpon Springs 81139 835 Town of Belleair 1,413 22 City of Tavares 71183 846 Town of Cutler Bay 141207 534 City of Titusville 18,981 11165 Town of Jupiter 22,399 11034 City of Umatilla 11277 190 Town of Lake Park 31428 11461 City of Vero Beach 81710 11201 Town of Lantana 31053 596 City of West Melbourne 101868 905 Town of Malabar 21451 218 City of West Miami 11850 200 Town of Pembroke Park 766 174 City of West Palm Beach 24,892 2,886 Town of Red i ngton Shores 1,055 33 City of Wilton Manors 31692 387 Town of Surfside 41200 111200 City of Winter Garden 161017 844 Village of Indian Creek 36 1 City of Winter Haven 201271 211376 Village of Key Biscayne 11528 NR City of Winter Park 11,962 11513 Village of Palm Springs 12,376 837 Hillsborough County 312,061 10,397 Village of Royal Palm Beach 111243 375 Leon County 381691 11092 Village of Wellington 141874 474 Marion County 2341665 38379 Volusia County 491343 41788 Miami-Dade County 2881045 151120 8 Copyright©2024 by the Florida StormwaterPsa-scy18" 16-O f 572 Agenda Item #16. Engineering for a Sustainable Environment Watershed Management Surface Water Integrated Modeling Floodplain Management Level of Service Determination Capital Improvement Program Water Quality Pollutant Load Modeling Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Desig n TMDL & NPDES Support BMP Performance Assessment & Monitoring Resiliency & Vulnerability Risk Evaluation Vulnerability Assessment Adaptation Plans Resilient Infrastructure Design Climate Based Life Cycle Cost Analysis �0 4 1 IV 0&�.��i Can ENGINEERING SCIENCE 8950 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. St. N, Suite 205 St Petersburg, Florida 33702 727-202-8958 Page 356 of 572 Wes.net Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Utility Fees and R Page 357 of 572 .Wl rr kr ` •� i F F + - , j F M1 L l} '' •}J r-~41 {�1 F� i� R!f�' ~,a•i .\Y7. •``f l _'Y Y•r T J ' '{ _ r-' - .. •, - •r� ? ' ;JL L J'•y •{'- • i+_ ?ti_�l Y�R'' �'• ,'Y• - •. i y'ti•� �•}i rf r•. r .r. ,t._{L�: '' k } r'_ r r' _ fi M •'Y ,4.i�1 _�� -4 f _i�. 29 1 , •r y `;-••{ �r� 1 Cl. ":. Y'.y'�.'• r `� ,.+�,�' ic Yr: .i► - l f.y �� _ '''r L F .#+ :i.in '};• ~f� ; / , .•Y. ..+� - �y��'�. •fJ ram.�"• �^I"- Imo. .2� fi }•, - -e y y'�••-•• � -- Fri lid}- . / #rt} •• i }- .. +Y�{. lap ' OW- � - .L• ` YTS tea• F+ Y• r 4, A% r , ' + r llj� L o + Y, YL jk _ 4r 1 .y.} •#•- y �, * mow+ 'i a�� �~ 56 IL "'";' 1 n 46. JAI •. - ; r - + � IL L� 'rv'• '•}fy` `_ r< �' •.r' ` � F 1 me 40 wr r V �. - r f i r ti — �a r� T { 1 1 tires' ,ram• • _ 3 * �+L `y S! 91N PEOPLE THAT CARE +1 (866) 236=24 chen moore and associates chenm O Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-1 Within which Water Management District is your SWU located? (multiple responses accepted) 8 34 NWFWMD-6% 2 SFWMD-39% 53 SJRWMD-34% �SRWMD- 2% SWFWMD- 25% 46 2-2 What is the basic methodology used for your revenue generation? 2 1 User Fee- 62 49 Non-Ad Valorem or Special Assessment-36% Ad Valorem Tax- 1 ■Sales Tax-0% Other- 1% 85 2-3 What is the general basis for your fee? 14 4 Impervious Area -72% 20 Both Gross Area & Impervious Area - 15% Gross Area with Intenstity of Development Factor-3% Other* - 10% 99 *"Other"responses included:Flat Rate,Area, and Impervious Area& Trip Generation. 10 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St MVq91j5qibifr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-4 If impervious area is the fee basis, what is the square footage of your average billing unit (ERU or similar designation)? Average is 2,598 square feet(average in 2022 was 2,643 square feet). 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 plow 1,000 • 0 2-5 Is the "average billing unit" based upon single-family units only or on all residential types (e.g. single and multi-family, condominiums, mobile homes, etc.)? 11 Single-Family-58% 46 All Residential Types- 34% Other-8% 78 'I'I Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49rieffiatifr5I72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6a What is your current SWU rate per month? Average rate is$8.86(2022 was$8.05) Utility Rate Range:$0.58(Low)$60.00(High) NR=No Response NA=Not Applicable Jurisdiction Rate Unit Size Jurisdiction Rate Unit Size Alachua County $4.17 41011 City of Kissimmee $9.10 2,404 Bay County $3.33 NA City of Lake Alfred $2.00 NA Brevard County $5.33 2,500 City of Lake Mary $4.00 41P576 City of Altamonte Springs $6.75 2,492 City of Lake Wales $3.38 NR City of Auburndale $0.75 NR City of Lake Worth Beach $6.52 1,748 City of Aventura $3.50 1,549 City of Lakeland $9.72 5,000 City of Boynton Beach $8.25 1,937 City of Largo $12.84 3,000 City of Bradenton Beach $9.58 NA City of Longwood $6.00 2,898 City of Callaway $1.00 NA City of Madeira Beach $10.00 11249 City of Cape Canaveral $10.00 2,074 City of Maitland $10.72 21532 City of Cape Coral $11.83 31296 City of Marathon $10.00 NA City of Casselberry $9.75 2304 City of Margate $8.25 21P328 City of Clearwater $13.87 1,830 City of Mascotte $7.00 31000 City of Clermont $7.85 2,000 City of Melbourne $3.67 2,500 City of Cocoa $10.98 3,100 City of Miami $3.50 1,191 City of Cocoa Beach $8.96 2,900 City of Miami Gardens $6.00 1,548 City of Coconut Creek $4.59 21P070 City of Miami Springs $6.00 NA City of Cooper City $5.58 1,750 City of Minneola $4.00 1,100 City of Coral Gables $19.07 2,346 City of Mulberry $4.00 31250 City of Daytona Beach $11.96 1,661 City of Naples $14.50 11934 City of DeBary $14.00 2,560 City of New Port Richey $6.67 2,629 City of Deerfield Beach $4.77 2,788 City of New Smyrna Beach $7.92 1,818 City of Deland $9.67 4,900 City of Niceville $4.74 71P500 City of Delray Beach $1.12 500 City of North Lauderdale $6.00 21P138 City of Doral $4.00 1,548 City of North Miami $7.12 11760 City of Dunedin $12.25 1,708 City of North Miami Beach $5.06 1,800 City of Edgewater $13.50 21P027 City of Oakland Park $9.50 1,507 City of Eustis $6.00 NR City of Ocala $7.52 1,948 City of Fernandina Beach $12.73 NA City of Ocoee $8.25 21P054 City of Fort Lauderdale $23.68 NA City of Oldsmar $10.00 21550 City of Fort Meade $7.44 2,750 City of Orange City $14.67 NR City of Fort Myers $9.80 2,500 City of Orlando $9.99 21000 City of Fort Pierce $5.75 2,186 City of Ormond Beach $7.00 31000 City of Fort Walton Beach $5.00 3,200 City of Palm Bay $10.92 4,693 City of Fruitland Park $2.00 NA City of Palm Coast $28.27 31682 City of Gainesville $11.00 21P300 City of Pensacola $6.34 2,998 City of Green Cove Springs $25.00 31000 City of Pinellas Park $5.78 2,000 City of Gulf Breeze $11.24 41450 City of Pompano Beach $5.90 2,880 City of Gulfport $11.45 21300 City of Port Richey $9.05 31P250 City of Hialeah $2.50 1,664 City of Port St. Lucie $14.00 21280 City of Holmes Beach $2.95 NA City of Riviera Beach $9.00 1,920 City of Homestead $3.37 2,000 City of Safety Harbor $10.93 1,865 City of Indian Harbour Beach $4.00 NA City of Satellite Beach $16.67 3,000 City of Jacksonville $5.00 3,100 City of St.Augustine $9.82 2,752 City of Key Colony Beach $60.00 NA City of St. Cloud $12.65 21664 City of Key West $9.82 11440 City of St. Pete Beach $15.31 31813 12 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49161 ciatifr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6a What is your current SWU rate per month? (continued) Average rate is$8.86(2022 was$8.05) Utility Rate Range:$0.58(Low)$60.00(High) NR=No Response NA=Not Applicable Jurisdiction Rate Unit Size Jurisdiction Rate Unit Size City of St. Petersburg $9.93 21406 Leon County $7.08 31272 City of Stuart $7.00 31707 Marion County $1.25 2,275 City of Sunny Isles Beach $4.33 111548 Miami-Dade County $5.00 1,548 City of Sunrise $10.01 1,884 Pasco County $7.92 21P890 City of Sweetwater $6.00 1,458 Pinellas County $10.11 2,339 City of Tallahassee $10.06 1,990 Sarasota County $7.55 3,153 City of Tamarac $12.21 1,830 Town of Belleair $11.92 5,459 City of Tampa $6.83 31310 Town of Cutler Bay $7.50 11548 City of Tarpon Springs $10.15 1,945 Town of Jupiter $7.06 2,651 City of Tavares $10.00 31500 Town of Lake Park $25.52 5,202 City of Titusville $9.60 NA Town of Malabar $5.33 61500 City of Umatilla $4.00 3,000 Town of Melbourne Beach $3.00 21P500 City of Vero Beach $0.58 3,972 Town of Pembroke Park $10.12 1,548 City of West Melbourne $4.33 2,500 Town of Redington Shores $1.50 1,312 City of West Miami $2.50 1,400 Town of Surfside $5.35 1,300 City of West Palm Beach $15.73 21171 Village of Indian Creek $4.39 4,385 City of Wilton Manors $6.46 31P460 Village of Key Biscayne $16.90 1,083 City of Winter Garden $8.25 41077 Village of Palm Springs $4.00 NA City of Winter Haven $7.83 NA Village of Royal Palm Beach $5.50 2,723 City of Winter Park $23.50 21324 Village of Wellington $21.25 NA Hillsborough County $7.21 4,267 Volusia County $6.50 21P775 2-6b What is your current SWU rate per month? [see below monthly rates with a standardized billing area] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Based on Standardized Billing Area Standardizing the billing area to 1,000 square feet gives the average for 2024 of$3.69(2022 was$3.30). Range of rate per 1,000 square feet:$0.15(Low)$15.60(High) Jurisdiction Rate/1000 Sq. Ft. Jurisdiction Rate/1000 Sq. Ft. Alachua County $1.04 City of DeBary $5.47 Brevard County $2.13 City of Deerfield Beach $1.71 City of Altamonte Springs $2.71 City of DeLand $1.97 City of Aventura $2.26 City of Delray Beach $2.24 City of Boynton Beach $4.26 City of Doral $2.58 City of Cape Canaveral $4.82 City of Dunedin $7.17 City of Cape Coral $3.59 City of Edgewater $6.66 City of Casselberry $4.23 City of Fort Meade $2.71 City of Clearwater $7.58 City of Fort Myers $3.92 City of Clermont $3.93 City of Fort Pierce $2.63 City of Cocoa $3.54 City of Fort Walton Beach $1.56 City of Cocoa Beach $3.09 City of Gainesville $4.78 City of Coconut Creek $2.22 City of Green Cove Springs $8.33 City of Cooper City $3.19 City of Gulf Breeze $2.53 City of Coral Gables $8.13 City of Gulfport $4.98 City of Daytona Beach $7.20 City of Hialeah $1.50 13 Copyright 0 2024 by the Florida St 49162ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6b What is your current SWU rate per month? (continued) [see below monthly rates with a standardized billing area] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Based on Standardized Billing Area Standardizing the billing area to 1,000 square feet gives the average for 2024 of$3.69(2022 was$3.30). Range of rate per 1,000 square feet:$0.15(Low)$15.60(High) Jurisdiction Rate/1000 Sq. Ft. Jurisdiction Rate/1000 Sq. Ft. City of Homestead $1.69 City of St.Augustine $3.57 City of Jacksonville $1.61 City of St. Cloud $4.75 City of Key West $6.82 City of St. Pete Beach $4.02 City of Kissimmee $3.79 City of St. Petersburg $4.13 City of Lake Mary $0.87 City of Stuart $1.89 City of Lake Worth Beach $3.73 City of Sunny Isles Beach $2.80 City of Lakeland $1.94 City of Sunrise $5.31 City of Largo $4.28 City of Sweetwater $4.12 City of Longwood $2.07 City of Tallahassee $5.06 City of Madeira Beach $8.01 City of Tamarac $6.67 City of Maitland $4.23 City of Tampa $2.06 City of Margate $3.54 City of Tarpon Springs $5.22 City of Mascotte $2.33 City of Tavares $2.86 City of Melbourne $1.47 City of Umatilla $1.33 City of Miami $2.94 City of Vero Beach $0.15 City of Miami Gardens $3.88 City of West Melbourne $1.73 City of Minneola $3.64 City of West Miami $1.79 City of Mulberry $1.23 City of West Palm Beach $7.25 City of Naples $7.50 City of Wilton Manors $1.87 City of New Port Richey $2.54 City of Winter Garden $2.02 City of New Smyrna Beach $4.36 City of Winter Park $10.11 City of Niceville $0.63 Hillsborough County $1.69 City of North Lauderdale $2.81 Leon County $2.16 City of North Miami $4.05 Marion County $0.55 City of North Miami Beach $2.81 Miami-Dade County $3.23 City of Oakland Park $6.30 Pasco County $2.74 City of Ocala $3.86 Pinellas County $4.23 City of Ocoee $4.02 Sarasota County $2.39 City of Oldsmar $3.92 Town of Belleair $2.18 City of Orlando $5.00 Town of Cutler Bay $4.84 City of Ormond Beach $2.33 Town of Jupiter $2.66 City of Palm Bay $2.33 Town of Lake Park $4.91 City of Palm Coast $7.68 Town of Malabar $0.82 City of Pensacola $2.11 Town of Melbourne Beach $1.20 City of Pinellas Park $2.89 Town of Pembroke Park $6.54 City of Pompano Beach $2.05 Town of Redington Shores $1.14 City of Port Richey $2.78 Town of Surfside $4.12 City of Port St. Lucie $6.14 Village of Indian Creek $1.00 City of Riviera Beach $4.69 Village of Key Biscayne $15.60 City of Safety Harbor $5.86 Village of Royal Palm Beach $2.02 City of Satellite Beach $5.56 Volusia County $2.34 14 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49rinibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6c What is your current SWU rate per month? [see year to year comparison below] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Averages 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 $3.07 $3.37 $3.18 $3.36 $3.52 $3.85 $4.29 $4.88 $5.22 $5.67 $6.53 $6.97 $7.50 $8.05 $8.86 Jurisdiction 2005 2007 2009 2011 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change Alachua County $3.33 $3.33 $4.17 $0.84 Bay County $3.33 $3.33 $3.33 $3.33 $3.33 $3.33 $3.33 $0.00 Brevard County $3.00 $3.00 $3.33 $3.00 $4.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $0.00 Charlotte County $3.00 $10.71 $10.71 $10.71 $10.71 City of Altamonte Springs $5.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $6.75 $0.00 City of Atlantic Beach $4.00 $4.00 $5.00 $5.00 $8.39 $8.39 City of Auburndale $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.00 City of Aventura $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $0.00 City of Boca Raton $3.22 City of Boynton Beach $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $8.25 City of Bradenton $4.50 City of Bradenton Beach $8.33 $8.33 $8.33 $8.33 9.58 9.58 $0.00 City of Callaway $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 City of Cape Canaveral $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $5.00 $5.00 $7.00 $9.00 $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 City of Cape Coral $3.50 $6.25 $6.25 $6.25 $6.25 $9.25 $9.92 $10.83 $11.83 $1.00 City of Casselberry $2.90 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $8.65 $9.20 $9.75 $0.55 City of Clearwater $8.65 $9.91 $11.13 $12.51 $13.77 $14.33 $14.58 $13.40 $13.40 $13.87 $0.47 City of Clermont $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $4.99 $4.99 $7.85 $2.86 City of Cocoa $3.00 $5.00 $5.75 $6.25 $6.75 $10.51 $10.98 $0.47 City of Cocoa Beach $5.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $8.00 $8.50 $8.96 $8.96 $8.96 $0.00 City of Coconut Creek $3.46 $3.54 $3.71 $3.92 $4.15 $4.59 $0.44 City of Cooper City $2.93 $2.93 $3.22 $5.58 $5.58 $0.00 City of Coral Gables $8.20 $8.80 $13.30 $16.16 $19.07 $19.07 $0.00 City of Daytona Beach $4.00 $6.00 $7.48 $8.67 $9.38 $10.07 $10.07 $11.46 $11.96 $0.50 City of DeBary $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $14.00 $14.00 $0.00 City of Deerfield Beach $3.75 $3.75 $4.77 $1.02 City of DeLand $8.69 $8.69 $9.67 $9.67 $0.00 City of Delray Beach $4.50 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $1.12 ($4.21) City of Deltona $5.00 City of Dora $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Dunedin $4.50 $6.00 $6.00 $7.40 $10.16 $11.10 $11.89 $12.25 $12.25 $0.00 City of Eagle Lake $4.00 City of Edgewater $6.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 $11.00 $13.00 $13.50 $0.50 City of Eustis $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 City of Fernandina Beach $4.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.73 $0.73 City of Flagler Beach $5.00 $6.25 $6.25 City of Fort Lauderdale $2.62 $2.90 $3.20 $3.53 $3.50 $4.10 $10.00 $14.00 $21.52 $23.68 $2.16 City of Fort Meade $4.25 $4.25 $4.25 $4.25 $4.25 $6.19 $6.75 $7.44 $7.44 $7.44 $0.00 City of Fort Myers $4.80 $4.80 $4.80 $4.80 $7.60 $9.60 $9.60 $9.80 $0.20 City of Fort Pierce $2.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $5.75 $5.75 $5.75 $0.00 City of Fort Walton Beach $3.00 $3.00 $4.25 $4.75 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 City of Fruitland Park $1.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $0.00 City of Gainesville $6.50 $6.95 $7.65 $8.15 $8.56 $9.00 $9.45 $9.90 $10.40 $11.00 $0.60 City of Green Cove Springs $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $25.00 $21.50 15 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St vqgr j62fibipr5l�2 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6c What is your current SWU rate per month? (continued)[see year to year comparison below] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Jurisdiction 2005 2007 2009 2011 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change City of Gulf Breeze $5.07 $9.38 $9.38 $11.24 $1.86 City of Gulfport $2.87 $2.87 $2.87 $3.21 $3.60 $3.95 $3.95 $3.95 $11.45 $7.50 City of Haines City $2.00 $2.00 $4.52 $4.52 $4.93 $4.94 City of Hallandale Beach $2.17 $2.68 $2.68 $2.50 $3.35 $3.35 $7.37 City of Hialeah $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $0.00 City of Holly Hill $3.00 $3.00 $6.00 $6.00 City of Hollywood $2.35 $2.69 $3.22 City of Holmes Beach $2.95 City of Homestead $3.18 $3.18 $3.37 $3.37 $3.37 $3.37 $3.37 $0.00 City of Indian Harbour Beach $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Jacksonville $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 City of Jacksonville Beach $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $4.78 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 City of Key Colony Beach $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $0.00 City of Key West $7.90 $8.22 $8.72 $8.98 $9.25 $9.82 $0.57 City of Kissimmee $7.38 $8.08 $8.08 $8.45 $8.78 $9.10 $9.10 $0.00 City of Lake Alfred $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $0.00 City of Lake Mary $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Lake Wales $3.38 City of Lake Worth Beach $2.90 $5.80 $5.80 $6.30 $6.30 $6.52 $6.52 $6.52 $0.00 City of Lakeland $2.00 $2.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $8.00 $8.82 $9.26 $9.72 $0.46 City of Largo $3.57 $3.57 $3.57 $4.45 $6.65 $6.65 $6.65 $8.91 $12.84 $3.93 City of Lauderhill $12.19 City of Leesburg $6.00 $6.00 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 City of Longwood $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 City of Madeira Beach $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 City of Maitland $8.60 $9.80 $9.60 $10.72 City of Marathon $20.00 $10.00 ($10.00) City of Margate $2.69 $2.69 $3.57 $5.15 $5.15 $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $0.00 City of Mascotte $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $0.00 City of Melbourne $3.00 $3.67 $3.67 $3.67 $3.67 $3.67 $0.00 City of Miami $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $0.00 City of Miami Gardens $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 City of Miami Springs $3.67 $3.67 $3.67 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 City of Minneola $2.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Miramar $2.00 $2.50 City of Mount Dora $5.00 $6.50 City of Mulberry $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Naples $4.00 $4.00 $11.82 $12.01 $12.80 $13.05 $13.35 $13.93 $14.50 $14.50 $0.00 City of Neptune Beach $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $5.00 $5.00 $18.41 City of New Port Richey $3.36 $3.36 $3.36 $3.36 $3.36 $6.50 $6.67 $6.67 $6.67 $0.00 City of New Smyrna Beach $7.17 $7.33 $7.67 $7.92 $7.92 $0.00 City of Niceville $2.65 $2.65 $3.85 $4.25 $4.51 $4.51 $4.51 $4.51 $4.51 $4.74 $0.23 City of North Bay Village $1.26 $7.72 City of North Lauderdale $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $0.00 City of North Miami $4.65 $4.65 $5.64 $6.19 $6.19 $6.19 $7.12 $7.12 $0.00 City of North Miami Beach $3.70 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $5.06 City of Oakland Park $3.99 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $9.50 $2.50 16 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49165ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6c What is your current SWU rate per month? (continued)[see year to year comparison below] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Jurisdiction 2005 2007 2009 2011 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change City of Ocala $3.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.71 $5.54 $5.54 $7.52 $1.98 City of Ocoee $5.00 $5.00 $7.00 $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $0.00 City of Oldsmar $3.50 $3.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $5.00 $6.00 $6.00 $10.00 $4.00 City of Orange City $12.55 $12.55 $14.67 $14.67 $0.00 City of Orlando $6.88 $9.08 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $9.99 $0.00 City of Ormond Beach $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $0.00 City of Oviedo $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 City of Palm Bay $4.47 $13.76 $12.34 $12.34 $10.92 ($1.42) City of Palm Coast $6.00 $8.00 $8.00 $11.65 $11.65 $11.65 $11.65 $11.65 $28.27 $16.62 City of Pensacola $4.40 $4.40 $4.40 $4.40 $5.07 $5.28 $5.28 $5.28 $6.34 $6.34 $0.00 City of Pinellas Park $5.50 $4.00 $4.00 $5.78 City of Plant City $4.00 City of Plantation $2.50 City of Pompano Beach $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.21 $3.68 $4.21 $4.50 $5.52 $5.90 $0.38 City of Port Orange $6.25 $6.25 $8.25 City of Port Richey $3.00 $3.00 $9.05 $6.05 City of Port St. Lucie $8.75 $10.25 $10.25 $12.75 $13.58 $13.58 $14.00 $14.00 $0.00 City of Riviera Beach $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $9.00 $9.00 $9.00 $0.00 City of Rockledge $3.00 $3.00 $3.75 $3.75 $3.75 $4.25 $4.25 $5.00 $5.00 City of Safety Harbor $3.50 $3.75 $3.75 $7.25 $7.25 $7.25 $10.61 $10.93 $10.93 $0.00 City of Sanford $5.20 $5.60 $6.79 $8.25 City of Satellite Beach $3.50 $4.50 $8.67 $8.67 $16.67 $16.67 $16.67 $0.00 City of Sebastian $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 City of St.Augustine $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $9.00 $9.82 $0.82 City of St. Cloud $6.35 $6.35 $6.35 $12.65 $12.65 City of St. Pete Beach $3.92 $3.92 $3.92 $3.92 $15.31 $15.31 $0.00 City of St. Petersburg $6.00 $6.40 $6.85 $6.84 $6.84 $6.84 $10.00 $9.93 $9.93 $9.93 $0.00 City of Stuart $2.65 $3.76 $3.76 $3.76 $3.95 $3.95 $4.18 $4.35 $4.35 $7.00 $2.65 City of Sunny Isles Beach $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $4.33 $4.33 $4.33 $4.33 $0.00 City of Sunrise $1.30 $2.32 $3.25 $4.50 $6.82 $8.09 $10.01 City of Sweetwater $4.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $6.00 $1.00 City of Tallahassee $6.25 $6.93 $7.61 $7.95 $7.95 $7.95 $8.18 $8.51 $8.83 $10.06 $1.23 City of Tamarac $8.00 $9.03 $9.58 $9.19 $9.19 $9.57 $9.86 $11.85 $12.21 $0.36 City of Tampa $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $6.83 $6.83 $6.83 $6.83 $6.83 $0.00 City of Tarpon Springs $5.65 $5.65 $5.65 $5.65 $7.15 $8.15 $8.65 $10.15 $1.50 City of Tavares $3.00 $4.50 $4.50 $7.75 $9.25 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 City of Titusville $5.30 $5.57 $5.85 $6.15 $6.62 $6.96 $7.31 $7.64 $7.64 $9.60 $1.96 City of Umatilla $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 City of Venice $2.98 $5.00 $5.00 City of Vero Beach $0.58 City of West Melbourne $3.00 $3.00 $4.33 $4.33 $4.33 $0.00 City of West Miami $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $0.00 City of West Palm Beach $6.04 $6.95 $8.48 $10.62 $13.57 $13.57 $14.83 $15.73 $0.90 City of Wilton Manors $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $4.37 $4.37 $5.31 $5.31 $6.46 $6.46 $0.00 City of Winter Garden $4.00 $5.13 $5.13 $8.25 $8.25 $0.00 City of Winter Haven $2.68 $3.16 $3.16 $6.81 $7.11 $7.46 $7.83 $0.37 City of Winter Park $9.78 $11.56 $11.56 $11.56 $11.56 $11.56 $11.56 $23.50 $11.94 17 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49166ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-6c What is your current SWU rate per month? (continued) [see year to year comparison below] Comparative Monthly Stormwater Rates Jurisdiction 2005 2007 2009 2011 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change City of Winter Springs $3.25 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 Hillsborough County $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $2.50 $3.00 $6.40 $6.40 $7.21 $0.81 Lake County(in mils) .4984 .4984 .4984 .4984 .4984 .4984 .4984 Leon County $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 $1.67 $7.08 $7.08 $7.08 $7.08 $7.08 $7.08 $0.00 Marion County $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $0.00 Miami-Dade County $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $0.00 Pasco County $3.82 $3.92 $3.92 $4.75 $7.92 $7.92 $7.92 $7.92 $0.00 Pinellas County $9.67 $9.81 $9.81 $9.81 $9.81 $10.11 $0.30 Sarasota County $6.70 $7.24 $7.55 $7.55 $7.55 $7.55 $7.55 $7.55 $7.55 $0.00 Town of Bay Harbor Islands $5.00 Town of Belleair $11.92 $11.92 $11.92 $11.92 $11.92 $0.00 Town of Cutler Bay $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $7.50 $3.50 Town of Jupiter $3.85 $4.10 $4.37 $4.37 $4.37 $4.55 $4.98 $5.70 $6.17 $7.06 $0.89 Town of Lake Park $25.52 Town of Malabar $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $4.50 $4.50 $5.33 $5.33 $0.00 Town of Medley $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Town of Melbourne Beach $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $0.00 Town of Pembroke Park $5.50 $5.67 $6.25 $9.00 $10.12 $10.12 $10.12 $10.12 $0.00 Town of Redington Shores $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $0.00 Town of Surfside $5.35 $5.35 $5.35 $5.35 $5.35 $0.00 Village of Indian Creek $4.39 $4.39 $4.39 $4.39 $4.39 $4.39 $4.39 $0.00 Village of Key Biscayne $13.35 $13.35 $16.90 $16.90 $16.90 $0.00 Village of Miami Shores Village $3.00 $3.25 $3.75 $3.75 Village of Palm Springs $3.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $0.00 Village of Royal Palm Beach $5.50 Village of Pinecrest $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $4.00 $4.00 $8.00 $10.00 $10.00 Village of Wellington $19.17 $19.17 $19.17 $19.17 $21.25 $2.08 Volusia County $2.50 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.50 $0.50 2-7 How are the majority of your stormwater charges invoiced? 4 78 ■Combined on Monthly Bill for Other Utility Services- 57% Separate Mailing-2% ■ Placed on Annual Property Tax Bill -38% ■Other-3% 53 2 18 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St YJ916/ ib I J!2 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8a What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee? $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,0001000 $25,000,000 $20,0001000 $15,0001000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 ---------------------------------- . ��������������IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�������������IIIIIIIII Average revenue generated is$4,994,875 (2022 was$4,801,248). Jurisdiction 2024 Revenue Jurisdiction 2024 Revenue Alachua County $2,900,000 City of Fort Walton Beach $1,034,658 Bay County $1,920,080 City of Fruitland Park $48,000 Brevard County $6,689,105 City of Gainesville $9,852,200 City of Altamonte Springs $1,908,477 City of Green Cove Springs $1,580,546 City of Auburndale $112,816 City of Gulf Breeze $460,274 City of Aventura $1,300,000 City of Gulfport $966,651 City of Boynton Beach $5,9251000 City of Hialeah $3,599,999 City of Bradenton Beach $309,520 City of Holmes Beach $862,031 City of Callaway $85,000 City of Homestead $2,698,632 City of Cape Canaveral $1,087,800 City of Indian Harbour Beach $218,293 City of Cape Coral $24,462,505 City of Jacksonville $31,561,888 City of Casselberry $2,491,554 City of Key Colony Beach $197,000 City of Clearwater $16,925,590 City of Key West $2,498,211 City of Clermont $1,800,000 City of Kissimmee $834,527 City of Cocoa $2,082,485 City of Lake Alfred $45,000 City of Cocoa Beach $881,307 City of Lake Mary $413,000 City of Coconut Creek $2,085,819 City of Lake Wales $490,000 City of Cooper City $550,100 City of Lake Worth Beach $1,575,000 City of Coral Gables $6,396,266 City of Lakeland $8,715,000 City of Daytona Beach $13,950,498 City of Largo $9,678,900 City of DeBary $791,000 City of Longwood $950,000 City of Deerfield Beach $1,800,000 City of Madeira Beach $375,000 City of DeLand $910,000 City of Marathon $1,006,454 City of Delray Beach $4,151,207 City of Margate $2,071,000 City of Doral $3,700,000 City of Mascotte $246,000 City of Dunedin $4,316,600 City of Melbourne $2,975,000 City of Edgewater $2,538,714 City of Miami $15,838,009 City of Eustis $850,806 City of Miami Gardens $6,3211918 City of Fernandina Beach $78,160 City of Miami Springs $450,000 City of Fort Lauderdale $31,667,000 City of Minneola $262,870 City of Fort Meade $192,170 City of Mulberry $280,000 City of Fort Myers $6,500,000 City of Naples $5,465,100 City of Fort Pierce $3,570,383 City of New Port Richey $1,067,154 19 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4916aibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8a What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee? (continued) Jurisdiction 2024 Revenue Jurisdiction 2024 Revenue City of New Smyrna Beach $2,4171000 City of Titusville $3,876,177 City of Niceville $500,000 City of Umatilla $99,000 City of North Lauderdale $1,193,100 City of Vero Beach $99,000 City of North Miami $2,624,268 City of West Melbourne $645,367 City of North Miami Beach $1,464,420 City of West Miami $163,161 City of Oakland Park $4,6001000 City of West Palm Beach $15,376,467 City of Ocala $6,835,282 City of Wilton Manors $550,000 City of Ocoee $3,918,740 City of Winter Garden $1,589,244 City of Oldsmar $942,136 City of Winter Haven $2,201,372 City of Orange City $810,620 City of Winter Park $4,500,000 City of Orlando $24,829,798 Hillsborough County $35,600,000 City of Ormond Beach $2,539,966 Leon County $3,737,589 City of Palm Bay $9,365,274 Marion County $4,095,673 City of Palm Coast $12,995,325 Miami-Dade County $31,000,000 City of Pensacola $2,000,000 Pasco County $29,802,000 City of Pinellas Park $3,258,719 Pinellas County $20,603,004 City of Pompano Beach $5,000,000 Polk County $2,500,000 City of Port Richey $288,351 Sarasota County $28,690,385 City of Port St. Lucie $22,893,483 Town of Belleair $327,878 City of Riviera Beach $3,200,000 Town of Cutler Bay $1,030,000 City of Safety Harbor $1,550,000 Town of Jupiter $4,012,081 City of Satellite Beach $1,022,865 Town of Lake Park $2,046,663 City of St.Augustine $1,336,143 Town of Malabar $133,107 City of St. Pete Beach $1,347,700 Town of Melbourne Beach $53,000 City of St. Petersburg $18,000,000 Town of Pembroke Park $1,440,000 City of Stuart $545,000 Town of Redington Shores $45,000 City of Sunny Isles Beach $1,482,477 Town of Surfside $137,000 City of Sunrise $931,685 Village of Indian Creek $183,390 City of Sweetwater $102,294 Village of Key Biscayne $1,832,835 City of Tallahassee $20,682,626 Village of Palm Springs $382,799 City of Tamarac $6,553,284 Village of Royal Palm Beach $1,123,848 City of Tampa $17,487,162 Village of Wellington $6,400,000 City of Tarpon Springs $1,735,314 Volusia County $4,558,297 City of Tavares $1,564,010 20 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49169ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8b What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee?[see year to year comparison below] Comparative Annual Stormwater Revenue Jurisdiction 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change Alachua County $1,939,850 $1,951,246 $2,900,000 $948,754 Bay County $1,7551880 $1,788,920 $1,777,160 $1,000,000 $1,920,080 $920,080 Brevard County $3,402,357 $4,956,903 $6,194,316 $6,435,425 $6,560,026 $6,689,105 $129,079 Charlotte County $5,000,000 $5,0001000 $5,000,000 City of Altamonte Springs $1,915,871 $2,022,364 $21058,306 $2,058,306 $2,0031165 $1,908,477 ($94,688) City of Atlantic Beach $855,000 $1,135,000 City of Auburndale $42,966 $42,966 $55,287 $97,150 $112,816 $112,816 $0 City of Aventura $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $0 City of Boca Raton $1,800,000 City of Boynton Beach $3,200,000 $5,925,000 City of Bradenton $1,847,000 City of Bradenton Beach $147,000 $298,650 $298,650 $309,520 $309,520 $309,520 $0 City of Callaway $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $0 City of Cape Canaveral $581,400 $582,000 $695,500 $853,227 $1,069,796 $1,087,800 $18,004 City of Cape Coral $12,365,100 $18,379,336 $20,227,445 $20,227,445 $24,462,505 $4,235,060 City of Casselberry $1,679,050 $1,711,878 $1,760,500 $2,1611317 $2,353,108 $2,491,554 $138,446 City of Clearwater $16,700,000 $16,700,000 $161700,000 $16,778,861 $16,925,590 $16,925,590 $0 City of Clermont $804,800 $1,038,627 $1,038,627 $1,400,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $0 City of Cocoa $520,000 $1,400,000 $11400,000 $11890,701 $1,890,701 $2,082,485 $191,784 City of Cocoa Beach $566,000 $566,000 $809,159 $853,956 $881,307 $881,307 $0 City of Coconut Creek $11552,800 $1,552,800 $1,6701000 $1,762,000 $1,762,000 $21085,819 $323,819 City of Cooper City $130,000 $130,000 $321,285 $550,100 $550,100 $0 City of Coral Gables $2,900,000 $3,1501000 $4,222,000 $5,540,000 $6,396,266 $6,396,266 $0 City of Daytona Beach $9,399,000 $9,399,000 $11,733,000 $11,733,000 $13,950,498 $13,950,498 $0 City of DeBary $791,000 $791,000 $791,000 $791,000 $791,000 $791,000 $0 City of Deerfield Beach $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $0 City of Deland $800,000 $910,000 $910,000 $910,000 $0 City of Delray Beach $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,210,727 $2,210,727 $4,151,207 $1,940,480 City of Doral $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $31700,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $0 City of Dunedin $3,219,581 $3,720,500 $4,060,500 $4,120,000 $4,316,600 $196,600 City of Eagle Lake $45,000 City of Edgewater $1,276,483 $1,302,571 $1,554,152 $1,892,121 $1,892,121 $2,538,714 $646,593 City of Eustis $824,450 $850,806 $850,806 $0 City of Fernandina Beach $250,000 $780,000 $825,000 $850,000 $78,160 ($771,840) City of Flagler Beach $260,000 $362,401 $362,401 City of Fort Lauderdale $5,197,944 $7,250,762 $91171,567 $13,800,377 $28,000,000 $31,667,000 $3,667,000 City of Fort Meade $140,000 $207,485 $193,841 $192,170 $192,170 $192,170 $0 City of Fort Myers $2,860,000 $3,050,000 $41700,000 $6,5001000 $61500,000 $6,500,000 $0 City of Fort Pierce $2,406,000 $2,406,000 $2,542,540 $2,542,540 $2,542,540 $3,570,383 $1,027,843 City of Fort Walton Beach $670,893 $892,659 $970,866 $970,866 $970,866 $1,034,658 $63,792 City of Fruitland Park $21,000 $21,000 $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 $0 City of Gainesville $6,753,539 $7,734,911 $6,802,057 $6,802,057 $9,161,009 $9,852,200 $691,191 City of Green Cove Springs $177,400 $177,400 $177,400 $177,400 $1,580,546 $1,403,146 City of Gulf Breeze $235,000 $460,274 $460,274 $460,274 $0 City of Gulfport $306,510 $324,089 $409,368 $409,368 $409,368 $966,651 $557,283 City of Haines City $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $520,000 City of Hallandale Beach $1,977,760 $1,977,760 $11977,760 21 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4917ffibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8b What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee? (continued) [see year to year comparison below] Comparative Annual Stormwater Revenue Jurisdiction 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change City of Hialeah $3,600,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,599,999 $299,999 City of Holly Hill $804,000 City of Holmes Beach $862,031 City of Homestead $1,644,744 $1,832,424 $1,847,930 $1,876,373 $2,698,632 $822,259 City of Indian Harbour Beach $226,114 $226,114 $226,114 $218,293 $218,293 $0 City of Jacksonville $30,600,000 $30,600,000 $29,584,022 $31,287,151 $31,561,888 $31,561,888 $0 City of Jacksonville Beach $1,209,604 $1,296,045 $1,326,178 $1,402,055 City of Key Colony Beach $197,000 $197,000 $197,000 $197,000 $197,000 $0 City of Key West $2,100,000 $21150,000 $2,150,000 $2,150,000 $2,351,456 $2,498,211 $146,755 City of Kissimmee $4,020,561 $4,738,000 $834,527 $834,527 $834,527 $834,527 $0 City of Lake Alfred $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $0 City of Lake Mary $408,930 $413,000 $413,000 $413,000 $413,000 $0 City of Lake Wales $490,000 City of Lake Worth Beach $1,846,304 $1,846,304 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $0 City of Lakeland $4,536,900 $4,536,900 $5,425,000 $5,9231000 $7,573,331 $8,715,000 $1,141,669 City of Largo $5,495,000 $5,789,000 $5,787,800 $6,825,000 $9,678,900 $2,853,900 City of Leesburg $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,983,211 $1,983,211 City of Longwood $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $650,000 $950,000 $300,000 City of Madeira Beach $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $0 City of Maitland $1,141,392 $1,1411392 $1,712,000 City of Marathon $1,037,326 $1,0061454 ($30,872) City of Margate $900,000 $900,000 $2,0711000 $2,071,000 $2,0711000 $0 City of Mascotte $160,000 $213,000 $246,000 $33,000 City of Melbourne $2,300,000 $21700,000 $2,925,000 $2,925,000 $2,925,000 $2,975,000 $50,000 City of Miami $11,424,031 $11,816,631 $12,575,573 $12,575,573 $15,838,009 $3,262,436 City of Miami Gardens $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,643,765 $5,643,765 $5,845,253 $6,321,918 $476,665 City of Miami Springs $278,515 $210,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $0 City of Minneola $190,800 $260,893 $260,893 $262,870 $262,870 $0 City of Mount Dora $848,843 City of Mulberry $217,885 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $0 City of Naples $4,754,978 $4,773,000 $5,032,252 $5,063,000 $5,465,100 $5,465,100 $0 City of Neptune Beach $173,127 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 City of New Port Richey $542,119 $985,987 $1,084,890 $1,068,910 $1,067,154 ($1,756) City of New Smyrna Beach $1,800,000 $2,100,000 $2,417,000 $2,417,000 $2,417,000 $0 City of Niceville $425,000 $480,000 $485,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 City of North Bay Village $112,927 $116,575 City of North Lauderdale $375,000 $375,000 $750,000 $1,193,100 $1,193,100 $11193,100 $0 City of North Miami $2,448,000 $2,598,048 $2,552,977 $2,624,268 $2,624,268 $0 City of North Miami Beach $1,275,000 $1,464,420 City of Oakland Park $3,000,000 $31000,070 $3,150,074 $3,1501074 $3,150,074 $4,600,000 $1,449,926 City of Ocala $4,803,148 $5,999,400 $6,835,282 $6,835,282 $6,835,282 $0 City of Ocoee $3,549,174 $3,549,174 $3,918,740 $3,918,740 $0 City of Oldsmar $509,000 $600,000 $719,000 $919,000 $942,136 $942,136 $0 City of Orange City $631,027 $715,729 $810,620 $810,620 $0 City of Orlando $22,632,278 $23,881,352 $23,881,352 $23,881,352 $24,829,798 $24,829,798 $0 City of Ormond Beach $2,550,000 $2,550,000 $239,890 $2,539,966 $2,539,966 $2,539,966 $0 City of Oviedo $697,000 22 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49171ciatifr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8b What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee? (continued) [see year to year comparison below] Comparative Annual Stormwater Revenue Jurisdiction 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change City of Palm Bay $3,135,767 $121200,000 $10,157,317 $10,157,317 $9,365,274 ($792,043) City of Palm Coast $7,852,470 $7,048,000 $7,048,000 $7,048,000 $12,995,325 $12,995,325 $0 City of Pensacola $2,410,000 $2,588,100 $2,588,100 $2,588,100 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 City of Pinellas Park $1,237,542 $1,266,806 $1,271,896 $3,258,719 $3,258,719 $0 City of Plantation $1,285,216 City of Pompano Beach $2,420,000 $2,843,950 $2,484,310 $2,586,378 $4,000,000 $5,0001000 $1,000,000 City of Port Richey $120,000 $118,638 $288,351 $169,713 City of Port St. Lucie $20,422,000 $20,727,845 $22,893,483 $22,893,483 $22,893,483 $0 City of Riviera Beach $1,600,000 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 $0 City of Rockledge $939,000 $875,250 $1,005,715 $1,100,432 $11?100,432 City of Safety Harbor $561,000 $561,000 $561,000 $1,489,500 $1,550,000 $1,550,000 $0 City of Sanford $4,7051595 City of Satellite Beach $513,303 $512,000 $1,005,000 $1,005,000 $1,022,865 $17,865 City of Sebastian $986,000 $986,000 $1,940,000 City of St.Augustine $800,000 $934,570 $1,004,200 $1,128,808 $1,336,143 $207,335 City of St. Cloud $11800,000 $2,0131000 City of St. Pete Beach $619,300 $619,300 $1,231,700 $1,347,700 $1,347,700 $0 City of St. Petersburg $13,000,000 $13,000,000 $161000,000 $18,000,000 $18,000,000 $18,000,000 $0 City of Stuart $545,000 $545,000 $545,000 $545,000 $545,000 $545,000 $0 City of Sunny Isles Beach $1,005,488 $1,169,975 $1,482,477 $1,482,477 $0 City of Sunrise $6,202,817 $7,225,952 $931,685 City of Sweetwater $102,294 City of Tallahassee $171200,000 $17,800,000 $19,079,490 $20,682,626 $1,603,136 City of Tamarac $4,953,790 $4,346,747 $5,539,717 $5,879,590 $6,107,898 $6,553,284 $445,386 City of Tampa $7,128,021 $16,056,716 $16,430,716 $16,793,390 $16,7931390 $17,487,162 $693,772 City of Tarpon Springs $1,028,000 $1,340,092 $1,589,975 $1,7351314 $1,735,314 $0 City of Tavares $139,760 $964,613 $1,287,510 $1,564,010 $1,564,010 $1,564,010 $0 City of Titusville $2,300,000 $2,300,000 $21500,000 $2,714,983 $2,724,028 $3,876,177 $1,152,149 City of Umatilla $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 $0 City of Vero Beach $99,000 City of West Melbourne $386,431 $366,577 $617,120 $680,146 $645,367 ($34,779) City of West Miami $126,534 $150,566 $163,161 $163,161 $0 City of West Palm Beach $10,748,860 $10,748,860 $10,748,860 $15,376,467 $15,376,467 $0 City of Wilton Manors $250,000 $250,000 $480,000 $480,000 $550,000 $550,000 $0 City of Winter Garden $1,506,992 $1,589,244 $1,589,244 $1,589,244 $0 City of Winter Haven $1,409,395 $1,409,395 $11700,000 $1,860,611 $2,014,950 $2,201,372 $186,422 City of Winter Park $2,963,998 $3,0211777 $31050,687 $2,783,911 $3,565,000 $4,500,000 $935,000 City of Winter Springs $980,000 $1,0901000 $11090,000 Hillsborough County $6,300,000 $16,900,000 $19,808,100 $30,384,880 $31,672,650 $35,600,000 $3,927,350 Lake County $3,2001000 $504,000 $582,300 $582,300 Leon County $3,2031866 $3,492,616 $3,539,181 $3,539,181 $3,684,258 $3,737,589 $53,331 Marion County $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $31700,000 $4,124,705 $3,793,235 $4,095,673 $302,438 Miami-Dade County $31,0001000 $31,000,000 $311000,000 $31,000,000 $31,000,000 $31,0001000 $0 Pasco County $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $251000,000 $25,0001000 $27,000,000 $29,802,000 $2,802,000 Pinellas County $17,006,064 $18,0001000 $191800,000 $19,700,000 $19,700,000 $20,603,004 $903,004 Polk County $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,670,000 $1,670,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 Sarasota County $17,092,167 $16,207,778 $17,522,361 $18,037,741 $28,690,385 $10,652,644 23 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49172ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-8b What is the total annual revenue generated by the utility fee? (continued) [see year to year comparison below] Comparative Annual Stormwater Revenue Jurisdiction 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Change Town of Bay Harbor Islands $206,000 Town of Belleair $350,000 $350,000 $337,400 $337,400 $327,878 ($9,522) Town of Cutler Bay $950,000 $950,000 $11030,000 $1,030,000 $1,030,000 $0 Town of Jupiter $2,229,043 $2,493,964 $2,782,844 $3,196,014 $3,500,442 $4,0121081 $511,639 Town of Lake Park $2,046,663 Town of Malabar $72,000 $108,000 $108,000 $128,780 $133,107 $4,327 Town of Medley $11000,000 Town of Melbourne Beach $53,000 $53,000 $53,000 $53,000 $53,000 $53,000 $0 Town of Pembroke Park $1,225,000 $1,345,000 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 $0 Town of Redington Shores $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $0 Town of Surfside $137,000 $137,000 $137,000 $137,000 $137,000 $0 Village of Indian Creek $181,000 $181,000 $183,538 $183,538 $182,835 $183,390 $555 Village of Key Biscayne $1,003,187 $1,003,187 $1,640,490 $1,640,490 $1,832,835 $192,345 Village of Palm Springs $383,731 $518,769 $382,799 $382,799 $0 Village of Royal Palm Beach $1,123,848 Village of Pinecrest $449,041 $919,600 $1,253,686 $1,253,686 Village of Wellington $5,700,000 $51700,000 $6,1001000 $6,100,000 $6,400,000 $300,000 Volusia County $4,622,778 $4,780,750 $4,780,750 $4,49%656 $4,499,656 $4,558,297 $58,641 Year 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Total $322,769,203 $443,030,723 $527,064,798 $560,933,887 $600,156,032 $664,419,656 Average $3,626,620 $3,661,411 $31962,893 $4,2811938 $4,801,938 $4,995,637 2-9 Who is responsible for paying your utility fee? 8 38 Property Owner- 66% Occupant-28 Other-6% 91 24 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49rinibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-10 For properties that are charged a fee based on actual, on-site impervious area (i.e. not a customer class average) please estimate how a majority of this information was initially collected and how it is maintained for your billing database?(multiple responses accepted) Property Appraiser's... Physical Onsite... Permit Records Initially Collected Air Photos Maintained Other* 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% *"Other"Initially Collected included:Engineering/Consultant Analysis, Google Earth,As Built GIS and Auto CAD. *"Other"Maintained responses included:Stormwater Assessment Management Billing Software, LiDar Collection,and Engineer Plans. 2-11 What properties are exempt from your user fees? Streets/Highways 76 Government 57 Railroad rights-of-way 57 Undeveloped land (non-agricultural) 53 Public parks 49 Undeveloped land (agricultural) 47 None 24 Airport runways and taxiways 19 Other 18 Properties that do not discharge runoff to system — 9 Waterfront 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2-12 Please indicate your billing practices with regard to the following governmentally owned properties: Exempt Bill and Collect Bill But Do Not Not Billed p Collect Federal 42 53 7 15 State 46 47 8 17 County 45 61 5 14 City 47 66 4 15 School District 50 43 18 18 Special District 24 56 4 13 2-13 Of those accounts that receive credits, what is the average percent reduction in the utility fee? Average Reduction: 25.61 2-14 Of the total number of SWU accounts, how many receive credits? Reported number of accounts that receive credits: 361,821 Average number of accounts that receive credits: 31092 25 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St YJgr J72fibipr5l�2 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-15 Of those accounts that receive credits, what is the range in possible percent reductions in SWU fees? Note:Of the 138 respondents, 72 do not indicate offering a range of reductions. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Median 50% 40 30% 20% 10% 0% Individual Responses 2-16 Are credits provided for private detention/retention facilities? 77 60 Yes-44 No-56% 107 2-17 Are user fees for single-family detached dwellings the same as for individual units in multi-family (e.g. apartments, condominiums)? Mill 62 Yes-55 75 N o-45 26 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4917 eibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-18 Do user fees vary by watershed? 1 Yes- 1% No-99% 136 2-19 Are different fees charged within the "zone-of-benefit" of specific capital projects to account for differences in capital costs? 3 Yes-2% No-98% 134 2-20 Does your local code require private detention/retention facilities? 21 Yes-85% No- 15% 116 27 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49176ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-21 How is payment of the utility charge enforced? (multiple responses accepted) 7 4 63 Shut Off Other Utility Service -46% 39 Place Lien on Property-42% Tax Certificate (Auction) Process-29% ■ Refer to Collection Agency-5% Other-3 58 2-22 Were interim rates established during the formation of the utility prior to adoption of a permanent rate format? 15 1W Yes- 11% No-89% 122 2-23 Have your stormwater fees or assessments faced a legal challenge in court? 14 Yes- 10% No-90% 123 28 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St Yj9r J77c'bf r5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 2-24 If your charges have been challenged in court, what was the outcome? (multiple responses accepted) 1 3 Fee Sustained -53% Settlement Reached -24% Pending- 0% 9 . Fees Not Sustained - 18% Other-6% 4 ,111 2-25 Has your jurisdiction modified your SWU rate structure to take into account new water quality requirements and corresponding costs as a result of the TMDL program? 47 Yes-34 No-66% 90 If not, are you actively considering such modifications? 12 26 Yes- 29% No-58% No Response - 13% 52 29 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4917a ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. .%jemTech Stormwa.M...ter • • Detention/Retention S Y s..,Wtem PY 1 - pl- / y r Designed to meet the most stringent industry performance standards for superior structural integrity while providing designers with a cost-effective method to save valuable land. Multiple Chamber Sizes Long service life design and stackable for efficient site utilization IsolatorO Row Plus A tested and proven water quality BMP that is easy to maintain and long lasting StormTech Design Tool Generate layouts and reports to evaluate the design direction and estimate potential cost For more information visit adspipe.com — ■ adspipe.com 800-821-6710 TM The ADS logo and the Green Stripe are registered trademarks of Advanced Drainage Systems,Inc. ©2023 Advanced Drainage Systems,Inc. 9/23 CS Page 379 of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Stormwater Pro 9 ram Page 380 of 572 CULTEC Create New cua e anarge j�. Print System USA E r - Project Projects Specificaitions 0 to f m G e n I I' Project - Set Agenda Item #16. #.rNL 100 21 7.75' E W _207-53' )jest Information � L — ckground&Tools > T stern Parameters VI Iect Chamber Type F�_;- - _; I s F a 1 I rage Volume(cf 10000 liable Length(ft) 7 ------------ __ .ca-a#- � a� Z PROP- -� S M_ VIM'IM' �i-03 liable width(ft) W ;'owe w W t 206 IW LEE w INV. 60' -le Above Chambers(in) �El���240Z ' ate.9-9'-ra'Pion sru 4 ,.ass 12 Ldj�� .21 i r 1 ne Below Chambers(in) � 25'_��'+�Sill�t.0�7C T - 9 4-42 - 12-IMPE S U o 11.0m GRATE-217.50' w air,+.- .aa' e Stone Elevation(ft) I apt_-ru o 1-on ne Porosity ¢) 40 '2-HEPE Sro• 1 _ rage weer(in) 10e NWE MFRIlOM CONCEPT OJECT MINUTES, POWERED BY CULTEC StormGenie The CULTEC StormGenie®Design Tool is a complimentary online roof for designing CULTEC Stormwater Systems. Using input system parameters, the tool generates project-specific AutoCAD drawings, reports, and submittals for CULTEC's Contactor and Recharger Stormwater Systems in minutes. ABOUTUS CULTEC is committed to protecting one I Ilk of the Earth's most valuable resources: water.Our knowledgeable and courteous team of professionals is dedicated to providing creative solutions while forming Long-Lasting,to yaL relationships.Understanding and caring for our client's needs motivates us to Variety we're Here Scan to offer superior products and services, empowering our customers with the of Sizes to Help Learn More tools they need to succeed. Our plastic stormwater Whether you prefer chambers varyin size working on our own � � • THE FOUNDER OF PLASTIC g y CHAMBER TECHNOLOGY from 12"-48"and are using our cloud-based able to accommodate tool or rather high water tables or personalized CULTEmaximize storage in a assistance with one of A restricted footprint. our design experts, RECHARGER&CONTACTOR STORMWATER SOLUTIONS we've got you covered. CULTEC • • • • • • Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-1 Does your utility use operation and maintenance permits (or other enforcement methods) to require private owners to maintain their on-site stormwater facilities? 56 Yes-59 No-41% 81 3-2 Does your jurisdiction charge a fee for (see selections below): (multiple responses were accepted) Stormwater Inspection After Construction (0&M) 20 Stormwater Inspection During Construction 63 Stormwater Management Site Plan Review 82 Stormwater Management Permits 41 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Note:43 respondents answered"None of the Above." 3-3 If your jurisdiction does charge fees for any of the services in question 3-2, does your SWU receive some (or all) of these revenues? 27 Yes-29 No-71% 67 31 Copyright 0 2024 by the Florida St 49182ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-4 Is your stormwater capital construction program funded only from stormwater fee revenue? 59 Fees Only-43% Fees and Non-Fees-57% 77 11 3-5 If non-fee funds are used for capital construction, what is the source of the revenue? (multiple responses were accepted) 33 46 Ad Valorem -43% Sales Tax- 18% Gas Tax- 18% ■Other(grants, loans)* -60% 14 14 *"Other"responses included:Federal,State and Local Grants, Loans, Bonds, Capital Funds/Budget, General Fund,Surtax, Impact fees, and State Revenue Sharing. 3-6 Please estimate your jurisdiction's capital improvement needs for stormwater management over the following periods of time. Period of Time Estimated Need (total) Average Need #Respondents Next 5 Years $212681435,669 $21,1391485 125 Next 10 Years $5,129,246,131 $48,389,114 106 Next 20 Years $11,667,700,526 $124,124,474 94 32 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49rinibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-7 Does your jurisdiction have an adopted stormwater master plan? 22 Yes-84 No- 16% 115 3-8 If your jurisdiction does not have an adopted stormwater master plan (i.e. you answered "No" to question 3-7), is the establishment of such a plan under active consideration? 7 Yes- 68 No-32% 15 3-9 If your jurisdiction does have an adopted stormwater master plan (i.e. you answered "Yes" to question 3-7), does your jurisdiction make an effort to coordinate your Local Government Comprehensive Plan with your stormwater Master Plan and NPDES Program concepts? 2 30 Strong Effort-72% Moderate Effort- 26% No Effort- 2% 83 33 Copyright 0 2024 by the Florida St yJgr J82fibipr5l�2 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-10 Is your stormwater operating budget funded from only stormwater fee revenue, or are other non-fee funds utilized? 48 Fees Only- 65% Fees and Non-Fees-35% 89 3-11 If non-fee funds are used for operations, what is the source of the revenue? (multiple responses were accepted) 20 26 Ad Valorem - 54% Sales Tax- 17 Gas Tax- 23% m Other* -42% 11 8 *"Other"responses included:Grants,Permit Fees,Drainage Agreement Fees,Investment Income,General Revenue,State Revenue Sharing, And Service Charges. 3-12 What is the current number of full-time equivalent employees funded with stormwater fee revenue? Jurisdiction Revenue FTEs Jurisdiction Revenue FTEs Alachua County $2,9001000 10 City of Deerfield Beach $1,8001,000 5 Bay County $1,9201080 3 City of DeLand $910,000 10.5 Brevard County $6,689,105 16.36 City of Delray Beach $41151,207 11 City of Altamonte Springs $1,908,477 15 City of Doral $3,700,000 2 City of Auburndale $112,816 0 City of Dunedin $4,316,600 14.86 City of Aventura $1,300,000 2.5 City of Edgewater $2,538,714 12 City of Boynton Beach $5,925,000 9 City of Eustis $850,806 4.5 City of Bradenton Beach $309,520 2 City of Fernandina Beach $78,160 5 City of Callaway $85,000 0 City of Fort Lauderdale $31,667 42 City of Cape Canaveral $1,087,800 2 City of Fort Meade $192,170 2 City of Cape Coral $24,462,505 115.5 City of Fort Myers $6,500,000 18.6 City of Casselberry $2,491,554 10.75 City of Fort Pierce $3,570,383 3 City of Clearwater $16,925,590 52 City of Fort Walton Beach $1,034,658 6 City of Clermont $1,800,000 7 City of Fruitland Park $48,000 0 City of Cocoa $2,082,485 6 City of Gainesville $9,852,200 67.1 City of Cocoa Beach $881,307 6 City of Green Cove Springs $1,580,546 2 City of Coconut Creek $2,085,819 9 City of Gulf Breeze $460,274 3.788 City of Cooper City $550;100 4 City of Gulfport $966,651 4.33 City of Coral Gables $6,396,266 8 City of Hialeah $3,599,999 18.5 City of Daytona Beach $13,950,498 35 City of Holmes Beach $862,031 0 City of DeBary $791,000 5 City of Homestead $2,698,632 11 34 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4918 eibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-12 What is the current number of full-time equivalent employees funded with stormwater fee revenue? (continued) Jurisdiction Revenue FTEs Jurisdiction Revenue FTEs City of Indian Harbour Beach $218,293 0 City of St.Augustine $1,336,143 5 City of Jacksonville $31,561,888 150 City of St. Pete Beach $1,347,700 3.15 City of Key Colony Beach $197,000 0.12 City of St. Petersburg $18,000,000 120.9 City of Key West $2,498,211 4 City of Stuart $545,000 3.33 City of Kissimmee $834,527 34 City of Sunny Isles Beach $1,482,477 1 City of Lake Alfred $45,000 0 City of Sunrise $931,685 25.25 City of Lake Mary $413,000 2 City of Sweetwater $968 0 City of Lake Wales $490,000 0 City of Tallahassee $20,682,626 96 City of Lake Worth Beach $1,575,000 10 City of Tamarac $6,553,284 25 City of Lakeland $8,715,000 30 City of Tampa $17,487,162 103 City of Largo $9,678,900 39 City of Tarpon Springs $1,735,314 10.1 City of Longwood $950,000 5 City of Tavares $1,564,010 4 City of Madeira Beach $375,000 1 City of Titusville $3,876,177 20 City of Maitland NR 7 City of Umatilla $99,000 0 City of Marathon $1,006,454 2 City of Vero Beach $99,000 0 City of Margate $2,071,000 11 City of West Melbourne $645,367 3 City of Mascotte $246,000 1 City of West Miami $163,161 1 City of Melbourne $2,975,000 6.5 City of West Palm Beach $15,376,467 31 City of Miami $15,838,009 36 City of Wilton Manors $550,000 2 City of Miami Gardens $6,321,918 12 City of Winter Garden $1,589,244 0 City of Miami Springs $450,000 3 City of Winter Haven $2,201,372 12 City of Minneola $262,870 2 City of Winter Park $41500,000 22 City of Mulberry $280,000 3 Hillsborough County $351600,000 6 City of Naples $5,465,100 15 Leon County $3,737,589 46 City of New Port Richey $1,067,154 6 Marion County $4,095,673 11.5 City of New Smyrna Beach $2,417,000 1 Miami-Dade County $311000,000 140 City of Niceville $500,000 0 Pasco County $29,802,000 115 City of North Lauderdale $1,193,100 8 Pinellas County $20,603,004 101 City of North Miami $2,624,268 10 Polk County $2,500,000 1 City of North Miami Beach $1,464,420 21 Sarasota County $28,690,385 104 City of Oakland Park $55,222,817 6.75 Town of Belleair $327,878 0 City of Ocala $6,835,282 28 Town of Cutler Bay $11030,000 3 City of Ocoee $3,918,740 7 Town of Jupiter $4,012,081 6.5 City of Oldsmar $942,136 5 Town of Lake Park $2,046,663 4 City of Orange City $810,620 2 Town of Lantana NR 6 City of Orlando $24,829,798 85 Town of Malabar $133,107 0 City of Ormond Beach $2,539,966 9.9 Town of Melbourne Beach $53,000 0 City of Palm Bay $9,365,274 37 Town of Pembroke Park $1,440,000 1.5 City of Palm Coast $12,995,325 72 Town of Red i ngton Shores $45,000 0 City of Pensacola $2,000,000 26 Town of Surfside $137,000 5 City of Pinellas Park $3,258,719 18.5 Village of Indian Creek $183,390 0 City of Pompano Beach $5,000,000 14 Village of Key Biscayne $11832,835 1.5 City of Port Richey $288,351 1 Village of Palm Springs $382,799 1 City of Port St. Lucie $22,893,483 74 Village of Royal Palm Beach $1,123,848 7 City of Riviera Beach $3,2001000 10 Village of Wellington $6,400,000 14.8 City of Safety Harbor $1,550,000 5.4 Volusia County $4,558,297 54 City of Satellite Beach $1,022,865 4 35 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49186ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-13 Does your jurisdiction monitor improvements in water quality? 38 Yes-72% No- 28% 99 3-14 Does your jurisdiction monitor improvements in flood protection? 13 Yes-91% No-9% 124 3-15 What percentage of your jurisdiction's stormwater facilities are mapped and inventoried? 12 6 0% Mapped & Inventoried - 1% 25% Mapped & Inventoried - 1% 44 50% Mapped & Inventoried -4% 84 ■75% Mapped & Inventoried -32% 100% Mapped & Inventoried - 63% 36 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St YJ9187' ipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-16 Estimate the number of employees (FTEs) and the percentage of your total stormwater program's annual budget allocated to the following program categories: Administration (management, billing, records, etc.) Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees M 8 81%-100% 0 � I 8-9 Employees 1 3 61%-80% 0 6-7 Employees - 3 41%-60% 2 4-5 Employees M 7 2-3 Employees —X 33 21%-40% 12 0-1 Employees + 77 0%-20% =a 114 Overhead Charges (Indirect Cost Allocation) Paid to Parent Governmental Jurisdiction Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 0 81%-100% 0 8-9 Employees 0 61%-80% 0 6-7 Employees 3 41%-60% 1 4-5 Employees 1 2-3 Employees 5 21%-40% 5 0-1 Employees 114 0%-20% 115 Operations & Maintenance (Field Activities) Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 39 81%-100% 6 8-9 Employees 9 61%-80% 14 6-7 Employees 13 41%-60% 24 4-5 Employees 16 2-3 Employees 27 21%-40% 37 0-1 Employees 28 0%-20% 46 Technical (Planning, Engineering) Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 9 81%-100% 0 8-9 Employees 4 61%-80% 1 6-7 Employees 1 41%-60% 3 4-5 Employees 4 2-3 Employees 20 21%-40% 6 0-1 Employees 89 0%-20% 115 37 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49rinibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-16 Estimate the number of employees (FTEs) and the percentage of your total stormwater program's annual budget allocated to the following program categories: (continued) Capital Improvement Program Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 3 81%-100% 4 8-9 Employees 2 61%-80% 11 6-7 Employees 4 41%-60% 12 4-5 Employees 4 2-3 Employees 15 21%-40% 30 0-1 Employees 99 0%-20% 67 Monitoring, Permitting, Enforcement Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 5 81%-100% 0 8-9 Employees _ 3 61%-80% 0 6-7 Employees 3 41%-60% 0 4-5 Employees ■ 6 2-3 Employees 21 21%-40% 1 4 0-1 Employees 88 0%-20% 120 Public Education & Information Number of Employees Percentage of Budget 10 or more Employees 2 81%-100% 0 8-9 Employees 0 0 0 61/-80/0 0 6-7 Employees 2 41%-60% 1 4-5 Employees 4 2-3 Employees 16 21%-40% 2 0-1 Employees 101 0%-20% 121 38 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49189ibipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-17 For Operations and Maintenance (field) personnel, how many received formal training or certification (from FSA, FDEP, FWPCOA, etc.)? 81- 100% 74 61-80% 1 41-60% 1 10 21-40% 12 0-20% 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 3-18 Is the stormwater fee revenue sufficient to address the following program areas? Administration 8 14 Adequate to Meet All Needs-54% Adequate to Meet Most Needs- 29% Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs- 10% 40 74 Not Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs-6% Operations & Maintenance 13 1P 27 Adequate to Meet All Needs- 20% 40 Adequate to Meet Most Needs-41% Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs-29% • Not Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs- 10% 56 39 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 4919(libipr5l72 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 3-18 Is the stormwater fee revenue sufficient to address the following program areas? (continued) Capital Improvment Program 15 40 Adequate to Meet All Needs- 11% 27 Adequate to Meet Most Needs- 20% Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs-38% . Not Adequate to Meet Urgent Needs-30% 51 3-19 Does your utility manage the FEMA community rating system flood management program for your jurisdiction? 58 Yes-58 No-42% 79 40 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St 49191ciatifr5l72 Agenda Item #16. IP ro i a .�• r COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SOFTWAR Simplifying NPDES Compliance for Florida MS4s �1 ark About NPDESPro Features Developed for and by stormwater 0 GIS professionals, N PDESPro supports2 Advanced mapping features your work to improve water quality and seamless integration with byp g rovidin an all-in-one software Esri ArcGIS platform for managing your stormwater programs. Customizable User-friendly, module-based 0 Post-Construction platform with customizable 0 Construction workflows, forms, reports, and 0 Illicit Discharges & Outfalls settings 0 Municipal Management 0 Public Education & Outreach Cloud-based Public Participation & Involvement Real-time access to data from 0 P2 (Pollution Prevention) Visits anywhere, on any device '.1 (800) i info@npdespro.com1 I11 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Public Information ort Page 393 of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report 4-1 How important is an organized public information/education effort to the continuing success of a user fee funded SWU? 2 49 Essential -63 Helpful -36% Not Necessary- 1 86 4-2 What media have you found to be most effective in educating the public about utility services, program needs and financing, and citizen responsibilities? (multiple responses accepted) Social Media/Internet 85 Brochures 70 Bill Inserts 61 Neighborhood Meetings 49 Press Releases 40 Public Hearings W 35 Public Service Announcements 25 Public Schools 16 *Other 15 Advisory Groups 9 Telephone Hotline 8 I Speakers 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 *"Other"responses Included: Website, Newsletter, Road Signs/Billboards, Postcard, Nixle Notifications, GIS Portal&FAQ page. 42 Copyright©2024 by the Florida St Yjgr jg2fibipr5l�2 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report Appendix Page 395 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Shane Williams Natasha Lithway Stormwater Engineer County Stormwater Engineer Alachua County Bay County 408 W University Avenue,Ste 106 840 W 11th Street Gainesville, FL 32601 Panama City, FL 32401 352-264-6831 850-248-8321 Bach McClure Bruce Doig Stormwater Program Administrator Division Director of Engineering/City Engineer Brevard County City of Altamonte Springs 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Ste A-219 950 Calabria Drive Viera, FL 32940 Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 321-633-2016 407-571-8337 Caleb Gabany Anthony Mihalko Streets Superintendent Public Works Stormwater Coordinator City of Auburndale City of Aventura 915 Charles Avenue 19200 W Country Club Drive Auburndale, FL 33823 Aventura, FL 33180 863-965-5511 305-466-8970 Poonam Kalkat Tom Woodard Utilities Director Public Works Director City of Boynton Beach City of Bradenton Beach 124 E Woolbright Road 107 Gulf Drive N Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Bradenton Beach, FL 34217 561-742-6085 941-778-1005 Lisa Koepke Tim Carlisle Assistant Planner Capital Projects Deputy Director City of Callaway City of Cape Canaveral 6601 E Hwy 22 100 Polk Avenue Panama City, FL 32404 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 850-871-1033 321-868-1220 Hugo Delgado Jane Dai Public Works Stormwater Manager City Engineer City of Cape Coral City of Casselberry 1015 Cultural Park Blvd 95 Triplet Lake Drive Cape Coral, FL 33991 Casselberry, FL 32707 239-574-0891 407-262-7725 Ta ra Kivett Lee Van Dever Public Works Assistant Director Public Services Manager City of Clearwater City of Clermont 100 S Myrtle Avenue, Ste 220 3335 Hancock Road Clearwater, FL 33756 Clermont, FL 34711 727-444-8202 352-241-0178 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 44 Page 396 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Frank Mirabito Jared Francis Project Manager Assistant Director and City Engineer City of Cocoa City of Cocoa Beach 155 N Wilson Avenue 1600 Minutemen Causeway Cocoa, FL 32922 Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 321-433-8776 321-868-3219 Randall Blanchette Hamid Nikvan Assistant Director, Utilities & Engineering Dept Assistant Utilities Director City of Coconut Creek City of Cooper City 5295 Johnson Road 11791 SW 49th Street Coconut Creek, FL 33073 Cooper City, FL 33330 954-973-6786 954-434-5519 Jose Olivo Justin Barton Deputy Director Engineer II, Utilities Division City of Coral Gables City of Daytona Beach 2800 SW 72nd Avenue 125 Basin Street, Ste 100 Miami, FL 33155 Daytona Beach, FL 32114 305-460-5000 386-671-8807 Amy Long Priscilla Cygielnik Deputy PW, SW, Facilities Director Director Environmental Services City of DeBary City of Deerfield Beach 16 Colomba Road 200 Goolsby Blvd DeBary, FL 32713 Deerfield Beach, FL 33441 386-601-0208 954-616-7046 James Dillon Jason Kaufman Environmental Compliance Coordinator Engineering Division Manager City of Deland City of Delray Beach 1102 S Garfield Avenue 434 S Swinton Avenue Deland, FL 32724 Delray Beach, FL 33444 386-626-7184 561-243-6235 Wilkier Vega Michelle Monteclaro Stormwater Utility Manager Stormwater Program Coordinator City of Doral City of Dunedin 8401 NW 53 Terrace 1405 County Road 1 Doral, FL 33166 Dunedin, FL 34698 305-593-6740 727-298-3232 Randy Coslow Sally Mayers Director, Environmental Services/City Engineer Manager City of Edgewater City of Eustis PO Box 100 400 Morin Street Edgewater, FL 32132 Eustis, FL 32726 386-424-2400 352-483-5480 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 45 Page 397 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Andre Desilet Sandra Marie Pierce Utilities Director Stormwater Operations Manager City of Fernandina Beach City of Fort Lauderdale 1180 S 5th Street 101 NE 3rd Avenue, Ste1410 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315 904-310-3431 954-828-7847 Mike Cagle Richard Thompson Public Works Supervisor Stormwater Resource Manager City of Fort Meade City of Fort Myers 521 NW 4th Street 2200 Second Street Fort Meade, FL 33841 Fort Myers, FL 33902 813-720-4610 239-321-7630 Alicia Forbis Kyle Oler GIS Specialist/SMU Assistant Stormwater and Streets Supervisor City of Fort Pierce City of Fort Walton Beach 100 N US 1 7 Hollywood Boulevard NW Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 772-467-3777 850-833-9613 Rob Dicus Gail Mowry Public Works Director City Engineer City of Fruitland Park City of Gainesville 506 Berckman Street PO Box 490,Station 58 Fruitland Park, FL 34731 Gainesville, FL 32609 352-360-6795 352-393-8421 Steve Thomas Greg Mandel Assistant Public Works Director Natural Resource Management Supervisor City of Green Cove Springs City of Gulf Breeze 321 Walnut Street 1070 Shoreline Drive Green Cove Springs, FL 32043 Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 904-297-7058 850-781-6451 Kendrix Anderson Yamil Alquizar Public Works Superintendent Roadway&Stormwater Engineering Manager City of Gulfport City of Hialeah 2401 53rd Street S 900 E 56th Street, Bldg 4 Gulfport, FL 33707 Hialeah, FL 33013 727-893-1083 305-687-2615 Sage Kamiya Eduardo Gonzalez Superintendent of Public Works/City Engineer Assistant Director, PW& Engineering Dept. City of Holmes Beach City of Homestead 5801 Marina Drive 551 SE 8th Street Holmes Beach, FL 34217 Homestead, FL 33030 941-708-5800 305-224-4770 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 46 Page 398 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Todd Scaldo Steve Long Director of Public Works Public Works Operations Director City of Indian Harbour Beach City of Jacksonville 2055 S Patrick Drive 214 N Hogan Street, 10th Floor Indian Harbour Beach, FL 32937 Jacksonville, FL 32202 321-773-3181 904-255-8748 Michael Guarino Elizabeth Ignoffo Public Works Supervisor Permit Engineer City of Key Colony Beach City of Key West 600 W Ocean Drive 1300 White Street Key Colony Beach, FL 33051 Key West, FL 33040 305-434-0804 305-809-3966 Nagel Altrui Michael Coffee Stormwater Engineer Public Works Superintendent City of Kissimmee City of Lake Alfred 101 Church Street, Ste 301 155 E Pomelo Street Kissimmee, FL 34741 Lake Alfred, FL 33850 407-518-2385 863-595-5310 Miguel Conde Sarah Kirkland City Engineer Public Works Director City of Lake Mary City of Lake Wales 911 Wallace Court 201 Central Avenue W Lake Mary, FL 32746 Lake Wales, FL 33853 407-585-1457 863-678-4182 Judith Love Laurie Smith Water Sewer Storm Administrator Lakes &Stormwater Manager City of Lake Worth Beach City of Lakeland 1900 2 n d Avenue N 407 Fairway Avenue Lake Worth Beach, FL 33460 Lakeland, FL 33801 561-586-1719 863-834-6276 Christopher Benigni Eric Nagowski Stormwater Program Administrator Public Works Engineer City of Largo City of Longwood 201 Highland Avenue 907 E State Road Largo, FL 33779 Longwood, FL 32750 727-587-6713 407-263-2382 Megan Wepfer Alyssa Eide-Cadle Public Works Director City Engineer City of Madeira Beach City of Maitland 300 Municipal Drive 1827 Fennell Street Madeira Beach, FL 33708 Maitland, FL 32751 727-543-8154 407-875-3693 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 47 Page 399 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Carlos A. Solis Eduard Morales Director of Public Works& Engineering Stormwater Manager City of Marathon City of Margate 9805 Overseas Hwy 102 N Rock Island Road Marathon, FL 33050 Margate, FL 33063 305-289-5008 954-972-8126 Larry Walker J. Danielle Straub Public Services Director Engineering Project Manager City of Mascotte City of Melbourne 100 E Myers Blvd 900 E Strawbridge Avenue Mascotte, FL 34753 Melbourne, FL 32901 352-429-4429 321-608-7300 Juvenal Santana Tom Ruiz Director, Public Works Public Works Director City of Miami City of Miami Gardens 444 SW 2 Avenue, 8th Floor RPW 18605 NW 27 Avenue Miami, FL 33130 Miami Gardens, FL 33169 305-416-1218 786-279-1260 Lazaro Garaboa David Jones Public Works Director Stormwater Technician City of Miami Springs City of Minneola 345 N Poinciana Blvd PO Box 678 Miami Springs, FL 33166 Minneola, FL 34755 305-805-5170 352-901-1274 Diana Perez Edward Bliss Administrative Assistant- Public Works Project Manager City of Mulberry City of Naples 500 SW 2nd Street 295 Riverside Circle Mulberry, FL 33860 Naples, FL 34102 863-425-5492 239-213-5001 Samantha Hamilton Kyle Fegley GIS Technician City Engineer City of New Port Richey City of New Smyrna Beach 6132 Pine Hill Road 210 Sams Avenue New Port Richey, FL 34668 New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 727-841-4536 386-410-2811 Ammy Hanson Myriam Jacques CFM, Grants Manager Public Works Superintendent City of Niceville City of North Lauderdale 208 N Partin Drive 701 SW 71 Avenue Niceville, FL 32578 North Lauderdale, FL 33068 850-279-6436 954-722-0900 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 48 Page 400 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Wisler Pierre-Louis Sam Zamacona Public Works Director Public Works Director City of North Miami City of North Miami Beach 1855 NE 142nd Street 17050 NE 19th Avenue North Miami, FL 33029 North Miami Beach, FL 33162 305-895-9871 305-948-2967 Christopher Cappiello Sean Lanier Public Works Manager City Engineer City of Oakland Park City of Ocala 1101 NE 40th Court 1805 NE 30th Avenue, Bldg 600 Oakland Park, FL 33334 Ocala, FL 34470 954-630-4432 352-351-6772 Stephen Krug Daniel Simpson Public Works Director Director of Public Works City of Ocoee City of Oldsmar 301 Maguire Road 100 State Street W Ocoee, FL 34761 Oldsmar, FL 34677 407-905-3170 813-749-1262 Alan Williamson Athnena Tipaldos Stormwater Compliance Manager Assistant Stormwater Division Manager City of Orange City City of Orlando 1100 S Thorpe Avenue 1010 Woods Avenue Orange City, FL 32763 Orlando, FL 32805 386-775-5477 407-246-2754 Shawn Finley Nadeca McLaughlin Public Works Director Public Works Accountant City of Ormond Beach City of Palm Bay 22 S Beach Street, Room 104 1050 Malabar Road SE Ormond Beach, FL 32174 Palm Bay, FL 32907 386-676-3292 321-409-7140 Andy Hyatt Brad Hinote Public Works Manager City Engineer City of Palm Coast City of Pensacola 22 Utility Drive 222 W Main Street, 6th Floor Palm Coast, FL 32137 Pensacola, FL 32502 386-986-4716 850-435-1837 Kyle Arrison Michael Taylor Director,Transportation, SW, Construction Stormwater Manager City of Pinellas Park City of Pompano Beach 6250 82nd Avenue N 1201 NE 3rd Avenue Pinellas Park, FL 33781 Pompano Beach, FL 33060 727-369-5621 954-786-4724 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 49 Page 401 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Sal Licari John Dunton City Manager/Operations Manager Deputy Director City of Port Richey City of Port St. Lucie 6333 Ridge Road 450 SW Thornhill Drive Port Richey, FL 34668 Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 727-816-1907 772-344-4035 Sedrick Clarke Renee Cooper Public Works Operations Manager Public Works Director City of Riviera Beach City of Safety Harbor 1481 W 15th Street 1200 Railroad Avenue Riviera Beach, FL 33404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 561-840-3119 727-724-1550 Kate Helms Shawn Shimko Stormwater Manager Public Works Director City of Satellite Beach City of South Pasadena 240 Jackson Avenue 7047 Sunset Drive S Satellite Beach, FL 32937 South Pasadena, FL 33707 321-777-2309 727-580-0701 Jessica Beach Kevin Felblinger Chief Resilience Officer Public Works Director City of St.Augustine City of St. Cloud PO Box 210 1300 Ninth Street, Bldg.A, 2nd Floor St. Augustine, FL 32085 St. Cloud, FL 34769 904-209-4227 407-957-7353 Brett Warner Brejesh Prayman Assistant Public Works Director Director, Engineering&Capital Improvements City of St. Pete Beach City of St. Petersburg 155 Corey Avenue 1 Fourth Street N St. Pete Beach, FL 33706 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-363-9254 727-893-7295 William Griffin Richard Labinsky Stormwater Specialist/Team Leader I City Engineer City of Stuart City of Sunny Isles Beach 121 SW Flagler Avenue 18070 Collins Avenue, 3rd Floor Stuart, FL 34994 Sunny Isles Beach, FL 33160 772-600-1264 305-968-4168 Rodrigo de Castro Eric Gomez Deputy Director of Utilities Dept City Engineer, Floodplain Manager City of Sunrise City of Sweetwater 10500 NW 55th Street 1701 NW 112th Avenue, Ste 103 Sunrise, FL 33351 Sweetwater, FL 33172 954-888-6071 305-455-6585 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 50 Page 402 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Jason Smith John Doherty Manager Stormwater Planning Acting Public Services Director City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac 300 S Adams Street, B-35 6011 Nob Hill Road Tallahassee, FL 32301 Tamarac, FL 33321 850-891-6860 954-597-3706 Alexander Awad Anthony"Tony" Mannello Chief Planning Engineer Streets and Stormwater Supervisor City of Tampa City of Tarpon Springs 306 E Jackson Street 6N 324 E Pine Street Tampa, FL 33602 Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 813-274-7865 727-942-5606 Jason Spann Sandra Reller Stormwater Manager Public Works Deputy Director City of Tavares City of Titusville 1000 Captain Haynes Road 555 S Washington Avenue Tavares, FL 32778 Titusville, FL 32796 352-742-6462 321-567-3861 Aaron Mercer Matthew Mitts Director of Development and Public Services Public Works Director City of Umatilla City of Vero Beach 1 South Central Avenue 1053 20th Place Umatilla, FL 32784 Vero Beach, FL 32960 352-669-1539 772-978-4816 Mark Piccirillo Lity Pittser Public Works Director Interim Public Service Director City of West Melbourne City of West Miami 1415 Henry Avenue 901 SW 62 Avenue West Melbourne, FL 32904 West Miami, FL 33144 321-727-3710 305-266-4214 Stephon Harris David Archacki Utilities O&M Superintendent EM/Utilities Director City of West Palm Beach City of Wilton Manors 1045 Charlotte Avenue, Bldg 5 2020 Wilton Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Wilton Manors, FL 33305 561-822-2168 954-390-2190 Jim Monahan Brittany Hart City Engineer Public Works Director City of Winter Garden City of Winter Haven 300 W Plant Street 2501 Motor Pool Road Winter Garden, FL 34787 Winter Haven, FL 33881 407-877-5463 863-291-5756 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 51 Page 403 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Shannon Monahan Jie Gao Engineer I Section Mgr, Stormwater Engineering Services City of Winter Park Hillsborough County 401 S Park Avenue 601 E Kennedy Blvd Winter Park, FL 32789 Tampa, FL 33602 407-599-3260 813-460-6539 Anna Padilla Christine Vrabic Stormwater Management Coordinator Engineer Leon County Marion County 2280 Miccosukee Road 412 SE 25th Avenue Tallahassee, FL 32308 Ocala, FL 34472 850-606-1539 352-671-8686 Randall White Sandra Choquette Stormwater Utility Section Manager Administration Division Manager Miami-Dade County Pasco County 701 NW 1st Court, Ste 500 4454 Grand Blvd Miami, FL 33136 New Port Richey, FL 34652 305-372-6406 727-834-3611 Melanie Weed Greg Knothe Enviromental Management Division Director Water Resources Coordinator Pinellas County Polk County 22111 US Hwy 19, Bldg 10 4177 Ben Durrance Road Clearwater, FL 33765 Bartow, FL 33830 727-464-4187 863-534-7377 Robert Laura Ryan Womack Manager III Public Services Manager Sarasota County Town of Belleair 1001 Sarasota Center Blvd 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd Sarasota, FL 34240 Belleair, FL 33756 941-861-0910 727-588-3769 Yenier Vega David Rotar Stormwater Utility Manager Utility Services Manager Town of Cutler Bay Town of Jupiter 10720 Caribbean Blvd, Ste 105 210 Military Trail Cutler Bay, FL 33189 Jupiter, FL 33458 786-573-5511 561-748-2701 John Wylie Jerry Darr Storm Water Infrastructure Foreman Utilities Assistant Director Town of Lake Park Town of Lantana 640 Old Dixie Hwy 500 Greynolds Circle Lake Park, FL 33403 Lantana, FL 33462 561-881-3345 561-540-5758 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 52 Page 404 of 572 Agenda Item #16. 2024 SurveyRespondents Lisa Morrell Tom Davis Town Manager Public Works Director Town of Malabar Town of Melbourne Beach 2725 Malabar Road 507 Ocean Avenue Malabar, FL 32950 Melbourne Beach, FL 32951 321-727-7764 321-724-5860 Aleem Ghany Bill Krajewski Public Services Director Commissioner Town of Pembroke Park Town of Redington Shores 3150 SW 52nd Avenue 17425 Gulf Blvd Pembroke Park, FL 33023 Redington Shores, FL 33708 954-966-4600 727-423-0494 Marisol Vargas Roseann Prado Interim Town Manager Village Clerk Town of Surfside Village of Indian Creek 9293 Harding Avenue 9080 Bay Drive Surfside, FL 33154 Indian Creek Village, FL 33154 786-778-1728 305-865-4121 Kat Kulpa Ivana Jimenez Zapata Resilience Coordinator Stormwater Coordinator Village of Key Biscayne Village of Palm Springs 88 W McIntyre Street, Ste 250 226 Cypress Lane Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Palm Springs, FL 33461 305-365-7581 561-584-8200 Paul Webster Christine Wadleigh Public Works Director Budget & Reporting Director Village of Royal Palm Beach Village of Wellington 10996 Okeechobee Blvd 12300 W Forest Hill Blvd Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411 Wellington, FL 33414 561-790-5122 561-791-4111 Robert Falk Civil Engineer III Road and Bridge Volusia County 3771 W International Speedway Blvd Daytona Beach, FL 32124 386-239-6535 Copyright©2024 by the Florida Stormwater Association,Inc. 53 Page 405 of 572 Agenda Item #16. FSA 2024 Stormwater Utility Report More About the Florida Stormwater Association Membership Membership in FSA is organizational: All employees of a member local government, consulting firm or other organization are members of FSA! There are seven categories of organizations that may become members of FSA: ✓ Local Government (cities and counties) ✓ Consultant (consulting and engineering firms) ✓ Associate (product manufacturers and vendors) ✓ Special District ✓ Academic ✓ Law Firm ✓ Water Management District For more information about membership, services and dues rates, please visit www.florida-stormwater.org/ioin or call FSA at (888) 221-3124. Publications 2024 Survey of Stormwater Utilities The Stormwater Utilities Survey Report summarizes the results of the biennial survey of stormwater utilities in Florida conducted by FSA. Its purpose is to provide information to both managers and policymakers in state and local government. Trends in the characteristics of the stormwater programs, utility rates and other practices within local government can be observed by comparing FSA's survey results. All FSA member organizations and contributors to the Survey receive a complimentary copy of the Report which is sent to the Primary Contact of the organization. New members receive their copy in their Welcome Packet.Additional copies can be ordered online. Manual for Establishing Stormwater Utilities in Florida FSA's Manual "Establishing a Stormwater Utility in Florida" was first published in 1998, and revised in 2003 and 2013. It was initially prepared to assist communities that were considering the development and implementation of a stormwater utility as a means of providing supplemental or alternative funding for their stormwater management program. The current edition is also helpful for those jurisdictions with existing utilities that are considering changes to rates or rate structures. Manuals can be ordered online. CopyrightO 2024 by the Florida Stormwater AssodP ,406 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment 51 From: Michael Tomes To: Lori McWilliams;Jeremy Allen;Allyson Felsbura; Molly Young Cc: Albert Caradonio;Christina Vanderwesthuizen Subject: [EXTERNAL]TTCA request appeal of VOT"s Determination regading Credit Proposal Date: Friday,December 12,2025 3:30:38 PM Attachments: We sent you safe versions of your files.msa Mimecast Attachment Protection was unable to create safe copies of your attachments. WARNING: This email originated from outside of our organization. Please be cautious and do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Stormwater Management Utility Board(Village Council) Jeremy Allen, ICMA-CM, CPM - Village Manager Allyson Felsburg - Utilities Director(Congratulations) Lori McWilliams, MMC—Village Clerk Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 RE: TTCA's Formal Appeal of the Village's written determination regarding TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal of November 13, 2025 as it refers to TTCA's request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment of August 13, 2025 regarding Agenda Item 23 of the VOT General Council Meeting of August 12, 2025 Resolution No. 13-25: A resolution of the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Florida, adopting the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2026, and authorizing the Village Manager to proceed in accordance with the village's adopted procedures: Providing an effective date; and for other purposes. Request Appeal of VOT's Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment & VOT's TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal Parcel ID: 60-443-40-3 0-51-001-1020 (TTCA Unit 1102) and 133 Remaining TTCA Unit properties Dear Tequesta Stormwater Management Utility Board (VOT Council), This correspondence is submitted on behalf of Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) and its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties to formally set forth the factual, technical, and regulatory basis supporting TTCA's position regarding stormwater services and assessments. As demonstrated herein and in the attached supporting documentation and information, TTCA is a perimeter-walled condominium community that is entirely and exclusively served by its own privately held and maintained stormwater drainage system, which was properly permitted, constructed, and approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) under Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P issued July 25, 2001 and the Page 407 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village of Tequesta permit 01-00597 and CO received on 9/20/2002. TTCA's stormwater system meets and exceeds all applicable regulatory requirements, provides full on-site retention and water quality treatment, contains no wetlands or surface waters, and has been expressly determined by SFWMD to result in no adverse environmental, secondary, or cumulative impacts, nor to be contrary to the public interest. As further detailed in the attached materials, TTCA and its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties receive no stormwater services, benefits, or regulatory functions from the Village of Tequesta's stormwater system, have no physical connection or drainage to that system, and therefore do not meet the statutory or ordinance-based criteria for assessment, ERU allocation, or related fees. The attached documentation is submitted to substantiate these findings and to support TTCA's position in full. Cover Letter The Present Situation and Apparent Approach by VOT TTCA's Independent and Privately Held Stormwater Drainage System Development History and Classification Event Timeline Ongoing Maintenance Acknowledgment of External Benefits as General Welfare Added information that may be required [Sec. 74-209 (b)] PSR: Problem— Solution—Result Conclusion Attachments: Binder 1 - TTCA Appeal to VOT Proposal Binder 2 - TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Response to VoT October 13th's communiques Regards, Michael J. Tomes, Owner Parcel 60-43-40-30-51-001-1020 (TTCA Unit 1102) 110-D Lighthouse Circle, Tequesta, FL 33469-2781 and Michael J. Tomes, Director Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell: (561) 310-3329 Email: semotnbellsouth.net Page 408 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Response A written Response to phone call and email from Marjorie Craig, PE, VoT Utilities Director on October 13, 2025 Submitted by: Michael J.Tomes, Director,Tequesta Trace Condominium Association Inc. on October 13, 2025 The following is a response to a phone call from Marjorie Craig, PE,VoT Utilities Director on October 13, 2025 at 10:12 AM and an email sent just a minute prior to the call regarding TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment in which you indicated: "We went back and looked in our code, and I wanted to make you aware of what we found, which appears to indicate that all property in the Village is responsible for paying a stormwater charge.This makes sense based on the billing. I am verifying our interpretation with our legal team, but I wanted to make sure you were aware of what we found. I've pasted it in below and attached it. Sec. 74-201. Findings. It is hereby found, determined, and declared as follows: (1) Those elements of the stormwater management system which provide for the collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulation of groundwater are of benefit and provide services to all property within the incorporated village limits, including property not presently served by the stormwater elements of the system. (2) The costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system and financing the necessary repairs, replacements, improvements and extensions thereof should,to the extent practicable, be allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom. (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1, 9-13-2013) Sec. 74-206. Fees authorized. The village council hereby authorizes the imposition of utility fees on all property within the village. (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1, 9-13-2013) The TTCA 7.454 acres,with its 16 residential buildings housing 134 property units have received approved VoT permits and COs, were delineated to receive NO benefits NOR services from VoT's Stormwater Drainage System that exists adjacent and immediately west(in Old Dixie Hwy.) plus south (in Tequesta Drive) prior to and after construction; and thus TTCA residential units should not be listed as full ERUs_ In general, over 99% of the property with its perimeter wall lies above street level and any stormwater drainage is to TTCA's own on property stormwater drainage system, which does not connect to VOT's adjacent stormwater drainage system to the west or south. For over 23 years the TTCA Property with its 134 residential properties have not received any benefits or service from VOT's adjacent stormwater system which services other nearby facilities and streets. For background information, please refer to my email of August 16, 2025 to Marjorie G. Craig, PE, Director—Utilities Department, Village of Tequesta with its attachments, plus the following presentation with attachments: NOTE: The two verbal requests (1st during my comment period and 2nd directly to the VoT's secatery and Village Clerk - MMC Lori McWilliams) for meeting minutes and particularly regarding Agenda Item #23 has not been received as of October 13, 2025. Page 409 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Key layman's statements and comments regarding recently provided VoT's Part II—CODE OF ORDINANCES, Chapter 74—UTILITIES, ARTICLE IV—STORMWATER, DIVISION 2 STORMWATER UTILITY from : Sec. 74-201. Findings. It is hereby found, determined, and declared as follows: (1) Those elements of the stormwater management system which provide for the collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulation of groundwater are of benefit and provide services to all property within the incorporated village limits, including property not presently served by the stormwater elements of the system. While TTCA's property lies within the village service area limits and has existing plus adjacent village stormwater drainage system immediately to the west and south of the property(meaning TTCA property can be serviced by the existing(not futuristic) V67 s Stormwater Drainage System), but said system elements do not connect to or service TTCA's property(as confirmed by V67 s email of 91191202);thus no benefits nor services are provided to TTCA or its residential 134 unit properties. (2) The costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system and financing the necessary repairs, replacements, improvements and extensions thereof should, to the extent practicable, be allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom. TTCA's property with its residential 134 unit properties receive no services nor benefits from the existing and adjacent V67 s Stormwater Drainage System just prior to and after village COs were issued to TTCA and its 16 residential buildings;thus allocation regarding financing costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system is not practical nor should be allocated to TTCA or its residential 134 unit properties[i.e.:since there is no connected tie-ins (relationship) to VoT's Stormwater Drainage System (confirmed in V67 s email of 911912025), TTCA does not enjoy benefits or services from V67 s Stormwater Drainage Systeml. (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1, 9-13-2013) Sec. 74-202. Definitions. The following words,terms and phrases,when used in this division,shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning.Words not defined in this section shall be construed to have the meaning given by common and ordinary use. Availability charge means a charge to a developer or individual resident to recover the debt service and extension and replacement costs paid on the stormwater management system facility that has been previously constructed, but which serves such developer or individual resident. As stated on received VoT email of 911912025: "1 spoke with Tom again on Wednesday and he said that he believes he has confirmed that Tequesta Trace does NOT drain into the village's drainage system, so you are correct!';• thus V67 s Stormwater Drainage System does not connect(tie—in) to TTCA property and neither TTCA nor its residential 134 unit properties receives any service from any VoT stormwater management system facility that has been previously constructed, extended or replaced. AND Fee in lieu of means a charge to a developer or individual resident to recover: (1) The costs of construction and debt service on the new stormwater management system facility which serves such developer or individual resident; or There is no new village stormwater system for the TTCA Property and the existing village stormwater system adjacent and immediately to the west and south of the TTCA property does not service TTCA nor its residential 134 unit properties. Page 410 of 572 Agenda Item #16. (2) The extension and replacement costs necessitated by development undertaken by such developer or individual resident. There were no village stormwater system extensions or replacements required for TTCA's property by the developer during construction as noted by the approvals of Phase 17(TTCA's common area site plan)received [VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (4)]from: Loxahachee River Environmental Control District approved 611812001 VOT Department of Fire Rescue approved 612812001 VOT Water Department approved 71512001 VOT Building Permit 01-00597 approved on 712412001 VOT's CO of Phase 17 Common(B)Bldg. 109(01-01028),pool,roads,utilities, etc. approved on 912012002 Nor has there been any necessitated village stormwater system permits, extensions or replacements required by TTCA or its residential 134 unit properties regarding a non-existent connection (tie-in) to the village stormwater system that is adjacent and immediately to the west&south of the TTCA property. See Attachment A, B, C, & D. (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1, 9-13-2013) Sec. 74-206. Fees authorized. The village council hereby authorizes the imposition of utility fees on all property within the village. (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1,9-13-2013) While the village council wishes to authorize the imposition of utility fees(water, stormwater,garbage, road/street, refuse &recycling services)on all properties within the village, it also has to meet and adhere to its own standards,ordinances, permits, EORs and COs,which in TTCA's case included the VoT's authorization for TTCA to have its own stormwater drainage system (that does not connect or tie-in to VoT's stormwater drainage system), plus its own streets; and thus the TTCA property with its 134 residential units receive no benefits and services from the existing and adjacent VoT stormwater drainage system per Sec.74-201&202 noted above. For this reason TTCA requested a Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment as first request verbally at VoT Council Meeting of August 12,2025and in writing via Tomes' email of August 16, 2025,for it does not meet the present definition of Equivalent Residential Unit(ERU)for an ERU rate since there is no(1) new construction and debt costs or(2) required extension and replacement costs by VoT that services TTCA and its 134 individual residents regarding the village's stormwater management system facility. Page 411 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment A Tomes' VoT Council Meeting Notes Tomes' Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 @ 6:0013M (Agenda Item #23) VoT Council;Who am I, Request tonight's minutes and adjustment of stormwater utility fees [VoT Sec.74-209(a) (1)]. received VoT's July 11. 2025 letter on Annual Stormwater Assessment on July 20t"for Parcel 60-43-40-30-51-001-1020. Don't remember receiving any earlier notices over 20+Yrs as a VoT-TT resident or as TTCA's President Understand: VoT Sec. 74-201(2): The costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system and financing the necessary repairs, replacements, improvements and extensions thereof should, to the extent practicable, be allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom. But the TTCA 134 residential units receive NO services from VoVs Stormwater System and thus should not be listed as full RCDUs. Understand: VoT Sec.74-202 Definition of Equivalent Residential Unit(ERU)and the ERU rate; But FEE in lieu of means a charge to ...individual resident to recover:(1)Costs of system and service which serves such.. . individual resident. BUT this is not the case:TTCA maintains&services its own system [VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (5)Just spent$18,750 on Main.] US Census VoT letter of 7/11/25 FY26(ERUs=1717) TTCA: Abt.5-6%of VoT Pop. [(134x2.5)/6285] & Abt.8%of VoT ERU (134/1717)+VoT Sec. 24-207(1) Issue: TTCA owns& maintains its own closed Stormwater System within TTCA's perimeter walls and property. Tomes Max. Total$ Min.Ass. Max.Ass. Parcel Ass. Parcel Ass. From ERUs Informed: VoT letter of 7/11/25 received 7/20/25: $94.64 - $291.22 $$97.56 $291.22 $627,000 Email to VoT 7/20/25,VoT acknowledged 7/21/25; New VoT 7/11 Letter to M.J.Tomes rec.7/26/25: $233.40-$252.96 $252.96 $252.96 $798,488 Provided Info: TTCA: 7.454 acres with 16 residential buildings housing 134 units having its own roads,4 dry retention areas with a stortmwater drainage system fully contained within its perimeter walls. All RCDU runoffs percolate via internal retention areas with NO contributing runoff to VoT maintained infrastructure (VoT Sec.74-209 (b) (1). Anticipated: 1) Proper&accurate records were kept by the VoT Utilities Department(VoT Sec. 74-212) noting that: (a) Schnars'submission regarding Phase 17 was a 9 page Site Engineering Plans for Tequesta Trace [VoT Sec.74- 209(a) (4)] with Sheet 1 was`Paving, Grading& Drainage Plans' Project#00136 Sept. 2000 [Summary Note: Drawing shows an enclosed area where surface drainage flows to street catch basins or to PVC drain basins and/or 3 dry retention area with bottom inlets,and said 8 catch+4 drain basins&6 inlets plus 3 storm man holes then allows excess storm water to ultimately drain/flow to one on-property master dry retention area via a bottom inlet utilizing 2,052 ft. of piping [538' of 10" HDPE (4 sec.), 137'of 15" HDPE (5 sec.), 546'of 15" PERF HDPE (5 sec.)and 831'of 15" RCP(10 sec.)]; NONE of TTCA stormwater drainage system connects to and/or discharges into VoT Stormwater System infrastructure(VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (1). (b) Approvals of Phase 17 (TTCA's common area site plan) received [VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (4)]: Loxahachee River Environmental Control District approved 6/18/2001 VOT Department of Fire Rescue approved 6/28/2001 VOT Water Department approved 7/5/2001 VOT Building Permit 01-00597 approved on 7/24/2001 VOT's CO of Phase 17 Common (B) Bldg. 109 (01-01028), pool, roads, utilities, etc. approved on 9/20/2002 2)VoT Stormwater Utility Director would then discover the error/oversight[VoT Sec. 74-209(a) (7)] and take appropriate steps [VoT Sec. 74-209 (a) (8)] regarding the TTCA residential units. View:The 134 TTCA units may not fully qualify as RCDUs since each of the ERU's impervious areas truly do not impact VoVs Storm-water Utility[VoT Sec.74-201 (1)],thus said parcels do not individually qualify as a EUR for determining any VoT annual stormwater assessment rates under Article IV,Division 2 Stormwater Utility(VoT Sec. 74-214 with VoT Sec. 74-202). [i.e.:VoT's stormwater management system does not service said 134 TTCA residential units, which is the reason for fee adjustment on all TTCA residential units(VoT Sec.74-209).] Thank you for your time, attention and consideration. Page 412 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment B VoVs Email of September 8,, 2025 Subjeet:RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Date:Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:10:26 +0000 From:Marjorie G. Craig <mcraiggtequesta.org> To:Michael Tomes <semotgb ell south.net> CC:David Tinoco <dtinocogtequesta.org>, Dennis Rick<drickgtequesta.org>, Christina Vanderwesthuizen<Christina.Vanderwesthuizengfsresidential.com> Mr. Tomes, I have rechecked with Tom. He has been researching the SFWMD database to get the environmental resource permitting (ERP) data. He was able to finally pull it down,but not get all the way through it yet. Please know that Tom is a competent engineer and has been working on engineering projects for the village for over 35 years. He started as an engineering intern. If it is found that Tequesta Trace (TT) doesn't drain to the village infrastructure, I don't know how they(Kimley-Horn/ Raftelis)may have calculated the impact of the Tequesta Trace residents on the rest of the Village stormwater infrastructure that the TT residents use as they utilize the roads, etc. We'll get to the bottom of it and if a refund is due, we'll get to the bottom of that,too. My apologies for the delay. • Marjorie Craig, PE Utilities Director PE The Village of Teq uesta r Utilities Department .y p. 561-768-0459 1 c. 561-529-1453 a. 345 Tequesta Dr,Tequesta, FL, 33469 w. www.teguesta.org •' e. mcraic�(b-tequesta.ora DIME Page 413 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment C General Grid List of Applications, Permits,, FOR Letters and COs Village Of Tequesta Grid List of Applications for Permits(Building, Plumbing&Mechanical) by Centex for Tequesta Trace,to which the Village of Tequesta then issued an associated permit. Info From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 Prepared By: Michael Tomes Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway In addition to the requirements of this permit,there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public CO Notice: Records of this county,and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Manaqement Districts,State Brennan Permit Info with Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Letter Parcel# 60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Dates Date Type of Building Permit Building Plumbing Permit Plumbing Mechanical/HVAC Mechanical/HVAC Brennan Eng Application Application or Mechanical or Letters Application confirmed their Certificate of or Permit Permit Application Mechanical inspections p y Occu anc through (Signed date does Class of Work Multi-Family Multi-Family (Blank)or 105-5+Family or construction not always match 104-3&4 Family New Installation efforts(i.e.: printed date) Work Description (Generally)Construct Items 8 Unit 10 Plumbing (Generally) New A/C Install foundation, Note: 13,838 or 13,952 Unit Lavatories 18 To:Ridgeway Air Conditioning per Plan To:Glacier A/C of Palm unit masonry, Site & g y g p floor,roof and Sq.Ft. 8-Unit 2-Story 24 Water Closets Plumbing,Inc. Beach,Inc wall framin Engineering Contractor Condo 18 24 Showers g' Plans for anchors& or Sinks sheating)and Tequesta Trace 18,234 Sq.Ft.10-Unit 8 10 that the w ork FOR 2 Story Condo Dish Washers 8 10 is in J,W,Mahannah or Pool Disposal 8 10 accordance Application Cabana Bath Tubs 8 10 with the 7/19/2001 Permitted Received Added Notes On Application's front Wash.Machine 8 10 Insp-Req(Geneerly): Insp-Req(Gennerly): plans and the Building Permit and back David Water Heater 8 10 Plumbing/Underground Mechanical/Underground provisions of #01-00597 Abrams attested to a Hose Bibs 8 10 Sewer Mechanical Rough SBC 1997 Ed. on 7/24/2001 statement Sewer Connect. 8 10 Plumbing Mechanical Final FOR Letter to Rough&Final Water Connect. 8 10 g VoT (See Below) A�1 Rignng Phase Bldg. No.of Days from Letter to CO Avg. Bldg.# Address Units Sq.Ft.Date Signed By Permit# Date Unit Type Date Signed By Permit# Date Date Signed By Permit# Date CO Date: 1 110 8 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00199 2/27/02 8 Unit 11/19/02 G Kozan 02-001316 11/25/02 4/4/03 D.C.Thompson 02-001344 12/3/02 02-001017 8/27/02 03-00440 4/7/03 Not Dated 6/23/2003 03 2 ill 8 13,874 1816/01 D. 01-00977 11/15/01 8 Unit 12/3/01 G Kozan 01-01029 12/10/0'6/11/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000600 6/18/02 9/12/2002 Abrams/ . 9/20/2002 8 3 113 8 13,838?/?/01 D.Abrams 01-01064 12/14/01 8 Unit 12/20/01 G Kozar 02-00018 1/08/02 6/11/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000661 6/18/02 9/12/2002 9/23/2002 11 4 115 8 10,786 10/02 D.Abrams 02-00031 1/10/02 8 Unit 1/?/01 G Kozan02-00094 1/25/02 7/09/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000797 7/15/02 9/13/2002 10/11/2002 28 5 117 8 10,786 1/09/02 D.AbramE 02-00071 1/23/02 8 Unit 2/11/02 G Kozan 02-00157 2/14/02 7/09/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000799 7/15/02 10/29/2002 11/21/2002 23 6 101 8 10,786 1/09/02 D.AbramE 02-00072 1/23/02 8 Unit 2/21/02 G Kozan 02-00194 2/25/02 9/12/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001051 9/16/02 11/21/2002 12/5/2002 14 7 102 8 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00162 2/15/02 8 Unit 3/04/02 G Kozan 02-00240 3/11/02 9/12/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001052 9/19/02 11/21/2002 12/16/2002 25 8 103 8 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00163 2/15/02 8 Unit 3/21/02 G Kozan 02-00304 3/27/02 10/21/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001186 10/24/02 12/20/2002 1/14/2003 25 9 104 10 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00203 2/28/02 10 Unit ?/?/02 G Kozan 02-00420 4/23/02 10/21/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001187 10/24/02 12/20/2002 2/3/2003 45 10 106 10 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00221 3/06/02 10 Unit 5/23/02 G Kozan 02-00559 5/23/02 11/27/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001345 12/03/02 1/31/2003 2/25/2003 25 11 108 10 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00204 2/28/02 10 Unit ?/?/02 G Kozan 02-000859 7/30/02 12/1702 D.C.Thompson 02-001406 12/18/02 1/31/2003 3/24/2003 54 12 112 8 10,786 12/?/01 D.AbramE 01-01065 12/14/01 8 Unit l/10/02 G Kozan 02-00041 1/14/02 6/11/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000662 6/18/02 9/12/2002 10/1/2002 19 13 114 8 10,786?/?/? D.Abram.,02-00032 1/10/02 8 Unit l/10/02 G Kozan 02-00042 1/14/02 7/09/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000796 7/15/02 9/18/2002 10/28/2002 22 14 116 8 13,952 1/9/02 D.Abrams 02-00073 1/23/02 8 Unit ?/?/02 G Kozan 02-00125 2/08/02 7/09/02 D.C.Thompson 02-000798 7/15/02 10/10/2002 11/8/2002 29 15 105 8 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00200 2/27/02 8 Unit 4/8/05 G Kozan 02-00379 4/10/02 12/1702 D.C.Thompson 02-001404 12/18/02 Not Dated 10/7/2002 23 16 107 8 10,786 1/24/02 D.AbramE 02-00201 2/27/02 8 Unit 5/10/02 G Kozan 02-00515 5/15/02 11/27/02 D.C.Thompson 02-001346 12/03/02 1/31/2003 2/12/2003 13 B 109 Common 680 8/20/01 D.Abram:01-01028 12/10/01 Schnars FOR-Mahannah's Letter 9/18/2002 9/20/2002 2 Application Front: "All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not." Average days from EOR's Letter to CO 20 Back: "Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installation as indicated. For undated letters,utilized the average of 14 other dated letters. certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction....." Owner's Affidavit: "I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning." Signing:Davis Abrams signed the front and back of the permit applications for 8&10 unit buildings Certificate of Occupancy:There was a CO for each residential building with 8 or 10 units therein,total of 16 COs.. Most of the time,the signed date by Jeffery C.Newell,CBO agreed with the printed date,but not always. To issue the 1st CO to Building#1 (110 Lighthouse Circel)a letter to Village of Tequesta from Scharns'FOR Mr.Mahannah had to be received(letter dated 9-18-202),who indicated that in his"professional opinion"based on field reviews that the"referenced plat have been constructed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans." Brennan Engineering,Inc.wrote letters to the City of Tequesta Building Department,which may have varied slighhtly(one letter to the next),but each letter attested that their 'office has inspected the structural components(i.e.:foundation,unit masonry,floor,roof and wall framing,anchors&sheathing)through the construction at the above referenced building.' the leters than state that:'This letter is to certify that all work has been installed in accordance with the plans accepted for permit by the City of Tequesta Building Department and with the provisions of the Standard Building Code,1997 edition.' Page 414 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment D VoT Listing of Permits for Tequesta Trace Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village Of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdi\Aslon: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 1 1 02-00199 Building Multi-Family 2/27/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj# 02-R 110 (New/Add/Alter) To:Centex 2 1 02-001017 Multi-Family New Const. 8/27/2002 C90 Day extension of Perm it#02-00199 for Insp-Req 110 (New/Add/Alter) • Bldg#1 To:Centex Notice of Commencement Foundation/Footer/Slab Form Board Tie-in Surgey Tie Bean Steel Bond Wall Footer Second Floor/Party Walls Roof Truss Roof Sheathing/Affidavit Wire Lath Wall Sheathing Floor Joist 1st Floor Window/Door Buck Framing&Trades Framing 1st Floor Dryw all Patio Group Shutter Final Smoke Alarms Driveway Final Building Final Final/Fire Dept. Elevation Certificate Final/Fire Dept. 3 1 02-000755 Constr. Trailers New Installation 7/1/2002 Relocate Construction Trainer to Lot #1 (EL. Insp-Req Final 110 Only) To: Centex 4 1 02-000674 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#1 per approved Insp-Req Final 110 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 5 1 02-000756 EL Serv./Panel New Installation 1/1/2002 150 AMP service for Constr.Trailer Insp-Req Electrical Final 110 Change To: Melco Electric Co. 6 1 02-000902 Fire Suppression New Installation 8/12/2002 Install Fire Supression Systen in kitchen Insp-Req Fire Suppression: 110 /Sprinkler hood Rough& Final To:AA Fire Equipment Bldg. Final 7 1 369 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough Final 110 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc /Fire Dept. Final 8 1 02-001304 Roof-Resid New Installation 11/15/2002 New Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 110 To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Tag&Metal In Progress Roof Final 9 1 02-001316 Plumbing 104-3&4 Family 11/25/2002 Plumbing Insp-Req Plumbing/Underground 110 To: Ridgeway Plumbing, Inc. Sewer Plumbing Rough&Final 10 1 02-001316 Electric- 104-3&4 Family 11/25/2002 800 Amp Service Insp-Req Electric Underground 110 New Resid. To: Melcon Electric Inc. Electrical Rough Const. Power Release Electrical Final 11 1 02-001344 Mechanical/HVAC 105-5+ Family 12/3/2002 New A/C Install Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 110 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 12 1 03-00008 Fire Suppression New Installation 1/8/2003 Fire Sprinklers Insp-Req Fire Suppression: 110 /Sprinkler To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. Rough& Final/Fire Dept Final 13 1 03-00049 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 110 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 14 1 03-00440 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 4/7/2003 A/C System Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 110 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, IN Mechanical Final 15 1 03-00585 Hurricane New Installation 5/8/2003 Hurricane Panels Insp-Req Final 110 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. Page 415 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 16 2 02-000600 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 6/18/2002 Install A/C per plan for Bldg.#2 Insp-Req Mechanical/Underground 111 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, IN Mechanical Rough Mechanical Final 17 2 02-000675 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#2 per approved Insp-Req Final 111 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 18 2 02-000744 Hurricane New Installation 7/1/2002 Install ROBICO Shutters/24 Ga. Galy, Insp-Req Final 111 Panels/Shutters steelstorm panels/20 openings To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 19 2 02-000933 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#2 Insp-Req Final 111 To:All Around Sprinklers 20 2 02-001001 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 111 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 21 2 03-00050 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 111 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 22 2 01-00977 Building Multi-Family 11/15/2001 Construct 13,838 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj# 01-AV 111 To:Centex 23 2 01-01029 Plumbing 12/20/2001 Plumbing for 8 unit condo To: Ridgeway Proj# 01-AV 111 24 2 01-01062 Electrical New Residential 12/13/2001 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj# 01-AV 111 25 2 02-00131 Building Misc. 2/8/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02- L 111 MFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 26 2 02-00168 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile rood w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#02- L 111 Tile(Apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 27 3 02-000661 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 6/18/2002 Install A/C per plan for Bldg.#3 Insp-Req Mechanical/Underground 113 /01-01064 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Rough Mechanical Final 28 3 02-000677 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#3 per approved Insp-Req Final 113 /01-01064 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 29 3 02-000934 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#3 Insp-Req Final 113 /01-01064 Ro:All Around Sprinklers 30 3 02-001002 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 113 /01-01064 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 31 3 02-001018 Hurricane New Installation 7/1/2002 Install Hurricane Shutters Insp-Req Final 113 /01-01064 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 32 3 02-00132 Building Misc. 2/8/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers per Proj.#01- BB 113 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 33 3 02-00012 Electric New Residential 1/8/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#01- BB 113 34 3 02-00018 Plumbing 1/8/2002 Plumbing for 8 unit condo To: Ridgeway Proj.#01- BB 113 35 3 02-00169 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile rood w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#01- BB 113 Tile(apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method w/Gutters To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 36 3 01-01064 Building Multi-Family 12/14/2001 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#01- BB 113 To:Centex Page 416 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 37 4 02-00031 Building Multi-Family 1/10/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02- C 115 To:Centex 38 4 02-00064 Electric New Residential 1/23/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02- C 115 39 4 02-00094 Plumbing 1/25/2002 Plumbing for for new 8-Plex per attached list Proj.#02- C 115 To: Ridgeway Plmb 40 4 02-00170 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile roof w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#02- C 115 Tile(Apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method w/Gutters To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 41 4 02-00135 Building Misc. 2/8/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers per Proj.#02- C 115 NFPA13R To: T&T Fire Protection Inc. 42 4 02-000679 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#4 per approved Proj.#02- C 115 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 43 4 02-000797 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 7/15/2002 Install A/C per plan for Bldg.#4 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 115 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 44 4 02-000935 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#4 Insp-Req Final 115 To:All Around Sprinklers 45 4 02-001003 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 115 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 46 4 02-001019 Hurricane New Installation 9/9/2002 Install Hurricane Shutters Insp-Req Final 115 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 47 5 02-000681 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#5 per approved Insp-Req Final 117 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 48 5 02-000699 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 New Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 117 Roof/Scre-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 49 5 02-000799 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 7/15/2002 A/C for Bldg.#5 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 117 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 50 5 02-000936 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#5 Insp-Req Final 117 To:All Around Sprinklers 51 5 02-001004 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 117 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 52 5 02-001116 Hurricane New Installation 10/7/2002 Install Hurricane Shutters on all opennings, Insp-Req Final 117 Panels/Shutters Bldg.#5 To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 53 5 02-00071 Building Multi-Family 1/23/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02- H 117 To:Centex 54 5 02-00157 Plumbing 2/14/2002 Plumbing for Bldg#5 8-Plex Proj.#02- H 117 To: Ridgeway Plumbing 55 5 02-00165 Electric New Residential 2/22/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02- H 117 56 5 02-00505 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers per Proj.#02- H 117 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. Page 417 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 57 6 02-000666 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#6 per approved Insp-Req Final 101 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 58 6 02-000700 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 New Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 101 Roof/Scre-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 59 6 02-000937 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#6 Insp-Req Final 101 To:All Around Sprinklers 60 6 02-001005 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 101 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 61 6 02-001051 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 9/19/2002 A/C for Bldg.#6 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 101 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 62 6 02-001113 Hurricane New Installation 10/7/2002 Install Hurricane Shutters on all opennings, Insp-Req Final 101 Panels/Shutters Bldg.#6 To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 63 6 02-00504 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers per Proj.#02- 1 101 NFPA13R To: T&T Fire Protection Inc. 64 6 02-00072 Building Multi-Family 1/23/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02- 1 101 To:Centex 65 6 02-00194 Plumbing 2/25/2002 Plumbing for Bldg#6 8-Plex per attached Proj.#02- 1 101 Fixture List To: Ridgeway Plumbing 66 6 02-00197 Electric New Residential 2/22/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02- 1 101 67 7 02-000667 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#7 per approved Insp-Req Final 102 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 68 7 02-000701 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 102 /Screw-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 69 7 02-00938 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#7 Insp-Req Final 102 To:All Around Sprinklers 70 7 02-001006 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 102 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 71 7 02-001052 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 9/19/2002 A/C for Bldg.#7 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 102 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 72 7 02-001219 Hurricane New Installation 10/31/2002 Install Hurricane Shutters Insp-Req Final 102 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 73 7 02-00503 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02-M 102 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 74 7 02-00162 Building Multi-Family 1/23/2002 Construct 13,953 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02-M 102 To:Centex 75 7 02-00240 Plumbing 2/25/2002 Plumbing for Bldg#7 8-Plex Proj.#02-M 102 To: Ridgeway Plumbing 76 7 02-00246 Electric New Residential 2/22/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-M 102 Page 418 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdi\Aslon: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 77 8 02-000668 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#8 per approved Insp-Req Final 103 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 78 8 02-000702 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 103 /Screw-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 79 8 02-000939 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#8 Insp-Req Final 103 To:All Around Sprinklers 80 8 02-001007 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 103 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 81 8 02-001186 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 10/24/2002 A/C for Bldg.#8 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 103 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Final 82 8 02-001302 Hurricane New Installation 11/15/2002 Install Panels Insp-Req Final 103 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 83 8 02-00163 Building Multi-Family 2/15/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02-N 103 TO:Centex 84 8 02-00315 Electric New Residential 3/27/2002 800 Amp Service to: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-N 103 85 8 02-00304 Plumbing 3/27/2002 Install Plumbing for Bldg#8 8-Plex Proj.#02-N 103 To: Ridgeway Plumbing 86 8 02-00502 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02-N 103 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 87 8 02-00017 Building Misc. 1/8/2002 Set Up 10'x 44'Cpmstruction Trailer Proj.#03-A 108 To: Centex 88 9 02-000669 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg.#9 per approved Insp-Req Final 104 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 89 9 02-000705 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 104 /Screw-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 90 9 02-000940 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg.#9 Insp-Req Final 104 To:All Around Sprinklers 91 9 02-001008 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 104 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 92 9 02-001048 Fire Suppression New Installation 9/19/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Insp-Req Fire Suppression: 104 /Sprinkler NFPA13R Rough&Final To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. Bldg. Final 93 9 02-001187 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 10/24/2002 A/C for Bldg.#9 Insp-Req Mechanical/Underground 104 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach, Inc Mechanical Rough Mechanical Final 94 9 03-00029 Hurricane New Installation 1/15/2003 Hurri Panel Insp-Req Final 104 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 95 9 02-00203 Building Multi-Family 2/28/2002 Construct 18,234 Sq.Ft.10 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02-U 104 TO:Centex 96 9 02-00420 Plumbing 4/23/2002 Plumbing per Attached Fixture List for Bldg Proj.#02-U 104 97 #9 10-Unit To: Ridgeway Plumbing 98 9 02-00407 Electric New Residential 4/22/2002 1000 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-U 104 Page 419 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NECorner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies,or Federal Agencies. Permit Info with Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 100 10 02-000671 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#10 per approved Insp-Req Final 106 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 101 10 02-000706 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 106 /Screw-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofinq and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 102 10 02-000941 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#10 Insp-Req Final 106 To:All Around Sprinklers 103 10 02-001009 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 106 Fire Alarm Final 104 10 02-001049 Fire Suppression New Installation 9/19/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Insp-Req Fire Suppression: 106 /Sprinkler NFPA13R Rough&Final To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. Bldg. Final 105 10 02-001345 Mechanical/HVAC 105-5+Family 12/3/2002 Install A/C Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 106 To:Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Final 106 10 03-00053 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 106 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 107 10 02-00221 Building Multi-Family 3/6/2002 Construct 18,234 Sq.Ft.10 Unit Story Condo Proj.#02-V 106 To:Centex 108 10 02-00580 Electric New Residential 4/22/2002 1000 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-V 106 109 10 02-00559 Plumbing 5/23/2002 Plumbing per Attached Fixture List for Bldg Proj.#02-V 106 #10 10-Unit To: Ridgeway Plumbing 112 11 02-000673 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#11 per approved Insp-Req Final 108 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 113 11 02-000859 Plumbing New Installation 7/30/2002 Plumbing for Bldg#11 10 Unit Insp-Req Plumbing/Underground 108 To: Ridgeway Plumbing, Inc. Sewer Plumbinq Rough&Final 114 11 02-000942 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#11 Insp-Req Final 108 To:All Around Sprinklers 115 11 02-001010 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 108 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 116 11 02-001050 Fire Suppression New Installation 9/19/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Insp-Req Fire Suppression: 108 /Sprinkler NFPA13R Rough&Final To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. Bldg. Final 117 11 02-001301 Roof-Resid New Installation 11/15/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Apple Tile Roof Insp-Req Roof Sheathing Roof/Tin 108 /Scre-on Tag&Metal In Progress To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. Roof Final 118 11 02-001406 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 12/18/2002 A/C Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 108 To:Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Final 119 11 03-00054 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 108 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 120 11 02-001010 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 108 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 121 11 02-00204 Building Multi-Family 3/6/2002 Construct 18,234 Sq.Ft.10 Unit2 Story Condo Proj.#02-A 108 To:Centex 122 11 02-000869 Electric-New New Installation 7/31/2002 1000 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Insp-Req Electric Underground 108 Resid. Const. Electrical Rough Power Release Electrical Final Page 420 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 123 12 02-000662 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 6/18/2002 Install A/C Insp-Req Mechanical/Underground 112 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Rough Mechanical Final 124 12 02-00676 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#12 per approved Insp-Req Final 112 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 125 12 02-000943 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#12 Insp-Req Final 112 To:All Around Sprinklers 126 12 02-001011 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 112 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 127 12 03-00051 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 112 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 128 12 01-0165 Building Multi-Family 12/14/2001 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#01-BC 112 To:Centex 129 12 02-00134 Building Misc. 2/8/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers for Bldg#12 Proj.#01-BC 112 per NFPA13R To: T&T Fire Protection Inc. 130 12 02-00171 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile roof w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#01-BC 112 Tile(Apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method w/Gutters To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 131 12 02-00034 Electric New Residential 1/14/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#01-BC 112 132 12 02-00041 Plumbing 1/14/2002 Plumbing per Attached Fixture List for Bldg Proj.#01-BC 112 #12 8-Unit To: Ridgeway Plumbing 133 13 02-000676 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#13 per approved Insp-Req Final 114 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 134 13 02-000706 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 7/15/2002 Install A/C Bldg#13 Insp-Req Mechanical Final 114 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc 135 13 02-000944 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#13 Insp-Req Final 114 To:All Around Sprinklers 136 13 02-001012 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Final 114 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc 137 13 02-001114 Hurricane New Installation 10/7/2003 Install Hurricane Shutters on all Openings Insp-Req Final 114 Panels/Shutters Bldg#13 To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 138 13 02-00172 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile roof w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#02-D 114 Tile(Apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method w/Gutters To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 139 13 02-00063 Electric New Residential 1/23/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-D 114 140 13 02-00042 Plumbing 1/14/2002 Plumbing per Attached Fixture List for Bldg Proj.#02-D 114 #13 8-Unit To: Ridgeway Plumbing 141 13 02-00135 Building Misc. 2/8/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers for Bldg#13 Proj.#02-D 114 per NFPA13R To: T&T Fire Protection Inc. 142 13 02-00032 Building Multi-Family 12/10/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02-D 114 To:Centex Page 421 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 143 14 02-000680 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#14 per approved Insp-Req Final 116 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 144 14 02-000798 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 7/15/2002 A/C Bldg#14 Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 116 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Final 145 14 02-000945 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#14 Insp-Req Final 116 To:All Around Sprinklers 146 14 02-001013 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 116 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 147 14 02-001115 Hurricane New Installation 10/7/2003 Install Hurricane Shutters on all Openings Insp-Req Final 116 Panels/Shutters Bldg#14 To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 148 14 02-00501 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02-J 116 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 149 14 02-00073 Building Multi-Family 1/23/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8 Unit 2 Story Condo Proj.#02-J 116 To:Centex 150 14 02-00128 Electric New Residential 2/8/2002 800 Amp Service To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-J 116 151 14 02-00125 Plumbing 2/8/2002 Install Plumbing for Bldg#14 8-Unit per Proj.#02-J 116 Attached List To: Ridgeway Plumbing 152 14 02-00173 Building Misc. 2/22/2002 New tile roof w/Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Proj.#02-J 116 Tile(Apple Cider)w/30/90 Underlayment, Screw on Method w/Gutters To: Reliable Roofing and Gutters, Inc. 153 15 02-000670 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#15 per approved Insp-Req Final 105 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 154 15 02-000703 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Tile/Apple Insp-Req Roof/Tin Tag&Metal 105 Cider/Screw on Method In Progress Roof Final 155 15 02-000946 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#15 Insp-Req Final 105 To:All Around Sprinklers 156 15 02-001014 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 105 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 157 15 02-001404 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 12/18/2002 Install A/C Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 105 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Final 158 15 03-00047 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 105 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 159 15 02-00500 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02-S 105 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 160 15 02-00200 Building Multi-Family 2/27/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8-Plex2 Story Condo Proj.#02-S 105 To:Centex 161 15 02-00379 Plumbing 2/8/2002 Install Plumbing per Attached Fixture List for Proj.#02-S 105 Bldg#15 8-Plex To: Ridgeway Plumbing 162 15 02-00388 Electric New Residential 4/11/2002 800 Amp EL Sery To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-S 105 Page 422 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village Of Tequesta List of Permits Issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace From: Village of Tequesta-Department of Community Development,250 Tequesta Drive,Suite 305 Tequesta,FL 33469(561)575-6220 FAX(561)575-6224 To: Centex Homes-8198 Job Rd.#200 Boynton Beach,FL 33437(561)536-1000 Subdivision: Tequest Trace Condominiums-NE Corner of Tequesta Drive&Old Dixie Highway Notice: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the Public Records if tgus ciybrt, and there may be additional permits required from other government entities such as Water Management Districts, State Agencies, or Federal Agencies. Permit Info w ith Proposed Use:Resid./Multi Family/Apt. Parcel#60-43-40-30-00-000-7420 Date Added Bdlg Page Bldg. Number Type Permit Class of Work Issued Work Description / To: Note # 163 16 02-000672 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for Bldg#16 per approved Insp-Req Final 107 plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 164 16 02-000704 Roof-Resid New Installation 6/20/2002 Monier/Lifetile Vanguard Roll Tile/Apple Insp-Req Roof Sheathing 107 Cider/Screw on Method Roof/Tin Tag&Metal In Progress Roof Final 165 16 02-000947 Irrigation New Installation 8/21/2002 Install Irrigation sprinkler system for Bldg#16 Insp-Req Final 107 To:All Around Sprinklers 166 16 02-001015 Alarm(Fire) New Installation 8/21/2002 Fire Alarm System Insp-Req Fire Alarm Rough 107 To: Life Safety Mgt. Inc Fire Alarm Final 167 16 02-001346 Mechanical/HVAC New Installation 12/18/2002 Install A/C Insp-Req Mechanical Rough 107 To: Glacier A/C of Palm Beach Inc Mechanical Final 168 16 03-00048 Hurricane New Installation 1/16/2003 Hurr Panel Insp-Req Final 107 Panels/Shutters To: Expert Installation Service Inc. 169 16 02-00201 Building Multi-Family 2/27/2002 Construct 13,952 Sq.Ft.8-Plex2 Story Condo Proj.#02-T 107 To:Centex 170 16 02-00517 Electric New Residential 5/15/2002 800 Amp EL Sery To: Melcon Electric Inc. Proj.#02-T 107 171 16 02-00515 Plumbing 5/15/2002 Plumbing for Bldg#16 8-Plex per Attached Proj.#02-T 107 List To: Ridgeway Plumbing 172 16 02-00499 Building Misc. 5/15/2002 Install Automatic Fire Sprinklers as per Proj.#02-T 107 NFPA13R To:T&T Fire Protection Inc. 173 B 02-000665 Landscape New Installation 6/18/2002 Install Landscaping for common areas per Insp-Req Final 109 approved plan To: Design Landscaping&Nursery 174 B 02-001042 Electric Misc. New Installation 9/17/2002 Install Street Lighting Insp-Req Electric Underground 109 To:Thompson Electrical Inc. Power Release Electrical Final 175 B 02-000930 Awning New Installation 8/29/2002 Install new 12'x34'Navy Blue Vinyl Awning Insp-Req Foundation/Footing/Slab 109 w/White Frame To:J. Dinarzo Constr. Co. Final Final/Fire Dept. 176 B 02-00090 Building Misc. 1/25/2002 Install 48"Pool Railing Proj.#02-AZ 109 To: Screenco North Inc 177 B 02-00047 Swimming Pool 1/14/2002 Construct 20'x 40'Public Swimming Pool Proj.#02-AZ 109 To: Olympic Pool Services Corp. 178 B 02-00035 Electrical Misc. Resid/Corn 1/14/2002 Electric for Pool To: Melco Electric Inc. Proj.#02-AZ 109 179 B 01-01028 Building Commercial(New) 12/10/2001 Construct 680 Sq.Ft. CBS Pool Cabana Proj.#01-AZ 109 Building Page 423 of 572 TTCA bequest for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment mailbox: : Users i hazel Appl t l o ming/Thunderbird . Agenda Item #16. Subject: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment From: Michael Tones <semot@ bellsouth.net> Date: 8/16/2025,, 3:09 PM T 0a "Marjorie G. Craig, PE" <n Cray atequesta.or CC: David Tinoco <dti o o@teq uest .or Dennis Rick <dri k@te esta > Christina Vanderwesthuizen q .or� <C risti na. a nderwest i e n @ sresid ntia I.Com> Marjorie G.Craig,, PE Director—futilities Department Village of Tequesta 45 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida-33469 Email: rncr ig tequ st.o ,er Phone: (5 1)768-0459 Cell: (561)52 --145 E: Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Parcel JD*60-44 0- - 1-001-10 0(TTCA Unit 11 )and 133 Remaining TTCA Units Dear Director Marjorie Craig, It was a pleasure speaking with you following the ViIIage of Tequ esta Council IVleeting on August 1 ,2025,where I provided comments under Agenda Item#2 ( esolution fro.1 - 5 and M e m o#25-1 7)regarding the adoption of Storm water Utility Fees for Fly 202 6. The item was subsequently approved unanimously by Council in accordance with VoT procedures with Council Attorney present. During my comments, I explained why my unit,along with all 134 Tequesta Trace Condominium Association(TTCA)units(see Attachments:Tequesta Trace Residential Units and Tomes'!Motes),should net be subject to storm ater assessment fees under Division 2, Sec.74-209 of the Village Code along with the two different VoT letters(see Attachment:Two different 1 oTkl ,2025 letters)which were followed with an email to and a response frorn your department(see Attachment:Emails between Tomes and Vo T). TTCA maintains its own independent storrnwater drainage systern,which is not connected to, nor serviced by,the tillage's stormwater infrastructure. TTCXs Independent Stormwater Drainage System * All runoff from TTCA' 3-6 residential buildings and associated unit impervious areas within its perimeter walls flows exclusively into TTCA's stormwate r drainage system(see A -o ment:TTCA Site Plan,Sheet 1 o ). * TTCA's system consists of its awry drain points, piping,manholes,and dry retention areas,which are self-contained and not tied to VoT's stormwater system. * Accordi ugly,the Village's stormw ter infrastructure does riot provide collection,disposal,or gr undwater regulation services to TTA properties. Development History and Classification * TTCA was developed in 17 phases(see Pala Beach County Records OR 14137177,dated 11 . a . ),with Certificates of Occupancy{Cos) 'issued by the Village for each phase(see detailed list below pIus Attachments:TTCA Recorded Documents and Builder's Applications, 1 oT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs). • While classified under Sec.74-207 as"Residential Developed Property,"TTCA units function as a sub-class of residential units. They do not meet VeT's technical definition of ERUs(Equivalent Residential Units),as their impervious areas are exclusively managed within TTCNs own system. Parion6/11/2025,424 of 572 1 f : F TTCA request for Stoirmwater Assessment Fee Adjustment mailbox: C:/Use r Mich l ppD t oa i . T u d rbird Agenda Item,Peeli6nTieul"HUS, o for VoT storrnwater constru cd on,debt service,or mainten a n e should apply to TTCA,as approvals and CiDs were granted contingent on TTCA's self-contained drainage 1nfrastructure. Ongoing Maintenance TTCA has continually maintain e d its stormwater system at its own expense: • 01 :Shenandoah Construction performed cleaning,repairs and inspection. * July 0 5:Above All PIumbing cornpleted cleaning,confirmed system integrity, and verified no unauthorized connections to VoT's system.(I personally reviewed findings ors site with the project manager and crew on August 1,2025.) All costs of maintenance,e,repair,and management are funded directly by TTCA through assessments to its 134 owners,without reliance on Village services. Acknowledgment of External Benefits We recognize that the Village's storrnwater infrastructure benefits TTCA owners,residents,and visitors outside the perimeter walls of the property. However,within Tequesta Trace,the system is fully self-sustaining and separate from VoT's infrastructure. Supporting Documentation For your review, please find attached: 1. Emails between Torres and VoT 2. Dotes used during the Agenda Item#23 comment period (Toms'Notes) .Two different VoT July 11,2025 letters(co rnments noted in Tomes"Notes) 4.TTCA Site Plan,Sheet 1 of 9(with drainage surnmary noted in Torres'Notes) 5.TTCA Recorded Documents . Builder's Applications,VoT Permits, Soft Letters,and COs .Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing Request Given this history and supporting documentation, I respectfully request that TTCA's 134 residential units be granted an adjustment to exclude there from the VoT 5torrnwater Assessment Fee. Please let me know r if you would like e to review these documents in more detail with me or schedule a site visit to Tecluesta Trace. I would also appreciate any update or status on TTCA's storrnwat r fee adjustment review. tea rd s, Michael J.Tomes,Owner Parcel -4 -4 - 0-51- 1-1 (TTCA Unit 110 110-D Lighthouse Circle,Tequesta, FL 33469- 1 and Michael J.Tomes,Director Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell. (5 1)310-3329 Email. ernt@bellsouth.net Final Records--Palm Beach County&pillage of Tequesta Cos PBC OR Book Entry Date/Time Phase Pages VoT CO Date Page 425 of 572 of 11 o , : P TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment mailbox:///C:/Users/M ichael/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/. Agenda Item #16. PBC OR Book Entry Date/Time Phase Pages VoT CO Date 14137 09/11/2002 09:43:04 2 0136-0143 09/20/2002 14166 09/19/2002 08:18:19 3 1559-1568 09/23/2002 14202 09/30/2002 0824:56 4 0575-058410/11/2002 14202 09/30/2002 08:24;58 12 0585-0594 10/01/2002 14339 3.1/01/2002 08:11:37 5 0934-0943 11/21/2002 14339 11/01/2002 08:11:37 13 0944-0953 10/28/2002 14339 11/01/2002 08:11:37 14 0954-096311/08/2002 14426 12/03/2002 13:03:28 7 1289-1298 12/16/2002 14426 12/03/2002 13:03:28 6 1299-1.308 12/05/2002 14676 01/16/2003 10:00:08 8 0080-0089 01/14/2003 34749 02/04/2003 10:0329 16 0410-0413 02/12/2003 14749 02/04/2003 10:03:29 9 0420-0429 02/03/2003 14807 02/18/2003 09:53:51 10 0831-0840 02/25/2003 14868 03/04/2003 09:33:16 15 0210-0219 10/07/2002 1.4905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 8 0563-0672 01/14/2003 14905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 15 0673-0682 10/07/2002 14905 03/11/2003 09:57:55 16 0683-0592 02/12/2003 14961 03/24/200314:05:40 11 100&-1.009 03/24/2003 7.5220 05/14/2003 09:28:03 17 0445-0463 09/20/2002 15422 06/24/2603 10:03:35 1 3974-1983 06/23/2003 Attachments.- 1. Emails between Tomes and VoT.pdf 653 KB 2. Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 812-2025.pdf 696 KB 3.a 1st VoT Letter 7-11-2025.pdf 988 KS 3.b 2nd VoT fetter 7-11-2025.pdf 534 KB Page 426 of 572 3 of 4 �2/11/2(}25,5:36 PM TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment mazibax:///C:/Users/Michael/AppData/Roanning/Thunderbird/ Agenda Item #16. 4. TTCXs Site Plan Sheet 1 of 9 Jpg 794 KB 5. TTCA Documents Recorded.pdf 224 KB 6. Builder's Application, Vo.T's Permits, EOR's Letters & VoT's 520 KB COs.pdf 7. Tequesta Trace Residential Units.pdf 780 KB Pa e 427 of 572 4 of 4 �2/11/Zp25,5:36 PA Ag for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 @ 6:OOPM (Agenda Item #23) VoT Council; Who am I, Request tonight's minutes and adjustment of stormwater utility fees [VoT Sec. 74-209 (a) (1)]. I received VoT's July 11. 2025 letter on Annual Stormwater Assessment on July 20t"for Parcel 60-43-40-30-51-001-1020. Don't remember receiving any earlier notices over 20+Yrs as a VoT-TT resident or as TTCA's President Understand: VoT Sec. 74-201 (2): The costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system and financing the necessary repairs, replacements, improvements and extensions thereof should, to the extent practicable, be allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom. But the TTCA 134 residential units receive NO services from VoT's Stormwater System and thus should not be listed as full RCDUs. Understand: VoT Sec. 74-202 Definition of Equivalent Residential Unit(ERU)and the ERU rate; But FEE in lieu of means a charge to. . . individual resident to recover: (1) Costs of system and service which serves such. . . individual resident. BUT this is not the case:TTCA maintains&services its own system [VoT Sec. 74-209 (b) (5)Just spent$18,750 on Main.] US Census VoT letter of 7/11/25 FY26 (ERUs=1717) TTCA: Abt. 5 -6%of VoT Pop. [(134x2.5)/6285] & Abt. 8%of VoT ERU (134/1717) +VoT Sec. 24-207 (1) Issue: TTCA owns& maintains its own closed Stormwater System within TTCA's perimeter walls and property. Tomes Max. Total$ Min.Ass. Max. Ass. Parcel Ass. Parcel Ass. From ERUs Informed: VoT letter of 7/11/25 received 7/20/25: $94.64 - $291.22 $$97.56 $291.22 $627,000 Email to VoT 7/20/25, VoT acknowledged 7/21/25; New VoT 7/11 Letter to M.J.Tomes rec. 7/26/25: $233.40-$252.96 $252.96 $252.96 $798,488 Provided Info: TTCA: 7.454 acres with 16 residential buildings housing 134 units having its own roads,4 dry retention areas with a stortmwater drainage system fully contained within its perimeter walls. All RCDU runoffs percolate via internal retention areas with NO contributing runoff to VoT maintained infrastructure (VoT Sec. 74-209 (b) (1). Anticipated: 1) Proper&accurate records were kept by the VoT Utilities Department(VoT Sec.74-212) noting that: (a) Schnars'submission of a 9 page Site Engineering Plans for Tequesta Trace [VoT Sec.74-209(a) (4)]with Sheet 1 was'Paving, Grading&Drainage Plans' Project#00136 Sept. 2000 [Note: Drawing shows an enclosed area where surface drainage flows to street catch basins or to PVC drain basins and/or 3 dry retention area with bottom inlets, and said 8 catch+4 drain basins&6 inlets plus 3 storm man holes then allows excess storm water to ultimately drain/flow to one on-property master dry retention area via a bottom inlet utilizing 2,052 ft. of piping[538'of 10" HDPE (4 sec.), 137'of 15" HDPE (5 sec.),546'of 15" PERF HDPE (5 sec.)and 831'of 15" RCP(10 sec.)]; NONE of TTCA stormwater drainage system connects to and/or discharges into VoT Stormwater System infrastructure(VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (1). (b) Approvals received [VoT Sec. 74-209(b) (4)]: Loxahachee River Environmental Control District approved 6/18/2001 VOT Department of Fire Rescue approved 6/28/2001 VOT Water Department approved 7/5/2001 VOT Building Permit 01-00597 approved on 7/24/2001 VOT's CO of Phase 17 Common(B) Bldg. 109(01-01028), pool,roads, utilities,etc.approved on 9/20/2002 2)VoT Stormwater Utility Director would then discover the error/oversight [VoT Sec.74-209 (a) (7)] and take appropriate steps [VoT Sec. 74-209 (a) (8)] regarding the TTCA residential units. View:The 134 TTCA units may not fully qualify as RCDUs since each of the ERU's impervious areas truly do not impact VoT's Storm- water Utility[VoT Sec. 74-201 (1)],thus said parcels do not individually qualify as a EUR for determining any VoT annual stormwater assessment rates under Article IV, Division 2 Stormwater Utility(VoT Sec. 74- 214 with VoT Sec.74-202). [i.e.:VoVs stormwater management system does not service said 134 TTCA residential units,which is the reason for fee adjustment on all TTCA residential units(VoT Sec. 74-209).] Thank you for your time, attention and consideration. Page 428 of 572 Agenda I W?tA fiment 4 - TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (Plan Only) t _ _ __ __ - - ---r- ------- i { yE� tx c5 C'-MI• 11 � i . 1 � �a riii ''" rep+roar i, a +wt► ti "Fp, Ell ''N a r#r+#7 .` rr,f �'u'is VAffii6�<%w i?a iP'!Cf o�C+' -��ia&r1r or 7 IFJIi r}MFGr ,• _ ti F'.rr4 v a F I�. W saw } {+v4*#u� 1 - ;' 'r i A&C+r�k 1 '4 I l,r.a,+r;Sror awr ti I *t`+••�Y, am + ` k EA,Srrrf 17/L q* �f,•xA6Y , - ;X ELF", +w Y#A iAMW s.# M -MQU 9TAOAKJr POWbum VA" 1 F' ,Y Q Jd y y. - r�4. _ —_ '�_. f f�..Tf I Lt•W N Ow _ s,+rQs }I �,•w'r —as •�+[�'s rf� � �,� �o..•�,', 1 f1f__ xd k#-- �.rO+[ F!L;' STre.['TA f4•#3l0 i Lr11 frlf w I •v. 7 R}i.-`#T ! 4 I ,, 17.GVP+for XLEr r Hx .+igra 1 '• 1 r r rf,'13U r*.,fro Of-fit+ Irk'' .: r ff_wiu 10 y } I U_�RAx,r:41 , 1 d4u ICF � a►r„wj4LL Il*mac, 1 11 } I I F€� ' A,$To b&9f rI��C 7fl /y 1 fir IN �� .' r , r1 I mff AdrfBM..' f{ r I c(,-{uQL '; I ■+ SY11�YAf I�lr Cf}.-•J`r#L�/ �JJIMJ i.F L t rToT c• IFS.AL11F_a4�i Is +lL1.!Wr aS►W r�rf• Rl.. 06 f rr' i[rf c F+r1YiP* .O,dw.7 r --.{� M —s ' r rr.wm $ y4 �k i sr�,rsu# i k Ff:1FI? 1 '� [ ,r,°E` sr ucad PO r r r 4w r ' rrAow 4 ir,-rs' Y' t (�►rr+'l�' 1V�T;A prr,rpprTpva CY,��+bSrAV li Y II a17 N ', y20 4t ? ;f OL"KW r•A1 rF1SfA�# i ' Ir I e i &r-.e.n0sruR^ - F _ y w, lw PAVING AND DRAMAGE LEGEND r - ,y� .•�l md Knoope raT�$T � Rf. #a,r£k.E+++LTION i4t Ite! i Alu9 I {'"}— ..,'H 1 ram_ Gf. GRATE CLEV00M i , `I 1f!rrq ' K1rFf tA'HD •:t..T17�• rf. r1+1EAi ECEV#,iLGhF +[ W4L WJ>., WLr ` Sf4 # +Y�l All .#R po�rtU110H REi,y1CWT$ASH -.._- r FJrDOS fwiSK0$LOOR ELEVk110H POOL� r i , rf,-rim he j �11#.. RD, [ T*lr,L LI11CS af 1 A . 1#rlfOM COI M ys` ++� i #ST{ ipQT�R! ` i , + 1 LUOTN,SIZE Or S10RIt VQJJ4 11Wr+F �{ } A'l,-�/! r f�- 'TEQUEST/k{N4Kg' fYT 1 rf.+ r7 { --a r Pft ' T JWdr+ �� PLAI LWS L piFCM pprFOH rtiil7 rj% EirlSilwG OR FRiSP05E6 EY 01KAr.wFORSI+ra* F•' •••:�� JT1J,aF'l9C+` � id4+iLlr+�rT7 r i .4.'L • 51opM SswErR MANHOLE r'r'ff Vam SrRQCTUAE WORUJLT'DN � r i r M AI'rk4 Lf-'Al r+p`!Re 1 UrSTMG L,IXME5 I . ,qr[-IF r 1.-fiCR+. TrAE'ff llf►L i IAl4pr €uuur.^:ti FtA!66— Nfmv ESL '*' ExsTIMG{1�EwAT14hL 1 r ,p {tdFE pp1[{Y�riAL I k„, F Al f#..�1,+7 Paw E3�0?. tip? f0.GR45E0 ELCYxTLOhI ' F ��r r lfra'4Br lf�TSO Ad'SIM,M f S7�&�4r r TTm'L'aM C $LJ�a- r-'""1 CGkCRE#E SUEwi�S Qj#�,'r F �. _ 1 —pE�ye+YNE r'ivF1F I r F 1 M SSforra AWK tCwCj9E7E OFUVEwa1 `�r 1if cr _X� 99n.C1c PkYEFS TO EX157' '4 1�:7�4rFl Ewa - � .i"7:� fRPr '.iy r. [76i0{iG COr'iCACS�'A"_ ...v TYPE I D �= miill NJi. •-- '_rlf`S<.a, — -------"- -i�'r= . _ _ 31in7Jfi i �tLT $rraw,x T rvpr'P CUF15 i G IER. -• r• �LL MCr RAW +tC I e+SF+'+iC AMId urr'g� ----- i S YciT=-+"` 1 FpPr IiAEr r �i r£AOfA CURB 57A S'ii�taw r,4. r'r --- • cr Ac Ms+M 7f �l 3 _ � �'... -�-�- -- - L= —dm— rRaP05$n CON*out EI EwXt .rY-Y +ram y •. r.�. c►s.i a`.a r r F Page 429 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Documents Recorded wr a l m Beach County — Office of Records Documents Recorded with Palm Beach County Building Building No. Book No. Book Document Marne Reference Phase Number Pages Reference Prase dumber Pages Amendment to OR 14339 0944-1001 Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Declaration of Condominium of S& Section 27.1 Trace,A Condominium OR 14137 0077-0133 Tequesta Trace,A Condominium OR 26035 1827-1828 Exhibit A-Legal Description of the Land Refer to Exhibit B 0134 Exhibit B-I th rou gh 8-17 Legal Descriptions and surveys,Plot Plans and Graphis Descriptions of Improvements for Phases 1through 17in€lusive 0135 111 2 013 -0143 110 1 0144-0150 110 1 OR 15422 1974-1983 11.3 3 0151-0155 113 3 CAR 14166 155 -156 115 4 0 56-0161 115 4 OR 14202 0575-05$4 117 5 0162-0167 117 5 OR 14339 0934-0943 101 6 €16 -0173 101 6 OR 14462 1299-1309 102 7 01.74-0179 102 7 CAR 14462 12 -1298 103 8 0180-01 5 103 8 OR 14676 OG80-0099 104 9 0186-0191 104 9 OR 14749 0420-0429 106 10 019 -1097 106 10 OR 14887 0 31-08Q 108 11 0198-0203 108 11 OR 14961 1000-1009 1.12 12 0204-0209 112 12 OR 14202 055-0594 114 13 0210-0215 114 13 OR14339 0944-0953 116 14 0216-0221 116 14 OR14339 0954-0963 1.05 15 022 -0227 105 15 OR 14868 0 10-0219 107 16 0228-0233 107 16 OR 14749 0410-0419 109 17 02.34-0238 109 17 OR 7529 0445-0463 Exhibit 0 Articles of tncorporationof Tequesta Trace Condominium Association,Inc. 0239-0258 Exhibit D Bylaws of Tequesta Trace Condominium Associations,Inc. 059-0275 Offering Circular for Tequesta Trace Survey PB 95 98-99 Easement Dual CAR 2403 23 -239 Notice of Lien Rights 0R4984 1254-1260 Revised Notice of Lien Rights CAR 7048 655-660 Second Reprised Notice of Lien Rights OR 7187 1.712-1714 NMice of Intent to Assess Tequesta PeninsuI a Assessment Area OR 9360 505-570 Sewer Easement Deed OR 10512 .1949-1952 Standard Devel perAgreernent OR 12245 17 1-1786 1 ater Service A reernent OR 12584 339-361 Page 430 of 572 Agenda Item #16. T ro M 47 LY 3 4�U_�LD C Q fD 17 {t] K`3 47 T LA VQ T-CII CiS,C L4 S r?N C'4 q. 0 - C . C. C 3.. � Yr7 r4 V4 Cy rj C_� YM}M '` Ci 1'!f`+}R�•7 K-,�1 {• G M' {_! �". '} S 1 p� eSi#ti Rif �* rj3 oi f; ram.? fJ err C.1 �. j [`-.t I..; €,Z C[S t r,x vq C J C! r5 {} G: L� l A �lS s� � C► r-�`. d C�_E C�3�_C4il L. r+`17 ; rl Z 3 C?r:: G't t. to LL347 J3 C3 i i W ... ►'� ei _ `� _' Cti[L' "� ,!Cyr iV t'1 re}riy CAS f`i CY_..TR]Cd � C> �. t-. '� �'6 ,C Y L; ci L j �J f_1 f_l(_[E�P_i �. I { [ .1.x s Op • a, fl L; lam-[+.4 J .4.+ rC �� T!e s!0 40 .� qf7+ f; f'` Lt-1= LL'7 r _ R}vl CJ ti xTtiZ \L C YY ti'Y 4"I y rt 4 �"'} + t +.f S IM C; ' �; `[. �'Lif G'3 Ca r r r�r r am? r s*+ + ram! cn ti cv 0 rl C+ -M0 _6 ru? Q Q � L to 6- '"" �]0 C- r�i d-%k CQ 7_j U i }-� }� �y .�� - i3 S? !F„fi- r-r ; 1 F¢ f' �La r�: CT} La 4 C"r3 i' I+ +4 C:} + T Gs # [L"��� t Lv Chi ,-_ 67 f C l 4 J r W [3 tw ["+ yr __ t I 'T7 � %I: C7 � {3 Z.Z C.+ r! r-' �! * r 1 C r i�d C !+a C1 COCV i ti 7 } > CCL SJ U r i, ►� C ir!C�'1 •_ •_ i"}*�ill C=}I,-�c�4=w'+q"�'tr w C; M }F 5;,1 Ci _ Q} i'; # r+i t: * +r.rt Cx �C}i-7 r-r`r r r•• CP n r_'1 t+r• �- '; NomaLL ram. J! �L�� .r - - Cl�Cl CD Yy Q4 0 n 4 M M CD CS CIL C3 C) �i C} miniU Ci } v �' V:C t_. f_ C1 C3 C7 O C?C}C3 C7 G [ O +- T-- .Qr (1f } ;_ ys�• S']yC�1�E73R {�* T, L�- [�1 �`}!* Cwf Cwt C#C+ {'wS Lwt Chi t 4 C+i(![tit r1i i�! .d y } � ■w C� _ �. r f,-� } y ..-. e,i in VP c-3 4 R'! 4i vF 4 Li CD +� 4* L; - i.3 rj F1 Tom ' :- - + TZ In _N4 a% r.RLZ a:L ■CC S) ^ r. C'i ��rj C4 i'.f i''__t�J _�r {'1{`i k'.! 1./ ap /" 4_ rM`1 [:} V_ .-_�+�a-1 fi+�+LL -"yak t'f 1s { 1 f ate + �6. �+ {:` 5 tl r T•t 3�S 3 C w C4�1 C`-0;M W.w!r;C} +� ' ' . (1 1 yn C F [: r r� l f'�T' LJ G L y . U1 ' f 3 Q Cc ui Tsi (4 Lrl CIZ ts'; fi� �rx C� Cd CI rq I r.Z r.i R i '2 {r Qj [ E� CCa 4. 3 e��_�+-3 �.::tra ! � r:r 3 r# p.R r R !`;'S'd f d rr r C i1] 4._ uj M 4} C} f,j r u. -4 l] Q ux CN b 0 � L`J� f�}; en '� Lt- � C7 a*�t-40�Q=4')�CV LO 4P to � �_ s: _� C� J C.3 Qx r� r3 �} l +`T. +fi�rr'� 37 N t C rn 'V" 'pF Chi{'}IT to U ir?RL-1 } #_1 T7 4rt } C (r} .r ry 1J �_R '- r O r � C�O Q i3 Gi C7 0�cp cl 4 clCQ' ��-'+iti c X- %a US r 4 2 j `} Z/, r' r { 1 R -_ O C#N C_�CI7 G7 0 C�C��C)C7 M C}C)C) [.7 Vj r �� �� � ct� �� C�r C14 SON :i r. .. iL:}�rC L_ � Ck �0 Q�G�Cp Cr 0��b�� �L Y � � �► Sl }•`� � C5,� :, 0� .'ti r fij T_ �` r r i-L Cz LL f l .:M r,: 'r i:r ft to cn Cl C Z�j{.) `!C] [� t� r J f1 fJ ,_ ri r: CJ L4 c1 r3 r. „# {' CJ C7 r r- T•r' Fa F', Ci �- ci cr fi {} �- Cy L Cti '� f :d,L`+Y;; _ r s +� {^j r `I`k 4 k , �' L.. { 4y_a o f1 4!' ri�V,� €� C; rj ,k � r 4 } L �'} ;"; F F!_ f ti. 4.01 C,•� S�`5 "I C !- 1"'J C^,{,] }w.. '',....k' _�^`6 Cn � 4r r,! ! 47 C'; T q1 C{ �' } io C w w T - {- [1 C'! 4�{` C1+, rj r-t k F`*L C a C: �`r 4*7 ti_ 7Y U) " "' C*S C1 ] r�r-F�w'4} r-� i -t` ut y Et CP Y1 4 ti: iJ f� �k 'J P'1 C J r r< fi(• C�.I C` i C 1!1 i_3 TI Ifi C••�»C�CS C� __ _�r*C•`C�1�' �_: �- � � may " C1f ' } G} C 1 •�'i +'.-7 r C 1 {'a r.C' C`.C*a C*7 C`*�!C'r-r- - } tS M.. r _� tD � � C 4-;0�� �: C17 ?I 4n C � J t" rr r- {` Lf .i�.: f:7 f~' " C ►+i [+ ;� sir _5r. + q '' -CJ, L�1M�= p per }+ `^ {^- E- r ._- 3 r.r it {- .- U! Ci r } "' �= i s-; uF t:!{+, � y i� �", ` r �_ �i Dr7[7C? .� �iP i"'7 _- C E` t+ �"... t'. .. 4.r Cf: +a r # :# ;1� C? { QC"rM C�)> +CD�,�..t-4 C.'7 C+3 CO COr �- t7 cn 4'f} .b. _ rl_ Aj �+ ` irl i 7 C14 C'a C4 C.1 C4 r,C r i [: r`1 X' C '1 � *# �, �•-- Q] Cy C� f•�f-•a �' �` - _ _ J{J CJ r T7 id7 .C.r _ '� ."� •Lti C/3 C •inRfi �+ :,.4,1 C: T; Ca . 71 ,. I tit ±f r- �" i * �.G. zi r�~ x :� C�rj y.J r 1 "J Cp } ill f - T V� .-LL r # SF# 0 ...,. �� ;s C: c�r-l �r t1Z C+[t"i€�S �CY}C*�t"7 Cr7 Z As � � � to � {.- La ZM L�O fl- Vi M I-rl-C}' �to Cp M 1 rQ LF!Cl-qz�C [V26r ��-+ � �... f-.�`. ry 4�•-' C 7 f r S'� A SIR ram_ + [�- {+] fJ �= C 1'1 r`C� CS CS C:r C"Ji �, ` = C7 O CP O CS�C7 C3 0 0� G 0 Cr C3 d� � ��. � i. rn •' k. ej :2 Q N �" s'r[V N CL rV CV C4 �CV 1y CV C;4 Tr t C••1 � � w. r` C`3- Li r+ 7 _ 3 +M rt` .' '�+ C'J+� �3.� ►f 0 Ct C3 O G Q O�0 C�c)C�C=C)=Cx�0 c A*1 jZ`Fi n S� •.,`+ [�; � � 0 y � r :r # v% en 0 in 0 cn 0 M M 47 m rn an -M T7 LA G; •~ ` i a -. Ll r; � ri ': _ "`'- C� � �S � f"i {'i M C �, R,. sS�J = 1. � � 'R+ 1t ; _ ... R�--�-�. �+ , y.-+ 4 F• j* - L.. k,. k. 2 to S f;i : t� U7 C`► -: tj o® ' .yam ' � r- C P � L _u :.2 3=�i!::1;'J J I J:J :? r �? G} - ` 0 ri ,... Ln SYr{ L_ a,. F 47 0% Up T7 .�t ex cr cv C c#r ry*- r r��' u, „r+ M ;:s Ll $Z_ k r. r , r V ;n = __ Q. f en -. 1 -_ Z .+_ C'i _ _ Cr}_ T L r'3 fii � V C_*1 ' C -' '� {iJ Zn dry CC)4Y3 r:l[ [D!i(_C�[^� U i . LL U r[fir ,�[O# '� f: C7 C'+' L C # C a C:J C R:}C:] C f t i R;}£.!tfr L"1 L7 LT QA }++ .. C'7 - � _•• C,1 C�tom .E+ C-#.-?.- �ft L'i:'_ C] L.L Lk C� : vi { Q , C. * T yr� Y'i`��-!•T- �� C r nC0Cl M „' { _ Li F +� C:; r 0 M�..y _ F_5 Fl ei CJ 4 Tq T` T' rt' T C7 CJ C.t n i.� ti- rr•� 2'� '�„ 'ir' '� r r r r r r r�r•r r•r 'Y r* L! L. _ 71 Ids ;3 }. 16- 0 77- c a 3 r } .r^- _• S [+3 T a_"CD ' CJ r ti 6- Li t,•, 04 Page 431 of 570v2 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TfCA Resoderttial Building Parcei Building No. Phase# Address APT.fD Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 101 6 101 Lighthouse Circle A 6101 60-43-40-30-51- 006-1010 12{5/2002 B 6201 006-2010 C 6202 006-2020 D 6102 006-1020 G 6103 006-1030 H 5204 006-2440 6104 006-1040 J 6203 006-2030 102 7 102 Lighthouse Circle A 7101 60-43-40-30-51- 007-1010 12/16/2002 B 7201 007-2010 C 7202 007-2020 D 7102 007-1020 G 7103 007-1030 H 7204 007-2040 f 7104 007-1040 J 7203 007-2030 103 8 103 Lighthouse Circle A 8101 60-43-40-30-51- 048-1010 1/14/2003 B 8201 008-2010 c 8202 aoa-zazo D 8102 oos-solo G 8103 008-1030 M 8204 008-2040 ! 8104 008-1040 J 8203 008-2030 104 9 104 Lighthouse Clicle A 9101 60-43-40-30-51- 009-1010 2/3/2003 B 9201 009-2010 C 9202 009-2420 D 9102 009-1020 E 9103 009-1030 F 9104 009-1440 G 9105 009-1430 Ft 92G4 009-2040 i 9106 009-1040 J 9203 009-2030 105 15 105 Lighthouse Clicle A 15101 60-43-40-30-51- 015-1010 10/7/2002 B 15201 015-2010 C 15202 015-2020 D 15102 015-1020 G 15103 015-1030 H 15204 015-2040 1 15104 015-1040 J 15203 015-2030 Page 432 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodential Building Parce! Building No. Phase# Andress APT.]D Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 106 10 106 Lighthouse Circle A 10101 60-43-40-30-51- 010-1010 2/25/2003 B 10203 010-2010 C 10202 010-2020 D 10102 010-1020 E 10103 010-1030 F 10104 010-1040 G 10105 010-1030 N 10204 010-2040 10106 010-1040 J 10203 010-2030 107 16 107 Lighthouse Circle A 16101 60-43-40-30-51- 016-1010 2/12/2403 B 16201 016-2010 C 16202 016-2020 D 16102 016-3.020 G 16103 016-1030 H 16204 016-2040 16104 016-1040 J 16203 016-2030 108 11 108 Lighthouse Circle A 11101 60-43-40-30-51- 011-1010 3/24/2003 B 11201 011-2010 C 11202 011-2020 D 11102 011-1020 E 11103 011-1030 F 11104 011-1040 G 11105 011-1030 H 11204 011-2040 11106 011-1040 J 11203 011-2030 110 1 110 Lighthouse Circle A 1101 60-43-40-30-51- 001-1010 6/23/2003 B 1201 001-2010 C 1202 001-2020 D 1102 001-1020 G 1103 001-1030 H 1204 001-2440 1104 001-1040 J 1203 001-2030 111 2 111 Lighthouse Circle A 2101 60-43-40-30-51- 002-1010 9/20/2002 B 2201 002-2010 c zzoz 002-2020 D 2102 002-1020 G 2103 002-1030 Fi 2204 002-2040 2104 002-1040 1 2203 002-2030 Page 433 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodential Building Parcel Building No. Phase# Address APT.ID Unit No, Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 112 12 112 Lighthouse Circle A 12101 60-43-40-30-51- 012-1010 10/1/2002 B 12201 012-2010 C 12202 012-2020 D 12102 012-1020 G 12103 012-1030 H 12204 012-2040 12104 012-1040 J 12203 012-2030 113 3 113 Lighthouse Circle A 3107. 60-43-40-30-51- 003-1010 9/23/2002 B 3201 003-2010 C 3202 003-2020 D 3102 003-1020 G 3103 003-3.030 H 3204 003-2040 3104 003-1040 J 3203 003-2030 114 13 114 Lighthouse Circle A 13101 60-43-40-30-51- 013-1010 10/28/2002 B 13201 013-2010 C 13202 013-2020 D 13102 03.3-1020 G 13103 013-1.030 H 13204 013-2440 13104 013-1040 1 13203 013-2030 115 4 115 Lighthouse Circle A 4101 60-43-40-30-51- 004-1010 10/11/2002 B 4201 004-20I0 C 4202 004-2020 D 4102 004-1020 G 47.03 004-1030 H 4204 004-2040 4104 004-1040 J 4203 004-2030 116 14 116 Lighthouse Circle A 14101 60-43-40-30-51- 014-1010 11/8/2002 B 14201 014-2010 C 14202 014-2020 D 34102 014-1020 G 14103 014-1030 H 14204 014-2040 14104 014-1040 3 34203 014-2030 Page 434 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodentiaf Building Parcel Building Na. Phase# Address AP7.fD Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 117 5 117 Lighthouse Circle A 5101 60-43-40-30-51- 005-1010 11/21/2002 B 5201 405-2010 C 5202 005-2020 D 5102 005-1020 G 5103 005-1030 H 5204 005-2040 5104 005-1040 J 5203 005-2030 Page 435 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Stormwater Management Utility Board (Village Council) Jeremy Allen, ICMA-CM, CPM -Village Manager Allyson Felsburg- Utilities Director(Congratulations) Lori McWilliams, MMC—Village Clerk Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 RE:TTCA's Formal Appeal of the Village's written determination regarding TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal of November 13, 2025 as it refers to TTCA's request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment of August 13, 2025 regarding Agenda Item 23 of the VOT General Council Meeting of August 12, 2025 Resolution No. 13-25: A resolution of the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Florida, adopting the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2026, and authorizing the Village Manager to proceed in accordance with the village's adopted procedures: Providing an effective date; and for other purposes. Request Appeal of VOT's Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment&VOT's TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal Parcel ID: 60-443-40-30-51-001-1020 (TTCA Unit 1102) and 133 Remaining TTCA Unit propereties Dear Tequesta Stormwater Management Utility Board (VOT Council), It was a pleasure having the opportunity to provide testimony the Village of Tequesta Council Meeting on August 12, 2025,where I provided comments under Agenda Item #23 (Resolution No. 13-25) regarding the adoption of Stormwater Utility Fees for FY 2026 and noted that errors, possibly an oversight had occurred. The item was subsequently approved unanimously by Council in accordance with VoT procedures with Council Attorney present. Following the meeting's closure, Marjorie G. Craig, PE -VOT Utility Director and myself had a short meeting as was directed by the VOT Mayor Molly Young where I reviewed my written notes (Attachment 2.Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025)with her and she requested that a fee adjustment request from TTCA be sent in to her attention (See attachment: Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment). During my testimony [Attachment Al (Attachment A2 is Total Council Meeting Transcript)] and comments afterwards, I explained why my unit, along with all 134 Tequesta Trace Condominium Association (TTCA) condominium units, should not be subject to stormwater assessment fees under Division 2, Sec. 74-209 of the Village Code along with the two different July 11, 2025 VOT letters (Attachment B1 & 132) which were followed with emails to and responses from your Utility Department regarding a general notice description (Attachment Cl); and of course the VOT Council Meetings Minutes (Attachment C2) were voted upon and approved Resolution No. 13-25 (Attachment C3). [Please note that VOT Council Meetings Minutes do not properly address my Testimony regarding an error or oversight in VOT assessments.] TTCA maintains its privately held and independent stormwater drainage system,which is not connected to, nor drains to, nor is serviced by, nor benefits from the Village's stormwater infrastructure or stormwater system (construction, maintenance and management). It was also pointed out that the 2025 non-ad valorem stormwater assessment being applied to 134 TTCA condominium units was not aligned with the legal requirement that such assessments must be proportional to and "allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received." [Sec. 74-201 (2)] TTCA's property, including the 134 TTCA condominium units within its walled in area receives no benefit or service whatsoever from VOT's stormwater system because its stormwater infrastructure is entirely private, independent, and not connected to the Village's utility. Sec. 74-211(b)(1) clearly states that the Village's assessment "process does not apply where the stormwater facilities are privately held." 1 Page 436 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Contents Page The Present Situation and Apparent Approach by VOT 2 TTCA's Independent and Privately Held Stormwater Drainage System 5 Development History and Classification 5 Event Timeline 6 Ongoing Maintenance 7 Acknowledgment of External Benefits as General Welfare 7 Added information that may be required [Sec. 74-209 (b)] 7 PSR: Problem—Solution—Result 9 Conclusion 10 Attachments 11 The Present Situation and Apparent Approach by VOT Background: Upon receiving recent mailing of VOT letters in July of this year, it appeared that VOT utilized outside consultants to assist them in preparing their required annually set levels of stormwater utility fees to be accurate and sufficient to ensure that adequate revenues are generated for the fiscal year ending September 301", 2026. Apparently VOT chose to utilized Raftelis (a specialized financial/management consulting firm, strong in water/wastewater utility finance, strategy, and rate studies) who sometimes partners with Kimley-Horn (a large, multidisciplinary engineering, planning, and design firm known for infrastructure (transportation, water, land development) on large projects or studies such as VOT's situation. Then when their efforts are completed,they provide VOT's Utilities Department with the formulas "NAV formula codes" which refers to specific codes and rates used for calculating stormwater utility fees that are based on equivalent residential units (ERUs). Sec. 74-202: Equivalent residential unit and ERU mean the average impervious area of residential developed property per dwelling unit located within the village and as established by separate ordinance of the village as provided in this division. ERU rate means the utility fee charged on each ERU as established by ordinance of the village council as provided in this division. The formula itself determines the specific rate for a given property type/categories like single-family homes (SFH), condos (CON), multi-family homes (MFH), commercial (COM),government (GOV), industrial (IND), and mobile homes (MH). The standard and universally applied formula for calculating Net Asset Value (NAV), including for funds associated with the municipality of Tequesta such as its employee retirement system, is: NAV=(Total Assets - Total Liabilities)/Total Number of Outstanding Shares Where: Formula determines the per-share value of a fund's holdings at the end of each trading day. Total Assets includes the current market value of all portfolio securities(based on closing prices), cash and cash equivalents,and any accrued income or receivables(e.g.,dividends or interest payments). Total Liabilities includes all money owed by the fund,such as management fees,administrative expenses,short- term and long-term debt, and pending dividend payments. Total Number of Outstanding Shares is the total number of units or shares issued to investors in the fund. It may sound simple, but the NAV calculation involves a detailed accounting process to determine the fair market value of all assets and subtract all liabilities. Mutual funds and ETFs are required by the SEC to calculate their NAV at least once daily, typically after the U.S. stock markets close at 4 p.m. Eastern Time. This value then becomes the price at which investors can buy or sell shares of the fund until the next calculation. While the general formula is universal,the specific figures for Tequesta's municipal funds may be unique. (Example:actuarial valuation date for the General Employees' Retirement System,the figures used in their specific liability and asset calculations might include:a) Market Value of Plan Assets(MVA); b)Total Pension Liability(AAL); and c) Net Pension Liability(the difference between the AAL and the Actuarial Value of Plan Assets). These figures are used to manage the pension plan's funding status, not to determine a daily trading price like a typical mutual fu nd NAV. 2 Page 437 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Situation &VOT's apparent approach (As seen from an outsider): VOT's overall NAV formulas are being affected/exposed to an error(134 CON ERU must be removed or can one change the outcome)which effects Total Number of Outstanding Shares (Units) used to calculate NAV and jeopardizes the contribution of every group where the number of ERUs was 1717, it would go to 1583 (almost an 8%drop). This change now may affect the Village Managers responsibility to proceed on behalf of VOT in providing a uniform assessment to all property types/categories in their respective areas [SFH (A, B, C& D), CON, MFH, COM, GOV, IND & MH (VOT's VAC is unaffected)]. That may potentially lead to 10 NAV Formula Codes having to be changed. So now the Village Manager gets involved,for he wants to keep the recently approved Stormwater Rate Resolution for FY26 unchanged or as nearly unblemished as possible. This appears to mean: a) VOT won't abide with Sec. 74-209 (a)(7),thus not alerting PBC (September's 15t"'s deadline petition date for the Clerk of Value Adjustment Board to receive any adjustment to non-ad valorem assessments) of an error and keep things in VOT's control; b) Delay any information from leaking out, especially if TTCA is found to be a completely separate,thus TTCA has a privately held stormwater facility [Sec. 74-211(b)(1)] i) Utilize other code sections to hide/mask the above and enlist TTAC's understanding that it is in their best interest and benefit to pay (i.e.:work in the gray area and not black&white and hide/conceal the facts as best one can); 1) Insist that TTCA obtains benefits from and services provided by VOT's system and to include TTCA properties as presently not served by VOT's stormwater infrastructure elements [Sec.74.201(1)]; 2) Stress that VOT is authorized to imposition all properties within the village with a utility fee (Sec.74-206); 3) Indicate that TTCA is within VOT's area of operation and has received a classification [Sec.74-2071 4) All properties having use of these VOT system services and facilities shall be rendered bills or statements by VOT utility department [Sec.74-208(a)] 5) Indicate that any request for an adjustment of the stormwater utility fee may be required to fulfill [Sec.74-209 (a), especially(2), (4)and last part of(5); 6) Don't bring up or mention [Sec.74-209(a)(7)] 7) Mention the appeal process [Sec.74-209(b)(1-6)and that one has 30 days after a denial to submit a written appeal a. VOT can't determine the amount of on-site impervious area,so TTCA has a problem as well as VOT; b. VOT can change Sec.74-209(b)(3)storm duration criteria,this will impact [Sec.74-209(b)(4); and, c. If need be VOT can ask for stricter yearly reporting from a PE 8) Don't bring up Sec. 74-211 (b)(1), but if it does come up go to Sec.74-211(c),that returns one to Sec 74-207 and 74.208; ii) Possibly by offering partial refunds for FY25 and establish a perpetual credit(but not a full credit for VOT wants to hold on to TTCA's contributions as much as possible)for FY26 and all the following years to TTCA Condo Unit owners; iii) Bottom line: stay in the gray area, don't provide too much information,do everything possible to maintain VOT's revenue/cash flow via Resolution No. 13-25 and associated future resolutions, plus try not to change any established NAV Formula Codes, property classifications or ERU rates. All of the above efforts(VOT's apparent game plan) were followed: first low keyed by the Utilities Department Director Marjorie Craig PE who provide continuous updates, but the process appeared to take way to long [all one has to do is go to the files and pull the appropriate records out, review and share with TTCA(one person possibly 20 minutes, an hour at best if records do exist and were well kept], so initially provide a) VOT's Stormwater Utility Code with highlighted areas (#1,#2 above), b) stressing#3 and #4 above, and c) noting VOT's difficulty in finding its total impervious area repeatedly to TTCA (indicating that TTCA will have a problem as well coming up with their total impervious area), plus d) its units do receive benefits and services from VOT's system (drop any connection to property, stress individuals). 3 Page 438 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Once Tom Jensen PE of Kimley-Horn came back(Timeline Event#40) indicating TTCA was a separate stormwater facility privately held by TTCA on September 19t" (4 days after the PBC deadline date to receive a VOT petition, 31 days since VOT-TTCA meeting on the error issue and 61 days since TTCA notified VOT of errors),things really slowed down in October with legal review [Timeline Items#43 , (Attachment I - Picking one area and forget the others Timeline Events 43 &44) with Response]. Then on October 30t" (Timeline Event#45) Village Manager informed TTCA that the Director was no longer with VOT, contact Allyson Felsburg-VOT Asst. Utility Director in the future. Time passed and finally a meeting was arranged for November 12t" (115 days had passed since TTCA notified VOT of their errors). This meeting lasted for a short 20 minutes and TTCA Board Members were informed within two hours thereafter with an attached yellow highlighted meeting handout,which only provided code sections that VOT wanted to share. Very early the next morning (November 14, 2025 at 12:54 AM) received VOT's proposal (Timeline Event#53) with a 50% Credit, but now requiring not a first year's PE report but a yearly report with stringent requirement(all of which would wipe out any 50%saving from a credit many times over). The new VOT's `Playing Card' appears to require: a) let the effort die and TTCA unit owners accept original fee costs with no further questions asked; or b) jump through hoops for these new terms and get a 50%yearly credit and provide stringent yearly PE signed/sealed reports (cost of reports outweighs the 50%credit); or c) submit an appeal with only a few days left and hope the VOT Stormwater Utility Board has ethics and will do the right thing. (VOT"Ethics and Transparency": We set high standards and are responsible for our personal, professional and organizational conduct and act with integrity. Florida engineers are to prioritize public safety, practicing within competence, being truthful, acting as a faithful agent, and avoiding deception, often summarized in the Engineers' Creed and detailed in Florida Board of Professional Engineers (FBPE) rules, that require specific ethics/law PDH credits for licensure renewal,focusing on integrity, public welfare, and avoiding negligence or dishonest practices; and, d) A question still outstanding: Was there a VOT Utility Board Meeting which was not relayed to TTCA for these new requirements were by VOT Code the 50% proposal was to come from its Director? TTCA has questions and would like another meeting and it appears OK with VOT plus TTCA points out that there are differences between hand written notes and TTCA's email to its Board and that of VOT's proposal the following day. (Attachment G -TTCA Meeting Notes on handout+email &VOT's Proposal). To which VOT rebuttal on November 26, 2025 (Timeline Event#57), asked for clarification and noted once again the 30 day for an appeal reply(sent from VOT Asst. Utility Director), but sent while I was already on the road to Tampa. After returning from Tampa,the questions were prepared (a simple YES/ NO response to save time and for a quick VOT reply) and sent along with TTCA Meeting Notes on handout plus the email to TTCA Board Members for VOT's comparison and notes TTCA understands the appeal time table. Now the next VOT `Play Card' is dropped; with a short timeframe will:TTCA be able to reply. The Village Manager's email noting they are open for a meeting, everything has been done legally, etc.,VOT will not answer the YES/NO questionnaire, and if TTCA wishes to Appeal its 30 days from the VOT-TTCA meeting date of November 12, 2025 (Timeline Event#51) [now for the first time designated as VOT's written determination date (VOT's proposal is not negotiable] or by 5:00 PM December 12th (it is now November 2nd and that now only leaves 10 days. (Attachment H - TTCA s VOT rebuttal 30 days No to & Questionnaire). An Event Timeline follows further down, with additional summarized details and specific details are also noted in more detail found in Attachment D—Event Timeline, a listing of events. 4 Page 439 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement TTCXs Independent and Privately Held Stormwater Drainage System All runoff from TTCA's 16 residential buildings and associated unit impervious areas within its perimeter walls flows exclusively into TTCA's stormwater drainage system {Previously provided on Aug. 16, 2025:TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 [Attachment 4—TTCA Site Plan Sheet 1 of 9 (Plan Only)}. TTCA's system consists of its own drain points, piping, manholes, and dry retention areas,which are self-contained and not tied to VoT's stormwater system [Confirmed by the VOT Director (Sec. 74-203 (b) by email which indicated TTCA's system does not connect to or drain to VOT's system per outside engineer (Tom Jensen) on September 19, 2025 (Timeline Event#40) and said: "you are correct"; thus TTCA's privately held system is 100% (not 50+%) [Attachment E - TTCA's Amendment to its Declaration to add Phase 17 (23 pages that also includes SFWND Standard General Permit 50- 05072-P with 4 Exhibits: 3a, 3b, 3c&4)] is a stand-alone from VOT's system [does not meet Sec. 74-201 (1), nor can any said VOT costs to the extent practicable, be allocated in the relationship to benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom—Sec. 74-201 (2)]. Accordingly,the Village's stormwater infrastructure does not provide collection, disposal, or groundwater regulation services to TTCA properties [thus the properties receive no benefits nor services from VOT's system,though the residents do receive general welfare -Sec. 74-203 (a)]. As noted above and during VOT Council Meeting of August 12, 2025 (Timeline Event#28),followed immediately by a meeting with VOT Utility Director Marjorie G. Craig, PE after the conclusion of said VOT Council Meeting (Timeline Events#29) and multiple occasions via email there after: TTCA's stormwater drainage system does not connect to or drain to VOT's system, does not need to be serviced by VOT's system nor any shared capacity use of VOT's system, never requires any capital need past or future from VOT, does not benefit from any existing or proposed VOT construction for it is independent, separate and privately held and maintained by TTCA. Thus no capital contribution,fee in lieu, non-ad valorem for VOT stormwater construction, debt service, or maintenance should apply to TTCA, as approvals and COs were granted contingent on TTCA's self-contained privately held drainage infrastructure—Sec. 74-211 (b) (1) The process does not apply where the stormwater facilities are privately held. Now that the facts are exposed and per the Director's comments on September 2nd (Timeline Event#37): If it is found that Tequesta Trace(TT)doesn't drain to the village infrastructure,I don't know how they(Kimley-Horn/Raftelis)may have calculated the impact of the Tequesta Trace residents on the rest of the Village stormwater infrastructure that the TT residents use as they utilize the roads, etc. We'll get to the bottom of it and if a refund is due, we'll get to the bottom of that, too. My apologies for the delay. Covering bases here: both Kimley-Horn (have to find out if there are any other communities like TTCA that don't fit into the EUR definition and can't be charged) and Raftelis (may have to reevaluate their entire NAV program for VOT,their unit protocols and Formula Codes per each of the 10 NAV Types. Development History and Classification TTCA was developed in 17 phases, Parcel "R", with cabana Bldg. 109, pool,tot-lot, driveways, sidewalks, streets and open common areas (see Palm Beach County Records OR 14137/77, dated 09/11/2002),with Certificates of Occupancy (COs) issued by the Village for each phase [Lists and attachments provided September 19, 2025 to Director; see detailed lists plus previous Attachments 5 &6:TTCA Recorded Documents and Builder's Applications,VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs and a complete list of TTCA Units (Attachment 7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units)]. While classified under Sec. 74-207 as "Residential Developed Property,"TTCA units function as a sub-class of residential units. They do not meet VoT's technical definition of ERUs (Equivalent Residential Units), as their impervious areas reside within TTCA's perimeter wall and are exclusively managed therein by TTCA's own privately held Stormwater management system. 5 Page 440 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Event Timeline(also refer to Attachment D - Event Timeline, a Listing of Events for further details) CaL ff5 Q C rA t . fu W 4k w O wL O "_A C e*1 �- ti eo ++ _ by " 00 Q �..,.�„.3 '�` d "' _ �i y .� C CL LO Ln LA in � Ln us Lly a tra p p ` Li O un b m a E $ 4J a4oe �r Ln d ar ,a or ' , o eq ' r4- 3 c ' m J.v as v, �, ' to �S - o ❑ Z V E i Lr-d o q� � ry mba a M ro = a O N ° L7 u5 ii o ra a 4 L" ar a ai v R s <9 - qq> w ~ ^4 W ° ' 3 N rg o vw4i d u,qr ° �i S emirs CO E 'It En tom- u, Ln u, Ln Ln r rW 01 ^ N N f�} tyj A Q N in O C D C f 'i r4 y nd � � pq Ln N 'r _.+?: m d Ot LM r` w L LO 'gyp Lri Fj V Ln Ln Lrl� {y C ra U F 0 G CO v AU to Ui Ln 1w c V 6f O' p N u C , p, gyp,4 O C ao rJ�o c = o t-RJ J-- c G 4 Fes++Ga C ` V IE ry�L y} L. = y !q iq f�-1 P ba F I► P Q1 C o �ue u o cai y ae ° E 9 r+ O N � IJ v� °�O p O �rt- ° V u � E w 2 +� V! `` z C C b y E ..-'fo 'Fro ee m 'ic ,� O 4C rc can ''° '° k` `4 R a m Fto {" zcar- Rum oc�uNLU w- ° ry r-A f e++f+-nr rw r►. r..ut Vr Ln LA Ln w u M on u, vt L" Ln tft ry vs to cr7 vs u5 rad N sv ry r d ry rd rid N 00 i V R' oD oD 06 Oh �5 In C5 11 r� ftj CA W m m m m m m ar v LO a Ln n a � [w m O Q1 tiro o C4 04 ri C Q i i .4%0 Y = Liz C QQ G re w 'a1/.1 f1 m fY ry m 4 " p = + Lu 'a �w A C. c = Q O G`� € 79 '� ' m 7 M 1-0 R is vi CY ¢r LL 7 9,- •- O off s-� L 01 O w+ i+A rr Y #+ y C M E w,c u W +� 4 tin _'-' m Ca c w O y6 -�� E r, At E a�a,emu�_a0+ � 62 � < 41 in O o r'u ao o 0 W ., m m E m E a�i w w m U 4k to a ne c �' w* , ,e `^ m m C C]C *1 Q 4 o 3 3 L- �+ � � py �� a ,Y " � °c#s �Jm f = E� E E �°� U CQ fJ u1 aC ry Z il,ZV1 w m M:p Ln In ti[F w rrt ry�f]W +M.pti npr pv m �pv G m L+ 6A u4 N U1 Lf5 Ln m m m ai mO� O O G7 O O W d W r`d w n ,n �f-q {ny o m rY+ O ry "+ a�v, N r N tD w U7 L �o f I N1 .40 95 u't 1 1 O ry fU ry rl ry ry pit N W + Q ■ Q rq W M 00 r�r/3 r'4 Ln ri�,,,�I"ti 11Y tS1 41 q SO Vt f� r�L OG C4 WiV W W s-'f Cfl - Q W G N V+ im P [� w- dn CO C4 N to E AF P. kry Y'� V 1 O-4 N M s Le" �f,w Ot Q-r N [+rY 7 Vl Lh iti u0 M a � r4 ry t+� Ln W n os#ti rti w w f+w. iv nl re ry re C4 av sv N rn M t„ � In ., u co ba m U c, i7tl a� w 4 m 0 D� � � Gl -M � w 5: u a� U z U i Q 6 Page 441 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Ongoing Maintenance TTCA has continually maintained its stormwater system at its own expense [Note:Tequesta Trace (FKA Lighthouse Key)] A requirement imposed on by SFWMD with wording for 18.2.5 and 18.2.5.1 & 2 before receiving their permit No. 50- 05072-P Date Issued:July 25, 2001 to proceed and LRECD final plan approval on December 18, 2000 [Timeline Events #10	 Information provided on September 19, 2025 to VOT Director(Timeline Event#40) and TTCA Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace, A Corporation on September 9, 2002 Palm Beach OR BK 14137 Pages 0077—0133]. South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit No. 50-05072-P for Tequesta Trace, a Condominium -Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P Date Issued:July 25, 2001 with Certificate of Service by Anthony M. Waterhhouse, P.E., Director Surface Water Management, Palm Beach Service Center having Enclosures: Environmental Resource Permit Charter 40E-4(10/95) 40E-4.321 Duration of Permit; Notice of Rights; General Conditions; Special Conditions,Site Engineering Plan for Lighthouse Key,Village of Tequesta, Florida; Permit Summary Sheet (Exhibit-A, B&C) and Staff Report Distribution List (Exhibit 4) included City of Tequesta Engineer [Palm Beach Book No. 15220 Pages 0445-0463 (for Phase 17)Attachment F-TTCA's Amendment to its Declaration to add Phase 17] 2013: Shenandoah Construction performed cleaning, repairs and inspection. July 2025:Above All Plumbing completed cleaning, confirmed system integrity, and verified no unauthorized connections to VoT's system. (I personally reviewed findings on site with project manager and crew on August 1, 2025.) November-December 2025 site repairs from certain downspouts after heavy rains in October 2025 by Jupiter Lawncare. All costs of maintenance, repair, and management are funded directly by TTCA through assessments to its 134 TTCA condominium unit owners,without reliance on Village services. Acknowledgment of External Benefits to Residents as General Welfare We recognize that the Village's stormwater infrastructure may benefit TTCA owners, residents, and visitors outside the perimeter walls of the property [residents do receive general welfare-Sec. 74-203 (a)]. However, within Tequesta Trace,the system is fully self-sustaining, privately held and separate from VoT's infrastructure or stormwater system. Added information that may be required [Sec. 74-209 (b)] While TTCA did not receive a final/formal denial from the Director of its Request for Fee Adjustment [Timeline Event #31 (Attachment-TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment)], it may consider to be approved by the Stormwater Management Utility Board via Village Manager Jeremy Allen's email of December 2, 2025 12:52 PM noting November 12, 2025 as the designated VOT's written determination date (another VOT`Play Card':VOT's proposal is not negotiable] and thus requiring the following from Sec.74-209 (b): (1) Existing or special characteristics of the site or parcel for which the adjustment is made; Tequestta Trace,a condominium, description of Phase 17: Parcel "R", "Tequesta Trace",according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 95, Pages 98 and 99,of the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Said lands situate in the Village of Tequesta (VOT), Palm Beach County, Florida,and contain 3.197 acres, more or less,which is part of the entire complex that also includes Phases 1-16: Parcels"A—P"for a total contained 7.454 acres, more or less. TTCA is a condominium association (f.s. 718) on 7.454 acres with 16 residential buildings housing 134 units having its own roads,4 dry retention areas with a stortmwater drainage system (privately held)fully contained within its perimeter walls. All RCDU runoffs percolate via internal retention areas with NO contributing runoff to VOT maintained infrastructure(VOT Sec. 74-209 (b) (1). 7 Page 442 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement (a) Schnars'submission regarding Phase 17, Parcel "R",common area was a 9 page Site Engineering Plans for Tequesta Trace [VOT Sec.74-209(a) (4)]with Sheet 1 was'Paving,Grading& Drainage Plans' Project#00136 Sept. 2000 [Summary Note: Drawing shows an enclosed area where site grading and inlets will route excess stormwater runoff [i.e.: surface drainage flows to street catch basins or ditch bottom inlet or to PVC drain basins(all of which are interconnected]to four dry retention areas/four exfiltration trench segments(where 3 dry retention areas with bottom inlets interconnect using 8 catch basins+7 ditch bottom inlets&4 12" PVC drain basins plus 3 storm man holes which allows excess storm water to ultimately drain/flow between them and to one on-property master dry retention area via a bottom inlet utilizing 2,052 ft.of piping[538'of 10" HDPE (4 sec.), 137'of 15" HDPE (5 sec.), 546' of 15" PERF HDPE(5 sec.)and 831'of 15" RCP(10 sec.)];the surface water management(SWM)system is 100%on- site retention (up to the predicted 3-day, 25-year stage per SFWMDER Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P, Permit Summary Sheet(copied to VOT Engineer July 25,2001]; All RCDU runoffs percolate via internal retention areas with NO contributing runoff to VoT maintained infrastructure(VOT Sec.74-209(b) (1); NONE of TTCA SWM system/ stormwater drainage system connects to and/or discharges into VOT Stormwater System infrastructure. (b) Approvals of Phase 17 Parcel "R" (TTCA's common area site plan) received [VOT Sec. 74-209(b) (4)]: Loxahachee River Environmental Control District approved 6/18/2001 [also noting SFWMDER Standard General Permit No.50- 05072-P,Permit Summary Sheet(copied to VOT Engineer July 25,2001)]; VOT Department of Fire Rescue approved 6/28/2001 VOT Water Department approved 7/5/2001 VOT Building Permit 01-00597 approved on 7/24/2001 VOT's CO of Phase 17 Common(B) Bldg. 109(01-01028),pool,roads,utilities,etc.approved on 9/20/2002 (c) TTCA is a condominium association (f.s. 718) having 16 residential buildings containing 134 condo units, 3—10PIex buildings and 13—8PIex buildings[provided by Centex Homes that received proper permitting and COs from VOT [Information previously provided to VOT at and noted in previous attachment#6 Builder's Applications,VOT Permits, FOR Letters,and COs on August 16, 2025 to VOT Director with previous attachment#7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing(Bldg. No., Phase#,Address,APT. ID, Parcel Unit No., Parcel ID with Unit and building CO date) and Response Attachment C-General Grid List of Applications, Permits, FOR letters and COs in Response with VOT List of Permits issued to Centex for Tequesta Trace to Director on October 13,2025]; (2) The amount of on-site impervious area; There has been no building coverage or pavement changes from the proposed project design as first submitted to VOT and SFWMD where pavement(2.44 acres)and building coverage(2.67 acres) has not changed,thus the total site impervious area 5.11 acres is unchanged as noted in SFWMDER—Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P report issued on July 25, 2001 Exhibit#B noting Environmental Summary(part of the SFWMDER Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P, Permit Summary Sheet(also copied to VOT Engineer July 25, 2001)]. (3) Twenty ,five-year frequency, 24-hour duration storm criteria(will be the minimum standard recognized by the director); From SFWMDER Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P, Permit Summary Sheet(also copied to VOT Engineer July 25, 2001),SFWMD determined that the project [known as Tequesta Trace(FKA Lighthouse Key)] features 100%on-site retainage [up to the predicted 3-day, 25-year stage based on .66 acres dry detention and 545 LF Exfiltration Trench **[Recent survey:864 LT of Exfiltration Trench and WTRM acreage 0.79 acres(December 7, 2025)see below] (4) Ponds, exfiltration systems or positive drainage facilities must meet applicable village,state and federal requirements, including groundwater protection devices and outfall treatment conveyance systems required by all governing bodies; From SFWMDER Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P, Permit Summary Sheet(also copied to VOT Engineer July 25, 2001),SFWMD determined that the project [known as Tequesta Trace(FKA Lighthouse Key)],a)will not cause adverse secondary or cumulative impacts to water resources, b) is not contrary to the public interest, c) project site did not contain any wetlands or other surface waters,and d)features 100%on-site retainage [up to the predicted 3-day, 25-year stage] based on .66 acres dry detention and 545 LF Exfiltration Trench **[ Recent survey: 864 LT of Exfiltration Trench and WTRM acreage 0.79 acres(December 7,2025 by two retired civil engineers)] 8 Page 443 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement **Survey findings of 3 enclosed walled property Dry Retainage Areas&one main exterior Dry Detention Area (12/7/2025) SZ=Splash Zone WTRM Location Distance between Bldgs.-SZ Width Length Acres 1. 100 LT Exfiltration Trench Behind Buildings 102& 103 (52.5-6.7) 45.8' 115.96' 0.12 2. 227 LT Exfiltration Trench Behind Buildings 105-107& 114-116 (45'-6.7') 38.3' 241.67' 0.21 3. 355 LT Exfiltration Trench Behind Buildings 113-115-117&W. P.Wall (30'-3.3') 26.7' 381.06" 0.23 4. 182 LT Exfiltration Trench Entire area between 187&209 Tequesta Drive 51' 205' 0.23 864 LF Exfiltration Trench Possible increase in rainfall capacity=59%,say 30%for safety 5. 0.66 acres Dry Detention "WTRM Acreage"Water Treatment Management Areas,-20%increase 0.79 From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT'S HANDBOOK VOLUME II,Appendix C:Isohyetal Maps from SFWMD Technical Memorandum, Frequency Analysis of One and Three Day Rainfall Maxima for central and southern Florida,Figure C-8,3-Day Rainfall,25-Year Return Period,Tequesta is in the 13"area [extra 25%storage area=(30%+20%)/2 would raise amount to z16.25"]; Figure C-6, 1-Day Rainfall, 100-Year Return Period,Tequesta is in the 14"area. (5) Ponds, exfiltration systems or positive drainage facilities must be maintained according to village standards, and must function in accordance with the required village design standards;and The'Ongoing Maintenance' section above provided evidence as to some of the maintenance efforts performed over the years which are in line with imposed required on SFWMD wording for 18.2.5 and 18.2.5.1&2 of TTCA's Declaration before receiving their permit No. 50-05072-P Date Issued:July 25, 2001 to proceed and is still followed today(Information provided on September 19, 2025 to VOT Director and TTCA Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace,A Corporation on September 9,2002 Palm Beach OR BK 14137 Pages 0077-0133). TTCA properly maintains(as noted above under section Ongoing Maintenance)while operating efficiently. [The system has been properly maintained and endured two 2004 hurricanes(Jeanne and Frances),a January 9, 2014 11+" rainstorm and a 8+" rainstorm this past October] (6) Adjustments will not be granted for swimming ponds, reflection pools, existing open ditch systems and swales. N/A PSR Approach: Problem—Solution—Result Problem: What is the problem: Stormwater Utility Non-ad Valorem Rates and Adoption of Annual Stormwater Assessment Roll in the Village of Tequesta, Florida against 134 TTCA Condominium Units at Tequesta Trace,Tequesta, Florida are unwarranted. Solution: VOT and TTCA to mutually agree that: 1) TTCA's stormwater system does not connect with or drain to VOT's stormwater system; 2) Both stormwater systems are independent from each other financially, operationally, maintenance wise and managerially; 3) TTCA's stormwater system has received proper state, county and VOT approvals in the past which therefor precludes the need for any further approvals and or restrictions; 4) While neither TTCA's property nor that of its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties, receive any services or benefits enjoyed regarding the collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulations of groundwater from VOT's stormwater management system, its residents my experience general welfare of VOT's system when they are exterior of TTCA's walled-in area; 5) Neither TTCA property nor that of its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties properly fit existing or future property classification for determining a utility fee,for they as noted above in#4 receive no services nor enjoy any benefits from VOT's stormwater system for TTCA Unit Owners privately hold operate, maintain,finance and manage their own stormwater drainage system; and, 6) TTCA's property and that of its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties are to be removed forever from any proposed or further established annual stormwater assessment rate rolls or fees in lieu or other capital contributions to VOT. 9 Page 444 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Result: VOT and TTCA to mutually agree that: 1) VOT's Stormwater Utility Code stays intact and relevant to the above solutions; 2) VOT's Stormwater Utility Non-ad Valorem Rates and Adoption of Annual Stormwater Assessment Roll in the Village of Tequesta, Florida will reflect proper legally accepted fiscal year rates for per Equivalent Residential, Nonresidential and Undeveloped Units associated with NAV type classifications (SFH, CONDO, M FH, COM, GOV, I N D, M H and VAC); and, 3) TTCA and 134 TTCA condominium unit properties will once again regain their true status in the community as originally intended by state, county and VOT governments plus federal and state regulators such as LRECD and SFWMD. Conclusion TTCA and its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties are: 1) Within a perimeter walled in area; 2) Completely serviced by TTCA's privately held storewater drainage system [Sec.74-211(b)(1) is met] that meets and exceeds SFWMD's requirements as noted in Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P issued July 25, 2001: a. Said system collects 100%on-site retention (up to the predicted 3-day, 25-year stage) if not mores; b. Water quality treatment equivalent to 2.5' times the percentage of impervious will be provided in the interconnected dry detention/exfiltration system; c. The site does not contain any wetlands or other surface water; d. No adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of Parcel "R" (Phase 17) construction; and, e. SFWMD determined that the system will not cause adverse secondary or cumulative impacts to the water resources and is not contrary to the public interest; 3) Regarding the collection and disposal said area's rainfall stormwater: a. While VOT's system is adjacent to TTCA 7.45 acres (west and north),there is not connection or drainage to VOT's stormwater elements of their system [Sec. 74-201(1)]; b. Thus the TTCA and 134 TTCA condominium unit properties receive no benefits nor is provided any services from VOT's collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulation of groundwater [Sec. 74- 201(1) is not met along with being charged for any availability charge, cost of construction or fee in lieu costs noted in Sec. 72-202,for they cannot meet to the extent practicable since 0% is the allocated relationship to any benefits enjoyed and services received from VOT's system [Sec.74-201(2)]; c. Additionally TTCA and it 134 TTCA condominium unit properties do not meet present standards for ERUs and thus there are no ERU rate (utility fee)that can be charged the these units are outside of the criteria used to establish said rate (no services are benefits are received from VOT's system); and d. Appeal section Added information that may be required noted above fulfills Sec. 74-209 (b) (1-6) is hereby incorporated to assess the VOT Stormwater Management Utility Board's review. While VOT should check via Kimley-Horn if there are other unique communities and may have to adjust through Raftelis their NAV formula codes which refers to specific codes and rates used for calculating stormwater utility fees, that are based on equivalent residential units (ERUs),TTCA and its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties are not a part of the NAV formula code system nor are VOT's and TTCA's stormwater system connected,they are separate and independent from each other financially, operationally, maintenance wise and managerially, plus TTCA and its 134 TTCA condominium unit properties do not receive any services nor are any benefits enjoyed regarding the collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulations of groundwater from VOT's stormwater management system, but its residents may experience general welfare of VOT's system when they are exterior of TTCA's walled-in area. 10 Page 445 of 572 Agenda Item #16. TTCA Appeal to VOT's Proposal / Judgement Attachments For your review, please find attached regarding Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment and its Appeal: Attachments previously sent to VOT Utility Director: Emails between Tomes and VoT(VOT has their records) Tomes Notes [Attachment 2.Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025] Two different VoT July 11, 2025 letters [Attachments B1 & B2] TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 [Attachment 4-TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (plan Only)] TTCA Recorded Documents [Attachment 5 TTCA Recorded Documents] Builder's Applications,VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs [Attachment 6. Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs] Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing [Attachment 7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units] Attached for your review regarding Appeal to VOT's Determination RE: Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment Binder 1 - TTCA Appeal to VOT Proposal TTCA Appeal to VOT Proposal Attachment Al-Testimony on Agenda Item 23 VOT August Council Meeting Attachment A2—Total August 12,2025 Council Meeting Testimony Attachment 131—VOT Letter July 11, 2025 notice of Meeting to Adopt Annual Stormwater Assessment Roll Attachment B2—VOT Notice of Public Hearing to Add Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Rates Attachment C1—VOT Notice of Public Hearing to impose and Collect Annual Stormwaterr Assessments Attachment C2—VOT Council Meeting August 2005 Minutes Agenda Item#23 Attachment C3—VOT Resolution No. 13-25& Exhibit A Approved Attachment D—Event Timeline,a listing of events Attachment E-TTCA Site Plan Sheet 1 of 9 Attachment F-TTCA's Amendment to its Declaration to add Phase 17 Attachment G-TTCA Meeting Notes on handout+email &VOT's Proposal Attachment H -TTCA s VOT rebuttal 30 days No to&Questionnaire Attachment I -Picking one area and forget the others Timeline Events 43&44 Attached for your review regarding Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment Binder 2-TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Attachment 2.Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 Attachment 4.TTCA Site Plan,Sheet 1 of 9(plan Only) Attachment 5 TTCA Recorded Documents Attachment 6. Builder's Applications,VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs Attachment 7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units Response to VoT October 13th's communiques Response to VoT October 13th's communiques with Attachment A Tomes' VoT Council Meeting Notes Attachment B VoT's Email of September 8, 2025 Attachment C General Grid List of Applications, Permits, FOR Letters and COs 11 Page 446 of 572 Agenda Item #'Attachment An. Testimony on Agenda Item 23 VOT August 12,, 2025 Council Meeting Village of Tequesta - Regular VOT Council Monthly Meeting-Aug 12 2025 Started at 6:01PM and lasted to 9:02:38 PM (Total of 3 hours, 1 minute, and 38 seconds. Transcript of interested section is Agenda Item 23 of the VOT General Council Meeting Starting at 2:23:47 to 2:31:58 Time: 8:24:47 August 12, 2025 at VOT Council Chambers at Village Hal1,345 Tequesta Drive,Tequesta, Florida 33469 Molly Younp, VOT Mayor Okay. Moving on to the next agenda item 23, resolution number 13-24, adopting our storm water utility fees for next fiscal year. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department Good evening. Mar Marjorie Craig, utilities director, and this is the um a request to approve the annual um stormwater rates for the stormwater enterprise fund. And we do that through anon-ad velorum assessment on the annual fee tax role. Uh like most of the stormwater utilities in Palm Beach County, um we're recommending the resolution and revised fee schedule increasing the stormwater rates by 5%for fiscal year 2025.That equates to about$4.51 annually for the base residential rate and that equates to about 38 cents per month. And I realize that that is another increase, but it is something that's sorely needed by our stormwater system. We are responsible for the operating and um maintenance of our stormwater system and for the MPDS which is just a um an acronym for the um uh county permitting stormwater permitting and compliance requirements. So there's a lot of things that we are required to do by law to maintain our stormwater system. And as you know, I have stood up here and talked about um our stormwater system and the needs that we have. And we have tried everywhere we canto get grants.You're also aware of that. We have a current grant for the Dover Ditch project for improvement. And um we spent over$2.6 million over the last five years um to work to keep up with the maintenance of our system. And the biggest bang for the buck right now is stormwater pipelining uh to get ahead of those failing stormwater pipes. Um as a part of your packet um we have a recommended resolution for that rate increase uh also exhibit A um the proposed stormwater rates and then a rate comparison of the village with other storm water utilities in the area. And we fall just a little bit to the right of the middle. Um and um then our net position and storm water budget. Um uh so that's our current rates and then our,what we have planned for the coming year and what our net position is. And then we also included the proof of publication to our um to our residents and customers. Uh we did send out we posted it on the county website. Um and then also we sent out a letter to everyone. So with that, do you have any questions? Molly Young, VOT Mayor Thank you, Marjorie. Council, any comments or questions? None.Thank you, Marjorie. No, ma'am.Thank you.Thank you.Thank you.And I will say unlike the previous agenda item,this one I'm really um pleased. I know we're taking half think of the water utility tax to fund this year. So again,there we thought,you know, looked outside the box, so we don't have to charge more than the 5%this year.So I'm very pleased with that.Thank you. Page 447 of 572 Aq"n 80item4myor Any public comment cards? Lori McWilliams, MMC VOT Clerk/Admin PIO Yes,we have Michael Tomes. Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Good evening. Thank you, Mayor,Vice Mayor, and uh council. Michael Tomes, resident of Tequesta Trace, 110-D Lighthouse Circle. I'm a past civil engineer, multiple states, including Florida. Retired -white hair. uh the village council. Uh I'd like to have the minutes of this section sent to me. Um I received on your July 11th letter on July the 20th which indicated that my personal increase was going to be of around $97. And then I sent my email into them. I understand section uh village section 74.201 bracket 2 uh regarding the cost of operating the system and I know it has to be done and I'm fully behind that and it's to be allocated in a relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received there from. BUT Tequesta Trace and it's 134 units receive no service. We don't connect to the storm water system. We're self-contained. I understand section 74.202 definitions and what ERU means.And under one, the cost system and services which service each individual resident. Once again,this is not the case for Tequesta Trace. We maintain our own service. We have our own storm system. We have our own roads. It's a small section. Um,we are approximately uh 6%of the population of the village at Trquesta, but in the uh ERU units,we would make up about 8%. The issue is the association owns and maintains its own storm water system. I informed the Village uh on the 20th when I got the letter and they sent me a second notice back in response uh that they received it on the 21st. And then in the mail, I got a restatement of the letter of which the rates were different than the first letter quoted to me.And the estimates of the money that you're gathering was different.The estimate was initially written down as 6,26 $627,000. The new revised number on the new letter was$748,488. 27% increase my rate was the whole issue that I was presenting to the board through my email was so that the person in charge of doing this estimate would actually follow their own advice and rules and acknowledge that there was an error made. We,Tequesta Trace are not in your stormwater system. We get our water there.We pay our sewer bills, everything else, BUT we're not in your system. Why are we being charged?That's 134 units. Myself, my fellow members, I didn't receive an answer. Molly Young, VOT Mayor Okay,sir. Um, unfortunately, your time's up, but maybe Marjorie can come up. Can you address some of these questions on the spot if you wouldn't mind?Thank you. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department I I'm going to have to get with him because I don't know.This was all calculated and and put together,you know, through another system. I don't know. I'll have to check into what he's talking about because I'm not. Could sir, could Page 448 of 572 Ag,eadaJt*wAJE%rn your contact information so we can get in touch with you and address some of these questions after the meeting? Molly Younp, VOT Mayor Yeah.Thank you. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department I'm sorry. Molly Young, VOT Mayor Okay. If if if sir if you maybe just leave your email with the clerk just to be sure before you leave tonight that would be great. Okay,you have it. Perfect. Thank you. We will absolutely get back in touch with you. All right. Is there any other public comment? Okay. Can I get a motion? So move. Second. All in favor? [Unanimously Approved] moving on. don't know. Page 449 of 572 Ag%ya A2 - Total August 12,, 2025 VOT Council Meeting Transcript Village of Tequesta - Regular VOT Council Monthly Meeting-Aug 12 2025 Started at 6:01PM and lasted to 9:02:38 PM (Total of 3 hours, 1 minute, and 38 seconds). Author:Village of Tequesta Transcript I mean, I love her, but man,jeez. Give her another minute. Yeah. Are you guys all going to be there this week um in Orlando?Thursday and I have to leave Friday night to take their train back. I have to do a presentation. So come back. Excuse me. [Applause] All right. Good evening, everyone. I'd like to call the meeting to order. It is 6:01 p.m. August 12th, 2025, and this is our regular council meeting. Lori, can I get roll call, please? No problem. Okay. Mayor Molly Young here.Vice Mayor Stori here. Council member Brandon here. Council member Painter here. Council member French here. You and the invocation and pledge of allegiance will led by Vice Mayor Story. You'll join me in a moment of prayer. Dear heavenly father, thank you.Thank you for this day.Thank you for the opportunity to gather here tonight with residents and people that really really care about the village of Tqua. Be mindful that everyone here, be it staff, members of the council, residents have worked a full day and they've debated all day long and they've discussed issues. And please give us a clear mind and an open heart as we may hear different opinions and that's okay. Um, I will give thanks to our first responders.As I've said in prior invocations,they leave their house every day and they leave their family to protect people they may never meet again.And for that, we are always very grateful.There's a lot going on in the world. Uh please guide, guard, and watch over the people that run the United States. Uh our troops that are here and abroad. and may um the people that are running our country have the same care, compassion, and conviction that I know the people and the residents and the council members of Toquesta have. Guide guard and watch over us as we finish out this week. In your name we pray. Amen.Amen.Join me for the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Can I get a motion to approve tonight's agenda?So moved. Second. All in favor? I. Okay. Our first presentation today, agenda item one, presentation by United Way of Palm Beach County for hunger action month and a proclamation declaring September 2025 as hunger action month in the village of Dquesta. I do not believe anyone from United Way is here. Nope. So,we'll skip the presentation and we will not read the proclamation in for record. Agenda item two is our legislative presentation by our lobbyist, Ken Puit. Ken, I believe you're joining us via Zoom. Can you see me yet? Nope. I apologize. Um, my video doesn't seem to be working. No problem.We can hear you loud and clear though, so if you want to Okay,the floor is yours. Well,thank you and I apologize for not being there in person and appreciate you all being uh accommodating me uh via Zoom. Um I have a brief legislative update for you. As you know, we've uh the legislature ended on June 16th after 105 days in the legislative session. And uh Lori, do you have that the um are we on slide one? Hold on just a second, Ken. Okay,thank you. So they were they were in session for 105 days and which is normally they go through a 60-day legislative session and uh there was uh obviously some differences of opinion uh particularly between the house and senate but they did uh resolve all those and so we're uh they sided on June 16th. Page 450 of 572 AgeiWafteMo#j Cb be just a minute if you want to I have to pull it out. So, um just to fill you in,there were 1,959 bills that were filed. Of that 1,959, 269 actually passed and then we had uh 11 vetos by the governor. uh the state budget overview. Uh just to give you a perspective of it, in the 2004 legislative session,they passed a 116.5 billion budget and the budget that they uh passed and this took effect on July 1st. Had a 1.2% reduction. Uh so the the total budget the state budget's 115.1 billion and then the governor issued 567 million worth of vetos. The reserves are in the 20 plus billion range which is excellent for the state. Obviously, uh the bond rating, uh just to kind of give you a perspective for every family in Florida, uh the debt,the bond indebtedness to the state, uh for families is about$400. And when you compare that at the federal level, uh the state of Florida really is doing a great job and keeping its bond indebtedness down to a minimum.We had some key local government bills that affected the village that we were uh that that we monitored and watched very closely. One of them was House Bill 11. And while it didn't directly affect the village, uh it did it would have indirectly affected us because there was another bill uh that that did not pass that would have directly affected us.And the reason I bring this up is because it's really important for us that when these bills come up that we number one, we try to kill them. Uh this one happened to be a food fight between uh Miami Gardens and North Miami. And that bill did pass, but it was vetoed by the governor.That was House Bill 11. And the and I bring that up specifically because there was another bill that would have really impacted the village and that was Senate Bill 1704 and House Bill 1523. While the House bill did pass,the Senate bill did not.And that one, uh,Jeremy,we're on page four. Thank you. Um, so that one would have directly affected us. And what was good about the veto was particularly what the governor said about it is that these are issues that need to be resolved at the local level and not done through Tallahassee. So we're what we're hopeful for is that these bills won't be uh sponsored again in the future knowing that the governor particularly he still has um a couple of sessions left and so where the governor would he would veto those bills anyway. the the one bill that that we were not supportive of that that did pass was House Bill 683.That's the bill that allows for the synthetic turf installation. Uh that one is going to be going through the Department of Environmental Protection for the rule making process. So,we're going to be watching that very closely.That one is the one where it obviously for those lawns that are less than one acre uh that that would be applicable to. And again,they had another glitch bill for the live local act.There wasn't um a great deal added to that that that would affect it that would have that would affect really the village except for a PUB. The uh we know the live local is applicable and industrial and commercial mixed use and uh it it's also going to be available in the PUD. We're um we don't know uh this has now been the third iteration of the live local act and whether or not there will be glitch bills in the future. It's just important for us to continue to monitor those uh to make sure that uh nothing um arbitrary will happen to the village in the future.There were a myriad uh I'm on page five,Jeremy, please. Um there were a myriad of bills that that died and and that's and that's uh what happens in the legislative process. A little bit over 10%of the bills that are filed actually do pass. But if you look at that list,there were a lot of property tax exemptions. Uh there are homestead property assessments. So, it it really uh has lend itself to the conversation that they're talking about now with property tax reform. And Jeremy, if you could do the next slide, number six, please. Which leads us into taxation. Uh the the legislature passed a $2 billion tax cut.That is a recurring tax cut.So when you look at uh when they when they cut that much, 900 million of that was the business rent tax that is completely eliminated in the state of Florida.And if you remember in years gone by,you'd have all those uh uh back to school sales tax exemptions.They were all non-recurring. And what and what they've done is they've made those permanent in the future. So they're not going to have to go back and pass them every year, but those will be permanent. For instance, if you buy a generator, it's going to be tax exempt all year long.And then we had some uh some of the local tax issues.The tourist development tax is something uh particularly if it impacts the village,you want to pay real close attention to that for next session. Uh there's some issues that uh that they did particularly up on uh the West Coast about lifeguards and using the tourist development taxes to pay for those. But what that is is that's really the segue into the property tax reform uh measure that the legislature um is going to be addressing. Um mayor, I know you're the vice chair of the policy for the legislative policy for the League of City. That's a great position uh for the village to be in uh to where you're going to have a loud voice there. We have met Page 451 of 572 AgandalitRiffle0fhairs of the house, Representative Lopez and Representative Overdorf who's from Martin County. We've met with them. We've discussed with them the impacts of not just going in uh and just wholesale doing the property tax reform uh but more or less if they're going to be doing it. And I I can assure you it appears at this point in time that something is going to be done is to go with a with a scalpel and not so much with the cleaver. So Jeremy on uh slide number seven. So the legislative session,these are the dates that are going to be the committee weeks are starting in earnest uh October 6th. And with the legislative uh session, it's an early session. Uh in an election year, uh which is the evening year, they always have the session in January and in the odd year they have it in March. So this one will start on June 13th and the 60 days will end up on March 13th.the Martin delegation meeting and and there's a reason I'm sharing this one with you although we're the Palm Beach one.The the Martin delegation meeting is tentatively set for October 21st and the Palm Beach delegation meetings are September 30th, October 23rd and the one that's really important for us is going to be October 13th and you're already there Jeremy.Thank you. So this is why uh the November 13th local bill delegation meeting is important to us is because if uh the village decides to go ahead and move forward on that and that is to uh take ownership of the Questa Regional Park,the 41.1 acre park uh located in Martin County. Um, so, uh, because of the village being in Palm Beach County and the land actually being in Martin County,we're going to have to go to both delegation meetings and get support from both the Martin County delegation and also the Palm Beach delegation. And uh uh we've been working closely uh thanks to to the mayor and the and the village manager that that we've been working closely. Both of our senator and our house member Schneider and Gail Herrell, our senator have agreed to uh sponsor it. Local bills go through the House only and then they're affirmed in the Senate and and Representative Schneider has agreed uh to go ahead and sponsor that which is huge for us. um as well as uh Senator Harold, both are senior members uh and leadership and so uh we feel very confident uh that you know having their support will at least get the bill uh moving and uh at least uh to be heard.And then to wrap it up a little bit, we've got the legislative leadership is uh still going to be Ben Albrittain is the Senate President and then the House Speaker is Daniel Perez.they will remain in their post. It's a two-year term. Uh they've just completed their first year and now they're entering their second year in that legislative position. And then finally, we've got um some special elections that are going to be happening. Uh the the untimely and unfortunate passing of Representative Joe Cassello. Uh he represents Boon Beach, Ocean Ridge, and Del Rey. um along with Bla1 Angolia, Senator Engolia uh as you may know is now the chief financial officer for the state of Florida. And uh so there will be a special election and those will take place on September 30th. And of course we have a brand new lieutenant governor. Uh Jay Collins is now the lieutenant governor of Florida.And so there will be uh a special election that will be held for his Senate seat as well. And with that,we've got uh there's uh there's a lot going on. Uh it's we thought we'd at least be able to catch our breath over the summer. Uh but that has not been the case. Uh the legislature uh they're going to be hitting the ground running here shortly. The delegation meetings have already been taken place throughout the state and obviously we're going to be having ours as well here shortly. So with that, um,want to thank you very much for the opportunity to serve and to represent the village, the citizens of the village and to serve you as well.And, uh, appreciate that opportunity and happy to take any comments or questions.Thank you, Ken. Council, I'll open it for any uh, questions or comments for Ken. No questions. I have one question, one comment. Hi, Ken.Thanks for the presentation, Council Member French. Uh, short- term rentals. Um, we can connect that to home rule or directly to a short-term rental bill. Uh, it's a big concern of mine for Toquesta,the amount of short-term rentals, uh, specifically Airbnb type rentals that have been popping up in the neighborhood. Do you have any direction or suggestions on where we can go with that? Uh,to Council Member French, I I uh that thank Thank you for bringing that that issue up. um just when you think it's losing steam um it rises from the Phoenix. So we're we are that one makes us very nervous and so we're watching that closely. It didn't get any legs on it last session. Uh but a lot of times the second year of a term of a presiding officer sometimes they will then make it a priority and and often times what happens too is that the incoming presiding officers they don't want to deal with the issue. So what they do is they ask the current presiding officer to get it off their plate so they don't have to so they don't have to deal with it. that this issue causes a lot of concern throughout the state of Florida. And I if if I had to handicap it, I would say that it is one that every year that it is brought up and it continues to lose steam,the better it is for us. But you got to be diligent and watching because you just never know about these these uh stealth amendments that come Page 452 of 572 Ag.gndae1tCM#c1J%alf hour. So I can assure you sir we are we will be watching it closely.Thank you for that response. Do you have any direct info of who's lobbying for these where they where it comes from? You know that you know what's interesting about that is that they didn't even Airbnb would when you talk to their lobbyists they were like we we've run out of gas on it. We're not we're not pushing it. But you know what happens often times is that um is that issues get stirred up. I call them rabbit droppings, but they get stirred up and whether or not they're trying to create business for themselves. But this is this is one of those issues that we cannot definitively tell you that it's the Airbnb or one of the other companies that's actually pushing it. It's not like it was a few years ago when they were it was all hands on deck.They had hired just about every lobby firm imaginable to do it.That's just that's just not the case now. So, we just hear about it. Last year particularly, it was one that just they it it kind of they talked about it a little bit and then nothing happened really. But I I just I always worry about um these these last minute amendments. Uh 60 days is a long time.This year was 105. So that's a long time for issues to be considered and brought up. Um and until they hit the gavvel and siny die, we just have to be on on alert. But there are there's no single company out there that particularly as you compare to years past that's pushing the issue any longer. Thank you, Ken. All right.Thank you. Hey, Ken,just one quick Well, first of all,thank you for all you and and Megan do for us up in Tallahassee. Um,you guys are working hard all the time. I know everyone doesn't see it, but just like you said,you've,you know, met with the House Committee chairs for the property tax and,you know,you've been working behind the scenes on that local bill. So, thank you for all you guys do. Um on Senate Bill 180, 1 we spoke about this at our last council workshop and um there is a section in it that talks about uh restricting or preempting us from doing any land use changes until I believe it's 2027. Um since 2027 and then it's also can't go back retroactive to 2024. Yes. Right. And that that did impact a huge project like a almost three-year project that we did with overlay districts here in Dqua. Um and you know we did not get any storm damage here. I mean I think we had a couple trees down but there was not significant damage from Milton in Dquesta. I know there's some other organizations that are already starting to advocate against that. Um do you know what the temperature is for next session on maybe making some amendments to that?Well, mayor, I I completely uh agree with you is that it it is an issue that's being discussed broadly with other organizations and um I believe that yes, there will be not only legislation filed uh but there will also be amendments that would be put on every land use bill imaginable. So, um,you will see that issue come back. Whe whether or not,you know, it's a lot easier to kill a bill or kill an amendment than is to pass one. Um, and so whether or not it would see the light of day, I,you know, I can't I can't predict that. Um, I I believe that there's going to be such a focus on property taxes, on property tax reform that that's going to be taking the oxygen out of the place. um and all these other issues, the preeemption issues, issues like in 180. 11 1 just don't know how much attention that they're going to get. But,you know,you can't just lay idle and just,you know, let it happen by,you know,just hope it's going to happen.You've got to be aggressive about it.So, I I fully appreciate what the Association of Counties, I know the League of Cities is going to be aggressive about it.There's going to be Thousand Friends of Florida and other organizations doing it as well. So, uh,this is not the last that you're going to see of this issue. Okay. I know. I mean, I believe there was consensus at our last meeting that we were in favor of,you know, keeping an ear on that and advocating against just specifically those land use change preemptions. So,yeah, I mean, Ken,that that's really important to us if you could keep your ear to the ground and let us know what we could do to um,you know, potentially help anything next session to at least get those land use preeemptions um, out of there. And I believe mayor and I and I appreciate that if you if um if there's some way that um instead of if there's a way to do it instead of wholesale taking out the entire you know both of those provisions if there's a way to do it in a longitude latitude approach if that's something that we could perhaps discuss in that way because when you try to take it all on just believe you're going to have a more difficult time particularly it had very strong sponsors on both sides. And so, uh,you know, it's not going to go away easily unless you, I believe, come in with some alternative language that doesn't wipe it all out wholesale. Agree. Yeah.And I I mean, my thought off the top of my head was,you know, um, cities that did not uh, have any damage from the storm maybe,you know, would be excluded. But I think maybe that's something we could workshop in the future, some language, Keith. Maybe that's something you could think about with Page 453 of 572 AqwWaiftamcklkh,we'll give that some thought. Maybe we'll workshop that again and we'll we'll uh give you something to work with. And mayor,thank you. And you know, Rebecca O'Hare is at the League of Cities. She's she's the best in the business. So if there's anybody who can come up with it, it'll be Rebecca. Yep. Right. Okay. Anything else, council? I have nothing. Thank you. All right.Thank you, Ken, for your time tonight. We appreciate.Thank you all.Take care. All right. Well,thank you. I appreciate it. Bye bye now. Okay, moving on to presentation three, a proclamation recognizing Richard Radcliffe on his 14 years of service to the Palm Beach County League of Cities. He is not here tonight, so we won't read it into the record. Um, he would like to be here, but he was felt very strongly if he went to one, he had to go to all and he could not possibly make it to all of the coun city council meetings. But, uh, his last meeting is August 27th. So if you guys are available and care to come to his last uh general membership meeting, we would love to see you there. Okay, our last presentation, agenda item four, is a presentation by our intern Joseph Janosi. Did I say that correctly? Come on up. Hi, I'm Joseph Josce and uh I'll be doing this uh presentation on different performance indicators across different municipalities in the area. Clicker there if you want to try. Okay. Isn't it backwards? like forwards is back and back is so these are the uh municipalities that were chosen.They're based on a comparison study during uh done earlier this year. It's uh organized by the population and right here it's just showing which um services are provided by the different municipalities. So for the scale of population we have we provide a lot of services um compared to ones around our population. So that's kind of what I gather here. Here we have the average home cost. It's uh number I got was 600,000 uh average home cost.That's towards the uh higher end with the ones that we have compared here. So it's uh a nice nice area. It's uh I got it from this and uh see here the uh you have the general fund. It's uh general fund and the general fund per resident.the uh same municipalities with the higher average home cost are also the ones with the higher um general fund per resident. And uh so we're kind of in the same area right here, which uh it shows we have a lot to provide for the uh the uh the residents here. These are the uh employees per thousand um for each department or for some of them. Uh we have 16 employees per thousand which is uh it's a it's uh we have a lot to provide for the residents based on this one. So here we have the uh seasonal residents and this is uh what this shows right here is that certain points during the year we have more people being customers for our departments and we still than than it seems. So it looks like 6,000. It's actually a little more and that's also the uh just to note the utilities department services 15,000 people. So it's uh it's more than it just seems based on the census. So here we uh going to go on to part breaking down the different departments. Here we have the uh violent crime rate per thousand residents here in Questa. have had zero over the past three fiscal years,which is very good. Um, compared to some of the other cities, we're I mean,we're the lowest usually.And uh when you look at some of the previous statistics about the uh home cost and all that stuff and and this it's a nice place to raise kids. It's safe and all that. And then this is the burglary rate. It's very similar. Uh we're low here too. Uh the lowest. So it's very safe place. Here we go to the fire department. We have the ALS calls. We uh we're on the higher side here, but that is because we have a a larger population of uh um older people, which is likely the cause for this. Um so that's explanation then we have the BLS calls and it's a similar case here um and we're yeah we're yeah so in the IT department we are kind of in the middle range which is good because it's uh there's not many problems with the uh technology and it's uh probably means that we're efficient with everything so That's the IT department. Parks and recreation uh total park acreage per resident. We have uh a lot of uh park acreage considering our size and everything which is good because it's uh provides people a lot of places to uh to go outside and safe and interact with the others. So, it's looking good. And then uh total park maintenance per resident uh is pretty low but the um parks are maintained regardless with that.So we have we have this and then human resources the full-time employee annual turnover rate uh has came down in the past few years and it uh brought us from higher a lower number which uh good retention. Move on to average cost per hire.This is uh I'm comparing a couple cities but we're on the lower end. Um so that's that utilities water main breaks per 100 miles of pipe. Page 454 of 572 AgeiWl;3Jtmmz#1& average um for 2023.That was a a study done by Utah University. So we have that good pipes. Um here we have the customer service calls per thousand residents. And these can be anything from just phone calls,you know, accidental phone calls to the wrong department, paying a bill,just general questions, and we're pretty low here. So,tells me the customers are probably pretty satisfied. um building permits. We have uh thousand permits per thousand residents and uh uh yeah, it's there's development here more than some other places. Um but it's that and then uh revenue drive from fees per resident. So we're doing that um about$150 per resident just about there. And then This is the important thing carry forward a lot uh per year compared to some other municipalities. So it's uh fiscal responsibility right here which is good risk management workers comp workers compensation uh for sworn fires. you have village of Tquesta has is pretty safe. Um 2022 was high but it came down and uh we're on the lower end of things.Then uh for law enforcement I think uh this also reflects the crime statistics pretty low um law enforcement uh workers compensation which is good. And then uh here we have the uh total workers compensation and uh medium range here which is uh good. Here we have the clerk.This is the average time to fulfill records request. Um ours is uh a little over three days which is uh speedy way way below the national um number. So we can get back to residents quickly.Then public information. Here's our Facebook posts. Uh engaged with the community here.The Facebook reach right here. We have uh spike in 2024 and uh yeah, we have the engagement right here. In 2022,we uh the village made a push to be more engaged on social media and think that shows and then kind of went back level number then it's a similar story with Instagram where more engaged in some of the peer communities but um yeah and then with the Instagram reach uh I guess a similar story spiking recently. Yeah, right here. The engagement, right? It's uh kind of difficult to get numbers from the other communities for this, but um again,the 2022 push for social media shown right there. And then we needed community development. Um Questa there's a lot of uh land applications. Um but yeah, compared to some of the other ones which is a it's a developing city. And here we have public works.This is the uh village of Tqua has um decent uh like middle public works budget for resident which I think means that we have a fiscal responsibility with that. And uh then here's the and Well,thank you for that very insightful presentation. Council, do you have any comments or questions? I do not.Thank you. Um, I hope you enjoyed your time. I heard you got to float through each department. Um, I think most of our interns get to do that and I love that that our village welcomes interns as a whole.They don't just get stuck in one department. um because I like our youth to be able to go out in the world and be wellrounded and you can be more helpful to as the next generation.Thank you for some of those numbers. I'm proud of some of those numbers. Um thanks to the clerk's office because I know you guys do a lot of the engagement controlling whether it's pretty much any type of medium, right?And just to share, I mean I remember when government didn't even use social media and I know that was a big jump many moons ago for government to take that jump. Um,yeah.Thank you.And really do hope you took something and I hope you got to meet with each one of us at some point. Pick our brains and good luck to your next adventure,whatever it may be.Thank you.Thank you,Joseph. Good job. How did you obtain these social media reach from the other municipalities? Um, I I asked them.They I I submitted a request. Um, some of them sent them back after a few days, some of them didn't. um but or they took longer too long but um yeah that's that's how I got them. Thank you. Great job.Yeah as well. Thank you.The same comments that you've already heard from my colleagues but thank you for the work that you did and um some of the information that you provided us may be very poignant and salient in the coming months. So thank you very much. Yeah. I just a question kind of similar to council member French. Um how did you get most of this data?Was it reached out to the cities?Were you able to utilize Al? like how how would you put all that together?Yeah. So, some of it was Al. Um, but then I would I would go to the uh like the CFR or the uh the budget and see that it's there. Um, but it would it would kind of tell me like, hey,this is where it is on the website. Go look here. Um, and then that was for like the first half of it, but then the uh more department specific numbers were foyer request and also going into the CFR. Page 455 of 572 14 1111da/lIte Alehem were had fewer municipalities on them just because some got back to me, some didn't. So, yeah,that was great.And thank you for choosing to spend your summer here with us and yeah, good luck on your next adventure.Thank you.Thank you. I appreciate it. It was a fun time here. Very nice.Thank you. [Applause] Okay, moving on to the consent agenda. Lori, do we have any um comment cards for the consent agenda? No. Any public comment on the consent agenda?All right. Can I get a motion?So moved. Second. All in favor? I mayor, if I could on that the the Palm Beach Road Runners are here and just want to say thank you for coming.You know, great news is the item wasn't pulled. Uh but thank you for what you guys do. It's an amazing event for us in the village of Tquesta every year to host to be the hometown of this. So thank you very very much for coming out tonight.Thank you for all that you guys do. Wow. Wow. Fantastic. Looking forward to it.Thank you. And on to communications from citizens. Lori, do we have any cards for items that are not on tonight's agenda? Yes. Okay. Marshia Nielson. I wish to address, Forgive my voice. I My husband says, "Good thing I lost it." I wish to address the discussion at the workshop on August 4th regarding the charitable giving. Historically, many groups came to the village meeting to look for donations. At that time, PowerPoint was a dream and the presentations were verbal and didn't take that long. However,they varied and were prevalent. From that council's viewpoint,there were two major problems. One did not have time to research each cause to see if the donation was um appropriate and two, it was embarrassing to say no publicly. The solution was the discretionary fund.This allowed each individual council person to donate as he or she saw fit. There was transparency to a point of course as all records are public but the donations were I might say more thoughtful.After each council person had a limited amount of money to donate. If you proceed as you seem it seems to be your intention. You will open the door again to various presentations from group seeking funds.You will be in the position of having to say no publicly or support those efforts that perhaps you would not personally donate to. If the charity ultimately comes under public scrutiny,there will be embarrassment. You will have to earmark certain amounts for public donations and that amount will escalate as more groups approach.The solution, as I say, is quite simple. Discretionary funds should be restricted to charitable donations.Travel should be separate line in the budget and council members should have to adhere to the village travel policy as all employees do.This is after all only fair and would eliminate eyepopping expenses.The changes you make today will impact future council. So I respectfully suggest thoughtfulness before adding a budget item for donations.Thank you.Thank you.Any other cards? Petta. Christina. Thank you. If you could state your name and address for the record, please. My name is Christina Vander West Husen. My address is 113B Lighthouse Circle to Quest of Florida. Right. I'm here to address the village on the quiet zone. I remember being here last year and we had a meeting and we spoke about it. I walked away feeling very happy thinking something is going to happen by March of this year. Nothing has happened. Have we heard anything from the village? No. I'm a firm believer in communications. It took an email from me personally and from the board of Toquesta at toquesta trace to get a response. I'm extremely angry about it because night after night, day after day, we have physically been thrown out of our homes. We cannot enjoy it because of the noise at the Questa Drive and Old Dixie. Um I feel that somehow or other the council Questa,the village has really dragged their um legs on this one.Jupiter Palm Beach Gardens. Quiet. I work in Palm Beach Gardens. I can't believe the silence. Why are we not there yet? Now I got this email saying that we have to wait for the Sorry, I have to look at my notes.The railroad administration for the Federal Railroad Administration. It's more than a year. Why haven't we done it? Right. And then once we sign that agreement, it can take up to another eight months.That means another year we have to suffer like this.And I'm telling you,we are suffering. Not last night, but the night before I was prepared to go into the Page 456 of 572 Agendatftem 16I-eep on the floor. So,you know what that's doing to our stress levels. Um, I feel as the residents,we have the right to really appeal to you to move this faster and to keep us updated. We really need an update. Um this whole thing is harmful to our health, our well-being, our property values. People come there to buy it and then they hear that crazy train going past there. Honk honk honk four times.The fourth time it's like an extra minute, right?So it's impacting our value property values too. Every night as I said the stress levels is so high and yet my friends in Jupiter and Palm Beach Gardens,they don't hear a train. So please me to Quest a trace I'm on the board as you know now if you don't know I am on the board we need a clear public timeline uh a firm deadlines we need a commitment that you are actually going to be doing something I know it will might impact the budget I don't know but again I feel a year has been too long that we've heard nothing I appreciate your time thank you thank you thank Thank you, ma'am. Um, I know we sent a response to the board today.Jeremy, do you just for public record,would you like to maybe kind of go over the high points on that?Yeah,we got the letter today and we responded um the same day.We uh have got a couple of uh requests for information on that. We typically respond as soon as we get it. Um,just as a highlevel, I guess recap of this, back in 23 when this first started, about the time Jupiter and and Gardens were applying and going through their process, we met with Treasure Coast and a representative from FRA,the Federal Railroad Administration, did a site visit. They told us our railroad crossing was uh available to do a quiet zone and we met all the requirements. And then 24 when we actually did a a site visit, they told us that the the requirements had changed and we were going to need to put in double arms on the other side. So that was going to be a $600,000 hit to the budget. At that point,we reached out to TPA for funding.TPA advised us there was potential funding out there. We had to go through an application process. Um there's some other key dates in here, but u we have um we have got a commitment from Bright Line to uh to help fund that. We are in negotiations, I'll say, with an agreement to do that um that railroad crossing. There has been some stipulations that they put in there that we were not in favor of us, meaning we were going to have to take care of that crossing for the life for the rest of it, and we're we're not really in the business of doing that. So, um, we think we're close on the agreement. Once we get that agreement,they will fund that railroad.We won't have to pay $600,000 out of our out of our general fund budget. Um, and so the the Jupiter and Gardens crossings were much different than ours in that we have one crossing and they they typically score all of your crossings on a on a scale. And so like Jupiter has six crossings.They they had different point scales and so they they were able to spread that out.they paid,you know, I don't I don't know how much they paid, but they were a able to make those improvements out of the general fund. They did not have a major arms that they were having to put on their crossings like we have. So, we have some major improvements that are being done. That's why we seek we were seeking funding. Um, and so we're happy to give an update any point, any p you know, anytime. I know we sent an email to them if they they now have Doug's contact and if they any point they want an update, Doug can give that to them. And so I think that answers the question and gives you guys an update. We are actively pursuing. We have not been non-stop. Um ever, you know, we've had several times where we've talked with council, had decision points, but you know, at this point,we're we're at the mercy of this agreement trying to get it done and then at that point we'll have the funding to move forward. And I know our staff is actively always working on it. I really um empathize with what you all are going through since the Bright Line started. if council agrees. Um I mean would it be at a minimum too much to ask for staff to send periodic updates to that board so they're informed and yeah I mean if as I mean if if there's a significant you know we hope to have that agreement in front of council next month or the month after um I mean that that but we can send any kind of update that's needed is council is you agree sending that that board specific some um periodic updates on status.Yeah. Okay. So,we'll start doing that.All right.Thank you,Jeremy. Lori, any other cards?All right. Any other public comment on items that are not on tonight's agenda? Okay. Moving on to communications from council. I don't have anything this evening. Um, nothing grandiose.Just thank you to public safety for reminding our village as a whole of the season that we just entered into.Yay, back to school. Um, also just note, um, I appreciate first responders always training, especially like fires, always doing dive training, whatnot throughout the summer for our storm season. I know we're in it and we always pray for nothing, but our former fire chief used to always say, always stuck with me, don't be scared, be prepared. So, would just appreciate on behalf of the people that we represent. Um, staff,first responders to just make sure that our village is as best as it can be right now, even utilities, making sure those storm drains are cleared out.And it's not Page 457 of 572 AgandagRiefflA116ents, but sometimes construction workers,they dump stuff in drains, and we have a lot of construction around. So,just making sure we're prepped and ready to go as best we can.That's all I ask. And that is it. No comments.Thank you, mayor. Uh,just one. And I don't want to steal the mayor's thunder because I'm sure she'll talk about it, but I want to say congratulations and thank you to Lori McWills, the clerk staff for the Palm Beach County League of Cities lunch that we hosted. Uh, and congratulations to Mayor Molly, who was also President Molly of the Palm Beach County League of Cities. Did a wonderful job along with the country club.They did a fantastic job. And um, typically when you're the very farthest north municipality like us or the furthest south like Poka or out west in the Glades, people don't come. But people say they love Toquesta and they never miss it. So congratulations to the village and what you guys did pulled it off for you. So thank you. You did steal my thunder.That's okay. Truly,thank you for the amazing job you guys did. I received so many compliments days after uh it was a great celebration. I know like like vice mayor said, people always look forward to coming to the meeting when it's inquest. Um, and then along the lines of uh what Council Member Brandon said,just thank you to the police department and fire department for the Operation Safe Start. And really, I want to thank our business community for coming out yet another year for our teacher supply drive. We always have so many business businesses contribute and donate supplies for our teachers here. So,thank you all around. Okay,we're moving on to appointments. Agenda item 14, consider appointment to fill the EAC environmental advisory committee vacancy. We have two applicants, Drew Henriquez and Joyce Rafty. Drew reached out to me and said he is out of the country and is unable to attend the meeting tonight. I'm not sure if Joyce made it to the meeting. So, both applications are in your agenda packet and this is to fill the vacancy on the environmental advisory. Okay. Since neither applicant is here, usually like to have him come up and speak to us. Uh, council, any thoughts on filling the seat. I'm thinking so I can go first. Um, looking at at the application, I do appreciate both residents uh applying for the board. Uh, it seems Drew has quite the application. Maybe he was more fit for a pension board than EAC looking at his application. Um, but I appreciate both applying and um, we're filling one position. Is that correct? So, I would uh vote that or make the motion that we uh approve Drew. I'm just trying to find his last name. I apologize. Drew Henriquez uh for that position. Yeah, I've looked at both of their applications. It is very helpful when we get to, you know, hear from them. So, this is a little tough, but I would go,you know,just off of uh Mr. Henrique's he based strictly on the amount of time I think he spent on the application. Um and the background I would agree with council member French. He would be a great addition to the pension board. Um I'm I'm going to go with uh Mr. Henrique. I'm excited we had applicants. Oh yeah. So thank you guys for applying if you're listening. Um I will second and in agreeance with my fellow council I too am in agreement with uh my colleagues. Um it's I think it's important to fill this role to get that back to a complete committee. Uh it's very important in the the input that they provide to us. It' be great to get just one more person with the input to have a full committee. So I'm in support of Mr. Henry case. Um yeah just like I said it's tough without them here. So on paper I I agree with um Drew, but if Drew, if you listen to this, I really agree with Council Member French. When I first read your resume, I felt pension board, pension board. So in the future, if one of those opens, I wouldn't be against you considering applying for a pension board position.Yeah, because you seem to definitely have the expertise for that. So I don't Did you I don't think you actually made a motion yet. Did you? Can someone make a motion or I'm sorry, let me take public comment. Is there any public comment? Nope. Okay. Now, can I get a motion? Uh, I'm Drew, right? Yes. I move to approve Drew Enriquez for the EAC committee opening. Second. All in favor? I on to standing reports. Village attorney. No report tonight. Mayor. Okay. Village manager, can take your three minutes? Uh yeah,just a little update. Uh G View Drive,there was some road damage from FPL trucks. We are aware of that. We are working with them to get that repaired. Uh the United Way um presentation. We are going to have a drop off location of that at the rec center uh after Labor Day. We'll have two weeks where we help promote that and and and have a drop off location. And then um which most of you guys know by now, but just for public knowledge, after 30 years dating back to 1995,the CWA has been descertified. And um so we um you know, won't change anything on our operations, but um just for everybody's Page 458 of 572 Agandaitpent#16n is no longer uh part of the village. And August 13th,which tomorrow, we have a special magistrate. Um August 13th, which tomorrow, we have the environmental advisory committee.And then August 18th, we have the council budget workshop.Thank you. Any questions for Jeremy? No. Okay. Next up, police department. Evening, mayor,vice mayor, council, roads attorney,village manager, and clerk. Before you,you have the monthly report. Uh just a couple of highlights I want to bring up. We continue with the civilian firearms safety class. We have another one coming this Saturday. Uh like I said earlier, we continue to fill them. Uh we did find out that they will be putting another grant in October or November and we'll be applying once again just because it seems there's a lot of interest in in the classes. So we're going to try to continue that if we can. Uh we have two car seat installation since the last time I saw you. We also trained Sergeant Yieldz. Uh he is our new car seat installer as well. Uh he just because of different timing, he works he's Monday through Friday. Helps us out when they come during the day. And we also have other shifts uh that are covered. Uh the nautical club uh it was a successful uh eight weeks. Uh it wrapped up last week. Uh kids had a great time and uh we're always happy to do that and looking forward to next year's. As you said,today was a yesterday was the first day of school. Uh we were on we will be on WPTV or we were we already been on at 4:00 and the six o'clock today. Uh we were on WPTV just going over uh the bus stops and uh riding along with the program that we offer. So uh if you don't get a chance to look at it, it came out good. Sergeant Yield took the lead on that.And then I want to thank you all and I know he wants to say thank you in your consent. You had for the donation of K9 Eric. Uh I just want to give you some of the highlights. Uh Eric was with the village serving seven years. Uh he was part of over 500 kilos of cocaine seized, 25 kilos of fentanyl seized, over 150 pounds of meth, and over$6 million of cash taken under Eric's watch. So, uh, Detective Looney does a phenomenal job with Eric, uh, as you all know, and I thank you once again for donating him to, uh,to Mike. Uh it's it's family to Mike and just from our perspective,you know,we're sad to see him uh retire, but we're happy for him. You know, he's worked very hard and uh Scout,just everyone knows, has been doing a phenomenal job and Scout has hit the ground running and as the manager knows, we are waiting for uh I believe it's $15 million that has been seized from a cryptocurrency case with Detective Looney working on that. So, we uh have put in for uh $15 million. of course village gets hopefully at least 20%. So that'll come back to the police department. So uh just want to thank you all for the donation and just seeing the importance of uh K9 Eric. So I know I'll give the rest of my minute to Detective Looney. Hopefully he doesn't get too emotional. Well, didn't expect this. Uh thank you. I appreciate it. Starting little raspy. Um we really uh appreciate your support. It's been Eric had a tough run here and I I appreciate everybody and your support. It was a rough couple years we had together and uh this has been the most rewarding of my career. Um he's he's loving the retired life now. He's he's fat. He's put on some weight and uh I appreciate it. You guys know what I've been through with uh with everything and it's been it's finally coming to a close. So, I thank you, village manager. Thank you. Um council, I can't thank you guys enough. Um we worked hard. Um and with everybody's, you know, approvals and I've traveled the world with Eric. I've done amazing things with that dog and he's so I uh I appreciate you guys. Thank you more. Sorry. It's I didn't expect this.They were They should have told me. Um I wouldn't be in a t-shirt. But uh I really do appreciate everybody. Um we work really hard. Scouts been working hard and the crypto seizure. Um it's probably one of the most rewarding things of my career. Um and and it made Fox News. So it's been a it's been a roller coaster.And again,thank you. Sorry about my voice. I'm coming down with a little cold. So Thank you. Thank you so much. Just real quick, if I would have told him, he wouldn't have showed up. So that's why you go if anyone has any questions. Council, any comments or questions? No questions. But Eric's the OG and I was,you know, I was a resident here when he first came and he was kind of like the first Kite for Tquesta. So,we love him. I'm a little biased. I got you.And I do love Scout and I I wouldn't doubt that Scout was hitting the ground running because he is a pointer breed. So, I mean,there is no sitting with those dogs. So, I'm excited. I'm excited to see what he does in his career. I'm very disappointed every time they don't come in though. I mean, he actually had him here today. So, he was here. So, anytime. Okay. So my request is anytime that they're a part of the conversation, if they're open to it and it's not too crowded,you know,they need to come and get the recognition out of out of fairness to them. So got it.They don't want to sit in the car. Okay.Thank you, Chief.Thank you.Thank you.Thank you. Page 459 of 572 Ageni0a.ROMAlfhent. Good evening, mayor,vice mayor, council. Uh pretty busy month. Um,we had our one of our captain's meetings which went very very productively. I also was told it was half the time that it was in the past. No offense to Chief Troop. So, uh, but the guys enjoyed it. It's all about them and they are all doing a great job. Specifically, Captain Harris, uh, who's been my right hand, who is also been the point person on the ISO evaluation we have coming up tomorrow. Super important for us. Um, he's done a tremendous amount of work. So has Judy and everybody has pitched in. So please uh say a prayer for us for tomorrow because I'm very nervous. It's my first one. So we had some public outreach stuff. Uh believe me or believe with me freedom run. We had the bike parade remebrance park uh raising of the flag.That was an awesome event. I was so happy I was able to attend that. U thank you for inviting us to participate. And we did do a water rescue drill. Um I believe it was it was it in your neighborhood?Yeah. Um, we did reschedule that class. I know you asked about that.The November swiftwater class is happening again. Um, Captain Tub, I hope one day, Lieutenant Dodd at the time is in a Palm Beach County officer development class. Uh,very high speed,very high intensity. It's two weeks. He's going to get his butt kicked,for lack of a better term, and he'll be done next Friday. Um, we're going to go out for his graduation, and we may go out one day this week uh to see how he's doing, but I know he'll do very well and represent us. uh as best he can. Uh we represented at the funeral for a line of duty death for St. Lucy,firefighter Hajj. Uh we had an engine company out there and there was three of us that were in attendance. Uh it was a great send off for the young man, unfortunately at 26, uh taken way too early in life. Um we have some new policies, uh new emergency evacuation plan. We have uh the fire investigation policy and the community risk reduction policy are finally 100%done.just in time for ISO to evaluate them.And our lieutenant promotional process is going to be run through a third party. It'll be Palm Beach State College.And we're probably going to have five to six candidates. I just want complete transparency and no favoritism of any way, shape, or form. So,they're going to run the entire program for us.And we're in talks right now to get that done. Um, we have some time before we have any retirements, but I need to get that out and get it moving uh way in advance because I do have a retirement about a year from now in one of the officer ranks. Um,we have about 42 applicants for a vacancy for firefighter paramedic. So, I should have a nice candidate pull to pick from.And we are still working on two different gra nts. one for medical equipment and one for turnout gear which is pursuant to the new house bill that Governor DeSantis just passed and hopefully we can acquire at least one of those if not both. So pretty busy month.Any questions from council?Thank you. Council ma'am. No.Thank you chief. Thank you chief.Thank you very much. Hey utilities department. Marjorie Craig utilities department. uh utilities director and there's a lot here on the page and you'll be so grateful that I'm not going to go through each one of them. Um so I want to hit the highlights a little bit. Um to your point about the being prepared for storms, we are you may may or may not have noticed but out at uh Cypress Drive, we did hire someone to clean out that excfiltration trench. So you um it's actually kind of slowgoing. Apparently, it hasn't been cleaned out in quite some time time and so there's a lot of mud in there. So, we're we're getting that cleaned out. Um, and but we do also clean out everything. Um, every time there's a a hurricane, we get notified that a hurricane's fixing to come our direction or even just a major storm, we're always out there,you know, clean out the catch basins and so forth. Um,we've got um many different projects going on. We almost the entire concentration line relocation is almost completely done with the exception of the sample tap. But if it uh you there's some pictures in here you can see. We're just we're so glad that that's finally done.Also the county line uh road bridge relocation.We believe that the um uh directional bore that they're going to be start setting up everything's going to happen kind of uh all at once. are going to start setting up towards the end of August. So, um Chief, we probably want to talk about any I mean, I don't think they're going to close the road, but just in case, we just want to coordinate on anything with that road. Um we also have uh issued two notice of proceeds. One for Dover Ditch, one for Water Main number one. Uh they've done their videoing and their uh the signs. We've put signs together. We're going to put those up next week. they've done their um it should be starting within by the end of August if not before. So we're trying to let everyone know particularly about water mane one and that's not the same as what's going on right now there. Doug's got the um he's doing the um sidewalk work. So but we will be we'll have signs. We're going to put it out in the water bells. We're going to put it on the weekly um notification. Hey,you Page 460 of 572 A9aR4aa1te0h#JrfP&o and and on the website. So with that, um you've got the dashboard and it shows that we're still trending up uh collecting revenue which is always a good thing um for these projects especially and your CIP timeline. So what we are looking to do and we met with the manager just to kind of discuss it. There's a in cleargov there's also a a module called projects and so if you go to projects affecting the village projects around village and to the utilities projects and if you kind of dig down in there you'll see um there's a page that opens up and it um and I'll bring you some screenshots next time but it'll show the little summary of the project the timeline and updates project updates. So, we're we're kind of playing with that to see if we can make sure that notifications go out if someone signs up. It's just another way to provide that outreach to make sure people know what's going on. Are there any questions?Thank you, Marjorie. Council, any comments or questions? Have not.Thank you, Marjorie.Thank you, Mar. Thank you. Okay, on to the regular agenda. Under old business, agenda item 19, ordinance number Oh,we have a visitor. Do you want to There he is. Especially for Council Member Brandon. He needs to come in and get his recognition permission to approach. Hey, it's a Scout. So,this is Scout. He's a German wire hair pointer. Oh my gosh. He just turned. You know,you're not that puppy. I thought we were giving him a seat. Did you not want to get a chair? Hey, Scall his.You're doing a good job.just got green. So, he's nice mustache and his beard is done. So, he's impressive mustache. He's two and he put on 15 pounds. He's a big boy. So, really, really quick, was he a part of that crypto? He was. Okay. So, good job, Scout. Krypto. So, now that I'm not on the spot, I can actually scout with you. Super playful. So,we got him from Belgium. He flew over and we went right to K9. Yay. Um just because he also is for narcotics and for tracking. So for tracking he can find missing and elderly adults and kids as well with lost school. We can track them by awesome a lot of training with the local. So again, I really appreciate the village you guys supporting us, supporting me and my mission down as well as right at home. So again, council,thank you. I appreciive [Applause] Whoa. Oh, he's so cute. Good luck,Jay being a tough act to follow. Have a dog. [Laughter] All right, so we are on agenda item 19, ordinance number 5-25, second reading of a voluntary annexation of a property off Riverside.That's a tough act to follow. I will do my best. Ordinance 0525, an ordinance of the village council, a village of the quest of Florida, providing for the voluntary annexation of additional territory owned by Robert and Amy Swan,to be included within the village boundaries in accordance with article 8, section 2C of the constitution of the state of Florida. Section 171044 Florida statutes is amended and section 4.02 of the village of the Questa charter redefining boundaries of the village of Questa to include all of said real property. Directing the village manager to do all things necessary to effectuate this annexation. Directing the village clerk to file a copy of this ordinance with the clerk of the circuit court in Palm Beach County. Chief administrative officer of Palm Beach County and with the department of state within 7 days after adoption providing conflicts clause sever building clause effective date and further purposes. Okay. Good evening.Jay Hubs, community development director. Uh so second reading um this past 501 first reading. Um the swans who are voluntarily annexing are not able to make it tonight, but they do really want to come out. So, they will be here at the next council meeting to just kind of introduce themselves. And uh that's really all I have. Nothing new to add. Any comments or questions? No comments since last time. No, I just want to thank the property owner for um voluntarily annexing their their property. And I know that's an effort that council and the village has been working on well before my time. I think even well before council member Brandon's time. So, it's a it's a big deal for us to have that. Is there any public comment cards?Any public comment? Can I get a motion? So moved to second. Second. All in favor? 11. On to new business. Agenda item 20. Special exception use 01-25 for a uh fast food restaurant with a drive mobile drive-thru. And mayor, if I may, uh, actually this agenda item number 20 and the the agenda item immediately following agenda item 21 are both quai judicial proceedings. Uhl with your permission, I can take care of the swearing in exparte disclosures and through preliminary comments at this time.Thank you. If you are going to be um speaking uh to the village council on either agenda item 20 or 21 uh the special exception use and the site plan modification for 150 to Quest to drive.These are both quite judicial proceedings. Page 461 of 572 AgandatlteM 41&to be under oath. So I need to swear you in. I'll swear everybody in together. If you'll all please stand, raise your right hands. Uh if you're going to be testifying, do each of you swear or affirm under penalties of perjury that your testimony to the village council and these items will be the truth,the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I do.Thank you.You can all have a seat. I need to come back to the council. Uh if any of you have had undertaken any exparte activities, uh including any discussions with staff or applicants or anybody else, done any site visits, consulted with any third party experts or done anything uh like a site visit. Um,while those activities are permissible, they do need to be disclosed on the record at this time in order to remove any presumption of prejudice uh from having done those activities. None. Nothing specific other than driving by to CVS and being kind of on the property. None. Uh, none. You mentioned discussions. I've had a discussion with the village manager.That's it. Not with the applicant. Okay. I've had discussions with uh Jay and Jeremy and I've also visited the site.Thank you.And then just uh before we uh begin, I just want to remind the council um as quasi judicial proceedings um your role is to apply the uh evidence that's in the record at tonight's hearing against criteria in our code which are part of the applications and make a decision as to whether or not the applicant has met um by evidence met their burden uh to establish those criteria. When we get to the point in both agenda items where a motion is going to be made, I would just ask um if it's a motion to approve, that means that the maker of the motion believes all the criteria have been met by evidence. Um however, if there's a motion to deny, my request would be that the maker of the motion identify the criteria that you believe has not been met.That way uh the record will be clear and I can prepare the appropriate uh order that memorializes the denial. So with those comments and that procedure under on the record,we can proceed with the agenda items. All right,Jay, now the floor is yours.Thank you. Uh Jay Hubs, community development director, uh presenting a special exception use and a site plan modification. I've got them in in one presentation. I think the applicant does too, but of course you'll have to make your motion separately. Uh property is located at the southwest corner of Tquesta Drive in US1. It's in the MU mixu zoning district. It's in our US1 zoning overlay. It's a 6,099 foot former banking facility that was constructed in 2004, but it's been vacant uh since 2022. So, here's the current site. Has three drive-through lanes, as you can see. Uh has the Mediterranean architecture. Uh here's your proposed elevation.This is looking from the corner of US1 and to Questa Drive. Um, so the drive-thru that's going to be proposed is on the other side of the building here. So this is a conceptual elevation that was shown to you all in June of 2024. So you can really see how the architecture has evolved. I think the council was not in love with this original architecture. And so uh,you know,we think we we work with the applicant to to make it much nicer just again for reference. So, so this project needs a special exception because it's considered a fast food restaurant um which are required in the in the MU uh zoning district. Um in recent years, the village council used to take special exceptions the council before the site plan application. It's kind of a cumbersome process.They'd have to get the special exception and then come back, go through development review process and come back a second time. So, we've done kind of what most other cities have done and and done them together. Um, we also did this at 358 Cyprus in early 2025. And I've got an example here that this is how it was done in 1996. So, we're just streamlining things and and doing them together. But, uh, of note,the U planning and zoning board does not look at special exceptions. We are going to change that in the code when we do our code update soon. Um, so they only looked at the site plan here.They did not look at the use of the the property. In terms of the zoning overlay, as as you know, as was talked about the last workshop and tonight, um Senate Bill 180 has rendered um the more restrictive aspects of the zoning overlay null until October 1, 2027. Um however,that's not really even in play because this application was actually submitted the day that the zoning overlay was adopted. So, it it's vested to what the code was at the time it was submitted. So,the overlay does not apply um for that reason. and not just from Senate Bill 180. Um the real major implication though if the zoning overlay was in place,the the real implication is that they would they would have had to get a special exception for the formula restaurant criteria that remember that we created. Um but there's really no other real things that would be impacted. So the civic open space would not be mandatory because in order for people that had to provide civic open space,you have to add 20%of gross floor area to the site.They're not adding any gross floor area. So, if the overlay was in place, they would not have technically had to provide civic open space. Page 462 of 572 Agen4a1JWr0s#4&-te. I know the applicant has a much much better graphic of what the site looks like. Um but as you can see,the fast food um it's a it's going to be a Chipotle.There's going to be what's called a Chipotle lane on the um southside. And it's kind of a kind of like a walk up drive up. you you pre-order, but it's not like your typical drive-thru where you order at a menu board. Um,you order in advance on an online app. I know Troy Holloway will will provide more detail on that. In terms of traffic, um,the traffic study they provided, um, has the amount of trips that were originally generated by the old use, which was the the drive-in bank, and then it has the total total uses of of the new project. So if you look at the bottom line,that's the net new trips generated from this use above what the bank use was. So 774 total daily trips, 375 of those are passed by.Those would be trips that are just kind of they're going by anyways. It's not new traffic technically created. Um there would be 399 new trips and then there would be 43 a.m. peak hour trips and actually a reduction of 7hour PM peak hour trips.That's because drive-in banks, uh, four to four to five, four to six is their peak hour. So, um, so that's that kind of explains that, um,the applicant did get a, uh, approval from Palm Beach County's TR transportation department, uh,traffic performance standards approval on March 6. So,that shows that it meets the the county's concurrency transportation standards. In terms of parking, our by code,they're required to provide 77 spaces.They're providing 79, so two extra spaces. But they did provide a shared parking study that shows that their their actual parking demand should only be about 62 spaces. And that's because the office use and the fast food use kind of have some synergy, right? Uh the uh medical office is has a 100% parking demand from 9:00 a.m. to 400 p.m. But 10%from 600 p.m. to midnight. And then of course during lunch hour um when the Chipotle would kind of have some peak use there would also be um probably less less utilization of of the uh medical office that's proposed. U but again not not not necessary because they technically are meeting code but they did provide that just just to show that the actual parking demand will only be about 62 spaces. So in terms of special exception uh review criteria,there are six different criteria here. Um it's a permitted special exception use. It's located and operated so that public health, safety, and welfare will be protected. It will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property. It's compatible with adjoining development.There's adequate landscaping and screening.Adequate off-streetet parking and loading. And ingress and egress is designed to cause minimum interference with traffic on abiding streets.There's an additional uh nine other criteria that that have to be met and uh council has to find that it it meets these before it would approve the project. So compliance with the comp plan again ingress egress off-streetet parking nuisance utilities screening buffering compatibility and whether it's kind of in scale with the neighborhood. Um that is it for the special exception. Um, I will let Troy do his presentation and if the special exception goes through, I've got some other stuff to to present on the site plan when he's done. Uh, and Troy Holloway from 2JHL will be presenting pres. Uh, good evening. For the record,Troy Holloway with 2GO. Um, I've also got with me here tonight, uh, Will Crowden with he's also with Chipotle in case any kind of general questions come up regarding Chipotle as well. Um, hopefully, uh, this is the last time you have to see me tonight on this parcel. And then we've been here, I think the last year and a half. I think we first came through with a Waw Wa. We've looked at Trader Joe's, we looked at banks, and then we ended up with uh,the conceptual about 14 months ago. We came through with the conceptual. So hopefully we've gotten everything worked out. We've worked a lot with your staff uh on the architecture and a lot of the site plan to get to where we are today. Um we're here tonight requesting a site plan and special exception approval uh for the redevelopment of an of the existing uh and vacant 6,99 foot building that currently has three existing drive-through lanes on a 1.4 acre property which is located there at 150 Tquesta Drive which is the old Bank of America site. property is currently zoned a mixeduse district uh with within the recently adopted US Highway 1 overlay. Our redevelopment proposal consists of 3,499 square foot medical office use and a 2600 square foot fast food restaurant with outdoor seating. The tenants do include Chipotle and the H Heartland Dental. Uh obviously you guys know where this site is. southwest corner there to Questa Drive and US Highway 1 surrounded by a lot of miscellaneous commercial uses. To the east side there, US1,we've got the commercial plaza.To the south, Page 463 of 572 Agan 114 1pt";ty line there, we have the CVS. Uh to the west, we've got Paradise Park. Um an existing and an existing three-story commercial mixeduse building. Uh on the north side of Toquesta Drive there,we've got a couple of office buildings and one in a three-story office as well as the existing Shell uh gas station on the corner.This is uh the the proposed site plan. Uh the majority of it is an existing site. We're not doing a whole lot to the to the property itself. Um the yellow there,that's the existing uh drive-through lane.three large uh drive-throughs, look like three cavernous drive-throughs that will be removed from the building. Um there's currently about four or five existing vehicular um entries and exit points to the property.Those will all remain um and stay as they are today. Um we're going to be adding uh some angled parking on the south side, which we can do with the removal of that uh drive-thru large structure there. Um and these are the uses within the building. On the north side would be the H Heartland Dental taking the majority of the building and then Chipotle would be located on the south side where we'd have the drive-thru and and the Chipotle lane pickup window as well. Out in front of Chipotle we'll have some outdoor seating. Um and also we've got the covered arcade on the building which would remain actually I think this gets a little bit larger that'll remain on the building as well. On the corner uh we've got the existing Toquesta monument sign which would remain as it is. Um here in the back on the west uh property line we've got some some shared uh recipro reciprocal uh shared parking spaces part of a shared parking easement.Those will remain as they are have they been since the last 20 years. So those will stay as well. As far as landscaping we have proposed a full renovation of all of the understory that'll all be removed. Um it's all very old, at least 20 years old. Um and most of the trees and palms will be removed and replaced. We will keep pretty much a lot of the gumbo limos which are nice and a lot of the oaks but some of the trees just aren't they're just old and haven't done so well. Um some of the site data that's again it's 1.4 acres. Uh the building area the current building is 6,99 square feet. We're not adding or reducing any square footage to the building. Um the outdoor seating would consist of 24 seats. Uh we have some tables and umbrellas which would uh add to that. Uh the existing open space is currently 26.5%.We're actually increasing that to 28.7%open space. Um and 25% is the minimum required by your code. Um as Jay had mentioned,the code parking required is 77 spaces. Uh the shared parking is 62. We're providing 79. So we're we exceed both of those. Um the reduction in building lot coverage is 23.2%.We are reducing that building lock coverage with the removal of the uh drive the drive-thrus at our PZB meeting at the end. Uh they that was brought up about our freestanding sign. Um in this little snippet here,this is the front of the property on US Highway One. This is our proposed sign location. Um your code has a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line. Um and in this particular location,the sidewalk is actually not on the property line. kind of sits about 9 ft off. So with our proposed location there, we're about 19 ft off of the back of walk. Um the existing sign that's out there is about one and a half feet from the property line and so about 10 and a half ft from the from the back of walk. This is the sign that we had previously gone in with and went to PCB with which is a 16 foot overall height which your code does allow for. Um so we have uh per their request we have dropped the sign 25% uh reduction down to a 12t height. Um so this is what we are currently proposing. Uh we've added some architectural features of the sign.This on the top we've got the decorative aluminum grill which is a feature on the on the proposed architecture. We've got some stucco wood siding look on the bottom which is also part of the architecture. and the owner just asked that we could continue to keep the 60 foot square foot sign face which is the maximum allowable by code. Um and here what we've done this is the view standing in the middle of US Highway 1 looking south. Um as you can see that's the existing uh approximately 7 foot sign that was for the bank. Um and this is the proposed sign. We just wanted to show this to to show that it really is not it doesn't look that large from US one and it kind of needs to be a little larger because there is so much going on out there today. We've got the Royal Palms which will be replaced but they'll still be there. We got light poles.We got street signage and it's the view coming from the north is actually not any better.You don't really see it until you hit the turnland because you can see those palm trees in the median. So you don't have a whole lot of time to see the sign even coming from the south as well. Um, I think I'd shown you some of these in the preapp about 14 months ago, but this is some Chipult Lane facts uh on the drive-thru. Um, it does allow for customers to pick up an order without having to park their vehicle and walk into the restaurant. Uh,the customers cannot place an order at the menu board or pickup window. Um,there is no menu board, so they definitely can't do that. Uh the pickup window is only available to those customers who have placed a prior order via their Chipotle app or through the Chipotle website. Payment of the order is also made through that app or the Page 464 of 572 Aganda.KWIZ#I 0ay at the window. Um if the order isn't ready when they arrive,they just uh or they arrive early. They're asked to park and the food will be brought out to them. Um they've done some studies on some higher volume stores. So these last two things I think are probably about double what this store probably would have. On the higher volume stores, uh they had they had shown the average of only two customers in a lane at a time through the in the drive-thru and an average time at the windows about 1 minute 13 seconds. And again,these were some high volume stores like Columbus, Ohio, I think Los Angeles, and some high volume locations. This is the architecture on the top of course is the building you recognize,the existing building. The bottom is the proposed uh elevation.This is the east elevation facing US1. Um,the architecture maintains the covered arcade as mentioned. It removes some of the large the large bulky drive-through structure as you can see those very huge tunnels there on the left. Um, it removes the dated Spanish Mediterranean style and finishes on the building. Proposes a light airy coastal architectural style. Reduces blank walls and increases window openings. It also utilizes light softer tone colors of silver aberine green and some muted whites. Um, again,this is the the top is the east elevation.The bottom is the rear elevation facing west. Some of the features are the silver standing seam metal roof. Um,that is the aluminum decorative screening that we've also mimicked onto the freestanding sign. Uh, they got some brackets and exposed rafter tails throughout the building. Some louvered shutters all the way around the the structure, decorative lighting, um, and also the uh the stuccoed horizontal sighting look which is also all around the building. And we've also mimicked onto the freestanding sign.These are backwards. I apologize.The top is not north. It's actually the south side. That's the drive-thru side of the building on the top.And the bottom is the north elevation which be facing to Questa Drive. As you can see the amount of windows. So on the south, north and east side is the building is full of windows.This is the 3D rendering. Again,this is just the east elevation there on the left side and the north elevation on the right. Uh you can see the amount of windows and all the detail.They've really done it. The architects I think did a great job again with your staff's help. I mean it didn't look like this in the beginning. It took a few renditions and actually a whole new architect to get to this point. Um and the arcade in the front really makes it nice. I I think it looks great. Um in conclusion, the project does adhere to all development regulations of your mixeduse zoning district. Uh the redevelopment of this existing site uh does strive to meet as many of the proposed US Highway 1 overlay requirements as we could as we could. Uh the redeveloped architectural styles in conformance with the architectural design guidelines of the commercial corridor master plan. We are requesting no variances as the project does meet all special exception and site plan review criteria and is compliant with all your zoning codes and comp plan requirements. Um, as I'd mentioned that all old overgrown existing landscaping will rem be be removed and completely refurbished um, exceeding your code. And lastly,this redevelopment will place an active vibrant use in a vacant structure on a main corridor once again revitalizing this prominent gateway parcel within the village and will set a standard for other parcels to follow. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you,Troy. All right. Okay. So, I think um the first item we are going to consider is a special exception agenda item 20.And Jay, can you come up to the podium, please? I just I want to be clear so everyone's on the same page. We're specifically um approving or denying the fast food use. If there's questions or comments on the mobile drive-through lane, is that to be saved for the site plan application or would that apply to the special exception? That would be part of the use. I mean, if if there were concerns about traffic or impacts on ingress and egress on other properties. I think that's that's more of a use question than a site plan question. 50. Okay. I just want to get put that on record because I know now that we have done them together sometimes we get convoluted what we can talk about on which application. So thank you for um confirming that and council I'll open the floor. So can you just repeat so this item we're commenting on what are we not commenting on site plan?Yes. No site plan comments. We're strictly going to address a special exception used for the fast food.And if anyone has comments on the um mobile lane, drive up lane that we could bring it up with this application. Not okay. We don't have to wait for this. But as far as if we wanted to comment on the overall aesthetic design of the building is that we're not even going there. We'll wait for it 21. Fair enough. So this is just the Chipotle lane. Okay.And the fast food use and the fast food use. Okay. So thank you Troy. Appreciate it. Um, in the past I was vocal about the use and just given the it's the gateway like we addressed. Um, and it's not because I don't like Chipotle. I actually love Chipotle. It's just,you know, it's the whole not in my backyard kind of Page 465 of 572 AgWidaAMM &,you know,the more I've thought about this,you know, I think we all would have loved to have seen,you know, make it maybe a local more unique use here. But the fact is this property sat for three years and nothing's happened. no one's tried to do anything unique with it. Um, and so,you know,with that thought in mind and the fact that it's not a Waw Wa, um, and I have to point out, it's kind of, it's interesting. We never have council meetings on Tuesday and today's Taco Tuesday. So,just got to point that out there. Um, but yeah, I, as far as I can tell, all the special exception criteria, um, the review criteria has been met. Um, so I don't have any objections to um the special exception. I I do like I've never been to a Chipotle that has a Chipotle and I think it's cool. I think there's probably a little bit of misinformation out which happens with residents.They hear drive-thru and they're assuming this like stack drive- thru. That is not what this is. I'm confident of that. Um, all in all, I I don't really have any objections to it. I'll I'll comment on the the design on the next item, but um again,the review the review criteria has been met as far as I can tell. So, uh have no objections. Okay, let me keep this organized.Thank you for clarifying that. Yeah, because I know we go down this road. All right, sticking to what this item specifically is for. I do have concerns on behalf of some residents. Um I feel like I'm getting more higher percentage concerns for it than the other um percentage is lower who would want a Chipotle. Now taking out the name Chipotle, part of what we look at when we have these things come to us is does it fit?And unfortunately, feel like we have so much Mexican food everywhere and it's so it's just such an easy food to make. I don't know if we need more of it. So, I'm not really saying no to fast food, but I think for me, right this split second before I hear public comment and my fellow council members thoughts, do we need this type of fast food?There's so many options out there these days,you know? I mean, so many options, right? and so much farm totable and creative things. And I'm not I don't want to say another company's name because I really don't personally like them, but I know they're popular and I think it'd be more fitting. So, I'm kind of torn between does this even fit into Questa. And once it's here, this use,you know, it's here and then let's say it doesn't survive and then the next person comes in and let's say it's not even as good as Chipotle. I mean, I have to consider those things for future because it's not always us sitting up here either. and the residents like to stick around. We don't have a ton of movement. People who are selling their houses tend to be retirees or unfortunately they passed away and the family is selling the house. So I consider residents stick when they move here.They're here and they're dedicated. So I'm going to listen. Um I'm really not fully decided yet. I would like to hear full circle and I'll pass the torch to Mr. French.Thank you. First I need to make correction. Um, I did speak with staff previously on this item and I don't know if we need to go back through or if it's just on record. I did speak with staff so I apologize for that mistake. Um, on the special exemption, I do not believe it meets the criteria of item number eight uh whether the change is uh in scale with the neighborhood. So, I'm a no on the special exemption for this proposal. Okay. Um,thank you um to for to the applicant and for coming back again again. Um, a question for for Jay perhaps. Um,this I want to be make sure I'm clear again and in basic terms this special use exception, right? Is this for because it's a fast food or because there there's it's the pickup lane or is it because under the existing zoning which overlays don't even come into play?Yeah, our definition Yeah, I mean our definition of fast food is is right here. So, um it's it's generally for for the for the drive-through lane or the the takeaway lane. So, it's a permitted use with a special use exception. Correct. If if they didn't have the fast food lane, it would be a permitted use. It would be. So, all right. So, without So, without that,we wouldn't be having this discussion. So if there was no pickup lane and I think that that definition is out to be debated.The reason I ask is is that is that if if there was no kickup lane would just be an approval by by right. So we wouldn't be and then what an approval by right. If we deny that approval by right what is the recourse for the applicant and what position is the village potentially put in if we deny an approval by right? Keith and I are both rereading this. I'm looking up the zoning code right now myself. So, good question. Yeah. So,this is off the top of my head, but restaurant takeaway is a permitted use in in the MU district. So,that'd be like like three natives, right?Which is more of you. You go up, there's a preset menu,you take it away. you're generally there are some seats there but you're generally you know taking it to go um I believe it would qualify as that but the way that this is written so the the definitions do not specifically refer to drive-thru through, which is where it gets tricky. So, Page 466 of 572 A9e4WianRQlr1Mi#16-apply on this.Yeah. And is it semantics, drive-thru,walk up, pick up?Just trying to determine if what what's the purpose of what we're what do we what can we approve or what can we not approve? Sure. We're looking at the code.Thank you for your patience. I should have come prepared for this question. I apologize. It's hearing all the presentations.This is what came to me. It has to have all Keith. Are you looking up definitions?Yeah. So,the the code For the mixed juice zoning district, a fast food restaurant has to obtain a special exception.The code has four elements for the drive up window that have to be met plus all the special exception criteria that any special exception use has to meet which uh were gone through in the presentation. So, it's both. It's they both need to be approved.The drive the the use as a fast food restaurant, the drive window has the code has stacking lane requirements, bypass lane requirements, US1 frontage. I don't think there's any question this has US1 frontage. And then a landscape buffer requirement. So those things have to be met as well as the criteria that were discussed during the presentation for a general fast food restaurant which is up on the screen right now is the definition for that. So it it see I'm confused if we have for the walk up or the drive up or whatever it's called the window there are there are exceptions to be met or conditions to be met but yet we can't talk about that because isn't that site plan? No. So, um, if you don't mind, I So,the way I interpret it when I was reviewing this,you know, over the weekend was this is coming before us because it's fast food. Um, whether it had a drive-thru or not, it had to come before us because it's listed as fast food. So,that's why I brought up can there is a drive-thru component on this. Is this something that we address on the special exception or site plan?and both parties say special exception and it does have under that special exception use it has criteria for a drive up window with stacking and how it should be marked in design and whatnot. So you're saying fast food triggered the special exception that we're speaking on. That's how I'm reading it. Fast food restaurant triggers the special exception in this zoning district. In this case,you also have the drive up window which has four additional criteria in the code that have to be met.Talking talks about stacking the bypass lane,the US1 frontage and the landscape buffer. And Keith, I think you sort of have you have both things. And I well, I think what Mr. Stori was saying was if the drive-thru wasn't there, would they still need the special exception?still need a special exception, but the drive-thru criteria would be irrelevant. Okay. But in this case,there is a pickup window or a drive-thru and we based on,you know,we had wasn't part of the presentation, I don't think. So those four things we assumably would be met. Landscape, I think,y would be met. Um, thank you for somewhat clear clarifying that. Um the ingress egress here's my concern and and it falls under number two for of the review. Is it designed located and proposed to be operated so the public health safety welfare and morals I'm focused more on the safety and perhaps the the welfare. Um next door is the CVS who's got a drive-thru that goes east to west.This will come around the building. Well,they'll come in off of US1, which can cause some problems if it's going to be a very successful, busy restaurant. We got backing up coming.They're going to be U-turning coming north to either U-turn to get in off of US1,then to or to turn left, cut in through Italiano, go down Main Street. Um, so we've got CVS going one way.We've got the people going around the building causing what appears to be a little bit of chaos. the pickup window. If it's not ready,they're going to drive around or go park and it's going to be walked out to somebody, which is not your typical drive-thru.Typically in a drive-thru, it's they just unfortunately most places just back up. Um, and don't forget,we have the Harvey School just to the immediate west of that, which is a pickup lane. I don't know where the pickup lane comes in, but I can see the convergence of CVS people trying to leave or enter the west the southwest corner of this subject parcel the Harvey school lane either coming at coming east or going south on the side of the building and just a convergence there. People walking across the to the pickup lane because the I see the they're ang they would drive around the building still not there. They would park at a diagonal facing US1.That's what it looked like.And somebody an employee would have somebody's have to walk across that to do that. And I know that studies have shown only two people would be stacked up and average weight times a minute and 13. But I have a I have a big concern with the safety under number two um for just that parking.And can Troy, can you address that or uh Yes. Um, actually that's the the traffic flow that's proposed is exactly the way it operates the last 20 years. I mean it it's all one way from west to east on the south side of the building with the three drive-through lanes. We only have the one um plus a pass through lane.That's the way it is. Page 467 of 572 AgeMatifem 016wt and the crosswalk we're showing is in the same location that it is today. Yeah. I don't know if the Harvey School was there when it was an operating bank. So it was there when the Harvey school moved to the current location or when they were on drive was um large but it was there. Okay. And over the years we've extended her floor space. Yeah. And I believe they also utilize one of the vacant parcels on Paradise Park as we call it for their green space and their PE. So I have concern about that. So just saying I've got a concern with that. Hopefully we'll have less traffic there with only one one number. And then number six on the review criteria, adequate off-streetet parking is nothing ingress and my same comments.The ingress egress um without interference with traffic on abuing streets. I think people U-turning to get in is going to cause a problem. Um this is not a Chick-fil-A, so we're not going to have cues wrapped around the building. Um but I have concerns. I'm not saying no, but I have huge concerns with two and six.And a comment was made before a prior presentation was waw wa you know and I made the comment then and I'm saying it now welcome to Tqua here's 12 lanes of gasoline this is I think the entrance to our city and I feel that what we're welcome to toqua and as much as we landscape it we still got a Chipotle at the entrance to a city that was founded 1957 and really hasn't thrived on fast food formula restaurants. Um, so I I'm struggling with this because I the use,the layout,the pickup window, um, and just the overall compatibility and, uh, and public outcry. You know, again, while I've received probably 12, 13 communications via text and of which I've all put in the public record for the record. Um,that uh, they no one's texted me and saying, "God, I can't think, God,thank God we're getting a fast food restaurant,you know, and I'm elected. I feel my job is listen to my constituents and I have not it's been 14 to zero.That doesn't mean there's not another 6,100 people that think it's the greatest thing that we're getting that. But I have some concerns. I'm really concerned with the ingress egress and the safety is my biggest hangup at this moment. So, um the the ingress egress I mean I've drove around it a couple times myself understanding it's vacant. Um there were some cars parked in that parking lot which I'm assuming are part of the shared parking agreement maybe from the building um behind them to the west but um I know in the in the um backup we have in the traffic study there was not FOT approval for US1 and can you explain why F dot because that would maybe bring up some of the concerns you have with U-turns and ingress egress off of that your concern was a US1 entrance yeah the first three or four times if somebody's going to go before they realize they can turn on to Quester Drive, but then they're going to wrap around the other building to get into that and then they're immediately beginning to go in the face of people leaving the CVS. I just have concerns with the traffic flow and the fact it's right where it's located within our village. I know the county said it meant their standards, but why does FD do not review it since it's coming off US1 as well? Good question.Yeah. So, because it's an existing curb cut and they're not adding a new curb cut,then there's no it doesn't trigger an FOT review. So, even though there's a change of use with the property,they don't care. Correct.And with 400 additional new trips, net new trips,that doesn't trigger anything. Okay.Absolutely. And then with the uh special exception is I understand it's for the fast food restaurant, but does that is that just for the Chipotle or if if it ends up being a different fast food restaurant, can they put anything in because we approved a fast food restaurant or would they have to come back um for another restaurant if if it were to change? So you're approving or denying the use, not the brand. So whether it's Chipotle or any other fast food restaurant that could use the same configuration that's been presented to you tonight, it doesn't matter. It's again, it's the use, not the brand. So, if you approved the use as presented with the traffic and the buffering and and everything the the way it's been presented and Chipotle came out and someone else came in under the exact same configuration,that would be permissible within we have the 90-day clause, right? So,they'd have to um come in within 90 days of that um because it's a the non-conformity, correct?Yes. What? So, so if another if another if the same exact use came in within 90 days of who, let's say you approved the fast food restaurant now, if they if the other one opened within 90 days of that one closing,they would they would be vested in and grandfathered in. But if it goes past the 90 days,they'd have to come back in for use by exception. And that's part current code, not that's current code.That's non-conforming code. That's pretty standard in most cities, right?So that in that example, you would presume that Chipotle comes in,gets approved, opens, operates, closes. Somebody else comes in within the 90 days,they could pick up the ball and run with it. If it's more than that,then uh it would expire and they'd have to come back for another approval for the special exception. Could a condition of approval Page 468 of 572 AgiamdaJtemf#16i;ything other than a Chipotle,they have to come back? I'm not I don't think you can condition it on again on on the brand. Okay. It's the use. It's not the brand. But what if what if they came in and they wanted to have a drive-thru, but a significantly modified drive-thru that is not. So that would be different. If if it's different and it affects the special exception criteria, which in this case to drive up part of the use has four specific code sections that have to be addressed. So, if there's a change,that would have to be brought back and you would have to make a determination that the change still complies with the code. Got it.Thank you. Okay. Um, and I know that I'm kind of hung up on the on the mobile the drive-through line because I know that to me it is you have two lanes of ongoing traffic.There's really not a delineated there's a walkway to the east but you know if cars are parked more you know west of that like I am and people walk up to the window or like you said the staff is walking out I have some concerns with safety there um I guess and I read the like 100page Chipotle lane whatever report it was but what what's the huge benefit or is there a huge loss if that drive-through mobile pickup lane goes Okay, I think it's Can you come to the podium and just state your name? Hi, Will Crow, real estate manager for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Thanks for let me letting us be before you tonight and uh appreciate uh the time. So,the uh operationally, it's what our leadership wants. It's what our guests like to have. um instead of you know uh you know similar to a Starbucks or another uh fast feeder uh you know maybe somebody with a car load of family or you know they just don't have time to come in. So um it's operationally what we would prefer. could take it back to our leadership though if it's something that the council has an uh issue with and see if we might be able to uh proceed forward without it here if that's a a big deal for uh the residents,the community and the council. Okay,thank you for commenting on that. Um because maybe there could be some improvements with the traffic flow if that's gone. I know um because I know with Starbucks they did a landscape buffer to buffer that lane and then also just from aesthetic point to kind of hide it. Sure. I when I was talking to Jay, it looks like that's a striped um just like a striped line between the drive aisle lane.Yeah. Perhaps a perhaps an actual curb could be added. Again, I'm not a but I don't know because I don't know if fire will have the required space they need. So,there's really nothing to do there with a buffer either for safety. Um because I think the overall dimension because I think fire needs 20 feet. I can't 20 feet. So,you're we're kind of restricted there with that as well. Um so, I'd be I'd be more inclined to okay this without the mobile lane. Um just I know we're trying to get away from that. Sure. Um, and I know I even since this meeting,we've received some emails of people not in favor of Chipotle. I've talked to a lot of people that are in favor of Chipotle. So, for me, I'm really split on that aspect. Um, well, we appreciate the opportunity nonetheless. And, um,you know, we're we know we may not be for everybody, but um, we really like to embed ourselves in the community. We will probably create about 60 jobs here with this restaurant, and we like to hire from within a community. and we would be proud to be part of of uh your town and uh again appreciate the time and uh like I said uh if we if it came down to the you know it's not my ultimate decision but happy to take it back to my leadership on the uh Chipotle lane and if that were to be disintegrated uh if we would still proceed. My guess is is probably yes but I can't go on the record officially to say that because it's not my decision. Okay.And then if we in my opinion if we were to get rid of that and say Chipley doesn't come in and someone else were to we kind of mitigate I think that risk of having like a more intense drive-thru down the road. I mean someone could always remodel the building but then again that would come to us versus someone just be able to kind of trying to use what's there. So again maybe a way to mitigate those concerns in the future too if something else were to go on that space. Um, and then the parking, I don't know if that's supposed is the parking supposed to be addressed with this or I know there's the criteria that you kind of brought up with the parking any ingress egress, but any parking concern should be with the site plan modification should be the site plan. Got it. Okay, I will take uh council, any other comments or questions? I'll make my final comments after public comment. Okay. Is there any public comment cards tonight, Lori? Nope.Any public comment?We don't have any public comment so but I would like to say for the record I know many of us have gotten texts calls emails other forms of communications and again for me it was it's mixed but it for when measure what I've heard it's heavier percentage on one side after listening and looking at the map and I am a family um I I like drive-throughs um for obvious reasons I've been in the position where I've had a baby sleeping and it was nice to be able to go through I see I try to look at every angle. I've been in every situation, but again, I'm looking at our village. Page 469 of 572 AgencWyltiew#1 fNrpose. Um, even Starbucks has the more modern. Okay. So, I'm looking at your use.The more modern way of these businesses doing is not even a pickup window anymore. So, I almost after listening don't think you even need that. You could just do the mobile app because you're already really focusing on the mobile app, online orders, have them park. I feel like that is safer than having parking plus pulling up then having them go park because you're not ready yet. Not you, but the food. I think you should just eliminate that all together and just stick to mobile ordering and having an employee deliver it so you have less people coming and going. I'm also an advocate for if you don't have a baby or it's not downpouring, send your teenager in there. make them go in there and do some work and pick up their stuff. So,that's where I'm kind of sitting right now is I don't think we need the window or the drive-thru. I think we should just eliminate that. Plus,for me long term, if Chipotle doesn't make it, what comes in there next?And I think that safeguards the village as a whole. Um, so that's where I'm sitting after listening. And I I want to bring up what council member Painter mentioned when he started off this conver kicked off the conversation. That property has been sitting banket for a long time and it looks awful.And in my opinion,the next agenda item uh that we're discussing is a beautiful building that they went out of their way to make nice and fit into Questa. We had awa come here which was a hard no from everyone I believe up here. And then we've had even local businesses, existing local businesses come with conceptuals and they kind of got some negative feedback from some councils. So,you know, I'm always kind of like, well, what's next?You know, we could approve or deny this and if it gets if it were to get denied, like what's the next best option?So, I feel like you're always at that risk. And there's been several things at the property already. And um everything I've seen on the next agenda agenda item, it's a it could be a beautiful improvement there. Um, I do I would really like to see that mobile mobile window go away and have no drive-through. I think maybe it could they could rearrange it and it could mitigate some of um the uh circulation concerns and safety concerns there. Is that doing could we could we approve it with a condition of approval to remove that window? I think that's an excessive condition of approval, but the applic you you could ask the applicant what their position is on revising their plan to do that. But I I would no, I don't think that you can impose that condition and and force that.You get to approve it as presented or or but that's what's presented at the moment. So that's what I was going to ask if if maybe it would help if we you know he will they take it back to the their you know higherups and they talk about whether the drive-through is definitely needed or not needed would it you know we could postpone it look at that and if they agree to that we could look at the site plan without the drive-thru and bring it back.way. I don't I don't I mean sounds like there's kind of mixed use or mixed uh concern with the use itself, but you know, if we could take a look at the plan without the pickup window and bring it back in front of you. For me, I would appreciate that, but there does there's been kind of a mixed bag of um concerns with the use. So, I I I don't want to waste your time doing that. So, should we I don't how would we address that?just poll counsel on if because I guess if do we vote or do we not like how do we address that? So because like I said I don't want to waste your time if it's going to be no regardless because some you know don't want a chipotle then you know it's the building itself is the next item. Well, if the applicant requests the item be postponed to take that step,then that request could could be formally made and you could um the item could be tabled until they come back. Um, including the next agenda item,they both agenda item 21 is dependent on agenda item 20 being approved.There's no site plan until the uses is approved. So, uh, they would they would both you'd hit the pause button on both if that request is made. Mayor, can I make a comment?Absolutely.from living here um since like 2011 and visiting before that just historically when we look at the use those aren't sticking anymore in the village and that's kind of what I was trying to say earlier is almost would love to see a revisit of what could be the other half of that building for the use I'm not saying it has to be non-food it could be food but I'd like to I'd like to see if you guys would consider that because Subway left Um,what was the other?Wendy's left. Pizzas are super competitive. Mexican is very competitive.They come,they go. And that's where I'm kind of sitting with the use is I still don't think it fits the village. And I'm just going historically and fictionally, too, based on what's been coming and going.And that's it. If it helps the decision at all, I'm going to know either way if it's drive-thru or not drive-thru. I I would I would I would concur. Um, not only do I have concerns with the um, ingress and egress, um, I just don't think it fits and and Councilman French had talked about one of the other criteria and don't think it fits. Um. I really want that building to to be occupied. I just don't think this is the use for it. So, I would Page 470 of 572 Aga0aI1tQMi#.'We in in fairness to the applicant, I can't imagine no walk up window is going to change my opinion on that. So, I just want to I want to be fair to the mayor's comments. No, exactly.Thank you. So, let me add a couple of comments. From a qua judicial hearing standpoint,your your decision needs to be based on the evidence in the record. So if you believe that regardless of the drive up window,there is still some special exception criteria in one through six that's on the board because if the drive up window goes away,the other code criteria become irrelevant. based on what's before you tonight. I think that's an acceptable position to take, but it would be inappropriate to presuppose something based on a future presentation that hasn't been made yet. If if if that if you understand what I'm saying, as it stands tonight,two and six, I I am I am convicted in and that two and six would do not meet the meet the requirements.That's regardless and your and I understand that's that's your um that's what you believe based on the evidence, but then that's regardless of whether there's a drive up component or not.That's correct.That's I said that. Even if with the drive up, I would say as presented tonight with a walk up window, would say I am I'm standing firm with two and six. Okay. Okay. So,yeah, let's take a vote then. Yeah, I I'm I'm sticking with my original comments. I mean, I I get it.You know, we'd all love this to be some local um business owner that wanted to put in a nice local restaurant without a pickup window, but I have a a lot of fear that if we keep saying no, eventually it's going to be something we really don't want. And I mean I we're being very picky in my opinion. I really do think that and I oppose this. You know,the last design, which I know we're not talking about, I would have never approved it. We'll get to that on the next one. But we all need to understand that if we keep saying no, eventually something might end up here we really don't want and it might just by right we may not have an opinion. So listen, we all have an opinion.That's fine. Um but I'm sticking with my comment. I can't seem to find I've read one through six at least three times and I am very other than the ingress egress which is very much dependent on that the pickup window. I can't see anything up there other than the fact that it's a it is a fast food and yes, I get it. We'd all love to have not a fast food there, but consider the alternative is what I'm saying. So, right now, I'm okay. I'm in favor of it. I think we're going at risk here. So, someone should make a motion and then since we do have to justify our votes on the criteria, let's we'll do a roll call after someone makes a motion. to approve or deny. So, we got to make something. So, I'll go ahead and I'll just make a motion to approve just to get that ball rolling. How about that?Second.To approve. I'm sorry.You can make a motion to approve. No. He's making a motion. My motion was to approve strictly because we got to get the vote going here.That's where I stand right now. I'll let somebody else go. Okay. So,there's no second. So, can I get a motion to deny, which I think someone else wants to do? I move to deny the special special exemption. And can we get a roll call or I need a second on that?Sorry. And again, I would ask the maker the motion to specify criteria that you believe have not been met. Okay. I was going to do roll call for that, but you want him to do it now. My request would be to be that it be part of the motion so that the record is clear. I make a motion to deny the special exemption based on the criteria 2, six, and eight. Does eight apply? 2, six, and what was eight? Eight of of chart number two of the second uh review criteria. There's two separate criteria, correct? Correct. Which one?Yeah. So, if I I need clarity, please. Um there's the review criteria under 78 363. So two and six under section 78 363 and then 8 under it's 64 6 uh 64. Is that correct? You want me to remake the motion? I just want to make sure I'm clear on which I mean there's only one number eight but I need to know which number two and six which code section then. Okay. Special exception number 26 of 78363 and number 80364. Okay.Thank you. Does everybody understand the motion? Yes. Sure. Everybody understands what the motion is.Thank you. So everyone can agree to that. You don't need us individually saying the criteria that we don't think it meets.The motion is uh agend uh criteria 2 and six under village code section 78 363 and criteria 8 under village code section 78 364. Okay. So we can all just Okay. All right. Can I get a second? I'll second. All in favor? I I I and I will specifically say it's just for a criteria 78364 um for the ingress and egress or no I'm sorry I think that's 70 360 64 yeah for the ingress and egress um just specifically for the Page 471 of 572 AgendaMem#46e 1 align with what council member Patrick was saying council member painter did you did you vote I I'm haven't changed my position. You still need to say yay or nay. So nay.Thank you. That was a that was a confusing one.Thank you everyone. Um so do we even do we even talk about agenda Jay?We don't even talk about agenda item 21. 1 mean does a property owner want any feedback? I mean are they going to come back with another tenant space? I don't know if it's permissible to talk about it and give them any feedback at all. That's a bummer. I had feedback. Uh, no. At this point, I guess he's going to have to just Chipotle is just a tenant. So, the property owner is going to have to take a look at what he's going to do. Um,you know, I know you guys want local local businesses. Problem is local businesses don't have the staying power.They don't have bank power.They can't pay these these rates for buildings like this. So, it's that's big that's a big problem with trying to get small users. So, he's going to have to evaluate what he want what he's going to do with the property. Do you want feedback for the property owner though on the on the next agenda item if that's permissible or do you not want feedback as far as the site plan goes?Yeah. Well, I mean the site plan I guess will change now depending on the whole new user at this point if he can find one. So, okay. Okay.Thank you. All right.Thank you for your time tonight.Thank you,Troy. Okay. So,we are skipping agenda item 21. Moving on to agenda item 22, resolution 17-25, adopting our refuse and recycling and yard waste collection rates for next year. Good evening, mayor,vice mayor, council, uh Jeff Snyder. I'm happy to be here. We're looking at uh solid waste rates and uh we have a contract with them. Does this thing work? No, it's not set for that.Just tell me where you want to go. Okay. Um, back. Back. All right.This for the update on the refues and recycling rates. uh the re refu and recycling fund has been um using up the reserves that we have and it's time that we want to look at maybe re re visiting the uh cost structure. Um, no ind indirect costs have been applied to this fund for 23, 24, 24, 25 and um, we don't anticipate being able to keep it in the black without moving. We are in a contract and uh, with Waste Management WM for automated automated pickup.The agreement has CPI increases uh not to exceed 5.75 for this fiscal year.Their rate will be 4.88 and staff is asking for an additional 3.5%to cover the costs. Remember what happens is it's on our tax bill. It's a nonadvalorum tax nonadalorum uh assessment. Early payers get up to a 4%discount depending on when they pay. So that eats into our uh herbs.This thing um will be $163 a month or$196 56.Thank you.Thank you very much. Um so that's that's where we are.That's what we're asking for. And a bittersweet point that I would like to point out is I have my notice from Port St. Lucy. It is also going up$20 uh a year and we are going to be paying$467.33 for one time a week. So it's very bittersweet to me. It's it's very sweet because uh the manager worked a great deal with our friends in waste management and I get to pay substantially more money is the bitter part. But that's that's what we're looking at. I have uh projections here to show you that we believe if we go this way that we won't be back for several years. Uh if they go the way if people aren't taking more of the discounts than they have. Historically, we've been looking about two to 3% uh early pay discounts and so we kept that trend up and we'll be able to go at least um a few more years before we come back but it will have uh annual increases up to 5.75 depending on CPI. Can I just add a couple of points? Uh you can see from our and he mentioned in our slide from our projections we have not created we have not collected indirect costs that we typically do for all of our funds. Uh this is to help stabilize that fund. Um I know Mr.Jeff Sabin is here. I I I told him you know he it'd be great if he he would come in case there's any questions as far as operations or comparable services that we have. He did provide me some updated cost. Uh Jupiter's rate is 2442 for similar service.Juno just passed their rate very similar service at 2171. JF JIC is 4353 almost you know double ours. Palm Beach Shores is 2081. Martin County is 26.They have two bids out that are in the 2627 range. So um our rates at 1956 going up to 1956 is very comparable and and u competitive. Thank you. All right. council open up for discussion. I I don't have any questions or comments. I I agree. I think uh our village manager and staff have negotiated as good of a deal as possible here, so I'm good with it. Page 472 of 572 Agandavltwa 1#166bout trash.We need it. It's hard to argue.Jeff, I appreciate you work with our staff all the time and always trying to be open-minded to what we're always asking from you.just please try to keep that,you know, in our relationship. I know the residents will appreciate it.Thank you.Jeff, no comments. Yeah. Um, thanks to staff and to WM. We really appreciate it. Um, you know,this is we victim to the collection method. You know,we are losing when people prepay in November. We we're losing and this is really recouping that. Uh, we we stopped doing, as you can see by for the public, you can see we stopped collecting the indirect costs or,you know, reimbursing for admin. Um, and I just think we have to do this or we're going to be tapping into the reserves that we worked so hard and councils well before I was involved to get us to where we are. So, it hurts.We did it for the water capital improvement charge for the water that we we talk about repeatedly on how can we get around that or what can we do to to get rid of that.And if it sounds like what I've been told um by our manager is that,you know, next year it hopefully will be less than three and a half% and then you can see here it hopefully goes away in two in years two. So, um, I'm in support of this. I hate there's any type of increase, but this is an enterprise, you know,this is like an enterprise fund that needs to, it needs to pay for itself. So, I think we really need to do that.And to add the staff to bill it monthly and collect it ourselves to get that discount back, we're just going to have to hire another person. So, we I don't think we gain anything by doing that. So, I'm in support of this.As much as I hate the fee increase, but I'm in support of it. Yeah, I'm good with the WM portion of the resolution, of course, but I'm still kind of on the fence with that 3.5%fee um recovery charge or whatever we want to call it for us. Um what is the dollar amount on that slide said 9,000 a year? What what dollar amount is that for this year and maybe next year and the following year?And you're saying we might be caught up in a third year. Recapturing here is$25,000 for this upcoming year and that's to to give us operating money. And if it does go down, I mean the discounts accepted are more than that,then we'll have some money for some leeway there. I think we're being very conservative at this ask and I don't believe we'll need to be asking next year if we approve it this year other than the the WM. So if you don't have to ask next year and you're saying it's just$25,000. Um it it's just been a hard pill to swallow. Everything's going up,you know, everything's constantly going up every single year and and it's always justified. But know,you know, again, we're bringing in more property tax revenue again this year, more than last.And I feel like 25,000 is such a small amount. Um,you know, we're not potentially not based on the last budget workshop earmarking that 1.3 from reserves for Remembrance Park. I it's such a small amount. I know it's not um typical practice to transfer from the general fund to an enterprise account, but I think this is unique and I just like if there's any way we can provide relief to the residents and not have to increase yet another fee at such a small dollar amount, I don't and if you're saying 25,000 will do the trick and then we probably wouldn't even have to charge the fee again um not next year but the year after. I don't know. It's something I want to throw out there to see if council would want to consider. I think you make a valid point for the one year, but I'd still go with Jeff's recommendation on charging the additional for that year and then being done with it instead of making that general fund transfer. I just don't want to get in the habit of making those general fund transfers. I don't I don't mean to bring back up the water fund, but we have roughly roughly 7,000 homes that we that are we're collecting the$10 a month charge on. So that's $7,000. I'm just trying to is this how far apart is it from something we've already we've already done? Because then, oh, it's just$25,000 here and it's$40,000 there. Well,then let's just absorb the $10 a month hard cost,you know,the $120 a year for the water capital improvement fund. It's a service that needs to be paid for. I mean,we all pay it. It's it's not a regress I don't look at as a regressive tax. Everybody pays this. Everybody has garbage.They come two times a week.We've got an amazing contract and I think I don't want to go upside down because oh it's only just a little bit but that argument then it becomes incremental creep and we can see right that the the chart was up there that incremental creep in our in every fund we have then we're then we are supplanting it with our our general fund or our reserves and um you know I don't want to do this either and I understand where the mayor's coming from and anybody that is was okay with it but I'm just trying to be fiscally conservative and say no we're going to I think we need I don't want to increase it, but I'm going to pay it just like everybody else. It's not like I'm up here saying, "Oh,you you pay it, not me. I'm going to pay it just as everybody else is going to pay it." I think it's something that I I don't want to see it start dipping and make that, oh, it's just a little bit. It's just a little bit because a little bit times five enterprise funds times the next 10 years.Just have a concern with that.Yeah. And I I mean, I was a Page 473 of 572 AgaiadadteMAJ&ecause I I mean,trust me, I've been on the enterprise fund side of the policy committees. not that's not uh best practice. Usually it's looked down upon more from transfer from the enterprise funds to general fund because it means you're collecting too many too much user fees. Um not as frowned upon going the other way but like said a onetime thing. It's such a small dollar amount in the big picture with the increased revenue we've continued to receive every year. We've built up reserves and I just I feel like,you know, the people that are paying early are getting penalized for it now because,you know, like, oh, I'm gonna get a discount, but not really because I'm going to be charged somewhere else for that discount that I took. So, again, I just want to throw out there because um totally in favor of the WM part of this, but I'm not in favor of the the 3.5 increase because I think we could handle it another way for just this next year. Okay. Is there any public comment cards? No. Any public comment? Good evening everyone. Pat Watkins, 167 River Drive. I just wanted to offer that for decades now,Jeff Saven has been a wonderful partner to the village and has always worked well with us and been over backwards. And one of our um major I think benefits from this is during hurricane time, we're one of the first municipalities that are cleaned up. And uh even before this automated system, his guys coming by were so courteous and kind. If you're injured,they try to help you with the cans and all this.They bent over backwards. So I would encourage you to support this.Yes, prices are going up everywhere, but there's no reason there shouldn't. If they if this is what we need to carry on business well for the village and have the trash collection the way we're used to having it, I say support it. Thank you. Thank you. Any other public comment?All right. Can I get a motion? So move. I'll move it. Second.All in favor? I say no. I am in favor of the WM increase, but have to vote no because I'm not in favor of the village 3.5%fee we're tacking on. Okay. Okay. Moving on to the next agenda item 23, resolution number 13-24, adopting our storm water utility fees for next fiscal year. Good evening. Mar Marjorie Craig, utilities director, and this is the um a request to approve the annual um storm water rates for the stormwater enterprise fund. And we do that through a non-advelorum assessment on the annual to tax role. Uh like most of the stormwater utilities in Palm Beach County, um we're recommending the resolution and revised fee schedule increasing the storm water rates by 5%for fiscal year 2025.That equates to about $4.51 annually for the base residential rate and that equates to about 38 cents per month. And I realize that that is another increase, but it is something that's sorely needed by our storm water system. We are responsible for the operating and um maintenance of our stormwater system and for the MPDS which is just a um an acronym for the um uh county permitting storm water permitting and compliance requirements. So there's a lot of things that we are required to do by law to maintain our storm water system.And as you know, I have stood up here and talked about um our storm water system and the needs that we have. And we have tried everywhere we can to get grants. You're also aware of that. We have a current grant for the Dover Ditch project for improvement. And um we spent over$2.6 million over the last five years um to work to keep up with the maintenance of our system. And the biggest bang for the buck right now is storm water pipelining uh to get ahead of those failing storm water pipes. Um as a part of your packet um we have a recommended resolution for that rate increase uh also exhibit A um the proposed storm water rates and then a rate comparison of the village with other storm water utilities in the area.And we fall just a little bit to the right of the middle. Um and um then our net position and storm water budget. Um uh so that's our current rates and then our what we have planned for the coming year and what our net position is.And then we also included the proof of publication to our um to our residents and customers. Uh we did send out we posted it on the county website. Um and then also we sent out a letter to everyone. So with that, do you have any questions? Thank you, Marjorie. Council, any comments or questions? None.Thank you, Marjorie. No, ma'am.Thank you.Thank you. Thank you. And I will say unlike the previous agenda item, this one I'm really um pleased. I know we're taking half I think of the water utility tax to fund this year. So again,there we thought, you know, looked outside the box, so we don't have to charge more than the 5%this year. So I'm very pleased with that.Thank you.Any public comment cards?Yes, we have Michael Thomas. Good evening.Thank you, Mayor,Vice Mayor, and uh council. Michael Tomes, resident of Questa Trace 110D, Lighthouse Circle. I'm a past civil engineer, multiple states, including Florida. Retired,white hair. uh the village council. Page 474 of 572 AgondakttamAIC minutes of this section sent to me. Um I received on your July 11th letter on July the 20th which indicated that my personal increase was going to be of around $97.And then I sent my email into them. I understand section uh village section 74201 bracket 2 uh regarding the cost of operating the system and I know it has to be done and I'm fully behind that and it's to be allocated in a relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received there from but the quest of trace and it's 134 units receive no service. We don't connect to the storm water system. We're self-contained. I understand section 74202 definitions and what ERU means.And under one,the cost system and services which service each individual resident. Once again, this is not the case for Tquesta Trace. We maintain our own service. We have our own storm system. We have our own roads. It's a small section. Um,we are approximately uh 6%of the population of the village at Trquesta, but in the uh ERU units, we would make up about 8%.The issue is the association owns and maintains its own storm water system. I informed the village uh on the 20th when I got the letter and they sent me a second notice back in response uh that they received it on the 21st. And then in the mail, I got a restatement of the letter of which the rates were different than the first letter quoted to me.And the estimates of the money that you're gathering was different.The estimate was initially written down as 6,26 627,000. The new revised number on the new letter was$748,488. 27% increase my rate was the whole issue that I was presenting to the board through my email was so that the person in charge of doing this estimate would actually follow their own advice and rules and acknowledge that there was an error made. We to Quest of Trace are not in your storm water system. We get our water there. We pay our sewer bills, everything else, but we're not in your system. Why are we being charged?That's 134 units. Myself, my fellow members, I didn't receive an answer. Okay, sir. Um, unfortunately,your time's up, but maybe Marjorie can come up. Can you address some of these questions on the spot if you wouldn't mind?Thank you. I I'm going to have to get with him because I don't know.This was all calculated and and put together,you know, through another system. I don't know. I'll have to check into what he's talking about because I'm not Could sir, could you be sure to leave um your contact information so we can get in touch with you and address some of these questions after the meeting?Yeah.Thank you. I'm sorry. Okay. If if if sir if you maybe just leave your email with the clerk just to be sure before you leave tonight that would be great. Okay,you have it. Perfect.Thank you. We will absolutely get back in touch with you. All right. Is there any other public comment? Okay. Can I get a motion?So move. Second.All in favor? I moving on. I don't know. Moving on. We're on agenda item 24, correct?Yes. Agenda item 24, consider approval of Dvan agreement piggybacking town of Jupiter for utility repairs and improvements. Marjorie Craig, utilities director. And this is a piggyback on the town of Jupiter on their contract.And it's a sound utilities business to have a contract in place for utility repairs as needed. Um, and so we recommend approval.Thank you. Any comments from council? No comments. No comments. Any public cards in this one?Any public comment? Can I get a motion? So moved. Second. All in favor? I. Thank you. Thank you, Marjorie. Agenda item 25 or 2025 2026 benefits renewal for health, dental, and group life insurance. Marlene. Good evening, Madame Mayor,Vice Mayor, Council, Merlin Reid, Director, HR, Risk Management. First of all, I want to thank the committee that works together on this every year. We have Christian Burkstrom from the Garing Group. We have the PBA rep, Matt Munis, he and Ray Kowski.The IAFF rep,J Jason Faucet, along with Kayla Preston,who helped him out a little bit there. and we had Bo Chesnney who once represented the CWA as the manager advised um the CWA was descertified today.The management reps remain Brad Gonberg and Jeff Snder and we make our recommendations to the village manager. So I want to thank everyone for that. Okay.This item addresses the 2020 202526 benefits renewal for health, dental,group life insurance and the employee assistance program.The v the village currently offers fully insured medical, dental, basic life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance coverages along with the EAP. And at the employees expense, there is also vision, voluntary life, AD and D and voluntary long-term disability. Only health insurance and the EAP opened up this year as all other coverages were uh negotiated for a minimum of two years. So this year we continued to shop the market due to the fact that we're still experiencing large claims and at our Page 475 of 572 AgapdaeftQ11111446wed three proposal including our current carriers FMIT United Healthcare they came back with a 16.7% uh renewal number and then there's another uh company called Curative I understand they're new to the market they came in with 10.9 and then further blue came in with 9.2%.The committee unanimously agreed to recommend to the village manager that the health insurance plan be moved from FMIT UHC to Florida Blue effective 101 2025. So what are we looking at now?There's a the budget actually had a 9.2% um in we had put aside 9.2%estimated which is exactly what Florida Blue came in at. So it's important to note here that we are our philosophy with benefits and compensation is to match the market. But you will see I have a line here because Jeremy and I were talking about the fact that we need to take start taking a look at our current approach to providing health insurance while ensuring it's a delicate balance. ensuring that we continue to remain competitive and able to attract and retain employees. Um what does that mean specifically? Uh we intend to raise this matter during our union during the union negotiation process and to address in order to address the escalating costs um being uh that we're experiencing currently. Um if well uh we appendix A if you take a look at appendix A the total the overall breakdown if you go to the bottom the right extreme right column at the bottom you will see that the overall cost is uh $214,093 which is an overall 8.8%8% and of that the employer is looking at with the village is looking at 189204 which is 8.9 and the employees their share would be 24889 or a 7.7% increase. So, we are asking tonight um that council considers and approve um the 2025 renewals um for health, dental,group life insurance, and the EAP.And we are we are Christian and myself are now available to answer any questions that you have.Thank you, Merlene. Council, any comments or questions? Um thank you. No comments? No. Good job, Lori.Any cards? No. Any public comment? Okay. Can I get a motion? So moved. Second. All in favor? 1 I. Agenda item 26. Consider approval of property and casualty and ancillary insurance renewals for 2025 2026. Okay. Uh our property and casualty insurance is currently underwritten by Florida Municipal Insurance Trust and this includes property general liability, workers comp, cyber and auto. Um, each year it's important to note that the village receives a 7% credit with FMIT due to our active enforcement of our safety and drug-free workplace programs. Um, and that's 2 point 2%and 5% respectively.The major changes for the upcoming fiscal year are as follows. Property premium decreased by 15%which res which um translates to $73,169. 1 understand Ramy is here um from the Gearing Group as well that it's due to the current state of the market um and if you wanted more information on that she's happy to provide that but um apparently it's going down property premium. The other lines experienced um combined increases of$85,035. The most significant increases were general liability which went up 14%and workers comp which went up 22%. Combined together that's se $76,255. The reason for these increases are mainly impact. It's the impact of um our payroll which if you look at the attachment there you will see that we move from um roughly uh 10 mil to 1164 46823. So um our payroll and our headcount um uh that's the biggest contributing factors that we have there. We are fortunate um one thing we are very happy about if you look at um our experience mod factor right somewhere in the middle there where uh we were at 0.92 and now we're at 0.80 which is very good. It means that our workers come um we're trending in the right direction and um doing way better than previous years. I just took a quick look back at the previous years 2023 we were at 1.07 07 and 2022 1.13 which is not good. Uh so that helped to keep the workers comp um numbers down and then the rest cyber autophysical and auto liability accounted for under 10,000. So in summary FMIT uh for the upcoming year the total increase is 11,867 representing a 1.2%2% increase over the expiring years.The village also has some other ancillary lines of coverage to include public safety statutory AD and D firefighter cancer storage tank liability and crime policies. And together these policy premiums total $9,53 up 7%over the expiring year. Um there the agenda was updated this week to reflect a minor decline of$121 in premiums for the statutory AD and D. So um it the the numbers have changed a little bit. Appendix A outlines it's accurate on appendix A. It outlines a total renewal cost of$970,388 for all lines of insurance now inclusive of broker's fee. and it's up one overall 1.29%. And as always, I ask for an additional $10,000 to um fund an average of two deductibles. Our deductible payments each year. Um it our policy requires $5,000 um for deductibles. So there's I'm asking for an additional 10,000. So I've added on. So this accounts for an overall additional 10,000. So you will see 970,388 on the appendix and we're asking for$980,388. Page 476 of 572 Ag*M AQM414ecom mend i ng that we renew uh with the uh 2025 2026 property and casualty and workers comp with FMIT and the other four anxular policies with the carriers outlined in appendix A. And we're open for questions. Thank you, council.Any comments or questions from Merlene? No. No. Good job. No comments. Curious. Um, what is the autophysical damage? I mean,while it it went up percentage- wise, it's 24%, but it's about 3,500, but what what is the physical damage that literally what it um for in the event there's a a claim?So that's like comparable Rammy Mitchell Garing Group that's comparable to like your own auto insurance if you get into like a collision or there's a comprehensive damage like a tree falls on a vehicle that's typically just based on the cost of replacement costs for vehicles nowadays obviously having increased Florida's market terrible with respect to auto insurance um and again that has a lot to do with replacement costs but also the fact um of the matter is that it's based on the asset schedule. So, however many vehicles are insured, they look at the value that we are insuring those vehicles at and they assess the premium based on that. So, a newer vehicle causes your premium to go up or an older vehicle, right?Well,well, both, right?So, replacement cost is,you know,typically trending up. So, if you have and a lot of I know you have a fleet,you have firet trucks,you have police vehicles. Fire trucks are very expensive now. I think the average cost of that is well over a million dollars. So when you think about replacement costs on those assets certainly that's what contributes to an increase. Thank you for clarific cards. No any public comment I get a motion.Thank you. So moved second.All in favor. Agenda item 27. Consider approval of increasing the number of authorized positions in the fire department. So,this is an item I can tackle um or at least lead off.This is an item that we brought to council two separate occasions.This will temporarily authorize uh additional firefighter position for the fire department.This will allow us to fill some holes in staffing. Uh this position will be absorbed through attrition, meaning if we lose somebody to retirement or to take another job or or leave the department, uh that that authorization will go back to our normal staffing. Um and so we will absorb that that position without further council action taken. Um it will bring uh this will help us bring um people up to speed quicker. It does take a while with the fire department to to bring somebody up where they can stand on their own two feet. We do have two retirements pending or coming up there in the drop. I think the chief mentioned one that was within the next year. Uh so if nothing else, if we have no other attrition, it'll be a good transition for the person to stand up, get on their feet, and have that transition. So we are asking for a temporary authorization uh of a firefighter position. So, we have 20 21 authorized positions and we would be authorizing it temporarily a 22nd position to help fill some of our our staffing needs. 20 Sorry, no mean 24 and this would be 25. Yep. Forgot I was in still in my seven man shift. So,we're we're in eight man shifts now. Sorry. Yeah,that was two years ago response.Thank you. So, it's it would be it would come up one. It would be 25 total.Yes, sir. Council, any comments or questions? No comments. Define what is why is it called temporary? Because we're only authorized that we're only authorized right now if there 24 firefighters plus the chief in that department.This will get us a 25 which will 25 temporarily and then you know unless you know if at some point if we're going to if we were going to change the staffing schedule within the department we'd bring that to council. Council would approve that kind of how we went from seven men to eightman shifts. Um, but this is just temporary. Neglected to ask you that question in the review, so I apologize for asking that question. Any comment cards? Nope. Any public comment? All right. Can I get a motion? So moved. Second. All in favor? I.Agenda item 28, resolution 14-25 for council to authorize a fee increase in our EMS transport. Okay. Good evening again, council. Um so just a little historic um what we're going for. We haven't raised EMS fees in almost 5 years. Uh next month will be 5 years. We've fallen to the very bottom of EMS fees and it's not close. It's just us and green acres are at the bottom. Uh we are actually below Medicare acceptable for ALS2. Um if we proceed this way, we won't be able to cover our cost. So this way we're asking for onetime bulk increase of 15%. And it really it sounds like a lot, but it's actually only about$100 per category.And it's uh it takes us from the bottom to about the lower end of the median range for EMS transport fees. Um and those all go up. A majority of the departments, there's 13 that transport within the county. Uh you can see the numbers there. uh most of them are doing this through CPI which I will be back for a an ordinance change in about a month and a half uh to try to go forward with that. If we would have done uh CPI through the past five years I wouldn't we wouldn't be asking for this one bulk increase because we would be right around where we would need to be and then this wouldn't be happening. We Page 477 of 572 AgendatiltMANhere. So as you can see uh right now uh with BLS we are 610 compared to the Palm Beach County average. It's the lower box on that screen. 670 for ALS1. ALS2 is 745. So we're well below the Palm Beach County average.We are also below Martin County Fire Rescue as well. So this doesn't just impact our residents. This impacts um any call we run even if we are outside the village. So JIC unincorporated town of Jupiter, Martin County,we keep and collect our own revenue from anything we transport. Um, Medicare is allowable to about 80% and you've seen the numbers as well.We'll go to them in another screen. But since we've switched to our EMS billing, third party billing agency, uh,there's been a tremendous increase in collect, almost a half a million dollars this year comparatively. So, EMSMC has also requested we do this. um they've asked for this same increase or more um because it behooves them because the more they collect the more we collect. So it that's part of their billing structure that was done prior to my arrival. Um so this is like I said this is a 15%fee across the board. Uh it's doesn't make us the top doesn't even make us in the middle. We're at the median end. Um so with that any questions or need any of this any more of this explained to you? I'm I'm more than happy to explain it all. I've got a lot of numbers and I don't want to just throw a bunch of numbers at you. Um, but this catches us up and then moving forward,we'll go to CPI just like our other fee structure that we voted on last month.And then we won't have this problem to where we're chasing this revenue or even to break even for what we spend on an EMS transport. Thank you, Chief Council.Any comments, questions? I do. So, you said Medicare covers about 80%. Yes, ma'am. So a senior citizen could be looking at like$162 left over. So if they have a supplemental,which most do, that supplemental will cover another 20%of that.So the bulk of this, if you think of it as going to an ER and paying a co- pay, even if you have Medicare,you're going to end up paying some type of copay. That's almost what this is going to come out to. So when we have one person that was a part-time firefighter collecting, he's trying to,you know, do this. You know, he's the collection guy. Now we have a professional agency doing this.They're dealing with the insurance companies. They're not going to be harassing people unless they have no healthcare whatsoever.That's not really the way it works. Because I've I've requested that. I said, "You're not calling my people."They're like, "Unless they're self- pay, we generally don't have to." Right. No, I was I lived here when I remember those conversations from long council. Of course. Of course.And that's kind of where my mind is going to just historically. I think those numbers were always very delicate because of the fact that sometimes people have to pay out of pocket for them. And there was a lot of discussion and this is before my time on council of we don't want people to be afraid to call you guys. No, absolutely not. Because usually,you know,that's a general society thing like don't call them, I can't afford it.And then it's the don't take me to the hospital. I just put me back to my house like leave me alone.And I don't want to go down that road. So, no, we we the bulk of this is going to be covered by Medicare A or B and a supplemental. And then I recently about a month ago had a senior citizen call me. Um her there's an issue and she got one of our bills from our department and I sent her in the right direction because obviously that's not my sure department. Um but it made me think and then it's funny you bring this up and so just again I'm just trying to look at be sensitive to the amounts um because medical is a nightmare already. I know 100% and we're just trying to cover our cost to be quite honest with you. And so just my my only thing to say is because you guys do so much with our senior citizens and anybody especially even families. I mean, insurance is super expensive. If you guys ever find any kind of tidbits that help, you know, we can always help educate residents course, like those fillers, and those are hard, too. I have to deal with those with my own family, like my mom. So, I I totally get where you guys are coming from, and I'm I see the other side,too. So, I'm not against it. I'm just always be mindful, please. Um, of course,that's why I I'm not shooting for the the I don't want to be number one ever. Everything else I'll be number one, not this one. I don't think the village needs to be number one unless there's like a desperate. I don't think we're climbing that ladder like we do on some other ladders in comparison. And these do run somewhat in cycles. Some do CPI, some do it every year, some do it every three years,whatever. They're about half do it via CPI. So the increments don't seem as strong and as heavy-handed as this one does. So that's why I'm I'm moving forward with that.And like I said, in about six weeks,you'll see me again. But that's going to be an automatic fee increase, basically a review, and then it'll be like a consent agenda type item. Interesting. Okay.All right.Well,thank you for putting that together.Appreciate it. Page 478 of 572 AgendanIte 1'U#19,;t again um kind of like council member Brandon said, want to be sensitive with this and it's one of those like why is it completely necessary?And it's a tricky one to wrap your head around because we write we have to do a write off an expenditure every year, right?So it's it's not a a it's not an easy financial uh projection to look at and kind of understand where the need is. So if we increase these fees, are we expecting I know we're doing better with write off with um reducing the write-off cost because of the billing company that we're using, but if we're increasing, you know, those fees, is the write-off going to increase too because it costs more? I guess where's the balance and is this going to there is a balance there off like understand it and what so our revenue generated will definitely go up that's speculative speculative on my behalf I can't really give you it's going to go up$100,000 but it's already increased so much from what EMSMC has done and I know that write offs have definitely gone down because it's a professional billing company that's what they do so we won't have to worry about it um they'll also capture more of what we have out there. And I think that the write-offs may go up a little bit, but I think the revenue will will outpace that to be honest with you.That's probably the what that's kind of the projection that I get from EMSC when I talk to them and they do this nationwide. Um because I asked this very similar question to them. I said, "So, how can you collect more?" It's a lot of it is going to come from that supplemental and then that like I described it as a as a co-ay almost. Um, but I I don't think the writeups,the write offs, excuse me, are going to go up a whole lot more just because of the this third party billing agency. Okay. I think that's a hard thing, too.You can't really give us projections because it's so cliff it's different every year. It's and the numbers are set for Medicare.There's a whole calculation that they do and it's regional slash by state. So, there's a lot that goes into it. Um, and then there's a factor that they multiply it out. It's kind of it's kind of hard to wrap your head around unless you're an insurance Medicare expert, but I'm trying to become one as it were. So So, but you think the increased revenue will um help cover some of those write-offs then? Like that would outpace the the write-off increase?Yeah, 100%. Okay. And then on your report,you it says that we don't accept Medicaid, I guess. I mean,the manager told me it's because it costs too much. Can you explain that?And is there ever room down the road to consider it? So within uh I've started the ball rolling again. So what happened was it had gone through the process twice prior to my arrival. Um I believe it was both times with Chief TR.They had some turnover at in with EMSMC and so they stopped the process.You have to run a background check on anybody that's going to be involved in Medicaid. Not similar to Medicare. That's an automatic. But Medicaid we are less than 1.8%8% of the village is actually covered by Medicaid. So they become an automatic write off that 1.8%and that's that's through statute. I read that actually this afternoon. So but we did get the ball rolling again with Medicaid. We're going to go through the process. Uh it's my understanding if you don't have enough call volume in Medicaid that it's very difficult to keep. But I'm still researching that and I'm dealing with EMSC.they've opened a ticket and if it's something worthwhile for us to do um cost to return then we will do it. If it's not and we're actually going to lose money by accepting Medicaid and having to pay EMSMC more then we will not. Um but it's just because of our population like I said we're less than 1.82 or something like that. It it that's why I think it died on the vine previous to me. Um but they did open a ticket and we're going to we're going to try it again and see where it goes. Okay. Well,thank you for explaining that and thank you for uh looking into it again. Okay. Uh Lori, any public comment, Carth? No. Any public comment? Nope. I have one more question. Yep. Go ahead. Referring to the write-offs, have our write-offs,they've gone down from the previous years, like we're still in that projection to keep going down, right? Yep. What do you feel like why do you feel like we have so many write-offs? People avoiding it, can't afford it. I think a lot of it has to do with our our method of billing. I don't judge anybody that anything that went on before I got here, but I think that because we weren't a professional billing company, I think that that's why they were we have a part-time firefighter paramedic that was doing our bill. So that's he still is for now. He's catching up with the stuff prior to 2024. So we are still going to see some of that those numbers come through, but they've definitely gone down. And and Mr.Allen, if you can speak on that as well. I think they've gone down since substantially since EMSMC has come on board. Okay. Um but I think that's the biggest reason uh from an outside perspective coming in late into this one. Okay.Thank you. Okay. Can I get a motion?So moved. Second. All in favor? Page 479 of 572 Agepoveltemg#Uat, Lori? Okay.Thank you, Chief.Agenda item 29, consider approval of the first amendment of agreement for fire rescue services between Dquesta and Jupiter Inlet Colony. Thank you, mayor. Um, recently we,the chief and I attended the JIC uh, council meeting where they approved this agreement.As you guys recall, um, earlier in the year,we brought this maybe even late last year, brought this, uh, agreement to renew this agreement.The original agreement was a 20-year agreement. The original original was a 20-year agreement um which would specified that the first five years they would freeze the cost.Then it'd be a 4% escalator for the next five years and then the last 10 years would be 6%. When they did that originally in 2002, after 10 years they came back, amended the agreement, extended the terms out another 20 years, did the same exact terms.We brought the agreement to council. council up said that if we're going to do this and we're going to extend these terms, it needs to be those same terms, which is the first five year,which is what you have in front of you, the first five years of this agreement. Um there will be no increase to cost. It's frozen at what it is today for five years.And then after that, it's a 4%escalator for the next five years and then the last 10 years will be 6%.The value of this is that it freezes, it locks them in with no out for 10 years. So the JIC when they sign up for this,they in an agreement with us for 10 years and do not have an out per contract. So that's the value. Obviously everybody,you know, knows the elephant in the room with with Jupiter and them starting on fire. Uh JIC values our partnership. They don't want to get caught up in that. We don't want to get caught up in that. So this is kind of um puts this, you know, solidifies our our partnership with JIC. and um they had nothing but positive things to say about our fire department.Appreciate the chief going with me um to that meeting and I know he's been a partner with getting them some information as they were uh contemplating that. But what you have in front of you is is that those terms?Thank you, council. No comment, nothing. Nothing.Thank you just to you two for uh negotiating the new agreement and I agree they've been a great partner for a very long time and I'm happy to continue that relationship. Any public comment cards? Nope. Any public comment? Make it a motion. So moved. Second. All in favor? I. Agenda item 30, notification of Dover Ditch uh shoreline FT grant amendment for a time extension. Marjorie Craig, utility director. Um this is a an amendment to our existing grant agreement for Dover Ditch and it's basically just a time extension because of the delays um due to the Army Corps of Engineers permitting. So they they cost us like an extra year and this is so that we can um keep our grant. Any questions? Council questions. No ma'am. No. Nope. Any comment cards? No. Any public comment? I get a motion. So moved. Second.All in favor? I.Thank you, Marjorie.Thank you, Marjorie. Right. And the last agenda item.Any other matters? Council, anything else to bring up tonight? No. No, mayor. No. Neither. Can I get a motion to adjurnn? So moved. Second. All in favor? Hi. Hi. Page 480 of 572 Agenda Item #16. V *111age 345 Tequesta Drive 561-768-0700 Tequesta,, FL 33469 www.tequesta.org July 11, 2025 T5 P1 82** *** ************AUTo** -DIGIT 33455 Tomes Michael J &Tomes Barbara A 110 Lighthouse cir Apt D Tequesta, FL 334 - 731 Parcel ID: 00-43-40-30-51-001-1020 Parcel Legal Description: Tequesta Trace Condominium Unit 1102 Re: Notice of Meeting to Adopt Annual Stormwater Assessment Roll In the Village of Tequesta, Florida The pillage of Tequesta, Florida, (Village) Utilities Department owns and operates a stormwater utility, which manages and maintains the stormwater infrastructure within it, and minimizes pollution of the water bodies that surround the Village. The pillage imposes an annual non-ad valorem special assessment against real property in the pillage to fund the stormwater utility each year. The pillage Council is currently in the process of adopting the stormwater assessment roll for theVillage's fiscal year, which begins October 1, 2025, and ends September 30, 2026 ("Fiscal Year 25" or"F 26"). The assessment includes a 5% increase in the rate, which equates to about 57 cents per month for the average resident or an additional $6.93 annually. Notice is hereby given that the. pillage council will conduct a public hearing to adopt the tormwater assessment roll for Fiscal Year 26, which includes a stormwater assessment against real property in the pillage, including the parcel identified above "Subject Parcel" . The public hearing will be held at 5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard, on August 12, 2025, in the Council Chambers at Village Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33489, for the purpose of receiving public comment on the adoption of the stormwater assessment roll for F 2 . All affected property owners have a right to attend and participate in the hearing as described abode c i�t'- ffi wi i en 1 with i the Vill Co -i� -i i ar t t,".-i'�"�e t rt`g`. � 1 i11 t y be submitted by email to utilities@tequesta.org or by U.S. Mail to the Village of Tequesta, Utilities Department, E: Stormwater Annual Assessment comments, 345 Tequesta give, Tequesta, Florida 334 . The storm water assessment is based on the impervious area of each parcel as measured in "Equivalent Residential idential Units" CERUs"). One EFT is based upon the average single-family residence and is equivalent to 2,505 square feet of impervious area. Each single-family residential parcel is assigned one EF , and other property uses are assigned EFs by using an existing rate class formula based on land use and impervious area of the parcel. The assignment of ER Us estimates the amount of stormwater runoff generated by the impervious area on each property. Impervious area includes the rooftop, driveways, parking lots, and similar hard surfaces that do not allover rainwater to percolate into the ground. Page 481 of 572 Agenda Item #16. The minimum and maximum annual stormwater assessment rates for F 26 will not exceed $94.64 and $291.22 per ERU, respectively. The assessment includes a 5% increase from F 25. Information regarding the assessment for the subject Parcel, including the number of ERUs assigned to such parcel, is included below. Number of Equivalent Residential Units (ER Us): 1717 Maximum assessment rate for Fiscal Year 25: $291.22 per ERU Total stormwater assessment for Year 25 for the subject Parcel is: $$97.56 Maximum annual stormwater assessment rate that can be imposed against the Subject Parcel without further notice for fiscal years after FY25: $291.22 per ERU. A rr±yl�J r`e specify' d scrint'on f the +nrrr)%A1 tcsr r lfility and i e r nt nrn r r nr-�I �Ko rnethr of t • ■■■V f v �/ ■# v i the te/ ♦..� \J■■■■■! tiv■ •.+r 4 i a 4 +..r.4 F� �..�.v��lxJ v i F ice■4 L 1�./ i 1#$ ■1 4rt 4■1�! 1 4■�l 41■ W P computing the assessment amount for each parcel are set forth in Article IV, chapter 74 of the Village code of Tequesta, Florida (the "stormwater Ordinance"). copies of the stormwater Ordinance, the adopted assessment rate for Fiscal Year 25 and the stormwater utility assessment roll describing the parcels subject to the stormwater assessments are available for review at the offices of the City Clerk located at City Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 88469. The Village expects to collect approximately $627,000 through the stormwater assessment for F 26. The stormwater assessments will be collected on the ad valorem tax dill to be mailed by the Palm Beach county Tax collector in November 2025 and each November thereafter, as authorized by section 197.3682, Florida Statutes. The stormwater assessment is an annual assessment that will be imposed each fiscal year and will continue from year to year. The annual assessment may include a share of the costs incurred in the annual administration and collection of the assessment. Florida law requires that the pillage must inform you that failure to pay your assessment will cause a tax certificate to be issued against the property which may result in a loss of title. If you have any questions regarding the stormwater assessment, please contact the pillage of Tequesta Utilities Department at 561 768-0700. If you decide to appeal any decision made by the pillage Council with respect to any matter considered at the meeting, you will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be made. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk at 561 768-0443 at least two 2 days prior to the date of the (nearing. *****DO NOT SEND PAYMENT - THIS IS NOT A BILL***** Sincerely, VILLAGE OF TE UESTA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 2 Page 482 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Village 345 Tequesta Drier 561-768-0700 Tequesta, FL 33469 www.tequesta.or f� f July 11, 2024 T4 P1 241 ****** ********:;,*** * T ** -DI IT 33455 Tomes Michael 3 110 Lighthouse Cir Apt D Tequesta,FL 349-2781 N011c OF PUBLIC 1111 1 T TO ADOPT THE NON-AD VAILORIEM ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TEE SOLID WASTE SERVICE AUTHORITY AND TO ADOPT E NON-AD VALORIEM ASSESSMENT RATES. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all owners of residential properties located within the boundaries of the Solid waste Service Authority for the Village of Tequesta, Florida, that a public hearing to adopt and certify the non-ad valorem assessment rolls and to adopt the non-ad valorem assessment rates will be held August 12, 2025 at 6:00 PM, or as soon there-after as possible,in theVillage Hall Chambers, 345 Tequesta.Drive,Tequesta, FL 33469. If you need additional information, please call 561-768-0438. The Village of Tequesta is considering a non-ad valorem assessment of up to $252.96 per Residential class Dwelling Unit RCDU starting with the 2025 tax year and continuing annually until discontinued. This assessment would fund residential waste collection, processing, disposal, and related services. The proposed increase is $19. 6 per year $1.63 per month per RCDU, raising the current rate from $ 33. to $252.96. The total estimated revenue ftom this assessment is $79 , 88. Parcel identification : -4 -4 - - 1- 1-12 Property address: Tomes Michael J Number of dwelling units on parcel: 1 Proposed assessment per dwelling unit: $252.96 Total proposed amount-to be levied for parcel: $252.96 All affected property owners have the right to appear at the public hearing and to fie written objections within 20 days of this notice. written objections should be sent to The Village of Tequesta Financial Management Office, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469. Ikon-ad valorem assessments will appear on annual tax bills and will be collected by the Tax Collector in the sane manner as ad valorem taxes. Unless proper steps are initiated in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure relief within 20 days from the date of the Village's anion at the above hearing including the method of appointment, the rate of assessment and the imposition of assessments), such action shall be the final adjudication of the issues presented. Failure to pay the assessment will cause a tax certificate to be issued against the property which may result in a loss of tittle. This notice is provided pursuant to the requirements of Section 197.3632, Florida Statues. If you decide to appeal any decision made by the Village Council with respect to any matter considered at the meeting,you will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be made. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact the city Clerk at 61 768-0440 at least two days prior to the date of the hearing. ****'ADO NOT SEND PAYMENT -THIS IS NOT A BILL***** Page 483 of 572 Agenda Item #16. NOTICE OF MEETING TO IMPOSE The stormwater assessment is based on the impervious area of eachr parrceI as mea ured in"Equivalent l e r erWal Unit " AND COLLETANNUAL ("ER Us"). one ERU is based on the average single-family residence and is equivalent to 2,506 square feet of STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS IN THE impervious area. Each single-family residential parcel is assigned one ERA, and ether property uses are assigned VILLAGEOF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA ERUs by using n existing rate class formula bad on land use and impervious area of the parcel. The assignment of _ ' k ERUs estimates the amount of stormwater runoff generated Y. by the impervious area on each property. Impervitous area LZ includes the rooftop, driveways, parting lots and similar hard surfaces that do not allow rainwater to percolate into �k the ground. - The minimum and maximum annual stormwater assessment 5 s f rate for FY26 will not exceed $94.64 and $291.22 per EI ..} __ ... respectively. The assessment includes a 5 increase from A more specific description of the stormwater utility and assessment program and the method of computing the �. assessment amount for each parcel are set forth in Article IV, Chapter 74 of the Village Code of Tequesta, Florida (the The Village of Tequesta, Florida, (the "Village') owns and " torm wrater ordinance"). Copies of the Stormwater operates a stormwater utility. The Village*s Utilities ordinance, the adopted assessment rate for Fiscal Year 26 Department manages and maintains the stormwater and the stormwater water utility assessment roll describing the infrastructure within the Village,and minimizes pollution of parcels subject to the stormwater assessments are available water bodies that surround the Village.The Village imposes for review at the offices of the City Clerk located at City Hall, annual non-ad valorem special assessments against real 345 Tequesta Drive,Tequesta, Florida 33469. property in the Village to fund the stormwater utility each The stormwater year. The Village Council is currently in the process assessments will be collected on the ad p valorem tax bill to be mailed by the Palm beach County Tay adopting the stormwater assessment roll for the Village's Collector in November 20 25,and each N ovem ber the reafte r, fiscal year which begins October 1, 2025, and ends September �, � ("Fiscal dear �' or"F "�. as authorized by section 197. , Florida statutes* The stormwater assessment is an annual assessment that will he Notice is hereby given that the VEliage Council wi I conduct a imposed each fiscal year and will continue from year to year. public hearing to adopt the stormwater assessment roll for The annual assessment may include a share of the costs FY26, which includes a.stormwater assessment against real incurred in the annual administration and collection of the property within the Village limits of Tequesta, as depicted assessment. Florida law requires that the City must inform on the map herein. you that failure to pay your assessment will cause a tax The public hearing ► ill be held at :00 p.m. or as certificate to be issued against the property which may soon thereafter as may be heard, on August 1 , 2025.. result in a loss of title. in the Council Chambers at Village Hall, 345 Tecluesta If you have any questions regarding the stormwater Oruro. Tequesta, Florida, 33469, for the purpose of assessment, please contact the Village of Tequesta Utilities receiving public comment on the adoption of the Department at(5 1)7 -0700. stormwater assessment roll for FY f. If you decide to appeal an decision made b the e Villa y pp g All affected property owners have a right to attend and Council with respect to any matter considered at the participate in the hearing as described above and to file meeting,you will need a record of the proceedings and uwrrMen objections with the Tillage Council prior to the may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, meeting. Comments may be submitted by email to including the testimony and evidence upon which the utilities@tequesta.org or by U.S. Mail to The Village of appeal is to be made. In accordance with the Americans Tequesta, Utilities Department, ICE: 5tormwater Annual with Disabilities Act of 1990t persons needing a special Assessment Comments,. 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, accommodation to participate in this proceeding should Florida 33469. contact the City Clerk at( 1)768-0443 at least two( ) days prior to the date of the hearing. Page 484 of 572 crular Council--Aug 12 2025 -Minutes-Html ht : t q e ta.civ i.e re .n.e Porgy l M t liif tion.a 'Zd= '1, Agenda Item #16 bATA AND FAR OTHER PURPOSES Finance Director Jeff` Snyder asked Council for consideration in adopting the refuse and recycling rates for the upcoming fiscal year. The proposed rate was a 4.88% contractual increase plus an additional 8.5% to corer costs. Mrs. Pat Watkins of 167 river Drive encouraged Council to support the increase as Waste Management had always gone above and beyond for the Village during hurricane clean up tunes and were a dedicated, good provider. Mayor Young was in favor of the increase but was not supportive of the 8.5% fee the village was adding onto the cost. MOTION:Vice-Mayor Sartory made a motion Consider adopting Resolution No. 17-25 as recommended. council Member Brandon seconded the notion. carried 4-1 (opposed; Mayor Young). 3. RESOLUTION NO. 3-2 , A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL NC1L OF THE VILLAGE F TB U STA, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE S TDRM ATBR UTILITY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 20260 ADD AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE MANAGER To PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE'S ADOPTED PROCEDURES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVEDATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Utility Director Marjorie Craig asked Council for consideration in adopting the stormwater utility fees for the upcoming fiscal year_ A 5% increase was proposed with justification provided on infrastructure needs and a cross subsidy from the water utility tax to reduce the resident burden. Mr. Michael Tonnes of 11 g Lighthouse Circle raised a question regarding assessments for condo associations not using- th.e. village stormwater system. [director Craig was asked to follow up with Mr. Torres. MOTION:Vice-Mayor Sartory made a motion made a motion to approve Resolution No. 13-25; Council Memb>er French seconded the motion. Carried unanimously 5-0. 24. Consider Approval of Deevan, Inc. Agreement Piggybacking the Town of Jupi er's Unit Price Contract for Utility Repairs airs and Improvements (Contract W233 and a Pro osal P r ase Order for $21,849-05 for [ illy Repairs Utility Director Marjorie Craig explained it was a best practice to. have a. contract in place for utility repairs} and to have it piggybacked for efficiency. MOTION: Council Member French made a motion to approve Dee an, Inc. Page 485 of 572 7 of 10 112 2 , : XPM Agenda Item #16. RESOLUTION NO. 1 - A RESOLUTION F THE VILLAGE COUNCIL F THE VILLAGE OF TE UESTA, FLORIDA,ADOPTING THE STORM WATER UTILITY FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2026s AND AUTHORIZING I THE VILLAGE MANAGER To PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE'S ADOPTED PROCEDURES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta is required to annually set sufficient levels of storm water utility fees to ensure adequate revenues are generated; and WHEREAS, the Village Council adopts the annual storm water utility rates as specified in the attached "Exhibit A" for the fiscal year ending September 36th, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year ending September 30th, 2026, rates represent a 5% increase from the prior year; and WHEREAS, the storm rater rates are to be adopted by resolution and transmitted to the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser as part of uniform method of assessment of these rates by the Village of Tequesta; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TE UESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Village Council of the Village of Tequesta hereby adopts the rates attached to this Resolution as ig Exh ibit " to be effective October 1st, 2025, for the fiscal year ending September 30th, 2026, and authorizes the pillage Manager to proceed on behalf'of the Village in order to provide for their uniform assessment. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. Page 486 of 572 Agenda Item #16. QD �D L1' M s i r� n I r-_ b O Q 4zi- R:zr qzzr ca C) (D O 0 CD O CD � L UL LLS ['+"x r- r- Ln r-i Gl MM i CD 00r� p 00 00 fix] 00 M 00 r� M � � cu r-1 ri `,! 00 00 00 00 M fir? rY3 r f 4) ca 13O CD CD O C) 4D �D m Ll- 04 75 ` M Az v �= J La LU E ; 3 r Ln x-i .- Li: Ln U. L M D LLn M r�, p" _ CL rrm Ln Ln Ln 3 M L�f w L i C _ LL- v, 0 Ln LA Er's 44 cr� ,n ski Q� z 0) 0 m a C:) r r1l r" n o o n CD a CD7B o � � � = a CD o o � � QCT ct c) a C C) CD CD C) M = M o 5 0 o 5 o o CD Page 487 of 572 Agenda Item #16. } RESOLUTION DATE ` 1 -25 08112125 MOTION Vice-Mayor Rick Sartory SECOND Council Member Jay son E. Preach FOR AGAINST ABSENT CONFLICT Mayor Molly Young Vice-Mayor Rick Sartory Council Member Laurie Brandon Council Member Patrick Painter Council Member Jay on E. French The Mayor thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted. MAYOR OF TE ESTA: Molly Young ATTEST. (Lk n i e Lori McWilliams MMC Village Clerk Page 488 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Attachment D - Event Timeline, a Listing of Events (It is understood that VOT has a complete record of emails and their attachments between M. Tomes and VOT, so only specific summaries or sections are presented below): Documents, Reports, Approvals and other material previously submitted to (VOT) Village of Tequesta concerning Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) and its 134 residential condominium unit properties regarding VoT Code Sec. 74-209 (b) (4): Event No. Event Summary 1. Easement Deed 26006 LRECD Palm Beach County Book 2403 Pages 238-239 February 17, 1975 2. Notice of Lien Rights LRECD Palm Beach County Book 84984 Pages 1254-1260 DOC OR 4984/1254 August 25, 1986 3. Revised Notice of Lien Rights LRECD Palm Beach County 91-348314 Book 7048 Pages 655-660 DOC OR 7048/655 December 7, 1991 4. Second Revised Notice of Lien Rights LRECD Palm Beach County 92-099647 Book 7187 Pages 1712-1714 March 19,1992 5. Notice of Intent to Assess Tequesta Trace Peninsula Assessment Area Palm Beach County 92-099647 Book 9360 Pages 565-570 July 18, 1996 6. Sewer Easement Deed LRECD Palm Beach County 98-263423 Book 10512 Pages 1949- 1952 May 21, 1998 7. Site Engineering Plans for Tequesta Trace, Village of Tequesta, Florida cover/index sheet (showing Location Map (S30. T 40S. R43E], Legal Description — from Schnar Engineering Corp. for Project NO. 00136 September 2000 for Centex Homes) Index of Sheets: Sheet 1 - Paving, Grading and Drainage Plans (Last Revision 1/18/2001 Revisions from SFWMD, LRD) Sheet 2 - Water & Sewer Plans (Last Revision 6/14/2001 Revisions from SFWMD,LRD,VOT, PB-HD,VOT Fire) Sheet 4 - Sanitary Sewer Profiles (Last Revision 6/14/2001 from VOT Fire Service) Sheets 4— 5 - Paving and Drainage Details (Last Revision 5/10/2001 Revisions from SFWMD) Sheets 6—9 - Water & Sewer Details— Sheets 6—9 (No Revisions) 8. Notice of Intent for Permit Application No. 001109-6 SFWMDER November 9, 2000 9. Standard Developer Agreement P# 509 LRECD Palm Beach County 01-011562 Book 12245 Pages 1781-1786 December 18, 2000 10.South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit No. 50-05072- P for Tequesta Trace, a Condominium - Standard General Permit No. 50-05072-P Date Issued: July 25, 2001 with Certificate of Service by Anthonlyl M. Waterhhouse, P.E., Director Surface Water Management, Palm Beach Service Center having Enclosures: Environmental Resource Permit Charter 40E-4 (10/95) 40E-4.321 Duration of Permit; Notice of Rights; General Conditions; Special Conditions, Site Engineering Plan for Lighthouse Key, Village of Tequesta, Florida; Permit Summary Sheet (Exhibit - A, B &C) and Staff Report Distribution List (Exhibit 4) included City of Tequesta Engineer [Palm Beach Book No. 15220 Pages 0449-0463 (for Phase 17)] 11.Water Service Agreement between VOT Utility Department and Centex Homes Palm Beach County 01-218631 Book 12584 Pages 339-3361 May 18, 2001 Page 489 of 572 AgentPIPWAit 01-00597 Approval Process of Phase 17 Parcel "R" [TTCA's common area Site Engineering Plan cover/index sheet (showing Location Map (S30. T 40S. R43E], Legal Description— from Schnar Engineering Corp. for Project NO. 00136 September 2000 for Centex Homes) showing approvals for Permit (June 18 —July 24, 2001) 13.TTCA Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws & an active corporation in the state of Florida by State of Florida Department of State, September 5, 2001 [Palm Beach Book No. 14137 Exhibit C Pages 0239-0258; also DOC: OR 14137/77 pages 163-182]; 14.TTCA Bylaws & a Florida not-for-profit corporation filed with Exhibit C September 5, 2001 [Palm Beach Book No. 14137 Exhibit D Pages 0259-0275; also DOC: OR 14137/77 pages 183-199]; 15.TTCA Building permits [Phases 1-16 (Parcels A— P with Building Numbers 101-108 & 110-117; Addresses matching building numbers: 101-117 Lighthouse Circle)] for building, plumbing, and mechanical / HVAC from November 15, 2001 to April 7, 2003 16.TTCA Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace, A Corporation on September 9, 2002 with SFWMD insertion of 18.2.5, 18.2.5.2 and 18.2.5.2 in addition to the original 18.2.5 [with * above Palm Beach Book No. 14137 Pages 0077-0133 with Exhibit A Legal Description of the Land, Palm Beach Book No. 14137 Page 0133 and with Exhibit B 1 — B17 (Phases for Parcels A— P & R Palm Beach Book No. 14137 Pages 0134-0238; Palm Beach Book No.14339 Pages 0944-1001; & Section 27.1 Palm Beach Book No. 26035 Pages 1827-1828] 17.TTCA Amendment To Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace, a Corporation to ADD Phase 3 Parcel C Bldg. 113 September 18, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14166 Pages 1559-11568 18.VOT's CO of Phase 17 Common (B) Bldg. 109 (01-01028), pool, roads, utilities, etc. (Parcel "R") approved on September 20, 2002 19.VOT's COs of Phase 1 -16 (Parcels A— P with Building Numbers 101-108 & 110-117; Addresses matching building numbers: 101-117 Lighthouse Circle)] approved from September 20, 2002 to June 23, 2003 20. TTCA Amendment To Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace, a Corporation to ADD Phase 4 Parcel D Bldg. 115 June 20, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14202 Pages 0575-0584 21.Tequesta Trace State of Florida, County of Palm Beach — Plat Book 95, Plats 98 & 99 regarding Tequesta Trace Parcels A— P & R noting Dedication and Reservations, Acknowledgement, Acceptance of Reservations, Survey Certifiecate, Title Certificate, Village Approvals July 2, 2002 22.TTCA Amendment To Declaration of Condominium of Tequesta Trace, a Corporation ADD Phase 12 Parcel L Bldg. 112 September 27. 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14202 Pages 0585-0594 ADD Phase 5 Parcel E Bldg. 117 October 28, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14339 Pages 0934-0943 ADD Phase 13 Parcel M Bldg. 114 October 28, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14339 Pages 0944-0953 ADD Phase 14 Parcel N Bldg. 116 October 28, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14339 Pages 0954-0963 ADD Phase 7 Parcel G Blgg. 102 November 25, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14462 Pages 1289-1298 ADD Phase 6 Parcel F Bldg. 101 November 25, 2002 Palm Beach OR Book No.14462 Pages 1299-1308 ADD Phase 8 Parcel H Bldg. 103 January10, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14676 Pages 0080-0089 ADD Phase 16 Parcel P Bldg. 107 January 23, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14749 Pages 0410-0419 ADD Phase 9 Parcel I Bldg. 104 January 23, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14749 Pages 0420-0429 ADD Phase 10 Parcel J Bldg. 106 February 14, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14807 Pages 0831-0840 ADD Phase 15 Parcel N Bldg. 105 February 15, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14868 Pages 0210-0219 ADD Phase 11 Parcel K Bldg. 108 March 17, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.14961 Pages 1000-1009 Page 490 of 572 Agendaftami#t&7 Parcel R Bldg 109 May 9, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.15966 Pages 0445-0463 ADD Phase 1 Parcel A Bldg. 110 June 20, 2003 Palm Beach OR Book No.15422 Pages 1974-1983 23.VOT established a Part II — Code of Ordinances, Chapter 74 — Utilities, Article IV— Stormwater, Division 2. Stormwater Utility Sec.74-201 to 214 (reserving 74-215-240) (Ord. No. 23-13, § 1,9-13-2013) apparently on September 13, 2013 24.First VOT Letter dated July 11, 2025 to Tomes Michael J & Tomes Barbara A Re: Notice of Meeting to Adopt Annual Storwater Assessment Roll FY26 with FY25 Min. Assessment in the Village of Tequesta, Florida received July 20, 2025 25.Email to David Tinoco, Utility Department, The Village of Tequesta July 20, 2025 5:38 PM; three concerns were listed: 1. Basis of ERU Assignment: Given that Tequesta Trace has its own self-contained stormwater system and retention areas, why are all 134 units being assessed as though each contributes an ERU equivalent to 2,506 sq. ft. of impervious area draining into the Village's system? In reality, the majority of rainfall within Tequesta Trace percolates into our internal retention areas rather than contributing runoff to Village-maintained infrastructure. 2. Proportional Burden: If Tequesta Trace's 134 units are included in the 1,717 ERUs cited by the Village, then our community represents nearly 8% of the assessment base. Given our independent drainage infrastructure, is it not a misrepresentation if not a complete inaccuracy to assess us as if we burden the Village's stormwater system in the same manner as other ERUs? 3. 2025 Assessment Clarification: The letter also states that my parcel was assessed $ $97.56 for the 2025 year. Could you please confirm if this figure is accurate or possibly a typographical error? Additionally, in light of the above concerns, was this amount appropriately assessed on my prior ad valorem tax bill (collected by the Palm Beach County Tax Collector in accordance with Section 197.3632 of the Florida Statutes)? 26.Response Email from David Tinoco, Utility Department, The Village of Tequesta July 21, 2025 7:57 AM Stated: We are in receipt of your email, I have copied our Utilities Director, Marjorie Craig and Utility Billing Manager, Dennis Rick on this email to provide a response to your questions. 27.Second VOT Letter dated July 11, 2025 to Tomes Michael J & (Blank) Notice of Public Hearing— To adopt the non-ad valorem assessment roll for the Solid Waste Service Authority and to adopt the non-ad valorem assessment rates. Received 7/26/2025 28.Tomes Notes for VOT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 @ 6:OOPM (Agenda Item#23) VOT Has copy 29.VOT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 @ 6:OOPM Agenda Item #23: Village of Tequesta - Regular VOT Council Monthly Meeting - Aug 12 2025 Started at 6:01PM and lasted to 9:02:38 PM (Total of 3 hours, 1 minute, and 38 seconds. Transcript of interested section is Agenda Item 23 of the VOT General Council Meeting Starting at 2:23:47 to 2:31:58 Time: 8:24:47 August 12, 2025 at VOT Council Chambers at Village Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469 Molly Young, VOT Maw Okay. Moving on to the next agenda item 23, resolution number 13-24, adopting our stormwater utility fees for next fiscal year. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department Good evening. Mar Marjorie Craig, utilities director, and this is the um a request to approve the annual um stormwater rates for the stormwater enterprise fund. And we do that through a non-ad valorem assessment on the annual fee tax role. Uh like most of the stormwater utilities in Palm Beach County, um we're recommending the resolution and revised fee schedule increasing the stormwater rates by 5% for fiscal year 2025. That equates to about $4.51 annually for the base residential rate and that equates to about 38 cents per month. Page 491 of 572 Agenda ltemi#16ze that that is another increase, but it is something that's sorely needed by our stormwater system. We are responsible for the operating and um maintenance of our stormwater system and for the MPDS which is just a um an acronym for the um uh county permitting stormwater permitting and compliance requirements. So there's a lot of things that we are required to do by law to maintain our stormwater system. And as you know, I have stood up here and talked about um our stormwater system and the needs that we have. And we have tried everywhere we can to get grants. You're also aware of that. We have a current grant for the Dover Ditch project for improvement. And um we spent over $2.6 million over the last five years um to work to keep up with the maintenance of our system. And the biggest bang for the buck right now is stormwater pipelining uh to get ahead of those failing stormwater pipes. Um as a part of your packet um we have a recommended resolution for that rate increase uh also exhibit A um the proposed stormwater rates and then a rate comparison of the village with other storm water utilities in the area. And we fall just a little bit to the right of the middle. Um and um then our net position and storm water budget. Um uh so that's our current rates and then our, what we have planned for the coming year and what our net position is. And then we also included the proof of publication to our um to our residents and customers. Uh we did send out we posted it on the county website. Um and then also we sent out a letter to everyone. So with that, do you have any questions? Molly Young, VOT Mad�or Thank you, Marjorie. Council, any comments or questions? None. Thank you, Marjorie. No, ma'am. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And I will say unlike the previous agenda item, this one I'm really um pleased. I know we're taking half I think of the water utility tax to fund this year. So again, there we thought, you know, looked outside the box, so we don't have to charge more than the 5% this year. So I'm very pleased with that. Thank you. Molly Young, VOT Mayor Any public comment cards? Lori McWilliams, MMC VOT Clerk/Admin PIO Yes, we have Michael Tomes. Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Good evening. Thank you, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and uh council. Michael Tomes, resident of Tequesta Trace, 110-D Lighthouse Circle. I'm a past civil engineer, multiple states, including Florida. Retired - white hair. uh the village council. Uh I'd like to have the minutes of this section sent to me. Um I received on your July I Ith letter on July the 20th which indicated that my personal increase was going to be of around $97. And then I sent my email into them. I understand section uh village section 74.201 bracket 2 uh regarding the cost of operating the system and I know it has to be done and I'm fully behind that and it's to be allocated in a relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received there from. BUT Tequesta Trace and it's 134 units receive no service. We don't connect to the storm water system.We're self-contained. I understand section 74.202 definitions and what ERU means. And under one, the cost system and services which service each individual resident. Once again, this is not the case for Tequesta Trace. We maintain our own service.We have our own storm system.We have our own roads. It's a small section. Um, we are approximately uh 6% of the population of the village at Tequesta, but in the uh ERU units, we would make up about 8%. Page 492 of 572 Agenda ltnmi#164s the association owns and maintains its own storm water system. I informed the Village uh on the 20th when I got the letter and they sent me a second notice back in response uh that they received it on the 21 st. And then in the mail, I got a restatement of the letter of which the rates were different than the first letter quoted to me. And the estimates of the money that you're gathering was different. The estimate was initially written down as 6,26 $62 7,000. The new revised number on the new letter was $748,488. 27% increase my rate was the whole issue that I was presenting to the board through my email was so that the person in charge of doing this estimate would actually follow their own advice and rules and acknowledge that there was an error made. We, Tequesta Trace are not in your stormwater system. We get our water there. We pay our sewer bills, everything else, BUT we're not in your system. Why are we being charged? That's 134 units. Myself, my fellow members, I didn't receive an answer. Molly Young, VOT Mayor Okay, sir. Um, unfortunately, your time's up, but maybe Marjorie can come up. Can you address some of these questions on the spot if you wouldn't mind?Thank you. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department I I'm going to have to get with him because I don't know. This was all calculated and and put together, you know, through another system. I don't know. I'll have to check into what he's talking about because I'm not. Could sir, could you be sure to leave um your contact information so we can get in touch with you and address some of these questions after the meeting? Molly Young, VOT Mayor Yeah. Thank you. Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department I'm sorry. Molly Young, VOT Mayor Okay. If if if sir if you maybe just leave your email with the clerk just to be sure before you leave tonight that would be great. Okay, you have it. Perfect. Thank you. We will absolutely get back in touch with you. All right. Is there any other public comment? Okay. Can I get a motion? So move. Second. All in favor? [Unanimously Approved] I moving on. I don't know. 30.After the VOT Council Meeting of 8-12-2025 ended there was a short meeting held in the back of VOT Council Chambers at Village Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469 At about 9:10 PM between Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department and Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) Once again, Mr. Tomes summarized his case utilizing his notes and asking: Why TTCA unit owners were being charges a non-ad valorem; this is an error, possibly an oversight. TTCA has its own separate and independent stormwater drainage system for the perimeter walled in section that includes about 98% of the property, all 134 of TTCA condominium units in 16 residential buildings, cabana, pool, streets, etc. TTCA's stormwater drain system that does not connect to or drain to VOT's system, thus: 1. TTCA maintains & services its own stormwater drainage system; 2. NONE of TTCA stormwater drainage system connects to and/or discharges into VoT Stormwater System infrastructure; 3. TTCA provides NO contributing runoff to VoT maintained infrastructure 4. TTCA 134 residential condominium units receive NO benefits nor services from VoT's Stormwater System, though it is true that residents receive general welfare from VoT's Stormwatepa St Of 572 Agenda ltem #lc&34 TTCA units may not fully qualify as RCDUs since each of the ERU's impervious areas truly do not impact VoYs Storm-water Utility; 6. Thus said parcels do not individually qualify as a EUR for determining any VoT annual stormwater assessment rates under Article IV, Division 2 Stormwater Utility; 7. Bottom line:VoYs stormwater management system does not service nor benefit said 134 TTCA residential units, a fee error has been made and thus the reason for fee adjustment on all TTCA residential units. ?? Sec. 74-209(a)(7) Error & Sec. 74-211(b)(1) Privately Held ??: Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department upon hearing the comments made from Tomes'Notes said we, TTCA, will have to make a formal stormwater assessment fee adjustment request. 31. Email of August 16, 2025, 3:09 PM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment noting VOT Council Meeting of August 12, 2025 under Agenda Item#23 (Resolution No. 13-25 and Memo#25-167) regarding the adoption of Stormwater Utility Fees for FY 2026 where the item was subsequently approved unanimously by Council: explained why all TTCA 134 units should not be subject to stormwater assessment fees for TTCA maintains its own independent stormwater drainage system, which is not connected to, nor serviced by, the Village's stormwater infrastructure. Thus, the Village's stormwater infrastructure does not provide collection, disposal, or groundwater regulation services to TTCA or its 134 unit properties. The 134 TTCA units actually function as a sub-class of residential units for they do not meet VoT's technical definition of ERUs (Equivalent Residential Units), as their impervious areas are exclusively managed within TTCA's own system; thus no "fee in lieu"for VoT stormwater construction, debt service, or maintenance should apply to TTCA, as approvals and COs were granted contingent on TTCA's self-contained drainage infrastructure. Supporting Documentation: 1. Emails between Tomes and VoT 2. Notes used during the Agenda Item#23 comment period (Tomes' Notes) 3. Two different VoT July 11, 2025 letters (comments noted in Tomes' Notes) 4. TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (with drainage summary noted in Tomes' Notes) 5. TTCA Recorded Documents 6. Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs 7. Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing Also at end of email: Final Records—Palm Beach County &Village of Tequesta COs (PBC OR Book Entry Date/Time Phase Pages VoT CO Date) Request: Given this history and supporting documentation, I respectfully request that TTCA's 134 residential units be granted an adjustment to exclude them from the VoT Stormwater Assessment Fee. 32.Email of August 16, 2025, 8.46 PM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: VOT's site visit to TTCA Property: a) believe the development drains into VOT's system at the pond; and b) asked Tom Jensen of Kimley Horn they performed the study) to evaluate their study and calcs to determine how to proceed. 33.Email of August 18, 2025 10:59 AM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: VOT's site visit to TTCA Property: a) Hopefully you went to the correct site; b) there are no ponds at TTCA; c) there are no connections to VOT's system; d) reference to TTCA drawings; e) only pipe draining to TTCA's dry retainage area is its own 15"RTC pipe into FDPT type "C" ditch bottom inlet from TTCA's system (about 200'north of Tequesta Drive); and 0 let Tom Jensen know Mike Tomes is available for a site walkabout. 34.Email of August 18, 2025 7:47 PM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: VOT's site visit to TTCA Property: Thanks you, Tom will take a look at the data. Page 494 of 572 Ageno AWN VAugust 29, 2025 12:25 PM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: VOT's site visit to TTCA Property: a) has Tom gotten back to you yet? b) 2025 property taxes are now arriving to all; c) have had another engineer review our drawings ; and d) he confirms my findings. 36.Email of September 2, 2025 8:29 AM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) R E: Will check with Tom again. 37. Email of September 2, 2025 8:29 AM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Have checked with Tom: a) been researching SFWDM database for ERP data; b) able to pull it down; c) but not all through it yet; d) Tom is competent engineer for VOT's projects over 35 years; e) If found that TTCA doesn't drain to VOT infrastructure, don't know how Kimley-Horn/Raftelis did their calculated TTCA impact on VOT system as residents utilize roads, etc.; f) we'll get to the bottom of it, g) if a refund is due, we'll get to the bottom of that too; and h)Apologies for the delay. 38.Email of September 8, 2025 11:31 AM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment: a) thanks for the update; and b) look forward to Tom's report and the VOT response. 39.September 15, 2025 5:00 PM at 301 N Olive Ave. West Palm Beach, FL 44301 - Petition deadline date for adjustment on taxes including non-ad valorem to Value Adjustment Board 40.Email of September 19, 2025 11:31 AM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: a) Spoke with Tom Wednesday; b) he believes he has confirmed that TTCA does NOT drain into the VOT Drainage System; c)You are correct; d) he is working with rate consultant to determine what relative impact has been assigned to customers who have property that does not directly drain into VOT's drainage system; e) but still impacts VOT's system by living in/being part of the community; f) don't know if rate will be adjusted; g) working on it; h) thanks for being engaged, so knowledgeable and such a great advocate for TTCA; i) looking forward to a final resolution. 41.Email of October 9, 2025 12:44PM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA and its 134 Units request for Sec. 74-209 (a) (7 & 8) Adjustment of Fees: a) Follow up on last email; b) noting Tom's and your error discovery, thus an oversight in calculations of stormwater non- ad valorem assessments to all TTCA units [Look at 74-211 (b) (1) "The process does not apply where the sormwaater facilities are privately held.']; and b) hoping to receive an official VOT Letter noting the above to share with fellow TTCA Unit Owners prior to receiving 2025 property tax invoices. 42.Email of October 9, 2025 3:06 PM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA Request for Sstormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment: a) Thank you for reaching out;b) Tom still working with rate consultant; c) talked with him yesterday; and d) will continue to contact him for updates. 43.Email of October 13, 2025 10:11 AM from Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: a) went back and looked in our code and found indications that all property in VOT responsible for paying stormwater charge; b) verifying our interpretation with legal: Sec. 74-201 (1) & (2) and Sec. 74-206 Page 495 of 572 Agen0.@*W9%#1Aetober 13, 2025 8:2 7 PM to Marjorie Craig PE, Director Utilities Department from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment: a) have reviewed your email; b) have responded with an attachment; plus noting the VOT has to also recognize, meet and adhere to its own standards, ordinances, permits, EORs and COs as it pertains to previous authorization/approvals to the TTCA Property and its 134 individual resident units; b) attachment: Page One Response:: a) regarding 74- 201 - TTCA receives NO benefits NOR services thus TTCA Units should not be listed as full ERUs (added background info); and b) referred back to email of August 16, 2025; c) Noted not yet received VOT meeting minutes from Lori McWilliams; Page Two & Three: Key layman's statements and Comments: a) Sec. 74.201 (a): while TTCA lies adjustment to VOT's system and could be serviced by the system, it isn't connected or serviced by VOT's system, thus no benefits nor services are provided to TTCA; b) Sec 74.201 (b) Since TTCA received no services nor benefits from VOT's system, VOT cannot practically allocate in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received (there is no relationship between the two systems); c) Section 74-202 : i) no availability charge can be made for VOT's system infrastructure does not service developer or individual resident; ii) fee in lieu cannot be used for no new VOT infrastructure nor existing system services TTCA or its residential units; iii) no extensions or replacements by VOT were required by TTCA(noted by permits and CO of Phase 17, parcel"R" common area; iv) nor any new VOT permits for estentions or replacements since receiving CO from VOT for Phase 17; d) SEC. 74-206: Yes VOT can authorize the imposition of utility fees for services rendered, but not stormwater to TTCA units (Question: BIG NOTE TO ALL:Why is there not a reference to Sec. 74-211 (b) (1) "The process does not apply where the stormwater facilities are privately held.") Page Four:Attachment A— Tomes'VoT Council Meeting Notes (Also refer to VOT Meeting Transcript 8-12-2025 (Agenda Item#23); Page Five: Attachment B VoT's Email of September 8, 2025 Tom Jensen researching SFWMD; Page Six: Attachment C—General Grid List of Applications, Permits, FOR Letters and COs: All this information is available in public record books and would have easily answered VOT's questions and concerns; Pages Seven—Fifteen:Attachment D—VoT Listing of Permits for Tequesta Trace. 45.Email of October 30, 2025 10:34 AM from Jeremy Allen, Village Manager to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: a)Apologizing for any delay in getting a proper response; b) Marjorie Craig no longer with VOT;Allyson Feisburg is contact point for Utility Department; c)Allyson is copied on email; and d) working with Jeremy to come up with the solution; e) TTCA property is unique to VOT; we can come to a resolution; 0 wants to discuss a Fee Adjustment; Meeting Availability? G) thanks for your patience while we work through this unique situation. 46.Email of October 30, 2025 3:14 PM to Jeremy Allen, Village Manager from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment: a) Sorry to hear news of Margorie's departure; b) she kept us informed of status and now it's being verified by legal team; c) suspect there was no changes from i) July's 11th public hearing notice; ii) August 12th public hearing; or iii) September's Property Tax Estimate on our 2025 Property Tax Bills for TTCA Units; d) Looking forward to a meeting for resolution noting TTCA doesn't connect to VOT's system; e) exchange of availability info. 47.Email of November 3, 2025 3:33 PM from Jeremy Allen, Village Manager to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Thursday afternoon 2:30pm work for everyone? 48.Email of November 6, 2025 2:33 PM from Silvina Donaldson, Executive Asst. to the Village Manager to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Meeting: a) Silvina is assisting in scheduling the meeting, b) Both the manager and Allyson Felsburg are available at 2:00 pm or 3:00 pm on Wednesday, November 12th, if it works with your schedule; c) let us know; d) meeting will be held at Village Hall, in the conference room. Page 496 of 572 Agen Rovember 6, 2025 6:44 PM to Silvina Donaldson, Executive Asst. to the Village Manager from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Meeting: a)Wednesday November 12th at 3:00 PM works for us. 50.E mail of November 7, 2025 8:47 AM from Silvina Donaldson, Executive Asst. to the Village Manager to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Meeting: a) Thank you for your response, b) we will send the calendar invite shortly. 51.Meeting Wednesday November 12, 2025 at 3:00 PM at Village Hall, in the conference room taken by hand, written on first page of 5 page handout (last 2 two pages - VOT research): 11-12-2025 3:05 PM— 3:25 PM VOT Conference Room Attendees: Jeremy Allen— VOT Manager Allyson Felsburg - VOT Asst. Utility Dir. Michael Tomes— TTCA Dir. • Offering 50% • Will have to write out individual checks to owners • Need a letter from a PE stamped saying we have a working system On the first page under at right side of Sec. 74-21 Findings (1)yellowed portion: NOTED THIS are of benefit and provide services to all property within the incorporated village limits, including property not presently served by the stormwater elements of the system. 1) TTCA& 134 units receive NO benefits or services from VOT System 2) There is NO connection to VOT System 3) TTCA& 134 units are behind a wall with its own system cleaned out this year- $20K On the second page under Sec. 74-209.—Adjustment of fees yellowed portions (a)Requests for adjustment of the utility fee shall be submitted to the director, who shall have authority to adjust the fee, to develop and administer the procedures and standards, and to review criteria for the adjustment of such fees as established in this division. All requests shall be reviewed strictly on the basis of the amount of impervious area on the property. No credit shall be given for the installation of facilities required by village or county development codes or state stormwater rules. The following procedures shall apply to all requests for adjustment of the stormwater utility fee: (2) The request for adjustment shall be in writing and shall set forth, in detail, the grounds upon which the correction is sought. (4) The owner or tenant requesting the adjustment may be required, at his own cost, to provide supplemental information to the director including, but not limited to, survey data certified by a professional land surveyor and/or engineering reports approved by a professional engineer and acceptable to the director. Failure to provide such information may result in a denial of the adjustment request. (5) . . . retroactive adjustments shall not exceed one year. (7) The director, upon discovering an error or oversight in the calculation of the fee, may initiate a request for adjustment. The request must be made in writing, documenting the reasons for the adjustment. If the adjustment would require an increase in fee for a fee payor, the director must provide the request for adjustments to the affected fee payor 30 days prior to adjusting the fee and offer the fee payor an opportunity within the stated 30 days to provide reasons why the adjustment should not be made. This section never highlighted or addressed even though Tomes pointed it out. On the third page under Sec. 74-209.—Adjustment of fees (8) yellowed portions . . . but will not exceed one year prior to the request for adjustment. . . . These appeals must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the written determination of the director. The stormwater management utility board shall complete its review within 60 days of receipt of the request for review. The board's determination on the review shall be in writing and set forth in detail the reasons for its decision. In reviewing denials of requests for adjustment, the stormwater utility board shall apply the following standards and review criteria: Page 497 0 f 5 72 9 Agenda Item #11QE.isting or special characteristics of the site or parcel for which the adjustment request is made; (2) The amount of on-site impervious area; (3) Twenty-five-year frequency, 24-hour duration storm criteria will be the minimum standard recognized by the director; (4) Ponds, exfiltration systems or positive drainage facilities must meet applicable village, state and federal requirements, including groundwater protection devices and outfall treatment conveyance systems required by all governing bodies; (5) Ponds, exfiltration systems or positive drainage facilities must be maintained according to village standards, and must function in accordance with the required village design standards; and (6)Adjustments will not be granted for swimming pools, reflecting pools, existing open ditch systems and swales. On bottom of third page taken from Sec. 74-202. Definitions. Stormwater management utility board.yellowed portions The stormwater management utility board shall consist of the village council, which shall hear appeals of rate adjustments and recommend capital projects and budget priorities for the utility. 52.Email of Wednesday November 12, 2025 at 5:22 PM of Meeting notes to TTCA Board Member from Michael Tomes: On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 5:22 PM Michael Tomes wrote: Fellow TTCA Board Members, There was a meeting today with VOT on an adjustment to TTCA and the 134 associated condominium units regarding TTCA's request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment. Meeting was held at VOT's Conference Room - 345 Tequesta Drive at 3:00 PM 12/11/2025. Attendees were Jeremy Allen (VOT Manager),Allyson Felsburg (VOT Asst. Utility Director), and Michael Tomes (TTCA Director) [Note: Albert Caradonio TTCA President was absent]. The attached PDF was handed out at the beginning of the meeting, which Jeremy summarized noting all the previous communiques that TTCA has submitted for a fee adjustment to TTCA and its 134 unit owners. They had reviewed other communities having stormwater management system to see what others offered, noting that TTCA'property situation was a unique to the village (last two pages of the PDF). VOT is offering a 50% reduction noting that TTCA's first request was initially mate at 2025's August 12th Public Hearing notice (Letter to TTCA Unit Owners of July 11, 2025 - Notice of Meeting to Adopt Stormwater Assessment Roll in the Village of Tequesta, Florida). If accepted VOT would have to write out individual checks to unit owners after their taxes were paid. Additionally a letter from a Professional Engineer , properly stamped, indicating that TTCA's Stormmwater System is a working system. It was further noted that TTCA and its 134 condominium units receive NO benefits nor do they receive any services from VOT's System. Also it has been determined that there is no existing connection between VOT and TTCA stormwater systems. Additionally TTCA and its 134 condominium units are behind a perimeter wall which separated its system to that of VOT's along Old Dixie HWY and Tequesta Drive. Thoughts: 1) Decide to either take the proposed offer (expecting an email from Jeremy) or not; 2) Review with attorney for additional input; 3) Get a letter for a registered Civil PE in Florida; and, 4) Have this subject added to our next meeting agenda. Thoughts? Attachment: VOT & TTCA Stormwater Fee Adjustment Meeting 11-12-2025.pdf 53.Email of Thursday November 13, 2025 at 12:54:54 AM and again at 7:54 AM from Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Meeting: Hello Mr. Tomes, Page 498 of 572 AgendaltSM#1fi6again for taking the time to meet with us on November 12, 2025. As discussed, the Village provided a document outlining the applicable Village Code that supports our determination to grant a 50% stormwater fee credit to the residents of the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association (TTCA). The Village acknowledges that TTCA retains the majority of its stormwater on-site, which reduces the burden on the Village's system. However, all Village-owned and Village-maintained stormwater infrastructure provides benefits to every property and resident within the Village, regardless of location or ownership of private stormwater system. As such, every property and resident including those within TTCA must contribute to funding its ongoing operation and maintenance. In accordance with Sec. 74-209, Adjustment of Fees, and in an effort to provide a fair and reasonable credit, the Village is prepared to issue retroactive credits to TTCA residents. Upon mutual agreement and receipt of the required documentation, individual checks will be issued to each resident for 50% of the stormwater fees paid with their most recent tax bills. Moving forward, TTCA will be required to submit a signed and sealed inspection report each year verifying the structural integrity of its privately owned stormwater system and documenting the system's ability to retain and treat at least 1.0 inch of runoff from the post-development 100-year/24-hour storm event. This documentation must be received by June 1 of each year to maintain eligibility for the 50% credit. This inspection requirement is essential. It ensures that TTCA's stormwater system is functioning as designed and that no failures exist that could cause overflow into the Village's system. This is not a unique requirement for TTCA; rather, it is the standard process that will be consistently applied to any community seeking stormwater fee credits now or in the future. The Village must adhere to its codes and procedures to ensure fairness, consistency, and the protection of public infrastructure. At the conclusion of our meeting, you advised that you would present this proposed resolution to your Board for consideration. Should the TTCA Board choose not to accept the Village's proposal, you may pursue the appeal process outlined in Sec. 74-209. Please note that a formal appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the Village's written determination. If you have any questions or require additional clarification, please do not hesitate to reach out. The Village remains committed to working with TTCA within the framework of all applicable codes, and we look forward to hearing from you. 54. Was there a VOT Utility Board Meeting that took place without notification — email not from Director so was it Utility Board Approved per VOT code? 55.Email of Thursday November 24, 2025 at 11:51 AM to Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment: We do have questions that require additional clarification to allow the adjustment of fee to fall within the framework of all applicable codes for TTCA's property situation being possibly unique to VOT and would like to have another meeting to discuss the matter. 56.Email of Thursday November 24, 2025 at 1:51 AM from Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: That should not be an issue. Are there certain days you have availability? With Thanksgiving this Thursday, we will most likely have to meet after this week. Additionally, if there are certain questions you have or topics you would like to discuss please feel free to share them with us so we can ensure that we have all required information readily available for a productive meeting. 57. Email of Wednesday, November 26, 2025 9:05 AM to Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Thank you for your communication. Scheduling a meeting next week or the week after would work well. Several individuals have already begun their Thanksgiving travel, so it may be difficult to finalize everyone's availability until after the holiday. It would be helpful if the Village of Tequesta could share its available dates and times so we can coordinate accordingly. Page 499 of 572 AgendaltrOff*tfi-Board was promptly informed within two hours based on notes I had written on the Village's five-page meeting handout as provided on November 12, 2025. This was followed by receipt of the Village's email proposal shortly after midnight the following morning. We note that the contents of that proposal differ in several key respects from the meeting notes recorded by myself. TTCA has, in parallel, begun notifying all unit owners regarding the current matter. After an initial review, the Village's proposal appears inconsistent with long-standing civil engineering and construction practices. It also does not fully address my comments regarding Agenda Item#23 from the August 12, 2025 Council Meeting, nor the written Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment submitted on August 16, 2025 with eight attachments, and the October 13, 2025 supplemental response to the Director's call with four additional attachments. We also believe certain wording in Part II—Code of Ordinances, Chapter 74—Utilities,Article IV— Stormwater, Division 2—Stormwater Utility, Sections 74-201, 202, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 212, and 213, may have been misinterpreted or applied in a manner that benefits the Village rather than reflects the intended statutory meaning. TTCA believes these sections require clarification and proper application to ensure statutory intent and equitable treatment. We look forward to continued dialogue and constructive resolution. I will be returning late Friday. Wishing you and your team a very Happy Thanksgiving. 58.Email Monday, November 26, 2025 12:35 PM from Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: You noted that the Village's written proposal differs from the notes you recorded during our meeting. If there are specific items you believe require clarification, please identify them. The proposal provided accurately reflects the terms and discussions communicated at that meeting. Should you believe any component is inaccurate or requires revision, kindly detail those points and we will review them accordingly. Regarding your statement that"the Village's proposal appears inconsistent with long-standing civil engineering and construction practices"the Village conducted a review of comparable practices in other municipalities where such practices even existed as it is not common to offer rate reductions under circumstances such as these. As discussed and provided in the meeting handout, this review formed the basis for the selected rate reduction, which the Village maintains is fair, appropriate, and consistent with the procedures and requirements of the Village Code. Both our meeting and the subsequent written proposal were provided in direct response to your comments regarding Agenda Item No. 23 from the August 12, 2025, Council Meeting, as well as to your Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment submitted on August 16, 2025. While we remain willing to meet should further clarification be helpful—I would be glad to provide availability the Village will not consider or issue any additional proposals for further reductions in stormwater rates for the residents of TTCA. Should the TTCA Board choose not to accept the Village's proposal, you may proceed with the formal appeal process outlined in Sec. 74-209 of the Village Code. Please be reminded that a formal appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the Village's written determination, which was issued on Thursday, November 13, 2025. Thank you, and I wish you a very happy Thanksgiving. 59.Email Monday, December 1, 2025 2:32 PM to Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Sorry for not getting right back to you, but was a bit delayed in Tampa with the family over the Thanksgiving break. Hopefully you had an enjoyable one. For your review, have included my meeting notes on VOT's handout of November 12, 2025 along with a copy of my email sent to all TTCA Board Members immediately after returning home from our 20 minute meeting; from which you can see how they differ considerably regarding the added details (which were expanded upon in your email the next morning) of what VOT now expects in certified stamped professional engineering letter and that VOT expects to receive a similar letter year after year, after year, etc. The one item I wish to state is that during VOT's Council Meeting of August 12th this year regarding Agenda Item#23, the aim of my testimony (you have a copy of my talking points) was to advise VOT Council Page 500 of 572 Agenda(ROMAH-Utility Board) of an error/oversight in their non-ad valorem assessment to TTCA and the 134 condominium unit property owners. To assist TTCA Board Members in understanding VOT Stormwater Utility's reasoning and thought process, please find attached YES or NO questions for your quick reply which should only take a few moments per question (possibly 20 minutes overall at the most) to fill in, thus no need for a written response by VOT or yourself. Once returned to me, I will share with the entire TTCA Board Members so a quick review and full understanding of VOT's determination, so please return the filled out questionnaire prior to the middle of this week if not sooner. Yes, we are now of the understanding that your email issued on Thursday, November 13, 2025 is to be considered VOT Stormwater Utility Board's (VOT Council's) written determination, so please be prompt in response to our questionnaire to enable TTCA to respond accordingly. 3 Attachments: Tomes Email of 11-12-2025 to TTCA Board Members.pdf VOT & TTCA Stormwater Fee Adjustment Meeting 11-12-2025.pdf Questions for VOT and its Stormwater Utility Board.pdf 60.Email Monday, December 2, 2025 9:53 AM to Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) RE: Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment I apologize to you regarding my handwritten meeting notes and typing errors (#10 FY28 should read: FY 26;#19 tome should be read time;#22 thesystem should read: the system; and#30 please drop the word why), for ever since a truck physically hit me breaking and fracturing both of my wrists my hands often shake uncontrollably. Looking forward to receiving the completed questionnaire back from VOT so we can proceed with our meeting, possibly this week. 1 Attachment: Questions for VOT and its Stormwater Utility Board.pdf 61.Email of December 2, 2025 12:52 PM from Jeremy Allen, Village Manager to Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) Subject: Re: Village of Tequesta —TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal Dear Mr. Tomes and Members of the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association Board, Thank you for your email of November 12, 2025, and for the continued dialogue regarding the stormwater utility fee credit for the residents of Tequesta Trace. The Village of Tequesta remains firm in the position communicated in our post-meeting letter following the November 12, 2025 discussion: we are prepared to grant a 50% stormwater utility fee credit (both retroactively for the most recent tax bill and on a continuing annual basis), provided TTCA submits the required annual signed and sealed engineering inspection report confirming that its private stormwater system continues to retain and treat at least the first 1.0 inch of runoff from the post-development 100- year/24-hour storm event, in full accordance with Sec. 74-209 of the Village Code. This requirement is not unique to TTCA; it is the standard that the Village applies consistently to any property owner or association seeking a stormwater fee adjustment or credit. We appreciate the detailed list of questions you have prepared. While we are happy to assist the TTCA Board in understanding the basis for the Village's determination, many of the questions presented cannot be accurately answered with a simple "yes"or "no"because they involve variables that may include engineering judgment or matters of policy that require context and nuance. Rather than provide potentially misleading binary responses, we believe the most constructive path forward is for TTCA to utilize Florida's public records process (Chapter 119, F.S.) to request any specific documents, notices, resolutions, engineering reports, or other records that would assist your Board in evaluating the Village's position and making an informed decision. The Village has at all times complied with applicable Florida Statutes, the Village Code of Ordinances, and all required public notice and hearing procedures in the establishment and administration of the stormwater utility fee. As a reminder, should the TTCA Board elect not to accept the Village's offer of a 50% credit subject to the annual inspection requirement, a formal appeal of the Village's written determination must be filed with the Village Clerk no later than December 12, 2025 (30 days from your receipt of our written determination), in accordance with Sec. 74-209. Page 501 of 572 Agenda 1t9MA0h&committed to working cooperatively and transparently with the Tequesta Trace community within the framework of the Village Code and Florida law. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if you or the Board have any specific public records requests or need clarification on the appeal process. Thank you again for your time and consideration. 62.Email of December 12, 2025 (Time-not known as of this writing) to VOT Utility Board (VOT Council) & Lori McWilliams —VOT Clerk, Jeremy Allen - Village Manager, Allyson Felsburg - VOT Deputy Utilities Director from Michael Tomes, Director, Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. (TTCA) Re: Formal Appeal of the Village's written determination regarding TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal as it refers to TTCA's request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment regarding Agenda Item 23 of the VOT General Council Meeting of August 12, 2025 Resolution No. 13-25 : A resolution of the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Florida, adopting the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2026, and authorizing the Village Manager to proceed in accordance with the village's adopted procedures: Providing an effective date; and for other purposes. Attachments previously sent to VOT Utility Director: Emails between Tomes and VoT (VOT has their records) Tomes Notes [Attachment 2. Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025] Two different VoT July 11, 2025 letters [Attachments B1 & B2] TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 [Attachment 4 - TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (plan Only)] TTCA Recorded Documents [Attachment 5 TTCA Recorded Documents] Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs [Attachment 6. Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs] Tequesta Trace Residential Units listing [Attachment 7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units] And Response to VoT October 13th's communiques with Attachment A Tomes' VoT Council Meeting Notes Attachment B VoT's Email of September 8, 2025 Attachment C General Grid List of Applications, Permits, FOR Letters and COs Attached for your review regarding Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Attachment 2. Tomes Notes for VoT Council Meeting 8-12-2025 Attachment 4. TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 (plan Only) Attachment 5 TTCA Recorded Documents Attachment 6. Builder's Applications, VoT Permits, FOR Letters, and COs Attachment 7 Tequesta Trace Residential Units Response to VoT October 13th's communiques with Attachment A, B & C Page 502 of 572 Agenda Item kl&ched for your review regarding Appeal to VOT's Determination RE: Email Request for Stormwater Fee Adjustment Attachment Al - Testimony on Agenda Item 23 VOT August Council Meeting Attachment A2 — Total August 12, 2025 Council Meeting Testimony Attachment B1 —VOT Letter July 11, 2025 notice of Meeting to Adopt Annual Stormwater Assessment Roll Attachment B2 —VOT Notice of Public Hearing to Add Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Rates Attachment C1 —VOT Notice of Public Hearing to impose and Collect Annual Stormwaterr Assessments Attachment C2 —VOT Council Meeting August 2005 Minutes Agenda Item #23 Attachment C3 —VOT Resolution No. 13-25 & Exhibit A Approved Attachment D — Event Timeline, a listing of events Attachment E - TTCA Site Plan Sheet 1 of 9 Attachment F - TTCA's Amendment to its Declaration to add Phase 17 Attachment G - TTCA Meeting Notes on handout + email & VOT's Proposal Attachment H - TTCA s VOT rebuttal 30 days No to & Questionnaire Attachment I - Picking one area and forget the others Timeline Events 43 & 44 Page 503 of 572 Agenda ment E - TTCA Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 9 Only)(plan t _ _ __ __ - - ---r- ------- Ell rr,gf� VAffii6�<%w i?a iP'!Cf o�C+' -��ia&rf or 7 IFJIi r}MFGr ,• _ ti F F+Grr4 S�ti►':kfa F I�. W a } {+v4*#u� 1 - RL + + B 009 A&Cff k 1 '4 I l,r.a,+r;Sror am ti I *t`+••�Y, i L + ` k EA,Sr+"17/L q* rf,•xD&Y , - :E-xvLr" +w Y#A �' *1G' ti � ''� f _ - .S:. � � �:��� r ' is.•# M 'TE4WE9TA OAli3' sa IF r3r .-AT P03pr - ... AJ'3 nor Arrarf T - v a Dom W&I 1110 ME Lc f4•#3l0 It frK w I •v. 7 [ �! II 14.,E R}i.-`#T ! 4 I ,, 17.W""for aefr r I rix :�+T�}7 i '• 1 'r ff_wiu 10 y } I RAx,r: , 1WNW U_Aff �PAW, I 1�, W,,sa►r„w�� V_-um, 1 LL% -y}1 n } I I F€C ' AJ yT/.#9r+I��C 7fl r , r� I a'ny1 aarrou,ror.tT 0. VAL er#i1mlr Ct}.-yIpfi;rr � �JJIMJ i.F L t Rr+Y c• IFS AL11F_a4�i 1JF+lL1.! }!� r+PO., 09'1Yl 1j� �; ' P�CM aS►W r�rf r�i *• Rl..�06 f rr' i[rf c F+�YiP* 4 rr,d.r]�f i"I ' i {tl 4{--S rir 14 r --. i sr„rsv# 13 i k Ff:1FI? 1 ' sR [ ,R,°E` lcad nana r r r cm 0' Neu 4 Lf-rs' r Y' t 100, (�►Rk+'l� 1V�T;A 100,1 rTpra MS.AV r iS II a17 N ',p/� • 4 ? ;f OL"KWr,a51 rF1SfA�fw i r I 1.yr fy.r.. 01 V'.rfl - F -- _ y �,' w, �w PAVING AND DRAMAGE LEGEND _},� - ,y�i ' wo r a 11 TDT�$T E Rf. #a,r£�Ev,�TiON i4'[M� ! i AluP I {}— ..,H 1 T ram_ FL GRATE CLEV001011 AL; IrM[tArlT •:t�..T�17��• rf. r1+1�Ai ECEV#,iLGhF { f#:Ir#7 +[Srir�+L k WLr ` Sf4 # +Y�larA7l R#R VOIUIiOH REi,yAG,yli$k57i u } �'- .LL"rJIdC+L'_ k 1 - rt -l- L r" i , rf,-elm FJrD03 iai. nrt j ad V,cy,,pr E T*lr,LLT'L111E9 . 1#rlfOM COI M ys` ++� i ,a7+ 1 LU TN,SIZE or sioR1t 9a+s�1 11Wr+F �{ } rlE,-�/! r f�- 'TEQUEST/k{N4Kg' i -L-` fYT i rf..aw { L�'�dwm r a�t�FS oar bUCT4E YtGw PF€ PRFNO �� PLAI LwTS FALtI&/ pro p NCW MJT r EirLSiFwG OR FRUPpSE6 EY .rluv i rar ———' plti[ik5 wFoasl+T�GM1+ - ] JArpW&AWA RPIWI 1Y F I fROP�SED PGR1�kil4x r"� •�� JT1J,aFAC+` idL+alwsSE rT7 r • Slopw SsR MANHOLE irk,�� .a. R'r'tCYr'am i0 SrRUCTUAE W10RUAT10N FLOW yalF,wf P w 04►ECT39W � r L r M EA I'rk4 Lf-'ff host R.0 EXr1TA G UTUTIES AFC WdF r 1.'.FL r rr 1DI FxJ'f'ffCfiAd 1 [R:fti6 -`'` r i�lf►L IAl4G+r €uuur.^:,ti il. �i jtA46t'RAR�� � ESL '*' � ESuSTIMG{1,EwAT14hL 1 o- F at rh f#.�1ip J rc" 0M-a ti� PapPdSEO ELCYxTL01+ RElfra'4Br Ff�TSO Ad'7r'row M f S7 &4r r TTm'L'L�+M C $LJa- r-'""1 CGkCRE#E SUwiS I` _ �.�,� � F � � � 1 M SSfo�r�AET i tCwCj9E7E OFUVEwa1' `F 1 9cnC1c PkYEFS L � r F 7 Ct ACT' � � ' '4 31aL.wI Eaa � i"7 fRPr iy r. LISrdiC COWCHM TYPE_ . _ _ Y 31in7Jfi i L�tLT $rraw,x T rvpr'P CUF15 1 G IER. Nt-RAW MR+tC I e+SF+'+�C AMId urr-a� FWF uAEr r - _ HE9VL C51A8 • �� 'iCLPrwr ars+M 7f �13 _ '... -�-�- -- - -= —um� rRaPosrn coy*out ELEwXt .rY-Y +ram y •. r.�. c►s.i aar A. Page 504 of 572 Agenda Item #16. M/1412003 090' � � OR DK 15220 PS 0445 crawl lo:(citeI ost self-add reind sumpW enve lop t) Palm BeachCounty, Florid Name: Denise Schacr.-WAver,CLAS Centex Homes Boynton Ecsch.IFL 33437 This Instramcat Ppa � 0 Mj437 r� ��: 13R SK ! 9" P G 0497 Ruda.McClo3ky.Smith Schauer&Russell,P.A Ott E&O PAlm Desch Bnul vaM I Sth Ft r Fort Lauderdale,Hozida 33 301 SPACE AB THIS SINE FOR PROCESSING DATA SPACE ABOVE TMS ME FOR FROCESUNG DATA AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM F TEQUESTA TRACE, A CONDOMINIUM TO ADD PEE 1' TMS AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COND MTMUM OF TEQUESTA TRACE, • A CONDOWNIUM TO ADD PHASE 17("Amendment"'), is made this q day o , by CENTEX KOMES, a Nevada general partnership (`€T a •eloper" , whose principal office is located at 8198 Jog load,Suite 200,Boynton Peach,Florida 33437. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Condominium Act, Chapter 718,, Florida Statutes, as amended through the date of recordation of the`* l arkati "(as hereinafter defined) ("'Act""), Developer has established Te u sta Trace Condominium ("'Condominium"), according to the l eclamlion o Condominium "Declaration" thereof recorded in Official Records Book 1413 7,Pages 0077 through 0275, of the Public Records of Palm Reach County. Florida and any amendments thereto [Includm* g amendments which added phases prior to the date herefl;and WHEREAS,the Condominium is "Phase condominium"as contemplated by Section718-403 of the Act and as set forth in the Declaration; and **THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RE-RECORDED TO ADD EXHIBIT "A" PREVIOUSLY NOT TN4CLUDED AT THE TIME OF RECORDING. NAP:Z8 t o :1 Bookl 5966/Page497 Page 1 of 2 + Page 505.;of 572 Order: t qu sta Doc: 2.01111209916PIOR-1 .4 1112 Page 1 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed; B 2B 200 9:48:57 AM EST Agenda Item #16. RM L&O-020 � WHEREAS, the Declaration provides for the submission to condominium ownership of the "initial Phase,' (as defined in the Declaration) and also provides for submission to condominium iniu ownership of phases l and Phases 3 through 17 as described in the a lamtion;and HEREAS, Developer desires to add Phase 17 as part of the Condominiums. NOW, THEREFORE, Developer, as the owner in fee simple of the "`Phase 17 Land," as hereinafter defined,hereby states and declares: All terms used herein shall have them meaning as defined In the Declaration. . The real property more panic ularly described on the legal ese ption and the Surrey for Phase l "`Phase 17Survey")attached hereto as ExWbit A(`'Phase 17 Lard'')and the improvements located thereon and all easements intended for use in connection with the Condominium are hereby submitted to condominium owner hip and added as a part ofthc Condominitunn pursuant to Articles 5,6 and 7 of the Declaration. The Phase 17 Land, together Mth improvements now or hereafter located thereon and all appurtenances hereto,al I as set forth on the Phase 17 Surrey,shall constitute Phase 17. . The Store water Managcmenty to is located within Phase 17 of theodor inlu and a portlian of Phase 17 is subject to that certain South Florida water Management District i Environmental Resource Permit No. - -P ("SFWMD Pit"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. . Tcquesta Trace Condominium Association.Inc.,has certain maintenance responsibilities as set forth in the F%WD Permit and in Section 1 . .4 and Section 2 1,5 of the Declaration. . This Amendment shall become effective upon recording amongst the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. The effect of this Amendment shall be that Phase 17, together with previously submitted phases . shall be,and the sarne shall constitute,the Condominium. Bookl 5966/Page498 Page 2 of 23 Pa e 506 of 572 Order: t questa Doc: 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 2 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 008 9:48:58 AM EST Agenda Item #16. • B" fW.M V%W 0447 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer has hereunto set its hand and official seal on the day and year first above written. WITNESSES: CENTEX BIOMES,a Nevada general partnership E TEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION Nevada corporation Its; Wnaging General Partner ^SigonaaturA ID E.ABRAMS J. • Its; President Southewt Florida Division V LU) ff Printed Name � (COR-POry r i# auk i ,■ t• , • • F ■F Printed f .. ,. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY PALM BEA Il Tle foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .by DAVID E.A RAMS,the Division President of theo lh Est Florida Division of CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION,a Nevada corporation on behalf of the corpomfion,as the Markin General Paler of F.NT X HONtES,a Nevada general partnership,who are personally known to me. My Conunission Expires: -ku (n Notary tary Pugli Printcd Marne of Notary Public . N 1 M18 EXPIRES'Foby i ,� 1 ►P: *0 3 BOOM 5966/Page499 Page 3 of 23 Pa e 50.7 of 572 Order:tequesta Doc: 2.011112099 BPI ORo15 3 Page 3 of 23 Created By: mn vllle Printed: 2 008 9:48:58 AM EST Agenda Item #16. 3" Mao ME �� r EXHIBIT Legal 1 esm' tion, Plot Plan and Location Map for Phase 17 of Tta Trace,a Condominium i P;281 7.7 4 Bookl5966/Page5OO Page 4 of 23 P q a e508of 1572 Doc: 2.0111120991B .1 9 .49 Pa 4 of Created B : mnevill Printed: J20 9:48:5 1�+M EST Order:tequSt� o I 1 1 � �' Agenda Item #16. CAffli&HAN•P&Q.C�T &w INC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO.LB 2938 6101 WesrATtANrtc mow.,MARGATE,FL PHOPiE(9%)4T23M FAX(9S4)p77si79 E-MAIL rtnmabua 11.proclorwn TEQUESTA TRACE,, A CONDOMINIUM aEscRiPrioN of PHASE 17 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL"R","TEQUESTA TRACE",ACCORDING TO 1'ME PLAT THEREOF AS]RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 95,PAGES 98 AND 99.0E THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PAl,hr!BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE Yli.i.AGE OF TEQUESTR, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLQRID& AND CONTAIN 3.197 ACRES,MORE OR LASS. i 11 TEgIfR9TATRJICX 706010.: 01030l DrtTE: 0624-03 ENE 1 4SMRlTs r:1fli4�t7tVlp�bkannnantt�a.00c Bookl 5966/Page501 Page 5 of 23 Pa e 509.6f 572 Order: tequesta Doc:2.Q111120991BPIOR.1546b.49711123 Page 5of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8/28/�008 9:48:59 AM EST ■ y + 00. 10 4LE �, IRPI i 1� - 00 � r y 10 10 'F . x + �' 100 - ► .,. '� .00 � f Opi lop IL lk Op . - �' - Tot �'0 or, lot Or go . OFr r M 90 # &9A , �. ► i . P� .� lop w •. 4 1 1� M } i M � ■ f 1 i fSVEET 2 OF Agenda Item #16. *wo" 491L751 .. ► i IN6701 "E 1W 047'1G@P9" Tea � � �j ► '+ r 03 91,00, 2C j I I PQ it 1 11,11 Io JD � . dt �ir 0 up Ap &1 0 1 + • ` I� N6 E Oka FCEL :. I. Phip tot# .0#4�*-W ti dM N670 11gag"IE 1 1. oil z -0 ' ri 9 M • r ra 0 � roll M , M C2,416� 4 0 ° co p � N 0 ont N67s 0 14 0, FMCAT A .. �� foe C) '97 TOT LOT r M 4 N67 ic ell 5'*E 961E 0 1 AV 91-0 .N67"151) 18E t PA 7 � `f u"Pat 11. do 416 (A ■ ' .'E r ,1 '-� M AIL y *; PEEL,"ir PARCEL" 94� 0 0 PA i 4 NL Afftee+ N67s,32,WT 1 24T,134 c i 4 F F oftwc '1 ��# .roc M.� r' N670 40 JOB ! . 010501 ava 13Y SCAL 1E e V16W PHASE 17 T QUESTA TRAM C `0 Sys 0Cw 05-23-03 SHEET 3 OF 4 STET$ Bookl 59 Pang 7 of 23 Page 511 0f,572 order.tequesta Doc. 2.011112 991 BPI OR.15966.49711123 Page 7 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed. 2 /200 9.49:00 AM EST Agenda Item #16. CARNAHANIN!q CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO.LB 2936 8101 WEST ATLWnD OL D.,&ARGATE FL 33M PHONE" FAX{ )M-4178 E4"L: rr **=Md=-pMCW,=n TEQUESTA TRACE, A CONDOMINIUM PHASE 1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED,,A SURVEYOR DULY AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, CERTIFIES THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN HERE N, SPECIFICALLY BEiNG PHASIE 17 OF "TEQUESTA TRACE, ONDOMINJU ". IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, SO THAT THE MATERIAL, TOGETHER WITH THE PFkOVIMONS OF THE DECLARATION DESCRIBING THE CONDOMINIUM PRCPERTY RELATING TO MATTERS OF SURVEY, IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS T AND SO THAT THE ICENTIFI ATI I , LOCATION, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE COMMON ELEMENTS TS AND OF EACH UNIT, CAN BE DETERMINED FROM THESE MATERIALS. ADDITIONALLY, ALL PLANNED ED IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING,ING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LANDSCAPtNG, UTILITY SERVICES AND ACCESS TO THE UNIT,AND COMMON ELEMENT FACILITIES SERVING THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LIMITS TO BE CONVEYED ARE LOCATED HAVE BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED. DATE OF LAST FIELDWORK: JU E 24,2003 C R i A !- P T F-CROSS,INC. STEM A~WRG PROFESSIONAL UR fEY R AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSE NO. 4886 NHS: 1. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL FUSED SEAL FLORIDA U EN ED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, . ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HERE-ON ARE EXISTING. . ALL SkSEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE PER RECORD PLAT.UNLESS OTHERWMIE INDICATED. . BEARINGS SHOWN HEREOF ARE B SED ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL wA'BEARING NORTH 87'3*IS*EAST,T.ACCORDING TO SAID PLAT, . El VATIONS SHMN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE ?NATIONAL GEODETIC VE TTCAL DATUM OF 1929�y1'�7���1#A E B SED DRIVE., PAL�1AA'�BEACH COUNTY BENCHMARK# -R ■ DE PTION: 50` #�'W OF DEN•E L■!7E TEO TA.Il��■51"11'4�. F FaB. R• . ..CROSSING; ELEVATION 17.474. 8. THESE PLANS ARE COMPLIED FROM PLANS AND DATA FURNISHED BY CEHTEX HOMES. AND SUPPLEMENTED BY SUCH FIELD SURVEY AND MEASUREMENTS AS DEEMED NEC WARY BY CA AHA PROCTOR-C ROS ,INC, 7. ALL AREAS NOT SHOWN AS BEING A PART OF A UN FT OR THE LIMITED COMWN ELEMF..NTS ARE COMMON ELEMENTS. :. Bookl 5966/Page5O4 Page 6 of 23 } F Pa e 512 of 572 Order:t qu st Doc: 2.01111209913PIOR.15966.49711123 Page 8 of 23 Created By: mn ville Printed: 00 :4 :00 AM EST Agenda Item #16. MW JS&O 13WX " EXHIBIT South Florida Water Management District nviron nt l Resourcc Permit No. - or Tequesta Trace,a Condominium i Bookl 5966/Page5O5 Page 9 of 23 Pa e 513 of 572 Order:tequesta Doc: 2.0111120991 BPI OR.159 . 9 [1123 Page 9 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8/28RO08 9:49:01 AM EST Agenda Item #16. so NT DiSTRICT ST 5O AT ICE : July 25, 2001 . PERITT : CENTEX HOMES 8198 JOG ROAD SUITE 200 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33437 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVING 7.45 ACRE(S) CF RESIDEN-l"IAL DEVELOPMEr, KNOWN AS TEQUESTA 7, ACE FKA !IHTKU E KEY) . PROJECT LOCATION: PALM BEACH COJNTY, SEC 3 -W 40SE PERMIT DURATION: Five years from tie date qssued to com l to cons t Luc.,{ n of the surface water management system as a t .or i d � r .r. See attached Rule 40E-4.3 1. Florida A mir i trat r e code. This is to roti fy you of the District's agency action concerning Noticeof intent for F Permit Application No. 0 109-5, dated November R. 2000. Th.s actiors is taKen pursuant to Rule 40E-1.603 and Chapter 40E-40 . Florida Administrative Code �F.k . . Based on the information prcvided, Cistrict rules knave been 8dherec tc and an Environmental Resource General Permit is ;r effect for this project subject to: 1 . Not r i -,rig a lilr=d r egiest for a C�arfter :ZO, F'orida Statute$. adiriniztrative hearing. . the attached General on i,0 ons. . tie attained 13 Special Conditicns, and 4. the at-:aced 4 E i lt� . Should you otject to these conditions, pl Ease r fer to the attached if Noticeo Rights r' wh-.,r.-h acdressesthe procedures to be fol l owe if you desire a public hea ri g or other reviEW of the proposed agency a; ..ors. :I ease contact this office if you have any quests n corcerriOng tni matter. if e o not near from you in acccr rlo with the ;JNoti i 4:41 4 k. ' we 7wi l l s,pm that you ccnc r it the O t sct r 7 c ti..i F . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 HEM E TTYY that a "Notice Rights" �.as been mailet to the Perinittee (and tle pro . i i s ed in the attached �i tri t n 7,i t later than : o p.m. on this 25 t f July, 2001, i accordance � hti ors120.601.3). da Statutes. i oy er ors E. 1 re for urfa e Water Managemeit Palm Beach Service Center Cortifl : Mail .7_ , C520 0015 2587 2476 Eno l os rEs Bookl 5966/Page5O6 e a 10 of 23 , Pa e 514 of 572 Order: teque to Doc: 2.0111120991 BPI OR.1 9 .497111 Page 10 of 23 Created By: mneviIle Printed: OO 9:4 :01 AM EST Agenda Item #16. { a" IS?20 POW 041 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APTERF4 E- 1 5 40E-4321 DuratJon of Permits 1) Unkm wed or otherwise modified the duration of an envimmmental resource paiWt �under chapter or Chapter 4(X ,FJLC.Is as thilom: a For a I approval,tvm yew f the date of ism or tv date q*dW as condition of tw permik uplen w]Nn tw period an appiica#lon r an IndtvltA or stardard guw2l Alt is fW for arry pwtl of ftproject. If an appka fbr an emirorwnerbi msocxce permit Is RW,thm ft corAptwl anal Ina vald ungl. 4nal acdm Is takm on the orwirm,meml resocrrce pert appimfion. It ft Vplkatfon Is grand, ftn tM carKwtwl approval is valid hr an addltl mS two years franc ft date of is uance of the permit Carceptal approvaLs whkM have no IrKtIvidual or stand s generai envftmrwtal Fume permit applications fled for a perW of two ors shall eVire"matkally at the end of ft two year pe od. For a mrxeptual appiwat bled c=urrently with a ent cf re iwl Impact M) Wpkatkxn fvr devekpnvnt approval and a Iccal govenwwart comprewwwo plan amendniend tt dui cf the carxefit approval shall be two years from wh hover one of the follawing occLrs at the la test date: I. the ewe date of the iaral govmffwnes o=prehensNe plan arnen*rii t 2. the dfecOie date of ft bcal qmwment d"ioprrmmt order. . the ate an which the Distrkt des t# =ncept of appmval,or 4. the latest date of the resoLifti of any Chapter 1 0. , F A. ,* ad inIsTattvie proceedfN or other kai appeals. ce For all 1�'IC + L31 or st dar general environmental Durce permit " }ream fmrn the date of Issuance or sLxh amunt of tines as made a cond1don ot the permit. d) For a natked general pwftt issued pustar t to Chapter 4 -E-400, F.A. ., Ike years the date ire nc dce of Intent to use the permit is provided to the Mtrkt. (a) Unlem presaited by spedat pe nt condidom permits expire autwriatl l;y accardling to the tkndlranws IncDcated in this rule:. If application f r extenskm is made In w1tirg pursuant to subsection ,the permit steall resin in fuU force and effed until: f. the Gcyemi g Ord Mkes act-on on an appkation 1br e. te,taim of are individual perml. or . staff takes t ri n an appkatfon far extesukr of a startard gewal Wit, b InstallaWn of the projea outfit stri,c re shall not ccnstWe a vmlng of the . imit ( ) The perrrul a tenslan shad be Iced provided that a mi it~ e Rkm a written guest Sri&. ft Dw3i=showing good came prior to ft expiradon of t m permit For the purpose of this ruled good cause gull mean a set of extenuadnQ dmurmmnces outsi of tie ccntrol of the pe-rNttee. Requests for Wcns ens,which smell I=Ldt documentatIcn of the cderuatM ck==Unces and now tt y have delayed this proms wil not be a epted more than 180 dais prior to the expiration date. Substandai mods atans to Canceptal pprcv* grin emend the duration of the Conceal 49raval far two years fmm the date of issu& e Of the mod1katlon. For tie purposes o1r this set kn ft ftin msubstantfal modlfcatbW shall mean a=dNkatlon whi Is reasonably exM ted to lead to bzrtially dlffe=t water rwuCe or env1mnffx r Mj mpact which require a detalled retie I. Substantial mood kations to indl dual or standard general environmental r urce~pe its wed pc cant to a permit applieador extend the duration of ft pe ni It for three yean hun ft date of issuance of the >d1Mcat . Indtvidual or gaWard general art0monrentaf resource pewit modika rrs do not extend"duraton of a conceptual a pp mvaf. ( permit it ifications issued pursuant to subsection 40 -4. 3& b, FA , letter r odificabG do not extend the dumttn of a Est. 7) Failure to complew coast cdon or alteration of the surface water management sysmm and obtain operation phase appmyal from the ot&ict waMin the permit duration she l recl tre a new permit aud=t,wWn In order to continue constriction unless a permit extension is granted. Spedfk authanty 373.044, 3 .:13 F.S. Law Irnieme� c 373.413, 373.4160 37141 , 3 1-. 6F.S. Hts , ew - 81r an d 1•3,4 , L -t r 90:rn& :15�c-4.07(4), �m �3-8 ,41 0194, 10-3-95 Book 1 5966JPage507 Page 11 of 23 Page 515 of 572 Order:tequesta Doc: 2.0111120991 BPI OR.159 .497111 3 Page 11 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 00 9:49:02 AM EST Agenda Item #16. MW I M20 045 N=CLQI�R19M Sewn 1 .569(l). Fla, $tad. (1999), requires that 6e ch noucs shalt i form the recipient of any admi is"five hiudnq or judkiat review that is a aHable under this secWs, s. 120.57, or s. 1 0.68; sh I Indicate tie procedure which rust be followed to obtain the hearing or judciat reylew, and shall state the time limits why apply,' Please rote that this oil of Rights is is not intended to pride legsl advice. Not all the legal proceedings detailed belcw may be an appft #a or appropriate rernedy.You may wish to consult an attoma►regarding your legal rights. Petition for Ad I fat 0ve Precondings d. -Landsnv1 1. A pion whose substw al interests are PO=k ftrsuant to Section 373.427, Fla. fit., aftd Raja affected by the South Fl+oride Watw Management Distrid s 40E.1. 11 , Fla. Admin. Code afso pubUshed as an F D)a E n has the right to request an adminis t,re exceptan to the UnNbrm Rules of ProWure as We 40E- hearing on that acdon. The meted per n may request 0.109(2)(c)), a petition objecting to the SFWMD'e age eRher a trmal or an infonal haadng, as set forth belcw.A ecdon regarding consoldated appfkm for point of entry into adminis tie proceedings is gwomed Ervironmental resource Permits and Use of Sovarifign by Roles 2 B-1 06.111 and 0 -1.511, Fla. Admin. Code, Submerged Lands( L s). must be flied withlin 14 days (also published as an mepdon to tha Unifwm Rules of of the notice of consolidated intent to grit or deny the Procedure as Rule , as set forth below. SLERP. Petons must substantalty comply wtth the Petitiors are deemed ffled upon receipt of the original requirements of either subsection a.or h.above. documents by the SFWMD Cam. a. ErneEgWqL&&odpftn and 0r a. Fcwmal AdrriniskaftHoft if a A person whose subWzntai Interests are affaAd by a genuine issue(s)of rr tedal fait is In dispute, tha affected SAD Emergency Authorization and Order* hos a fight perscn seskng a formal hezOng on a SFMD decision to file a petidon under Seotons 120.569, 1 . 7( , end which does or may determine their suhstant i interests 1 . ( ): Fla. StaL, as prodded In subsections a. and b. snail fit a-vedton for hearing pumuant to Sew rls 120.569 above. l o e+er, the person, or the agent of ft pe o and . , Fla. Stat of for med tiort pursuant to responsible for causing cc cont bu ng to the emergency Se dan 120.573, Fla. StaL within 21 days, except as conditons slat take whatever actton nemsary b ems+■ provided in subsections c, and d. be rw, of ear wdftn immediate cornpilanc.e with the terms of the EmeWcy ncb a through mail cr posting or pubkobor of notice that Authorizzdon and Onjer. the SFWMD has or intends to take final agency action. PeWans ,must substantially comp y with �ha requirements f, Order for Emerartcv Agt] ; A perm of Kale -10 . 11 . Fla. Admin. Code, a cc y of the whose su suntal lnteresM ara OeCted by a SFMD. which is attached to Ns Notre of Rights. Order for Emergency Actcn has a right to Ills a pe on pursuant to Rules 2&107.00 5 and 40E-1. 111 Fla Admin. b. i Wo al AgMaMiLtadM H2sdnz if there Code,copies of which are attached to this Matte of FUgh1XT are nc issues of mate ial fact in dispute, the afleded and Sedan .1 tg( ). Fla. StaL. fcr a heaft on Me person seeking an informal heOrg on a SFWMD decision Order. Any subsequent agency action or proposed agency r mich does or may determine their su stantal interests action to Initiate a fond revocation proceeding shah to slhaU flee a petftiori for hearing pursuant to Sectons 1 0.559 separately noticed pursuant to secdon 9.below. and 1 {. ( , Fla, Stat or for m diation pursuant to Sodom 12C.573L Fla.. Stat wthin 21 days, a capt as g. Permt Suscension. RaW prodded in sub erns c. and d. below, of either written -tulm r~ l the ' If the SFWMD i ues an noke through ,nail or pcstng or public don of notice that administradve complaint to suspend, revoice, annuk or the SAD has or intends to take final agency aeon. witlidraw a permit, the permittee may request a hoarlr;g to Petitions must substantially comply with the requirements be conducted in accordance with Sectons 120.E and of Rule 8-1-06_ 1(2), Fla. Admin. Cade, a copy of the 120-57v Fla. Shia, wifthirt 21 days of either wr n r tic which is attached tc this Nails of Rights. through mall or posting or puolicaton of notice that the SFWMD has or intends to take filial agency act= c. dm*n_ .� #r�; dQr Peftens must substantially comp with the r ire Wits It a Rmpondent objects to a SFIWD Adrminis"five of Rule -107. ). Fla. Admire. Code. a copy of the Ccmplaint and Order, piursua t to Secficn 373.119, Fla. which is attached to this l otrca of Rigrits. Stet (1997). the person Warned in the Administrative ornpiaint and Order may ffle a petNon for a hearing no 2. Bemuse tne adMinl3tratue heOMS process later ftn 14 days after the date such order is served. is pi ned tc tormul.i a final agancy action, the Ong of Pedtlons mu t substardally comOywith tLhe requrreMentS a Petition ,,leans that the SFVIi I `s final acdoft may be of either subsedion a.or b.above. different from the positron taken by rt PMVIOUSIT Pers3ns whia a substandal interests may be affected by Revised Augw.2 t A Bookl 5966Page 12 of 23 til Page 516 Of 572 Order:teque to Doc: 2.0111120991 BPI OR.1 .4 7111 Page 12 of 23 Created By: an ville Printed: 008 9:49:02 AM EST Agenda Item #16. BWK MWO bWWon of rcUce that the SFMD has or Intends to c The name adars is rye aunber take foal apnoy scUon,Choostno madaflon wwii not affect and any facsJmfle number of the Mornay or quaffed �he dgtt to art xk aMve hem 9 mediation does not r preser auve of the honer,Qf arty); .at in softmenL d the applIcsWe rule at porn of the nk-I pursus t to Rine 26-100.402m, FIa. Adman. Code, the a the coon to the statue the nk is contents of V* peftion for rnedlation shall cordain the Impiemen&V; fb1k3%MngInman; (0 the type of action requested; 1 the name, addrass, and telephone W the spedfle fads that demon&ge a number of the pemon re ues ng rr dlation and that b tan# I s 1p or violation of pd of is of f eu per ani`n's r pre e, any thatwed juslify a salver or v*ftmw for the pelt er (2) a statement of the preriminilry agency (h) the reason why the vxianca or the w r action; requested would serve the purpows of the undwtyft an explanation of hove the pewn's s tute;and substantial Interests wail be afrected by tha agency 0) is statement of whe ar the va ow or detefnninatW;and waiver Is pen eft or temporary, if tha vadame or - a Mament of n0of sought, waiver Is temporary, the pe It n shall Include the dates As peed In Seddon 120.573, a. StaL 1997, the IndicaUng the duration of the requested varlsnoe or w iv ; tier MOM of all the paffl*s to ate will toll the tins 1rr�itadom Irnp umd by SWfons 120.569 and 1 0.57, A person mque3ft are emergency variance from or s. Slat., for .,. %fta4 ng and hokft an edrrdn1WvU re waver of a SFWMD rule must aurly so slate in the hewing. Unlau other lse agroW by the pares, the csAlon of the petlfion. In adder to tho mqulremwts of miedefim must be canduded whirr e0 days of the Semen 120,54 ,� Fie. S L pursuant to W* M croon of the agreement, If medWon results In 104.004(2)11 Fla. Ads in. Code, the peWon mv.% also aettlerrwd of tto dlsWe, the SAID must ertaf a final include: order Incapradng tha agmement of the parties. Pemon a the Vecfflc facts that make the sl uat on an whom subSWMal Interest YAH be a cWd by such a emargen r;and �lfied agancy decision have a Vd te pe n for b the specffic fads to show that the honer w .hearing wtW 21 days of receipt of the final order in a far kirTedate ad em effa t onlesa the varies or c=wdanc*with the requiraments of Sadlons 120.50 and waiver is issued by the SFWM mom wcMdIddusty than t2a.57, Fla. 8t., and SF'WMD Rule 1 . o1(2), Flia. the appiluble Urnefrar es set forth in Seddon 120.54Z Fla. Admin.C*de, if mad von terminates wthout saftfemeM of St . the dispute, ft SFWVD shell notify aN parties in writing that the adminlatradve heartng mess under Sacdons WAJVIER OF RJGHTS 120,569 and 120.57 0 Fla. Stat., re sin .evallable for 14. Failure to observe the relevant titre disposMan of t o clspLA91, and the riotcs wit specify the l mes prescribed above gill constituta a waiver of such deed9nes that them YAllappy for challenging the age ncy fight. acHon. -1 . 1 IN ATF i lk OF PROCEEDINGS ARrAN Ea AND WANFEf S (INVOLANO UUMJTW IWU OF MATS Fes) 13. A person who Is subs to regulation pursuer to a SFWMD rule and believes the appilcafion AN petitims filed under these rules shall contain: that rule will crane a sub9artal hardship or will violate a The name end address of each agency of led principles of falmess (as hose temis are digned in and each agency's file or J&MJflW1on mLmber,If know; ubse tlon 120.54 (2 , Fla. Stat. and can demonstrate N The name, address, and talephone number of the that the pub of the undertying smuts ill be or has pets one«; the mama, address, and e(ephooe numW of been*Meved by other means, !may file a petNon with the the petit er's repmerdadve, if any, which shall ba the SFWMD Clark des ng s vmrtamca f m or waiver of the address for service purposes dudrV the caum of the SFWMD rule. Applying fora vadance or waiver does not proceea',ft, and are can on of how the der a subOute or Wend the Ume for Ong a melon for an substantial interests vAH be afraded by the agency adminWrgive hearing or axerdsing any other rah#thal a determination; perwn may have oonoarning the SFWM 's acdon. c A statement of when and low the peftner Pursuant to Rule 8- o .DD 2)t Fla' grin. Code, the valved notice of tna agency decider; pet i on must include the tollowtng n n-nation: 0 A statement of all disputed tssuas of material facL If theme are none, a peWon must so ir�cilte; a the cap on shall reed: e) A concil3e statement of the uffimaie facts a fte+d, Petition for Jad nce from)or(Waiver o Rule ftatlon as well&s the rules and statutes which entitle the pe tloiler The name, address, telephone number to retle-,and and any facsimile number of the pel loner, # A demand for relief. Revised Auoust,2000 3 Bookl 5966/Page5o9 Page 13 of 23 , '+ Pa e 517 of=572 Order: tequesta Dad: 2.0111120991BPIOR.lS966.49711123 Page 13 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8 2 9:49:03 AM EST Agenda Item #16. y mm Isno pwx 0454 GENERAL CONDITIONS . ALL A TIV TIES AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT SHALL BE I PLEMFNT E AS SET FORTH I THE PLMS. SPECIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AS APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT, ANY DEVIATION FROF THE PERMITTED ACTIVITY AND THE CONDITIONS FOR UNDERTAKING r-1AT ACTIVITY SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THIS PERMIT AND PART IV, CHAPTER , F.s. . THIS PERMIT OR A COPY 7HER CP. COMPLETE WITH ALL CONDMONS. ATTACHMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND MODIFICA71ONS SHALL BE KEPT AT THE WORK SITE OF THE PERMITTED Alto."TIVITY. THE COMPLETE PERMIT SHALL BE A AILA U FOR REVIEW - THE WORK SITE UPoN REQUEST BY THE DISTRICT STAFF. THE PERR TT E SHALL REMIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW THE D ?LETE PERMIT PRIOR To COMMENCEMENT F THE ACTIVITY AU7 ORI ED Y THIS PERMIT. . ACTIVITIES APPROVED BY THIS PETIT SHALL BE CCNOUCTED :N A MANNERWHICH DOES NOT CAUSE VIGLATIONS OF STATE WATER QLALITY STiANDARDS. THE PERMITTE E SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION ANO POLLUTION DON T Rod. TO PREVENT VICLATION F STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. TEMPORARY EROSION O# T L SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO AND DURING O STR O T ION, AND PERMANENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE COMPLMD WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ANY ST U TI ACTIVITY. TURBIDITY BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED T ALL LOCATIONS HE THE POSSIBILITY OF TRANSFERRING SUSPENDED SOLICS INTO THE REC'EIVING WATERSODY EXISIS DUE TO '�E PERMITTED WORK. TU BI 17f BARRIERS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AT ALL LOCATIONS UNTIL CONSTRUCTION 15 COMPLETED AND SOILS ARE STABILIZED AND VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIT4 THE GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED lN CHAPTER 6 OF THE FLORIDA LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL: A GUIDE TO SOUND LAND AND WA7tR MANAGEMENT (DEPARIMMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION. ISB , INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ICE RULE 0E- .O i t F.A.C. UNLESS A PROJECT-SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. THEREAFTER THE PERM17EE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE BARRIERS. THE PER' ITT E E BALL OORRE ' ANY EROSION OR SHOALING THAT CAUSES ADVERSE !PACTS!VPAC7'S TO THE 'NA7R RESOURCES 4. THE PERMITTEE SHALL N071FY THE DISTRICT OF THE ANTICIPATED CONS. LOTION STAR LATE WITHIN 30 DAYS Or THE CATE THAT iHrs PERMIT IS ISSUED. AT EAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO C04M N EMEf T OF AC TI 17Y AU47140RIZED BY PERMIT, 7HE ER�.I 1 EE SHALL SUBMIT TO T4E DISTRICT AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONS RUCTION COMMENCEMENT NOTICE FORM NO.. D INOXATTiNG THE ACTUAL START DATE AID rRE EXPECTED COMPLETION DA'71" . S. WHEN E DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED ONE YEAR. THE PERMIT tE SMALL SUBN17, CONSTRUCTION STATUS REPORTS TO TEE DISTRICT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS 'DTI L I Z IN AN ANNUAL ST T REPORT FORM. STATUS REPORT FORMS S . L L BE SUBS!I TTED T4E FOLLOWING JUE OF EACH YEAR. Bookl 5966/Page5l - Pacie 518 of 572 Order: tequesta Doe: 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 14 of 23 Created By: mne ilia Printed: B OEM 9:49:04 Aft EST Agenda Item #16. Mw Ew-w Pvw� . WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMITTED ACTIVITY, THE PER'!ITTEE SMALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR OTHER APPROPRIAwl 1NOIV ID AL AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW, UTILIZING THE SJPPLIEC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE P ERP I T CONSTRUMON CO 1PLE7 O /CON TRUCT ON CERTIFECATION FORM NO.0981. THE STATEMENT O COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION SHALL BE EASED ON ON51TE OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION OR REVIEW OF A R I L T DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING IF THE WORK WAS COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH PERMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THIS SUBM17AL SHALL SERVE TO NOTIFY THE DISTRICT THAT THE SYSTEM IS READY FOR I SPE TION. ADDITIONALLY, iF DEVIAT:ON FROM THE A PRCVED DRAWINGS ARE DISCOVERED DURING THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS. THE CERTIFICATION MOST B ACCOMPANIED 2Y A COPY OF TK APPROVED PERMIT DRAWINGS WITH DEVIATIONS NOTED, BCT� THE ORIGINAL AND REMISED SPECIFICATIONS MJS— BE CLEARLY SHOWN. THE PLANS MOST BE CL EARLY LABELED AS OP ASBL IL T" OR "RECORD" D RA q l N . ALL SURVEYED DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A REGISTE EE SURVEYOR. . THE OPERATION PHASE OF THIS PERMIT SMALL NOT BECOME E EFFECTIVE: UNTIL THE PERNITTEE HAq COMPLIED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS O 'CONDITION ) A O E. HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR CONVERSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT FROM CONSTRUCTION PHASE To OPERATION PHASE, FCRM NO.0 : THE DISTRICT DETERMINES TFE SYSTEM TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WIT4 THE PER T T TES PLANS AND SPEOIFICA71 : AND THE ENTITY APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE UITH SECTIONS 9.0 AND I0.0 OF THE BASIS OF REVIEW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATIONS WI�HI 4 THE OUT� FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT , ALGUST 1995, ACCEPTS RE PONSI I.ITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. THE PERMIT SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO SUCH RCVEC OP RATLON AND MAINTENANCE ENTITY UNTIL THE OPERATION! PHASE OF THE PERMIT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. FOLL 0I I PE:TION AND AP RO AL OF T E PERRYFEC SYSI M BY HE DISTRICT, E PER ITTEE SHALL INITIATZ TRANSFER OF THE PERM17 TO THE AP�ROVED RESPONSIBLE OPERATING ENTITY IP DIFFERENT FROM "0H.E PERM:TTFE. UNTIL THE PERMIT I S TRANS FER.RED PUBS AN7 7O S E t I ON 43E-1.610 7, .A.C. , THE PER4171 EE SHALL BE LIABLE FOR COMP.IA 'OE WITH T'�E TERMS OF THE PERMIT. . EACH PHASE OR INDEPENDENT PORTION OF THE PE MI-FED SYSTEM MUS7 BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH E E M TTED PLANS AND PERMIT OONDI T IOt S PRE R TO THE INITIATION OF THE PERM177C-;' E OF SITE INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA SERVED BY THAT PORTION OR PHASE OF THE SYSTEM. - E CP RHASE CR IN EPENDE�F PORTION 07 T-E SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH T'dE PERCH 1 T QED PLANS AND PERMIT CONDITIC S PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF RESPONSIKLITY FOR OPE A713N ,AND f : T NA CE OF THE PHASE OR PORTION 0: ICE SYSTEM 73 A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR CTHE� RESPC : LE ENTITY. . . FC SE SYSTEMS THAT SILL BE OPERATED OR PAIN-TINED EY AN ENTITY TBAT WILL REQUIRE AN E�SEHENT OR DEED RESTRICTION IN DER TO ENABLE THAT E ` 7Y TO OPERATE OR MAINTAIN THE SYS7EM IN C NPOR ANCE WITH THIS PERT i'. SUCH EASEMENT C DEED RES7RICTION MUST BE REC2ROEO IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS AND SUBMI i 1 ED TO THE DISTRICT ALC M' ITrt' ANY OTHER FINAL O ERATION AND MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS RE D;IRLn Y SECTIONS 9.0 AND 1C.0 OF THE BASIS OF REVIEW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RE UK PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITHIN ��E SOL7,H FLORICA WATER MANAGEMENT DIS 1CT - A,OC=CST 1995, PRIOR ;O LOT OR uNIT SALES OR DRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE SYSTEM. WHICHEVER OC::FRS F:RST. OTHER 20C S E TS CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT ANC ALTHORITv OF TEE OPERATING ENTITY TY MUST BE :::LED dlI �'HE SECRE-7ARY OF 7ATE WERE APPROPRIATE. FOR THOSE SYSTEMS H:CH ARE PROPOSED TO BE MAINTAINED BY TEE COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL E TI7:ES. FINAL OPERATION AND MAINIENANCE DOCUMENTS MIST BE RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT WHEN, MAINTENAACE AND OPERATiON OF THE S TEM I ACCEPTED 3Y THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EN71TY. FAILURE TO SLBMIT THE APPROPRIATErw FINAL DOCUMENTS WILL RESULT IN THE PERMITTE REMA-.:NING LIABLE FOR DAR�YINO 00, MITE AN',�,E AND OPERA'=3 CF THE PERM T TECH SYSTE4 AND ANY OT�ER Z:ERM!T CONDIT!ONS. Book 1 5966/Page5l Page 5 23 Pa e 519 of 572 Order: t qu sta Doc: 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 15 of 23 Greaten By: mneville Printed: 008 9:49:04 AID EST Agenda Item #16. Boa is 04% IO. SHOULD ANY OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THE E"RMITTE SYSTEM, THE PE M I T TE E SHALL NCTIFY I"CI E DISTRICT IN WRITING OF THE CHANGES PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION SO THAT A UETERMINATION CAN BE MADE WHETHER A PERMIT MODIFICATION IS REUIREO. .0 11. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY TO OBTAIN AI NY U:RED FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT AU O ATIOI S R:OR TO THE START OF ANY ACTIVE T 1 APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONVEY TO THE PERMITTEE OR CREATE IN THE PERMITTEE ANY PROPERTY RIGHT, OR ANY INTEREST I REAL PROPERTY, NOR DOES IT AUTHORIZE: ANY ENTRANCE UPON OR ACTIVITIES ON PROPERTY THIGH IS NOT OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE PERM1 i EE, OR CONVEY ANY RIGHTS DR P I ILESES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED :N THE PERMr T AND CHAPTER -4 OR CHAPTER OE- O, F.A.C. 12. THE PERMITTEE IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT SECTION 253.77. F.S. STATES THAT A PERSON 4AY NOT CCMMENCE ANY EXCAVATION. CONSTRUCTION, OR OTHER ACTIVITY INVOLVING THE USE OF SOVEREIGN OR OTHER LANDS OF THE STATE* THE TITLE TO WHICH-: IS VESTED I THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FU O WITHOUT O 7AI LINO T'HE REQUIRED LEASE, LICENSE, EASE1 EN7. OR OrHER FORM OF CONSENT ArPORIZING THE PROPOSED USE. T E E CRE. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLEF3'R OBTAINING ANY NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS FROM THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRIOR TO COMMENCING AOTI I ' ON SOVEREIGNTY .ANDS OR MER STATE-01 �D LXNDS. 13. THE PERMITTEE MUST OBTAIN] A WATER USE PERMIT PRIOR TO OOHS T -J TIO DEWA7.RING. UNLESS THE WORK QUALIFIES PCR A GENERAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO SUB E TiON -- 0. . F.A.C. . ALSO KNOWN AS THE " O NFi I OE" RULE. 14. THE PE .M17EE SHALL HGLD AND SAVE THE DISTRICT HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL DAHA ES. Or AIMS. OR L IABILITIE H:CH MAY AR S E BY.REASON OF T-1E CONSTRUCT ION. ALTERATION, OPERATION. MAINTENANCE, REMOVAL. ABANO� MET OR USi OP ANY SYSTEM ALI-7HORIZED THE PERMIT. 15. ANY DELINEATION 0c, r E EXTENT OF A WETLANDOR GTHER SURFACE WATER SUBMITTED A PART n.F tI1E PERMIT APPLICATION. lNCLJD.7NG PLANSCR 07HERSUPPORTING DOC 1E 1TAT QN. SHALL NOT BE CONSIOERED BINDING UNLESS A S E I :O :ONDITIO J OF THIS PERMIT OR A FORMAL DETERMINATION UNCER SECTION 3. 1( ). F.S. . PROVIDES OTEIE, 1 . THE PERMITTEE SMALL NNIFY THE DISTRICT IN WRITING ' I T kJN 30 GAYS OF ANY SALE., CONVEYANCE, OR OTHER TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL OF A PERMITTED SYSTEM OR THE RED PROPERTY ON WdICH THE PER T TTED SYSTEM IS LOCATED. ALL TRANSFERS OF OWNERSHIP OR TRANSFERS OF A PERMIT ARE SUBJECT TO THE E UIREME i OF RULES . E- . 10 AND E-1. 1 . F.A.C. THE PERM!1 TEE -'-�NSFERRING THE PERMIT SHALL REMAIN LIAR' FO CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 7-AT MAY BE REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF ANY V IOL4 7IO 1 PRIOR TO THE SALE. CONVEy4NCE OR OTHER 01"HER 7RANSFE OF i 'E SYSTEM. 17. UPON REASON-ABLE NOTICE 70 THE PERMIT7E. DISTRICT AUTHORIZED S7AFF WITH. PROPER IDENTIFICATION SHALL HAVE PERMISS11N TO ENTER, INSPEC7. SAMPLE ADD TE T THE SYSTEM 1`0 INSURE CONFORMITY WI 'HE PLANS AND PE C I F CATION 1 APPR ISED BY THE PERMIT. 18. IF HIS'n"CRICkL OR ARCHAE3LOGICAL ARTIFACTS kRE DISCOVERED AT ANY TIME ON THE PROJE7.7 SITE. THE ER I ;EE SHALL IMMECIATE Y NOTIFY T`r E AFP OP IA: E DISTRIC'lp- SE4VICE CEN7ER. 19. THE PERMI7EE SHALL I MED I A J E_ NCT:Fv 7HE OIS r P:C7 I ITI Oc' ANY PREVIOUSLY S IT""E 14 O A1 I O '7� IS LATER O: 00 ER"ED TO BE I AOOURA;E. 13ookl5966lPage5l2 Page 16 of 23 Pa e 520 of 572 Order: tequesta Doc: .01111 0991 BP I OR.15966.49 111 Page 16 of 23 Created By: �nnevi I l Printed: / 008 9:49:05 AM EST Agenda Item #16. SPECIAL COOT IONS 1. .4rNIMUM BUILDING FLOOR ELEVAT# . 17.8 FEE NGVD. 2_ MINIMUM PARKING LOT ELEVATION: 16 P EET N `D. . DISCHARGE FACILITIES: TOTAL ON-SITE RETENTION. . THE PERM M EE SHALL BE RESPCNSIBLE FOR T.HE CORRECTION 0; ANY EROSION. SHOALING R WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS THAT RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERA7ION OF 74E SURFACE 'AT•E MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 5. I EA . RES SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CON'S"FRUCTION TO TNSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION kND OP TU I IT R BLEMS ARE NOT CREATED :N THE RECEIVING WATER. 5. -F�E 01 TRICT RESERVES "."PE RIFT TO REQUIRE THAT ADDITIONAL WATER QUALI7Y TREATMENT ET�CDS BE I CORD R .T O I T T'•,E DRAINAGE SYSTEM IF SJCH MEASURES ARE SHOWN TO BE NECESSARY. . LAKE SI E SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEE ER THAN :1 (HORIZONTAL:VER T 1CAL TO A DEPTH OF TWO FEET BELOWTHE C OL ELEVATION. SIDE SLOPES SHALL E TOR SOILED AND TABILI E THROUGH SEEDING R LAN'TI G FROM FEET BELOW T T.1 FOOT THE CONTROL ELEVATION TO PRCMGTE VEGETATIVE GROWTH. . A I,[TIES OTHER THAN DOSE ST 7 ED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE CD STR C7ED WITHOU7 AN APPROVED ODI 'ICAT'ION 0: THIS PERMIT. . OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SPALL BE THE RESPCNSIBILITY OF TE UESTA TRACE NOMI NI: A,SSO IATI t INC. 10. REFERENCE 1S MADE T E �-:SI S . THROUGH 2C CONSISTING G P PAVING & DRAINAGE AGE PLANS. AND PAVING & DRAINAGE DETAILS. THE DRA I i GS.HAVE BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY DAMES W. MAHA NAH. P.E. F ARE :NCLDOEB I N THE PERMIT FT L E, AND ARE HEREBY NCL DEC IN THIS PERMIT BY REFERENCE. 11. THE OPERATING E TIT"If SHALL CONDUCT PER:ODIC iNSPECTIONS TO MONITOR EXFILTRATION TRENCH FUNCTION. THE INSPECTIONS S LL I CLUCE OBSERVATIONS A:7TER E i E DED AND/OR NTENSE RAINFALL TO IDENTIFY SURFACE PONDING 7�AT MIGHT :NOICATE LM LIIE AND/OR OR ° DESPREAD CLOGGING. WATER LEVELS WITHIN THE INLETS SHALL BE RECORDED TO CHECK E F IL7RAT ION CAPACITY. I LE T SUMPS SHALL BE !NSZIECTED AN L ALL� FOR SEDIMENT BUILDUP AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED MANUALLY OR BY VACUUM PUMP SUMMARY REPORTS SLM ARI ING TEE RESULTS OF THE PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND ANY MAINTENANCE PREFORMED DURING THE PRECE INS YEAR -iALL BE SUBMITTED ANNUALLY T THE DlS T R CT` EN' I ROWENTAL RESOURCE COMPLIANCE DIVISION. 12. WITHIN NINETY SAYS of PERM:T !S LANCE. THE ER rTTEE SHALL SUBMIT COPES Cr THE RECORDEDCONDOMINIUMD CU _ENTS TTI N5 FOR 7..H THE AFOREMENTIONED EP 71 N AND MAIN"ENA CE REQUIREMENTS, AS WELL AS THE REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHING, AND FULLY FUNDING ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. A RESERVE AC'0UNT TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF REPLACING THE PROPOSED EX ILTRATION SY T E EVERY F17EEN YEARS. THE VALUE OF THE RESERVE ACCOUNT SHALL BE E VALE IT T !COX OF THE DRO E T EO CGS E REPLACING E ENTIRE EX7:LTRA. `IoN SY TE PRESENT,. ESTIMATED ATED AT D,00 .0 . THE REP#A E EN7, COST S . L. BE RE-ESTIMATED B • STANDARD DEANS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS PRIOR TO THE A.SS0C!A 7:CIS'S ANNUAL BUDGET MEETING T� ENSURE THE RESERIE WILL BE FULLY FUN ED1 Bookl 5966/Pa Page 17 of 23 Pa e 521 of 572 1 BP .1 966.4 Page 1 of Created B : mneville Printed: / �OO 9:49:06 Ali EST Order: teq�eSta hoc. .�I�I 1 1 � I 9 �' Agenda Item #16. i 9" 1 SWO 04 SP EL.-L L %ofFIO 1 , PRIOR TO AUGUST 3L 2001, THE PERMITTEE SQL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT OPY F THE RECORDED 4ARRANTY DEED IN THE PERMITTEE'S NAME. Book 1 5966/Page5l4 Page 1 El of 23 Page 522 0f 572 Order: tequesta Doc: 2.0111120991BPIOR.lS966.49711123 Page 18 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8 8 0B8 9:49:06 AM EST Agenda Item #16. v % tz 1:�NUINLERING PU FOR L5120 wPWA=QS4%Ew 0439 Jighthouse 1 ,ey e of esta, o f a IMTZ TIFOU&STA bit �d AMP L i lk LOCATION MAP S 30, T 40S., R 43E NOV 0 Z006 -WPB 0 0 6. EXHIBIT I Bookl 5966/Page5l5 Page 19 of 23 Page 523 of 572 Order: tequesta Doc 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 19 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8/28/2008 9:49:06 AM EST Agenda Item #16. P E�T: TEQUE57A TrRA.E (F A LIGHTHOUSE KEY N'ERY SC F; APPLICATION NUMBER: o 11 -- LOCATION: PALM BEACH T . T 0 E OWNER: CENTER HE ENGINEER: S H A S ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT AA: 7.4~ A�RES DRATNAGC" AREA; 7.45 ACRES PROJECT USE: S I EN"IAL FACILITIES: I. EXISTING; The proposed project site is located within Section 30, of Township 40 South, Range 43 East. in Palm Beach County. The site 4s generally bordered to the ors y a United States Postal ep- ie CUSPS site. to *1.-.he south by Tecuesta Drive. to the east by the t e uesta Oaks deve o mEnt. and to the vast by 04 d Di g x e Highway (Alt ALA) . The s to is presently undevelooed. The site is to at,.ed on the e'.1 grained sandy soi's w;-.ioh make uo thn coastal ridge. In severe v ' t , excess stormwater runoff re entl discharges to the Loxana4Z,chee River v4a e ex s,.i ng Old "U~ 7 , !sway sirfacM W .e management S sirs m.e . 2. Pic PDSE ; The a P"i oC-1n t is seeking art En iron len a l Resource Permit E P to hon a cons -IZ,Cp. . a proposed surface Z r. water management ,, system �o serve . acres of pro osed residential e elo ert to be known as Te ues:a Trace f a '!tnouse Key) . n Palm, .cr. County. The proposed SWM s s r `will consist of 1 on-site retention (u to .he edi� 3-day, 5"-yeah stage.). i:e grading and inlets will route excess to"mw t runoff -o one of four dry r t nto'on areas or four exf1trat-iorr tr- rich segments, all of which are i r 4' r en eot ed_ The aoollcarL r s engineer has submitted an aana~ysis which deTwon ,- tes * the proposed SM systen - i11 recover (i,e. return to its pre-storm -apability), roe i i" r*a ti or and, e fi l tp r tin 66 r nc-h, in less than twelve days (a required e Z i o .91 a f the Basis s f Pe ;mw Reference is made to exhlb,,ts thrcuch 2C consist',ng cf Pav4rg O r8 i ra e D`a s. ark Paving vlra i na a Details. The draw nos have Keen stgned ano sealed by James w. Mahannah, P.E. are 1, o' u d d in the permit" fln e i aid are h ret y included in this e rmi 4. Ll y reernoe. E hi bit Bookl 5966/Page516 Page 20 of 23 Pae5 24 of 572 Order: tequ sta Doe: 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 20 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 8 008 9: 9:07 AM EST Agenda Item #16. L Boom Ism PPM 0%1 APPLICATION NUMBER.6 1 8 - LO AT ON: PALM BEACH COUWY. S30/T40SIR43E PIIT LEVEL: DM NAG SIN: WA A TAL RECEIVING $M : ON S RE.-.TT: PARKING LOT CRI IA: SYR-IDAYSTOW. iyfi+ WATER QUALITY Water qua"ity treatment equivalerst to 2.5n6-16i percentage 61 impervious will be providedin the Interconnected dry Jeers t l ors / exfllt"atioti system.. Vol Vol Req d. v' (arc-fU (ac- S acres DRY DFENTI� SITE §i%zo L F X P_I LTRAT � 2.86 NVI�UALASM� iT## The project site does contain ary wetlands nr other rfa.. waterc., adverse vi:� n ita impacts are rt4 N ed as resin t o this phase o The pos activities have beer, a al.-at° for p t ti al secondary and cum �r ti acts and ' t rmine i the r is contrary t tie pea ll tPr e s ased upon the or~ pd project design, tie Di r4--:- has determined that the r je-,-. i"l not. cause aversa. secondary or :', irtipacts to the wa mace and �s not contra ry t � publ i c 4 rt s t. TFAL PREV 1 PROJECT PERMITTED THIS PHASE TOTAL ACRES 7.45 7.45 acr s WTR ACREAGE .66 .66 ayes BUILD RAGE 2,67 , 7 acres PERVIOUS i,68 '1.68 a*C^ s Bookl 5966/Page!51 7 Page 2 23 7? Order tequesta Dec. .0 1 10 �O OR.166.47 1 e 210f Ltd BY: mnevilte Mnted:8P�29ARORI sT Agenda Item #16. HOW L5220 pME 04W APPLICATION NUMBER: 0i0 - LOCATION: PALM BEACH COUNTY, S30/T40S/R43E USINEEEE BRDMWN AND FL TETO Basin Name:: ITE FLOOD PROTECTION: PARKING ' T RITE r FLOODEONTOUR 1 .67 'E ET NGVD MIND PARKING LOT GRADE 16.00 FEET 100 YEAR FLOOD FLOOD CONTCUR 17.71 FEET NGVD MINIMUM L f ELE" A-7I N 117.80 FEE' NGVD FEMA FLOOD ELEVATION FEET NGVD 1 JTS Discharge Rate: The propro4 t f x- Cn- k:� retention u +-.-I ... the re- i t 3-day. -year st6� ) . DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: .;. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DATE:0 r-'Medei ZX j E ENT DATE: v e P95 i {ryy L:e r i ■ xh 4i Bookl 5966/Page5l8 Page 22 23 �, - Pa e 526 of 572 Order: teque to Doc: 2d011ll2O991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 22 of 23 Created By: mneville Printed: 00 9:49:07 Alai BST Agenda Item #16. STAFF REPORT DITRIB UTZ1V&&;7NW PAW 0463 Milken, Clerk T Al TA FKA ILGHTHOUSE PIT 1MATON NUMBER* - 502- IOWL DI ION EXTERNAL 015 ION Reviewe X Jo n a . X Owner X LeRoy Rodgers EVE X Done w d L. 'fed 'i X Hugo A. Carter, P.E. X p1 i ant. J, Golden RED 2NTEXHOME S X P. Walker. PB - 1680 X Applicant's on _tart A. ate - RED SCHNARS ENGINEERING CORPORATION P. Bell - IPE ERA Engineering X Engineer, County X ERC Environmental PALM Enforcement e' 11 31 QEPT,. OF MENTAL P TE T_I ON Loca". Drainage D- � tr i coum X Palm Beach -Building Division -Environmental Res Mgt -Health De -Laird Devi opmn� i -School Board row h Mg.. BUILDING ANDIN EOEP Florida Audubon - �,a l i Lee Fl Sri da Fish i A lire Conservation Com 7 Duel N. Vacatta r. Ed Dailey. President X Rosa Dorado 7jmozb�y K Large, Bldg Code Perm't MIdmIrl E ! 1 8 1T A Bookl 5966/Page519 Page 23 of 23 Pa Re 527 cif 572 Order:toque to Doc: 2.0111120991BPIOR.15966.49711123 Page 23 of 23 Created By: mn ville Printed: 2 008 9:49:08 ANC EST 1 - * , A e n d a I t- a6 M - rX V� 6�7 4dFWA`j -7�14 Sec. 1. - Findings. Ire It i s here by found, determ1ned$ and declared a s folio r (1)Those elements of the stormwater management system which provide for the collection 4P � of and dig o al of stormwater and regulation of groundwater are of benefit and provide . services to ail property within the incorporated viUa e Iunits, i ncludi ng propertynot resent served by the stormwater elements of the t-erg. .� (2)The costs of operating and ma the villa e stormwater manage ment stem and . financing the necessary repairs, re laoernent , improvements, and extensions thereof P should to the extent p raetioable be allocated in relationshi p to the benefits en'o ed and services received therefrom. (0 rd. No. 2 1 � § 1 -1 -201 ,p a See. - 1 . -St r w t r management utRity fu n d. There shall be established a stormwater manager ent utility fund for the deposit of all fees collected pursuant to this division.The fund will be used e olusi elyto provide services and facilities related to the stormwater management program. The funds shall be used only for the foRowi ng expenditures and shall be held as trust funds of the village: (I)Operation aind maintenance of stormwater management f a ci Lities under the jurisdiction of the village; (2)Costs forthe evaluation, design., construction management, and eon truotion of major and minor structural irnprovernents of the stormwater management infrastructure; (3)Admi'm'strative costs related to the management of the stormwater management p rogra M; (4)Management services such as permit review and planning and development review related to the storm water management program; and (5)Debt service financing of capital improvements related to the stormy ater management p rogra m. Page 528 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Se c. 4- . -Add u st m ent of fees. (a)Req uests for adjustment of the utility fee shall be submitted to the director,'who shall have authority to adjust the fee, to develop and admin1ster the procedures and standards, and to review enter I Tor the adjust dent of such fees as established In this dg ision. requests shall be reviewed strictly on the basis of the amount of impervious area on the _- °V. No credit shall be given for the insta[latio f facilities required village r county de eLopment codes or state stormwater rules.The following procedures shalC apply ¢ to all requests for adjustment of the stormwater ud ity fee: 1 ny owner or tenant who believes the utility fee is incorrect may, subject to the [i r- itations set forth ire th is section, su bmit a request fo r adjustment to the d i recto r. (2) The request for adjustr ent shall be in writing and shaU set forth ire detail, the grounds upon which the correction is sought. (3) F eq uests for adjustment for the utility fees shall require that the person mal ingthe request pay the fee in advance* (4)The owner ortenant req uesti ng the adjustment may be required, at his own cost,to provide supptementat information to the director including, but not limited to, survey data certified bra professional land surveyor and/or engineerin reports approved by professional engineer and acceptable to the director. Failure to provide such information may resutti a deniatofthe adjustment request. (5) requests for adjustment made during the fiat calendar year that the utility fee is imposed will be reviewed by the director within a two-month period from the date of filing of the request for adjustment. A►djutrents resulting from such request Shall be retroactive to the beginning of the billings, but retroactive adjustments shall not exceed one year. (6) The adjutmentto the utility fee will be made upon the granting ofthe adjustment request, in writing, by the director. A denial of a request for adjustment shall be made in writing by the director, a copy of which shall be provided to the owner. (7)The director, upon discovering an error or oversight in the calculation of the fee, may initiate a request for adj ustm ent.The request must be made in writing, documenting the reasons for the adjustment. if the adjustment would require an increase in fee for a fee payor,the d i recto r rnust provide the re ue t for adjustments to the affected fee payor 30 days prior to a dj usti ng t he fee and offer the fee payoran oppo rtu n ity with 1 n the stated 30 days to provide reasons why the adjustment should not be made. Page 529 of 572 Agenda Item #16. A rate adjustment, If granted, will a p ly retroa ctivetyto the date at wh1 c h the e rro neaus infari atlon was applied to the fee payor`s fee, but wllt not exceed one year prior to the request for adjustment. These appeats must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the written determination of the director. The stormwater ma utility board shall complete its review within 60 days of receipt of the request for review. The board's determination on the review shall be in writing and set forth in d eta ilthe reasons for its decision. In revie gyring denials of requests for adjustment, the sto rm ater utility board shalt a ppty the foLlo gyring standards a nd re iew criteria: (1) Existing or special characteristics of the site oo pareet for which the adjustment request Is made; (2)The amount of on-site impervious area; (3)Twenty-fire-year frequency, 2 --dour duration storm criteria will be the minimum standard recognized bythe director (4) Ponds, exfiltration systems or positive drainage faoitildes must meet applicable vitlage, state and federal requirements, including groundwater protection devices and outfatl treatment conveyance systems required byal1 governing bodies; (5) Ponds, exfittration systems or positive drainage facilities must be maintained according to village standards and must function In accordance with the required village design standards; are (6)Adjustments will not be.granted for swimming pools, reflecting pools, existing open ditch systems and swat es. Y In Chapter 74-Utilities, Article Ill-Storm water, Division 2, under"'Rates, billings,, rate adjustments and appeals" in the Code) it states: "The Storm water Management Utitity Board shall consist of the Village Council,, which shall Bear appeals of rate adjustments and recommend capital projects and u g5et priorities for the utility:"Muni(;'o d .�E }� :� This explicitly names the Village Council a the "Stormwater ManagementUtility Board"'for the purposes of the Code. .i,, The ViLlage's public notices regarding the stormwater assessment hoer that prcperLy oar ners have the right to attend the public hearing held by the Village Council and to file written objections with the l 'ltage Council. i j(_ ir i Page 530 of 572 Agenda Item #1 F J The Town of Jupiter offers a Private Stormwater Improvement Grant Program,which is a reirnbur erneint grant rather than a direct fee credit. It is available to homeowner associatioins (H oAs), property owner associations POAs , a nd other private entities.There i s no d irect stormwater fee reduction program for indi idua[ property owners. Private Stormwater Improvement Grant Program Purpose:The grant encourages private entities to ir�nprove storm ater management systems in their communities.The goat is to enhance grater quality and minimize ftooding. Eligibility:The program applies to com munities and entities within the Town of Jupiter rurnicipaI limits. How it works o The grant»a reimbursemernt matching program that can provide financial assistance for up to ono of eligible project construction costs. pplicant rr��Jst pay for the improvements in fill and then submit a request for reirnbur ement to the town. o Re1mbursement is contingent orn field inspections and approval by the Town of Jupiter Stormw ter Utility. North Palm Beach: North Palm Beach does not have a direct fee credit program, but property owners can reduce their stormwater fees by decreasing the amount of impervious surface on their property, as fees are often based on the amount of concrete, asphalt, or other surfaces that do not allover rainrater to infiltrate the ground Roya[Palm aka: Royal Palma Beach does not appear to offer direct torm rater fee credits for individual properties in the same way some other municip Cities do.The stormwater fee is primarily based on the amount of impervious surface area on a property, such as roofs and driveways Martin County: Unincorporated Martin County does snot appear to have a storm water fee credit program; some of its incorporated municipalities do. Martin Counter has invested in large-kale stormwater Page 531 of 572 Agenda Item #16. infrastructure irn provements but does not currently offer a public credit progra m for individual property owners. City of Delray Bea --^ Provides . °:o discount storm water assessments for properties with a privately maintained ston-n Fat r system approved by the C1q, Engineer. Page 532 of 572 T-TTCA Meeting on a fee adjustment mailbox: : User i el ppDat /foaming/Thunderbird ., Agenda Item #16. Subject* VOT - TTCA Meeting on a fee adjustment From: Michael Tomes <s mot@ bellsouth.net> Date: 11/12/20251 5:22 PM To: Albert Caradonio <a1 a radon io@gma`i1.com>, BETH HALL < hall .8 @ mail,com>, Angie Genova <amgeno a . @yahoo.co m>, Michael C < osta @ ma il. o >, Christina Vanderwesthuizen <Ch ri'sti r a. and rw sth i n @fsr sid ntia I.corms>, Jeff McLane 110-1 j ff@ m fi It r;corn Fellow TTCA Board Members, There was a meeting today with VOT on an adjustment to TTCA and the 134 associated condominium units regarding TTCA's request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment. Meeting was held at VOT's Conference Room - 345 Tequesta Drive at 3:00 PM 12/11/2025. Attendees were Jeremy Allen VOT Manager), Allyson Felsburg (VOT Asst. Utility Director), and Michael Tones TTCA Director) [Note: Albert Caradonio TTCA President was absent). The attached PDF was handed out at the beginning of the meeting, whi kr Jeremy summarized noting all the previous communiques that TTCA has submitted for a fee adjustment to TTCA and its 134 unit owners. They had reviewed other communities having stormwater management system to see what others offered, noting that TTCA' property situation was a unique to the village (last two pages of the PDF). VOT is offering a reduction noting that TTCA's first request was initially rate at 2025-s August 1 th Public Hearing notice (Letter to TTCA Unit Owners of July 11, 2025 - Notice of meeting to Adopt Stormwater Assessment Moll in the pillage of Tequesta., Florida). If accepted VOT would have to write out individual checks to unit owners after their takes were paid. Additionally a letter from a Professional Engineer , properly stamped, indicating that TTCA-s Stormmwater System is a working system. It was further noted that TTCA and its 134 condominium units receive €O benefits nor do they receive any services from VOT's System. Also it has been determined that there is no existing connection Between VOT and TTCA stormwater systems. Additionally TTCA and its 134 condominlum units are behind a perimeter wall which separated its system to that of VOT- s along {old Dixie HWY and Tequesta Drive. Thoughts: 1 Decide to either take the proposed offer expecting an entail from Jeremy) or not; Review with attorney for additional input; Get a letter for a registered Civil PE in Florida; and, 4 Have this subject added to our next meeting agenda. Thoughts? Nike A-ftachments: VOT & TTCA Stormwater Fee Adjustment Meeting 1.7 MB 11-12-2025.pdf Page 533 of 572 202 12;2 Fuel: [EXTERNAL] Ike:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment... m ilbo : : U er icha l AppD t amin Thunde rbf rcl . Agenda Item #16. subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment From: Michael Tomes <semot@ eIIso th.net> Date: 11/13/2025, 9:10 AM To: Albert Caradonio <alca radon io@gmai BETH HALL < ha1l4186@g ail. om>, Angie Genova <am e no ra 19@ya hoo*core>, Michael C <m osta o4@ mail. om>, Christina Vanderwesthuizen <Christina. rw sth i @fs i l ti l* om>, Jeff McLane 110-1 <j eff @mpwfilter.com> Fellow Board Members, This morning I received V T`s email regarding yesterday's meeting on'TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment ent Fee Adjustment'which summarizes es their offer as discussed at the meeting, but now requesting a signed and sealed inspection report each year from a FL Professional Engineer. Thoughts? Mike -------- Forwarded Message-------- Subject:RE: [EXTERNAL] Re:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Dat :Thu, 13 Nov 2025 1 :5 :5 +0000 From:Allyson F lsburg afeisburgS�jt que ta.org To:I iichael Tomes semot(c�bell outh.net r :Christine Vanderwesthuizen Christina.Vanderwe thuizen(@f residential.corn ,Albert Caradonio<a1caradonioO?gmai1xom>, Jeremy Allen jlln@tequesta. rg Hello Mr.Tomes, Thafn k you again for taping the time to meet with us on November 1 ,2025.As discussed,the pillage provided a document outlining the applicable Village Code that supports our determination to grant a 50%stormwater fee credit to the residents of the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association(TTCA).The Village acknowledges that TTCA retains the majority of its storm ater on-site,which reduces the burden on the tillage's system.However,all pillage-owned and pillage-maintained storm water infrastructure provides benefits to every p rope rty and resident within the Village,regardless of location or ownership of private storrnwater system.As such,every property and resident—including those within TTCA—must contribute to funding its ongoing operation a nd ma In accordance with Sec.74- 0 ,Adjustment of Fees,and ire are effort to provide a fair and reasonable credit,tine Village is prepared to issue retroactive credits to TTCA residents.Upon mutual agreement and receipt of the required documentation,individual cheers will be issued to each resident for 50 of the stormwater fees paid with their most recent tax bills.M oving forward,TTCA wiII be required to submit a signed and sealed inspection report each year verifying the structural integrity of its privately earned stormwater system and documenting the system's ability to retain and treat at least 1.0 inch of runoff from the post-d eve I o p me nt 100-year 4-hour storm event.This documentation must be received by June I of each year to ma intain eligibility for the 5 %credit. This i nspection requirement is essential.It ensures that TT A's storrnwater system is functioning as designed and that no failures exist that could cause overflow into the pillage's system,This is not a unique requirement for TTCA;rather,it is the standard process that wiII be consistently applied to any community see l ing storm ater fee credits now or in the future.The pillage must adhere to its codes and procedures to ensure fairness,consistency,and the protection of pubiic infrastructure. At the conclusion of our meeting,you advised that you would present this proposed resolution to your Board for consideration.Should the TTCA Board choose 3notto accept the ViIlage's proposal,you may pursue the appeal process outlined in Sec.74- 0 .Please note that a formal appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the pillage's written determination. Paae 534 of 572 1 10:10 F lewd: [EXTERNAL] :TT CA Request for Stormwater Assessment... mailbox: : I r Mi l AppD t Roamin Thund rbird , Agenda Item #16. If you have any questions or require additional clarification,please do not hesitate to reach out.The ViIlage remains comrnitted to wort ing with TT CA within the framework of all applicable codes,and we look forward to bearing from yo u. f Allyson Felsburg Deputy Utdiftes Director . The Village of Tequesta y5 � n Utilities Department 61-7 8-9497 I 561-919- 88 a 901 N old Dixie Hwy,Tequesta,FL,33469 W.wrr W.tequesta.org e afelsburg a@tequesta_crg 0080ML-, From:Jeremy Allen<j l.len@tgquesta.arg_ Sent:Monday,November 3,2025 3:34 PM To:Michael Torres emotL@�eiisouth net Cc-.Christina Vanderwesthuizen<Christina, anderwe thuizen f re identia1.core>;Allyson Felsburg afelsb u rg@teguesta- ;Albert Caradonio al aradonio rri0i1. o Subject:RE:[EXTERNAL]Re:TT CA Request for.Storrnwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Thursday afternoon :30prn work for everyone? Jeremy Allen Village Manager The Village of Tequesta p 5 6 1-76 8-04 I c; 1-97 -30 9 a 345 Tequesta Dr.Tequesta,FL,33469 e.japer tequesta.cr-q From:Michael Tames semot(@.aeilsouth.net Sent:Monday,November ember 3,2025 1: 1 PM To:Jeremy Allen LalI�t rg> Christina Vanderwesthuizen hri tina.panderwe thu zen@fsresidential. om>;Allyson Felsburg afelsburg@tequesta.or ;Albert Caradonio altar onioE rnaflxorn Subject:Re:[EXTERNAL]Re:TTCA Request for storrnwater Assessment Fee Adjustment WARNING:This email originated from outside of our organization.Please be cautious and do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. i n 10 30 0 5 3:14 PM,Michael Torres wrote: Jeremy Allen,I MA- M,CPM Village Manager The Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Dr,Tequesta,FL,3349 Phone 5 1- -04 Cell:5 1-9 -3 9 Email:fallen@tequesta.org Page 535 of 572 e1 1 11 10:10 PIS ICE: [EXTERNAL] e:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment F.. ma ilbo : / : U r Mi l Dart oa►min Thund rbird . Agenda Item #16. subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment From: Jeremy Allen <jaI1en@tequesta.org> Date: 12/2/2025, 12:52 PM To: Michael Tomes <ser ot@ bel CC: Christina Vanderwesthuizen <Christina# an erwest u l en@ sresi ential. om>, Albert Caradonio <a Ica on io@gmai1.com>, Molly Young <rn our @te esta* r >, Allyson Felsburg <afeIsburg@tequesta.org> Subject:Re:Village of Tequesta—TTCA Stormwater Utility Fee Credit Proposal Dear Mr.Tomes and Members of the Tequesta Trace Condominium Association Board, Thank you for your entail of November 12,2025,and for the continued dialogue regarding the storm water utility fee credit for the residents of Tequesta Trace. The Village of Tequesta remains firm in the position communicated in our post-meeting letter following the Novernber 1 ,2025 discussion:we are prepared to gram a 50 tormwater utility fee credit(both retroactively for the most recent tax bill and on a continuing annual basis), provided TTCA submits the required annual signed and sealed engineering inspection report confirming that its private storrnwater system continues to retain and treat at least the first 1_0 iinch of runoff from the post-development too-year 24-hour storm event,in full accordance with Sec.74-209 of the Village Code.This requirement is not unique to TTCA;it is the standard that the village applies consistently to any property ow ner or association seeking a storm wraterfee adjustment or credit_ We appreciate the detailed list of questions you have prepared.While we are happy to assist the TTCA Board in understanding the basis for the Tillage's determination,many of the questions presented cannot be accurately answered with a simple"yes"or"' o" because they involve variables that may include engineering judgment or matters of policy that require content and nuance.Rath provide potentially misleading binary res ponces,we believe the most constructive path forwa rd is for TTCA to utilize Florida's public record s process(Chapter 119,.F.S.)to request any specific documents,notices,resolutions,engineering reports,or other records that wouId assist your Board in evaIuati3ng the Village's position and making an informed decision.The Village has at all times complied with applicable Florida Statutes,the Village Code of ordinances, and all required public notice and hearing procedures in the establishment and administration of the stormwater utility fee. As a reminder,should the TTCA Board elect not to accept the ViI[age's offer of a 50%credit subject to the annual inspection requirement,a formal appeal of the Tillage's written determination must be filed with the Tillage Clerk no later gran Decemb r 12,2025( 0 days from your receipt of our written determination),in accordance with Sec. 4-20 _ We remain co rn mitted to vwrorking cooperatively and transparently with the Tequesta Trace community within the framework of the Village Code and Florida lawny.Please do not hesitate to contact rye directly if you or the Board have a ny specific public records requests or need clarification on the appeal process. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Jeremy Allen Village Manager 1 A- M, CPM The Village of Tequesta 561-7e8-043 1 t. 1- -309 345 Tequesta Dr,Tequesta,FL,33469 � {.tequp ta.org e fallen@tequesta.arg 0111110001L From:Michael Tomes emot@be11south.net Page 536 of 572 1 of 3S 1 11 P RE: [EXTERNAL] Re:TT CA Request for Stormwater Assessment F.. mailbox: : U r i l pp Data/Roaming/Thu nd rbird . Agenoel daJ c l r J 025 9:53 A To:Allyson Fels burg<afe Is burg @)tequesla.org :Christna Vanderwesthuizon Christina.Vander esthuizen@fsresidential.corn ;Albert Caradonio a1caradonio 3gmail.corn ;Jeremy Allen jaIlen@teque ta.org ;Moller Young rnyoung@tequesta.org Subject:Re:[EXTER NAQ Re:TTCA Request for 5tormwater Assess rnent Fee Adjustment WARNING:This email originated from outside of our organization.Please be cautious and do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. r Allyson Felshur Deputy Utilities Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Emil:afelsburg@tequesta.org Phone:( 1)7 -0497 Cell:( 1)919-5888 RE: Request for Storrr water Assessment Fee Adjustment llyson, Good morning, I apologize to you regarding my ha ndwritten rneeting notes and typing errors(#10 FY28 should read: FY 2 ;##19 tome should be road time;#22 then stem should road:the system;a nd# 0 please drop the word why),for ever since a truck physically hit me breww ing a nd fracturing both of my wrists my hands often shake uncontrollably. Loot ing forward to rece iving the completed questionnaire hack frorn VOT so we can proceed with our rneotin g, possibly this wee l . Best regards, Mike Michael J.Tor es,Owner Parcel -43-4 - 0- 1- 01-1 0(TT CA Unit 11 2) 11 -D Lighthouse Circle,Tequestn, FL 4 -271 and Michael J.Tomes, Director Tecluesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell: (5 1) 1 -3 29 Email:sernot«bells gt . n 12 102 2:32 PSI,Michael Torras wrote: Allyon Felsbur Deputy Utilities Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Email:afeIsbuLg@t ue ta.org Phone: (5 1)7 - 4 7 Cell: (561)919-5888 RE: Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Pa e 537 of 572 2 of 1 1 202 r 10; 7 P : [EXTERNAL] :TTCA.Request for Stormwater Assessment P... .ailbo : C: U r i ha l/App to Roaming Thunderbird . Agenda Item #16. Allyson, Good afternoon, Sorry for not getting right back to you,but was a bit delayed in Tampa with the family over the Thanksgiving break. Hopefully you had an enjoyable one. For your reviewer, have included my meeting notes on VOT's handout of November 12,2025 along with a copy of my email sent to all TTCA Board Members immediately after returning hone from our 20 minute meeting;frorn which you can see hove they differ-considerably regarding the added details(which were expanded upon in your email the next morning)of what VOT now expects in certified stamped professional engineering letter and that VOT expects to receive a similar letter year after year,after year,etc. The one item I wish to state is that during V T's Council Meeting of August 1 th this year regarding Agenda Item#2 3,the airn of my testimony(you have a copy of my talking points)was to advise VOT Council( to rmwate r Utility Board)of an error oversight in their non-ad va lore rn ass s ment to TTCA and the 134 condorrtiniurn unit property own To assist TTCA Board Mern b e rs in understanding VOT Storrrtvwrater UtiIity's reasoning and thought process,please find attached YES or NO questions for your quick reply which should only take a few moments per question(possibly 20 minute overall at the most)to fill in,thus no need for a written response by VOT or yourself. Once returned to me, I will share with the entire TTCA Board Members so a quick reviewer and full understanding of V T's determination,so please return the filled out questionnaire prior to the riddle of this week if not sooner. Yes,we are now of the understanding that your email issued on Thursday, November 13,2025 is to be considered VOT torm ater Utility Board's(VOT Councils)written determination,so please be prompt ire response to our questionnaire to enable TTCA to respond accordingly. Best regards, Mike illlichael J.Tonnes,Ovwrnr Parcel 0- 3-40-3 - 1-001-102 TTCA Unit 1102) 110-D Lighthouse Circlet Tequesta, FL 33469-2781 and Michael J.Tornes, Director Tequesta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell: ( 1) 10-332 - Email:se tot f bell outh.not On 11/26/2025 1235 Pill,Allyson Felsbur'g wrote: Good afternoon,Mr.Torres, you noted that the Village"s written proposal differs from the motes you recorded during our meeting.if there are specific its you believe require clarification,please identify there.The proposal provided accurately reflects the terms and discussions communicated at that meeting.Should you believe any component is inaccurate or requires revision,kindly detail those points and we will review there accordingly. Regarding your statement that"'the Villa e-s proposal appears inconsistent with long-standing civil engineering and construction practices""the Village conducted a reviewer of comparable practices in other municipalities—wrvhere such practices even existed—as it is not common to offer rate reductions under circumstances such as these.As discussed and provided in the meeting handout,this review formed the basis for the selected rate reduction,which the Village maintains is fair,appropriate,and consistent with the procedures and requirements of the Village Code. Both our meeting and the subsequent written proposal were provided in direct response to your comments regarding Agenda item N o.23 frorn the August 121,2025,Connell meeting,as well as to your Request t or StormwoterAssess rent Fee Adjustment submitted on August 16,2025. While we remain will ing to meet should further clarification be helpful--1 would be glad to provide a ailability-the Pa e 538 of 572 f : []EXTERNAL] Fie:TT CA request For Stormwater Assessment F:.. mailbox: : r Micha l ppl ata Ro ing/Thunderbird . Agenda It M-1 gji@ .t co nsider or issue a ny additional pro posaIs for further reductions ire stormwater rates fo rthe residents of TT A.Should the TT CA Board choose not to accept the Village's proposal,you may proceed with the formal appeal process outlined in Sec. 4- 09 of the Village Code.Please he reminded that a formal appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the Village's written determination,which was issued on Thursday,No ernher 1 *2025. Thank you,and I Irish you a very happy Thanksgiving. Allys n Felsi ur Deputy Utilrti s Director �- The Village of Tequesta Utilities Department p 561-76 M497 l ; 561-919-5888 ti 901 N Old Dixie Hwy,Tequesta,FL,33469 .www.teciuesta.org a€ I L urg..@tip uest§.org 01300M13 From:Michael Tomes<semot@bellsouth.net Sent:Wednesday,November 26,2025 9:05 A To:AIlyson Fel burg<afe lsburg-@tequesta.or :Christina Vanderwe thuizen<Christina.Vanderwesthuizen@fLrQsidential.com Albert Caradonio<a Ica radon iopgrnaii.cor t Jeremy Allen -alb @tequesta,org Subject:Re:[EXTERNAL]Re:TT CA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment WARNING:This email originated from outside of our organization.Please be cautious and do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Aliyson Felsbulrg Deputy Utilities Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Email:afe Is b u rg tequesta.org Phone:(561) 6 -0497 Cell:(561)919-5888 FEE. Request for Stormwater Assessment Foe Adjustment Allyon, Good morning, Thank you for your communication. Scheduling a meeting next week or the week after would work well.Several individuals have already begun their Thanksgiving travel,so it may be difficult to finalize everyone's availability until after the holiday. It would be helpful if the Village of Tequesta could share its available dates and tires so we can coordinate accordingly. The TT CA Board was promptly informed—within two hours—based on rotes I had written on the Tillage's five- page meeting handout as provided ors November 12,2 025. Th is was followed by receipt of the pillage's ernai� proposal shortly after midnight the following morning. we note that the contents of that proposal differ in seve raI key respects from the meeting rotes recorded by Myself TT CA has,in parallel, begun notifying all unit owners regarding the current matter. After an initial r view,the Tillage's proposal appears inconsistent with I o ng-sta n di ng civil engineering and Paqe 539 of 572 of 35 1 1 1 P E: [EXTERNAL] e:TTCA Request for Ster water Assessment F.. mailbox: : User Mi a l A pDa in T and rbird . Agenda IteM,#1 n p,actices. It also does not fully address my comments regarding Agenda Item H23 from the August 12,2025 Council M eeting,nor the B ritten Request for Stormwat r Assessment Fee Adjustment submitted old August 16,2025 with eight attachments,and the October 13,2 025 supplemental response to the Director's call with four additional attachments. 11e also believe certain wording in Part II—Cede of Ordinances,Chapter~74—Utilities,Article IV—Stormwater, Division 2—Stormwater Utility,Sections 74-201,202,203,206,207,208,209,211,212,and 213,may have been misinterpreted or applied in a rnanner that benefits the Village rather than reflects the intended statutory meaning. TT CA believes these sections require clarification and proper application to ensure statutory intent and equitable treatment. We look forward to continued dialogue and constructive resolution. I will be returning late Friday.Wishing you and your team a gory Happy Thanksgiving_ Best regards, Mike Michael J.Tomes, Owner Parcel 60-4 -40- 0-51- 01-1 20(TT CA Unit 1102) 110-D Lighthouse Circle,T qu sta,FL 46 -27 1 and Michael J.Tomes, Director T questa Trace Condominium Association, Inc. Cell: (561)310-3329 Email:semot@bellsouth.net n 11 4 2G 5 1:51 P F Allyson Felsburg wrote: Mr.Torres, That should not be are issue.Are there certain days you have availability?With Thanksgiving this Thursday, we wiII most likely have to meet after this week. Additionally,if there are certain questions you have or topics you world Iike to discuss please feel free to share therm with us so we can ensure that we have all required information readily available far a productive meeting. T h an k yo'u., } ' Atlysn Felsburg Deputy Utilities Director The Village of Teque to Utilities Department p 561-768-0497 1 c 561-919-5888 a 901 N old Dixie Hwy,Tequesta,FL,33469 ,w .tequesta.org e.afe1sburg_ ue ta_pr From:Michael Tomes<semot(@be11south.net Sent:Monday,November 24,2025 11: 1 Ally To:Ally on Fels burg afelsbu t --gum rg :Christina Vanderwestbuizer Christina.yander a thui;"n�f resider al.corr>;Albert Caradonio a Ica radon ioL@g_M@ilx rn>;Jeremy Allen 5j@ftn@ttqg st a rg Subject:F d:JEXTERN LI Re:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Pa e 540 of 572 of 3S 1 11 , 10: 7 P E: [EXTERNAL] Re:TT CA Request for Stoirmwater Assessment F.. mailbox: : Users Michael App ata/Roaming Thunderbird . Agenda Item 1.6.-.-- WARNING:This email originated from outside of our organization.Please be cautious and do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Allyson Felsburg Deputy Utilities Director Village of Tequesta 345 Teq u esta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Entail:afelsburg�tequesta.org Phone:( 61)768-0497 Cell:( 1)919-5888 RE: Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adju Ament We do have questions that require additional clarification to allow the adjustment of fee to fall within the framework of all applicable codes for TT Xs property situation being possibly unique to VOT and would Iike to have another meeting to discuss the matter. Rga rds, Michael J.Tomes,Owner Parcel --40- 0- 1-001-10 0(TTCA Unit 110 ) 11 -D Lighthouse Circle,Tequesta,FL 4 - 7 1 and Michael J.Tomes,Director T questa Trace Condominium Association,Inc. Cell: 1)310-3329 Er ail:semot@be]Isouth.net Forwarded Message Subject:RE:[EXTERNAL] e:TTcA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment Date:Thu, 13 Nov 2025 1 : 4: 4+0 o0 Fror :Allyson Felsburg afelsbur&Lt q esta.org To:MlchaeI Tomes<semot@beI]south.net :Christina Vanderwesthuizen Christina.Vander sthuizen fsresidertial.corn ,Albert Caradonio alcaradonio ?gMai�.c rn ,Jeremy lien all nit t uesta.or Hello Mr.Tomes, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us on November 12, 2025.As discussed,the Village provided a document outlining the applicable Village Code that supports our determination to grant a 5 0 storrnwater fee credit to the residents of the Tequesta Trace o n d o m 1 n i u m Association (TT A).The Village acknowledges that TT A retains the majority of its storm grater on-site,which reduces the burden on the Village's system. However,all Village- ow n e d and Village-maintained stormwater infrastructure provides benefits to every property and resident within the Village,regardless of location or ownership of primate stormwater system.As such,every property and resident—€ncIuding those within TT A—must contribute to funding its ongoing operation and maintenance. in accordance with Sec.74- 09,Adjustment of Fees,and in an effort to provide a fair and reasonable credit,the Village is prepared to issue retroactive credits to TT CA residents, Export mutual agreement and receipt of the required documentation, individual checks will be issued to each resident for 59 of the stormvwrater fees paid with their most recent tax bills. Moving Pa e 541 of 572 6 of 1 1 10:57 PIV Agen4geVSMIJAMT and its Stormwater Utility Board Yes No Notes:VOT=Village of Tewquesta and TTCA=Tequsta Trace Condominium Association, inc. 3, The Village remains committed to working honestly and lergalty with TTCA within the framework of all � o applicable cedes(VOT and State of Florida)? 2 TTCA i5 a CC}A(f.s. 71$) not a HQA(f.s.720) correct? � a 3 Has not VOT representatives continually made a point in saying that TTCA and its 134 unit condominium � ❑ owners[all of which awn developed properties and have been issued certificates of occupancy (COs) from V07] receive benefits and services from VOT's 5tormwater Utility or Storrrrwater Drainage System? NOT Code Sec.74-201 &202] 4 As a district in Palm Beach Canty, is VOT allowed to levy and collect non-ad valorem assessments on all � ❑ properties within said district? [f.s. 191A11 (1)] 5 Does the amount of levy increase for Fiscal Year 26(FY25)exceed the average annual growth rate in a a Florida personal income aver the previous S years? [f.s. 191A09 (2) (a)] 6 Was there on file at VOT an assessment plat noting construction and operating pans and specifications, � D plus an estimate of the cast of the proposed service or improvement open for public inspection? [f.s. 191.011 (3)] 7 Did VOT provide a notice of the hearing regarding its intent to impose and collect assessment for FY26 by publication in a newspaper generally circulated within Palm Beach County for 4 consecutive weeks preceding the hearing?[fs. 191.011 (3)(a) & (4)(b)] 8 Was there change in use or in the purpose for such assessment provided by VOT? [f.s. 191.011 (2)(d)] El El " 72 9 Has VOT(via Stormwater Utility Board)adapted anon-ad valoremassessment roll for FY25 & FY26? [f.s. �7_--7, �! 191.011 (2) & 197.3532] 10 If VOT(via Starmwater Utility Board) has adopted anon-ad valorem assessment roll FY25& FY26,are they correct? 11 The recent July 2025 non-ad valorem assessment was not the first time it has been exercised,correct? [f.s. 191.011 (2)(a)] 12 Was the non-ad valorem assessment increased beyond the maximum rate authorized by general law or � a special act at the time?(f.s. 191.011 (2)(b)] 13 With the correct completion of the preliminary assessment roll, did VOT by resolution fix a time and place� at which the owners of the property to be assessed or any other persons interested therein could appear before the board and be heard as to the advisability of providing the service or making the improvements,as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property so improved? [f.s. 191.011 (6)] 14 Has there been any changes in VOT's boundaries? ff.s. 191.011 (2)(c)] Page 542 of 572 Agenq@JVmsflAfOT and its Stormwater Utility Board Yes NoNotes:VOT=Village of Tewquresta and TT CA=Tequsta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. 15 Did VOT Council Meeting at OT's Hall Chambers on August 12, 2025, meet and hear testimony fr0r 1LJ affected property owners as to the advisability of providing the service or making the improvements ents and funding them with non-ad valorem assessments on property? [f.s. 191.011 4) & (7)] 16 At the VOT Council Meeting at VOVs Hall Chambers on August 1 , 2025 following any outside testimony, did VOT adjust any assessments as may be warranted by information received at or prior to the bearing before making a final decision on whether to levy the non-ad valorem assessments? [f. . 191.011 )] 17 Does VOT's entire Stormwater Management System have the ability to retain and treat at least- a) rainfall runoff from a twenty-five-year frequency, 4-hour duration storm criteria? b) 1.0 inch rainfall runoff from a 100-year4-Dour storm event 1:3 18 TT Xs perimeter walled area includes TT A's common building structure (cabana at 109 Lighthouse Circle) and all of TTCA-s 134 condominium unit properties which are serviced by TTOA's stormwater management system that is separate and does not flowing into that of VOT's stormwater management system, does the VOT's Stormwater Utility have a relationship that services and benefits said TT'0A structures? [VOT Code Sec. 74- 01 }] 19 TT A's perimeter walled area as previously noted lies above VOT street levels and TT Xs storrnwater management system has operated for over 23 years and during this time the system has been properly maintained endured two tropical cyclones during the hurricane season of 2004 (Jeanne and Frances), a 11+"January 9, 2014 rainstorm, and a +" rainstorm this past October and no flooding to TT AFs 1 4 cohdominium units were reported; during this same time has VOT received any flooding reports:. 0 There has been no TTA stormwater drainage system changes or general topographical land alterations within TT Xs perimeter walled area, plus Florida is not subject to earthquakes, voica nos or a mega tsunami (caused by a massive, sudden displacement of water from events life landslides, volcanic eruptions, or asteroid impacts) in the past 23 plus gears since VOT issued all of TTOA's Cos that has altered TT CA property; does VOT know v of any changes which warrant submitting a signed and sealed inspection report each year verifying the structural integrity of its privately owned stormwater system and do urne-nting the syster 's ability to retain and treat at least 1.0.inch of runoff from the post- development 100-year 4-hour storm event. 1 Is it not the case that TT CA., its condominium unit owners and residents and even the village and its torrnwater Utility receive general welfare of TT A's established and maintained d stormwater drainage system while also receiving the general welfare of VOT's Stormwater utility? [VOT Code Sec. 74- 0 (a)) 22 Mould TT CA and its 134 condominium unit properties that are within the incorporated village limits (VO-rs District) be provided with service or have benefits from VOT's regulation of ground water plus the system? [VOT Code Sec, 74- 01 (1)] Page 543 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Questions for VOT and its Stormwater Utility Board Yes No Notes:VOT=Village of Tewquesta and TT CA=Tequsta Trace Condominium Association, Inc. 3 While TTCA"s 134 unit properties are truly residential developed properties and TTCA"s common property C (cabana at 109 Lighthouse iecle) is a nonresidential developed property, do they not also fail to be properties included in the area of operation of VOT's Stormwater Utility for said properties are unaffected properties that receive no benefits nor services [f. . 1 7.3 3 }( )] from the 1 OT's Stormwater Utility nor its Stormwater Drainage System? [VOT Code Sec. 7 - 0 a)] 4 At the VOT Council Meeting at VOT's Hall Chambers on August 1 , 2025 and noting that certain parcels or E 2 lots for which the non-ad valorem assessment amounts may be reduced Igrant a discount equal to ail or a part of the payee's proportionate share of the cost of the proposed service or improvement [f. . 191.011 (2.d,, 37 4, 6 &7)] and the amount of the benefit to and the assessment against [f. . 191.011 (5)] each lot or parcel of land), noting the information received did VOT Council warrant any adjustments or rake said adjustment prior to making a finai decision on whether to levy the non-ad va lore m assessments? S After the adoption of the resolution for VO-rs Storm Water Utility on August 1 , 2025, was the lots and lands assessed,the amount of the benefit to and the assessment against each lot or parcel of land in which the assessment was divided also entered and shown upon the assessment roll correct? [f.s. 191.011 5 ] 26 Was VOT's adoption of the resolution and preliminary assessment roll published in a newspaper of general circulation in Palm Beach County? [f.s. 191.011 ] 7 While VOT's Council may adjust the assessment or the application of the assessment to any affected property based on the benefit which VOT's Council will provide or has provided to the property with the revenue generated by the assessment [f.s. 1 7. 6 (4)( ]; a) does TT CA and its 134 unit properties (all within TT A's perimeter walls) in the past, present or future directly receive benefits from the revenues generated by VOT's Stormwater Utility assessments. utility fees? [VOT Code Sec. 74- 0 ]; or b does TT A and its 134 unit properties (all within TTCA"s perimeter walls) in the past, present or future directly receive services and facilities from VOT"s Stormwater Utility or its Stormwater Drainage t [VOT Code Sec. 74- 08(afl 28 VOT*s Council and Utility Director [VOT Code Sec. 74- 03 (b)] at VOT Council Meeting held at VO-rs Hall Chambers on August 1 , 2025 regarding Agenda# - Resolution No. 13- ,5 and Memo# 5-167, heard L-J testimony from Mr Tomes regarding the d iscovery of an error or oversight in the calculation of the fees for TT CA and its 134 condominium omit properties [VOT Code Sec. 7 - 0 a) 7 j; is it not the responsibility of the VOT Council to ensure that fee roll be free of errors? [f.s. i 7.3 3 S a)] 29 Noting the aforementioned, was a request made in writing, documenting the reason for the adjustment? NOT Code See. 74- 0 (a)(7)] Additionally: a) was the adjustment requested for said properties to be excluded from Stormwater [utility fees and the fee roll? NOT Code Sec. 74- 0 {a}( )]; b) within 30 days of Director's notification (references to VOT Code Sec. 74- 01 &Sec. 74- 06)was O-rs 2 ;' Utility Director provide reasons why adjustment should be made? [VOT Code Sec. 4- 0 (a)(7) & b]; c within 10 days of error discoveries were alterations to such roll made by the chair or his or her designee before certification. Its. 17.33 (5)(a)]; d might the tax collector discover errors on such VOT roll,she can request VOT Council to file a corrected �° � �, � �, roll or a correction of the amount of any assessment? [f.s. 197.3 6 S) a)] Page 544 of 572 Agen �� J OT and its� r atel *l`� r Ye s No Notes: VOT=Village ofTewquesta and TT A=Tequ to Trace Condominium Association, Inc. 30 If TT CA and its 134 condominium ium unit properties are not subject VOT Code Sec. 74- 07 with Sec. 74- 0 , nor Sec. 74- 11 (b) because stormwater facilities are privately held, perimeter walled-in TT CA with its 134 condo rr inium unit properties have no cur ulative impact on VOT facilities and its storrnwater drainage system does not connect with or drain toVOT's facilities, is there any lever of a non-ad d valorem assessment at all which fall under and/or meets fair apportionmentstandards? [f. . 191.011 1)J 1 If TT A and its 134 condominium knit properties do not utilize the services and facilities of the VOT � store warter management system, does VOT have accurate isssued records from TTCA's permits and COS? a) Didn't TT CA with its 134 condominium unit properties receive proper permitting prior to any construction? b) Didn't TT CA with its 134 condominium knit properties receive Cos from VOT? c) Weren't the listing of said permits and Cos along with associated locations of engineering and surrey E:1 records reports provided to VOT and, d) Was appropriate changes made to VOT's records and rates? [VOT Code Sec. - 1 ] 32 Floods from stormwater runoff may occasionally occur which exceed the capacity of VOT's,storm drainage facilities constructed, operated or maintained by VOT [VOT Code Sec. 7 - 131 can also apply to TT A,for any storm water systems capable of handling all storm events cannot be cost-effectively constructed., operated, or maintained? 3 So is it correct to say that a) TT CA and its 134 condominium properties having its own stormwater drainage system within TT A's walled in area: i are not serviced by nor receives benefits from VOT's Storm water Utility; ii) do not meet any of VOT's property classifications as used in VOT's ERU rate system (because said properties, chile withinVOT's district, are excluded and outside foreign to VOT's,storrnwater drainage system and its facilities); iii) do not connect to (there is no physical interlock whin) nor does it drain to VOT tormwater Utility structures; iv thus why t the VOT Council Meeting at V01s Full Chambers on August 12, 2025 regarding Agenda # 3-Resolution No. 13-25 and Memo# -1 7, the VOT Council heard testimony from Mr.Tome5 regarding the discovery of an error or oversight in the calculation of the fees for TT A and its 134 condominium unit properties [VOT Code Sec. 7 - 0 (a)(7) &74-- 11 (b)] and after which Mr. Allen Village Manager said our`situation is unique to the village' b Is it not the responsibility of the VOT Council to ensure that fee roil be free of errors? [f.s. 1 7.3 3 ( ( )] Page 545 of 572 E: [EXTERNAL] Re:TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment F.. mailbox: : ` rs/Mi hay l p t . o in Thund rbird . Agenda Item #16. Subject: RE. [EXTERNAL] Re. TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment From: "Marjorie G. Craig" <mcraig@tequesta.org> Date: 10/13/20251 10:11 AI D To: Michael Tomes <ser ot@ ellso th-net> CC: holly Young <myou @te esta;or >, Christina Vanderwesthuizen <Chrl's ina. an er esthu i en@fsresi ential. or >, Jeremy Allen 1a1len@t use ta.org> r.Torres, We vent back and looked in our code,and l wanted to make you aware of what we found,which appears to indicate that all property in the Village isresponsible for paying astormwater charge.This makes sense based on the billing.l am verifying our interpretation with our legal team,but 1 wanted to make sure you were aware of what we found.I've pasted it in below and attached it. Sec.74-201.Findings. It is hereby found,determined,and declared as follows: (1) Those efernents of the stormwater management system which provide for the collection of and disposal of stormwater and regulation of groundwater are of benefit and provide services to all property within the incorporated village limits,including property not presently served by the stormwater elements of the system. ( ) The costs of operating and maintaining the village stormwater management system and financing the necessary repairs,replacements,improvements and extensions thereof should,to the extent practicable,he allocated in relationship to the benefits enjoyed and services received therefrom. {Ord.No. -1 ,§1, -1 - 01 } Sec.74-206.Fees authorized. The village council hereby authorizes the imposition of utility fees on all property within the village. (Ord.No. -1 ,§1, -1 - 91 ) Marjorie Craig, PE Ufifitre.Director P The Tillage of Tequea Utilities Department p 561-76 -64 59 61- 9-145 a 345 Teque to Dr,Tequesta,FL,33469 .mcraig a@t questa.org 911130130 :.I From:Marjorie G.Craig mcraig@tequesta.or Sent:Thursday,October 9,2025 3:06 P M To:Michael Tomes sernot@bellsourth.net c:Molly Young rnyoung tequesta.org ;Christina Vanderwesthuizen Christina.Vander a thuizen@f r idential.com ;Jeremy Alien jalien@tequesta.org Subject:RE:[E, TER: AQ lie:TTCA bequest for Storm water Assessment Fee Adjustment Good afternoon, Thank you for reaching out.Tom has still been working with the rate consultant on coordination of what was done for setting up the rate.1 spoke with hire just Pa e 546 of 572 1 1o: A 1 of 1 , e: [EXTERNAL] e:TTCA Request for tor-mwater Assessment i i.. mailbox. : er Mi ha l A t Roaming T u nderbird ... Agenda Item #16. Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adjustment From: Michael Tonnes <semot@ e11so th.net> Date: 10/13/2025, 8:27 PM To: "Marjorie G. Craig" < n raig@te esta.o g> CC: Molly Young <m ours @te e ta.or >, Christiana Vanderwesthuizen <Christina. an er esth i en@ sresi ential. om>, Jeremy Allen ja I len @toq esta.or > Marjorie G.Craig, PE Director—Utilities Department Village of Tecluesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Email:rncralg�tequ st .org Phone:( 1)7 -04.5 Cell:(561)529-1453 RE:Request for StormwaterAssess ment Fee Adjustment Parcel ID;6 -44 -40- 0--51-001-10 0(TTCA Unit 110 )and 133 Remaining TTCA Units Dear Director Marjorie Craig, After your phone call this rnorning,I reviewed your ernaiI and have attached a response regarding TTCA Request for Stormwater Assessment Fee Adj ustm ent, noting my objections anal referring backs to specific sections of VoT"s Part I I—CODE OF 0 RDINAN CES, Chapter 74—UTI LIT[ES,ARTICLE IV—STORMWATER, D I V I S10 N 2 STOR MWATER UTILITY,plus noting that the village has to also recognize, meet and adhere to its own standards,ordinances,permits, EORs and Cos as It pertains to previous authorization approvals to the TTCA property and its 14 individual residents units. The attached response regarding TTC 's request for Storrnwater Assessment Fee Adjustrnent with its attachments and pr vious correspondence should also be part of your legal tearn's review. Regards, Michael J.Torres,Owner Parcel 60-4 -40-- 0--.51-001-10 0(TTCA Unit 110 ) 110-D Lighthouse Circle,Tequesta, FL 33469-2781 and Michael J.Tomes,Director Teque.sta Trace Con dorninium Association, Inc. Cell: ( 61)310-3329 Ea'rl:serotpbellsouth.net Aftachments: Response to VoT October communiques.pff 1.0 MB Page 547 of 572 Agenda Item #16. }i� yy�*+, � �1''Y9 r�1'a G'�1Td��1 � C:��1.�I__L.. --�� ._�_�.���rf.' _-�.- �}� ✓ r �f,, 13 4alr(air,+-'+ r Liu, ' daaF u I G •� +4�RAVP w i II S PlrIP FCpr 1 pm, i• �:� F,RAPHIC SCALE � I � I ►iGE[']'� I I It I MP) 42•rill 1 fl.+[ljxl I li I ��� xl AEd�WE frrdTr�.L. .J• Ffr7JU � Ff�Stl � i + II ftfA M '• 1� 2If•'�'� � 4i5�q�SVGA � !1 --EX61NG a'1pCN i d+IATE VIFPL,. rAo,�crA,�v n4 � ,Krhrt!mr ea+ I ur4iO If wrL� AM AGO W I,L.NN I I MATSI '" ll M�rnrrE ii[�aH L117� 91. .�Srr / rr1EQUESTA OW 40 51 A3'3d rAd+f AT1 I F4C7+�t '►4r��- --____--''r+._" ._ --- ....__' r , Ir f1C QgAI�II U'r I I AEtM+wG w +► '' trP€OC 9 —to F ` � r.•1� `. a,+�"'-....•'_ ��►+�._ � I I r�,•lay 4d D E 'a fill' -- I. u S�ctr11 MATCH I 4tiECpRATIVE►AYEA Lai IJ.SON P/ I' u�srAadf11A[If 1 e[�rs•SEE A;x++. +•,. sa .xa►E no$FOR VAAS ` �E�fB,TREACN L ErF1� ' i F {�rSrl# av i '��` l� 3 fS I SIG Iaf 0116 MA4L , I fix anq�T'T011 off � I 'i[ ��w►ddTE- hANA S SEE `/ GE.I= p ! `I f04 OOTAC5 f ,` ',��iW ffrelDC Ffr= 1 15 �, , ,1 ffram 10 I , 1 I I F' • r.• + GW't�� I I °srxua�er dprArr ypkvra EXI$1NC$'MChI ,rMASONRY WALL I I , +f 14�OfEd ap Ifr4TKF ,I 'r, I � �� 9.Aolr} i rE.•rxaa I I ;*S)m f1 ` tLJ-�I u STAZd9T�f0A'd�d CATCH 8�W I �Krryq Oniu rNck7 i 1 i of..�675 v,Ir R�' �-r�!f,dS Rr ' } I IF.•r2[�d51 12190 ri I '• � h7B5ihI'1 �; r' � I o� STAJAIdift d�ll1' ' n tf••d'MAaE MI �. "+!�' a'• filar TrK r �d�.'PfAf.of. STAd4�13 ddL�Hdr� &Fen OTOu IN[Er �' 14 EO L rlffNpr wArr�1 E ,I + �f j,.r�ACP a�•d�LGa I S s l,•�# i ffrrflGO 9� f ,I To I �ldSf�TYPEow �I HANDCAP r5{[f,•Is `l I n y'Q1Ra e I rmr Trr!r P `II prfrER OTCH 80flou Ir rE.•4.051rA9 If 01 I ;# �wg 1 ! f 9. PR$r, R+dSTaP$40 t ,,��l [ww f STOW I' I 1 ! �Iwn l BA+a 11 _� A1CING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND - , M ff•15'HoPE w��- {, ` }r ._ BAZINE OF cOHSTAUCTIOH r 1 v.'�ldrf,nr�C I { i I Tor-LOT t erf+�rAfNCH '' Ate, AIU LEVATON A![OCArEG I' ' I r pw r oumug w-AES� GE. GRATE ELEvAT10ti fPl I ' I+rrrrE PrVNTEO $ 1 Pwir� I w S wex +f, wvEAT ELEVATION I�E +f 1 Fa SIOA�r>+AN PAR POLLUTION RETARDANT 8ASW 1 F�--Gi!'".�}�001_ .r wan I IWL;: I IE,+rF00 FfrAGO i INISHED FUOQR ELEVATION I [�►- ° -I r - �N i hC 54N � I+ 4� I -41 ifr[S+�CP EXISTING UTILITIES I ny.l [s►or S+ ' ' I t STA Srar.T�ro�a Ar SrA y [oar r7Tl I mSTO�54 STORY yA9r10cE � " ; r�+ L+RJ f!4T LENGTH,SIZE OF STA DRAIN + it cAru+LIAsdN "TMEM OAKS' I 'rEA7 -. + Iva 79r 0•4T, DUCTILE PON PIPE r I ' PR9Wf 57Ar?•J05d>II'13'd�f r I �-r+.— PLAT LArl15 .. r- I [jTOu[NU7 ! I ,Pf� ---- p ISIIN I R PROPOSED By r OZ..raoa I � _ ran E Iry1r�_ � I I��9.50 I 1 �,• --- JAYBElVwsER fPyS I PROPOSED INFONATiON !4 Lf,dS'flCP .."�Js-- { ��{ ,6OIWrtlSE fll'PI '' C@oy 510RIi SEAR MANHOLE i r+ I J � •, ��I I}1; r 1] , , ,• ' 1 TYPE'O've ' STRUCTURE INFORMATION I�Er;YIQN SURFACE FLOW D I Q � r c EA POL& S ; ._... Ex15TIrdC UTILITIES rl v Nf�bVNATE W/fP I If:PERf,HG°F TYPE'a7f�AB EtST NG EXFrrr TRE�tH 1 COuVOCAL i I SSE EXISTING ELEVATION wHa7E pdAfL7,OkN. C'a'S' „, PROPOSED ELEVATION I cATc�eAs+x ff,lay AAw BLDG. AH SrOP Ste+ E U -r r IE,+4.c'jfPRB! Ff,SdO $1.58 RpT FUAN�'U I -1YPE'UCuRe C h' BLDG. �—{ CONCRETE SCEWALK 111 '} PR�EJ �rwci STOP BAR �E '4�.'W_�r} I ]17 p11 1 =BElORArNE PrvEA i II r, I JO 0 5-SEE ARLN• CONCRETE DRIVEWAY po PU45 a QET+4l5 "' othoJ4h I {1' CLO .0�` I sMM i CA1dfEf7 y ,A }'t�' BRICK PAVERS � / To EvSTIAC SS coz a'�r;[t 51c'n Eare c� .I�d EXISTING CONCRETE SICEWALK 2. CURS , .. ++�_ �.JA TYPE I' --- L' �4'tifrt7E - - - '�u�C11;�ys1ECr Y 3�r�ouln �. ..,, flf'E'.F.CURB CUTTER _— !_-_--« __!� rL ElrST[rdC O�1R9 I�Chfl♦f '81 '+ --� �- - df iWn r[C pup PER r. HEADER CURB � fOOT►NpEX , �1 SG� Ib'� STA f[I�]'f' T E/ S 5 i ,,1�r.�rr� • rrr.ar+L•rir+=rr.r. r, frpK pFwj 84Y UES6 D ' _ { --- PROPOSED CONTOUR E�EIIATIOiV ` hw= GL-445 1 ] �} d_F#A �+M �_i� r�ariI�r.�. •yx r* •' 7 I '[LR� 1•i Frr.��i�iii7ihM� rrr.+! r i*�r � � '�'�a-% riYf Page 548 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units Attachment 7 TfCA Resoderttial Building Parcei Building No. Phase# Address APT.fD Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 101 6 101 Lighthouse Circle A 6101 60-43-40-30-51- 006-1010 12{5/2002 B 6201 006-2010 C 6202 006-2020 D 6102 006-1020 G 6103 006-1030 H 5204 006-2440 6104 006-1040 J 6203 006-2030 102 7 102 Lighthouse Circle A 7101 60-43-40-30-51- 007-1010 12/16/2002 B 7201 007-2010 C 7202 007-2020 D 7102 007-1020 G 7103 007-1030 H 7204 007-2040 f 7104 007-1040 J 7203 007-2030 103 8 103 Lighthouse Circle A 8101 60-43-40-30-51- 048-1010 1/14/2003 B 8201 008-2010 c 8202 aoa-zazo D 8102 oos-solo G 8103 008-1030 M 8204 008-2040 ! 8104 008-1040 J 8203 008-2030 104 9 104 Lighthouse Clicle A 9101 60-43-40-30-51- 009-1010 2/3/2003 B 9201 009-2010 C 9202 009-2420 D 9102 009-1020 E 9103 009-1030 F 9104 009-1440 G 9105 009-1430 Ft 92G4 009-2040 i 9106 009-1040 J 9203 009-2030 105 15 105 Lighthouse Clicle A 15101 60-43-40-30-51- 015-1010 10/7/2002 B 15201 015-2010 C 15202 015-2020 D 15102 015-1020 G 15103 015-1030 H 15204 015-2040 1 15104 015-1040 J 15203 015-2030 Page 549 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodential Building Parce! Building No. Phase# Andress APT.]D Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 106 10 106 Lighthouse Circle A 10101 60-43-40-30-51- 010-1010 2/25/2003 B 10203 010-2010 C 10202 010-2020 D 10102 010-1020 E 10103 010-1030 F 10104 010-1040 G 10105 010-1030 N 10204 010-2040 10106 010-1040 J 10203 010-2030 107 16 107 Lighthouse Circle A 16101 60-43-40-30-51- 016-1010 2/12/2403 B 16201 016-2010 C 16202 016-2020 D 16102 016-3.020 G 16103 016-1030 H 16204 016-2040 16104 016-1040 J 16203 016-2030 108 11 108 Lighthouse Circle A 11101 60-43-40-30-51- 011-1010 3/24/2003 B 11201 011-2010 C 11202 011-2020 D 11102 011-1020 E 11103 011-1030 F 11104 011-1040 G 11105 011-1030 H 11204 011-2040 11106 011-1040 J 11203 011-2030 110 1 110 Lighthouse Circle A 1101 60-43-40-30-51- 001-1010 6/23/2003 B 1201 001-2010 C 1202 001-2020 D 1102 001-1020 G 1103 001-1030 H 1204 001-2440 1104 001-1040 J 1203 001-2030 111 2 111 Lighthouse Circle A 2101 60-43-40-30-51- 002-1010 9/20/2002 B 2201 002-2010 c zzoz 002-2020 D 2102 002-1020 G 2103 002-1030 Fi 2204 002-2040 2104 002-1040 1 2203 002-2030 Page 550 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodential Building Parcel Building No. Phase# Address APT.ID Unit No, Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 112 12 112 Lighthouse Circle A 12101 60-43-40-30-51- 012-1010 10/1/2002 B 12201 012-2010 C 12202 012-2020 D 12102 012-1020 G 12103 012-1030 H 12204 012-2040 12104 012-1040 J 12203 012-2030 113 3 113 Lighthouse Circle A 3107. 60-43-40-30-51- 003-1010 9/23/2002 B 3201 003-2010 C 3202 003-2020 D 3102 003-1020 G 3103 003-3.030 H 3204 003-2040 3104 003-1040 J 3203 003-2030 114 13 114 Lighthouse Circle A 13101 60-43-40-30-51- 013-1010 10/28/2002 B 13201 013-2010 C 13202 013-2020 D 13102 03.3-1020 G 13103 013-1.030 H 13204 013-2440 13104 013-1040 1 13203 013-2030 115 4 115 Lighthouse Circle A 4101 60-43-40-30-51- 004-1010 10/11/2002 B 4201 004-20I0 C 4202 004-2020 D 4102 004-1020 G 47.03 004-1030 H 4204 004-2040 4104 004-1040 J 4203 004-2030 116 14 116 Lighthouse Circle A 14101 60-43-40-30-51- 014-1010 11/8/2002 B 14201 014-2010 C 14202 014-2020 D 34102 014-1020 G 14103 014-1030 H 14204 014-2040 14104 014-1040 3 34203 014-2030 Page 551 of 572 Agenda Item #16. Tequesta Trace Residential Units TTCA Resodentiaf Building Parcel Building Na. Phase# Address AP7.fD Unit No. Parcel ID /w Unit CO Date 117 5 117 Lighthouse Circle A 5101 60-43-40-30-51- 005-1010 11/21/2002 B 5201 405-2010 C 5202 005-2020 D 5102 005-1020 G 5103 005-1030 H 5204 005-2040 5104 005-1040 J 5203 005-2030 Page 552 of 572