HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Stormwater_05/21/1998 F rf
yP �? G ��a
� ° � VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
�� Post Office ]3oa 3273 • 3�? "fequcsta Dri��e
�� �� o` Tequesta, I�londa 33�i69-0273 •(�61) �?�-6�(Nl
3 � 0 1�aY: C561) �77-6203
a��, �. 4�
4p Co .�y
�IT ,I.: A r � pF �EQUESTA
5TORMWATER UTILITY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
l�IAY 21, 1998
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Village Council held a meeting sitting as the
Stormwater Utility Board at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta
Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Thursday, May 21, 1998. The
meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Elizabeth
A. Schauer. A roll call was taken by Betty Laur, Recording
Secretary. Councilmembers present were: Mayor Elizabeth A.
Schauer, Vice Mayor Carl C. Hansen, and Alexander W.
Cameron. Also in attendance were: Village Clerk Joann
Manganiello, Villa�e Manager Thomas G. Bradford, and
Department Heads. Councilmembers Joseph N. Capretta and Ron
T. Mackail were absent from the meeting.
I2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
vice Mayor Hansen made a motion to apprave the Agenda as
submitted. Councilmennber Cameron seconded the motion. The
vote an the motion was:
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Carl C. Iiansen - f or
Alexander W. Cameron - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Agenda
was approved as submitted.
Rc�cr<�h�d 1'rrprr
Stormwater IItility Board
Meetiag Minutes
May 21, 1998
Page 2
III. CO�UNICATIONS FROM CITIZ�]'S (NON IT�'S)
There were no communications from citizens.
IY. APPROVAL OF MINIITES & RFPORTS
A) Stormwater Utility Board; April 30, 1998
vice Mayor 8aasen made a motioA to approva the min.utes
for the Stormwater Utility Board meetiag of April 30,
1998 as submitted. Couacilmember Cameroa secoaded the
motiou. The vote oa the anotion was:
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
C�rl C. 8ansea - for
Alexaader �, Cameron - for
The motion �vas therefore passed aad adop�ed.
V. Cf}NSIDBR.ATI4W OF NPDLS ANNt1AL REPOR7.`
A) Review and Approval
Stormwater Utility Director A1 Oslund explained that he
had compiled a report in book form in accordance with
government requirements, and that since this was the
first year for the report, it had been more difficult
than it would be to provide updates in subsequent
ycars. Mr. Oslund reviewed the sections included in
the book, and explained that since some ot what was
included was not required until the fifth year, there
would be a 4-year grace periad to work on those
structure�. In respanse to Mayor Schauer�s question
regarding the dates pictures were taken during
inspections, Mr. Oslund statecl he would add the
inspection datES as well as a brief description of the
location of each structure. Mr. Oslund explained that
Stormwater IItility Baard
Meeting Minutes
May 21, 1998
Page 3
the report was a complete list of all outfalls within
the Village of which he was aware. Mr. Oslund
responded to a question from vice Mayor Hansen that he
could revise item 2.4 ta read that the Village
stormwater pipe and structure system has not
deteriorated to the point it will fail. Mr. Oslund
explained that the permit required the village and all
co-permittees to implement some kind of street
� maintenance program by the third year. Street sweeping
could be required on a quartesly basis for streets with
curb and gutters. This would be included in the ZO-
year budget by the tenth year, and was estimated at
approxima.tely $1,500 annually. Mr. Oslund indicated
there were several items indic�ted in th� report as not
yet in place because at the time the report was
compiled the ordinance had not yet been implemented.
The report could now be revised to reflect that these
items were in compliance. �n the map identifying
structures, Councilmember Cameron commented that B253
and B264 were two separate dry wells, one on each side
ot the street, and not connected as shown. Mr. Oslund
responded to Village Manager Bradford that by next year
the storm outfall at Tequesta Oaks would be added to
the report. Village Manager Bradford questioned two
new outfalls at Dover Ditch, which Mr. Oslund e.xplained
he had added to stop erosion of a driveway.
Vice Mayor Han�en questioned whether projects such as
Tequesta Oaks and the proposed Lighthouse Cove would
affect the Village`s stormwater s�stem, to which Mr.
Oslund responded these projects would only affect the
system in the event of a storm larger than a 25-year
storm, since their on-site retention was designed to
hold a 25-year storm event on the sites, and the
buildings were designed for a 1�0-year storm; however,
the Village was ultimately responsible for the
maintenance of their outfall systems so that it wauld
function properly for them. Vice Mayor Hansen
questioned whether new �evelopments which adhered to
Stormwater IItility Board
Meeti�g Minutes
May 21, 1998
Page 4
the new regulations would add to the Village stormwater
system, to which Mr. Oslund responded that they would
not, or if they did they would be required to re-size
their systems. Mr. Oslund reported that no illicit
dumping into outfalls had been found during the
inspections.
Mr. Oslund cQmmented that Dover Ditch needed to be
added to the report. The Boardmembers commended Mr.
O�lund for his good work on this report. Mr. Oslund
explained his intent was to make small book� for
employees showing al1 structures marked on a map so
that structures needing work could be located easily.
In response to a questian from Mayor Schauer, Village
Manager Bradford explained that although the Village
had a hurricane evacuation plan, it did not currently
have a plan for an organized process whereby the Fire
and Police would begin an orderly evacuation, but he
b�lieved that Fire Chief Wein.and wa� working in his
role as Disaster Preparedness Coordinator to prepare
such a plan. Mayor Schauer commented that during the
October 1995 flood the dispatcher had told her that the
City Hall was being prepared for people to stay there.
Village Ma.nager Bradford responded that was not
advertised because the City Hall was not hurricane
hardened and could go under water or be blown away.
Councilmember Cameroa made a motioa to approve the
Aaaual NPD$S Report with accompanyiag correspoad�ace.
Vice Mayor �aasea seconded the a►otion. The vote oa the
motiou aras z
�lizabeth A. Schauer - for
Carl C. BaASea - for
Alexaader �. Cameron - for
The motioa �vas therefore passed and adopted.
Stormwater Utility Board
Meetiag Minutes
M�ay 21, 1998
Pag� 5
8) Sigaature Authorizatioa
Couucilmember Cameroa made a motion to authorize
Stormwater Utility Director Al Osluad to siga the
certification frSr the Aanual NPDF�S Report. Vice �ayor
i�anseu secoaded the motioa. The vote oa the motioa was:
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Carl C. Saasea - for
Alexaader �P. Cameroa - for
The motiox� was therefore passed aad adopted.
VI. RSVIh'D� OF PROPOSBD FY 1999 STORM�PATBR tJTILITY OP�RATIONAL
BIIDG�T
AND
VII. RTVIE'TiQ OF PROPOSFD FY 1999 STORM�AT�R IITILITY CAPITAL
BIIDGET
AND
VIII. REVIB'V� OF PROPOSED FY 1999 STORM�ATTR t3TILITY LRII R.ATE
Village Manager Bradford explain.ed that the Stormwater
Utilit�r Ordinance required review of the operational and
capital budget, which at �his time was slightly premature
relative to the budget process but this budget must be
approved at the next Village Council meeting in order to
meet the July 15 Property Appraiser's submittal deadline,
which would be before ali the numbers were finalized for
stormwater assessment and refuse and recycling assessment.
The Village Manager explained that in the past the
operational capital budget had been approved subject to
final numbers. Village Manager Bradford commented that
ren� must be added to the budget in the amoun� of $1.,068
because the auditor had indicated the village must begin
collecting rent on its entergrise funds. Ma�ror Schauer
questioned that no amounts were shown for dues for
1998/1999. Mr. Oslund explained that dues were paid every
two years. village Manager Bradford questione� whether the
Stormwater IItility Board
Meeting Minutes
May 21, 1998
Page 6
$12,000 for the LOS study was in the operational or capital
portion of the budget. Mr. Oslund responded it was added
into the capital outlay but was not indicated as a line
item.
Viee Mayor Hansen recalled discussion some months
previously regarding the Tequesta Drive Diversion Project
for which the cost had increased over the original
estimate, ancl questioned why that project was not shown in
this budget. Mr. Oslund explained that work on that
project would be completed before this budget went into
e€fect. village Manager Bradford explained that current
work was not shown in the capital budget. Vice Mayor
Hansen questioned whether there were more projects which
would cost more than the original estimate. Mr. Oslund
explained that Seabrook ltoad and Tequesta Drive had
originally been one project for which the cost had been
estimated as $500,000+, and the Village did not have
funding av�.ilable. $250,000, which was the figure provided
by the contractor for Tequesta Drive, had been taken ou�
by change order. The Seabrook Road portion of the project
was then completed, which ended up including Seabrook Road,
Seabrook Road landscaping, Seabrook Road irrigation, Shay
Place, and Seabrook Road South. Money was taken from
various locations to cove� the five projects and these had
been accomplished for a considerably smaller amount than if
they had been done separately. Mr. Oslund explained that
funding for the Tequesta Drive project was still short, and
that although it had been pulled out of the original
Seabrook Road/Tequesta Drive praject in the amount o�
$250,000, it cost $298,000 when re-bid later because of
cost increases and e�ctra paperwork required to sta�r in line
with block grant funding. Village Manager Bradford added
that the original estimate had also been under the amount
it should have been.
Village Manager Bradford cammented he was satisfied with
the operational budget, but that minor changes would be
made; for example, a reduction would be made to reflect a
Stormwater Utility Board
�eeting Miautes
May 21. 1998
Page 7 �
�ecrease in the rate for the retirement contribution for
employees in the Florida Retirement System. The Village
Manager advised that Mr. Oslund would receive a memo the
next day reflecting that rate reduction so that he could
change the budget.
Vil�age Manager Bradford requested that Mr. Oslund d�scribe
the portion of the work presented by Cherie Sova at the
last meeting that Mr. �slund believed cauld be accomplished
for the $90,000 budgeted for the Fairview East drainage
modification. Mr. Oslun� stated the general location of
the work would be the south golf course pond, and indicated
the actual location on a map, stating this work would
involve replacing existing pipe with 42" pipe, which would
stop at River Drive. The existing pipe from that point to
the Loxahatchee River was 36", which would be replaced in
the next year or so. Work would include dropping the golf
course pond pipe approximately four feet, which would a11ow
discharge from the pond at a much faster rate. In response
to Village Manager Bradford's question of how much above
the $94,000 would be needed to make the pipe 42" from River
Drive to the Loxahatchee River, Mr. Oslund estimated
$30,040 -$35,400 in additianal funds, and explained it
would be cheaper to do all the work at one time; however,
it would necessitate an almost 30� increase in utility
fees. Mr. Oslund explained that he and Cherie Sova
believed the village could obtain a permit from South
Florida Water Management District for swales because a
mechanism and funding was in place, and that the permit
would probably con�ain conditions requiring that a portion
of the swales be completed, but prabably would allow 5-10
years for all swales to be completed. Village Ma.nager
Bradford questioned what would happen if SFwNID said the
Village must complete a11 swales now. Mr. Oslund stated he
would take exception and respond that the Village would no�
do the project, and SFWNID would then back down. Mr. Oslund
discussed the project further.
Vice Mayor Hansen commented that the in.come shown in the
Stormwater Utility Board
Meetiag Minutes
May 21, 1998
Page 8
budget from Jupiter for pover Ditch maintenance did not
seem to be much in light of the fact that the Village spent
$lOQ,000 every five years in maintenance. Village Manager
Bradford explained the $100,000 scheduled for the year 2003
was not really a plan to sgend that amount every five
years, and in 2003 the project would include work from
Garden Street behind the First Baptist Church to Seabraok
Road. Mr. Oslund stated it was his intent not to spend any
more than absolutely necessary but that in 2-5 years
maintenance dredging would probably have to be done.
Mr. Oslund exglained that �he water landward of the Dover
Ditch weir was the result of the water table rising, and
that Jupiter had controZ of discharge on their side, and
that water must rise to an elevation of 4.9 before it would
spill over into Dover Ditch, and that according to permit
calculations Dover Ditch could accommodate the spillover.
Mr. Oslund explained that in an� future flooding of Dover
Ditch there would be a question of whether Jupiter or
Tequesta was li�.ble for damages. After further discussion,
the increase in the ERU rate that would be necessary to
increase the size of all the pipe to 42�� was calculated to
be a 24,6� increase, or $7.11 per month in order to budget
a total of $125,000 for the project. Mr. Oslund stated he
would not recommend such a large increase in one year, and
that he preferred to spread the project over twa years,
beginning in July 1999, and to include in the contract that
payment would be delayed until the second fiscal period.
It was the consensus of the Stormwater Utilit� Board that
they were in agreement with Mr. Oslund's recommendation.
Mayor Schauer commented that residents had seen the
imgrovements made by the Stormwater Utilit�r and knew their
money was being spent wisely. Mr. Oslund commented that
this project was the most crucial area and that there were
other serious drainage problems on Garden Street.
Councilmember Cameron commented there was a natural swale
on the eas� side of Garden Street. Mr. Oslund commented
that drainage in Eastwinds Landing was very good.
Stormwater IItility Board
Me.etiag Miautas
Malr 21, 1998
Page 9
Vice Ma.yor Hansen cammented that the decision had been made
ta implement the program presented by Cherie Sova
incrementally, but inquired what the cost would be to do
all the work she had recommended at one time. Village
Manager Bradford explained that Ms. Sova had recommended
two separate projects, the most critical of which she
labeled as Project #2, which was the project Mr. Oslund had
just described, which included everything except cutting
the swales if that was required by South Florida Water
Management District. The other project, Project #1, was
not as critical as Project #2, and ideally would include
expanding golf course ponds, but that was too co�tly. The
project would bring remaining pipes up to 42��. Mr. Oslund
commented that there was also an area west to Yacht Club
Drive that needed to be resized which was not in the
budget. After discussion, Mayor Schauer suggested that
next year the Village laok at that sectian and address
whether there were other areas in the Village which needed
the same type of work, and prioritize them at that time.
Mr. Oslund commented that $12,000 had been budgeted for a
part-time employee, probably a college student, who would
work during the summer months, whose job would be to start
going through records of Sauth Flarida Water Management and
the Village to see what permits were in place and what the
permits were for, and to locate areas which needed work, sa
that Cherie Sova could be hired just to assess specific
areas and advise the Village on methods of correction.
This would cost much less than having Ms. Sova assess the
whole Vill.age. Village Nlanager Bradford explained that the
Village had an adopted level of service, and the part-time
emplo�ree could identify older sections with lesser levels
of service so that they could be brought up to the current
level of service.
Joe 8a11, 159 Couatry Club Drive, inquired where he could
see a copy of the annual NPDES report and was directed to
Mr. Oslund's office at 139 Bridge Road. Mr. Hall
questioned the meaning of outfall, wh�.ch Mr. 4slund
Stormwater Utility Board
ffieeting Miautes
Ma�r 21, 19 9 8
Pa�e 10
clarified was where a collectian of storm systems emptied
into a retention pand, into Dover Ditch, into �the river
etc., and that new prajects provided stormwater retention
or�-site. Mr. Hall discussed the level of the c�.am in the
' golf course pond behind his home on the 18th fairway, which
Mr. �slund explained was supposed to be at 3.5' elevation,
or 2-1/2� lower than the top of the structure. Mr. Hall
expressed concern that attention was ga.ven to water in the
streets rather than to water in houses. Mr. Hall stated
when his house was flooded that the street was not floaded.
Mr. �slund expl.ained that the objective was to stop the
flooding and the best way to accomplish that objective was
the project outlined earlier in the meeting. Mr. Hall
ques�ioned plans to correct flooding from the pond behind
his house. Mr. Oslund responded there had been no
discussion regarding that pond, that the weir there now
would need to be replaced with or�e that could not be
adjus�ed by Country Club personnel, and that he would study
the problem.
Village Manager Bradford commented that there would be
minor additions and reductions to the budget before the
June 11 Village Council meeting, which might or might not
affect the ERU rate. The �7'illage Manager questioned
whether if costs exceeded revenues by a couple of thousand
dollars, Mr. Oslund would prefer to raise the r�te or
increase the transfer of funds from the Stormwater TTtility
Fund balance. Nlr. Oslund stated he would prefer not to
raise the rate, and that the budget at this point was
merely an estimate, which included the 5� discount for
early payment. The preliminary tax run, when received from
the County, would provide a basis for proper figures. Mr.
OsZund advised that unless the figures were several
thousand above the estimate, that the budget as presented
could be fine tuned to accommodate increases.
Couacilmember Cameron made a motioa to approve the
teutative FY 1999 Stormwater Utility Operatioaal Budget.
vice Mayor Haasea secoaded the motioa. The vote oa the
Stormwater Vtility Board
�eetia� MiAUtes
May 21, 1998
Page 11
motioa was:
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Carl C. Sansea - for
Alexander W. Cameron - for
The matioA was therefore passed aad adopted.
Vice Mayor 8ax�sea made a motioa to agprove the teatative FY
1999 Stormwater IItility Capital Budget. Councilmember
Cameroa secomded the motioa. The vote ou the motion was:
Elizabeth A. Schauer - £or
Carl C. 8ansea - £or
Alexaader W. Cameroa - for
The motioa was therefore passed sud adopted.
Councilmember Camerou made� a motiog to approve the
teatativie FY 1999 Stormwater Utility LRU rate of $6.20 per
month. Vice Mayor 8aasea seconded the motion. The vote oa
the motion was: '
,
�lizabeth A. Schauer - for
Carl C. 8arisea � for
Alexaader �. Cameroa - for
The aiotion was therefore pass�d and adopted.
=x. �nr oTSSR r��rsRs
There were no other matters to come before the Board.
St�rn��wat�r Utilivy �oar3
Me�t�r� ��autes
�a� 2�, 1���
Fa,�r2 �2
L�i . iii+ai v i, .�.'
V:i�:@ a�3yt3�' H8ri3@i1 T"ii�3ii@f�i �ai�t �21� IItE��1.ILc3 �i'iv af'.a�6ii�ilEt"�.
Cou�ciln��r�be� Camero� seeonu�d �he moti�n. The v�te �n t�e
����ion wa�:
Eli�a ;etr, A. Sehaua� ° for
�arl C. �ansen ° f�r
Alexa�der W. Camercn ° f�r
the a►otior� was therefare pas�ed an3 adopte ;. and the mzeti��g
was a�journed at �:�0 P.M.
Respectfu�ly sub�r�i�tc3,
,_�? ��.�. �'�.���
�y r ��; �-'�,a . Betty Lc`lu�
,<J " " c
'�=�. c-�'"�-� � Recarding Secretary
ATTEST:
Joann Manganie o
Village �lerk
DATE APFPOVED:
c� a3 , i99P'
�—