The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 18_05/12/2011 ; �� VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA �'�� AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL FORM � 1. VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING: Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Regular Ordinance #: N/A May 12, 2011 Consent Agenda: No Resolution #: N/A Originating Department: Community Development 2. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: (Wording form the SUBJECT line of your staff report) CASE # SE 01-11 Application of the Good Shepherd Episcopal Church, 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469, for a Special Exception per Code Section 78-173. R-1 Single—Family Dwelling District (d) Special Exception Uses. The Applicant is requesting modification of a previously approved special exception by constructing a 1,997 square foot addition to the existing school, which includes two (2) resource rooms, two (2) offices, a storage room, a rest room, and mechanical rooms. The application includes a proposed landscape plan. 3. BUDGET / FINANCIAL IMPACT: Account #: N/A Amount of this item: N/A Current Budgeted Amount Available: Amount Remaining after item: N/A N/A Budget Transfer Required: No Appropriate Fund Balance: No 4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES: (This is a snap shot description of fhe agenda item) The Applicant is requesting a modification of a previously approved special exception by constructing a 1,997 square foot addition to the existing school, which includes two (2) resource rooms, two (2) offices, a storage room, a rest room, and mechanical rooms. The application includes a proposed landscape plan. 5. APPROVALS: y ;, Dept. Head: Finance Directg�: Reviewed for Financial � �� S iciency � No Financial Impact Attorney: (for legal sufficiency) Yes ❑ No ❑ Village Manager: • SUBMIT FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION: • APPROVE ITEM: ❑ • DENY ITEM: � VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA >� � �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � `��'�� Staff Report — Village Council Meeting — 05.12.11 1. PETITION DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 402 Seabrook Road Tequesta, FL 33469 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Special Exception Use to allow a modification of a previously approved Special Exception in R-1 Single Family Dwelling district. 2. LAND USE AND ZONING EXISTWG LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING SUBJECT Residential Low Density Residential Low Density R-1 Single Family Dwelling PROPERTY North Residential Low Density Residential Low Density R-15ingle Family Dwelling South Commercial Commercial C-1 Commercial Public Buildings and Public Buildings and Grounds Grounds East Residential Low Density Residential Low Density R-1 Single Family Dwelling Public Buildings and Public Buildings and C-1 Commercial Grounds Grounds West Recreation and Open Recreation and Open C-1 Commercial Space Space R-OP Recreation and Open Commercial Commercial Space 3. BACKGROUND The Applicant is requesting a modification of a previously approved special exception by constructing a 1,997 square foot addition to the existing school which includes two (2) resource rooms, two (2) offices, a storage room, a rest room, and mechanical rooms. The application includes a proposed landscape plan. The existing elementary school (K-5 grade) located at the Good Shepherd Episcopal Church site was approved as a Special Exception Use in 1996. As part of the 1997 Development Agreement, Good Shepherd Episcopal Church agreed to construct an eight foot high masonry wall on the East side of 1 Department of Community Development -Staff Report—Special Exception Use—Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School proposed new school building. The intent was to screen the landscaped courtyard, while also minimizing any noise that might affect the adjacent properties. As presented in the attached photos, the masonry wall is part of the existing conditions of the site. Also, the photos indicate current location of playground area, and proximity to residential neighborhood and commercial development. 4. STAFF ANALYSIS Section 78-361 of the Village Code states that certain uses because their unique characteristics cannot be classified or regulated in a particular zoning district without consideration in each case of the impact of such uses upon neighboring uses and the surrounding area, compared with the public need for them at particular locations. Such uses and features are treated as special exceptions, and the application needs to comply with a set of criteria and standards. CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL EXCEPTION Per Section 78-362 of the Village Code, Special Exception Use shall be permitted only upon authorization of the Village Council provided that such uses comply with the following requirements: 1. The proposed use is a permitted special exception use. In compliance with Section 78-173 (d) Special Exception Uses permitted in the R-15ingle-Family Dwelling district. 2. The use is so designated, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare and morals will be protected. In compliance. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the previously approved special exception use. 3. The use will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located. In compliance. The proposed use will not cause injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where the subject property is located. 4. The use will be compatible with adjoining development and the proposed character of the district where it is to be located. The proposed use is compatible with adjoining development and the character of the district. Further considerations should be done repardinq screeninp toward adiacent residential neiqhborhood. 5. Adequate landscaping and sc�eening is provided as required in this chapter. As part of the 1997 Development Agreement, Good Shepherd Episcopal Church agreed to construct an eight foot high masonry wall on the East side of proposed new school building. The intent was to screen the landscaped courtyard, while also minimizing any noise that might affect the adjacent properties. As presented in the attached photos, the masonry wall is part of the existing condition of the site. Also, the photos indicate current location of playground area, and existing landscaping. Proposed landscape plan meets Code standards. Further considerations should be done reaardinp screenina toward adiacent residential neiphborhood. 2 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Use — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 6. Adequate off-street parking and loading is provided and ingress and egress is so designed as to cause minimum interference with traffic on abutting streets. Per Village's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) and (32) the proposed addition requires the provision of an additional six (6) parking spaces. The Village Code requires to calculate parking spaces based on the sum of the requirements of the various uses computed separately. In this case, the Code requires three (3) spaces per each administrative office; and 1(one) space per room used for class instruction. The applicant is reauestinp a Variance from the Villape's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) Repuired number of parkinp spaces. 7. The use conforms with all applicable regulations governing the district where located, except as may otherwise be determined for planned developments. The applicant is reauestina a Variance from the Villape's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) Repuired number of parkinq spaces. FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL Per Section 78-363 of Village Code, before any special exception is granted, the Village Council shall apply the standards set forth in this division and shall determine that satisfactory provision and arrangement of the following factors have been met with the applicant, where applicable: 1. Compliance with all elements of the Village Comprehensive Plan The subject property is located on Residential Low Density future land use district. Policy 1.1.2 of the Village Comprehensive Plan states that The Village's Land Development Regulations shall conform to, and implement, the use, density and intensity standards as outlined on Table FLU-1. The proposed use is a permitted Special Exception Use in the R1 Single-Family Dwelling district. The applicant meets this provision of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The subject property is located in an existing development; ingress and egress to the property with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety, and access in case of fire or catastrophe are factors that are met. The proposed use meets this provision. 3. Off-street parking and loading area, where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection (2) of this section. The applicant meets requirement for loading area. Per Village's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) and (32) the proposed addition requires the provision of an additional six (6) parking spaces. The Village Code requires to calculate parking spaces based on the sum of the requirements of the various uses computed separately. In this case, the Code requires three (3) spaces per each administrative office; and 1(one) space per room used for class instruction. The applicant is repuestinp a Variance from the Villape's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) Reauired number of parkinq s aces. 4. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to subsections (2) and (3) of this section. The proposed use meets this provision. 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Use — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 5. Nuisance factors detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the village as a whole. Nuisance factors shall include but necessarily be limited to noise, odor, smoke, glare, electrical interference and/or mechanical vibrations. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood, and it will not be detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the Village as a whole. This application is a modification of a previously approved Special Exception Use. 6. Utilities, with reference to location, availability and compatibility. The subject property is located in an existing development and further review will be conducted before site plan approval. 7. Screening and buffering, with reference, to type, dimensions and character. As part of the 1997 Development Agreement, Good Shepherd Episcopal Church agreed to construct an eight foot high masonry wall on the East side of proposed new school building. The intent was to screen the landscaped courtyard, while also minimizing any noise that might affect the adjacent properties. As presented in the attached photos, the masonry wall is part of the existing condition of the site. Also, the photos indicate the current location of playground area, and proximity to residential neighborhood. Further considerations should be done reqardinq screenina toward adiacent residential neiahborhood. 8. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. Since the subject property is located in an existing development, signs and proposed exterior lighting will be in compliance with Code requirements and aesthetics provisions. 9. Required yards and other open space. The proposed use is in compliance with this provision. 10. General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposed use is compatible with adjoining residential and commercial districts. 11. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the village. The proposed use is compatible with the character and uses of the neighborhood and the Village. 12. Any special requirements set out in the schedule of site regulations in 78-143 for the particular use involved. Per Village's Code Section 78-705 (28) (b) and (32) the proposed addition requires the provision of an additional six (6) parking spaces. The Village Code requires to calculate parking spaces based on the sum of the requirements of the various uses computed separately. In this case, the Code requires three (3) spaces per each administrative office; and 1(one) space per room used for class instruction. The applicant is repuestinq a Variance from the Villaqe's Code Section 78- 705 (28) (b) Repuired number of parkinq spaces. 4 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Use — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 8. FINAL REMARKS This special exception use application met the requirements set on Section 78-368 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised in the Jupiter Courier on 05.01.11; and, it was also mailed to all property owners located within a 300-foot radios of the property for which a special exception is requested. Per Code Section 78-367, a special exception shall commence with 12 months from approval date; and only one extension shall be permitted by the Village Council up to six months. This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacarias, AICP, and; Approved by ChiefJames M. Weinand Date � � , t � :,; � � q �� . °� "�`� � . � 3 ,w '� � �" . �` � �� ; � ' �b ° � : � a a�� ' � � �� ' � �`� �r � � � �� . � �t ��_� �� c �e t �. � rx � s � � � �, p .:. ��. a . � .• y '-��a, `�7 . . .. . � �attt�% .� s. � � � � � .� rv� `'v ° ` Existing School Conditions and Parking Area �' � � ' �� ,� � :��;� � � �� . � �.�� ;� ' � � , . a.� �° �. :�, � , � ' �� : , , � a,� ��; �w� �� ., �t� .,� a - � �°'� _ ��*"� �" . � ' " 8 a . � � �� 4 � � � � �� , �. , ,� ��` � � , � � � � �. � � � s >� � ,x : � ry 4 � t ;� ±q ' ^ � ',� x.. �. �� ` . a ''�s4. �'��§ � � �; � b� a ti � � ... _.. . . . � . . , . . . . � . �" �� .. � � , � �: � ,�� ; � � � � k , � � " ' � ' a�. �'� � .+� �t �'. , _' " , ^° �� c�"��-w�.��`_�. � �`�: �"_ " . . . � , . � � �r�� . �� . � x.. , �_� �' �` '�� `�ti �''�r ��'2� . . � � �� .. .. ....t �'.,. :... . .. .,,�. ��+'d, �in"� . . 5 Department of Community Development -Staff Report—Special Exception Use— Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School �� ' g ' �, ; � � '� § } "''� ' �� ,�} � y} '` °� � 3�'�� ` � �, . �� ,.�±, �: :s�� ,: e , �,. �,��. �'� T-�"��.' �:: � .� +.�,ro:6 a�€ W;:i ',�y . �.n .. � M. ,,�, �"� �s ! 'y�" "%,� � , ` � ' �, t.a "� � �� ,� � � i � � � � ;� '� �a �^ � x# i K� ,� ; ,� { 0 � ��a �� µ`� ' A . ,: r:« ., .. - ,n ' . . , ' �� , µ ��*�� . . . . ...�, . � , �*� � � W � � Il �T� . �� P 'i � �� { � . � ° � � �'' $` t �,� �k §; �� x r �k;� � t � � � � � �" °�° �� Existing School Conditions and � �� ' ' Playground Area �'� .�� '� �.. � � � b � 7 � � : � :N,, se� �..,# %y �. < P' s '�". '� �.� M � �^ 4 S �� , � �y �� e,` � ' t3�" i� ° €':j'£ 9 � *:�� . '" � ��* , � �'� ��> �� „ � ��$`� �„ � � ��'�° , � � �� .-� .� ��'`�� ::�.,�, ,� a ,, ,� � �* '� �`': � .x r � - � x� �§�`,� ' 3 ; ra �,� � � � a� � x �� , �� . ��^� " �- � �`� � t s �. � �a�� x� ��,�,�°. �, � :��i°� �` T a >�, � � � � � �^ : ' . � . . � ' � � �,. .,�,. g`` . � '. _ .�' �� .a � ��.,u: � � � � ��,� e� � � �� K � N � �, •�.� � � ,� � � �, s e � . � � ,� �� ,�� : ��`�� g �'�� x . � ��; �� .�� k ,� , ��` �-r � � .�� . � � � ��, �a� � � � � � � � , �� ,u �, � � � �` � � �� + �� - � � �, � � . „ �� ,�,k� t � a� �� ` '"`�'' . � �� ' a "' � � ;,� .� �.. g " � � � � ; �' �" n,' �, a _ � b � Y �' �' � � �- � � �� ' � � � � � � � �� ; � �� ,� � �¢� ' � _ ". # = '��`��,� �s�� '� �;is � .��; ��,'� � ��^�.;�'�'n s, `,� �. � i �;�# �¥ ,€ s�, z �� r " � � � 4 ��. �' � r , § � -� ;� ,v -z� ��,�: s te t � � ;#� �� s�� a "� � c t �. 7 � •-- __.... .. �.�.: € � ��: b, �t�F �� •.,�'.; , 4�.�`' � � y��i8� ,»� i::`�..,�. ... ; . .. . .. ? � � � r ` � �� 9� � � � � . �,:, y � , � . ��`. �� y �'r =s� � a-, r' � � � �w�� a , �"' - � .: �� ,� � ,��,. :� �+. � ,�``„�' °�°' .. � ,.�_�:�� ,�§�, � � ��::,�e; �s�«�.� � �.;� � A� � p ? � ,� ;� �� r�'i,. ° '� �� . �., � � � � _� � �� d� � �. �' � :�,,; x �� , � �. ,�,_ _ 6 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Use — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 7 Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Special Exception Use — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School p jE ' t e�: U v ¢' . DEP,4RTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMBNT - �, 3�5 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469 � ;� � Phone: 561-768-0450; Fax: 561-76$-0698 X O �'4 � �� Date: Marcn i4 , aoii � r i SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Tiie undersigned requests a Special Exception for the Use Specified below. Should this application be approved, it is Understood t�at it shali o�ily authorize that }�artic�ular use described in ihis a�plicatiqn and any conditions or safe.guards required by the Village of Tequesta. N3mE of AppltCallt: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church & School Mailing Address: 4oz Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 Phone No. (Home) �47-8357 �BU�lIleSS� �56-5507 Lot/Parcel Address: 402 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL Lot: a5 Block: 4o Subdivision: 4Z Property Control Number: 60-42-4o-2s-oo-000-5iio EXiStillg USe: Church + Accessory Private School Description of Special Exception : A 1 , 997 square foot i-story addition to existing school (i3, 5oosf) containing 2 resource rooms, 2 offices and toilet & mechanical/sto support space Addition does not increase student population or school staff. Property Owner: cood shepherd spiscopal schoo NOTE: Applieant s�ia11 include the folloiving with the applieation: 1) Current survey or site plan of property shovs�ing structures and setbacks. 2) I?ra4��ings to scale of proposed improvemenis regniring special exception use. 3) Written approval from pro.perty owr�er if oth�r than applicant. 4) Any other documentati�n pertiz�e�t to this application. 5) Fifteen (IS) copies Qf a11 su�mittals. 6) Application Fee of Five Hundred ($300:00) Dollars. � �- C� r r 2.a�� Applicant's Signatur ate � , OWNER'S (ARCHITECT STERGAS & ASSOCIATES) STATEMENT OF REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE FOR A PROPOSED SMALL RESOURCE AND SUPPORT ROOMS ADDITION TO EXISTING GOOD SHEPHERD SCHOOL AND CHURCH 4/12/2011 (revised) Good Shepherd Episcopal School is a K- 5` grade private school with a current student capacity of 169 students. As the only Elementary school in the Village, Good Shepherd is the only provider for a 'close to home' school option for children of village residents. Currently, some 40% of the student population is village residents. Good Shepherd is requesting a 1,997 square foot addition to the existing school to house two resource rooms, two offices, and support space. In the school's current configuration the Art, Music (integral parts of their curriculum), Science Lab and Computer Lab share two Resource Rooms. Currently in order to accommodate these four functions, the existing two Resource Rooms have to be constantly broken down and set back up. The proposed addition with two additional Resource Rooms, will allow the school to have a dedicated room for each of the four curriculum activities requiring resource rooms. Similarly, the Financial administrative staff person shares the small Librarian's office, and the Director of Admissions shares a corner in the dual use Computer/Music Resource Room. The two offices in the proposed addition will allow these current faculty members to have dedicated offices to meet with students and parents of students and prospective parents. The other miscellaneous/support spaces in the proposed addition serve the function of providing a local toilet facility at the addition, and to house mechanical and storage functions. As stated above, the proposed addition will not add any students or staff, nor will it affect the School's current operation hours which are: 1) 8:10am-8:20am start, 2) Early Learning dismissal at 11:30am, 3) Pre-School dismissal at 2:10pm, and 4) Elementary School dismissal at 2:50pm. � � OWNESR's (ARCHITECT STERGAS & ASSOCIATES) RESPONSE TO SECTION 78-362 CRITERIA 4/12/2011 (revised) 1) The proposed use is a special exception use. This proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition is a listed special exception use in an R-1 zoning district, Section 78-173 of the Village Code, with paragraph (d) Special Exception Uses, subparagraph (1) Churches with or without accessory .... schools, and .... 2) The use is so designated, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare and morals will be protected. The proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition to the existing school meets the criteria of the front 25' setback, the 20' rear setback, and the 7.5' side setbacks, having a front setback of 368+', rear setback of 25+', and closest side setback of 40'. And the manner in which the addition is designed within the existing courtyard and on the inside(school building side) of the existing 8' high rear privacy wall, the addition will protect public health, safety, welfare and morals of the public and surrounding properties. 3) The use wil! not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is located. The proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition will add to the quality of the curriculum and thus the quality of the school is enhanced, and reflect only a positive influence on the surrounding property, community and beyond; thus causing no substantial injury to the value of the neighborhood. 4) The use will be compatible with adjoining development and the proposed character of the district where it is located. The proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition is designed with the intent of minimum impact on the surrounding property and to be in keeping with the existing project style. 5) Adequate landscaping and screening is provided as required by this chapter. We will be providing additional landscape to buffer the small addition, along with existing mature trees and vegetation being relocated, which will not only maintain the established look and feel, but will in fact add to it. page 1 of 2 , , 6) Adequate off street parking a►Jd loading is provided and ingress and egress is so designed as to cause minimum interference with traffic on abutting streets. Section 78-705, subsection (28)(b) requires additional parking spaces for the proposed addition, thus Good Shepherd obtained a variance for the parking based on non-concurrent/non-cumulative parking between the School and the Church. 7) The use conforms with all applicable regulations governing the district where located, except as may otherwise be determined for planned developments. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the design of the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition complies with all of the applicable regulations governing R-1 district. (End of response to Section 78-362 criteria) page 2 of 2 OWNER's (ARCHITECT STERGAS & ASSOCIATES) RESPONSE TO SECTION 78-363 CRITERIA 4/12/2011 (revised) 1) Compliance with all elements of the village comprehensive p/an. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the proposed small Resource and Support Rooms addition complies with all elements of the Village comprehensive plan. 2) Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition is in the existing rear courtyard and is connected integral with the existing school, there will be no impact on automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, and no impact on traffic flow and control, and will provide code required access in case of fire or catastrophe. 3) Off-street parking and loading area, where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection (2) of this section. Section 78-705, subsection (28)(b) requires additional parking spaces for the proposed addition, thus Good Shepherd obtained a variance to add no parking based on non-concurrent/non- cumulative parking between the School and the Church. 4) Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to subsection (2J and (3J of this section. As the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition adds no students, faculty, or functions there will be no appreciable increase in refuse, and thus no effect with existing refuse and service areas. And likewise the proposed addition triggers no code increase requirements. 5) Nuisance factors detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the village as a whole. Nuisance factors shall include but not necessarily be limited to noise, odor, smoke, glare, electrical interference and/or mechanical vibrations. As the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition is all interior space there will be no additional outside noise added. Further the addition adds no students or faculty. Based on the above no nuisance factors should be generated by this proposed addition. 6) Utilities, with reference to location, availability and compatibility. As the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition ties into the existing building utilities in the immediate area of the addition, there will be no new utilities needed. page 1 of 3 7) Screening and buffering, with reference to type, dimensions and character. The site is established and thus contains a lot of mature vegetation, including in the courtyard area where the proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition is located. This vegetation includes two medium sized oak trees and some mature shrubs and plants; and these will be relocated and additional landscaping is being added resulting in a net add of landscape . Also, there is an existing 8'+ high wall at the rear of the courtyard, whose rear and the south side sections will remain in total, and this will screen the bulk of the new 24' wide proposed addition; leaving only some new roofline (which will match the existing) to be seen. 8) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. No new exterior signage will be added. And new exterior lighting will be limited to soffit lighting and building mounted wall packs with cut-off shields to control spill-over light onto the neighboring properties. 9) Required yards and other open space. , The proposed School small Resource and Support Rooms addition to the existing school meets all J the setback criteria, which includes the 25' front setback, the 20' rear setback, and the 7.5' side setbacks; having a front setback of 368+'to the front of the existing school, having a rear setback of 25+' to the back of the proposed addition, and having the closest side setback of 40' (at the south side of the existing school). And the proposed 1,997 square foot addition will occupy some 1/100 of the site and reduce the existing open space by less than 2%; and results in an open space that is 2 times what the code requires. 10) General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposed small Resource and Support Rooms addition to the existing school, is very much in keeping with the existing school. Both the existing and the new have low roof lines and pitched � roofs which are in keeping with the primarily residential character of the surrounding properties in the district. 11) Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the village. The proposed small Resource and Support Rooms addition to the existing school, is very much in keeping with the design style of the existing school with both having lower style roof lines and pitched roofs, and as the narrow dimension of the addition (24') is what faces the perimeter, the massing of the addition is smaller than the existing massing, and thus will help to reduce the scale of the project to the exposures where it can be seen from adjacent properties. page 2 of 3 12) Any special requirements set out in the schedule of site regulations in section 78-143 for the particular use involved. The project as submitted meets all the requirements of section 78-143 (Schedule of Site Requirements). (End of response to Section 78-363 criteria) page 3 of 3 � � ❑ Kimley-Horn � and Associates, Inc. Good Shepherd Episcopal School Expansion Palm Beach County Drainage Statement The existing site of the Good Shepherd Episcopal School is located at 402 Seabrook Road in Tequesta, Florida. The 3.91 acre parcel is currently developed with two parking lots, a]2,500 SF church sanctuary, a 2,600 SF thrift shop, a 5,200 SF church office building, a 4,700 parish hall, and a 13,622 SF school building. There is an expansion proposed for the site that will include a 1,997 SF addition to the existing school building, approximately 1,130 SF of additional sidewalk, and approximately 221 SF of covered walkway. The proposed expansion will replace approximately ll40 SF of existing covered patio area. The existing stormwater management system is permitted under a 2004 South Florida Water Management District No-Notice General Permit (Application Number 031118-17). As part of this permit application, the existing stormwater management design was certified to be in accordance with the Village of Tequesta's stormwater criteria for retention of the runoff from the 3-year/24-hour storm event. Surface runoff from the site and parking areas currently drains into the onsite drainage system and is routed to an onsite dry detention pond, and ultimately discharges offsite through a control structure at the northeast corner of the site. No changes are proposed to the site drainage system or parking lot layout. The proposed building expansion will add an additional 1,078 SF of roof area and an additional 1,130 SF of sidewalk to the site. Based on the calculated required and provided retention capacity in permitted drainage calculations for the site, the existing stormwater management system has sufficient capacity to retain the increased runoff from the additional impervious development for the 3-year, 24-hour storm event without negatively impacting the site. The total increase in impervious area on the site is less than 13% of the total site area. Therefore, no negative drainage impacts are anticipated as a result of this proposed expansion. � Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. �„/�w� `.� k. QR.w� �I-lv-Lo�� Anjuli K. PansP, �.E., PE #:-71504 ' 1920 Weki�ra Way, Sui±e 200 West Palm Beach, FL 33411 (561)-845-0665 CA 000006G6 K:\WPB_Civil\144071001\Drainage Statement\Drainage statement 4-2011(2) doc �j'� Phone: 561-733-6500 '�� 12539 Acme Dairy Road '�j �� Fax: 561-733-6505 ,L� Boynton Beach, FL 33473 . � /� Suee l979 r 1/'� 2 � 1 � Z ��a��U�D, � � 1��;�� GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL � f5 �� TEQUESTA, FLORIDA � •C' �x �' � L(u�G� EXISTING LANDSCAPE-AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ' ' �� ,• SYMBOL QUANT COMMON NAME - BOTANICAL NAME SlZE AND SPECIFICATION . � • • ( .� '• •' ' A 1 LIVE OAK — Quercus virginiana 13" CALIPER, TRANSPLANT ON SITE ' �L� B 1 LIVE OAK — Quercus virginiana 15" CALIPER, TRANSPLANT ON SITE '' .. � Y' �� C 1 LIGUSTRUM — Li ustrum 'a onicum 8'X9', TRANSPLANT ON SITE �� g J P � •' � � - 2 BROMELIAD — Aechmea spp 3'X3' CLUMPS, TRANSPLANT ON SITE G� �; •; • - 4 CRINUM LILY — Crinum augustum 4'X4' CLUMPS, TRANSPLANT ON SITE • ,; • . ..' 1 EUROPEAN FAN PALM — Chamerops spp 5'OAH, SINGLE, TRANSPLANT ON SITE . SOp� • , Z� - 105+/- EX SHRUBS (Chrysobalanus, Codiaeum, & Duranta spp.) REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ' 2 Uv� �, � " 1' LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST � . SYMBOL QUANT COMMON NAME - BOTANICAL NAME SIZE AND SPECIF/CATION • � u �� *NEP 65 BOSTON FERN—Nephrolepsis exaltata 18"X15" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. � ��a�� *STA 52 PORTERWEED — Stachytarpheta jamaica. 18"X15" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. , ��jA� ��-�ph( ��- *ZAM 60 COONTIE — Zamia floridana 12"X12" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. ' SOD TBD BAHIA SOD — Paspalum notatum SF, REPAIR AS NEEDED • �� i �(�� APPROXIMAT � Y SHRUBS TO REMO ED CONSTRUCTION, BE REPLACED W/TH NATI [rE SHRUBS PER PLANT L/ST i�v � NOTES -ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN/TRANSPLANTED TO BE PROTECTED UP TO DRIPLINE WITH 4' ORANGE � ��IV✓. Y�� BARRICADE FENCING, STAKED AT 8' CENTERS (MAXIMUM) AND MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. -EXISITNG LIVE OAKS THAT ARE TO BE RELOCATED TO BE ROOT PRUNED 10 WEEKS PRIOR TO RELOCATION, WITH �� ' h �^ APPROX 50% OF ROOTS PRUNED AND WATERED FOR DAILY FOR 5 WEEKS (M[NIMUM), FOLLOWED BY THE ��ylp REMAINING ROOT PRUNING AFTER 5 WEEKS AND ALLOWED DAILLY WATERING FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVE WEEKS �(�� r � _ PRIOR TO FINAL RELOCATION. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION TO BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. � v, -VARIOUS PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULED FOR RELOCATION TO BE STORED AND PROTECTED ON OR OFF SITE, �i�rl0 �� (J�� UNTIL SITE IS READY FOR LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND -�-�J�,�� -ROOT PRUNING, TRIMMING, AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN � � F�`is1 �� ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST, ACCORDING TO COMMONLY ACCEPTED PRACTICES. , � -ALL PLANT ,�ATERIAL TO MEET/EXCEED MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR FLORIDA NUMBER 1, PER CURRENT "GRADES �� fl � � & STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, PARTS I& II", STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AG. SERVICES. � -ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO ACCEPTABLE NURSERY PRACTICES IN A MANNER DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE VIGOROUS GROWTH. SOIL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES MAY BE RQUIRED TO ENSURE �J� HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. UP TO 3" OF NON CYPRESS MULCH TO BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND 2��(�� (��(,`� LANDSCAPE BEDS. MULCH IS NOT TO COME 1N CONTACT WITH PLANT STEMS OR TRUNKS. n(, �� r A= i �� -REQUIRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL BE SECURELY GUYED, BRACED, AND/OR STAKED AT THE TIME OF PLANT[NG lf�V UNTIL ESTABLISHMENT. ALL STAKING AND GUYING MATERIALS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS V[SIBLY EXPOSED AT GRADE LEVEL. -LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED W1TH AN AUTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES ] 00%+ COVERAGE, A RA1N SENSOR, AND THE ABILITY TO WATER SHRUBS LESS FREQUENTLY THAN LAWN AREAS. -SITE UTIITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS, PRIOR TO [NSTALLATION. -BACKFiLL MIXTURE TO CONSTST OF LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL AMMENDED PER SOiL TESTING RESULTS. RESOURCE ROOM ADDITION - LANDSCAPE PLAN � MARCH 14, 2011 ( �� REVISED APRIL 14, 2011 � � S'� � _ � Phone: 561-733-6500 � 12539 Acme Dairy R�d Z$ , F Fax: 561-733-6505 � ,�� Boynton Beach, FL 33413 . ' � � _ 5� 1979 . . � � � . - ' . , . . � � ' � ld�C��' `r � I . . _ �b � ��nJs��,}�-� GOUD SHEPHERD EPISCUPAL SCH04L � � � �� 6 . TEQUESTA, FLURIDA Z�11 . , '�c�p ' . �. L(u��- EXISTING LANDSCAPE-AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION , i�- .� . . • � '. . • SYMBOL QUANT COMMON NM�' - BOTi1NICAL NAME SIZEAND SPECIFICATION � •� • �� A 1 LIVE O.AK — Quercus virginiana 13" CALIPER, TR.ANSPLANT ON SITE . '� B 1 LIVE OAK — Quercus virginiana 15" CALIPER, TRANSPLANT ON SITE ' • �`�� C 1 LIGUSTRUM — Li strum 'a onicum 'X9' TRANSPLANT ON STTE - . . �� J P g � '� � � - 2 BROMELIAD — Aechmea spp 3'X3'�CLUIV�S, TRANSPLANT ON STfE G � '' ' • 4 CRINUM LILY — Crinum augustum 4'X4' CLLJMPS, TRANSPLANT ON STTE . • _ ' ; .- - C • , .� ', � .• . = 1 EUROPEAN FAN PALM — Chamerops spp 5'OAH, SINGLE, TRANSPLANT ON SITE �.�b� ' , Z� 105+/- EX SHRUBS (Chrysobalanus, Codiaeum, & Duranta spp.) REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTTON _ � - • Z (,t� C�, . - � � � LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST . • --. SYMBOL QUAIVT COMMONNAME- BOTAMCAL NAME SIZE AND SPECIFICATIDN � • t u �� _�i *NEP 65 BOSTON FERN— Nephrolepsi.s exalta.ta 18"X15" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. � - � �� *STA 52 PORTERWEED — Stachytarpheta jamaica. 18"X15" #3, FIJLL AND THICK, 24" O.C. .; �t'`p�( 14 � *ZAM 60 COONTIE — Zamia floridana i2"X12" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. � SQD TBD BAHIA SOD — Paspalum notatum SF, REPAIlZ AS 1�TEEDEI3 ' i� (�/� �l� _ •DFJVOTESFLORIDA NA77vEPLANTM�TERL9L (I00% OFNEW MATERIAL WILL BE FLORIDA NATIYEJ �� (� �b � APPROXIMATELY 105 SHRCIBS TO BE REMOYED FOR CONSTRUCT70N, TO BE REPLACED WITH 177NATlVESHRUBSPER PLANT LLST r�vl � NOTES . . -ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN/TRANSPLANTED TO BE PROTECTED UP TO DRIPLINE WITH 4' ORANGE � �� . �� ;(i BAR.RICADE FENCING, STAKED AT 8' CBNTERS (MAXIMUIVQ AND MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. w�a��r -EXISITNG LNE OAKS THAT ARE TO BE RELOCATED TO BE ROOT PRUNED 10 WEEKS PRIOR TO RELOCATION, W�'H � �� . � ; APPROX 50% OF ROOTS PRLJNED AND WATERED FOR DAILY FOR S WEEKS (MINIMUNn, FOLLOWED BY THE � �� i REMAINING ROOT PRUNING AFTER 5 WEEKS AND ALLOWED DAILLY WATERING FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVB WE�� t �� A r � i. PRIOR TO FINAL RELOCATTON. TEMPORARY IRKIGATION TO BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ��f � -VARIOUS PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULED FOR RELOCATION Tf� BE 5TORED AND PROTECTED ON OR OFF SITE, �(��Q �� ; UNTII.. SITE IS READY FOR LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND �''��,�t� -ROOT PRUNING, TRID�IlNG, AND RELOCATION OF EXISTIIVG TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN � . ' C'""�l �� ISA CERTI�"IED ARBORIST, ACCORDING TO COMMONLY ACCEPTED PRACTICES. • , -ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO MEET/E3�CEED MINIMUM STANDARDS FdR FLORIDA NUMBER 1, PER CURRENT "GRADES �. {7� . �fl � � � : & STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, PARTS I& II", STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AG. SERVICES• . A � � -ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO ACCEPTABLE NURSERY PRACTICES IN A MANNER �"� DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE VIGOROUS GROWTH. SOIL IlVIPROVEMENT MEASURES MAY BE RQUIRED TO ENSURE �J7 � � HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. UP TO 3" OF NON CYPRESS MULCH TO BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT NIATERIAL'�ND . 2��,� (��►Y LANDSCAPE BEDS. MULCH IS NOT TO COME IN CONTACT WITH ALANT STEMS OR TRUNKS. ' ^(, � {�� -REQUZRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL.BE SECURELY GUYED, BRACED, AND/OR STAKED AT TI� TIl�IE OF PI.ANTII�G ��Vl:�t �" "�I✓ � UNTIL ESTA.BLISHMENT. ALL STAKING AND GUYIN� MATERIALS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLY EXPOSED AT GRADE LBVEL. ,� -LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES 100%+ '� � COVERAGE, A RAIN SENSOR, AND THE ABII,ITY TO WATER SHRUBS LESS FREQUENTLY THAN LAWN AREAS. _ - ,, �-, ,. -SITE UTII'T�5 ARE TO BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. . -BACKFILL MIXTURE TO CONSIST OF LOOSENED NATIVE SOTL AMMENDED PER SOIL TESTING RESULTS. � �, � ;: RESUURCE ROOM ADDITION - LANDSCAPE PLAN ' � � MARCH 14, 2011 � REVISED APRIL ] 4, 2011 " �.. ��' ` � �� , ; . Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR.