Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 07_09/08/20111. VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING: VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL FORM Meeting Date: September 8, 2011 Meeting Type: Regular Ordinance # : N/A Amount Remaining after item: N/A Budget Transfer Required: No Consent Agenda: No Resolution #: N/A Originating Department: Community Development 2. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: (Wording form the SUBJECT line of your staff report) CASE # SPR 4 -11 Site Plan Review to construct a 1,997 square feet addition to the existing Good Shepherd Episcopal School. The application includes a proposed landscape plan. The address of the proposed site in 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta. 3. BUDGET / FINANCIAL IMPACT: Account #: N/A Amount of this item: N/A Current Budgeted Amount Available: N/A Amount Remaining after item: N/A Budget Transfer Required: No Appropriate Fund Balance: No 4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES: (This is a snap shot description of the agenda item) The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan development to construct a 1,997 sq. ft. addition to the existing Good Shepherd Episcopal School. The addition will house two (2) resource rooms, two (2) staff offices, a storage room, a toilet room, and mechanical rooms. It is assumed that there will not be an increase of students and faculty numbers as a re . It of this expansion. 5. APPROVALS: Dept. Hea Attorney: (for legal sufficiency) Finance Director: Reviewed for Financial uff iciency o Financial Impact Village Manager: —5 i • SUBMIT FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION: • APPROVE ITEM: ❑ • DENY ITEM: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report — Village Council meeting- 9.8.11 1. PETITION DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: James M. Stergas, AIA Stergas & Associates, AIA 1940 Riverside Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 OWNER: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 400 Seabrook Road Tequesta, FL 33469 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan development to construct a 1,997sq. ft. addition to the existing Good Shepherd Episcopal School. The addition will house two (2) resource rooms, two (2) staff offices, a storage room, a toilet room, and mechanical rooms. 2. LAND USE AND ZONING 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING SUBJECT PROPERTY Residential Low Density Residential Low Density R -1 Single Family Dwelling North Residential Low Density Residential Low Density R -1 Single Family Dwelling South Commercial Public Buildings and Grounds Commercial Public Buildings and Grounds C -1 Commercial East Residential Low Density Public Buildings and Grounds Residential Low Density Public Buildings and Grounds R -1 Single Family Dwelling C -1 Commercial West Recreation and Open Space Commercial Recreation and Open Space Commercial C -1 Commercial R -OP Recreation and Open Space 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School • • 3. BACKGROUND Good Shepherd Episcopal School proposed to construct a 1,997 square foot addition to the existing school, which includes two (2) resource rooms and two (2) offices. Per Village's Code Section 78 -705 (28) (b) Required number of parking spaces, the proposed addition required the provision of an additional eight (8) parking spaces. Good Shepherd Episcopal School applied for a Variance from Code Section 78 -705 (28) (b) Required number of parking spaces so that it does not have to provide the required additional parking. Village Council approved the Variance application at the June 9, 2011, Public Hearing (See attached Variance Order). Since Good Shepherd Episcopal School is located on the R -1 zoning district, they needed to apply for a Special Exception Use to allow the expansion of their existing school. Village Council approved the Special Exception Use application at the June 9, 2011, Public Hearing. The Special Exception order includes conditions of approval that were imposed by the Village Council for this application. The applicant needs to meet those conditions before site planning approval (See attached Special Exception Use Order). Good Shepherd Episcopal School submitted its application for Planning and Zoning Advisory Board public hearing in June, 2011. DRC (Development Review Committee) met July 13th and provided comments to the applicant. The application was heard by the Planning and Zoning Advisory Board on August 4, 2011. The Board recommended approval 5 -0, and provided recommendations to the applicant (See attached meeting minutes). The current site plan analysis was conducted based on compliance with Village Code, conditions of approval imposed by the Special Exception Use order and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Advisory Board. 4. STAFF REVIEW a. Setbacks Front Rea r Side- North Side -South b. Height PROPOSED COMMENTS 459' Code: 25' Met Code Requirement. 25.01' Code: 10' Met Code Requirement. 93.5' Code: 71/2' Met Code Requirement. 40.0' Code: 7112. Met Code Requirement. 1- story building 12'8" c. Lot Coverage 23.35% d. Open Space Code: For accessory structure: 1 story or 15Ft. Met Code Requirement. Code: 37% Met Code Requirement. 50.75% Code: Min 25% Met Code Requirement. e. Landscape See proposed landscape plan. Approx. 105 shrubs to be removed for construction, and replaced with 177 native shrubs. In compliance with Code. f. Parking None Per Code applicant would need to provide 8 Parking spaces. Note: Applicant applied for a variance that was approved by Council June 9, 2011. Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 2 • • • Special Exception Use Conditions of Approval On June 9, 2011, Village Council approved a Special Exception Use for the addition to the existing Good Shepherd Episcopal School. The following conditions of approval were imposed by the Village Council: 1. "In the event that the applicant's student enrollment reaches 169 students, the applicant shall immediately implement a three (3) tiered system for student's pick -up ". On May 19, 2011, the elementary school started implementing a "tiered" dismissal schedule with 15t tier release at 2:55 pm and 2nd tier release at 3:05 pm. This strategy has improved the negative stacking situation at elementary school dismissal time. Additionally, the school has staggered releases times as follows: Early Learning dismissal at 11:30 am; Pre - School dismissal at 2:10 pm. The current 2011/2012 student enrollment is 115; with 18 full -time staff and 1 part -time staff. At this time, the applicant does not need to implement a three (3) tiered system. Also, staff has been monitoring stacking condition after classes started this school year. Currently, staff has observed no problems with stacking at the site. The site planning application meets this condition. 2. "The applicant shall enhance the hedge line on the south property line so that it is code compliant; the applicant shall also install, operate and maintain an irrigation system" The proposed landscape plan includes the following information regarding this condition: "210 Myrsine to replace southern property line hedge, remove existing mixed Ligustrum hedge, install a continuous native Myrsine hedge from Tequesta fire department fence corner (east) to utility box (west), fertilize, mulch, maintain, and water with a fully operational and maintained irrigation system ". The site planning application meets this condition. 3. "The applicant shall provide the Village with its student enrollment and faculty numbers on an annual basis. This shall be coordinated with the Community Development Department and the Village Clerk's Office." The current 2011/2012 student enrollment is 115; with 18 full -time staff and 1 part -time staff. The site planning application meets this condition. Planning and Zoning Advisory Board Recommendation The application was heard by the Planning and Zoning Advisory Board on August 4, 2011. The Board recommended approval 5 -0, and provided recommendations to the applicant (See attached meeting minutes). The PAZB recommendations were as follows: Coordinate with Gallery Square North property owner a mutual agreed solution regarding the southern property line hedge. The applicant provided a letter indicating that Gallery Square North agreed with the proposed landscape and irrigation system (See attached letter). Integrate supplemental rainwater harvesting with the irrigation system. Department of Community Development -Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 3 • • • FINAL REMARKS • This development application met the requirements set on Section 78 -334 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised in the Jupiter Courier on August 28, 2011. • This development application was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) including Community Development, Law Enforcement, Public Works and Fire Safety. • Palm Beach County Traffic Division has determined that "the proposed school facility expansion project does not include any addition to the number of students and will not generate any new daily or peak -hour trips, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County ". • The applicant is proposing to demolish the current 8' wall located on the rear of the property. Village's law enforcement recommended to demolish this wall to provide clear sight that will foster a safe environment for the school activities. The original intent of the wall was to screen the landscaped courtyard, while also minimizing any noise that might affect the adjacent properties. Considering the current location of the playground area, the wall is not accomplishing its initial intent and it is becoming a potential hazard or unsafe area that it is difficult to monitor. • Per this application, it is assumed that there will not be an increase of students, and not additional impact on water consumption. This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacarias, AICP, and; Approved by Chief James M. Weinand Date Department of Community Development - Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School 4 • • • Existing School Conditions and Parking Area Existing Playground Area Department of Community Development - Staff Report— Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School • • • Existing conditions in proposed School expansion area 8 Ft. Wall to be demolished to provide a clear sight to foster a safe environment for the school Existing conditions of hedge located on the south property line. Proposed landscape plan includes removal of all dead /exotic materials, and provides a continuous hedge and irrigation system. Department of Community Development -Staff Report — Good Shepherd Episcopal Church and School • • • GALLERY SQUARE NORTH OZ OF TEQUESTA, INC PO BOX 3245 TEQUESTA, FL 33469 561.346.3616 August 18, 2011 To Whom It May Concern: Oz of Tequesta, Inc. and Gallery Square North approve the Good Shepherd Episcopal School Landscape plan of removal of existing planting along the alley between the Church /School and Gallery Square North and replacing the hedge with 210 myrsine plants. The plan that we approve also includes 100% automated irrigation system for the entire planted area. Cyrese Colbert Property Manager ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION CASE NO.: SE -01 -11 FILED: Village of Tequesta Date: W/61, IN RE: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church & School, Owner /Applicantfime: ID: g adi PROPERTY LOCATION: 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 25- 40 -42, E 620 FT OF S 275 FT(LESS S 15 FT RD R/W) OF NE 1/4 OF SE Y4 PARCEL CONTROL NUMBER: 60- 42- 40- 25 -00- 000 -5110 SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTED: Modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f. single story addition onto the existing school in the R -1 Single Family Dwelling Zoning District in accordance with Sec. 78 -173 and Sec. 78 -362 of the Village Code of Ordinances. ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION This cause came on to be heard upon the above application and the Tequesta Village Council having considered the evidence presented by the applicant and other interested persons at a hearing called and properly noticed, and the Tequesta Village Council, being otherwise duly advised, THEREUPON, THE TEQUESTA VILLAGE COUNCIL FINDS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The subject property is located in the R -1 Single Family Dwelling Zoning District in the Village of Tequesta. 2. The applicant has submitted all documents required by the Village's Code of Ordinances for special exception review. 3. The application, the staff report and all other supporting documentation and presentation materials as reviewed by the Village Council at its June 9, 2011 meeting, and as kept on file by the Village, are made a part hereof and are hereby incorporated by reference. 4. According to Section 78 -173 of the Village Code of Ordinances, churches with Page 1 • • • accessory schools are permitted as a special exception in the R -1 Single Family Dwelling Zoning District upon approval by the Village Council. According to Section 78 -362 of the Village Code of Ordinances, modification of an existing special exception is allowed only upon a finding that the Village's special exception criteria have been met. 5. The applicant is requesting modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f single story addition onto the existing school. 6. Under the provisions of the Village Code of Ordinances, the Village Council has the right, power and authority to act upon the request herein made. IT IS THEREUPON CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: The application for Special Exception, Case No. SE -01 -11 with reference to the above described property within the Village of Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida, to permit the following: Modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f single story addition onto the existing school, in accordance with the special exception application attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby APPROVED since the Village Council hereby finds that the applicants have met the standards set forth in Sections 78 -362 and 78 -363 of the Tequesta Zoning Code for special exception approval. The following conditions of approval are imposed by the Village Council for this application: 1. In the event that the applicant's student enrollment reaches 169 students, the applicant shall immediately implement a three (3) tiered system for student pick -up. 2. The applicant shall enhance the hedge line on the south property line so that it is code compliant; the applicant shall also install, operate and maintain an irrigation system for said hedges so that they receive sufficient watering. 3. The applicant shall provide the Village with its student enrollment and faculty numbers on an annual basis. This shall be coordinated with the Community Development Department and the Village Clerk's Office. 4. The applicant has agreed to each and every one of the aforesaid conditions of Page 2 • • • approval during the special exception public hearing. The term applicant(s) as used herein shall include all successors and assigns. * The applicant's special exception approval shall expire in twelve (12) months unless a building permit has been obtained, preliminary site plan or plat approval has occurred, or other significant action to satisfy the requirements of this approval have occurred in accordance with Sec. 78 -367. DONE AND ORDERED THIS q DAY OF JUNE, 2011. ■ %% ,, p,C�,E OP I,% LORI 9Mc WILLIAM S1 Ri m = m:cn= VILLAGE CLERK � quORpn'gC -� 9TF0 . "� ►nmaun���`` Page 3 MAYOR TOM P. TERNO, VILLAGE OF QUESTA • • • ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FILED: Village of Tequesta CASE NO.: VAR -01 -11 Date: l&Pali Time: IN RE: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church & School, Owner /Applicant PROPERTY LOCATION: 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 25- 40-42, E 620 FT OF S 275 FT(LESS S 15 FT RD R/W) OF NE 1/4 OF SE %4 PARCEL CONTROL NUMBER: 60- 42- 40- 25 -00- 000 -5110 VARIANCE REQUESTED: Variance from Sec.78 -705 (28)(b) and (32) to forgive the eight (8) additional parking spaces required for the modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f single story addition onto the existing school in the R -1 Single Family Dwelling Zoning District. ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION This cause came on to be heard upon the above application and the Tequesta Village Council having considered the evidence presented by the applicant and other interested persons at a hearing called and properly noticed, and the Tequesta Village Council, being otherwise duly advised, THEREUPON, THE TEQUESTA VILLAGE COUNCIL FINDS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The subject property is located in the R -1 — Single Family Dwelling District in the Village of Tequesta. 2. The applicant has submitted all documents required by the Village's Code of Ordinances for variance review. 3. The application and all supporting documentation and presentation materials as reviewed by the Village Council at its June 9, 2011 meeting, and as kept on file by the Village, are made a part hereof and are hereby incorporated by reference. 4. According to Section 78 -61, variance approval by the Village Council is required. Page 1 • • • 5. The applicants have applied for a variance from Sec.78 -705 (28)(b) and (32) to forgive the eight (8) additional parking spaces required for the modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f. single story addition onto the existing school. 6. Under the provisions of the Village Code of Ordinances, the Village Council has the right, power and authority to act upon the request herein made. IT IS THEREUPON CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: The application for Variance, Case No. VAR -01 -11 with reference to the above described property within the Village of Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida, to forgive the eight (8) additional parking spaces required for the modification of a previously approved special exception to allow the construction of a 1,997 s.f. single story addition onto the existing school in accordance with the variance application attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby APPROVED since the Village Council hereby finds that the applicants have met the standards set forth in Section 78 -65 of the Tequesta Zoning Code for variance approval. * The term applicant(s) as used herein shall include all successors and assigns. * The applicant's variance approval shall expire in six (6) months unless a building permit has been obtained in accordance with ' 78 -68. If the building permit expires or is voided, the variance approval also expires or becomes void. DONE AND ORDERED THIS DAY OF JUNE, 2011. l - ,.�•v Okp0R Qee, LORI McWILLIAMS, MME SEAL VILLAGE CLERK - `• INCORPORATED - . "ov.,9411C".‘e.1 MAYOR TOM PAT)jNO, VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA Page 2 • • • DRAFT PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 4, 2011 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Village of Tequesta Planning and Zoning Advisory Board held a regularly scheduled meeting at the Tequesta Village Hall, 345 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Thursday, August 4, 2011. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Acting Community Development Director James Weinand. A roll call was taken by Lori McWilliams, Village Clerk, who noted the following were present: Chair James Hackett, Vice Chair Michael Schmidt, Board Members Elizabeth Schauer, Steve Okun, and Eric Jolly, and Alternate Edward Gigante. Also present were Acting Community Development Director James Weinand, Village Attorney Keith Davis, and Village Clerk Lori McWilliams. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION Board Member Schauer moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Board Member Okun seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES MOTION Board Member Jolly moved to approve the minutes of the July 7, 2011 meeting as submitted. Board Member Okun seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. SWEARING IN OF WITNESSES Attorney Davis swore in all those intending to offer testimony in tonight's case. EX -PARTE COMMUNICATION Board Member Jolly disclosed his son had enrolled at Good Shepherd for the fall; he had checked with Palm Beach County Ethics Commission and found since he paid normal fees and received normal discounts this did not meet the special financial benefit. Chair Hackett reported he had had a brief conversation with a parent about this application coming before the Board. No other ex -parte communication was reported. OLD BUSINESS — There was no old business to come before the Board. • • PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 4, 2011 " Page 2 of 4 NEW BUSINESS P &Z 5 -11 Application for site plan development review to construct a 1,997 sq. ft. addition to the existing Good Shepherd Episcopal School. The application includes a proposed landscape plan. The address of the proposed site plan review is 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469. Acting Community Development Director James Weinand introduced the application. Consultant Nilsa Zacarias presented the staff report. The project had been reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC). Staff had reviewed the project for compliance, and project details were provided in the staff report. On June 9, 2011, the Village Council had approved the proposed Special Exception Use and imposed the following condition of approval: `The applicant shall enhance the hedge line on the south property line so that it is code compliant; the applicant shall also install, operate and maintain an irrigation system ". The landscape plan included the following in regard to this condition: "100 Myrsine to be installed along southern property line and irrigated (remove all dead /exotic plant material)" Jim Stergas made a presentation on behalf of the applicant, providing background information and describing the project. Board Member Okun urged the applicant to integrate supplemental rainwater harvesting with the irrigation system. Board Member Schauer asked about replacing the oak trees instead of transplanting due to their age; Mr. Stergas indicated transplanting should not be a problem but if so, the applicant would be agreeable to replacement. Staff provided a traffic performance standards review handout from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division. The applicant responded to Vice Chair Schmidt's concerns regarding enclosing more space and concerns about water collection in large roof valleys, which he explained would flow into the courtyard. Public Comment Cyrese Colbert, 11663 Banyan Street, Palm Beach Gardens, explained she was Property Manager for Gallery Square North which was located adjacent to the subject property. Ms. Colbert reported Good Shepherd was a good neighbor and they got along well, but expressed concern regarding proposed replacement plantings for the alleyway, which were described to be the same kind of plants as those existing. She provided a handout of what the proposed Myrsine plants were supposed to look like, which was different than the existing plants. There had been problems with the existing tree roots growing into the sewer system, and the sod had had to be replaced numerous times. She asked if there would be berries and bugs, and advised these plants could grow to a height of 50 feet, so they should be maintained properly, and commented she would prefer a different plant and proper maintenance. Mr. Jolly commented Village • Council had approved the Special Exception with a condition that the irrigation system • PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 4, 2011 • ' Page 3 of 4 and plantings be maintained. Chair Hackett indicated there were better plant material choices. Mr. Stergas noted an irrigation system was encumbent upon Good Shepherd, and suggested the applicant work with the adjacent property owner to come up with an agreeable hedge material. Ms. Colbert requested to meet with the landscape company. Acting Community Development Director Weinand requested the two come to agreement and report the results to him before the Village Council meeting. MOTION Board Member Okun made a motion to approve the site plan for application P &Z 5 -11. Motion was seconded by Board Member Schauer. The vote on the motion was as follows: James Hackett Yes Michael Schmidt - Yes Steve Okun Yes Elizabeth Schauer - Yes Eric Jolly - Yes The motion therefore carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. COMMUNICATION FROM CITIZENS • None ANY OTHER MATTERS Acting Community Development Director Weinand provided a handout of Ordinance 08- 11 and Ordinance 09 -11, designating the Planning and Zoning Advisory Board as the Local Planning Agency. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Board Member Okun; seconded by Board Member Schauer, and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lori McWilliams, MMC Village Clerk • PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 4, 2011 "Fage4of4 Note: These summary minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the meeting. A verbatim audio record is available from the Office of the Village Clerk. All referenced attachments are on file in the Village Clerk's office. • • • • • PROJECT NAME: VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA Department of Community Development 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 Phone: 561.768.0450 Fax: 561.768.0698 Ck. # Rec. # Date: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 7- (46:-.FrinDy€..Th $ )41' 1) VILLAGE COUNCIL ocry ski-vier-47 'E (2 c c.oeo L 64114 ooL - S,U 126,e71.4 ts-122i-ri PROJECT ADDRESS: f 0C) — 4 o t- V-6)12-47 7 Estimated Project Cost: '( 7E7 ogic7 Applicant Name: A thfr 1 'T g g 41..ss t iS.4 c t e c L\i. Applicant's Address: I'T 64d t\! P t' . ., �r' .�� .� Ft_ Applicant's Phone No.: S15.43(#0 r? 43(ic7 Fax No.: 747 ?Sot" E -mail Address: gT bg! f -'SW t Provide written approval from the property owner, if other than the applicant. Property Owner's Name: .4cfe�17 , �� " I G� L t 1 1 •- r ;011.2 s�rt a vac � � � z�r! Property Owner's Address: 4'd �� ?ta Property Owner's Phone No.: 144-c-co/ Fax No.: E -mail Address: G1(sS76�ot7Si fi 4r-44- v DESCRIPTION OF WORK: (T� /r fraV(711701.1 rO tjlsr ii.1c cL - ro :Le ¥G4,4;r7G -rS. All construction, additions, and/or alterations of commercial buildings must be approved by the Planning & Zoning Board. The Planning & Zoning Board meets the first Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m., as needed in the Village Hall Council Chambers, 345 Tequesta Drive. The applicant will be informed by letter of their scheduled meeting date. Due to administrative review, the meeting date the applicant is scheduled to attend, may not be the closest meeting to when the application is submitted. The Planning & Zoning Board is an Advisory Board only. After review and recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Board, applications will be heard at the next available Council Meeting of the Village of Tequesta, for final approval. After approval by the Village Council, a building permit can be issued by the Building Department. 1 A. STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP: AO ®n SpJGf 4 ' 512J5C7f • Gtra • ANV bit✓ • B. STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE: -1'j c,I•.1 "j� 140t,l . F6s00 t- ofFICE -� TOILZT 'fie St41+,44uS life Le P.420.4vt4 SNvi tAMV -,1-. C. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMP PLAN & CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS: ' •' 1 114 c tfip.tt 44 6 ii .V tL- 1 4 Ctn-A? t 4041-5 4 o 7Y .54 co•la-1 • C-T D. E. • STATEMENTS OF PRELIMINARY REVIEW BY OTHER AGENCIES: 1 OCA.l.t - GENERAL LOCATION MAP: k4F 4. ot•! 1 LLl t '%4V F. SURVEY Ve 5 14114 G. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS /STUDY: jeAl H. TREE SURVEY: gip, Afe 01JLI( 2 fieeSS iNIVOt 1lgQ 4 V _56 A /4 I: SITE PLAN: 1_J 1. ARCHITECT-ENG ER- SURVEYOR- PLANNER - DEVELOPER:? Tf l 57-T4 ti.st � oc..- CtiLG���J Z; Q�ic.�� *.A.5soc -sit �v� R, 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION: (a) BOUNDARIES & TOPOGRAPHY: *I P% L L. 1 I OP-( 0/4 / f 1t%ST SGf. R.' '; 4c4.4 TA • SHoPPWA r.G .; t r *N G. . s.IvsATIA.t (b) EXISTING STREETS: 5 pix2arrio4 Pees Nor Vt4S ' hJ4 drizoors (c) ADJACENT BUILDING & /OR STRUCTURES: ' go 'D .:�/ .� 5 d %c Ey4c9, I " # ."n_t.; AWL 4oi -c4-6yl t fes,IN.sr "r© I1 \M. w (d) ACCESS (INGRESS & EGRESS): fo0'-4- 1.MIo Nb'( Di'/ • OI 94txEFsae (e) TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT: tao rpor-f-le, Kto S cJDstit -% cc_ sT FF Wlu. t AP F'; 4aa - ii4C4.4-1G612 1'w FJC, S ?/a v4waT (f) TOTAL PAVING WITHIN PARKING AREAS (SO. FT. & %)( 14CW A/4. S1t76" L.I&L#GS) Z55 SP-(16.9%) (g) OFF STREET PARKING /LOADING AREAS:A i wi4Put,n fi42 V14.Ib4si(.6 VAug �t•-o1 (h) T B ILATJON OF PA �G /JO4DI IGG S,PACES: 63 ' Se -gooL p'L'aP -Of? e -Go GtdR �to :G IC. SP - I �t S ATI S 7Htzt o -? Sf►ec:. c x i4 f g (i) RECREATION FA ILITIES & LOCATIONS mg .,- ENt , F sobs -r 1 - saG'. f `2T[ L-ME S of, =� � () SCREENS & BUFFERS: ( tI4 P (k) REFUSE C E N 1e EAS: 4/51/44 LJJG(c,SGt2 DLJtry1 z off 50u , (]) AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES: POWER tg j (0 4 WATER ] tiler SEWER '..;-14M77/46.1 TELEPHONE E-74911144 CABLE TV jif je//'fii4h FIRE HYDRANTS 3 S' .577^d4 Acts Ire -} t4X"L '3fiSNPip . Hvsa coNalcc,To,k1 S (m) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS OR GRANTS: a6,/ 05w (n) PROPOSED RIGHTS -OF -WAY: t4lol.1t f °a7 2 3. GROSS ACREAGE / ACRES & SQ. FT.: 1101600 Sr*JOI2,5 peer)/ S.9/ (a) TOTAL OPEN SPACE (SQ. FT. & %): 8a/644 9r'/ 40.510 (b) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (STRUCTURES) (SQ. FT. & %): �a�r too SF /Z; 2 °7.0 (c) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: ALL PAVING, WALKWAYS, PATIOS, DECKS, ETC.) (SQ. FT. & %): ) /46 F /'o -. 7. (d) LOT COVERAGE (GREEN AREAS) (SQ. FT. & %) 1. WITHIN ALL PAVING AREAS: 2-1,400. cor 41 / I'4 % 2. REMAINDER ALL AREAS: &it /46SF+7-/ ,4 14, 3. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: ea, 645-5r/. 5 ?O (e) UNITS PER ACRE: /4 /A., (f) TOTAL SQ. FT. AREA ALL BUILDINGS, ALL FLOORS:( /i(GL.uopl tov[4z50 34%1cc Sr/ J. PROPERTY & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS (AGREEMENTS / SURVIVABILITY BONDS): (244 Iegz, 14.4s i b Arsats. . b/ .I'rat14,4C.£s ez Cr' K. PRELIMINARY PLANS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 5T� qRM DRAINAGE: G silwj-4 , IA 117144 1_44Z'7 17146.145 (p{ It q 6017! j SE6 VN4aleig24144 Lta'!'r (Mt/x *lo) 2. SEWER LAYOUT:'S771.t4 ;11.1104 fro ?'PI't 4 rz -N1 3. WATER DISTRIBUTION & SYSTEM LAYOUT (INCLUDING BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS): 444t2 'P 5/121 aE� Fey/r..1 %a3 ?D f47011 *.1 4. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LAYOUT (INCL -UDING RANSFORMER LOCATIONS): gp_OL44, 7�c�vnI 4'.vIc. room + X14P i6'/ '?aP14 '- 5. TELEPHONE & CABLE UNDERGROUND LAYOUT (INCLUDING ABOVE GROUND JUNCTION & DISTRIBUTION BOX LOCATIONS): £•4Sli,14) 6/.6 &IC S Wk.L Jt7 L. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS (ALL ORIENTATIONS): ('r�i (.�,,,42.g r'wr 44 egsgA r ,_1; -V,w i (5 etf. NU-owe/7 -r A -Z. 01 M. BUILDING APP ARANCE & LANDSCAPING: ' iI A.50kr ) 4- i-wa12. &' // len.4 iS cr 471'/ r E1l0.14 2o`17›u. as' liMeS4tWru) AMc 4T 601-41 4111,g1: fir. N. SIGNS (PROPOSED NUMBER, TYPE, SIZE & LOCATIONS):W A►-tb 68p 4 Nc NN+..) 4 'Fc 2, o¢ 504,45 r it l4 bovraV WIT 610 ' 6,44 (S 'V Irkwneb uschp O. PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS (DREDGING, FILLING, SLOPE, DRAINAGE ft-'u MIIICH 1.114 Yogrtg Row; uNE tivom PATTERNS, NATURAL VEGETATION, ACCESSIBILITY, RETAINING WALLS, BERMS, PRIVACY WALLS AND /OR FENCES): t4° Vela** 7 &t-1c. -c M Igor?, F1 ca.. d7' tNitnet7thrG :p- �F D�1T'ior�J W( O► ilatn4e Ra1�14. 1i1/s `eXls1i. /4 ' i rt.,...) w YARS? E7(zb,04 5 e:r + coor ibizo * 4911,1 r 4orrapv poom5fw15. `M' Ib.eoLG 1 4p12-0a/4 Us46T6.�or`1.1SccescsIstu j,( Wier II Stile-P1,44 , 62US7W4 Si Fl vacY LAM-t4.- T7 FGttill4 bT Cas1 $ 4scif4 1,P PPos from j isioraw. re ►I /A. a CA.■& ✓ie_i- ._ . - - -. . 1 -c) 1 ..IGC _ 17.471.* a..IV.. Ir, itlr,..1hIl.1 rrf7?t7 P. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS: • 1. ZONE DESIGNATION: 4912 N6- ` • Q. 2. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N/4. - f p Vc.w - v 4oi4 1t4 3. 3. PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: IS .G3 I-1 60112 4. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: iYha 114 ti, tt HtZi.17 Z *Ja) DEVELOPMENT STAGES (PHASES):: b Vj& ST � 7 I e=14,41 R. LEVEL OF SERVICES [SEE CODE SEC. 78- 331(h)] 1. TRAFFIC (ROADS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY): GothfUGc5 < c-' ( kcie►ol 'f / ak, ) Scp✓tca (-Va. . 2. SANITARY SEWER: CP't 'LIGr—s: 4 4?).l.S1 Jpf f PS i vF & _S 51(p 44.1-s/ / na-( Kgp. 3. DRAINAGE: GGMWt t €S: MtAxIrt tt4.957. a 2,--f "t - 2414oUIZ.4pn s‘64.7 4. POTABLE WATER: c-o'�pbi s. 'O2cs 41°A);164,-E/ V 'T (Mai < 303o 46L s/b /t7a�� fr' c, u PI 04.Y) 5. RECREATION: 5E 2,(,) iZ .sc_ rrit,1.1 Permits and/or level of service documentation from all applicable agencies. Include a copy of the letter /document with your application. Apply a page number to the letter and indicate the page number in the spot provided below. 1t1 c'-rL btL T i,i-its , sI✓R-v iea p-Xi'rt�%4 Mr% Di70 fold ) r L9 SEcot -►t�j T ps -ra 431c 4 a� esob , 1) Vi lage of Tequesta ti sties Department 2) Village of Tequesta Engineer 3) Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District (ENCON) 015 4) Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority 5) Palm Beach county Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) ;C- 6) Palm Beach County Health Department 7) Palm Beach Traffic Engineering Department 11/41/4., 8) Palm Beach County School Board (Letter of Determination for School Concurrency) 'ls_ X. 9) Waste Management (Nichols Sanitation) I D 10) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) • 11) Florida Power & Light 12) Florida Department of Transportation t /s., 13) Florida Department of Environmental Protection gror 14) Comcast Cable Company • 41' 15) AT &T Communications Ic,) VILLh4t5 of ?Lgtdc S7 • The applicant will submit to the Village of Tequesta Department of Community Development with the following documents for Planning & Zoning Board review, forty -five (45) days prior to the meeting date: • • 1) For new construction or additions, Fifteen (15) sets of professionally prepared site plans showing all existing and proposed structures, setbacks, parking and loading layout, ingress and egress, sidewalks and walkways, exterior lighting layout, dimensions of street frontages and property lines and all signage. 2) Fifteen (15) sets of Landscaping Plans in accordance with Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances, Division IV, Landscaping. 3) Fifteen (15) sets of multi - dimensional color renderings and /or photographs are to be provided. The Planning & Zoning Board needs to see an exact rendering of what is to be placed on the site. Color photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to be used must be supplied. Since color printers often do not display the correct color, it is recommended that samples of the paint chips, as well as a sample of the support materials (i.e., canvas, wood, metal, etc.) be provided. 4) One (1) set of Plans 11x17 size and One (1) disk. 5) Any other documents that may help clarify the position of the applicant. APP AP ICA G/141201 DATE NOTE: All renderings, models, drawings, photos, etc., submitted to the Village will become the property of the Village of Tequesta. 5 • VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 136 Bridge Road Tequesta, Florida 33469 (561) 768 -0700 or (561) 768 -0421 July 1, 2011 Mr. James M. Stergas Architect Stergas & Associates, AIA 19540 Riverside Dr. Jupiter, Florida 33458 RE: Good Shepherd Expansion Dear Mr. Stergas: In response to your recent request, this is to advise that the Tequesta Utilities Department is the purveyor of water service to the above referenced. Service to be provided will be in accordance with the Tequesta Utilities Department Water Service Policy and appropriate Water Service Agreement as required. This is a letter of service availability only and not a commitment of service. As of this date, The Tequesta Utilities Department has capacity to serve this project and a firm commitment will be established when the Water Service Agreement and the Tequesta Utilities Department have executed the appropriate agreements and connection fees have been paid. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Russell R. White Public Services Manager LOXAHATCHEE RIVER DISTRICT 2500 Jupiter Park Drive, Jupiter, Florida 33458 -8964 • Telephone (561) 747 -5700 Fax (561) 747 -9929 E -mail: osprey gloxahatcheeriver.org Website: www.loxahatcheeriver.org • • D. Albrey Arrington, PhD., Executive Director June 17, 2011 Jim Stergas, AIA Architect Stergas & Associates 19540 Riverside Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 Re: GOOD SHEPARD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL Addition of 1,997 s.f. Dear Mr. Stergas: Preserving Nature by Design • Award Winning Wastewater Progran • WildPine Ecological Lab • Busch Wildlife Sanctuary • The River Center • Friends of the Loxahatchee River This letter is provided in response to your recent request concerning sanitary sewer service availability for the subject project. Please be advised that, as of this date, sanitary sewer service can be made available to the subject property upon the joint execution of a Standard Developer Agreement and the payment of certain costs in accordance with the District Rules. Copies of the Standard Developer Agreement and Chapter 31 -10 are available for your review. Consistent with District policy, the Developer will be responsible for all costs associated with connecting to the existing wastewater system of the District. Should you require additional information on this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Clinton R. Y. Deputy Ex ve Director V: \dev \proj \Good Shep Chrch\2011 \availltr.doc Gordon M. Boggie Board Member Joseph 0. Ellis Paul J. Whalen Board Member Chairman Harvey- M. Silverman Sawyer Thompson Jr. Board Member Board Member James Stergas From: Mark Godwin [MGodwin @pbcgov.org] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:42 AM To: James Stergas Subject: RE: Good Shepherd School Addition, Tequesta James, You are correct, the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code, Article 14, Chapter C, Vegetation Preservation and Protection is only applicable to the unincorporated areas of the county. No type of approval is required from PBC Environmental Resources Management Department to remove native vegetation from project sites located within a municipality. Please contact me if more information is required. Thank you, Mark Godwin, Sr. Environmental Analyst Palm Beach County Dept. of Environmental Resources Mgmt. 2300 North Jog Road, 4th Floor West Palm Beach, FL 33411 -2743 Office Phone: 561- 233 -2473 fbOffice Fax: 561 - 233 -2414 mgodwin @pbcgov.org From: James Stergas [mailto:stergas @bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:38 AM To: Mark Godwin Subject: Good Shepherd School Addition, Tequesta Mark, This is to confirm our phone conversation regarding Good Shepherd School Addition; and to confirm that as the project is in the Village of Tequesta, this does not fall under Palm Beach County ERM. Please reply to confirm. Thank You, James M. Stergas, AIA ARCHITECT S 1'ERGAS & ASSOCIATES, AIA _ _ _ Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. 1 James Stergas From: Kenny_Wilson @doh.state.fl.us • Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:41 PM To: stergas @bellsouth.net Subject: RE: Good Shepherd School Adition, Tequesta,Florida James, This will do just fine. The Health Department is satisfied with the letters from the two utility departments. Thanks From: James Stergas [mailto:stergas @bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 5:12 PM To: Wilson, Kenny A Cc: 'Jesse Sukhu' Subject: RE: Good Shepherd School Adition, Tequesta,Florida Kenny, As discussed, the Village is requiring your sign -off even though the utilities for this site are not from municipal service providers. Attached are the Tequesta Utilities letter confirming water service, and Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District confirming sewer service. If you can please reply with your sign -off. If any questions, please contact me. Thanks, Jim James M. stergas, AIA, LEED ®AP ARCHITECT STERGAS & ASSOCIATES, AIA 19540 Riverside Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 (561) 575 -3360 [(561) 747 -7800- fax] 1 James Stergas • -4? - f- N FAPil) •From: Kenny_Wilson@doh.state.fl.us Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:00 AM To: stergas@bellsouth.net Subject: RE: Good Shepherd School Adition, Tequesta,Florida James, That is correct, once I have proof of connection I will send you an e-mail confirming that we are good. Thanks Kenny Wilson PBCDOH Pn) (-)(4 f„.! Fe? 4---f--v12-1 From James Stergas [mailto:stergas@tellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:23 AM To: Wilson, Kenny A Subject: Good Shepherd School Adition, Tequesta,Florida Kenny, This email is to confirm our conversation that if/since our sewer and water services are from LRECD for sewer service and Tequesta Utilities for water service, Palm Beach County Health Department approval is not aplicable. Also as discussed, I will email you their letters as soon as I get them. Please confirm with a reply to this email. Thanks You, James M. Stergas, AIA. ARCHITECT STERGAS & ASSOCIATES, AIA • 1 • Department of Engineering and Public Works PO. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416.1229 (561) 684 -4000 FAX: (561) 684 -4050 www.pbcgov.com • Farm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T Marcus, Chair Shelley Vana, Vice Chair Paulette Burdick Steven L. Abrams Burt Aaronson Jess R. Santarnaria Priscilla A. Taylor County Administrator Robert Weisman 'An Equal Opportunity ,4ffirnrrtive Acton Employer" pnnfed on recycled paper August 2, 2011 Ms. Carol Lux, Planner Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: Good Shepherd Episcopal Church & School Project #: 110715 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Carol: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the proposed school expansion project entitled Good Shepherd Episcopal Church & School, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as follows: Location: East side of Seabrook Road, north of Tequesta Drive. Municipality: Village of Tequesta PCN #: 60- 42- 40- 25 -00 -000 -5110 Existing Uses: 22,400 SF Church, 2,600 SF General Retail, and Private School for 169 Students. New Proposal: Addition of 1,997 SF to existing school facilities — with no addition to total number of Students. New Daily Trips: None New PH Trips: None Build -Out: Year End 2013 Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed school facility expansion project does not include any additions to the number of student and will not generate any new daily or peak -hour trips, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. No building permits are to be issued by the Village after the build -out date specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684 -4030 or e -mail at matefina,pbcgov.com. Sincerely, Masoud Atefi - TPS Administra MA:sf "CC: Chris Heggen P.E., - Kimley -Hom & Associates, Inc. File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Reviews F :ITRAFFIC1ma\Admin\Approvais12o 1 111 1 07 1 5.doc palities - Traffic Engineering Division • • • Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Good Shepherd Episcopal School Expansion Palm Beach County Drainage Statement The existing site of the Good Shepherd Episcopal School is located at 402 Seabrook Road in Tequesta, Florida. The 3.91 acre parcel is currently developed with two parking lots, a 12,500 SF church sanctuary, a 2,600 SF thrift shop, a 5,200 SF church office building, a 4,700 parish hall, and•a 13,622 SF school building. There is an expansion proposed for the site that will include a 1,997 SF addition to the existing school building, approximately 1,130 SF of additional sidewalk, and approximately 221 SF of covered walkway. The proposed expansion will replace approximately 1140 SF of existing covered patio area. The existing stormwater management system is permitted under a 2004 South Florida Water Management District No- Notice General Permit (Application Number 031118 -17). As part of this permit application, the existing stormwater management design was certified to be in accordance with the 2004 Village of Tequesta's stormwater criteria for retention of the runoff from the 3- year /24 -hour storm event. Surface runoff from the site and parking areas currently drains into the onsite drainage system and is routed to an onsite dry detention pond, and ultimately discharges offsite through a control structure at the northeast comer of the site. The proposed building expansion will add an additional 1,078 SF of roof area and an additional 1,130 SF of sidewalk to the site. The existing on -site detention area will be expanded to retain the additional runoff from the proposed net increase in roof area and proposed sidewalk area for the 25 -year, 24 -hour storm event. No other changes to the site drainage system are proposed. The total increase in impervious area on the site is less than 1.3% of the total site area. Therefore, no negative drainage impacts are anticipated as a result of this proposed expansion. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Anjuli K. Panse, P.E. 7/25 /2011 PE #: 71504 1920 Wekiva Way, Site 200 West Palm Beach, FL: 33411 (561)- 845 -0665 CA 00000696 K: \WPB_Civil \144071001\Drainage Statement\Drainage statement 7- 2011.doc TEL 561 845 0665 FAX 561 863 8175 E Suite 200 1920 Wekiva Way West Palm Beach, Florida 33411 t X Curt ola /1-/›-r& 12-a)- ///Tve7-0- \71_•r962)- Oa> (1-10-r v&r 1 k - ;\[(e7fit-1(,i P-01-10) -6v 51A 61 • June 24, 2011 T)i((age of Tequesta Department of Fire - Rescue Services 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469 P: (561) 768 -0550 F: (561) 768 -0693 James M. Weinand, Fire Chief James M. Stergas, AIA Architect Stergas & Associates, AIA 19540 Riverside Dr. Tequesta, FL 33469 RE: Good Shepherd School Addition Dear Jim: This is to confirm that the Village of Tequesta will provide Fire - Rescue services to the proposed addition at the Good Shepherd School, 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL. Please feel free to contact this office should you need further assistance. Sincer x 'Ors M. Weinand, Fire Chief • Dedicated to Service July 7, 2011 James M. Stergas, AIA Architect & Associates, AIA 19540 Riverside Dr. Tequesta, FL 33469 TEQUESTA POLICE DEPARTMENT RE: Good Shepherd School Addition Dear Jim: 357 Tequesta Drive Post Office Box 3273 Tequesta, Florida 33469 -0273 Phone: (561) 768 -0500 Fax: (561) 768 -0695 4-17 Accredited 2000 This correspondence will serve to confirm that the Village of Tequesta Police Department will provide law enforcement services to the proposed addition at the Good Shepherd School, 400 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL. If you require any additional assistance please feel free to contact myself or Captain Rick Ricciardi. Sincerely, Pete Pitocchelli, Chief of Police • • ELK/GAF SHINGLE FOREST GREEN TRIM/BANDS/SHUTTERS TARRYTOWN GREEN I3M HC-I34 STUCCO FIELD COLOR COTTON BALLS BM 2145-7() Phone: 561 - 733 -6500 Fax: 561- 733 -6505 12539 Acme Dairy Road Boynton Beach, FL 33473 GOOD SHEPHERD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL TEQUESTA, FLORIDA EXISTING LANDSCAPE - AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION SYMBOL QUANTITY A 1 B 1 C 1 2 4 - 1 105 + /- COMMON NAME - BOTANICAL NAME SIZE AND SPECIFICATION LIVE OAK — Quercus virginiana 13" CALIPER, TRANSPLANT ON SITE LIVE OAK — Quercus virginiana 15" CALIPER, TRANSPLANT ON SITE LIGUSTRUM — Ligustrum japonicum 8'X9', TRANSPLANT ON SITE BROMELIAD — Aechmea spp 3'X3' CLUMPS, TRANSPLANT ON SITE CRINUM LILY — Crinum augustum 4'X4' CLUMPS, TRANSPLANT ON SITE EUROPEAN FAN PALM — Chamerops spp 5'OAH, SINGLE, TRANSPLANT ON SITE EX SHRUBS (Chrysobalanus, Codiaeum, & Duranta) REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST SYMBOL QUANT COMMON NAME - BOTANICAL NAME SIZE AND SPECIFICATION *NEP 65 BOSTON FERN — Nephrolepsis exaltata 18 "X15" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. *STA 52 PORTERWEED — Stachytarpheta jamaica. 18 "X15" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. *ZAM 60 COONTIE — Zamia floridana 12 "X12" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24" O.C. SOD TBD BAHIA SOD — Paspalum notatum SF, REPAIR AS NEEDED REVISED AS FOLLOWS PER 7/13/11 VOT MEETING - REVISED 8/8/11 TO PROVIDE ENTIRE HEDGE REPLACEMENT * 210 MYRSINE — Rapanea punctata 24 "x 18" #3, FULL AND THICK, 24"O.C. 210 MYRSINE TO REPLACE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE HEDGE REMOVE EXISTING MIXED LIGUSTRUM HEDGE, INSTALL A CONTINUOUS NATIVE MYRSINE HEDGE FROM TEQUESTA FIRE DEPARTMENT FENCE CORNER (EAST) TO UTILITY BOX (WEST). FERTILIZE, MULCH, MAINTAIN, AND WATER WITH A FULLY OPERATIONAL AND MAINTAINED IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SPECIFIED BELOW. `DENOTES FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL (100% OF NEW MATERIAL WILL BE FLORIDA NATIVE) APPROXIMATELY 105 SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION, TO BE REPLACED WITH 177 NATIVE SHRUBS PER PLANT LIST. APPROXIMATELY 110 LIGUSTRUM HEDGE TO BE REPLACED WITH 210 NATIVE MYRSINE HEDGE ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. NOTES -ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN /TRANSPLANTED TO BE PROTECTED UP TO DRIPLINE WITH 4' ORANGE BARRICADE FENCING, STAKED AT 8' CENTERS (MAXIMUM) AND MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. - EXISITNG LIVE OAKS THAT ARE TO BE RELOCATED TO BE ROOT PRUNED 10 WEEKS PRIOR TO RELOCATION, WITH APPROX 50% OF ROOTS PRUNED AND WATERED FOR DAILY FOR 5 WEEKS (MINIMUM), FOLLOWED BY THE REMAINING ROOT PRUNING AFTER 5 WEEKS AND ALLOWED DAILLY WATERING FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVE WEEKS PRIOR TO FINAL RELOCATION. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION TO BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. - VARIOUS PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULED FOR RELOCATION TO BE STORED AND PROTECTED ON OR OFF SITE. -ROOT PRUNING, TRIMMING, AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST, ACCORDING TO COMMONLY ACCEPTED PRACTICES. -ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO MEET /EXCEED MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR FLORIDA NUMBER 1, PER CURRENT "GRADES & STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, PARTS 1 & II ", STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AG. SERVICES. -ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO ACCEPTABLE NURSERY PRACTICES IN A MANNER DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE VIGOROUS GROWTH. SOIL IMPROVEMENT MEASURES MAY BE RQUIRED TO ENSURE HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. UP TO 3" OF NON CYPRESS MULCH TO BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND LANDSCAPE BEDS. MULCH IS NOT TO COME IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEMS OR TRUNKS. - REQUIRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL BE SECURELY GUYED, BRACED, AND /OR STAKED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING UNTIL ESTABLISHMENT. ALL STAKING AND GUYING MATERIALS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLY EXPOSED AT GRADE LEVEL. - ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MAINTAINED, AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES 100 %+ COVERAGE, A RAIN SENSOR, AND THE ABILITY TO WATER SHRUBS LESS FREQUENTLY THAN LAWN AREAS. - SITE UTIITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. - BACKFILL MIXTURE TO CONSIST OF LOOSENED NATIVE SOIL AMMENDED PER SOIL TESTING RESULTS. REVISED AS FOLLOWS PER 7/13/11 VOT MEETING -ALL LOCATIONS OF TRANSPLANTED TREES AND PALMS TO BE COORDINTED WITH VILLAGES UTILITY DEPT. •OOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON VILLAGES FINDINGS AND FINAL TREE LOCATIONS RESOURCE ROOM ADDITION - LANDSCAPE PLAN MARCH 14, 2011 REVISED APRIL 14, 2011 REVISED JULY 19, 2011 (PER VOT 7/13/11 COMMENTS) REVISED AUGUST 8, 2011 (SOUTHERN LIGUSTRUM HEDGE REPLACEMENT) Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR.