HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Miscellaneous_07/22/1997_Finance & Administration Committee F Tf
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive
o` Tequesm, Florida 33469 -0273 (561) 575 -6200
4 o Fax: (561) 575 -6203
F9ph cu ty
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
JULY 22 1997
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Finance and Administration Committee held a
regularly scheduled meeting at the Village Hall, 357
Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Tuesday, July 22,
1997. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 P.M. by
Chairman Carl C. Hansen. A roll call was taken by Betty
Laur, the Recording Secretary. In attendance were the
following Committee members: Chairman Vice Mayor Carl C.
Hansen, and Co -Chair Joseph Capretta. Co -Chair Ron T.
Mackail was absent from the meeting. Also in attendance
were Village Manager Thomas G. Bradford, Village Clerk Joann
Manganiello, and Department Heads.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Village Manager Bradford requested two additions to the
agenda under ANY OTHER MATTERS: Direction from the Committee
in regard to sale of water department land, and if time
allowed, to view a video of an organization working in
Tallahassee on important annexation issues.
Co -Chair Capretta made a motion to approve the agenda as
amended with the additions requested. Chair Hansen seconded
the motion. The vote on the motion was:
/tec P� �cd Prt /x"r
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 2
------------------------------------
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the agenda
was approved as amended.
III. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS)
There were no communications from citizens.
IV. REVIEW OF RO WATER TREATMENT FACILITY DESIGN PLAN
Bill Reese of Reese Macon and Associates, consultants for
the RO Water Treatment Plant, reviewed the site plan for the
project and the architectural drawing presented to the
Community Appearance Board, as well as a revised
architectural drawing made after the Community Appearance
Board meeting. Mr. Reese commented that the Community
Appearance Board had wanted a cement tile roof, but had also
directed that they did not want to increase costs. Since
the initial cost of a cement tile roof had not been
comparable to the proposed standing seam metal roof, and the
tile roof would require ongoing high maintenance costs, Mr.
Reese had consulted Water Department Manager Tom Hall, and
the decision had been made to keep the standing seam metal
roof. Mr. Reese commented that the building was designed
for low maintenance. Mr. Reese reviewed the floor plan. In
response to Co -Chair Capretta, Mr. Reese explained that the
cost of the building without equipment was a little over $1
million. . Chair Capretta questioned whether the changes
desired by the Community Appearance Board had increased the
building cost. Mr. Reese responded that if the roof had
been changed to cement tile that costs would have been
increased.
Mr. Reese reviewed the permits for this project and their
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 3
------------------------------------
status. SFWMD and FDEP permits had been obtained, as well
as right -of -way permits from Palm Beach County, FDOT, and
Department of the Army. The FDEP Environmental Resource
Permit had been received. The Palm Beach County
Engineering /Traffic Driveway Access to Old Dixie Highway
permit had been issued and required response. The Palm
Beach County Health Department permit for the water
treatment plant was in process, and the Health Department
had asked for some items which would increase costs. The
Palm Beach County Health Department permit for the sewer
system connection for the plant had been submitted to ENCON
and the permit was anticipated in September, 1997. The
Village Community Appearance Board and DRC approvals were in
process and the first Community Appearance Board appearance
had been held July 16. Mr. Reese explained that some of
these permits had an expiration and that the permits must be
monitored so that renewals would be submitted when required.
Mr. Reese explained that the project was now at the point to
begin financial work and that an Engineering due diligence
report would be needed. Discussion ensued regarding what
Jupiter might do to prevent issuance of permits. Mr. Reese
explained that the only permits remaining that Jupiter might
object to were the Health Department permits. Any
objections from Jupiter could be countered with the argument
that the Village was in violation of the Health Department's
regulation that a plant must be under construction, so if
the Department would not issue a permit then they could do
nothing about the Village's failure to comply.
Proposed capacity of the new plant was discussed. Mr. Reese
explained that one train of 1.2 MGD would be installed
initially and that piping would be installed to allow a
total of 7 -1/2 MGD to be installed in the future. It was
pointed out that for future equipment additions only the
Palm Beach County Health Department Water Treatment Plant
permit would be needed, and if the building exterior changed
then approval from the Village would also be needed. Co-
Chair Capretta speculated that within five years the Village
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 4
------------------------------------
would only be able to get 2 MGD from ground wells, therefore
increased supply would be needed from the new plant and the
village would have to install a second module. Co -Chair
Capretta questioned whether in phasing out the old plant
there was a point in time that the old plant would become
impractical to operate. Mr. Reese responded that he could
not predict the actions of SFWMD but expected them to remain
conservative in the amount they would allow to be drawn from
the surface wells; and there was no reason the old plant
could not continue to operate at 2.7 MGD and that plant
would always be cheaper to operate than the RO plant, so
that the RO supply would always be the secondary water
source. This assumption was based on known technology. Co-
Chair Capretta commented that therefore the only reason to
install a second RO module would be when the Jupiter
agreement expired in 12 years.
Chair Hansen questioned when the first gallon of RO water
could be sold, assuming everything went as planned with the
RO plant construction, to which Mr. Reese responded the
target was mid 1999. Mr. Reese explained that as long as a
plant was under construction that he believed the Health
Department would cooperate and that if lack of water became
a problem he expected SFWMD to grant a temporary permit to
allow pumping more water from the ground. Discussion ensued
regarding surface wells and the capacities they were
permitted for versus the amounts available. Mr. Reese
pointed out that the current plant could only handle 2.7
MGD.
During discussion of the lawsuit with Jupiter, village
Manager Bradford explained that before the trial on August
4, the judge would decide on Jupiter's challenge to
Tequesta's RO plant project where their contention was that
under FS Chapter 180 Tequesta had to have their permission
to build an RO plant. Village Manager Bradford commented
that if Jupiter lost that decision that he did not expect
them to challenge the Health Department permit.
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 5
------------------------------------
Mr. Reese explained to the Committee that his firm's next
step would be to prepare an Engineering and Due Diligence
Report, which would consist of an engineering document and
the supporting documents to go into the bond issue. Finance
Director Kascavelis commented that the bond rate was now the
lowest in years.
V. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL MATTERS ASSOCIATED WITH RO PLANT
Village Manager Bradford introduced Robert Ori, Public
Resources Management Group, Inc., Maitland, Florida, a
Utility, Rate, Financial Management Consultant, whose
services had been secured through Reese Macon and
Associates.
Mr. Ori explained that due diligence meant the Village must
make sure the rates were adequate to cover operating
expenses, including debt service, set aside funds for
Capital Improvements, and financial requirements of the
bonds. Certain financial ratios must be met; and bond
insurers and ratings require these ratios.
Mr. Ori explained that the purpose of the study he had done
was to evaluate potential rates, taking into consideration
the cost of the RO plant plus operating costs plus issuance
costs of revenue bonds over a 5 -year projection, using FY 97
as a basis since that was the most recent financial plan of
the Village. Mr. Ori stated that this was a preliminary
plan which was subject to change, especially since the
Jupiter litigation was an unknown; the cost of the plant
could change, and any available cash reserves could change.
Mr. Ori verified that the Water Department would carry this
cost and that the Village could not be required to raise ad
valorem taxes for this purpose.
During explanation of the overview of his analysis, Mr. Ori
commented that a projected rate adjustment of 8.5% would be
needed and a one -time adjustment with no phasing had been
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 6
------------------------------------
assumed. This one -time adjustment should meet financial and
rate covenant requirements and no further adjustment was
anticipated until the year 2001. Rate phasing options were
available to the Village based on the financial needs of the
system, cash reserves /fund balances, debt service payments,
and operating expense requirements. Mr. Ori explained that
rates were favorable at the present time and that rates
could be phased. One known cost was that a Renewal and
Replacement Fund contribution of $150,000 annually would be
needed.
Village Manager Bradford expressed agreement with Mr. Ori's
analysis of a rate increase, since Village cash reserves
were rapidly being depleted to pay legal fees. The village
Manager explained that Water Department funds would not be
available for a rainy day unless the reserves were
replenished.
Mr. Ori reviewed significant assumptions for financial
forecast, explaining that the forecast was based on FY 1997
budget, and no recognition of Town of Jupiter bulk rate
increase /litigation costs had been made. The assumptions
made were:
No change in water purchases from Town of Jupiter
- Maintenance of minimum purchase requirement
Incremental costs for RO water treatment plant
- Operational June 1999
- Power /Chemicals /Insurance
- Increased labor costs
Debt service for expansion
- $7,270,000 principal amount of bonds
-Level debt service payment
- Average interest rate 5.44* (very attractive)
-30 year term
-No capitalized interest
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 7
------------------------------------
Bond resolution assumptions (Covenants)
-Debt service coverage of 1.15
- Renewal and Replacement Fund deposit of 5% of previous
year gross revenues
- Capacity fees not considered as gross revenue
(contingency factor of $50,000 annually included)
Forecast of customer growth
- Average compound growth rate of 1.6%
- Higher during FY 1998, approximately It thereafter
The rate impact assumed a stand -alone rate adjustment of
8.5W and 10,000 gallons of service. Proposed rate increase
was $2.14. The difference between the proposed Village rate
with a 9W utility tax and the current Village rates with
Jupiter surcharge was $4.86. A sample utility average
indicated rates would be competitive with other utilities
utilizing RO water treatment, assuming 10,000 gallons and
without a 9% utility tax. The proposed Village rate of
$25.16 was compared to the average of $26.10. Other cities
rates were discussed, several of which were considering
increased. Mr. Ori commented that Boca Raton was
considering a 27% rate increase.
Mr. Ori reviewed other options which could affect rates,
including debt service, outside service surcharge,
guaranteed revenues, phasing options, and the Jupiter water
purchase contract. Mr. Ori had concluded that the Village
should finalize their financial forecast, adopt a rate
adjustment prior to issuance of utility revenue bonds in
order to achieve AAA rating, and ascertain that utility
rates would be competitive for systems with RO water
treatment. Mr. Ori explained that he had been very
impressed with the Villages financial status, since they
were virtually debt -free, and commented that even with $7+
million the picture was very good. Mr. Ori stated that the
Village would grow into the new system and pay it off, and
that the village was very strong in its ability to meet the
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 8
rate covenants. Chair Hansen commented that Mr. Ori had
been very conservative in his analysis, and questioned
whether the village was too small to proceed with this size
plant, to which Mr. Ori responded he did not believe so.
Co -Chair Capretta commented that Mr. Ori assumed that rates
should be increased as soon as possible to replenish
depleted reserves, and that Mr. Ori had recommended placing
surcharges charges on non - residents, changing Village policy
to reserve capacity to contractors, and planning to pay
interest only until the RO plant became operational. Mr.
Ori explained that the Village had an option of adjusting
base charges, especially for seasonal residents. Water
Department Manager Tom Hall verified that only minimum base
charges were charged to seasonal residents when they were
out of town.
Mr. Ori estimated total cost for the engineering and
financial documentation needed for the bond issue as $25,000
- $30,000, and explained that a bond issue would take
approximately 2 months. Discussion ensued. Co -Chair
Capretta commented that the Committee should recommend that
the village Council authorize proceeding at their August 14
meeting. The Village's fixed charge per month of $8.80 was
compared to Jupiter's charge of $9.80.
Co-Chair Capretta made a motion to recommend the following
actions to the village Council: To increase the base rate
from $8.80 to equal Jupiter's base rate of $9.80; to
consider the feasibility of 4% increase on commodity; to
institute a reservation and capacity charge for developers;
to capitalize interest to pay interest only in the
beginning. Chair Hansen seconded the motion. The vote on
the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted..
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 9
------------------------------------
The concept of a small rate increase now rather than a one-
time large increase was discussed. This would mean that
another small increase would be instituted in a couple of
years. Mr. Ori suggested that both increases be adopted in
the original ordinance with an effective date for each,
which would help with bond insurers and avoid having to
decide on the increase again. Discussion ensued.
In response to Chair Hansen question, Village Manager
Bradford reviewed the recommendations which had been made in
the motion, and commented that the Committee had also
recommended the possibility of an Ordinance with a dual
increase.
Chair Hansen made a motion to approve the Engineering and
Financial documents needed for the bond issue. Co -Chair
Capretta seconded the motion. During discussion of the
motion, Finance Director Kascavelis recommended consultation
with Clark Bennett, Financial Advisor, and with Bond Counsel
to determine a source of payment for the documents. The
vote on the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
VI. STATUS REPORT ON POTABLE WELLS DRILLED ON TEQUESTA PENINSULA
Tom Hall, Water Department Manager, reviewed the status of
the wells. Well 25, located at the entrance of Turtle
Creek, had been in service for two years. Well 26, on
Country Club Drive, was placed in service in December, 1996.
Well 27, inside Turtle Creek located on Turtle Creek Drive,
had been in service since February, 1997. Mr. Hall
explained that these wells operated well and the quality of
their water was adjusted by blending with water from other
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 10
------------------------------------
wells. 108,000,000 gallons had been pumped from these wells
in two years. Co -Chair Capretta reported that at a meeting
he had attended in Turtle Creek, someone had reported that
the Village did not get any water from the wells in Turtle
Creek. Mr. Hall verified that well just inside Turtle Creek
was one of the best producers with the best water quality.
VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
Village Manager Bradford reminded the Committee that
adjacent to the new public service facilities garage behind
the 222 Building there was a strip of land which had been
leased to Mr. Shaw, the owner of the 222 Building, and to
the owner of the building formerly known as the Hamilton
building. Because of changes in Florida Statutes which
required such city -owned properties to be taxable, and at
the direction of the Village Council to offer the land for
sale only, this land had recently been appraised. Callaway
& Price had appraised one parcel at $42,000 and the other at
$52,000.
Village Manager Bradford explained that on the next Village
Council agenda, the village Council would consider whether
to appeal a recent decision by the Special Master to waive
the requirement that a registered Landscape Architect must
prepare plans submitted for Ordinance 377 improvements in
the case of Mr. Shaw. The village Manager explained that
the Village Attorney had indicated that the Village might
want to find another way to gain compliance from Mr. Shaw,
and suggested that the land sale could be used as leverage.
It was considered a bad precedent to establish by allowing
one person not to use a registered Landscape Architect and
requiring all others to do so. Status of Ordinance 377
compliance was discussed.
Chair Hansen made a motion to allow staff to proceed with
the offer to sell the property at a price to include the
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 11
------------------------------------
appraisal price plus any other charges which had been
incurred. Co -Chair Capretta seconded the motion. The vote
on the motion was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Village Manager Bradford showed a video from Florida League
of Cities, explaining the Commission on Local Government II.
The Commission was requesting each municipality's input
regarding their three greatest challenges, and what
constitutional, legislative or other tools were desired to
make their jobs easier. village Manager Bradford suggested
that liberalization of annexation laws to provide Village
services at a more reasonable price to all the people
profiting from those services would be a tool helpful to the
village, and that matter was under consideration by the
Commission. After the video was concluded, village Manager
Bradford explained that workshops were scheduled in West
Palm Beach in November, and that comments were desired prior
to September 1. Chair Hansen requested that the village
Manager provide the Village Councilmembers with a written
proposal requesting feedback regarding the seven areas
discussed in the video and the three specific questions the
Commission would like answered. Co -Chair Capretta requested
that a workshop be held to discuss the Council's position on
these issues. Co -Chair Capretta commented that the Federal
government was balancing their budget by giving items to
states but keeping the tax money, and the states were in
turn passing on items to cities without the tax money to
take care of those responsibilities. village Manager
Bradford commented that Tequesta had always been a proponent
of local control and home rule, which was a point that
should be made to the Commission. Chair Hansen commented
that Tequesta needed annexation. village Manager Bradford
commented that this Commission could help institute major
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
July 22, 1997
Page 12
------------------------------------
changes.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Co -Chair Capretta made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Co-
Chair Mackail seconded the motion. The vote on the motion
was:
Carl C. Hansen - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting
was adjourned at 7:00 P.M.
Res submitted,
z 6--
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
oann Mangano
Village Clerk
DATE APPROVED:
i i 7