HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Miscellaneous_11/19/1992_Downtown Task Force TE
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta, Florida 33469 -0273 • (407) 575 -6200
3 o Fax: (407) 575 -6203
o
m 4�
� couN
T E Q U E S T A D O W N T O W N T A S K F O R C E
M E E T I N G M I N U T E S
N O V E M B E R 1 9, 1 9 9 2
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Downtown Task Force held a regularly scheduled
meeting on Thursday, November 19, 1992 in the Village Hall,
357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida. The meeting was called
to order at 8:30 a.m. by Chairman Fred Martin: Task Force
members in attendance were: Chairman Fred Martin, Mac
Goodner, Peter Pimentel, Gary Van Brock, and Fred Onorato.
Staff members present were: Village Manager, Thomas G.
Bradford; and Building Official, Scott Ladd.
Vice - Chairwoman Schrecengost arrived at 8:45 a.m.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Pimentel moved to approve the Agenda as submitted.
Boardmember Goodner seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
Mac Goodner - for
Fred Martin - for
Gary Van Brock - for
Fred Onorato - for
Peter Pimentel - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (November 5, 1992)
Reflect in each motion made that Boardmember Peter Pimentel
voted "for" the motion.
Boardmember Goodner moved to approve the above - referenced
Minutes as amended. Boardmember Pimentel seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
Mac Goodner - for
Fred Martin - for
Gary Van Brock - for
Fred Onorato - for
Peter Pimentel - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Recycled Paper
Downtown Task Force
Meeting Minutes
November 19, 1992
Page 2
---------------------
IV. REVIEW OF MASTER PLAN AREA WITH WAYS AND MEANS OF INTEGRATING
VAN BROCK PROPOSAL AND ADENBAUM PROPOSAL. George Gentile.
George Gentile, local planner, presented to the Board several
overlays to the proposed Downtown Master Plan showing how the
proposed Dorner project shown south of Village Boulevard, and
the proposed Adenbaum /Hummert project for Lighthouse Plaza
impact the Master Plan.
The proposed roads of the Master Plan were depicted in red on
the overlay, showing how the access relates to the proposed
projects. In the Master Plan, Main Street was the spine of
the proposed downtown area, the link for the entire area.
Both the Dorner and Adenbaum /Hummert projects impact rights -
of -way. Pedestrian orientation and orientation to the road
network by the public has been the theme of the Master Plan.
The Adenbaum /Hummert project relates to that to some degree;
the Dorner project is a more traditional development, with the
circulation and open space happening inside the development -
more of an inward - oriented project with access onto Village
Boulevard with a potential future access onto Main Street.
It was Mr. Gentile's opinion that, in order to integrate these
projects into the proposed Master Plan and to link them
together to make them function, Main Street would be a very
important concept in maintaining the integrity of Town Center
Plan. Encouragement should be given to each project to orient
pedestrian traffic toward a Main Street access, as well as
some vehicular access. Another option would be to look at
vehicular circulation on a loop system and totally connect the
interior pedestrians. Church Street on the Master Plan is
probably no longer an important link.
Boardmember Van Brock interjected that the planned road
connections of the Master Plan suit neither project. He felt
the Board should work out a suitable road plan to fit those
proposed projects, if in fact, those projects are acceptable.
Mr. Gentile reminded the Board that they must remember to
consider the reasoning behind those road patterns and
determine how changes in those patterns would effect other
areas of the Plan.
Boardmember Pimentel asked if the Dorner project kept its
entrance as is on Village Boulevard, would it not serve the
Master Plan if they developed a pedestrian feature on Main
Street. Mr. Gentile responded that it could work, and
expounded further that the way Main Street was conceived was
as the main pedestrian and vehicular circulation, with
parallel parking and a wide sidewalk area.
Downtown Task Force
Meeting Minutes
November 19, 1992
Page 3
--------------- - - - - --
The road networking concept of the Master Plan is to cause
everyone to pass through the town center area, causing
everything to work together.
Bill Shannon, representative of St. Jude's Church, commented
that:
o the overlay did not show the appropriate location for the
Main Street access to the Church, pointing out the
correction.
o Another concern of St. Jude's Church was that the
proposed Main Street travels from an 80' right -of -way to
a 120' right -of -way and felt that would pose a problem
with some drivers, particularly the elderly, and that it
should be made a uniform right -of -way, considering
perhaps, the possibility of taking out the medians.
o The concept of eco -site park can be developable at a
point when it is no longer used as a feeding site for
Scrub Jays. Therefore, he felt the area should be
labeled on the Master Plan as a "temporary preserve ".
Jim Hummert stated that the southern end of the proposed Main
Street does not fit in with his proposed project plan and
displayed for the Board a drawing of his proposed project.
He felt Main Street connected nothing and cuts too close to
other things (roadways) that would cause it to be in violation
of State Codes. It was his suggestion that Main Street loop
through his proposed project in a zig -zag manner. Mr. Hummert
felt Old Dixie Highway, U.S. Highway One, and Tequesta Drive
offered all the main thoroughfare that was needed.
Boardmember Pete Pimentel left the meeting at 9:06 a.m.
Mr. Bradford felt that to have Main Street traverse through
the Lighthouse Plaza area could present many problems, causing
buildings and rights -of -ways to be re- oriented.
Boardmember Van Brock felt a developers plans ought not to be
changed to meet the Master Plan, but that the Master Plan
ought to be changed to meet the developers plans. Mr. Gentile
pointed out that axial relationships and direct site lines are
very important in the Master Plan to the overall concept,
stating that parallel parking is much easier on a straight
section of road than on one which curves and winds.
Downtown Task Force
Meeting Minutes
November 19, 1992
Page 4
---------------------
Mr. Hummert stated that if the Village insists on Main Street
as is presently proposed, he would abandon his proposed
project. Mr. Adenbaum felt there was a possibility of Main
Street being developed on one side, with a chance that it
could be years before the other side was developed.
Boardmember Goodner felt that if a theatre was located in the
proposed Adenbaum /Hummert project, and main street went
through that project, it could present a bottleneck in traffic
when 200 theatre -goers try to exit at one time.
The Board suggested that avenues be sought to determine if the
Adenbaum /Hummert project and Main Street can, in some way, be
adjusted to become more compatible. Mr. Adenbaum stated he
would not consider doing any planning off a non - existing
street that is not scheduled to be built or financed until
some time in the indefinite future. And, further, would not
invest any time nor monies, until the Village has made a
commitment to actually build whatever new streets onto which
the Adenbaum /Hummert would front, as well as committing the
monies to pay for those streets. Village Manager Bradford
informed Mr. Adenbaum that Northern Palm Beach County Water
Control District would be the ones building the streets, which
would be paid for by the landowners. Mr. Adenbaum answered
he would not even consider paying for that road.
V. ANY OTHER MATTERS
o Village Manager Bradford stated, as asked, he checked on
parking requirements for Alex Webster's Restaurant,
discovering they have 33 parking spaces now, and are
required by Code to have 58.
o Village Manager Bradford reported on the legal opinion
regarding 600 unit threshold. If one developer built
everything and wanted to go over the 600 units, and /or
the 115,000 square feet of commercial, that would become
a DRI, Development of Regional Impact. Those units which
exceed those thresholds would have to conform to Palm
Beach County's Traffic Performance Standards and would
not be "vested ". If a series of developers propose to
develop, the first one which causes the threshold to be
exceeded cause must comply with Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards (first come, first served basis).
Downtown Task Force
Meeting Minutes
November 19, 1992
Page 5
---------------------
VI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other matters before the Board, Boardmember
Goodner moved that the meeting be adjourned. Boardmember Van
Brock seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was:
Faye Schrecengost - for
Mac Goodner - for
Fred Martin - for
Gary Van Brock - for
Fred Onorato - for
the meeting was adjourned at 9:38 A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Fran Bitters
Recording Secretary
Date Approved:
ATTEST:
ann Manganie o
Village Clerk