Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Miscellaneous_06/12/1985_Community Appearance Board MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD JUNE 12, 1985 A meeting of the Village of Tequesta Community Appearance Board was held at 9:OO A.M., Wednesday, June 12, 1985 in the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida. Board members present were: Cleveland, Nagle, Sundermann, and Alternate Member, Ruth Butterfield. Also present were;R. Harp, Clerk of the Board and Scott D. Ladd, Building Official. The Building Official handed out pages 419 -421 of Chapter 7 of the Village Code, Community Appearance Board with Items 1, 3, 4 and 10 high- lighted. The Board was advised that two (2) additional items had been re- ceived and were scheduled for this meeting. The Chairman advised that the items for consideration were: (1) Free standing sign for Nozzle Nolen, Inc. (2) Sign for Calhoun Travel; and (3) Sign for Dollar General Stores The first item for consideration was the Free Standing Sign for Nozzle Nolen, Inc. 451 Old Dixie Highway. Don Rochford, Rex Signs, was in attendance representing the applicant. The Board looked at the plan of the proposed 12' x 8' Double faced sign and the Building Official showed the color chips that had been submitted for the sign. Rochford said the sign was the standard logo for the company. The Site Plan indicated the sign to be placed on the northwest corner of the property, a minimum of ten feet from the right -of -way line. The pole would be 20 feet high and 28" overall including the sign.It is to be an illuminated sign. The proposed sign is light yellow background, elephant is light blue, crown and "NN" to be red, name to be royal blue and other wording and figures to be black. Cleveland questioned what was on the adjacent Rinker Property at this area and Ladd advised nothing but their office building was to the east. Nagle said he thought the sign was too garish and that the logo could be kept but the colors should be more discreet. Ladd advised the Board did not have to accept the proposed colors. Rochford said the colors were soft colors and not garish. Nagle reiterated that the sign was too Minutes of the Community Appearance Board June 12, 1985 Page 2 - ---------------------------------------------------- garish and that he would like to see an actual sign. Rochford said the same general logo was on the Nozzle Nolen truck and would contact them to have one come to the Village Hall for the Board to see if they so desire. The Board thought this would be helpful and Rochford contacted the company and a truck was brought to the Village Hall and the Board looked at the logo on the truck. Nagle suggested that the applicant present the real colors of the sign for the Board's consideration. Cleveland questioned why the background could not be white color. Mickey Nolen said the_same sign was at their Stuart location. It was noted the sign is to be internally lighted. Nagle moved- second by R. Butterfield that the applicant submit a color rendering of the sign in exact colors for the Board's consideration. The vote on the motion was: Nagle - for Butterfield - for Sundermann - Against Cleveland - Against and the motion did not pass. A discussion then ensued on the background color. Cleveland asked Nagle how he would feel about the sign if it had a white background and Nagle stated he would like to see a true color rendition. Rochford noted that there would be a slight difference in any colors submitted to the finished product. Nagle said he needed to see the sign in colors in order to give his opinion. Rochford said sign makers are aesthetically conscious. Nagle said a realistic color photograph would give him a good idea of the color scheme for the sign. Cleveland asked the Board if they would like a color photograph of the Stuart sign sub- mitted and it was the general feeling of the Board that they would like to see a color rendition of the proposed sign. Rochford expressed concern about the delay for his client. Cleveland said there was concern about the color scheme for the sign and the Board did not want to be pressured into a decision. He suggest carrying the matter over to a meeting on June 19, 1985 for review of a color photograph or color rendering. Rochford said he would provide a color rendering. Therefore, no action was taken on the application at this meeting. The next item for consideration was a Sign for Calhoun Travel, Tequesta Fashion Square, 150 North U.S. Highway No. 1 Bay 15. Rochford also was representing this applicant. The Board reviewed the plan for the proposed sign. Ladd noted it conformed to the Signage Plan for the Square and was beige background with dark.brown letters. Letters are to be cut out and put onIND0 plywood. Nagle moved, second by Sundermann, that the plans for Calhoun Travel be approved as submitted. The vote on the motion was: Nagle - for Sundermann - for Cleveland - for Butterfield - for a Minutes of the Community Appearance Board June 12, 1985 Page 3 - ------------------------------------------------ and the motion therefore passed. The Board then signed the plan. The next item for consideration was the Dollar General Store Sign for the former Eagle Store, 200 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta Plaza. The appli- cation was a replacement face for the existing box. The proposed sign is a yellow background with black letters. Nagle recommended that the Board only go along with the existing general sign motif for the Plaza, white letters or the aqua facade. He noted the Village Manager had written a letter to the store suggesting this. It was the general feeling of the Board that the sign be revised to conform to the other signs already existing in the Plaza. It was suggested that since no one was present for the applicant that no action be taken on the application. Gill Gemino asked what would happen to the sign partially up and not completely covered. Ladd said it could be better covered or taken down. Nagle moved, second by R. Butterfield that "Dollar General Stores be notified that the partial sign now in place is not acceptable and is to be removed at once." The vote on the motion was: Nagle - for R. Butterfield - for Cleveland - for Sundermann - for and the motion therefore passed. The meeting was adjourned at 10 :00 A.M. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT HARP Clerk of the Board MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING OF.THE VILLAGE:OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA JUNE 11, 1985 A meeting was held by the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Florida at 7 :30 F.M., Tuesday, June 11, 1985 in the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida. Councilmembers present were: Gemino, Howell, Mapes and Murphy. Mayor Stoddard was on vacation. Vice -Mayor Murphy was Chairman of this meeting. Also present were: Robert Harp, Village Manager, Cyrese Colbert, Village_Clerk and John C. Randolph, Village Attorney. The Opening Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was given by Councilmember Gemino. There was no one who wished to speak under "Time for Visitors'.'. The Council Meeting Minutes for May 14, 1985 were received. Councilmember Howell asked the Village Manager what was happening with the enclosure for Well 7R. The Village Manager told Council the footer will be poured on Wednesday and the blocks will be laid on Thursday. It should take 3 to 4 weeks for completion. The Village Manager told Council that he has received a memo from the Water Department Superintendent concerning the water supply of the Village and the present drought conditions. In the memo, Mr. Worth stated, "in this drought period the water table is showing a decrease.each week..." The Village.Manager.told Council that Well Field 5 'is down to the lowest level we have had. Council talked about putting on Mandatory Water Restrictions. Mapes reminded Council that unless SFWMD went along with us, our Ordinance is only enforceable to Tequesta residents. Council set a Special Council Meeting for June 19, 1985 'at 5:00 P.M. to 'scuss the possibility of a mandatory water use restriction. The Village Manager. told Council that he had received a call from Mr. Tom Vani, Step Saver, advised that he could not meet with Council until he first week in July.if that is okay with Council. Council agreed that t at date would be okay. Council talked about the appointment.of members to the Community Appearance Board and their duties. Minutes of the Village Council Meeting June 11, 1985 ,Page 2 - Howell suggested that some kind of Beautification Committee be set p in connection with the Community Appearance Board. Gemino told Council she objected to the proposed sign for the "Dollar" Store that is replacing "Eagles ". The Village Attorney advised that Councilmembers can go to these meeting and speak in favor of or against items on the agenda but they cannot advise the Board on how to vote. Council suggested that a Workshop Meeting be set up to set up guide lines and to express their concern about the Community Appearance Board and suggested amendments. Howell moved, "that we have a Council Workshop Meeting to review the procedures and guidelines of the Community Appearance Board." Gemino seconded - and vote on the motion was: Gemino - for Howell - for Mapes - for Murphy - for ' and therefore the motion was passed and adopted. A Workshop Meeting on the Community Appearance Board was set for Thurs- day, June 20; 1985 at 7:00'P.M. Mr. Robert Sattely, resident, spoke on the installation of a traffic. light at Old Dixie and County Line Road turning to go to`the Post Office. The Village Manager told Council and Mr. Sattely that this is already being pursued by the County because the County owns the traffic signals. .Mr. Arthur Bchakjian asked Council if anything temporary is going to be done about the noise at Well 7R. Council said no and that they.are doing the best they can to eliminate the problem. Mapes moved "that we adjourn ". Gemino seconded and vote on the was: Gemino - for Howell - for Mapes - for Murphy - for and therefore the motion was passed and adopted and the meeting was adjourned at 8:13 P.M. i APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA 0'g, �t om ��V E / DATI� 7 O NAME •F APPLICANT �v MAILING ADDRESS G�� ti alct 150 A - os PHONE NUMBER: HOME BUSINESS 74 7- 5 6 95 LOT /PARCEL ADDRESS �f iS LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ADDI NS AND/ORATE RAT NS RE UIRIN/Gj�J COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW: atL ( an 7l PROPERTY OWNERi MAILING ADDRESS f �O N. ` S �' f " Act-, tX NOTE: APPLICANT SHALL INCLUDE WITH THIS APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1. TWO (2) SETS OF A,PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED SITE PLAN SHOWING ALL EXISTING AND'PROPOSED STRUCTURES, SETBACKS, PARKING AND .LOADING LAYOUT, INGRESS AND EGRESS, SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS, r LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. 2. TWO (2) SETS OF PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS WITH COLOR SCHEMES, SIGNAGE, TYPE OF ROOF AND ROOF COVERING AND WINDOW AND DOOR TREATMENT. 3. ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION PERTINENT TO THIS APPLICATION. 4. WRITTEN APPD FROPERTY OWNER. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: -- ! ,fA n ,✓ i i IZ -rte 1,7: 5E 0 RED -"C) CAq,-(!e-fIf WTICE OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA 357 TEQUESTA DRIVE TEQUESTA, FLORIDA TELEPHONE MAILING ADDRESS AREA CODE 305 _ P. O. BOX 3273 746 -7457 TEQUESTA, FLORIDA 33458 June 7, 1985 Mr. Wilcher Dollar General Corporation 427 Beech Street Scottsville, Kentucky 42167 Dear Mr. Wilcher: RE: SIGN DOLLAR GENERAL STORE 200 TEQUESTA DRIVE, TEQUESTA PLAZA, TEQUESTA, FLORIDA Pursuant to your request of Councilmember Gill Gemino, we are enclosing a copy of that Section of the Village Code, Appendix A- Zoning, Section XII Sign Regulations. Also enclosed is our invoice in the amount of $1.75 for the copy. For your information, your store is located in Tequesta Plaza with a general sign concept of white letters on the aqua colored facade of the building and we would appreciate your sign conforming to this concept. Yours very truly, VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA ROBERT HARP Village Manager RH:mk Enc. cc: Mr. Scott D. Ladd, Building Official f Village of Tequesta From----------- ---------------__----------_______.------------------------------_._.._....----------------_-------- P. 0. Box 3273, Tequesta, Florida 33458 To _..__Dollar Genera C orporation (Attn: Mr. Wilcher) Address----427 Beech Street -- Scotts ville, Kentucky 42167 Terms Ne t upon receipt-- - - -_— Order No. r �- - 1985 — -- — — I Jun 7 Copy of Section X S Regulations $1 75 j — T H ANK YOU APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA NAME OF 'Ai'PLICAKT �'I' �� ..,. DATE: c tz3 PHONE NtJMBRR; NOME BUSINESS 7 7 LOT/PARCEL ADDRESS, C) L Qu ES ?A LOT... BLOCK SUBDIVISION PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ADDITIONS AND /OR ALTERATIONS REQUIRING. COMMUNITY; APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW: PROPERTY OWNER: ,g - 2 C��P d - f7/ 3 8' c MAILING 'ADDRESS ' CS�L ' /�'"' STr ifz !�dK NOTE:_ APPLICANT SHALL INCLUDE WITH THIS APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1. TWO (2) SETS OF A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED SITE -PLAN SHOWING ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURES, SETBACKS, PARKING AND LOADING LAYOUT, INGRESS AND EGRESS, SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS,, - LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. 2. TWO (2) SETS OF PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS WITH COLOR SCHEMES, SIGNAGE, TYPE OF ROOF AND ROOF - COVERING AND WINDOW AND DOOR TREATMENT. 3.. ANY -OTHER DOCUMENTATION PERTINENT TO THIS APPLICATION, 4. WRITTEN APPROVAL,FROM PROPERTY OWNER. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: u.l 3 0 Il_ tv LLJ Q W u c9 - == < 5 J M 0 a 16 s WS r .[] z x O m eG z r D Q __'` _ -_- -- 0 -j N O in Un - Q � C ` , H J I - - — —_ -'- - NSW o o Q V Q W p •L _ 1-• W LU U J ,n Z W x o � s x V/ < 03 cn � W - H a 7. LU Q Ln cm in z I 1 II - aLO 0 LU - - -- - - W CZCVG LOI.OV 9NINnu8 APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW , VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA NAME OF APPLICANT ' " ezz k N O A I hy DATE: 6A 1° ? O/ � MAILING ADDRESS zl-5 ` /-� PHONE NUMBER: HOME BUSINESS 7 W - 9 ?/ S LOT /PARCEL ADDRESS LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ADDI ONS AND / ALTERATIONS REQUIRING COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW: PROPERTY OWNERi .. M E MAILING ADDRESS m NOTE: APPLICANT SHALL INCLUDE WITH THIS APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1. TWO (2) SETS OF A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED SITE PLAN SHOWING ALL EXISTING AND'PROPOSED STRUCTURES, SETBACKS, PARKING AND LOADING LAYOUT, INGRESS AND EGRESS, SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS, r LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. 2. TWO (2) SETS OF PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL BUILDING - ELEVATIONS WITH COLOR SCHEMES, SIGNAGE, TYPE OF ROOF AND ROOF COVERING AND WINDOW AND DOOR TREATMENT. 3. ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION PERTINENT TO THIS APPLICATION. 4. WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM PROPERTY OWNER. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: -( 1 i zv 4 1 , 11L Y RD um NOW T�l % `j•�. �.*` 4h S�il'�''3� ip ..` i =y' -� �11V� T >H y pp1 d V ) t f r ANTONE __t BLACK C O N C►A R i (� (' % c�► i t.ly G Iry l 1. 3F_ f , s CP R A z SY: