The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 01a_10/14/2010 � • .,..,. ..o, • �� `"� VILLAGE QF TEQ,�►UESTA • � �� `�� A �E UEST' FOR PROPOSALS • �� `.� 4 4 �'. �� RF P: VC 2-10 • a ,�:�{ • �� • � � � ,�, • AN N EXAT I O N ST RAT E G IC P LAN ANALYS I S �* • , . � a • , �A � , , ,�� m � . . .. • . .� � . • . $ . , � *� � � � �� , �� - � � � � � �� _ • . . ° �s � .� - �,. � � =� �+►�� :� 4 � � , :: . . , . � . G . �. , ,� X , , .- . , ,k,� , . � . , ,� . � , . �.a . � , . �. � , � , } * " . . � F � . * . � � y . . ,� , a . y ••� ; � � : ; � � ' =�„xr . � , �" a � . � ; ' ' �� .. . . �. � �, �� a <. , , ,. z� � ,• �, � � � # � � ., � . , , � . , �. • . , � a . ,. w , ,� , ti , . , . , . . i .. � , . ` � . , � ��"�°� � � _ `«� g „ . , ,, , ,, . , � � � �. ;,+�,, � _ �_ .�p - * . � � . .�..•� �s,'S+� : • ' . , '�'$ � `� f . • � ' "� � � • � « g . � e �� r� � , `�a�a � � � k�. � � . � �,� � �� . � • -� � . �, • �. ; . '� � � �� - � . e�, � � � � s. � . �� , �•�*. � . . „ ,�� „ . � �, � �� . fi _ ,� , r . � � � ,,. � n � x F _ . . ., . . — ---_�_ s , . °�.� ` ,� � � �� f � I�' �`�t C PARRISH 8� � ; � / � "�° .x,.: � � � r ' � �� r° : �``" , EDWARDS INC. .� w ° � ,. .. ° : p v � , ,. � , .� �'� �. �� „� _� „�,.,�.:.� . ,� � � . � _. �— . �� < ,� ° �.,. ` � . , �� . . , � • ��'� ,, � � :. �� ' � � � A , _.��,.. � . *�ri�i��. . > r �r. 3M . �� , � � .. � � ' . . - Z�4 ••, �.. � � v�. 9�. r`� .. _ ' . 'm "' •; - . . , v . , . ,. � . , - M < _ µ y � � � " ' �� _ ,„ SY .._� s�"5we�.�' .. *a.+°�' , . � ; t.. . . � � � ,�� , . . �. . .� ,� _ • ��. � � _ .� . • �.��. .n .. y �, ..�. • e • i `='#",..m, � / / � � � � � � � � Table of , Contents � � � � � � � � / � � r r � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �.. ,� - _ � � � � ' �. , . 1.. :1e. , y.^ , :� ^ ., . , _ o- _. � . , ��i.Y� �� `� � . . , � � • � + � .� ' . . � � . , r , ., I .. . ' � _ , • . • Z . Cover Letter - �- .-.��- � '�� ;�. . ..v `� i � �,,. ° y'`:..a. f . ��.. # � ry � ypo a�.�r., , � Firm Overview � � . Experience � � Project Understanding and Approach � � . Personnel � � Reporting Capabilities � � , Required Forms � � � � � � / � / � � � � � Cotleur & � - Hearing � � � � � � � � � � � , Cover Letter � � � � � � / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � r 1 � - _:. �� _ � - � ' �, , �.. b'� , � � .��,��'r�'.��y:� ��_� � � ;.� � - - . � . � , - �. • � \\� ' ' . ..� a j ~. i +: 1 � . �� / / / 1. Cover Transmittal Letter / / 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` � � � Cotleur & • • � Hearing � • � � � � C:c�t�le�_zr� � I-I� ��rlrl� � � �� ; ,, i . _ � , _ . � �<<- . _ ��: ��.��, . www.coUeurheanng.com � � S.;�l C�::��a��xr�cc t_:�nc S�ntc 1 „�ti})itc�, r�I��iicit� �.;'4�;h' � PI� 5�1.i=1i_�336 � F4�x `�G'f.i=1i.'1:177 I ii:-S;L C-Cb(Jf}2�59 . , Au�ust 27, 2010 • ViUage of Tequesta � 345 Tequesta Drive � Tequesta, FL 33469 � . Re: RFP #VC 2-SU Annexation Strategic Plan Analysis � , Dear Villagc Council and Village Manager. • Creating successful strategies and projects are a landmark trait of Cotleur & Hearing and why we are � pleased to have the opportunity to submit our qualifications to serve the Village of Tequesta assisting � with your annex�tion needs. Our team's combined municipai and private sector experience foster . sustainable and community based efforts that make lasting positi�e impressions. � Corporate Experience � Cotleur & Hearing is an established firm located in Jupiter, now cel�brating 20 years af community , service. Throu�h our corporate vision, we remain financially sound and continue to maintain a zero debt , policy, which include5 the office buildin�;s owned by our firm. Our specialties remain as Landscape Architecture, Land Planning, Municipal Consultin� Services and Environmental Consulting. We have � extensive experience working with local municipalities and �;overnmental a�encies, currently providing . services for the Town of luno Beach, the Town of lupiter, Villa�e of Royal Palm Beach, Palrn Beach . County, St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie. In addition, Cotleur & Hearin� is actively working on numerous projects for the Florida Department oF Transpartation {including in-house landscape � architecture services at the District) and the South Florida Water Management Qistrict. � . Team Experience . The team assembled for this project h�s been carefully selected based upon similar project experience as well as past experience in and knowledge of the Village of Tequesta. Cotleur & Hearing will be the � prime consultant and project manager for this annexation praject. We are also able to assist with a . variety of ather municipal areas. � Annexation Experience � Cotleur & Hearing has been an acti�e part of annexation processes for many public and private clients. . We have helped with varying sizes of annexations from very small % acre parcels to sorne �ery large . projects. Recently we assisted with a 2,500 acre de-annexation into the City of Parkland (che Wedge property}, where the property was de-annexed out of Broward County back into Palm Beach County's � City of Parkland. We also assisted the City of Fellsmere with the 2,500 acre and 3,500 acre Ansin � properties located at the intersection of I-95 and Highway 512. These annexations �Iso ind�ided . numerous land-use and development agreement discussions. � � � � � � . Viilr��;e of 7equesta RFP JIVC ?-70 , rinnexation Stratc�;ie Pl�m Flnalysis , Au�ust 77, 2010 P�i�;�� 2 . , Commitment , Uur team is c.ommitted to serve the Villa�e of Tequesta with the hi�;hest level of service possible. We �re passion�tc �t�out wtiat we do anc! believe in being the best. This philosophy has pro�en successful � and c�n b� evidenc�d by our noted refcrences and project results. • We thank you for your time in re�iewing our credentials and for your consideration of our qualifications. � We believe we rneet and exceed the criteria set forth and are confident of our ability to deliver timely � and successful results tt�at are cost-efficient. Our go�l is to exceed your expectations by helpin� you . successfully work through your annexation and other municipal needs. We look forward to meeting . with you. • Sincerely yours, � � � Donaldson E. Hearin�, ASLA, LEEDm AP � Tod owery, AICP, LEED�' � Landsc�pe Architect/Principal Land Plannin�/Project anager � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Fi� � ye � 1ew 1 r � � � � � i r • r � � � � � � • • • � � � . ► � -� � - �. . � � � . �� , , _, < _ , Q- � -- ( • . , � .'� � . "'�'�► � ' ' � t., . � . . .. ^_ _ � � ' "� _ � ` 2. FirmllndividualOverview � � � � / / / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & � � Hearing � � � � � � • Cotleur& ' Hearin . g . Landscape Architects � Land Planners � Emironmental Consul[ants , . � COMPANY OVERVIEW , ��.�-� 4°�� ` - - Robert Cotleur and Donaldson Hearing have been practicing � � �� ;i� ;�;:�:�� Landscape Architecture in South Florida for over 24 years. Both � �: '� ^�>, � a �� ,��: graduated with honors at the top of their class and have won � � �`�� 1� �� .° scholastic and professional awards in their field. In May 1991, they � � . � �_ J .�; _;��; �� started the firm of Cotleur & Hearing, Inc; focusing their expertise and :, � '- energy on Landscape Architecture, Land Planning and the rapidly �.:: � � e � �" �, � growing field of Environmental Design. , �: � : Today, the firm provides professional services in the disciplines of � Landscape Architecture, Residential Landscape Design/Build, Land � � �{` Y � ?�,� T , Planning and Environmental Consulting. Cotleur & Hearing services ��°�°�'�' �� a multitude of high-profile clients including, the Florida Department of � ,� � ��''�"' `�'� `' �'� �� ' '� �`��- �`�- Transportation, Florida Power & Light, The South Florida Water . �+:��`^��- ��`' �` Management District, along with counties and municipalities f ..P statewide, land developers and many other private sector clients. � _ _ Besides building an extensive portfolio within Florida, the firm has �,P� also added their signature to projects in the Bahamas and the . � � `# . ,� � , ,�� Caribbean. � ��r^�, �� 7 � ;�� 1 � - � a T �� u� ; �, 1 °,� � aw .�� 6�"'�� °=� � ��:� 1 �,�� Managing complex Landscape Architecture, Land Planning and F �� ; .- . 4�;, g�: .� � _ ;.,; , Environmental projects requires the kind of skill and talent that is , developed through experience. Our seasoned staff includes , ' ",��, landscape architects, designers, graphic designers, planners and � ��' �� environmental specialists. This dedicated team utilizes a multi- , �'� 1",� p�� d>>� `'' ' �� disciplinary approach to problem solving and has produced award- �1 ,„.,,� �`�r % winning results. , a �,'t � .� �� 7 �. R ��Si S ��y'�''".'�� Whether forging through a wetland conducting environmental �.. , � � *` assessments, analyzing and building GIS (Geographic Information � �`�' � Systems) maps, designing and building landscape projects or , planning the next residential or commercial destination, you can count ' on Cotleur & Hearing to accomplish the task. / .� � .. Cotleur & Hearing focuses on creating positive results and / „�-. ,� _ ..� :� contributing to our projects and the environment. This pride is very , r �:� ,� �'� 4,;. evident and contagious, represented by our ability, as a company, to "' ��., r�'`�-'�-� '' �� give back to the community. Whether contributing time and effort to a � �"- ��- � ` local cause or financially supporting area needs, Cotleur & Hearing +.�, ' "'�--- - —� simply enjoys blessing others whenever possible. � � / � / � � � / ! Clark 8� McCarthy Engineers, P.A. � The Forum III . 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 712 West Palm Beach , FL 33401 � T 561 689 9500 F 561 689 8080 . info@clarkmccarthy com � � � Firm Profile � � � The firm of Clark & McCarthy Engineers P.A. was incorporated as a Professional � Association effective October 1, 2009 by Daniel P. Clark, P.E. and Thomas J. � McCarthy, P.E. for the purpose of providing general civil engineering services for � local government and select private clients. Our business plan is to remain small � in order to offer our clients superior Experience, Knowledge and Value. � � Prior to forming Clark & McCarthy Engineers, Dan Clark was a principal in the � firm of LBFH/Boyle for ten years and his primary assignment was as the City � Engineer for the City of Palm Beach Gardens for nine years. Prior to LBFH Dan � was with Brown & Caldwell for approximately twelve years and was a consultant � to South Florida Water Management District on a series of projects. / � Tom McCarthy was with the firm of Mock Roos and Associates, Inc. for 26 years � and was President of the firm for eight years. During his tenure with Mock Roos � he was the Project Manager/Principal in Charge of a number of major public and � private projects. � Tom left Mock Roos in 1997 and operated Tom McCarthy Consulting Engineer, � Inc. until forming Clark & McCarthy Engineers. During that period the firm was � involved in a number of private projects in the Town of Palm Beach including � several major improvements for The Breakers Hotel, the Everglades Club, � development of Landmark Estates and off the island the firm has worked for � � several of the older gated communities on infrastructure evaluations and design � of improvements to infrastructure, primarily roads, but also on pumping stations r and other typical community type facilities. � The firm has full CADD capabilities and a staff of six highly experienced � personnel. We are lean and mean for the benefit of our clients. � � � � � � � � � � GENERAL INFORMATION • � Since 1985, our firm has been serving the appraisal needs of lenders, • developers, insurance companies, mortgage brokers, investors, attorneys, utility companies, real estate brokers and individuals. Our appraisal services are � tailored to the requirements of each valuation assignment. This flexibility allows � us to estimate the market value, determine the highest and best use, and • analyze the feasibility of a project. � Whether the property is large or small, residential or commercial, we provide � quality appraisal services. Because of our expertise, our professional staff has • valued millions of dollars of real property, including: � • Residential properties • Permanent easements � • Condominiums • Planned unit developments • • Townhomes • Restaurants • Adult Living Facilities (A.L.F.) • Retail facilities � • Automobile dealerships • Service Stations � • Commercial properties • Shopping Centers � • Condemnations � Special purpose buildings • • Hotels • Subdivisions • Industrial properties • Temporary easements ` • Institutional real estate • Trailer parks � • Manufacturing plants • Vacant land � • Marinas • Warehouses • � Mini-storage facilities � • We have the ability to service South Florida and the Treasure Coast. At Parrish � & Edwards, Inc., we are committed to quality and performance by providing to � our clients professional valuation and consultation services. � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � APPRAISAL AND VALUATION SERVICES � AUDIT/REVIEW � • Appraisal reviews and updates are often necessary for portfolio management, financial reporting, and current value accounting. � � IN-DEPTH NARRATIVE STUDIES � In-depth narrative studies are often required for commercial, industrial, and other property � types involving the valuation of complex properties. This service provides in-depth research • of similar properties, as well as neighborhood analysis, highest and best use analysis, and valuation analysis. � � These reports are used for: � • Financing � • Tax Purposes • • Contract Sales • � Marketing • Determining project feasibility � � Condemnation purposes � • Assessment of the marketplace for highest potential property use. � Our highly qualified professional appraisers provide efficient, accurate, and personalized � service. Continually updating their knowledge, they participate in courses and seminars with � the Appraisal Institute. Our secretarial and production staff is also proficient in providing • quality support and services. + MARKET ANALYSIS � Market Studies compare the "value created" with the potential return and risk analysis. This � service provides an economic base analysis, pricing and absorption study, as well as an • analysis of project feasibility. This predevelopment service is vital in determining product pricing, in securing financing, and in acquiring governmental approvals. • EXPERT TESTIMONY � • Parrish & Edwards, Inc. has a team of experienced expert witnesses in matters of real estate • value. Our services are often required in cases of bankruptcy, condemnation, foreclosure, and related legal proceedings. � At Parrish & Edwards, Inc., we use current valuation techniques that meet the highest � standards required by the Appraisal Institute, Appraisal Foundation, as well as FNMA and � FHLMC guidelines. � We serve our community with professional appraisal services reinforced by a reputation for � dependability, accuracy and excellence. � � � � � � � � � � � KEY CORPORATE PERSONNEL • � J. KENNETH PARRISH, MAI, SRA • Our Fort Pierce office services both St. Lucie and Indian River Counties and is managed by � Ken Parrish. � � Our main office (Jupiter) primarily serves Palm Beach County and is co-managed by Ken • Parrish. Ken has a B.A. degree with a major in Real Estate and Finance from Florida Atlantic University. Ken has first hand knowledge of the growth and trends which have taken place. � Ken has had extensive experience appraising all types of residential and commercial � properties, and he is qualified as an expert witness in several of the Circuit Courts. � Ken has served as Special Master to oversee and rule on tax appeals for Palm Beach � County. Ken has also done tax / consulting work in Palm Beach, St. Lucie, and Indian River � Counties. � BRIAN G. "BRIG" EDWARDS, MAI � � Our Jupiter office, which primarily serves Palm Beach County, is also co-managed by Brig • Edwards. Brig has a Chemical Engineering Degree from the University of Florida and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin. He is also � a member of the Appraisal Institute. Brig has had extensive experience appraising all types of � residential and commercial properties, and he is qualified as an expert witness in Palm Beach • County Circuit Court. � He has also served as a Special Master to oversee and rule on Tax Appeals for Palm Beach • County. � CORPORATE INFORMATION • � The company was formed and incorporated June 26, 1985 in the State of Florida. J. • Kenneth Parrish has been a director since inception. Mr. Brian G. Edwards has been with the company since 1989 and became a partner of the corporation in January, 1997 and the � corporate name has changed to Parrish & Edwards, Inc. Since that time, Ken Parrish and � Brian "Brig" Edwards have been the primary managers of the corporation. � . Mr. J. Kenneth Parrish is President, Treasurer, Secretary, and a dire.ctor of the corporation. � Mr. Brian G. Edwards is Vice President and a director of the corporation. Their mailing � addresses are the same as the corporation: 3418 W. Mallory Blvd., Jupiter, Florida 33458 • and can be reached at (561) 622-9992. � � � � � � � � � � / / / , ; ; � _ ___ � Public/Private Development Advisors . � 1 � � . / , ° � � / ,,� {, � _, �� l y r � � � ~�� - �a�- �� ! . t .�i. a °1�l i , : - '`�� , rZ � • " � * y G� •� Y �' ..,. � �! � y 1 M "' � � � `� .�� j ,,. �, � t " ur"" � ' � �E _... � �3� �+�' • "tia.s...Or �;�.��E,• , � � { �� ,�. � ��Y � � • l y �(� � _ r ' � � �� ` . _ �� M •��+�'�r ra � fcr.iL�� ♦ , .�� k : � ' . p "� � w � w► J - 4 . = . - y�- ��.. j'/ �_°� , �' � � � — _�.i ! �i�a �ii' � r , BBP & Associates, LLC (BBP LLC) is an economics and real estate development advisory firm which counsels an array of public and institutional clients, as well as both novice and sophisticated private investors, interested in bringing , development projects to fruition. BBP LLC has unmatched experience and expertise providing predevelopment , feasibility assessments and implementation strategies for a wide variety of product types and settings. , BBP LLC is considered one of the leading development consulting firms nationwide, assisting federal entities and state and local governments with economic analysis and real estate development expertise. We have caused construction of , over $8 billion of development in 47 states and 4 countries while assisting over 1,100 public sector clients meet their � development objectives. . SELECTED SPECIALIZATIONS , , 1• �� ' �� • � � � � ➢ Financing I Funding ➢ Retail ➢ Downtown ➢ Predevelopment Feasibility � Office ➢ Urban Infill � ➢ Redevelopment ( Urban Planning ➢ Residential ➢ Suburban , ➢ Economic Development ➢ Hotel ➢ Rural I Greenfield ➢ Market I Economic Analysis � Recreation / Entertainment ➢ Waterfront , ➢ Public 1 Private Development Feasibility � Institutional / Technology ➢ Transportation-Related � ➢ Development Packaging � Industrial ➢ Adaptive Reuse ➢ Revitalization Assessments & Implementation Strategies > Govemment ➢ Regional / Statewide . ➢ Govemment Asset Management & Privatization � . SPECIAL FOCUS , In addition to the range of services outlined above, BBP LLC has extensive experience and expertise in the following selected specialized focus areas. These issues, such as tax increment financing, transit-oriented development, and , affordable/workforce housing, are becoming an increasingly important topic throughout the United States as , governments seek innovative financing mechanisms and emerging demographic and economic trends impact where people live, work and play. , . ➢ Transit Oriented Development ➢ Tax Increment Financing (TIF) ➢ Workforce / Affordable Housing ➢ Development Impact Assessments . ➢ Innovative Financing I Funding ➢ Corridor Revitalization � � , 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , . . . � / / � / / � � , Experience / � � � / � / � � � � � / � � � � � / r � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . . , ° .� �..� 2�::dr�..0 �}1 �i _ . „. . r. ,�'° � . �._ �.,: -� f+� ��rrt` �.��.xiv�+�u�r � , r �t/4��, '�'�, t /-� r �r-� �n ��F�- �� ' . , r . - �.� . � � - _ . � -�� :�. � � � . . � The team members that make up this proposal are very familiar with both private and public operations. � As a team, we have an abundance of local knowledge and prior experiences in the municipal sector, , including the positions of city/village manager, city engineer, city planner and various other positions. We , know municipal operations, and we know Palm Beach County operations and staff. Through our similar project experience we can develop an annexation strategy that will allow both the Village and County � residents to evaluate possible annexation options. Our success in evaluating the economic impact of a , potential annexation and then our ability to communicate these impacts to the residents, with the support of the Village staff and Council, is one of the keys to our team's success. r , Our team members have been involved in all types of residential and commercial annexation processes. We are also able to assist the Village Council in successfully evaluating their potential annexation � decisions. The annexation question is not just a matter of whether a particular neighborhood desires to � become a part of the Village. It is also a careful analysis of the Village Council in whether the newly , annexed property will become a negative drain on the existing village residents and tax payers. � Our team includes the following firms/disciplines for this project: � A. Cotleur 8� Hearing Inc. — Planning, Public Participation, Municipal Operations Assistance, � Negotiations, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Consulting , Cotleur & Hearing is a trusted name that has been relied upon by numerous municipalities throughout r South Florida. Our staff members have experience in both public and private operations with a long- standing tradition of providing cost-effective solutions and assistance to a variety of municipal clients. � Our recent governmental sector experiences allow us to have a broad understanding of annexation , and other municipal needs. � Recent experiences include assistance with the City of Parkland and a de-annexation of the 2,500 , acre wedge property from Broward County back into Palm Beach County. We also worked closely with the Village of Fellsmere on two separate annexations and land use amendments for 3,500 and � 2,500 acres respectively. We have municipal contracts with Palm Beach County to assist them with � annexations, land use amendments and facility discussions. � Both Don Hearing and Tod Mowery have a tremendous amount of experience to bring to the Village's � efforts and their professional and proactive approach has created numerous success stories. Tod's , experience as both a village and city manager, along with being an assistant town manager in Jupiter, makes him uniquely qualified to assist the Village in a myriad of municipal needs. Don grew up in � Tequesta and as a boy biked all over many of the areas that today are potential annexation � neighborhoods. His intimate knowledge of the community and his solid experience running a vibrant . planning and landscape architecture firm makes him a proven advocate for this project. Together, Don and Tod's development and planning experience, along with their successful negotiation styles, will � greatly assist the Village in working through decisions and in resident / nonresident issues and , concerns. � � Cotleur & � � Hearing � � � / / , We currently have municipal contracts with the Village of Royal Palm Beach, the Town of Juno Beach, the City of Stuart, the City of Port St. Lucie, Palm Beach County, the Florida / Department of Transportation and Florida Power and Light. , B. Clark and McCarthy Engineers — Civil engineering � Clark and McCarthy bring a wealth of municipal engineering knowledge to the table. Tom � McCarthy has been Assistant Palm Beach County Engineer and Town Engineer for The , Town of Palm Beach as well as Town Engineer for the Town of Juno Beach from 1997 to 2002. � , Dan has been a consultant to Indian Trails Improvement District, the City of West Palm , Beach, Palm Beach County, Seacoast Utility Authority, and, most recently, the City Engineer for Palm Beach Gardens from 1999 to 2008. Their understanding of municipal operations � and their positive and friendly demeanor is very helpful to any road, sidewalk or utility , discussions. / C. Parrish and Edwards Inc. — Land and Tax Appraisers , Parrish and Edwards have served numerous municipal clients throughout south Florida, , including the Department of Transportation in evaluating the values of properties in any municipal annexation or eminent domain proceeding. They bring a tremendous amount of � experience to the team, and as a local firm, their intimate knowledge of the Village is vital to , he►ping both Village and County residents understand how annexations could affect property values in the future. � , D. BBP LLC — Market and Economic Analysis , BBP LLC has a tremendous amount of experience in Florida perForming assessments for municipalities. Their focused experience allows a thorough analysis of the fiscal impacts of . an annexation decision. Their proven track record allows a thorough understanding to be , made of an annexation decision. Ralph and Brian are skilled in examining both social and economic impacts of municipal policies and decisions. � � � / � � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & � � Hearing � � • � � �•. •. -• •• ••• _ � . � �� rj .� � �. _ , . , . . ,, � . , ,. _ � j _ _ � ,. ,, , , ,. ,. ,. ,. The Abacoa Nei�hborhoods offer residents the opportunity� to enjoy the aesthetics and beauty of Florida's environment. A few examples of this unique blend of residential lifestyles is Cambridge where residents of this quiet neighborhood routinely stroll through the woods and along the waterways of Abacoa's greenway enjoying spectacular sunsets and unprecedented wildlife. This project contains a mixture of single-farnily townhouse and duplex building typologies designed in a Florida Georgian architectural style. The Virgin Islands come to Abacaa with Abaco�'s newest traditional neighborhoad development known as Martinique. Martinique introduces Anglo, Caribbean and Bermuda Architectural styles to create a unique traditional neighborhood. The site design departs from the grid typically associated with traditional neighborhood design. Patterned after Olmsted's historic Riverside neighborhood, Martinique provides a more informal curvilinear neighborhood design. Linear parks create a green-space network connecting the entire neighborhood to the central neighborhood square. Careful micro-siting of roads and home sites provides for preservation of native flora and fauna reinforcing the naturalistic design of the neighborhood. Tuscany is Abacoa's Tuscan traditional neighborhood development located north of the town center and adjacent to Palm Beach County's "state-of-the-art" Independence Middle School. Tuscany provides all the amenities expected in a traditional neighborhood development. Residents are within easy walking distance of the town eenter which contains a movie theater, restaurants and other convenient and specialty shops. Numerous families have made Tuscany their new home. Students can readily walk to school and easily take part in after-school, intramural a�tivities. Numer�us parks, open spaces and neighbor centers provide a sense of community in a neighborhood place. � � _ _ _ ___ __. _ _. .____ - --- -_ _ __ _ _ _ _ ._ _ __ --- - __. ._ _ _ _ ' Cotleur& Abacoa Nei hborhoods � . 9' � �-Iearing . � , � ,,� �+ �. < � � �. d , �. ; , �i�.�� `� '+ � r��' � �� 'f ;• ,:, � � � � � - , . � � v�� ; �' ��: '�. �'*� � t �7�� . �` \. �1 �' �i ` ' � .rf � ;r i� . �- , / -��.��.� � ��,�'�!'�� ` .Y 1�` A #� .r! � . #� � . . : ,� � �.,: ��r� •.,�, �"`'y ',l y� ' ;�.� '�, * � , ,� y � � T . , �- �� .. Y. ��. t _ �F � , .�;�a � � ��,i.4 '+'� ��`'4 r '`q: � , .. �� y �.t� . �� ,� +; ��! ,�i. . J rC`" r, tx '` ��,,� �' �kV �, aA; . ' ,�if", . a . � - ry�i � ' i._ . iR� ' � - s �. - �Y'- , N �� t i� — � y � '� *� � �{ * t �,�� ' � Y � - ' �_ `� .��... ' ,Y� '!. .�,�� ++ - .. ��`. �n.� , - �� # *�'� ` ::�� -��""'.-. . , , ., - �'� r ��' � � — .� �-+ �'�� "�� . �- '�'� �„ � �� , , y ..y, � 4 t . .�� ' . . � . �' .. � �.,:i.'M. + ; # � : Y � �`�.r.- � a 1' - a . , '�i,. - r s. c'�' =,� �a; _� . .. � �. � 3 r Ls , �� Y� .� -xa z ` " ' " �'� , � � ',. th� �� `� t Y, , p.�' Y � q{~0 � '_ Y .� S o y° . . � , � `.�fi ..�., M , �, � � ', , � � ». e �`" e�F "�r> �ec,... � � i �+ � ��,�,, � _ _ .:�' , � � ` � ' [ � � ' � � I� � . �� ' � -�1��6�. a �� -�� -_ I `,'' �, .`.��`,�„;:.,_'��v.�. .�. _._..�...,��.�..w��...;_ f ,��` ,. , � K� � : ; �� . �., ,, � � � .� �� 4 , � , . 1 , .. � _. _ _ � �� s� � , , . �a : . . -� � db°!�-� � , � ?` ,.,�- � � , ,:, �.� � � _ �<,� $ k , . �. �.,- y . ��T .:��. .u, v'i �.:.. �......��S.Ki� � . . .,.... .,� S .. - i g�* k4 , � [ 1 +,� . .......-... f . � �. � � }�. u 3 l' $ - ; , •' ��.� J � �• � A e � ,_ � "�"�� , � � � � �^ , �� ` � � y t � d� '� Y F ry � � °' �, �" � �� 7 .� .. , � + # � . � � � � . r � � — � --•� � � � � � �� , , � �a � N# � � � . ��'� ��. Z ° , � ...M: �.. • S '. 1 _ .,. . Y` 7� � a , �� "r..114 '��rc � 'y� . .. . I � . .. „ • " �.r � ..:.. .Y�.. - a a. .., .•.. �. , , �` t �, r , r��f?:k� � � l S b,l��;'.��1..,. ��y,: ��,��,�..��'"`, t 1 , ";;,�� t.. �, r� � „ , . ,� �;, � �;,,. � � . � � N �� L � , � . _ � ��? � � � � � , u , 1- . }y r �, 8 � � 5 , . , � � ' u, r � � Jt�l.� p- M ' � i f�5,�.•L-�. '"'� i�•':�.� � J " • - � � � a � , �� •y. ..! . " °"_ � „�$� ,a ��mi�! '� " ' � , � �� .� �,- � �,,.u,: ;�� ,,. .� . g, � � ry�� -��,,:�, ' � . _ �� .. � � _ ,.��,.�`1F.. „,� . � , __ � �., a..��`�� • , � � I � I � I � � • � � � , �� f . �'�,� , t a p � ;�E�,.�; �, r .,� � $� �'' .w;,, , �� « " � , �+� . � � , a . � ..} � �� ', �s ` tic � � � , 1{ ^� -s '�. � � S, �k ,.. "3i" ' �, . ;'� �; * , _ . i : r �s ` �, �. .: i � �" � l ,. ��• t w � "� � .. �• � ' �� . �. a •+ : .� <r '�' '�` : Y� • , ��&.'¢', ,�. �S � a" "' • � .��:- . 'a'F't�:. .. � �� ;.. .� , � . � �';,- . �� . .";?..".s. �' . ��rw .. Carlin Park Amphitheatre Cotl�ur & Hearing, Inc. was retained by Palrn Beach Gounty Facilities to assist in the pianning and development approvals for � a performing arts pavilian to be located within the Carlin Park { Amphitheater. Caclin Park is one of the oldest parks within Palm y;� ., �. , Beac� County artd was � land granC by President Calvin Coolidge � �� dating back to the early 1904s. The proposed performing arts :"" �` • pavilion will be utilized for a uariety of concerts and community � .�:. `�`�'�' '"� '`�= event�, ineluding the Palm Beach County Shakespeare Festival. � c �„ � :'s i _�. The building was designed in a Florida Elizabethan style to be 'tr , k � 1 .. ..: : � � ° consistent with the coastal context of the park and to facilitate the � ��"' requirements af the Shakespeare Festiva! � .• ', ,,. �' Clien�t: Palm Beach County facilities �� Loca�ion: Jupiter, Florida �'' Project Type: Performing ArtsfParks and Recreation F:: . , ,, ,r�� '�'' Services Provided: Planning, Landscape Architecture, ' ;:� �� Zoning Entitlements `�: �� Project Size: 3,800 Sq. Ft. �,�, �:.. ,;,�. �; � Com�letion Date: 2007 �; � �;� � � `° �` •�, � � � 1• • . - . •- _ � . � _ .� 1�� T . � ,� � �n . , . �� s� : . �a , �- � - � ' � � � . �a+d � + . , �' �� ;� �,�:� -� ,,.. �� , �� - ; � � .,� .. . , �, , , , r ,. . �_,,:�:. t � � , .. ��1 a � 'm�:� " ' � �� , - _.: � � ,. * � ,��. T �. �'. `• + „� ; � � i � ��< ,,, ... ..a�,i �'°' : .:�. 4 '.� �. � t ..� vw �� 'a - , � . � „r. r'. . '.. • ii � 1 - .. , . . . _ . 4 "^'itr ' I . . .,�... � i a � + f . 5 * �2, i . u .,' : .�^ �i . ..y . .: • Y �: . - 4 . . ; . �. :�H` ,.,�. ,. �� - .-. ; a,. «' ',.... . �� ',�k. -�:�. ._ �� . � .. a` �� _ R � .• , �� ` k �, . . � � _. . � � „. 2, , _ . � '� �'s � �r� � � � �.. � . �� . , , _. � .� ' .:?� c ., �, # ; � , o , y +,� °' ��.* �, ;� � �_�#!� ` � �� ;.,��'_ � '"�� .+... �'$ �a � �°��'' � i: -"`":1�� »1' _ k:" „� q�.Gs�.. +v"`.,�. t .. �. - ��n, -. s;: , � . Downtown at the Gardens ''` Downtown at the Gardens is an upscale, retail, rnixed-use project. This GO .„ ��;"� � +/- aere site is bordered by the Gardens Mall to the east and Alternate A I A to the west, and is being designed with Che help of Cotleur & Hearing, to enhan�e the northern end of Palm Beach County. Downtown at the �` �,�` r` Gardens includes approximately 350,000 sq. ft. of retail components a >.� `�� µ � � featuring a 3,200 seat, 16 screen, state-of-the-art Cobb Theatre (the only stadium-seated movie theater located in Palm Beach Gardens), and Whole `Y� � �- h ' 3 ��' Foods Market along with nationally knawn restaurants and specialty retailers new to the a�ea, a 166 unit residential tower and class-A office space will be bordered by a 2U acre lake and lakeside sculpture park. This � will be a place where people can park once, dine at any one of a number `�---,� ,�, ;� of restaurants, see a movie, browse through a book store, visit a�allery, �='� `„�,,"�°.�- hear a jazz ensemble play, shop in unique boutiques or just take a stroll. C(ienk: Menin De�elapment � � Locatioh: Palm Beaeh +Gardens, Florida �`� Project Type: Retail Commercial - - •• • ' �� ? � }�,�� Services Provided: Zoning Entitlement, Landscape / �� r,,�,� <� t�+�i�;,!f� Hardscape tArchitecture, Site Design �"""' �"�"� � Project Size: 350,000 Square Feet - s ' _ ;; _ Completion Date: 2005 �'';.�„,=aa:, . I �� I . �� i ••� � � .,� . _ M , . � �� '" � ` - � ' �,� � � , � .� „ - . . �.. . G .;� � � ` a^ Y l �. ,. .�...- . ' '�. , � ♦ . , � " x � s,. � 1 � �.b ° ': �;. � , . .. "' � +n . p�. � � �� #� �� , .t. � n �' q � .' � . . b , + ` � � i .'. . , � � . t f , � , � �. � � , — � � . s , �<.. � � � � ;: • -- , . r�,_. •s� ,+ � _ <� . . j a' a . �?7. �.� �. � . „ , ' . �� M �� '�"^�. �� ,t' � �, . � � w� e � '�� .. , � . �,��'` i !.i ,a°.'s � � �� . ,� � ° � � �:« s �„,,,� � f ;� � .�; „ � � , , ,�,� � �� r •y�.kv�y�� \t _ .� I�`.. �. � • •:.. . . ' . . , F ' s ^ S, d�' '� , < � v ,.. ,; � , � . �, , � ;� , u �+� . . . , � � , �. , ��.. . a ,: � �,;.� °� 4'��, �.+ A �" �� g �� # � � • V , .. : e • e4 5» �� ., k�� . � .. ,^' , '� s i�``• �, ,:_ . ' _ , ,. . „ � : _ ' � x �a� � � �_._� �,a! , �;,, _.; U. '�� t: .3 , r x � �g ° vt�'"��' �� " -.,. � �' ��. e , i� " �; y 4 w � � ��+o-, q?� . � � . �, � i� �� . . .. �a�: k�t - _ � a � '� h �� .,.� r 1 g . � i � , _ � � �� i ��{� �,s .�r"+;. Y * � �-�« �i� � t�� . i _' . .v #5 c�`' �' . * � � r �� , r ,� ' x .. , � ,� . T� � II' V �T C s 1 � !� %a� � �-.>: � � � � •� „�� * � � .`� � '::� ; '�`. '� r A�.�`�#, °.� _. ��, � �; y • ,;�'� .x, '��,� 'r"� � ��: a � « .wt,°.; ; x � ` .. � f . i� .t , �., . �."' . , Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. was retained by Martin County and the Florida Department of Transportation, District 4 to provide landscape architecture, irrigation, hardscape and park design for this road reconstruction and new bridge project. The Indian Street Bridge project involved initial development of landscape ��and hardscape design plans which were then later utilized by the District fo'r their actual design build Request for Proposal process. Cotleur & Hearing was then retained by the selected design build contractor to camplete all construetion related plans for this project. The designs for the bridge inelude unique tta�dian paver patterns symbolic of the Native American heritage in Martin � �r. The proje�t begins at the Florida Turnpike/Martin Highway and ��c �t across the south fork of the St. Lucie River where it connects _ �+iLh [�a �tre�t. T'he project ends at Indian Street/Willoughby Boulevard. The total �roject cost is $I62M and represents a 4.25M, three-phase corridor project. � Client: �I � Martin County and FDOT Location: Martin County, Florida Project Type: Road Construction and New Bridge � ;,,� �' • Landscape Architecture Design, Irrigation �� <� � � �wa _ �'x� ��'� Services I�rovided: Design, Public Involvement and Post Design � �; ;:-�; Services _� +�� ` � Project Srze: 4.25 Miles Completipn Uate: 2012 �,. :�- 'I � • ' � - - - � -. . � . � � 1 _ - �' � �:a� s " , a' 'i> !a ' , t ' � r r Y�+ a �i'��'�y �, - �` � � � aj' �'��'�'3Y'� t�� ^e� .�" `�` c :�p' 'r � `�.�y � , ° r �?:'��;� _ Lt �� . . . . � . � �µ .. 5 -. ; � � �: . Y � . . . . ��. _� l� . i f l �'1 � t S �: � . � �: � I wy � � �� St' X � 3�� £ } d� � .�, ��, y 1 � . � : ,} �i>��i� G `k�4 �}t� "S� t ta�' q �. � u :. . �A� �,t • �t �� e„ � � k ��`" F :� �' ��' � ,� �;4�` r " +? . J ..:. ,; r 4 '` � '� .. ; j ? ,°r^ tir '� �t a .�� 2 4. , - � i. �,- .. "5"kY .E r X�.,:. { ,. .. � �._, , v.E�'Z. L a �,. � .i �f�7,�� '��' � � 1: - �d a-� P �6" !� , , y . i r . ,�' . y � .• p� .• £ _ s. , '. � .... .. �. . , ... - ,. . . , _ ,. .. ...�� . .', `" __-_. . � .d�..: rY ^" 'wf • i,� . .. ,. y . _ ,.. . '°— .�s... �.'. :;.. t .. �n�� m� ^yFi �� :A,�. . ,�..... -.e . . _ . h ` ' .. _.. y;�,+i!•t . , ., - i ,. t' , ; x. �� ., ,.. � 5.,. . Cotleur & k#earing, lnc. was retained by Florida Department of Transportation, District 4 to ',provide landscape, irrigation, hardscape and park design for this streetscape and waterfront park project. The 1.9 mile causeway connects Jenson y .� , A - - Beach with Hutchinson Island and includes several waterfront park features like boat ramps, fishing piers, picnic pavilions, parking areas, restrooms and a playground. Cotleur & Hearing was responsible for assisting the department with the park layawt and for specifyin� all site furniture includin� benches, bike racks, ��} � trash cans, B�Q grills and play areas: 7'he proposed landscape plant palette is comprised vf I mostly native-coastal speeies that can tolerate the harsh waterfront conditions and also provide shade and wind protection and aesthetic interest. The --+ irrigation system was also a desi�n challenge because the use of potable water had '` to be minimized due to cost and environmental cancerns. The final result was a combination of city water and well-water systems. With a landscape budget of approximately $ I million, this project was completed in the winter of 2004. f` � j ' . . � �� ..� �", � �•� b II � .� Cltent: Florida Departrt�ent of Transportation � �� 1-c�c�tiian: � Jensen Beach, Florida "� Project Ty : Streetscape Design -� -_, , . , °�, +..,1 Services Pro ided: Landscape Architecture, [rrigation Design � � "� � �'�� Project �i�e� 1.9 Miles ' Project CosC: $50 Million � � ., , � �. • , � � • i I � � � � . • � � � � . � � � � � � 1 : 4 3 �� #'`� . n� 'y- k t' �� ' _ �� • 1 ,�� .. y, . ;+' ` t< .;� � , •; 3�.� �'. . � '� ,. ' '''�C��ri�"' � ' ' .:.x, . � t _: ._.., ,.. :... ..,,, .,, : ._. � � ' � �.. , ` � �' �, �..:� w �ri` � , .; ."� ., ,;� t � . � .. .. •• • � : �, r: , - , • -„� . ,, , r, �, � �t , � '% � : � > t� . .. i � �� -; .: � 'x c.rE�e , .�sc � ' f� ,, F ;� y � � -r ,�.�4 �� ' � .�>._ :� � ._.. ' �._...:�'' � � � �, _ ,�:� ,� � , r; ,_ . , . . . r . �.: � - � , w �� `�' Cotkur & Elearing, Ine., in conjunction �vith REG Architects, �vas retained to design and procure development entitlements for the new Administrative Headquar[ers and Einer�ency f}perstions Center (EOC) far Northern Paim Beach County �• ,�„ , w Improvement District (NPB�ID). One of the most significant challenges was to -t accurately establish the remaining devetopment entitlements within the PC,A National s,, DRI ar�d to gain acceptance of the proposed in[ensit�� allocation by the Grow�th �� Management staff. The site design was required to incorporate NPBC[D's esisting -� =m:� administrative offices. ancillary warehouse building and 10(!% native plant materiaL [t ,., «as NPQCID's intent to sell the etisting tacilities to a publ�c or pr�vate secEcrr inferest I in order to tinance the ne�� Administrative Headguarters and slate�f-the-art � Emergency Operati�ns Center (EOC). The E(� buitding is intended to be a disaste� stant tacilitX fbr district employees to monitor the functian of the drainage district ltt�uuring times of eritical eoncern. Codeur & Hearing �vas direeted to lead the tear� tl�rough the zoning entitlement proc;ess because of their ektensive experience in wor{cin �g with the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Cotleur & Hearing developed a unique � landscape program to compliment the art-deco archi[ectural design. The 100% native �;,� 4 landscape plan is cottsistent with the districf s empha5is on ecology and . 3: enviro�,r�nta) preservatian. ,� � .+ ; � Clien�: Northern Palm Beach County Improvement �,;> , District Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Florida � �.�'" Project Type: Municipal Servic�es Provided: Land Planning, Zoning Entitlement, ' Lan�tscape Architecture, Site Planning, t� � y� ' Irrigation Design, Project Representation ',,,�": � . Pro'e I Size: � 26,000 Sq. Ft. /$250 Million , , Comp�letion Date: 2008 X � ♦ . ' �•.• • •• . � � . � � • _ Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. was retained by Ward Waldman Real ' Estate to assist in securing a site specific CRALLS desi�nation for the praposed �illage Green Center in , t�V�l��ton. As a part of this effort, Ward Waldman Real Esiat� committed to work with the Village of Wellington, Villa�e of Royal Palm Beach and Palm Beach County to "jump start" the State Road ? Corridor Master Plan. Cotleur 8z Hearing's planning staff was engaged to perform the inventory of the existing Land Use and Zoning and to develop a GIS data base for the corridor. Cotleur & � , � . _ , _ . , , , , _ . . Hearing's research became the backbone for analyzing the future traffic and land-use allocations for the State Road 7 Corridor. �, � Client: Ward Waldman Real Estate Location: Wellington, Florida Project Type: Corridor Master Plan � Services Provided: Planning, GIS Services Proje�t Size: 5 Mile Corridor • . • • -. . Com�Ietion Date: 2010 ` k y*: ;� �:: � v:: ,� � `" � ,« , � '� �.: . . . �..-. _ �� _ �„� : . �, - � r <^'' x' � x3 ,,..: . q,'_ ' I �� ,,... ��; � . � 3 {�' µ ��. � � .. .. ,. , T ' ' i �a:.. �'Zb �- _ .. � . � r i Y�;, "::f... � 5,,, �. . . . �5�e, i'�":;�f,. *�.. �. , i � .,r.= :i '' s •, ��". ' g �. d ' , �: ,�,, ; r .' 'a` � rr' � � r { . . � • i �� w; �Y��..� ,,. , ..� 4 '. �� ,. e' , .... _, . _ � . „ � � . c . - . j • . � . f , . ��' . . P � . � r .�,..� , .� � �. �..�;. � �. � ifli ` . E .. i .. ,y.��` '" � �` -°"-� ` � - � by the p•�s a k , � �� rsu�tat�O i�y �'�:� ��►c. `� � ,� f the fa�` �; ,� ,.x , �`J � ..� y . �- � '' He ' s' rin�+ �ro�id fl �� a �s �O d �: 4 � Cot�eu� eYape�� ately 4, ��, �� 512 � c , !w'"- , i gUnbe � aPp'�ox GaUn �' s '. Coun . the o`r �er��g ts��'t�+R�`� qe ° ��+�ert v�'�t �t�� p�a� 4tf � - � �� r� in � � � �cth ��' �s F�ilsm c � ��ar��'� �, an �� use� , C�,tte� �o �� o� �° , 1an '" t ��, e d b. - co � s �� `l e° � ��,a �� m� t�Q�e �or tha e ` . �;, :�; �se� �o�� M�� n 1�� "`� � wet �d �� a� ��ct. ��' �, up� a harn� t�s tt ;:. �on� ec ��t 1� � b .��2e!� �� ' ' �� t� �� eY�G �� :,F f ` �", } .�� ,i`��' �, . s}00 � ��, pC ��esl 'i�� Su� Cna�an R � '' � y ; �� i � om �� j,'` � �; ,. ;� ` a � n tia � , � � y: � C��en�: �es� �,ocat� ��xea � � QCO je�t T �� Zon�n� �enta� P �„- �: � En4�� 5e , 'C, e: 2 p1� �iz ,� _ � nFai�� . _., na • ` , I . � . . I I � I � • . I I . I � � � � t � .+`�� s "� '. ;; , -; 7 ... �:a� f.v-"d.°`.. � �. ��ffn'�� a�„� `~} ^i . ;�;��'. .:. .f � 1; � y� :�vr� s'" �, � • ♦ �* � .«��.�- :k , -� ■ � � Cotleur & Hearing was retained by the Village of Royal Palm Beach to `t develop a Landscape Master Plan for the Village's Municipal Camplex , a� �� located at the intersection of Okeechobee Boulevard and Royal Palm � Beach Boulevard. Cotleur & Hearing was also responsible for developing ' t a hardscape improvement plan to foster greater resident utilization of this � tremendous asset. Hardscape improvements include a pedestrian plaza, ` ��,�, w�ich spatially connects the Council Chambers with the administration b�tifding, sidewalks, and walking trails including a boardwalk along the � � e�isting lake, Th� overall design theme was intended to maintain the �� n�Itural pazk-like setting while creating greater continuity between di�ferent uses on the site. Cotleur & Hearing's scope of work included �� pr"�ocessing the required zoning approvals for the revised municipal � , � � campus. �� Client: Village of Royal Palm B�;ach Lpcation: Royal Palm Beach, Florida �-`' � Project Type: Municipal lnstitution � � ;� Services Zoning Entitlement, Landscape Architecture '� Provided: Hardscape/ [rrigation Design � ' P�oject Size: 3Q Acres � Pi!�ojectCost: �1.4Million Completion Date: 2004 . '=%; � • ' I � I I . ■ / . - _`�:. f,r `�, r •: �.<�-:a ��. . ,�, � 4 t� :: .: West Palm Beach Fire Statian #4 Cotle�Mr & Hearing, Inc. was selected along with Currie, Sowards and Aguila Architects to develop the design of the redevelopment of Fire Station #4 located within the City Centre of dawntown West Palm Beach. �- The subject site is located at a key intersection of Parker and Park Street a, 1 �� j� �j�� ; adjacent to the Armory Art Center. The site is of particular impartance because it sits on the boundary of the City's historic Flamingo Park Resid�rttiaf Di�'i�i. The praject team worked closely with the City of West �'altn Bea,ch to develop consensus with the Flamingo Park Residents' Assoc�ation as to the site design and architectural style for the buildin�. Speciat emphasis was given to creating a landmark building that would providie architectural diversity to the Distriet and en�age the intersection of Aark and Parker. Cotleur & Hearin� worked with the design team to - incorp�rate several specimen Seagrap+e trees into the overal} landscape . , .�_ . , desig�. Cotleur & Hearing's lead d�sign sta€f �varked with the project team to ineorpvrate energy, conservati�n principals ta enable the building to become LEE D�? eertifiable, consistent with the objectives of the City. Client: Currie, Sowards and Aguila Architects and ' the City of West Palm Beach � Location: West Pa(m Beach, Florida Projeet Type: Public and Institutional ��_ .� �, _ Serviees Provided: Zoning Entit(ement and Landscape Architecture Project Size: Approximately Three Acres Cam�letion Date: December 2009 - � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • • • � � � � • � • � � � � � � � � � � 1 � , _________.___— . Public/Private Development Advisors • • • North South Atlantic Beach eroward County Daytona Beach Cape Coral • Fort Walton eeach Coconut Grove � � Hurlbult Field Coral Gables Jacksonville Dade County � Jacksonville Beach Dania � Melbourne Davie Panama City Deerfield Beach Pensacola Fort lauderdale St. Augustine Fort Myers Tallahassee Hallandale � � Hollywood • Central Homestead Bradenton Jupiter � Clearwater Key West Gainesville Lee County � � Kissimmee Miami � La Belle Miami Beach lakeland Naples Leesburg North Fort Myers � Orlando Punta Gorda Oviedo West Palm Beach Plant City � � St. Cloud St. Petersburg � Sarasota � Tampa Titusville ,A+� r Italics = more than 2 types of BBP LLC Development Services boldface + italics = more than 4 types o/BBP LLC Development Services boldface = more than 6 types of BBP LL C Development Services 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � , ; ; � — , Public/Private Development Advisors � � �• . � �• •�� • �. . . . � , A special focus of BBP LLC's predevelopment feasibility services includes , ¢ development impact assessments. These assessments have included both short- �;; � term and long-term studies which often include presentations as both oral , t o �� s,, � testimony and a written report. We have performed our development impact � � � , , �; �� analyses primarily at the request of public sector groups as part of their land use ,, ��S �,r'� ° or master planning review processes. At times, private sector parties applying , : j.; n �� ,�� . f o r d e v e l op m e n t app r o v a l s a l s o re t a i n B B P L L C t o pr ep ar e these analyses as part , '�,�;�� of negotiations on rezonings and other development approvals. Y $��. �r�:�il�i , Our economic impact assessments consider both the direct and induced economic efforts of development such as material purchases, employment , �' _„�' generation and spending by the new work force. Our analyses describe these , �� factors both for a proposed development's construction and permanent operation phases. , `� �� + �� +��` We are often tasked to evaluate the fiscal costs and benefits of development � �� • _ r �� programs and public policies. BBP LLCs fiscal impact evaluations generally , �� _�,� include: evaluating and projecting development by land use type; estimating net new employment; population and households; and translating the development , and demographic projections into fiscal costs and revenues. Fiscal impacts are , quantified in terms of capital and operating costs of providing services and facilities. Capital and operating revenues created from development (enhanced , .._. , property values, tax revenues, jobs and payroll spin-off revenues, secondary �� development, etc.) are also assessed. BBP LLC's fiscal impact evaluations � r..�:�� , ,,,.,, conform to federal, state and local evaluation methodology procedures and , � ..._.M ; "'—" requirements. ,.� __ m —. ' _, ��. ; ...._. , m- '�%--� BBP LLC's in-house transportation division also handles one of the most �." .� , M controversial topics considered during project development review -- traffic - .._._ �, impact. Often working in concert with traffic and transportation engineering , °�' ��"� firms, our economists prepare aspects of traffic impact reports that accompany . �\ �' � development applications or reviews. Our analyses often consider existing traffic �� - conditions and proposed site characteristics, followed by an identification of . � future conditions with and without development. .`.: `� " ,` :'.. � . . �, � , �� --•�' We also measure social impact by assessing the population generated by the , proposed development as well as the needs of that population. We use this information to identify the demands imposed by these parties on an array of , , general and specialized social services. , "'�` ': '" i -�-�° f Aberdeen, MD, HEAT Center. Conducted an economic fiscal and financial , T�� : ^ �;�� evaluation for a mixed-use development project funded by the Maryland , _ �.. ; , I i •� �, �, ,i Transportation Authority called the HEAT Center, Higher Education and Training , � � �i ` ,a� T �� Facility, which is a mixed-use office industrial park in Harford County; a major ; �. �� '�� .`�-��. �:� °.i_�I."� portion ofthe site was sold and developed by Battelle Research. � , 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com . . , r � � / / � � � � � , , Public/Private Development Advisors � , Alpena, MI and Canada: International Ferry Service Study: Completed a ^:'""` � market analysis and development impact evaluation of a proposed passenger { "'°°^ , and vehicle ferry service between Alpena, Michigan, and the Ports of '"' , Tobermory and South Baymouth on Lake Huron in Canada. � Annapolis, MD: Pork Place: Provided market evaluations and an economic � „.� � and fiscal impact analysis for the private developer of this major mixed-use „�� ..,'� � project, the largest in downtown Annapolis, that includes two Class "A" five- - m � � . . .. .. . ._. .. .. � , story office buildings, retail arcades softened by curved stone archways, ` -- landscaped and pedestrian-friendly plazas, a four-star full-service hotel, a , performing arts center, and a concierge condominium complex. , Baltimore, MD: NFL Stadium: Prepared a series of economic evaluations for , the Maryland Stadium Authority, which included the economic impact of , recreation and entertainment facilities that would generate new business to � ', Maryland and specific economic fiscal evaluations of new �;�" , w �'� , conference/convention facilities. '�; . �-r-� � � �`a�. � �.,,�,� � w"�e�.`�.^•�a,.�`� ,'` .�. , Broome County, NY: Brownfield Opportunity Assessment: Commissioned by 4 �'�� , the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to identify _�• . _...._..,. priority sites for brownfield redevelopment including conducting a >?- "` , socioeconomic and fiscal impact evaluation to quantify the socioeconomic �' � i p ' ��.,, , impact of (re)development in terms of new jobs created, impact on local . labor force, payrolls, construction expenditures, consumer expenditures, , neighborhood spin-off development, and economic multiplier impacts. , Carlisle, PA: Land Use and Development Study: Completed a highest and best , use study in downtown Carlisle for reuse into a mixed-use project containing hotel, group meeting, retail and parking uses; led to construction of a 100- �� , room Quality Inn on the property. ��";. � .. �- � i"r E -''�: , Cincinnati, OH: Light Roil Benefit Cost Analysis: Conducted a benefit cost • +w•- -�, , evaluation of various alternative transit investments in the I-71 Corridor in � " !� �'� -�; � � '< ;. , , -: , the greater Cincinnati area. � r '__ '� ' � - . Clayton, NY: Waterfront Reuse Project: Focusing on reuses of the Frink `� America property located on the St. Lawrence Seaway. , , Cleveland, OH: Development Plons: Performed numerous economic, market, financial and fiscal impact analyses for a variety of communities in the , Cleveland area including a determination of the 20-year development � potential along a 1.9-mile corridor in Midtown. �� " � • M ♦ i W f n � y � � _ . Cleveland, OH: University Circle Area: Provided retail and residential market `.,,;�,�" YRN � , strategies and an economic impact evaluation to the University Circle Shaping u► � the Future visioning process; this district is the cultural, medical and � educational center of Cleveland with institutions such as Severance Hall, The '' �"��` ` � • Cleveland Museum of Art Natural History Museum, Cleveland Institute of Art, ��"'" . Cleveland Clinic Foundation and is anchored by Case Western Reserve ;; „_. �- .. , University and University Ho4pitals _._____—___ ____.� _____.— r 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , , , , � / � � , ; ; � .� , Public/Private Development Advisors � • , �: - _,: ��"•�� Decatur, AL: Proposed Mixed-Use Development: Conducted a fiscal tax impact , �' f � analysis on a proposed hotel conference center and performed several _ ',�'�'' �•: • ; , __;_ �-�; further fiscal impact analyses on the effects of trading city-operated �■ �� : _..�..,�,,, amenities, such as a local golf course, in exchange for reduced capital , � __.: , improvement requirements and hotel property taxes. � 1 ` "' =_►.� , '� ' a� Denver, CO: FosTracks TOD Economic Impact Study: Conducted a system- , .. , -� -- *s''°= wide and station specific Transit-0riented Development (TOD) economic and financial analysis related to the City's FasTracks initiative, a$4.76 regional , � infrastructure investment that wiil fund the expansion of six rail lines in 10 , yea rs. . Durham, NC: West Village Expansion Analysis: Conducted an economic and , � fiscal impact analysis to determine the potential tax revenue as a direct and �ii indirect result of the completion of the West Village Expansion project, which , � includes the conversion of approximately 1M SF of vacant warehouse space ,� (old Liggett & Myers tobacco buildings) in historic downtown Durham into a , '� � mixed-use development with loft style apartments, Class A office/lab space, , ( � artist space and commercial/retail space. � ',.,� � , � '�, '� �,.� ��;:��;, East Rutherford, NJ: Meadowlands Xanadu Project Litigotion: Prepared an � � ��q � economic impact study for a law firm representing the developer of a 4.8M , �� SF entertainment, sports, retail, office and hotel space at Meadowlands + �`�' f I' �' Xanadu near Giants Stadium outside New York City. 1 � `. � � , � I �� ;�, Fredericksburg, VA: Kolohari Resorts Study: Evaluated a proposed tax _.' , , � ! �� incentive package in order to facilitate the construction of a$250 million, , ; '�� 700-room condo/hotel and attached indoor waterpark. , .•� •�� 1� , �� * Frostburg, MD: Prichord Form Residential Moster Plon Project: Conducted an -�� `:' economic and fiscal impact evaluation of a planned 420-unit residential , development on a 140-acre site that would include single-family homes, townhouses, condominiums and low-income apartments. Quantified the , economic and fiscal impact of the development during the construction , period and during annual operations at build out for each phase of the project and for the project as a whole. , ;~ ' ` ----•---=` Harrisburg, PA: Proposed Federal Courthouse: Prepared a fiscal and economic , '- -� impact analysis of a new courthouse complex to be constructed by GSA in , downtown area. � h. � , �•�°• � Hartford, CT: Benefit Cost Evaluation: Completed an economic and fiscal � -' evaluation of various transit investment alternatives in the greater Hartford , � area, focusing on the Griffin Road Corridor using the REMI (Regional , Econometric Model Index) to measure the benefits and cost of various transit alternatives. , , 1 , 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , , , , � / � r � ��, , Public/Private Development Advisors � , Houston, TX: Metropolitan Transportation Plan: Conducted an analysis of , regional land use/transportation investments which represent potential regional policies that encourage more efficient development patterns , including the development and evaluation of several alternative land , use/transportation scenarios based on economic, environmental and community costs and benefits. � �� 1 � �; � Kent, OH: Kent Central Gateway Study: Addressed the economic ��"�" ' �a� �� , development linkages between Kent State University and the regional transit ��„�,,, p , system focusing on a multimodal transit center. � ,. , Montgomery County, MD: North Bethesda People Mover: Examined the land , use, development and fiscal impacts related to the proposed North Bethesda People Mover. � , ..�; � , e; � � �� Norfolk, VA: Tidewater Rapid Tronsit Economic Impoct: Evaluated the y ` �' � �� , economic and development impacts of a light rail transit system constructed , �, - � -.`::* from downtown Norfolk to Virginia Beach. � �� '� r ' y , �i � �,.•,� , Oak Ridge, TN: City-Owned Porcel: Performed a highest and best-use study of �.,"� ��'� a 700-acre parcel of land and conducted a fiscal impact analysis to determine , , the effect of several development aiternatives for the study site. - - - n ,�� ,. , Odenton/Fort Meade, MD: MD 175 Planning Study: Analyzed potential , socioeconomic impacts of alternative transportation improvements to the , Maryland 175 Corridor which was projected to add employees and �.,. �'�' households rapidly as a result of BRAC. Employment and household growth +�,-,:. � , was expected to stimulate development including the proposed Odenton ': .,� Town Center. � , s;: � ,W ., Owings Milis, MD: Metro Center MasterPlan: Assisted the Maryland �,,, ? �' r , Department of Transportation in prepanng a development master plan for '� �. �--- , the Owings Mills Metro Station in suburban Baltimore County for phasing and � ��a1 »-'� .„_, . . _ .. implementing up to 4.5M SF of development over a 20-year time period. "`� '" , ` , Plainsboro, NJ: Hospital Construction Impacts: Completed a fiscal and ��`" , � economic impact analysis of the construction of an extension of the a �`'° �`� '�' � / _ � �� ` � �� Princeton Healthcare System and associated developments proposed to be A �' � . ;.. built in the downtown area. _�� : a � �� , _. , Prince George's County, MD: Addison Road to Bowie Corridor Project: Conducted an Alternative Analysis for the Addison Road Corridor which , followed federal alternatives analysis policies and procedures. Work ��,. `�` ' � )r � � � � � . concentrated on determining the economic development impacts, joint '�`°°--.,� .,,�. ��v ' �i .,rl�- , development potential and innovative financing and funding alternatives for j •�� -�,•. �"... , proposed transportation improvements. � ��p�� . �� f �l �� t� :� , . , Prince William County, VA: Potomoc River Drive Economic Impact °'-^ �s '�' . ., ta�.s' � :. , Assessment: Conducted a land use and economic impact evaluation of a � s s �.- proposed $17M road and bikeway improvement. ---� — , �� , 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , , ' , � / � / , � ; , __ � / Public/Private Development Advisors � , �� Rockland County, NY: Proposed Shopping Mall: Prepared a fiscal impact , ��'�'�= analysis for a private developer to be used in discussions with County and ��•��.�.. �.. � �:-t�... , *�* �� .� Town officials for a proposed 875,000 SF shopping mall named Palisades ��r ;�,�. ��=-� '.:::� � Center located between the New York State Throughway and New York � '�� ., � Route 59. � R �� , � `��` Sandy, UT: Economic and Fiscal Impact Evoluation: Completed an economic , 7�!""� ,,,;�`�R •: •. .,,. ,- :. andfiscal impact evaluation of a major multiple-phase mixed-use project planned in the North RDA area of this rapidly-growing city; Proscenium , Project will total 2.3M SF of office, retail and residential space, as well as two , hotels, a high-tech data center and non-profit spaces (theaters and schools). , '+� Silver Spring, MD: Downtown Development Projeds: Prepared multiple ,,�i�;{ economic and fiscal evaluations of development proposals in Silver Spring, , , which included economic evaluations of alternative office developments and , ' �� R ��p� the net benefit that would be generated by County investment in "seating' ♦.,,, �. ' ::1;. major new office development; the County was successful in having the , '"" '"" �^��"w'�� "'* Discovery Channel locate their new headquarters in downtown Silver Spring; �� "�� "' '��1. ]` subsequently conducted detailed economic and fiscal impact evaluations of 1 '��'� �,��;''�s+� �I retail, entertainment and mixed-use development options for Montgomery , County and the Silver Spring Urban Development District; also conducted economic evaluations of a multimodal center including major joint , development at the Silver Spring Metro Station resulting in a$65M , multimodal center being developed. ,�� .. � .� ' r �r� Spotsyivania County, VA: Finonciol Modeling ond Instructional Services: Developed a user-friendly financial model capable of evaluating the impact of , County recommended proffers on proposed development. The model , �;� �,,, � accommodates a range of development types, timeframes, and basic �'�� financial assumptions and shows the user the retum on investment for , p ,� �� _� proposed development before and after the inclusion of proffers. , �, ---�""'�� Virginia Beach, VA: Economic Development Plon Strategy Updote: Key , � � � ' � _. - � ,��„_ �,,; �� demographic, economic, and market trends identified and analyzed over the '�' - _ a � .s_... _ _ course of the study are presented in the final report, followed by an action � agenda to achieve the City's economic development goals. Issues addressed , include job creation standards, identification of focused industry targets, , _:; �.` opportunities for minorities and women, workforce development, and . ,% retention of the existing military. . �.��.r , � k � °.� ^'� � • � �r„r ;`�� Washington, DC: Downtown Development District: Completed a market, , ! sti �' �.� i `" economic and fiscal impact analysis for the Washington, DC Office of � �� ' � t N., Planning to determine the aggregate fiscal benefits by land use type, � �.. �4 including real property tax, personal property tax, franchise tax, parking sales , : �` �` tax, individual income tax and general sales tax; utilized by the District of "' �'-' # Columbia Zoning Commission to formulate and select preferred development � *` �. � � - r ,� ��- plans, incentives and policies for downtown. � � � 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , , , , � / � � , ; ; � _.�_�.._. / Public/Private Development Advisors � � ' � � f ", w Washington, DC: Gallery Place: Conducted fiscal and economic impact , ,:,, � analysis for this major downtown retail and entertainment complex to aid the � °� �, _'� ;;� developer in selection by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit , �"y,,�� ,;,.�� .�� ^" Authority; served as the basis for a$60M tax-increment financing on the air -� ��'' rights above this $150M retail entertainment office complex. � �� • � 21 ��` �.. . �, y , y t- �� "�� -� t Washington, DC: IDI Hotel Evoluation: Undertook an economic and fiscal W�• impact evaluation of constructing a 1,000-room convention center hotel in 1 � downtown Washington adjacent to the new convention center; served as a , '��-�` basis for a financing and funding program that included both private sector financing, private placement syndication and tax-increment financing. ' Washington, DC: WMATA Grosvenor Station Analysis: Undertook a complete , �, O �� o'� development feasibility analysis for the Washington Metropolitan Area , Transportation Authority (WMATA) to assess the market, financial and fiscal , FN �"�,;, �,� Q �',� '�`� impacts of a major mixed-use retail, office and residential complex at the c '`�. �'.� � ��' ,� � system's Grosvenor Station in suburban Bethesda, Maryland. , vA o/ '� e �� '° ''4� +e '�',<� f .� Washington, DC: City Visto Financial Analysis: Conducted a financial analysis ' of City Vista, a public/private partnership between the District of Columbia � �� and Lowe Enterprises consisting of a$220M mixed-use development of residential and retail space. 1 � 0 5 � a'� �+ Winchester, VA: Proposed GSA Building: Completed a fiscal and economic , F ��,� F ,� r �,• impact analysis of a proposed federal GSA building to be constructed along I- , .,� 81 with Shenandoah Valley. , , � � , � � 1 ' 1 � � , � , , 111 Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com , , � , � � � � � � � • Understanding � b Approach / � � � � � � � � � � � � � / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � -�. �raject �n�erst�nc�ing ar�d' , . +4 ».� �.. f . ,»� ,- �� , � � . _ • • �,:. - . "'� -'� . . . .. � . . . � � �,,. i ` � . _ rvw a � ...e:' -,. � �.t"""yy. -.- � .. - ` . � 4. Proiect Understandinq and Approach: Identify an understanding of the scope of the services . requested by the Village and the approach to providing those services. List any additional services . that the proposer is willing to provide and costs associated with services. � At Cotleur & Hearing, we pride ourselves on developing relationships with communities where we have . intimate knowledge. As a local firm, we have developed a reputation for being thorough, professional, knowledgeable and skilled at our trades. The annexation discussions in the Village of Tequesta are � common questions that many municipalities wrestle with on a yearly basis. Having watched, listened and . attended several meetings with Village staff, we believe that Cotleur & Hearing is most familiar with and knowledgeable about the annexation issues currently being discussed. Many of our staff either live within, � next to or previously lived within the Village of Tequesta. We are very familiar with the various . neighborhoods and community leaders that will be impacted, affected or involved in an annexation . decision as proposed in the RFP. � Local Knowledge: Our team is very capable of evaluating the various annexation properties or . neighborhoods adjacent to the Village, including Bermuda Terrace, Anchorage Point, and N. Plantation. Our historic and intimate knowledge of the Village allows us to fully understand the past and to help the � Village focus on the future. We have a solid understanding of area public services and close relationships • with those involved. � The approach for annexation: • 1. Neighborhood evaluation: Every neighborhood being considered for annexation needs to be � evaluated by the team in terms of the overall service needs, their anticipated service level required � and their existing and proposed infrastructure needs. Initial evaluation material will be provided to • the Village Council for their suggested list of desired neighborhood and/or commercial property annexations. � a. Engineering — the existing infrastructure will be examined to determine the overall state � and condition. The cost of any necessary improvements to the existing infrastructure will be • important to understand. In addition, it is important to find out what the future costs will be of any improvements and maintenance. � b. Neighborhood Values — the existing property values and tax costs associated with the • annexation properties is important to understand. Our team will help to evaluate these elements and to best determine what impacts will be in place. � c. Market analysis and Public Policy — the team will evaluate the social and physical � elements of the neighborhood and help to develop a strategy for the residents and the • Village Council to determine the pros and cons of each annexation. The analysis will include spreadsheets of cost benefit factors. � � � � Cotleur & • • Hearing • • � � � � � � • 2. Neighborhood outreach: Each selected neighborhood will need an outreach program that includes neighborhood meetings and some door-to-door meetings. The pros and � cons of annexation will need to be discussed and a methodical and positive course of � action will need to be presented. The annexation program cannot be forced upon the • neighborhood and certain concession requests may need to be presented. Printed media should be developed that can be left with the residents detailing the various pros � and cons of each proposed annexation. One of the often overlooked elements in any • annexation is the impact on the existing residents. Care should be taken when discussing any concession so that existing residents do not perceive an inordinate � burden. If an annexation property is a commercial property, then the approach will be � slightly different, realizing that meetings will need to be held with the property owner and then consideration of the impacts to the Village will be necessary. Our approach would � be to use a SWOT analysis where the strength's, weaknesses, opportunities and threats � of each annexation are examined. Our team's understanding of municipal services, their • impacts, the local history and geography, along with demonstrated experience in public policy analysis allows for a solid understanding and review of any annexation request. � • 3. Village Council Deliberation/Action: The Village Council and staff will need to have a • series of public workshops and meetings prior to any annexation taking place. These meetings will require that enough preliminary information and neighborhood participation � took place, ensuring a stronger opportunity for success. The team will also coordinate • with the Village's Legal Counsel and with Administration throughout the annexation process. Our approach is to provide guidance, review, public participation and � assistance every step of the way. Our desire is to help make sure that the guess work is • taken out of the annexation questions prior to a decision being made by the Village Council. � � Additional Services: As a full service firm and as a team, we are ready to assist the Village with a myriad of services � depending upon the situation. Our team is able to effectively evaluate all the elements of any � municipal question. With experienced former public officials, we can provide some of the most • experienced and proactive approaches desired by the Village. Our rate sheets are attached for your review, however, a more specific contract can be developed depending upon the desired � need and approach. � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • • = Hearing • • Z: * '�ry'� # * � .4� �� : � £ - � _ 1 , '� ,S� - +'�ti � � "'�� _ � .;i. - .. • . . � a � . . . .. _ '. � . � . Y " �� ..� �, �.. ��► � MA�RT�I�N� C4U�NTY ,� � t _� ;� .,�. � ._ ; , . , � . _ . i .. y . ;. � t ' � . ,. , .x .-, , . ' • , ` � �- �' JUPITER w.�. ;: � �.�. � � , ,. �,,,, . � , � r :' CRESTA ;`� �,. � . . � . s ., �w '�' RIVERSIDE °�:� s, , .._ � A � •g F � �- � � � ; ; ., ,x _. ° . .. ; � , � �-� �'� ' Oi4KS °' :; NORTH,RIVER �' -�. ` � '�� ;� : . ,z. . ' ` � �,. N� ��„ �� ` PL�ANTA ON � WATER DEPT. . �, _ � � �� ..nr ' .�,°b .� . . � �.� ,� ,� �.; :. , . � � � � ,. a�a� ', ..:= �:� ' �'kr .. �- � ` JUPlT�Rb ' � ; �� s �� 3 TEQUESTA = . TEQUESTA . HEIGH S�� , � � �_��,�� : �,� �, .; "�` PINES �' ` COUNTRY CLUB � ' �.� � � �' � � : to t� _ ,� ,, -„�' �'.�`'' � � ,� , , , ,� � � � x � �� , ... 4 a� � •r �' , __ : r ' '°• - .. - . �.,�Y.�n. P. R ;�, � :� - - � ; CY ESS a�; � - . . ,.z ,� ., .� n �-« -� . � -,�--� ;�� - � �, � ''_ a _ �` .� � y . .? � �.� T. ..-.� 4 a a ' •.� � � �� .. .. RIDGE • , ° ;� �� . . _ : , . . � . „, �� - _. . . �,� ,�, :_ r . . �,- _. _: ��..{ ,::, RIVERSIDE - - � �,�, ,�. , � BERMUDA� °� ` PINES' � _ , ` � ..�TERRACE � , _ � . .�` .. a - �, ; _ ,ri �. : . ti . ' . w � — POLIC� DEPT. }' . �' ; . . '',�_�£ . . .. . '�`� � � s .� � ��;� FIRE DEPT. �,*. �� _ � � � -�• �� , ;: � __ � , . - � �'�� $ ,t.. .. � .. WA�ERWAY ` .. � � . _ p - _ " �'t� '��-� JUPITER�IN THE PINES r VI�LAGE� �� '�. . � . . z - . - �,.: . _ ,.� .�: - - - _ _ . �� - , «. � .� . � _� �`�- �'- . � . ._ .. 7 ,. '� -�' `� .s�.�r � . �.; � ,.. .. .. - � , � 1 � �` ,. � � t '� y � �� .t � y . ��. �. _ f ,i � � �� ' • • ♦ c r �e� .. . ' r - . _ _ *At�� y E s s . . 4. � . �� , • � , � �-�J U�P�:I T E�R, � ,� �&, . . . 4 -. . � ^ � . � , ,, � . : � , ., � ,,,,, � -� �• �a T - - ._, . , , � � .�. �! � y , �r p . , ♦�r . . . - y -�' . . : � � � � :, {F ,�-, ,'� ;� � � - * k . � . `� , . X .} , „ , . ;� . � , � ' � # � • ��Y}�� t � S � _��- �� a -$ I � 'W ( t� � * ;i�ll _ �;. , . w .. � � � � y � „. a ..,. . _ � k , � �; :. � � ,,•; ANCHORAGE� _;-� �. „ � � �, ; .- � � , � . ..t � . ,. � . � :. � �, �° . � � r .v :. � . ; ` �., , .. w : ,= , g . , a� . ,n .. . Y . . � r . , .j � ...,. � POINT . �-.. � . �-. . . . .. . -- .�. I � {+ - , ,_. _ _ . . * , i :, _� . ��: -� � � � �, � � � �:. � , . .a _ ; .. .. , _ . . e ,., . � ,'�. - '� 'PALM BEACH_COUNT:Y '` �'` ° - " .� . � a .. � . .. : ; .; - UNINCOFtPORATED� ' '#�� :;,,. ::: .:��, °� _�_. . �� . �j` � � � �:g: ,.• �� , ' _ u . '� ` � � s _ ' - l'► , . � , . �, .�� a � . . .<... . . *;�i r: �.�I► �s�. �:'. � Iq ' Y"4. " �t�"w .a` A- , it 1 ��_� . F . � . t � §� • - � . .. , i. � ' . � t { < . . . _ �. _ . w _ . �.. .. . .' s ' i a � F � e� � ,�,x . �. � :P ,... ¢ �,. • ��. '�° ., � _• s .. � .... ' s s . r � + • ' �.. �y.., � � -.. � ' . . � . i .e a � .:. a: � _ . � � . d t : .'� . � ..tr. - � .. .: - w t°" l .:$� � v • ' I, . J. ' �ds .. . * _. . ��• . . _ { � _ _ . .. . e : . .. - ,. ....y..:� .. _. _ a s.i . � . � ' - i � � _ E .�. ��.. t - , � � • •��., , k _ a�'ro� _ . . ,_ , ; - , . �-; _ " .: .. . . 1 aq. �� .... . - .. . � _ . �, .i� �� r "� , d #�a. LO . p , ,. , .,.. � �� .� ; _ , . . .. ...,exi, � , .,� o� , .� . .a ` .�= e-'� . ` • t^= � p ,• `�` , > �_ »_; ,�' �- - ;� �� , ,, i-_ �. � .,�:. y � �� - +,� • �� r : '� .s.. � ... ,. a,... . .-`a �--.. � " i � Y a q , sa � . � � 1F '� �_ � -- S' . _. . _ _ �,:., . -, . .-.� .... - , _ _ . F: . . �: �,... , �:.: '�„ . _ r ,. , . ,� �'� - - _ � � _ . r a. . . � � CO NY . '; ,, �' t ' .. � t >� � � � ,� .w ., e .� A . , . � . - �_ _� � f � n � s � ' ' -� . � ' , ... . '4� ` � ' � �. � > .� . ` "' . ��N�� ,� . . . .. � - �,. - `�� - �. .,.� ., <.� e .. -, .. . � ^ . ; i.-.T K' II Y.1 � � • I � � �. �! � � . � . �:: {: � F . � I � .� � . x * ' e .� � . • .' ` e . q . 4-a.v f!F H� 9 _ I � . I _ _ ' .` " `' �'�� •�•." �..' a;'w ' ,:...a, . :_-.. :�. ��q ,�. . .. y. "_� ..� " . .•" . . � , ..,, . . � --�, / ,. � . ; . t . I - ,� � . . . .. . �, �� ,. . . , . < . ,. , ..� , � '.�, . . , �.;;- .;_: .; c 3 - m • �t - , .� . �- I � , . .,. . . . b�,. � ., . F . � �° �; : s �, - '�� F , _ , t �� . p� . . - _ ..,. � .� . ... '.�` , • . . ., �s .. * ,�,.� � ; _!r. .es t .. _ ,� � � .. , . , � ,. t _, � .. , ,, .. : � ,e , „ , , -, � ., :;: � � .� . . _ . � , ti . � � . L .' 3,� . . ..•.- . . .. . � ; . � ,�� . � . >�� .r s _ . .. . :. . -� , .. - " . - ' '�- . . . _ �. � � �- . . . � �... �'i . e�.� � r � � r e . _ � � .�� .�� . 1 y .. . . ; . �' . : ' . � � ,. • . � . ,� �b" } T 6 � � ' . . i �." . t ,-� ��- f � �� ". '�' , ��' � I4� ��;r . .. ., . s ., t � � ar =i. � • � � ...:. .#�s: ' !!' ' � 3� .� . � � � . `� '��s � Ili ..M - � o �`&..-p^. �` c � .°' �. g " ` �* ��f x _ 1 '.e i •. �I[ a ° • . � * i • � r-', r, � •_d 1 � � .� :a r ,d�'c°��^''� ,�,�•..�. .�� .�V 1'� '" - �� 4 :� � � , �, a.�. '•`' � r` " �, " "4m �t.. ' . �,,.... °, � a z�'3y�,, , A - �u� - �• $ . .... ,: �: � ,�_; r .v.�=,.«�° �° �s+�r � �.y 1��;; �+'t -,� � . . >"a� �t _ �.. �. _ _ . _ � � � : R ..,, � . .. _� _ � .. . � .-_., @ 'dP ..,�,. ;., � `. t ,,� � ` �� e ��R . �' �a . . - . . �!. . �.- � • .� R ° •- a • •' . , . -�:, ° �� 't � .. � Y •.., . . , �.. *� � �- g � � , �• l :r d ' , • , , ' _ _ < � .� ; � , : , , a - . , ,� . ., � �'`� .. � . Y - � ;t , y? • � > ""� � � ,. ,.E r� -- y. ., Y r � , . � � ? �. r. ��. `_� .�"�"f . .M � � - . • � . �• � , . • .. , , . . • . . �. . .- " .: �wt .� . � , " . t 'v a�,+ s r>,� � ,. � . � C�e nte r St t . �, . � , . . . Ce nte r �St ,.� , .; .t . ,� �� •w � �� }� : ; , � . x < • ..,. t } . � . .�.� ... .- . � _ �` . { ` � �Y ` n s �: r �. . f. . �r9. �f �♦ .�.:__ _ iE � � �. , � : �• .�-��. L. /q e � � � � o .' . � � . .�•.� ) < . ?' !� .E -l�. s' - �. . � � — — _ f —� � � � ' � � � � r � , Personnel / � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • � � . � �`' ` �..�.. �� ` � .'`"` ;�� r�a � . � ,��' � �"�'. �� #'` � . < .... , . � ,� �'', �, • � ��.. ,.� , ,�_.- � ~� � � ` y � .,.�;,�.�;. • �� • � �, � _ .�,� . � • "�•'`�n�,`•�';.� :t�.�..- . � � 5. a) The names and positions of each professional to be assigned to this contract � , including familiarity with projects of a similar nature. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , � ' � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • • � Hearing • • � � � �`� � aC.otleur& _ � � � � iearing � . � � • . . . Y]is:AT�:�' y "� . x... � °,E • .� € � . • � � ••-� • �� t '" � � _ � _ � � i�� , �`;, ;i,' � � �° ��" � � �,� � � �, • TOD MOWERY � DON HEARING -_ BRIAN CHEGUIS JAMES HACKETT �x :� PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL SENIOR PLANNER SENIOR PLANNER � i �� :„ .. s�P�. .. � � �. � y � "4 . �..s . ., - .. , •�_ � ...`� `�� '{ , ., o � .�{. +i ". � 4 � � �` <' � �sj"y� g; 'A ; � $-�� . •",. `�,.. �� &.lT( ��' # �� r .��, GRAPHICS �� '"��€� y � * < �� ,� �� "' � LINDSAY PERRY ?q,�, . N k N �i . «. "- : , � . . � n ,� �. .. :: . fi ° 3 .� „<. . ,-. ... < e � ... � , . .�y,. .... .::.: r. , ,. �a . .� �. . , .. . e , a a _ . � .� .. . v � � :.�. . � � o� �>� , , . . . _ . . 4 d ♦. . , � .. , . ' . r J'� � .. _ t� l ., , .. � ' �� ' �" r �� '� �� .. . > , . . , , ,: � ., ,� � . . � '� . � ' ,#� , < ::, ,� • � � . . . _ � , a ��.c ,, . � . � �'�. . ' " �� ,, �� R ' ' � i w ty1R, S JF -. w a � '... . •�� ••� � ��•' V . • } � - x� tl �� J � � � h �= � , . �. � �- �, � � * � ,,..� .;,, x.�P< k • � � �� ' � .... � . " N . � � � #" � �. . ., � . . a „ • . �. � ,Y ' . .. g . . . . .. - -., , _.. . � � ::ri.. ' . . ... .. . .. "?iqp . . ,,: ,.,«.,�. ' � �. • �, . • � ... . . � � . . .: . � . ` • :' �s � •� � . . ' � . . .,,ii � y ' . � � � i • � PARRISH 8� , , � k � ` � �� > �. � . EDWARDS INC. � � � ; CLARK & MCCART �`` '�� p y • �- - .:• : . � . 561 -$4$-Z r J22 '� ENGINEERS P.A HY �.�, a+ � ° . � '� ` 561-689-9500 443-261-1828 "�` .' °° � . ,�v�.- , „�.� , �' �°� � , � , . �► � _ „ .. .. �%� N . � �� .� � �,'+�,�, � � ,. :.� $ . �� • � � � 9 *'a..'K .,,. . � '�_. • .. � � s � '� s ,,, y JOHN KENNETH . DAN CLARK, P.E. � RALPH BASILE . �� . PARRISH � � � . �� PRINCIPAL �` f PRINCIPAL � -� ��;,�,,� �� ",� �` � MAI SRA � " � � �,, . � �� . - Y � , , �� v .�� _ . � _ _ 5 _ �_ �, �T . r w „ F e � _ �� .. � �" - ��,�9. � � . ; • .�.. � �. �' _ , il , �.°�_� , i � ,a _ �. ,�- - � � �� , �K� �� BRIG EDWARDS � � TOM MCCARTHY a � �� * � � . ° BRIAN DOWLING �, �. } ��*� � �� MAI, PRINCIPAL � �, � � P.E., PRINCIPAL �� SENIOR ASSOC. �` ��: � � . � � �� ; . �� . � � � � , . �r � � - �� ,� '� - rrw� r ��" v: .E � � „�. �r (Ir►�� „ � � �,?�, ,� ,� �, , - r ., . � .. � �� _ • ,� . �' , � � ,. 1 � - .. � ` „� ��. � .. 4 : � ��i.,.�'11'Y � ` , . � � -� ,� �°�� "'�"� � � . � � � -. � � �� • �`�a° xArr` "�::' ° _ . • .�� -. , �,,. . e . . • ` : +a�.�qwn- ' ��-, � • �' � � �y � _ � � . . ,�. _ .a�. . � - . ., • � `� �Y � �Estimated Amount of � � �� . . � �nvolvement - � • �.,�� - . • r _ �` • _ i�; TM • . � =�ercentage - - � �_ _.��.�-: �_� � • .M ' ��.r•• r ~..�"��-.$8,:� �.. � � • O� � Cotleur & Hearing� Inc. Time � Don Hearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 � Tod Mowery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 � Brian Cheguis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 • James Hackett . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Lindsay Perry ................... 30 � � � � �C'�� rt� ,� .M��'a r��h � �'� ^ � � c�� Y.�. pA. • Dan Clark ...................... 15 � Tom McCarthy .................. 15 � � � � Parrish & Edwards, Inc. • • Brig Edwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 � � � BBP & Associates, LLC • � Ralph Basile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 • Brian Dowling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 � � � � � � • Cotleur & • Hearing • • • � � , _.� . . . � .e; . �_ �. � .� � a � . F �` � ' _` � . � � _ ��; � � ;' � �-- s � � �` - . � . ~ � 4 . e �._.; � d a. . � m..� r� . � +c �� . ��bu . . ' • �� * � • � ~ , ,. , � h�� • . ' \ . .� • .... . ' l . • ". ,. • . �fii • � 5. c) Willingness and ability to complete the project within the time and budget constraints', � considering the firm's /individual's current and projected workload. Identify any conditions • that might restrict your availability to work on the project. � The team assembled by Cotleur & Hearing is readily available for use by the Village Council for any � desire annexation needs. Cotleur & Hearing always meets project timelines and works within the • constraints of any developed budget. As a team, we are able to meet the demands of any annexation project, and there are no restrictions to this project. � � � , � � � � � � � � � � I � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • • � Hearing • • � � �, d) Resumes �": � _ • � ��. e,) Licenses/P�rmits ,� .�£°- : . : • :�'. 3� � � . ��_ • - • _. - � � � • _ . . f • � 5. d) Resumes of academic training and employment in the applicable fields. � • 5. e) Evidence of possession of required licenses or business permits. � � � � � � � ' � � ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • • �` Hearing • • • � Cotleur& • � 1 Iearin� • `._. _ • . E. Hearin�, A.SLA, LEED °AP • �:�• Principal �� • �,, ,,, j� ;'� 28 Years Experience , � '-� :'` - . � � � �'. � �� 1atl dhearing@cotleur-hearing_com '+�'` � �s Commerce Lane Suite ' • ¢ .� � �ter FL 3345° • �°' ,r¢' . � • • Education 1982: University of Florida, Bachelor of Landscape Architecture; graduated with High Honors • 1982: American Society of Landscape Architects Scholastic Merit Award 1982: National Honor Society Scholastic Achiever • 1994: USACOE Hydro Geomorphic Wetland Assessment Methodology Training � Professional Experience Mr. Hearing has twenty-eight years of experience in landscape architecture, land use, and • planning and zoning consultation. Mr. Hearing has been practicing in South Florida since 1982. He . is a partner of the planning and landscape architectural firm of Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. founded with partner, Robertl. Cotleur, Jr., in 1991. � Mr. Hearing has extensive expertise in the area of land use, planning and zoning, and has � represented several of south Florida's largest builders/developers in governmental affairs, land • use and zoning approval matters. Mr. Hearing is routinely involved in land use plan matters, roadway enhancement projects, development approvals and re-zonings, landscape ecology • projects and environmental resource permitting. He has become an enthusiastic leader in the • area of new urbanism, and is responsible for several successful new urbanist projects in Jupiter's Abacoa DRI. Recently, Mr. Hearing was responsible for the planning of New Urban Communities' � Botanica neighborhood, Menin Development's Downtown at the Gardens and the Borland Center � for Community Enrichment in Palm Beach Gardens. • As project manager, Mr. Hearing has been responsible for the design and permitting of Florida Power & Light Company's Everglades Mitigation Bank. The 13,455-acre Everglades Mitigation � Bank is the largest of its kind in the United States. Mr. Hearing is also responsible for coordinating � Mitigation Bank review team (MBRT) activities for South Florida's Water Management District • (SFWMD) and Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation's Loxahatchee Mitigation Bank. • As practicing landscape architects, Mr. Hearing and Mr. Cotleur believe it is essential to have a primary role in the design and project management of all projects of the firm. Mr. Hearing has • been and will continue to be responsible for the management of Cotleur & Hearing's projects • with the Department of Transportation (FDOT) and local governments. In this capacity, he has been responsible for the Turnpike District's Polk Parkway, FDOT District IVs Lake & Lucerne, Lake � Worth Road Roundabout, SR 5& SR 76 in Stuart, and University Drive and the town of Jupiter's SR • S and Indiantown Road Bridge enhancement projects. Mr. Hearing also has experience in providing expert witness testimony in the areas of land use planning, zoning, transportation • enhancement and landscape ecology matters. � Professional Affiliations State of Florida Registered Landscape Architect #LA0000943 � Certified LEED Accredited Professional American Society of Landscape Architects, member � Northern Palm Beach County Chamber of Commerce, Board of Directors and Executive Committee • Lighthouse Center for the Arts, Director • PGA Corridor Association, Director Borland Center for Community Enrichment, Board Member • Palm Beach County Economic Development Council, Board of Directors and Executive Committee Indiantown Road Corridor Association, Board Member � � � � � • Notable Projects Listed below are but a few samples of projects, by category, with reference information: Commercial � Downtown at the Gardens. Palm Beach Gardens, FL — Menin Development; • Reference: Mr. Rob lacoby, 561-282-5000 Midtown-Borland Center. Palm Beach Gardens, FL — Palm Beach Communitv Church • Ram Development; Reference: Mr. Casey Cummings, 561-630-6110 • Bascom Palmer Eve Institute, Palm Beach Gardens. FL — Bascom Palmer Eve Institute; Reference: Ms. Coreen Rodgers, 305-326-6031 • PGA Desien Center. Palm Beach Gardens, FL— Catalfumo Construction & Develoament; • Reference: Mr. Brian French, 561-694-3000 Abacoa Work Place. Abacoa. Jupiter, FL — Rendina Companies; • Reference: Mr. Brian Mock, 561-630-5055 � SeaPlum PUD. Jupiter, FL—Centex Homes; Reference: Mr. Kevin Borkenhagen, VP, 561-536-1032; Ira Waitz, 727-669-7412 • Community Sawfish Bav Park, Jupiter FL — Town of Jupiter; Reference: Mr. Russ Ruskay, 561-746-5134 • Jupiter Farms Fire Station #10. FL: Reference: Ms. Melanie Borkowski, 561-233-0257 • North Countv Governmental Center. Palm Beach Gardens, FL - PBC Facilities & Development: • Reference: Ms. Melanie Borkowski, 561-233-0257 • Community Pro Bono Christ Fellowship, Palm Beach Gardens. FL— Christ Fellowship: � Reference: Pastor Tom Mullins, 561-799-7600 Gardens Shul. Palm Beach Gardens. FL; Reference: Rabbi Dovid Vigler, 561-847-7070 • Villase of Hope. Palm Beach Gardens. FL— Villase of Hope; • Reference: Mr. Charles Bender, 561-775-7195 West Jupiter Communiri Center, Jupiter, FL; Reference: Ms. Mary Hinton, 561-746-5873 • Place of Ho�e. Palm Beach Gardens. FL; Reference: Mr. Charles Bender, 561-775-7195 Alliance for Communitv Enrichment; Reference: Dr. Ray Underwood, 561.904.3114 � • Environmental The Kine's Academv Mitisation Area. West Palm Beach FL —The Kin�'s Academv; • Reference: Mr. Jeff Loveland, 561-686-4244 Everelades Miti¢ation Bank. Biscavne Bav/Turkev Point Nuclear Faciliri. FL — Florida Power and • Li¢ht Comnanv; Reference: Mr. Jack McNeal; Phone: 561-694-4860 • Botanica Wetland Preserve. Jupiter. FL— Northern Palm Beach Counri Improvement District; Reference: Mr. 0'neal Bardin, 561-624-7830 � � • Mixed-Use St. Lucie Citv Center, FL: Reference: Mr. George de Guardiola, 561-691-5858 Abacoa: Dakota. Bermudiana and Botanica. Jupiter, FL— New Urban Communities; • Reference: Mr. Tim Hernandez, 561-279-8706 • Residential Windsor Park & Mallorv Creek. Jupiter, FL— DiVosta & Companv; � Reference: Mr. Rick Covell, 561-222-6669 • Waterwav Villaee. Vero Beach. FL— DiVosta & Companv: Reference: Mr. Rick Covell, 561-222-6669 � Valencia at Abacoa. Jupiter, FL — DiVosta & Companv; Reference: Mr. Rick Covell, 561-222-6669 • Island at Abacoa.luaiter, FL: Reference: Mr. Rick Covell, 561-222-6669 Greenwich. Jupiter, FL — New Urban Communities; Reference: Mr. Tim Hernandez, 561-279-8706 • The Isles. Palm Beach Gardens. Fl — DiVosta & Companv; • Reference: Mr. Charles Hathaway, 561-625-9583 Rialto, Jupiter. FL — Lennar Homes; Reference: Mr. David Baselice, 561-333-4700 � • Transportation Turnnike District's Polk Parkwav, FL; Reference: Bruce Mantell, 954-934-1211 • FDOT District IV's Lake & Lucerne. FL; Reference: Joe Borello, 954-777-4400 Lake Worth Road Roundabout, Lake Worth. FL; Reference: Joe Borello, 954-777-4400 • SR 5& SR 76 in Stuart. FL: Reference: 1oe Borello, 954-777-4400 Universitv Drive. District IV, FL: Reference: Jose Velarde, 954-777-4677 • Town of Juniter's SR 5. FL; Reference: Mr. Doug Koennicke, 561-741-2258 • Town of Jupiter's Indiantown Road Bridse Enhancement, FL; Reference: Mr. Doug Koennicke 561-741-2258 � � � � v �� ;�� '�;� .� STATE OF FLORIDA � _ � ��.��rrs�Trr c�� Bv�z�r�ss �rn �Ra��sszc�x�v REGUL�A'PION ��' $ . � ��i �� '� BD�RD QF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (850) 4$7-1395 • �.y _; � 194Q NQRTH MONR�� STR��T • �n,�p� TAT.,LAHASSEE FL 32399-0783 � � � � HEAR�NG, DONALDSON EDWARD C/O C�TI.�EtTR & HEARING � 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 1 � �TUPITER FL 33458 � � � _ � ,,� � sTn��or�� AC�: ��r �� ongratufations! V1rth this license you become one of the nearly one millioh �- �.��M��-; ��. �� Our�p ofes�s onals a�nd b s� eses a�nge Bom architects to yacht brokers�f o�m � ��`��'�� '��'�� -� � boxers to barbeque restaurants, and they keep Fforida's economy strong; ,' � z��.0��oa��, �/aa�� o�a��a�v ~ � Every day we work fo improve the way we do business in order to serve you better �_- , �" ��"� �� '� For infarmation abaut our services, please log anto www.rnyfloridalicense.cam REGISTER�D L�Ni?SCAP� ARC�ZT��d' � There you can find more in€ormation about our divisions and the regulations thaf "HEA�t�i�Q, A�N,�1Is�}SON �EI7�+TA1� irnpac# you, subscribe to department newsleiters and learn more about the :� "� �. �� - �'' �� : a , may'��q � r = � (`� � � L7epar�ment's initiatives_ ' ¢'E7�i,��F��i� �P�E'�S��L��.L ��l�C?�'S �� r `'` e ��i!��'a i '� � � ° � t � (3ur mission at the Department is: License Efficiently, Regufate Fairly. We �� ' ��, a' ,,„� E� constantiy strive to serve you bstter so fhaE you Can ser�te your customers. ,, �� .� �� Thank �rau ft�r doing business in �Fforida, and congrafufations on your nevv 1[cense! �� , ��, �� y �~� � .. . — . _.� -- W �9L � � � 1�� . � . � � DETACH HERE � ____ � . _...__ _._ �..�� __�, _ _._.__ - � - - - � �� ':�� +,d-�r ` � �Y �. �! �.��f^11�11 at`�¢ � � ; D��?�.RTM�1+F'I' �F BE75�I�TES� A'N'I7 F�C7FES��C3NA� �EGULATION j; � ' � � ; �9�L�. {�1� L1�3+TD�C�iPF �i�,�'�I�EC'I'L�'�tE � � , ; z . _� � ��" � _ F _. ��LQ9��0$(f�.�� - � M .� � - - '�ICENSE I�E�R � . .,. ( ,_ , , .. 5,., i,-. .�._ � .e. : Nn Yk 8 � - e ° ;Q�/`08/�009 O�C�128t?5D LA00��:Q9�3'; ; r� �� T�e ��I3��APE i'�A.RGHITE��' �� `� ;^°,� t� «- `l�'aamed : b�3.aw �S REG�S�'�RED � ` , � � ` ,U�7C�E�' t�1+� �7�`O'ST1�3.C?31S G�� 5��Z` '��,, .�'�u' � : � �1x�c'3.��C�I1 C��:'��'� ��1�" �� Q',.�.� �,'�� __ ; � ,.�.�� *�� .QU1��'�r'��I) _ �'RC?�"�6`SI�}NAI, �ANt�.2QV� ,r�'�"��1�IER � ��'� ' n ,� ��' � y "; � � � � .. �p� �y �,_ . a � � �ZEARIN�, �(3I�A.LI7�t�N - EDT«�F�RD � "`'��;'� � �' � � �/C3 CQTLELTR S� H��,�tTNG � � : ° ��jip�;� � ,�� 1�3� CUI��RC'E �,�i�,�= �'��`E �., � � � �, � "� r� , e�� J°�7k��'�R � �� - �x�:�58 ,� � � � e �� F�r� � �nS; p � °, � � ",� � ` ,. '. CEiAF2.LIE - ��IARLES.�fi �1 �3R�iGC3 ,r, � GQV�R2+�'{3�t, SE�RF�'A1�'� t ; � " p1SPLRY�S�R�QUlI�ED B�' �Al� � �_____._._'� � __ .��_._. �..��.._..�.. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� J � ❑ ��CI - � EE U�L� I� CERT'IF[CATI� I�`TIT�JTE HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT _.. � ; .. s .,_ _.: . _.. . . , ... .. , .... —. ,: N _.. . . , . . . . , , 3 , . ; � . : � -. . , ,_.. _ - .. , :. . _ o n�a � s o n e�a r� n� . HAS ACHIEVED THE DESIGNATION OF L ED° CC E��T'E P��FE�SIO L TM BY DEMONSTRATING THE KNOWLEDGE �P GREEN BUILDING PRACTICE REQiIIRED FOR SLiCCESSFUL IMPLEMINTATION OF THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY �� AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (L�ED GREEN BUILDI�IG AATING SYSTEMT"�. �G�CGf�- � / G • a`� October 2'0, 2008 Chairtnan Date lssu�d 5. Ricl�ard Pedrizzi, Aresident and CLO Primcd on SU^� tum6no 6be�s / SD°.6 past-cnnsumcr fibcrs �ti�di vegctablc bascd inFs. � � � Cotleurt� • I Ie�rin� • . � ,'��. � '" r �rd fi:�" . ,� f p� •_ �. i.. p ;. � L� l� t fi • �� A .�� , • { ` � 3 �� - � � 18 Years Experience �. � ��. � � �a�_s��,� � Fdlail: tmo�i } ��._.�: r �,, ��;ea:� � ...� �4 Commerce Lane Suite 1 462 SW Port St Lucie Boulevard. Swte 113 . � . . . � � c�,�? � Education 1994: University of Tennessee; Master of Science in Planning • 1990: Kent State University; Bachelor of Business Administration, Major in Management • P1'OfeSS1011d1 Exp2�lent2 Mr. Mowery's former experiences as executive director of an economic development non-profit (501 � C3), assistant town manager, village manager, city manager, and private planning and management • consultant have provided him with vast opportunities to experience both public and private sector work from many angles. His professional career has allowed him to work in several different states, � along with an experience with the UN in Geneva, Switzerland and Zambia, Africa (where he served as • a short-term missionary). As a part of his efforts in organizing the Town of Jupiter's bioscience program, a$670 million dollar deal was awarded to lure the largest non-profit bioscience research • institute, the Scripps Research Institute, to North Palm Beach County. � As a strategic member of the Cotleur & Hearing team, Mr. Mowery services several of Florida's largest • builders/developers in governmental affairs, land use and zoning approvals. Mr. Mowery was • responsible for approvals of Corporate Place at Tradition, a new 7 building office campus and VGTI (Vaccine Gene Therapy Institute), a new 100,000 sf bioscience project both in Port St. Lucie's New � Urbanism community, Tradition. He has become a key player in facilitating successful project approvals • for all types of development projects, including the bioscience field. Mr. Mowery generally handles projects from the Jupiter area north, especially as growth continues in Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River • counties. � Professional Affiliations American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Port St. Lucie MAKO Youth Compet. Soccer Coach � ALIM — Inner City Ministries, Board International City County Management • St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce Board Association member International Hispanic Network (Div. of ICMA) • Calhoun County Planning Commission (former Jupiter Teen Challenge —Advisory Board member) Lighthouse Center for the Arts — Protege member • Conference Lecturer for ICMA, MML and MCMA Sawgrass Lakes HOA Board — Vice President • Florida Chapter of American Planning Association & Sturgis Rotary Club —(former member) current Treasure Coast APA Section Chair Swartz Creek Community Theater - numerous • Flint Bishop International Airport, (former Zoning musicals • Appeals Board member) Swartz Creek Kiwanis club—(former V.P.) Homer Lions Club —(former President) Univ. of Tennessee Professional Promise Award � • WO�k HistOfy 2005: Assistant Town Manager, Jupiter FL 1997: City Manager, Swartz Creek MI 2002: City Manager, Sturgis, MI 1995: Village Manager, Homer, MI � 2000: Senior Planner & Local Government 1991: Ex. Dir. Loudon Merchants Association — � Consultant —LSL Planning, Grand Rapids, MI Non-profit 501 C3 Economic Development Org. � Notable Proiects: • Commercial Sea Plum Commercial Center. Juaiter. FL — Monroe Presti�e Group Reference: Ira Waitz and Don Tupper, 727.669.7412 � Mr. Mowery oversaw the implementation and C.O. process for this neo-traditional Publix . shopping/retail center. � � � � � • Cove Shoppin� Center. Martin Countv. FL — Woolbri�ht Development • Reference: Mark Rickards, 561.989.1947 Mr. Mowery was responsible for the site planning and project management for the expansion efforts • of Cove Center which included the expansion of inline retail and Bealls. • Abacoa Town Center. Jupiter. FL — Woolbri�ht Development Reference: Larry Bernick or Mark Rickards, 561.9891240 • Mr. Mowery was responsible for site planning, entitlement and project management services as requested by Woolbright ATC, the owner of Abacoa Town Center. This neo-traditional shopping � center located in Jupiter FL is one of Florida's jewels. • Courtvard bv Marriott. Abacoa Town Center,lupiter, FL — The Finvarb Group Reference: Ronald finvarb, 305.861.3500 � Mr. Mowery was responsible for the entitlement, site plan and landscape plan development of this • 160 room full service hotel within the Abacoa Town Center. The hotel includes new urbanist design criteria of the Abacoa Development of Regional Initiative (DRI). Restaurant and commercial store- • front uses are incorporated into the ground floor to activate the pedestrian sidewalks along Main � Street. Coco Vista Shoppin� Center. Port St. Lucie. FL — Cocovista LLC • Reference: Gearl Gore, 561.746.0980 • Mr. Mowery was responsible for the overseeing the site plan and c.o. process for this 5 building retail center located on the Florida Turnpike and Port St. Lucie Blvd., which is now home to TNT Fitness, • Nutritionsmart, Shindig's Irish Pub, Chevron Gas and others. • Industrial Power Svstems. Jupiter. FL — Derbvshire Mana�ement • Reference: Josh Simon, 561.575.6454 • Mr. Mowery was responsible for the site planning and project management for the 187,992 sq. ft. high-tech building, which will create close to 200 new high wage jobs. Power Systems is the global • leader in designing and manufacturing aftermarket, high-technology components for land-based, • combustion turbines for power plants. This was the first project to go through the Town of Jupiter's expedited review process allowing for complete approvals in approximately two and a half months. � � Jupiter Park of Commerce. Lot 22. Jupiter. FL — Derbvshire Mana�ement • Reference: Josh Simon, 561.575.6454 Mr. Mowery was responsible for the site planning and entitlement process for the 21,000 sq. ft. • industrial building to house Simplex Grinnell's new offices. The project was the 2" project to go � through the Town of Jupiter's expedited review program and received administrative approvals in 1.5 months. , Distriplex Lo�istics Center. St. Lucie Countv. FL - Connectiv • Reference: Dennis Griffin, 248.284.0222 Mr. Mowery is responsible for assisting Distriplex develop their plans for a new 1 million SF logistics , + distribution and office center on Kings Highway in St. Lucie County. Distriplex is a national leader in � the development of logistics centers and they are working through their development plans. • Residential Abacoa Aaartments.lupiter. FL - Crescent Resources • Reference: Richard Buck, 772. 220.4552, Ext. 26 Mr. Mowery was responsible for the oversight of developing the entitlement, site and landscape plan • approvals for this 336 unit multifamily neotraditional development in Abacoa. The process involved amendments to two separate subdistricts of the Abacoa DRI and coordination with Pulte/DiVosta. � Waterwav Villa�e. Vero Beach, FL — Pulte / DiVosta Homes � Reference: Bill Tew, 407.447.9669 Mr. Mowery was responsible for preparing the annual reports for this DRI project located in Indian � River County, along with various assorted entitlement needs on this mixed use residential project. • RO-ED Corp's 300 acre. 2.500 acre and 3.500 acre proqerties, Fellsmere, FL — Ansin Reference: Jim Goggins, 305-795-2617 � Mr. Mowery is responsible for assisting with the annexation, land use and other entitlement aspects • for these properties located in Indian River County. These properties received various land use designations and are scheduled to contain close to 13,000 residential units, industrial and corporate • centers, along with neighborhood commercial centers. � � � � � � � � � � � � • The A�rner�.ca�. I�st�t�.te a� �erti��iec� �'`lar�ner� • � The ProFess�anal lnstitute of t�ie America� Planrfing Assaciation � � hereby qu�.l.i.��es • • • �'a►t� B. 11!j�w�� . � • � �.� a �� wi.th all �i�e berxef�.ts � of a �er�i.��ed Pl.annex and � r�sponsibi��. tQ the � �:I�P Code of Ethics � ancl �'rofessit�nal Canduct. • � Gertified Planner 1'�Ti�mber. �19�89 � � Ja�uary 1�, 200� � � • � ��.-�— ��.- . PR�ID��T E11EGL'=73Y'E 1)LRECTdR . , • • • • • . • • • • . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ►,9 � ❑ ❑��1 ❑�i� ��❑ �� C EE lJ�LD� G CERT'IF�CAT[� � STITl1T'E HEREBY CERTIFIE5 THAT , ' .: - _ , , : . o - � :owe: __ _ _ . . � , . . , � . , , . _ _ .._ . _ . ,_ + HAS ACHIEVED THE DESIGNATION OF . LEE ° ACCRE �TE PR�FESSIO AL 7M � IiY DEMONSTRATING THE I{NOWLEDGE OF GREEN BUILDING PRACTICE REQUIRED TOR SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LfiADER5HIP IN ENERGY �� AND ENVIItONMENTAL DE5IGN (LE�D°�') GREEN BUILDING RATING 5Y57EMTM. �G�GGC� � / G • ��_ Octo6er 25. 2008 Chairman Datc Issued S, RicUard �eclriui, President and CLO Prinred on 5�",n 6ambao 6her5 / 50°b �ns�-consumcr fibcrs n�ith cegeta6le bascd inks. � � � Cotleur& � Hearing � __ _ � � � . � Principal Planner � �, .� 10 Years Professional Experience � �" � . L� ��.� n �"'Otlbul-'�._;lili(�_COrTI . •• :^_.ommerce L ane Suite 1 � � Edueation Current: University of Waterloo Masters of Arts Degree — Urban and Regional Planning, Thesis � pending (Pedestrian Network Connectivity and Residential Neighborhood Design) � 1998: Carleton University, Bachelor of Arts Degree — Urban and Environmental Studies, (High Honors) . 1993: Northern College of Arts and Technology — Architectural Technology three year Diploma . Construction (Highest Honors) � Professional Experience Mr. Cheguis has been the Principal Land Planner with Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. for ten years. He . has worked throughout Palm Beach, Broward, Martin and St. Lucie Counties carrying out government liaison work for clients seeking entitlement approvals for zoning, land use and/or . site planning matters associated with development and urban infill projects. He has conducted . due diligence analyses throughout south Florida for numerous clients assessing the value potential of lands considered for purchase. He is responsible for site-design review and the . coordination of all professional consultants and internal staff needed to effectively expedite . entitlement approvals. He is a seasoned site designer and has provided design guidance for numerous residential, commercial and industrial projects throughout the State. � � Professional Affiliations American Planning Association member ` Board of Directors of the Northwood Renaissance � Palm Beach County Public Art Committee Board member North Palm Beach County Chamber of Commerce member � PGA Boulevard Corridor Association member . � Work History 2001- present: Senior Land Planner; Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. . 2001: Land Planner with Site Concepts, Inc. 2000: Six-month internship (project manager) with Palm Beach County Zoning Department, . Board of Adjustment Section . 1999: Summer internship with the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton � � Notable Projects • CommerCial Gander Mountain. Palm Beach Gardens. FL—Oppidan Inc. Reference: Jay Moore, 952-294-1246 . Mr. Cheguis was responsible for site planning and obtaining zoning entitlements for this 120,000 square foot retail, sporting goods store. This store, located in Palm Beach Gardens, is the i company's flagship store in Florida and the largest built. The project involved the coordination • and relocation of over 350 trees and palms on the site. The site and landscape were designed to meet The U.S. Green Building Council standards and the project is currently pursuing LEED ` certification. Multiple petitions were required as part of the entitlement process to ensure the • final product met the expectations of the client. � � � � � � � . Community South Florida Blood Bank, Miramar, FL— Blood Banks of South Florida Reference: Jeffrey Ornstein, 561-745-2207 . Mr. Cheguis was responsible for the planning approvals obtained for the development of a 21,720 . square foot, blood processing and regional office for the blood bank in Miramar, Florida. All consultant and client coordination was managed by Mr. Cheguis which resulted in an approved . site that is currently under construction. � Industrial Pike Road Industrial Park. Palm Beach Countv. FL— Precise Properties, Inc. . Reference: Robert Blatt, President, 514-369-2006 . Mr. Cheguis was the planning and zoning manager for the development of an industrial warehouse project that totaled approximately 70,000 square feet of warehouse and accessory . office use in Palm Beach County. He assisted the client with obtaining all necessary planning and . zoning entitlements for the project. Mr. Cheguis coordinated all consultants for submittals and public hearing representation work. • Belvedere West Industrial Park (Lots 1 and 51, Palm Beach Countv. FL — McMillen � Development Group . Reference: Douglas McMillen, President, 561333-1111 � Mr. Cheguis was project manager for the development of two warehouse developments totaling over 81,000 square feet across two parcels of land located on a significant Palm Beach County . arterial roadway. The development program was carefully developed between the design team . and the client to ensure the maximum amount of square footage was integrated. . Mixed-Use Parkland Commons. Parkland. FL — Monroe's Prestise Group . Reference: Ira Waitz, Project Manager, 727-669-7412 Mr. Cheguis was project manager for a forty-acre development spread across two sites at the . intersection of University Drive and Trails End in Parkland, FL. The site incorporates a mix of commercial uses that include a 42,000 square foot Publix and up to 48,000 square feet of mix � retail and restaurant uses on the one site, and a mix of banking and pharmacy uses on the second . site. The development program included the incorporation of lakes and public squares on each site. � . Residential Seaplum PUD. Jupiter. FL — Centex Homes Reference: Kevin Borkenhagen, VP, 561-536-1032 � Mr. Cheguis was a member of the development team for a"new urbanist" residential . development known as Seaplum located in the town of Jupiter, Florida. The development incorporated a combination of residential and commercial development interconnected by • pedestrian and vehicular roadways in concert with a natural-greenway system. • PubliC Northern Palm Beach Countv Improvement District (NPBCIDI — Emer�encv � Operations Center (EOC) and Administrative Office Buildin�. Palm Beach Countv. FL . Reference: O'Neil Bardin, District Chief, 561-624-7830 • Mr. Cheguis obtained all the planning and zoning entitlements for Northern's new EOC located within PGA National DRI. He assisted the client with the application and processing and . represented the client at all staff level, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council hearings. The new, 13,366 square foot facility is designed to withstand category five, hurricane-force winds and � will provide necessary pre and post-emergency services for all of northern Palm Beach County. � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & � Hearing � . ._ __._. � � � � ,�,# Land Use Planner � � a ,-� ;.. . . 10 Years Professional Experience � a �'�:: • .. : -i�iau. �Y,ack�lt��c;Ciieur-he��iny.�utit . 934 Commerce lane. Suite 1 j�;��1 �(� „ i� �� ,�� Jupiter, FL 33458 . . . Education 1995: Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, Bachelor of Arts Degree — Business Administration � Professional Experience Mr. Hackett recently joined Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. as a Land Use Planner with a diverse � background which includes both municipal and private sector planning services. Mr. Hackett . has provided clients with project management and team coordination through the many facets � of the development review process, as well as, development review oversight and long range comprehensive planning as a consultant for municipal clients throughout Southeast Florida. . Mr. Hackett has provided invaluable client and team coordination to facilitate the transition through the many levels of governmental approvals throughout Palm Beach County and � Southeast Florida. He has worked on a wide range of projects from residential, commercial, . mixed use, industrial, and Development of Regional Impacts. Additionally, Mr. Hackett has . extensive experience using the most recent Autocadd design programs and has designed numerous large scale commercial developments, neighborhood master plans, and . governmental facilities. � Professional Affiliations Village of Tequesta Planning and Zoning Board member � Licensed Florida Real Estate Sales Associate . Leadership Palm Beach County — Class of 2003 � � Work History 2009 - present: Land Use Planner; Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. . 2005-2008: Senior Land Planner; Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc. 2000-2005: Project Manager; Kilday & Associates, Inc. � � Notable Projects . Commercial Villa�e Green Center, Villa�e of Wellin�ton — Ward Real Estate, LLC Reference: Tricia Ward, 561-805-7660 � Jupiter West Plaza — Precise Propertv • Reference: Trish Nemeth, 561-743-4630 • Community Miramar Rehabilitation Center — Citv of Miramar, FL Villa�e Rehabilitation Center, Town of Ladv Lake. FL � � Reference: Wingate Continental Development Company - Steve Levin, 781-707-9209 • Industrial � Land Yachts. Jupiter. FL — . Reference: Brandy Kraker, Owner, 561-745-0242 Residential Wvndson� Ranch PUD. Palm Beach Countv. FL � Reference: Skip Olmstead, 561-718-0845 � Public Citv of Belle Glade Public Librarv and Civic Center, Palm Beach Countv, FL • � Reference: Miradieu Aubourg, 561-233-0251 � � � � � � � � C:otleur& � -� �.learing � __ ._ . � �,� ��r _ _.� ,-� � � �'�'�' Graphic Designer/Illustrator �� 9 Years Experience � � �► � ; � `°"` � -� '�`:� � ��#�,�,k4`� �,� � � . Education � 2000: Florida Atlantic University; BFA in Graphic Design 1994 - 1997: Rhode Island College; Theatre/Set Design � • 1990 - 1991: Rhode Island School of Design; Summer Art Classes a � � Professional Experience Ms. Perry has nine years experience as a graphic designer/illustrator with five years experience at . Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. During her employment, she collaborates with landscape architects and . planners to develop architectural elevation, site and landscape plan renderings as well as company � marketing/advertising materials. � � Professional Affiliations The lunior League of the Palm Beaches, Graphic Design Sponsor . Young Friends of the Norton Museum of Art member West Palm 100 volunteer group member . United Way of Palm Beach County member � � Work History 2003 - Present: Graphic Designer/Illustrator; Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. . 2000 - 2003: Art Director/Graphic Designer; Universal Land Title 1999: Graphic Design Intern; Green Advertising . • Notable Projects � Commertial Gander Mountain. Palm Beach Gardens. FL — Oppidan. Inc. . Reference: Jay Moore, 952-294-1246 • Ms. Perry was responsible for the site plan and elevation renderings for this 120,000 square foot retail, sporting goods store. This store, located in Palm Beach Gardens, is the company's flagship . store in Florida and the largest built. The project involved the coordination of relocation of over • � 350 trees and palms on the site. The site and landscape were designed to meet The U. S. Green Building Council standards, and the project is currently pursuing LEED certification. • p . Community Villa�e Walk at Lake Nona, Orlando. FL- DiVosta & Company Reference: Mark Evans, Phil Wrobel & Juan Tome • Ms. Perry was responsible for the site plan rendering for this 1,650 dwelling unit community � � located in Orlando, Florida. • Mallorv Creek and Windsor Park,lupiter, FL- DiVosta & Companv � Reference: Phil Wrobel, Juan Tome, Bob lohn • Ms. Perry was responsible for the site plan rendering for this 1,250 dwelling unit community • located in Abacoa, Jupiter, Florida. ! � � � � � � � � • � Waterwav Villase. Vero Beach, Florida - Pulte . Reference: Phil Wrobel, Juan Tome, Bob John . � Ms. Perry was responsible for the site plan rendering for this 707.9 acre, 1,540 dwelling units community located in Vero Beach, Florida. � � . Mixed-Use Midtown, Palm Beach Gardens. FL- Ram Development . Reference: 1on Rosenthal, 561-282-4630 � Ms. Perry was responsibie for the site plan and residential leasing plan renderings of this mixed- • � use retaii/commercial and performing arts development located in Palm Beach Gardens, FL. � � RCA Center Palm Beach Gardens FL Catalfumo Construction & Development . Reference: Jeffrey Marshall, 561-624-9697 � Ms. Perry was responsible for the site plan rendering of this 53 acre site located off of PGA . Boulevard and Alternate A1A in Palm Beach 6ardens, FL. • � Bermudiana, Abacoa, Jupiter. FL — Cotleur & Hearin� Investments • � Reference: Donaldson Hearing, 561-747-6336 . � Ms. Perry was responsible for site plan and elevation renderings as well as development of signage for this 59,500 square foot retail and professional office development. Bermudiana is a . five-acre, commercial project located on the east side of Military Trail at the intersection of . University Drive within the town of Jupiter. . . � • � � � • � � • � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1vlGSvPalv{bSv'L-tiVY-SvY�lv(G-tivl�v(t YVY-yvlaV VIG9vY�VlG�:v(f-�1V2�1VlaS tiv$�1vIGSvY•SVlGXV WyVir tiviG \��1Vv(t tiVitaiVP ��o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o-o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o-o�o�o�c 3 = �,n�,nn�n��nh�nR�nR�nR�,r.n�,n�r.n�nR�,nh-�n�,nR�,n��n�-rnR7n��r.n�,n�-�n�-�n�n �� 0� 0� ��c • �c � � � 1 ��c . ► •- _� � s�r ��C � � — � C �OC �� , � ' t � yo� � .:'• : „ a O h '•,� n � � � � 0� (�- ` =�; � ' �� ./ ' ' h• ��,,� ,r ^ �� ti � �C \OL �� `__� � � � � � a R �OC � �� R i' 1 7 1 � � ti t L- ��C � r R S�Y �GC ��C s < ��C � r �� c ' ' ' ' � �� 1� if- ' • � � � • � � � � • � :/�� • f '�,. yoj � �� • • •. ' • �' � I � � ' � � �. �• � �v/' �� J,' '\' - • • �O�/ �� r!f.1\ i! R til•1/ �� f � � � � • • ' •' • • •• . • � •��• �� LQ� �.� ��C !! R to,/ �G, �.� �-� - . . . . .. . . . . - - . - . - . . � , �O � � � 10` �.� �' ' •- �1 . • '�• • • '�• J�'�� —. f �!I, 1 -• • 11 • . . - � • f � ��R ti0� > c• �•�� 7 `c � Z � ' ' . � • � � . � • � • � � • � • • �'�ir. ��f �.� ��C• >�� ?I R S t. 1 �✓ �,� �� \O�! y o� �• • ��C ro� VO� 5 1 �.� � � yo}� SOJ � �0� � � ` �� Os � ��c ��c s��. ��c ?t� y0f yo'1. � � ' • � • � • � �O �O� �- _ 0 • • �- �•v • ' �� O�- '' � .... � � . . • • yo� i' \ .-'': �u:r,:.�... • • • . • � � �•� � � ' � LOv ''��''� - •,' ,,', � � � �� `' '' �::� °-'°': �.,, �:� e'r:�'':- �O� �_ � ��:�:: ;� � .. . �� f _,�/� il ;��,.. yOr � �'� -'� ��' ��C y F. '••' � ; � „wu ,��i::� . �� sOi � : �;.;, _ �� Y _��_ � �7 � / � � `O✓ • , ,O .... _.___.. , 1 ��- � �J ' ' a / � �� J � '• � /- J � 91 ti �O � ... ��''V��'V'�"l�J�'V�''V��'V� _ , ��O�O�OnO�OnOnO O�O�O�OnO O O�OnOnOnOnOnO�O�O�O�O�OnO O OnO�On � � #�� .� :i.� �.�� • ,� � .,� STATE t)F FLORIDA � :� °� �� . �_-�� ,�� I)�PARTMENT �F BUSINES� AND PROF'ESS20NAL REGUI�ATIQN • �� . �` � B4ARD OF LANDSCAFE ARCH2TECTURE (850) 487-1395 � `.� ��, ,�'� 1940 N�RTH MOI�7R4E STRFET • �.�� TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0783 � � � � GC3TLEUR AEARING INC • 1934 CQMMERCE L.AI+T�, SUTTE 1 JUPZTER FL-3345$ � � i � • . _ � __ _ . ` w57`A"t�CMFfLORIDA ' AC� ��`�� "`� �angrafu1atio�i`s! "Vr1itY�Tt�a"s l��en'se� c��beaame one�r�f�th��rgarl one miffion _ . - � `� � � � ` ` � y �` ��r�r° c��ss ��°�" -_ -Ficiridians licensed by fhe DepartmenC of Business �arr�! Professional Regulation. p�� - �� Our professianals and businesses range from architects #o yacht brotcers, from j C � • boxers ta barbeque restaurants, and they keep �lorida's economy stro�g. ` ° ��CC�tt70239 Q��'OSJ09 �9€?1�2�Q�� * Every day we work to improve the way we do �usiness in order to serve you better �' N �; w � ��, �� r � � ��ot� inforrriation about our services, please log on#o www.myfloridalicense.com ,�-:�'�S�APE��:F�iRCI3ITEGT�- B`US��1�T��£�`� �� " � There you can find more information abQUt qurdivisions and the regulatians that 'CUTI;EVR HEARZNC�",INC a� ° 'rmpact you, subscribe to department newsletters end learn more about the �� ; �eparfinenYs initiatives. � �' ,� � � � � �a �� ti ' ;�� Our mission at the Department is: License Eff(ciently, Regulate Fairly.lNe _ ; ;��"'�"`�" �� " � cor�stantly stri+�e to serve you better so fhaf yo�u �an serve your customers. � �'� � �� ° z� HA5 ��2ST�R�T3 un��r tfig _�,��visaoas �€ c� 4 H�. � � Thank you for daing business in florida, and 'congratulatic�ns� on your new lieense� , � �� _�. �� . _ . — � . _. _ . .�p � �z �'�- �� `� ° - � . . . � . . - _ . . � - .. . - . - - . .. -._ t • � : -- . . - - .. . • - - - - . � .. � � . � � � � � � DETAGH HERE � � � �� . � .�� : ` � ��" ' ��,�� `��TAT� t��"�'t�"t�"t7�i�A �, �� a, �.� �ti � . . -_ . <: '� ��P��'��r�r a� ��s��r�s� .� ��.ai��ssz�r�r�z� R��v��az� } ! B�7A�tT} E}F LP�;N'�?�C.�P� A:RCHITECTUFtE . % , ` _ �� S�Q# ��9t?9{}841��3 ., _. �, r � L�CE��E I+T�3� �- � ��, , t . � , - _. � � ,� . . , �, ; � �- •� � �� . < _ >.. ,�-..� - , � ... d ,, � ._�_. ��u .._. , � _: _ � tl�/t38I2(}0"9 l790�.�.28fl62 ��CQQt��39 �. .` - �>; � - : n�, . ,Th� I,A1�Tf7$C�iP.E: ��2CI�ITEC'�' $VS�N`ESS.: , ��' '- ° „: ' ' ¢ e a. . . �, - � � ,Nct�ned b�lo�a-' RECIST�1�� = � „, .. � s tJnder �he gr�iv�.��.or�� f C�i�,pt�r �81 �'S ' [.. .- � � . ��pa.r�a��.t�� c�a�e �'��Z 3C1f� `�t}�I ('� _�f d �' P � � r� - � � � � _ t � � r� i � I Er'I' ) '»�� ,�. � 0 V� � . �kj� &`' � _ . �� _ ,_ "` ., : ��4�IMi��Y{.� n :, . ,,` d "� ' �. Ct)�'I,��Ft.� .HEA��NG �NC� . d �;� r�� 5 .� �. �_. :-� 1 TT 9 T � T 3 y 4 I��F� r ; 3U��'E � l. ; � : � 4!-L L' 1�. 1 L'iiC � rT. C � x � �' A L'L� .��JU � ( � r � ' 4 . . ., _ . . , " .. _ � r . . , . , - - m. o , ff ' -. - - , .. .- ' .r -- _ i _ �� „ �. o " " , m .. . . _ , �.e - , ... . : �;;, � -. - - , ti •, ,�.v ,>° a r:��: ' �. ,. ' C:�1RL�.E �CRTST �'' CHARLES . W. I'�RP�Gf� � "�+ � �'; �� - ` � �" � � � �� d'��`RN�R ' ; � DlS�LA'Y.A� REQfJ1,R�D"BY LAW' �Fs�RET�R'Y �_ �n�� __ _ � � � � � QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER • � JOHN KENNETH PARRISH, JR., MAI, SRA • STATE CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER #RZ249 � PERSONAL � Born in Winter Haven, Florida. Resident of Treasure Coast Area for 44 years. � Licensed as a Broker with Florida Real Estate Commission #0404285. � • PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS � Member - The Appraisal Institute • MAI Certificate No. 7980 SRA Senior Residential Appraiser � • EDUCATION � Florida Atlantic University: • B.A. Degree in Business Administration, 1982. � PROFESSIONAL COURSES • Society of Real Estate Appraisers Course 102, July 1983 � Society of Real Estate Appraisers Course 201, October 1983 � Society of Real Estate Appraisers Course 202, November 1984 • Society of Real Estate Appraisers Course 101, May 1985 SREA Narrative Demonstration Report, June 1986 � SREA Experience Evaluation completed, February 1987 , American Institute Course #2 - 3, March 1985 American Institute Course #IA - I, March 1986 � American Institute Course #IA - 2, March 1986 � American fnstitute Course #IB - A, September 1986 • American Institute Course #IB - B, September 1986 American Institute Course #2 - I, March 1987 � American Institute Course #2 - 2, July 1987 • AIREA Narrative Demonstration Report, January 1988 American Institute Comprehensive Exam, February 1988 � AIREA Experience Evaluation Completed October 1988 � Appraisal�lnstitute Litigation Valuation Course, March 1991 � � Served as a Special Master to oversee Tax Appeals for � Palm Beach County • Qualified as an Expert Witness, Palm Beach, Martin, Broward and Nassau County Circuit Courts � � � � � � � � � � � � � J. Kenneth Parrish (Cont'd) • SEMINARS ATTENDED (LAST 5 YEARS) � Subdivision Valuation (October 2005) � Florida State Law Course (November 2005) • National USPAP Update Course (December 2005) Appraisal Principles (March 2006) � Real Estate Mortgage and the Law (March 2006) • Neighborhood Analysis (March 2006) Appraising from Blueprints and Specifications (April 2006) � Communicating the Appraisal (February 2007) � Summary Appraisal Report (April 2007) • National USPAP Update Course (March 2007) Sales Comparison Approach (March 2007) � Continuing Education (April 2007) • Analyzing Operating Expenses (April 2007) FL RE Law (February 2007) � The Income Approach (April 2007) � Forecasting Revenue (September 2007) • Supervisor/Trainee Roles and Rules (April 2008) Introduction to Expert Witness Testimony (February 2010) � The Cost Approach (February 2010) • Florida Appraisal Laws and Regulations (February 2010) Ad Valorem Tax Consultation (February 2010) � Florida Supervisor/Trainee Roles and Relations (February 2010) � 7-Hour National USPAP (June 2010) � PROFESSIONAL SERVICE � Candidate Guidance Chairman, SREA Chapter #200, 1989-1990 • Vice President/Admissions Chairman, SREA Chapter #Z00, 1990 President Elect, Appraisal Institute, Palm Beach Chapter, 1991 � President, Appraisal Institute, Palm Beach Chapter, 1992 � Served on Appraisal Institute Experience Review Committee 1989-2000 � TYPES OF VALUATION/CONSULTATION SERVICES PERFORMED � Appraisals Leasehold & Leased Fee • Appraisal Reviews Valuations Condemnation Market Studies � Court Testimony Reproduction/Replacement • � Estate Valuations Cost Estimates � Feasibility Studies Partial Interests � Highest and Best Use Studies � Tax Assessment Appeals/Impact Studies � WORK EXPERIENCE � Partner, appraisal firm of Parrish 8� Edwards, Inc. � July 1985 - Present � Principal Golf Investment Advisors — October, 1998 to June, 2001 � � � � � _ .............. . __.... .._.....:_...: ...._.. _... � �� ac# .��.,� `�.;� �i � �. , r STAT� OF FLORIDA . � � _ . _ . ,_ t fi.,.- .;� . . i_ J' . � � 1� �.e:e.. '(�. "Y' . I 8. Z. ! �Y,�, t, - .F Y � . f '. ,` � _ . . . t ', � - ' E . i�E�AR'�N1EI�2' •E1�'' $US�ld'�� p�D��S�I4NAT� FRE(4ULA�TON, - .�,s ,:. °� r "- "=� ' ' FL9�II�'R�A�,'E�T� A�PR.AISAL $D - ,,�•,:., ., :k � : _, 1 r `rt '� ,s ,; r = j J F � �, _ T - SE.�#L06,�.015Q2439 . �. - _ - ._:�. . - ,� _ . ,.. � ._ r , _- ,-� -•` ` - - - . �ICENS�-NBR , _ ., ., , , _;�!, °.1. Q�i�15 �� '!4 8 ' �'(��B d° ' �'2�� 0 3.�`�� R�2'4 9 ` �` �� : � �i :' � �.,.�! �, �,� , Yf� � * � - I - - f !l4 4 'T�e ER��,��? ;�x�l`T��lgp,L- �APgR�,A1�aE�� . r _ , , � � , ' , , . - , '' ainec� � b��bv��S �, , � - � -` ` , � � ; e4�f. I r,kr � 'e � i '� r i. � ''�rider tH� pr�ivis ons o� Chapt �'S `.. , _ ' . �� i Expiration da�e: NOV 30, 2010 � � c i � �� y , T . . . ; i� i _ ? a;; �,��''� � r�ir`:� ? 1 �J'`.�r�� L'� n, y ' _ ' _ �;.... � � � - . . ' .. . I{y- _ € .- � _ r � . � #r= pa"' � , ' F �Fi 4 f� t _ � . �r: � �;ARR��1�, > J�3HN ;TCENI��#�I �� _ _ - .. JUPITER'��, T 1K,g.�,rEORY°,i pL+V FL�` �'��4 5 8 *� , .�. s t " ` F . , .. ; . } L = , . . . ... , ,�•._.._.._ - ,r,: -_. - ��;':iL rri�a:�' .� +� w,�1:A ':si•.ii 1 ':rY�, .1.v' - =1�-xy -- � y ' - 7�a: :.14' - �iS`FA. -_ F _ ` _- "-? ' '.:�d �— �ati.''. ,� �.''-'!� _ ' - �� ' �a. � C' i i� ��:�1; F�;� '�,:IT"'��;e� `,�!t:�, r1 y � i.+f� �{E ��iY1j• : �(t i i� ljl f .� , +�'1 �t �x. i.C�t� v 7 r � ( � , � T � � �.+ .� � � b � • f - � r � � -•�( �i . r{ W { ' .'• - , - .+. .-- ,� , - ' �!_ �el _ �'�I +� W `�h�4��,,�T .$rr# *� .:� „ _ � y �J�, � F�et 1 +.a r � �� }� ��is ± _W DtCKr7� ..,��4 � ,�4 � �+Fl�� _j :[ �. �_ �1,�. a �� i M,y�r'�f ��¢1r ��1�:� k _�} i � ECR$TARY ,�. � � ,, , �,; � .. EJFSPL�Y-A� �F�E�UIRED BY !AW -. .. - - _ � � � � � � S • ' • • • � • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • � � - � QUALIFICATIONS • BRIAN G. "BRIG" EDWARDS, MAI � STATE CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER #RZ1303 � • PERSONAL Born in Rome, GA. Resident of Palm Beach County, Florida for over 30 years. � � EDUCATION • University of Florida - 1980-1985 B.S. Degree in Chemical Engineering � • University of Texas at Austin - 1987-1989 Master's in Business Administration (MBA) with a concentration in real estate. � � PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Member - The Appraisal Institute, MAI Member No. 10,815 � PROFESSIONAL SERVICE � Served as a Special Master to oversee Tax Appeals for Palm Beach County. • Qualified as an Expert Witness in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. � GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS FOR ASSIGNMENTS COMPLETED � Florida Virginia Pennsylvania • Wisconsin Texas Connecticut � WORK EXPERIENCE � Parrish & Edwards, Inc. - Partner, January, 1997 to Present . Commercial Appraiser, August 1989 to January, 1997 • Golf Investment Advisors, Inc. - Principal, October 1998 to June 2001 � Bailey Controls Company, Houston, TX - Acting District Service Manager 1986-1987 � Service Engineer 1985-1986 � TYPES OF PROPERTY APPRAISED � Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLF) Office Buildings • Apartment Complexes Permanent Easements Community Shopping Centers Residential Projects � Distribution Warehouses Restaurants � Golf Courses R/W Acquisitions • Hotels/Motels � Service Stations Manufacturing Plants Single Family Residences � Marina Special Purpose Properties � Mini-Storage Facilities Vacant Acreage: Commercial & Residential • Multi-Family Up to 4 Units Vacant Lots Neighborhood Shopping Centers Wetlands � � TYPES OF VALUATION/CONSULTATION SERVICES PERFORMED • Appraisals Leasehold & Lease Fee Valuations Condemnations Market Studies � Feasibility Reproduction/Replaeement Cost Estimates � Highest & Best Use Studies � � � � � � PROFESSIONAL COURSES / SEMINARS (LAST FIVE YEARS) � Florida Appraisal Laws and Regulations February 2010 • Feasibility, Market Value, Investment Timing: Option Value January 2010 Cost Approach January 2010 � Florida Supervisor/Trainee Roles and Relationships January 2010 � Income Capitalization January 2010 • Online Analyzing Operating Expenses January 2010 Analysis of Operating Expenses, December 2009 � Analyzing Distressed Real Estate, October 2008 � Business Practice and Ethics, October 2008 • Appraising from Blueprints and Specifications, October 2008 Roles and Rules of Supervisors and Trainees, August 2008 � Using your HP12C Financial Calculator, August 2007 � FL National USPAP, July 2007 • Communicating the Appraisal, July 2007 FL Real Estate Appraisal License Law, July 2007 � FL National USPAP, Oct. 2006 � FL Real Estate Appraisal License Law, Sept. 2006 • Real Estate, Mortgages & Law, Dec. 2005 Analyzing Operating Expenses, Aug. 2005 � Business Practices and Ethics, Aug. 2005 � Feasibility, Market Value, Investment, Mar 2005 • Sales Comparison Approach-General, Feb 2005 Using Your HP-12C Calculator, Feb. 2005 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � STATE OF FLORIDA �� o �•-.,;� �� DEPARTM�NT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION • � Y , • �� FLORIDA REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BD 850-487-1395 1.940 N. MONROE ST. .` TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0783 � � � � • EDWARDS, BRIAN G 3418 WEST MALLORY BOULEVARD . JUPITER FL 33458 �� i • srAre oF F�oRi�a AC# 4 Q 9 2 8 5 7 Congratulatlons! With this license you become one of the nearly one million `=-: D�PA`RTMENT.==OF�;BIISINESS AND • Floridians licensed by the Department of Susir�ess and Professional Regulation. '�;'_-_ �. �.�.p.ROFESSTONAY,-=REQULATION Our proiessionals and businesses range irom architects to yacht brokers, from ___ _- . boxers to barbeque restaurants, and they keep Florida's ecanomy strong. --_��; � Y- _� � 1 ._' . I2Z1303_;�;�� 10/14/08� 088Q93697 E�ery day we work to improve the way we do business in order to serve you better � For informatian about aur services, please log onfo www.myflorldalicense.com. C$RTIF'3ED C#ENBRAL APPRAISER. There yau can �nd more infarmation about our divisions and the regulations that ;�� TsDWARU3, SRIAN Q � _- _� -_ -_ � impact you, subscribe to deparlment newsletters and tearn more about the - - - - • Department's initiatives. -- -_ _- Our mission at fhe Department is: License Efficiently, Regulate Fafrly. We -�- -` � constanlly strive to serve yau better so that you can serve your customers jg. (, under tha proviaiono o!. Ch .475 PS � i'hank you for doing business in Florida, and congratulations on your new llcensel „_ _ _- � --- _ - •- sxpiraciqo•<tieii•�NOY�:30.;; �07.0 =.�081874 01 92 6-= _ - - _ -_ - — -- _ -�' _ • ' - • - - - � • • � � DETACH HERE AC# }� � �' � ( 7 y �( � _ _ � STA�E O�. FLORIDA,�_ _ _ _ _ . �lLt.��,✓ N°#�� ' --- y,_ �. � • I - � ' " - _ " : . - ��"s �,r r � { 'r. �� t- ,h 'n ��` t e - � ;*r .E,�' - �t i �; ys. - � i � � � - s �- _ y . h � � "'� t� ; f`'" - ',DE�AR��IE�T� �� S't�Sf1�TE�. �D P.RO�ESS�TON,AL'REGULATION ' • s�� -�_ ,� #z�F: �;;`� t� '�.; P'=� �'FLOi2IDA�` REA3�;�ES-�ATE�,A$FR�ISAL: BD� - .•, � � � � , -t +F 3 � - SEQ# LOB].01401925 _$•r ` l .•��r �;i� - •� - J�ri t��r,� � t.- �t e, ?� '� .x)� i�' .. ,,,. _ z _ - _ � . . : , : - Tt'ICENSE=�1BR :. ._ : _ ---, � � �� 10::�4�/.2�008 0:880.9.3,b97}..tRZZ`30 = ` ; . • =�Tlie .CERT�ZF�ED GEN�RA'�'�Ai�R.��`3ER ` k '- = � � � .�,�Named'�`below .`IS ' CERTIF,��D �� ` - * ' , � _ _ '' _ Uinder`�the pr':.ov��.sions �of�• Chap�er 475= FS. •_ -_. � Expiration date: NOV 30, 2010 �'v �` { �� - x 'r�- � ,� � � x _ f ;�� -;,j . � .� , � �XsJ � i . � __ - _ _ - - _ _- _ '� -Lf''S'ti�,� !.F w -ttti`� • � � ' y � � i s� y -, } �..L L:'�� 1 i' 7+- i ; ri �r J a r - _1•- . �i - ' ' f • " ' ��''^ r � � �IlWA�S ; � �8`�Al� V _� .. + � - . a , }.. . _ f` _ L _+ ' i , y . ^ � - y _ ` . �s%�,�;�� 3�18.iiWE�'�' 1+�.�i�ORY BOULFUAR�� ` �. i � ._, � r . � � u k - �'- �� - . n� . , �_�;; JUP��STEl�°�� s'tE�s;�r` . �,,. FL 3.3.`F� 5 8, �- , �,�;�, - � ,-� , _ . - : • -�.,F . -.:,,,� _ . . K..` L _� Stij r '>7 �-, �;�• ��'tl�. . - ii ki:� ti..' `°�:y "`) _*s �a,e-%p e;� r ..y:�(i:t�.__ . r1X:: . . . ' _ _ _ _ .. zr.- -!r.�c _ _' _' - _.�. _ - " 'iY': .i ' ' ii.Y.. ' �`'Jt= . . _ ' - - •r. �:'Y- / _ : -`I� - . �: _ .j : .(. 4 :r� -` - �i. . � :.1 ,i- - �i' ti - - - - _ ' :•K ro� - - o ,c:� a :!-. - ' _,�i.. ;-�: '=l= _ _ ' ' Z _ _ _ - `.ti .. - � � _ `.� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ �: `. —.�± ' - ' . _ ' ' ' .. . - - _- i _ y'7 " '�""' _ _ 6. ':i - - :_'��'�,I -i i 4 ��y _' A ± _ ' .`1: - '. �• _ •:l�' `''F ' _ 1.�� r�� _t"•.' - <J , ;i^� .CHARL;IE `�:'CRIST CHARLES` 'i�.�: DFtA O. �ii - ,. `:t,?�:.- ''k:: _.:.� _#,_.. _c . - --- - : p � �k{ � � :lt - ': .;:��' ` GOUERNOR�:� :;.� r� , �_ � s ..., . �c�.SECRE.TARY �r. :�=' _ - � �' �' . . . :. „ a =. x D�SPL��ftS��UIREb��Y LAW ' ---� r- - � . � � � � � F�„ ��9 Request for Taxpayer �rye fa� to �,e • (Rev.Nrnrember2005) Iden#iflca�ion Numher a�d Certification �luester. Do not �aenmen► oi u,e �r�aeury send ta ihe IRS. • IMemal Revenue Serv�� N Name {as sFmwn on your income tex ►etum) • � m • � Buslness name, tf dttterent (rom above o Parrish & Edwards, Ir�c. � � � o � �,��a�v �I � ❑ Partn�shlp ❑ at,� ► . ❑ w �' � `� check app�npriate box sofa proprietw }L9{' ------- ---------- • �� Address (numb�, strest� and apt. or sufle rro.y ►�equest�'s name end adaress (opt�onaq • � n 34Z8 W. Mallory Slvd � ciry, s�ate, ana Zm � Ju�iter, FL 33458 • c " ust accoimt r�+unber(s) here (optloneq • � � • Tax a er ldeMification Number {N � Enter yaur TIN In the appropriete box. The TIN provlded must match the name given on Une 1 to avoid Sxtal Secu�h' "�smb� backup withhofding. Far Individuals, thls is your sodel se�urity r�umber (SSM. However, ior a resldent � allen, sole praprfetor, or dlsregarded entity, see the Part i lnstructions on page 3. For othsr entlUes, k is your employer {derditicadon number {Eli�. Ii you do riat havs a number, see How fo get a TlN on page 3. or � Note. It the accourrt fs in more than one narr�, see the chart an paga 4 tor guidellnes on whose ��°1'� ��O"'"""b�� • number to enter. 5 9 2 5 5 7 7 �J � Certification � Under peneftles of perjury, i certlfy thax • 1. The number shown an this form is my comact taxpayer idendflcadon number (ar I am waiUng for a number to be issued to me), and • 2 I am not subJect to bacicup withhotding becausa (� I am exempt from badcup wtthholding, or (b) I have nat been notlfled by the lntemel Rev�ue Service ({RS) ihat f am subject to backup wNhho3ding as a resutt of a failure to repart all interest or dlvldends, or {c) the fRS has notified me that I am no longer sub)ect to backup wiihholding, and � 3. I em a U.S. person (fn�luding a U.S. res�derrt alian}. • Certificet�an inatructiona. You must cross out ifem 2 above iE you have been riotifled by the IRS that you are curtenUy subJect to backvp withholding hecause you have talled to report all interest and dtvldends on yotu tax retum. For real estate transactions, kem 2 does not appiy. • For mortgage lnterest pald, acquiskion or abandonmerrt of secured property, canceqatl� of debt, contr�ut(ons to an individual retirement arrangetnent QR�y, and generaUy, payments otfier than interest and dtvidands, yau are not required ta sign the CerHflcatlon, but you m�st • provEde your carrect T1Nl. (See the n ans on page 4.� • S�9n s�mre oi � .� c'� H@P9 U.S. perean 1 Date ► + Purpose of For � • An Indfvidual who is a c'rtizen or residant of the United � A person who is required to fife an informatlon retum with the S � t �' IRS, must obtain your aorrect taxpayer identi�callon number � A partnership, corporatfon, company, or association � (TIM ta report for exampls, Income pald to you, real estate created or organized in the United States or under the laws transectlons, mortgage interest you paid, acquisition or of the United States, or • abandonment ot secur�d property, cancellation of debt, or • qny estate (other than a foreign estate) or trust. See conttibutions you made to an IRA. Regulatians sections 3Di.7701-6(a) and 7(a) for additionai � U.S. person. Use Form W-9 only ff you are a U.S. person Informattan, (Includfng a resident alfen), to provide your correct 71N to the 5pecial rulas fiar partne�shtps. Partnerships that conduct a � person requesting it (the requester) and, when appUcable, to: trade or business in the United States are, generally required • 1. Certity that the TIN you are giving Is correct (or you are to pay a withhoiding tax on any foreign partners' share of walting for a number to be issued), income from such business. Fu�ther, i� certa[n cases where a • 2. Certify that you are not subject to backup withhoIding, or Form W-9 has not been received, a partnership is � quired ta 3. Clalm exemption irom backup wifhholding ifi you are a p��me that a partner is a forQign pprson, and pa the U.S. exem t ayae. withhalding tax. Therefore, if you are a U.S, person tt►at is a � p p partner in a partnership canducting a trade or bustness in the In 3 above, if applfcable, you are also certlfying ti�at as a Untted 5tates, provide Form W-9 !o the parine�ship to � U.S. person, your alfocable share of any partnership income ��blish your U.5. status and avo(d withholding an yaur • from a U.S. trade or business is not subject to the share of partnership income. withholding tax on fareign partners' share o# effectively connected income. The person who gives Form W-9 to the partnership for • Note. lf a re uester ives ou a fvrm other than �orm W-9 ta Purposes of estabiishing ris U.S. status and avoiding 4 9 Y withholding on its allocable share of net income from the • request your'fIN, you must use the reyueste�s farm ff ii is p��ershfp conducting a irade or business in the United substentially similar to this Forrn W-9. States is in the foll�wing cases: � For federal tax purposes, you are considered a person if you • The U.S. 4wner of a disregarded entity and not the entily, • are: CaL No. 10237X Fartn {N�9 (Rev, ii-2005� • • • � � � �� e � � _ " `'�} � � ° -Y ' ��',� 3 � � , a��D��,fi � FLORIDA DEP.AR,TMENT OF STATE • Division of Corporations � January 2, 2008 � � JOHNSON, PARRISH & EDWARDS, INC. 4411 BEACON CIRCLE #4 � WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33447 � � � � � Re: Document Number H63993 � The Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of JOHNSON, PARRISH & � EDWARDS, INC. which changed its name to PARRISH & EDWARDS, INC., a Florida • carporation, were filed on December 26, 20�7. � Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please telephone (85fl) 245- • 6050, the Amendment Filing Section. � Cheryl Coulliette • Regulatory Specialist f1 Division of Corporations Letter Number: 708A00000117 � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � P.O. BQX 6327 -Tallahassee, Florida 32314 � � � • Tom McCarthy, P.E. • � � Mr. McCarthy is a Senior Projecf Manager/ Consulfant with more than 50 ��.� ,� � �� years of experience. He has directed civil engineering for some of the most �� „ �� successful public and privafe developments in South Florida. He has a • ��`' history of strong, effective working relationships with key agencies and • municipalities. • r � � �; �� Related Experience :°.\��` � President, Clark 8� McCarthy Engineers, P.A. 2009 - Present • EDUCATION • Seagull Cottage/Royal Poinciana Chapel. Prepared Site/Civil � MS Business Administration Construction Drawings and provided Construction Phase Services • Florida Atlantic University for Restoration and Additions to Seagull Cottage (a landmarked 1984 � building) and Modifications to Royal Poinciana Chapel in the Town • BS Civil Engineering of Palm Beach University of Florida � 1958 president, Tom McCarthy Consulting Engineer, Inc. 1997 - 2009 � • Palm Beach Community College. Provided a variety of civil � engineering services on multiple contracts over six years. � YEARS OF EXPERIENCE . Juno Beach Town Engineer. Supplied municipal engineering Engineering: 40+ years services. � Town of Palm Beach Jonathan's Landin Roadwa Im rovements. Ins ected Mock Roos • g y p p � Tom McCarthy Consulting approximately 5 miles of existing roads, designed improvements • Engineer and refurbishment, and oversaw improvements of the entire road • C/ark & McCarthy Engineers system. * • Lost Tree Village. Prepared an infrastructure evaluation covering REGISTRATIONS existing roads, drainage, water distribution system and sanitary • Professional Engineer, sewer system. Developed a three-year road and drainage � Florida 6998 improvement program for approximately 6 miles of roads. • • Ballantrae Planned Unit Development. Inspected approximately 6 Professional Surveyor/ miles of roads, sidewalks and associated drainage and developed � Mapper, Florida (inactive as a multiyear improvement program. � of Feb. 2003) . The Lawrence Group. Served as site/civil engineer on the Neiman � AFFILIATIONS Marcus Worth Avenue Palm Beach Store, II Lugano and Bellaria National Society of condominiums, and dozens of private residential projects in the � Professional Engineers Town of Palm Beach. � F/orida Engineering Society • SKA Architects. Provided the site/ civil portion of construction ` drawings for approximately 30 private residences, primarily in the • American Society of Civil Town of Palm Beach. Engineers . The Everglades Club. Provided civil engineering services on the • Urban Land /nstitute Golf Course Reconstruction and Storm Water Management � System. � • The Breakers Palm Beach, Inc. Supplied Civil Engineering on site • improvements, including Golf Course Reconstruction, Stormwater � � � � � Tom McCarthy, P.E. � Management System, Entrance Road Reconstruction, � � • Construction of the A-4 Bypass Pumping Station, DEP/SFWMD . Monitoring Programs, etc. � � Mock Roos, Principal, President (8 years), Vice President and Senior . Project Manager, 1971 — 1997. Provided design and project management services for the following projects: � � • Quail Ridge, a 1,000-unit PUD golf course community � • Harbour Ridge Golf and Yacht Club, a 700-unit PUD (DRI) � � • Vista Center, a 600-acre Planned Industrial Park (DRI) � � • Ballantrae Golf and Yacht Club, a 595-unit PUD � • Addison Reserve, an 800-unit PUD golf course community � � • Gateway Boulevard from Military Trail to Congress Avenue � • Linton Boulevard from Jog Road to Legends Way � � � Town of Palm Beach, Town Engineer Consultant, 1978 — 1986 � � Palm Beach County, Assistant County Engineer, 1961 — 1965 � � Gainesville, Florida, Assistant City Engineer, 1958 —1961 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � •••••••••••••••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••••� � � �, � �. Board of Pr�f��i��a� En ineers g Attests t�at Thomas J. McCarthy JR,P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engi��er t�nder Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 28-FEB-11 P. E. Lic. No: Audit No: 228201101680 lliSPLAYAS I�QUI�D BY LA�� 6998 � � � Daniel P. Clark, PE � � , � ', Mr. Clark has more than 26 years of engineering experience specializing in � � � utility and stormwater planning and design, municipal engineering, � �..�t; , .` wastewater planning and design, wastewafer operations, combined sewer � M� overflow, potable wafer conveyance and construction management. � ' - � j Related Experience � ' � ��,� �' ' Vice-President, Clark & McCarthy Engineers, P.A. 2009 - Present � Lost Tree Village Lift Station Evaluation. Review all lift stations . EDUCATION within Lost Tree Village and make recommendations for . LEED GA 2010 improvements. Present data to SUA and defend recommendations. . MS Civil Engineering Portland State University Lost Tree Village Lift Station 4 Replacement. Design, permit and � 1984 manage the construction of a small sewage lift station located next to � BS Civil Engineering the Lost Tree Village Club House (700 gpm, 21 feet deep). . Portland State University . 1983 City Engineer, City of Palm Beach Gardens, A consulting engineer AA Wastewater considered City Staff and having an office at City Hall. Oversaw a staff � Technology Linn-Benton of up to10 employees and various consultants working on all aspects of � Community College 1975 the City's engineering needs including planning, budgeting, design, . construction management, consultant management, liaison with City YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Council Grant application and administration and liaison with other � Engineering: 26 years local and state agencies. . Pacific Power & Light . Preparation of regional drainage master plan, design of Brown and Caldwell im rovements for $5 million canal restoration ro ect, provided � LBFH/Boyle Corporation p p � Clark & McCarthy construction oversight, enlisted 4 separate contractors at once to � Engineers complete work on time, � • Design and construction oversight of $12 million road widening Operations: 4 years � City of Sa/em oR project including property takings, coordination with FDOT, . City of Medford oR Seacoast, FEC Railroad, and Palm Beach County, obtained grant monies, provided early completion incentives, oversight of 2 � REGISTRATIONS contractors to complete work ahead of schedule, . Professional Engineer . Design $5 million swimming pool, gymnasium, and locker room FL 51181 additions (weather hardened facility), provided construction � OR 13638 • WA 26264 management, • Represent City as City Engineer with Seacoast Utility, Palm Beach � AFFILIATIONS County, South Florida Water Management District, Northern Palm • American Society of Beach County Improvement District, Florida Department of Civil Engineers Transportation, and other local, regional and state agencies, • WaterEnvironment Responsible for implementing Council policy as directed by the � Federation City Manager, � • Review of all development projects for land development . American Water Works ,4ssociation regulation compliance (over 450 project reviews per year), . • Review and Assessment of infrastructure conditions and needs for � � � � � Daniel P. Clark, PE � AFFILIATIONS (Cont.) possible annexations, � Florida Engineering . Member of Gardens EOC for water and drainage. . Society . Florida Institute Consulting Engineers Vavrus DRI, As City Engineer — Participated in the preparation of an � Application for Development Approval (ADA) for a Development of . American Consulting Regional Impact (DRI) for a 4700 acre parcel of land (The Vavrus Engineers Council � Ranch). This effort included significant traffic analysis, planning input, Florida Association of and an application for CRALLS with Palm Beach County. Several � Special Districts meetings with State and County officials regarding traffic, economic � development, drainage, water supply, airport noise, and density and � intensity. Participated in intense negotiations with State, County, Local . government teams as well as the property owner and his team. � L-8 GRR and the L-8 Pilot Study Project, Principal In Charge; Boyle � Engineering/LBFH, Inc. - Oversaw the preparation of the L-8 GRR and � the L-8 Pilot Study Project including participation in key decision making . meetings, all public hearings, coordination, and liaison meetings with 4 public agencies involved in the funding and operations of the pilot � project. � . Everglades Construction Program Pump Station, Client Service Manager; Brown and Caldwell - Responsible for design of two 1.9 billion � gpo low head stormwater pump stations (G310, G335) for the South � Florida Water Management District Stormwater Treatment Area No. 2 . and for Stormwater Treatment Area No. 1 W. Engineer of Record for . both stations. Required extensive coordination with South Florida Water Management District Operations staff to insure facilities are compatible � with existing stations. Included engineering services during construction � including, review and comments on Primavera Schedule, coordination of . construction on 2 sites, total construction costs estimated at $66M. � Everglades Construction Program, Client Service Manager; Brown � and Caldwell - Desktop study of alternative treatment technologies. . Responsible for conducting a worldwide search for Everglades Forever Act - Phase 2 treatment technologies that remove phosphorus from � stormwater. Treatments processes and "trains" were identified, budgets � prepared, a report written and presented to staff and the Governing � Board, and various shareholder interest groups. Assisted in the • preparation of several pilot programs to test the most promising new technologies. � � Everglades Construction Program - Stormwater Treatment Area No. . 2, Client Service Manager - Responsible for the design of a 6,500-acre constructed wetland for the removal of phosphorus from agricultural � runoff prior to discharge into the Everglades. � � � � � •••••••••••�•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••� � � � � � � � Board of Prc�f��a� �n ineers g attes�s that Daniel P. Clark ,P.E. Is licensed as a Professionai Engi�eer �nder Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 28-FEB-11 P. E. Lic. No: Audit No: 228201110000 DISPLAYAS REQUIRED B�' LAW 51181 •••••••••••••••••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••� � � � � � (� Board of Professional Engineers Clark and McCarthy Engineers, P.A. Is authorized under the provisions of Section 471.023, Florida Statutes, to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer, duly licensed under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. Expiration 2s � Certificate of Authorization cA No: Audit No: 22820115219 I 28793 DISPLAYAS REQtJIRED BI' LA��T � � � � ; � , � . ; ... � � ��-�� Ralph Basile � Principal � • Education Mr. Basile is a founding Principal and co-owner of BBP & Associates LLC (BBP LLC) of • • Juris Doccor (Law) Annapolis, Maryland, a real estate development advisory firm which assists public and � George Mason University private clients located both here and abroad with their real estate-related needs. He has . • Mascer's in Urban and over 28 years of experience in real estate development and consulting. Coupled with his Regional Planning . Virginia Tech extensive development and business experience, Mr. Basile has a broad educational • Bachelor of Ares in background including degrees in law, city planning and urban economics. . Economics and Political Science • Virginia Tech Mr. Basile has broad experience in such diverse fields as market analysis, development • programming, economic planning, financial feasibility, development packaging, project . funding, project implementation and management. Mr. Basile has been responsible for a Professional Registrations/ • Affiliations variety of development consulting assignments especially during the pre-development and project packaging stages of these endeavors. He has managed hundreds of market . • ULI-Urban Land Institute research efforts and financial feasibility assessments. . • National League of Cities • National Council for Urban . Economic Develop. He has also negotiated dozens of development agreements, procured project financing • National Trust for Historic for large- and small-scale projects, managed local development organizations, � Preservation strategically planned various economic development projects, directed preliminary ` • Nat. Assoc. of Housing & Redevelop Officials design services and completed real estate workouts nationwide. His management and � • Society of American technical expertise has been employed through the conceptualization and development . Military Engineers of both small-scale and major commercial, recreational, industrial and residential real • National Associacion of estate projects carried out solely by private investors and through cooperative business • Installation Developers • Int. City Management arrangements structured between public and private entities. • Associations * • The Privatizacion Council In addition, Mr. Basile has conducted dozens of real estate and economic development- • Int. Assoc. of Corporate � Real Estate Executives related assignments for several federal government clients over the past 30 years. His • • Conservation Foundation experience centers on preparation of analyses supporting asset management decisions • American Bar Association as well as subsequent execution of agreements to transfer real estate assets from the � • American Planning federal government to private entities. To date, total transaction value is nearly $3.4 Association � billion. � � Relevant Selected Projects • • Prudential Insurance, Jacksonville, FL: Negotiated for a 780,000 SF building for Prudential � Life Insurance Company; received TIF funding. • • Southern Bell, Jacksonville, FL: Assisted a local nonprofit development corporation in � securing firm financial commitments to proceed with this I M SF regional headquarters building • for Southern Bell and a 1,400-car public parking garage. � � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � ; ; , � . . �• Downtown Regional Shopping Mall, Lakeland, FL: Retained to assist the City in a downtown revitalization program to support existing uses and attract new investment. A plan • was prepared locally calling for construction of a two-story shopping center in the downtown • area and preliminary interest by a developer was secured. • • Renaissance Vinoy Hotel and Resort, St. Petersburg, FL: Assisted the City to attract a • developer to rehabilitate this landmark waterfront destination closed for 30 years into a 360- room Stouffer Renaissance Hotel, a new 102-room tower and meeting facility; the only luxury • resort on Florida's west coast offering the combination of a private marina, an 18-hole golf • course, a 14-court tennis center and croquet courts, and is central to the area's many cultural and entertainment attractions, including the Salvador Dali Museum, Florida International . Museum, Tropicana Field and two bayside beaches. • • Webb City Site Reuse, St. Petersburg, FL: Assisted the City's Downtown Improvement � Corporation to attract a developer to construct two projects at a former major shopping • facility in downtown St. Petersburg known as Webb City: a neighborhood retail center anchored by a Winn-Dixie supermarket; and, a 60,000 SF headquarters building for a local � construction company. • • Park Plaza/Wall Street Projects, Asheville, NC: Rehabilitation of 21 buildings as part of � two major reuse projects, in different portions of the downtown area which included office, • residential, specialty retail and a small inn. � • Hopewell Business & Industrial Park, Beaver County, PA: Guided public sector efforts • which led to construction of the Hopewell Business Park with 300,000 SF of facilities, including • the headquarters and east coast distribution center for a British firm active in video production, and a company relocated from New Jersey that reconstructs diesel engines. � � • Mall of America, Bloomington, MN: Packaged the Mall of America, the largest US retail- entertainment project with 2.6M SF of retail space (400 stores), I M SF of entertainment • (amusemenu, rides), and parking for I 2,800 vehicles (largest parking facility in North America). • • South Station, Boston, MA: Devised an implementation and packaging approach for joint • development of South Station, a historic train station; assisted the local Transit Authority in � the preparation and distribution of the request for developer qualifications and proposals, and assisted in financial evaluations and negotiations at this facility which has the busiest AMTRAK � station in the US. • • Highest and Best Use Study- Bowman Lot, Carlisle, PA: Guided negotiations which led � to construction of a 105-room all-suites hotel with food/beverage and banquet facilities for up • to 400 people in the historically-preserved downtown area; the property received the 2003 Choice Platinum Hospitality Award in recognition of it's performance. � • • Downtown Development, Chatta�ooga, TN: Provided feasibility assessments and development counseling to City officials which led to the construction of an 80,000-square- � foot industrial trade center and a 350-room Marriott Hotel adjacent to the new downtown • exhibition facility in Chattanooga. � • Palmetto Center, Columbia, SC: Assisted in sensitive negotiations between the developer • and the permanent mortgage lender on Palmetto Center, which led to this major downtown � • I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � : ! , . • : i.r.r • ' project that consists of a 450,000 SF office building, a 305-room Marriott hotel, a continuing education center for the University of South Carolina and banquet and meeting room space. � • • Capital Square, Des Moines, IA: Market feasibility and packaging services for the Capital Square project that culminated in successful negotiations of a development agreement for . 450,000 SF of office space and 60,000 SF of retail and restaurant space for this mixed-use • project built adjacent to a performing arts center. � • Northern Virginia Graduate Center, Falls Church, VA: Guided construction of a • 105,000 SF brick and glass building with a fiber optic backbone and a downlink capability to serve classrooms jointly operated by the University of Virginia and Virginia Tech on city-owned � land next to the West Falls Church Metro Station. • • Old Town Redevelopment, Fort Collins, CO: Rehabilitation of the deteriorated Old � Town area into specialty retail, professional office and entertainment uses. • • Greenville Commons, Greenville, SC: Packaged Greenville Commons, the most physically � and financially integrated development in America which includes a$36M Hyatt Regency Hotel, • o�ce building, public convention center and parking garage financed with private funds, a $5.5M UDAG grant, a$1.9M EDA grant, $10.5M in local public capital funds and $4.5M of � local private capital as equity. � • • Hampton Roads Center, Hampton, VA: Packaged 200-acre first phase of Hampton Roads Centre, a publicly- owned business park located adjacent to the NASA Langley Research • Center, and minutes away from the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (a • federally- and state-funded national atomic research facility). • • Tidewater (Hampton Roads) Success Story, Hampton, VA Performed economic, . market and financial analyses for numerous development projects in the Tidewater region. Noteworthy examples include: the $20-million International Trade Center in the waterfront • area of Norfolk; Hampton Roads Center, a 300-acre publicly owned business park in Hampton; • The 305-room Radisson Hotel Hampton and Visitor Center on the waterfront in Hampton; and the 446-room Sheraton Waterside Hotel in Norfolk. � • • Radisson Riverfront, Hampton, VA: A new $22M Radisson Hotel and Visitors Center on the Hampton River adjacent to the City's downtown area. � • • GMAD Assembly Plant, Hamtramck, MI: Developed a reuse plan for the former 465- acre Dodge Main Assembly Plant in Hamtramck, the largest single industrial building under one � roof in the world, and proposed an economic adjustment strategy for the area in response to • Chrysler's closure of the plant in 1979; assisted with packaging efforts to implement the project and helped secure approximately $200M in public funding for this $735M project � (including a$30M UDAG); the property was conveyed to General Motors and construction • was completed in 1985. � • Industrial Expansion Project, Hopkinsville, KY: Retained to devise an UDAG strategy, • prepare the application and negotiate with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) officials to secure funds for the project; devised a funding strategy which � led to a successful application for UDAG funds that enabled a Michigan-based industry • specializing in the provision of automobile parts to expand its operations and relocate some � � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � ; ; i � . + additional operations to a site in Hopkinsville, during a time period in which the auto industry � faced severe economic difficulties. � + • • Holiday Inn, lowa City, IA: Packaged this 97-room located at I-80 and I st Avenue within three miles of the University of lowa, Proctor and Gamble, a Marriott Conference Center and • the Coral Ridge Mall on Coralville. � • Old Capital Center, lowa City, IA: Prepared workout strategies and negotiated � development agreements transforming a 12-year dormant urban renewal parcel into a 60- • store, 400,000 SF inall near the University of lowa. � • Beachfront North, Long Branch, NJ: Undertook markeddemand potential studies and • financial analyses to determine the feasibility of constructing a residential project in the • Beachfront North redevelopment section. • • Oceanfront-Broadway Redevelopment, Long Branch, NJ: Reviewed multiple • development proposals to provide affordable housing uniu as part of several mixed-use projects containing residential, retail, hotel, o�ce and theaters along the waterfront and in the • downtown area. • • Pier Village, Long Branch, NJ: Guided development of Pier Village, an $87M mixed-use • project with 420 residential units and 100,000 SF of retail. • • Brown Hotel, Louisville, KY: Guided the renovation of the historic 296-room Brown Hotel • and adjoining 54,000 SF of office space, construction of a new 500-car parking structure, • retention of a 1,400-seat theater as a performing aru facility and construction of 50,000 SF of specialty retail, entertainment and food and beverage space around a public plaza known as S Theater Square. • • Crescent Center, Louisville, KY: Assisted a local nonprofit development corporation to � select a residentia) developer which constructed a$60M downtown residential project known • as Crescent Center, which was funded through a combination of private equity, long-term • debt, public funds and a grant from a private foundation. � • Theatre Square Renaissance, Louisville, KY: Assisted in the predevelopment packaging . and implemented of new mixed use development. This included assistance in negotiations with public and private property owners including the City, the Board of Education and special • purpose development corporations. � • Waterfront Mixed-Use Development, New Bern, NC: $22M development program • including 150-unit condo-hotel, 100-slip marina, 400-person banquet hall and 40,000 SF of • specialty retail space. • • Sheraton Waterside Hotel, Norfolk, VA: A Sheraton Hotel next to the World Trade • Center office building and Waterside Festival Marketplace in the downtown area. � • World Trade Center, Norfolk, VA: Negotiated development commitments to undertake • an office/hotel complex on the waterfront known as Towne Pointe; these development activities led to construction of the $135M development known as the Virginia World Trade , Center, a 250,000 SF o�ce building on the waterfront. � � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � : ; , � . • • Town Center Mixed-Use, Novi, M1: Completed mixed-use development planning which led to construction of a new Town Center which a 148-Wyndham Gardens Hotel and a major • regional mall anchored by Hudson, Sears, J.C. Penney and Lord & Taylor. • • Comfort Inn, Oak Ridge, TN: Conducted asset management exercises for the fourth • largest United States shopping center developer which led to development of a new I 10-room • Comfort Inn by Crown American and a revamped regional shopping facility owned by the developer in Oak Ridge. � • • Golf Course/Residential Development, Oak Ridge, TN: Performed a highest and best- use study of a 700-acre parcel of land and conducted a fiscal impact analysis to determine the � effect of several development alternatives for the study site. • • Sprint MXD, Overland Park, KS: Engaged as part of a consulting team in a collaborative � effort to support both Sprint and the City in packaging a mixed-use, entertainment retail • project on 55 acres next to the 14,000 employee Sprint campus in Overland Park; included a . national search/evaluation of qualified development partners. • • Urban Entertainment Center, Overland Park, K5: Prepared a market and financial • feasibility analysis for a retail and entertainment center that addressed spending patterns by residenu, visitors and area employees, as well as regional and local market conditions. A • capture rate analysis was prepared, retail sales projections were forecasted and a potential • development program of over 400,000 SF of space was defined. A developer solicitation process involving property owned by the Sprint Nextel Corporation is underway for a mixed- • use project funded in part through tax increment financing. � • One Reading Genter, Philadelphia, PA: Acted in a fee-development capacity to cause • construction of a major high rise office building that sits atop an underground subway station in � the downtown area, which serves as the national headquarters for ARA Food Services. • • Market House Square, Raleigh, NC: Formulated a funding strategy calling for innovative • uses of local, State and UDAG funds to undertake land acquisition, infrastructure improvemenu and other open space improvements in Market House Square, a downtown . train station adaptive reuse project. • • Marriott Hotel, Richmond, VA: Worked to secure hotel operator commitmenu, after � three unsuccessful negotiations conducted by others, and concluded an operating agreement • with the Marriott Corporation for a 400-room hotel in the downtown area. � • Elderly Housing and Life Care, Tarboro, NC: Packaged the Albarmerle, a life care center • residential facility offering a mix of units to elderly individual with varying health care needs. � • Roebling Market, Trenton, NJ: Guided reuse of a turn-of-the century Roebling steel mill • into a 177,000 SF, $33M urban mixed-use project that includes a 54,000 SF supermarket and • the new 66,000 SF headquarters for the $tate Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency. . • Marriott Hotel, Trenton, NJ: Packaged the new 197- room Trenton Marriott at Lafayette • Yard Hotel, the first new high-quality lodging facility built in 40 years, which is within walking distance to the New Jersey State Capital Complex and various historica) sites. � i � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � ; ; , � • � Brian Dowling, MBA � Senior Associate • • • Brian has over 8 years of financial analysis experience having worked for both an equity Expertise trading firm on Wall Street and a national real estate development firm prior to joining � BBP LLC. His financial expertise enables him to determine the most effective and • • Financial Feasibility Analysis appropriate capital structure for private, public/private, and public development • • Capital Planning projects. He is also skilled in developing complex financial models used to evaluate the • Deal Structuring feasibility and potential return of real estate investment opportunities. � • Redevelopment • Management � Relevant Selected Projects • Education • Mixed-Use Business Park Reuse Strategy, Orlando, FL: Retained to package • • Masters of Business development of a mixed-use business park at the former McCoy Annex property owned by Administration — Finance • The Babcock School the City that is located adjacent to the Orlando International Airport. Assistance included Wake Forest University preparation of developer solicitation documents, evaluation of developer responses and later • • Bachelor of Arts negotiation of development agreements. • Economics & International Studies • Oceanfront-Broadway Redevelopment Program, Long Branch, NJ — As acting � Colby College redevelopment coordinator, Brian is responsible for managing a massive waterfront • cum loude redevelopment initiative encompassing five sectors over 142 acres. His experience includes: • o Financial feasibility (market analysis and project pro-forma creation) o Drafting RFQ/RFP documents � o Critical evaluation of financial components of developer proposals • o Business point negotiation of City-Developer agreements • o Creation of multi-faceted project funding strategies including: TIF, land write-down, tax abatement, affordable housing credits • o Monitoring project progress with frequent client updates � • Center for Innovative Technology Real Estate Advisor, Herndon, VA - BBP LLC is • undertaking real estate development advisory services to provide strategic land valuations for • property located at a future METRO site along the toll road near Dulles International Airport, and to assist in developer negotiations to implement a phased mixed-use project on our • client's land. • • Lorton Reformatory & Penitentiary Redevelopment, Fairfax County, VA —This • ongoing project involves the creative adaptive reuse of a historically significant site. Brian • created complex financial models to evaluate the financial feasibility of redevelopment plans. Analysis included layering of various sources of capital including, TIF funds and historic tax • credits. The analysis allows Fairfax County o�cials review and compare the financial feasibility, • developer return, and public tax and financing implications of each proposal. � • Del Mar Fairgrounds Hotel Feasibility Study, Del Mar, CA — Determined the feasibility • of construction a hotel/condo-hotel at the Del Mar Fairgrounds, including evaluation of a � � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � � � � � ; ; , _..M_�___w._._._._._..�.�.. _.__..____.__�.�.� _.��..�..._.�.._,�_...�._ �.�.�..._..w.__�__�.��.a____. � • • hotel's ability to capitalize on the site's value and allow the Fairgrounds to attract national tradeshow and convention business. Located in affluent Del Mar, the Fairgrounds provided a � unique site offering a rare opportunity to develop a new hotel property on the shores of the • Pacific Ocean. Adding to the value of the site, the Fairgrounds is home to the Del Mar Race Track, one of the premier thoroughbred horse racing venues in the world. The Fairgrounds is � the area's largest events venue, offering a wide variety of indoor and outdoor space for • exhibits, concerts, athletic and equestrian events. • Project Horizon, Charleston, SC — Providing financial pro forma modeling services to test � the feasibility of a 4 M SF urban research mixed-use project being contemplated. Uses include • bio-science research, hotel, o�ce, retail and residential space. � • Technology Park System, Salt Lake County, UT - Retained jointly by the State of Utah • and Salt Lake County to devise a strategy that will lead to a world-class technology park • system. Characteristics of such a technology park system were documented and market analyses were conducted to lay a foundation for study findings. Funding opportunities were • created by the state legislature's USTAR program. Two sites were initially targeted to � accommodate private and public space demand (state university system) due to technology- transfer opportunities. Financial analysis led to endorsements of projects at multiple locations. � • • Initial Assessment, Westbrook, ME - BBP LLC completed an identification of potential sources of retail demand to support government approval and financing commitmenu to • construct a new I million square foot regional mall ouuide of Portland. • • Papago Park Center Analysis, Tempe, AZ: Retained to manage a development • programming effort designed to produce a mix of uses suitable for construction on a suburban • site located east of 56th Street and north of Washington Street near Tempe. We reviewed major development activity in the local economy and determined that a mix of commercial and • residential uses should be built on the site, which was programmed to support the • development of 300 hotel units with conference space, 30,000 square feet of restauranUdining space and 200 residential uniu with additional residential and hotel uniu and approximately � 500,000 square feet of office space developed. • • Pascagoula Riverfront Market Analysis, Pascagoula, MS: As part of a team evaluating � the riverfront, BBP LLC is preparing market analysis of the o�ce, hotel, residential and retail • sectors, financial evaluation of project viability, and developer solicitation. � • NVR — Brian worked in the Acquisitions Group at NVR, a publicly traded (AMEX: NVR) • national real estate development firm. His responsibilities included identifying, researching, and • evaluating properties for redevelopment in the Mid-Atlantic region. He has experience conducting real estate market research, developing detailed redevelopment business plans, • exploring various financing alter�atives, and negotiating acquisition terms with property • owners. � � � � � � � I I I Annapolis Street • Annapolis, MD 21401 • 443.261.1828 • www.bbpallc.com � � � �_ vl�`[�] .�1vL-l'I�IL-`7��]l.\ L� �<-' �r—'�` T G-��'�V'G�l � G-Y[�}1/-S1v1�-7` �7 L � l-�`�it1�L-�lv`G� d- 1�1V1 �'<•y � 1-1 � G ..�.. �.• •. :'..n.� .. . . ...�.. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . ._Q.�.. .. . .. . .. . ..Q.:�.. � .�.:�� ;� �L�l � ,� �n:� � � ��,�� Gl � ldti s sal�l��s--�� . � � � � E� • •� .Y. : �� L o� ��c � � ' � � •�� • = 1 .�: �a� `';7 ' � t � � �c .. �O � � ��.�� ' • ` . -: �.;*" � :•� _ �.;R._ , ��. �0� � '� "�a� � _ a .«. , . � �� S �� '� =�` � �� Os .� , � :�ii i � � O � _ <: � • JJJ�� G /,15 Q f a�SCil av � � s� �� •�c .. �, � . - . . . . . : : - : � • 1 . �_� �� -s .• • •. . � -• • . . • • �O� �� • . • - � • - • . 1 i yo� �� '� � � 0 � �� - �• �- • -� .• • •, f1111/� 1 �O � � � � �y _ �O� � �� • '� .• � •. •. • • • �•G.' � � • � ' � � � � � � :; r S ! G •4� ��c �Q (( � �� . -s .. . s. , . -. . . �e� 3 ,.=�" � �� •�� _ � t�� •S � G � � � 1 � �_� �O� � O � � S • � +� + � •O •� �� •1 • • • • �� S � S �� L �Q �� j � =-r .�: . - . . - .�: �QC . - - . . . . �O� �� - . �� •�j ' , • ,.--. ..._.,. � � � � • � �f .. O �O i ;.�r�-... � � S G , ��. ;,� I Of • C :' '� ' ,:� f .`� y .'• • � :� �� - �r: ��; ��:,e� �C � a . �s j. O :',�� 4 � �7� �� - � �• T. � .� �'`41�. �I f � � "' i'� �.�:�1.� •1 ' ` � O\1 �8� �� °�-�"...N. -. � �� . �� . . - =;..f; f��i :j'�• � � � O' � �"'_ d �J- 1 1 �� ' f • � ��d • 1 � � ''� � _ I �� 't- • � � K • � • G � � � �� Q l �1 �1vL � CY '<=l�l �T� F'! `lU'LSII � 1laV' S1 � IL1�l- d SfVl �lv'L-�SUG$v'l-Y�.! $�Y-5 L � d ��11U'1 `i � C a � 'L-s1V! � � ! v�� / O!- � �- n�aC�lti�C�lK�rn�-fli1-�nyaCil��\��iC�l�.�n� �,S31�1i�C�l��(�_le��-�Llt�.aC�l��(�1:�n�L1i��l�L�l�.r(�lF-��-�n`�C�IR�nC � � � � �r � � �- _, . � .� . . � .� . �. � _ . > ,_� �� , �` �° '� � = ... _ _ � r. _ � .�` � °= �''�` � � . � -:�,�:: , . t � � �`:;. � • . ' �` ��. • ` �a � � -� Y wi . . w -. y ��. ~ . . � � � 5. � Evidence of any previous experience in projects of a similar nature-provide contact names • and phone numbers along with project. � + Please see our reference sheet behind our Required Forms tab for experience related to recent annexation programs. Annexation programs are always unique to each given neighborhood or property � and sometimes a small project can be more challenging than a large annexation project. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • • �� Hearing • • . ��f � � . • �. . � s " 7 `� � ;. � °°` � E �'° p � -� . ._d . __ r _ .� �,� :' � � � �� `ti� � . � - � �, r ~ . �, �� g) Fee Schedule �. - � . Please see our rate sheets for team member hourly rates. Suggested compensation for this project includes the following: � . 1. Initial evaluations: . Property and neighborhood evaluations, including the review of engineering, utility, infrastructure, community services. The neighborhood evaluation will also include a basic � analysis of annexation impacts on property values and tax impacts. Specific SWOT (strength, . weakness, opportunity, threats) analysis will not be performed at this stage. Basic market analysis examining the location of certain public services, the availability of public services and � basic feasibility to provide public services will be addressed. Evaluations will also consider . zoning and land use elements, along with their possible conflicts (setbacks, density, intensity, . lot coverage, signage, etc.) � 2. Village Council Discussions and Annexation Property Determinations: . The initial evaluations will be used by the Council in determining which properties or neighborhoods could be addressed. The evaluation process could entail the Council selecting � one or two initial properties or neighborhoods and then waiting on a later date for other . neighborhoods. � 3. In-depth evaluations: � Following the Council discussions, more in-depth evaluations will be necessary in order to . allow a more thorough analysis of the various municipal services required for each annexation, along with specific engineering analysis of the public infrastructure. Public roadways will need � to be evaluated to determine their life expectancy and expected maintenance costs to the . Village. The engineering analysis will also need to detail the current and future costs of the utilities and any anticipated upgrades or improvements for each annexation area. If desired by � the Village, specific tax and property analysis will be performed for each property to assist with � a true understanding of the implications of an annexation. � 4. Public Neighborhood Reviews and Dialogue: � Each individually selected property will require varying amounts of public participation and . dialogue. The team will develop an annexation brochure that covers the basics of annexation and the anticipated pros/cons of each annexation project. The brochure will show service � levels for police, utilities, roads, etc., and what annexation means. Group meetings and some � one-on-one meetings will be required. Village staff and/or Council will participate in some of . the meetings. � 5. Village Council Workshop and Deliberations: . Publicly posted workshops and meetings will be required with each annexation. It is assumed that the annexation program will be performed over a series of years. � . The suggested fee for steps 1 and 2 is assumed to be just under $20,000 and the fee for steps 3— 5 need to be determined as the number and size of each annexation area is determined. � � Cotleur & � • Hearing � � � � � � � � � � Hourly Rate Schedule � � � • COTLEUR 8� HEARING, INC. Hourly Rate* Village of Tequesta Rate � Principal $150 $125 � Client Service Manager/Project Manager $125 $110 . Sr. Planner $ 95 $85 Graphic Designer $ 75 $65 � . *note — We are providing the Village with a special discounted rate, thus the new rates are shown to the right of our normal hourly rates. � � . Subconsultants' Hourlv Rates � PARRISH 8� EDWARDS, INC. . Principal $200 Staff Appraiser $125 � • CLARK 8� MC CARTHY ENGINEERS P.A. � Principal $125 � CADD Tech $ 60 � � BBP LLC � Principal $230 � Sr. Associate $155 � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & � � Hearing � � 1 � � � � � , Reporting / Capabilities / / / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � - � . f;`° � '� t f ` 1� ,. �,� ?... � o�' d � � . � �: �' *" ` ,��° . V "��'.�y`° � °'i�-�„ . . . ... �� - �..�.:- ' �. . �F k^ . . .. . . .. ..r�� . � • . .�• • � ��{� �� ,: y�� ",. Y.-e'; ', k ' ; �,^°�,;�.�, • 6. Reporting Capabilities: Provide samples of report analysis or report production. Identify � through a narrative discussion of your experience preparing strategic plans and with annexation � issues. � � Included as a separate attachment is a recent report analysis for the City of Fellsmere on a 2,592 acre � comprehensive plan analysis prepared in conjunction with an annexation. This report was one of three . separate reports prepared for this intersection, where we had an additional 300 acre annexation and a 3,500 acre annexation. Cotleur & Hearing was the lead on this project and everything was fully � coordinated with the City of Fellsmere and the property owners. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Cotleur & • � Hearing � • Required Forms � 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � R � u �� Fo �'"s � � r r � � � � �► r r � � • � • � r � � r � - � � � � ..y1 • , . . • ,�' P � � e � h , � � k:.' �.. ��` �— �� . � ,, _�� , ? � � �.. � -r` � � : -^r^ • ``� y • �.'� �g • `� ,,,,° � � � � � " • ,�"'. y —='f ;.; t -�""'". . . � � • 7. Required forms: � -References • -Drug-Free Workplace � � -Public Entity Crimes Form � -Proposer's Certification Form � � � � � � � � r � � � i • • • • • • • • • • � Cotleur & • • � Hearing • • � � � � � , REFERENCES FORM . The Village may contact some of the Proposer's current and former clients, both supplied by the Proposer and independently derived, to request that they validate the qualifications of the � Proposer an� the accuracy of the claims made by the Proposer in its Proposal, and that they � assess the Proposer's ability to perform the types, level and quality of services that the Village , desires. � � Provide at least three (3) references (preferably municipal governments or other governmental , agencies of similar size in Florida) for your company, where your company has provided the i same or similar services within the last two (2) years. � ! Current References: , 1. Name of Firm/A enc : Villa e of Fellsmere � Address: 21 S. C ress Street, Fellsmere, FL 32948 , Contact: Jason Nunemaker Title: Cit Mana er / Telephone: 772-571-0116 / Email: cit mana er cit offellsmere.org , 2. Name of / Firm/A enc : City of Parkland '. Address: 6600 University Drive, Parkland, Florida 33067 �, Contact: Roberta Moore Title: Plannin and Zonin Director /' Telephone: 954-757-4158 ', Email: rmoore cit ofparkland.or r 3. Name of �' Firm/A enc : Palm Beach Count � Address: 2633 Vista Parkwa , West Palm Beach, FL 33411 Contact: John Chesher r Title: Director, Facilities and Develo ment r Telephone: 561-233-0260 ' Email: 'chesher pbc ov.or / / ` � � ` � r � � r � � � / � DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FfJRM � r The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.487 hereby certifies that — , Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. (name of business does does not {circle appropriate response�: � � � 1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, / dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prahibited in the workplace, , and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations af such , prohibition. � . 2. Inform employees about the danger of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's . policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, and any available drug counseling. � , Signat � � Donaldson E. Hearing, ASLA, LEED� AP . PrincipalNice President � � r � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • � � � � � � � � �u��t� ��T�� i�� ar��n � �� s� r��us� e� s��r�� ►r�� w��ou �ro ar� �t�� r�� r�c��r��v � F��J�€L[C C�R �T�El� Q�FlCl��. �1�TI�C�RIZ�D'�`O� ADMI�t�STER t)ATHS. � � , 'I`his s��rn �t�tesrt�er►t is sukami�tt�d t� V`#LL�4+�� ` "��Q�l�ST�, �''� � � BY: �c�n�ldsc�r� �. Hea�rir� ,�SLA L��C?� AP Pcinci ��/�� Rresi��nt �Prir�f ir�d�vicl��1'� narn� and title� � �f��: �r�tl�ur & H��rtn Inc, � ��rint n�me �� ntity st�bmi�ti�rg_��wc�rn st�ter��nt) � �1#�c�se t�u�i€��ss addr�s� is arad (if �pplicabl�) �t� ��d�r'�I �mpl�y�er 1d�ntifica�it�r� � Nur��er �F�I�Jy is �,�2��14 �(� th� ��t�i�y ��s �nc� �€I�d, ir�clude t�re ��lal �ecurity . �Jumb�c �f the individt��J s{r�n'rng #his �wcrrn �tat�ment}. � �, 1 �a�derst�nd th�� "pr��l�c �n#ity �rime" �s d��ne� �n Par�gr�ph 2�7.133E1 }�g�, �lvrid� � �'t�tut�s, mean� a�ic�latic�r� ctf ar�y st�te c�r federal l��v by ��a�rson with res�a�ct t+� anc� � �lirectly re��ted t� f�e tr�ns��ti�n af bus�nes� with arry publrc er�titq �rwith �n ager��y or ' � ��litic�� stab�i�i�ic►n af �r�y �tt�er state ��f fihe Uni�� 5t�t�s, inclut�ing. �ut t�rr�t �f€��t�d • #cr, �ny Pr�p�sai e�� contr��t for go�ds c�r servi�s tc� fa� {7rravided tt� ar�y publi� entity ar ar� ager�cy ar pt�litical suk�divisic�r� of any �th�r �t�te t�r �f the Ur�it�d �t��es �n�d ir►uolvi�g � an#i�r�st, fr�uc�, t�eft, t�i��ery, ��E#�si+�r�, r�c4�etc��in�, c�ns�i�a��, ar r��t�rial � . rr►i�r��ar�ser�t�ti�a�. � � �. ! u��stand that "c�rtvict�et�" vr'"ca�viGtion" �s ��f�r►�� F�ar��r�pFr 2�'�.��1��b}, �l�r�d� S��tu�te� m��s a�fin�fng c�P �u��t �r � c�nvi�ti�n �� blec ��fit� c�ir��, with or � without an �dj�tdicatic�n of c��ailt, ir� any f�d�r�� c�r st�te tri�l co�rt �f r�c�rc3 r�l�#inc� tt� � char��s br�uc��t �y i��ictrnerrk ar inf�rm�ti�r� ��t�x July 1, 1��J, �� r�sult c�f � gury � v�rdi�#, n� jury trF��, �r �ntr}r c�f a�al�� f ��ilty ar n�lc� conkendre, j • �• I�+�!*��`�f}`+� 4 F*C�5 �� jp �iPldf��.�� " �s �efined sn Paragr�ph 287, �33(��{a}. Florid� St�tut�s, + m�a�ns: 4-�. ;� pr��c�ss€�r �r �ucce�sa�r �f � per��n �ar�v��ted r�f � public eniity crim�e. or � • �-2. Ar��r �r�#it�r un��r t�e �ontrc�l c�f any naturai p�r�c�n wha is ac#iv� in th� m�r��gernent t�f the et�t�Ey a�� v�h� �a�s b+��n convi�ed af � publ�c er�t'tty crit�r+�. �'he ferm "'a�tiate" � inctudes thc�s� o`�ic�r�, c�ire�tt�rs, e.�tec�ativ��, �ar�n�rs, st�ar�hc�l�l�rs, �rr�p�Oy��s, � mei�i:�r�, an� �c�er�t� wh� �re ��tiue in #[�e m�roag�m�r►t �f an a#�I��t�. Tl�� owrr�rs�ip . by r�r�e per�e�n cs� sh�res �ons#i#uti�� a csntr�lling ir�terest �ra�ther �rs�n, c►r ��+ac�ling �a� , �quiprnEnt c�r incc�me arnar►g �aens�ns vartre� n�a� fc�r fair m�rl�et rra�€�� ut�9�r �n ��rn's � ��ngth agre�rn�nt, shail b� a prima faci� case ��at ran� person �trntr+�ls ar�c�#har p�rsmn. � A person wh�a knowin�ly er�ter� ir�to � jc�int ►�enture with a perso� wha h�s �een � con�►c��r� �f a pub�c e�tr� cra�� ir� t�i� St�� f F(�r�d� clu�� the p�r+�+��d�ng 36 m�ntl�s • sh�l� be �t�t�s�det'�d �rt ��liate. �. 1 u�dersta�rd th�t a"persor�" �s �iefirr�� in P�r��raph ��7. ��3�1}�e), �1�rid� St�t�rt��, � means ara� nat�r�a p�rsc�� r�r �ntity c�r�a�ri�ed und�r th� ��ws of �ny state ar of #1�� ; • Unit�d �t�t�s with the 1e��1 �o�n+�r to ��ter ir�tc� a� k�nc�ing car�tra�t �nd �r�►ich P�crp�sal ' • applEe� t� Propc�sals on c�rrtracts far th� provisian �� a�ds Qr �erv�c�s !et by � public � � � ' ��.,,,.-,.,._ ... ..._..�.__��___ _....� �., ._._�..�________. _.___ u.... . �......_.., � � � � / � , entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term "person" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, � employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of an entity. � 6. Based on information and belief, the statement, which I have marked below, is true in . relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. (indicate which statement applies) , X Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its o�cers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members or agents who are active in � the management of the entity, nor any affiiliate of the entity has been charged with and , convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. , The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officer's directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members or agents who are active in � the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the entity has been charged with and , convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. . The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one of more of its officer's directors, , executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the entity has been charged with and � convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. However, there has been a . subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Officer of the State of Florida, Division of , Administrative Hearings and the Final Order entered by the Hearing Officer determined that it was not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement on � the convicted vendor list. (Attach a copy of the final order) , I UNDERSTAND THAT THE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM TO THE CONTRACTING � OFFICER FOR THE PUBLIC ENTITY IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPH I ABOVE IS FOR THAT . PUBLIC ENTITY ONLY AND THAT THIS FORM IS VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31 OF THE CALENDAR YEAR IN WHICH IT IS FILED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT I AM REQUIRED TO � INFORM THE PUBLIC ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF , THE THRESHO AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.017, FLORlDA STATUTES FOR . CAT ANY CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM. � Sig � Donaldson E. Hearing, ASLA, LEED� AP � PrincipalNice President � STATE OF:. � OVI� � CO U NTY: � � � � /� V _ p � Z -- 1 �-�, ,� f ..� 9 y �__ . Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 2010. � SIGNATURE OF NOTARY: � � --, . MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES: !�v Gv � I � `/ . PERSONALLY KNOWN: v OR PRODUCED ID: _ TYPE: a,TTANY �EE B . , '" r P �d �"� Notary PubUc - Slate ot Florida ''� • `� x kes Nw 20, 2011 c My Commission E D . =; � �i; Commission � DO 7369J8 �''%,',';�j�,�•' Bo�deAThtwphNetia'aIN°1�yASM. . . • � � � � � � PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION FORM � � The under signed Proposer certifies that he/she has read, carefully examined, and thoroughly � understands the terms, conditions, and specifications c�ntained in the RFP and any other . documents accompanying or made a part of this RFP and states as follows: � I hereby propose to furnish the services specified in the RFP. Furthermore, 1 agree to abide by all � conditions of this RFP. I certify that all information contained in this submittal is truthful to the best of . my knowledge and belief. I further certify that I am duly authorized to submit this Proposal on behalf . of the firm or entity who is the Proposer, as its act and deed and that the Proposer is ready, willing and able to perform if awarded the contract. I further certify that this Proposal is made without prior � understanding, agreement, connection, discussion, or collusion with any person, firm or corporation . submitting a Proposal for the same service; no officer, employee or agent of the Village of Tequesta . or of any other Proposer is interested in the Proposal; and that the undersigned executed this Proposer's Certification with full knowledge and understanding of the matters therein contained and � was duly authorized to do so. � � � BY: � • SIGNATURE � . Donaldson E. Hearinq, ASLA, LEED� AP . PrincipalNice President PRINTED NAME � • STATE OF: j � �� • COUNTY: Q � Q � � � 2 -� �„ da � � �v�us� • Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 2010. � SIGNATURE OF NOTARY: G�� • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: � !�U � I � / • PERSONALLY KNOWN: � OR PRODUCED ID: _ TYPE: � • �� gRll TANY LEE ,�.�"� �`��t;., No1ary pu0lic • 5tate ol floride • : My Commrss�o� ExPk� N0'� 20, 2011 �omm�ss�on M DD 736J38�� • '" '�t a n�`� gondeA Th� WOh NaUona� Nol�rY ��.... • • �_ _ --------- --- , • � � � � � � � ► •� � � • � ' � � � � � .�.,�, � w . . � +�' �. -� . ,� 1 ; � ' : � «� : z t � &� �� : . �� e� '; r � ,� .�, � a.3<t �� 'F= " i � �� A��r��'`�,�>"�j �! �i � ' ��`a ,r�� . '^',�;�`� �3 �� . T ,�. � , - »� �ar��'� � ��i�s"`�� . � �r,r=: t � �'�, � � � fr � �T`:� � �� R �' .�.�, � * '� S� .Pa, '� )�'�' -r �' �' � a� �� s , a � ta o � 'x a„ �r x, +$�#l�S� ��:. ,kt ,�„ ° � � � '� °,' "' �'� �� 4 t �� a �'� �° s � •�,,. �„ '° z c s � . z """�- . � � � •_; .� �s , `t .; ; a .+ _ y ., 9� ,�t � '�.r :� S� "�' � �..r� x-� � ;: s { `"` > �' �'t ��x r �: # . s � � �� *� � y�m � , = : � � . 7 , '."- � �i d n < � e � « � +.; i t }„ f 4 'WS , Y w i '�.7�°w�`.w .�n �a # � J 'a Y 5ik �� : ,. X ' '� �L� y � .'�G r..M�f` '� , �. r �" :,� ?,�' S, s � '.:% � 'N'r "' � � t . � �uR i �� r � 'i� � r : t . : , ""'"�?w� -,�. ,� r,'"'^ ��`��'� " ,�� ',e ` �r e -�.s , � `�3 x� ,. # � ( < . " � a � j 4a„� ''A' � J. �' :�'^�"+��ixi+��+ t w� � . t � r ,# ..t °� t � �:Y�x �, � � �. �Y - ;a E � < i q F � t � � x � � z � �,� ri � �s '� "` +� a� �: ;- " r t. `°`�. a - �l t � � '�` �� *R��' t ; a �, , ?. „�� k `� - F a 3 ' j 3 �' .`+R,F.�. d ' µ r ;� � �d$" � � .z. i i� � � qS � � ` 1x a+ �" `�,�� ' � �� , i „#` d � n�f � r = - � ' �. ?� .� � � i �.� � �� ' ; ' - . . �r' .. "a ' j. 'r"' �" ' ^ s .,y. Y �. Y .�:: k �. ' . .. �., , �°! Y" � . . w y„ `� 'c � p .. Y .�! f �,�.- � � � � �' � , 4 � ,� t � � � � .....� E --� � � � � �a MWI� - � „ � � MNpI� w � ;$ ,* ,k �� , � y � , � s � � S '�, �,�€� A � , ... �+ � �. . . ��,v� $� „�'�` z �b i �""��" � y .. �'k . � .., � � � .t5 �� {;{ .M. �»+.: .-a.- a ��... �.. a'# .... . . .,. ot . a .. . � A � . „. �� <.e� �� 7 k q �� . '� �.r Y� �° �,`?i Kr :� , 5 '� � .� �� 4 �� i , �. � � f � k ¢ � � �� . . * �! °� � � P f' } • „�. t x ; } � � � .. � ffi � � � � tlkA F ` ? .i ^ ,j;: � �#3r � �� . s(- . � y 'MT,- � py y � Y� F I } "� .� �`'!�� { ��a�� +'�`,�. � .'a�� + '� >. 4 ' �.. �> r f . � a � �r� r ..i* 3 »� ' � � �t.'. `� � � . . A.t **� iW . � _ , „ .,._....___..w.�`,�,r vre� �� c. .,. a 'ww. �{,; n aa�n-�:K� "� � ,. � . § �� .:,.,. ��. .�� . - ,.,. -.. . �„`�'�.� L _ . ..r , ;r��„ .» �,-.t �, � * y . � r . s . . �' a ,,�� s s"� h r� � °�t-""� �� . � } � . '� ° `�,�Z , �� ' ''^ ^ - i� . � r � r `".�;„�'� �""��'°� � � � , � �• f ' �'�"'.� "�" �� + � , . � ` ��r ,� � `� ��,+ �"� � x � ; ' �I . , ,, � � � � �m.r '� � � � � � � �; ` �: ' � `: ' r � ; .e. �sw. 1 :m.� ,�. � , � '� � :' 'S ,&x , . �: ,�i �� , �, � ,_ �� -, , , � � � ; � ��: 4 �t � � d . ° y�` x �.. Is � . �" _ . .- . " ,. � 3 4 � � • �`."f1��"qE�`' . � ' .. � `d t ? � �t �z � $�� , Y�,��'+� p e� . �' � "� Y',� �} ia^�� .. �"�', L ��'�'��"� �' '''� � ''�jF � . . 4 ��; 17' yy p,h � .5+2?�- �� T. ,� � `:: x+ .�� .. � `-L �}�� r' ,a f �°,� p �� . . � . °� �� a` �y �£ , . S � � � y � r � � �;, "�,,�.' . � ` �� .`� . . �}. �� 7 � �� . "�� , f �� ' � S� . „y ;'� .. . �yk .t b w ; .: � •� � � . ' , � . � � . .. ' �.......° � d1 � +" �T < ° e'� � � ` '�� a'� � � ,. �, s �°' »� '�. � �` '�w' � n , . � �. � � � ,�-€ . a :.. � ��, � �,.: ,- ��..� � � ... . � �� , � .. � . p „�, � , . , p.:r ,.� ;-°?°" � �:��. „ 4 t � +�§ ��'', ' ��'� � " ��y �" . , , �s�� N,+�w �� "� �'- , t' ^s -,+r�s b , -`� , .i^ �,a�+, � w��- � � -':+' �;�� f k r; A � . . . `�:.. � 4.. . . > . . . . _',# f�"� .';� . . , .. , � . .... . ��rS .. . .. Cotleur& I - Iearing Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants July 21, 2008 Mr. Jason Nunemaker City Manager 21 S. Cypress Street Fellsmere, FL 32948 Dear Mr. Nunemaker: In compliance with the City of Fellsmere's Comprehensive Plan submittal process and in accordance with the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs policies and procedures, we hereby submit this application for consideration by the City Council for a large scale comprehensive plan amendment on the RO-ED Corp. 300 acre parcel and on the RO-ED Corp./Ed Ansin 2,592 acre parcel. Also enclosed are the required checks, application statement, warranty deeds and other supporting items for this application. Please fee free to contact us with any other questions you may have regarding this amendment application. We look forward to answering any questions you may have regarding this application. Thank you. Sincerely, Tod Mowery Tod Mowery, AICP Cotleur & Hearing Enclosures Maplewood Professional Center 1934 Commerce Lane — Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 Lic.# LC-0000239 561-747-6336 FAX 561-747-1377 i t��: �/ �.��,�'��'�J � Note: Provided behind the introduction letter is the application, warranty deeds, authorization letter and an affidavit of ownership. TAB 1. Justification Statement - Includes Existing and Future land Use Maps, Analysis for Utilities, Solid Waste, Stormwater, Emergency Services, Flood Plain, Schools, and Recreation 2. Environmental Assessment 3. Traffic Impact Analysis 4. Analysis of Need 5. Miscellaneous Cotleur & Hearing In�r �934 Com e ce LaneGSte. 1 fax. 561.7476 3 6, ext 109 �� Jupiter, Florida 33458 e-maiC tmowery@cotleur-hearing.com Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application From AG-1 - Indian River County to Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood (LDMXN) - City of Fellsmere RO-ED Corp. & Ronald M. Ansin - 2,592 Acres Fellsmere, Florida 'Ttivp. 325, Rng. 38E, Sec. 3,4�,5,9,10 PREPARED FOR: RO-ED Corp. and Ronald M. Ansin 1401 79"' Street Causeway Miami, FL 33147 PREPARED BY: TOD MOWERY, AICP - COTLEUR � HEARING, INC. SUBMITTAL DATE: Monday, July 21, 2008 PROJECT TEAM: Cotleur Flearing, Zoning, Entitlements and Environmental Keith and Schnars, P.A., Traffic Analysis , Fishkind and Associates, Market and Needs Analysis Carter Associates, Inc., Utilities • � �o�le�r �. �--Ie�ring � . .� -�- . _.�,r � r� � ��,��_ �f.� - - -� - - 1. $4,500 - LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT: Response: Provided with Application along with escrow check in the amount of $5,000. 2. TWO COPIES OF A CERTIFIED SURVEY, SHOWING EXACT SITE AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION, WITH EXACT ACREAGE: Response: Provided with application packet. 3. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND WARRANTY DEED: Response: Provided within. 4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR LAND USE AMENDMENT: Response: The property's recent annexation requires the placement of a City Land Use and subsequent Zoning District. The current Land Use is L-1, which is a County Land Use. The attached application includes a Justification Statement reflecting the need for a LDMXN Land Use, which is supported by the property's annexation agreement. This land use amendment request provides for the City's desire to encourage compatible land uses to adjacent lands, promotes and prescribes urban uses, maintains environmental quality and natural features, creates economic development opportunities through neighborhood commercial development and is coterminous with the City limits in accordance with the City's annexation policy. The land use amendment request provided herein is supported by the adopted Annexation Ordinance for the subject property. The City and applicant diligently worked to establish annexation elements that would provide for compatible land uses adjacent to existing Indian River County land uses. (Chapter 1 of the City's Future Land Use Element A-9, A-10, A-10.1, A-10.2, A-10.3) 2 • ' • • This application proposes a Future Land Use Amendment for the subject 2,592 acre parcel from the Indian River County future land use designations of AG-1, with a current density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres, to the City of Fellsmere future land use designation of LDMXN, with a proposed and annexation agreed upon density of 2 dwelling units per acre. Table 1. PROPOSED AND EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE COMPARISONS PROPOSED CITY FUTURE AREA (ACRES) EXISTING COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE LAND USE LDMXN +/_ 2,592 AG-1 Table 2. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE ACRES/UNITS FUTURE LAND USE ACRES / UNITS LDMXN - Residential Densi +/- 2,592 / 5,184 units Total Residential Densi * 5,184 units *Established in Annexation Agreement at a density of 2 du/acre. Development Criteria It should be noted that for the purposes of this report, all calculations (traffic impact, projected water and wastewater usage, etc.) are based upon the following development criteria: Table 3. DWELLING UNITS FUTURE LAND USE UNITS Residential both sin le and multi le famil " 5,184 units ' Annexation Agreement requires 50% of the properties to remain as open space. Dwelling units per acre are calculated over the gross acreage of the Annexation properties. As the above table indicates, the proposed land use will provide for a development pattern consistent with the approved Annexation Agreement. The Annexation Agreement provides for a request to be made to the City requesting a mixed use LDMXN development. The Agreement also provides for 50% of the Annexation Properties as open space, unless otherwise agreed upon by the City Council. The Annexation Agreement also requires that no development occur on the Annexation Properties for any planned development residential project uses for 5 years for the effective date of the Agreement, unless approved as part of a DRI or Preliminary Development Agreement. The Annexation Properties shall be limited to a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre calculated over the gross acreage of the Annexation Properties. In accordance with the Annexation Agreement, intersection improvements shall be made at CR 512 and CR 510 for any direct access collector roadways developed for the project. Similar to the 300 Acre annexation property, 8' sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the collector roads. The housing stock proposed for this development includes a diverse mix of housing styles, size configurations, costs, including town homes, row houses, garden or patio homes, multi-family units, age-restricted communities, congregate living facilities and independenUassisted/nursing care facilities. Location See Figure 1 for Location Map. 3 - "� �� `aaauas��a� d � I.i L N - d�W uoi�e�o� � �� Z o � �; . _ �� _,, . � r � � � R 1�,� ��,� �t � � ,� � '�. - , � � � � y . � �,� �� .,� � s � :zi � �x� � � . � ,a� r� �;, � , 38lf1 Avf � ," ; , � � � � �; a� ` - eo � o t� • - � 1 � �n ,��:�'�. - ' .. . _..:..w._.._ �_',-�f" ,.r Q � � z' � C) . � . . 4. `� � �J � � � 1 �° � .f � Q la �'� �� {1 ." J� ( �'C _ ., r�nd �d � N r . Y :/1 � .. �'x��1 ,. � ... � J � '��, + N � ( _ � UJ . � I 1 1 ��, . #� � j a � � � °� � � _��` � � , , � � . 1 � �r" : . 1 ��Nr�� .. - . i��►�s , �� N � N'> m � � � ti � . � Gj � � N N � A�r`"��'. ;�� 'r N � Existinq Future Land Use The current Indian River County land use and zoning designations for the property are indicated in Table 1 above. The area to the north of the subject site is a single family residential community called Vero Lake Estates. The property to the east and south of the subject property contains agricultural uses. To the west of the subject property is I-95. The subject property is currently being used for agricuitural purposes. The tables below reflect the area land uses. Table 4. Existing Future Land Use and Zoning EXISTfNG FUTURE LAND USE* Sub'ect Pro e Indian River Coun , L-1 North Indian River Coun — L-1 Vero Lake Estates South Indian River Coun A-1 East Indian River Coun — A-1 West Interstate I-95 EXISTING ZONING'' Sub'ect Pro rt Indian River Count RS-3 North Indian River Coun — RS-3 Vero Lake Estates South Indian River Coun A-1 East Indian River Coun — A-1 West Interstate I-95 EXISTING USE Sub'ect Pro Undevelo ed North Sin le Famil Subdivision — Vero Lake Estates South Undevelo ed and A ricultural Uses East Undevelo ed and A ricultural Uses West Interstate I-95 *See Figures 2 and 3 for maps 5 _ *�.� w�..a� +� �c,�� ""� ,� � ��. � � #� ,. �„ . + f ' �," ;,„ . � „�, ... �s � ,- �,..� �� .�n��y �a�,.,��1� � .� � .' .� � � Y � �.�. �,�� , � w� � � �a � � ,�� ,� '.` ��, � sw.�. ' � .. �r - ar��ac Awt� ' � � ��` .�.�� n�ms�.�.. . �r � � � � _ m �"'' 3.�►•*..-� � � .° � �,� .�� ..�. � �,. � � �:, �� '�rsC� �'�"i . q '�. ��'�•..x; � *� {�• �� `..` r 3� �'� �j�� M � ... � � .. 'a:: " ,.� .. 5�., . ' � � '� „t k�� °a # '�'� �, .° '�'� �� " � �; � ` � M � _ w ..c � r s � y �, : .. •« �� v.r'�'w � �_,sX�� .s '. ;�, � ,�, �cx� � � r �.,�'?.. a ' � -'" . �' ... � �a. ,�, rar . . # _ 1 } � �� ` �; 9 � � � . � u� � � � R � ��r�- rt,;,. .�r,., � � , � � , � ■ � e � � ? '� �' p.. ° &�;�� .. ':rc � f� �` .y 'k'. �� '� ' "ii*� a '�+ s ^p� � � �� . i� �.�` �" � 4 t « �'T � �I�F�z d11 I �-R y� a -x � � X � � Y � � x . . �' � �' ' � l- � g' .� ^ �� I . 5 � ,," � � , , . � � � i .. . .uswwf� .a.E�:� � 3' w- � 4 . 4 M 5 � 6 .. � �'� - �� }M� , � .::� ! o�;� �' ... � �� nn ,wi..� � ' ' � a`� �'":, h ;��r : � �� aP' � .. Y a. . , � ,, y . v ��' � s+'*�' . .,. 'Y�' `N h' ' . ' ` � Q _ �k � yrh M � �J t � - � � � � . .. . . � � A � �k� r � � k w #� . � .. � � � � ` �.; � u � � � � g � *� m' , .,. � �.. � *�+� �- *�' 1 r�' d° ,� �. .. � ._ ,�. ,�: . .c�° � �� a w� o O � �� r '° ++� . �^<' � '�� • � � a ' . � �� - �� , � � t.�� „ w. � .� � �' h ^r± . I�.�w wa.�.= . } E . . . . ,� ; �, � �, .. ��, r r..:. : �> � � . . �� ••. .; r . � � ,, . ,� � , � . �;a' ., S � m, . r p ;� „ , , .. s .• . ,. v: ; � a ..> t .. , , ., . .,� - „�. ; �, . _- ,y . . , rr., . . ,` ,. � .: � �., ,.»u.a: � � .�b. , � v, :;s _" _ � . . , �� y '�`' .sF _ t� I� . k - u. , � � '"�� ;; � _ , � � ., * _ )1-r k 1 } 'u" �� y 4-� y . . o � ��' � � �? g r, ; �ai } � - &,� • � n.res. iw` •' k v'uka` ��'A`v �� a 4 yr3� *" ` . . �� . � �' �"' � s u��'� $�� .. ,� .; � �� .. � � °� n°�. � _ � ,: `„� � , _ _ : � �.ti , �� _ . . � . _.�w _ ., �. � 5 . , „ , �.w, ,� , � � � �' � � � _ �. , . ,�, � , _ m � �� . r3:..� .,. : , r .. . � �,: . - ... �'J .. � � . $g •, aAi �b n Ar` �ne , s .b4� +�w � F�{ f , � � � . . �9 �5 Y"'� ke., � +�Y��a$ du" �1 '� �=x�^..n {�'"!�� at� ��. � � ' t s, s. . � ,' � . : z �. 1- >� . o-. llRsh a2.. I�T �.#* ad�b z-b✓� .. � s,� :: ..... � �'... �lYG. �4w r,.� E ak4m .�,d+ w,8 ..sm„ . o s, O .. t � » .:, .;: . .... . ., t;. +° ' .,. � � A�{ Yt � 'k r. � � "'�o-.�:d�i: iCY� Y�d`M � ., 0 � 1 . �k �.�. �� . �✓A , :: L ,:' � ?: � � °kM,� aM*i � . Y ".r<a C s�.�z �11b • O ► �u � " .. yw . +s :s .., , - r_ .�se " �„£ � , � .: . a� a.. .� .:> � s':.a.9 � _ , ' � . , � �r�-� � . • � *� � �& �.. � ' .e «. � s.+,. � . ,�,a ,.;- d � + o�. �� s i,. ars� �,'! Y . � r e. 3 '�r ,» R� a� e,. 7 � ,a q � hr�' +,�d �` m s' �Tx 1,�'. N4. .a �Ri �Jt � . t' +�°`" .. t x � �ca��. .es- " . .«gi� �,� � 5� n . �& � c_�s� �+'�ti k � sr�8 1`9aa n. s �. � 4 ,�'�� . � .�' � � ��."ue yt ° � " � :e �" �m '��a� �� ^�� r"�� '� ,�� ",.�'�� "�� : ��,,�� , ;�,�,»� � �s w � � �'f��' '� � t` � �AF.�Ya r. '" rt r � - °= �' � �,�� ,a. ' �` '�t�'�;� ��°�� "��i� j , � � �. ��- r .� o ; �, ��% �� '�� ;'� � : � � ' � k �`�k m � �}` »�; y � � `� °� �� .��, �� ,�-,�� "�� . � �"` � ,'!�: �� +'� � � � � � � � r�� +, �, � .. .� � d +t�t � � ► � �'. � , �,. � . .. .. � �.�+ ,`.t `; � � :'. xsa "°' .a . . aa� ,-.F � �: ' � �. : � :.ro ,ac , '""�` �k,.:z� �'" �� ¢ '* (�, -.� v � a- � x s s r� a s . � � � �€,� ,� � �a v��a $ � "� , �� r`� � �` m„, �a� 3 � :. � � i c� *g Y �� ,.:.� '� i '� ' !�. � ��f � � �4� � s � ro "« � � �, � , ��" �.�,.'�� ,� �� .+5�' �,3`� � ,�µ` �. ""�� f ��,'�: ` .:�-� k �;�.. �, .: t,�.»� �� .e> ,+�„�"w� �° ".�� . a z....:.,�� Ywrr,c� �� , �nx.� rm� i�.�,.=.► .c_ �" �' � �. � � ��, � w � � x ��. , �, �.� r �� .;; .�: �aa � � � �,. S � ..« , t � F � '� ,.�c. ,t ,g � �: z,' i' s,�s^« -; ; d � ^a . � � �, m � i � , �# � �+'i�tlF � � w . .. � i`rn�1�' 's�.^� �.'�: ; & a ��t�,�� y ��'&Q �� 8��,��a�w��'i�� "��u: r� �� '�� ; 3�" a A «�Al"°" J� ��+9rv� � � .� �„ 's � dC' � �'V '&. � r � -. � : �`' ' �^�� .�� , . r �� n �#, K � ° ` .. -. �,'� � � y��. � 'y. +� � � y '� L' �. , � ,� ' �.y� p �"�`� O i"�* , g �' � s � ' M v � g � `� a � �°Ms ,a '�'� Y,. 1ni�� `;'�. a + � �,Z'�'. �> � � �� . �r �.< �'� ; � �� "� � �•P� ��,�* ��{�� } "' � �'�a' . k �* � Y �s_� - v� `.� ^.�`P`�: . . �d" �: ,a�." k�"`'^-,g�,``d4�95.��1�, c�.,A��,�R'" �a� R.a � t:: �� s�' x��i"- :�.✓`° & ` .. a.s ��e' :�'vF� 'ro' S 1€� k��i':� y 'v v�to- !� A '�' s � � x .� -x�, � -' � , yyX�"� +� ,4 �'..�y� ,, � � ��o"�, 7�� '�"^ Y S` ! � � �4 h .... : � �� >a,��e b,.. ��a�, ,. .. ��. " . .� � � � ¢ � �°' ( h� �� a eF"� ' r .�. ,,, � �'�� w �" � .w-, .�,�+�...� ��,�..w�.» �.-.,� � � � � �� ,� � i.� � � r� �i�� .� ' � � � � s ,.. . . � '13� `*`'�` r� . �� ` ��„��,�. ` �w'� ' � � « • - y �+ w s -"' .y "'"� ["�i � `w�a" f � . �..��,� 4 .�k eb '_ °e a' � +�', ��ry„"� : t y5'� � �"k°* �� .' �l f y 'k "`�'s"� " � � ��»� � ..,.. w 'v �' : cs �� , ..:.. , 8 � � . b yi' ;. t' .", � " ., a � � �- „ . - � ,.. L�, . d�'#�, .. � ��"'�+�ti°. ��'� �� '� i�h :v +P. ' " � , ,. „ ; 1 '� �'" � .�rt .i._._ . , ' .._ . � c � ».,:- . . . � _, 0 �. # ; � � ¢ �'" � `} ° o L� � Existing Indian River County & �� R� �� ` ° �� W Ci ty o f Fe l lsmere Zoning Map - :�= 4 = — Proposed Future Land Use In 2007, the City updated the 2003 Comprehensive Plan to include a number of changes. Objective FLUE A-9 deals with annexation and the City's desire to encourage annexation of new lands into the City limits when the annexation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, statutory requirements, and will be compatible in use with adjacent lands. Table 2 above identifies the proposed future land use designation and density for the subject property. Figure 4 below identifies the proposed future land use of the property, along with a proposed traffic circulation pattern and potential public institutional use site (currently shown as school). The development pattern within the LDMXN district will consist of a mixture of housing types, ranging from single family homes, townhomes, condos, apartments and other residential uses as detailed in the Annexation Agreement. It is anticipated and as shown in this application, single family homes will comprise 75% of the development units and multi-family products will comprise the remaining 25%. The proposed land use amendment requests the same density provided for in the Annexation Agreement, which is compatible with the surrounding land uses and provides for land uses that the subject property is capable of handling. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan (FLUE B-2.6), which establishes the Low Density Mixed-Use Residential District. In this Comprehensive Plan section, the City recognized that large scale residential neighborhoods are desirable developments, bringing new residents to promote economic development, establishing neighborhood commercial bases and provide a diverse range of housing opportunities. The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for Level of Service Standards. These LOS Standards are discussed in further detail in the sections to follow. The adopted LOS Standards are as follows: 1. Water Service: 250 gallons per equivalent residential unit and 2,500 gallons per day per acre on commercial uses. 2. Sanitary Sewer Services: 250 gallons per equivalent residential unit and 2,500 gallons per day per acre on commercial uses. 3. Solid Waste: 6.5 pounds per capita per day. 4. Water Quality: Retention of the 1 inch of runoff. 5. Water Quantity: Post development peak rate of discharge must not exceed the pre-development peak rate of discharge for the 25 year frequency, 24 hour duration storm event. 6. Recreational Land: 2 Acres per 1,000 population. 7. Traffic: CR512 Minimum LOS Standard Peak Hour =D , 8. Schools: Impact fees for the proposed development will provide the financial support necessary to assist with the maintenance costs for local schools. The proposed land use designation is also consistent with the City's desired goal to provide for orderly land use transitions (FLUE A-1.2) and planning and designing for residential quality (FLUE A-1). s �` '.^� ,� .�� • +..,.� a - b'ta.du�4.� � 1:�7`ir.'��'ce - - �,,� � � ,� h � ` �.%.�'�'� � i aie�ss,l�.ff`:a�i.. ,. - _... °.. a � ..�' �"�-' g ;�R-;;�.. - ,,,� "�i'�� ' '�'# ��b�"v..#�PpR'Y`r�,,�,�A9'+r�s- 1�'<��::: =-�: mY a' .�� - � a � S`p ;r s + �, 1 d. a � ��°� �. � �� t•.•. •�cY s� �'�� .::� a ::;� r �� ;,�� >fi: .`..� MlDDLESCHOc'( +a��.1�i�� #� " � „ �,M �'.6 6 ,,�. 1 � � k '�� r � � . 4- �$ ilr..A � d,�lld �� .: . �`' � ° p N¢ � ��`� ` �. . ! � y � �, „ � �.� y ' "�'"�:Y •'l�.��"�'d'CM�� y'.�`� <��.. i" "• ..l � a ., � � _ � �:� ��a�ss�� '��°'��'II"�'9�'�;°r 3�`�„'"��i: . y ' ��'�_ � �� 3. •� �s M�� '� � �'�� d�r y ' r �,`". � i °"�'M ��r ��'�' � µ ��`��;:: �T �s e�� r' �� . ,� �° � .7 � r �4 � k� ' �' z ' ; � e � k � � .Y7a�rie ° y �^°�° °� . � �}�` ,,, � ?�. , q, i c x «. �ad�`'�� r1i��*� y r , 6M ":+�" �`Wj.'� ,..3 y ��.�,-�,... . 4� �� ,y p " � '�'t��`x' �, � �.r �3'E�9, ,�8a'' . �i ' R 1 R(ia' � . 4 & a ' _ � �-L �' , � '^,`L t �s .� � � � .p t �k "�'r..��''�� . � � �� C .. ^� � `" , ri, ; �... 1,.. �' U�.�1 ^e�� _ � �.:) � � � , N..� 'V �r[ rA ..3 .� .M" r . , "' � �. ,� y ' i -�9 ! .25'� ��f , � z �; "t�4a',' � , x e . �.:: .a .. r �'�4+ d � '�� w, ' - ': a x.x �� . J"�� < Ff: � .,p �,y i'�n 'k,� .'m. y� M' a'- , �� " IF" � eS�, • 5 i��w sr •� ��4' � 3 � � �� 7 g � ..� r� a t �,� � ,�. ��.:� r+� �t ��' � �"'� y 5 � , , � , „ �..� � � ?� '�'� ,� �� a `�lr � �ti�� '�� . . , a � _ , .. � ..,;- �.a � ...� , ,: - , d �, � �� :� l. w, ��: '" r p�a�,�,` :hct.^-EL �< 1 �.�'r��'?C �,' r Q�� «� � �;.� � � m � � � � ► � �„�� , c`" _ X �„ . �'. - � �." �' � � �- `'� � �; a, � � �� ca_� � � � .,:, �� . � ,,�� 7 , .r ��:�.�s �-� xT��+ .w• , _ ; '� t , � y � H.� . � .:. � �y, KI�I ". . . i.. � .. ��- � �* R � \ , � , . � �. t -K m : �a � � �� *� ��# " �;i '�` �� ,� " C '"k� s, � g '� - �� t '�` � t � ' �7'� . �+, A s x )_- , k � " '.i`.5��, I�i��"�* �ai � �� +��. Y � -� : � �� r., � . . � ..ry k:, I �h. � ' �4 � _� ,±� s V . 1 �uSP.7�'. � ryq . �•(6 � ..sS. � � � ,�' .i.� � � . � } # � � "�.3.� . ♦ • ,w^ � . � S,dwl1 "� � . . �� 1 . ��."_ �"�t ' � �; �,:. 'er f dd'� � <YY�� i� p� ti � ,�3 e � ,� � � t �� °' "� � F� "' � s � � � e � , �� i � , a� ;x y�i � � ¢° t . � j �� r � �4 ,� �� .� �� 3 � � w '�»� ` ~ lo, ^ � ; .1, . � • �: � ' . `. Y .,��{� � Y' � , � '�"�'. � s, ; . 1, -�. �� f. , `�x :,� �c ^' �� ' �� '� a � ` �� '+ �' � � `"'� ... �"�. ��. � �x . . , . ' ... � t `:` -.; u � ` �� '��+" � � +'� ' �..• .="�dsti'�' �r � "�� S g �� :;r.a � .. ' t�"' , � 'J` � , . .. �_-_• . . . � , S P �. i � • ..m� .,-�.. � ��^ � ry � 8 � � � ,.t � y 5 } �e� ..�{ f u' � i L. � � r * ` � ��: � �, � � ';. I �rth C ^BY' � � � > � • .. i. .. � � � � '}, �. ., 4 F °a'�.i a d°k ��.��wa^T� �" � �'� �C .' � I�� M�,.: �Y° #� , � � � � �� $ ��9� � � � � Alf /f*;�AN�Y �lth d' . � . . ��'� �� x .3c"` a 4 x !� p� � � �,� �i��€� r/ ..4. � '� � �� ,.�� . � '�� a:. �'w . {�` ,�� P s`:e ` x{�s��.��G� �i� 7". �� 4� � �� a S s ' ��yg 1 k .� e�: �:. � k. x:��,w �'-i'- �q � � ' *'��^3 , (:' . ��'., . u. ; I . � . � �� t l., Y �' !�> 7 � 4 f uI �6N� � � t t. y�'�+��*u .pg lM;�;,"_ _' r d' I � y.� . „ , , �' Leg�nd �'� �t � i �' � � � , � r � � � yurii��i � '' z� `� � *� �fi • � �� £ �• 6 , � , � �fi � r �� y �1.� � � � t��- � d- � t s: d ID . > r � .m.._..s Sitg Deta a! � � `� � 1 � x w a�� _ , , � ' ��°�� t ' o � � �� '� � . NrH�r r. - � � '�� • +�� '" � ��"� �rs .�=.� �e �,.' ' , � ' t - - - � � � �.,:;t �3 � ° 4 e i s� > ^� Sin le Fami Wrellin Units - 4488 � I � � � � � . �� -� � � r : $ . � 9 N 9 �� * .r. � `; � , ,. . �� 4 ��a.. .._. _ - ;�`, ,- ,... ¢a,.. .....�... , "� 5 �t+ Y 3 k �� .. � f Y '�I , '' . : _ . .� ... ,�a � I r N t� $� -1 � Mul�iple Family Uveliing Units � 1596 � . �� V �'� •` t """" } ��",�°`� �'� � � � I. a ��e. ..� � � � � :. Total DwelHng Units 8,084 �, t �S , a . � `%� �� te � � ' ; w °.':' • ..� t� � ,_ - � Commerci� � 30-40ACRE5 �, , ' �� ^�" ��, �� , T� � ��; p�q _ - � � ' . � �� - � -y �. .: �' � � � x �� N F r �a� ..r„ t, F .., s '�# f �aPC4TCX'At DCA.V4L � §� �. � Oeen SP�e IGreen wavsr8lue ways: � c � �% px : ' $ : }� � ^" `�`� '.�'` ` � . . l a ... ��Nr,. � f . &. � �;.� g m, $t" .. 5eh � k �� ! �+' � ' � ��`� �� ' �'� �� S�: ` `�sa� ,.,,� � —. ARTERIAL I� ' � s ��'� �� a.x � �lt ; `'�#€�iF: �y �� , � `' i{ a r.. �' e a 4 LANEIMEDIAN z': " #t>� Ja c° " � � 4� .. � � � � �....' � �. �t:. Y,' � �.� y � �l _...,.r` : ""°._' ' �" � Y.' ' _ � . . . , ` _ r ` . �: _ 7 I � , . �t� � �r �� r' .,,°' t �'.� ' �' y. . ., � ' . `-._..' : t i „a�, SECONDARY �'� �,�' M• - . � - a �. . I �� l�R� � .,� � , 2 LANE PAVED � �r ,I �, *�: � ` " * . . � .� K �' � g ` � �+ r��RO-EDIANSINBOUNDARY �rY "� �� < °'�� `��` \' - .` � � P'' � �= �, F � nt r �►: I t'ti.. 'P. . . ■„-.,. ,>. ,�• r'� � � � 'tt', _ � Proposed futur� Land Use Map c:ott�ur� 300 Acrr RO-ED Coip. LDMXN � Heari[1g 1 mch equals 3„000 feet & 2,592 Ac� RO-ED Corp. / EdAnsin - LDMXN ,,,, y,„,u x t.}, ,,,,,, »' �' Fe/Ismeie Annexation Properties • • � �. � . �. Citv of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan — Chapter 4: Public Facilities Element Solid Waste Service Goals, Objectives, and Policies The following italic notes are in response to the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan, Public Facilities Element Goal PF A: Needed Public Facilities. Ensure availability of needed public facilities in a manner which protects investments in existing facilities and promotes orderly growth. Objective PF A-1: Ensure available public facilities, and prevent urban sprawl. Public facilities shall be provided concurrent with the impacts of new development and at a level of service that meets or exceeds the City's minimum acceptable standards. Policy PF A-1.2: Level of Service Standards Solid Waste Years 2000-2020: 6.5 pounds per capita per day (1.2 tons/year) The Cify solid waste disposal is provided through the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD). SWDD solid waste generation is based on 2.2 tons per capita per year, (reference IR County 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3C, Policy 1.3) GOAL PF B: Providing facilities to meet existing and projected demands. Assure that wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage and potable water facilities and services are available to meet existing and projected demands identified in the comprehensive plan. � Objective PF B-2: Provision of Solid Waste Management Servi�es. The City has not identified any existing solid waste deficiencies. The City shall annually coordinate with Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District Board regarding available capacities for solid waste disposal at local transfer stations and the County landfill, as well as for recycling programs. Annually, the City shall evaluate whether central solid waste collection services should be implemented. Policy PF B-2.1: Ensure Proper Solid Waste Disposal Policy PF B-2.2: Solid Waste Projects 10 Policy PF B-2.3: Coordinate with Indian River County Hazardous Waste Planning Efforts. The site will be assessed for whether solid waste collection systems should be implemented by the City through franchise agreements with a private waste management company. The existing transfer stations including fhe renovated Fellsmere Convenience Center located on CR 512 will provide local disposal facilities. The site projected densities will be included in future coordination efforts with the County regarding solid waste generation projections which are updated annually and incorporated into future planning efforts to insure adequate land fill capacity for all incorporated areas of the county. Objective PF B-5: Meeting projected public facility demands to 2006 b. Solid Waste Projects. None, services provided by Indian River County The City will update the County annually of development activity projections on the site to coordinate the Solid Waste generation projections and to allow sufficient planning time to meef future service requirements. RO-ED-ANSIN 2592 Parcel Summary Year Solid Year Solid 2013 Waste 2033 Waste Tonstyr Tonstyr Residential 0 0 5,184 34,214 (DU) Non- * N/A " N/A Residential Notes; (DU )= Dwelling Unit = 3.0 people, Waste Generation equals 2.2 tons per person per yr ` non residential waste generation — accounfed for in the County's residential projections as Functional Population for Solid Waste Generation All solid waste generated by the project site will be taken to the Indian River County Sanitary Landfill located at 1325 74` Avenue SW, Vero Beach Florida. The solid waste may be dropped off at any of the (5) transfer stations, or pickup curbside for a fee by private firms and taken to the Sanitary Landfill. ' The RO-ED-ANSIN 2592 Parcel was historically allowed 1 unit per 5 acres, (2592/5 = 518 units) when it was part of the unincorporated county. The table above is based on the full build out of 2 units/acre and does not reflect the net increase in units. The existing density allowance of the existing 518 units was not deducted to provide a net increase. The population projections used by the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District to calculate land fill capacity requirements are reviewed annually. Updated projections will be incorporated into planning efforts to insure that the land fill has sufficient capacity to meet the project's solid waste disposal needs. Currently there is a surplus of more than 3 millions cubic yards (1.8 million tons) of disposal capacity through the year 2030. 11 Reference: E:valuation and Appraisal Report for the Indian River County Comprehen� ive Plan, Solid Waste Sub-element Draft, 2008, Population Projections l�able page 13 and Landfill Capacity narrative on page 13 and 14. Carter Assoc.iates, Inc. has submitted a letter to the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District requesting confirmation that the land fill has capacity to serve the prc�posed land use, see attached Exhibit. Utilities Goals, Objectiv�es, and Policies Goal PF A: Nee��ed Public Facilities. Ensure availability of needed public facilities in a m�mner which protects investments in existing facilities and promotes orderly growth. Objective PF A-1: Ensure Available Public Facilities, and Prevent Urban Sprawl. Public facilities sliall be provided concurrent with the impacts of new development and at a level of ��ervice that meets or exceeds the City's minimum acceptable standards. Policy PF A-1.1 Compliance with Concurrency Management Standards. Within one year from the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan, the land development regulations shall stipulate that applications for development permit comply with the c;oncurrency management requirements set forth in the concurrency management ele ment of the plan. All project devek�pments shall comply with Section 7.24 of the Fellsmere Land Development Ccde regarding concurrency managemenf. Policy PF A-1.2; Level of Service Standards for Wastewater Service Sanitary Sewer Systems LOS Standard Residential Uses 250 gpd per equivalent residential unit* Commercial / Industrial Uses 2,500 gal per acre' per day *= I.R.C.U.D. le��el of service in lieu of 200 gpd (max. month) per city of Fellsmere Code Section 78-77. (') Equivalent to wenty-five (25) persons per acre. This project is pl��nned to be serviced by Indian River County Utilities. Per Indian River County Or�iinance 91-9, the level of service per ERU is 250 gpd. Projections of non-residential building areas have been determined for this project with a proposed level of service r<�te averaging 0.15 gpd per square foot. Policy PF A-1.3 Compliance with Level of Service Standards As a condition of the issuance of development orders and permits, all public improvements including new facilities or replacements, expansion, or other alterations to public facilities shall be compatible with the adopted level of service standards for the facilities. Iss��ance of development orders or permits shall be conditioned upon 12 demonstrated compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for potable water, wastewater, drainage, and solid waste facilities. All developmental projects associated with this site will be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for potable water, wastewater, drainage, and solid waste facilities. Policy PF A-1.4: Demand and Supply Information System The City shall coordinate with Indian River County Utilities on a regular basis in order to obtain current data on the demand and capacity of County facilities providing service to Fellsmere. Indian River County freatment plant capacity information is made available to the public via the County web sife. See FIGURE 5(A-1.4)for typical treatmenf plant information availability. Policy PF A-1.5: Coordination between Future Land Use and Potable Water/Wastewater System Needs The City shall coordinate with Indian River County Utilities to ensure that needs, planning, location and timing of improvements for emergency potable water and continual wastewater service are consistent with land use and conservation resource management policies stipulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan. This project shall receive Comprehensive Plan approval prior to any development approval. Policy PF A-1.6: Areawide Planning for Potable Water and Wastewater Systems The City's land development regulations shall not permit proliferation of small fragmented water or wastewater systems except in cases where the City Council determines that the public health and safety is served by such a system and area wide service systems are not available. The projecf is proposed to be serviced by Indian River County regional utilify facilities. No small fragmented water or wasfewafer systems are to be used. Extensions of water distribution and wastewater collection facilities shall be planned and constructed in a manner which prevents construction of utilities in isolated areas, reduces or eliminates stagnant piping sections and facilitates future extensions. Policy PF A-1.7: Available Infrastructure for Developments Approved Prior to Plan The City's land development regulations together with the concurrency evaluation requirements and level of service standards referenced in the Plan shall ensure that adequate levels of public services are made available to developments for which development orders were issued prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and such development permits have not expired. The monitoring and evaluation system shall include provision which establish an early warning system which 13 determine when a designed capacity for an infrastructure system component nears capacity. No developments in this project area have been approved prior to the Comprehensive Plan. Policy PF A-1.8: Maximize Use of Central Water and Wastewater Systems The City shali adopt land development regulations which mandate connection to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new development, and to the extent available and practicable for all existing development. However, until otherwise established in policy by the City Councii, existing development shall not be required to connect to the central wastewater system unless required to do so by the Indian River County Environmental Health Unit or the City. The newly constructed wastewater system (completed in 2002) is intended to serve only the CR 512 corridor, the central core commercial areas and to the extent capacity is available, Pine Grove Estates. Annexation agreements require the Pine Grove development to provide for connection to the public system, whether through extension of the existing system, enhancements for the existing system or construction of a new sanitary sewer system paid for by the developer and dedicated to the City. The City shall utilize formal Chapter 163 FS Development Agreements to secure funding for provision of needed facilities and/or improvements prior to issuance of any development order for any portion of the Pine Grove development or other developments in other areas of the City where in its discretion a development is needed. The projecf is proposed to be serviced by and connected to the Indian River County regional utility facilities. The project is located east of Intersfate I-95 and is not intended to be serviced by the existing Fellsmere C.R. 512 corridor utility system. GOAL PF B: PROVIDING FACILITEIS TO MEET EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMANDS. ASSURE THAT WASTEWATER SYSTEMS, SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL, DRAINAGE AND POTABLE WATER FACILITEIS AND SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO MEET EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMANDS IDENTIFIED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Objective PF B-1: Provision of Wastewater Services All existing (as may be exempted herein), and new development shall be served by , wastewater senrice that meets minimum level of service standards adopted herein by the City and consistent with State laws. Policy PF B-1.1: Elimination of Existing Deficiencies No known deficiencies exist for wastewater treatment within the City of Fellsmere. The City shall continue to coordinate with the Indian River County Health Department regarding any septic tank systems failing to comply with County adopted operating standards. 14 There are no developments within this project area and thus no existing deficiencies. Policy PF B-1.2: Central Wastewater Service The City shali require all new non-residential and multiple family residential development and redevelopment along CR 512 and within the central core commercial areas to connect to the City's wastewater system. By December 2004, the City shall evaluate the merits of adopting a program that requires non-residential development within the wastewater service area to connect to the system according to the time period or conditions set forth in the program adopted by the City. The City shali also pursue Community Development Block grant funds or other grant funds from other state or federal programs to help reduce costs to connect existing development to the wastewater system. The project is located east of Interstate I-95 and is not intended to be serviced by the existing Fellsmere C.R. 512 corridor wastewater collection system. The project is proposed to be serviced by and connected to the Indian River Counfy regional wastewater collection, treatmenf and disposal facilities. There are no current wastewater collection andlor transmission facilifies available to the project at this time. A major wastewater transmission main, best located between 69�" and 77 Avenues, will need to be extended to the projecf site from currently existing county facilities near the North Regional W. W. T.F. Treatment and disposal capacity can be fumished by the County North and Central Regional W. W. T. F. Policy PF B-1.3: Wastewater Systems Projects The City shall ensure that Indian River County achieves timely expansion of the sub regional wastewater treatment plant scheduled to serve the City of Fellsmere. Upon adoption of this Plan, new development shall be required to connect with the central wastewater system consistent with the Plan. The City shall coordinate wifh the Indian River County Utility Department to plan for projected growth and wastewater infrastructure requirements needed to service the project. The City shall provide periodic updates to the Indian River County Utilify Department so that proper adjustments to the County's 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (see FIGURE 5(8 -1) can be incorporated. Objective PF B-3: Provision of Potable Water Currently, there are no potable water deficiencies in Fellsmere. The City shall own, operate and maintain a potable water system to serve existing and new development , at level of service standards adopted or provided otherwise herein. The City shall continue its agreement with Indian River County to provide emergency back-up capacities. Policy PF B-3.1: Maximize Use of Existing Systems The City shall continue to maximize use of existing facilities to ensure capacity is available for existing and proposed development as well as promote orderly growth. The City shall adopt land development regulations, which inctude performance 15 standards mandating all new development to connect to the central potable water system. The project is located east of Interstafe 1-95 and is not infended to be serviced by fhe existing Fellsmere C.R. 512 corridor water distribution system. The project is proposed to be serviced by and connected to the Indian River County regional water treatment and disfribution facilities. A limited portion of the project can receive water service from the north via the recently installed 12-inch water mains extended along 104�' Avenue and 79�`' Street in Vero Lake Estates. A major water distribution main, best located between 69 and 77"' Avenues, will need to be extended to the project site from currently existing county distribution facilities along 66�`' Avenue. Treatment capacity can be furnished by the County's North and South RO water plants. Policy PF B-3.2: Well field Protection Program The City shall continue to enforce their well field protection program currently in place to ensure that a safe drinking water supply is available to the citizens and businesses of the City of Fellsmere. All project developments shall comply with Section 7.20 of the Fellsmere Land Development Code regarding wellfield protection. Policy PF B-3.3: Maintain Available Capacity To assure that water capacity is available for the normal and emergency situations, the City shall continue to coordinate with Indian River County to implement improvements to the interconnection between municipal and county water systems. The City shall coordinate with the Indian River County Utility Department to plan for projected growth and potable water infrastructure requirements needed to service the project. The City shall provide periodic updates to fhe Indian River County Utilify Department so that proper adjustments to the County's 5-year Capital Improvement Plan see FIGURE 5(8 -1) can be incorporated. Policy PF B-3.4: Aquifer Withdrawal The City shall monitor average daily volumes pumped from the surficial aquifer for consistency with authorized volumes approved by the St. Johns River Water Management District. The City shall continue coordination with the SJRWMD regarding programs to conserve water and to protect groundwater quality. All project developments shall comply with Florida Administrative Code Section 44C-2 regarding the permitting of consumptive uses of water. All project developments shall a/so comply wifh Florida Adminisfrative Code Section 44C-3 regarding wafer wells constructed within the St. John's River Water Management District. 76 FIGLTI2E 5 (B-1) INDIAN RIVER COLJNTY UTILITIES FISCAL YEAR 2007 - 2008 S- YEAR CAPITAL IlVIPRO�'EMENT PLAN Priordy P.aiiliuix(Flease Ft:u�k: Betweeu I- 5) 1= Hiy��es! Priurtc, Ca[ . ar PraJec[ F]' 2007�08 FY 200Bi09 FY 2009�10 F'Y 2010�II FY'.Alll12 F1' 7A72/13 Revmue 3ource 5— i.00�mst Prinrrty tYL`Jlvt `3il tree[Sa@iN. -t�Fbtiieze.'L E50p,�0 i2;',O�JG �a�ity't�� 12° VJM - 65tl'i Street Ei _ t in�;cHvra l"�r!� 12j $106;_� $200,GG0 .. it,+ I.,�.,�_ 1 �s. 15' EiEluenli�.iain-Idoc}t.b� �i iei'F1lxJTFtuDi Bch Svr Cror�r� $�r��=nf $500.C�C -`a��aud,+ 'I.. <,- '1 16' Effluenlbinm --^_k 510 from�_14 �o Bndge �750,On0 C��::�_d. �'Irar,;'= A 16'EtTlue�llbLam-A1Afttvn•^.R`tOf��CilJ�fVP.ro3ta�9�Intacnmec[ $9fN.�,C00 $70�J,006 'npacd� ln�.- 12'Effluen6blain-IRE(vdrvru4WhS[-!.<�Cit,+oEVeroEeat:h $3fi�1,000 �s00,C60 �:aoa�:ity�=ha�ti-- 1 16• F41Y ,treetE�nk'u.;;sH✓ry (,Vdii27i g23:}"�6 4a3i�il: £63.�00 $83,(A�0 $��l>�lU �''S,OtX� �cit 'I�u�r.-�, 1 12' v72�d S:rdSt.Eofh_ink�iH�,vy T.:ti5.1(Ve'i113� $ b,.�t7 t�1�;,-, 1 'Ptv 53 nfI?�rv7,Hw• ,r�:.1 uJW. R95p,�.xi0 �atv�;h� 1 � tE re�.�se �f��- `�` F iF_:n^sl�w•, ToIIS 1 RF�),?OU ,,� � p�sr��L 'I x��-- 1 ti 5. � ve ES�� ; ar t� I no E. �d ri�c,' '^ .'lxI NSi $50J�piJ $SOqLU�p SAs�,O�'9 ?7�,�; uj0 :a�iW F� .-, 7 p CcncWM�,3M_F �. '."2,4ate:Fia�md'.4�aLaMamalcxi{;17t1� g7?3.;R` _apacit� Ya>.-- � 27th So. To 43rd P,v � y 1 � CcsWct 1,3?A LF of ;2" VJ.M ab>ng Dth A•a_ hom 7?th St. S.W to l�th St. £347.Cx1C rapso�tv �'hsa' _: '� 6 tid z O - �+ L5�'�t EUSc��v A.�:.mvert3•FM�urei�erc�amatLat�3cai�al $15l'�,�yJO $I.i25r,u)� _ Cor,uc:h� �:'h�r,;e�_ � Un �rade :�' Fbf to l Y' FM Crcnn 4 P� ,t t� �1`_=�' St alon 26'� Nv $r.Sp.QUC ,citv ".hsr, a- ? R E 3:�3tto41'�SC $2�.Q�i00 ,rit!"I.ar_as ., °i Esnic�Besch Sewer � N�.��tl�i P.lone A1.4 �xlFe L.5 f7;,U�N� $200.'r)0 "a �t h r. 7 y s pan �. �&:ta��i 7?" Rause Mam �la�� 43id 1.v. flran ZStr, St ,' W. to nath ci 17th St S �a! $SGD,pI,Y% Sa�:;cdv � hsr;�== f 'Y'3rm=Dispo�siAlterost�v�.IV�ithROPlant ��1.>�O,OOb $2.OV�,000 ;,edv'Iwrv.=- ' �—�+ Bnn� Dxs t AltetleGaes - South B O F9ar�i $1.SiC.000 �1.Cmp.dC�:� � �� pos eatVCl:�arfz. _ � . ��uc � Const»ad:n-imefi'epmnpStaGo�atTreaswrcGeastEl?maitay5ehc g�GQ00�1 $7Ut:U00 �.a�sc�h+Cl::;nx: - '� ConsGud.in-t;ne ke um "tati�ni'.o Y.e l�.e Souih Cuur�.Y RF um Faatity $1,400pO1i '�a ,-uh `�L;,r:es P F�� P+" P P '- G�� I , I•7o�U� of V{inds & F'olo C:ub c3ea G9k�'�h,�N 51) $2.1,OU�) $LOA�Xi rapseiiv ?'I:sr_-_ ] Fa�°.oriTreceDevPlope�'sA2rPV:r-ntCl7��t.k"�`F` E`0,��i $'�p,t�00 $`�U,000 �iG,00C� Cnpaut I�.b.e.r ' Tu_ ar.vl.ake ..�,elc �sr'su� rrr�r�it $11`�,3ic. g�ItS,478 R1t4:4i6 $'l19,a76 Fit�4'fi �na� I, _ 1,&i �oti�et 76 ��.�I [� eas•_ ._a4: hair fl�. N Rc ,resxve �*: =an�emenG g...i�JX 6 �72 J,006 $22� DU'0 oaut Lur„": 7 Ins:aII1,�0�ti"I�Tceir.ain�n��n�unzGOnwith43rd:��:.koar,llmprovanra�rs $2Qp,066 .,;,nnt t.�r.�-- -^.on>Wct 5" Fan:- Pf.;�an uf i�� ioG�i P,c'?J/� a3ni Av $1�.000 =epncit 't.,r_-.. 1 II� rtn i7owty f�=_c rs� Jar ,i_ �.'� M�- � nso�ne�at $I'L,06Q000 4;2,�Op.00ir :soa�'d �, t:� _ , P�n-Maste��Pla�mecWat� N.a..atix.tersr:ns Y:Sp0,U0U $50.�,000 $`�fF]1704 �i��0,�J00 �7UQOr�O S�C.�rn _aci�,�t�r,+�- 4 a�rviceTrtirsin:ss.criLm:� .:.IcParF_,�fdw��sofVe�oYea-k�',anleris('Fit171 $7GC,Opp ;.i0V,0��+J :a[,NCd„t..,__�e ' Faral�F Ec•:��cMairt<OsioKc-adlvJ_4VVdikli �59QCr�0 �2�G.)p0 $2�0.0[N� �7 �a,a��f �Y,:rr: t V �:j.nrdensE,ff'luentMnm ocu�eUi�ai $Z25,a)0 �20QO�,�x'i ua�•itJ Lj�_-. , Vi_taRopaleLftlaerd;fa�n�'cxirie�.tiat $i5��00C �?OC,Ot'�0 CaFa1U_t�.,.�- 1 bOes!.Fegional�A.WTP20t�E0MGL?E�:�•sion �10.G00.000 RU,OW.000 �_�F,�cih,+��'hac;=- , We:Jands Z.G Dd.�,L �:<;ansion -EEtlu��t Nl � $750.@�p �'acacibr,'t��r.�;.: 5 2ry' W M E:7ensim-66'"Av .��SLtcCR51U x303.00v' $1,2fjCi.C�O $1,Srh,.C�O�) $1.500,pq�� £1.�4�]�.Gr�6 �apacil'J�'kir-_ _, � �h" WMExtns�on-77 V 70�' Av.,th�North[oCP.51U �SOO,Oi!Q �S�G.OIk�� S�LF,•�).C�u� ��.�spa��ity�:.'h�,:�r: 7 v� �� a _t .. - .- .- .� .- .. ... r� c, _� .- _ �., . .-, .� �, v, ��. .r w �� r.. �., �r ,.. ,r �. k� �. . - � .i = c � - i i i. i., i.�� r� i: i i i�. i i: i�. - i i W - _ _ � F _ _ _ _ _ ' �c ' F L `� e�l M C i. L L 2: !� L' L i �, K � _ �'G � _ `,� - _ ` � �.., � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .b �J � � - _ - c� � � �, O ;� R � � �F v_ ' c ;� - o ^� - - - - � _ ' � _ -_ n. ' �,�a .�. ° *. _ c ' " 3 .a' 4 = r"�, ;� � .� - <`a � - - � � rn b> �W � Vi - v _ �K _ � � � _ � K � f � y - � h n � _ � � - � � G •� _ _ ,��x ` �g ' �3 � ��', tj r�`y+ C �. - c r G� 0 � v, Fr, �.: ?: '-.��- � ,`� ° t b �= � `�_n' : xL - n - � u�i v� �G>� - � v� � H }j = :S _ :� _ `'Ji i i' Y c� _ r� _ � O _ � � iS � _ �p - _ _ J _ C _ _ _ V � � � � �� K i _ = O _ _ _ _ _ _ � � _ -- _ _ �1 �' _ b3 63 b9 69 6 �9 _ m W M o >` ` - � t� r, %5 = °' � :s � . - ;� %� %� � 'j �i o � r�', m n� - a ' � _ v w ' � - � 4: o � _ - _ � ' � e a s�a � w��., �� ,-, �,e n. � r, v'» .-��' � v, '� cc o �" � � � y � a � � � ��-^• �' , z � S a � v � � `y ` `� � = - � c"' '�'' - . V � ' '(' � � � v�9 ` a 3 i 0 . S c �; = ';o '� ' ° v � C _' q � T% 4 ' `3 � G Q F C . � ti - ;� ' N G � Qi Vi y .�. 2 p U _ F q _ _ 3 O F, C t _' ,�i .�i f." L y �p '"..- 'J F- p 4 � � x� s _ � 'Q L: i V� r �S � � � v � � s e' v � .� � �� W ^ � � .� � '" �,.. -. � c � s. C w3 � � rn m d iK a r � w3 z�ww•�� %� R r� ��, c i � E � - °� ° d W� G G�� S�' j � W u. µ u.l �n ry [� G � S� 6 � a - t :- 'd ° , � 4 ' E . o � `" = � ti � ^ s . ' ,�3 t'' c: � :' ': ¢ z a o N = � �+. L E' . � A , L] _ ".J _ _ n L !- � � " �, F� f-i a � } . c �' y � c .s � " .: k' -� n � a� `� vY w v �3 L" � � s. � � ;� t� `� t � � '_' � :n � � � � �`a . w - � .� i `" �' . � ,� c � � a ti '� - ,; o `-' � a � ¢ ='� � `� � � >, w f k a , � s: � � � .� a V' � � = K M Mi +C �y, `� ' Y P. y E« � c , C ' � e ? �'�� q b _ Z �. `� ' � -� � � w _ h 3 .'C. K [� �, y E" b 'r •- � , h� 3;� � c` R i„ ��' ��i:.Z _� ��a" 5 �� fi yw, a' 9 z� W N- k � z`o; N s.. j - � `` a� a �� ° �� '� w � 5 �' a1 c a: , � , d 3 F !'i � � � � _ *.i Ti � x °� ' k� l- , a 5 ��, �, � " � � � 9 w � _ = 3 c 4 ` F' � `L -� .°: � � c , � E' y [x . w, W t'? �: � � t � ° �e t 3 � � N � 5 � ., .� � ", � � �� :' '� O 4 y m�&�-. _..: .�-1 a h � �' h a'> w' W k .� w m.� � L� `E 3 , 'k �� e`'i p :` a '� o''t fa L' i a�' c S� �, t; � w.. .-� � k r. 4 b Q tt , � ',�. c � 'o z �, S' >�.�.. a�� >> �'s' s r r.i � x 3 ��.G .x N� x W i.e. u: � e� w w�� ti D a E` w� k �M al4plod P�� a,�ag �C.r��meS ~ �a1pM alQ�7o�T Pnr, .�an�a�,f�r.�toea5 1�%7o.i. pur.r;� F'IGURE 5 (A-1.4) OF'f'9R'1��1I�'�'�'I� t)F L7'�l.l'1"5'�i'.IZ�'f(:FS -R'�a"fi'R & �t�aSl'P,AC�.4"II:R ('I_�'V"f Itif�i)It�1�1'1"1O'�' OwnerofSystem: TndianRive�Counrvnzpartmentof[Jtility`en•i�rs � I'1i57t'L'� 1� - �Z�� -�� , Address� 1 rii' rh °t o• , - �� f � City� Count,y� State� 7_IP -, F h, Iriai r F , F. Fr - A 4/ _ _ � �' y � ,� �i Telephone 1 Fax '- - , �xt i i �-: ] � ; : clw, �! �i+ ,�, F.ng�neenng Serv�ces: Tide: Phone Extension: em:ul: * g ��,„ -�.' * lJt�chael C Hotchl:�ss, L' E Capital F'c��ects P�tar�a�ez 1321 F: <�; Gerdon E Spacks, T' E E��vizoeamcntal Engir.eer 1823 �s�: k z�.e m f ` / [> Larry Brown, PE Emaronmeatal Engin_er 1821 1} c•: +nla� -_•> > ��•m I ` ) " , �� ]zsseRoland I'Iar,sRev�eurer 1(i36 i�°lan<4i�ar.�;e:<ern �c_�sr►:�r.�t} tt rriF �i�ti �ri u:u,in ��x��-ii>i�FC�itti��ric» Nanu of'Ireamier�t Plant 9endng Projec[ <,entrsl \R'\X'7F tiorch 1R'WTF ��uth 1k �C"TF ��. �R�e>t \x \["IF County Ineiian Rivec Lidinn P.ivet Indian Rivet � Indiu, River Cit�+ Ver<; Beac}i Jeto Beacli � eto Beav� ' � erc Eeah DEP Pemtit Number FLA U10431 Fi-ti 104388 FL.A 010435 FT,O n41G3? I E�cpirntlon Date 4/22/2008 12/u(2009 7/15/'L012 � 03%27/2010 Status gch.�� Plow reutzd tc Crntral Active tictive W�:4TF Floar routed tn Central Mnx:icnum monthly average daily flow ocer the last 12 month period 1.Stl4 MGL'i �;�YI,F 1.7151�SGLi i 1 24� P�I��D Month(s) Ured June-07 to May-Og Maeinnun thrce-month average daily flow over the last 12 manth perio d 1.855 MGD � C to Centril 1 5'i3 DhGL 1.1£? IvlGri 'YJWT'F Months(s) U>ed June-07 te M2}�-OS Ciurait Permitted Capucity, MADF 4A00 h�IGD 0 850 MGD 2.000 IvIGD ! 2.u00 MGT� I F'uture Expansion, MADF - - - - - - - - Ciurent Outtanding F7nw CornmiCmmts (�) 2-617 bfGD L9'4 t�IGLi {i� 1'•7u MGD (a) (�') Curn�m Ouertrndi �Fbw Camnvrmen� = Po1zA-imurn.bfojnNyADF + p/pM f �ciry.{.rso�sart�d �uirhFkti's SoM ro Feserrr Fmwr Crpa�ary�. (a) - Saurh W 1F�'Fd We3r lP'lY�I'F.are in e mmmon seroi�r ama. P[ "[31�(: AG�.1 t't�;R �lS�l�l:'�1 (P\FSl i\F�(�R�1.11l(")\ PWS Name: 1� orth (;ountv ��outh C:ountv FO \�':a1�rr Planrh PWS Identific9tionNo.: 3314052 PWS Type: C�mrnun�[y TotalPemiittedMaximumDayOPeratingCayacityofPlanQs): �12,100,0U0GF'L? Total D4a4imum Day Flow at Plant(s} as Fecorded on MonthlyOperating Feports During P�st 12 Months: lO,Ifi0,000 GPD Stormwater Service Goals, Objectives, and Policies The following italic notes are in response to the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan, Public Facilities Element Goal PF A: Needed Public Facilities. Ensure availability of needed public facilities in a manner which protects investments in existing facilities and promotes orderly growth. Objective PF A-1: Ensure available public facilities, and prevent urban sprawl. Public facilities shall be provided concurrent with the impacts of new development and at a level of service that meets or exceeds the City's minimum acceptable standards. Policy PF A-1.2: Level of Service Standards Drainage Drainage: Current LOS standards in the City are sufficient to effectively manage stormwater with the existing infill areas and future development. The LOS requirements are as follows: 1. Water Quality. Retention of first inch of runoff 2. Water Quantity. Post devetopment peak rate of discharge must not exceed the pre- development peak rate of discharge for the 25 yr frequency, 24 hour duration storm event for water quality. During the site developmenf permitting process the applicant will demonstrate that the proposed development will meet the above LOS sfandards as well as the SJRWMD permitting requirements. GOAL PF B: Providing facilities to meet existing and projected demands. Assure that wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage and potable water facilities and services are available to meet existing and projected demands identified in the comprehensive plan. Objective PF B-4: Implementation of the proposed stormwater improvements to the primary conveyance facilities within the City. Stormwater improvements shall be designed and implemented to maintain a drainage system capable of ineeting the adopted level of service standards for stormwater quantities and water quality. Policy PF B-4.1: Fellsmere Water Control District The site does not fall wifhin the FWCD boundaries. Policy PF B-4.2: Vero Lakes Water Control District. Currently, the VLWCD is an established district but has no continuing administration. By December 2005, the City shall coordinate with the SJRWMD and Indian River County to determine if this VLWCD warrants continuation. For the Pine Grove Estates property and 20 other properties within the VLWCD, a stormwater master plan shall be prepared in conjunction with development applications for the Pine Grove Estates and/or other properties on the east side of the City. The Eastside Stormwater Master Plan shall identify improvements necessary to maintain adopted level of service standards for lands within the VLWCD and, if determined necessary by the City, adjacent lands within the FWCD. The subject site does lie within the VLWCD boundaries. The original Plan of Reclamation for VLWCD includes a grid of proposed drainage ditches and right of ways for the ditches. lmplementation of the Plan of ReGamation was not completed. In fact most of the ditches were not constructed. SJRWMD would require permits for the construction of the ditches and due to the existing wetlands many of the original ditches would likely never be approved for construction. However, the VLWCD may still provide a useful purpose as the responsible entity for the construction and maintenance of drainage infra structure. An overall master plan for the 2592 acre site will be developed. Pre vs. post development peak rates for the 25 year storm event and the 1"of water quality treatment volume will be included in the plan. The masfer plan will be permitted by the City and SJRWMD and the USACOE. Policy PF B-4.3: Stormwater Improvement Implementation. Major improvements identified in the Eastside Stormwater Management Master Plan shall be included within the City's Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements if they involve expenditure of public funds, development related improvements that the City required to be bonded, or are set forth within a development agreement. The RO-ED-ANSIN 2592 parcel Annexation Agreement includes a reference to a regional water management area to improve the water quality in the Sebasfian River Improvements District Lateral "D" Laferal "D" receives the water from the other agricultural areas as well as this site and conveys it to the Indian River Lagoon via the Sebastian River. The SJRWMD and the owner are engaged in discussions to address this significant water quality improvement facility. Policy PF B-4.4: Compliance with Capital Improvements Element. This site currently does not contain any public facility improvements in fhe Capita/ Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan Policy PF B-4.5: Priority for Correcting Existing Deficiencies. This site currently does not contain any public facility improvements in the Capital � Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan Policy PF B-4.6: Existing Deficiencies Shall Not Be Increased by New Development. This site wil! be reviewed and any existing stormwater deficiencies shall be addressed as part of any new development Objective PF B-5: Meeting projected public facility demands to 2006 27 b. Drainage Projects. Stormwater Retrofit Project in the Hall, Carter and James Subdivision Area Eastside Stormwater Mangement Master Plan The subject site is not included in either of the above drainage projects. GOAL PF C: PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. ENHANCE STORMWATER DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS TO PROTECT AGAINST FLOOD CONDITIONS AND PREVENT DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS. OBJECTIVE PF C-1: PROTECT NATURAL DRAINAGE FEATURES. Policy PF C-1.1: Provide Adequate On-site Stormwater Facilities while Directing the Surplus Run-off to Receiving Waterways in a Manner which Prevents an Imbalance to Pre-Development Drainage Patterns. Policy PF C-1.2: Coordinate Watershed Management Plans and Policies with Appropriate Public Agencies. Policy PF C-1.3: Inspection and Maintenance of Drainage Systems. The subject site development plans shall be reviewed by the City, SJRWMD, and Sebasfian River Improvements District for compliance wifh the Goal PF C and the related Objective and Policies noted above. RO-ED —ANSIN 2592 Parcel Summary The project site lies approximately 12,000' south of CR 512, immediately east of I- 95, and south of the Vero Lake Estates subdivision. Existing drainage is provided by the east west conveyance ditch located at the north end of the parcel which is the common property line with the Vero Lake Estates subdivision. Also, a network of pasture ditches and old grove ditches provides drainage to the parcel. All the drainage ditches eventually outFall into the Sebastian River Improvements District Lateral "D" canal which then outFalls into the South Prong of the Sebastian River. As noted in the Fellsmere Annexation Agreement, a regional water management area may be located on the property. This water management area is in � discussion stages between the owner and the SJRWMD. Following completion the water management area could provide significant water quality improvements for the Lateral "D" canal water and provide substantial benefits to the downstream water bodies including the South Prong of the Sebastian River and the Indian River Lagoon. Project development will be required to limit the post development discharge rate to less than or equal to the pre development rate for a 25 year / 24 hour storm event to satisfy the permitting requirements of the City and SJRWMD. The 22 Sebastian River Improvements District has a discharge volume limitation policy of 2"/day for a 25 year 24 hour storm event which may be the more restrictive limitation. Also, any project areas located in the 100 year flood zones as depicted on FEMA flood zone maps will have to address the flood plain storage criteria. All permits will be obtained before actual construction work is started. Therefore, the Stormwater Service facilities will meet the intent of the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan. 23 Emerqencv Services There are 3 different Indian River County fire stations that could provide senrice to this property. Indian River County provides regional fire services to County residents and has a total of 11 stations. The stations that are closest to the subject property are Stations 8, 9 and 10. Station 10 is located in downtown Fellsmere, Station 9 is located in Sebastian and Station 8 is located off of CR 510. The City of Fellsmere police department is located in downtown Fellsmere on CR 512. Mutual aid is provided by the Indian River County Sheriff's Department, with headquarters in Vero Beach. The Annexation Agreement requires that land be provided as a part of the required land dedication to be used for public education facilities, EMS/Fire Services and any other County facilities that the City determines are necessary consistent with the requirements of the Development. Impact fee credits will be provided as a result. FEMA Flood Plain The property is located in Flood Zone X and AE. Traffic Analvsis Attached is a detailed report by the projects traffic consultant, Keith and Schnars. In summary, the proposed change in land-use was studied for short-range (2013) and long-range (2033) planning horizons. The Indian River County Transportation Improvement Program and the FDOT 5 year work programs are assumed in the analysis. Short term analysis through 2013 show that all roadways meet LOS standards. The Traffic Analysis details the LOS standards for the long term 2033 planning horizon and the volumes at various roadways and roadway segments. Analvsis of Need (Market Studv) Attached is a study prepared by Fishkind and Associates, Inc. related to the projected housing need during the life of this project. As discussed more fully in the study, the existing population projections for the City of Fellsmere are outdated and do not accurately reflect the current conditions. Therefore, the Analysis of Need report presents updated projections for the City of Fellsmere's population through 2030. In addition, the report examines the existing City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan, and � it assesses the capacity of the Plan to accommodate the � updated projections for population. 2a School Impact Analvsis This application includes the following School Impact Analysis, which is in accordance with the Indian River County Interlocal Agreement for Coordinated Planning and School Concurrency, effective March 1, 2008. Over the past year, numerous discussions have been held between representatives of the Indian River School District and the RO-ED Corp. The discussions included the School District's desire for a new elementary school site, impact fees, and other School District related items. Currently, an agreement is being reviewed by the County Attorney, authorizing the donation of a 20 acre site by RO-ED Corp. for a new elementary school site on RO-ED Corp.'s recently annexed 300 acre property. Overall, the Indian River County School District currently provides education services to over 20,000 students in the 26 County Schools. There are 14 elementary schools, 3 middle schools, 2 high schools and 3 special schools. In addition, there are currently 4 charter schools. The School District requires that new comprehensive plan applications include an analysis to determine the impact of a residential developmenYs impact on the existing school district system. For close to a year now, discussions between the School District and the property owner have revolved around the potential impact of RO-ED Corp's annexation properties. The School District anticipates the need for a new elementary school within the immediate RO-ED Corp's area. The 300 Acre RO-ED CORP Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application includes the dedication of property to be used for such a purpose. The property and site location have been adopted by the School Board, however the site does not yet appear on the adopted School DistricYs Educational Facilities Plan. As a part of this application's School Impact Analysis, the established requirements of the school selection standards have been reviewed. As discussed above, a site has been selected by the School District and RO-ED Corp. for donation. This site is located in the northeast corner of the 300 acre RO-ED Corp parcel. Important to this area is its ability to meet the intended requirements of the school site selection standards as provided for in Section 6.2 of the adopted School Board's Interlocal Agreement. The anticipated elementary school site (just west of 89' Street and south of 108 Avenue) meets the standards in that it is within walkable distances to existing and proposed residential subdivisions; would not provide for a site located along a major roadway, thus providing for a safer school; would provide a logical focal point for community activities; and including many other factors as requested considerations under Section 6.5 of the Interlocal Agreement. . The following issues are required for consideration in the Interlocal Agreement for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and our responses to each are provided below: (a) The compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. Response: The adjacent land uses are L-1 residential land uses, which is compatible with a new elementary school location. 25 (b) The co-location of parks, recreation and community facilities in conjunction with school sites. Response: The High School and Middle Schoo/ for the Schoo/ Service Boundary are adjacent to the existing residential neighborhood (Vero Lake Estates). (c) The linking of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. Response: The Annexation Agreement requires that all new roads within the subject properiy include sidewalks and abundant open space areas. (d) The targeting of community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. Response: The subject property is located in an area directly adjacent to existing residential and limited commercial areas. The development of the subject property could spur redevelopment of existing and older neighborhoods. (e) The development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and the surrounding neighborhood, including any needed access improvements, sidewalks to schools, off-site signatization or safety-related signage. Response: The subject property provides for a traffic circulation pattern that promotes connectivity, will establish an arterial off of CR 512 at 108 and would establish pedestrian sidewalks throughout the development. (fl The location of school bus stops and turnarounds in new developments. Response: The development design will take this into consideration. (g) The consideration of private sector action to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. Response: The property owner is in discussions with the Schoo/ District to provide a site suitable for a new elementary school. (h) The consideration of School District comments on comprehensive plan amendments and other land-use decisions. Response: The School Board has been involved in the various land use elements of this properfy for some time. (i) The availability of existing permanent school capacity or planned improvements to increase school capacity, in accordance with applicable school concurrency policies and requirements. Response: The School District is working to analyze the proposed comprehensive plan amendment in order to provide a Schoo/ Capacity Determination Letter. For this comprehensive plan amendment, the location of area schools has been evaluated. The subject property is located within the Treasure Coast Public School Concurrency area. Sebastian River Middle School is located on CR 512 just outside of Vero Lake Estates and Sebastian River High School is located within Vero Lake Estates, south of CR 512 and on CR 510. This places both schools in very close proximity to the subject property. Students attending the High School from the subject property would not have to enter onto either CR 512 or CR 510 in order to attend the school. 26 A critical component of the school concurrency process is projecting the number of students that will be generated from new residential development. To assist with this process, a Student Generation Multiplier was prepared by Fishkind and Associates, Inc. (May 24, 2006) and adopted by the School Board. This generation rate multiplier is to be applied to any new residential development. The Student Generation Multiplier utilizes 3 different generation rates based upon the type of residential housing: Single family; Multiple Family; and Mobile Home. Table 1 below shows the breakdown of the subject property and the total student generation based upon our current application. Table 5: Student Generation Rates, Indian River County, 2005 Single-Family Multi-Family Mobile Home All Unit Types Elementary 0.189 0.037 0.045 0.131 Middle 0.097 0.015 0.016 0.066 High 0.123 0.014 0.016 0.082 Total 0.409 0.066 0.078 0.279 Source: Fishkind & Associafes, Inc., MAMCO, Inc., Indian River County School Boaro; Indian River County Properly Appraiser The utilization of these numbers creates the following table: Table 6: Student Generation Rates, 2,592 Acre Development Single-Family Multi-Family Total Number of (3,888 units) (1,296 units) Students Elementary 0.189 = 735 0.037 = 48 783 Middle 0.097 = 377 0.015 = 19 396 High 0.123 = 478 0.014 = 18 496 Total 0.409 =1,590 0.066 = 85 1,675 The applicant has contacted Dr. Dan Mclntyre, Executive Director of Growth Management for the School District, regarding the proposed Future Land Use Amendment and will continue to work with Dr. Mclntyre regularly. 27 APPE�IDIX `E' School Service Area Boundaries -..._,.._._�_._�___.��.______.___-- � �___,.�_.—__ .: � -___ ____ � �� . ,'`�ai+`��., r/ �;�;'�f . ' �� s ' .�'�--r� A , d �.✓' _! ,^` 1 �y"" � J , ,� � . �� d �. L< �I .�, O � _ e a , . � � �� ,�. f �_+ �J ` /- f �a $, - ,;.�- . 1� �, " � � i t i ✓'"� z - r [. �;�' . .� !� - ;� �^ -� ?�l y i C -� - _ �- i:= � - , ; .--. , , ' � ' � `' � _ ; J L i r �y i J I - _ rj _ I f � � � il .".__."___. _. .._ ._._. . _. � I I I \/ � � ; � ,�^� i�A. ` �4� T . .. _ . . . . . . . �.-.... _.. .-__.._ . ��: Figure 6 � f �y 0 z �� '' y ' _ r- � _ � h ��" _ - r yg , :.�nd H r � .��:.�, -� 4--� � yz � : , � . ' " � ~ r � � ° b � � � zn 1 � !L � � ' � � ' H N , v i � ~f : ` � � j� 1 � _. � �� '� � . � r / . � . '.' - l' 9 � . a � . y y � �. 1 i ' � � ; • i i r � V , - " ' S " � o, �--� (n � � � "� �- ` v �� '� . r -' • �c Z (� '1', ca r = � Y � � ti � � � � �� - � N �1/� o ° d' �. � ° � a 1 ' ^' Q. / ` o 0 �� 1 � � `� . . `''� ` - " � 3 }...s'� r 0 M � � _i i F% 1 � . � o � � o� ' V , a � � . � � � �� °� -, v � � �"`` � a � ".. r? � � d � � � r �, o � o , .� ' � . � , o � J- J � ' s �=� � �� \�� , �� Recreation and Open Space The proposed land use amendment for the subject property includes the Annexation Agreement requirement to keep 50% of the Annexation Properties as open space. The City Council may, at their discretion, waive this requirement. Open space includes conservation areas, greenways and trails; all public parks greater than one acre; agricultural land; golf courses; all common open space; all drainage systems, whether reservoir, conveyance, retention, or detention; upland preserves; and all public institutional property that is donated. It is anticipated that the subject property will include a reservoir and wetland mitigation area on a portion of the Annexation Properties to improve the water quality of the Lateral "D" canal. The design of the stormwater system will be designed to accommodate public recreation areas. Currently, the applicant is working with the St. Johns River Water Management District on concepts and in methods to assist with detaining stormwater flow from the southwest and in capturing water from Lateral "D" and diverting it onto the subject property. Chapter 6 of the City's Comprehensive Plan provides for a level of service standard of 2.0 acres per 1,000 people. The City currently contains 6 public parks and they are as follows: 1. Grant Park 2. Little League Park Complex 3. Roadside Park 4. Senior League Park Complex 5. Colorado Ave. Park 6. Lions Park The City also has the Fellsmere Riding Club on South Carolina and the Physical and Cultural Arts Center, located on CR 512 next to the Little League Park Complex. The City's 2000 Census established population was 3,813 with an average household size of 2.59 persons. Based upon the LOS Standards, the 2,592 acre annexation amendment would establish a need for 13.4 acres of new recreation land. As mentioned above, the Annexation Agreement provides for the property owner to keep 50% of the Annexation Properties as open space. This equals open space totaling 1,296 acres, which greatly exceeds the Comprehensive Plan Objectives and the LOS Standards described above. The Annexation Agreement also requires that 10% of the gross acreage of the Annexation Properties by donated to the City. This totals 259 acres of land dedication to be used for public use or benefit. The land will be provided on a proportional basis to the property to be developed. Each plat will require the 10% . open space provision to be dedicated. . 30 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2,592-ACRE ANSIN PROPERTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR RO-ED CORPORATION AND RONALD M. ANSIN , PREPARED BY . �A ,�� 1� � 1�34 C�tm►nerce L�rte • Sua#e i�.lupiter, Fl. • 33458 56"l.T4T.�x336 • S6i.7d7:13T7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PURPOSE ..............................................................................................................3 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 3 3.1 VEGETATION ................................................................................................. 3 3.2 FLUCCS CODES .............................................................................................. 5 3 .3 SOILS ................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 WILDLIFE ......................................................................................................10 3.5 PROTECTED WILDLIFE ............................................................................10 3.6 WETLANDS ....................................................................................................11 3.7 SET-ASIDE REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................12 4.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................12 TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1. List of plant species found on the Ansin 2,592-Acre Parcel during a visit on May 30, 2008. This is not an exhaustive list of all plant species found on the site. Table 2. List of soils mapped on the Ansin 2,592-Acre Parcel. Table 3. List of species protected by federal or state of Florida laws that are likely to occur on the subject properties. Figure 1. Location Map Figure 2. USGS Quadrangle Map Figure 3. Aerial Map Figure 4. FLUCCS Map Figure 5. Soils Map Attachment 1. Site Photos 1.0 INTRODUCTION On May 30, 2008 an environmental assessment (EA) of the 2,592-acre Ansin property was conducted by the staff of Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. The site is located along the eastern side of I-95 south of Fellsmere Road (See Location Map and USGS Map). The property is surrounded by agricultural land, low density residential, and undeveloped land. As mentioned, the entire western side of the properties is adjacent to I-95. The EA was conducted by driving the site, getting out periodically for closer inspection of certain areas. 2.0 PURPOSE The objective of this EA was to determine habitat coverage including general areas of wetland habitats, soils present, and the presence of state or federally listed species. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The 2,592-acre property is bordered by low density residential, agricultural land, and undeveloped land (See Aerial Map). Most of the northeastern part of this property is abandoned tomato fields and citrus groves. The southern and western areas contain open pine flatwoods interspersed with dense swamps or open herbaceous wetland. The entire 2,592-acre property is currently used to graze cattle. Several ditches bisect the abandoned tomato fields and groves, and one large ditch cuts through the native habitat diagonally from east to west. Two large ponds have been created along the western edge, one in the northern portion of the property and one in the southwest corner. 3.1 VEGETATION The abandoned tomato fields and citrus groves have been colonized by Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) and pasture grasses. Large oaks, cabbage palms, and slash pines are scattered throughout these areas. The southern and western parts of the property contain native habitat, including xyric and mesic pine flatwoods, hardwood swamps, freshwater marshes and cypress stands. Table 1. List of plant species found on the Ansin 2,592-Acre Parcel during a visit on May 30, 2008. This is not an exhaustive list of all plant species found on the site. Wetland Status refers to designations according to Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Common Name Latin Name Wetland Status FDEP red maple Acer rubrum FACW chalky bluestem Andropogon virginicus var. FAC laucus swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FACW sawgrass Cladium jamaicense OBL spikerush Eleocharis sp. OBL dogfennel Eupatorium capillifolium FAC slender flattop goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana FAC loblolly bay Gordonia lasianthus FACW pineland heliotrope Hekotropium polyphyllum FAC gallberry Ilex glabra small-leaf climbing fern Lygodium microphyllum wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC spatterdock Nuphar advena OBL torpedograss Panicum repens FACW slash pine Pinus elliottii cam horweed Pluchea s. FACW blackroot Pterocaulon pycnostacyum laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC Brazilian pepper* Schinus terebinthifolius FAC saw almetto Serenoa re ens eenbriar Smilax s . c ress Taxodium s. OBL ai lant � Tillandsia s . � Southern cattail T ha domin ensis OBL shiny blueberry Vaccinium myrsinites muscadine Vitis rotundifolia Virginia chain fern Woodwardia virginica FACW 3.2 FLUCCS CODES Plant communities were classified according to the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). A FLUCCS map showing the approximate location and acreage based on the site visit and aerial interpretation is included as Figure 4. In addition to the abandoned fields and groves, upland areas consist of various pine forest habitat, wetland areas corisist of freshwater herbaceous and forested habitats. 2110-Improved Pasture — This category in most cases consists of land which has been cleared, tilled, reseeded with specific grass types and periodically improved with brush control and fertilizer application. Water ponds, troughs, feed bunkers and, in some cases, cow trails, are evident. 2140-Row Crops — Corn, tomatoes, potatoes, and beans are typical row crops found in Florida. Rows remain well-defined even after crops have been harvested. 2210-Citrus Groves — Oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, etc. 4110-Pine Flatwoods — These forests are quite common throughout much of northern and Central Florida. Originally, longleaf pines were common on drier sites while slash pines, which are less fire-resistant, were confined to moister sites; wildfire being the contributing factor in this distribution. However, fire control and artificial reforestation have extended the range of slash pine into former longleaf sites. The pine flatwoods class is dominated by either slash pine, longleaf pine, or both and less frequently pond pine. The common flatwoods understory species include saw palmetto, wax myrtle, gallberry, and a wide variety of herbs and brush. 4140-Pine-Mesic Oak — On moister sites, slash, longleaf, and loblolly pine grow in strong association with a wide variety of inesic oaks and other hardwood species. Southern red oak, water oak, white oak and laurel oak in addition to hickories, sweetgum, and dogwood commonly grow along side these pine species under mesic conditions. Gallberry, wax myrtle and saw palmetto are among the common understory species. 4340-Hardwood-Conifer Mixed — This class is reserved for those farested areas in which neither upland conifers nor hardwoods achieve a 66 percent crown canopy dominance. 6170-Mixed Wetland Hardwoods — This category is reserved for those wetland hardwood communities which are composed of a large variety of hardwood species tolerant of hydric conditidns yet exhibit an ill-defined mixture of species. � 6216-Cypress-Mixed Hardwood 6410-Freshwater Marsh 3.3 SOILS Soil geographic data developed by Saint Johns' Water Management District and National Resources Conservation Service was used to obtain a list of soils occurring on the properties; descriptions follow below. Table 2. List of soils mapped on the Ansin 2,592-Acre Parcel. These data are meant as reference for soils expected at the locations, but should not be used as a primary re ulato tool for ermittin or citin decisions. Soil Name ID Hydric Area Y/N acres Chobee muck loam fine sand, de ressional 62 Y �5 Eau allie fine sand 3 N �1530 Floridana fine sand 55 Y �22 Holo aw fine sand 47 Y �300 Holo aw fine sand, de ressional 57 Y �112 Immokalee fine sand 4 N �93 Malabar fine sand 39 Y �32 Manatee loam fine sand, de ressional 15 Y �10 Manatee muck loam fine sand, de ressional 53 Y �15 M akka fine sand 5 N �41 M akka fine sand, de ressional 45 Y � 13 Oldsmar fine sand 6 N � 18 Oldsmar fine sand, de ressional 52 Y �2 Pineda fine sand 16 Y � 170 Pomello fine sand 21 N <1 Riviera fine sand 10 Y �213 Water 99 N/A �15 The Chobee series consists of very deep, very poorly drained, slowly to very slowly permeable soils in depressions, flats, and occasionally on river flood plains in the lower Coastal Plain. They formed in thick beds of loamy marine sediments. The average annual air temperature ranges from 70 to 74 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 50 to 60 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The water table is within 6 inches for 1 to 4 months during most years. Depressional areas are ponded for long duration in most areas. The drained areas are used principally for citrus, pasture, and range. Most of the �soils remain in their natural state and have vegetation consisting of pickerelweed, lilies, sawgrass, and scattered swamp maples in treeless areas. Some areas have a growth of ash, gum, maple, and cypress. The EauGallie series consists of deep or very deep, poorly or very poorly drained, slowly permeable soils in flats, sloughs and depressional areas. They formed in sandy and loamy marine sediments in Peninsula Florida. The climate is humid subtropical. The average annual air temperature ranges from 70 to 74 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 50 to 60 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The water table rises within 6 to 18 inches of the surface for periods of 1 to 4 months and is within 40 inches for more than 6 months. Depressional areas are covered with standing water 3 to 6 months during most years. Many areas of EauGallie soils are used for citrus, truck crops, and pastureland. Natural vegetation consists of longleaf pine, South Florida slash pine, and sawpalmetto. The understory vegetation includes inkberry, southern bayberry, and pineland threeawn. � The Floridana series consists of very deep, very poorly drained, slowly to very slowly permeable soils on low broad flats, flood plains, and in depressional areas. They formed in thick beds of sandy and loamy marine sediments. The average annual temperature ranges from 72 to 76 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 50 to 60 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 1 percent. The water table is at depths of less than 10 inches below the surface and depressional areas are ponded for more than 6 months during most years. Flood plains are flooded for 1 to 3 months during most years. Many areas of Floridana soils have been cleared and used for pasture. Where water control is adequate, it is used for growing truck crops and citrus. Natural vegetation consists of sand cordgrass, cabbage palmetto, myrtle, and pineland threeawn. In depressional areas, most of the soil has a sparse to dense cover of cypress. In flood plains, the vegetation is mostly sweetgum, blackgum, red maple, and cypress. The Holopaw series consists of deep and very deep, poorly and very poorly drained soils formed in sandy marine sediments. These soils are rapidly permeable in the A and E horizons and moderately or moderately slowly permeable in the B horizon. These soils are on low lying flats, in poorly defined drainages or depressional areas. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The climate is humid and warm. Precipitation is about 50 to 60 inches annually and mean annual air temperature is about 70 to 74 degrees F. A water table is within 12 inches of the soil surface for 2 to 6 months during most years. Depressional areas are ponded for more than 6 months during most years. Large areas of Holopaw soils are used for range. With adequate water control, these soils are used for citrus, truck crops, and tame pasture. Native vegetation is scattered slash and pond pine, cabbage and sawpalmettos, scattered cypress, myrtle, sand cordgrass, and pineland threeawn. The Immokalee series consists of deep and very deep, poorly drained and very poorly � drained soils that formed in sandy marine sediments. They occur on� flatwoods and in depressions of Peninsular Florida. Slope gradients are usually 0 to 2 percent, but adjacent to swamps, ponds, marshes, and lakes, slopes range from 2 to 5 percent. Annual precipitation is about 50 to 60 inches, and mean annual air temperature is about 70 to 74 degrees F. Runoff is slow or ponded. The water table is at depths of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 4 months during most years. It is between a depth of 18 inches to 36 inches for 2 to 10 months during most years. It is below 60 inches during the dry periods of most years. Depressional areas are covered with standing water for periods of 6 to 9 months or more in most years. Principal vegetation is longleaf and slash pines and undergrowth of sawpalmetto, gallberry, waxmyrtle, and pineland threeawn. In depressions, water tolerant plants such as cypress, loblollybay gorodonia, red maple, sweetbay, maidencane, blue maidencane, chalky bluestem, sand cordgrass, and bluejoint panicum are more common. Most areas are used for range and forest. Large areas with adequate water management are used for citrus, tame pasture, and truck crops. The Malabar series consists of very deep, poorly to very poorly drained soils in sloughs, shallow depressions, and along flood plains. They formed in sandy and loamy marine sediments. The average annual temperature ranges from 72 to 74 degrees F. and the average annual precipitation ranges from 53 to 57 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The water table is within depths of 10 inches for 2 to 6 months during most years. Depressions are ponded for periods ranging from 3 to 6 months in most years. Flood plains are flooded for periods of 7 days to 1 month in most years. Large areas of the Malabar soils are used extensively for range. Some areas are used for citrus crops, truck crops, and improved pasture with adequate water control. Native vegetation consists of scattered slash pine, cypress wax myrtle, cabbage palm, pineland threeawn, and maidencane. In depressions, the vegetation is dominantly St. Johnswort or maidencane. The Manatee series consists of very deep, very poorly drained, moderately permeable soils in depressions, broad drainageways, and on flood plains. They formed in sandy and loamy marine sediments. The climate is humid subtropical. Slope is dominantly less than 1 percent but ranges to 2 percent. The average annual air temperature ranges from 72 to 74 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 47 to 55 inches. The water table is within 10 inches of the surface for more than 6 months annually during most years. Depressional areas are ponded for about 6 to 9 months during most years. Most areas of Manatee soils remain in native vegetation. A few small areas have been drained and is used for growing winter truck crops, citrus groves and improved pasture. Natural vegetation consists of red maple, gum, cabbage palm and widely spaced cypress. Treeless areas are covered by pickerelweed, sedge, maidencane, Jamaica sawgrass, cutgrass bluestem, panicum, cinnamon fern, sand cordgrass, St. Johnswort, and other perennial grasses. The Myakka series consists of deep and very deep, poorly to very poorly drained soils fortned in sandy marine deposits. These soils are on flatwoods, high tidal areas, flood plains, depressions, and gently sloping to sloping barrier islands. They have rapid permeability in the A horizon and moderate or moderately rapid permeability in the Bh horizon. Slopes range from 0 to 8 percent. The soil formed in sandy marine deposits. Rainfall averages about 50 to 60 inches annually with mean annual air temperature of about 70 to 74 degrees F. They have slow internal drainage and slow to ponded runoff. Permeability is rapid in the A and E horizons and moderate or moderately rapid in the Bh horizon. The water table is at depths of less than 18 inches for 1 to 4 months duration in most years and recedes to depths of more than 40 inches during very dry seasons. Depressional areas are covered with standing water for periods of 6 to 9 months or more in most years. Most areas are used for commercial forest production or native range. Large areas with adequate water control measures are used far citrus, improved pasture, and truck crops. Native vegetation includes longleaf and slash pines with an undergrowth of sawpalmetto, running oak, inkberry, waxmyrtle, huckleberry, chalky bluestem, pineland threeawn, and scattered fetterbush. The Oldsmar series consists of very deep, poorly drained and very poorly drained soils in flats and depressions of Peninsular Florida. They formed in sandy marine sediments overlying loamy materials. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The climate is humid subtropical. The average annual temperature ranges from 70 to 74 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 50 to 60 inches. The water table is at depths of less than 18 inches for 1 to 3 months during wet seasons in most years. It is at depths of 18 to 40 inches for periods of more than 6 months and recedes to depths of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Depressions are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more in most years. Most areas of Oldsmar soils remain in native vegetation. Areas with water control are used for citrus, truck crops, and tame pasture. Native vegetation consists of cabbage palmetto, sawpalmetto, live oak, slash pine, with an undergrowth of laurel, wax myrtle, and pineland threeawn. In depressions the trees are cypress, blackgum, pond pine, loblolly bay, red maple, and sweetbay. Other plants included maidencane, blue maidencane, chalky bluestem, sand cordgrass, and bluejoint panicum. The Pineda series consists of deep and very deep, poorly and very poorly drained, very slowly permeable soils in depressions, low hammocks, poorly defined drainageways, broad low flats, and flood plains. They formed in thick beds of sandy and loamy marine sediments on the lower Coastal Plain. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The climate is humid semitropical. The average annual air temperature ranges from 70 to 74 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 50 to 60 inches. The water table is within depths of 12 inches for 1 to 6 months. In some areas the soil is flooded from 7 days to 6 months. Depressions are ponded for periods of 3 to 6 months in most years. Areas of Pineda soils that are drained are used for citrus, truck crops, and tame pasture. In their undrained state, these soils are used for range. Natural vegetation consists of slash pine, cypress, myrtle, cabbage palm, blue maidencane, chalky bluestem, bluepoint panicum, sedges, pineland threeawn, and sand cordgrass. The Pomello series consists of very deep, moderately well to somewhat poorly drained soils that are sandy to depths of more than 80 inches. Pomello soils fortned in sandy marine sediments in the flatwoods areas of Peninsular Florida. Slopes range from 0 to 5 percent. Pomello soils are on ridges within the flatwoods in Peninsular Florida. Precipitation averages 50 to 60 inches, and average air temperature is 70 to 74 degrees F. The seasonally high water table is at depths of about 24 to 42 inches for 1 to 4 months. Pomello soils are mostly used for range and forest production. A few areas are used for pasture. In its northern extent of occurrence many areas are used for urban development. Native vegetation is dominated by scrub oak, dwarf live oak, sawpalmetto, longleaf pine, slash pine, and pine land threeawn. The Riviera series consists of very deep, poorly drained, very slowly permeable soils on broad, low flats and in depressions in the Lower Coastal Plain. They formed in stratified sandy and loamy marine sediments on the Lower Coastal Plain. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The climate is humid semitropical. Slopes are less than 2 percent. The average annual temperature ranges from 74 to 76 degrees F., and the average annual precipitation ranges from 58 to 65 inches. When drained, Riviera soils are used for citrus, winter truck crops, and improved pasture. Native vegetation consists of slash pine, cabbage, and sawpalmetto, scattered cypress, maidencane, and pineland threeawn. The water table is within 10 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months in most years and 10 to 30 inches deep most of the rest of the year. It is below 40 inches for short periods in driest seasons. Some areas are flooded for periods ranging from a few days to about 3 months. Depressions are ponded for periods ranging from 6 to 12 months. 3.4 WILDLIFE Wildlife encountered during the EA includes species typical of Florida habitats; these include turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), common ground dove (Columbina passerina), sandhill crane (Grus canadensis), red bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus), Florida black racer (Coluber constrictor priapus), Florida softshell (Apalone ferox), and gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). There was also large areas of wild hog (Sus scrofa) rooting and a nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) burrow. 3.5 PROTECTED WILDLIFE As noted above, sandhill cranes and a gopher tortoise were encountered during the EA. Both species are Threatened in the State of Florida. Development of the property will require a complete gopher tortoise survey conducted no more than three months prior to any clearing or construction activities. Depending on the number of active AND inactive burrows encountered during the survey, and the relocation plan, a special or standard gopher tortoise relocation permit will be required. The special permit is for relocation of five or fewer tortoises; the standard permit is for more than five tortoises. Due to the � significant amount of gopher tortoise habitat on the property, it is expected that a standard relocation permit will be required. Table 3. List of species protected by federal or state of Florida laws that are likely to occur on the sub�ect ro erties. Latin Name Common Name US Status FL Status Plant Dicerandra immaculata Lakela's mint E E Glandularia tam ensis Tam a vervain E Lechea divaricata ine inweed E Pe eromia humilis terrestrial e eromia E Pe eromia obtusi olia blunt-leaved e eromia E Calo 0 on multi orus MC E Schizach rium niveum scrub bluestem MC E Am hibian Rana ca ito o her fro Bird SSC A'aia a'a'a roseate s oonbill SSC A helocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-'a T T Aramus uarauna lim kin SSC Athene cunicularia oridana Florida burrowin owl SSC Caracara cheriwa crested caracara T T E retta caerulea little blue heron SSC E retta ru escens reddish e et SSC E retta thula snow e et SSC E retta tricolor tricolored heron SSC Eudocimus albus white ibis SSC Grus canadensis ratensis Florida sandhill crane T Haliaeetus leucoce halus bald ea le T T M cteria americana wood stork E E Rostrhamus sociabilis lumbeus snail kite E E Mammal Podom s oridanus Florida mouse SSC Sciurus ni er shermani Sherman's fox s uirrel SSC Re tile Alli ator mississi iensis American alli ator T S/A SSC D marchon cou eri eastern indi o snake T T Go herus ol hemus o her tortoise T Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus Florida ine snake SSC E = Endangered � � MC = Management Concern SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T S/A = Threatened by Similarity of Appearance 3.6 WETLANDS The information presented in this EA includes very general descriptions of the wetland areas within the property. These areas were identified using data gathered during the field visit, from the Soil map, and the Aerial Map. In addition to wetlands occurring in native habitat, significant portions of the tomato fields and citrus groves contain hydric soils and wetland characteristics are evident on recent aerial photos. The 2,592-acre Ansin property contains remnants of historic wetlands. Much of the wetland habitat currently remains although hydrology has been impacted by development. The aerial view shows that prior to major development, including I-95, water flowed unimpeded to the northeast and wetland habitat formed long, continuous strands across the property from the southwest. Water still flows to the northeast, but it is now captured in a series of ditches, and water coming from the southwest includes agricultural runoff containing excessive nutrients and other pollutants. Additionally, Lateral D is a major canal running along the east side of the property. This canal impacts the hydrology of on site wetlands and is also negatively impacted by excessive nutrients and other pollutants. Lateral D eventually connects to Sebastian River; therefare, the quality of water flowing into the canal and how they impact the river are a major concern. A thorough wetland delineation conducted in the field will be required to accurately identify all wetlands on the site. It is expected that much of the wetland habitat occumng on the property will be claimed by both the Saint John's Water Management District and the US Army Corps of Engineers. 3.7 SET-ASIDE REOUIREMENTS As required by the Annexation Agreement, 50 percent of the 2,592 acres, approximately 1,296 acres, must be set aside as open space. As described in the regulations, open space areas can be used for a variety of purposes including stormwater management ponds. Furthermore, Chapter 5: Conservation Element of the City of Fellsmere's Plan highlights as a goal conserving, protecting, and appropriately managing the City's natural resources. Water quality and surface water management are two components of the City's water resources that are specifically mentioned. Saint John's Water Management District (District) has approached the owner of the property to discuss incorporating some type of stormwater management area into the land set aside as open space. There is interest in locating a stormwater management system here because of the proximity to the Lateral D canal and because the property contains ditches draining agricultural lands to the southwest. Additionally, a large area of land would be required for adequate stormwater management. An effectively executed stormwater management system could help to reduce pollutants in Lateral D and the water from the southwest, in turn improving the quality of water discharged into the Sebastian River. The owner is open to working with the City and District regarding potential plans for stormwater management. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Vegetation and soils indicate that much of this site would be classified as forested and herbaceous wetland and both the St. John's Water Management District and US Army Corps of Engineers would claim jurisdiction. There is extensive gopher tortoise habitat present in upland areas, and a gopher tortoise was seen during the survey. An endangered species survey would be conducted to identify and locate active and inactive gopher tortoise burrows on site, and relocation permitting through the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission would be required. • �� t� � � a ' r� �� e �, � �J � �, _ '�, 1' �� . �- . , � _� . . . �� , � �� e#�a �#ian f� I �� s�° �n�� _ � r � �� r � f �' � ; �t � r � ��,�� j �� , ,, � y , i � �, t �� yr � �� r �� ; � ��, ��.�.� E E . .` < �, �,°' � �'��„�� ,�� `� , � ; � � ��_„� w.� � ��. � �' � , ,�� , � _ �� 1 _.m�� `� � �� , � ... ��'ll �i . ' � ��y`'� ��'`�.\ < ' ;, ; �, . �'�,�n,`v �, �'�'"�` ° � � E �' � �'p� �� . : �IN�� y �� , ; �'�,�,�,�`'�" ��.4�. �� ry w w, t J t 1 � �'" �, � � � � �, � � . � __ �. � ; ` Fellsmere Rd � � a � ,,� !'� � �,� �,`��`� �� '� . � . ___ _ �. 3� � �'� �`;'.� �� ' �x� ,� �� : i L4 � � � r�o . �3 ��;I'� � L i ``,� s � a. � ,�"� _ �. � �' � - " �� . .: � . .= -��a toE - .,�� ". : � . p�, �� .W -�.�,. ,,,�,,.�,,. .. , � - � "��^ � . €.......: ; . � - ' .` . �'tt� .. .:`. �r �� . ai'*��-� � �-�' . �4-._ - �� ,�, ,� _ d �� s = i `� � ; � � ��.� '� �e � _ _ , ��,� E �� `�`�� :. t wa,� � �� ,�.�� r 4""`.SCi - � , . � � � ; �� E�� r � � �� - . �_. . � �� ;. � . � _ � �. ...� _ �,�� , � a � � � � �.��w �.��... _ � � �� N'�) �. � �°� _.�� ,.� __� � � � i �. � � � , � �. � � , �� iC�" � i , ._.:, i � g � � � ri —�� . . � �Up �' �� - , �� , ., ' ��'�,�s i�� , � , � < . �,_.�_�� : - r�a i � � ,.� 1� ii�� .- � �.. , �� 3 � 3� � �?��:1 ��! w i�. �. � °�.�T � :t`. � �... � � � � `� � r j � 1 "� � s�� #'�7� ' ��; , �.:�.::_„'g;".c � �''� � � _ : �= � �� ...; ,_. ri � � � 3 - ,,,,,., � ': � � . � � § . �nn-- t � .. - " _ �� «»� �»..�. u��_ ,,: - _ � ........... .w , , , o.�-.��„o, l . . �. m ,., , -. � 9 + � � .� - � ` - � . . -�." . _ r � � � z �...s . � , € -� $ .......� �;' � � � � r � 9 i . ,. . , � _, .,.�.... . - - , , ,_,'. _ , '. .. _ -; . : _� : _ -- , j^^— . „ � - � , , , , + x ' . . g i . k : rv,,: � x « a 5 f � � 3 f � i � + .' ._.... . . { � ' r �� 2 ^ . , ..o � _.?w..,,,-,.. - . , _ � � �� b �, _ � � � � . . � � � ` �� „ ' � ` . _ - - _ y �y» ,. —.- , ; _ � ..y 1 k � � w }i � � `.� _ . �L. Le en� ; �� . � � , � � � -� S`t' ��° � H�ra Ave _ ;rOtF� St � _ _1 M, e �� " A ' �` �� #` � ° Parcel Boundaries ; - � `- �� , ° �.�� . � ,;� . O Location Maf� ��, �_ -- �C}��,lr � Ansin Property He�ring 1 inch equals 2 miles Fe//sme�e, F/o�ida 7934 Commerc� Lane • Suite 1� Jupiter, R• 33438 561347.6836 - SSt.747.7377 Mep Do�ument: (C:\Pro9ram FlesWrcGIS\BinlTemplales\CH\FPL-EA.mxd) 7/12/2006 — 3:38:19 PM � �� z �> -. � ''-. �� . � "' ck� :� � '7 ,��.v -� -�$ ; �h�' �u'�"E�� „ �,� a�c�., - i. _ ,�^a f . J 5� ��- y _ 4 . - . � � '" v �� ,� R �*� *� � � j � � � _ '� � � ik �j 3 � ..� il� �ni � ✓ f S � i �y` 4� ' �'-? F j P r � '"A . L� 7 � � �!a 4 _ � _x \ � � m�' R F t - i Z . 'b � Y 'Yf i � Y +�+` L � y p, a � , � Y%4.� �- � � I �'w � . � . ��-k� C .� I � � � �� &; ^C'iZu'1." `�-'-� - ,r� �� , ' � , i { : _ � . *' �, 7 i.�v � i a� ��i�'�.^"" i.,. I s � � � � t'.: �� a � • f a - � h1 3' �_ � ' > ;�`- � �j�: ` � �]„ ? �� "�' � "" � . � .,_ � -r 1 . r� , -�-.� rr Jk+ _ � �.' ` �i !� Nat ,#'� 3 � '� �.�.^' = � s � �b - - �� -�"ly � ^� -? . / � � 'RVi � ` s �.�' .,.,...__ �.,i � f'�`' x x�s ��,^� � � !`;G�tl� y _Sr d�.� � i��d� - �... � ,y � + .'� � � ,� ,N�' - i �' F � i �p�,�� . , ' a i _ .�" 'L�. �c � } . 5 � � � � t T '{ 3�, � . �. � S��' 'p t '. I - � 1 •" _ � 3� � ��` .1� � � : �, � ��- � � i' �, x . t r�� P�� 6§� :_ � ti� y � ." � � I " � � ' � � �l 1 s 1� � R ,� t�j'4 7 ' s � ° � � ("�� ' } . '� . * y Y_ �� '. ; � � L� . , � ...; p � '� f • * ' �y t � 4•_ � _ �' � � �� ` �, ' '� �.`� '3' 3� ;�` 1 �J ^ aT#� 1 �� 4 ' �r�� i � � ' d i� , y w j. tx- "r^�._ u � � '!�" �- � � `� � �� _ � � '� y a q . E' k �a. .�s , -- f � "� �,� � �,', �, � � �� a �SEBASTIAf� � u. �� - T r — �': � � ` �,2�080G5�a� ; �'��,,`�_ ,� { _ � # 2708 ��" , � �� { "� � 'h . ,�,�r� s.,� 3F � �,�� _ �'": �� . _ r , �� , r � � -I y �„ � � ` ,�� F- r �4 � � . - � .;; +a w � ` � ,�'" '�., 9 �' � � � � Lt- _ � �,� r ,= C'�- . '�, � r a �t . � � � �'� E ! r � �" �. 5,'.��4�, +' � � _ � � =�3 �, � " � - � ,� . • �-' ' � a�" -.' �' ..� I—` � Pj . 'd j.� �� ' ��, � � �f �-�!�.�'�_ L � � � � - a 5..��k �'ai a � �� -. � .� x � � I �- � .., F� .l ' � �t .�,�` r`15 "� � ?" , �'� � !:,.� ?� r �T'L�e _ n a is � -'" i� `�� Li� � �� -°,,� � s+ �- e � �: �; .�� M I � � R � fh . ��` � J Sw i ( h � 4�� M I l 5 . � ,,, � k � j .F r �„i'S i"f� � �" -}� 'e �. ' l '�"�� ji i rt_ i� `i�.�}" at�}^ � � e. 4'�'[� �_ � � �' '�i � � � �"_ -�, � � � '�,.-�* ,� tl"s�" , � T��_ �� . � �� * a ��t � _ "'�=$.+"! � ,'. -# �� y � , �{i A � Y �_3— . :t , y,Y^ r-�A� ; _ �� -v- i �+";3, ^ 4 ~ J � F �s� � � � _ �`�-,: �-IV ... � � -�h i -. 5 ", .. `.P' �4 � .. �... � . -_J„ - k �,. .: � 5 v �V B f _ { ` z � % 'e�tt „2' �r �� m° " . �� s'.��" � T �� 4 t � �- : , G � � . �:_g� 4v'� � . �%'.� � `� >;r<�''k'��,�;4 �- �� .,, a S � �� J�'��t d��"�5�r � �a` , I � y €� a � ' 4 / 6 � .�"I �� .aq� . -f t t ti � ' - � _ - r. t f - . e� + —1 _. .<. '2, � �' .�z� -.�. _..,, _ _ " �A �.y r � r a ' x ,�a;# i ,. � __ r�i � _ , � , • �"��. : � � �.. '� � � t � ; � . �g� � �.�. _ _� :,>z g _ - ' ,-s� , �:: , � � � ° .. � .� � � � � :� ( � � � � �' �i � - � �? F� � � � Y A 5 4 � 9 .., � . i .� � z . ■ � f ' i — M �� - ,'�i '� _ T' � 1 • t ` � i� : - . F '� � * I �� .. .- .:.. _ � t ` 4 � � �> � � � � �r: ., v,� ,� t i ° {" yt:, � �4.�..s.:... E � � ` � '�"-� -I., ' _ � k � . � � z �.� � , i aiq�i� r _ s E � 5 , j ' �,� � t� .' : � �� n , �� = ,� . r � �."�, � _ � � .; � � - � � ._ � ,� � � �� --� � 4 # ��,..�._. -- 1 i � � -- r �*i �`# ! �arri�srr�i�� -�. � - x "s€-° �-- � ��,�: - u: ._ { i � � � 1�� r �� ., - . _ r- � _t� .,�, � � � _ �� F 6.� � ...3..'}� * f ..� ! � � , f � . _. ..� ,. . � .� � * � ! ; ` � x � - , � � � � ! � � � : . -- . a � _ . � :�;� � �� . �� l � � 1 �1� '" � �ti: , �„� � " �� " .. y � �fi �� i E ��i ' ��> 3 �. � _i � �' � _ 'y � � � � � �� 1 `� � � � �. � . • , , �: } y t° ��f}.�...0 t ' w(� 3 � 34ti. -_3 L� � � Y ' f � � ' 4� � .. � :_ I , � ��, , # - � T r i � � r; x �r ,e #� r. ( . �: -„ . ..... ri .. y : p {} � � . C � .;{ i "`-S i�yr �, o _� � "'y� 9 7#r �, � � , .>w»� y � ' �rt 7^ . :-.:. -_.. _ t ... � � . i x ""�h�+ . _ n I � y � i � " � � �k „ .,, __ ; � � � 5 ,� ' -"} r . � � "'°` � .: r -' ^ � d - ��iti��' r ��``�� f __'--� '� — a , . ��k i, / � 1 � ., t � + � i r ' _.. i ., .. � o � . .- 4 - �, _ - '��'j ; :- 'w , , . r��"' £ : € � "� - - c - .— ..,� � .+ ��-� ��.�� [��r�'�t�t��iY-�� 1 1 ��.,�.�s�._ .. - ,� r :. ![ _ � � � _ ., _ . °" _ � t� �} ' � � # � 6 � 60 H F'��LSIvf�RE �• `.! � ��'�`-, ; ERp BEP1C� � « � s J 1 �� # "f �� . - _, y � � �r� � Y" � ' s r � ,., , .... � 1 � � � . _.,=�--�,�.�, . � . _ � 1 p N�� 2 ! � ' Q,�� i P ,� § -�� + �' �� - '�e$'�' ` .i g F � 5� �..- I ^r ! • y �a � - ; 2 � � , 9 r: . i - � ��! r30Q5 - f � � � �I � , t � , ,= 300r�= � �. � � � � �:.� �� , � � � � F � � ,�� ( { r �` ` -°r . - .... . ti . � � : - __ � � �.-� , - . s + - _ .. �'*-a �� _ _� - , .* - w� , v _ b ..t r �,- -� �- L. � ' � t 0. � %f l 3 � � � � ''� � �'� „�' �.. ._ ' � f � -_ � '- �,i� r �;..� .'� 5 � K _r _ _ a: i i�,_ `e�` i �� rf f• .,� � -� _ � � - ' '..a�. ....e r� .... ' _� j _ , x _� , �.; f � ,� ° � f � '�� _ y � � � . .�.. � - � � � � = � { �1 � 1 5 -, � 1. � I I. I _ � 'k.., � ' � 4 f ""^"'�S. � F *. �� .... � I'� � _ ..r+u ��' C -- - � � �i�, �1 � y '�� F .{ y � � �II�� ' ' T 'r.'+�-"m. t < .�� ,' . � s � _ I °.1 i ] '� - � � �_ � ..�.�. f r -� � � . ,� � ,- � � 1 . � _ �. '9- �, a x i � — r L � �e 3 i � � �,-�=, � i"". . :'� � ,��.�_ � . �.I ": k s y r V - { ,�a - �.� ,. ` � �� _ }� �, � r f � f .. . ~. � t M1 J, i�� b`t S��a^_ '` 3 a � ! '- '� �' _ d �_ t�,� t�'^k-.ur_2� Legend �`'� �^ � ' f ` i � �� , � _ � . � r � T�' , � �'�- � � t . � k � ' k.. � , 1 � �� j I � � , �� 1 t - a' ��• � i �� 4 . �• �� -ajv � ..,�� !t t . ��! Parcel Boundaries _ �, �u' . �'�`, � �:'� �- � � r �- � . � : � ; � � * L � � s � �' � ^9 � ' ' �- + _._ � USGS Quadrangie Index -- --��- �• �-�, , � = - ;�-*;�T--�-�-- -= x< _I � ' t "7�A9' + h!_ „_"`j' ' T _�.� ... - . .. . � a r .; `( . , at � . _ O USGS Quadrang/e /Vlap = �p�]e�� g� Ansin Property H�� r �� 1 inch equals 7,500 feet F/orida 199�CommereeLane • 8uHa7 • Jupl[e,FL • 3345$ Fe//smere 561.747.W36 • 561.747.1377 Map Documenl: (C:1Progrem FBesUrcG15\BinlTemplates\CM\FPL-EA.mxd) 7/12/2006 - 9:38:t9 PM , , . �. _ , � 4 - .� �' _ _... , � � y � ��, ��,,� � ; y , , � < <�.�., , , � � �,� ' � �* � '. �[: # �,,�i,�;. :j E . �p i Il� � �, • „ �� ' ..L . ,.. � g . . } k� I R � � ..: e n a �,.., f Y � � " " �. � � � �;i . , �; , : . .. . _ _ � ,. . r �� . . .:.. ,,._'... . :-,..�:.�-.:.-. _. Y, .. ' , �� . d ii � '�� y�G il'��. � i �� I��j § . d v: , i � _. � � � � � 4�� d �,� i, . I �, �� '�j, m : i � k . °' •;:'_- r:::g. .;£ t Legend ,,..,,._; 4 BOUNDARY O Aeria/Map � _ = ��tleur & Ansin Properly Hearing 1 inch equals 2,000 feet fe//smere, F/orida 1934 Commerce Lane • SuNe 1• JupNsr, FL • 334i8 561.747.B338 • SB1.747.1377 n�P 000��re�e (F:WCMap_7rojecls\091023.01 FELLSMERESUNBEAM\New Paicels 013008\BASE.mxd) 1/302008 FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION AREA (acres) 2110 / 2210 Improved Pasture / Citrus Groves 851.97 2140 Row Crops (tomatoes) 478.87 4110 / 4340 / 6170 Pine Flatwoods / Hardwood-Conifer Mixed / Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 288.67 4110 / 6410 Pine Flahvoods / Freshwater Marsh 788.42 5200 Lakes 9.02 ' 6170 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 82.54 6216 Cypress-Mixed Hardwoods 12.19 6410 Freshwater Marsh 80.38 E 2592.00 _ ,� . „ �' _ .. ��, � � � s t, � . i i � s �i � - i I �'� ,� �'� I �P�� k� u !I i i � j � i� � �� r k'� k ¢ ^' �I � � � ,F� { � '' ? b f 4;� , ;� ! # s � ! �'I i � ..o��r -� ,..�. .. ,_. . _. .....; a . . : +� i � �� - . , . ..,. �' I ' i � ; ,. � , , ,� �; �, � ; �� , , , r , , t :, , � _.,: � ,� �� „ < i f i I �d � �. "�i ,�,� , ,. �, � �' , . y �� . g . ,R'; q ,,, � � , Legend fluccserase Union O Fcvccs n�a,� �otleu� & 1 inch equals 2,000 feet 2. Acre Ansin Property Hearing Fe//smere, F/o�ida 1834Gommrr�e WnE - Svite i- dupitcr, FL � 33468 567.7d7.6336 • Sfi1.797.1777 Map DocumenL (C:\Pio9ram FdesWrcGIS\Bin\Templates\CH\FPL-EA.matl) 7/72/ZOOfi - 338:19 PM �-� � >. , � � � � � �- A. - , ;. , _ _ .,��' " �.`. .� �_ . - - _ ` r;. � A � �1 � �' i % �� i � � n �� i l, � ,,�'-. 4 d, �' �k P i. il; ", �':f i' 6. �� r � � il � � 1 7 + i �� E �P 4� a�� p E$ ', Q^ � I: � I, � i '� k I � l !;� �1 �'R! Legend , � �, ' '�� BOUNDARY � �� :' 39-Malabarfinesand-32acres � � �..�..�. ...,,, �. � SOIL TYPE AND APP ROXIMATE AREA 45 - Myakka fine sand, depressiona� - �3 acres ". � � � � �� 3 - Eaugallie fine sand - 7530 ac�es � � �� - 47 - Holopaw fine sand - 300 acres � ��: 4- Immokalee fine sand - 93 acres _ �: 52 - Oldsmar fine sand, depressional - 2 acres � �� 5- Myakka fine sand - 41 acres � - 53 - Manatee mucky loam fine sand, depressional - 15 acres � 6- Oldsmar fine sand - 18 acres �� . 55 - Flondana mucky fne sand, depressional - 22 acres � ' ' 10 - Riviera fine sand - 213 acres �� 57 - Holopaw fine sand, depressional - 112 acres - 15 - Manatee loamy fine sand - 10 acres �- 62 - Chobee mucky loamy fine sand, depressional - 5 acres ... . . _.. - �. i 16 - Pineda fine sand - 170 acres ': �: 99 - Water - 15 acres � �� 21-Pomellofinesand-<lacre O Soi/s Map c�}��r � 2,592 Acre Ansin Property `' Hearrng 1 inch equals 1,500 feet Fe//smere, F/orida 1934 Commeree Lane • Suke 1• Jupiler. FL • 33456 561.747.8398 � SB1.747.7377 Map Document (F'WCMep_Projecls\Oi1023.01 FELLSMERESUNBEAMWew Paicels 073008\BASE m�E) 1I30Y1008 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment 1. Site Photos , n . _ � � � - ��, � �� .... r ' S� , � x _ = c � �. � , . .� , .. . <_-: : ° �:. � ,� , � ,, r � �_ � � 7 � � �; _ ¢.;; , �� ; �� . � .� ,; �, � � ..�,_ ;�� .. , � � _ � �, �� . � . � , _ , r. �, r�. �_� i , __ ., ,� �„ � �, s - ,_ _ a. � ,tik� Photo 1. Pine flatwoods habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. s �-� -= , � s �� , w . � �, � � � _ , �. _ ,,� .. � �� ' _ � �:.= , , ��E .. , � � � �� , , Y , ��, , s�° �. r _ , � , �. - � ,. , _ . -� - , , _,� � ,.... � , �, -, s. �. : � � ..- �_ �_ .� ... " . ,� . :. " = i �",,,�,_' , . , . .:. =_ :: - , ., ' �'� -. a � '�,g�"" �p� . � � ,_ �� F�- �� . $ v�f �� ,� :,. � a �� > ��,� �. m ��, � �- � _°�� n —_ �,. � � ,��`-.»-�., � � - ` � � � ,. � r�, - �� . ,.. - . . ar.._.__ ' .�� - --�- `�"' �= E - , _ . �. ,.�m �' . Photo 2. Example of large oak located in upland habitat in southeastern corner of 2,593-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment 1. Site Photos �� w�� _ ,: i� ( ��:�n�� a�.�� M x,: :� t a �l�� p "� �„, �? �7 �i-: � "� y II� I • � I I 4' i.� � � I Y I I �� I� z I � � I�� ` dl r m �N �� I � y�� R . � �� E � � �� i �; ;"; �:.. , __ 4 �:�a:- w. — � � 3�- � ., . u �.- � _ -. �- ;� �; , =� Photo 3. Pine flatwoods habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. � ,��, � �� i� � �� ;- � � r� � i � � � �� `�� r �q ; ; M I f i' - �, ' ;:. ; ' � � r � S � I �tk -" I..n �� I ti �� I tn � i�} t '�U'Iiili�itc �, .�"+ - � �6��h��( : � . ' ' �P . � F ro zc � � - � �m. � �1I i ��' �+ � � ��3 � " �14p 'F�� ' , � „ I ��,�� '! �� ` �, ' u� ��P '��M �f t��M �I �' �' � I �.. ��, ^"''+;{ I i � � � �l � , i' . f� »-- �-�`�. t" s �. 7' Photo 4. Pine flatwoods habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment 1. Site Photos � , �� t �'� : � €� sk r ��m _- ��„� �� ; �i�a � ti�� 'a�� ', � � � �� , , � � � ;i, �� r. �; � � � y - _,°- � � ; ° `�- •�. �� . , <. ,� _ �.�= F� ,. - ,u�, .s �� ,�. � � ' i, �., � �� i ,: � !. i ' ';i � •�;'# ' �� ,, :� � Photo 5. Pine flatwoods habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. �--��-� _ �� „ . � . , _ �x, - � �: � : . . _ �, �:. _ - x .�, ,� �� ,� � � h�� r �, � W.. i'a: �'a �'='-�" '"'.,'� r.'Ay:: � 1. , . . ��:. . _ . . �» : -. . . .:. b- w �� >. �� _ � ��- �:: �_,"' �� , ` _ . � �_ ' �__ , i i ;. .• .. . . Y . " . ;4 � `.� _ ' .. �:_ � � H ".�.. l i � � ti,' . .., "�,. n ��' �� „a � _ Photo 6. Cypress and mixed hardwood wetland habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment l. Site Photos z � � � , _„ �; : � : � �.� � � �,' � �� -. �ia� ' '�� h � �S � � � � - �^�. . � ',a. � - ., �" , _ � `— s � < s � �"` ,_ ' : _,._ -� . ., ._ �' " : �� n_ - ' , . �,, ., � � M1 �' `� � � � � G",. ,'F.� ��y y „�. � � � � 7 _ � p �� -. � �.� . � � �� . �� s� � � � � ; �`:: � �l ` � , �. ��- � � �� "�� ,� �� <, � � x �s r4E } ta� .'�� '� 1 f b i , _ ,4 ^-�F"'e.._ ; k J �, � t � .. � �k� � e�.,• � � �'� � � � jt y , , k,� - �.. � ! -.. :-�',.. Y,'' � h a � k t � �' y � � i� y � t q x i �� Y } �. � r� �� ,,� ' � �� d �� `� � �" � J �� " '�y �t,� � ��, . p b �� , ,, z� : ° �d�_ p. a � � ._ , , �._` �� . �- , � �'�� y �� ; � �°, ��, : � �� - 4. � I �� i �*. � � � � �� ' I�� § � �� ' II I 4 �� `� - `� f i . I -'i: 4f�i � I �.. t i ' ti � Y .- .,. ' I`_ . �. • j �^. k � - p f�il � � �' �� , �� ° � ;� . _ *.» = s i. � .. `i;��. , �- � -,,� Q�a� �i =t4`;�' h � , -�� o= � � , �, , ��.�, `.� , � =, �i t � �. Photo 7. Cypress and mixed hardwood wetland habitat in southeastern corner of 2,592-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment 1. Site Photos ;� � � �� i � � � �a� �,; � � �� p ,. 1� t� �� ' � I � � � �� .,� ;� "" ��; ,:�.; " „,� �� ,,. � �� -� �_ �.� � � � � � �: �. �� '� �� Gs- _�' w g .=fk .� 9 �:- �° � x .� ��: �� .« � & � � � � .f��: b'�� 'n� � .: ?L- .. � ._ , . .. . . ,� � ,..... � ,' "� -��.:r__:;_ ' �.. ' ;,: a, � " �- . .,:--.. n. ' :s . :_3.y��'-'ti--. � ., - � � � �'* . _. �' -.: $n' : :--.. ,,:- ;s.:. , ..- �.`� i - :::�.�- :. 4 .—� .,-� � - . -.•� . �: `s...:, ,.. ..� ...s.:_. - . --' ..?!q• Photo 8. Small herbaceous wetland impacted by hog rooting in the southeastern corner of the 2,592- acre Ansin property. p 5, �� i � i�lli� r � � � a + � � _ �`� � �`�` � � � 7 � a'� i ��i�i �s' � r r "�) hJwp) � . E ^�' _ : � - � n� ' I 4�� ., - r ,��' r � ��y y k � ¶P�V +T � x � ` b .. : ��'� ��'�s �T' �� a � ��'- �Y �� - �� ( �, � . 7 � �) � � ¶ C �; i S � � N� �� :'� _ ``�„�� j i}'�i�P> �� i � '�"e„ �. '' `a - - � ;, gas�� ' ,d�� - -::,��° ` m �� Photo 9. Another view of the small herbaceous wetland in the southeastern corner of the 2,592-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment l. Site Photos � � � <-�� =�� ,� � _ `� �r�, � � �� k. : , . - r ..:., ' �� --" .» :: "' � '��i t� I �.�{ , .,... „ _; .. . : :. ..,; r .,. S R : :,- i .; �1, y g�q. " ; :': ` � - &d ' », , : k r l'1 r � � 4,. � � � 4 �I�l:I�� @�I'I ,� ;� �;: - � � w� � �a r; � y ��, >`'.. , , � v,: 4 � . - ,�, �� " , �: ', u � ; �� ; i � . �� .W �� "� ' �� ,. L � � +��_ < : �; ` ?p . ��, _.,: , y 7 'x � i " � s � ,g�, � � m V M , LV ( " � Z W � _ tvr - if�,�_ : � A I�i i.a i�,tr� % r � . � � � ��@� � �' I �,, � r � - i� ' � i "` A � � " �. �, �, Photo 10. Pine flatwoods habitat in south half of 2,592-acre Ansin property. ~r� sa � ,��,o� � ��' � �"� � � � �� : ��"�ti � i ;� ��d�r�i� �, �;�� _ � � � � ��. : � , r � � ' , �� ,c�� i � �� r � a � � � � � � ��'��', fi � �� ` -�, :� � � o �� h�� ' � �� h � ,.. y `" �_ � __� ; F � . � � : �r ��ww� .� � a ;�aa ��d �� p x, : -� �s ��`�A' „ #+� li��i � r� t r _�� ,Y 7 . 3�: w :?: �� E ' • _ " 5tr6 '-' . � � .� . ,.. . . n . 4� ., - r:. ,,.: '' s :, . 4 Y, �� ; , f-, s� r _ �.. : � <_ - ,. � � Photo 11. Upland habitat in south half of 2,592-acre Ansin property. 2,592-Acre Ansin Property Environmental Assessment Attachment 1. Site Photos �_ �,�. � �� ;,r,. �� ` � ��`�� _ ,� �e , ,- �.� ,. � ; �.� �� ;�� _ '' �� - �.: Photo 12. Freshwater marsh habitat in the south half of the 2,592-acre Ansin property. ,� k ,:„ ��,� �a� x . �� .: �.. �'"�:: � Traffic Im act Anal sis �f p y �� r � �� = Land Use Plan Amendment , _ ,a �k 'Y�; `` w':: Yk'lu -`z�'»�� ( � 3 RO- E D Cor . 300 Acres p ��r �� Fellsmere Florida ,� a�� - , , �; s � z: � �� s; � � '� � Prepared for: � = �-�: ��,�� RO-ED Corporation �� clo Sunbeam Properties, Inc. �� - 1401 79th Causeway � �� Miami, FL 33141 � � � x � # . �� ,z �- � "� July 21, 2008 � �� . ,. -� :-- _ :., , , _ - � ��,��G��u� �� ,� . ,,,,,� � �� Prepared by: , � . � : fr . � � .x �� '�``� aa�d ��-IN��, �'.�. � � �� t��rrv��s. �c.anrtv��,�, sv�rr��t�� ___,�-' b5�t� l+�.Andr�e+,�slt►ve.• Furt Lauder�ale,FL �3304 � � ��z�t� ��t�-� � � � _ ��sa��r �-��s�►� f�� f �. ,� ,�� _; Traffic Impact Analysis Land Use Plan Amendment ..�:� ��.�.a�u _-� � _�sE��rn�� «�� . ��..��u� _ RO-ED Cor . 300 Acres p Fellsmere, Florida Prepa�ed for.• RO-ED Corporation clo Sunbeam Properties, Inc. 1401 79t" Causeway Miami, FL 33141 , July 21, 2008 ''�u� ... ��Gi�y�iii��'�� 4 '� Jose L. Rodriguez, P,E. State of Florida License No. 45596 P�epared by: .a� � , '�� ' 1� I�ETTH and S��CHI'�A.1�S, P.rA. ��.�� ENGlNEE�tS PLAAFNEF#S, u�Uf2VEYC?RS _,�,,,,,�' b34f1N.�hrnde'�wsAve..FarfLa�u'd�rdale,Ff.333fl9 ��sa��-�a�a*�4se)��r-��o Fa� Table of Contents Section PaQe 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Trip Generation ...................................................................................................... 1 3. Impact Study Area .................................................................................................. 4 4. Future Traffic and Project Trip Distribution ............................................................. 8 5. Short Term Year 2013 ............................................................................................ 8 6. Long Term Year 2033 .......................................................................................... 10 7. Findings ................................................................................................................13 List of Figures Fi ure Paqe Figure Location Map ................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Primary Impact Study Area ............................................................................. 5 List of Tables Table Paqe Table 1: Daily Trip Generation ...................................................................................... 3 Table 2: PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ....................................................................... 3 Table 3: Primary Impact Study Area Roadways ............................................................ 4 Table 4: Current 2008 Roadway Conditions ................................................................. 6 Table 5: Growth Rates Based on Indian River County and FDOT Annual Traffic Counting Programs .................................................................. 9 Table 6: Year 2013 LOS Evaluation ............................................................................ 11 Table 7: Capital Improvement Program Projects ........................................................ 13 Table 8: Year 2033 LOS Evaluation ............................................................................ 14 Appendices Appendix A: Indian River County Links Maintenance Report, March 6, 2008 Appendix B: Indian River County Annual Traffic Counting Program, 2007 Report Appendix C: Model Trip Distribution Plots for School and 2033 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment i July 21, 2008 1. Introduction Keith and Schnars, P.A. has been retained by RO-ED Corporation to provide the traffic impact analysis report for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) for the proposed RO- ED Corp. 300 Acres project to be located in the eastern sector of the City of Fellsmere in Indian River County, Florida. The proposed project site is located in the area generally bounded by CR 512 on the north, I-95 on the west, 79 Street extension on the south, and 106 Avenue on the east (see Figure 1). This area has been recently incorporated into the City of Fellsmere. The current land use designation is L-1 (County) which allows three dwelling units per acre. The proposed RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres project consists of the following elements: • 900 residential units dwelling units (600 single family units and 300 multi-family units); and • a 750 student elementary school. Per request by the City of Fellsmere's Planning Office staff, in order to maintain consistency with Indian River County guidelines, one-way peak hour evaluations of traffic impacts were used instead of annual average daily traffic (AADT). The traffic impact analyses presented herein include analyses for existing year 2008, short term year 2013, and long term year 2033 time frames. The proposed phasing of the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres development is as follows: • Year 2013 — School; and • Year 2033 — Full build-out of 900 residential units. 2. Trip Generation Trip generation analysis is based on the trip equations and/or rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 7 th Edition. Table 1 provides the daily trip generation analysis for the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres project. A total of 8,060 external two-way trips are estimated to be generated on a daily basis. A total of 859 external peak hour trips are estimated to be generated during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. The inbound trips number 517 trips and the outbound trips number 342 trips. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00.09003 Land Use Plan Amendment 1 July 21, 2008 � �- � � �. � � �: � :. � - �� }.:; ,� r ,, . ��-. � ; �, - . � �, � `F � � � � � � � �� '{ � _ V . , i. " .. -� ., � /Yw ::,k�[ �, .�� /�{ yy 4f �� . .. � • � f � � i � � s Y ? •{ i _ � � 1 � �� Y7 .�^�._ .T ' _: , ._.. : ,�, � , �� u i , � �,� �� ` , � .� � __ . . � � � . � '� � ::. -.« ; �� :. - � : . � �. � , ' .�. � ' �" A�. � : �� W �� - ,� � �. � � 's �� . � �� . �� ,��r, � �� ,', ��, RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00.09003 Land Use Plan Amendment 2 July 21, 2008 Table 1 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Daily Trip Generation 20-Ju1-08 ITE 7TH EDITION LAND USE DESCRIPTION DENSITY UNITS LAND USE DAILY TRIP GEN DAILY TRIPS CODE RATE OR FORMULA (�) � Elementary School 750 Student 520 T= 1.29 (X) 968 Residential - Single Family 600 Dwelling Units 210 Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 5,406 Residential - Apartments 300 Dwelling Units 220 T= 6.01(X) +150.35 1,953 GROSS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS: 8,327 INTERNALIZATION RATE : 13.8% OF STUDENT TRIPS (4) 267 EXTERNAL TRIPS AFTER INTERNALIZATION: 8,060 PASS-BY TRIP REDUCTION COMMERCIAL 5: 0.0% 0 EXTERNAL TRIPS AFTER PASS-BY: 8,060 TRANSIT TRIP REDUCTION = 0.0% 0 TOTAL NET EXTERNAL TRIPS: 8,060 Table 2 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment PM Peak Hour Trip Generation 20-Ju1-08 LAND ITE 7TH EDITION PM INBOUND OUTBOUND LAND USE DESCRIPTION DENSITY UNITS USE PM TRIP GENERATION PEAK CODE �TE OR FORMULA (1) HOUR (2) TRIPS % TRIPS % TRIPS Elementary School 750 Student 520 Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.4 191 45.0% S6 55.0% 705 Residential - Single Family (3) 600 Dwelling Units 210 Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.53 538 63.0% 339 37.0% 199 Residential - Apartments 300 Dwelling Units 220 T= 0.55(X) + 17.65 183 65.0% 119 35.0% 64 GROSS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS: 912 60% 544 40% 368 INTERNALIZATION RATE : 13.8% OF STUDENT TRIPS 4 53 50% 27 50% 26 EXTERNAL TRIPS AFTER INTERNALIZATION: 859 60% 517 40% 342 PASS-BY TRIP REDUCTION COMMERCIAL 5: 0.0% 0 0 0 EXTERNAL TRIPS AFTER PASS-BY: 859 60% 517 40% 342 TRANSIT TRIP REDUCTION = 0.0% 0 0 0 TOTAL NET EXTERNAL TRIPS: 859 60% 517 40% 342 NOTES for Tables 1 and 2: (1) Trip rates are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation, 7th Edition. (2) LEGEND: T= Number of Trips; X= Number of Students or Dwelling Unit (DU) (3) Single Family Dwelling Unit trip ratelequation capped at 3000 units. Applied corresponding rate after 3, 000 units. (4) School-Residential internalization rate based on Indian River County rates of 0.189/Sing/e family Unit and 0.037/Mu/ti-family unit. The 900 sing/e family units in the 300-acre parcel will generate 124 elementary students or 13.8% of total students. (5) Pass-by reduction applicable only to net extemal trips of Commercial Use. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00.09003 Land Use Plan Amendment 3 July 21, 2008 3. Impact Studv Area The impact area for both the current and proposed RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres project land uses were determined based upon Indian River County's and City of Fellsmere's concurrency system guidelines. The impact area and significance levels are defined as those roadways within a 5-mile project radius that generate: 1. Eight (8) one-way project trips on two lane roads; or 2. Fifteen (15) one-way project trips on four and six lane roads. Figure 2 presents the primary impact area of a five mile radius with respect to the project and impacted roadways. The study area roadways included for the proposed LUPA and within the impact radius are summarized in Table 3. Table 3 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Primary Impact Study Area Roadways CR 512 � 58 Avenue 108 Avenue Fellsmere Road / 95 Street CR 613 CR 510 66 Avenue 69 Street 90' Avenue / 85` Street CR 615 CR 508 I-95 82" Avenue 77tn Street SR 9 CR 619 / Ranch Road Table 4 summarizes the 2008 roadway conditions for each of the roads within the primary impact study area. The table includes: (1) the study roadway and jurisdiction, (2) the study roadway links, (3) the roadway facility type and number of travel lanes [2L— two lane undivided and 4LD—four lane divided], (4) the adopted level of service {LOS} for the roadway link, (5) the link capacity thresholds or maximum service volumes for one-way peak hour [vehicles per hour], (6) year 2007 one-way peak hour volumes, and (7) whether or not the road meets the current LOS standards. The maximum service volumes were obtained from the Indian River County Links Maintenance Report (March 6, 2008) [see Appendix A] and the Florida Department of Transportation "2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook". The 2007 peak-hour volumes are taken from the "Indian River County Annual Traffic Counting Program, 2007 Report" [see Appendix B]. As presented in Table 4, all of the roadways within the primary impact study area currently meet the LOS standards. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00.09003 Land Use Plan Amendment 4 July 21, 2008 �� q � � � � � p , ..r' U�'' ��j o��' ¢ ��` � �v��a� � � � � � �,�� r�.�� a � v� � �� > �, � �. �� ; � � � � � � �� #,��`- � � �� ' 31t1Yti1�1 � a�� ' *!.! �" " ��QI��i9 �7 � � � a i � � dI�S 2f� �ar t�E � �� '�'. � , �....,.._....�..,� � � � � *�, � �� F� '� � � � � + W � � � � � �* i � � � �� t��ee � � C� �irt�ca � � � � .. �v � �;.... � set�� g ..Y.. f-9� ,r `' w Ir .- � � N � ��„� ; " �, � W � �S t �:�°�.�� ' � �� °°�,>.,�� iL �� m '�: � «�.. ..�...r.. .e.. � �.._.._.. �,� .. r' �'' t; ; �►. � 's p r � u�^i , . � ! � ��`�� '� �.,.� � � � �� . , . �� ' c; � � �" � � � �r,s-�� .,. _ . : � ��. �� :� ,� ,�......� "� ,+' � � ,� « �• � � ��_ �' .i � �� ,� �*,� � � � �� ., .��` � � ,� �..�.�;�� "" - - � r� � �� ......._,._�._..�,��,,�.._...�,.� _ � � z�.�-�ra . � . � �� "'J' bi�1i �� -��.Si�1y'. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Tra�c Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 5 July 21, 2008 Table 4 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Current 2008 Roadway Conditions ` 2008 Facility;Conditions ' R4ADWAY LtNK Z 2007 � 20Q8 Capacity Peak � Adopted Meef LbS t� Facility Threshold Hour PROM >TO � Type L �� (vph} Volume �xandards? 0 CR-512 (COUNTY) SR-60 CR-507 EB 2L D 860 54 YES WB 2L D 860 42 YES CR-507 I-95 EB 2L D 860 44B YES WB 2L D 860 645 YES I-95 108thAvenue EB 4LD D 1,860 823 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 729 YES 108th Avenue CR-510 -90th Avenue EB 2L D 860 823 YES WB 2L D 860 729 YES CR-510 -90th Avenue Sebastian City Limil EB 2L D 860 737 YES WB 2L D 860 721 YES Sebastian City Limit Roseland Road EB 2L D 860 553 YES WB 2L D 860 542 YES Roseland Road Barber Street EB 4LD D 1,860 553 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 542 YES Barber Street Fleming Street EB 4LD D 1,860 535 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 616 YES Fleming Street Easy Street EB 4LD D 1,860 630 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 624 YES Easy Street Delaware Street EB 4LD D 1,860 602 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 707 YES Delaware SVeet U.S. 1 EB 4LD D 1,860 584 YES WB 4LD D 1,860 695 YES CR-510 COUNTY CR-512 85th SVeet NB 2L D 860 491 YES SB 2L D 860 347 YES 851h Street 66th Avenue EB 2L D 860 272 YES WB 2L D 860 667 YES 66th Avenue 58th Avenue EB 2L D 860 321 YES WB 2L D 860 667 YES Seth Avenue US-1 EB 2L D 860 396 YES WB 2L D 860 717 YES 77TH STREET COUN 90th Street 66th Avenue EB N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WB N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A 66th Avenue 58th Avenue EB 2L D 820 85 YES WB 2L D 820 162 YES Selh Avenue U.S. 1 EB 2L D 820 60 YES WB 2L D 820 150 YES 69TH STREET COUN 82nd Avenue 66th Avenue EB 2L C 410 37 YES WB 2L C 410 24 YES • 66th Avenue 581h Avenue EB 2L D 870 33 YES WB 2L D 870 78 YES 58th Avenue Old Dixie Hwy EB 2L D 870 48 YES WB 2L D 870 78 YES Old Dixie Hwy U.S. 1 EB 2L D 870 49 YES WB 2L D 870 78 YES ' LOS "D" Capacity Threshold is based upon the adopted standards by Indian River County. N/A = Not Available RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 6 July 21, 2008 Table 4 (Cont'd) RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Current 2008 Roadway Conditions Y 2008 Facili ;Conditions '' `: ROADWAY LINK Z 2007 � PeBk ` 2008, Capacity c Facility Adopted Threshold Hour �eet L�3a w LOS 3tandards� FROM TO " � Type (vph}- Voluine C I-95 (STATE N. County Line CR-512 NB 4LD C 2,740 1,504 YES SB 4LD C 2,740 1,509 YES CR-512 SR-60 NB 4LD C 2,740 1,510 YES SB 4LD C 2,740 1,519 YES SR-60 S. County Line NB 4LD C 2,890 1,726 YES SB 4LD C 2,890 1,712 YES 708TH/106TH AVENUE CR-512 89th Street NB 2L C 410 0 YES SB 2L C 410 0 YES 82ND AVENUE COUNTY SR-60 69th Street NB 2L C 410 52 YES SB 2L C 410 43 YES 69th Street CR 510 NB N/A N/A N/A N/A NO SB N/A N/A N/A N/A NO 66TH AVENUE COUN SR-60 26th Street NB 2L D 860 426 YES SB 2L D 860 529 YES 26thSVeet 41stStreet NB 2L D 860 469 YES SB 2L D 860 398 YES 47stStreet 45thStreet NB 2L D 950 706 YES SB 2L D 950 441 YES 45th Street 65th Street NB 2L D 870 678 YES SB 2L D 870 376 YES 65th Street 69th Street NB 2L D 870 681 YES SB 2L D 870 350 YES 69th SUeet CR-510 NB 2L D 870 723 YES SB 2L D 870 360 YES 58TH AVENUE COUN SR-60 26lhStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 920 YES SB 4LD D 1,860 863 YES 26thStreet 41stStreet NB 2L D 860 629 YES SB 2L D 860 576 YES 41st Street 45th Sreet NB 2L D 860 545 YES SB 2L D 860 484 YES 45th Sreet 49th Street NB 2L D 860 489 YES SB 2L D 660 418 YES 49th Street 65th Street NB 2L D 860 545 YES SB 2L D 860 402 YES 65th Street 69th Street NB 2L D 860 412 YES SB •2L D 860 330 YES 69th Street CR-510 NB 2L D 860 399 YES SB 2L D 860 266 YES CR (COUNTY) S. Carolina Ave. N. County Line NB 2L D 860 173 YES SB 2L D 860 168 YES ' LOS "D" Capacity Threshold is based upon the adopted standards by Indian River County. N!A = Not Available RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 7 July 21, 2008 4. Future Traffic and Proiect Trip Distribution The latest Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model (TCRPM) was used to estimate background growth for project build-out conditions in 2033 and to distribute project trips on the roadway network. The growth rates were estimated for each roadway link by comparing traffic volumes between the 2000 Validated TCRPM and the 2030 Cost Feasible TCRPM. The 2030 TCRPM model reflects the approved roadway network and anticipated developments consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The 2030 TCRPM was used for estimating project trip distribution percentages on each roadway link by creating a special zone for the project (TAZ 160) and perForming a select zone analysis. Two distributions were developed for the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres. One distribution was for the proposed elementary school to be completed in the first phase in 2013. The second distribution was for the school plus 900 residential units to be completed at build-out in 2033. Both distributions are provided in Appendix C. The 2013 background conditions were produced using committed development trips obtained from the County, and by projecting background growth using historical growth rates. The 2033 background volumes were based on model-derived growth rates that accounted for all anticipated developments included in the LRTP. The only changes made to the LRTP roadway network for this analysis were to provide roadway links to connect the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres to the roadway network. 5. Short Term Year 2013 Traffic forecasts for the short term (year 2013) were derived by growing the year 2007 two-way peak hour traffic forward using the growth rate per year as calculated from four years of historic traffic data (2004-2007) from the Florida Department of Transportation count stations and Indian River County traffic data as shown in Table 5. A minimum growth rate of 0.5 percent was assumed for any roadway link that had a growth rate less than 0.50 percent. The Year 2013 Background projections were then developed by adding the forecasted 2013 peak hour volumes based on the historic growth rates presented in Table 5 with the aforementioned Indian River County committed development traffic as contained in the Indian River County Links Maintenance Report. The 2013 Total Traffic includes the 2013 Background traffic plus the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres (750 student elementary school) trips, distributed as discussed earlier based on the TCRPM FSUTMS model. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 8 July 21, 2008 Table 5 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Growth Rates Based On Indian River County And FDOT Annual Traffic Counting Programs COMPOUND APPLIED [1] Y � R GROWTH GROWTH ROADWAY LINK RATE RATE FO FROM TO NUMBER ZQ04 2005 2006 2007 yp042007 2013 C R. 507 S. CAROLINA AVENUI N. COUNTY LINE 9010 2,200 2,799 2,987 2,854 9.06% 9.06% CR. 512 SR. 60 FELLSMERE ROA 9080 900 800 894 775 -4.86% 0.50% FELLSMERE ROAD I-95 1710 9,800 10,676 9,562 9,792 -0.03% 0.50% I-95 CR.510 1720 14,500 17,566 15,388 15,465 2.17% 2.17% CR. 510 ROSELAND ROA 1730 15,500 14,846 15,207 15,338 -0.35% 0.50% ROSELAND ROAD BARBER STREET 1740 15,200 14,628 12,509 13,755 -3.27% 0.50% BARBER STREET FLEMING 1747 14,500 13,670 13,777 12,845 -3.96% 0.50% FLEMING EASY STREET 1742 14,900 16,299 13,754 13,828 -2.46% 0.50% EASY STREET DELAWARE 1743 13,900 16,057 13,268 15,050 2.69% 2.69% DELAWARE US 1 1750 15,200 16,110 14,077 13,754 -3.28% 0.50% CR. 510 CR. 512 87TH STREET 9075 7,900 11,319 11,892 9,043 4.61% 4.61°h 87TH STREET 66TH AVENUE 1810 9,000 10,636 11,287 11,583 8.77� 8.77% 66TH AVENUE 58TH AVENUE 1820 11,600 12,505 11,368 10,054 -4.66% 0.50 % 58TH AVENUE US 1 1830 13,700 13,634 13,597 11,457 -5.79% 0.50% US 1 A1A 1840 16,700 14,742 14,246 9,653 -16.70% 0.50% 77TH STREET 66TH AVENUE 58TH AVENUE 3590 1,700 2,035 2,001 2,086 7.06% 7.06% 58TH AVENUE US 1 3610 1,300 1,573 1,526 1,631 7.85% 7.85°h 69TH STREET 82ND AVENUE 66TH AVENUE 3710 800 206 410 445 -17.76 % 0.50% 66TH AVENUE 58TH AVENUE 3720 800 1,474 829 856 2.28% 2.28% 58TH AVENUE OLD DIXIE HWY 3730 1,100 953 1,042 1,038 -1.92% 0.50% I-95 N. COUNTY LINE CR. 512 FDOT #9919 38,059 39,616 39,990 40,500 2.09% 2.09% CR. 512 SR. 60 FDOT #2001 37,500 30,000 37,500 36,500 -0.90 % 0.50% 82ND AVENUE SR.60 65TH STREET 3340 1,400 218 275 977 -11.30% 0.50% 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 3350 800 206 204 339 -24.89% 0.50°h 66TH AVENUE SR, 60 26TH STREET 3120 9,800 11,170 9,663 9,916 0.39% 0.50% 26TH STREET 41ST STREET 3130 10,000 11,227 9,717 10,726 2.36 % 2.36 % 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 3140 9,200 10,573 9,389 10,905 5.83% 5.83% 45TH STREET 65TH STREET 3150 8,500 10,122 8,682 10,211 6.30% 6.30% 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 3160 8,400 9,730 7,145 9,823 5.35°h 5.35% 69TH STREET CR.510 3170 8,300 10,146 8,503 71,281 10.77% 10.77% , 58TH AVENUE SR 60 26TH STREET 3030 20,400 27,197 23,805 19,342 -1.76% 0.50% 26TH STREET 41ST STREET 3033 13,200 14,694 15,498 73,286 0.22% 0.50% 4�ST STREET 45TH STREET 3035 11,200 12,394 11,585 10,559 -1.95% 0.50% 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 3040 9,800 11,060 10,390 9,626 -0.60% 0.50% 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 3045 9,800 11,194 9,097 9,896 0.33% 0.50% 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 3050 7,900 9,162 8,040 7,630 -1.15% 0.50% 69TH STREET CR-510 3055 7,000 9,118 6,881 6,638 -1.75% 0.50% RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 9 July 21, 2008 Table 6 presents a comparison of the results of the projected 2013 background and 2013 Total Traffic roadway LOS evaluations for the RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres (750 student elementary school). Table 6 also shows those links on which the project is considered significant and whether or not the link meets the LOS standards. The 2013 short term level of service analysis table assumes current programmed roadway improvements to be constructed from the Indian River County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for FY 2007/2008 - FY 2011/2012 published by the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), approved July 11, 2007, and the FDOT adopted 5-Year Work Program. These projects are summarized in Table 7. As indicated in Table 6, all of the roadway links will meet the LOS standards for both the 2013 Background and 2013 Total Traffic conditions. 6. Lonq Term Year 2033 The Long Term Background (2033) projections were based on the application of the model derived growth rates resulting from comparing, on a link by link basis, the validated 2000 and adopted 2030 models to the existing volumes. The proposed project trips were added on using the model derived distribution. Table 8 presents the projected long term year 2033 traffic projections for both the background traffic and total traffic conditions (with RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres project). Also presented is the LOS analysis for the impacted roadway network within the primary impact study area. As presented in Table 8, the following roadway segments are projected to be below the LOS standards in year 2033 for the background conditions (without the proposed project): • CR 510 between 58` Avenue and 66 Avenue; and � 66 Avenue between 45 Street and CR 510. Of those aforementioned links that fail to meet their adopted standard under the background traffic conditions, only the following links are those where the project trips would be significant: • CR 510 between 58 Avenue and 66 Avenue; and � 66 Avenue between 45 Street and CR 510. The following roadways meet the standards without the project trips but fail with the project trips: � CR 510 between 66 Avenue and 85 Street. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 10 July 21, 2008 Table 6 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Year 2013 LOS Evaluation 2073 Facilit 2073 COMMITTED PLUS BACKGROUND 2073 PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC ROADWAY LINK � u . u m W m y � n � = W E F rv E o � o- = T N 9 1' = f m C 9 m � .� � 9 O f � O W 9 > ] V C � C � ; 9 F 2' y q � K � p u W � Q O F ~ N ~ ` � ro O � O � FROM TO � LL O F U 3 y �� V y O m O C m � � N o Q � o � u E m O a o 'p � � H O ° ° a m ° `� c a = ry m � = s ' V � 2 � y d f N m N � a m O S � N 6 cR-so� �couNrr S. Carolina Ave. N. Counh Line NB 2L D 860 9.06% 9.06% 173 25 198 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 198 023 YES S.CaroBneAVe. N.CounlyLfne SB 2L D 860 9.06% 9.06% 168 28 196 YE5 0.0% OUT 0 B NO 196 0.23 YES cR-s�2 �couNrr� SR-60 CR-507 EB 2L D 860 0.50% 54 39 93 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 93 0.11 YES SR-60 CR-507 WB 2L D B60 0.50% 42 11 53 YES 0.0% OUT 0 B NO 53 0.06 YES CR-507 I-95 EB 4LD D 1,860 -O.Q3! 0.50% 44B 39 487 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 4B7 0.26 YES CR-507 I-95 WB 4LD D 1,860 -O,Q3w� 0.50% 645 11 fi56 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 656 0.35 YES I-95 70BM Avanue EB 4LD D 1,860 2.17°0 2.17% 823 B7 910 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 910 0.49 YES I-95 108C�Avenua WB 4LD D 1,860 2.17°n 2.17% 729 25 754 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 754 0.41 YES 108thAvenue 1oemAvenue EB 4L0 D 1,860 2,17°io 2.17% 823 87 910 YES 100.0% OUT 105 15 YES 1,015 0.55 YES 1oemAVenue 708mAVenue WB 4LD D 1,860 2.17% 2.17% 729 25 754 YES 700.0% IN 86 15 YES B40 0.45 YES 10BMAVenue CR-510-90�hAVenue EB 4LD D 1,860 2,17% 2.77% 823 87 910 YES 65.3% OUT 69 15 YES 979 0.53 YES 108MAvenue CR-510-9othAvenue WB 4LD D 7,860 2.17, 2.17% 729 25 754 YES 65.3% IN 56 15 VES 810 0.44 YES CR-510 �90M Avenue Sebestian Ciry Limit EB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 737 51 788 YES 38.9% OUT 47 15 YES 829 0.45 YES CR-510-90thAVenue SebasHanCiryLimit WB 4L0 D 1,860 0.50% 721 57 778 YES 38.9% IN 33 15 YES 811 0.44 YES CR-570-90M Avenue Roseland Road EB 4LD D 1,860 -0.35% 0.50% 553 43 596 YES 19.0% OUT 20 15 YES 616 0.33 YES CR-510-90mAVenue RoselandRoatl WB 4LD D 1,860 -4.35Y 0.50% 542 49 591 YES 19.D% IN 16 15 YES 607 0.33 YES RoselandROad BaroerStreet EB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 553 47 600 YES 13.4% OUT 14 15 NO 614 0.33 VES RoselantlRoatl BarDerSlraet WB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 542 40 5B2 YES 13.4% IN 12 15 NO 594 0.32 YES Barber SVeel Fleming Street EB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 535 47 582 YES 13.4% OUT 74 75 NO 596 0.32 YES BerberStreet FlemingStreet WB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 616 40 656 YES 13.4% IN 12 15 NO 668 0.36 YES FlemingStreet EasyStreet EB 4LD D 7,860 0.50% 630 47 677 YES 8.9% OUT 9 75 NO 686 0.37 YES Fleming Street Easy Street WB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 624 40 664 YES 8.9% IN 8 15 NO 672 0.36 YES EasyStreat Delawere5tree� EB 4LD D 1,860 0.50% 602 47 649 YES 4.1% OUT 4 15 NO 653 0.35 YES EasyStreet Delaware5treel WB 4LD D 7,860 0.50% 707 40 747 YES 4.1% IN 4 15 NO 751 0.40 YES Delaware5traet U.S.1 EB 4LD D 7,860 0.50% 584 47 631 YES 2.7% OUT 3 75 NO 634 0.34 YES Delaware5traet U.S.1 WB 4LD D 1,860 0.50°/a 695 40 735 YES 2.7% IN 2 15 NO 737 0.40 YES CR-570 COUNTY CR-512 85tl�Street NB 4LD D 1,860 8.77% 8.77% 491 183 674 YES 26.4% IN 23 15 YES 697 0.37 YES CR-512 BSNsheet SB 4LD D 1,860 8.77% 8.77% 347 106 453 YES 26.4% OUT 28 15 YES 481 026 YES 85th Sbeei 661n Avenue EB 4LD D 7,860 8.77% 8.77% 272 183 455 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 455 0.24 YES 85t�street 66mAVenue WB 4LD D 1,860 8.77% 8.77% 667 106 773 YES 0.0°h IN 0 15 NO 773 0.42 YES 66thAvanue 581nAvenua EB 4LD D 1,860 -4.66% 0.50% 321 779 440 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 440 024 YES 66[hAvenue SBNAVenue WB 4LD D 1,860 -0.66% 0.50% 667 117 784 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 784 OA2 YES SBth Avenue US-1 EB 4LD D 1,860 -0.66% 0.50% 396 728 524 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 524 0.28 VES SBthAvenue US-1 WB 4LD D 1,860 -4.6fi% 0.50% 717 754 871 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 871 0.47 YES 77TH STREET COUNTY 9Mh Street 66M Avenue EB 2L D B20 7.06% 7.06% 0 0 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 0 0.00 VES 90th Street 66N Avenua WB 2L D 820 7.06% 7.06% 0 0 YES O.Oq IN 0 8 NO 0 0.00 YES 66tnAVenue SBthAVenue EB 2L D B20 7.06% 7.06°/a 85 10 95 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 95 0.12 YES 66t�AVenue SBmAVenue WB 2L D 820 7.06% 7.06% 162 7 169 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 169 021 YE5 SBthAVenua U.S.1 EB 2L D 820 7.06� 7.06% 60 70 70 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 70 0.09 VES SBthAvenue U.S.1 - WB 2L D 820 7.06% 7.06% 150 � 157 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 157 0.19 YES 69TH STREET COUN 82ntl Avenue 66M Avenue EB 2L C 410 -17.76% 0.50% 37 33 70 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 70 0.17 YES 82ndAvenue 66mAVenue WB 2L C 410 -17.76% 0.50% 24 33 57 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 57 0.14 YES 66th Avenua 58th Avenue EB 2L D 870 -17.76% 0.50% 33 17 50 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 50 0.0fi YES 66thAVenue 58thAvenue WB 2L D 870 -17.76% 0.50% 78 22 100 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 100 0.11 YES 581h Avenue Ola Dizie Hwy EB 2L D 870 -17.76% 0.50% 48 13 61 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 61 0.07 YES 581h Avenue Old Dixie Hwy WB 2L D 870 -17.76� 0.50% 78 14 92 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 92 0.11 YES Oltl Diue Hwy U.S. 1 EB 2L D 870 -17.76% 0.50% 49 4 53 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 53 0.06 YES Oltl Dixie Mwy U.S. 1 WB 2L D 870 -17.76% 0.50% 78 4 82 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO B2 0.09 YES RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 11 July 21, 2008 Table 6 (Cont'd) RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Year 2013 LOS Evaluation 2013 Facili 2013 COMMITTED PLUS BACKGROUND 2013 PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC ROADWAY LINK „ � H m '� c m n m - � E � � E °- W � y q a ` n � � � o � Q i, � c � � c m 'o ° Q o '� r � �` � o m o t o �� m _ t- oi H c FROM TO w . w n t � � W 9 � ° A y ° ° m � � o vi K LL a � .y o � E� m O a G o u i w�i n O � "' Q n q g � m E 3 a` c �- n � N a S O Q U � S � y O � U = � � O 6 p � H I-95 STATE N.CounryLine CR-572 NB 4LD C 2,740 0.00% 0.50% 7,504 0 7,504 YES 0.0% OUT 0 75 NO 7,504 0.55 VES N.CounryLine CR-512 SB 4LD C 2,740 0.0096 0.50% 1,509 70 7,519 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 7,519 0.55 YES CR-512 SR-60 NB 4LD C 2,740 0.00% 0.50% 7,510 20 7,530 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 7,530 0.56 YES CR-512 SR-60 SB 4LD C 2,740 0.00% 0.50% 1,519 23 1,542 VES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 1,542 0.56 YES SR-60 S.COUnryLlne NB 4LD C 2,890 0.00% 0.50% 7,726 48 1,774 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 7,774 0.61 VES SR-60 S.COUnryLine SB 4LD C 2,890 O.00Yo O.SOq 1,712 35 1,747 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 1,747 0.60 YES 108TH AVENUE CR-512 89MStree1 NB 2L C 410 0.00% 0.50% 0 0 0 YES 700.7% OUT 105 8 YES 105 0.26 YES CR-5�2 89thStree� SB 2L C 410 0.00% 0.50% 0 0 0 YES 700.7% IN 86 8 YES 86 0.21 YES 82ND AVENUE COUNTY SR-60 69th Straet NB 2L C 410 -11.30% 0.50% 52 15 67 YES 8.8% IN 8 8 YES 75 0.18 YES SR-60 69th Street SB 2L C 410 -11.30� 0.50% 43 16 59 YES 8.8% OUT 9 8 YES 68 0.17 YES 69th Street CR 570 NB 2L C 410 N/A N/A 202 15 217 YES 26.4% IN 23 8 YES 240 0.59 YES 69th Street CR 570 SB 2L C 410 N/A N/A 226 i6 242 YES 26.4% OUT 28 8 YES 270 0.66 YES 66TH AVENUE COUNTY SR-60 26tti Stree� NB 4LD D 1,880 0.39% 0.50% 428 138 564 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 564 0.30 YES SR-60 26m Street SB 4LD D 1,860 0.39% 0.50% 529 74 603 YES 0.0% OUT 0 75 NO 603 0.32 YES 26thStreet 47stStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 2.36% 2.36% 469 145 814 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 614 0.33 YES 26thStreet 4istStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 2.36% 2.36% 398 80 478 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 478 0.26 YES 41stS[reet 45ttiStreet NB 4LD D 7,860 5.83% 5.83% 706 65 771 YES 0.0% IN 0 75 NO 771 0.47 YES 41st Street 45m Street SB 4LD D 1,860 5.83% 5.83% 441 54 495 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 495 0.27 YES 45th Streat 65M Slreel NB 4LD D 1,860 6.30% 6.30°k 678 70 748 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 748 0.40 YES 45th Street 65m Street SB 4LD D 1,860 6.30% 8.30% 376 55 431 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 431 023 YES fi5th Street 69M Street NB 4LD D 1,860 5.35% 5.35% 681 44 725 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 725 0.39 YES fi5th Straet 69tl� Sheet SB 4LD D 1,860 5.35% 5.35% 350 42 392 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 392 027 YES fi9thStreet CR-510 NB 4LD D 7,860 10.77% 70.77% 723 60 783 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 783 0.42 YES 69th Street CR-510 SB 4LD D 1,880 10.77% 10.77% 360 50 410 YES 0.0% OUT 0 75 NO 410 0.22 YES 58TH AVENUE COUNTY SR-60 26�h Sheet NB 4LD D 1,860 -1.76% 0.50% 920 112 1,032 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 1,032 0.55 YES SR-60 26U Street SB 4LD D 1,860 -1.76% 0.50% 863 74 937 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 937 0.50 YES 26thStreet a7stSVeet NB 4LD D 1,860 -1.78% 0.50% 629 112 741 YES 0.0°h IN 0 15 NO 747 0.40 YES 26thStreet 4tstStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 -1.76% 0.50% 576 74 650 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 650 0.35 YES 41stStreet 45mSreet NB 4LD D 1,860 -1.95% 0.50% 545 174 719 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 719 0.39 VES 41stSVaei 45t�SUeet SB 4LD D 1,860 •1.95% 0.50% 404 106 590 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 590 0.32 VES 45th Sreet 49N Street NB 4LD D 7,860 -0.60% 0.50% 489 199 688 YES 0.0°h IN 0 15 NO 688 0.37 YES 45th Street 49th Stret SB 4LD D 1,860 -0.60% 0.50°k 47B 117 535 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 535 029 VES 49th Street 65th Street NB 4LD D 1,860 0.33% 0.50°k 545 263 808 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 808 0.43 YES 49th Stret 65th Sveet SB 4LD D 1,Bfi0 0.33% 0.50% 402 133 535 YES 0.0% OUT 0 75 NO 535 0.29 YES fi5th Street 69th Street NB 4LD D 1,860 -1.15� 0.50% 412 105 517 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 517 02B YES fi5th Street 69m Slreet SB 4LD D 1,880 -1.15% 0.50% 330 177 447 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 447 024 YES 69thSheet CR-510 NB 4LD D 7,860 -1.75% 0.50% 399 100 499 YES 0.0% IN 0 75 NO 499 0.27 YE5 69th Stree[ CR-510 SB 4LD D 1,Bfi0 -1.75% 0.50% 266 90 356 YES 0.0% OUT 0 75 NO 356 0.19 VES Notes: ' LOS "D" Capaciry Threshold is baseE upon Ihe adopled standards by Intllan River Counry. N/A = Not Available RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 12 July 21, 2008 Table 7 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Capital Improvement Program Projects Rev 7-18-OB Project Location Description FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011I72 Programmed �1] Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Funded CR 510 61s1 Drive to Indian River 7.6 mi, 4L $3,700,000 $11,550,000 $2,500,000 n/a Na YES CR 510 751h Court to 67st Drive 1.5 mi, 4L $2,025,579 $1,700,00 $5,421,387 $9,000,000 n/a YES CR 510 CR 51210 751h CouA 4.5 mi, 4L $2,000,000 $18,190,000 $20,000,000 Na n/a YES CR 512, Phase 3 Roseland Road to Sebastian Middle �.5 mi, 4L $2,533,672 n/a n/a n/a n/a YES School CR 512, Phase 4 Sebastian M�dle to I-95 2 mi, 4L $2,708,520 n/a Na n/a nla YES CR 512, Phase 5 I-95 to 730ih Avenue 3 mi, 4L nla n/a n/a n/a $6,000,000 YES 66th Avenue 59th Street to SR 60 6 mi, 4L $1,900,000 $7,300,000 $3,750,000 $16,000,000 $70,450,000 YES 66th Avenue 59th Street to 77th Street 2 mi, 4L $500,000 $500,000 n/a $5,000,000 $6,000,000 YES 66th Avenue 77th Street to Barber SUeet 2 mi, 4L $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $760,000 $5,000,000 YES 82nd Avenue 26th Street to 77th Street 5 mi, 2L Na n/a Na $2,000,000 n/a YES 82nd Avenue 77th Street to CR 510 1 mi, 2L n/a n!a Na $700,000 nla YES SR 60 66th Avenue l0 82nd Avenue 2 mi, 6L n/a Na Na Na Na YES SR 60 82nd Avenue to I-95 7.5 mi, 6L $30,000,000 Na n/a n/a Ma YES 77th Steet 90th Avenue to 66th Avenue 3 mi, 2L nla $3,000,000 Na n/a $5,950,000 YES Bi st Street 66th Avenue to 5BM Avenue 0.5 mi, 2L $500,000 $400,000 n/a n/a nla YES 58th Avenue 77th Street la 53rd Street 3 mi, 4L $637,829 n/a n/a $3,100,000 $6,000,000 YES 58th Avenue CR 510 to 771h Slreet 1 mi, 4L n/a n/a n/a $3,500,000 n/a YES 74th Avenue 77th Street to 26ih Street 5 mi, 2L n/a $200,000 n/a n/a $11,800,000 YES O e: [1] Indian River County TranspoRation Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2007/2008 through 2011/2012 adopted July 11, 2007. 7. Findinqs Based on the results of the traffic impact analyses presented herein, it can be concluded that the proposed RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres project, will not adversely impact the roadway network in 2013, and will have only a minimal impact to the roadway network in 2033. Trips from the full build-out of the proposed development in 2033 cause a segment of CR 510, between 85 Street and 66 Avenue to exceed the adopted LOS standard. Based on the analysis, the adopted threshold would be exceed by 102 trips or just over 5 percent. In other cases such as CR 510 and 66 Avenue, background conditions not related to site traffic cause the roadway link failures. This indicates that some programmed or future roadway improvements may address the failing conditions. The continued development of this area of Fellsmere and Indian River County may require future participation in roadway improvements by RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres and other future planned or programmed developments. This participation may be more clearly defined during the City's and/or County's concurrency management system and site development processes. RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 13 July 21, 2008 Table 8 RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Year 2033 LOS Evaluation 2033 PM PEAK HOUR p033 PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ROADWAY LINK m � � � m > � : q E o ` � - a ., t F 9 a u m ° � 9 . Q � O o o c "o a c � � � � 9 �' '� �m c9 0 � Q o � F w F c : FROM TO w �w a F m Y ui o � y � � o y � M Q � •m m o a c o � F � O 'c o q � m C a C V N y N N 9 n 'C U � � � V o o m y �o � � a a` CR-507 (COUNTY S. Carolina Ave. N. County Line NB 2L D B60 3.68% 356 YES 0.7°h IN 4 8 NO 360 YES S. Carolina Ave. N. Counry Line SB 2L D B60 3.68% 346 VES 0.7% OUT 2 8 NO 348 YES CR-512 (COUNTY) SR�O CR-507 EB 2L D B60 10.69% 412 YES 0.1 % IN 1 8 NO 413 YES SR-60 CR-507 WB 2L D 860 10.57% 313 YES 0.1% OUT 0 8 NO 313 YES CR-507 I-95 EB 4LD D 1,860 4.89Yo 1,164 YES 9.8Yo IN 51 15 YES 1,215 YES CR-507 I-95 WB 4lD D 1,860 4.87% 1,669 YES 9.8% OUT 34 15 YES 1,703 YES I-95 108thAvenue EB 6LD D 2,790 3.37% 1,597 YES 18.6% IN 96 15 YES 1,693 YES I-95 708thAvenue WB 6LD D 2,790 3.33% 1,404 YES 17.9% OUT 61 15 YES 1,465 YES 108thAvenue 108thAvenue EB 6LD D 2,790 3.37% 1,597 YES 0.0% OUT 0 15 NO 1,597 YES 108IhAvenue 10BthAvenue WB 6LD D 2,790 3.33% 1,404 YES 0.0% IN 0 15 NO 1,404 YES 70BthAvenue CR-510-90ihAvenue EB 6LD D 2,790 3.84% 1,749 YES 22.1% OUT 76 15 YES 1,825 YES 108thAvenue CR-570-90thAvenue WB 6LD D 2,790 3.79% 1,534 YES 22.1°h IN 114 15 YES 1,648 YES CR-510-90thAvenue SebastianCiryLimil EB 6LD D 2,790 3.09% 1,355 YES 22.1% OUT 76 15 YES 1,431 YES CR-570-90thAvenue SebastianCiryLimit WB 6LD D 2,790 3.00% 1,302 YES 22.1YO IN 114 15 YES 1,416 YES CR-570-90thAvenue RoselantlRoad EB 6LD D 2,790 2.72Yo 946 YES 17.6q OUT 60 15 YES 1,006 YES CR-570-90thAvenue RoselandRoad WB 6LD D 2,790 2.65q 914 YES 17.6°k IN 91 15 YES 1,005 YES RoselandRoad BarberStreet EB 4LD D 1,860 2.48% 903 YES 9.9% OUT 34 15 YES 937 YES RoselandRoad BarberSheet WB 4LD D 1,860 2.46% 881 YES 9.9% IN 51 15 YES 932 YES BarberSlreet FlemingStreet EB 4LD D 1,860 2.18% 824 YES B.9% OUT 30 15 YES 854 YES BarberStreet FlemingStreet WB 4LD D 1,860 1.95°k 906 YES 8.9% IN 46 15 YES 952 YES FlemingStreet EasyStreet EB 4LD D 1,860 0.69% 723 YES 6.1°h OUT 21 15 YES 744 YES FlemingStreet EasyStreel WB 4LD D 1,860 0.74% 723 YES 6.1% IN 32 15 YES 755 YES Easy Street Delaware Slreet EB 4LD D 1,860 0.40°k 652 YES 5.SYe OUT 19 15 YES 671 YES EasySireet DelawareStreet WB 4LD D 1,860 0.45% 773 YES 5.5% IN 28 15 YES 801 YES Delaware Street U.S. 1 EB 4LD D 1,860 0.57�0 654 YES 4.6Yo OUT 16 15 YES 670 YES DelawareSlreet U.S.7 WB 4LD D 1,860 0.61% 7B5 YES 4.6% IN 24 15 YES 809 YES CR-570 COUNTY CR-572 85thStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 4.63% 1,214 YES 16.1% IN 83 15 YES 1,297 YES CR-512 BSthstreet SB 4LD D 1,860 4.77% 871 YES 16.1% OUT 55 15 YES 926 YES 85th5treet 66thAvenue EB 4LD D 1,860 5.06% 730 YES 28.7% OUT 98 15 YES 828 YES 85thstreet 66thAvenue WB 4LD D 1,860 5.13% 1,814 YES 28.7% IN 148 15 YES 1,962 NO 66ihAvenue 58lhAvenue EB 4LD D 1,860 5.64% 962 YES 17.7Yo OUT 61 15 YES 1,023 YES 66thAvenue SBthAvenue WB 4LD D 1,860 5.65% 2,002 NO 17.7% IN 92 15 YES 2,094 NO SBihAvenue US-1 EB 4LD D 1,860 3.67% 814 YES 14.BYo OUT 51 15 YES 865 YES 58thAvenue US-1 WB 4LD D 1,860 3.74% 1,494 YES 14.8% IN 77 15 YES 1,571 YES 77TH STREET COUNTY 90thStreef 66thAvenue EB 2L D B20 7.24°l0 0 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 0 YES 90thStreet 66thAvenue WB 2L D 820 7.24/ 0 YES 0.0°h IN 0 8 NO 0 YES 66thAvenue 58thAvenue EB 2L D B20 4.96% 224 YES 0.0% OUT 0 8 NO 224 YES 66thAvenue 50thAvenue WB 2L D 82tl 6.09% 528 YES 0.0% IN 0 8 NO 528 YES SBlhAvenue U.S.1 EB 2L D 820 7.51 % 255 YES 1.3% OUT 4 8 NO 259 YES SBlhAvenue U.S.1 WB 2L D 820 7.59% 648 YES 1.3°k IN 7 8 NO 655 YES � 69TH STREET COUNTY 82ndAvenue 66thAvenue EB 2� C 410 6.93°Jo 122 YES 0.0°h OUT 0 8 NO 122 YES B2ndAvenue 66thAvenua WB 2L C 410 6.13( 79 YES 0.0°k IN 0 8 NO 79 YES 66thAvenue SBthAvenue EB 2L D 870 6.35% 113 YES 0.5% OUT 2 8 NO 115 YES 66thAvenue SBthAvenue WB 2L D 870 6.07% 253 YES 0.5°h IN 3 8 NO 256 YES SBth Avenue Old Dixie Hwy EB 2L D B70 6.15% 758 YES 0.0 % OUT 0 8 NO 158 YES Seth Avenue Old Dixie Hwy WB 2L D 870 6.04°k 252 YES 0.0 % IN 0 8 NO 252 YES Old Dixie Hwy U.S. 1 EB 2L D 870 6.74% 161 YES 0.0°h OUT 0 8 NO 161 YES Old Dixie Hwy U.S. 1 WB 2L D 870 6.03% 252 YES 0.0 k IN 0 8 NO 252 YES RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 14 July 21, 2008 Table 8 (Cont'd) RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Land Use Plan Amendment Year 2033 LOS Evaluation 2033 PM PEAK HOUR Z033 PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ROADWAY LINK �; u c " m c � m o- E ? � o- a L s F. v c L � u v Z A N 9 � 9 N � 1 U� N � � � O � O O O C 'O y C �F � C � '0 F. � y w U' O � Q O F � y F' m FROM TO w �" " L m .x y m � S u � o y � M -o �. m m O a p p � m M O 0 o Q � � 0° � a r F- o a a m � y m m ri N m A o � � � d � U � N ` y 0 a a I-95 STATE N. Counry Line CR-512 NB 6LD C 4,230 2.29% 2,365 YES 5.1 h OUT 17 15 YES 2,382 YES N. Couny Line CR-512 SB 6LD C 4,230 2.29% 2,373 YES 5.1 % IN 26 15 YES 2,399 YES CR-512 SR-60 NB 6LD C 4,230 2.33� 2,394 YES 7.3% IN 38 15 YES 2,432 YES CR-512 SR-60 SB 6LD C 4,230 2.31 % 2,398 YES 6.7% OUT 23 15 YES 2,421 YES SR-60 S. Counry Line NB 6LD C 4,230 2.95% 3,087 YES 4.7% IN 24 15 YES 3,111 YES SR-60 S. Counry Line SB 6LD C 4,230 3.20% 3,214 YES 4.1% OUT 14 15 NO 3,228 YES 708TH AVENUE CR-512 89thStreet NB 2L C 410 p.00% 0 YES 36.5% OUT 125 8 YES 125 YES CR-512 B9th Street SB 2L C 410 0.00°l0 0 YES 36.5% IN 189 8 YES 189 YES 82ND AVENUE COUNTY SR-60 69th Street NB 2L C 410 0.00°to 52 YES 1.9% IN 10 8 YES 62 YES SR-60 69th Street SB 2L C 410 0.00 % 43 YES 1.9% OUT 6 8 NO 49 YES 69th Street CR 510 NB 2L C 410 0.00 % 202 YES 3.5% IN 18 8 YES 220 YES 69th Street CR 510 SB 2L C 410 q.001 226 YES 3.5% OUT 12 8 YES 238 YES 66TH AVENUE COUNT SR-60 26th Street NB 4LD D 1,860 3.25% 808 YES 3.5% IN 18 15 YES 826 YES SR-60 26ihStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 3.86% 1,128 YES 3.5% OUT 12 15 NO 1,140 YES 26th Sfreet 41st Street NB 4LD D 1,860 3.47% 928 YES 3.8% IN 20 15 YES 948 YES 26thStreet 41stStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 3.76% 833 YES 3.8% OUT 13 15 NO 846 YES 41stStreet 45thStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 2.92% 1,255 YES 3.9% IN 20 15 YES 1,275 YES 41stStreet 45thStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 3.10% 812 YES 3.9% OUT 13 15 NO 825 YES 45thStreet 65thStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 3.81% 1,432 YES 6.0% IN 31 15 YES 1,463 YES 45th Street 65M Street SB 4LD D 1,860 3.77°h 788 YES 6.0% OUT 21 15 YES 809 YES 65thStreet 69ihStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 5.24h 1,891 Np 6.5% IN 34 15 YES 1,925 NO 65th Street 69ih Street SB 4LD D 1,860 5.23% 970 YES 6.5% OUT 22 15 YES 992 YES 69th Street CR-510 NB 4LD D 1,860 4.42% 1,717 YES 7.5°h IN 39 15 YES 1,756 YES 69thStreet CR-570 SB 4LD D 1,860 4.45% 860 YES 7.5% OUT 26 15 YES 886 YES 58TH AVENUE COUNT SR-60 26thStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 1.72% 1,294 YES 0.6% IN 3 15 NO 1,297 YES SR-60 26thStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 1.63% 1,192 YES 0.6°h OUT 2 15 NO 1,194 YES 26thStreet 41stStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 3.89% 1,349 YES 1.5°h IN 8 15 NO 1,357 YES 26thStreet 41stStreet SB 4LD D 1,860 3.67% 1,184 YES 1.5°h OUT 5 15 NO 1,189 YES 41stStreet 45thSreet NB 4LD D 1,860 5.82% 1,689 YES 2.Ok IN 10 15 NO 1,699 YES 41stStreet 45thStreet �SB 4LD D 1,860 5.48% 1,407 YES 2.0% OUT 7 15 NO 1,414 YES � 45thSreet 49thStreet NB 4LD D 1,860 4.31% 1,137 YES 0.1% IN 1 15 NO 1,138 YES 45th Street 49th Stret SB 4LD D 1,860 4.16% 944 YES 0.1% OUT 0 15 NO 944 YES 49th Street 65th Street NB 4LD D 1,860 3.03% 990 YES 0.7% IN 4 15 NO 994 YES 49th Stret 65ih Street SB 4LD D 1,860 3.20 % 755 YES 0.7� OUT 2 15 NO 757 YES 65th Street 69th Street NB 4LD D 1,860 1.79% 587 YES 0.4°h IN 2 15 NO 589 YES 65th Street 69th Street SB 4LD D 1,860 1.84 % 475 YES 0.4 % OUT 1 15 NO 476 YES 69thStreet CR-510 NB 4LD D 1,860 2.80% 693 YES 1.3% IN 7 15 NO 700 YES 69th Sireet CR-510 SB 4LD D 1,860 2.90% 471 YES 1.3% OUT 4 15 NO 475 YES Notes: ' LOS "D" Capacity Threshold is based upon the adopted standards by Indian River Counry. N!A = Not Available RO-ED Corp. 300 Acres Keith and Schnars, P.A. Traffic Impact Analysis Project #17798.00 Land Use Plan Amendment 15 July 21, 2008 RO-ED/ANSIN 2, 592 Ac re P a rce I City of Fellsmere FLUM: Analysis of Need J u ly 15, 2008 Prepared for James G. Goggins Executive Vice President Sunbeam Properties, Inc. Prepared by Fishkind � Associates, Inc. 12051 Corporate Blvd. Orlando, Florida 32817 407-382-3256 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report analyzes the need to amend the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") because of ongoing structural changes in Florida's economy. • The existing population projections for the City of Fellsmere are outdated and do not accurately reflect the current conditions. Due to the impending buildout of primary counties afong Florida's southeast coast, secondary coastal counties in the State are experiencing a structural shift in their growth trajectories. Given this structural shift, Fishkind has conducted an independent population forecast which projects growth at a level falling between the BEBR Medium and BEBR High projections. • Based on Fishkind's population projections for Indian River County and the capacity for housing units found within the Indian River Future Land Use Map (FLUM), there is currently a shortfall of just under 86,000 units within the Indian River FLUM. The City of Fellsmere is well positioned to accommodate a portion of this countywide shortfall. • Fishkind projects that by 2030, the City of Fellsmere will account for roughly 15% of the countywide population. This amounts to 39,000 people or 21,000 housing units. Utilizing an allocation ratio of 2.5, the total capacity required in the City of Fellsmere FLUM is approximately 52,500 housing units. The current capacity of tf�e City of Fellsmere FLUM is 12,631 housing units; thus, the City of Fellsmere currently has an allocation ratio of 0.60. On this basis, there is need within the City of Fellsmere FLUM for the 5,184 units proposed for the Applicant's prc�ject. � If approved, the three� currently proposed comp plan amendments will result in residential growth th�at will generate demand for 8.69 million square feet of commercial space. The current capacity of the City of Fellsmere FLUM is 2.15 million square fE:et; thus, the City of Fellsmere currently has a shortfall of over 6.5 million squ�ire feet. On this basis, there is need within the City of Fellsmere FLUM for the 300,000 square feet of commercial space proposed for the Applicant's prc�ject. x�� Page 1 of 58 �� 1.0 Introduction This analysis is being conducted to determine the future population projection for the City of Fellsmere, Florida through the year 2030 and the corresponding land use needs to accommodate the expected population. Fishkind contends based on the analysis that follows that the project proposed on the Applicant's recently annexed 2,592 acre parcel is needed to accommodate the levels of growth projected to occur within the City of Fellsmere over the next 20 to 25 years. The City of Fellsmere is located inland, northwest of Vero Beach in Indian River County. Currently, the City of Fellsmere's population is small in number compared to the coastal urban and metro regions in the State, and although historically growth has been slow, it is anticipated that future growth will increase at a much more rapid rate due to its strategic location just to the north of the tri-county southeast Florida coast and its proximity to the Florida Turnpike and Interstate 95. This analysis discusses state and regional population growth trends as they affect future local population growth. In addition Fishkind has conducted an analysis of the trends which lead to the identification of a long term population forecast for the City and the corresponding residential and commercial land use needed to support expected population growth. 2.0. Overview of the Rationale for Amending the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Land Use Plan This report analyzes the need to amend the City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") because of ongoing structural changes in Florida's economy. Florida law requires that the Future Land Use Element ("FLUE") in a comprehensive land use plan provide sufficient land to accommodate the population growth expected in the future. Florida law and practice prescribes that the projections for future population growth be based on either: (a) forecasts from the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research ("BEBR") or (b) professionally prepared projections acceptable to the Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA"). As discussed more fully below, the existing population projections for the City of Fellsmere are outdated and do not accurately reflect the current conditions. Therefore, this report presents updated projections for the City of Fellsmere's population through 2030. In addition, the report examines the existing City of Fellsmere Comprehensive Plan, and it assesses the capacity of the Plan to accommodate the updated projections for population. �� Page 2 of 58 �� While the City of Fellsmere has had only modest growth in the past, recent growth in Indian River County has been quite rapid compared to historical levels. Due to its coastal location and the expansion of urban area population concentrations in southeastern Florida, Fellsmere is in the path of structural change and much stronger future population growth. South Florida's high growth coastal areas are becoming increasingly built out. Population growth that historically was accommodated in Broward and Palm Beach Counties, can no longer be accommodated at the historically high levels. As a result, population growth is shifting north and west. This shifting of growth represents a structural change in the region, and the City of Fellsmere is in the path of this new growth pattern. As discussed below, in situations where structural changes unfold, the projection methodology used by the BEBR projections is typically not applicable, especially with respect to the BEBR medium projections. BEBR projections are extrapolations of historical trends. When the future is like the past, the methodology works well. However, when the future is impacted by structural changes, BEBR's projections cannot adapt and tend to significantly underestimate the future population. The multiple forces and structural changes affecting where growth will occur are likely to result in long term population growth rates that are sharply higher than what would otherwise have been expected for the City of Fellsmere based solely on recent historical growth. This report identifies the following major structural changes affecting growth in the City of Fellsmere. 1. The sustained migration to Florida from other parts of the country by the increasing number of retiring baby boomers. 2. Continued "relative build out" in the coastal and metropolitan areas resulting in sustained immigration to areas north and west of Palm Beach and Broward Counties. 3. The shift to place-making mixed use communities, self sustaining towns and villages (live, work, and play). The changes that are occurring along coastal Florida suggest that Indian River County and the City of Fellsmere are on the verge of a period of unprecedented growth. Section 5.0 describes the variance in BEBR's forecast accuracy for counties where structural changes occurred during the forecast time horizon; as compared to the high accuracy for counties where a structural change did not occur. ��`� Page 3 of 58 �� 3.0 Shift in Florida's Coastal Urban and Metropolitan Area Population Growth Location A significant shift has occurred over the last decade in where Florida's population growth chooses to locate. The shift has two dimensions. First, the components of growth have changed and second, the physical destination of residents moving to and within the State of Florida has shifted. A number of Florida's major urban metropolitan areas (including some entire counties) are approaching relative buildout resulting in a series of cascading growth pressures. These pressures are being played out in similar fashion throughout the State. First, as raw land availability in major metro areas is depleted, there is increasing demand for urban infill and redevelopment type projects focusing on multifamily and high rise development. This has been evident in counties across the state such as Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Orange, Pinellas, Lee and Duval Counties. Second, as the primary core counties have depleted raw undeveloped land, population growth has expanded to secondary and tertiary counties within 100 miles of the core urban locations. Thus, adjacent to Duval County growth has dramatically increased in St. Johns County. Adjacent to Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties growth has dramatically increased in Pasco. In southeast Florida, growth has moved up the coast to St. Lucie County and is poised to move into Indian River County. Today each of these secondary locations currently has from 40,000-to-60,000 residential units in the planning and permitting stages. In order to understand the direction and volume of future population growth in the state of Florida, one must review the state's historical population growth in terms of geographical and quantitative terms. 4.0 Florida's Historical Population Growth Florida's population growth has been extraordinary over the last 100 years. In 1900, the state's population was just under 529,000 people and by 2000 had increased to just under 16-million. That represents a 30-fold increase in the last 100 years. Between 2004 and 2010, Florida's population is expected to increase from 17.5-million to a projected 19.7- . million, or 12.2 percent, for an average yearly increase of 366,000 people per year, or 1,000 people per day during this period. Net population growth as reported by the University of Florida BEBR from 2004 through 2007 was 1,062 persons per day. �� Page 4 of 58 �� Figure 4.1. United States Population Change from 2000-2006 Pc�p�l�tic�n �Gh�n�� 2t1�0�d�#i ,,��r .� ��-� . �; � _.�_� ��"�, A+ET �� hJt� � � � �`> r ' �� ti�u�i� �. r � � � i��;"�� '�€� �,�l i N (• '� � � 3 �' ��' �r � iD��.�� ; �'III�I�i� �� F ., ��. m s J � ' - — �.^'"��--a'�"'`'�"��.� � I� e � ' i_ N9 _ � �� 1� � � ; �' �L ; `--� �- � s, _ � � � 5 .: � �� ,,, x - ''�- „' {�j ��-- � - �'�' � � n -_ r �., ,r � � _ - m�......� - '"� A - ,,.<�-, "� ,LIW:l. c &� _ r � t�+ :, � .:: i� i . _ . I�, II' - � W :. �. S � » k , r � � _ . � ��nt '�h��i�� :, ';'� ;, �d.1 t�a �1:� � �� _� �- : � � �.., �, �r �.:� to 4_7 � 5.fl to �.�J +► �� 1�1.1 t�r 1�G.+� �� a r� a �aur�m: Rr�par� tr� ERS usin±� ��n�us d�ta_ Tha LJn�tesd �,� �, �t�E�� papu�ati€�n chang� fi�r t�€is p�riad asras �� pe�nt ■�.2 ko ��5.� The state has seen over a 13% increase in population growth over the past six years (See Figure 4.1 above). In terms of the largest populations having a positive change, only Texas and Georgia have outgrown Florida during this period. Florida continues to grow at an unprecedented rate compared to the rest of the Country. Florida will continue to enjoy in-migration from northern states as more northerners reach the retirement age and seek warmer climates. In addition, the state will continue to outpace its death rate and grow internally from the existing population. � Although the percentage of overall population gain in Florida compared to the total United States population is projected to increase, the actual population moving to the state will continue to increase at the 300,000+ people per year pace as the "Baby Boomer" generation moves closer to retirement age. �� ; � � Page 5 of 58 � � � Population Growth since 1940 The population of Florida has grown an average of 3.48% annualiy each year since 1940 (See Table 4.1 below). This is a strong indication that Florida continues to be a preferred residential destination for the people migrating from the northern states. According to IRS migration data, roughly 57% of all migrants into Indian River County originate from outside of the State of Florida and 23% are from the Northeast. Table 4.1. Florida's Population Growth from 1940 to 2000. 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Florida 1,897,414 2,771,305 4,951,560 6,789,443 9,746,324 12,937,926 15,982,378 Annual Rate 2.60% 3.86% 5.98% 3.21 % 3.68% 2.87% 2.14% Annual Change 42,920 87,389 218,026 183,788 295,688 319,160 304,445 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Looking at the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) projection numbers for the next 25 years, it is interesting to note that Florida's population is expected to continue its steady growth rate from an absolute numbers perspective (See Table 4.2 below). Although the State's growth is expected to remain relatively depressed through 2010 at an average of just over 200k people per year, BEBR projects a return to more robust growth beyond 2010 through 2030. This equates to an influx of over 6-million people over the next 20 to 25 years. Table 4.2. Florida's Projected Population Growth from 2010 to 2030. 2010 2020 2030 Florida 19,308,100 22,477,900 25,340,700 Annual Rate 1.11 % 1.53% 1.21 % Annual Change 209,244 316,980 286,280 Source: Bureau of Economic and Business Research. BEBR. Florida Population Studies. 2008. A significant portion of the future growth will occur on both the extreme southeast and southwest coasts. Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, Lee and Collier Counties will account for 33 percent of the growth in population through 2010 based on current estimates. The area bordering the "I-4 � corridor" both north and south will also have significant growth. � This includes Sumter, Lake, Hillsborough, Polk, Orange and Osceola Counties. Some of these counties will grow significantly in total population while others will grow rapidly in terms of percentage population growth. The southeast and southwest coast of Florida will account for almost 23 percent of total population growth. ��"� Page 6 of 58 �� Figure 4.2 Major Growth Regions Holmes _ _ Colum Na�sa , _. Gadsden +�efferson Hamilton bia ` � � ' Urn � Bak � Bra rd _ r' e5}n �;�',�r�,��` Li � Ta far = �`e'�� ,>`' StJo s ,. ` � � � _ : _ � � Eseambia �kal ° - : ��' F ler � � �� , �� , �' Washington ,� � LeSr� >> tYla�iorr ' Gilchrist � ` Sumtar �" ` .� Seminole �- Hernando i=a � Brevard _ �;� Okeechobee. � �� 3 '� ��E . Indian Pinellas � ' , River m � i mm ; �Iwi` �f�li i R. Lucie e artill' Sarasota '� �-�°' � '� "' � _ : � -�� Chadotte Hendty � ,�;_ _ �� i �, �,, � �) �� : � Monrce 1 / I 0 � � The third area of significant growth is along the upper northeast coast. Nassau, Duval, Clay, Flagler and St. Johns Counties will account for about eight percent of the state's total growth through 2010. Finally, there are three panhandle counties (Walton, Franklin and Wakulla) that will have significant percentage growth in population but will only account for about one percent of statewide growth. In total, these 20 counties will account for almost two-thirds of Florida's growth through 2010. While these counties will account for an overwhelming proportion of the State's near term growth, other counties will experience significant growth in percentage or total terms as well. Rapid growth over the last 50 years combined with overall poor planning and lack of funding to overcome infrastructure deficits throughout the coastal and urbanized counties of Florida has made the traditional high growth counties less desirable to live in. As these locations reach physical buildout, their growth rates are slowing down and there is out migration to the less congested, more rural counties. There is even out migration from the State occurring to less congested States in southeastern United States and other Sunbelt areas of the country. ��° Page 7 of 58 �� The primary coastal counties and metropolitan areas of the state are beset by traffic congestion, water shortages, hurricane vulnerability, crammed classrooms, high property values/taxes/insurance and lack of affordable housing. It will be very costly to rectify these existing situations due to the major infrastructure investment that would be required. Overriding these conditions is a rapidly diminishing inventory of buildable lands. Many of these core counties are reaching buildout. Land availability constraints contribute to very high and rising property values. As a result population growth is migrating to less urban or more rural areas of the State. Along Florida's west coast, population growth that would locate in Lee and Collier is locating north and east into Glades, Hendry and Desoto Counties. In this same fashion, population growth is expanding from Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties north and west into Okeechobee, St. Lucie, Martin, and Indian River Counties. The general direction and paths of growth throughout the State are currently directed to less congested areas with more affordable homes and good highway access. In recent years, housing costs in Florida have continued to rise dramatically due to a number of factors including increased governmental impact fees, the lengthy and complicated land entitlement process, the impact of hurricanes on insurance, the almost doubling of home prices fueled by investment and speculators, rising land costs and the spiraling costs related to construction. The lower land costs, insurance rates and relatively easy and short entitlement process found in the secondary coastal counties allows for less expensive homes, which becomes an attractor for Florida residents and future in-migration residents. Fueling the increased coastal metropolitan housing prices is the skyrocketing land prices This has put pressure on the business community to provide "affordable" and workforce "attainable" housing. Relative build out in primary coastal counties, density restrictions and very high land costs have caused growth to locate in adjacent less developed coastal areas or to inland areas throughout the State. Highlands and Polk counties have been the recipients of this shift in population growth as have Lake, Marion, St. Lucie, St. Johns, Flagler and Pasco Counties. The secondary coastal counties have primarily felt the vast impact of this . growth with more than 60,000 single family . units currently planned or approved each in St. Johns and St. Lucie counties. These trend shifts will result in increased future population growth in Indian River County and the City of Fellsmere, specifically. ��' Page 8 of 58 �� The Southeast Florida Coast has seen significant structural change resulting in increased population growth since the 1930s. The advent of the railroad line being extended from Palm Beach through the Florida Keys, the completion of Interstate 95 and the Florida Turnpike highways, the expansions of the Miami International, Fort Lauderdale International and West Palm Beach International Airports as well as the introduction of air conditioning have all contributed to increasing the population in record fashion. The increases have lead to the near buildout of both Palm Beach and Broward Counties. Table 4.3. Growth of Counties in Southeast Florida from 1940 to 2000. 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Miami-Dade 267,739 495,084 935,047 1,267,792 1,625,781 1,937,094 2,253,362 Annual Rate 6.48% 6.34% 6.57% 3.09% 2.52% 1.77% 1.52% Broward 39,794 83,933 333,946 620,100 1,018,200 1,255,488 1,623,018 Annual Rate 7.07% 7.75% 14.81 % 6.38% 5.08% 2.12% 2.60% Palm Beach 79,989 114,688 228,106 348,753 576,863 863,518 1,131,184 Annual Rate 4.44% 3.67% 7.12% 4.34% 5.16% 4.12% 2.74% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Table 4.3 above shows the growth in ten year increments that has taken place in the tri-county area since 1930. Today, over 5-million people call this area home. Table 4.4 shows that the Florida southeast region has captured just over 30% of Florida's growth over the past 40 years. With less land to develop and the subsequent high land costs along with the congestion and its related issues, this region will capture less of the State's population growth going forward. The State's growth will be forced to Iook towards inland and to secondary coastal counties for settlement because of the lack of housing availability along with the future residents' desire for well-planned communities. ��i� �� Page 9 of 58 �� Table 4.4. Florida Southeast Coast and State Growth from 1940 to 2000. 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Southeast Florida Growth: 387,522 693,705 1,497,099 2,236,645 3,220,844 4,056,100 5,007,564 10 Year Growth: 172,692 306,183 803,394 739,546 984,199 835,256 951,464 Average Annual Growth: 17,269 30,618 80,339 73,955 98,420 83,526 95,146 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Percent of Florida Population: 20.42% 25.03% 30.23% 32.94% 33.05% 31.35% 31.33% Percent of Florida Growth (10 year): 40.24% 35.04% 36.85% 40.24% 33.29% 26.17% 31.25% Percent of Florida Growth (Annual): 40.24% 35.04% 36.85% 40.24% 33.29% 26.17% 31.25% 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Florida Growth: 1,897,414 2,771,305 4,951,560 6,789,443 9,746,324 12,937,926 15,982,378 10 Year Growth: 429,203 873,891 2,180,255 1,837,883 2,956,881 3,191,602 3,044,452 Average Annual Growth: 42,920 87,389 218,026 183,788 295,688 319,160 304,445 Source: U.S. Census Bureau 5.0 Forecast Accuracy and Structural Change As discussed, the population growth trajectories in interior and secondary coastal counties have the potential to change dramatically. The multiple forces affecting growth in Indian River County and the City of Fellsmere, specifically, are likely to result in long term population growth rates sharply higher than expected based on recent average growth. Looking at the accuracy of 25 year population forecasts, there are some significant patterns which would apply. Table 5.1 below compares the 1975 BEBR long-term projections to year 2000 with year 2000 Census actual counts. What is strikingly clear from these data is the level of forecast accuracy for Desoto, Pasco, Polk and Highlands compared with the very large degree of error in Flagler, Lake, Marion, St. Lucie, and St. Johns. Table 5.1. Comparison of Long-Term Projections 1975 BEBR Year 2000 Variance projections for 2000 Actual Counties Flagler 21,700 49,832 -129.6% with St. Johns 71,000 123,135 -73.4% Structural Lake 143,300 210,527 -46.9% Shift Marion 191,000 258,916 -35.6% St. Lucie 149,800 192,695 -28.6% Counties DeSoto � 36,700 32,209 12.2% without Highlands 81,400 87,366 -7.3% Structural polk 471,300 483,924 -2.7% Shift Pasco 343,600 344,768 -0.3% Counties with Shift Total 576,800 835,105 -44.8% Counties without Shift Total 933,000 948,267 -1.6% Sources: Projections of Florida Population Bulletin 33, June 1975, U. FL and US Census 2000 �� Page 10 of 58 �� Fishkind believes the dramatic variance in forecast accuracy from county to county has to do with the emergence of structural change during the forecast period. This means forecast accuracy depends on two factors: (a) the degree to which the trends toward shifting growth trajectories were present at the time the forecast was prepared and (b) the degree to which they changed or remained the same over the forecast period. Structural change in the form of changing growth patterns was already underway in 1975 in Pasco County when the BEBR projections for 2000 were revealed. Structural change was not present in DeSoto, Polk or Highlands and that growth pattern continued right on through 2000. In Flagler, St. Lucie, St. Johns, Lake and Marion the shifting growth patterns were not present in 1975 but did change and take hold during the forecast period. The BEBR forecast methodology is based strictly on extrapolating historical trends. Therefore, the methodology cannot adequately or accurately capture the trend shift changes in the forecast of long range population growth. Where trends did not shift, forecast accuracy averaged 98% over the 25 year period. Where structural change took place and trends did shift, average forecast error was 45 percent. As a result of these gross forecast errors, BEBR instituted a forecast program change which now provides a low, medium and high series population forecast. The purpose of these alternative forecast views is to allow users to understand the magnitude of potential forecast error given changing future conditions. Structural growth changes in St. Lucie County have already been observed and this pattern should extend into Indian River County during the next 5 years. With regard to Indian River County and the City of Fellsmere, the case for impending structural change is clear. First, consider the impact that a very large, successful, master-planned community can have on the structure of an area's economy. For example, the Villages has wrought dramatic structural change in Sumter County totally altering the County's historic growth track. Coral Springs and later Weston transformed western Broward County. Today a similar structural change is underway in Port St. Lucie with the approval of more than five major DRIs containing over 50,000 residential units located in the south portions of the County. � Page 11 of 58 �� 6.0 Indian River Population Projections 6.1 Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) As described in Section 4.0 and 5.0, population growth trajectories are changing in much of Florida. This explains, in large part, the dramatic growth in Flagler, St. Johns, Pasco and St. Lucie counties, and in this case, foreshadows changes in population growth expected for Indian River County. Fishkind believes that the methodologies employed with the BEBR Medium population projections do not fully reflect the structural changes that are expected to occur in Indian River County. Additionally, Fishkind believes the BEBR High projections potentially overstate projected growth in the County. As such, Fishkind believes a more appropriate forecast for Indian River County should project a level of growth which lies between that of the BEBR Medium and the BEBR High projections. A forecast in this range more accurately takes into consideration the structural shifts associated with: a) Population Boom - In the United States, nearly 70-million people will be approaching retirement age over the next fifteen years. Many of those retirees will be seeking warmer climates to enjoy their golden years. This fact, coupled with the net in-migration projected by the BEBR state forecast, validates the projected future population growth for the State. b) Relative Build Out of The Urban Coastal Counties and Metropolitan Areas of Florida — Relative build out occurs when a county has reached saturation due to significant deficits or financial ability to catch up with infrastructure, schools, workforce housing, and hurricane vulnerability. It is also associated with high taxation, impact fees that have reached their maximum productive level and an economy that is limited in scope and questionably unsustainable resulting in an undesirable place to live. Furthermore, build-out is also occurring in Broward and Palm Beach Counties due to a limited supply of vacant developable lands. c) Place-making Planning Paradigm Shift — This paradigm shift refers to the ability of the County's major land holders to concentrate efforts . that will affect structural change and accommodate population grovvt.h from the coastal metropolitan areas through means such as developing desirable place-making master planned communities and supplementing the main infrastructure of the County. �� Page 12 of 58 �� d) Long Range Planning Programs — Long Range Planning Programs such as the Rural Lands Stewardship Areas (RLSA); as established in 2001 by Florida Legislature under Section 163.3177(11)(d), F.S., offer planning initiatives to balance economic growth with the preservation of environmentally sensitive lands and incentives for sustained agriculture. The proper implementation of these types of programs provides accommodations for population growth by: -Elimination of urban sprawl -Efficiently managed compact rural developments -The provision of cost efficient infrastructure and services The 2008 BEBR Medium forecast shows the population of Indian River County increasing to 205,200 by 2030, while the BEBR High forecast shows the population reaching 271,200 in 2030. This represents total growth of 65,443 people in the BEBR Medium projection and 131,443 in the BEBR High projection. Table 6.1 compares the BEBR Medium and BEBR High projections for Indian River County. Table 6.1. Indian River County BEBR Medium and BEBR High Population Projections BEBR Medium BEBR High 2007 139,757 139,757 2010 145,800 155,900 2015 162,000 182,700 2020 176,900 210,700 2025 191,500 240,300 2030 205,200 271,200 Source: Bureau of Economic and Business Research. BEBR. Florida Population Studies. 2008. Fishkind feels strongly that the correct population forecast for Indian River County lies between the 205,200 shown by the BEBR Medium projection and the 271,200 shown in the BEBR High projection. To support this belief and to determine the appropriate level of growth for Indian River County, Fishkind conducted two independent population growth forecasts utilizing two distinct forecasting methodologies. The first analysis utilizes a non- linear regression model to determine the future share of statewide growth � that will locate in Indian River County. The second analysis relies on the belief that Palm Beach and Broward Counties are quickly approaching buildout and that future growth that would otherwise desire to go to these counties, but cannot due to supply constraints, will locate instead to other counties in southeastern Florida. FRSI NCp� �� Page 13 of 58 �� No Text . - -. �- _. �. ;4 . .; �� ; . � .: , ��,. .. � - :�,.,� ;<�� ,,. � � '� o �,:: m $ x � � C �� .� 7� w 0 �� '� �� --�.--�---. �� ` � � �� =�°�� ,:�_ �—� �.-----� �.� ° �~.�� - = �� ,. �� A --�..� �� '�� , ��.�.�,. -� �...��_ . � u ::-. - -z,; `J�� t , �. �� .,� ,�. e ��" �� . �. �,._ �. - .� � : � �_,� ..� � , ; _;, � £ �-�._ `� ��j ��.� ., � M � �4� �<< � � �. � . � k-=� � � ;��.� � �. w�� : � ` = U��.. � �� = � :� � � ,; _ � �. �. � - . , K � � � � �- � � . �. � ; �: t � b �. . ; � � r� -� � ,�,. , ., �� ";� � � � �. ;a � � �. ' `� � �� . � °� � E �� . �. ` .� m � � �� N �: � �� : � _ �� :� � -�� . : ; ;#.. �: � �. � � � � � �� . � � �3 :,� _� � ��:._. ��.. � �. � _ . � � ;., . � x. � � � �.. �� a -,.-�.- � �� ;�� .,: h �k �.. � �� ,„� � ' �� .. � :�4, � � � , ..x ' .- , . . �- �; .- � k ; g � a � �4 . � ._ a , =�u �� , � _ �..a �_. � � . .. �,... � ` � ., �� fi ,.� . s . _ _ _,. � �� __ _.,� _ _ , , � , _- _. , � ._. _ z,.. . . s _ �... a��i' 3 m ""'_�^ � z � �, �... . _ �" -"""°"" . — .. .� ,,, �'� ; , �4 _ J=��= �.,..:- __-,'"—� � __� .. - '�/ �.�� ry � Y. � O. �,. � .,,�..,.,. ��,�..:,•.. :.�.",.�.� � 9. '��x�; 8 �� ; �� , �" y/ � "' { " � ' . = � v �s 2 µ � � �'" �' .We �� 3 �''p $ � � � � � � � � � � s s�' i � .�3.�.-.... 7 g $ �' � � �' �. � e a ". �-'_ � � � � + �� y � �.� ,k, � { .,,.� �� ' � ^' � �s � � � � g -'� � � $�` . �.�5 � �y l�! �S'f � �� `�� e� 3: r""-� r:a � �-°": � 2J� �� K� n 1'�'c � � � �.� '° � y � � e .. + � '� ° � �* �' s_ C � � - g � �,. �' �"�'-'3�� .�P� ri1 � �i � $ �� ' �y R�'1 '_"IF � .� ��. � � �" Q lR }� '� �, � Q�j � �� t _ � � M In � n`.n j� 'A _W ,�� - �. f � � 9, P + �� g �� +�� `, �� i � �� FI�M �� ; � ��a� � � � �� =r� ° � Fla�d Insuran�e Rate Nlap 4� � � � � � �� , �;, � �� _ _� - . _-, , ._ �;: ,.w �. ... .� . , � ¢ a ,�. � �� .,�- - � - .� - .. �� ,:,.. . :: � � ��. � � -= .�. = -• � : ,, . � -,�n., , " , z ,:. . � � .._:.. - � � �.. 3,�. ; � � :,` _. - �„"� �" � �� c• t'� , ¢ , i 4 � �� ;. � .� ff �i p��'� s , x :� � �: , �� 'r�t;4'�s_:: °` ��Q_ - . ° - t� d ��_ . � � ._,� ' _ - . SC _ � �--..° ; ,�" �,�:. : . _<. � � � � � ,. � - � .: 4 .;� . � �� :.� � „ � ,:.. � �,.- -�" .. � ,___'"�"--�-�^"""`w�"'�^'�,�� e:e `��, Pn � ,.. l' �,.�'�-w.�.. w � ,� , `a }' �� :«,� sf �� } � t �'�€'� . ��..�...�,,,,,,,�n' � � � .� _ �.. �� m y�� i��r 4 < � 5 � � � .;_ ,�- �_"'�..� � � � ` _ �c� t � tet � �� "� � � � r`" r � : � ✓�,.µ��.+,e'� � at � �rx - °s . � ��t�e .✓' .��' y � ; N ✓ °� � � .✓''� i r „�! � �: [fl " -7C- ".` � �`� �,�. � °'� k .� o " u ..� , s ' ra t' ii�t's�� .; � ` . '� �. .. � ` ��`, �` ��.�, a. � .`:-: � 2: .: ,�.`�, i ?* � x �_, �� Y < , Fz't'�' s .r,� . '� � � =. �_ . - ' - ' , _ i �?6 €# - z � � s �� ;,. y- `P � # =�E � v �_ y � - x,� � i� .wi �,? ..+. �n �� ,_ U � �� &"s� ° v�.��. y a ,s �„"� �� f '�' . Ai k _ a � ,�# �"' a : : � .�. r �:a � '�:. .:: ... , ' :� ,,; _., 'm' ��_`' F : �: � ..,��"' � z,� ; n � � � '� ::: � � . � � �� t �,,� �a .�.�' � � � ^�''' - "1�'�j° S ,. ;,ax , . ., s � � s ";� � �,' �a' �z � n` - �� `� ! � � � , � : � a M � ' � _.�� a '� ,. � _ �•,�. € t°` _ �, ' , fi F:� " �� x_: , :: k ��-�2� t A � ', _ d . . �'�, ti � � : .� � s�. � ttt. � � z: �.�v '� "� ��,' s -: c' - x � » #,. a': �,;k �` �. - '* ,n' ' � � x,,,, : ,. � ' � z t �::; � - � . � �� l` �� ._..�.: �� " x 3.� 5 � �_-x'� ��.. .:: � s';._..- , , _,' t , �: , ,r. , � 4 '. a - � - �"�. � , .. _. , . . r , , :s . . `s , �� .', . � . d� A-a t �r, �'�}: t` Cf � F � �p y A � S. .�"° � � �} 5` 6 CS * � - j- .� � �� 7.M Z� � 2 S 2 � &-� z�� s -R� ��, ' 2 - �'4 } A 141 A Uu i0 D i9 A m iR - $ Y +� � �fi�=.'.� 4 . 1 o aca :„ �=�e r a m;.-� ><� �_ h � - :.. . � r Y� in m iX a �� ,�..�Y. .� O ¢ %i � ��' # � � �" � �� :� =� �` � �"2 �� a �� : „�'.� �a�� z r�� °"�'�C G": „� ��- � �. 3n � � � �s � �� `_ � � � A �+ `" g �'� 3° � �� ' s §? � � a � �':: �� ¢ � � �5' �� . ^ �n � �� TF �g� "�� a� � �- �� n � � 4� � �t� �"��'�� ;�� `� `�' �� - �� #�� 'a �a � � � � �' s �& � g '�$ �� ,�. a < �� - �, � �. � . .. � y � �. - � � N r � �r� ; �� : � �� £ s #� � � � � � � � tr ��= s �� a P � �� + C�� 3 , "''4_� x �� ,$'�� `St� � z � S �'. � � bw � � A � � �k� �� "�� #� �� r o �` � _- -� C� ��$� " �„� Fl��l �� e� � �''� � � �� .� � �m�°� �, �o ��z � � F�c�ad tnsurance F�at� Map � � � � � � �