The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 19_05/12/2011 � VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA '� �� ,' AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL FORM 1. VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING: Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Regular Ordinance #: N/A May 12, 2011 Consent Agenda: No Resolution #: N/A Originating Department: Community Development 2. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: (Wording form the SUBJECT line of your staff report) CASE # SE 02-11 Application of GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC, 217 Village Boulevard, Tequesta, FL 33469, for a Special Exception use to utilize an existing 118,716 square feet three-story building and adjacent grounds as a Rehabilitation Facility, pursuant to Sec. 78-180. of the Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances. 3. BUDGET / FINANCIAL IMPACT: Account #: N/A Amount of this item: N/A Current Budgeted Amount Available: Amount Remaining after item: N/A N/A Budget Transfer Required: No Appropriate Fund Balance: No 4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES: (This is a snap shot description of the agenda item) GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC is requesting a Special Exception to allow a Rehabilitation Facility use in the Mixed Use zoning District. On March 10, 2011, the Village Council adopted Ordinance 1-11 amending the Mixed-Use district to add "Rehabilitation Facility" as a special exception use subject to certain conditions as outlined in the attached staff report. � 5. APPROVALS: . i � Dept. Head: /-- Finance Director: ❑ Re iewed for Financial � � � fficiency ' �` No Financial Impact � �_.. � Attorney: (for legal sufficiency) Yes ❑ No ❑ Village Manager: ` —�_ s • SUBMIT FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION: ,� • APPROVE ITEM: ❑ • DENY ITEM: ❑ �°d�� ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1111 Hypolwco Road, Suite 207 ��zri�oi�acL �l�2r� .�'�'/t62 JOHN CORBETT TELEPHONE (561) 586-7116 TRELA J. WHITE TELECOPIER (561) 586-9611 BRADLEY W. BIGGS*^ KEITH W. DAVIS* R. MAX LOHMAN ABIGAIL FORItESTER JOI2ANDBY ' Board Certified in City, County and Loca1 Government Law JENNIFER Gt�RDNER ASHTON ^ State Certified County and Cirwit Court Mediator MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Paterno, Vice Mayor Arena and Council members Brennan, Humpage & Turnquest; Village Manager Couzzo FROM: Keith W. Davis, Esq. DATE: May 2, 2011 RE: Special Exception Use; Process and Legal Issues GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC has applied for a Special Exception Use, which application will be heard by the Village Council on May 12, 2011. This Memorandum will briefly outline the special exception process as well as the legal issues relevant to that process. Special exceptions are uses which although are allowed to exist and operate, have unique characteristics and require case-by-case analysis of their impacts on neighboring areas and Village infrastructure. Sec. 78-361. In order for the GMH special exception use to exist and operate, the Village Council must find that the proposed use complies with the seven (7) requirements of Sec. 78-362. In addition, the Village Council must find that the proposed special exception use has made adequate provision for the twelve (12) factors set forth in Sec. 78-363. The Staff Report prepared by the Community Development Department discusses these requirements and factors in more detail. Special exception applications are heard by the Village Council at a quasi judicial public hearing. It is the burden of the applicant to establish, through the presentation of competent, substantial evidence, that they have met each of the above referenced seven (7) requirements and 1 sufficiently provided for each of the above referenced twelve (12) factors. Competent, substantial evidence can be in the form of sworn testimony, the development application as required by Sec. 78-368, or other documents and materials presented to the Village Council at the public hearing. Once the applicant has provided competent, substantial evidence that the proposed special exception use complies with the above referenced criteria (7 requirements and 12 factors), the burden shifts to the Village to establish that the criteria have not been met and that granting the special exception would be adverse to the public interest in order to properly deny the request. The Village is likewise required to provide competent, substantial evidence at the public hearing in order to meet this burden. Such evidence can came from sworn testimony or other documents and materials presented to the Village Council at the public hearing. Redner v. City Council of City of Tampa, 827 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 2" DCA 2002). Competent substantial evidence has been defined by the Florida Supreme Court as evidence that is sufficiently relevant and material that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached. DeGroot v. She�eld, 95 So.2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957). In simple terms, competent, substantial evidence amounts to any valid reason supported by the record. Orange Counry v. Butler, 877 So.2d 810, 813 (Fla. Sth DCA 2004). Based on the cornpetent, substantial evidence presented at the public hearing, the Village Council may grant the request, deny the request or grant the request with the imposition of special conditions designed to protect the surrounding properly and neighborhood or the overall public health, safety and welfare of the Village. Sec. 78-364. In the event that the request is denied, the Village Council must state the reasons for the denial by way of explaining which requirement(s) or factor(s) have not been met. Sec. 78-365. A failure to make such fmdings is considered a departure from the essential requirements of law. Redner v. City Council of City of Tampa, 827 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 2 DCA 2002). Following a denial, the applicant is foreclosed from re-applying for twelve (12) months from the date of such action. Sec. 78-366. 2 ViLLAGE OF TEQUESTA - � � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report — Village Council Meeting — 05.12.11 1. PETITION DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: DeRose Des+gn Consultants, Inc. 470 S. Andrews Avenue, Ste. 206, Pompano Beach FL 33069 OWNER: GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC 10 Campus Boulevard Newton Square, PA 19073 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Special Exception to allow a Rehabilitation Facility use in the Mixed-Use zoning district LOCATION: 217 Village Boulevard Tequesta, FL 33469 2. LAND USE AND ZONING EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING SUBIECT PROPERTY Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Mixed-Use NORTH Public Buildings and Public Buildings and Commercial Village Water Plant Grounds Grounds SOUTH Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Village Boulevard and Lighthouse Cove Condominiums EAST Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Sterling House Facifity WEST Recreation and Open Recreation and Open Mixed-Use Old Dixie Highway, FEC Space, Residential Low Space, Residential low R-1-Single-Family Railroad, Residential Dwellings Density Density 3. BACKGROUND On March 10, 2011, the Village Council adopted Ordinance 1-11 amending the Mixed-Use district to add "Rehabilitation Facility" as a special exception use. Ordinance 1-11 provides a definition for "Rehabilitation Facility" as well as density restrictions, parking requirements and other conditions of approval that all rehabilitation facilities would have to meet in order to receive approval to operate. 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Ordinance 1-11 also provides an amendment to the definition of residential use to include rehabilitation facilities in the Mixed-Use district. GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC (part of GMH Capital Partners) acquired the existing three-story building located on the corner of Village Boulevard and Old Dixie Highway. The existing building has been vacant for a number of years, it was originally designed to accommodate an Assisted Living Facility (ALF). GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC applied for a Special Exception to allow a Rehabilitat+on Facility use on the vacant three-story buiiding located in the Mixed-Use zoning district. The Village's Code recognizes that there are certain uses and features which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be distinctly classified or regulated in a particular district without consideration in each case of the impact of such uses and features upon neighboring uses and the surrounding area. A special exception is not the automatic right of any applicant. The applicant needs to comply with criteria stated in Sections 78-362 and 78-363 of the Code. The following graphic presents the approval process regard'+ng GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC proposed rehabilitation facility: 1 ta � e e 1 N' � ," �� I ' � �. ., :Y � �. � �5' °3 4 � � ��-:� � � � � i� ;� . . . . .. .... 4. STAFF ANALYSIS The following staff analysis will include compliance with provisions of Ordinance 1-11, Criteria for Granting Special Exception (Section 78-362), and Findings Required for Approval (Section 78-363) regarding Special Exception of the Village Code. Provisions of Ordinance 1-11 According to Ordinance 1-11, approval of rehabi{itation facilities are subject to the following conditions: a. Rehabilitation facilities shall be prohibited from being located within a one half mile radius of another rehabilitation facility. The proposed rehabilitation facility is located on 217 Village Boulevard, Tequesta, FL 33458. There is not other rehabilitation facility located within a one half mile radius. In comp�iance. 2 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC b. Ninety percent of the dwelling units shall have a minimum of 575 square feet. The remaining ten percent of the dwelling units may have a minimum of 500 square feet. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a total of 75 dwelling units. 90 percent (68 units) of the dwelling units have a minimum of 575 square feet. 10 percent (7 units) of the dwelling units have a minimum of 500 square feet. In compliance. c. A maximum of forty percent (40%) of the dwelling units shal{ be permitted to have two (2) bedrooms. In no case shall a dwelling unit have more than two (2) bedrooms. Two (2) bedroom dwelling units shall have a minimum of 750 square feet. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes 30 dwelling units that have two bedrooms (40°/a). All two bedroom units have a minimum of 750 square feet. The proposed rehabilitation facility does not include dwelling units of more than two bedrooms. In compliance. The following chart presents the proposed rehabilitation facility dwelling units breakdown: No. of Units Unit Area (sq.ft.) ist Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor D (Studio/Efficiency) 500 2 4 1 Studio (Efficiency) Unit Subtotal 2 4 1 F (1 BR) 576 2 0 4 G (1 BR) 673 6 6 4 G1 (1 BR) 673 3 2 2 C (1 BR) 685 2 2 2 C1 (1 BR) 685 0 2 1 1 Bedroom Unit Subtotal 13 12 13 A (2 BR) 796 3 4 3 A1 (2 BR) 796 0 2 0 E (2 BR) 932 4 4 2 B (2 BR) 1,048 2 2 2 H (2 BR) 1,080 0 1 1 2 Bedroom Unit Subtotal 9 13 8 Total Residential Units 24 29 22 Total Studios/Efficiency: 7 Total 1 Bedroom Units: 38 Total 2 Bedroom Units: 30 Total Units: 75 Total Beds: 105 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC d. Occupant load for individuals receiving treatment shall not exceed the number of bedrooms. Bedrooms and studio dwelling units shall be for single occupancy only. Overall density for a rehabilitation facility shall not exceed eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes 105 bedrooms; and, all bedrooms are single occupancy. The total number of individual receiving treatments is 105 patients. Since the applicant site is 9.33 acres, the proposed number of dwelling units is 75 units (8 dwelling units per gross acre). In compliance. e. Dwelling units shall be configured as follows: 1. Studio units, if provided, shall have a one (1) combination bedroom/living area/ kitchen, and a private bathroom. 2. One-bedroom units, if provided, shall have one (1) private bedroom, one (1) private bathroom, private living areas and a private kitchen. 3. Two-bedroom units, if provided, shall have two (2� private bedrooms, two (2) private bathrooms, common living areas and a common kitchen. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes all of the above dwelling unit configurations. (see dwelling units lay-outs Sheets A-107.1 and A-107.2). In compliance. f. Dwelling units shall not have seqarate individua! mailing addresses. Rather, the rehabilitation facility shall maintain one master address which all residents shafl reside under during their stay at the rehabilitation facility. The proposed rehabifitation facility is in compliance with this provision. g. Rehabilitation facilities must be equipped with a controlled space, effectively screened from public view, for arrivals and departures of patients. This space shall be large enough to accommodate an ambulance for transporting patients in and out of the facility. The proposed rehabilitation facility incl�des the following two areas for arrival and departure of patients (see Sheet SP-1 and LP-2): Area 1. It is the main entrance located on the southwest corner of the building. Landscaping is used as screening along the perimeter of the site. Further screeninp will be required before site plan approval. Area 2. It is the ambulance access located on the southeast corner of the building. Landscaping is used as screening along the perimeter of the site. Further screeninq will be repuired before site plan appraval. h. Rehabilitation facilities shall be surrounded on all sides by a fence or wall located as close to the property lines as is practical. The fence or wall shal{ be a minimum of six (6) feet in height but may be as high as ten (10) feet, measured from finished grade, in order to ensure privacy for both rehabilitation facility patients and for Village residents. The fence or wall shall be constructed in such a manner as to compliment and accentuate the principal structures of the rehabilitation facility. Both the interior and exterior sides of the fence or wall shall be landscaped in accordance with the principles set forth at Sec. 22-84 of the Village Code of 4 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Ordinances. If a fence, wall or hedge is located on a corner lot or a double frontage lot, a � vehicular and pedestrian visibility triangle of a size and dimension which complies with current trafFic engineering standards of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the county shall be provided in both directions from the intersection point of the property lines. The existing facility includes an aluminum rail fence with 2'x 2' concrete columns surrounding the property. The height of the existing aluminum rail fence varies from 5'-4" to 6'-0'. The proposed rehabilitation facility modifies the existing columns and aluminum fence to comply with this ordinance provision. The existing column will be extended and the aluminum fence will have an addition on the top area to meet the 6' requirements. These modifications will take place on needed areas located on the west, east and south fence (see sheet C-5 for fence and entry gate design details). The north fence toward the Village Water Plant consists of a 6'-0" chain link fence without concrete columns. According to the Village Water Plant survey, the fence belongs to the Water Plant. The applicant needs to provide a fence toward the water plant. The proposed fence needs to be landscaped (interior and exterior sides) in accordance with the principles set forth at Sec. 22- 84 of the Villape Code of Ordinances. Sheet SP-1 presents the vehicular and pedestrian visibility triangle in agreement with current standards. The above description regarding the fence height, visibility triangle and landscape is in comp{iance with this provision of Ordinance 1-11. Further review of the detailed desiqn features o�the qate and fence will be reviewed before site p/an approval. The existinp chain link fence and proposed landscape will offer a limited buffer toward the Villape watei plant. There should be further considerations about protectinp the water plant considerinp its critical role in the communitv. i. The rehabilitation facility shall include a backup generator system. The sYstem shall be sized for the building occupancy load and have a fuel source sufficient to operate the facility for a minimum of seven days. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a 1,500 kW emergency generator located on the north east corner of the building. The generator is sized to provide full backup for seven days of the entire building electrical service of 5,000 amps/208 volt/3 phase, which supports the entire building occupancy load. In compliance. j. The rehabilitation facility shall by separate agreement guarantee payment to the primary fire rescue provider for patient ambulance transport service. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes an agreement that guarantees payment to the primary fire rescue provider. This agreement was reviewed by the Village Attorney and Fire Chief (see attached agreement). In compliance. 5 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC k. In conjunction with the application for special exception use, the rehabilitation faci{ity shall submit a security plan that includes patient off-site visits. The security plan shali be approved by the Village Council with input from the Chief of Police. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a security plan that includes patient off-site visits. The proposed security plan was review by the Chief of Police and others Village staff (see attached security plan). In compliance. I. The rehabilitation faciiity shall submit quarterly reports to the Village's Community Development Director that establish and document compliance with all rehabilitation facility funding and occupancy requirements and restrictions. Not applicable at this time. m. In conjunction with the app{ication for special exception use, the Village may, at its discretion.. secure an impact analysis study, performed by an independent entity, detailing the proposed rehabilitation facility's projected community wide impacts. This study, if prepared, shall specifically address the rehabilitation facility's potential economic impact to the Village, the creation and continuation of jobs, the potential impact on law enforcement and criminal activity, and the potential impact on the Village's emergency medical resources. In addition, the study should address the proposed rehabilitation facility's impact on the quality of life for neighboring properties and the Village as a whole. The option of securing an impact analysis was discussed at the April 14, 2011, Village Council meeting. The Villa�e Council elected not to en�a�e in the impact analvsis studv at this time. In compliance. n. In conjunction with the application for a business tax receipt and the annual renewal thereof, a rehabilitation facility shall submit to the Village, in the form of a sworn affidavit by the rehabilitation facility's legal representative who is authorized to do so, written documentation that the rehabilitation facility is in compliance with all requirements of this section as well as the definitional requirements of Sec. 78-4. Should the rehabilitation facility's business tax receipt be issued based upon a false afFidavit, the Village may seek to impose all penalties allowed by law, pursuant to Chapter 70, Article 11 of the Village Code of Ordinances. Not applicable at this time. o. Should the rehabilitation facility at any time violate any of the requirements of this section or any of the definitional requirements of Sec. 78-4, the Village may obtain relief through the code enforcement special magistrate process pursuant to Chapter 2, Article IV of the Village Code of Ordinances. For purposes of the code enforcement special magistrate process, each day that tfie rehabilitation facility is found to be in violation shall be considered a separate offense. In addition to the code enforcement special magistrate process, the Village may seek any and all relief available to it by law or in equity, including, but not limited to injunctive relief, recovery of money damages, or both. Not applicable at this time. CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL EXCEPTION 6 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Per Section 78-362 of Village Code, special exception use shall be permitted only upon authorization of the Village Council provided that such uses comply with the following requirements: 1. The proposed use is a permitted special exception use. In compliance with Section 78-180 (i) Special exception uses permitted in MU Mixed Use district. Per Ordinance 1-11 "Rehabilitation Facility" use was added to the permitted special exception uses under MU Mixed-Use district. 2. The use is so designated, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare and morals will be protected. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a security plan (see attached security plan), 24-hour staff and video surveillance, gated entrance, alarm system, personnel safety training and client screening. Also, the proposed facility has a fence and landscaping surrounding the property for security and privacy. As part of this application, the entrance toward Village Boulevard will be closed to ensure safety and privacy. The Village has conducted a detail review of the proposed use. As part of the Code Text Amendment process, the Detox component of the facility was eliminated. Also, Ordinance 1-11 provisions states the following requirements to ensure that the proposed facility will operate so that the public health, safety, welfare and morals will be protected: ■ (I)."The rehabilitation facility shafl submit quarterly reports to the Village's Community Development Director that establish and document compliance with all rehabilitation facility funding and occupancy requirements and restrictions." ■ (n) "In conjunction with the application for a business tax receipt and the annual renewal thereof, a rehabilitation facility shall submit to the Village, in the form of a sworn affidavit by the rehabilitation facility's legal representative who is authorized to do so, written documentation that the rehabilitation facility is in compliance with all requirements of this section as well as the definitional requirements of Sec. 78-4." ■ (o) "Should the rehabilitation facility at any time violate any of the requirements of this section or any of the definitional requirements of Sec. 78-4, the Village may obtain relief through the code enforcement special magistrate process pursuant to Chapter 2, Article IV of the Vi{lage Code of Ordinances. For purposes of the code enforcement special magistrate process, each day that the rehabilitation facility is found to be in violation shaN be considered a separate offense. In addition to the code enforcement special magistrate process, the ViHage may seek any and all relief available to it by law or in equity, inc{uding, but not {imited to injunctive relief, recovery of money damages, or both." 3. The use will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located. The existing three-story building has been vacant for a number of years. According to the applicant the proposed rehabilitation facility will be a high end "Four Season" type of facility. The 7 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC proposed use will not cause injury to the value of the other property in the neighborhood where the subject property is located. 4. The use will be compatible with adjoining development and the proposed character of the district where it is to be located. With regard to compatibility with the surrounding properties, the Village water plant is located to the north of the proposed facility. The water plant is located on a Commercial zoning district. An existing chain link fence and proposed landscape will offer a limited buffer. According to the Village Water Plant survey, the fence belongs to the Water Plant. The applicant needs to provide a fence toward the water plant The proposed fence needs to be landscaped (interior and exterior sides) in accordance with the princiales set forth at Sec. 22-84 of the Villaqe Code of O�dinances. There should be further considerations about protectina the water planr considerinp its critical role in the communitv. The Sterling House Facility is located to the east of the proposed facility. The Sterling House Facility, an assisting living facility, is on a Mixed-Use zoning district. There is an existing Declaration of Use Agreement "Landscape Buffer" that states "GMH, and any future owner of the ALS Parcel or any portion thereof, shall, at its sole cost and expense, install not later than 365 days after the date first above written and thereafter maintain at all times a landscape buffer along that portion of the ALS Parcel that borders the Sterling House Facility, which buffer shall include plantings and other landscaping materials (which may include fencing and other customary landscaping materials reasonably acteptable to the owner of the Sterling House FacilityJ (the "Landscape Buffer"). The Londscape Buffer shalt ot all times (iJ be reasonably acceptable to the owner of the Sterling House Facility and (iiJ provide (aJ reasonable visual obstruction of the ALS Parcel from the Sterling House Facility and (b) obstruction of ingress and egress (including, without limitation, pedestrian ingress ond egressJ between the ALS Parcel and the Sterling House Facility. The owner of the Sterling House Facility shall have no responsibility to perform or pay for the construction or maintenance of the landscape Buffer". The applicant stated on April 7, 2011, written statement "the latest landscape plans have been provided to Sterling House for their review". The applicant also stated that "GMH is in the process of acquiring a letter from the Sterling House and anticipates being able to provide the letter to the Village prior to the meeting" (April 19, 2011). To this date, the Villaqe has not received a letter from the Sterlinp House approvinq the proposed landscape buffer (April 28 2011 . 7he Lighthouse Cove Condominiums is located to the south of the proposed facility. Residents from Lighthouse Cove were present at the Village Council Workshop on February 22, 2011. They expressed their support for this proposed facility. It is also located on the mixed-use district as well as the proposed facility. Closing the entrance toward Village Boulevard and adding needed landscape will offer a buffer toward the Lighthouse Cove. To the west of the proposed rehabilitation facility is Old Dixie Highway, FEC Railroad tracks, and residential dwelling units. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a fence, and 8 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC landscape on the right-of-way along Old Dixie Highway which will add a layer of buffering. The proposed landscape for the O/d-Dixie HiAhwav ripht-of-wav will be a requirement of the site plan approval process. 5. Adequate landscaping and screening is provided as required in this chapter. Please see attached Mr. Steve Parker, Village landscape architect, analysis letter. 6. Adequate off-street parking and loading is provided and '+ngress and egress is so designed as to cause minimum interference with traffic on abutting streets. Per Ordinance 1-11, Section 78-705. Required number of parking spaces "One space per patient bed" is required for rehabilitation facilities. Since the facility includes 105 beds, the applicant needs to provide 105 parking spaces. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes 150 parking spaces, six ADA accessible spaces and three loading spaces. 7. The use conforms with all applicable regulations governing the district where located, except as may otherwise be determined for planned developments. The proposed use is located on a MU Mixed-Use district, and conforms with the following regulations governing the district: setbacks, height, open space, building coverage, parking, and density (8 units per acre per Ordinance 1-11). The applicant is proposing 22 dwelling units on the third floor. The reminder of the third floor will be assigned as future offices totaling 9,000 square feet. The proposed office space can not be available for sublease to other uses since it is part of a Special Exception use that is limited to a rehabilitation facility. The Village traffic engineer analysis states that "a condition of approval be place on the proposed development to ensure that anv future office space anticipated for the third floor be limited to internal use only for the rehabilitation facility". With regard to signage, the existing facility has two monument signs at the site. The applicant is proposing to demolish the monumental sign located toward Village Boulevard. Also, the applicant is repuestina to the Villape Council a waiver to allow the existinq monument sian located toward ald Dixie Hiqhway to remain. The waiver also includes the use of both sides of the existinA monument siQn, and an exposed area of 18 spuare feet per each side. Per Code Section 78-740 "signs in residential areas of a mixed use development no more than one sign per lot shall be permitted with an exposed area of not more than four square feet, and advertising only the sale, lease or rental of the lot or the improvements thereon." With rec�ord to landscapinp, further landscape features will be repuested before the plan approval process (please see attached Villo4e landscape architect analvsis letter). FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL Per Section 78-363 of Village Code, before any special exception is granted, the Village Council shall apply the standards set forth in this division and shall determine that satisfactory provision and arrangement of the following factors have been met with the applicant, where applicable: 1. Compliance with all elements of the Village Comprehensive Plan 9 Department of Community Development - Stoff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC The subject property is located on Mixed-Use future land use district. The proposed rehabilitation facility complies with Policy 1.1.2 "the Village's Land Development Regulations shall conform to, and implement, the use, density and intensity standards as outlined on Table FLU-1". Table FLU-1 states that the Maximum Density and Intensity for a Mixed-Use district should be "18 dwelling units per acre, 24 units per acre in an Adult Congregate Living Facility. Residential uses shall comprise no less than 20 percent and no more than 80 percent of a mixed-use district" The proposed rehabilitation facility provides 8 dwelling units per acre (per Ordinance 1-11). Also, Ordinance 1-11 amended the definition of Residential use by including residential rehabilitation facilities in Mixed-Use district. The proposed use "Rehabilitation Facilitv" meets this provision of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The applicant submitted a traffic study that was reviewed by the Village traffic consultant (please see attached final technical memorandum from McMahon). The final traffic analysis emphasized that the proposed rehabilitation facility will not impose a negative impact on adjacent roadways. The analysis also states that "a condition of opprOVal be place on the proposed deve/opment to ensure that anv future office space anticipated for the third floor be limited to internal use only for the rehabilitation facilitv". The proposed rehabilitation facility includes two separate locations for fire access. One on the east side, and another on the north side toward the water plant. Both access points have stabilized roads and gates. 3. Off-street parking and loading area, where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection (2) of this section. Per Ordinance 1-11, Section 78-705. Required number of parking spaces "One space per patient bed" is required for rehabilitation facilities. Since the facility includes 105 beds, the applicant needs to provide 105 parking spaces. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes 150 parking spaces, six ADA accessible spaces and three loading spaces. The proposed use "Rehabilitation Facility" meets this provision. 4. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to subsections (2) and (3) of this section. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes an on-site dumpster area located an the west side of the existing building. Concrete wafls, an opaque gate, and landscaping screens the dumpster area. The ,vroposed use "Rehabilitation Facilitv" meets this provision. 5. Nuisance factors detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the Village as a whole. Nuisance factors shall include but necessarily be limited to noise, odor, smoke, glare, electrical interference and/or mechanical vibrations. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a security plan with provisions to prevent nuisance factors that couid be detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the Village as a whole. The applicant proposed: smoke detection, fire suppression system, adequate site lighting and patient conduct poiicy as part of their preventive approach. Further review will be conducted before the site plan approval process. 6. Utilities, with reference to location, availability and compatibility. 10 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC The proposed rehabilitation facility is located on an existing bui{ding. Utilities including water, sewer and drainage are part of the existing facility. The Village Public Services Manager, Mr. Russell White has reviewed utility requirements (see attached memorandum from Mr. White). Further revisions will be conducted before the site plan approval process 7. Screening and buffering, with reference, to type, dimensions and character. With regard to screening and buffering, the Village water plant is located to the north of the proposed facility; and, an existing chain link fence and proposed landscape will offer a limited buffer. According to the Village Water Plant survey, the fence belongs to the Water Plant. The a�plicant needs to provide a fence toward the water plant The proposed fence needs to be landscaped (interior and exterior sides) in acco�dance with the princip/es set forth at Sec 22-84 of the VillaQe Code of Ordinances. There should be further considerations about arotectina the water plant considerina its critical ro/e in the communitv. The Sterling House Facility is located to the east of the proposed facility. The Sterling House Facility, an assisting living facility, is on a mixed-use zoning district. There is an existing Declaration of Use Agreement "Landscape Buffer" that states "GMH, and any future owner of the ALS Parce/ or any portion thereof, shall, at its so�e cost and expense, install not later than 365 days after the date first above written and thereafter maintain at al! times a landscape buffer a/ong that portion of the ALS Parcel ihat borders the Sterling House Faci�ity, which buffer shall include p/antings and other lpndscaping materials (which may include fencing and other cusiomary landscaping materials reasonably acceptable to the owner of the Sterling House Facility) (the "Landscape Buffer"J, The Landscape Buffer shall at all times (i) be reasonably acceptable to the owner of the Sterling House Facility and (iiJ provide (aJ reasonable visuol obstruction of the ALS Parcel from the Sterling Hause Facility and (bJ obstruction of ingress and egress (including, without limitation, pedestrian inqress and egressJ between the ALS Parcel and the Sterling House Facility. The owner of the Sterling House Facility shall have no responsibility to perform or pay for the construction or maintenance of the Landscape Buffer" The applicant stated on April 7, 2011, written statement "the latest landscape plans have been provided to Sterling House for their review'. The applicant also stated that "GMH is in the process of acquiring a letter from the Sterling House and anticipates being able to provide the letter to the Village prior to the meeting" (April 19, 2011). To this date, the VillaQe has not received a letter from the Sterlinq House approvinp the proposed /andscape buffer (April 28 20111 The Lighthouse Cove Condominiums is located to the south of the proposed facility. Residents from Lighthouse Cove were present at the Village Council Workshop on February 22, 2011. They expressed their support for this proposed facility. It is also located on the mixed-use district as well as the proposed facility. Closing the entrance toward Village Boulevard, and adding needed landscape will offer a buffer toward the Lighthouse Cove. To the west of the proposed rehabilitation facility is Old Dixie Highway, FEC Railroad tracks, and residential dwelling units. The proposed rehabilitation facility includes a fence, and landscape on the right-of-way along Old Dixie Highway which will add a layer of buffering. The ,vroposed landscape for the O!d-Dixie Hiahwov riqht-of-way will be a repuirement before the site plan approval process. 11 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC 8. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. With regard to signage, the existing facility has two monument signs at the site. The applicant is proposing to demolish the monument sign located toward Village Boulevard. Also, the applicant is requestinp to the Villaqe Council a waiver to allow the existinq monument sipn located toward Old Dixie Hiphwav to remain. The waiver also includes the use of both sides of the existinp monument sian and an exposed area of 18 spuare feet per each side. Per Code Section 78-740 "signs in residential areas of a mixed use development no more than one sign per lot shall be permitted with an exposed area of not more than four square feet, and advertising only the sale, lease or rental of the lot or the improvements there on." The proposed exterior lighting will be in compliance with Code requirements and aesthetics provisions. The proposed light fixtures and pole heights ensure that parking areas, access to parking, and recreation areas are illuminated to prevent safety hazards. 9. Required yards and other open space. The applicant is proposing a 51.3 percent of open space, the Village Code requires 25 percent. The proposed rehabilitation facilitv is in compliance with the open space arovision of the Mixed-Use district. 10. General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposed rehabilitation facility is located in the Mixed-Use district along with an assisted living facility to the east and a residential condominium to the south. Also, Ordinance 1-11 amended the definition of Residential use by including residential rehabilitation facilities in Mixed-Use district. The Village water plant is located to the north of the proposed facility, an existing chain link fence and proposed landscape will offer a limited buffer. There should be further considerations about protectina the water plant considerina its critical role in the community. 11. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the Village. The existing building has been vacant for a number of years and it was originally designed to accommodate an Assisted Living Facility (ALF). The proposed rehabilitation facility approval process included a Code Text Amendment that reviewed and considered if a rehabilitation facility will be compatible with the Village. The process also included a series of workshops with public attendance. Residents from Lighthouse Cove were present at Special Village Council Workshop on February 22, 2011. They expressed their support for this proposed facility. Village Council approved the Code text amendment March 10, 2011. 12. Any special requirements set out in the schedule of site regutations in 78-143 for the particular use involved. The proposed use is located on a Mixed-Use district, and conforms with the following regulations governing the district: setbacks, height, open space, building coverage, parking, and density (8 units per acre per Ordinance 1-11). With regard to signage, the existing facility has two monument signs at the site. The applicant is proposing to demolish the monument sign located toward Village Boulevard. Also, the applicant is 12 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC reguestinp to the Villape Council a waiver to allow the existina monument siqn located toward O/d Dixie HiQhwav to remain. The waiver also includes the use of both sides of the existina monument siqn, and an exaosed area of 18 sauare feet per each side. Per Code Section 78-740 "signs in residential areas of a mixed use development no more than one sign per lot shall be permitted with an exposed area of not more than four square feet, and advertising only the sale, lease or rental of the lot or the improvements thereon." With regard to landscapinp, further landscape features will be repuested before the site plan approval process (see attached Villave landscape architect analysis letter). 8. FINAL REMARKS AND SUMMARY This special exception use application met the requirements set on Section 78-368 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised in the Jupiter Courier on 05.01.11; and, it was also mailed to all property owners located within a 300-foot radios of the property for which a special exception is requested. Per Code Section 78-367, a special exception shall commence with 12 months from approval date; and only one extension shall be permitted by the Village Council up to six months. The following is a summary of facts based on this analysis: 1. The applicant needs to further comply with Village's requirements listed below, before the site plan approval. ■ Further screening and design of the equipped and controlled space, to accommodate ambulance transportation form the facility must be provided. ■ Further review of the design details and features of the gate and fence must be reviewed. ■ Further landscape features should be provided in accordance with the Village's landscape architect analysis letter. ■ Further evaluation review of any potential nuisance factors which could be detrimental to adjacent or nearby properties and the village must be conducted. ■ All utilities locations must be thoroughly evaluated and approved by Village engineers. 2. The applicant is requesting to the Village Council a waiver to allow the existing monument sign located toward Old Dixie Highway to remain. The waiver also includes the use of both sides of the existing monument sign, and an exposed area of 18 square feet per each side. 3. The Village water plant is located to the north of the proposed facility. An existing chain link fence and proposed landscape will offer a limited buffer. According to the Village Water Plant survey, the fence belongs to the Water Plant. The applicant needs to provide a fence toward the water plant. The proposed fence needs to be landscaped (interior and exterior sides) in accordance with the principles set forth at Sec. 22-84 of the Village Code of 13 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Ordinances. There should be further considerations about protecting the water plant considering its critical role in the community. 4. The applicant stated on April 7, 2011, written statement "the latest landscape plans have been provided to Sterfing House for their review". The applicant also stated that "GMH is in the process of acquiring a letter from the Sterling House and anticipates being able to provide the letter to the Village prior to the meeting" (April 19, 2011). To this date, the Village has not received a letter from the Sterling House approving the proposed iandscape buffer (Aprif 28, 2011}. 5. The final traffic analysis emphasized that the proposed rehabifitation facility will not impose a negative impact on adjacent roadways. The ana{ysis also states that "a condition of approval be place on the proposed development to ensure that any future office space anticipated for the third floor be limited to internal use only for the rehabilitation facility". This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacarias, AICP, and; approved by Chief lames M. Weinand Date 5'—�/� 14 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Ho�dings LLC � - , � -�,. �, �a ,� � � , ,. �� ;� �r . ,i� rk F �,•-� . '� '� ` � � � � I f i � t.'� ti� kn,,�+��,� � �� r, � - � .' °�� L, � � � , >- � > ,. �� -!� _ _ �y�• �� _ �� — ` , � � � ��'� � ,� � � �V ` . � _ . � � � �� i' � : �; i �� : � � �. � _, ., � . � � �;: � ,��„ � � �y.tF�, �.' �s� �.�,��'�'§, � � . - t` � �,.:° � ` .�.. _ Existing West Fence , �� ,� ----_--= ---� �� - �� .� � � . �__ � _ ; ' � �r ,� �- � ,,.- ��. �� v _ :� «�� `�.� , a a � �� a _ .L. n ' ° � = Ao�, m i:. . , A �� k`�• E � ,��,, �,� �� : � s7: :� -> �, ,�� a rz.. '�� .. .: � n; - . , �� .. --_____ " � �,�-- �.�� ?' r :� . . _____ i ' — � _.. , _" :�•� ��_ __= v , � . ��:. �.: � � � �+J:.-'.' � � .._ W , sa} u .; . ; . � , - .� . , ' �� _ �� ' a� t . `Fwl�''�t�k�l� ,�, _ , m � _., < . . , ". . °. - � _, , � . ., ,� _ � e ` ewr,,.,.. � ��. Existing South Fence z. ° ; Existing East Fence Existing North Fence �� , � � ,� �,� m � � � , � .a �_ . r z �� „ � � , , i � �� . _ �„ .: ' s - - d � _ . - � �'`� � � � � �� : � ,� � ,� � � � "� , ' ' �. .,� _ ; .: �° � �°� ,� '� �'. ;*� ��''� r�- _` _ � "�"'`.. ' < , . . . , s ,. �� '• � � + . _ ., , , : � � � . � } °..� _ _� . n _ � �, . _. , _ _ _ , � . . , � � � � �� .x,� �i � *»,. f4. ,. .. . a., , ,<�,� �.. . '"°"� # "� 3�� „� � � Department of Community Development - Staff Report – Special Exception Application – GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC � ._ - ;� ��.�. � ;q� �. � : � n � � � � --..._, �.--� - �' - � � � � �" � � ,„� �. � �� = � � � --1::�� x � � �,. �. � � - :� ,.-, . �: =� .� :� �. � �,�,,�� y �� u � � �� n �� , �, �,�' .� . �, . �. - � ,� g �� ,, � . r �+'1� 1'P * �rr + �� "Y,"�i,"" r � a �; � "� .. � ' ' ��5�� k � � � '�`3"��"��..F"� ��`� 1*�. '.. � � +'A;' '�, !" .-_� . '� �' � r�'�, �c 1,',�« l � p : ? y, n � m - zw�u �� ';,�„'�.^.�� ,++ „ '��k , ;,, Existing Conditions of --. � the Site and Buiidings �� ' rxa � ��; ¢ � 9 '� � �.�.T,... _wwa ; � .. . . . . ,. . �� . .. ..�aM . .-, _ �� -._.. . �_ � M1 _..�., � .........�_ +��+� . � i��. . � '�� . A�. �dy.:"" yL� �. ��LL .. i f '`' : 1,2;i.: . . s .. .. . , . . � fi �� . � t ' �yi :� ' li:, l . Il� ' �:. , / n _ ' ., ' fi 'T/ � � � �. � � � � w� - � � '► �g�' _ �. � The applicant is a �„� h� $ �,� � �.�� ^ _ �. � �-.� � . .� + �. � � requesting a waiver for r� ,� - ---�- '� �� ` ._ :.;�: �� + � r � the existing monument �� ' . �•°. -�. . � sign located taward Old Dixie Highway �� _ �.�� 6 � E� u� � �., il , Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC �".h. i t . ` - _ _ > __n��'� . - - ... �.-''-�1. -_ p i j � �� . . —_C — �. __ . rrt - f` 3 _.�,- J - - , �.,. � � � .._ .. ..�... ' .:.., . .� ..{ � � ; � 3 4 ` I -�-�� -_' `e . •. _ _ -"__ _ � # { � :� . -. � .�.. x:R�" . .. M � f r -9 y , .�. v � s : ��' �,,,� a r �- 'tt _ � � - � � ..-. . � _,.� - �. _ ,. .. _.. .' Existing Conditions of the Site and Buildings � �� -�� - - - ,�:�;�.,� �: �' �� . � � � � .�� 11 � �- �,:.� ,�� _ � � � . . � �� ," � ,�$° � _ : � � _� -� ;: � _`; �� - � M � � �`u'i�`e�n {� �� .k� > � � �� -. ` P � _ .. . � .. _ - � 1 d � �L 1 4 � . .(iL � � � � U'� i J� , ' . j ..� NZ'.y � - p��' 1 ' �'�y- w � E 'A1 � - . z �.. ... ".. . � . - �+ 2 �: � r \ Hp, + � - � ..., i�.-W„ Y� ,x a M , f';�. My .- .. . � . .�,,.... .. �. � .. r,.A4.i . ':' . ' . _ .a.- '. � ... _. " � .. �., � - . . .. �_ _� .... �, � ��R-�S.^..-�-y� .. . 4 ..yy �..�. � a ��III�I I I . � . . _ . � � _ _ � '.0 �� ':� � . i . �. _ �=�., � �_ .Y :i1. ' - _ � � Mfx+.: x . ' ' y1�0. .... . i.� .'i1b'. . . . ., r �. r . . -. �� . ...Y°""0�` . . - ' . '�4M " . 1 �- �.. . . �. . . � �-� �� .IR.._.___....:_._.._"_" -_ -. -... � �w. '�'{�'? � : � y � �� . � � y; ,. _ . ., � , „ � , �� •� :, � . 4 � ` �� , . ,.. _ � �� .� � �a - � � �: - _ ,.� _ �� - - � _ ..; �.. � _ ..: , � .. ,� � . � w.�.�- � - ,,�-.,�- .� . . . ,. :. ., _ — 4 _ � - _ ��`�'� � �`, �; ,��,, ,�,. �,4 < , - � = , . � �� . -� � � �. . � .� . , � . ,: � � � . ' � "�' �� fi� �'' , �' �. � ,� � �` . �,. ` ' b R 2�� 'TT .,.X,Ww _ ,r ��s�!'�YPR�t . ' �� -. �-� � � 1 �l��'P { � a �� . +(1� , � � 7�`� ��' �.` K. .. ) .�. - y9,:' ,"�L ��-� . . � . . _ . a. . . . _ _ � vr .. .. � . _ _. •�.,,.. . .. _ . . ^m::Y'..... Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Special Exception Application — GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC - - .,� m � �� ° �a a' I7 �'�DD � �e�� o L�3•�� am PARKER + YANIVETTE desige group, ince Via E-Mail - Apri127, 2011 Mr. James Weinand Fire Chief & Acting Community Development Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, PL 33469 RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Dear Mr. Weinand, This letter is a summary of niy review of the latest revised landscape plan and response letter prepared by Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney, dated 4/19/11. This is my final review of the plans prior to the Special Exception meeting on May 12, 2011. Perimeter Hardsca�e/Landscane: 1. West and South Property Lines: a. Based on the response letter regarding the perimeter fence, columns and landscape, there are two (2) issues that I believe have not been completely resolved. i. Because the green space in the right-of-way is more than 35' wide along Dixie Highway and 10' wide along Village Boulevard, its appearance is an important part of the exterior of tliis site. Although the applicant is in the process of preparing plans for this area, we will definitely need information regarding types of plant material, sizes and quantities and planting criteria from Palm Beach County prior to site plan review. In addition, the applicant should address whether sod and irrigation will be installed and maintained in areas that are not being planted. ii. I disagree tliat there is not sufficient space for two (2) layers or two (2) rows of plant material between the fence and sidewalk along Old Dixie Highway. Presently, a Buttonwood hed�e is planted in this area and ° there is clearly space between the hedge and sidewalk (see attached photos). The proposed Cocoplum and Spanish Stopper hedges are nice, but a minimal improvement over the existing hedge. I still feel LANDSCAYE ,4RCFI1"1'ECTLIRF � PL:�\hING � GRAPf•IICS S2> South U.S. HiQhway One Suite ;;0 Jupiter. Flc�ricia ;;=177 i61%747-5069 l_ic. /FLC-ODUO297 additional plant varieties and layering are necessary to upgrade the existing appearance. b. Please note on the plan where the larger (18'-24'ht.) Oak and ivlagnolia trees will be installed. c. The schematics of the fountain, gates, fence and signage are sufficient at this point. Prior to Site Plan Review the applicant will need to submit detailed plans and elevations that tie all of these elements together. d. The recent submittal of the Tree Preservation and Rerr�oval Plan is very helpful in determining the status of the existing plant material. Please note on the plans that the existing plants will be maintained and protected during the development of this project. 2. East Property Line: a. Per the recent response letter, GMH shall provide a letter from the owner of the Sterling House Facility, prior to the Special Exception meeting, stating that the proposed landscape buffer is acceptable. Interior Hardscane/Landscape: 1. Recreation Area and North Portion of Property: a. I disagree with the applicant's view of the proposed landscaping at the loop road. Minimal plantings have been added to the loop road from the originally submitted plans. If this road is to be designated a"walking path", then additional trees, palms and shrubs need to be incorporated in this area. Plant List, Details and Specifications Sheet: 1. Based on my past experience reviewing plans and inspecting projects for the Village of Teyuesta, the majority of the plans include shrub and groundcover heights and spreads. I find havin� this information eliminates any "grey areas" on whether a plant is Florida Grade # 1 or of sufficient size. Landscape Plan i Survev 1 Site Plan Discrenancies: 1. Please label the generator on the landscape plan. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Sincerely, . ��. ��- .:-� - , Step n. Par r ASLA � �11VI��1I�AHON ti��,<<��t�� ,�s��s� ,��. 5500 Jillaoe 8oulevard I Su�te 103 I West P�lm Beach, FL 33407 � �, � p 561-840-8b50 I f 561-840-8590 www.mcmtrans.com PR[SC[P�LS Joseph W ;V�cMahon, P.c. ;oseph J. DeSan[is, ?.E , PTOE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM �°',� � °�P��a William T Sreffens CaSey A. Moore, P.E. �ary R. �ticNaugh[on, P.E, PTOE _AS�.SOC1A CES TO: Nilsa Zacarias, AICP � �,�� p � Vllldg2 Of TeC�U2Std ChrisCOpher 1. Wi�liams, P.E. John F Yacapsin, P_E. CC: Natalia L. McGuckian, P.E. McMahon Associates, Inc. FROM: R. Trent Ebersole, P.E. McMahon Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Traffic Impact Study Review McMahon Project No. M11172.01 DATE: Apri122, 2011 McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has completed a review of the Traffic Impact Study prepared for GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC by Thomas A. Hall, Inc., dated April 2011 and the response to comments letter dated April 18, 2011. McMahon identified minor math errors in the analysis. However, if corrected, the analysis would show that the study roadways are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service. Therefore, we recommend approval of the proposed development. In addition, we recommend that a condition of approval be placed on the proposed development to ensure that any future office space anticipated for the third floor be limited to internal use only for the rehabilitation facility. NLM/hsv F: \ FL \ 11172M_VillageOfTequestaTransportationServices \ 11172M_01_GMH_TequestaHoldingsLLC \ Admin \ Technical Memorandum_042211. doc Curporate M�adquarters; Fort Washinoton, Pernsylvama Serving tne East Coast from 11 offices throughout New En�land, the Mid-Atlantic �nd Flerda , �v � 7 , � � � TEQUESTA UTILITIES ; � ' `� o� MEMORANDUM y C TO: NILSA ZACARIAS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: RUSSELL K. WHITE, PUBLIC SERVICE MANAGER SUBJECT: GMH / TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC/ SUMMARY TO DATE DATE: APRIL 28, 2011 As you know we have had nuxnerous talks and xeviews of the above subject. To date GMH has been very cooperative with all of my comments. These comments include but are not limited to e�sting water appurtenances, easements, landscape and drainage. I feel like they are close to a final submittal and that they will abide by all of the Villages requests. Overall it has been a great working relationship with GMH and I look forwaxd to getting this project underway. Should you have any concerns �liat I can be of assistance with, please feel free to contact me. PAYMENT GUARANTEE AGREEMENT FOR REHABILITATION FACILITY PATIENT AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2011, effective immediately, between the Village of Tequesta, a municipal corporation organized and constituted in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, with offices located at 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469, hereinafter referred to as the "Village" and GMH Rehabilitation Enterprises, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with offices located at 10 Campus Boulevard, Newton Square, Pennsylvania 19073, hereinafter referred to as the "Rehabilitation Facility". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Rehabilitation Facility is located within the Village; and WHEREAS, The Village's Fire Rescue Department is licensed and mandated to be the primary provider of Ambulance Transportation Services within the Village; and WHEREAS, the Village Code of Ordinances requires that all rehabilitation facilities located within the Village enter into an agreement with the primary provider of Ambulance Transportation Services to guarantee payment for Ambulance Transportation Services provided to rehabilitation facility patients; and WHEREAS, the Village and the Rehabilitation Facility desire to enter into this agreement wherein the Rehabilitation Facility shall guarantee payment to the Village for Ambulance Transportation Services provided by the Village's Fire Rescue Department to the Rehabilitation Facility's patients. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein to be kept and performed by the parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. RECITALS: The above recitals are true and correct. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED: The Village, through its Fire Rescue Department, shall provide Ambulance Transportation Services and associated EMS service, to Rehabilitation Facility patients on an as-needed, on-call basis, in the same I manner that the Village provides such services to any other person. 3. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Agreement, "Ambulance Transportation Services", "EMS" and "Patient" shall be defined as follows: Ambulance Transportation Services: The transportation of a Rehabilitation Facility Patient by Village Fire Rescue resources (i) to the Rehabilitation Facility from any other location; or (ii) from the Rehabilitation Facility to any other location. EMS: Any emergency medical treatment provided by certified paramedics andfor EMT's whether or not body invasion and/or any life support equipment is utilized. Patient: Any client of the Rehabilitation Facility, including, but not limited to, clients who may be transported to the Rehabilitation Facility prior to initial admission and clients who may be transported from the Rehabilitation Facility following discharge. 4. AMBULANCE TRANSPORTATION FEES / EMS FEES: The Rehabilitation Facility agrees to provide direct payment to the Village for all Ambulance Transportation Services and associated EMS service provided to Rehabilitation Facility Patients in accardance with the Village's schedule of fees and costs. Such Ambulance Transportation Services and associated EM5 service costs shall be invoiced directly to the Rehabilitation Facility and shall be billed, collected, and retained in full by the Village as compensation for rendering such services. The Village's current schedule of fees and costs is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". It is agreed and understood that said schedule of fees and costs may be amended from time to time at the sole discretion of the Village; however, any such amendments shall address all users in the same manner and shall not be applied only to rehabilitation facility users. The Rehabilitation Facility shall be notified immediately of any such amendment. The Rehabilitation Facility shall pay I the Village within 30 days of receipt of the Village's billing invoice. 5. TERM: It is understood by both parties that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect so long as the Rehabilitation Facility continues to operate in the Village and so long as the Village continues to operate primary Ambulance TranspoRation 2 Services and associated EMS service. In the event that the Village ceases to operate primary Ambulance Transportation Services and associated EMS service, then the Rehabilitation Facility agrees to enter into a similar agreement with the subsequently I designated primary provider for Ambulance Transportation Services in the Village. 6. TERMINATION: It is understood by both parties that this Agreement shall not be terminated except under the conditions set forth in Paragraph 5. above, which, in the case of either of those conditions occurring, shall result in the immediate termination of I this Agreement. 7. NOTICES: All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses via hand delivery or via certified mail, return receipt requested: VILLAGE REHABILITATION FACILITY Village of Tequesta GMH Rehabilitation Enterprises, LLC Fire Rescue Department 10 Campus Boulevard 345 Tequesta Drive Newton Square, Pennsylvania 19073 Tequesta, Florida 33469 Attn: General Counsel Attn: Fire Chief 8. NO TRANSFER: This Agreement shall not be assigned or transferred by either P�Y• 9. GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted according to laws of the State of Florida. Any and all action necessary to enforce the Agreement will be held in Palm Beach County, Florida. The prevailing party in any action brought for the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 10. NO WAIVER DUE TO DELAY: No delay be either party in enforcing any covenant or right hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of such covenant or right, and no waiver of any particular provision hereof shall be deemed a waiver of any other provision or a continuing waiver of such particular provision, and except as so expressly waived, all provisions hereof shall continue in full force and effect. 11. ENTIRE UNDERSTANDING: This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the provision of and payment for Ambulance 3 Transportation Services and associated EMS services for Rehabilitation Facility Patients, by the Village. It may not be modified, nor any of its provisions waived unless such modification and/or waiver is in writing and is agreed to and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto set their hands and seal this day of , 2011. ATTEST: VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA LORI McWILLIAMS, CMC THOMAS PATERNO VILLAGE CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY DATE: ATTEST: GMH REHABILITATION ENTERPRISES, LLC JAMES I. KENNEDY SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT DATE: 4 BLS ALS-1 ALS-2 Ambulance Trans ort Rates Rate Rate Rate $435.00 $435.00 $625.00 • r• F r y e f DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469 r Phone: 561- 768 - 0450; Fax: 561 -768 -0698 ca Date: February 10, 2011 SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION The undersigned requests a Special Exception for the Use Specified below. Should this application be approved, it is understood that it shall only authorize that particular use described in this application and any conditions or safeguards .required by the Village of Tequesta. Name of Applicant: DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. Mailing Address: 470 S. Andrews Avenue, Ste.206, Pompano Beach FL 33069 Phone No, (Hoene) NIA (Business) 954 - 942 -7703 Lot/Parcel Address: 217 Village Boulevard, Tequesta, FL 33469 (See also legal description, attached.) Lot: NIA Block: NIA Subdivision: NIA Property Control Number: 60- 43- 40- 30 -46- 002 -0000 Existing Use: Vacant building and additional vacant land Description of Special Exception: Proposed "Rehabilitation Facility" use under Sec. 78- 180(i), Mixed Use District Special Exception Uses Property Owner: GMH TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC NOTE: Applicant shall include the following with the application: 1) Current survey or site plan of property showing structures and setbacks, 2) Draivings to.sca:le of proposed improvements requiring special exception use, 3) Written approval from property owner if other than applicant. 4) Any other documentation pertinent to this application. 5) Fifteen (15) copies of all submittals, 6) Application Fee of Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars, February 10, 2011 Ja U A i an 's Signa e Date iceabrera-Frias. Degas Design Consultants, Inc. GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Legal Description PARCEL 1: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 40 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA;, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE BEAR NORTH 89 0 58'00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 393.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 17 0 17'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 335.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 0 42'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17 0 1707" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET AND WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 25 0 07'29" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, BEING THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VILLAGE BOULEVARD, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 0 06'58 ", A DISTANCE OF 77.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 625.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 0 54'56 ", A DISTANCE OF 260.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °22'20 ", A DISTANCE OF 194.52 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6485, PAGE 1729, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 22 0 41'51" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 456.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7,679.44 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 0 11'35 ", A DISTANCE OF 427.98 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE, SOUTH 89 0 58'00" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 527.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AS CREATED BY RECIPROCAL RETENTION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10846, AT PAGE 137 FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACTS AND /OR EASEMENTS OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 40 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, AND BEING A PART OF STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID TRACTS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT "B" BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THENCE NORTH 17 0 17'07" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 165.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19 0 56'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 82.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 75.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 °32'29 ", A DISTANCE OF 38.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 9.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 0 46'17" A DISTANCE OF 13.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 11.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 113 0 44'11 ", A DISTANCE OF 21.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 21 0 30'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 6.37 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "B1 "; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 21 0 30'51" A DISTANCE OF 23.69 FEET; TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VILLAGE BOULEVARD, AND WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 21 0 30'51" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 °36'39" A DISTANCE OF 45.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND TRACT "C" TRACT "C" OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TRACT "D TRACT "D" OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TRACT " E " TRACT "E" OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TRACT "F" TRACT "F" OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TRACT "G" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 89 0 58'00" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 12.82 FEET THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 0 58'00" EAST, ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 105.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 1 02'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "G1 "; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00 °02'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 51.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 0 00'00" A DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 89 0 58'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.35 FEET; TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS 109.00 FEET, AND WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °22'37" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 0 29'41" A DISTANCE OF 54.21 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "G2 "; THENCE, CONTINUE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 0 21'25" A DISTANCE OF 25.41 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 00 0 02'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 36.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND TRACT "H" TRACT "H" OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, PAGES 102 THRU 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TRACT "I" COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THENCE NORTH 17 0 1707" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 262.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 17 0 1707" WEST, ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 107.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 0 42'53" WEST, CONTINUING ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 71.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29 0 14'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 0 11'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.65 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 90.00 FEET, AND WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 09 1 31'41" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08 0 31'26" A DISTANCE OF 13.39 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 88 0 59'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 49.71 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76 0 12'53 ", A DISTANCE OF 19.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 12 0 46'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 6.26 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "I1 "; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 12 0 46'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77 °13'08" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 23.17 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET, AND WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 71 0 03'49" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 °59'30 ", A DISTANCE OF 13.82 FEET THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 14 0 03'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 90.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND TRACT 1 7 1 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 17 0 17'07" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 217.7064 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 71 0 03'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.53 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER TO AS "31 "; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 71 1 03'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 90.00 FEET; WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 71 0 17'29" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 °13'19 ", A DISTANCE OF 38.05 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 12 0 11'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS 6.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 131 0 25'32 ", A DISTANCE OF 13.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 60 0 45'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 7.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 0 00'00 ", A DISTANCE OF 6.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 29 0 14'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17 11 17'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 70.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "B1 "; THENCE NORTH 72 0 34'39" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 40.02 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "H ", ACCORDING TO SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; AND TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT "C ", ACCORDING TO SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 13 °09'54" WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 24.01 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "D ", ACCORDING TO SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; AND TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER SAID TRACT "D "; THENCE NORTH 07 0 12'17" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 10.72 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "E ", ACCORDING TO SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; AND TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "G1 "; THENCE SOUTH 89 0 58'00" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 49.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "F ", ACCORDING TO SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; AND TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "J1 "; THENCE NORTH 25 0 23'27" WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 35.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13 0 17'26" WEST, CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 127.44 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "G ", AND THE POINT OF TERMINATION AT AFOREMENTIONED SAID POINT "G2 "; AND TOGETHER WITH A 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "I1 "; THENCE SOUTH 82 0 01'47" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 23.53 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID TRACT "C ", ACCORDING TO SAID STERLING HOUSE OF TEQUESTA PLAT. PARCEL 3: NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AS CREATED BY PARKING, INGRESS /EGRESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 10845, AT PAGE 169, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. GMH TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC 10 Campus Boulevard Newtown Square, PA 19073 February 10, 2011 Mr. James Weinand Acting Community Development Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: GMH TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC To whom it may concern: This letter is to verify that Lawrence DeRose, P.E., and Janice Cabrera- Frias,. of the firm of DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. are employed by, and are acting on behalf of, GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC, DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. is authorized to act as the GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC representative regarding federal, state, county, and municipal permits for construction of the above referenced project, located at 217 Village Boulevard, Tequesta, Florida. Sincerely, James Ian Kenned Senior Vice Pre ' ent & General nsel i Since 1979 DeRose Design Consultants, Incorporated STRUCTURAL • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • ELECTRICAL • MECHANICAL ❑ 470 South Andrews Ave. • Suite 206 Li 9620 N.E. 2nd Ave. • Suite 203 Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Miami Shores, FL 33138 954 -942 -7703 • Fax 954 - 942 -7933 305 - 249 -3674 • Fax: 305 - 249 -3410 Website: http : / /www.deroseconsultants.com April 18, 2011 Village of Tequesta 357 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 Attn: James M. Weinand, Fire Chief RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Application for Special Exception for Rehabilitation Facility OPN: 10003A Dear Chief Weinand: This letter supplements our client's application for a special exception for use of the property located at 217 Village Boulevard as a Rehabilitation Facility and revises our letters of February 10, 2011, March 9, 2011, and April 7, 2011. As you know, Ordinance 1 -11, which adds the use of a Rehabilitation Facility as a special exception use within the mixed -use district, the zoning district in which the property is located, was passed by the Village Council on March 10, 2011. We hereby request that our client's special exception application be considered by the Village. In that regard, this letter addresses the criteria and findings required for approval in the Village Code described in Sections 78 -362 and 78 -363, in the order set forth in the Code: Section 78 -362 1. The proposed use is a permitted special exception use. Per Ordinance 1 -11, adopted by the Village on March 10, 2011 a Rehabilitation Facility is a permitted special exception use in the mixed -use district. 2. The use is so designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare and morals will be protected. Along with size and location, the proposed layout of the site was designed so as to not endanger the public health, safety, welfare and morals of the Village, as shown in the site plans accompanying the application. Our client and the Village worked together as part of the recent zoning code text amendment to establish Rehabilitation Facility requirements that address the concerns of the Tequesta community, including creating provisions which address site security and privacy. For example, the existing south access drive will be removed to screen residents living across Village Boulevard from the facility and to eliminate any potential traffic issues along the street. Several security measures will also be put in place and are described in detail in the security plan provided as part of our 10003A. special .exception.app.suppi.041811.icf client's submittal. They include 24 -hour staff and video surveillance, gated entrances, alarm systems, personnel safety training and client screening. 3. The use will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located. The proposed Rehabilitation Facility use will not cause injury to the values of the other property in the neighborhood. The property has been vacant for a number of years and is currently in a deteriorated condition. Our client proposes to substantially improve the site by renovating the existing facility and providing new amenities on the surrounding property. The proposed improvements include extensive site landscaping; tennis, basketball, and volleyball courts; a pool and spa; decorative water features; as well as a complete interior building renovation. These items are more particularly described and illustrated on the materials that accompany the application. 4. The use will be compatible with adjoining development and the proposed character of the district where it is to be located. The proposed Rehabilitation Facility use will be compatible with the adjoining development and the proposed character of the mixed use district. The neighboring uses of the property are an assisted living facility to the east, the Village of Tequesta Water Treatment Facility to the north and the Lighthouse Cove Condominiums to the south across Village Boulevard. Adjacent to the property on the west side is Old Dixie Highway, the F.E.C. Railroad and multi- and single - family residential beyond. The proposed use is primarily and substantially residential in nature, and is similar in character to an assisted living facility. The property and use is proposed in a campus -like setting with an emphasis on privacy to both the residents of the Rehabilitation Facility and to the residents of the surrounding neighborhoods, as indicated by the previously referenced site improvements. 5. Adequate landscaping and screening is provided as required in this chapter. Landscaping and screening will be provided in excess of the requirements of the Village's Code. Multiple varieties of trees and hedges, gentle berming, and elements of site interest are proposed on the site. The perimeter of the site will consist of an aluminum rail fence with concrete columns, effectively screened from view by trees, palms, and shrubs of varying heights. To provide a more established look to the facility, our client will install trees of heights in excess of the minimum heights required by code. A decorative fountain and pavers will be added to the entrance and roundabout at Old Dixie Highway. Our client is also planning on providing additional layering of plant material along Old Dixie Highway by planting groundcover and shrubs within the right -of -way and extending north along the Village of Tequesta Water Plant. The details of the landscaping and screening are presented in the site landscape plans accompanying this application. 10003A. special .exception.app.suppl.041811.jcf 6. Adequate off - street parking and loading is provided and ingress and egress is so designed as to cause minimum interference with traffic on abutting streets. Adequate off- street parking and loading is provided as more specifically detailed on the materials accompanying this application. One parking space per patient bed for off - street parking is required for rehabilitation facilities. The proposed project, which proposes 105 beds, exceeds this requirement by providing a total of 150 parking spaces, including six (6) A.D.A. accessible spaces and three (3) loading spaces. Section 78- 180(i)(16)(g) specifically addresses providing a controlled space, effectively screened from public view, for arrival and departure of patients. Ingress and egress for the existing site is provided along the two major rights -of -way which abut the property and are more particularly illustrated on the site plans accompanying this application. The site plan submitted as part of this special exception application proposes the removal of the access drive along Village Boulevard to minimize the impacts of the facility to the residential community to the south. This area will consist of additional site landscaping and parking and shall be screened from the right -of -way by proposed trees, shrubs, and fencing. The traffic study provided also shows the proposed use causing minimum interference with traffic on the abutting streets and to neighboring properties. 7. The use conforms with all applicable regulations governing the district where located, except as may otherwise be determined for planned developments. The proposed Rehabilitation Facility use conforms with all applicable regulations governing the mixed use district, including, but not limited to requirements relating to project density, lot coverage, setbacks, and open space. Section 78 -363 1. Compliance with all elements of the village comprehensive plan. The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and provisions of the Village comprehensive development plan, including compliance with the use, density and intensity requirements outlined in the plan. Goal 1.0.0, Objective 1.1.0, Policy 1.1.2 of the Village comprehensive plan specifically requires that mixed -use districts have a maximum of 18 dwelling units per acre, a maximum floor area ratio of 4.2 for non- residential uses and mixed use buildings, and that residential uses comprise no less than 20 percent and no more than 80 percent. The proposed project exceeds these criteria by providing 8 dwelling units per acre, a floor area ratio of 0.29, and residential uses totalling approximately 57 %. This information is also included in the site tabulations provided in the submitted plans. 10003A.special.exception.app.suppi.04181 1Jcf 2. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the existing property is provided by two driveways located along Village Boulevard and Old Dixie Highway. The traffic study prepared for the proposed project indicates that the number of trips that will be generated will not require any additional roadway improvements to the site. Removal of the access drive at Village Boulevard, as proposed in the site plan included as part of this submittal, is also not expected to adversely affect the adjacent roadway network. Stablized access roads and gates are also provided at two (2) separate locations for the purposes of fire access: (1) a point along the east boundary of the property and (2) at the north side of the property between the proposed walking path and the Village of Tequesta Water Plant. 3. Off - street parking and loading area, where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection (2) of this section. Section 78- 705(33) requires a total of one parking space per patient bed for off - street parking. A total of 105 beds are proposed at the facility. The proposed project exceeds this requirement by providing a total of 150 parking spaces, including six (6) A.D.A. accessible spaces and three (3) loading spaces. 4. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to subsections (2) and (3) of this section. An on -site dumpster area is provided on the west side of the existing building located on the property and is screened from public view on three sides by concrete walls and by an opaque gate on the fourth side. Landscaping is also provided around the dumpster. 5. Nuisance factors detrimental to adjacent and nearby properties and the village as a whole. Nuisance factors shall include but not necessarily be limited to noise, odor, smoke, glare, electrical interference and /or mechanical vibrations. The proposed property use does not promote the production of any nuisance factors which would adversely affect nearby properties or the Village as a whole, including noise, odor, smoke, glare, electrical interference and /or mechanical vibrations. The security plan provided with this submittal addresses these general concerns and includes provisions for a smoke detection and fire suppression system, adequate site lighting that does not negatively impact adjacent properties, and a client conduct policy. A possible exception would be the temporary power generator required by Section 78- 180(i)(16)(i), which is only intended for use during periods of electrical power outages. 6. Utilities, with reference to location, availability and compatibility. Utility infrastructure including water, sewer, and drainage has been constructed 10003A. special .exception.app.suppl.041811.icf for the existing structures on the site. The proposed development, which primarily includes the renovation of the existing facility and construction of a new recreation area, will be coordinated with all pertinent utilities, and all required approvals and /or permits will be obtained. 7. Screening and buffering, with reference to type, dimensions and character. As indicated previously and in the plans accompanying the application, the property shall provide site screening and buffering in the form of landscaping along the property boundaries. An aluminum fence with concrete columns is also provided along the perimeter of the site. Additional screening at the building entranceway in accordance with the rehabilitation facility requirements indicated in Section 78- 180(i)(16)(g) is also provided in the form of trees, shrubs, and fencing. 8. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. An existing concrete monument sign is currently located at the driveway entrance to the property at Old Dixie Highway. The monument sign complies with the minimum setbacks indicated in Section 78 -739 of the Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances. Section 78 -740 of the Code of Ordinances requires a maximum of 4 square feet for residential signs in mixed use districts. The existing sign contains an exposed area of approximately 18 square feet, and while it presently exceeds the requirement, it's design is compatible with the facility and adjacent neighborhoods. The existing sign also does not run counter to the spirit and intent of the code, which is concerned primarily with signs advertising sales, leases or rentals. Per Section 78- 180(m) we request that as part of the review and approval process, the village council modify the property development standards to allow the existing monument sign to remain. Outdoor lighting is provided according to the requirements of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 5, Section 4.E. The proposed light fixtures and pole heights were selected according to these criteria to ensure that parking areas, access to parking, and recreation areas are sufficiently illuminated, while controlling glare and other conditions that may create safety hazards on site. 9. Required yards and other open space. The yard and open space requirements comply with the requirements for mixed - use districts, as indicated in Section 78 -180 of the Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances. A total of 51.3% of the property consists of open space (38% required by code) with perimeter buffers at the east, west, and north property lines exceeding dimension requirements by up to 83 ft. Please see also the site plans provided with this submittal. 10003A. special .exception.app.suppl.041811.jcf 10. General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposed use has a substantiated residential component which is consistent with the properties surrounding the site: Lighthouse Cove Condominiums to the south and single- family residential to the west. The proposed rehabilitation facility is also comparable to an assisted living facility, several of which are located within the Village. 11. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the village. As previously indicated, the proposed facility is surrounded by residential neighborhoods and live -in facilities. The existing three -story facility was previously approved by the Village as an assisted living facility. The proposed rehabilitation facility, which will consist of the existing buildings on -site as well as a new recreation area, will have a residential component that is in keeping with the previous use, in the scale with the surrounding neighborhood. 12. Any special requirements set out in the schedule of site regulations in section 78 -143 for the particular use involved. The proposed project complies with the site regulations for mixed use districts, as indicated in the Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances, including lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, and open space. Please see also site plan tabulations provided with this submittal. Based on the foregoing we respectfully request that the Village Council apply the standards set forth in Division 3, Special Exception uses, and determine that the provisions of Section 78 -362 and 78 -363 have been satisfactorily met to approve the requested use of a Rehabilitation Facility. Sincerely, Ice Cabrera- FriY.T. JCF /adr Encl. 10003A. special. exception. app. suppl.041 81 1Jcf Since 1979 DeRose Design Consultants, Incorporated STRUCTURAL • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • ELECTRICAL • MECHANICAL ❑ 470 South Andrews Ave. • Suite 206 ❑ 9620 N.E. 2nd Ave. • Suite 203 Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Miami Shores, FL 33138 954 -942 -7703 • Fax 954 -942 -7933 305 - 249 -3674 • Fax: 305 - 249 -3410 Website: http : / /www.deroseconsultants.com April 18, 2011 Village of Tequesta Community Development 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 Attn: Ms. Nilsa Zacarias, AICP RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Special Exception Application OPN: 10003A Dear Ms. Zacarias: As requested in the Department of Community Development staff comments dated April 4, 2011 for the above referenced project, below please find our responses to the provisions listed in Ordinance 1 -11 for the proposed rehabilitation facility. A. Rehabilitation facilities shall be prohibited from being located within a one half mile radius of another rehabilitation facility. No other rehabilitation facilities are presently located within the Village of Tequesta limits. B. Ninety percent of the dwelling residential living units shall have a minimum of 575 square feet. The remaining ten percent of the dwelling living units may shall have a minimum of 500 square feet. As indicated in the site tables provided on Sheet SP -1 in the plans included as part of this submittal, a total of 75 units are proposed. No units contain less than 500 square feet and a maximum seven (7) units contain between 500 and 575 square feet. All remaining units are greater than 575 square feet. C. A maximum of forty percent (40 %) of the dwelling units shall be permitted to have two (2) bedrooms. In no case shall a dwelling unit have more than two (2) bedrooms. Two (2) bedroom dwelling units shall have a minimum of 750 square feet. All proposed units have two (2) bedrooms or less and no more than 30 units of the total 75 units proposed shall have two (2) bedrooms. Please see typical unit layouts provided with this submittal. All proposed two (2) bedroom units shall have a minimum of 750 square feet. As indicated in the unit information table provided on Sheet SP -1, all two bedroom units exceed this minimum. D. Occupant load for individuals receiving treatment shall not exceed the number of 10003A .ordinance.resp.041811.jcf bedrooms. Bedrooms and studio dwelling units shall be for single occupancy only. Overall density for a rehabilitation facility shall not exceed eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre. The property contains a total of 9.34 acres and shall provide 75 dwelling units in total. Each bedroom and each studio unit will have one occupant only which limits the total occupancy load as required. E. Dwelling units shall be configured as follows: 1. Studio units, if provided, shall have a one (1) combination bedroom /living area/ kitchen, and a private bathroom. 2. One - bedroom units, if provided, shall have one (1) private bedroom, one (1) private bathroom, private living areas and a private kitchen. 3. Two - bedroom units, if provided, shall have two (2) private bedrooms, two (2) private bathrooms, common living areas and a common kitchen. All units meet the required configurations. Please refer to unit layouts provided on Sheets A -107.1 and A -107.2 for typical unit configurations. F. Dwelling units shall not have separate individual mailing addresses. Rather, the rehabilitation facility shall maintain one master address which all residents shall reside under during their stay at the rehabilitation facility. Residents at the facility shall not maintain individual mailing addresses during their stay. G. Rehabilitation facilities must be equipped with a controlled space, effectively screened from public view, for arrivals and departures of patients. This space shall be large enough to accommodate an ambulance for transporting patients in and out of the facility. The resident arrival and departure area is located at the southwest corner of the building. It is screened from view with landscaping located around the building and along the perimeter of the site consisting of a layering of trees, palms, and hedges. This area of the building contains an overhang that will be located above an entrance walkway, but will not extend over the drive aisle. Ambulances will access a separate area of the building located at southeast corner. The space will be for the exclusive use of emergency vehicles and will be provided access to the rear of the building from a concrete access path adjacent to the space. Please see Sheet SP -1 provided in the plans included in this submittal for exact location and Sheet LP -2 for proposed landscaping along the site perimeter. H. Rehabilitation facilities shall be surrounded on all sides by a fence or wall located as close to the property lines as is practical. The fence or wall shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in height but may be as high as ten (10) feet, measured from finished grade, in order to ensure privacy for both rehabilitation facility patients and for Village residents. The fence or wall shall be constructed in such a manner as to compliment and accentuate the principal structures of the rehabilitation facility. Both the interior and exterior sides of the fence or wall shall be landscaped in accordance with the principles set forth at Sec. 10003A.ordinance.resp.04181 1.jcf 22 -84 of the Village Code of Ordinances. If a fence, wall or hedge is located on a corner lot or a double frontage lot, a vehicular and pedestrian visibility triangle of a size and dimension which complies with current traffic engineering standards of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the county shall be provided in both directions from the intersection point of the property lines. An existing aluminum rail fence with concrete columns currently exists around the perimeter of the property. The portions of the fence that are not presently 6 -ft. high will be modified to provide the required height. The site triangle indicated is provided on Sheet SP -1. As shown in the drawing, the distance between the edge of the property and the street is sufficiently large to prevent any issues with vehicle or pedestrian visibility. I. The rehabilitation facility shall include a backup generator system. The system shall be sized for the building occupancy load and have a fuel source sufficient to operate the facility for a minimum of seven days. Proposed generator, estimated at 1500 kW, is provided on the site. Please see Sheet SP -1 for specific generator location. J. The rehabilitation facility shall by separate agreement guarantee payment to the primary fire rescue provider for patient ambulance transport service. An agreement is presently being prepared the Village of Tequesta Fire Rescue. K. In conjunction with the application for special exception use, the rehabilitation facility shall submit a security plan that includes patient off -site visits. The security plan shall be approved by the Village Council with input from the Chief of Police. A revised security plan addressing Village comments was submitted via e-mail on April 7, 2011. A copy of the plan is also provided as part of this submittal. L. The rehabilitation facility shall submit quarterly reports to the Village's Community Development Director that establish and document compliance with all rehabilitation facility funding and occupancy requirements and restrictions. Not applicable at this time. M. In conjunction with the application for special exception use, the Village may, at its discretion, secure an impact analysis study, performed by an independent entity, detailing the proposed rehabilitation facility's projected community wide impacts. This study, if prepared, shall specifically address the rehabilitation facility's potential economic impact to the Village, the creation and continuation of jobs, the potential impact on law enforcement and criminal activity, and the potential impact on the Village's emergency medical resources. In addition, the study should address the proposed rehabilitation facility's impact on the quality of life for neighboring properties and the Village as a whole. An impact analysis has not been requested by Village for this project. 10003A.ordinance.resp.04181 1Jcf N. In conjunction with the application for a business tax receipt and the annual renewal thereof, a rehabilitation facility shall submit to the Village, in the form of a sworn affidavit by the rehabilitation facility's legal representative who is authorized to do so, written documentation that the rehabilitation facility is in compliance with all requirements of this section as well as the definitional requirements of Sec. 78 -4. Should the rehabilitation facility's business tax receipt be issued based upon a false affidavit, the Village may seek to impose all penalties allowed by law, pursuant to Chapter 70, Article 11 of the Village Code of Ordinances. Not applicable at this time. O. Should the rehabilitation facility at any time violate any of the requirements of this section or any of the definitional requirements of Sec. 78 -4, the Village may obtain relief through the code enforcement special magistrate process pursuant to Chapter 2, Article IV of the Village Code of Ordinances. For purposes of the code enforcement special magistrate process, each day that the rehabilitation facility is found to be in violation shall be considered a separate offense. In addition to the code enforcement special magistrate process, the Village may seek any and all relief available to it by law or in equity, including, but not limited to injunctive relief, recovery of money damages, or both. Not applicable at this time. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. incerely, Ja ' e Cabre - Frias, E.I.T CF /adr Encl. 10003A.ordinance. resp.041811.jcf ^ r JAC xa , u th a 0 PROJECT ,� l ei SITE Al, ... _ „ - r' y[ a _. x d ; ESTIMATED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 105 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM SEATING: 80 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PATIENTS: 80 PROJECT ADDRESS DeRose Design 217 VILLAGE BOULEVARD, TEQUESTA, FL FORS GMH TEQUESTA Consultants Inc. GMH TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC 1:200 LAND PLANNING • CIVIL • STRUCTURAL TITLE HOLDINGS LLC ENVIRONVENTAL •ELECTRICAL • MECHANICAL N CrNnFlCATE OF 470 S. ANDREWS AVENUE AERIAL MAP 0 100 200 AUTHORIZAMN / 4056 SUITE 206 POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA 33089 DRAWN- DATE- PROJECT NO DWG NO. 1984) 942-7703 MDM 1 02/01/11 10003A EX -2 vp I Page I of 6 GMH TEQUESTA HOLDINGS LLC Wellness & Recovery Center Security Plan GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC ( "GMH ") purchased 223 Village Boulevard, Tequesta, Florida on November 1, 2010. GMH intends to develop a wellness and recovery center at the aforementioned address (the "Center "). GMH's management philosophy is based on delivering a state -of -the -art wellness and recovery program to its clients and becoming a positive force within the Village of Tequesta. In connection therewith, GMH is committed to providing a safe living environment for our clients, staff and Village residents that ensures the Center will operate in harmony with surrounding neighbors. GMH shall certify to the Village that, in accordance with Ordinance No. I -11, the Center shall have and maintain twenty -four hour on -site security and twenty -four hour patient supervision by licensed nursing staff. GMH will ensure this safe living environment by implementing the following safety systems and protocols. 