The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 11_05/10/2012 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL FORM Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Regular Ordinance #: ay 10, 2012 Consent Agenda: No Resolution #: Originating Department: Community Development AGENDA ITEM TITLE: (Wording form the SUBJECT line of your staff report) Site Plan Modification SPM 04-12. Application of Lamar Building Condominium Association to modify existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. The address of the proposed site plan is 375 Beach Road. BUDGET / FINANCIAL IMPACT: Account #: N/A Amount of this item: Current Budgeted Amount Available: Amount Remaining after item: Budget Transfer Required: No Appropriate Fund Balance: No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES: (This is a snap shot description of the agenda item) The Lamar Condominium building was built in 1969. The proposed application does not increase the quare footage of existing condominium units (32 units); and the number of existing parking spaces (45 spaces). Considering that the building was built prior to the Village's current zoning code, the subject property has received a number of waivers in terms of parking and landscaping previously. The proposed site plan modification includes a change of the existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application also includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application for compliance with Village's Code, law enforcement, fire safety, and public works requirements on March 12, 2012. APPROVALS: SI E: Department Head Finance Director Reviewed for Financial Sufficienc � r � ? v ❑ ��' '' � �.. No Financial Impact ■; __. _! .-=� � Attorney: (for legal sufficiency) Village Manager: Submit for Council Discussion: Q� Approve Item: ❑ � Deny Item: � SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLERK: (if you wish to have agreements signed, be sure to include the number of copies you want signed and place "Sign Here" sticker on them) • VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA �j DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �, '� - Staff Report — Village Council Public Hearing — 5.10.12. 1. PETITION DESCRIFTION APPLICANT: Howard F. Ostrout, RLA, APA P.O. Box 1415 Jupiter, FL 33458 OWNER: Lamar Condominium Association Inc. 375 Beach Road Tequesta, FL 33469 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to modify existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. 2. LAND USE AND ZONING • EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING SUBJECT PROPERTY Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District NORTH Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Cliveden Condominium Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District SOUTH Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Island House Southwest Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District Condominium EAST Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Beach Road and Island House Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District Northeast Condominium W E5T Intracoastal N/A N/A N/A 3. BACKGROUND The Lamar Condominium building was built in 1969. The proposed application does not increase the square footage of existing condominium units (32 units); and the number of existing parking spaces (45 spaces). Considering that the building was built prior to the Village's current zoning code, the subject • property has received a number of waivers in terms of parking and landscaping previously. 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —Village Council Public Hearing — Lamar Building. • The proposed site plan modification includes a change of the existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application also includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application for compliance with Village's Code, law enforcement, fire safety, and public works requirements on March 12, 2012. The Planning and Zoning Advisory Board recommended approval of this application (3-OJ. 4, STAFF REVIEVI� �� The proposed application does not increase the square footage of existing condominium units (32 units); and the number of existing parking spaces (45 spaces). In terms of structures, this application is extending to the east the parking canopy to provide roof coverage to existin four more parking spaces. Also, the building entrance canopy will be replaced by a new structure. Proposed Code Comments a. Lot Coverage 31.4% Code: Max 35 %- Met Code Requirement. b. Open Space 11.4% Code: Min 30 %- Not in compliance� c. Parking 45 spaces (existing) Code: Required 64 spaces. Not in compliance� d. Landscape 39% Native (shrubs Code: 60% Native Plants- Not in compliance�l� �2� and groundcovers) 50% Natives (trees) Notes: 1. Since the Lamar Building was built in 1969, the property is not in compliance with current zoning • codes, and it has received waivers in terms of parking and landscaping in previous years. The Owner requested waivers in 1997; and, they were approved by Village Council in 1998. 2. Steve Parker, ASLA, Village Landscape Consultant, has conducted an in-depth review of the landscape portion of this application and prepared a memorandum (See attached documentJ. FINAL REMARKS • The application also includes the following features: - Replacing asphalt surface on drives and parking areas with concrete pavers. - Relocating existing Fire Hydrant to ensure accessibility. - Installing concrete pavers on existing walks and pool deck area. • Even though the applicant has improved the landscaping conditions in comparison with the 1997 plan, the applicant is requesting waivers to comply with the following code provisions: - 15% landscaping of the gross parking area. - 60% native plants count. - 50% minimum shade trees to palm clusters. - 30% open space. • This development application met the requirements set on Section 78-334 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing will be advertised on April 29, 2012. � • This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacarias,,AIC ,, nd; ,/ � / / � /'' � Approved by ChiefJames M. Weinand'; _� ' Date 2 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —Village Council Public Hearing — Lamar Building. i • - , . �. ; . r�i" �;" �-- , ��d�9�YfiB�11V��8n� � , �.�� 1:�1 � - -- , z , . � lnn �-- I ' �� .^�.,�,,___ _��-'_ � _ — _ . �'�" -� � , � - ' q.�� y�.� � ��;� � ' " �" � !: s� - .� ! � � �,' -..� ' . , �;; � , - , , - a , x.�...� � �, -. . ;� � � - - .,�. . � � : , ;� � , n . , w . . . ..- , • �,; " _-__-- � i > ; -- � - � ---. . _ �� Existing Conditions at the Site �, � �, �+ � ;� � � . , _-- �l ryd� �'J'� �I eL I p �ar !� �� S •' II �ir �� 7 � � � . � 11 � ' �i �, � !� F IIC11 ��.., � �"l _ _,[�:..�, r � ..�. w, , � ✓A � ! � f p �. �.. � � � �� -� ..' � �"I oiis �� `� �t � ,� . ` Kj�'`�.'•��. yY .^a ..�i��K . � 11 [B o1! . �� .z=� x a:' 4 � r . � S - T;� ¢ �.a�,��R� _ � � " --: r - AA� If E a� lipl � � � � �� : Y i' ' �� I ��A BG �h P� .:� . hfl� I-ra�. aS C vr� t�4�.y. ,� `�v, L,� d '� v . � � "j: '� �, l[ . '� r' a . 'i^ � � '�`�� ° � .� , �it5 ,iE . , � i�: trj I � .,.a�. �c � � ,r :P_ . •L. � . f`I I f, �. F -� ' _ _ �'. � - _--� "-s--� '� '� � l � _ _�- _ ' � � "'��. - � _ ,� - . Y .e __ �� 3 5 � ... . .. � �° T°�' __ 1��i_ M_.. . _. _ . ._ ___ .. _ . . ... . . _ . . . �. — - � � ��'�! r f� �� w A ' '� ry ':�',.- '� � � ��- '� . l r - 1, '� r� ��I ��I'.�.1 - �� r. '�� at� ��-�� , � II ' y . i a�mm.. ; - �. < <� _r �w-� � � s . _ ,. � , � •�. - �1 #� ffi .. 1�i'.Yu��i:� .-.- '_ :�_�.'i' , �� ,�,Y' �*� �� , �� . � R � ` , , .�. _ '� . i �1� . � `� _ ! �: `':� ;I , : � �� a . _ � t �, x _ _, .. + r _ � _ - „ ,�.3:�,� � � ,�; ,; � ,,: _ � _ � � .. _ ��_-' � �,'� , � � �' . - � � -- :i c ,'�. .. . s . . , , . -- - _�_.— , �r....� _ _. ... ..� _.. . � ;�� . . _ � - - .. �.._ . , . ._ . _ - .� - -. __ - - • , . , �� --�,,, -_ _ _ � �� _ - - - _.. --. _:. . ...- E ,�... : .... _ . � gi��.u. • 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —Village Council Public Hearing — Lamar Building. , � . . �� ; � � • �� s� PAR,�R • YAI�NE� dc�i�n group, inc. ^ M�MQRANDUM T0: Nilsa Zacari-as, AICP Vipage of �'equesta FROM: Stephen J. P�rker, ASLA Parker - Yannette Design Group, inc. DATE: March 24, 201� RE: �.atr�ar Condominiums 375 8each Road ( have reviewed the revised Hardscape Plans, Land�cape and Landscape Lighting � Ptans far the Lamar Condominiums, 375 Beach Road, as prepared by Howard Ostrout Jr. and Associates, LLE, dated March 20, 2412. The revised plans have made signi�cant strides in addressing previous comments and in reducing deficiencies in tl�e Viflage o�Tequesla iandscape requiremenCs. in some cases the plans have exceetfed the landscape waivers granted �n .2997 for this projecr. North Property Line �. The plan meets and cx�eeds the landscape buffer widtli and tree cuun� per Village of TeQuesta landscape reyufrements and the i.947 waiver. 2. The hedge requirement has been meG East Property Line 1. The plan includes the majority of the landscape buffer !n the righC-of-way as per the 1997 waiver. 2. The tree requirements (and waivers) :�ave been exceed�d pmvided the Sylvester Date Palms �re counted as one (1) full trew Based on the size and stature of the Sylvester Date Palms, and the fact that the Coconut Palms wer� counted 1 far 1�er 1997 waiwer, i recommend acceptin� the Sylvester Date Palms as one (1) full tree. 3. The hedge requirement has been met. � _ LANI�St'APE ARCH17'kC:Tl.1RG • 1'E.AN�IfNCi • (iRAt'lilt'S `� 825 South U.S. High�;��y E)n� Suitr 33U JuPicrr. F'larida 33477 Sfii/7�t7-5069 t.ic. �LC-000(?297 � Nils� Zacarias, AICP - Lamar Condaminiums Marth 29, �01� Page 2 South Property Llne 1. The majority of the property line does not l�ave a bufFer. 'Fh�s area was granted a waiver in 1947. 2. The plan exceed� the tree count per the 1997 waiver (2 trees per waiver, 4 trees provided). 3. The 1997 plan and current plan dn not provide a hedge. Although a watver was not specifically requested on the 1997 plan, a hedge is not possible due to the Iandscape buffer watver. Suildiz�g Suffer The 1997 plan had a watver for this area. �'he current plan exceed� the buffer r�quirements (anc! waiver). Landscaipe Requirement � The 1997 pian was granted a waiver to count the Coconut Palms as one (1) full tree. • The current plan requests the same consideratlon. Interiar Parking , The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for the �nter€or landscape requireme»ts. The current plan requests the same consideration. Additional Requirements 1. The �.997 plan was granted a waiver for landscaping 15% of the gross parking area. The eurrent plan requests the same consideratfon. 2. The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for provfding 60°Jo n�tive piant rriaterial. The euri•ent plan requests the same consideration. However, the native count has been significantly improved Fram the 1997 plans. 3. The 1997 ptan vt�s granted a waiver for 50% mtnirn�rr� sh�de trees tQ pa!m clusters. The current plan requests Che �ame consideratIon. 5ummary I recommend approval of the Hardscape Pl�ns, t,anclscape and �,and�cape Lighting �lans for Lamar Condominiums. The proposed landscaping, additional greenspace and decorative pavers will greatly improve the aesth�tics aFthis property. � r � � • �� VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA Ck. # �'� �.ry. �� Department of Commun.ity Development Rec. #_________ 345 Tequesta Drive Date: � � Tequesta, FL 33469 • 3 ~` 1 : ; .� Phone: 561.768.0450 •�' ��' Fax: 561.768.0698 � � � - F:;: AP]PLICATI�N FOit SITE PLAN REVIEW S('rC P� � _ _ ��,. . �'(010� rIG�%r7T�►J PLANNTNG & ZOI�TING BOA:RD � , 7� !1� ��f /J' . VILLA.GE COUNCIL � PROJECTNAME: ��M�}� CDI�I�a NIIt�I I vI�/1 SI �' �l.�r� M�?(�J f'JC�i'7'1�'t�I PROJECT ADDRESS: 3 7 r 7 �� t3 Estimated Projeet Cost: �� QL�� i ----: APPlicant Name: _� d�l1!/�i �� Q�J�f � U l� � c� �� 1.� �/� ��"1 i f � U+u f APPlicant's Address: �'Q� �jL� )( -�%�'� V C1��IT� I'� � ��' `Y�/�I 3 `"��' � APPlicant's Phon�N� � � $(t� - �3� Fax�o� f �mail Address:�W 12Y� " � � , �M � � rovide written approval from the property owner, if other than the ap � N G, �Arn�l� �ot�t��rn�hcrv� �rSSaG��►' - ('�p►.1 � Property Owner's Name: �/1 [2 .�}G lG{�i" I� f� l� LI i E% � �V Sf YJ�� Property Owner's Address: _ �� 1 CP1G� ('�Q/�t b � �� lJ � Sfii� , �l.G��1�'�' � �j �0 � Cs�/) Property Owner's PhoQe No. � � 0 7 � Fax No.: �—'� E-mail Address: � pA 12�11 rs �" r'f��`�1 G�1 �.�M DESCRIPTION OF WORK _� C� � M�n��1' A11 construc�ion, addi�ions, and/or alterations of commercial buildings must be approved by the Pla.nning & Zoning Board. The Planning & Zoning Board meets the first Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.»�, a.s needed in the Village Hatl Council Cham�ers, 345 Tequesta Drive. The applican.t will be inform.ed by letter of their scheduied meeting date. Due to administrative review, the mee±�ng date the applicant is scheduled to attend, may not be the closest meeting *.o w�hen the application is submitteti. . The Planning & Zoning Board is an Advisory Soard only. After review and recommenaation by the Planning & Zoning Board, applications will be heard at the nezt available Council Meeting of the Village of Tequesta, for fmal approval. After approval by th.e Village Council, a building permit can be �ued by the Building Department. 1 � ° A. ` STATEMENT OF 0 WNERSHIP: I.� M �C � � � � M i N ( � M /`�►�'QG/ H5 �'f � �4 � ► t.6 G ,. j B. STATEMENT OF 1NTENDED USE: L: I S t� �1 P.CJN G� M,! M 1 V t�l �/�/tTl� ��'' � C. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMP PLAN & CONCURRENCY�UTR MENTS: � • D. STATEMENTS OF PRELIMIIVARY.REVIEW BY OTHER AGENCIES: N� E. GENERAL LOCATION MAP: � F. SURVEY k/''� G. ENVIRONMENTAL IIVIPACT ANALYSIS/STUDY: N� 1 H. TREE SURVEY: N� I: SITE PLAN: 1. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER-SURVEYOR-PLANNER-DEVELQPER: �� 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION: (a) BOUNDARiES & TOPOGR.APHY: � (b) EXISTING STREETS: t/ (c) ADJACENT BiJILDING &/OR STRUCTURES: � � (d) ACCESS (INGRESS & EGRESS): � i (e) TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT: N� { fl TOTAL PAVING WITHIN PARKING AREAS (SO. FT. &%): I 1 �r �sC�'� S� p� �i � o (g) OFF STREET PARKING/LOADING AREAS: �X�S� 1 l� �'1 �Pt �� t*� �1 �� C-l: s�'�' (h) TABULATION OF PARKIlVG/LOADING SPACES: �� I f p! (i) RECREATION FACILITIES & LOCATION: V � (j) SCREENS & BUFFERS: V" (k) REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS: I�SIl�G ��/ d.� ✓� It� `1 (I) AVA]LABILITY OF U'TII.,ITIES: POWER � WATER � SEWER • V TELEPHONE +� CABLB TV � . FIlZE HYDRAIVTS ✓ 1�+1 ,C'��tJ t+l'f " � I' �jV �. Lb I 1J [-y (m) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS OR GRANTS: ►`t�1 (n) PROFOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY: �/ 2 � ' ' 3, GROSS ACREAGE / ACRES & SQ. FT.: O� � � � �G , 9� .3$ , � � a �r . (a) TOTAL OPEN SPACE (SQ. FT. & %): � � ( s1 • �� C� � � �� (b) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (STRUCTURES) (SQ. FT. &%): I Z � I�}�j �S �i' . ti�► � I!'9" �/ o • (c) TOTAL �LOT COVERAGE (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: ALL PAVING, WALKWAYS, � PATIOS, DECKS, ETC.) (SQ. FT. &°/a): �L � � � � 5� � �� 51 1 2 �I � (d) LOT CQVERAGE (GREEN AREAS ) (SQ. FT. & %) I. WITHIN ALL PAVING AREAS: ��`� ��+ �� 3� 7� �� 2. REMAINDER ALL AREAS: Z9 � 1• S�, ��-° ��G+ 5��p 3. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: �� I �� f t►��ti. � ,�; (e) UNITS PER ACRE: ��. , ��I s j'� v1 � U J G-�' I�''� �"'� 1� 1� ( fl TOTAL SQ. FT. A.REA ALL BUII,DINGS, ALL FLOORS: ��+ J. PROPERTY & LANDSCA,PE MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS (AGREEMENTS / SURVNABILITY BONDS): � K. PRELIMINARY PLANS AS FOLLOWS: 1. STORM DR.AINAGE: N � � � X�S� � �t �� t '''� U I I �►I7I� � • 2. SE WER LAYOUT: � � � 3. WATER DISTRIBUTION & SYSTEM LAYOUT (INCLUDTNG BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS): �� 4. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LAYOUT (INCLUDTNG TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS): �) 5. TELEPHONE & CABLE UNDERGRQUND LAYOUT (II�iCLUDING ABOVE GROUND TUNCTION & DISTRIBUTTON BOX LOCATIONS): L. A.RCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS (ALL ORIENTATIONS): 1/ M. BUILDING APPEARANCE & LANDSCAPING: � N. SIGNS (PROPOSED NUMBER, TYPE, SLZE & LOCATIONS): �i�CISTI N C�( O. PROP4SED TOPOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS (DREDGING, FILLING, SLOPE, DRAINAGE PATTERNS, NATURAL VEGETATION, ACCESSIBILTTY, RETAINING WALLS, BERMS, PRNACY 11 WALLS AND/OR FENCES): � 3 I '' P.' � FL(�ODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CONSIDER.ATIONS: 1. ZONE DESIGNATION: �� E ''� �� E � � 11 � 2. � BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 3, �, 3. PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: � � � rj 4. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DESIGN CONSIDBRATIONS: Q. DEVELOPMENT STAGES (PHASES): I�(i P( . ��IS� 1��'t �jV � 1.��'''11� R. LEVEL OF SERVICES ['SEE CODE SEC. 7&-331(hJJ 1. TR.AFFIC (ROADS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY): i`� �� C� ��1 hl� I�j' V� L'�l1��- 2. SANITARY SEWER: �1 '� 11 tt � 3. DRAINAGE: � � ' II �� 4. POTABLE WATER: a ,� 5. RECREATION: Permits and/or level of service documentation from all applicable agencies. Include a copy of the letter/document with your application. Apply a page number to the detter and indacate the page rrumber in the spot provided below. � P� � X I�"'t"f ��t �v t c.� �t►� M � �' 1) Village of Tequesta Utilities Department h 2) Village of T�uesta Engineer �� 3) Loxatiatchee River Environmental Control District (E1VC01� �' 4) Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority 1► 5) Palm Beach county Department of Environtnental Resources Management (DERM) �� 6) Palm Beach County Heatth Department �` 7j Palm Beach Traffic Engineering Department f � S) Pa.lm Beach County School Boarc! (Let�er of Detertnination for School Concurrency) � � 9) Waste Management (Nichols Sanita.tion) �� 10) South Florida. Water Management District (SFWMD) � � 11) Florida Power & Light �� 12) Florida. Department of Transportation , �� 13) F}orida Department of Environmenta.l Protection tl I4) Comcast Cabte Campany �F 15) AT&T Communications 1� 16} Others as may be applica.ble. � 4 , , a �, The applicac�t will s,ubmit to th� Village of Tequesta Deparlment of Community Development with the following documents for Planning & Zoning Board review, foriy-five (4S� days prior to the meeting date: 1) , For new construction or additions, Fifteen (15) sets of professionally prepared site pIans sho�S all existing and proposed structures, setbacks, parking and loading layout, ingress and egress, � sidewalks and walkways, exterior lighting layout, dimensions o€ street frontages and propertY lines and all signage. 2) Fifteen (15) sets of Landscaping Plans in accordance with Village of Tequesta Code of ; Ordinances, Division IV, Landscaping. ' 3) Fifteen (15) sets of multi-dime�sional color �renderings and/or photographs are to be pxovided. • The Plann.ing & Zoning Board needs to see an exact rendering of what is to be placed on the site. Color photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to be used must be supplied. Since color printers often do not display the correct color, it is recommended that samples of the paint chips, as well as a sample of the support ma.terials (i.e., canvas, wood, metal, etc.) be provided. 4) One (1) set of Plans l 1x17 size and One (1) disk. 5) Any other documents tha.t may help clatify the position of the applicant. � t� P4 � � � � � �'�►'�.�? � "°�°° � � � APPLICANT NAME (PRIN1� � - AP�LIC 'S SIGNATURE Mf�I�GI�{ 2 � ?�� DATE NOTE: A.11 renderings, models, drawings, photos, etc., submitted to the Village will become the property o� the Village of Tequesta. � 5 . �� . . • FEE SCHEDULES: 1. Plannin and Zonin � Board review Onl : a. Sign $ 75.00 b. SateIlite anfenna $ 75.00 c. New construction, additions, renova.tions, remodeling, including landscaping pIans; based on cost of work as follows: $0.00 to $9,999.99 $ 100.00 $10,000.00 to $24,999.99 $ 154.00 $25,000.00 to $49,999.99 $ 250.00 $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 ' $ 300.00 $100,000.00 to $199,999.99 $ 350.00 $200,000.00 and over S 400AU Z• Applications Requiring P& Z& Village Council review for final approva! $ 75.00 ' 3. Site Plan Review: a. Sign $ 125.00 b. Satellite antenna $ 125,Oo �' New construction/additions, renovations/remodeling; based on cost of work as follows: $0.00 ta $9,999.99 � 425.00 $10,000.00 to $49,999.99 $ 625.00 $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 $1,250.00 � $100,000.00 to $199,999.99 $1,875.00 $200,000.00 and over $2,SOO.QO d. Site plan modifica.tion: One-fourth of original base site plan review fee for each resubm ittal. e ' Site plan review time extension: One-half of original base site plan review fee. f Expedited site plan review: In addition to the applicable site plan review fee listed aboee $1,000.00 *To cover a11 additional administrative costs, actual or anticipated, including, but not limited to, engineering fees, consultant fees an.d special studies, the applicant shall campensate the_Village for a�l such costs prior to the processing of the application or not later than thirty (30) da.ys after final application approval, whichever is defermined as appropriate by the Village. � 6 � VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA � � "_; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � y',� Staff Report — Planning and Zoning Advisory Board- Public Hearing 4.19.12 1. PETITIOIV DESCRIPrION APPLICANT: Howard F. Ostrout, RLA, APA P.O. Box 1415 Jupiter, FL 33458 OWNER: Lamar Condominium Association Inc. 375 Beach Road Tequesta, FL 33469 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting recommendation for modify existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. �. E.AN� USE AND �ORlIIVG • EXISTING LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE ZONING SUBJECT PROPERTY Residential ResidentFal R-3 Mu{tiple-Fa�ily Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District NORTH Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Cliveden Condominium Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District SOUTH Residentiaf Residential R-3 Muitiple-Family Island House Southwest Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District Condominium EAST Residential Residential R-3 Multiple-Family Beach Road and Island House Medium Density Medium Density Dwelling District N ortheast Condominium W EST I nt racoasta I �1/A N/A N/A 3. BACKGROUND The Lamar Condominium building was built in 1969. The proposed application does not increase the square footage of existing condominium unifis (32 units); and the number of existing parl<ing spaces (45 spaces). Considering that the building was built prior to the Village's current zoning code, the subject • property has received a number of waivers in terms of parlcing and landscaping previously. 1 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —P&ZAB— Lamar Building. • The proposed site ptan modification includes a change of the existing parking canopy and building entrance canopy. The application also includes a proposed landscape and hardscape plans. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application for compliance with Village's Code, law enforcement, fire safety, and public works requirements on March 12, 2012. 4. STAFF REVIEW The proposed application does not increase the square footage of existing condominium units (32 units); and the number of existing parking spaces (45 spaces). In terms of structures, this application is extending to the east the parking canopy to provide roof coverage to existin four more parking spaces. Also, the building entrance canopy will be replaced by a new structure. Proposed Code Cornments a. Lot Coverage 31.4% Code: Max 35 %- Met Code Requirement. b. Open Space 11.4% Code: Min 30 %- Not in compliance� c. Parking 45 spaces (existing) Code: Required 64 spaces. Noi in compliance�'� d. Landscape 39% Native (shrubs Code: 60% Native Plants- Not in compliance�1� �z� and groundcovers) 50% Natives (trees) Notes: 1. Since the Lamar Building was built in 1969, the property is not in compliance with current zoninq codes, and it has received waivers in terms of parking and landstaping in previous years. The Owner • requested waivers in 1997; and, they were approved by Village Council in 1998. 2. Steve Parker, ASLA, Village Landscape Consultant, has conducted an in-depth review of the landscape portion of this application and prepared a memorandum (See attached documentJ. FINAL REMARKS • The application also includes the following features: - Replacing asphait surface on drives and parking areas with concrete pavers. - Relocating existing Fire Hydrant to ensure accessibility. - Instaliing concrete pavers on existing walks and pool deck area. � Even though the applicant has improved the landscaping conditions in comparison with the 1997 plan, the applicant is requesting the following waivers with this application: - 15% iandscaping of the gross parking area. - 60% native piants count. - 50% minimum shade trees to palm clusters. - 30%a open space. s This development application met the requirements set on Section 78-334 notice of hearing. The notice of hearing was advertised on April S, 2012. = `; /; f � This report was prepared by Nilsa Zacanas, AICP, �id; / , / ;, , ��; �� Approved by Chief James M. Weinand ---�` ��'�"" � / Date �;��%� �.:�. � , . 2 Department of Community Development - 5taff Report —P&ZA8— Lamar Building. • T � f _ �r t � ,, — , .�,+ k?�fN�il't�69�� :�,;,u� �� '� � f � ' f�.0 — � ��. _ _.�.. r I :.. � � �� ' �_-�' i �� •°��rta�ri 1 y � •. � � �, g,�+,.,. Vws� j �r�i` � ? 4AD_ `� ,�, � „ . 4 � �. c • P . . .. � ` ' � .�. �. ....a . ' �iQ . •_ �` �,�, + �r � ts i - }j � � ,1;.,... _ " :'ys Existing Conditions at the Site ,''� '!' �;�° r. � ' c�i , ✓'� ,rM �. ' � ' ry � ; ' �� ., ��„ �� "� , ' � ,a� ��+, �� , �� , �� ;� �`,�ri�� ',� � �' U 1F � M� � ` }' � '► �� dE� i �� '' � '� , � � ia �t� � ►f ir � � plit - _.� '.!a� ' �: h�t �' .� �' l ' � �I F« � � � ik. �,� �,. �„ Y� }-�� .e.i+eEY � S +,� ;.� �� j .;'�, �-. /� i , u � q 1/1 '�- &s.. :�s ,. �'��$'1 :� � '�'� I p � � i i , , �IM � . ` ��,�� ' �� r � � � f . �dN '�} � y � :�.�Y �.i _ - a M i:..,' ,{, �� '� Sa� �� i9 ,I • q , * .., .�1 675 t `�;:: ... � ,�: i"a «,`�;Y�� k R' `�" { �'r�� . \�� '� � .. . . �w _ " .�. . . . � . . � - � � , ' + i ''.. .. � ,.- ,.�' ►� . . ii - �Y : / � ' P T .I� R i � � � ' ;��_. � � ��' �� I�� ' �' i , �,.,� � �� 7 � - <, _ _ ,,', .,: " -- ,�„; i„ �� -- w � h � � �, '.� ; : � ,��. * i �J:: � �,, q . _ ` � r `K* } " �`.'�m': @,� -�':y� �.-- � �� n ,�, �fa �iP _ J4 I � �� r - � . ' t�p .. — ' �� t�, . �.)i!J`� y r I � F.,. `_.,'' , ��"_ �+M ' r »; � t _ p . ; i .:,. �° - ✓ � '.� .. : , �.� ..,, - � � „,.. r,�,= �' � . _ �� r ` r- , Y , =ti' F�" Z . ,�.>,.F .. . - �- a�.. , ._. �` ,2'+x_ '�nca�hlx• E: , • 3 Department of Community Development - Staff Report —P&ZAB— Lamar Building• � ' ' - • � .�� . �� C�� a� �� 6 ��.�� •�� P�� R.�� Y,�N� ET cic�i�n gi•oup, inc. nnEnnar�aN�um T0: �iilsa Zacarias, AICP Village of Tequesta FROM: Stephen J. Parker, ASLA Parker - Yannette Design Group, Inc. DATE: lv�arch 29, 2012 RE: Lamar Condorniniums 375 Beach Road [ have reviewed the revised Hardscape Plans, Landscape and Landscape Lighting Pians for the Lamar Condominiums, 375 Beach Road, as prepared by Howard • Ostrout Jr. and Assaciates, LLC, dated March 20, 2012. The revised plans have made significant strides in addressEng previous comments and in reducing deC�ciencies in ti�e Viiiag� of Tequesi.a landscape requirements. [n some cases the pians have exceec�ed the landscape waivers granted in 1997 for this project North Property Line 1. The ptan meets anr� cxceeds the lartdscape buffer widt}� aau tree cuu�►c per Village of Tequesta landscape requirementis and the 1997' waiver. 2. The hedge requirement has been met. East Property Line 1. The plan includes the majority of the tandscape bufFer in the right-of-way as per the 1997 waiver. 2. The tree requirements (and waivers) :�ave been exceeded provided the 5ylvester Date Palms a*e caunted as one (1) fall tree. Based on the size and stature of the Sylvester Date Palrns, and the �act that the Coconut Palms were c�utited 1 i'ar 2 per 1997 waiver, i recommend accepting the Sylvester Date Palms as one (1) full tree. 3. The hedge requirement has been met. • + L/�NI7SCA r�RCH17'�CTURC • Nl.�lNi��fNG ° (iftAPH1C'S _ 825 South U.5. Hi�h�i�ay ()ne Suitc 330 Jupitcr. Fi�rida 33=177 S61!747-.r+U69 I.ic. �fLC-OOOQ2�)7 • IVilsa Zacarias, A1CP - Lamar Condominiums March 29, 'L012 Page 2 South Property Line 1. The majoi•ity of the properry line does not have a buffer. This area was gc�nted a waiver in 1997. 2. The plan exceeds the tree count per the 1997 waiver (2 trees per waiver, � trees provicteci]. 3. The 1997 plan and cui•rent plan do not provide a hed�e. Although a waiver was not specEfically requestecE on the 1997 plan, a hedge is not possible due to the Iandscape buffer waiver. ��aaldiz�g Buff�� The 1997 plan had a waiver for l area. The current plan exceeds the buffer rec�uirements (and waiver). Landsca�pe Re�{�airem�� The 1997 plan was granted a waiver to count the Coconut Palms as one (1) full tree. The current plan requests the same consideration. [nterror Parking The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for the interior iandscape requirements. The current plan requests the same consideration. Additional Requirements 1. The �.997 plan was gi-anted a waiver foi• Iandscaping 15a�O of the gross parking area. The current ptan requests the same cansideration. 2. The 1997 plan was granted a waiver for providing 60% native plant rnaterial. The curi•ent plan requests the same consideration. However, the native count has been significantly improved from the 1997 ptans. 3. The 1997 plan was grantec! a��raiver for 5�J°ro minimum shade trees ta �alsn clusters. The current plan requests Che same consideration. Summary I recommend approva! oFthe Hardscape Plans, Landscaue and Landscape Li�hting Plans Por Lamar Condominiums. The proposed landscaping, additional greenspace and decorative pavers will greatly improve the aesthetics af this property. • . { March 20, 2012 � Site Plan Modification Lamar Condominium 375 Beach Road DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work proposed in this Site Pian Modification indudes the following: 1. The removal of the existing concrete parking canopy which has been deemed structurally in need of replacement. Removal of the existing aluminum and canvas entry canopy which has been destroyed in past hurricanes and is situated at a height which is too low to allow for emergency vehicles to pass under. The existing parking canopy and entry canopy will be replaced with a reinforced concrete structure that is similar to what is being removed and has architecturaf detailing that is compatible with the existing building architecture. The parking canopy is being extended to the east to allow for four more covered parking spaces. The building coverage including the proposed new structures is 12,133 square feet or 31.4% of the site which is lower than the �Ilage of Tequesta's maximum allawed building • coverage of 35%. 2. The asphalt surface on the drives and parking areas is to be removed and replaced with concrete pavers. The existing wafks and pool deck area is to be remodeled with a new surfacing of concrete pavers. There are no proposed changes to the number of parking spaces. There are some adjustments to the landscape planting areas resufting in a 27% increase in total green space to 4401 square feet or 11.4% of the site. The site grading and drainage is to remain as it now exists with the drainage patterns directed to existing catch basins and swale areas. 3. The landscaping is to be refurbished leaving many of the existing trees in place or relocating them on site. There are three non-native Ficus trees on the pool deck area at the rear of the building that are to be removed to create more usable deck space. We are adding four native trees, Clusia Rosea, to the north landscape buffer area which we are more than doubling in size from 2'-8" wide to more than 7'-0" wide. One major feature tree being introduced is the seven Sylvester Rate Palms which are in the front bufFer and along the sides at the entry areas. They are very compatible with the beach salt environment which bums many plant materials including natives. The proposed Landscape Planting Plan increases the use of the native plants from less than 10% that currently exist on site to 39% natives for shrubs and groundcovers and 50% natives for trees. � . ♦ Site Plan Modification • Lamar Condominium 375 Beach Road Descriotion of Work Continued — Page 2 4. The landscape lighting plan shows a limited number of up lighting fixtures which will highfight the larger trees and smafler fixtures on smalt palms to create a p�easing nightscape. 5. A site I�ghting plan shows the placement of sconce waH lights under the entry and parking canopy and area site lights which will provide a minimum af one foat candle of lighting on the site. There is lighting under the existing parking canopy and exposed spot lights on the edge of the parking canopy which aim to the north and south. The proposed Profiler Light Lumineers were selected for their forward throwing, high cut off lighting characteristics, which dramatically limit any off site ligh�ng. This wili be a significant improvement over the existing exposed spotlights which are pointed directly towards the neighboring properties. � • ��. � -�`�"�� THFODORE E. DAti IS • ARCHITECT & ASSOGIATES, P.A. � ,. � �� `� � 78797 RIO YI6TA DRIVE, TEQUESTA, FLORIDp S34l9 (361) 379-7W9 . AAC - 001630 / AR - 0004615 Date: 03-16-2012 �.ETTER OF RESPONCE Village of Tequesta Building Department 345 Tequesta Dr., Tequesta, FL 33469-0273 Phone: 561-768-0700 RE: Lamar Condominium Covered Parking Structure located at 375 Beach Road, Tequesta, FL 33469 Comments: Responces (1) "Provide a sprinkler system on the proposed covered parking area." The proposed Concrete Parking Structure does not require Fire Sprinkler System per FBC code requirements. (2) "Submit color rendering of proposed front elevation:' See 11x17 Co/or Elevat�on in submittal package. • (3) "Provide sample of all proposed materials and chip colors." See 11x17 Co/or Elevation w/ color chip in submittal package. (4) "Clarify finish color of columns and canopy (Architectur�l drawing A-3) " The stucco finish and paint co/or will match exisffng buildin'g stucco �nish 8 color. (5) Plans not matching with the Architectural plans showing 6 uncovered spaces and the others showing 4. See revised Architectura/ plans w/ (4) uncovered parking spaces on East end of proposed Parking Strucxture.. RespectFully submitted, ��. Theodore E. Davis License # AR-4615 AAC001630 • PAGE 1 OF 1 � T O z � m r m D � O , Z ,-. m D � � � �.. � � D r m ; z � � � � — � m � N S � � p1 3 � D � m o 's s PARKING STRUCTURE RENOVATION m � > LAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION � � 375 BEACH ROAD, TEQUESTA, FLORIDA 33469 m � DRAWN BY: REVISED: � N p K�M THEODORE E. DAVIS � D ° ARCHITECT AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. � � O � CHECKED BY: � � ti TED DAVIS 18797 RIO VISTA DRIVE, TEQUESTA, FLORIDA 31d69 '� � O Phone: 361•�747049 � DATE: % 03-19-2012 AR-d6/5 ACC 00�630