The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Planning and Zoning_Tab 03_04/19/2012 �,.:-...,.�.. V ��.4`9�� 6 ��D�� d 6� � ' "�, Q�PAR`�MEfU�' �F COM6VV��fI�Y �E1fELOPfUdEN� i J l � 6 J ��aff R��p� — Planning and Zoning Advisory Board- f�ublic Mearing �.39.1� �. P� s B�9Oft9 D��CR9P'd'@0419 APPLICANT: Noward F. Os�rout, RLA, APA P.O. Box 1415 Jupiter, FL 33458 OWNER: Lamar Condominiurn Association Inc. 375 Beach Road TequesYa, f-L 33469 RE(�UFST: �'he appiicant is requesting recommendation for modify existin� parkino can�py and E�uilding entrance canopy. l'he applicacion includes a proposed landscape and hardscap� plans. �. �Qf��'� �1�� f�f�� 41f8619� � E)CIS 01fUG lAND USE FUTURE LAND USE Z04VING ��g,�� p�,pp�R`p"y � Residential Reside�toaE R-3 �'iaai��sie-�� Medium D�nsity Medium Density Dwellin� �is4rfcY NORTN Residential Residential � R-3 Multiple-Family Cliveden Condomini�um Medium Density Medium Densitv Dwelling District SO�1TH ResidenYiai ResidenYial R-3 Muieiple-Farnily Island House Southwest Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District Condominium EAST �� Residential Residential� R-3 Multiple-Family Beach Road and Island hlouse Medium Densit�y Medium Derasity Dwelling District N ortheast Condominium wESr _- �-� --- -- - Intracoastal �1 N/A Iv/A 30 �3AC6t�R��1�lD 1'he Lamar Condominium builcJing was built in 1969. 7'he proposed applicaiior� does not increase fhe square footage of euisting condominium unii;s (32 units); and Yhe nur�ber of existing parlcing spaces (45 spaces). Considering that the bui�ding was built prior �o th� Villag�'s current zoning code, the subjec� property has received a number of waivers in terms of parlcing and IandscaPing pr�viously. 2 Department of Community Development - Staff f�eport �P&ZAB— Lamar Building. The proposed site plan modification includes a change of the existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application also includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application for compliance with Village's Code, law enforcement, fire safety, and public worl<s requirements on March 12, 2012. 4. ST'AFF RE!l8E1!!I The proposed applicaYion does not increase the square �ootage of euisYing condominium units (32 units); and ehe number of existing parking spaces (45 spaces}. In terms of structures, this application is extending to the east the parking canopy to provide roof coverage to existin� four more parking spaces. Also, the building entrance canop� will be replaced by a new structure. Pr�pmsed �cade �orr�r�oenfs �. ��t ��verage 31.4% Code: Max 35 %- Met CodP Requirement. b. t5�a�n �pace 11.4% Code: Min 30 %- Not in compliance� c. ParEci�� 45 spaces (existing) Code: Required 64 spaces. Not in compJiance� �. �andsca��e 39% Nafive (shrubs Code: 60% Native Plants- Not in compliance�1� �z� and groundcovers) 50% Natives (trees) Notes: 1. Since the Lamar Building was built in Z969, the property is nof in compliance with current zoning cades, and if has received waivers in ferms of parking and landscaping in previous years. The Owner requested waivers in 1997; and, they were approved by Vi!lage Council in 1998. 2, Steve parker, asca Village Landscape Consultant, hps conducted an in-depth review of the /andscape portion of this application and prepared a memorandum (See attached documentJ. �9il9AL REftfdARKS o The application also includes the following features: - Replacing asphalt surface on drives and parking areas wifih concrete pavers. - Relocating existing Fire Hydrant to ensure accessibility. - Installing concrete pavers on existing walks and pool deck area. o Even though the applicar►t has improved the landscaping canditions in comparison with the 1997 plan, the applicant is requesting the following waivers with this application: - 15% iandscaping of the gross parking area. - 60% native plants count. - SO% minimum shade firees to palm clusters, - 30% open space. o This development application met the requirements set on Section 78-334 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised on April �, 2012. ' J � This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacarias, AICP, a�id; ; ' �:' /' �'�li' � �� d8t@ r � � `i? � �/ � Approved by Chief James M. Weinand !; 2 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —P&ZA8— Lamar Building. - !.� ;:: i _ � , � � i , . �, - - f , � "{'ldfJ��Pdll�� k �ssa�au4ao�u�tE�&e I�ii� _ ' ��r� . .. lepap .2 r -�. � � �, �. � � c- . � �,� 4 — a.�...Y -- -- - �.{ ! ' "s€{ .,'��,nA+�&NI ,,i�' # ` i � .�' I ,! � y`' � �•, ; -�+� a � j � � �" �' ! , .�, - •+r� 6 _ .. . , i _ ; i � ._.__,. — fljl I - - �--- :"s`�'.��., . .. , , I ,, J.,. y � I i �%S6�'�A� ��9�(�9'�a��ll� �f'��G� �7U�� r! ► ; : � ,,.� -- �.� � , , i �i. ,,� � , _ � , ;, � � �, ,,,�� ' . i . ' .• � !�M �IN/ � �.. �� 1- °L i �� I! �� s�..+. y �+�+ �� fl(y .� �� i � '1 il � li I � �'u ; � # p � *aFi NA� i+i - , �f� ! r r t� j� �`a �� ■�tq �� IMr ' �" � ��'� ' 9 � ,1� e ��, , � +�� , ' �i n n �r , ��e �n�l ! a C f :, � � j sr�� , � F �•„ �r ''' ,}��,� `, �,��:�, �,.:�� (� t. u ti r:' �'+ t`..4 . ��„��q�l �� 1y �� ' ■N �. �'� _ - . �+fNA .� . ,�'f`.� ,I '' Y ,!,-�.. t�`� i �•• � Kr '. r%I - i 1 � 11 �,.;,� �� Id'N . �:�zix .. � � � fz`'r,� � ,��,, y �„ �i.t' �.� ' '� ..�; i � I � .� �� ,��` �� . ge _ -vJ.sw . _ :_.__- -_ � _ . � #e�.��r...� �ii � _. � ' -�-.*�; r . . . , -_ e ' 1'1 �. �� _ �,.� _ , . , _; : . ... <t -- - �,�,��, �+ � ` �'� - ,;� •�i �� , ' � , / � � �� - ' �� :� , ;, ,� . �. , ,, , ��i _. ; i ;� �i�l ' ' '-• 3 L i ' �� I 'i ;,, '"� ' ,� '� , - � s,�.�. , ; �. 1 __ I . , � , . �� t' _ f . �i - r; I �, I- ' -T' Y+ Fa k ��j�' ��k� ` r �1" �� i. +� . f � __ � � �i�� .� � t4� ;,X s l NV ?, ' �Y �„" J� � j' - � ,,j.. , _ • � � "'`' 1�,� �'.�, t >,��'�' �F .. _� �y�� . . .. .. �� i ` __ �I vptNi � _ - � �.-e : . . � .� � '� ' .___ . _ � � d ,h {. .J-�, I .. ..1 i �,.. r bi(t9071':S'.'.�o ,^.`tntf�C� � ' { i 1 •• � . 'f.7C II� -.. . . . . . "_ ..��t � . = ��;e.� s. . .. 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report -P&ZAB- Lamar B�iilding• 1i r y rr ...� r 1��1�� r [ . ' ��6?� �� ' 'W�� `�� *� � � m w . ! mM �i� �� '� ET ��e�i��a �p•c�i�p, ►t��:o MEnno�NDUnn T0: Nilsa Zacarias, AICP Village of Tequesta FROM: Stephen J. P�rker, ASLA P�rker - Yannette Design Croup, Inc. DATE: March 29, 2012 RE: Lamar Condorniniums 375 Beach Road t have reviewed the revised Hardscape Plans, Landsc�pe and Landscape Lighting Plans for t�e Lamar Con�ominiums, 375 Beach Road, as prepared by Howard Ostr�ut Jr. and Assoeiates, LLC, dated March 20, 2012. The ��evised plans have made signiFicant strides in address�ng previous comments and in reducing deficiencies in t,�� illage of T'equesta landscape requirements. [n some cases the pians have exceeded the landscape waivers granted in 199� For this projecr. North Property Lir�e ?. The plan m��Ls ar�� c��etts �h� ta�ds�d�e'�~uffe�' �i�'�.�i �rtu �r�� uutti pet° Village of Tequesta landscape requirements and the 1997' waiver. 2. The hedge requirement has been met. East Property Line 1. The plan includes the majority of the landscape bufFer in the right-of way as per the 1997 waiver. 2. The tree requirements (and waivei•s) have been exceeded provided the Sylve�ter Date Palms are counted as one (1) full tree. Based cn the size and stature af the Sylvester Date Palrns, ancf the fact that the Coconut Palms were countec� i i�r i per i991 �nra►ver, i recommend accepting the Sylvester Date Palms as one (1J full tree. 3. The hedge r�quirement has been met. LnNI7SC'APE :\RCht17'EY'Tt.1RE ^ t'L�IN\�IN ° C 825 So�rtli U.S. Hi�lt�v�y C)nz Suitc 3:�Q Jupitcr. Florid�x 33477 Shl!747-Sf)69 Lic. ;�LC-0000?�J7 IVilsa Zacarias, AICP - Lamac• Condominiums March 29, Z012 Page 2 Soutla k'roperty Line 1. T}�e majo►•ity of the property line does not have a bafFe� This area was gr�nted a waiver in 1997. 2. The plail exceeds the tree count per the 1397 waiver (2 trees per waiver, � trees provicieci). 3. The 1997 plan and current plan do not pravide a hedge. Although a waiver was not specifically requestecE on the 1997 plan, a hedge is not possible due to the Iandscape buffer waiver. �� :�.i�� The 1997 ptan had a waiver for �his area. The current plan exceeds the buffer requarements (and waiver). Lar��s��e �er��'i�P�nQ�� The 1997 plan was granted a waiver Co caunt the Coconut Palzns as one (1) full tree. The current plan rec�uests the same cansideration. Interior Par�ng The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for the interior iandscape requirements. The current plan requests the same consideration. Additional Requir�ments 1. T1ne ��7 ptan was granted a waiver foi• Iandscaping 15% oi Che grass parking ai•ea. The eurrent plan reques�s the same consideration. 2. The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for pi•oviding 60% n.ative plant material, The cur�•ent p]an requests the same consideration. However, the native count has been significantly improved from the 1997 ptans. 3. The �997 ��an �ta� g� a��e� � �n�ui�,rer for ��%� :xF:r:i�t�r� sh�de �r�� t� �alrn clusters. The current plan requests the same cansideration. Suanrrnary I recommend approval of th� Hardscape Plans, Lanclscane and Landscape Li�h�in.g Plans for Lamar Condominiums. The proposed landscaping, additional greenspace and decora�ive pavers will greatly improve the aesthetics aFthis property. . =. �* r� ��,� . ,'� V�LLAGE OF TEQUESTA Ck. # ,," ,;,. �' Department of Community Development Rec. #_______ 345 Tequesta Drive Date: �.�� , ' Tequesta, FL 33469 3 '�;� ,;; o � Phone: 561.768.0450 � o ;,��,� �" Fax: 561.768.0698 J ��' � � 00 APJPL�CAT�OIeT �'0�2 SI'I'E PLt�N RE�� W S I'f �� '� � - - I'.�io�l �=��+�'(°� � PLANNING & ZONING �OAItD � '7� � `�� VILLAGE COUNCIL � PROJECT NAME: L�'i MI'� }� GDi� t7�' � I t.l I v� sI ��' P�� M b I� l�''iC.�i"�g�I PROJECT ADDRESS: � � 5 C�� Estimated Project Cost: �� ► APPlicant Name: d ��'�t � � ► �� cl � � �.� � �� f I V'� Applicant's Address: � � �? � ;�'� � �1 �0��%� � ��' � �� `�"� $ ( h � t aS� �or� Applicant's Phon�T� 3 $� " �'� Fax�o.: "��" �1.�""��-mail Address: �� 5121� ( "�_ � Provide written approval from the property owner, if other than the ap �a5 v� ��„� �� t 6 ,,,� �� Ar�/�� c�vr,-��M�rl,rv� �'r � Pro pe r f y Owner's Name: 6°/1 !e •� PZ V t� b� 0� � ��` ' ��' � p �� Property Owner's Address: 37 �� C Pj� � Q�t � �� l� � S�/Qf , �'tmO�,Y'�i' ��J �O � Property Owner's PhOne N 7�"� '1 t Fax No.: r"' E-mail Address:l� 1�.�4 {�`t1 +� �" �''�� _G�1 �� DESCRIPTION OF WORK: � t%'� �i '�'�� ''�� A�11 construction, additions, andJor altera�ions of commercial buildings must be approved by �1ie Plarming & Zoning Board. The Planning & Zoning Boazd meets the first Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m., as needed in the Village Ha11 Council Chambers, 345 Tequesta. Drive. The applicant wi.11 be inform.ed by letter of their scheduled meeting date. Due to administrative review, the meeting date the applicant is scheduled to attend, may not be the closest meeting ±o when the application is submitted. The Planning & Zoning Board is an Advisory Soard only. After review and recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Board, applications will be heard at the nezt available Council Meeting of the Village of Tequesta, for fnal approval. After approval by the Village Council, a building permit can be issued by the Building Depariment. 1 \ - A. • STATEMENT OF OWNERSHTP: L�M�� C, C.c� c'�{ �� M 1 t� I�.1 �t !� y S D C J f�'T'I t� t� � i� � , B. STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE: L�45 I� �� M\ �L tI6�1 tA� !"�H' 2. U t� ('t"�S `� �� PC��hLC'! S�'�tG�+S►. C. ST�ATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMP PLAN & CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS: �� D. STATEMENTS OF PRELIMINARY REVIEW BY OTHER AGENCIES: �' � E. GENER.AL LOCATION MAP: ✓ — F. SURVEY � � G. ENVIlZONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS/STUDY: I�� ° H. TREE SURVEY: �� I I: SITE PLAN: 1. A.RCHITECT-ENGINEER-SURVEYOR-PLANNER-DEVELOPER: ✓ 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION: (a) BOUNDARIES & TOPOGRAPHY: IO (b) EXISTING STREETS: V (c) ADJACENT BUILDING &/OR STRUCTURES: � � (d) ACCESS (INGRESS & EGRESS): �/ (e) TRAFFIC IIVIPACT STATEMENT: o `° � (� TOTAL PAVTNG WITHIN PARKING AREAS (SO. FT. &%): �C� � I� �i s� Q Y�, �"�' �� (g) OFF STREET PARK]NG/LOADING AREAS: �"`s �«'� (`� � � � � �"� t`E°t'f � �'��''� '� ' �� o• 1� Ri (h) TASULATION OF PARICTNG/LOADING SPACES: (i) RECREATION FACILITIES & LOCATION: 1� (j) SCREENS & BUFFERS: � (k) REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS: (� S(� t�� ?t1 t L.�I !`� �! (I) AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES: POWER � WATER � SEW�ER E+'� TELEPHONE ✓ CABLE TV � FIRE HYDR.ANTS � �'� �� U } l..l� � t� ��-t (m) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS OR GRANTS: 'N �i (n) PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY: � 2 � � < 3. GROSS ACREAGE / ACRES & SQ. FT.: � r � � `� �� G � � �.. � �! ► ~ T �� ' (a) TOTAL OPEN SPACE (SQ. FT. & %): %3 ��I I S C�� ' Z � ° � (b) � TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (STRUCTURES} (SQ. FT. & %): �► I 3� � F �l� � I � `�" � � (c) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: ALL PAVING, WALKWAYS, PATIOS, DECKS, ETC.) (SQ. FT, &%): '�i?� t o � 9 (� �j �' , � � 5� r �' `��' (d) LOT COVERAGE (GREEN AREAS ) (SQ. FT. & %) 1. WITHIN ALL PAVING AREAS: � �'� 9 S � � �� • 3 � � � ° 2. REMAINDER ALL AREAS: �- I 3�v S�' �� ' S� 3. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: �j S'�,, J '�'-�' r• ��' �' 2" °�° (e) UNITS PER ACRE: � l� , �� x ( $"'S"`I t� � �U � C.t'� 1 � � - - �� ri (� TOTAL SQ. FT. AREA ALL BUILDINGS, ALL FLOORS: N�Ii � J. PROPERTY & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS (AGREEMENTS / SURVNABILITY BONDS): � K, PRELIMINARY PLANS AS FOLLOWS: 1. STORM DR.AINAGE: `�► � , � .�C � r '�' �� 1� �{ � 6�� t.� � t1'�`�� ..� `� � �► 2. SEWER LAYOUT: � � 3. WATER DISTRIBUTION & SYSTEM LAYOUT (INCLUDING BACKFLOW PREVENTER O� LOCATIONS): 4. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LAYOUT (INCLUDING TR.ANSFORMER LOCATIONS): �� 5. TELEPHONE & CABLE UNDERGROUND LAYOUT (]NCLUDING ABOVE GROUND JUNCTION & DISTRIBUTION BOX LOCATIONS): � E L. ARCHITECTUR.AL ELEVATIONS (ALL ORIENTATIONS): " M. BUILDING APPEARANCE & LANDSCAPING: N. SIGNS (PROPOSED NUMBER, TYPE, SiZE & LOCATIONS): ��'�� O. PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONSIDER.ATIONS (DREDGING, FILLING, SLOPE, DR.AINAGE PATTERNS, NATURAL VEGETATION, ACCESSIBILITY, RETAINING WALLS, BERMS, PRNACY . Il WALLS AND/OR FENCES): � 3 ° p � tl FL�ODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS: � � � � � ' � N A � E,� �'� "`� � � i �` 1. ZONE DESIGNATION: I{ 2, � BAS� FLOOD ELEVATION: 3. �` 3. PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: � e� 4, COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: Q. DEVELOPMENT STAGES (PHASES): � � • �� v ` �� R. LEVEL OF SERVICES [SEE CODE SEC. 78-331(h)J 1. TRAFFIC (ROADS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY): � � ' ► ��, �� `� �� 11 �� 2. SANITARY SEWER: 11 it 3. DRAINAGE: 11 i� 4. POTABLE WATER: 6� � 1 5. RECREATION: Permits and/or level of service documentation from all applicable agencies. fnclude a copy of the letter/document with your application. Apply a page number to the letter and indicate the page number in the spot provided below. � Pt � � 1 �"""E°'i � � � u t c.� i� � �� 1) Village of Tequesta Utilities Department r► 2) Village of Tequesta Engineer e► 3) Loxaliatchee River Environmental Control District (ENCON) �� 4) Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority �� 5} Palm Beach county Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM d� 6) Palm Beach County Health Depariment �` 7) Palm Beach Traffic Engineering Department +` 8) Palm Beach County School Board (Letter of Determination for School Concurrency) � � 9) Waste Management (Nichols Sanitation) e� 10) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) � � 11 } Florida Power & Light e� 12) Florida Department of Trat�sportation °` 13) Florida Department of Environmental Protection P ' 14) Comcast Cab(e Company BE 15) AT&T Communications �� 16) Others as may be applicable. 4 J The applicant ,will submit to th� Village of Tequesta Department of Community Development with the following documents for Planning & Zoning Board review, forfy-five (4S� days prior to the meeting date: 1) , For new construction or additions, Fifteen (15) sets of professionally prepared site pTans showing a11 existing and proposed structures, setbacks, parking and loading layout, ingress and egress, sidewalks and walkways, exterior lighting layout, dimensions of street frontages and property lines and all signage. 2) Fifteen (15) sets of Landscapu�.g Plans in accordance with Village of Tequesta Code of Ordinances, Division IV, Landscaping. ' 3) Fifteen (15) sets of multi-dime�sional color Tenderings and/or photographs aze to be pzovided. • The Planning & Zoning Boazd needs to see an exact rendering of what is to be placed on the site. Color photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to be used must be supplied, Since color printers often do not display the correct color, it is recommended that samples of the paint chips, as well as a sample of the support materials (i.e., canvas, wood, metal, etc.} be provided. 4) One (1) set of Plans 11 x 17 size and One (1) disk. 5) Any other documents that may help clarify the position of the applicant. �$�� I� � �,�'�`�� "'�"� J� " APPLICANT NAME (PRINT) . AP�LIC ' S SIGNATURE �•n�� , ��1� DATE NOTE: AIl renderings, models, drawings, photos, etc., submitted to the Village will become the property af the Village of Tequesta. 5 � � . • FEE SCHEDULES: 1. Plannin and Zonin Board review OnI : $ 75.00 a. Sign $ �5.00 b. Satellite an�enna c. New construction, additions, renovations, remodeling, including landscaping plans; based on cost of work as follows: $0.00 to $9,999.99 $ 100.00 $10,000.00 to $24,999.99 $ 150.00 $25,000.00 to $49,999.99 $ 250.00 $50,000.00 to $99,999'.99 . ' $ 300.00 $100;000.00 to $199,999.99 $ 350.00 $200,000.00 and over $ 400.00 2• Applications Requiring P& Z& Village Council review for final approval $ 75.00 3. Site Plan Review: a. Sign $ 125.00 b. Satellite antenna $ 125.00 �' New construction/additions, renavations/remodeling; based on cost of work as follows: $0.00 to $9,999.99 $ 425.00 $10,000.00 to $49,999.99 $ 625.00 $�0,000.00 to $99,999.99 $1,250.00 $100,000.00 to $199,999.99 $1,875.00 $200,000.00 an.d over $2,500.00 d. Site plan modification: One-fourth of original base site plan review fee for each resubmittal. e ' Site plan review time extension: One-half of original base site plan review fee. f Expedited site plan review: In addition to the applicable site plan review fee listed above $1,000.00 *To cover all additional administrative costs, actual or anticipated, including, but not limited to, engineering fees, consultant fees and special studies, the applicant sha11 compensate the_Village for a11 such costs prior to the processing of the application or not later than thirty (30) da.ys after final application approval, whichever is determined as appropriate by the Village. 6 �` � Howard E Ostrout 1r. Planning P 0. Box 1415 Phone 561-386-4433 Web Site: and Associates, LIC. Landscape Architecture lupiter, Flosi�a 33458 fax 561-744-1445 '�'!•ostrout.com Ur6an Design Email: howard�ostrout.com March 21, 2012 Ms. Nilsa Zacarias, AICP Department of Community Development Village of Tequesta 345 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469 RE; Response to the DRC Comments on the Site Plan Modificatfon Application for Lamar Condominium 375 Beach Road, Tequesta, Florida 33469 Dear Ms. Zacarias: Please except this letter and attachments as our response to the DRC comments dated March 12, 2012. Please see the attached letter of response dated March 16, 2012 from Mr. Theodore E. Davis, Project Architect, regarding the stafF review questions 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, related to the architectural design and plans for the canopy and parking structure. Additional information regarding the DRC questions is as follows: 1. The architectural and survey drawings have been revised to show the correct reconfigured parking and planter layout at the parking structure. 2. As we discussed the existing fire hydrant is shown relocated to the east in a. position that will be unencumbered by the landscape buffer. You have indicated that the fire department would relocate the fire hydrant for a discounted fee of $1200:00. 3. The last two comments related to the Landscape Planting Plans have been addressed with the Villages Consulting Landscape Architect Mr. Steve Parker. Although we are relying on the previous landscape waivers for the property, we have significantly improved the landscape plantings by increasing the square footage of the landscape area by 27% to 4401 sq. ft., increasing the number of trees and shrubs on site, and dramatical(y increasing the percentage of native plant materials from less than 10°10 existing to 39%` for shrubs and groundcovers and 50% for trees. A detailed review of the landscape improvements is shown in the Landscape Requiremen�ts Summary on sheet LPP-1 of the Landscape Plans. We will bring paving samples, pictures of projects where the same pavers have been insta.I�ed and a colored Landscape Planting Plan to the Planning and Zoning meeting on April 19, 201Z: � Printed on reryded paper. y �dv Ms. Ni1sa Zacarias, AICP MarcM 21, 2012 Page 2 Enclosed are fifteen full size copies of the revised plans, one 11" by 17" copy of the plans, discs with all the pians in a PDF format, and a reuised description of v�rork which reflects the changes made in response to the DRC comments. If you have any questions after reviewing the materials please feel to contact me at your convenience. Sincereiy, Howard F. Qstrout Jr. and Associates, LLC. �� (' • �� v � `� d �' - � Howard F, Ostrout Jr., RLA, APA, FIUD President Cc: Mr, Fred Dargie, President Lamar Gondominium Association, Inc. MFO:Io � ,_. �,= �` ;� TIiFODORE E. DA�%IS • ARCHITECT c4� ASSOCIATES, I? r1. J ,_� -'�� - 18797 RIO VISTA DRIVE, TEQUESTA, PLORIDA 33489 (581) 379•7043 AAC - 001634 ! AR - 00046f 5 Date: 03-16-2012 LETTER OF RESPONCE Village of Tequesta Building Department 345 Tequesta Dr,, Tequesta, FL 33469-0273 Phone: 561-768-0700 RE: Lamar Condominium Covered Parking Structure located at 375 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 Comments: Responces (1) "Provide a sprinkler system on the proposed covered parking area." The proposed Concrete Parking Strucfure does not require Fire Sprinkler System per FBC code requirements. (2) "Submit color rendering of proposed front elevation.'° See 19x97 Co%r Elevat�on in submiital package. (3) "Provide sample of all proposed materials and chip colors.'° See 11x17 Color Elevation w/ color chip in submittal package. (4) "Clarify finish color af columns and canopy (Architectural drawing A-3)e" The stucco finish anal pa►nt color will rrratch existing buildin'g stucco finish & co/or. (5) Pians not matching with the Architectural plans showing 6 uncovered spaces and the others showing 4. See revised Architectural plans w/ (4) uncovered parking spaces on �ast end of proposed Parking Strucxture.. Respectfuliy submitted, Theodore E. Davis L.icense # AR-46�15 AACOO�i630 PAGE 1 OF 1 � �7 O � m r m < D � O z � m D � � .