1. External Security GMH shall implement the following external security systems to enhance the safety and protection of the Center, Center staff, clients and Village residents: A. The Center perimeter shall be monitored via twenty -four hour video surveillance. The shift supervisor shall routinely monitor and log the perimeter surveillance on an hourly basis via video screens located in an office within the Center. All video surveillance shall be recorded. Any unauthorized perimeter breach (ingress or egress) or potential security threat shall be reported to the Village of Tequesta Police Department. B. The Center shall be entirely surrounded (excluding the Old Dixie Highway entrance areas and Tequesta Water Treatment Center border) by a six feet high concrete block pillar and iron fence. GMH shall install a gate at the Old Dixie Highway entrance area. C. The Center shall have site lighting throughout the property with pole lights that address parking lot and common area lighting needs without exceeding the light spillage requirements on adjacent properties. D. The Center shall sticker, log and, if necessary, report to a local towing company (Center to enter into contract with a local towing company) any cars improperly parked or cars not authorized (i.e., vehicles without proper parking sticker and/or unauthorized guests) to park at the Center. E. Every night a designated staff member shall perform a nightly exterior lighting log as well as a Center's equipment check to ensure all lighting GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC • 10 Campus Boulevard • Newtown Square, PA 19073 610 - 355 -8000 • 610 - 359 -0571 FAX a Page 2 of 6 and equipment is operating without error. In addition, staff will provide a nightly patrol log to the Center's operations manager for their review. F. The Center has 10 first -floor units with exterior doors that will be equipped with an internal alarm that will notify the reception staff if opened between 10:00pm and 5:00am. 2. Internal/Structural Security GMH shall implement the following internal /structural security systems and protocols to enhance the safety and protection of the Center, Center staff, clients and Village residents: A. The Center shall meet or exceed all current fire /life /safety codes including hard -wired smoke detectors and a twenty -four hour monitored fire suppressant system. B. The main entry doors shall be visually monitored twenty-four hours a day by dedicated reception staff. The main entry doors shall be the sole means of entry /exit (subject to fire /life /safety codes) for all Center visitors. C. All doors (other than main entry doors and staff /client entrance) shall be panic -bar doors (i.e., only open from within the Center). D. All windows shall have locks and all windows at the Center are double pane, hurricane rated which enhances energy efficiency and improves client security. E. All Center staff members shall undergo safety related training (including fire extinguisher training), violence prevention and CPR certification courses. The Center shall utilize the Crisis Prevention Institute (training module summaries attached hereto as Exhibit A) training modules which involve both classroom and hands -on demonstrations of verbal and physical interventions. Training is required upon hiring and every two (2) years thereafter. CPR certification will be conducted by local, certified medical professionals. For more information on training modules offered by the Crisis Prevention Institute, please visit their web -site at www.crisisprevention.com. F. Certain Center staff shall undergo additional violence prevention training to minimize any potential or actual verbal or physical threats from clients, staff and/or visitors and to subdue such threat until the Village Police and/or emergency medical personnel arrive on scene. Every Center employee with direct client contact (close to 100% of staff) shall undergo advanced training (Crisis Prevention Institute), including physical interventions utilizing holds and restraints. Every shift shall have at least two (2) individuals that have completed the advanced training modules. GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC • 10 Campus Boulevard • Newtown Square, PA 19073 610 - 355 -8000 • 610 - 359 -0571 FAX Page 3 of 6 3. Therapeutic Pass Security GMH shall implement the following security systems and protocols in connection with clients leaving the Center on "therapeutic passes." Therapeutic passes are reviewed weekly by the Center's entire treatment staff and are a privilege and not a right. Time in the program does not guarantee any particular level and clients are granted said passes based on the following tiered system: A. LEVEL 1: Clients are restricted to the Center and are prohibited from leaving (unless Client leaves the program AMA (i.e., Against Medical Advice)). Clients are typically within Level 1 during their first week of residency. B. LEVEL 2: Clients are permitted to leave the Center, on a supervised basis (i.e., accompanied at all times by Center staff member), for the following reasons: 1. Attend 12 -step Meetings (evenings only — approx. 5 clients on any given evening) 2. Personal Errands (one time per week — approx. 4 -8 clients per week) 3. Recreational Excursions (weekends only — approx. 4 -8 clients per weekend) Clients are typically within Level 2 during their second week of residency. Clients that become separated from the Center staff member accompanying them on their excursion shall be contacted via cell phone. If Client does not confirm return time or fails to answer the telephone, a designated Center staff member and a co- lateral contact (e.g., family member) are immediately contacted to attempt to determine the Client's location. A Center staff member may attempt to locate the Client by driving to the Client's pre- approved destination. If the co- lateral contact is unaware of the Client's location, did not locate the Client at the pre - approved destination point and the Client has not returned within one hour of separation, the Village of Tequesta Police Department will be contacted and informed of the client's physical description. If a Village of Tequesta police officer locates the missing client, the police officer will contact a designated Center staff member and said staff member will pick up the client (with police officer supervision, if necessary). C. LEVEL 3: Level 2 privileges apply in addition to the following: 1. No more than two pre- approved weekend excursions of 3 -5 hours in duration (in no event may client be out past 10:00pm) 2. Must be accompanied by pre- approved individual (e.g., sponsor, friend, relative or fellow client) GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC 9 10 Campus Boulevard • Newtown Square, PA 19073 610 - 355 -8000 • 610 - 359 -0571 FAX Page 4 of 6 Clients are typically within Level 3 during their third week of residency. Clients that do not return to the Center within one hour of their designated return time are contacted via cell phone and their pre- approved chaperone shall also be contacted via cell phone. A Center staff member may attempt to locate the Client by driving to the Client's pre- approved destination. If Client and/or pre- approved chaperone does not confirm return time, is not located by Center staff member or fails to answer the telephone within two hours of their designated return time, a co- lateral contact (e.g., family member) is contacted to attempt to determine the Client's location. If the co- lateral contact is unaware of the Client's location and the Client has not returned within three hours of their designated return time, the Village of Tequesta Police Department will be contacted and informed of the client's physical description. If a Village of Tequesta police officer locates the missing client, the police officer will contact a designated Center staff member and said staff member will pick up the client (with police officer supervision, if necessary). D. LEVEL 4: Level 3 privileges apply in addition to the following: 1. One independent, pre- approved weekend excursion of 3 -8 hours in duration (in no event may client be out past 10:00pm). Clients are typically within Level 4 during their fourth through sixth weeks of residency. Clients that do not return to the Center within one hour of their designated return time are contacted via cell phone. A Center staff member may attempt to locate the Client by driving to the Client's pre- approved weekend destination. If Client does not confirm return time, is not located by Center staff member or fails to answer the telephone within two hours of their designated return time, a co- lateral contact (e.g., family member) is contacted to attempt to determine the Client's location. If the co- lateral contact is unaware of the Client's location and the Client has not returned within three hours of their designated return time, the Village of Tequesta Police Department will be contacted and informed of the client's physical description. If a Village of Tequesta police officer locates the missing client, the police officer will contact a designated Center staff member and said staff member will pick up the client (with police officer supervision, if necessary). E. LEVEL 5: Level 4 privileges apply in addition to the following: 1. Two independent, pre- approved weekend excursions of 3 -12 hours in duration (in no event may client be out past 10:00pm). Clients are typically within Level 5 during their seventh through twelfth weeks of residency. Clients that do not return to the Center within one GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC • 10 Campus Boulevard e Newtown Square, PA 19073 610 - 355 -8000 • 610 - 359 -0571 FAX Page S of 6 hour of their designated return time are contacted via cell phone. A Center staff member may attempt to locate the Client by driving to the Client's pre- approved weekend destination. If Client does not confirm return time, is not located by Center staff member or fails to answer the telephone within two hours of their designated return time, a co- lateral contact (e.g., family member) is contacted to attempt to determine the Client's location. If the co- lateral contact is unaware of the Client's location and the Client has not returned within three hours of their designated return time, the Village of Tequesta Police Department will be contacted and informed of the client's physical description. If a Village of Tequesta police officer locates the missing client, the police officer will contact a designated Center staff member and said staff member will pick up the client (with police officer supervision, if necessary). 4. Client Admissions Agreement Each client shall sign a comprehensive admissions agreement with Center. The admissions agreement outlines all of the rules and regulations concerning client behavior and visitor behavior and shall be an enforceable, binding legal agreement. Any violations of the rules and regulations potentially puts a client in default of their admissions agreement and may subject them to disciplinary action, tier reduction (e.g., from a Level 2 status to a Level 1 status) as well as expulsion from the program and funds forfeiture. If a Client that is expelled from the program demonstrates any action or activity that may pose a threat to themselves, a staff member, visitor or Village of Tequesta resident, the Village of Tequesta Police Department shall be contacted and potentially asked to assist with the expulsion. Clients expelled from the program shall be escorted from the Center via pre - arranged transportation and shall be accompanied by a staff member trained in the Crisis Prevention Institute's advanced training modules. If the Client is local (i.e., 50 mile radius from the Center), the Client shall be escorted/transported directly home. If the Client is not local, the Center shall attempt to purchase a same -day airline ticket for Client and accompany Client to the airport. Client conduct must never violate the rights of other clients and/or staff, visitors and/or residents of neighboring properties. Clients that violate the following rules and regulations potentially place themselves into default under their respective admissions agreement: A. Being loud, obnoxious, disorderly, boisterous or unlawful. B. Disturbing or threatening the rights, comfort, health, safety or convenience of anyone in or near the Center. C. Disturbing or disrupting the business operation of the Center. D. Engaging in or threatening violence of any kind. E. Displaying, discharging, or possessing a weapon on the premises. F. Possessing, selling or manufacturing illegal drugs of any kind or type or possessing any illegal drug paraphernalia in the Center or anywhere on the premises. GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC • 10 Campus Boulevard • Newtown Square, PA 19073 610- 355 -8000 • 610 - 359 -0571 FAX Page 6 of 6 The Village of Tequesta Police Department will be contacted immediately in the event any client, staff member or visitor engages in any criminal activity or poses a potential threat to themselves, a staff member, visitor or Village of Tequesta resident. 5. Client Exclusion Criteria: Potential clients shall be denied admission to the Center if any of the following criteria are met during the pre- admission screening process: A. The potential client exhibits severe suicidal, homicidal or acute mood symptoms /thought disorder. B. The potential client does not voluntarily consent to admission or treatment. C. The potential client has medical conditions or impairments that would prevent beneficial utilization of services, or is not stabilized on medications. D. The potential client exhibits a major mental health disorder (e.g., psychotic symptoms). E. The potential client has been identified with a history of violent behavior or threats to the public heath, safety and welfare or the health, safety and welfare of other patients. 6. Contact Information In the event of an emergency at the Center, staff shall immediately contact 911 emergency services. In the event staff needs to contact the Village of Tequesta Police Department or Fire Department, Center staff shall utilize the below contact information: Police Department: 561- 768 -0500 Fire Department: 561- 768 -0550 GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC * 10 Campus Boulevard • Newtown Square, PA 19073 610- 355 -8000 9 610 - 359 -0571 FAX Blogs News Legislation Contact Shopping Cart t' 888.426.2184 Search for: Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Home > Specialties > Nonviolent Crisis Intervention > Our Program > Program Overview nonviolent crisis intervention Certified Instructors, check out what's new or begin by Renisterina if this is your first tin. Our Program Create a Safe and Caring Work Environment to the new site. Program Overview Email Addr 9 All groups attend the same session on the first day, but the Workshop and Instructor Certification Instructor Certification participants continue with more in -depth training and practical techniques on the second day. Instructor Certification participants receive Password Meeting Standards two additional days of training to develop their intervention skills and learn to Program Benefits conduct in -house programs of their own. Forgot your Password? Frequently Asked Questions One -Day Introductory Seminar Create an Account Continuing Education Units Gain a basic understanding of crisis intervention methods. Free and easy! Gain immediate On -Site Training On the first day of Nonviolent Crisis Intervention ® access to additional information and training, the emphasis is on early resources. Required for Certified intervention and nonphysical methods for preventing or managing disruptive Instructors who are first time International Training behavior. CPI's Personal SafetyTechniques for staff are also demonstrated and visitors to our new site. practiced in this seminar to prepare staff to safely remove themselves and others Hybrid Training from a dangerous situation. You'll learn: Register Now >> • How to identify behaviors that could lead to a crisis. Advanced and • How to most effectively respond to each behavior to prevent the situation from escalating. Instructor Excellence s , • How to use verbal and nonverbal techniques to defuse hostile behavior and Renewal Courses resolve a crisis before it becomes violent. • How to cope with your own fear and anxiety. - - • How to use CPI's principles of Personal Safety to avoid injury if behavior becomes physical. AkM Feeds Two -Day Comprehensive Workshop Reinforce preventive techniques and learn principles of nonharmful Cpg Mews physical intervention. CPI Holds First Nonviolent Crisis The second day of training expands on crisis intervention methods to include the Interventiowl Instructor study and practice of nonharmful Nonviolent Physical Crisis Intervention These certification Program in the ues are taught to be used as a last resort when an individual becomes an Netherlands techniques 9 03.31.2011 immediate danger to self or others. You'll learn: Details on 2011 CPI International • When it's appropriate to physically intervene. Instructors' Conference Now • team intervention strategies and techniques. Available How to develop g q 03.10.2011 • How to assess the physical and psychological well -being of those involved in a crisis. Dr. Randy Boardman Speaks at • How to safely and effectively control and transport an individual. Hearing for Oregon House Bill 2939 • How to maintain rapport with the acting -out individual. 02.23.2011 • Key steps for debriefing after a crisis. • How to properly document an incident. CPI Blogs Four -Day Instructor Certification Program Teamwork and Partnering With Parents and Families Become certified to teach additional staff at your facility. Susan Keith 03.28.2011 On days three and four of the program, participants learn how to master the intervention techniques they have learned so they are able to teach them to staff at commemorating Two Years With CPI their organization. In addition, participants are taught how to effectively conduct Tony ]ace 03.28.2011 The Impact of Dementia on Driving and tailor the Nonviolent Crisis Intervention program for in -house training. You'll Chris Ebell 03.24.2011 learn: • How to tailor program content to address workplace realities. • How to use the Participant Workbook as a valuable teaching tool and the Instructor Manual as a reference tool. • Effective techniques for facilitating a group and methods to enhance adult learning. • How to objectively test the participants' competency in the program concepts and techniques. • How to maintain consistency in instruction and avoid "training drift." • How to best educate staff about the risks of using restraints. • How to develop your own presentation style. • How to handle difficult questions and manage challenging participants. • How to develop proficiencies in teaching personal safety and physical intervention. • The key components of an effective, ongoing Training Process. • How to best utilize CPI's free follow -up services to customize and support your facility's ongoing training. Blogs News Legislation Contact Shopping Cart r 888.426.2184 Search for: Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Home > Spa: lames > Nonviolent Crisis Intervention nonviolent cri sis intervention "The most frequent response we hear over and over is, 'This is the best training I've ever had. Certified Instructors, check out CM Why has no one taught me this before? new or begin by Reaisterina if this is your first tin^ E Susan Bowden - Lake Ozark, MO to the new site. Email Ad dress Our Program Pas sword On -Site Training - Forgot Your Password? International Training Hybrid Training Create an Account Free and easy! Gain immediate access to additional information and Advanced and resources. Reouired for Certified Instructor Excellence Instructors who are first time Renewal Courses visitors to our new site. >. :;. Register Now >> ....... _ Nonviolent CrisislnterventioiP Training a a Free Training This program, considered the worldwide standard for crisis prevention and Resources intervention training he p your organization: (up to a US $439 value) • Reduce the risk of injury. • Comply with legislative mandates. IK Nom &wds • Meet regulatory/accreditation standards. PW 3 • Improve staff retention. ' • Minimize exposure to liability. eNewsletter M CPI Mews • Promote the philosophy of Care, Welfare, Safety, and Security . Subscribe [o the Prevention CPT Holds First Nonviolent Crisis Perspectives Monthly eNewsletter Interventions Instructor "estimenials I Case Studies I Program Benefits Certification Program in the ........... ..e�. ,- �<.,.,<.,,r,..,<.,.<.,<.�, -_ . _..,��,.,,.,..<.,.,...,.,. .u...,.v -,. .,.......,.,. ...:. ,..,.,,.,..,., Netherlands 03.31.2011 Training Options to Meet Your Specific Needs Details on 2011 CPI International Instructors' Conference Now Positive Behavior Nonviolent Crisis Intervention training focuses on prevention and offers proven available Support strategies for safely defusing anxious, hostile, or violent behavior at the earliest 03.10.2011 Examine how CPI's Nonviolent possible stage. Choose from the following training options: Dr. Randy Boardman Speaks at Crisis Intervention training Hearing for Oregon House Bill 2939 supports PBIS concepts, premises, and strategies. One -Day Introductory Seminar 02.23.2011 Learn to organize your thinking about how behavior escalates and how to respond appropriately during moments of chaos. CPI Blogs Two -Day Comprehensive Workshop Teamwork and Partnering with Parents and Families Joint Commission and Build on content from the Introductory Seminar by reinforcing preventive Susan Keith 03.28.2011 CMS techniques and practicing the principles of nonharmful physical intervention. Tony lace C o m m e morating Two Years with CPI Do you comply with Joint Commission and CMS Four -Day Instructor Certification Program T requirements regarding Gain the skills and confidence to teach the program to staff at your facility. The Impact of Dementia on Driving Restraint and Seclusion? CPI Chris Ebell 03.24.2011 can help. Instructor Certification is the premier choice of most organizations. Program Ove;vie� °a Learning in Action Video Watch an overview of a live Nonviolent Crisis Intervention training session. Take a glimpse at the program content, and see how group discussions, role -play, and activities /exercises are used to enhance adult learning. Blogs News Legislation Se Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Horne > Specialties > Nonviolent Crisis Intervention > On -Site Training nonviolent Crisis intervention Our Program On -site Training On -Site Training Quality Training — Delivered Thousands of organizations around the world have taken advantage of CPI's ons Benefits training —an effective option if you have a number of staff members who need Mini Courses training. Just pick a date that's convenient for you and we'll handle the rest of tt details. You can count on CPI's experience, knowledge, and dedication to provid( Needs Assessment what could very well be the most important on -site training program your staff t Program Sponsorship ever participated in. International Training All Nonviolent Crisis Intervention course options can be brought on -site to your facility including: Hybrid Training • One -Day Introductory Seminar • Two -Day Comprehensive Workshop Advanced and • Four -Day Instructor Certification Instructor Excellence Renewal Courses Additionally, if you already have Certified Instructors on staff, all of our Advance Courses are available as well. The Nonviolent Crisis Intervention training program provides a solid foundation helping your organization build an effective crisis prevention and intervention training plan. You can add options —and depth —to your training experience by enhancing skill sets that support specific program content. These additional trair opportunities can be added on before or after an onsite training and are also available as stand -alone sessions: CPI Matters at Work • Autism Awareness • Workplace Bullying CPI Mini Courses • Safe Travels: Preventing and Reducing Disruptive Behaviors While Transporting Students • Reactive or Proactive: Improving Your Crisis Response Teams • Be Prepared: Considerations When Facing Crisis Situations Alone • Breaking Up Fights: Advancing the Physical Safety of All Blogs News Legislation Se Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Nome > Specialties > Prepare Training p repare training "The program empowers employees to bring E about peaceful, win -win solutions to workplace conflicts." ; AI Goodjoin — Bronx, NY Our Program On -Site Training Definition of Workplace Violence 1: \, x ', r Workplace Violence News IL ;r Free a ook Proactive Strategies for Promoting a Safe and prepare TrainingA Program Respectful Workplace This flexible training results in confident employees who respond safely and consistently to a variety of challenging situations. It helps proactive organization 1, `�k +ig. 'i�l �� '� +i� • Reduce disruptive incidents. • Prevent workplace violence. Leam More • Lower the risk of injury. Workplace Violence • Improve customer and employee relations. Har.ressme • Reduce exposure to liability. • Build a culture of Respect, Service, and Safety at Work Testimonials I Program Ben( � �_ .aYa..a�,m,gss ..r , �._. �3. sqa. .xmxmxsgmsmsgmsgmsxgx�,.K . x , �. �. xexffx. qsB., Bmsgm. . Bsgmsxmesexsm gmsmmsmx.m..ro..g, W or k place Violence Training Options to Meet Your Specific Needs News The Prepare Training program components are flexible and can be easily adapts to a variety of business environments. Choose from the following program optior to help tailor the training to the evolving needs of your organization: One -Day Foundation Seminar (Foundation Course and one Topic Module) Foundation Course Acquire the skills to respond effectively to anxious, irrational, angry, hostile, or potentially dangerous behavior and minimize the negative impact of challenging encounters. Topic Modules Meet the unique needs of your organization by combining a two -hour Topic Module with the Foundation Course to create a full day of training focused on a specific issue. Three -Day Instructor Certification Program Master the intervention techniques taught in the Foundation Course and become certified to tailor the program for in -house training. Instructor Certification with Violence Response Procedures I Learn and become certified to teach strategies that bridge prevention into preparedness and physical responses that allow individuals to remove themselves from a physical attack without harming or containing the aggressor. Program Overview O_P Site Mao Career Opportunities Privacy Policv Contact Us Like us, fol © 2011 CPI. All Rights Reserved Crisis Prevention Institute, Inc. 10850 W. Park Place Suite 600 Milwaukee, WI 53224 t•888.426.2184 f•414.979.7098 International Contacts: Australia 800.55.3247 Canada 800.558.8976 Ireland 800.558.077 New Zealand 0800.44.9187 UK 0800. Blogs News Legislation Se Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Horne > Specialties > Prepare Training > On -Site Training prepare training Our Program On -Site Training Thousands of organizations around the world have taken advantage of CPI :7- air; training —an effective option if you have a number of staff members who need On -Site Training training. Just pick a date that's convenient for you and we'll handle the rest of tl Needs Assessment details. You can count on CPI's experience, knowledge, and dedication to providf what could very well be the most important on -site training program your staff h Definition of Workplace ever participated in. The many benefits of on -site training include opportunities 1 Violence Tailor the Content Role- plays, examples, and scenarios can be tailored to your organization': Workplace Violence specific needs and challenges. This is guaranteed to make training unique News and relevant which, in turn, makes utilizing the proven strategies highly effective during a crisis situation. Protect Your Investment Your on -site account manager will support your organization's training effi and help protect your investment. You'll receive quarterly follow -up calls Z reports on how your Instructors are maintaining their certification. Schedule at Your Convenience Training can be scheduled to fit your schedule, at a time and location that are most convenient for staff. This makes it easy to train staff on different shifts. Maximize Your Training Budget You can eliminate travel and lodging expenses for employees. Without ev( leaving the building, staff can gain new skills, boost their confidence, and improve their productivity. For more information about our on -site training options and how to implement si training at your organization, please email us at ptp @crisisprevention.com or cal to speak with an On -Site Training Specialist at 800.787.5166. You can also use c On -Site Needs Assessment Tool. _ ®,.,.., H fi R E CPZ Blogs Teamwork and Partnering With Parents and Families Susan Keith 03.28.2011 Commemorating Two Years With CPI Tony ]ace 03.28.2011 The Impact of Dementia on Driving Chris Ebell 03.24.2011 Site Mao Career Opportunities Privacy Policy Contact Us Like © 2011 CPI. All Rights Reserved Crisis Prevention Institute, Inc. 10850 W. Park Place Suite 600 Milwaukee, WI 53224 t•888.426.2184 f•414.979.7098 International Contacts: Australia 800.55.3247 Canada 800.558.8976 Ireland 800.558.077 New Zealand 0800.44.9187 U t Blogs News Legislation Se Specialties Training and Events Products Resources About CPI Home > Training and Events > Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program Tue 5/17/2011 Hollywood FL US Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program English ' When Where Tuesday 5/17/2011 - Friday 5/20/2011 Holiday Inn Ft Lauderdale Airport 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM daily 2905 Sheridan Street Hollywood FL 33020 US Course Options Currency: US Dollars Type Price Quantity One -Day Seminar $509.00 USD 0.,, Two -Day Workshop $999.00 USD 0;, n Four -Day Instructor $1729.00 USD Certification Program Four -Day Instructor Certification Program with $1854.00 USD 0 , - DVD Contact us if you need to register more than five attendees. Course Description The cornerstone of CPI since 1980, this program is considered the worldwide standard for crisis prevention a intervention training. With a core philosophy of providing for the Care, Welfare, Safety, and SecuritySM of everyone involved in a crisis situation, the program's proven strategies give human service providers and educators the skills to safely and effectively respond to anxious, hostile, or violent behavior while balancing 1 responsibilities of care. One -Day Seminar First day of the program - emphasis on early intervention. Two -Day Workshop First two days of the program - physical intervention principles Four -Day Instructor Certification Program All four days of the program - become certified to teach staff. Four -Day Instructor Certification Program with DVD Add any CPI DVD to Instructor Certification for just $125. Site Map Career Opportunities Privacy Policy Contact Us Like us © 2011 CPI. All Rights Reserved Crisis Prevention Institute, Inc. 10850 W. Park Place Suite 600 Milwaukee, WI 53224 t•888.426.2184 f•414.979.7098 International Contacts: Australia 800.55.3247 Canada 800.558.8976 Ireland 800.558.077 New Zealand 0800.44.9187 UK 0800. 1 Thomas A. Hall, Inc. 1355 Adams Street Hollywood, FL 33019 954- 2884447 tomha111234@gmall.com April 18, 2011 Janice Cabrera - Frias, EIT Project Engineer DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. 470 South Andrews Avenue, Suite 206 Pompano Beach, Florida RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC — Revised Traffic Study Response to Comments Project No.: 201017.02 Dear Janice: This letter is in response to additional comments received today from the Village of Tequesta's traffic consultant. Those comments, and our responses, follow: 1. The driveway volumes in the revised analysis assume a driveway connection to Village Boulevard. As previously mentioned, the Village of Tequesta is requesting that the driveway connection to Village Boulevard be closed. Driveway volumes should only be shown at the driveway connection to Old Dixie Highway. Response: At the time of the most recent analysis update, no direction was received from the client asking for this revision in access. However, that direction was received today and all analyses have been revised to reflect this change. 2. The project trips in the significance and link analyses are incorrect for the roadway segment of Old Dixie Highway from Tequesta Drive to County Line Road. The analysis should account for the highest volume of project trips on any portion of the roadway segment analyzed. For example, during AM peak hour conditions, the inbound (northbound) travel movement from the south has the highest peak -hour, peak - direction volume. The inbound AM peak hour trips are 13 of which 80 percent travel on the roadway segment between Village Boulevard and the project driveway connection. Therefore, 13 * 0.80 = 11 project trips. In Table 2, the AM project trips are shown as 5. The PM trips are also incorrect. Please revise analysis. Response: The project trips have been revised. 3. The project distribution map does not indicate what percent of project trips travel on County Line Road or Tequesta Drive from Old Dixie Highway to US -1. Therefore, the project trips in the link significance analysis could not be verified. Please provide that information. Response: Figure 2 - Distribution and Assignment, has been revised to show the requested distribution on the outer links. Janice Cabrera - Frias, EIT April 18, 2011 Page 2 of 3 4. The traffic study mentions that the project distribution is based on a review of existing turning movement counts, obtained from Palm Beach County, at the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and Village Boulevard. The response to comments letter indicates that the counts have been included in Appendix A. The counts, however, are not attached in the Appendix. Response: Please accept our apology. The counts were inadvertently left out of the previous submittal. They were not, however, from Palm Beach County. They are now included in Appendix A. 5. Test One, Part One: It is still unclear how the total volumes were derived for the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and County Line Road. Background (2011) turning movement volumes should be summed together with anticipated project trips to determine total traffic conditions. A comparison of background volumes obtained from Palm Beach County, which are included in Appendix A, with the HCS worksheets reveal that project trips are being added to movements that would not seem relevant for project traffic. Other movements, where project trips are expected, do not reflect project trips. For example, for PM peak -hour conditions, two (2) project trips exit the site and travel northbound towards the intersection of County Line Road and Old Dixie Highway. Therefore, (2) project trips should be assigned to the northbound movements at the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and County Line Road. A comparison of volumes from Palm Beach County and the volumes input into the HCS analysis reveal no project trips added to background traffic conditions. This is not the only error. Please show calculations of background and project trips for the movements at this intersection and revise the analysis accordingly. Response: The traffic volumes have been revised. 6. Test One, Part One: There appears to still be an error in the CMA spreadsheets. Under the critical volume analysis for the northbound and southbound movements, the through plus right -turn volumes should be divided by two (2) to obtain the volume per lane. This is because there are two (2) southbound and northbound through lanes. In addition, a reduction of 60 vehicles is taken for right turns on red with an exclusive right -turn lane per Palm Beach County guidelines. The westbound right -turn movement is not an exclusive lane and, therefore, should not assume a reduction of 60 vehicles for the right turns on red. The spreadsheet should be revised to show accurate results. Response: The analysis, and traffic volumes, has been revised. 7. Test One, Part One: The volumes for the intersection of Old Dixie Highway at Tequesta Drive are incorrect. Existing and background volumes are not consistent with the volumes from Palm Beach County attached in Appendix A of the report. Also, as previously mentioned, the distribution along Tequesta Drive is not provided; therefore, project trips at that intersection could not be verified. Response: The analysis, traffic volumes and distribution information have been revised. 8. The LOS E peak -hour, peak - direction threshold for Old Dixie Highway is 880, not 860. Please revise Table 5. Y Janice Cabrera -Frias, EIT April 18, 2011 Page 3 of 3 Response: The table has been revised. I want to take note of the Village of Tequesta's reviewer, Natalia McGuckian, P.E. Ms. McGuckian provided excellent review comments and was also very helpful in resolving some misunderstandings on our part regarding those comments. Her assistance was greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this response to comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Hall President TAH/kh CAWork\201017 - Tequesta DevelopmentWpril 2011 Report Revision\Report\Response to Comments 04182011.doc r Since 1979 DeRose Design Consultants, Incorporated STRUCTURAL • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • ELECTRICAL • MECHANICAL �� ❑ 470 South Andrews Ave. • Suite 206 9620 N.E. 2nd Ave. • Suite 203 Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Miami Shores, FL 33138 954- 942 -7703 • Fax 954 -942 -7933 305 - 249 -3674 • Fax: 305 - 249 -3410 Website: http : / /www.deroseconsultants.com April 18, 2011 Village of Tequesta Community Development 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 Attn: Ms. Nilsa Zacarias, AICP RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings LLC Special Exception Application OPN: 10003A Dear Ms. Zacarias: Below please find our responses to the comments provided by Russell K. White, Public Service Manager, dated April 12, 2011, for the above referenced project: Comment 1: The drainage statement is adequate. RESPONSE: Comment addressed and approved by the Village. Comment 2: They will need approval from the LRECD to do any improvements on the existing cleanouts. RESPONSE: The project shall undergo all pertinent LRECD reviews and permits shall be secured prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. Comment 3: 1 will accept lowering the existing water services and appurtenances, but will require a meter box be set over them to avoid losing the locations. Also, will the Village ever allow townhomes to be built this close to the proposed improvement of the property? RESPONSE: The owner has no intention of developing the townhome lots previously proposed for the property at any time in the near future. It is their intention only to perserve the existing infrastructure if they should ever want to change the proposed use of the property. This application for special exception is strictly for a proposed rehabilitation facility. A change of use would be required to provide townhomes on the site. 10003A. public .works.com.resp.041811.jcf Comment 4: When the Alternative Living Services property was demolished and the Crossings were built, the water main was relocated. The existing plan does not reflect the actual location of the utility easements. It still shows the easement over the old location of the water mains. RESPONSE: The owner is in the process of amending the plat for the property. As part of this process, the existing easements will be updated to reflect the actual utility locations. Comment 5: The Utilities Department requires 24 hours notice prior to any work being done on our facilities. RESPONSE: The proper notification shall be provided prior to work. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Ice Cabrera -Fria , E.I.T. JCF /adr Encl. 10003A. public .works.com.resp.041811.jcf GENTILE George G. Gentile, FA5LA HOLLOWAY M, Troy Holloway, A5LA O'MAHONEY Emily O'Mahoney, A5LA - 1 A T E 5. I N . 1 31`1d5capeArchitect5 Planners and Environmental - Ccn5ultant5 LC-0000177 April, 19, 2011, James Weinand Fire Chief .& Acting Community Development Director Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC — Futures Wellness Center, Tequesta, Florida Dear Mr. Weinand: - As requested, please find attached hereto, for your distribution and review, fifteen (15) copies of our revised landscape development plan. Pursuant to the comment letter from Parker - Yannette design group, inc, dated April 13, 2011, for the, above referenced project, on behalf of GMH, we offer the following . responses. We have provided our response in bold italics below each comment. Perimeter Hardscaae/Landscape 1. West and South Property Lines: a. Based on the response letter statement that - the fence and columns into the property.is economically prohibitive and not possible along the south property line' due to site constraints and would not allow for trees and palms between the fence and sidewalk due to overhead power -lines along the west property line; please provide the following: i. _ Submit more detailed information regarding proposed plant material within the Old .Dixie Highway right -of -way. Specifically, types of plant material, sizes and approximate quantities. Provide right -of -way planting criteria from-Palm- Beach County for reference. = As discussed, the planting plans for' Old Dixie R.O. W. are in process. We have talked to PBC Land Development Streetscape and they are amendable to our planting within this section of R. 0. W. We are in the process of gathering the proper information necessary for preparing these plans - for all to .review These Plans will be provided ' to the Village of Tequesta, for. your approval prior to submitting to PBC for permit ii. Submit existing and proposed fence and column details including ornamentation at the top of the proposed fence (see attached Schematic Fence and Column Elevations "A" and `B "). Based on my field measurements, the existing fence on the west property line has sections that are as low as 5' -4" ht. In 'addition, the west end of the fence on the south property line has sections that are as low as 5' -7" ht. - As suggested, GMH will modify .the existing aluminum fence section in lieu of raising the entire panel. Please see the proposed fence modification detail provided on ,Sheet C-5. GMH does not want to add ornamentation at - the top, since the desired effect is to flood the boundary with an abundance of beautiful landscape; , hence GMH's desire not to draw attention to the fence. 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 10 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561- 575 -9557 561- 575 -5260 FAX PlTequestoeVdfago- Bibb c(GW rCapital) 10 -08021Applications & ApprovalslCorrospondencelparker yannette response Itr 4-19 - 11.doc GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Response Letter 41181,11 - Page 3 of 5 2. North Property Line: �. Label the proposed secondary access point at. the north property line. It appears to be shown graphically, but has not been labeled. - The secondary access point has been labeled b. Label the proposed berming on the plan. - For clarity; the proposed berming has been labeled throughout the landscape plan. c. As noted in my previous letter, per Village Code, the interior and exterior sides of the perimeter fence shall be landscaped. Because the fence is on the property line, one (1) of two (2) options must be pursued. Either the fence must be relocated into the property to allow for plants on the exterior, or, the applicant - must apply fora variance for this condition. - As requested, the 6' chain link fence will be shifted 3' south (into the subject property) to allow for a hedge to be planted on the north side of the fence, buffering the water treatment plan 3. East Property Line: a. Please provide a letter from the owner of the Sterling House Facility, prior to the Special Exception meeting, that the proposed landscape buffer is.acceptable. ` . - GMH is in the process of acquiring a letter from the Sterling House and anticipates being able to provide the letter to the Village prior to the meeting. Interior Hards6 e/Landscaye: - 1. Recreation Area and North Portion of Property: a. If the existing loop road is to remain "as is ", then additional shade trees and palms should be provided to create a more pleasurable walking experience. Live Oak trees, 14' -16' ht., 60' o.c., will take years to provide a shaded walking corridor. - As indicated on the previous landscape plan, additional palms, trees and shaded seating areas have been provided in this area. We feel that the proper and healthy" spacing for Live Oaks is 50 -60' which allows for the normal growth & large canopy spreads expected for Live Oaks. Many street tree Live Oaks in this area have been planted too closely, resulting in random tree removals to allow for the continued and uninterrupted canopy growth of the Live Oaks b. The orientation of the basketball court has been revised incorrectly. The hoop is oriented to the south and should be oriented to the north. The volleyball court has not been reoriented. The orientation of the basketball court has been revised as requested The volleyball court can not be oriented north /south due to the existing site constraints. However, this " court will only. be utilized by the patients of the facility and will -not be used for public recreational or tournament play. 2. Main Building: and South Portion of Property: a. The sizes of the palms were increased a negligible amount per my previous review letter (8' -10' g.w: to 10' g.w. versus 8' -10' g.w. to recommended 12' -22' g.w.). Please provide renderings of the west and south elevations of the main building showing -the proposed plant material. A rendering of the south and west elevations will be provided on Wednesday, April 20`", prior to the meeting. GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Response Letter 4118111 Page 4 of 5 Plant List. Details and Specifications Sheet: 1. Canopy spreads have not been noted for the Live Oaks, Slash Pines, Gumbo Limbos, Dwarf Poincianas, Jatrophas and Southern Red Cedars. ,Calipers have not been noted for the Live Oaks, Japanese Blueberries, Japanese Fem Trees, Magnolias, Slash Pines, Gumbo Limbos and Dwarf Poincianas. Please add this information to the specifications. - Approximate canopy spreads and calipers for the above trees are provided. 2. The Magnolia tree sizes have not been revised per the new specifications. - The Magnolia tree sizes have been revised 3. With the exception of the Queen Emma Crinum Lilies and Lantana, none of the spreads have been indicated for the shrubs and'groundcover. Please add this information to the plans. - Providing spreads for shrubs and groundcovers is not something that we typically do, nor is it required by the Village code. Specifying heights of container grown shrubs and groundcovers is provided, but does vary depending on the season, current demand and nursery provider. However, specifying the spreads of these same plant materials is even more difficult and varies greatly for the same reasons as indicated above. The Planting Detail and Specification sheet provided for this project requires that all plant materials be Florida Grade No. I or better and shall also meet the FL Grades and Standards, index, which has minimum spread requirements and governs the quality and standards of all plant materials provided for this project: All plantings installed will be inspected and adherence to this requirement will be enforcer 4. I have concerns there is too much Philodendron `Xanadu'. I've found `Xanadu' does not have a long "shelf life" and would prefer hardier shrubs such as Pringles Yew, Coontie or Parson's Juniper. - The overall quantity of the Xanadu has been reduced, but we do continue to specify this species, as we have had good luck using this material in the right location. _ Landscape Plan / Survey / Site Plan Discrepancies: 1. The survey notes an existing brick paver walk around the main building. The landscape plan and site plan note an existing concrete walk. - The survey has been revised to indicate the existing concrete walk - 2. The site plan still notes a proposed concrete walk in the recreation area. The landscape plan has updated the walk to pavers.. - The site plan has been revised to indicate brick pavers. 3. The site plan still has incorrect basketball and volleyball court orientation. The orientation of the basketball court has been revised as requested. The volleyball court can not be oriented north / south due to the existing site constraints. However, this court will only be utilized by the patients of the facility and will not be -used for public recreational or tournament play. 4. The site plan notes a proposed generator on the east side of the main building. The landscape plan does not show the generator. - The generator has been indicated on the landscape plan. 5. The site plan does not show the entry fountain or decorative pavers. - The site plan has been revised to indicate the entry fountain and pavers. GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Response Letter 41.18111 Page 5 of 6. The site plan notes incorrect perimeter fence and column heights. - The perimeter fence and column heights have been revised on the site plan. 7. The survey notes aluminum railing and 2' x 2' columns on the north property line whereas there is an existing chain link fence. - The survey has been revised to correctly indicate the existing 6' chain, link fence. 8. The paving for the interior courtyard does not match between the landscape plan and site plan. - The site plan has been revised to indicate the proposed interior courtyard layout Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call. Sincerely, M. Troy Holloway Sr. Vice - President Existing Column w /rough Stucco Finish, to be extended Existing Decorative Cap where necessary Proposed Fence addition to provide 6' height. co (Verde Green color to match existing) Varies 3 -6" 25" I v Existing Verde Green Alum. Fence Proposed Fence Modification Detail Scale: 1/2" = V -011 �s y �v4n P Prepared for DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. Prepared by THOMAS A. HALL, INC. April 2011 MH Te uesta Holdings, LLC Traffic Impact Study Palm Beach County, Florida Prepared for GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Prepared by THOMAS A. HALL, INC. April, 2011 i in E. Vvtxgnvq��. P. f r oi ida ,rai) Registt1otiN, -,44174 • Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................... ..............................1 ProjectDescription ........................................................................... ............................... l Distribution and Assignment ............................................................. ..............................4 ExistingConditions ........................................................................... ..............................4 FutureConditions ............................................................................. ............................... 5 TestOne ............................................................................................ ..............................8 TestTwo .......................................................................................... .............................12 ProjectDriveways ............................................................................ .............................12 Conclusion....................................................................................... .............................12 Appendix A — Traffic Counts and Adjustment Data ......................... ............................... A AppendixB — Capacity Analyses .................................................... ............................... B Figures Figure1 — Site Location .................................................................... ..............................2 Figure 2 — Distribution and Assignment ............................................ ..............................6 Figure 3 — Project Driveway Volumes .............................................. .............................11 Tables • Table 1 a — Daily Trip Generation ..................................................... ............................... 3 Table lb — AM Peak -hour Trip Generation ........................................ ..............................3 Table 1 c — PM Peak -hour Trip Generation ........................................ ............................... 3 Table 2 — Test One Significance ....................................................... ............................... 7 Table 3 — Intersection Level of Service .............................................. ..............................9 Table4 — Link Analysis .................................................................... .............................10 Table 5 — Test Two Significance ...................................................... .............................13 • ii • Introduction Thomas A Hall, Inc. was retained to prepare a traffic analysis demonstrating that the transportation- related concurrency requirements of Article 12 — Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County's Unified Land Development Code are satisfied for the proposed new GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC drug rehabilitation center. The project was previously approved as a residential development known as "The Crossings" and was planned to contain 78 apartments and 73 multi - family units. However, only 78 apartments and 6 multi - family units were constructed and no transportation - related concurrency assessment was ever recorded. (This was probably due to the fact that the project lies within the Coastal Residential Exception area and was, therefore, not affected by concurrency requirements.) The new project is expected to use the existing 84 units (78 apartments + 6 multi - family = 84 total units) as a 105 -bed drug rehabilitation facility. To complete the traffic analysis, the following tasks were completed: Description of the Project, Distribution and Assignment of project traffic, Test One, Part One and Part Two, and Test Two analysis. Project Description The GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC project is located on the north side of Village Boulevard and the east side of Old Dixie Highway in the Village of Tequesta, Florida. The project is proposed to contain an 84 unit, 105 -bed drug rehabilitation facility. Figure 1— Site Location, shows the location of the proposed development. Trip Generation/Maximum Radius of Development Influence Trip generation for the project was based on Palm Beach County's February 2, 2011 Trip Generation Rates for an Assisted Living Facility. Table 1 — Trip Generation, summarizes the estimated project trips. Based on the daily trip generation estimate of 249 trips, the project traffic study has a radius of influence of 0.5 miles. • 1 • p \ Y , G O O. N County Line Rd. N co 0 Site Village Blvd. • Tequesta Dr. S. Beach Rd Figure 1— Site Location • GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Village of Tequesta, Florida Table la Daily Trip Generation GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Land Use ITE Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate(ll Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips Pass-by New Trips • • • • In Proposed Use Assisted Livin Facility 254 105 Beds T=2.37 (X) 50/50 124 125 249 0 0 0 0.0% 124 125 249 0 0.0% 1241 125 249 Total 1 1241 1251 2491 01 01 01 0,0%1 1241 1251 2491 01 1 1241 12 249 ( ' ) Trip generation data and Pass -by percentage taken from Article 13 of the Palm Beach County ULDC. Table ]b AM Peak Hour Trip Generation GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Land Use RE Code intensity Trip Generation Rateol Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips Pass-by New Trips In Out Out Out Out Total Pro osed Use Assisted Livin Facility 254 105 Beds T =0.17 X 73/27 13 511 181 01 0 0 0.0 % 13 51 181 01 0.0%j 131 5 18 Total 13 5 18 0 0 0 0.0%1 13 5 18 0 13 5 18 ( ' ) Trip generation data obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation manual, 8th Edition. Table 1 e PM Peak Hour Trip Generation GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Land Use ITE Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate(l) Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips Pass-by Now Trips • • • • ut Total Proposed Use Assisted Livinq Facility 254 105 Beds T=0.29 (X) 52/48 16 14173701 01 01 01 0.0%1 161 141 30 01 0.0%1 161 141 30 Total 1 1 161 141 301 01 01 01 0.0%1 161 141 301 01 1 161 14 - Trip generation data obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation manual, 8th Edition. C.\ Work\ 2oto11- Teyueaa DawlupmenlWpri120\\ Repon ReHaionlTa�las \Tailo 1 Distribution and Assignment The project distribution was based on a review of the local roadway network and turning - movement counts collected at the intersection of Old Dixie Highway at Village Boulevard. The distribution reflects 26% to the north, 74% to the south. This distribution led to an assignment of 25% of the project traffic to the east along Village Boulevard to US 1 with the remaining 75% assigned to Old Dixie Highway north and south of the project site. Figure 2 — Distribution and Assignment, shows the project assignment. Table 2 — Test One Significance, summarizes the project percent of Level of Service (LOS) D maximum service volumes on all of the roadways immediately adjacent to the project on both a two -way and peak - direction basis. The project has a 1% or greater impact on Old Dixie Highway from Tequesta Drive to County Line Road in the AM and PM peak hour on a peak - direction basis and in the PM peak hour on a two -way basis. Therefore, the two intersections on either end of the link will be analyzed for Part One and the link will be analyzed for Part Two. Existing Conditions Old Dixie Highway is a two -lane, undivided roadway with a north/south alignment near the project site. However, it widens to become a four -lane roadway as it approaches • Tequesta Drive to the south. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. There is a northbound right -turn lane and southbound left-turn lane at the Old Dixie Highway/Village Boulevard intersection adjacent to the project site. There is a northbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Old Dixie Highway at County Line Road, which is stop -sign controlled for the north/south movements on Old Dixie Highway. Village Boulevard is a two -lane, undivided local roadway adjacent to the project site and forming a "T" intersection with Old Dixie Highway from the east. It has an east /west alignment and a posted speed limit of 25 mph. County Line Road is a two -lane, undivided roadway with an east /west alignment that intersects Old Dixie Highway at the northern end of the studied roadway segment. Its posted speed limit is 35 mph. Tequesta Drive is a two -lane, median - divided roadway to the west of Old Dixie Highway and a four -lane, median - divided roadway to the east of Old Dixie Highway. The posted speed limit on Tequesta Drive is 30 mph and the intersection of Tequesta Drive at Old Dixie Highway is signalized. Average Daily traffic volumes and peak -hour, turning- movement volumes were obtained from the Palm Beach County website and are included in Appendix A - Traffic Counts and Adjustment Data. The volumes are also summarized in the Test One and Test Two sections of this report. 4 Future Conditions The project buildout year is 2011. A review of the Palm Beach County Project Database revealed a small amount of committed development traffic within the project limits, as is shown on the volume adjustment sheets in Appendix A. A growth rate (6.77 %) for the studied roadway link was obtained from the Palm Beach County Average Daily Traffic tables and was applied to the roadway volumes to estimate background traffic. Project trips shown in Table 1 were added to the background traffic to estimate future total volumes. • • 5 o fl- G m 0 0 County Line Rd. N 10% CD I-D a 0 Site Village Blvd. 25% cr o 0 Tequesta Dr. 15% 20% 0 Legend: S. Beach Rd. XX% = Project Assignment Figure 2 — Distribution and Assignment • GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Village of Tequesta, Florida Table 2 Test One Significance AM Peak Hour (Two-way): LOS D Project Project % of Is ! No 1814 Old Dixie Highway Tequesta Dr. County Line Rd. 2 1480 14 b.95'�__r__ No 0 County Line Road us 1 Old D Hwy. 2 1480 2 0.14% Number Peak•Hour, Trips • AM Peak Hour Traff 1207 Tequesta Drive us 1 Old Dixie Hwy. 2 es Two -Wty? PM Peak i i 0 Project Project % of Is Project Number Peak -Hour, Trips - PM Peak Hour Traffic >1% of S oad Name From To of Lanes Two•Way Peak Hour Capacity Capacity? 0 County Line Road us 1 Old Dixie Hwy. 2 1480 3 0.20% No 1207 Tecquesta Drive us 1 Old Dixie Hwy. 2 1480 5 0.34% No AM Peak Hour ( One-way): LOS D Project Project % of Is V Number Peak -Hour, Trips - AM Peak Hour Traffic StatioR oad Name From To of Lanes One -Way Peak Hour Capacity Capacity? 0 County Line -... ® • . Dixie Hwy. 0 810 00.12% 0 1207 1 Tequesta Drive us 1 Old Dixie Hwy. 1 810 2 0.25% PM Peak i ur (Directio LOS D Project mmturoject % of Is Project es Number Peak -Hour, Trips - PM Peak Hour Traffic >1% of S oad Name From To of Lanes One -Way Peak Hour Capacity Capacity? 0 County Line Road ® • . - 0 ©�� 1207 Tecquesta Drive us 1 Old Dixie Hwy. 1 810 3 0.37% No • Test One Part One - Intersections The project traffic is significant on Old Dixie Highway between Tequesta Drive and County Line Road. As such, the intersections on each end of the roadway segment must be analyzed. The project is not expected to have an impact of 10% or more on any approach to the immediately adjacent intersection of Old Dixie Highway at Village Boulevard. Therefore, although close to the project, this intersection was not required to be analyzed. The intersection of Old Dixie Highway at Tequesta Drive is signalized and was analyzed using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA). The intersection of Old Dixie Highway at County Line Road is unsignalized and was analyzed using the Federal Highway Administration's Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The results of the intersection analyses are summarized in Table 3 — Intersection Level of Service. Appendix B — Capacity Analyses, contains copies of the CMA and HCS analyses. Part Two — Links To satisfy Test One — Part Two — Links, the total traffic on links where the project is significant must be less than the allowable threshold based on two -way, peak -hour values. The following link has an impact of 1% or more of project traffic and exceeds the peak - direction threshold for the AM peak hour and both the two -way and peak - direction threshold for the PM peak hour: • Old Dixie Highway from Tequesta Drive to County Line Road Table 4 - Link Analysis, shows that the peak - direction link capacity will not be exceeded with the project traffic included. • 8 Table 3 Intersection Level of Service GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC AM PM AM PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Old Dixie Hw . at Te uesta Dr. 629 828 Old Dixie Hwy. at County Line Rd. NB 17.3 C 48.1 E SB 14.5 B 17.1 C C: \Work \201017 - Tequesta Development \April 2011 Report Revision\Tables\Table 3 & 4 Link Analysis 2011 Project Is Project Total AM IYe lour han Roadway ty? 2011 Project Is Project Total PM Total LOS D Total Trip - PM Project % Traffic More Peak Peak Hour Peak Hour Background Peak Hour of Capacity Than 1% of Hour Less Than POIdDixieay From To Direction Number of Lanes Directional Directional Directional Peak Hour Capacity? Directional Capacity? \Line G Cou N CD J � a- � 1 Site - o Village Blvd • �a Tequesta Dr. Legend: XX = AM Project Trips S. Beach Rd. (X) = PM Project Trips Figure 3 — Project Driveway Volumes • GMH Tequesta Holdings, LLC Village of Tequesta, Florida Test Two Five Year Test Table 5 summarizes the significance of the project. There are no links upon which the project has an impact of 3% or more of the Level of Service E maximum service volume. Therefore, no links or intersections require analyses. Project Driveways Figure 3 — Project Driveway Volumes, depicts the AM and PM peak -hour project trips expected to use the driveway currently planned to provide access to /from the proposed project. As can be seen in the figure, the project driveway volumes are quite small. In fact, the project trips do not warrant the addition of a right -turn deceleration lane or left - turn storage lane per Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering's Turn Lane Geometrics and Approach Striping detail. The county's detail has a minimum turn-lane volume of 30 trips, well above the PM peak -hour maximum of 16 inbound project trips. Conclusion • The GMH Te uesta Holdings, LLC project, with 18 AM peak-hour trips and 30 PM q g p J � P P peak -hour trips, will not adversely affect the adjacent roadway network. Compliance with Test One and Test Two has been demonstrated through this analysis. No roadway improvements are required. • 12 Table 5 Test Two Significance Holdings, AM Peak Hour: LOS E Peak Project Trips - Project % of Is Project Number Hour, One- AM Pk Hr Peak Hour Traffic >3% of St" Road Name From Tq Direction of Lanes Way Directional Capacity Capacity? Dixie Highway Tequesta • '• NB 0 ::1 10 1 No PM Peak Hour: LOS E Peak Project Trips - Project % of Is Project Number Hour, One- U1111 Pk Hr Peak Hour Traffic >3% of S Dixie Highway I Tequesta • - '• NB ::1 13 1 No 010 Appendix A — Traffic Counts and Adjustment Data A • 0 PALXJRAFFIC VOLYMES 2010 DAILY njQAMPgAK, HOUR ?fl-14 Pry PEAK HQUR STA ROAD FROM TO LANES 2005 2.006 2007 2008 2009 DATE VOL OR 2-WAY NWEB SBIWB 2-WAY NOIES SBMS 6900 OLD DIXIE 1 11 WY Palmetto Park Rd GladeQ Rd 1 22049 19190 18928 17848 ffi724 t/27PZQl0 17962 •1.73% 1337 1742 6866 OLD DIXIE IIWY rilaxles Rki NP. Loath St 4D 111172 19025 19206 17629 1$01 1 3 1127.'I=0 17861 -239% 1120 INDO 6560 OLD DIXIU- I IWY NV 20th St $Panish Riw� Blvd 4D 1890 18794 19095 17349 16366 1127/2010 17346 -3,1 S* I31;2 1668 6862 OLD DIXIE HWY Spaulgh River Blvd Yarmuo Rd 40 17518 17415 IV% 15679 14715 112712010 1 1769 2,77% 1 1591 6304 OLD DIXIE 14WY Lindell 73W Hidden Valley Blvd 2 12,946 11890 12256 114111 11930 1/271?010 11996 -0,741/ 432 1054 3302 OLT) DIXIE UWY 45th St MILK Ir Blvd 4 17011 14204 16900 15900 VW2010 t 146$ -17,13% 926 396 539 1033 530 522 7810 OLD DIXIE HA"V N4L K B IVA slut Baron I) Ivj 5 16407 15680 15196 14144 12675 2116"2010 11520 -8.82% 875 345 546 1128 32 501 ,sm 14244 111 2/21) 10 13667 -4,7r 1077 499 598 1215 657 573 z OLD DIXIE H\VY elite Heron Blvd Silvotreach Rd 4D 17101, 17M 15807 14913 1806 OLP DIXIE HWY 8R -8 Vacach Rd Tees Dr 4 13863 13285 13100 12554 12074 1/2712010 12257 -119% 927 368 572 1000 572 442 1$14 OLD DIXIE IMY Tequeoa Or County Line Rd 2 6712 8042 6664 6331 6362 211012010 SIIZ 6.77% 554 191 36+1 694 453 234 330 OLIVP AVE S WPO C-ItyLitrut Alhambra Pf 2 10263 10765 11092 9289 7312 3110 ?1010 7044 - 14,02% 532 359 185 789 306 491 3926 OLIVE AVE Alhambra PI Forest 14ill'91vd 2 3910 OLIVE AVE famst Hill Blvd t"Cx I-n 2 1 11)41 7900 6800 3892 OLIVE AVE Fwx Ln qrAnbefu Blvd 2 12021 5986 7449 3890 OLIVE AV11, Southern 131W Mornuc Dr 2 9870 5797 6100 5200 212562010 4446 376 20 116 425 155 256 3969 OLIVE AVE Monroe Dr Belvedere Rd 2 8907 9000 6190 $450 4371 3623, 4'334 -1 1420% 383 304 79 372 1841 198 3864 OLIVE AVE Belvedere Rd Okeachobee BI 2 14435 141500 57,19 5591 4371 31231201 0 3908 -12,02% 401 374 11 290 174 149 3845 OLIVE AVE Olecc4mbee BI Banyan Blvd 2 13932 14000 1300 13700 3836 ()LIV9 AVE BJM)-Wl Blvd LaAht Sr 2 16191 102011 3343 1362 3509 31231'2010 5109 1$,11 a 416 416 0 425 425 0 3830 OLIVE AVE 1061SI Palm Beach Lakes Blvd 2 ir343 5900 2196 .1471 2663 311762010 2955 8.77 241 139 112 20 240 57 2417 ORANOf BLVD Scminote Nall Whitney Rd 140111 Ave N 2 7100 6534 7509 VI W20 10 7292 0,99% 4$2 264 224 769 313 3!l6 .1409 ORANGE BLVD 140thNvcN Ownuu1111vd 2 8513 8371 7783 7231 71411 UIP2014) 8099 1-29%. 671 504 176 779 309 • 476 A I I I Thursday, June 10, 2010 *Note: Where no peak hour volumes are shown, the 2000 daily Volume was estimated based on previous tount data or collected wl;hout peak hour' data. Pgge3tot`43 DAILY TRAFFIC VQLUME§ ZQJQ DAILY 24110 AM_1Pg6L( 1tQUlt* 2111(1 PM PEAK HO W STA ROAD FROM 7Q LANES 2005 2006 2007 2008 20009 DATE VOL OR ZMAY NBIES SW WS 2 -WAY N81EB ;aOl' S SM f it US -S Af anfle Ave NF 40,11 3 1012 164611 14514 13358 11130 2117 "24410 12453 A. 98 ung 0 14:119 8192 0 896 "383 #1 US -1 14F41hSl (kor"":BIra1sBlvd 3 13852 11521 12+49 12,32° 11174 21172010 111±7 ,a601v 1(Q6 tl (026 794 1) 7941 Sa28 1.15 -1 Kr- 41ls51 OmrpKi iAiHIA 3 44775 15122 12742 12734 11912 2100010 124,80 - 0,691,, 142 599 tJ 1 #ti 1260 Cr 2800 I,1ti l 1'arkAve: 1401 41) 3066 2171117 29362 74187;1 271(1!1 3121'200 25465 460 17111 7117 105 2149 124 4150 2842 LN-I 1lorlhlatikellhd UghthiaioeOr ti17 33144 11441 :31961 30191 :'95X1 2838 1511 Li4hthcamcOr KIA941d 41) ?1383 2045 263" 26104 25087 37111211111 234211 .:1^E?% IS," 696 909 2.16 111h 5)W W2 US,-1 PGA [3hd l,lnivoseBlvd 417 36W 33q'3 348,44 1101 32139 2 26236 4021% 141 1086 1153 2261 i;lltl 946 2840 LSS•I l7xilver'ReLlvd Oonaliiltrr "3tid 411 27406 24163 24198 230214 23031 1;1x'21110 24044 - da.Cr7 "Si 1 495 912 19141 1135 696 1312: US - 1.1111venit Blvd Marvift%vt IM 41l 32717 3313!5 35 37687 29 3,'1::201() 2821, 4,79% 1907 690 1256 2410 1.382 1048 11510 U18-1 41amiw�tiltd 1na1144towll1111 41) 28 27364 267, 26619 245711 24r20111 15144)14 .2.07% 1677 63 114415 .209 12134 411'5 1802 11S-I' Indimlo" 1131 1100w t Ild 41) ?4992 72410 22530 2170 20085 ?J9120 10 2006 -2,32% 1342 507 #155 1424 106, 115fr 130 Us-I tlrwhIt(I CminlyLnIt" Rd 61) 26617 116052 23134 23147 22445 211(14214141 24652 243% 1864 494 1370 2t17 1457 856 73432' 141 -' 7 1 rowarrcl County Linv 6!1427 41) 0240 1.7386 16107 1635:11 1205 311 V0 10 11.4:5 -I0,I r/. 6385 245 4% 719 Slit 283 7030 1±ST -27 CK -823 S1t -80 443 1 994 t3400 14800 11300 7(x00) 3+MS 2000 4542 , 1161% 507 241 2515 613 374 241 "x1133 US SIZA0 Levey Rd all) 26365 .3324 M97 199744 16200 *4?28, {7740 4€4% 1156 569 630 13ki+4 fa) 5$9 7034 IJS -27 Levee Rd klissmiC. -real Rd 4 1535 15300 1*410 14900 13{90(1' :1212010 W42 2.71431, 965 4M] 547 12311 679 `64 7035 IJS -27 Miami CODMI Rd 1' 13; x 4kawly'1:o U11e 4 49814 202 19700 WWI 135f5[t 3632 VILLAGE BLVD f.'natiu utlity Dr Pall 11CUCII 1 ACS filv(l +4 30662 3.1706 30400 3WW 3m,o VILLAC*I± 11LVD C rail xerWid Or Shersa7aflualt Or 4 17264 14767 17700 1"00 3630 4 "ILLACi1, 331 VP 45"1 C.urrrlxerlaanit Or 4 2111143 23271 23100 24000 3652 WA14A`5;+'C Oft, C e1 .'6faarlbew HI WesttaaleA v 723;3 635(d 1;141 6209 5402 2110/0119 3.3133+ AM, 411 295 126 474 2131 238 3 WAS) IIl Cif" M 1#1) Over St ;Catltbern Mvd z 7017 7100 71..00 7400 I '1 litldYr unt 10, 2010 '.Nota; Where no peak hour volumes are shown, the 2009 dally volume was estimated. based an previous count data or collected without peak - hour date. Page 4 2 of 43 SIGNAL 10 E-W STRE15T N-S STREET DATE TIME NBU NBL NOT NOR 881J SOL SOT $OR ESIJ E8L EST EBR WOU WBL WBT WBR TOTAL 80550 Sw Ave ElCr 880/Martin L Main Stlgr 15 512012008 %15AM 0 113 611 104 0 61 441 66 0 47 ifli 100 0 139 161 49 1889 80550 Sw Ave Elor 880IMartin L Main SttSr 15 611812010 4AS PM 3 170 663 144 2 71 631 61 0 68 Ila 147 1 153 153, 74 2260 80550 SW Ave EIC r ago/Martin L Main 8VSr 15 5=12009 416 PM 0 100 601 111 a 69 439 42 0 72 144 129 0 130 283 52 2176 80350 Sw Ave eMartin Luther K! Sr 715 511812010 Tl 5 AM 0 1 268 160 0 72 274 3 0 0 2 1 n 93 3 62 939 80350 Sw Ave OVIartin Luther Ki Sr 715 101412007 1 1-15 AM 0 0 375 133 0 36 356 0 0 1 0 0 0 112 0 64 1066 863501 Sw Ave E/Martin Luther Ki Sr 745 5/1 5:00 PM 0 1 284 188 0 77 411 1 0 1 4 1 0 213 1 SE1 1240 803 Sw Ave "Aartin Luther 1(1 Sr 715 101412007 5 0 PM 0 0 309 199 0 50 410 0 0 a 0 0 0 259 0 123 1439 27675 Sycamore Or e Seminole Pratt Whitne 3124=10 701 AM 0 32 478 A a 3 5" 87 0 262 4 258 0 1 2 16 1734 27675 Sycamom Or 'E Seminole Pratt Whittle 10122=09 7',00 AM 1 28 465 4 0 10 583 ft 0 285 4 258 0 A 0 is 1726 27675 Sycarnw&Orr- Seminole Pratt Whitne 11121312007 6;30 AM 0 40 616 0 0 7 649 68 0 253 2 242 0 2 2 11 18131 27675 Sycamore Of F Seminole Pratt Whiine 112512006 715 AM a 94 479 3 0 10 704 60 0 195 6 314 0 1 1 14 1978 27675 Sycamore DrE Seminole Pratt Whitine 9/2412010 5Z0 PM a 216 659 6 0 11 409 157 a 120 0 90 0 2 2 10 4689 27675 Sycamore Or E Seminole Pratt Whifne 1012212000 60 PM 0 182 688 4 0 10 400 131 0 144 3 68 0 0 0 E 1638 27675 Syoomore or E Seminole Pratt Whitne 14128/2007 5:00 PM 0 194 $16 1 0 Ila 482 1q7 0 t12 2 80 0 3 3 1906 27675 Sycarm.re Or E Seminole Pratt Whitne 112,WO06 5;00 PM 0 247 706 7 0 17 527 166 0 134 2 84 0 3 2 16 2001 2600 Toquesla Or old Dixie Hwy 0/212009 8:00 AM 0 121 165 31 0 28 266 44 0 65 182 216 1 49 133 111 1314 2600 Tequests Or Old Dixie Hwy 1011012007 8:45 AM 0 131 168 43 a n 192 54 0 62 190 209 0 46 137 23 1283 2600 Tequesta Or Old Dixie Hwy 1011012007 12:45 PM 1 164 241 49 a 35 158 Ila 0 93 t93 ISD 0 35 172 43 1474 280o Teclues.ta Or Old Dixie Hwy 91212009 4 PM 0 178 326 69 a 52 205 110 0 85 190 130 0 55 log 59 1647 2600 Tequosta Or Old Dixie Hwy 1011012007 4:00 PM 0 118 294 73 1 46 192 101 0 87 196 134 0 42 170 39 1553 2400 TatIttesta Or Rivefskle Or 10012007 &45 AM 0 89 24 5 0 le 63 10 0 2 222 168 0 4 154 14 758 2400 1'equesta Or Riverside Or 101I012007 5;00 PM 0 187 53 12 0 17 40 12 0 9 166 130 0 7 236 47 918 2500 Taquesta Or Seabrook Rd 91212009 8= AM 0 3 $0 18 a 106 160 16 0 24 173 9 io 2 172 45 7$6 2$00 TaqLjesta Or Seabrook Rd 10/1012007 8:45 AM a 18 24 17 0 ar 40 19 0 43 217 11 0 7 181 62 735 2500 Tequesta Or Seabrook Rd 9I217009 4,16 PM 0 6 al 21 0 74 66 15 • 0 16 181 9 0 14 218 109 808 2600 Taquosta Or Seabrook Rd 1011012007 500 PM 0 12 71 17 0 41 46 25 1 18 1184 9 a 18 247 129 860 2700 Taquesta Dr/Waterway Us list 5 91112009 7:46 AM 5 81 473 19 16 17 1137 106 to 73 14 112 0 34 21 7 2115 2700 Taquesta Or/Waterway Us lists 21612008 7:30 AM 10 94 734 30 6 26 1542 79 16 92 25 1116 3 24 12 6 2621 2700 Tequesta Dr /Waterway Us list 5 10/9?2007 710 AM I 1$ 516 IS 7 23 1314 102 14 63 14 153 0 36 11 1 2344 2700 Taquests Dr /Waterway Us 115r 6 9, 4AS PM 14 110 1146 43 11 37 6515 77 7 Ila 25 79 0 58 38 24 2345 2700 Taquosto Dr/Walarway us list 6 21612008 4;30 PM 20 157 1427 54 19 28 914 106 110 162 33 134 0 93 43 26 3220 2700 Taquosta OdWpto—Y Us I/Sr $ 10)012007 4A5 PM 29 125 1260 317 21 19 g46 87 lie 162 36 101 0 74 33 33 2661 9600 The Benjamin Schooi/GM Central Blvd 91I612009 7A5 AM 0 102 $61 9 0 8 657 % 0 53 4 76 0 19 24 34 1643 Thursday, June 10,20`10 Page 140 of 155 • • • LOCATION DATE TIME NBU NBL NIEIT NBR SOU 881. SBT SBFt EBU 15011, EBT EBR WRU WOL WBT W13R TOTAL Aviation Dr at Seeline Hwy 342012006 4�00 PM 0 10 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 1081 9 1 1T 1319 5 1988 Aviallon Drat Beeline Hwy 312012006 4:00 PM 0 10 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 1081 9 1 17 B19 0 1983 Boynton aeach Bjat.Pear'Tree Cir 1212112005 9.30 AM 0 11 0 38 0 31 0 24 0 24 1958 14 0 40 q65 is 3123 Boynton Beach BI at Pear Tree Cir 1»/2 112005 12-45 PM a 13 3 19 0 2$ 0 27 0 54 2094 10 0 133 1506 27 3814 Boynton Beach Bi at Quail Covey Rd 1211912001 9:30 AM a 8 1 79 0 13 1 20 29 16 1 19 16 39 970 15 2713 Boynton, Beach 81 at Quail Covey Rd 12JI912007 215 PM 0 15 0 47 0 16 0 15 20 to 1581 20 22 53 1535 17 3346 Briella ter at Hagen Ranch Rd 414512009 1 WOO AM 0 So 545 8 0 10 472 52 0 go 2 so 0 0 3 34 1315 Briella Dr at Hagen Ranch Rd 411512009 4:30 PM 0 9 764 16 0 28 614 to 0 94 3 38 a 9 2 26 1619 Burns Rd at PIP Gardens City Gomplax 612712008 7'30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 15 1 10 0 6 1135 12 0 0 1595 17 1792 Bums Rd at PS Gardens ClIty Complex 812712008 4A5 PM 0 0 0 9 0 a 0 15 0 6 493 40 0 5 11003 9 1687 Cedar Point 81 at Military Trail 3131/2000 715 AM 0 38 9115 0 6 4 1687 39 0 go 0 113 0 9 a 13 2923 Cedar Point 6) at Military Trail 313112008 415 PM 0 119 2300 20 11 7 951 115 0 54 1 55 0 2 0 1 306 Charleston Shares BI N/Taylorwood Or at Hagen Ranch Rd 912412007 7:1$ AM 0 2 251 74 0 152 424 2 0 7 5 12 0 56 1 191 1176 Charleston Shores BI NITaylorwo9d Or at Hagen Ranch Rd 972412007 2:00 PM 0 2 247 34 0 85 200 1 0 3 1 3 0 so 1 143 770 Chickasaw Rdt Woodlake Bt at Jog Rd 711512009 7:15 AM 6 4 926 16 13 19 1169 0 0 21 1 23 0 22 1 34 2254 Chickasaw RdtWoodlaka 81 atJog •Rd 7114=09 5;00 PM 46 19 1434 34 20 35 130 26 0 6 1 7 0 10 0 41 1027 Christian Converition Cir at Congress Ave 518/2007 7,30 AM 0 0 783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 753 Christian Convention CArat Congress Ave 51812007 4:30 PM 0 a 736 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 737 Clint Moore Rd at 411ood4old Or 9/912009 9:00 AM 0 41 0 79 0 0 0 0 1 0 791 51 a 49 446 0 1458 Clint Moore Rd at Woodfield Or 91912009 2,45 PM 0 55 0 66 0 .0 0 0 0 0 681 43 1 66 757 0 1.559 Cornnntmity Dr at Crosstown plaza 212112010 7:30 AM 0 23 a 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 653 52 0 16 291 0 1041 Corrimunrly Or at Crosstown Plaza 2122)2010 2A5 PM 0 160 0 74 0 0 0 0 a 0 379 116 0 30 469 0 1228 Community Or at Jewish Community CepterMoblix 21221200 7:30 AM a 20 3 47 0 26 3 39 0 98 466 42 a 53 269 39 1105 Community Or at Jewish' Community CenterfFlublix 2!22/2010 2:45 PM 0 40 6 117 0 26 2 36 0 39 338 40 0 123 36'a 31 1 to$ COMMUNITY OR AT PUBLIX JGC Wl 7120 1 0 T30 AM 0 11 1 20 0 17 1 31 a 66 420 34 0 28 W 32 009 COMMUNITY OR AT PUBLIX JCC 2117/241 2A5 PM 0 51 6 82 0 2A I Is 0 25 339 61 0 88 300 24 11005 Community W at Pu4lixtJewish Comm Ctr 71i012007 12.1 PM 0 39 2 84 b 21 3 18 a 14 285 65 a 87 257 16 as! community Or at PubliWavAsh Corwo Ctr 7110=7 640 PM 0 56 1 104 0 23 6 47 0 14 341 64 0 123 594 31 1394 County 1-10 Rd at Old Dixie Hwy 4121/2009 1110 AM 0 140 20 74 a 7 31 5 0 4 126 123 0 45 114 4 695 County Line ,Rd at Old Dixie Hwy 41272007 11:00 AM 0 152 66 85 0 0 27 a 0 9 1133 140> 0 64 113 6 862 County Line Rd at Old Dixie Hwy 412112009 4.30 PM 0 243 16 92 0 " a 22 0 0 1 176 123 0 35 200 7 920 County Line. Rd at OW Dixie Hwy 402007 4:15 PM 0 214 26 107 4 V 22 4 1 3 177 113 0 38 212 12 960 CR 827A at SR, 15 402009 P00 AM a 2 174 44 0 8 194 1 0 0 2 1 a 60 1 1 497 Thursdayi June 10, 201 0 Page 2 of 10 20035 Peak Season Factor Category Report N RE port Type; ALEa Cat=egory: 9301 CEN. -W OF US! TO SR7 14F: 0.95 Week Dates . S>< PSCF 1 01/01/2009 01/03/2009 0.99 1.04. 2 01/04/2009 - 01/1012009 0.95 1,03 3 101/1112009 - 01/17/2009 0,96 1.03 * 4 031/18/ - 01/24/2009 0.97 1.002 5 081/25/2009 - 0;/31/20009 0.96 1.031 * 6 €32/01/2009 - 02/07 /2€309 0.96 1.01 * 7 02/08/2009 82/14/200 9 0.95 1.00 * a 42/15/2009 - 02/21/20019 a_94 11.9 * a 032/22/2009 - 02/28/2009 0.94 0.99 *10 03/01/2009 - 03/07/2009 0 .94 €1.99 *11 03108/20039 - 013/14/2009 €3.54 0.9 *In 03/15/2009 - 03,/21/2009 €3.94 0<99 *13 03/22/2049 _ 03/28 /20309 0.94 0.9 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2G09 0.95 1.007 *15 03.4/05/2009 - 04/1112009 0.95 1.00 *16 04112/20019 - 0411812009 03.96 1.001 17 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2.009 4.97 1.02 18 0412612009 - 05102/ "2009 0.98 1.43 19 05/03/20003 - 05/09/2009 1100 1.05 20 05/10/2069 - 05/16/2009 1.01 1.076 21 05/`17/2009 - 05/23/2009 1:031 1_.06 22 05/2412009 - 05/30/2049 1.02 1.07 23 05/31/2009 06/C6/2009 1.02 1.€37 24 006/07/2009 - 05/13/2009 1.03 1.09 25 06/'14!20009 - W20/2009 1. 00 1.09 26 06/2112009 - 06/27/2009 1.04 1.14 27 06/28/2009 - 0,/;0=4/2009 1.035 1.11 28 07/01. - 07/11/20309 1.06 1 =12 29 07/12120o9 07/13/2009 1w06 1.12 30 47/1.9 /2009 - 07/25/20.09 1.16 1.12 31 07/26/2009 - 08/C,1/2449 1.05 1.11 32 0810212009 - 08/C8/2009 1,015 1.11 33 oa/0912009 08./15/20039 7..0}4 1..1-0 08116/20039 _ 08/:2/207 09 7..04 1.10 � 34 15 08/23/ 009 - 038129/2009 1.04 1.10 S6 08/30/2+0019 - 01-31105/2009 1.014 I.1G 57 09 /06/20109 - 039112/2009 1.175 1:31 35 0?r13/20i� - 019!19/20019 1.015 1.1-1 39 own /2005 - Qgn,6 /2007 1.04 1.10 401 OAS' '2 10/03/200039 3..03 1.09 41 10/04/2009 - 10/103/2009 1.02 1.07 42 10/`11/2009 - 107/'1.1120039 1.01 43 1 -0/18/200€39 - 141/24/2009 1.031 1,06 44 1051251-/2009 - 101/31/21709 14011 1.06 45 11/01/?QO9 -- 11107/2045 1.01 1.06 46 11,08/2009 - 11/141'20039 1.01 1.06 47 1.1/1S/20009 - 11/21/2009 1.01 1.005 48 11,122/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.:443 1.05 49 11/29/2009 - 1 2/05/2!109 1,00 11005 50 12/06/20(19 _ 12/12/2109 0.99 1.014 51 12/13/2049 - 12/19/2009 0.59 1.04 5' 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 0.98 1.03 53 12/27/2009 _ 12/31/20009 0.98 1.03 Peak Season Pace 2 of 4 J THOMAS A. HALL, INC. O XIE HWY. AT VILLAGE BLVD. 1355 ADAMS STREET Site Code: 10006 QUESTA, FLORIDA HOLLYWOOD, FL 33019 Start Date: 11/17/2010 COUNTED BY: TOM 954- 288 -4447 File I.D.: Dix /Vil UNSIGNALIZED Page: 1 ........................................................ .................................................... :. ALL VEHICLES DIXIE HWY. :VILLAGE BLVD. :DIXIE HWY. :N /A From North :From East ;From South :From West Uturn Left Thru Right:Uturn Left Thru RightUturn Left Thru RightUturn Left Thru Right: Total Date11/17/10 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... 7:00 0 5 56 0 0 17 0 41 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 119 7:15 0 14 46 0 0 12 0 3 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 0 114 7:30 0 3 71 0 0 26 0 21 0 0 21 12 0 0 0 0 135 7:45 0 1 58 0 0 16 0 13 0 0 28 30: 0 0 0 0 146 Hr Total 0 23 233 0 0 71 0 22: 0 0 82 83: 0 0 0 0 514 8:00 0 4 49 0 0 28 0 13 0 0 34 25 0 0 0 0 153 8:15 0 19 69 0 0 21 0 5: 0 0 29 27: 0 0 0 0 170 8:30 0 7 57 0 0 26 0 5: 0 0 31 16: 0 0 0 0 142 8:45 0 5 55 0 0 16 0 7 0 0 33 24 0 0 0 0 140 Hr Total 0 35 230 0 0 91 0 30 0 0 127 92: 0 0 0 0 605 ........................... * BREAK * ............................................................................................................................................................. ............................... ...................................................................................................... ............................... 11:15 0 0 0 0i 0 0 0 0i 0 0 0 0€ 0 0 0 0: 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0': 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0€ 0 Total 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0€ 0 Hr Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ........................... * BREAK * .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................... 16:00 0 12 51 0 0 31 0 23 0 0 70 51 0 0 0 0 238 16:15 0 3 38 0 0 38 0 24: 0 0 48 55i 0 0 0 0 206 16:30 0 5 41 0 0 24 0 25 0 0 63 44 0 0 0 0 202 16:45 0 11 36 0 0 30 0 23 0 0 61 42 0 0 0 0 203 Hr Total 0 31 166 0: 0 123 0 95 0 242 192: 0 0 0 0: 849 17:00 0 7 39 0: 0 33 0 25 0 0 78 721 0 0 0 0 254 17:15 0 1 36 0 0 36 0 19 0 0 63 65 0 0 0 0 220 17:30 0 4 34 0: 0 35 0 20€ 0 0 59 58 0 0 0 210 17:45 0 7 35 0: 0 34 0 22: 0 0 54 54 0 0 0 0 206 Hr Total 0 19 144 0: 0 138 0 86: 0 0 254 249: 0 0 0 0 890 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... *TOTAL* 0 108 773 0 0 423 0 233 0 0 705 616 0 0 0 0 2858 • THOMAS A. HALL, INC. O E HWY. AT VILLAGE BLVD. 1355 ADAMS STREET Site Code: 10006 ESTA, FLORIDA HOLLYWOOD, FL 33019 Start Date: 11/17/2010 COUNTED BY: TOM 954- 288 -4447 File I.D.: Dix /Vil UNSIGNALIZED Page: 2 .............................. ............................... ............................... ............................ALL VEHICLES DIXIE HWY. ;VILLAGE BLVD. :DIXIE HWY. :N /A From North :From East :From South :From West Uturn Left Thru Right:Uturn Left Thru RightUturn Left Thru Right:Uturn Left Thru Right: Total Date11/17/10 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 9:00 on 11/17/10 Peak start 07:45 :07 :45 :07:45 :07:45 Volume 0 31 233 0 0 91 0 36 0 0 122 98 0 0 0 0: 611 Percent 0 12% 88% 0 0 0 0% o 0% 55 45%: 0% 0% 0% 0 %: Pk total 264 127 220 0 Highest 8:15 € 8:00 8:00 : 8:15 Volume 0 19 69 0: 0 28 0 13 0 0 34 25 0 0 0 0 Hi total 88 41 59 0 PHF 0.75 : 0.77 0.93 € 0.00 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 11:15 to 13:15 on 11/17/10 Peak start 12:00 :12:00 :12:00 :12:00 Volume 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0s 0% 0% 0 %: 0 9 6 0% 0% 0 0 0% 01 0 %: 0 0% 0% 0%: 0 0tal 0 0 0 0 est 12:30 ;12:30 :12:15 :12:30 Volume 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: Hi total 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0.00 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 11/17/10 Peak start 17:00 ;17:00 :17:00 ;17:00 _ Volume 0 19 144 0 0 138 0 86 0 0 254 249 0 0 0 0 890 Percent 0% 12% 88% 0 %: 0% 62% 0% 38 %: 0% 0% 50% 50 0% 0% 0% 0 Pk total 163 224 503 0 Highest 17 :00 :17:00 :17:00 :17:00 Volume 0 7 39 0 0 33 0 25: 0 0 78 72: 0 0 0 0: Hi total 46 58 150 0 PHF 0.89 : 0.97 0.64 0.00 Note: Used PM Peak Hour for distribution analysis. Is Input Data E -W Street: County Line Rd COUNT DATE: 4/21/2009 Report Created: 04/13/2011 N -S STREET: Old Dixie Hwy CURRENT YEAR: 2009 TIME PERIOD: AM ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 GROWTH RATE: 6.77% PSF: 1.02 SIGNAL ID: 1500 Intersection Volume Development sstimu Westbound �k Southbound 1 0 It €t Tttht Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Existing Volume a 45 114 4 � 7 31 5 DIVefSIOnS ��} >3`a fk 0% 0% 0 ° /a R -: 6% 0% 0% Peak Season Volume 131 ;. F25 46 116 4 t 4 3 T 7 32 5 Committed Developments Type % Complete o Atlantis 0 0 0 0 0 Res 0 /o Total Committed Developments 0 0 0 ` B, 0 0 0 4 f` Total Committed Residential 0 0 0 "� = 0 11 0 0 4` 3 ti Total Committed Non - Residential 0 0 0 � � Q - 0 0 Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 0 €t 0 0 0 Q Total Discounted Committed 0 0 O ff t 0 0 Historical Growth 1 18 17 1& 20 3 10 Comm Dev +1 %Growth 0 3 3� 3 0 6�, r� Growth Volume Used 1 18 17 20 3 10 € Total Volume 5 149 142 6 163 23 85 Input Data E -W Street: County Line Rd COUNT DATE: 4/21/2009 Report Created: 04/13/2011 N -S STREET: Old Dixie Hwy CURRENT YEAR: 2009 TIME PERIOD: PM ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 GROWTH RATE: 6.77% PSF: 1.02 SIGNAL ID: 1500 Intersection Volume Development tbound Westbound ATorh17c3ut Southbound I Left Thru Right heft Thru t ;Left Thru Right Existing Volume 171�p 'A, 35 200 7 4 t& 3 5 22 0 Diver ions 0% 6 %€ d "o� 0% 0 % ° r� i %61 0% 0% 0% Peak Season Volume ai _ W ' , t25 36 204 7' 5 22 0 Committed Developments Type % Complete Atlantis} N; 5 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Res 0% Total Committed Developments 0 0 0� �fl 0 0 3 ~' Total Committed Residential 0 0 0 E 0 0 3 ff fl Total Committed Non - Residential 0 0 0 € 0 0 0 0 EPA Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 € Q 0 0 0 Total Discounted Committed 0 0 0 104I1 0 0 3 0 _... Historical Growth 0 25 17� 1 35 2 13 E� Comm Dev +1 %Growth 0 4 3 r 5 0 5 `0 0 Growth Volume Used 0 25 17 f 35 2 13 1' 3 18 107 Total Volume 1 205 142 23 - $ 283 6 25" a a., • Input Data E -W Street: Tequesta Dr COUNT DATE: 9/2/2009 Report Created: 04/13!2011 N -S STREET: Old Dixie Hwy S CURRENT YEAR: 2009 TIME PERIOD: AM ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 GROWTH RATE: - 4.31% PSF: 1.1 SIGNAL ID: 2600 Intersection Volume Development ystiaoaartr Westbound Southbound ght; Left Thru Right tt Left Thru Right Existing Volume 6 $ �6 50 133 13 ,65 3f" 28 266 44 Diversions °!a Q°�� 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Season Volume QO3 55 146 141 y 31 293 48 Committed Developments Type % Complete Atlantis 1 0 0 Res 0 £t �� 8 0 4 #}_� ° 0 % JPB Realty fl1 0 0 0 €€_ 0 1 1 0 NR 0% Tequesta Offices 0 1 0 0 { 0 0 0 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 0 1 1 0 2 7 u t 0 Total Committed Residential 0 0 0( 0 0 2 0 0 Total Committed Non - Residential 0 1 1 E} 0 2 5 o Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 1� j2 Total Discounted Committed 0 1 1 ` 0 2 6 �� w ... Historical Growth -6 -17 20� 1 -11 -15 32 ` 4 Comm Dev +1 %Growth 1 5 6 4 3 6 7 �� I Growth Volume Used 1 5 6 a 4 3 6 7 Total Volume 73 205 244 f5 44 8 136 188 414 , Input Data E -W Street: Tequesta Dr COUNT DATE: 912/2009 Report Created: 04/13/2011 N -S STREET: Old Dixie Hwy S CURRENT YEAR: 2009 TIME PERIOD: PM ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 GROWTH RATE: -4.31% PSF: 1.1 SIGNAL ID: 2600 Intersection Volume Development Westbound rtk� n Southbound Left Thru Right ;€t fight Left Thru Right Existing Volume f6€f 55 189 59 8g 52 205 110 Diversions 0% 0% 0% 1 0% 0% 0% Peak Season Volumeu a -0 t4S 61 208 65 €E�; 57 226 121 Committed Developments Type % Complete Atlantis ftttl 7 0 3 Et 5 0 0 Res 0% JPB Realty 0 0 0 € 1 1 0 NR 0% Tequesta Offices (1 5 0 04 1 _ 'Y 0 2 0 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 0 1 1 tl i 0 1 11 Total Committed Residential 0 0 0 0 0 10 Total Committed Non - Residential 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 ` tk 0 0 0 0 Total Discounted Committed 0 1 1 3 0 1 11 Historical Growth -8 -18 12 18 -17 -30 6 Comm Dev +1 % Growth 2 5 4 4 4 4 8 13a Growth Volume Used 2 5 4 4 4 4 8 13 Total Volume 96 214 147 212 6p 200 366 89 • Input Data ROAD NAME: Old Dixie Hwy STATION: 1814 Report Created: 04/13/2011 CURRENT YEAR: 2010 FROM: Midpoint ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: County Line Rd GROWTH RATE: 6.77% COUNT DATE: 2/10 /2010 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2 -way NB /EB SB/WB 2 -way NB /EB SB/WB Existing Volume AN, �, Peak Volume ;k�'� , Diversion( %) { Volume after Diversion =7 k Committed Developments Type % Complete Tequesta Offices 3 2 0 3 1 2 NR 0% Atlantis 5 4 1 8 3 5 Res 0% JPB Realty 1 0 1 1 0 1 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 9 6 2 12 4 8 Total Committed Residential 5 4 1 8 3 5 Total Committed Non - Residential 4 2 1 4 1 3 Double Count Reduction 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Discounted Committed Developments 8 6 2 11 4 7 Historical Growth 38 13 24 46 31 16 Comm Dev+1% Growth 14 8 6 18 9 9 Growth Volume Used 38 13 24 46 31 16 Total Volume 592 210 385 730 484 250 Lanes 2L 2 -way or Class 11 Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. P YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2 -Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 2 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES • Input Data ROAD NAME: Old Dixie Hwy STATION: 1814 Report Created: 04/13/2011 CURRENT YEAR: 2010 FROM: Tequesta Dr ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: Midpoint GROWTH RATE: 6.77% COUNT DATE: 2/10 /2010 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2 -way NB /EB SB/WB 2 -way NB /EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion( %) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type %Complete Tequesta Offices 3 2 0 3 1 2 NR 0% Atlantis 5 4 1 8 3 5 Res 0% JPB Realty 1 0 1 1 0 1 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 9 6 2 12 4 8 Total Committed Residential 5 4 1 8 3 5 Total Committed Non - Residential 4 2 1 4 1 3 Double Count Reduction 1 0 0 1 0 1 Total Discounted Committed Developments 8 6 2 11 4 7 Historical Growth 38 13 24 46 31 16 Comm Dev +1 % Growth 14 8 6 18 9 9 Growth Volume Used 38 13 24 46 31 16 Total Volume 592 210 385 730 484 250 Lanes 2L 2 -way or Class II Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2 -Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES Input Data ROAD NAME: Tequesta Dr STATION: 1207 Report Created: 04/13/201 CURRENT YEAR: 201 FROM: Midpoint ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: IN Us Highway I GROWTH RATE: -13,39% COUNT DATE: 1127/2010 PSF 1 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume j, I Diversion(%) 4 M �,,,A Volume after Diversion 95 'N Committed Developments Type % Complete Tequesta Offices 8 7 1 9 2 7 NR 0% Atlantis 10 2 8 17 10 7 Res 0% JPB Realty 1 1 0 1 1 0 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 19 10 9 27 13 14 Total Committed Residential 10 2 8 17 10 7 Total Committed Non-Residential 9 8 1 10 3 7 Double Count Reduction 2 1 0 2 1 1 Total Discounted Committed Developments 17 9 9 25 12 13 Historical Growth -87 -50 -37 -110 -57 -53 Comm Dev+1% Growth 24 13 12 33 16 17 Growth Volume Used 24 13 12 33 16 17 Total Volume 675 389 287 858 442 416 Lanes 2L 2-way or Class 11 Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2-Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. I? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES • Input Data ROAD NAME Tequesta Dr STATION: 1207 Report Created: 04/1312011 CURRENT YEAR: 201 FROM: Old Dixie Hwy ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: Midpoint GROWTH RATE: -13.39% COUNT DATE: 1127/2010 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NBIEB SB/WB Existing Volume bi Peak Volume 64 11 Diversion(%) 4 Volume after Diversion Ifill, V0, V_'�Fzz Committed Developments Type % Complete Tequesta Offices 8 7 1 9 2 7 NR 0% Atlantis 10 2 8 17 10 7 Res 0% JPB Realty 1 1 0 1 1 0 NR 0% Total Committed Developments 19 10 9 27 13 14 Total Committed Residential 10 2 8 17 10 7 Total Committed Non-Residential 9 8 1 10 3 7 Double Count Reduction 2 1 0 2 1 1 Total Discounted Committed Developments 17 9 9 25 12 13 Historical Growth -87 -50 -37 -110 -57 -53 Comm Dev+ 1 % Growth 24 13 12 33 16 17 Growth Volume Used 24 13 12 33 16 17 Total Volume 675 389 287 858 442 416 Lanes 2L 2-way or Class 11 Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1/Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2-Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES Input Data ROAD NAME: County Line Rd STATION: 0 Report Created: 04/13/2011 CURRENT YEAR: 2010 FROM: Old Dixie Hwy ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: Midpoint GROWTH RATE: 0% COUNT DATE: NA PSF: 0 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Atlantis 8 6 2 12 5 7 Res 0% Total Committed Developments 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Committed Residential 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Committed Non-Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Discounted Committed Developments 8 6 2 12 5 7 Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comm Dev+1% Growth 8 6 2 12 5 7 Growth Volume Used 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Volume 8 6 2 12 5 7 Lanes r - 2L 2-way or Class II Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2-Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2 /Opt. I? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 • Link Meets Test 2/Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES Input Data ROAD NAME: County Line Rd STATION: 0 Report Created: 04/13/2011 CURRENT YEAR: 2010 FROM: Midpoint ANALYSIS YEAR: 2011 TO: Us Highway 1 GROWTH RATE: 0% COUNT DATE: NA PSF: 0 Link Analysis Time Period AM PM Direction 2-way NB/EB SB/WB 2-way NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume 0, "., Peak Volume Diversion(%) ....... .... Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Atlantis 8 6 2 12 5 7 Res 0% Total Committed Developments 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Committed Residential 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Committed Non-Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Double Count Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Discounted Committed Developments 8 6 2 12 5 7 Historical Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comm I)ev+l% Growth 8 6 2 12 5 7 Growth Volume Used 8 6 2 12 5 7 Total Volume 8 6 2 12 5 7 Lanes r - 2L ----I 2-way or Class 11 Capacity 1480 810 810 1480 810 810 Link Meets Test 1/Opt. i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 1 /Opt. ii? YES YES YES YES 2-Way LOS E Capacity 1570 860 860 1570 860 860 Link Meets Test 2/Opt, i? YES YES YES YES YES YES Class I LOS E Capacity 880 880 880 880 Link Meets Test 2/Opt. !I? YES YES YES YES Appendix B — Capacity Analyses B Palm Beach County Signalized Intersection Analysis INTERSECTION: Old Dixie Highway at Tequesta Drive VOLUMES: Year 2011 GEOMETRY: Existing Input Data AM PM Growth Rate = 6.77% 6.77% Peak Season = 1.10 Current Year= 2009 Buildout Year= 2011 AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right Existing Volume (9/2/2009) 121 165 31 28 266 44 65 182 216 50 133 13 Peak Season Adjustment 133 182 34 31 293 48 72 200 238 55 146 14 Diversion ( %) Diversion (Volumes) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Background Traffic Growth 19 25 5 4 41 7 10 28 33 8 20 2 1% Background Growth 3 4 1 1 6 1 1 4 5 1 3 0 Approved Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Background Used: GR 19 25 5 4 41 7 10 28 33 8 20 2 Project Traffic 0 1 3 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 Total 152 1 210 39 36 1 335 56 1 85 1 228 1 271 1 63 167 1 18 Approach Total 401 427 1 584 1 248 Critical Volume Anal sis No. of Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < 1 1 1 1 2 < Per Lane Volume 152 125 < 36 196 < 85 228 271 63 185 < Right on Red 10 /viii 60 10 Overlaps Left 0 ii i , /i! 0 % % %;t j; 0 %!ii j ;; /% p Adj. Per Lane Volume 152 1 115 < 36 186 < 85 228 211 --- 63 — T175 < Through /Right Volume 115 186 228 175 • Opposing Left Turns 36 152 63 1 85 Critical Volume for Approach 151 338 291 1 260 Critical Volume for Direction 338 291 Intersection Critical Volume 629 STATUS? UNDER PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Existing Volume (9/2/2009) 178 325 69 52 205 110 85 190 130 55 189 59 Peak Season Adjustment 196 358 76 57 226 121 94 209 143 61 208 65 Diversion ( %) Diversion (Volumes) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Background Traffic Growth 27 50 11 8 32 17 13 29 20 8 29 9 1% Background Growth 4 7 2 1 5 2 2 4 3 1 4 1 Approved Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Background Used: GR 27 50 11 8 32 17 13 29 20 8 29 9 Project Traffic 0 1 3 0 1 2 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 Total 223 1 411 87 1 67 1 260 141 110 238 163 69 1 237 77 Approach Total 720 1 468 511 383 Critical Volume Anal sis No. of Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < 1 1 1 1 2 < Per Lane Volume 223 249 < 67 201 < 110 238 163 69 314 < Right on Red 10 %! 10 /i /� %/i 60 %ii i �' �D 10 Overlaps Left �i�i /!�? 0 ; �� /y:� % /�! % %�� '/ � 0 Adj. Per Lane Volume 223 239 < 67 191 < 110 238 103 69 304 < Through /Right Volume 239 191 238 304 Opposing Left Turns 67 223 69 110 Critical Volume for Approach 306 414 307 414 Critical Volume for Direction 414 414 Intersection Critical Volume 828 STATUS? UNDER C\W,W01017 -Te mt,D —kp—e pnl2o11 RWorl RevisionlAnalysislGMA Old DW al Te...e TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY • General Information Site Information A nalyst [411312011 AH Intersection Old Dixie at Count Line Rd. Agency/Co. homas A. Hall, Inc. Jurisdiction Villa e of Te uesta Date Performed A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description GMH Te uesta Holdings, LLC East/West Street: County Line Road North /South Street: Old Dixie Highwa Intersection Orientation: East -West I Study Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 5 149 142 54 132 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 156 149 56 138 5 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R • Volume veh/h) 163 23 86 8 37 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 171 24 90 8 38 6 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LT R LTR (veh /h) 5 56 195 90 52 C (m) (veh /h) 1440 1256 422 814 432 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.46 0.11 1 0.12 95% queue length 0.01 0.14 2.38 0.37 0.41 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.5 8.0 20.6 10.0 14.5 LOS A A C A 8 A pproach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 17.3 14.5 A pproach LOS -- -- C 8 • Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.2 Generated: 4/1812011 6:22 PM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 40 General Information Site Information A nalyst TA Intersection Old Dixie at County Line Rd. Agency/Co. Thomas A. Hall, Inc. Jurisdiction Village of Te uesta Date Performed 411312011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description GMH Te uesta Holding LLC East/West Street: County Line Road North /South Street: Old Dixie Highwa Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 1 205 142 44 233 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 215 149 46 1 245 1 8 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 V Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 uration LTR LTR am Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R • Volume veh/h) 283 19 109 6 26 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 297 20 114 6 27 0 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LT R LTR v (veh /h) 1 46 317 114 33 C (m) (veh /h) 1312 1195 351 754 331 /c 0.00 0.04 0.90 0.15 0.10 95% queue length 0.00 0.12 8.98 0.53 0.33 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.7 8.1 61.6 10.6 17.1 LOS A A F 8 C pproach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 48.1 17.1 pproach LOS -- -- E C • Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.2 Generated: 4/18/2011 6:22 PM __ - _ _ �-I . �� : � �� _ �n I! { I � � - - �`�� . ,. r_.__� - .. ,(�. � , � ,.� � ,�� . _ x� � , �i f F � °- „ wc !; � y�--� < _�._ , �.: 4 _ y't.i J ; _ ._ .. � �,� P -- -- - - j .•x' -�� r .�,: � t:°W; ' �^_ .�"` _ , ��r� {'�`� ,'i: '�' ��.`� ,_ . -. - ._ s. �''. - �� "!+�`:�^.•. � '� . � � � � �, +�� I�;. �' � � , �Y . _ _ i.. _ 'W : .}�i t. ,�'�. � � ��fiT'; 4i � 7T �' � . ��' ► �,.i.�. � � 4 ��.f � � j �: 'X�^pi.�" � g ` _ � f✓�,� . � 7�, r.� r i � °ify xl�' � T •>��: �+1� ..f; � � � *�4 f n ';R. 7 �� - . V,'�;, J �i� �� 'Yi� '1-i�..xt; � ��fe -}:�.' `y��, .r�,,,_r,a. � :.d �`�.�.:li�� ! ,�' � :�� p -•J�. �,�� '1� ;� . �� -� .+ :� r ,..�. \!'_'.. .. '�. y,.�i � �._rl,t i _ , �*Lc`,_fi? r at ..i d� '��, �•� � - �: � ��+- � , � � . . _--, -� F � _ " 7��4.`: �� .:� �� 4 f . �LI_ ��' � „� _�� : ��n� . ` 1 _ �"�S. . _ d - - 'I p -1- �,.��s.g T _:w e _ .•� � I j�:. r � �' �J�. a`+ �.� _ � •�c n t � F � _ �7 7 I . �'�.� - � }' `� �� ■" � r 'l�f ; }� � - a ''� , � ,� � , _ _ n ��1 >� , .a. '. � "✓ 'TI� I�� 1'ir __ •:1 �~�� R �.� �� _'I{� �('� t_�( •,..� � _ _ +' ! � S' � •- ~ 1 _ _ - ., . ,, , � •;r-� � . . ,� , �_ .: � � :. . : r,,� I , _ �, � � � � �s r� ,; > , . .. ; _ , i _ ,,. , • ^ ;._.� , . . _, ' ,. , . ,. . , . : : ',_, ;,_ . . ,_.. .. � .:. �� , , : : . .. �� WEST ELEVATION (OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY) ,. , � , ,.: --- 1 t � � --- - - � � I�� ; , -,_ , �� , . . � ,,r ,�{f i ii� -f �� I f� �� i�i I �� ,� 1tt - f - - I'-� �-� j � ��',� � � i� :��j��' _�';�, -,� , � i._ � r _^_ � �� T � . ��`> . f� ,�'. r -,.,• • J ,�_ , t � �, /'' 4 '� � - ;�`( ti; `at� �• � . / � � I � "4 � %! h� � �1 � �z L _,. �(' i �:�"�--'�� ' �-� yl: S� , , � _ i, � � ,} � .`� �� ..1 . �'� �y7q°1 �� ..{ I ��l,. �� } , ��'y / ; � _ � e��'„t".. '__ ! �'�•. '� � .�} -� i �� i ,.x.,„ r . . _. :; � � ? �. , ,,: � � _ .. e 'r ,��b .,� � � .i�-__� , I � � f � - �,;.� �i � �, �, � �� / ! � {� 'A � .: .—__'___ � t �' �a1QC, � .___ -__- � ` _ ' _ ,� �� . �� ;_ ';K. -- - _— — ' �� _ � , : . ; _ _ �; � � � i .� � . � � _ ��'` � . • , � _�_. �"�..°;� � _ _- '` P — - � � ! `. � : , : ; .' �'�� ;,. � . . , _ - - ' � ,_:�, - , � � �"j � ; � �- :,� 1 3°. �� } � �.: _ ' �• I �i� � � � _ �,, !`� . _ �` �> -i � _�; i �, �? � � � ', � f ; - ��_- �-r. . ; f = ; - ,�'�' �f � - � � ,� . _ � . t � ,,, ► f : � � �+� ��, f � : y� _ J � �� -� �� .� � �+_ �� -��- }�+�� , �� -� � � � �� 11 +� ��- � . k �� ,� � ..►'�' .�� .. �� _ "� �.�, � a _, ., � �! �_ ... ,. .. �i � , ;. ,,, ; r � ., ,_, � ' . . , .. ak , - , -� _ 1 � SOUTH ELEVATION (VILLAGE BOULEVARD) ��1�� 1 � �C/��A �� J�� _ �1�� `��,Y�'��. 9 '�Y7� ;'% i1 � Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR.