HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 13_09/14/2006 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
MEETING AGENDA ROUTING SHEET
MEETING DATE: September 14, 2006
REQUESTED ACTION/SUMMARY: Council at their August 17, 2006 Village Council
Meeting agreed to place this item on the September Council Meeting agenda for
discussion: Council discussion and possible action regarding the Performance
Compensation Recognition (PRC) for the Village Manager.
RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE NUMBER: Res # Ord #
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Village Clerk
FUNDING SOURCE: 2005/2006 BUDGET
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
CURRENT BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE:
AMOUNT OF THIS ITEM:
AMOUNT REMAINING AFTER THIS ITEM:
BUDGET TRANSFER REQUIRED: ❑ Yes No
APPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE: ❑ Yes No
Piggyback Contract Name and #:
Or
Competitive Bid #
APP1ZQvALS�
�
DEPARTMENT HEAD: .; /-�^� �� �� -�''�l`
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
VILLAGE MANAGER: _ �
VILLAGE MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE ITEM: ❑
DENY ITEM: ❑
VILLAGE ATTORNEY: APPROVED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
❑ Yes ❑ No
C] Not Applicable (n/a)
MINUTES OF THE
ViLLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2005
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Village of Tequesta Village Council held a Village Council Workshop
meeting at the Tequesta Recreation Center, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta,
Florida, on Tuesday, November 29, 2005. The meeting was called to order at
9:06 a.m. by Mayor Humpage. A roll call was taken by Village Clerk Gwen
Carlisle. The following elected officials were present: Mayor Jim Humpage, Vice
Mayor Pat Watkins, Council member Geraldine Genco, and Council member
Tom Paterno. Also in attendance were Village Manager Michael R. Couzzo, Jr.,
and Village Clerk Gwen Carlisle. .
II. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
MOTION
Vice Mayor Watkins moved approval of the agenda as submitted Council
member Paterno seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4-0 vote.
III. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Mayor Humpage announced that the discussion would follow the backup
materials. Vice Mayor Watkins commented that she was particularly interested in
looking at salaries, which had been mentioned at the last Council meeting. Vice
Mayor Watkins commented that a lot was continually asked of staff, and she
wanted to be sure tha# the people who were needed could be kept, with job
descriptions provided for their jobs, and to be sure the salaries were competitive.
Mayor Humpage noted that the salary study should include Stuart and Martin
County as well as south county. Council rnember Paterno commented that from
the new employees coming into the pension plan, one was from Stuart, one from
Port St. Lucie, and the rest had been from Jupiter ar Tequesta, which was good to
see. Mayor Humpage expressed concern that the biggest problem faced by
employees in this area was housing costs. Council member Genco commented
that was being addressed by the Northern Palm Beach Chamber of Commerce,
and Tequesta had opted to drop out of that, and the Chamber had been looking at
trade-offs, encouragement, and grant money, and she did not know the current
status of that. Mayar Humpage commented that Jupiter was also looking at
workplace housing by Lennar Homes. Council member Genco commented the
salary survey would be looking ir�to everything, and expressed her opinion that
the objective should be to stay in the top of the third quartile rather than to be at
the very top. Council member Genco commented the Village probably had one of
the best working environments of any municipality except maybe for Jupiter
MINUTES OF THE VIL�,AGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 2
Island. Vice Mayor Wafkins commented that it would be interesting to see what
the survey showed, and it was her opinion that the Village had some very good
people they could not afford to lose. Council member Genco advised she had
gone through the study done for Jupiter Island, and of the six random salaries she
had reviewed, the Village was right there. Council member Paterno comrnented
that it might be difficult to put people into categories because they might be doing
more duties than for one specific job. Council member Genco commented that
since 2000, 110% had been added onto personnel, and there were l 13 employees
if part tirne personnel were included. Village Manager Couzzo commented there
were not quite that many; some were seasonal. Council member Genco
cornmented there were now 113 and there had been only 55 and 3 when she
started here at the beginning of 2000, and an employee census had been done at
that time. Vice Mayor Watkins commented she would like to see that study.
Village Manager Couzzo indicated that the salary study would be tracked from
2000. Council member Paterno commented if there were really that many, he was
�urious to know what positions were added. Discussion ensued. Council member
Genco stated she had all the information at home. The Village Manager advised
that in 2000 to 2002, there had been np Recreation personnel, so that wo�ld be the
biggest percentage jump. Council member Genco commented the population had
not quite doubled so she would have expected staff to increase, and property
values had probably gone up about 35%, because you could only count resales,
and the only newly developed properly that was on the tax rolls in past years was
Tequesta Oa.ks. Vice Mayor Watkins commented the prior study and the budget
were good tools to have.
Mayor Humpage noted he had not mentioned health insurance and that needed to
be incorporated with salary and benefits in the next budget, and items such as
changes in benefits, cafeteria, and changes in deductibles had been discussed.
Council rnember Genco expressed her opinion the cafeteria plan was the fairest
because everyone got equal benefit, and people who did not use the benefit got
the money. Mayor Humpage commented because of the collective bargaining,
the information was needed right away in order to educate those who would be
recipients, to counter the initial reaction that they did not want any change.
Council member Genco asked if Mr. Gallagher could come up with three types of
cost-effective plans and distribute information to the employees and have
someone come out at different periods of time to educate them. Mayor Humpage
responded that the Council needed to decide on the plans first. Council member
Genco clarified that she would like Mr. Gallagher to do some cost-benefit
analyses and come up with three, and then the idea would be to take those tbree
plans and educate the employees on them, and at some point in time take a survey
as to what they would like to do. One of them could end up being reducing the
amount of co-p�yments, or increasing the amount of co-payments. Vice Mayor
Watkins asked about the time line of doing this as far as the Village Manager's
negotiations, to which the Village Manager responded that t1�e union contracts
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAG� COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 3
were up for negotiation this year, and it was not possible to get a handle on health
inswance numbers until really late, and October was the deadline. Village
Manager Couzzo agreed with Mayor Humpage that it would be beneficial to talk
about the options and have a little more direction from the Council based on
initial information before going to the employees. Council member Paterno
agreed the Council needed to figure it out first, since there were economics
involved. Council member Paterno commented if it were him he would choose
what was most beneficial to him and not necessarily most beneficial for the
Village, and possibly the Council could come together with alternatives. Council
member Paterno commented he had a little different perspective on kids, and did
not feel he should get a deduction on his taxes £or his kids since he chose to have
them, and since that was his responsibility it should not take away from someone
who did not nave kids, and maybe there was a way to do it so that people with a
family could get into the cafeteria plan since it might work better for them, while
others might want something else. Council member Patemo suggested getting it
down to two choices, one for people with kids and one for those without kids, and
after the kids were grown then they could switch to a different program. Council
member Genco commented that was what a cafeteria plan would do. Cauncil
member Paterno expressed his opinion that in getting the information out too
early, the union would start finding everything they did not like about it which
could work against it. Council member Genco suggested the following
timetable: since the union contract had to be signed in October, ta make a target
that by May the Council would have selected the options, and by June the
education process would start. Village Manager Couzzo cautioned that the health
insurance numbers would not be available, but the agent could give information
regarding the trend. Mayor Humpage noted that last year, in a couple of areas in
the different offerings there had been a$4�,000 to $50,000 difference. Council
member Genco commented it was a problem when there was an agent of record
because they locked out other companies from providing a competitive rate, and
to be careful this year to follow a process that would allow competitive rates.
Consensus of Council was to set a target date of May for Council to make a
decision, and June to educate the employees. .
On his goals, �ouncil member Paterno commented that his nurnbers on reducing
truck tr�ffic on Country Club Drive went along with Council member Resnik's,
and now with the bridge the through trucks really needed to be managed. Vice
Mayor Watkins commented the lower speed limit might do that. The Vice Mayor
commented the Council members were suppo�ed to be givin,g goals and
objectives to the Manager, a.nd should not give a goal that could not be attained or
a method to do it implemented, and asked what he would expect the Manager to
do to reduce t�uck traffic by 50%--was that an achievable goal? Council member
Paterno suggested since 45% of the truck traffic came from Turtle Creek, to open
a second access on the other side of Turtle Creek to eliminate that firuck traffic
from coming through Tequesta. It could be made less convenient for trucks to
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 4
come through. The truck permit system was now one permit for Ruikers for $200
no matter how many trucks they had, and Council member Paterno suggested
maybe it should be $1,000 for every truck they had, which might be the incentive
for Turtle Creek to open a back truck access. Vice Mayor Watkins commented
the Manager would be held accountable for achieving, and if this goal was set and
Martin County did not cooperate, would that be the Manager's fault? Council
member Paterno commented he was here to compromise, and maybe the numbers
could be reduced. Vice Mayar Watkins commented she understood the problem .
but was concerned about the accountability, that it might be something not within
the Manager's power. Mayor Hu.mpage commented there would be a track record
of the Manager's efforts. Council member Paterno commented it might be only
20% accomplished, but people r�ight be happy with that. Council member Genco
suggested there were two types of goals--one was administrative, where the
Manager would have total control over implementation, monitoring, budget, and
on Council member Paterno's list goals 2, 3, 7, and 8 were under his total control.
The other goals were personal goals that a Council member wanted to promote
because they felt that was best for the Village as a whole or it benefited a specific
area of the Village. Council member Genco commented that Council member
Paterno mentioned that when looking at what the Manager did that a portion of
his pay was based on him achieving the administrative functions over which he
had total control, and the smaller portion should be based on his meeting the
individual goals the members would like to see promoted in areas where they
would like to see improvement. Council member Genco suggested a roundabout
in tl7e huge easement in front of Turtle Creek that big trucks could not get around,
and noted she had suggested this four or five times in the past. The poor
condition of the bridge was discussed. Council member Genco reported she had
seen large trucks using the bridge. The Village Manager responded the speed
limit sign had been changed but the truck tonnage sign had not yet been changed;
if that did not work then one option was to have a police officer there to monitor
every truck crossing the bridge. Council member Paterno suggested another
option, to require permits for trucks going into Turtle Creek. Council member
Genco asked for at least 5 hours per week enforcement on that for the next three
months. Mayor Humpage commented this would assist in deliberations with
Martin County, Palm Beach County, and Jupiter to log the trucks going into
Martin County. Mayor Humpage recommended a warning, and if the truck got a
second warning they would get a citation. Council member Genco commented if
the truck did not have a permit that should be enforced immediately. Mayor
Humpage gave an example of a right turn only sign that had been placed and
motorists who did not comply had been stopped and educated for a six-month
period, and suggested the trucks be stopped and told they had just left Tequesta
and since they were a through truck they needed a permit, and be told t�is was no
through traffic, and issue a written warning; and if they came through a second
time, issue a citation. Council member Genco commented the truck should be
cited innmediately if they did not have a permit, and that would be an opportune
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 5
time to address the through truck issue. Village Manager Couzzo recommended
letting the law speak for itself and allowing the police officers to do their job with
some degree of discretion.
Consensus of Council was to have police enforcement of through truck traffic and
permits for five hours per week for three months. Village Manager Couzzo
indicated this would be logged with a special code and reported in his monthly
report.
Mayor Humpage suggested revisiting permitting fees and creating a fund for road
or bridge repairs. Council member Genco reported the Village's impact fees and
permitting fees were lower than those of surrounding communities.
Council member Paterno commented getting back to the goals, he would like to
increase reserves 1%; annexation was an item he had seen on other Council
members' lists and he suggested setting a goal over ten years or some reasonable
alternative; there was the potential of bringing ather businesses to the Village; and
commented that the goal _ of getting grants was already being accomplished.
Council member Paterno noted that one resident had built a huge shed almost as
large as the house and there had been a lot of complaints about it, and commenfed
the code needed to be tightened to prevent things like this and preserve the look of
the community. His biggest goal was to improve the Village but keep it the way
people loved it. Mayor Humpage commented at the Fall Festival about 30 people
came up to him who were happy this was occurring and saying this was a nice
Vi�lage to live in and that was why they were here. and the way they would like it
to stay. Mayor Humpage suggested that the Community Development Director
could suggest ways to make changes in this part of the building code. Couneil
member Genco recalled that the code had been updated in 2003. Council member
Paterno advised that the huge shed was in the Village on Chapel, the first house.
�ouncil member Genco commented she would like to discuss the lack of code
enforcement by the county at the upcoming meeting with Martin County and
Palm Beach County. Council member Genco commented she did not know if this
information was accurate but she had heard Martin County was evaluating
changing the density in the development on Island Way and that the decision was
to be made .in December. Mayor Humpage reported he had received a call from
the Stuart Netivs about that and right now they were just addressing one parcel
with 39 homes, and he had advised that the Village's primary interests were
tr�c and preservation of the environment aud althougli they were not too
pleased with the surficial wells and new stores, he thought Martin County was
moving forward with that, and there were many more acres that would soon be
developed, and he had advised that the Village was trying to get a meeting with
Martin County to discuss the environment and being good neighliors. Council
member Genco reported Martin County had changed the density in their
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 6
comprehensive plan in order to do Jupiter Isles and at one point Islands of Jupiter
had been undevelopable, and they made changes so that they could do what they
wanted. In this case, Council member Genco expressed her opinion that Martin
County would hold over the Village's head that if they made the changes they
would have to change their comprehensive plan, which would open up the entire
area adjacent to the county line for heavy density development. Council member
Paterno commented there was a new development plan for 16 to 21 homes right at
the Moorings at Island Way, so they were adding small amounts at a time.
Council member Genco advised that she agreed with Council member Paterno's
goal of increasing reserves at least 1% a year. Vice Mayor Watkins noted the
Council had already set a goal of 15% in reserves. It was clarified that next yeaz
it would be 16%, the next year 17%, etc., until there was a stockpile of cash over
and above what was needed for hurricanes. Council member Paterno indicated
that extra 1% would be stockpiled and if, for example, bridge repairs were needed
, when it was at 18%, the stockpile would be used and it would go back to 15% and
it would then build back up. Council member Genco stated a lot of communities
had larger reserves than the Village, and the auditor had told her that. Vice
Mayor Watkins indicated she had a problem with creating a reserve approaching
20%, since taxes were not being reduced and since the auditor had stated the
Village was in excellent shape and their reserves were larger than most
communities. Council member Genco stated she had a problem if the Village was
doing something like a well and needed money to pay to complete it, and if there
were two hurricanes back-to-back again, the reserves would be gone. Council
member Paterno spoke against financing, and in favor of saving and pay as you
go. Mayor Humpage commented the Vice Mayor was saying this needed to be
justified to the community, but this Council's goal was no more debt service, so if
they wanted to increase reserve accou.nts they should educate the public that the
reason was not to have debt service in the future. Council member Genco
commented this would only be done until the Council felt there was enough in
reserves. Vice Mayor Watkins commented she had a problem with the 1% per
year since the Village had been over the 15% goal last year. Mayor Humpage
reported he had done a study and there were municipalities between 18% and
24%, but it was imperative to tell the citizens up front and get their feedback.
Council member Genco commented she would never vote to increase the millage
rate just to maintain a higher reserve, but you had to look at it like a money
market savings account to meet emergencies or special projects, and it could be
built up for a project and then brought back down to be built up for something
else, and once it was at an amount such as a couple million dollars the 1%
increase would stop. Council member Paterno commented it could be opportunity
money and that with cash available things could happen. Mayor Humpage
summarized that maybe it could please everybody if the decision was to increase
reserves by 1% annually if possible and when it got to 18% to revisit that issu�--
that would give three years until the issue was revisited. Mayor Humpage felt it
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, Z005
PAGE 7
would be okay with that timetable, and with general education of the taxpayers.
Mayor Humpage commented if the two acres on Seabrook became available he
would love to buy it for another park, and if the V illage did not have the money
they would have to do debt service. Everyone agreed they were on the same page
and did not want the 1% to continue indefinitely. Consensus of Council was to
increase reserves by 1% per year and revisit the issue when it reached 18%.
Council member Genco commented Council was agreed on Council member
Paterno's number 3, and stated she would like to see a summary list done of this
when done. Council member Genco indicated she felt the percentages stated in
Council member Paterno's number 3 were attainable. Village Manager Couzzo
commented he believe it depended—that last year this Council had added staff
that administration did not request, which affected personnel cost. Vice Mayor
Watl�ins commented that was something for which Council could not hold the
Manager accountable. Village Manager Couzzo commented if they were going to
do a bridge this year, that would cost, too. Even bridge repair would be an
operational cost. Council member Genco commented this was not about capital
improvement costs, only operational costs, and axpressed her opinion that 3% for
operational costs was reasonable. Village Manager Couzzo commented that
personnel costs also depended on contracts with the unions. Council member
Paterno responded the goai was to be 6% or less.
Village Manager Couzzo cautioned to remember these were goals, not mandates,
and at review time to see why gaals had not been met. Vice Mayor Watkins
commented when it came time to review this and hold the Manager accountable
she wanted to be sure Council knew that x, y, or z were not his doing. Village
Manager Couzzo stressed the importance of discussion before he went into
negotiations this yeaz because of the health perspective and cost of living, etc.
The Village Manager advised these were Council's goals, which he was trying to
help them accomplish, not necessarily mandates of the Manager, unless he had
misunderstood. Council member Genco stated these were his goals, that this
meeting was to decide which ones of these were to be implemented by the
Manager on Council's beha�f. Vice Mayor Watkins commented that was the
problem she was having with it. Village Manager Couzzo responded, then he had
not understood, because he had thought these were Council's goals that he was to
help implement, in addition to what he normally had to do by charter and budget
and everything else. Council member Paterno commented part of that, as was
discussed, was that the perc�ntage would be his normal adminish'ative duties
which would be the main part of his pay, and these things would be a smaller part
of his percentage to give him direction that the Council wanted to move towazds.
Vice Mayor Watkins commented the Manager should have the �atitude to come
back and say, Council, at your request this happened anc� that's what threw it off.
Mayor Humpage commented at the last Cou.ncil meeting they looked at some of
the public works monies spent on maintenance, they talked about increasing
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 8
public works, so that meant the 6% was no longer viable. Operations would come
down and personnel would go up. Council member Crenco indicated she did not
want to have a situation of having a department with 8% or 9% annual increases
and others with only 5°/a or 6%, and there needed to be criteria for what
employees would be given on an annual basis. A person performing
exceptionally should be given a larger increase than someone just barely
performing their job, but overall the department should be at the 6% more—and
that was the Manager's decision. If this was exceeded every year and taa�es
started to level off, there would have to be a tax increase, and she did not want to
see that happen. V illage Manager Couzzo agreed, but noted the figures had been .
projected for ten years and the Village was in good shape. Council member
Genco asked for a workshop on those projections. The Village Manager
responded those projections had been strictly done on 6% increase in personnel
and 3% increase in operations and did not include capital. Council member
Genco stated one of her goals was number 3, report of optimum staffing needs for
the next 5 yeazs, budgets and sources of funds, and the 5 and 10-year things the
Manager forwarded to her had addressed part of that, but not all, and she felt
those things should be addressed. Council member Genco anticipated more
commercial annexation than residential annexation, which she stated would not be
an increased load on staffing, and she thought it was something for which the
Council really needed to hold a workshop.
Vice Mayor Watkins stated she was always going to be opposed to forcing
annexation, particularly in a residential area. Council member Genco agreed
with just having Mart'in County and Palm Beach County implement code
enforcement in their areas. Council member Genco commented she would like to
pursue commercial areas aggressively, and that would be a goal for her that she
would like added to the list to see more annexation of the commercial areas.
Council member Paterno noted Village Hall was in process, the RO train was in
process, grants were being worked on and that could continue. Vice Mayor
Watkins commented regarding grants, the Village had to be careful, and when
they were received they had to be carefully monitored because they were time
sensitive and it took a lot of staff time to make sure everything was done in the
proper time frame, etc., and if Council was going to direct staff to keep going
after gants they had to realize the time was coming that a person would have to
be added to do that, because if there was not staff to watch it the grant could be
lost because something did not get in on time. Council member Genco expressed
her opinion that a couple of grants a year were all that could be ha.ndled. She did
not think a full-time grant _person was needed because the Village could not
manage too many grants, and recommended just knowing the Village wanted to
go after big grants, especially those for infrastructure improvements.
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 9
Council member Paterno commented with going into the new building, he would
like to see office workflow streamlined to be more efficient and not to have so
many hand deliveries, and train staff better so they could be better at it, enjoy
their jobs more, and not to have so much turnover. Turnover for the past yeaz had
been �pproximately 30%. The Village Manager commented a lot of it was due to
compensation, pension, and benefits because of which fire and police persorinel
were being lost. Council member Genco noted even more it was also due to
inexperienced people coming here to get experience and using that as a
springboard to get a job where they lived. Village Manager Couzzo commented
that losing more top quality personnel was bad for the organization. Council
member Paterno indicated he wanted to get that number down. Council member
Genco commented the Village was paying for training for fire personnel for their
certification, and as soon as they got the certification, they were gone, and she
never saw the money coming back. The Village Manager confirmed those
employees were tied to a time commitment, and the money was always held from
their pay. Council member Genco indicated she had never seen that being done.
Council member Paterno suggested extending the period of education. Council
member Genco asked to see what had come back.
Council member Genco commented one thing she would like to see was for
someone on staff go to intergovernmental meetings and provide Council with
reports, particularly on development matters from other municipalities. The one
that Karen Marcus had was only one, another was Northern Palm Beach Chamber
of Commerce, there were things going on with the county and with Jupiter, and
she would like the staff person attending to get comp time, or trade time they
might have spent in the office, to keep Council up-to�date on what was going on
with the Village's neighbors.
Council member Genco commented Village Hall was in process, personnel
staffing needs had been discussed, all were agreed on the infrastructure. In
management and review of services, one thing she would like more focus on was .
the parks and recreation and the grounds and the streetscapes, to evaluate that and
find a better way of doing it. She had heard that a tremendous amount of the
people utilizing the services of Parks and R�creation were non-residents, and
wanted to find ways to better serve Tequ�sta residents. Vice Mayor Watkir�s
commented those people were charged, and Mr. Corbitt had provided information
on that last year. Council member Genco commented that no information had
been received as to how many people were using Tequesta Park, and Lee
Webberman had pronused Tequesta money if they could show that Martin County
was using that park, and asked for that information be provided. Vice Mayor
Watkins asked where the Viliage stood on being able to take over Tequesta Park
by purchasing it from th� State, to which Village Manager Couzzo responded the
lease had been renewed, and it was now in a new division in the State, which
should make it easier. Mayor Humpage commented if Martin County provided
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 10
money they might argue against purchase. Council member Genco commented
Martin Counry did not want to mair�tain and service the park, but were willing to
give some money from their discretionary fund if the Village could show it was
used by Martin County residents. Cou.ncil member Paterno agreed the
information on usage should be provided and then this matter discussed, because
he would like the Village to own the park. Council member Genco commented if
Webberman wanted to give the money with conditions she would walk away from
it, but if there were no conditions she had no problem w�th it. Vice Mayor
Watkins commented if the usage by Martin County was not much, it might not be
worth fighting a battle. Village Manager Couzzo indicated he would get the
informatian. Ideas on how to obtain the information were discussed--first find out
who was using the ball fields, and if it was Martin County, then a survey could be
done. One idea was to have this park for teenagers since Coz�stitution Park was
for smaller children. Council member Genco commented JTAA was an
expensive proposition for the Village; Council member Patemo indicated it was a
trade-off since Tequesta residents used Jupiter parks. Mayor Humpage
commented the Village was going to rent out the new pavilion at Constitution
Park. Council member Paterno suggested not allowing non residents to sign up
until a month in advance.
Council member Genco commented her other item, annexation, had already been
discussed. Cost control had been covered. Number 8 was she would like more
input on staff issues and legal items in the Manager's report. She would like as
much as possible done in-house without going to legal, and to use Attorney
Roselli for development matters.
Council member Genco commented that she believed Attorney Roselli handled
development matters more cost effectively and better, and that was her specialty.
Council member Paterno commented that Village Attorney Hawkins had his
expertise, and a lot of txmes he would say he had to check and get back regarding
certain items which were not his area, whereas Attorney Roselli came out with an
answer when he asked her a question, and he did not have to wait a week to find
out how he needed to think about something. The Village Manager responded
that Attorney Roselli was working on the zoning in progress amendments.
Council member Genco commented she saw the most important thing the Village
Manager did as managing staff, with everything else flowing from that.
Council member Paterno commented that he greatly appreciated the timing of the
Village Manager's reports in getting them out sooner than later, which he was
really working hard to do. Also, his job was to manage the people and to make
the people helping him to be accountable rather than the Manager having to do
everything. Using Assistant Manager Garlo as an example—if the Manager gave
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE O�' TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 11
him a task, then let him run with it—and that was something that needed to be
done.
Council member Paterno commented that before next year he would like to see
the grounds and streetscapes turned a little bit. Village Manager Couzzo
explained that the first thing was to get out of the contracts just approved in
September, and staff was looking at the implications of that, and people would
have to be brought on. Council member Paterno recalled that at the meeting
where the contracts were approved he had stated he wanted to make sure there
was a way out. Village Manager Couzzo responded that there were ways to get
out of the contracts, but to amend the budget, take on personnel, shift it out, buy
equipment and vehicles�—it all had to be finely meshed.
Council member Genco commented the other thing she had under item 8 was that
individua.l Council member requests made to the Village Manager should come
back to the Council to see if the Council as a group wanted to pursue that. Mayor
Humpage responded that was policy. Council member Genco explained #here had
been the issue of the Country Club and changing the roads and the curbing, which
required spending money—an engineer had to be hired, and an aerial obtained—
and all of that had happened before it came to Council. Council member Genco
commented she haii had no idea it was even going on until she received a copy of
an aerial that was what was going to be done, and she wondered how this had
happened because she did not know about it. Village Manager Couzzo explained
that had just been explaratory. Council member Genco responded she understood
that, but before taking on a new project which might or might not be something
the Council would support, she would like the Manager to come to the Council
with the idea so that they could talk about it, because everything was not always a.
benefit to the entire community, and if money was involved she thought it should
be on the table. Council member Paterno stated he agreed with Council member
Genco, but it was a tough thing because what ended up happening was
government could work very slowly to get things accomplished for the residents,
and things couldn't be always be held up and he did not always agree, but
understood why the Manager had to go ahead on certain things. Otherwise, things
never got done- just like these goals which were supposed to get discussed six
months ago but things happened and they were just now being discussed. Council
member Paterno commented he liked action and getting things done. Vice Mayor
Watkins commented this would go down to directing . staff and getting certain
reports. The Council was supposed to act to give direction to the Manager, so if
they were going to do that it needed to be across the board. Regarding the
Country Club issue, at that time several residents had been calling and
complaining about the roads in the Country Club and the possibility of kids
getting hit at the corner, and it had been generated as a safety issue, and she had
understood that was the origin and the reason the Village had even looked at it at
the tirne. Vice Mayar Watkins expressed her opinion that if the Council was
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 12
going to say everything must come back to Council, then everything had to come
back and not just little bits of things, but she did not want to micromanage. The
Village Manager commented that it had to be all or nothing, and staff tried to use
• their best judgment as to what to bring to Council so they could see it if there was
a major cost. In the Country Club issue it had been accompli.shed without the
� curbing so there had been very little expense other than re-striping the road, and
that could have been brought to Council and discussed for hours, but if every
single thing was brought to Council, the risk was that the txain was going to stop.
Council member Genco commented she did not think that was the idea—that the
entire idea was Council should know about it—if sdmething was important
enough for the Manager to vote the resources of the Village towards promoting a
project that the Council had not approved or budgeted for, then she thought the
Council should know about it up front and not after plans had been done. Village
Manager Couzzo commented that re-striping the road was not a project. Council
membEr Genco commented it could have been a$75,000 project. Village
Manager Couzzo responded he did not have the authority to spend $75,000 so he
would definitely have brought that to Council. Things had to be looked at to see
the best way to do something, and this had been discussed in this room with
residents and the whole issue resolved by just re-striping the road for only a
couple of thousand dollazs. Council member Genco commented she thought these
were things Council should be aware of. Mayor Humpage commented h� did not
want to micromanage staff, and regarding this particular issue he also had not
known what was going on but understood it was a safety issue with kids thet�e for
the bus stop and people parking in the area with lawn equipment, etc. It was a
safety issue that the residents brought forward, and Council member Paterno had
championed it. The residents wanted rights-of way changed and everything, but
the quick fix for safety reasor�s was to do re-striping and put in a stop sign, which
he believed was a management and sta.ff decision and Council did nat need to be
involved in everything. Council member Genco stated she agreed with him, but
the Village had hired an engineer and prepared aerials. Mayor Humpage advised
the aerials already existed. The Manager explained that the Village did not hire a
plane to take photos, but had just used aerials already done by the county and they
had cost almost nothing. Vice Mayor Watkins comme�ted under $5,000 had
been spent and the Manager had just used his creativity to solve the problem.
Council member Genco commented there had been a cost, but that was just an
example. Village Manager Couzzo responded he understood, but it was going to
be hard for him to judge things. Vice Mayor Watkins commented, the Manager
was suppased to guess what Cou.ncil wanted to knovv about and what they didn't.
Council member Genco commented the other thing was along the road on Dixie
Highway by Walkers Warehouse—that went to the Community Appearance
Board and was something the Council never reviewed. She had gone through
every set of minutes to check. Village Ma.nager �ouzzo responded that was right;
it was an operational matter. Council member Genco stated she had had no clue
that was going to be done, and would like to know about things like that.
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 13
Manager Couzzo commented that was on the master plan, and he would get a
copy for Council member Genco. Council member Genco responded she was the
one who helped develop that master plan and that area had never been looked at.
Village Manager Cou�zo commented he could get a copy—Connie Fisher had the
plan. Council member Genco responded that came later—she had checked the
date on it. Council member Genco commented she agreed with Connie doing that
but maybe she would have liked to have seen more landscaping done: Mayor
Humpage cornmented in that case Ordinance 377 came into it. Council member
Genco stated she would like to see hedges done there and all the way down the
entire railroad track, but Council was denied the opportunity of any input if they
did not know about it, and for the amount of money being spent they should know
about it, and also the community was denied input if they didn't know .what was
going on. Council member Patexno commented that many times he felt the same
way when he found out about something he had not known about, but also felt he
must let go a little, and did not know where the line was. Village Manager
Couzzo sta.ted it was a balance and he would try to improve the balance. Vice
Mayor Watkins commented Council also had to trust the Manager to do his job.
Council member Paterno commented all of the Council members were committed
to the communiry, and all nf them saw different little things that needed to get
done, and if one member reported a problem to the Manager and could work with
him to get something accomplished quickly, then why couldn't everyone
understand it was for a common goal. Council member Genco suggested such
items be put in the Manager's report that he met with someone and discussed
the matter and was going ahead to pursue the project. Council member Paterno
commented this could be too much information—he didn't want to read about
what the Manager and the Vice Mayor, for example, talkEd about—too much
information was burdensome. Council member Genco commented a11 the
Manager had to do was put into his report that as a result of looking at a certain
area he decided to go ahead and do this.
Cou.ncil member Paterno commented if he requested a paper, he thought it was
ridiculous that everybody had to get it just because everybody was scared he was
going to find something they did not know about. The Village Manager
commented they could save some trees—if they didn't want individual requests
reproduced to all, to let him know. Council member Paterno felt to send
everything out to everybody was ridiculous. Council member Genco commented
the Manager was required to do that. Vice Mayor Watkins noted the Council had
already established a limit of $15,000 for the Manager and if somethi�g was over
that it had to come to Council. Mayor Humpage commented he thought what
Council member Genco was saying was just put it in the Manager's report so
everyone would know what was going on. Vice Mayor Watkins commented, not
every conversation. Mayor Humpage agreed, clarifying he tneant something like
Cypress Drive or the Country Club, but not to micramanage because then nothing
got done and the Council would just spin their wheels talking and nothing
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOF
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 14
happened. Vice Mayor Watkins asked how this could be done to make everyone
happy, because on the one hand Council member Genco wanted to maintain
personal involvement in high profile projects like Atlantis, and there had been
such a big hoopla about just meeting with Atlantis to say hello. Council member
Genco commented what the Manager did with Atlantis, she assumed had to do
with his job, and that was another issue. Vice Mayor Watkins responded take
Atlantis out—any developer that walked into the Manager's office to say they
were interested in Tequesta—that was a PR thing and the Manager should
welcome them and invite them to work with the Village, but she did not want to
get to where every little detail had to be appraved by the five Council members.
At some point they had to let the Manager manage. Council member Genco
stated that was not what she was saying: if he was taking on a new project which
was the result of someone telling him something—put that in the Manager's
report. If he had decided a11 the trees on Seabroak Road had to be replaced
because of a disease, put that in the Manager's report. Vice Mayor Watkins
commented then she just wanted an FYI. Council member Genco responded, yes.
Council member Paterno comme�ted he beli�ved what Council member Genco
was saying, just let the Gouncil know things were getting done. Council member
Genco commented people called her at 6:15 in the morning on their way to work
to tell her about something she had no idea what they were talking about, and she
had to say she would find out. Village Manager Couzzo commented he had
worked in 4 or 5 communities and every community dealt with the same thing.
Council member Paterno commented the Council wanted the Manager to manage
but just put it inta his report so they knew what was going on. Village Manager
Couzzo reported that the level of information provided to Council had increased
quite a bit over the last 18 months and staff would continue that he was always
available by phone or e-mail and would respond. Council member Paterno asked
Council member Genco if everyone had to see every piece of paper if a Council
member requested something. Village Manager Couzzo asked if he was to
understand that if a Council member requested something that it was to go only to
that Council member. Council member Genco stated, yes, unless the Manager
felt that it was going to be samething Council would need or a topic that was
going to be coming before them. Council member Genco commented she had 4
years of files, so might not be requesting as much information as other members.
Consensus of Council was to copy all Council members on items if it was
something staff thought might cpme before Council, or when it came to the point
that it was felt it would come before Council
Mayor Humpage commented on the ztems on his list: Annexation had already
been discussed. He was talking to Jack Cory about beautification of U.S. One
through Tequesta, but the State was not forthcoming with money because of the
recent storms. sidewalks and the well those were being worked on.
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 15
Mayor Humpage advised that his last item w�s beautification of Tequesta Park,
and he had ta.lked to the people at Jupiter Hills, and as soon as the season was
over they were going to clear the balance of the park and put m a berm, which had
been authorized by the State. The Council had previously discussed trees in the
right-of-way under the power lines, and the Mayor had counted trees people had
planted in the Village right-of-way. He counted over 106 trees just in streets in
Bay Harbor, on Leeward and Starboard. The Council had talked about not
allowing people to plant trees in the right-of-way since they would grow up and
get into the power lines. Mayor Humpage suggested moving the oaks the Village
had planted in rights-of-way to Tequesta Park. If the Village contracted with
some�ne it would be vary costly--approximately $500 per tree, but the Village
could buy a plow or spade attachment to go on the front of the new rotor to do the
job. Tequesta could then, beautify Tequesta Park and the problems with FPL
would be gone—but the Village had to make the expenditure. Council member
Genco suggested the cost would be around $80,000. The Village Manager
disagreed that it would cost that much. It would just be an attachment and would
probably be $10,000-$15,000. Council member Genco recommended this be
brought before the Council, and that more trees be placed on the north side of
Seabrook.
Consensus of Council was to get Mr. White to do the homewor.k and put it on the
agenda for the first of the year.
Mayor Humpage commented that he had talked to Mrs. Resnik. The interment
for Col. Resnik was set for January 12 in Arlington. Mayor Humpage advised
that he planned to attend and would go January 11 and return January 14. There
was a conflict with two meetings—the Council meeting January 12 and the
county meeting. Consensus of Council was to look at moving the dates of those
meetings. Discussion ensued. Vice Mayor Watkins advised she would not be
able to attend a Council meeting on the 12�'. The Village Clerk was to confirm
new meeting dates with everyone.
Council member Genco reported she had been asked if Council member Resnik's
seat would be filled now or wait until the election. Mayor Huinpage clarified that
if the vacancy occurred six months out an election was required by the charter; if
it was 90 days out nothing was to be done, In this case there was a nine c�ay
window, and there could either be an appointment or nothing could be done.
Mayor Humpage commented his idea was to let it go until the election. Both
Council member Genco and Council member Paterno agreed. Council member
Paterno indicated an appointee could �ave an u.nfair advantage at election time,
and also he would like to leave the seat open as an honor to Council member
Resnik. Mayor Humpage commented then the Council had to get along for three
more months. Village Clerk Carlisle noted the Resnik family had requested that
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 16
his hat be displayed � at Council meetings. Consensus of Council was to do
nothing regarding filling the vacancy on the Council until the election.
Village Manager Couzzo advised that the Village Clerk would suminarize the
goals discussed at this meeting. Discussion ensued. Village Clerk Carlisle noted
many goals had been discussed. Council member Genco commented about 10 or
11 had been formalized. The Village Manager advised that the Village Clerk
would prepare a draft summary.
Council member Paterno asked the Village Manager how he interpreted all the
conversations in this meeting. Village Manager Couzzo responded he saw them
as goals the Council had established and his job was to assist Council in
accomp�ishing goals they had set for the Village, which he would try to do, and
there were quite a few. The Village Manager commented he assumed these goals
were for this year and since 1/3 of the year was over, he was not sure there were
� enough resources to do everything the Council wanted in the way they would like
it don�. People were fairly stretched, but staff would do their best. Vice Mayor
Watkins commented the Council was extremely late in doing this. The Village
Manager commented it was discussed in August. Vice Mayor Watkins
commented Council should remember they were asking the Manager to do
something that he did not have a full year to accomplish, and asked that he review
the summary prepared by the Clerk. Village Manager Couzzo commented
another thing to take into consideration was there would be one new Council
member, and possibly others in April who had no input into this at all, so the time
really might be as short as three mont�s. Consistency became a problem, which
could be alleviated by not having an election every single year. It took new
members time to understand what was going on, and by the time that happened
their term was almost over. Elections were becoming more costly and that money
could be invested back into the community. Council member Genco commer�ted �
she would love to see a three-year term. Village Manager Couzzo commented it
had been discussed but the Charter Board did not want to do it. Council member
Genco recommended just keep bringing it up and maybe one day it would take. It
was the norm to have three-year terms. Mayor Humpage commented a
referendum election would have to be held to make that change. Council member
Genco suggested when there was anything that required the process, it could be
done at that time. Village Manager Couzzo commented maybe it could be added
at next yeaz's election when only twa seats were up. Council member Genco
suggested putting it on for the upcoming election. Clerk Carlisle noted there was
also the Council salary issue--they were very low compared to other
communities, and that might be a deterrent to people running for Council. Village
Manager cautioned that the salary issue did not need to be on the ballot. Council
Consensus was to place both of these items on the December agenda.
MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAG� COUNCIL WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PAGE 17
Council member Genco requested � salary evaluation form be developed by the
people doing the salary survey that Gouncil could accept.
ADJOURNM�NT
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Watkins, seconded by Council Member Genco, and
unanimously carried the meeting was adjournecl at 11:1 S a.m.
Res ectfully submitted.
�" ,
�7� ��'�-�--
: �Gwen Carlisle
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
MEETING MINUTES
TEQUESTA RECREATION CENTER
AUGUST 31, 2005
L Call to Order and Roll Call
The Tequesta Village Council held a Village Council Workshop Meeting at the Tequesta
Recreation Center, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, August 31,
2005. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Jim Humpage at 9:00 a.m. A roll call
was taken by Village Clerk, Gwen Carlisle. Council Members present were: Mayor Jim
Humpage, Vice Mayor Pat Watkins, Council Member Edward D. Resnik, and Council
Member Tom Paterno. Council Member Genco was unable to attend, because she was
attending a trial out of town. Also in attendance were: Village Manager Michael R.
Couzzo, Jr., and Village Clerk Gwen Carlisle, and Department Heads.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Council Member Resnik moved to approve the agenda, as submitted; seconded by
Vice Mayor Watkins; motion passed 4-0.
l. Council's Goals and Objectives 2005/2006
Vice Mayor Watkins read for the record Item #1, from her Goals and Objectives: "I'd
like to evaluate where our personnel salaries are in comparison with other municipalities
in the county and decide as a Council whether or not they are where we want them to be".
Vice Mayor Watkins explained she wanted to make sure that the Village's salaries and
benefits were competitive with the jobs that the Village expects the employees to do. She
felt the Village has outstanding employees and would want to be sure that they remain.
She asked Council to take a look at this issue and decide whether or not they were
satisfied with the current salary levels. She noted when Council received the report of
where the Village's upper rnanagement level ranked in comparison with the other cities;
she was a little surprised. She wanted to see what Council's position was regazding this
issue, and mentioned her worst fear would be if the Village starts losing the good
employees they rely on, especially some that do their job, and many more jobs at the
same time. She noted she just wanted to be sure the Village was taking into consideration
of where the employees are at now, and in the future. She felt there were some jobs that
needed adjustments. She asked for Council input.
Council Member Resnik indicated he also reviewed the study, and did a brief analysis
based on the information in the survey. He mentioned he was not validating the study,
just taking the information that was presented and formulating it into a document that
shows where the employee's fall by title within the list. He distributed a handout of his
results. He pointed out in the study there were only 31 positions fell into the same title
that we had. He explained not a11 municipalities submitted information. He noted
Tequesta did not submit for some positions because they did not have a job that fit the
description.
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 2 of 21
Council Member Resnik reviewed his results: 11 general employee positions fell in the
mid range and 19 upper level management positions fell into the bottom of the range,
between 15% and 0, and few were in the 20% category. He felt Council should consider
at some point in time deternuning a level at which the Village would like to eventually
have the employees at, whether it be mid-range or a little above mid-range. He suggested
then each year try to adjust the budget to obtain that figure. Mayor Humpage commented
the Village was using the price index to come up with a number, and there were many
variables and indexes that determine this. He felt what needed to be done was to find out
how the Village determines this; whether the Village uses other municipalities, or if the
Village determines it by the performance of the individual, which is their merit raise. He
felt in order to determine what to start the employees at the Village needed to have some
type of index or procedure that they could use. He noted when looking at recruiting new
police officers one of the issues was the starting salaries for the Village police officer's,
around $36,000.00 annually. He asked Staff to check into the starting salaries of the
Martin County Sheriff's Office, Jupiter Island, and City of Stuart. He pointed out the
starting salaries to the south were typically $42,000 -$44,000. He noted there was a
considerable difference there, and if the Village was trying to attract new officers how
would they go about getting them when other cities were paying more. He felt that
needed to be looked at; and as a consideration in the Village's long- term goals and as the
revenues fluctuates; he questioned how does the Village go about keeping the quality
people. He felt the Village needed to give them something or they will move on to bigger
and better things. He suggested the Village should come up with a system that allows the
Village to take the overall salary and benefits of employees, so that the Village stays
competitive. He suggested maybe Council should dedicate a Workshop this year, to
address these issues, long before Council and Staff begins next years budget. Vice
Mayor Watkins agreed.
Council Member Resnik mentioned about 2 or 3 years ago the Village awarded a contract
to have a firm come in and review the pay structure. He pointed he did not get a sense at
that time that the Village's pay shucture was that bad in comparison to other
communities. He mentioned in reading the recent newspapers other communities were
doing the same thing, looking at their pay scales, etc. He mentioned he recently spoke
with Chief Allison regarding filling some of the police officer positions; he indicated
Chief Allison noted the response for applications was poor, with only about three
responding. Mayor Humpage explained the Palm Beach County Sheriffls Office had a
job fair about a month ago. He noted there were 30 positions, and about 650 applicants.
He mentioned the problem with trying to compete with the Sheriff's Office position was
their level of salary, and benefits, and the take home car. He explained there are at least
620 people remaining, and questioned why the Village only received 3 applicants. He
agreed maybe the Village should consider having some type of professional survey, and
do it on the entire employee base of the Village so the Village knows where it is going.
He felt the Village needed to come up with a solid based index that could be used to
evaluate the positions. Council Mer�ber Resnik agreed with having a workshop, and
suggested it should be done after Council is provided with information that they could
base it on. Village Manager Couzzo commented the previous consultant firm looked at
the different classifications and appropriate ranges.
2
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 3 of 21
He mentioned that was three years ago, and a lot of communities were doing studies
every year, or two years, because they were so many changes. He noted the Village has
had access to the new Town of Palm Beach Study, and now Jupiter Island was doing one,
and also the PEPIE studies are done annually. He indicated Staff was looking into the
Martin County salaries, as requested by the Mayor, and that would be provided to
Council. He pointed out this was kind of like a moving target, with everything changing
all the tixne. He noted the Village was trying to stay competitive with the other
communities, so it makes it very difficult. Vice Mayor Watkins explained the Village is a
small community, but felt it would be well worth the time to look into the issue. She
indicated she did not really know how to evaluate it, but wanted to be sure the Village
was watching it carefully, so that the Village would not be caught in a mass exit with no
one paying attention.
Council Member Paterno noted he understood the police department salaries, and
suggested Council work at coming up with where the Village would like to be, as far as
in the communiry, maybe 50% or 75% level, or something else. He mentioned as far as
the police department and moving up into management; or different levels or different
pay scales they really do not have the opportunity or potential to move up, so some
people may not want to come here for that reason. He felt that should also be considered.
He suggested another thing is to make the job more desirable to the people already
employed here with other things, other than pay. He noted there were other ways of doing
it, with a combination of pay and other incentives that the Village needs to look into.
Mayor Humpage pointed out one of the things the hospital did was to purchase a number
of townhouses over by the hospital and offer them to their employees as rental property
to get a reduced rent. He commented if someone was a police officer or school teacher
making $40,000 a year, and had to drive to Tequesta, because there is no affordable
housing in the area and now with the gasoline prices, someone may find that 10% or 15%
of their annual salary just gets them to the job. He agreed the Village needed to look at
other incentives to bring the people to work at the Village.
Council Member Resnik mentioned one incentive they had in the civil service was the
step in grade. He explained the step process, and the ability of the individual, based or�
their performance to go to the next step and get an increase in pay. Village Manager
Couzzo noted the Village does not use the step in grade process, and felt there was a
down side to it, but noted the Unions would like to see it. Council Member Paterno felt
one drawback to the step and grade process was someone could stay in the position and
keep moving up, but sometimes they are not doing the job that should be done. He felt a
downfall to this being in government is that it is very difficult to give incentives or
bonuses financially for people that are really exceptional at their job. He felt it tends to be
everyone is treated the same, and that was one thing that he finds very difficult for him in
this atmosphere. He noted if he has an exceptional employee he would rather pay them,
or do something, or give them some type of benefit, extra vacation, whatever makes it
more desirable for the employee. He commented in the atmosphere that governments
works in it is very difficult to implement that potentially. Village Manager Couzzo
commented the Village has that benefit, and was probably one of the innovators. He
noted that is now just catching on as a trend across the board. He pointed out there is a
down side to it; the unions were not really in favor of it, because they do not want it to
3
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 4 of 21
look like the city/municipality was showing favoritism to any union member. He
explained the concept of the union is one is all, and all is one. He noted he approached
the unions in the last negotiation session, and they flatly rejected it. Mayor Humpage
agreed collective bargaining makes it difficult to do that. Village Manager Couzzo
pointed out the union representation in the Village was about 35%-40% of the employee
population, so 60%-65% of the employee population it can be done with, and is done
with on an individual basis. Mayor Humpage pointed out the two unions represented in
the Village was the Clerical Workers of America (CWA) and the Fraternal Order of
Police (FOP). Village Manager Couzzo agreed. Council Member Resnik noted he did not
say he endorsed the civil service step and grade process, but felt if the employees were
offered an incentive, that would give them something to look forward to in the future. He
noted nothing was guaranteed; it just gave the employees the opportunity to be reviewed
far a higher range of pay.
Vice Mayor Watkins read her Goals a.nd Objective #2. She commented she wanted to set
a goal for Council to make it a point to accentuate the position things going on in the
Village. She felt Council should complement Staff, the residents, and each other when it
is deserved. She felt last yeaz it seemed to get bogged down in the negative, and there
were so many good things going on in the Village, that she would like to see Council
highlight the good. Council Member Resnik agreed.
Vice Mayor Watkins commented on her Item #3 Goals and Objectives, noting "she
would like to continue to look for grants and alternative sources of revenue, whenever
possible, to help the Village bring even more enhancements into the community". Vice
Mayor Watkins nated last year when she and Ms. Wendy Harrison visited Commissioner
Karen Marcus indicated she would have Parks and Recreation grant monies available for
this yeaz, and that the Village should come back and ask for some of those funds. Mayor
Humpage questioned whether the Village was pursuing the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) grant for the well. Village Manager Couzzo responded
in the �rmative and noted it would be for the well, and the pipeline from the Water
Plant to the well.
Vice Mayor Watkins read for the record her Goal and Objective #4. She mentioned "she
would like to encourage more open dialogue between the Council members and the
manager, through discussions between each of Council individually with the manager and
workshops to exchange ideas and information". She felt this might also help Council
curtail the amount of time and resources that are spent on legal assistance. She indicated
she was very aware of the Sunshine Law, and communicating with other Council
members, but she felt Council could individually address questions with the Village
Manager. She noted she really liked the idea of workshops, where Cauncil could put
ideas on the table that could not otherwise be discussed, and that it could also save time
in the Regular meetings. She mentioned many times Council Member Genco has some
history on topics, ideas, and resources that she knows other Council Members may not
know. Vice Mayor Watkins indicated she really appreciated those comments. She pointed
out each of the Council Members have different backgrounds, and felt everyone's
message should be incorporated into the discussions, for better communications for
everyone.
4
Minutes — Village Council Warkshop
August 31, 2005
Page 5 of 21
Vice Mayar Watkins reviewed her Goal and Objective #5: "I look forward to watching
the progress of the projects that are on going as we enter the new fiscal year and I hope
we will continue to focus on more projects that we can do to enhance the Village and
make our residents proud of their community. I want to spend our revenues wisely, in a
manner that will have the greatest impact that we can have toward giving our residents
the highest level of service and quality of life that we can reasonably provide". Mayor
Humpage thanked Vice Mayor Watkins for her input.
Council Member Resnik read for the record his goal and objective #1. "Immediately
begin planning for and implementing actions, including traffic calming measures, to
mitigate the increase in traffic on residential streets of Tequesta. resulting from the
Western Corridor and the associated growth in residential density in western Martin
County and Jupiter". He noted "an excellent beginning action would be the connecting of
the northern end of Country Club Drive in Martin County to the end of Couniy Line Road
if Martin County will cooperate". He mentioned he has brought this up many times to get
fruition over the last year and half. He suggested this would be a near-term goal, and that
it could be done this year, or next year, but it certainly should be done before the Village
gets inundated with tr�c. He pointed out all the construction going on right now on the
Western Corridor, the article in the paper regarding "mega mansions" in western Martin
County, and the 180 units in Section 28. He felt the problem is the infrastructure of roads
to permit the traffic to flow without creating downfall on residential areas. He indicated
Martin County provided access to I-95 and Indiantown Road via the Western Corridor,
but was not planning on adding access to U.S. One. He noted to get to U.S. One; one way
is either through Tequesta, or through Little Club in Martin County, and both of them
were residential areas. He noted if it was not planned for in advance to get it so that it
minimizes the traffic flow, the Village would be unprepared. He quoted former Council
Mernber Joe Capretta, "we want to create a feeling on the part of drivers that they do not
want to drive through Tequesta to get to U.S. One, because it will be too slow and they
are going to get a ticket". He felt in the next five years or so, Tequesta will see greater
traffic.
Council Member Paterno commented he meet with Commissioner Marcus last week, and
she said she would be more than happy to facilitate a meeting with Tequesta's Council,
Martin County Commissioners, and Jupiter, or individually with each group. He indicated
she would like to attend the meetings, and would help to facilitate a date if that was the
desire of Council. He felt that would be a good thing, and that would help push to get
what Council Member Resnik wanted for Tequesta. He indicated he had some ideas on
this also, pointing out his Goal and Objective #6, "reduce truck traffic on .Country Club
Drive by 50% and over all traffic by 30% in one year". He felt other things could be
implemented through cooperation, or unilaterally in reference to fees. He noted he would
like to see the truck traffic on Country Club Drive addressed, because in the last week he
noticed dump trucks on Country Club Drive and there was no construction going on in
Tequesta, so he felt they were going further west, or to Turtle Creek. He felt this was be a
big impact to Tequesta that needed to be addressed, and jointly worked with the other
communities to get it to happen. Mayor Humpage agreed, but noted the key for Tequesta
was working with Martin County, and Cornmissioner Webberman, because the people of
Little Club do not want this collector road.
5
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page6of21
He thanked Council Member Paterno for meeting with Commissioner Marcus. He felt the
Village needed to push hard at Martin County, and do whatever it takes, and if that does
not work, then resort to other measures such as forced permitting, and stopping the
vehicles and just making things very difficult. Vice Mayar Watkins felt that having a
joint effort between Councils and the County Commissioners would have more impact on
everyone then meeting individually. She noted the real critical issue for the Village was
the in-fighting going on in Little Club. She indicated the single family residences would
like the connector, because that is where they are cutting through now. She commented
the apartments in the back do not want it, and it would have to go right by them. She
noted there were many Martin County residents that did not want it, so what would be
Martin County's incentive to allow the connector.
Council Member Paterno suggested putting pressure on Turtle Creek, and working with
them because there were some things they wanted from the Village. He felt those 500
people could get on our side for adding the connector road. Vice Mayor Watkins
commented the people who work at Pratt Whitney, that drive from the County Club and
Turtle Creek, are now going the back way because it says them 12 minutes. She felt that
was one way it was affecting Tequesta to the better. Mayor Humpage suggested Staff set
up a meeting. Vice Mayor Watkins agreed. Village Manager Couzzo clarified Staff
would set up a meeting with Commissioner Marcus. Council Member Paterno noted
Commissioner Marcus would put the meeting together, and facilitate it. He noted that she
would like to pick the topics and narrow the discussion to some extent. He commented
for example, traffic. Village Manager Couzza suggested a joint meeting with all entities,
and the people from the Counry Club and Turtle Creek.
Council Member Paterno felt it would be better to have Council meet with the Martin
County Commissioner's and Karen Marcus first before meeting with the public. Village
Manager Couzzo asked Council if they would consider meeting in Commissioner
Marcus's office. Mayor Humpage indicated the Council could meet in Martin County if
necessary. Village Manager Couzzo indicated he would let Commissioner Marcus decide.
Consensus of Council agreed. Council Member Resnik commented as the expansion in
the west grows, so should the expansion of the ability to go east. Vice Mayor Watkins
noted Martin County Commission could care less whether the Village is going to charge
a truck to come down Country Club Drive, and that the issue that they bring to bear on
them is really the road. Council Member Paterno indicated if the Village charges them a
large enough number, than instead of paying us they would be forced to go County Line
Road, or sorne other way. Village Manager Couzzo indicated Staff would get with
Commissioner Marcus regarding the meeting. Council Member Resnik pointed out one
important thing to consider was in the mid 1990's there was a group that planned for the
infrastructure, roads, etc., (Treasure Coast Planning) and they had it that the Western
Corridor would not stop at Island Way; it would continue on around with State approval
through Jonathan Dickinson Park; and go a11 the way to U.S. One. Vice Mayor Watkins
commented they would not have to come over to Country Club Drive at all. Council
Member Resnik agreed. He noted there was to be access roads that would be constructed
within. Martin County that would go to U. S. One. He commented nothing happened with
it although it was a viable approach.
6
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005 �
Page 7 of 21
Council Member Resnik noted people in Martin County thought it was a good way to
relieve the traffic in the residential areas.
Council Member Resnik read for the record his Goa1 and Objective #2: "Aggressively
design and pursue obtaining grants for the landscaping and beautification of the U.S.
Highway One Corridor through Tequesta from the Jupiter line to the Martin County
Line". He mentioned he was at a meeting where some grant agency was offering bits of
information on grants that would be available in the coming years for beautification of
Highway One. He felt it would not be easy to secure grants when the Village already has
a Staff that is dedicated to doing their jobs that they were hired to do, and then take on
more work. He felt grants are a very competitive for the dollars. He explained it would
enhance the beaury of U.S. One, and that it should be done with grant money, and not
taxpayer money. Mayor Humpage agreed, and noted it was one of his objectives. He
indicated Mr. Jack Cory, the Village Lobbyists' might be able to bring everyone up to
speed on the projects. He explained he spoke the other day with Representative Joe
Negron regarding an event on November 19�' and asked Mr. Negron if he could talk to
Mr. Cory regarding U. S. Highway One. He asked Council to keep November 19�' open
on their calendar. Village Manager Couzzo pointed out Mr. Cory came to Tequesta and
met with the landscape architect and the Administrative Coordinator for the Highway
Beautification Grant, and they toured the U.S. Corridor, and spoke about opportunities.
He indicated Staff was working on that project, and that it would be a joint funded grant.
He noted the grant would be a rather lengthy process, but the Village's beautification
project was included on the list. Mayor Humpage commented Representative Negron is
the chair for the Ways and Means Committee. Village Manager Couzzo indicated there
may be other ways to do it other than the Highways Beautification Grant, because they
have such rigid criteria for planting materials, irrigation, etc. He explained when Jupiter
did it, they put out a lot of their own money.
Council Member Resnik presented his Goal and Objective #3: "Build on the goal
presented in April 2004 by then Council Member Jim Humpage to establish a Village
committee to attract new business to our Village. As a first step the committee should
poll Village residents on the type of businesses they would like to . see established in
Tequesta. (Over the past few years some residents have indicated to me that they would
welcome the return of a K-Mart type shopping facility). The committee should determine
feasibility and prioritize options of desired new businesses and with Village Council
agreement, solicit accordingly". He noted the demographics have changed in Tequesta
since the K-mart left, and now the community was more family-oriented. He felt family
members were looking for a place that they could go and shop a11 in one store. He
. stressed not everyone wanted that type of establishment, but he supported establishing a
committee of community business owners. He suggested the Village could poll the
residents through a survey, or whatever way to try and get an idea of what type of
businesses they would like to see added to the community. He comrnented on the handout
that was distributed to Council on all the businesses within the Village of Tequesta. He
noted to his surprise the number of small businesses the Village has within its boundaries.
He suggested this list, or a survey could be used as a baseline to ask what the residents
would like to see. He noted then the committee could pursue that with Council approval
for the expansion of the C-2 area.
7
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 8 of 21
Mayor Humpage noted that was a great idea, but indicated the larger retailers do
marketing studies, and if they do not feel that they can produce at a level they are
comfortable with, they will not come into the Village. Vice Mayar Watkins commented
they were all moving towards free-standing buildings, not part of a plaza or something
like that. She noted the Village does not have a lot of land to offer such accommodations.
Mayor Humpage pointed out when Publix leaves that building will be vacant, and since
the Village does not own that building, the owner can choose whatever they want within
that space. He noted with these marketing studies if someone was going to open up a
Wal-mart or McDonalds, he felt the owners would be hard pressed to put them in because
there was already a Wendy's. He commented it is just in the numbers of where these
businesses go. Vice Mayar Watkins noted at least three stores in Tequesta have gone out
of business lately because there was not enough customers to keep them open. She noted
if the small businesses do not have enough customers to keep them open, how would the
big stores stay in business. She commented Tequesta would have to have something so
attractive, that Jupiter does not have, or any neighboring community to draw other
community residents over the bridge to shop in Tequesta.
Mayor Humpage commented where the old Publix is that would be a good place for the
Village, but along with big businesses comes traffic. Council Member Resnik stressed if
the Village could get some idea from the residents, what they would like to see over a
period of time. He noted he has heard comments that some residents would prefer to
drive the 3 miles to . Indiantown Road rather than have the traffic. He pointed out the
Village has residents from up north, and with the new homes out on the Western Corridor
it would provide a different demographic base for studies.
Council Member Paterno commented everyone has great ideas, but the Council would
only be able to settle on a few. He distributed a handout and read for the record, as far as
a Mission Statement: "To provide services and programs that enhance the quality of life
for all Village residents". He felt "all" the residents were the Village's primaty business,
and that Council should always keep that in mind. He agreed with Council Member
Resnik regazding the change in the demographics to the west, but commented at the same
time the Village would want to put businesses in that not necessarily make more traffic.
He commented if a Lowe's came into the Village there would be more people, and a lot
more traffic coming past the residential areas, and that was a concern of the residents in
the north end of the Village. He read for the record his Goal and Objective #1: "Review
G2 zoning area in order that Tequesta maintains its commercial area/businesses".
Council Member Paterno referred to his handout regarding "Development in Tequesta",
and read the verbiage for the record. He felt it was very important that Council preserves
and maintains the commercial area, and that it does not become residential. He asked for
Council consensus to have the Village Manager review the existing G2 zoning language,
with Staff and legal counsel, and to report their findings to the Village Council far
consideration at the next Council Meetirig. He noted another one of his goals and
objectives was to have the Village "Manager promote the Village of Tequesta and recruit
two new companies to Tequesta with a minimum of 25 employees each". He indicated
that would make it more of commercial area where people come and work, but preserve
the Village's lifestyle.
8
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 9 of 21
Vice Mayor Watkins felt it would be difficult to charge the Village Manager with the task
of attracting businesses. She mentioned the Village does not own any property in the
Village, and the best would be to promote the city. She indicated she wanted to be very
careful with how this goal and objective would be worded, because she did not want to
hold him accountable if he could not get businesses here, with 25 employees. She felt that
was a difficult thing to ask him to do. She pointed out she has no problem with looking at
language, but she would not want to exclude the ability to ever look at doing something
else in the commercial area. She explained she would not want to word the C-2 zoning
district language that would not allow a special exception, or something like that. Mayor
Humpage indicated Council would in the future be discussing the G2 zoning, and felt
Council should get up to speed on what the parameters are in the G2 district, and where
the PCD wants to come in, what exceptions can be made, and what can not. He indicated
he would not want to seal in stone that there could not be some kind of exception made.
He commented Council may not have any option, and a piece of property could sit there
vacant, which would not be good for the Village. He noted Council would not allow any
project that does not fall within the parameters of the density, and elevation requirements.
Council Member. Paterno read the definition for the C-2 Community Commercial
District. He noted the idea of a commercial area would be to provide services to the
community. He felt it was something that Council needed to review, because it was at a
point of changing the dynamics of the community and this topic would be the most
important topic that Council will face in the coming year. He suggested Council should
take the time to think this out, because it the next three years, Council would look back
and say what happened. He agreed Council should look into other alternatives also.
Mayor Humpage commented he did not have a problem with it, but for example, the old
motorcar place has sat empty for the last ten years, and Mr. Zucarrelli can not get rid of
the empty spaces in his building that has sat there 3 years. Council Member Paterno
commented having vacant land was not such a bad thing, because the longer it sits there
the more desirable it becomes for businesses to come into Tequesta. He commented the
bad thing would be if the Village does something that they would regret later.
Mayor Humpage commented he would agree with that, but if the citizens were asked,
most folks would probably say that want something done with that parcel between Old
Dixie Highway, and U.S. One. Council Member Paterno noted the next question to ask
them would be if they want their lifestyle potentially ta change, or the Village to change
it make-up; he felt they would say to leave it vacant. Vice Mayor Watkins noted at least
for a yeaz, or since the inception of Atlantis, she has asked people in the grocery store
what they think. She stated the entire time she has had three individuals contact her,
Council Member Paterno being one of them that were opposed to that development. She
indicated she has not had anyone else object to having Council look or invite, not 12
stories, but a mixed-use sort of thing, or something that had some commercial on the
bottom, and condominiums over it. She stated they had no problems with it, and that they
hated the empty parking lot of Zucarrelli's property. She felt it was something that
needed to be considered, that Council should not blanket say what the residents want and
do not want there. She suggested the residents should be asked for their input. Attorney
Hawkins noted Council should not be discussing specifically the pros and cons of a
particular project.
9
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 10 of 21
He suggested it should be a broad discussion regarding the code and the concerns of the
code. Vice Mayor Watkins felt the residents would want Council to keep their minds
open to not just commercial, and to not exclude that possibility from the code. Village
Manager Couzzo suggested holding a Workshop prior to the next Council Meeting to
discuss the text of C-2, the purpose, and place it on the agenda as an agenda item, should
Council wish to take action. He noted there were sections of the Village code that needed
to be revised, and needed to be more specific. He felt discussing the language would
provide more clarity in developing and understanding the code. He noted at the time the
code was created the language was fine, but it may have been vague enough that it let a
lot to interpretation. He felt it could be cleared up if the language was looked at, and
additional language added to be more specific. He stated it was important because the
Village is at a 98% buildout, and now even more important would be the redevelopment
issues. He noted if Council was agreeable he would schedule as a Workshop, and then for
the Council agenda. He indicated he would provide the information for the September
Meeting. Council Member Resnik questioned the rush to review this information. Vice
Mayor Watkins indicated Council has a public hearing on September 7 at 6:00 pm.
Mayor Humpage suggested holding the workshop in Octaber. Council Member Paterno
felt it should move forward. He felt the Village should consider these issues, in keeping
the Village the way it is, and he would not want to let the future generations down.
Council Member Resnik noted the C-2 zone is a very srnall area along U.S. Highway
One. He felt there were two main areas; 1) Publix Shopping Center (Shoppes of
Tequesta) and the 2) new Publix shopping center (County Line Plaza). He commented
those two areas are truly C-2 and Council should make sure they remain C-2. He
indicated he had heard comments the builders wanted to offer that up to developers, so
that they could get a special exception, and put up residential. He noted he does not agree
with that, and that type of C-2 should say C-2. Village Manager Couzzo commented the
Village has a narrow C-2 district, and Council should look at it in a broad general non-
specific scope. Council Member Resnik felt the Village should look at the alternatives
available to make sure the C-2 district remains intact, and does not get overcome by
mixed-use or residential. He felt there would be a need for a transition period by code
that would not p`hase out PCD's. Council Member Paterno suggested taking the time, an
extra month or so, to come up with something, and know what properties are left that
needed to be addressed, and look at the big picture. He noted this would affect everything
from the Western Corridor, to policing, to traffic, and if the Village does not take care of
it, these other decisions, the Village will end up with no choice. Council Member Resnik
indicated Council members change and can come on pro commercial, pro residential, so
the Village needs to look at what can be done now to make sure that the Village lifestyle
would not get eroded in the future. Mayor Humpage agreed but to some extend C-2 has
its place. He noted he did not move to Tequesta for C-2 or C-1, he moved to Tequesta
because it is a Village. He felt the C-2 zoning in place may have a couple of glitches, but
overall he felt it was good, and Council has the overall say. He commented at this point
in time he would not make a definitive decision of whether C-2 could only have
commercial and nothing else. Council Member Paterno pointed out the idea of this
meeting was to set goals. He indicated he was trying to establish overall goals. He
mentioned the Council would not want to do something as goals for long-term that would
take away the reasons people rnoved to Tequesta.
10
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 11 of 21
He felt the setbacks and a number of things in the code could change what the residents
moved to Tequesta for by allowing other than retail and commercial. He felt it should be
brought to Council, so Staff could open it up and study the situation, before the Village
gets into a predicament that they do not want to be in. Mayor Humpage indicated he
agreed with Vice Mayor Watkins in not charging the Manager with the goal of recruiting
new companies with a minimum of 25 employees, because he has enough on his plate.
Mayor Humpage suggested to Council Member Paterno that if he was interested in
bringing some businesses to the Village that he or another Council Member separately
could form a committee with other businesses owners, such as Mr. Gary van Brock, to
bring businesses into Tequesta. Council Member Paterno explained when he sat on the
other side of the dais, as a resident, he felt the Village Manager was not given the go
ahead to try and go through the process in recruiting potential employers for Tequesta.
He suggested the Village Manager could help facilitate the atmosphere that Tequesta is
looking for some good high paying professional office to come in and support the small
retail stores. Mayor Humpage agreed the Village Manager should be able to talk to
potential business owners, and not be reprimanded. Council Member Paterno felt Council
needed to give him guidance in which way to go. He noted he was trying to establish
goals.
Vice Mayor Watkins indicated she would support this Council just giving the Manager
the ok to promote the Village. She noted she considered it a part of his job, to do Public
Relations (PR) for the Village. Council Member Resnik stressed when the Village
Manager first came on in the Village he was charged with attracting businesses to
Tequesta, and then it got ta.ken out of hand, and he was spanked for doing it. He felt the
Village Manager was in the best position to look at and judge, and with the consent of
Council to attract business to come to the Village. Council Member Paterno indicated
Council would want to set a goal and a plan for the next five years, and have the Village
Manager work toward and head in that direction. He noted Council would ma.ke the plan,
instead of having other people make the plan. Mayor Humpage felt the message was
getting out of what Council will and will not allow. Consensus of Council agreed to allow
the Village Manager, with the consent of Council, to go out and attract businesses to
Tequesta. Council Member Resnik felt the Village should get some type of consensus
from the community of what type of businesses that would like to see, in addition to the
listing of businesses that is currently. available. He stressed the Village Manager should
have some guidance that flows upward from the public. He noted the Mayor's survey
produced a good response, and he felt the Village did not need to have everyone respond.
He commented a represeritative number would give a number of answers that could be
prioritized. Mayor Humpage indicated he did not know what could be p�t together in
time for a Workshop before the September 7�' Regular Council Meeting. Village
Manager Couzzo indicated there would be time available to have a Special Meeting
immediately following the Final Millage and Budget hearings on Septernber 15, 2005. He
suggested the meeting start at 6:30 P.M. Attorney Hawkins suggested Council have a
broad discussion about zoning in general and not confine it to G2 District. He noted
Council may want to have a broad discussion regarding growth management issues.
Mayor Humpage agreed, and noted Council would be able to discuss other areas, such as
R-1, R-2, and mixed-use.
11
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 12 of 21
Attorney Hawkins commented the character of Tequesta is principally a residential
community, with small commercial nodes, and would not be an entity out recruiting large
businesses, the Village has a bond revenue mechanism for doing that. Council Member
Resnik commented on the R-2 code requirements in the Country Club. He felt not
everyone in the community wanted to do all these zoning restrictions. Village Manager
Couzzo indicated it is Council who makes the policy decisions based on the community's
desire.
Consensus of Council agreed to have a Special Meeting on Growth Management Issues,
on September 15, 2005, at 6:30 P.M.
Council Member Paterno read for the record his goal and objective #2: "Increase reserves
by 1% per year". He noted the prior Council approved having a goal of 20% for reserves.
He indicated he would like to see, as a goal, to increase that 1% per year, so that in 3 or 4
years there would be extra money saved for special projects and improvements. Vice
Mayor Watkins felt Tequesta was one of the few municipalities that have the goal of 20%
for reserves, but at the same time the Village is a not-for profit organization. She
mentioned she would be fine with identifying projects, and having a budget for that
project, but could not see building up a reserve pot. She felt Council would have a very
difficult time explaining to the residents why the millage rate could not be reduced if
these reserves were growing so much. Mayor Humpage agreed, and noted for example, if
there was $3 million in reserves, the residents would ask why the millage rate could not
be reduced. Council Member Paterno agreed, but noted when he invests he is very
conservative, and does not make as much return on his money, but it is safe. He felt the
Village has always been very conservative, but suggested the 4% that would be saved
over the 4 years could be put back into the community. Mayor Humpage commented for
the citizens sake, maybe identify a project and save the 1% annually for that project.
Village Manager Couzzo suggested designating the 1% as a designated reserve for a
particular project. Consensus of Council agreed they thought it would be a good idea to
have a goal for designating a 1% reserve for a specific project.
Council Member Paterno read for the record his goal and objective Items 3 and 4. Item 3:
"Personnel costs not to exceed 6% annually and operational costs to not exceed 3%"; and
Item 4: "Annex 15% of enclaves every two years". He noted items 5, 6, and 7 had akeady
been discussed. He read for the record. Items 8-10. Item 8} "Completion of Village Hall";
9) "Completion of train at the water plant"; and 10) "Obtaining grants for the Village
exceeding $500,000". Village Manager Couzzo noted the completion of the Village Hall
should be around July 1, 2006. Mayor Humpage commented July 4�' would be a good
date. Village Manager Couzzo noted Staff would shot for July 4 He commented the
second train should be completed next year. Council Member Patemo noted Council
should set a goal for completion. He felt Council should give the Village Manager a
number (dollar amount) for the Village Manager to achieve in grants. He mentioned there
were other sources of grant monies available from the County, Federal grants, and South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD}. Mayor Humpage commented the Village
has already applied for grants from SFWMD. Village Manager Couzzo cautioned
Council that a lot of the grants are matching fund grants. He noted the grants would need
to be maintained, and managed, and monitored throughout the whole grant process.
12
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 13 of 21
He noted there were legislative appropriations that are given out with no matching funds
involved. He noted the Village pays Mr. Cory to research that funding for the Village.
Vice Mayor Watkins rnentioned those were alternative sources of funding. Council
Member Paterno suggested the Village would look for those opportunities.
Council Member Paterno read for the record his goal and objective Item 11:
"Streamlining of inter-office procedures. (example: payroll, workflow)". He felt there
were some workflow duplications. He felt now may be the time to address this issue. He
read for the record his last goal and objective: Item 12) "Establishing training with the
idea that the Village is a service business". He felt the Village was a service business,
and that more money needed to be put into training, and try and work something together
for the employees. He noted these were ideas, and if one or two, or five of them were
implemented. He pointed out these are just ideas he was bringing to the table. Mayor
Humpage explained he had spoken with an individual about training, that had to do with
Community Development, and what they do is to have another add on to their
Community Development fees, like 1%. He explained if the pernut was $50,000, an
additional 1% fee was added on so that they earmark the 1% for educational programs for
Staff. He noted the entity would not be saddled by the training expense; the program
would be paid for out of this additional fee. He suggested the Village ought to consider
adding that to their permit fees. Village Manager Couzzo indicated Staff would be
bringing the permit fees to Council very shortly. Mayor Humpage noted the building
department was now part of the General Fund and that could give administrative
personnel training. Council Member Paterno commented if everyone gets a little more
' training it helps the organization overall. Mayor Humpage agreed the Village needed to
do professional training. Village Manager Couzzo noted when the Assistant Manager
Garlo was transferred from the Police Department it was one of the Village's primary
goals, but with everything going on it was been somewhat sidetracked. He noted Staff
was going back to that goal. Council Member Patemo indicated it's all about community,
and lifestyle, and it just makes it better for the residents and the employees, and that's
why the Village is so unique.
Mayor Humpage read for the record Council Member Genco's goals and objectives: 1)
"Management of Staff, while maintaining personal involvement in high profile projects
and intergovernmental relationships"; 2) "Village Hall Building construction —
Delegation of, and management of project for integrity, materials, and costs"; 3)
"Personnel — Provision of an evaluative report of optimum staffing needs for next 5
years, projected budgets and sources of funding"; 4) "Infrastructure Dixie Highway,
Parks, Cypress Drive, Water Plant — Delegation of and management of projects, ongoing
control of materials, results, and costs"; 5) "Management and overview of services
provided by Village to residents, parks, recreation, facilities, and roads (grounds and
street scapes)"; 6) "Pursuit of annexation of all commercial property adjacent to, or
abutting Village"; 7) "Cost control — Assure competitive bids, expense reduction and
procurement of services as to value added and cost effectiveness"; and 8) "Ongoing
communication with Council with regard to: Staff issues; legal status of ongoing and new
situations, changes in governmental relationships and financial matters. Allowing
Council to prioritize special Council Member requests in the event that projects are
competitive or time consuming".
13
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 14 of 21
Mayor Humpage read for the record his goals and objectives: 1) "Complete all sidewalks
and streetlights throughout the Village". He rnentioned this goal is planned for in the
budget over the next 3 years. He indicated he wanted to make sure that objective comes
to fruition. 2) "Beautification of US Highway One through Tequesta". He mentioned
Council discussion of this earlier in the meeting, and hoped Council would receive
something from Mr. Cory, so Representative Negron could pursue for the Village. 3)
"Purchase of Tequesta Park from the State". He noted he would like to see the Village
press on with this issue, and have Mr. Cory involved with it. Village Manager Couzzo
asked if that was something Council was interested in doing. Council Member Paterno
noted it was a goal to annex it into the Village and be under the Village's jurisdiction, so
the Village could police it and have control. Village Manager Couzzo indicated it may
cost the Village $1, but to do it legally it would be quite expensive. He noted one
problem was that it was in Martin County. He pointed out he did not have a problem with
doing this goal, because he felt it would be very challenging. He explained the Village
would have to dedicate resources and time in order do it. He stressed when the Village
goes after this legislatively, everyone will have to be committed to doing this project.
Council Member Paterno commented as an option rather than buying it, and getting into a
fight with Martin County, or Palm Beach County over jurisdiction (which create a lot of
other problems), have the State lease the land to the Village long-term, and (also at the
same time) have the State give the Village jurisdiction, and basically lock out Martin
County having the jurisdiction. He felt that would accomplish the same thing without
having to fight Mart:in County to get it. Village Manager Couzzo mentioned that was
only as far as policing authority. He felt if the Village owned the park, then the Village
could control the destiny of the future development of the Park. Council Member Paterno
noted another way would be for the Village to technically own it, but that it stays in
Martin County. Village Manager Couzzo pointed out the Village has put Capital
improvements funds into the park. Mayor Humpage commented over $18 million. He
pointed out it took over 7 months to put in the berm. Vice Mayor Watkins asked if it
would be possible to have the Village Manager do a preliminary letter to Martin County,
or the entities involved to see if there would be receptive to the idea, before the Village
starts spending attorney fees. Village Manager Couzzo noted it was State Land, but the
Park sits in Martin County. He felt the Village would not have a problem with Martin
County if the park is improved and it becomes a mutual benefit for Martin County
residents. Attorney Hawkins suggested procedurally it makes sense that the Village
Manager inquire to State Park service representatives the procedures for obtaining
ownership of State land and see if there is a mechanism in place. He commented he was
not sure if there is one in place. Village Manager Couzzo indicated the Village has in
place Mr. Cory to assist the Village through the process, and stated he knows how to do
that. Council Member Paterno suggested maybe have an amendment attached to a bill,
that gets it done. He felt that may be a better alternative than going head to head with
Martin County.
Vice Mayor Watkins noted she did not want to incorporate a lot of Staf�s time, and
money into something that may be a wild goose chase. She indicated she was just trying
to see if there was some preliminary way to entertain the issue. Attorney Hawkins
commented the Village would have to be a financial case warranted to persuade the Staxe.
14
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 15 of 21
Village Manager Couzzo pointed out what Mr. Cory could do in a very short time, could
take Staff 6 months to a year. Mayor Humpage commented he would not want to burden
Mr. Couzzo with this project. He noted he would speak with Mr. Cory, and
Representative Negron to see what their thoughts would be. He felt if the Village could
do it, he would work on the foundation of the project, and then see where it goes. He
mentioned he would not want to commit the Village's assets and Staff time. Council
Member Paterno asked how long the lease was at this time. Mayor Humpage indicated it
was just extended for 50 years. Council Member Paterno pointed out that could work into
our hands, to make it come our way. Council Member Resnik questioned what powers
did the Village not have regarding the Park. Mayor Humpage indicated nothing could be
done in the Park without the approval of the State. Council Meinber Paterno explained if
the Village wanted to change the playground it could be a lengthy approval from
someone in Tallahassee. Village Manager Couzzo stressed the Village would like the
authority to police the park. Council Member Resnik questioned who polices the Park
now. Mayor Humpage commented Martin County. Village Manager Couzzo noted it
would also exceed the level of service needs for Parks area. Mayor Humpage agreed it
would increase the greenspace. Village Manager Couzzo felt now would be a good time,
because the park for the last fifty years is at it's worst position, and if someone comes to
the plate they may be more receptive.
Mayor Humpage read for the record his remaining goals and objectives: 4) "Annex
County pockets throughout the Village"; 5) "Install 3 deep water well for back-up and
future customers"; and 6) "Beautify Tequesta Park". Mayor Humpage asked Council to
consider having a Town Hall meeting, in season, on a Saturday, from 10-2, with no
agenda. He commented there could be sandwiches and coffee, and Council could mill
around the public, and leave suggestion cards at the table, and let the residents come in
and talk about issues, such as zoning, etc. Council Member Paterno suggested maybe do
something such as an event, and have them come out for other reasons, but have it as a
Town Hall meeting. He suggested even if it was at the Park. Village Manager Couzzo
commented there is a Village event on September 18�', Family and Friends. Council
Member Paterno suggested have the residents come up questions or comments. Mayor
Humpage suggested having some type of form for the public to fill out, something that
they would want to talk to Council about. Vice Mayor Watkins suggested letting the
public know Council will be there. Mayor Humpage agreed September 18 was a good
day, but indicated he would want to do it when all the residents were here, something
between Thanksgiving and Christmas, have a small town hall meeting.
2) Council Review of Village Manager's Performance Recognition Compensation (PRC)
Vice Mayor Watkins felt it was something that needed to be done. She indicated
everyone probably agrees that over the last year if not for Mr. Couzzo's leadership there
would be a significant difference in things going on around the Village. She suggested he
should be recognized for this service. Council Member Resnik indicated he employment -
agreement states when it needed to be done, prior to the October Meeting. Vice Mayor
Watkins noted she supported a PRC for the Village Manager. Couricil Member Resnik
agreed he supported a PRC. He felt the Village Manager had done a great job, based on
his monthly reports.
15
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 16 of 21
He commented if you look at what his staff does, that is also an indication of his
leadership. He stated by code, if the Manager is doing all of the things lie is supposed to
do, it is a lot of responsibilities. He noted as stated in the employment agreement, for all
the responsibilities he has, he gets compensated above and beyond with the PRC. He
noted the PRC was designed to save the Village money, because he does not get a
percentage on the amount each year. He felt he deserves a PRC for the work he has done
in the past year. Mayor Humpage asked if the dollar amount was to be established or if
Council was reviewing the possibility of getting one. Council Member Paterno noted it
was a discussion to establish the amount of the PRC, because in the past Council has had
someone negotiate with the Manager. Mayor Humpage indicated it was the Vice Mayor's
turn to negotiate with the Village Manager. Council Member Paterno indicated he did not
particularly like the way it was done. He believed he deserved a PRC. Mayor Humpage
asked what he did not like about the way it is done. Council Member Paterno stressed he
did not think any one of Council should discuss it individually with the Manager. He felt
all of Council should have input into what they think it should be, because he works for
the Council. He asked if the PRC was allowed to be discussed in a closed-door session.
Village Manager Couzzo responded no, and reviewed the steps: 1) Council establish, per
the Contract, if the Manager warrants a PRC for the last years performance; and 2) if he
warrants a PRC have a mechanism to get to the establish the amount. He commented
traditionally one of Council was appointed to finalize it. He noted over the last 4 years it
has never been a negotiation session.
Vice Mayor Watkins felt it made sense to start with what the Manager got last year, and
decide if it was better or worst performance. Council Member Paterno commented it was
very hard for the new Council members with the way it is done. He suggested
establishing a way to do it, for the future so it does not put a burden upon anyone. He
commented he really did not care for the process. Council Member Resnik noted in the
past trying to establish a PRC in open session was very embarrassing. He felt it reflected
poorly on Council, and on the ind'ividual. Village Manager Couzzo noted if Council did
not want to discuss in open session, they could discuss this evening, and come up with an
answer. Council Member Paterno suggested for the future when Council sets up their
goals, if the Village Manager meets them, then that would reflect the PRC. He felt that
would take everything out of the process, if he does his job, then he gets so much. He
suggested setting up a procedure. Council Member Resnik explained what happened in
the past. Council Member Paterno noted Council sets the goals, and if he meets those
goals, he is entitled to a PRC. Attorney Hawkins indicated as long it is not a contractual
agreement, as long as it is a goal. He indicated Council should not base it on tax
revenues. Vice Mayor Watkins asked Council if they would want to discuss this evening.
Council Member Paterno questioned what the PRC was last year, and the year before,
Village Manager Couzzo commented it was $14,004 last year, and $12,000 the year
before. Council Member Paterno questioned whether the PRC was based on a percentage
of his earnings. Village Manager Couzzo responded no. Council Member Resnik noted
the basic consideration was whether or not the Village Manager had improved in his
performance and productivity, so as to whether the PRC should improve. He commented
his performance has improved $2000 each year. Village Manager Couzzo noted it was
an arbitrary number.
15
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2405
Page 17 of 21
Mayor Humpage recessed the meeting at 10: SS am, and reconvened the meeting at
11: 00 am.
-Village Manager Couzzo stepped out of the room.
Vice Mayor Watkins noted the amounts of the PRC for the last 3 years: $14,000, $12,000
and $8,000. Mayor Humpage reiterated Council Member Resnik's comments regarding
the duties of the Manager as listed in the code, and that the PRC was based on the job
above those requirements. He indicated this was only the second time that he has been on
Council to discuss the PRC, and noted what money he saves the Village. He pointed out
50% of Mr. Couzzo's salary comes from the Water Utility. He commented the Village
previously had Mr. Mike Estop in charge of the Water Utility at approximately $90,000.
Council Member Resnik commented since that time the Utility has performed excellent.
Mayor Humpage explained after Mr. Estop left the position, the position was eliminated,
and now the Utility gets charged $55,000 per year for Mr. Couzzo's salary, but it saves
the Village about $40,000 a year. He felt the Village management does not suffer from
his dual role. He noted befare Mr. Couzzo started the Village paid for two .positions, the
Utility Director and Village Manager, around $180,000 a year, and now the Village has
dropped that down to approximately $105,000 a year. He commented the Village
Manager is instrumental, and has done some very good negotiating for the Village as far
as some of the cell towers, and the additional revenues that has occurred. He pointed out
Mr. Couzzo has always been available to Council, and the Village, whether it is 9-5 or 9
to midnight, or overnight. He noted that was a positive consideration also. Mayor
Humpage questioned where does Council go with this, should it be 10% of his gross, or
20% of his gross. He pointed out the Town of Jupiter just gave their Town Manager, Mr.
Lukasik a larger raise, which created some concern with the residents. Council Member
Paterno noted it was 25%.
Mayor Humpage commented on the other side of the coin, some people say that is the
Village Manager's job, and he got the job, and that is all he should get. He explained
Council previously spoke of employee incentives, and coming up with some type of
criteria that makes that happen. He mentioned probably the only area there would be a
problem with is when the Village does their labor negotiations. He felt Councii was in the
same situation with Mr. Couzzo. He asked what the number would be, and if Council
would want to have a Workshop to discuss the steps and system to follow for next year.
Mayor Humpage asked what the current salary was for Village Manager Couzzo. He felt
Mr. Couzzo does an exceptional job, and even does a good job with legal opinions and
intervening to save the Village money. Attorney Hawkins agreed. Vice Mayor Watkins
felt he thinks of things others would not, such as the Tropic Vista water, etc. Mayor
Humpage agreed he thinks out of the box. Council Member Paterno felt Mr. Couzzo
thinks of the Village has his own business, and that's what makes it unique in the way
that he does it. He indicated he appreciated that. Vice Mayor Watkins indicated the
Village benefits from that, and she stressed he feels responsible for the Village in every
way. Council Member Paterno indicated he looks down the road for the Village's best
interest. Council Member Resnik commented he has never turned down a meeting, and
his predecessor was almost impossible to see.
1'7
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 18 of 21
Attorney Hawkins stated he is currently making $111,000, and his PRC was 12.6% for
last year. Council Member Paterno noted last year he made $14,000 for his PRC on his
salary of $103,000. Attorney Hawkins commented that would be 13.5%. Council
Member Resnik explained he got a 3% COLA last year, and 4% increase for Merit,
which is in his contract. Mayor Humpage pointed out Mr. Couzzo made $104,000 in
2004, and with the COLA and merit from last year he is currently making $111,000. Vice
Mayor Watkins mentioned last year Council did not use a percentage. Attorney Hawkins
stated 13.5% of his currently salary would be $14,985, and 14% would be $15,540. Vice
Mayor Watkins mentioned the way she understood the PRC was to look at the amount
given the year before and see if he improved or not. She noted Council felt the Manager
had done better than the year before, so Council increased it from the PRC the previous
year. Council Member Resnik commented Council Member von Frank negotiated the
PRC last year; and felt the Manager had done better than the year before and therefore
increased the PRC. Council Member Paterno pointed out the Village Manager has
already built into his contract a 4% merit.
Attorney Hawkins noted he was told the Village Manager was awarded a$14,000 PRC
last year, which is 13.46% of his gross compensation. Council Member Resnik
questioned whether the PRC was given to him in a lump sum. Attorney Hawkins
responded in the affirmative. He asked if the $14,000 was included in the $111,000.
Attorney Hawkins noted the $14,000 was not included in the annual salary of $111,000.
Council Member Resnik indicated he would get a check for the $14,000, a one-time
thing. Attorney Hawkins clarified he would get a gross payment less tax. Mayor
Humpage agreed less the government tax. Council Member Resnik agreed less the t�.
He noted he received $14,000 last year that was 13% of his salary, and counting the 4%
Merit he was getting 17% in compensation, not counting COLA. Mayor Humpage noted
that was a contract issue, and Council should not include that in the PRC. Attorney
Hawkins stated to give Council some focus if Council was figuring out a PRC based on
14% of $111,000; it would be $15,540. Council Member Resnik asked what percentage
would $15,000 be. Attorney Hawkins noted $15,000 would be just under 14%. Council
Member Resnik agreed to $15,000. Mayor Humpage noted $15,000 was where he was at
for the PRC. Council Member Paterno commented he would make it a percentage to
make it easier for everyone. He suggested 15%, or $16,500. Attorney Hawkins noted
15% was $16,650. Mayor Humpage commented Council Member Paterno was at
$16,500, Vice Mayor Watkins was at $16,000, Council Member Resnik was at $15,000,
and he was at $15,000. He indicated the middle of the road would be $16,000.
Council Member Paterno indicated Council should set a policy to establish a percentage,
so going forward, if he meets the goals, he gets the same percentage of his salary. He felt
that would rnake it easier for Council, so that they do not have to have someone negotiate
again, other than if he really has done something exceptional. Vice Mayor Watkins noted
Council can only discuss it at this meeting, they could not take action, and that it would
need to come back to a regular meeting. She noted Council would want to have Council
Member Genco present also. Attorney Hawkins commented if Council gives the Village
Manager a PRC of $16,000 it would be 14.46 %. Counci] Member Resnik clarified that
next year there will be goals, and those goals have to be adjusted to be a certain number
of goals. Mayor Humpage agreed.
18
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 19 of 21
Council Member Resnik pointed out his job performance should not be based just on
those goals. He felt these were individual goals Council brings up for the benefit of the
Village, and the residents, that Council would like him to accomplish. He commented
Village Manager Couzzo would be doing a lot of other things, in addition to the goals. He
stressed Council needs to look at total performance for compensation. Council Member
Paterno pointed out he was just trying to make a formula that would make it easier. He
felt doing this negotiation in public creates animosity. Consensus of Council agreed to
$16,000, and that the PRC would be around 15% annually based of the completion on the
goals Council has set for him. Attorney Hawkins indicated the consensus of 15°/a was
higher than what Council had determined for this years PRC at 14.46%. Mayor Humpage
noted this was for the future. Attorney Hawkins questioned if Council wanted to give
Council Member Genco the opporlunity to function on this.
Consensus of Council agreed to bring it back as an agenda item to the next Council
Meeting. Council Member Paterno pointed out unfortunately, if there were four Council
Members already in favor, Council Member Genco may not really have a say. Mayor
Humpage indicated it gives her an opportunity. Vice Mayor Watkins noted Council has to
vote on the PRC. She felt Council has to give her the opportunity to comment. Attorney
Hawkins suggested, but noted he liked the point of creating some certainty; he felt there
could be a time in the future that the Manager only receives 7 out of 12 goals, and
Council does not want to give that person the full 15%. He suggested Council might not
want to wedge themselves into something like that. Mayor Humpage suggested a not to
exceed percentage. Attorney Hawkins indicated that would be a way to do it, he
commented that would probably solve Council Member Paterno's concerns. Mayor
Humpage noted if the Manager thought that he was automatically going to get the 15%,
and if he ended up with 9%, it would tell him Council did not think he got to the level
they desired. Consensus of Council agreed not to exceed 15%, based on suggested goals
and objectives, and that this policy would go into effect for the Fiscal year 2006.
Village Manager Couzzo returned to the Meeting.
3. Additional items as requested
Vice Mayor Watkins read for record her feelings regarding the impact of Hurricane
Katrina on the Gulf Coast region: "As I was raised in New Orleans and have 5 brothers
and sisters who live there with their families, I am particularly sensitive to the need and
the desire to do something to help. Mr. Couzzo called yesterday and offered the
suggestion that we as a Council could consider donating our surplus ambulance to help in
the recovery effort. He told me that Chief Weinand has generously offered to help in
coordinating the transfer of the unit as well. While I would never presurne to ask for
something for myself, I would like to ask that you consider the donation of this unit to
any municipality that has been affected by this storm. We are a small community with a
very big heart, and this would be a wonderful way to extend a helping hand to another
communiiy in need. I'd like add also that I am very grateful to the Manager for making
the suggestion, and as I have told you many times before I feel so blessed to live in this
community, and to be surrounded by so many caring and compassionate people. I want to
thank you all for your lovely basket of goodies you sent yesterday, as well as your calls
19
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 20 of 21
offering support and prayers. You can not know how much that meant, to me. Thank
you". Council Member Paterno felt as long as it did not jeopardize the Village in any
way, since he was for supporting the Village residents, but in this case he knew there
were people in need. He suggested finding some city that could actually use the
ambulance, and not let it sit somewhere. He noted the Village should not send it to the
State, and let them find someone. Village Manager Couzzo indicated Staff would be
looking for a local Parrish or community, and the vehicle would have first aid supplies,
and Meals Ready to Eat (MRE's). He noted Chief Weinand has volunteered to drive his
vehicle with one Staff inember and a police officer, so they could put in the vehicle in
service immediately. Mayor Humpage agreed it was a great idea. Vice Mayor Watkins
stressed she did not want to put anyone in jeopardy. Fire Chief James Weinand
commented the vehicle was a surplus vehicle that was going to come to Council to sell,
so the Village has no value for it here in Tequesta. He noted it still has some life left, and
would be fit for an agency that has lost everything. He commented he knows that some
departments in the Gulf Coast region had lost all their equipment. He noted he would
make sure it goes to an actual department or city, not sit on a State reserve. He indicated
if he could not accomplish that then it would not go.
Council Member Paterno asked if there would be any problem legally with doing this.
Attorney Hawkins suggested having a public meeting, because it was a taxpayer funded
asset. Council Member Paterno questioned the value of the asset. Chief Weinand felt the
Village would probably generate about $15,000 -$20,000 out of it if it was sold. He
noted he would start to make arrangements to see if anyone was in need of it. Village
Manager Couzzo noted Council could do it on September 7, 2005 Regular Meeting, or
have a short Special Meeting tomorrow, so Council could declare it surplus. Council
Member Paterno asked if it would need a seven-day notice. Village Manager Couzzo
noted a Special Emergency Meeting could be called with 24-hour notice. He commented
this was an emergency. Attorney Hawkins agreed that the Village was trying to provide
emergency care. Village Clerk Carlisle indicated she would need the Mayor to sign the
notice for the emergency special meeting for September l, 2005. Vice Mayor Watkins
noted Firefighter Peter Allen was out in that region helping and felt it would be a
wonderful idea for it to go anywhere over there, and did not need to specifically go to
New Orleans. Council Member Resnik noted he liked the idea of giving it to a fire rescue
unit in need. Attorney Hawkins suggested the meeting be later in the day, close to 4:00
P.M. due to advertising requirements. Chief Weinand indicated he could get with Mr.
Allen to start the ball rolling because he was already in that area.
Consensus of Council agreed to hold an Emergency Special Meeting at 4:00 P.M. at the
Public Safety Facility (EOC), September l, 2005. Council Member Patemo suggested
someone call Council Member Genco and express to her what the desire of Council is,
and if she would like to take part. Mayor Humpage noted she could be on a conference
call at the EOC. Council Member Paterno indicated Council may need to pick a time that
is convenient to her, because she will be in court, that it may have to be a little later in the
evening. Village Manager Couzzo suggested 4:00 P.M., and if needed for Council
Member Genco to be part, it could be moved to 5:00 P.M. Village Manager Couzzo
indicated he would be informing the media regarding this donation. Vice Mayor Watkins
noted she wanted the media to know it was a Council decision.
20
Minutes — Village Council Workshop
August 31, 2005
Page 21 of 21
Council Member Resnik asked what the source was for the MRE's. Mayor Humpage
indicated the Village has the MRE's, and that they would be expiring soon. Chief
Weinand explained they really do not have a shelf life on them, and the Village buys
about $1,100 dollars a year, and keeps them for 5 years. He pointed out they are good for
even longer than the Village keeps them. Chief Weinand asked if it was the consensus of
Council to put the equipment back on the truck, and take out of stock bandages and first
aid equipment. Consensus of Council agreed.
Council Member Paterno suggested making sure there was a gurney on the vehicle. Chief
� Weinand noted a new stretcher was just purchased, so they could put the older one back
on the vehicle. He noted the vehicle has been properly maintained so it should be fine.
Vice Mayor Watkins mentioned she really appreciated coming up with the thought and
the Chief doing what needs to be done to make it happen. She thanked Council also.
III. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Vice Mayor Watkins moved to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Council Member
Resnik; motion passed 4-0.
Therefore the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 A.M.
r
������
�
Gwen Carlisle
Village Clerk
21