HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 05A_04/28/1994 ' V(LLAGE OF TEQUESTA �
:; �� :
� DF,P.•�R1�iF.ti 1' nF CnMMI �NTTY DEVELOP1�iF'vT
�
'�S• �� f'c�tit Oil�cc B��x 1?73 • 357 Tcyucsta Urivc
. -
�� �� TCi�ilt' F'���fli�.l �Za(i�a (?��� • :�l,i �' - /�'�I)
' i � /�
. � � (•�r, iv�i�� l'♦.(l�lli
� y ��
��'v fn��M�
BOARD OF ADJIJSTMENT
PUBLIC HEaRING
IdEETING l�IINUTES .
1�,RCH 21, 1994
Z. C1iLL TO ORDER �I�TD ROLL CaLL
The Village of Tequesta Board of Adjustment held a regularly
scheduled Public Hearinq at the Village Hall, 357 Tequesta
Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Monday, March 21, 1994. The
meetinq was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Kenneth
Northamer. A roll call was taken by Betty Laur, the
Recordinq Secretary. Boardmembers present were: Chairman
Kenneth Northamer; Alfred DeMott; Edwin Nelson, Raymond
Schauer, and Susan Brennan. Scott D. Ladd, Clerk of the
Board, Village Attorney John C. Randolph, and Village Clerk
Joann Manganiello were also in attendance.
II. 1�iPPROVaL OF AGEND�
Boardmember Alfred DeMott moved that the Agenda be approved
as submitted. Boardmember Edwin Nelson seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was:
Kenneth Northaaer - for
�lfred Qel+tott - for
Bdwin Nelson - for �
Rayaond Schauer - for
gusan grennan - for
The aotion was therefore passed and adopted and the aqenda
was approved as sul�itted.
III. 1�iPPROV1�iL OF PRSVIOIIS i�BTII�tG I�iOTSS (8eetinq l+Iinutes of
Janusry 17, 1994)
Boardnember i�lf red . Detsott �oved that the Board of Ad justaent
Meetinq trtinutes of January 17, -1994 bs approved as
� submitted. Board�enber EdWin Nelson seconded the �otion.
�
The vote on the motion was: _
Recvcfed Pare�
Board of l�djustaent
Meeting Minutes
March 21, 1994
Page 2
------------------------------------
Kenneth Northamer - for
A1 f red De2sott - f or
Edwin Nelson ' for
Raymond Schauer � - for
Susan Brennan , - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Minutes
were approved as submitted.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
(1) An application from Brian G. Wayne, owner of Lot
472, Tequesta Subdivision, located at 128 Fairview
East, requestinq 8 variance to the ter�s of the
Official Co�prehensive Zoninq Ordinance of the
Village of Tequesta, Ordinance No. 355, as amended,
Section VII (C), Schedule of Site Regulations, R-lA
District, ii.ni�um side yard setback, to allow for
the enclosinq of an existing porch with a side yard
setback of two and one half feet (2.5') in lieu of
ten feet (10'), �as required by the Zoning
Ordinance.
Brian Wayne explained that the existing porch which he would
like to enclose had been built years ago before he purchased
the property and consists of an asphalt shinqled flat roof
covering 3x8 beams and screen walls which have four wood 4x4
supports around the circumference. His plans to remodel
the whole house at once are no lonqer possible because of
illness which has left him without the finances he had
planned to use for this purpose, so he now plans to remodel
gradually as he can afford it, and would like to enclose the
porch first since that would be the least costly area to
remodel and Would provide additional needed dininq area and
den space for his family. Scott D. Ladd, Clerk of the
Board, reported from his research that the porch had been
added to the house many years aqo without a penoit and
violated setback requirements. Scott D. Ladd read into the
record the followinq letter from Hurant and Josephine
Tavetian of 132 Fairview East: �My na�e fs Hurant Tavetian,
owner of property at 132 Fairview East, Tequesta, Florida.
we have resided at this address tor 18 years. Ne, at tbis �
time are "aqainst" the possible issuance o! narfance to the
applicant for reason ststed in your notice dated 3-3-94
related to Lot #472, address 128 Fairview $ast, Tequesta.
Further, we believe that Zoninq Ordinances were developed
for the overall qood of a community. Therefore, should be
Board of �djustment
Meetinq Minutes
March 21, 1994
Paqe 3
adhered to. It is understood by this writing, our
expression "against" is an acceptable way to convey our
thoughts to the Board as a property owner. If additional
information is required, please advise.' Scott D. Ladd then
read into the record the following letter fro� Ann F.
Tuggle, 120 Fairview East: 'Z am opposed to the request to
grant a variance to enclose a porch to within 2-1/2 feet of
the sideline on Lot 472 (128 Fairview East). Zoning is
adopted in order to protect the riqhts of all parties in a
community. Especially important is the maintenance of
buildings within the allotted space. Thank you for your
consideration of my views.'
In response to Boardmember DeMott's concern whether the
Board could legally approve a variance to a condition that
had been done with no approval by the Village, Village
Attorney Randolph stated the Board would be approving only
the current application and not what had been done that was
never approved. In response to a point raised by a member
of the audience, Wade Griest, Village Attorney Randolph
stated that this Board only. acts on behalf of the Village
and their decision has nothing to do with any action by the
Homeowners Association.
Susan Mitchell of 124 Fairview East, the property
immediately south of the property under discussion, stated
the entire property is in extreme disrepair, and requested
any improvements be submitted to Zoninq and be approved by
an architectural qroup and that work be done by a
contractor.
Boardmember Nelson made the suggestion that Mr. Wayne and
his neiqhbors meet informally to arrive at a mutual
agreement reqarding improvinq landscapinq.
Boardmember Brennan made a motion to defer Mr. Wayne•s
Application for Variance until the next regular meetinq of
the Board of Adjustment with the request that Mr. Wayne
redesign the porch enclosure within the 9.3� setback.
Boardmember DeMott seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
1Cenneth l�orthaser � - !or A
�I.fred DeKott - for
Bdwin Nelson - ��r
Ray�ond Schauer - aqainst
Susan grennen - for
Board of Adjustaent
Meetinq Minutes
March 21, 1994
Page 4
------------------------------------ ,
the motion was therefore passed and adopted.
(2) An application from City Signs, as agent for the
Goodyear Tire Store, located at 160 Bridge Road,
requesting a variance to the terms of the Official
Comprehensive Zoninq Ordinance of the Villaqe of
Tequesta, Ordinance No. 355, as amended, Section
� XII, Sign Regulations, Subsection (R), Technical
Requirements, Paragraph 5.b., to allow the
continued use of the existinq free-standinq siqn
located on the northwest corner of the property at
Bridqe Road and Alt. AlA, and not within the middle
one-third of the property, in lieu of said siqn
beinq located within tbe middle one-third of this
property frontinq on the puplic street, as required
by the Zoninq Ordinance.
Bert Leib of City Signs stated moving the existing free-
standing sign from the corner of the property to the middle
one-third of the property would create a hardship because it
would then be in.front of existing service bays. Scott D.
Ladd, Clerk of the Board read into the record the following
letter from Ricker Alford, Jr. , of 206 West Riverside Drive,
Jupiter, Florida (whose business location is within 300 feet
of the subject property): 'As property owners receiving
your notice concerning an application from City Siqns, as
Agent for the Goodyear Tire Store, requestinq a variance for
their siqn, my wife and I have no objection to the existinq
sign and are for the variance.'
Boardmember Nelson moved that the application for Variance
be approved. Boardmember Schauer seconded the motion. The
vote on the motion was:
Renneth Northa�er - for
Pilfred Det+Iott - for
Bdvin Nelson - for
Ray�wnd Schauer - for
Susan Brennan - for
the iotion was therefore passed and adopted.
p. UNFINISA$D BUSIIiSS3
� There was no unfinished business to be brought before the
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
March 21, 1994
Paqe 5
------------------------------------
Board.
VI. ANY OTHER MATTERS
1. Discussion of Snyder Decision by Village Attorney:
Attorney Randolph advised the Board of Adjustment that the
Snyder decision basically indicated that there are some
zoning matters that are quasi-judicial proceedings. Members
of a quasi-judicial board basically act as a judge would act
in regard to ex-parte communication. Of interest to this
board was the Jennings case which determined that any board
or committee that acts as a quasi-judicial board or
committee should not allow itself to be lobbied in any way.
A boardmember cannot listen to comments outside a hearinq
because that could sway the boardmember's opinion, and as
soon as the boardmember realizes a person is attempting to
lobby regarding a matter pending before the Board, the
boardmember should tell that person he or she is sorry but
cannot discuss the matter. If anyone alleges prejudicial
conduct (lobbyinq outside a public meeting) it will be
assumed there has been prejudicial contact. The burden of
proof would then shift to the Board of Adjustment to show
that the contact has not been prejudicial. Therefore
Attorney Randolph recommended that boardmembers not allow
themselves to be lobbied in any way. He stated that
proposed legislation now pending only relates to elected
officials, therefore if passed, this leqislation would not
change his advice to this Board.
In response to Boardmember Brennan's questions as to how she
• should react to specific situations involving matters she
would deal with both in her capacity as Boardmember of the
Tequesta Country Club Community association and as a member
of the Board of Adjustment, Attorney Randolph advised
Boardmember Brennan to abstain from any matters brouqht
before the Tequesta Country Club Community Association that
she knew would be brought before the Board of Adjustment;
and if any matters were brought before the Board of
Adjustment that she had participated in�at the Tequesta
Country Club Community rissociation she should abstain from
voting on thea ttt the Board of adjust�ent aeeting.
2. Boardmenber DeMott expressed the thanks of the 8oarcl to
former Boardmember willfam G. Rirkland for his
contributions and many years of service to the Board of
1�d justment .
µ � R
/
Board of Adjustment
Neeting Minutes
March 21, 1994
paqc E�
------------------------------------
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Boardmember DeMott moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Boardmember Nelson seconded the motion. The vote on the
motion was:
Kenneth Northamer - for
A1 f red De2�iott - f or
Edwin Nelson - for
Raymond Schauer - for
Susan Brennan - for
the motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting was �
adjourned at 8:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
,�� L � �� �✓
Y--�=� � _
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
�� �����
Scott D. Ladd
Clerk of the Board
DATE APPROVED:
(�cv'� ��, ! 99