Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution_29-96/97_07/24/1997 RESOLUTION NO. 29 -96197 • A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC POLICIES PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) HURRICANE OPAL /DR -1074 REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, the Village of Tequesta wishes to receive funding under the Commmunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) Hurricane Opal DR -1074 Program; and I WHEREAS, the CDBG requires Tequesta, among other things, to implement specific policies to satisfy the Program requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A Citizen Participation Plan pursuant to Section 104(a) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference as a part of this Resolution, is hereby approved. Section 2. A Citizen Complaint Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference as a part of this Resolution, is hereby approved. • Section 3. A Procurement Policy pursuant to Federal 24C.F.R. Section 85.36 and F.S. 287.055, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference as a part of this Resolution, is hereby approved. Section 4. A Section 504 Self - Evaluation Plan pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act entitled ADA Accessibility Survey for People with Disabilities in Employment Provisions and Local Government Administration, attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Resolution, previously adopted by the Village Council on January 14, 1993, is hereby reconfirmed. Section 5. A Transition Plan pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated by reference as a part of this Resolution, previously adopted by the Village Council on July 23, 1992, is hereby reconfirmed. i Section 6. The Village Manager or his designees are hereby j directed to do all things necessary to effectuate the aforementioned CDBG Policies and Plans in order to comply with the CDBG Program requirements. ' I THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED by Councilmember f i Cameron , who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by I Councilmember Hansen and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: i I I FOR ADOPTION AGAINST ADOPTION • Alexander W_ Camernn Josenh N_ Canretta II T Carl C. Hansen Elizaheth A. Schafer The Mayor thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this 24th day of July, A.D., 1997. MAYOR OF TEQUESTA t .1-i- z-abeth A. Schauer ATTEST: oann Mangan,4ello Village Clerk wp60 \res \29 -97 2 i i EXHIBIT "A" • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN In order to provide citizens with information concerning the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, the Village of Tequesta will take the following actions: a) Make available to the public, in a reasonable and timely manner, information concerning the amounts of funds available for various activities and the range of activities that may be undertaken. b) Provide citizens with adeqate notice of public hearings, which are to be held in locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries and with accomodation for the handicapped. If a significant number of non - English speaking residents could reasonably be expected to attend a public hearing, an interpreter will be provided for the language expected to be represented. C) Hold at least one public hearing to obtain the veiws of citizens on community development needs. d) Develop and publish a summary of the proposed application that will provide citizens with an opportunity to examine its contents and submit their comments. • e) Consider any comments and views expressed by citizens on the proposed application, and, if appropriate, modify the proposed application. f) Hold at least one public hearing to obtain the views of citizens on the final application prior to its submission to the Department. g) Hold at least one public hearing during the grant implementation process to review the Program performance. This may be combined with the public hearing on amendments, if any such hearings are required. TGB/krb wp60 \misc \cdbg • EXHIBIT "B" • CITIZEN COMPLAINT POLICY In order to provide citizens with timely written responses to all citizen complaints and grievances arising from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, the Village of Tequesta will take the following actions: a) Whenever a Department, employee, or Department Head of the Village of Tequesta receives a written complaint or grievance from a citizen relative to the Community Development Block Grant Program, the employee, Department, or Department Head shall respond to such complaint or grievance, in writing, within not more than fifteen (15) working days. b) Definitions: • Complaint: Something that is the cause or subject of protest or outcry. • Grievance: A cause of distress felt to afford reason for complaint or resistance. Working Days: Monday through Friday. Saturday, Sunday, and days designated as holidays, are excluded. • Written response: The act or art of forming visible letters or characters by computer or typewriter to form a series of coherent words in syntax structure in response to a citizen compliant or grievence transmitted to the citizen by U.S. Mail, courier service, hand - delivery, or telefax. TGB/krb wp60 \misc \complaint • EXHIBIT "C" • PROCUREMENT POLICY In order to ensure that the Village of Tequesta purchasing policies associated with the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program comply with Federal 24 C.F.R. Section 85.36 and Florida Statute 287.055, applicable Village of Tequesta procurements shall be made pursuant to the following: a) Procurement Standards. 1) The Village of Tequesta will use its own procurement procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified herein. 2) The Village of Tequesta will maintain a contract administration system which ensures that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. 3) The Village of Tequesta will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of • contracts. No employee, officer, or agent of the Village of Tequesta shall participate in selection or in the award or administration of a contract supported by federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when: i) The employee, officer, or agent, ii) Any member of his immediate family iii) His or her partner, or iv) An Organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above, has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award. The Village of Tequesta's officers, employees, or agents will neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors, potential contractors, or parties to sub - agreements. The Village of Tequesta may set minimum rules where the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal intrinsic value. To the extent permitted by state or local law or regulations, such • standards or conduct will provide for penalties, 1 • sanctions, or other disciplinary actions or violations of such standards by the Village of Tequesta's officers, employees, or agents, or by the contractors or their agents. The awarding agency may in regulation provide additional prohibitions relative to real, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest. 4) Village of Tequesta procedures will provide for a review of proposed procurements to avoid purchase of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach. 5) To foster greater economy and efficiency, the Village of Tequesta Administration is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements for procurement or use of common goods and services. 6) The Village of Tequesta Administration is encouraged to use federal excess and surplus property in lieu of purchasing new equipment and property whenever such use is feasible and reduces project cost. • 7) The Village of Tequesta Administration is encouraged to use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects of sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions. Value engineering is a systematic and creative analysis of each contract item or task to ensure that its essential function is provided at the overall lower cost. 8) The Village of Tequesta will make awards only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. 9) The Village of Tequesta Administration will maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of a procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. • 10) The Village of Tequesta will use time and material type 2 • contracts only: i) After a determination that no other contract is suitable, and ii) if the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk 11) The Village of Tequesta alone will be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and adminstrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the Village of Tequesta of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts. Federal agencies will not substitute their judgment for that of the Village of Tequesta unless the matter is primarily a federal concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, state, or federal authority having proper jurisdiction. 12) The Village of Tequesta will have protest procedures to handle and resolve disputes relating to their procurements and shall in all instances disclose information regarding the protest to the awarding agency. A protestor must exhaust all administrative remedies with • the Village of Tequesta before pursuing a protest with the federal agency. Reviews of protests by the federal agency will be limited to: i) violations of federal law or regulations and the standards of applicable federal regulations (violations of state or local law will be under the jursidiction of state or local authorities) and ii) violations of the Village of Tequesta's protest procedures for failure to review a complaint or protest. Protest received by the federal agency other than those specified above will be referred to the Village of Tequesta. b) Competition. 1) All procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of s.85.36. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include, but are not limited to: i) placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business, 3 • ii) requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding iii) non - competitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies, iv) non - competitive awards to consultants that are on retainer contracts, V) organizational conflicts of interest, vi) specifying only a "brand name" product, instead of allowing "an equal" product to be offered and describing the performance of other relevant requirements of the procurement, and vii) any arbitrary action in the procurement process. 2) The Village of Tequesta will conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed in -state or local geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographical preference. Nothing in this section is designed to preempt state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A /E) services, geographic location may be a selection criteria, provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract. 3) The Village of Tequesta will have written selection procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures will ensure that all solicitations: i) incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description shall not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product, or service to be procured, and when necessary, shall set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specification should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, • "brand name or equal" description may be used as • means to define the performance or other salient • requirements of a procurement. The specific 4 • features of the named brand which must be met by offerors shall be clearly stated; and ii) identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. 4) The Village of Tequesta will ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods or services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the Village of Tequesta will not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. C) Methods of procurement to be followed. 1) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41USC403 (11) (currently set at $100,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations shall be obtained for an adequate number of qualified sources. • 2) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising) . Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed -price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bid method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions in s.85.36(d)(2)(i) apply. i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and C) The procurement lends itself to a firm -fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be principally on the basis of price • 5 • ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: A) the invition for bids will be publicly advertised and bids shall be solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, providing them sufficient time prior to the date set for opening the bid; B) the invitation for bids, which will include specifications and pertinent attachments shall define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; C) All bids will be publicly opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bid; D) A firm fixed -price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation costs, and life cycle costs shall be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior • experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. 3) Procurement by Competitive Proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed - price or cost - reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. If this method is used, the following requirements will apply: i) Request for proposals will be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Any response to publicized requests for proposals shall be honored to the maximum extent practical; ii) Proposals will be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources; iii) The Village of Tequesta will have a method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals • received and for selecting awardees; 6 • iv) Awards will be made to the responsible firm whose proposal is most advantageous to the programs; with price and other factors considered; and v) The Village of Tequesta may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications - based procurement of architectural /engineering (A /E) professional services whereby competitors qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. vi) As provided in State Law, the Village of Tequesta shall comply with F.S. 287.055 known as the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act pursuant to the following procedures. A) PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT AND QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES a) The Village of Tequesta shall publicly • announce, in a uniform and consistent manner, each occasion when professional services are required to be purchased for a project the basic construction cost of which is estimated by the Village of Tequesta to exceed the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY FIVE ($120,000) or for a planning or study activity when the fee for professional services exceeds the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO ($10,000) except in cases of valid public emergencies so certified by the Village Manager. The public notice shall include a general description of the project and shall indicate how interested consultants may apply for consideration. b) The Village of Tequesta shall encourage firms engaged in the lawful practice of their professions that desire to provide professional services to the Village of Tequesta to submit annually statements of qualificiations and performance data. • 7 C) Any firm or individual desiring to provide professional services to the Village of Tequesta must first be certified by the Village of Tequesta as qualified pursuant to law and the regulations of the Village of Tequesta, including Village of Tequesta Administrative Policy No. 1- 89/90. The Village of Tequesta shall make a finding that the firm or individual to be employed is fully qualified to render the required service. Among the factors to be considered in making this finding are the capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record, and experience of the firm or individual. d) The Village of Tequesta shall adopt administrative procedures for the evaluation of professional services, including, but not limited to, capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record, experience, whether the firm is a certified miniority business enterprise as defined by the Florida Small and Minority Business Assistance Act of 1985, • and such other factors as may be determined by the Village of Tequesta to be applicable to its particular requirements. When securing professional services, the Village of Tequesta shall endeavor to meet the minority business enterprise procurement goals set forth in s.287.042. e) The public shall not be excluded from the proceedings under this section. B) COMPETITIVE SELECTION a) For each proposed project, the Village of Tequesta shall evaluate current statements of qualificiations and performace data on file with the Village of Tequesta, together with those that may be submitted by other firms regarding the proposed project, and shall conduct discussions with, and may require public presentations by, no less than three firms, regarding their qualifications, approach to the project, and ability to furnish the required services. 8 • b) The Village of Tequesta shall select in order of preference no fewer than three firms deemed to be the most highly qualified to perforn the required services. In determining whether a firm is qualified, the Village of Tequesta shall consider such factors as the ability of professional personnel; whether a firm is a certified minority business enterprise; past performance; willingness to meet time and budget requirements; location; recent, current, and projected workloads of the firms; and the volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the Village, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms, provided such distribution does not violate the principle of selection of the most highly qualified firms. The Village of Tequesta may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations under subsection (5). C) This subsection does not apply to a professional service contract for a project the basic construction cost of which is estimated by the Village of Tequesta to be not in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY FIVE ($120,000) or for a planning or study activity when the fee for professional services is not in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO ($10,000). d) Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit a continuing contract between a firm and the Village of Tequesta. C) COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION a) The Village of Tequesta shall negotiate a contract with the most qualified firm for professional services at compensation which the Village of Tequesta determines is fair, competitive, and reasonable. In making such determination, the Village of • Tequesta shall conduct a detailed 9 • analysis of the cost of the professional services required in addition to considering their scope and complexity. For any lump -sum or cost-plus -a- fixed -fee professional service contract over the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY FOUR ($60,000), the Village of Tequesta shall require the firm receiving the award to execute a truth - in- negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete, and current at the time of contracting. Any professional service contract under which such a certificate is required shall contain a provision that the original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the Village of Tequesta determines the contract price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such contract adjustments shall be made with 1 year following the end of the contract. • b) Should the Village of Tequesta be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm considered to be the most qualified at a price the agency determines to be fair, competitive, and reasonable, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated. The Village of Tequesta shall then undertake negotiations with the second most qualifed firm. Failing accord with the second most qualified firm, the Village of Tequesta shall terminate negotiations. The Village of Tequesta shall then undertake negotiations with the third most qualified firm. C) Should the Village of Tequesta be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the selected firms, the agency shall select additional firms in the order of their competence and qualification and continue negotiations in accordance with this subsection until an agreement is reached. • 10 • D) PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES a) Each contract entered into by the Village of Tequesta for professional services shall contain a prohibition against contingent fees as follows: "The architect (or registered land surveyor or professional engineer, as applicable) warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the architect (or registered land surveyor, or professional engineer, as applicable) to solicit or secure this agreement and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the architect (or registered land surveyor or professional engineer, as applicable) any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this agreement." For the breach or violation of this provision, the Village of Tequesta shall • have the right to terminate the agreement without liability and, at its direction, to deduct from the contract price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. b) Any individual, corporation, partnership, firm, or company, other than a bona fide employee working solely for an architect, professional engineer, or registered land surveyor, who offers, agrees, or contracts to solicit or secure Village of Tequesta contracts for professional services for any other individual, company, corporation, partnership, or firm and to be paid, or is paid, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or the making of a contract for professional services shall, upon conviction in a competent court of this state, be found guilty of a first degree misdemeandor, punishable as provided in s.775.082 or s.775.083. • 11 C) Any architect, professional engineer, or registered land surveyor, or any group, association, company, corporation, firm, or partnership thereof, who offers to pay, or pays, any fee commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of any Village of Tequesta contract for professional services shall, upon conviction in a state court of competent authority, be found guilty of a first degree misdemeanor, punishable as provided in s. 775082 or s. 775.083. d) Any Village of Tequesta official who offers to solicit or secure, or solicits or secures, a contract for professional services and to be paid, or is paid, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon the award or making of such a contract for professional services between the Village of Tequesta and any individual person, company, firm, partnership, or corporation shall, upon conviction by a court of competent authority, be found guilty of a first degree misdemeanor, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 and s. 775.083. E) APPLICABILITY TO DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACTS a) Except as provided in this subsection, this section is not applicable to the procurement of design -build contracts by the Village of Tequesta, and the Village of Tequesta shall award design -build contracts in accordance with the procurement laws, rules, and ordinances applicable to the Village of Tequesta (Village of Tequesta Administrative Policy No. 11- 94/95). b) The design criteria package shall be prepared and sealed by a design criteria professional employed by or retained by the Village of Tequesta. If the Village of Tequesta elects to enter into a professional services contract for the preparation of the design criteria • package, then the design criteria 12 professional shall be slected and contracted with in accordance with the requirements of subsections B) and C) . A design criteria professional who has been selected to prepare the design criteria package shall not be eligible to render services under a design -build contract executed pursuant to the design criteria package. C) The Village of Tequesta shall adopt rules or ordinances for the award of design - build contracts. See Village of Tequesta Administrative Policy No. 11- 94/95. Such procedures shall include as a minimum the following: 1) The preparation of a design criteria package for the design and construction of the public construction project. 2) The qualification and selection of no fewer than three design -build firms as the most qualified, based on the qualifications, availability, and past work of the firms, including the partners or members thereof. 3) The criteria, procedures, and standards for the evaluation of design -build contract proposals or bids, based on price, technical, and design aspects of the public construction project; weighted for the project. 4) The solicitation of competitive proposals, pursuant to a design criteria package, from those qualified design -build firms and the evaluation of the responses or bids submitted by those firms based on the evaluation criteria and procedures established prior to the solicitation of competitive proposals. 5) For consultation with the employed or retained design criteria • professional concerning the 13 • evaluation of the responses or bids submitted by the design -build firms, the supervision or approval by the Village of Tequesta of the detailed working drawings of the project; and for evaluation of the compliance of the project construction with the design criteria package by the design criteria professional. 6) In the case of public emergencies, for the Village Council to declare an emergency and authorize negotiations with the best qualified design -build firm available at that time. F) REUSE OF EXISTING PLANS Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, there shall be no public notice requirement or utilization of the selection process as provided in this section for projects in which the Village of Tequesta is able to reuse existing plans from a prior project. However, subsequent to July 1, 1975, • public notice for any plans which are intended to be reused at some future time shall contain a statement which provides that the plans are subject to reuse in accordance with the provisions of this subsection. 4) Procurement by non - competitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source or after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. i) Procurement by non - competitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals and one of the following circumstances applies: A) The item is available only from a single source; B) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation; C) The awarding agency authorizes non- competitive; or 14 • D) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. ii) cost analysis, i.e., verifying the proposed cost data, the projections of the data, and the evaluation of the specific elements of cost and profits, is required. iii) The Village of Tequesta may be required to submit the proposed procurement to the awarding agency for pre -award review in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section. d) Contracting with small and minority firms, women's business enterprise and labor surplus area firms. 1) The Village of Tequesta will take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women's business enterprises and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. 2) Affirmative steps shall include: i) placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists; • ii) assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; and iii) dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority business and women's business enterprises; iv) establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority business, and women's business enterprises; V) using the services and assistance of the Small Business Adminstration, and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and vi) requiring the prime contractor, if sub - contracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (v) of this section. e) Contract Cost and Price • 15 • 1) The Village of Tequesta will perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the Village must take independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. A cost analysis must be performed when the offeror is required to submit the elements of his estimated cost e.g. under professional, consulting, and architectural engineering services contracts. A cost analysis will be necessary when adequate price competition is lacking, and for sole source procurements, including contract modifications or change orders unless price reasonableness can be established on the basis of a catalog or market price of a commercial product sold in substantial quantities to the general public or based on prices set by law or regulation. A price analysis will be used in all other instances to determine the reasonableness of the proposed contract price. 2) The Village of Tequesta will negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration will be given to the . complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of sub - contracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work. 3) Costs or prices based on estimated cost for contracts under grants will be allowable only to the extent that cost incurred or cost estimates included in negotiated prices are consistent with federal cost principles pursuant to s.85.22. The Village may reference its own cost principles that comply with the applicable federal cost principles. 4) The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods for contracting shall not be used. f) Awarding agency review. 1) The Village of Tequesta shall make available, upon the request of the awarding agency, technical specifications on proposed procurements where the awarding agency believes such review is needed to ensure that the item or service specified is the one being proposed for purchase. • This review generally will take place prior to the time 16 • the specification is incorporated into a solicitation document. However, if the Village of Tequesta desires to have the review accomplished after a solicitation has been developed, the awarding agency may still review the specifications with such review usually limited to the technical aspects of the proposed purchase. 2) The Village of Tequesta shall, on request, make avaiable for awarding agency pre -award review procurement documents, such as request for proposals or invitation for bids, independent cost estimate, etc. when: i) The Village of Tequesta's procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with the procurement standards of applicable federal regulations; or ii) The procurement is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation; or iii) The procurement, which is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, specifies a "brand name" project; or iv) The proposed award is more than the simplified • acquisition threshold and is to be awarded to other than the apparant low bidder under a sealed bid procurement; or V) A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or increases the contract amount by more than the simplified acquisition threshold. 3 ) The Village of Tequesta will be exempt from the pre -award review in paragraph (f)(2) of this section if the awarding agency determines that its procurement systems comply with the standards of this section. i) The Village of Tequesta may request that its procurement system be reviewed by the awarding agency to determine whether its system meets these standards in order for its system to be certified. Generally, these reviews shall occur where there is a continuous high - dollar funding, and third -party contracts are awarded on a regular basis. ii) The Village of Tequesta may self- certify its procurement system. Such self - certification shall not limit the awarding agency's right to survey the system. Under a self - certification procedure, • awarding agencies may wish to rely on written 17 assurances from the Village of Tequesta that it is complying with these standards. The Village of Tequesta will site specific procedures, regulations, standards, etc., as being in compliance with these requirements and have its system available for review. g) Bonding requirements. For construction or facility improvement contracts or sub- contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the awarding agency may accept the bonding policy and requirements of the Village of Tequesta, providing the awarding agency has made a determination that the awarding agency's interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements shall be as follows: 1) A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to 5% of the bid price. The "bid guarantee" shall consist of a firm committment, such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance of its bid, execute such contractural documents as may be required within the time specified. 2) A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100% • of the contract price. A "performance bond" is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's obligations under such contract. 3) A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100% of the contract price. A "payment bond" is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in execution of the work provided for in the contract. h) Contract Provisions. The Village of Tequesta's contract must contain provisions in paragraph h of this section. Federal agencies are permitted to require changes, remedies, change conditions, access in records retention, suspension of work, and other clauses approved by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. 1) Administrative, contractural, or legal remedies in instances where contractors violate or breach contract terms, and provide for such sanctions and penalties as may be appropriate. (Contracts more than the simplified acquisition threshold) • 18 • 2) Termination for cause and for convenience by the Village of Tequesta including the manner by which it will be effected and the basis for settlement. (All contracts in excess of $10,000) 3) Compliance with Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41CFR Chapter 60). (All construction contracts awarded in excess of $10,000 by grantees and their contractors or sub - grantees) 4) Compliance with the Copeland (Anti- Kickback) Act (18U.S.C.874) as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (29CFR Part 3). (All contracts and sub - grants for construction or repair). 5) Compliance with Davis -Bacon Act (40U.S.C.276a to 276a -7) as supplmented by Department of Labor Regulations (29CFR Part 5). (Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by grantees and sub - grantees when required by federal grant program legislation. 6) Compliance with Section 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40U.S.C.327 -330) as • supplemented by Department of Labor Regulations (20CFR Part 5). (Construction contracts awarded by grantees and sub - grantees in excess of $2,000 and in excess of $2,500 for other contracts which involve the employment of mechanics or laborers). 7) Notice of awarding agency requirements and regulations pertaining to reporting. 8) Notice of awarding agency requirements and regulations pertaining to patent rights with respect to any discovery or invention which arises or is developed in the course of or under such contract. 9) Awarding agency requirements and regulations pertaining to copyrights and rights in data. 10) Access by the Village of Tequesta, the Federal Grantor Agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives to any books, documents, papers, and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to that specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions. • 11) Retention of all required records for three years after 19 the Village of Tequesta makes final payments and all other pending matters are closed. 12) Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42U.S.C.1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33U.S.C.1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency Regulations (40CFR Part 15). (Contracts, sub - contracts, and sub - grants of amounts in excess of $10,000. 13) Mandatory Standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State Energy Conservation Plan issued in compliance with Energy Policy and Conservation Act (PUB.L.94- 163,89 stat. 871). TGB /krb wp60 \misc \procurement i • 20 EXHIBIT "D" • ADA ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN EMPLOYMENT PROVISIONS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION Surveyors PAULA RUSSO AND ALLEN PRESTON COALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS, INC. 2326 SOUTH CONGRESS AVENUE • WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 (407) 966 -4288 Performed for The Village of Tequesta Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager 357 Tequesta Drive, P.O.Box 3273 Tequesta, Florida 33469 -0273 (407) 575 -6200 Criteria Used Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Titles I, II Date Submitted January 8, 1993 • Appendix F Self- Evaluation Checklist (Employment) F SELF - EVALUATION CHECKLIST Employment Provisions (Titles 1, 11) Developed by the Texas The questions included in this self - evaluation checklist were Governor's Committee for Dis- designed to help employers, both public and private, come into abled Persons, in conjunction with compliance with Title I of the ADA. the Office for (ivil Rights at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Region IV. e' 1. Have you reviewed your employment policies (recruiting, hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring) to be sure that you and your employees are giving • nondiscriminatory treatment to applicants and employees with disabilities? Yes FN No N/A ❑ Action /Due Date: SEE COMMENTS PG.1 2. Have you reviewed your employment practices to make sure that they do not limit, segregate or classify job applicants or employees in ways that adversely affect their opportunities or status because of the disability of the applicant or employee. Yes Ga_: No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A FOUND ACCEPTABLE 3. Have you reviewed your employment practices to make sure that you are not participating in a contractual or other arrangement or relationship that subjects your qualified applicant or employee with a disability to discrimination (i.e., relationships with employment or referral agencies, labor unions or organizations that provide fringe benefits, training or apprenticeship programs. Yes Ni No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A • FOUND ACCEPTABLE F -1 Local Officials Guide C omp ly ing with the Americans with Disabilities Act 4. Hove you reviewed your employment practices to make sure that you are not using standards, criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability or that perpetuate the discrimination of others who are subject to common administrative control? 9 Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A FOUND ACCEPTABLE 5. Have you reviewed your employment practices to make sure that you are giving nondiscriminatory treatment to applicants and employees who have a friend, associate or family member , with a disability? Yes ® No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A FOUND ACCEPTABLE 6. Have you determined the process you will use to decide at which point "reasonable accommodation" causes on "undue hardship "? f- Yes ❑ No Action /Due Date: 7/26/93 i, SEE COMMENTS PG.1 7. Do you hove a policy concerning "reasonable s accommodation "? 1) Yes ❑ No Action /Due Date: 7/26/9 SEE COMMENTS PG.1 S. Do you have a procedure to document decisions not to hire r or promote because of "undue hardship "? i Yes ❑ No )9 Action /Due Date: 7/26/93 SEE COMMENTS PG.1 9. Have you reviewed the requirements of your jobs (job descriptions, employment tests, or other selection criteria) to be sure that no criteria are included that would discriminate against an individual with a disability unless such criteria are job - related and consistent with business necessity? Yes Z No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A SEE COMMENTS PG. 2 • F -2 Appendix F Self - Evaluation Checklist (Employmen 10. Are your hiring procedures (applying, testing and interviewing for a job) carried out in wheelchair accessible locations using accessible formats, such as a reader, tactile information, Braille, audio cassette for vision impaired people, written materials, sign language interpreters for hearing impaired people, and personal assistance for people with manual impairments? Yes U No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A SEE COMMENTS PG.2 11. Have you made sure that employment tests are selected and administered in a way to ensure that test results accurately reflect the skills or aptitude necessary to perform the job rather than reflect the impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills of the applicant or employee, unless the sensory, speaking, or manual ability is necessary to perform critical element(s) of the job? Yes JU No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A • NO FORMAL TESTS EXIST EXCEPT FOR THE POLICE DEPT. 12. Have you made sure that your employment application forms do not contain questions as to whether an applicant is an individual with a disability? Yes 0 No ❑ Action /Due Date: 7/26/93 SEE COMMENTS PG. 2 13. If your business conditions an offer of employment based upon the job applicant's satisfactory completion of a medical examination, do your procedures conform to the requirements of the law prohibiting inquiries as to the nature and severity of disabilities except as they are job - related? Yes ❑ No ❑ Action /Due Date: 7/26/93 SEE COMMENTS PG.2 14. Have you reviewed your personnel policies and practices to be sure that an applicant or employee who is a recovering alcohol or drug abuser (not currently using alcohol or drugs) is included in accordance with the low? Yes B No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A • FOUND ACCEPTABLE F -3 i Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act 15. Have you posted equal employment opportunity notices in an accessible format (e.g., in large print, Braille, and audio cassette)? ;I Yes ❑ No U Action /Due Date: 7 SEE COMMENTS PG.3 16. Have you reviewed medical, hospital, accident, life insurance, and retirement fringe benefits to ensure that they give nondiscriminatory treatment to people with disabilities? Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A SEE COMMENTS PG.3 17. Are your social and recreational activities accessible to all employees and their relatives and associates? Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A 18. Do you have a policy on how to handle contagious diseases? Yes U No ;# ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A SEE COMMENTS PG. 3 19. Have you considered the creation of an ADA employment committee to assist you in making policy decisions? Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: 'N/A A COMMITTEE.HAS:ALREADY BEEN FORME 20. Have you reviewed your interview questions and techniques to determine whether they are nondiscriminatory? Yes U No ❑ Action /Due Date: 7/ 26/93 SEE COMMENTS PG. 3 • F-4 • G SELF -EVALUATION CHECKLIST Local G overnment ADA Adminstration Prepared by the National League The following self - evaluation checklist was to assist local govern- of Cities' Center for Education and ment officials ensure that they have met the administrative require - Information Resour(es. ments of Subtitle A of Title II. 1. Have you designated someone to coordinate your efforts to comply with ADA? Yes )EI No ❑ Action /Due Dote: N/ A Z. Have you established grievance procedures that incorporate due process standards and that provide for the prompt and • equitable solution of complaints of discrimination against an individual with a disability, including job applicants, employees, citizens, and other visitors? Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A SEE COMMENTS PG. 3 3. Do your written materials (publications) include a notice of nondiscrimination? Yes )9 No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A 4. When you provide public notices, including employment notices, do your procedures utilize all types of media and displays, e.g., print media, radio /television and other alternatives, such as taped job announcements available over the phone? Yes ❑ No XFK1 Action /Due Date: 7/26/93 A TELEPHONE LINE WITH RECORDED JOB_ OPPORTUNITIES WILL BEPUT IN PLACE. I i G -1 1 f l s 4 ! Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act S. Have you reviewed policies related to hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff and rehiring to ensure they are not discriminatory? Yes ❑ No ❑ Action /Due Date: QUESTION ALREADY ANSWERED IN SECTION F 6. Have you reviewed medical, hospital, accident, life insurance and retirement fringe benefits to ensure that they give nondiscriminatory treatment to people with disabilities? Yes ❑ No ❑ Action /Due Date: QUESTION ALREADY ANSWERED IN SECTION F 7. Are the social and recreational activities offered by your local i government accessible to all employees and their friends and ` relatives with disabilities? Yes ❑ No ❑ Action /Due Date: i� QUESTION ALREADY ANSWERED IN SECTION F ( S. Have you notified unions and professional organizations with j I whom you have collective bargaining or other professional j agreements of your nondiscrimination policy? 4 Yes ❑ No Ea Action /Due Date: 7/26/9 �4 k I 9. Have you made sure that individuals with disabilities are f allowed the opportunity to participate as members of your planning or advisory boards? I Yes No ❑ Action /Due Date: N/A i� 1 • G -2 page - 1 Section F • Self - Evaluation Checklist, Employment Provisions (ADA Titles I, II ) Comments pertaining to: Question 1 In the Employee Handbook there are instances where it is specified that the form of communication between the employee and the employer will be by written notices, such as, notices of resignation, suspension or dismissal. It is not necessary to change this wording, but the Village must be willing to accept or give such notices in other forms besides written. For example, a notice of dismissal and reasons for discharge of a blind employee should not be only in writing to that person but in another form such as direct oral communication or voice tape. Another example of someone who might not be able to utilize written communication would be an employee with dyslexia. To as great an extent as possible communications with disabled employees must be as effective as with non disabled employees. • Questions 6, 7, 8 Reasonable Accommodation Actions that fall within the concept of reasonable accommodation range from purchasing equipment to modifying company policies to reallocating space. The most common types of accommodations made by employers include: Making facilities used by employees readily accessible and usable. Restructuring jobs. Acquiring or modifying equipment or devices. Providing readers or interpreters. Reassigning an employee to a vacant position. Employers are not required to make an accommodation just because a disabled employee requests it. Although the employee is often the best source of ideas about what reasonable accommodations he or she requires, the employer can choose the means to accommodate the employee. For example, if an employee who uses a wheelchair asks for a specially constructed desk that is high enough to accommodate the chair, the employer could choose instead to raise an existing desk, perhaps by placing it on blocks, thereby providing a reasonable accommodation without incurring a large expense. Undue Hardship • Undue hardship is defined to mean an action requiring significant difficulty or expense for example, an action that is unduly costly, extensive, substantial or disruptive, or that will fundamentally alter the nature of the business. page - 2 Congress has made clear that employers must determine whether an accommodation constitutes an undue hardship on a case by case basis. This means that no one factor, such as cost, size or location of a particular facility, or any single combination of factors, can always be the standard by which undue hardship is measured. A policy which on a case by case basis compares the needed accommodation against the possibilities of accomplishing it should be formulated. Question 9 Employment tests must measure only the skills or capabilities that are essential for the job in question. Another important factor is whether a disabled applicant can take the test in a normal manner. When administering the test, the employer must provide any reasonable accommodations that the applicant needs to take the test. For instance, applicants with visual impairments might require additional lighting, large type, brailled materials, taped materials, or talking calculators to take a written test. Other accommodations, such as those for people with learning disabilities, might include providing additional time to complete the test. An employer that • gives a written test to an applicant who it knows has dyslexia and cannot read is violating the ADA. In this case, a reasonable accommodation would be to give an oral test. Question 10 A willingness to provide the accessible formats mentioned in the question, upon request of the disabled applicant, within the parameters of reasonable accommodation is sufficient. It is not necessary to provide these alternate formats before hand. Question 12 Employers must not inquire which organizations an individual belongs to other than job related organizations. On the Application for Employment under the heading of Membership in Professional or Civic Organizations we suggest the Village add the word disability to the statement of exclusions. Question 13 Employers are prohibited from making medical inquiries that are not job related. The village • may wish to confirm with the village physician that his / her examinations are within this parameter. page - 3 Question 15 The ADA specifically requires notices to be available in accessible formats for people with disabilities. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission states that notices must be posted in a location that is accessible to applicants and employees with mobility impairments. In addition, the commission states that print notices should be made accessible for people who's disabilities limit their ability to see or read. Notices can be recorded on audio cassette or read to such applicants or employees. The ADA requires a notice be posted that states the provisions of the act that apply to applicants, employees and members. The EEOC has issued a poster containing the appropriate language. Copies of this poster as well as a limited number of free audio cassette recordings of the poster are available from EEOC, Office of Communications and Legislative Affairs, 1801 L Street N.W. , Washington D.C. 20507, (800) 669 -EEOC. Question 16 We reviewed the Florida Retirement Systems' handbooks and noticed no discriminatory features. In a telephone conversation with the State of Florida Department of Administration, Research, • Education and Policy Section we were told that they had done an informal in house check of the plan for compliance with the ADA and that it is their belief that it does comply. We reviewed the Florida Municipal Health Trust Fund, Master Plan of Benefits handbook and noticed no discriminatory features. In a telephone conversation with we were assured that a detailed evaluation had been done of the plan. The plan was revised in October 1992 bringing it into compliance with the ADA. Question 18 People with contagious diseases, such as hepatitis, tuberculosis, AIDS or infection with the HIV virus, are considered disabled under the ADA. The Village does not conduct business which involves food handling which is an important factor. The non - discriminatory policy which includes people with disabilities and which the Village already has in place should suffice. Question 20 The only written manual pertaining to this is for the Police Department. We reviewed this and noticed no discriminatory features. The Village may wish to create a manual of techniques and • guidelines which encompasses ADA requirements for use with non police applicants. page - 4 Section G • Self - Evaluation Checklist, Local Government ADA Administration Comments pertaining to: Question 2 The Village should be willing to accept complaints in a form of communication other than written as discussed in section F, question 1. page - 5 Materials of The Village of Tequesta Which Were Reviewed Announcement in newspaper regarding the ADA Village of Tequesta ADA Grievance Procedure Application for Employment (police and non - police) Tequesta Police Department Requirements for Employment The Panel Interview - Manual of Suggestions For Interviewing (The Police Department) Collective Bargaining Agreement FRS Handbooks Florida Municipal Health Trust Fund, Master Plan of Benifits Handbook Job Descriptions: Non - Police Police Finance Director Chief of Police Finance Clerk / Secretary Lieutenant Building Official Sergeant Deputy Building Official Detective Sergeant Building Inspector Detective Director of Public Works and Recreation Patrol Officer Public Works Foreman Admin. / Communications Secretary Recreation Department Foreman Dispatcher Equipment Operator Water System Manager Customer Service Representative I Customer Service Representative II Chief Water Plant Operator Water Plant Operator I Water Plant Operator II Water Plant Operator Trainee Distribution Supervisor Field Service Technician I Field Service Technician II Field Service Technician Trainee Sources of Research and Technical Assistance The Federal Register . ADA Compliance Guide, The Thompsons Publishing Group The National League of Cities' Center for Education and Information Resources Capital District Center for Independence, Client Assistance Program, Albany, New York EXHIBIT "E" • K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Prepared by the National league Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of Goes' CeMerfor Eduaft and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the Irrfo "on Services changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: 7-15- / Name of person completing the plan: • Name of the ADA coordinator: Address of the facility: :35'7 UFSfq 01Z1 VC (01= �1= CdMr!'ldn� y Ue�rptf7�' List public services offered at this locations ,8cr% din �d. 6cary1c /. 1, l01Zr11?cyjeu/f 2At3/t7'O �l�l inc� 9�c.U1 • UP!'Y�C�f' . /.� ; >��'`er/I7Q *`.� , ?�t »7A ?a`!!I. ?/IS�f.C �rnr�iQrlf C ` �,tl�id�K�' n�1 / 7 (Fp ra /,1JAS•he 041) �orDin,o�ir� �i��' �Q�CrV�v �l('P11JyJ 'IYAfi • C/ �I� r� ��� I'll iZth rllw�Knf �' � n orccmr� j�c r v> �J • K -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification Location Complete By: P,441,11 51.4 � o" M f De - 1-26- 9 3 A ass /� f Do /xm i�• _AOP, y qghb,rn Dadks f6 ?t VIdE 32''o% 7.26 -93 3• C�,ange. ad 14vo)-,iary handle lo Levu 7 Re,b b rn S 7- 26 -q 3 4, Acme ou A/l 0, s&a.C#,anPky fd L � '" ,& - 7-26- 1 73 i (lep //o f 46eley e an,D6- 1 ,411, M 4 1 of Rgjrifoa »mS i - 9 3 (o. 1aD�'y Ru�� �oa �r v2 9er rp� vt Lo 6913 App 7 _46 _ y3 . st t e names, organizations/and phone nubmdrs of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • 0 K -2 RdAA(r / ��C�n1 Lulf� �i3�'��� 4Ci ACCT=--JJ d d y (�UiQ�1,riFf • ARCHITECTURAL y BARRIERS CHECKLIST e mov nlfy This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? ❑ J9 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? ❑ 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ 5. Is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? ❑ 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? ❑ 8. Are other than revolving doors available? ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ • 1 -1 Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act 2. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) protrude no more than 4 "? ❑ 0`A 4. Are elevator controls low enough (48 to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ I JA 5. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ 10 6. Does elevator provide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ 7. Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51" for wheelchair? ❑ -❑ Restrooms Yes No • 1. Are restrooms near building entrance and /or personnel office? M ❑ 2. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3� Are doors at least 32" wide? *� ,❑ (rquta c'lasers PrevP, J( jj' -Y {ron) _yj�e '71111 f- /'Y 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ la NIA 5. Are stall doors at least 32" wide? ❑ ❑ 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? ❑ S. Are sink handles easily reached and used? e.45i l y R(-*jc/jrJ (1&f )I f.- l f� �e A/ I r ri /. 1 -2 • Appendix 1 Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ❑ 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes He 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ Z. Is the door easy to open? ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide enough for wheelchairs? ❑ S. Do you have a counter that is too high to serve individuals in wheelchairs? El • 1-3 K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Prepared by the Natlonal League Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of Cirw' Center for Edua mw and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the Information Services changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: Name of person completing the plan: L 1�� • Name of the ADA coordinator: Address of the facility: '067 `T OOIF jTR F o1AncF. (od Ek Deds. List public services offered at this location: R�,2 % /rn ('vl�ecf�v� 1�SCti�r�s (' C it r:! l j'Cl✓1tc' J t'frittj , Fit7 \0 ye ; - v1Ce4� if : ACds ?AV /e IfCC /VX de , 11ccf , Or orc / �l /�ill7 /r7 c2'rxieel K -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification Location Complete By: �Pve�o��rJe+l l . �em s � s7e� Or) Coma. �tJr Y• //pr�s�i�n ��Q A��11 Cp ��c t Add. AID � { P?10 11 �/? CorriDor ,ol�w,a 7- Z�n'�3 9 , ' .4n Fjg ,q JeY fa Le T 4. 0 JaillI/_ you R CIi� OfT�- A� rnnl�v� ,( �p,e F/,� Z� t t e names, organization bnd phone nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisorss C (PaSf Alf�rrin f��t� Name /Organization Phone • • K -2 • 1 /I N ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS CHECKLIST GyA�r-Q �DrPArfmF�f This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? ( picre Thxr6 u ❑ Conli /rev.) 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? 0 ❑ • 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ 5. Is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? ❑ 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? ❑ 8. Are other than revolving doors available? ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ • 1 -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act 2. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) protrude no more than 4 "? ❑ /VIA 4. Are elevator controls low enough (48 ") to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ NJ S. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ /vlA 6. Does elevator provide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ / Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51 " for wheelchair? ❑ ❑ Restrooms Yes No 1. Are restrooms near building entrance • and /or personnel office? ❑ rul 2. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3. Are doors at least 32" wide? * C9 El (,qufo elvlcrs prrv[nf 4vrS ,�t"') 01)"x'1 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ /V f A 5. Are stall doors at least 32" wide? ❑ ❑ 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? ❑ 8. Are sink handles easily reached and use - ? St�y 1 -2 • Appendix 1 Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? El 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes He 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ 2. Is the door easy to open? ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. �{ wide enough for wheelchairs? tom, ❑ • 5. Do you have a counter that is too high 9 to serve individuals in wheelchairs? ( ❑ • 1-3 K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Prepared by the Naito W league Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of aft' Center for Educaft and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the WormationSerdm changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: 7 l6 - 92 jj� Name of person completing the plan: C�bQ Name of the ADA coordinator: I l h Address of the facility: A fir_ "AR r ,? rg0C6; u B�•, List public services offered at this location: /n. SeYVic &A 64iC " 1?A'71 j alle ��"Cf f.�t ia�► 1 Q m�Q, ert/J�.S �/'. e; �� f� �i i i; J' g reels, I CY( bt 1 i rJ �raC�f'S�i19 jr1�'ulr / PJ' �e %� 1 c � � I do 57rreik9 l /t ih.. W 67U 114 t�rc'�f J C���S � ,t� r l,d lr�.i � / rJ4 f f i c fie% r t'� /�n'!r• K —i Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act • List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification 1 Location Complete By: 0 ArFD F,, /es Ill /A Comm, &V• WAiEk F ir7,onC E P s• Ad Ole A0 i 1'47 nor , 1nF = Alm# ins S) APE tyeA ,• Axtaw A -1,44tp'Yr cr/ 5j;OF -S 0 eur6 Cut pvAFO, Al Items /4 c �e ox Ricers lhfd tv��/ cad��ic� .�1x fief /I 17 Co�eRidoK 7�2�93 3. (dA Oc/7 OPF/c -�' , bole 1�nfiles k JcKr , v `e 7 List the names, organizations and phone nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • K -2 • ARC H ITECTV RAL „ BARRIERS CHECKLIST P16/<< 004 / RF credsl �c This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? (5 5 U 41) ❑ La tkV , 1 ,j,7Cf I GvA4frQ [? Pff- 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main ��yy building entrance? JDI ❑ 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? 11 l ❑ ❑ � Slip- 5. Is the clearance ofthe entrance doorway �{ at least 32" wide? IQ1 ❑ 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? ❑ 8. Are other than revolving doors available? ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wi de enough for a wheelchair? / ❑ ( I T ems j 1 akr.1) /y:e I /war /�157r�i r ACCESS • 1 —i Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act Z. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) protrude no more than 4 "? (FiR F F. x f A9006) ❑ NIA 4. Are elevator controls low enough (481 to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ NIA S. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ ,VIA 6. Does elevator provide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ NIA 7. Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51" for wheelchair? ❑ -❑ Restrooms (5hdrC5 (v/ C'.�►M Utv. Gv a f cr Yes No F'44 ACr ) 1. Are restrooms near building entrance • and /or personnel office?( ❑ S. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3. Are doors at least 32" wide? (Re4r.'W ❑ 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ hA YN N JA 5. Are stall doors at least 32" wide? ❑ ❑ 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? (� ❑ S. Are sink handles easily reached and used? t 1 —Z Appendix 1 • Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ❑ 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes me 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ Z. Is the door easy to open? ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide enough for wheelchairs? ❑ • N f A S. Do you have a counter that is too high to serve individuals in wheelchairs? ❑ ❑ • 1-3 K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Prepared by thii Nati W U9u Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of tines' Cemer for Eduaft and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the InfWnu toaSOWW changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: Name of person completing the plan: o ► L1Q��� C& • Name of the ADA coordinator: Arc 17T Address of the facility: 6 APX tqfflcf L1,11,4ge CAA List public services offered at this location: S rw(ey t e1 i4 jig z lo C'h l t' CXcc V Of t �- Pr fvn cl), , f o rwi - I'lM 4&70 AeCel)r 3 O)Z ' vne d , fA � A&r n(VJ, &)1 Sy/ jd n15 j Ct �Izr"7 , � jer�/4 rn T I � l/ l�"T r r; , /l/�7Ar �/ Jll �1A9� UPY�C 5�1�1�J(;F -J , f• eT� Oc'r /�fe�ilJ /!� � f��t'LOr /�S rP %t'rI7 •'a i/7 (�v�r iacrffl! � i Znzw 4 xjP1 J K-1 Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification Locati n Complete By: 0 i " C', rIM S ) 6 (F5 f0 /�IIIQ( '1777 bi114 1 `J Z(. -93 Ac..4cuss 31 {'V it o 00 vile dfa io Metl/y1 , 3 Z " A [41no 7 2 T A 4. d ,, f y lies Rooms me �Dqq j p / nn D-0as S7 4 /r ,.0 f o MJul • 72 iQ f�jf��i`oIY171 -7 - Z6 - q - ? pz ,Locutr T�uc/ D "s (nfrr �Wtxp ilof(, skr Ai � 7- 26-rJ3 sC'/ .a v er � aV� / 14 �C �O�)� IdIpFrQ 7- 2-6 G" �1 3 ng Al 0/ icC N6or i(/rr�D �f f r t yx ,d1/ d )PLAS 7- Z(- 93 . List the names, organizations and phone nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • • K -Z I' i i 1 ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS CHECKLIST ����in�sfr,�f�y �f <��l�,aye irk ( vi lle5 Clcrks I This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? ❑ 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? ❑ 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at uilding entrance? ❑ ( &+ Curb pfcvc►,ts USnf 1 +� 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ 6. Is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? &,f onl ar ❑ 4 Dark Prows 9;rn . 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? 91 ❑ 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? W ❑ S. Are other than revolving doors available? 10 ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ 1 -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act 2. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) �r protrude no more than 4 "? ❑ NIA 4. Are elevator controls low enough ' (48'1 to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ NIA S. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ N JA 6. Does elevator pro_ vide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ f4IA 7. Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51 " for wheelchair? ❑ ❑ Restrooms Yes No 1. Are restrooms near building entrance • and /or personnel office? ❑ 2. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ S. Are stall doors at least 32" wide? ❑ 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? ❑ S. Are sink handles easily reached and used? yes e4sl(. iZrk%cW , 6u4 n eed Lever >L ►J��dl� s • 1 -2 • Appendix 1 Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ( Nfej }o C.wcr t•wI ❑ 015atnor) 1O.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes No 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? 0 ❑ Z. Is the door easy to open? 10 ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? 10 ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide enough for wheelchairs? 0 ❑ 5. Do you have a counter that is too high to serve individuals in wheelchairs? El 1 1-3 K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Prepared by the Notional League Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of Clues' Centerhx Edumfimund need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the Information Services changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date -7- /6 -gz Name of person completing the plan: 14 Name of the ADA coordinator: 1 r / � P f Address of the facility: 57 %,� U�5/r' . �4 ACC �e List public services offered at this location: 1 /icF ei -vlca ty o f 96? 1miAj Yo - /d/,7 f xpaj j Y 0i visa h 4 Wo .4P G / / L )C z Co r%w't A "n, x1 ol ��Sxi�c�r �G��Sfa�e� Cvc�r /�;��fi,� � i�v� /� �Pw�or�r��f.I �Oro�;rr�►� �� �r�!' • K -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification Location Complete By: Ald Arf y o P frI'I/� ✓t GO !i Post Aft�/Ip� -* f - ?oa mS 7 ,2613 2� AIPY Bd JA &7 P (C ,*rt fo Ityd 1 / f� f 7 2Q hv,q . 2' cwlox A gvite m .7 . 1 11 3, '-e od fulyet! .oar �aCecrs ,Al fmx4j v-e f+ Str✓itY �hd 17 ��d�� _ 7-26 3 Pos f' .4 ltrMtrIj vt List the names, organizations and phone nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • • K -2 • ARCHITECTURAL Ile BARRIER'S C HECKLIST po��cr This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? ❑ ,� 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? ❑ • 3. Is there a drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 6W R Ars" I cu ro petyrnfs Access) 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ S. Is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? * 1-f OdAft Adit5 UrA ❑ 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? ❑ S. Are other than revolving doors available? ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ 1 -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act 2. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) protrude no more than 4 "? ❑ NIA 4. Are elevator controls low enough (48'1 to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ h` A S. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ t1jA 6. Does elevator provide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ PJA 7. Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51 " for wheelchair? ❑ ❑ Restrooms (r4of H.C, C001 pAQ ) Yes No 1. Are restrooms near building entrance • and /or personnel office? ❑ IN 2. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ JN 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ S. Are stall doors at. ast 32" wide? ❑ 0 ( No N'C'. 54,11 j 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ Er 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? ❑ S. Are sink handles easily reached and used? ❑ F ;d y Ruicli ,! 4 u+ f IWJ Lever Sf A 1 -2 Appendix I Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ❑] 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes He 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ 2. Is the door easy to open? ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide eiough for whe @� j L lchai fr$ ? C am p aFFitcs CAnAI A(Ca�oP4 +t (ul d C74i-ri3 S. Do you have a counter that is too high 9 to serve individuals in wheelchairs? ❑ 1-3 • K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Reared by & NaWW qua Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of Gft' CmWfor EdWaft and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the infarmation Se" changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: 7 -�t 9Z Name of person completing the plan: • Name of the ADA coordinator: Address of the facility: O / OM D/Xl,c A tl/aY� _ - r'C Uf-S4' (,(1AT5 P4 List public services offered at this location: © i C/- f,(Ci , f e i jtr 1xe jrrg S �v cm�& 7�5 &,7�r�c 'O � C L ' � '4 � l kj � (--PnerA6 (��A7 Pr �ll��f GbPrn_ : h��`v�iC��r'7 iC>'yACy , zoCX/ �j - r� Guf • K -1 Local Officials Guide Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act • List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification Locati Complete By: 1 svj F c A 4 0 &'o S f � 6o'' �.��T or o ,ce 7 -26-43 ,4CCesj 41 t �1P - F.i 2, r ,, ✓'O r / VC, A ccfuS `ramp &j,A 5x_5' Lrvrl p f.rin )t 7 aj= rpm 4 wifh fr•)7 or drrjc �o Dfi'AV f f-d( SS/l� o. ,a , �+� /J •�r -26:L3 3 c&; c ad F� loaf e v�: ��� Corrigir T f "A A4,16 -aA 'I o•r 11A A 4 �Pr vroe R)0)71 ' C 13n x 41 /YQce /Rr H- TM2UAr 9' HbcA _t/1A aFlce, 7 -26-2 3 Gear • CcrNQ�r 6, oa m v c �'/t117x1JP��' C/ilAnc� auf o r N,4nIJ1 ) Levfr ,d!/ 4o -(Xj 2 2G —�3 List tie names, organizations and ;Cno nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • K -S I ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS CHECKLIST `TAQ64YfA wA49 7411 This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? (No 0, C, SPAc(s) ❑ M Z. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? ❑ • 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ S. Is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? ❑ 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ 29 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? E3 ❑ S. Are other than revolving doors available? ❑ Building Corridors Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ 1 -1 I Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act Z. Is floor surface hard and not slippery? ❑ 3. Do obstacles (phones, fountains) protrude no more than 4 "? ( F f' Ar w °ll ❑ M IAUr 14C N IA 4. Are elevator controls low enough (48 ") to be reached from a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ NIA S. Are elevator markings in Braille for the blind? ❑ ❑ N I p 6. Does elevator provide audible signals for the blind? ❑ ❑ N �A 7. Does elevator interior provide a turning area of 51" for wheelchair? ❑ ❑ Restrooms C N FQU•,ogd) Yes No 1. Are restrooms near building entrance . and /or personnel office? ❑ S. Do doors have lever handles? ❑ 3. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ ( Door Opens Iii) 4. Is restroom large enough for wheelchair turnaround (51" minimum)? ❑ S. Are stall doors at least 32" wide? ❑ CR 6. Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ❑ 7. Are sinks at least 30" high with room for a wheelchair to roll under? ❑ S. Are sink handles easily reached and used? ❑ 14 01-2 i • Appendix 1 Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ❑ lA 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to those individuals using a wheelchair? ❑ Q Uidi #y T(A Typt NIA City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes He 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ ❑ 2. Is the door easy to open? ❑ ❑ 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ❑ ❑ j 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide enough for wheelchairs? ❑ ❑ i 5. Do you have a counter that is too high to serve individuals in wheelchairs? ❑ ❑ • 1-3 • K ADA TRANSITION PLAN Ptepored by t6 Notional U9ue Use this transition plan to document those architectural barriers that of laic:' CMW iar Education and need to be removed. The deadline for completing this plan, not the bdonn w Sa vim changes, is July 26, 1992. After you have completed your self - evaluation checklists and architectural barriers checklist, you are now ready to prepare your transition plan. Use this form for each facility that needs structural modification. If your local government employs more than fifty people, you must retain this transition plan for three years and make it available for public inspection. Date: 7 f - 9 Z Name of person completing the plan: VJ, t� /j �� C • Name of the ADA coordinator: Address of the facility: 2286 Coen X L/ 7 / oaf — TFQ 11A5iq All List public services offered at this locations v Jc�C Ecrr,-W14 c5erocei / clvvm ll lelef x: /e ACTi ✓1 lam Ane K -1 Local Officials Guide • Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act List all structural modifications to be made and their location: Modification , l L Location Complete By: li o F Ti u o / lk. D C. / 41,1 Y <rS ARiCt /y /ii -'n •, I VAV han W (ad' &4r ACCESS A/s lfS Ca u F 45 A # or ('.077 I () z, ! /�aViQ� 197/A. .3<v" Cu��F PkffrrA y g8ryc�;o� Fns A/C. s�p,�c�r fa f1z A 1P,a» Frm l,�i�rf f Dr. -.f Guf,S7� Si�� ,aYllG") 7i7� A. IJIr.R a - xC L',►�Ctst�. /oeB ,OY� 260 fa iv, /Cohcessr:n S An0 aUt (�i�s Qaie ./: , WppA'4� s� z (o -V3 !Jl ange ov Pies Rooir S A/ Qoo,CS a M/ NJ ,32" D ooms LNVorM .r F / A�c 11 fo Le vtr erY�CC o1 ' r r TS�.� pad ore A V Ot ' 4 f'rrnA 0 .Pruea IQ Kq f'or (pA<c c A,.1 C04 &Srei4 f n List the names, organizations and phone nubmers of the disabled persons who served as advisors: Name /Organization Phone • K -2 • ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS CHECKLIST 1�Qvts�A Pot This checklist is designed to give local governments a very quick appraisal of potential problem areas for achieving accessibility and when making structural changes. Building Access Yes No 1. Are 96" wide parking spaces designated with a 60" access aisle? ❑ 2. Are accessible parking spaces near the main building entrance? ❑ 3. Is there a "drop off" zone at building entrance? ❑ 4. Is the gradient from parking to building entrance 1:20 or less? ❑ S. is the clearance of the entrance doorway at least 32" wide? ,� ❑ I 6. Is door handle easy to grasp? ❑ ,, 7. Is door easy to open (less than 8 lbs. pressure)? JAI ❑ S. Are other than revolving doors available? L9 ❑ Building Corridors (N a t �4 p ?h,A t 1 Yes No 1. Is path of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair? ❑ ❑ I -1 1 Appendix 1 Architectural Barriers Checklist 9. Are soap dispensers, towels, etc. no more than 48" from floor? ❑ A 10.Are exposed hot water pipes located under sinks wrapped in insulation to avoid injury to th eAJ e ind u in y wheelchair? ❑ ❑ U IY0 WA City Departments that Serve the General Public Yes He 1. Are doors at least 32" wide? ❑ i 2. Is the door easy to open? (� ❑ i 3. Is the threshold no more than 1/2" high? ® ❑ 4. Is the path of travel between desk, tables, etc. wide enough for wheelchairs? ❑ 5. Do ou have a counter that is too high Y g to serve individuals in wheelchairs? ❑ 1-3