� - � � D r Z � � o -� � � � � � � � N � - O1 � � Z o A S � m D A PARKING STRUCTURE RENOVATION � > LAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION > 0 375 BEACH ROAD, TEQUESTA, FLORIDA 33469 : > °RA"""BY: RE°'SE°: THEODORE E. DAVIS D v KIM � - ° ARCHITECT AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. >_ � � m CHECKED BV: � � �-�i TED DAVIS 18797 RIO VISTA DRIVE, TE�UESTA, FLORIDA 33469 a � p Phone: 561379-7043 r ' DATE: � ^ 03-19-2012 AR-4615 ACC 001630 � . � ' March 20, 2012 Site Plan Modification Lamar Condominiurra 375 Beach Road DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work proposed in this Site Plan Modification includes the fol(owing: 1. The remaval of the existing concrete parking canopy whECh has been deemed structuraily in need of replacement. Removal of the existing aluminum and canvas entry canopy which has been destroyed in past hurricanes and is situated at a height which is too low to allow for emergency vehicles to pass under. The existing parking canopy and entry canopy will be replaced with a reinforced concrete structure that is similar to what is being removed and has architectural detafling that is compatible with the existing building architecture. The parking canopy is being extended to the east to allow for four more cove.red parwng spaces. The building coverage including the proposed new structures is 12,133 square feet or 31.4°l0 of the site which is lower than the Village of Tequesta's maximum allawed building coverage of 35%. 2. The asphalt surface on the drives and parking areas is to be removed and replaced with concrete pavers. The existing walks and pool deck area is to be remodeled with a new surfacing of concrete pavers. There are no proposed changes to the number of parking spaces. There are some adjustments to the landscape planting areas resulting in a 27% increase in total green space to 4401 square f�et or i1.4% of the site. The site grading and drainage is to remain as it now exists with the drainage patterns directed to existing catch basins and swale areas. . 3. The landscaping is to be refurbished feaving many of the existing trees in place or relocating them on site. There are thr�e non-native Ficus trees on the pool deck area at the rear of the building that are to be removed to create more usable deck space. We are adding four native trees, Clusia Rosea, to the north landscape buffer area which we are more than doubling in size from 2'-8" wide to more than 7'-0" wide. One major feature tree being introduced is the seven Sylvester Date Palms which are in the front buffer and along the sides at the entry areas. They are very compatable with the beach salt environment which burns many plant materials including natives. The proposed Landscape Planting Plan increases the use of the native plants from less than 10% that currently exist on site to 39% natives for shrubs and groundcovers and 50% natives for trees. . . �� ' Site P(an Modification Lamar Condominium 375 Beach Road Descri tiQn of Wo�ic ontinued � Page 2 4. The landscape �ighting plan shows a�imited number of up lighting fixtures which will highlight the larger trees and smaller fixtures on small patms to create a pleasing nightscape. 5. A site ligh�ing pian shows the placement af sconce walf lights under the entry and parking canopy and area site lights which will pravide a minimum of one foot candle of fighting on the site. There is lighting under #�e existing parking canopy and exposed spot lights on the edge of the parking canopy which aim to the north and south. The proposed Profiler Light Lumineers were seiected for their forward throwing, high cufi ofF lighting characteristics, which dramaticaily limit any afF site lighting, This wiil be a significant improvement over the existing exposed spotlights which are pointed direcfily towards the neighboring properties. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR.