The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 05b_05/13/2004 • � 111 � t11 O�d 11. C�. Llr 11 Date: 5/7/2004 To: Michael R Couzzo, Jr., Village Council From: Mary Miles, Village Clerk RE: ORDINANCE NO. 587 This is the second reading of Ordinance No. 587, a small scale comprehensi�e plan amendment, that allows us to go fonvazd and complete the anne�tion process (designates a change in land use) of contiguous parcels of Palm Beach County land into the Village of Tequesta. This is a commercial property along U.S. 1 in between Harbour Road Sonth and Falm Court. Turtle Beach Construction is planning to build construction offices at that location. Ft� reading by Council was approved on Apri18, 2004; and the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as � Planning Agency, recommended it for approval at their Apri121, 2004 meeting (see �tt��ied��,,,Proper noticing requirements were adhered to, as well as courtesy notices to those aresic�ts,^within 300 ft. as requested by Council. � � :;;, �i ii i i .,. �j .. � �� ORDINANCE NU. 587 �' ;I I j AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF �; THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH i; COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED ;� VILLAGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PURSUANT TO � � CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND �. CHAPTERS 9J 5 AND 9J-11, FLORIDA I ADMIrTISTRATIVE CODE, APPLYING A �i �� j� COMMERCIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TO A �? PORTION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE � i EAST SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE BETWEEN ij PALM COURT AND HARBOR ROAD SOUTH, i; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.495 ACRES, �' PROVIDING FOR A REVISION TO THE VILLAGE'S !i �! FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING FOR ; � CODIFICATION, SEVERABILiTY, AND PROVIDING ;:; AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ;, t� i. WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta has received an application ; � for an amendment to the Future Land Use Element/Map of the Village Comprehensive ; � Plan from the owner of real property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached; ': � and i! �; WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency has reviewed the proposed amendment to the � i Comprehensive Plan, applying a future land use classification of "Commercial" to the j ; subject property, has held a properly noticed public hearing, and has recommended I � adoption; and �� i; WHEREAS, the Village Council, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has �� reviewed the proposed amendment, has held two properly noticed public hearings, and �'� has found that the amendment furthers the public health, safety and welfare; is consistent �' with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rules 9J-5 and 9J-11, Florida �� Administrative Code; and axe consistent with other elements of the Village ;� Comprehensive Plan, the Strategic Regional Policy Plan, and the State Comprehensive j Plan. fj " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VII.,LAGE COUNCIL OF i� THE VII.,LAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: ;I ; i SECTION 1.: INCORPORATION OF RECITALS ;� , i� !; The above recitals are incorporated as though fully set forth herein. i; ; � SECTION 2.: FINDINGS �i i� �� i �f il �I � �I i I � � I � i ; ; � i The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments as more particularly deseribed in ! Exhibit "A" is determined by the Village Council to be consistent with the public health, �� safety, and welfare, consistent wrth the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, ; �� consistent with the requirements of Rules 9J-5 and 97-11, Florida Administrative Code, �� and consisterit with all the elements of the adopted Village Comprehensive Plan, 1 Strategic Regional Policy Plan, and the State Comprehensive Plan. � +; SECTION 3.: REPEAL OF INCONSISSTENT ORDINANCE PROVISIONS � � � All Ordinances or provisions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. !� ' � SECTION 4.: SEVERABILITY I' ; If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, for any ' i; reason, is held to be unconstitutional, void or otherwise invalid, the validity of the �� remaining portions of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. � � SECTION 5.: EFFECTIVE DATE i This Ordinance shall become effective when the Florida Department of j � Community af�airs issues a final order determining this Comprehensive Plan Amendment �i to be in compliance with the State Comprehensive Plan, Florida Statute Chapter 163 and ' '! Rules 97-5/9J-i l, Florida Admixristrative Code. �� ; � READ AND APPROVED on First Reading by the Village Council on the 8` day I � of August, 2004. � i THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was offered by Councilmember '� ,� who moved its adoption. The Ordinance was seconded by Councilmember ; i And upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: I I ;� FOR ADOPTION AGAINST ADOPTION � � � I� �� .� „ ,� �� ;� �� ;, . ;; ;, �� , ;, ;. ,, ;� ,� , � � ,, ,, ,, �� , i � � �� i � The Mayor, thereupon declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2004. i I �� Village Mayor i� l0 li � Viltage Clerk I � ij i I i , �; �; ;�� I� ; ; �; i! � �. il �; �� ,; ;, f� �� ! ,i �� I� +; � I � I ( I� �� ! �� 'i I! ,; . � , �; �i �� ; �' i LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 THROUGH 9,1NCLUSIVE, BLOCK 5, JUPITER HEIGHTS, A SUBDIVISION IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 69. TOGETHER WITH A PARCEL OF LAND 40 FEET IN WIDTH, MEASURED FROM EAST TO WEST, AND 180 FEET IN LENGTH, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO SOUTH, LYING IMMEDIATELY WEST OF AND ADJACENT TO LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK 5, JUPITER HEIGHTS, A SUBDIVISION IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS RECORDED iN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 69, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS PROPERTY BEING THE EAST 40 FEET OF THAT CERTAIN 100 FEET DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC LYING EAST OF U.5. HIGHWAY #1 (STATE ROAD #5) RUNNING PARALLEL TO SAID ROAD AND BETWEEN SAID ROAD AND SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE, OF BLOCK 5. CONTAINING: 21,600 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHTS-OF- WAY OF RECORD. N �i�..�� '� �.��t��. � � � � .R4 . �..�.�� ''� r�+�.� - � ,� � ° q s � N . : �� , ik , �. , �, �� . ' � .a. ,�y � ' k �«.<k� �� ' , ` � � ' � �� W��r..�� ' '� . �� `� ��.. � � �. 1� La�1li�.�V � �� r n '. Y ��. � � �.' '( '� w :; � � .-.-,. N � ,� .. � 4 �_... �`'.� �r `, � '� `-:-"-' '� xz H� � , ��; �}'� t f \�� i, � 1' � � � ,'� t ` ; �� - �"` ' j rF v�. '^ �'`, �T'equ�sta TerraGe r � � � � � � . � ..� �� i" �] �� ;`�`� � �. �� a , :: R �}�; �� t�� +5�, �.S# � e� � - �,�� ;� � ,� �'� _ � � '3 �� t x 't ��: -k,". Y +� � :s� '�, ,,, .�'' -.8,; � �' . �„ � � � � ._ . _ �ryM•�� e �_t �� J �: . � � � � . _ .�.. ... -•-r-.. _ :..,_.. .. .____:�._ _----'Ji.l�J �k � ? ''° �z �, ., ' � ' � ��'., �y, � � � � , , , . , a ' =m � _ �� . '� '; , , : :. _.,. _. . ,.. . ... �. . ._.,. . �,_-.-�_ : __,_ � „ - �, - T�questa Commerce Lentea yY � `. __ �- -- �`�:t �. _ "�.,� �� 'v � �� q ., ', � f '+, �`� �' :� . .; ; S�. Jude s �atha�lic Gf��s��h ; . . � µ , , .:� ` . ;.. � , �, : .: , , , � � � � � �� j �� ' , t� � �� p � , � T 1 � _�.._1_. �.._ � � � S i �� . . . � �! �. �e_��' '�•^ y'� "'1_:� '^^"I' — — .�...� ..`_ .-._..,_... __'. . ' ' �. � . �� — . , '� 15 � ��`M'�y�R;��;:?q . . ! � , x . .. ar�r� Turtle Beach �onsfYUCtion Proposed Land Use Plan DesYgnation & R�-Z+oning �=�jr��ntly in tlnir�corporat�d Palm Beach �ounty Proposed Annexation into Tequesta �urrent Land Use: C!5 Proposed Zoning: G-2 Community Commeraal .;�srrent Zo�ing: �ommerciai Ger��rai �CG) i'roposed Land Use Pian Designation: Commer�cial Ca�rrent Use: Vacant Prc�posed Us�: Cans#ruction Campany Office Areas rrvith Goloret! Overtays are within th� Vitlat�e Municipai Limits Me11101�`dt1d�L�Y1 rF ` �P G�� , � � To: Michael Couzzo, Village Manager ��-� _ CC: JeffNewell - �� From: Carol Lux r �,� � Date: 5/3/04 ; y '� p� � ;' �r Re: Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Results �q�y :� c• Results from the Pianning and Zoning Board of April 21, 2004 Three items were discussed at the P&Z Board Meeting held at 6:30 on Wednesday, Apri121, 2004. 1. The third item on the agenda was moved to the first item. This item was an application by Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc. on behaTf of Indeco Inc. of 399 Cypress Drive, Tequesta FL. Indeco Inc. was applying to install three wall signs on their building at Cypress Drive. The white signs with green lettering were approved by the Board with no changes. 2. The second agenda item handled was the Public Hearing and Recommendation to the Village Council by the Local Planning Agency of Ordinance No. 587. This ordinance amends the Comprehensive Plan to apply a commercial land use classification to a portion of real properiy located on the east side of U.S. Highway One between Palm Court and Harbor Road South known as the Turtle Beach Construction site containing .495 acres. The Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, approved the revision of the Village's Future Land Use Map; providing for codification, severability, and providing an effective da.te. This proposed revision will go before the Village Council for second reading in May. 3. The final item to be heard by the P&Z Board was the Public Hearing and Recommendation to the Village Council of Ordinance No. 588. This ordinance applies a zoning designation to the Turtle Beach Construction site noted above. The zoning classification approved to be applied to the site was C-2, Community Commercial. This proposed zoning application will go before the Village Council for second reading in May. DD� � r � �ILLAGE OF TEQUESTA �' Post Office Box 3273 • 250 Teyuest� Ihive, Suite 300 � � Tequesta, F1oridYa 33469-0273 • �561) 575-6200 ; , �� ' �' �ax: (561) 575-6203 - t• � VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES APRIL 21, 2004 I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Village of Tequesta Planning and Zoning Advisory Board held a regularly scheduled meeting at the Tequesta Recreation� Center, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, April 21, 2004. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 P.M. by Chair Elizabeth Schauer. A roll call was taken by Recording Secretary Betty Laur. Board members present were: Chair Elizabeth Schauer, Vice Chair Steve Okun, Board member Jeff Robbins, and William Wilder. Also in attendance were Village Planner Carol Lux and Clerk of the Board Jeff Newell. Board member Leslie Cook arrived at 6:33 p.m. Chair Schauer requested that if a member of the board had a question that they address her and she would recognize the person to which the question should be directed. Chair Schauer requested that all cell phones be turned off. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION Vice Chair Okun moved approval of the agenda as amended to change item C under New Business to item A and renumber the subsequent items under New Business; also, to add discussion of e-mail received by Jeff Newell to Any Other Matters. Board member Robbins seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Agenda was approved as submitted. III. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES Vice Chair Okun moved approval of the minutes of the meeting of March 30, 2004 as submitted. Board member Wilder seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. Retycled Paper � Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 2 IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Recommendation to Yillage Council (P&Z) A request by Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc., on behalf of Indeco, Inc. (properry owner) for approval of two (2) 24" wall signs, one to be placed on the north elevation and one to be placed on the south elevation; and one (1) 36" wall sign to be placed on the east elevation, for the commercial office building located at 399 North Cypress Drive in Tequesta, Florida. Village Planner Carol Lux presented the request and advised that the requested signs met all Village regulations. John Burroughs of Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc., spoke on behalf of the applicant. MOTION: Board member Cook made a motion to recommend to Village Council approval of the request from Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc., on behalf of Indeco, Inc. for approval of two 24" wall signs, one to be placed on the north elevation and one to be placed on the south elevation; and one 36" wall sign to be placed on the east elevation, for the commercial of�ce building located at 399 North Cypress Drive in Tequesta, Florida. Vice Chair Okun seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. B. Public Hearin� and Recommendation to Village Council (LPA) Ordanance No. 587 — An Ordinance of the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida, amending the Adopted Village Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J-S and 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code, applying a commercial land use classification to a portion of real property located on the eastside of U.S. Highway One between Palm Court and Harbor Road South, eontaining approximately 0.495 acres, providing for a revision to the Vllage's Future Land Use Map; providing for codification, severability, and providing an effective date. The Board was now sitting as the Local Planning Agency for this agenda item. Community Development Director Jeff Newell, Clerk of the Board read Ordinance No. 587 by caption and no ex-parte communication was reported. Chair Schauer declared the public hearing open. Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 3 Bryan Chekas, Cotleur and Hearing, spoke on behalf of the applicant, who would like to locate their corporate offices to the Village. Board member Cook commented she knew the people who were running this company and they did a beautiful job, so she was sure the project would be beautiful, and stated she was in agreement with this change. Vice Chair Okun also stated agreement. Board member Wilder commented this property was zoned commercial by the county, and there was no reason the Village should not have it zoned commercial. Board member Robbins and Chair Schauer stated they had no problems with this request. Hearing no other comments, the public heaxing was closed. MOTION Board member Cook moved that approval of Ordinance 587 be recommended to the Village Council. Vice Chair Okun seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. C. Public Hearing and Recommendation to Village Council (P&Z) Ordinance No. 588 — An Ordinance of the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta, applying a Zoning Designation to a portion of real property located on the east side of U.S. Highway One behveen Palm Court and Harbor Road South containing approximately 0.495 acres, to C-2 Community Commercial; making certain findings of fact; providing for revision of the Village Zoning Map; providing for severability, an effective date, and for other purposes. Community Development Director .7eff Newell, Clerk of the Board Chair Schauer declared the Public Hearing open. Clerk of the Board Newell read Ordinance No. 588 by caption. There was no-ex-parte communication reported. Mr. Newell presented the staff presentation, stating the Village would apply a commercial zoning classification; and pointed out the location of the C-2 district on a zoning map. Mr. Newell explained that the purpose of the C-2 district was to provide zoning for businesses fronting along U.S. Highway One. The county's designation for this land was C-5, . which Mr. Newell explained was intensive commercial zoning. Discussion ensued. Chair Schauer explained that when the Board reviewed the site plan for this property they would look at landscaping, building design, etc., and could make changes; tonight the Board was just reviewing the parcel. It was noted that the Village property was more heavily landscaped than that in the county. Mr. Okun asked if rezoning Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 4 would have any effect on minimizing the use of this property. Mr. Newell explained that size and other controls would come into play; that the sma11 size of the parcel limited certain uses, such as a large car dealership. Mr. Okun asked by applying the Village designation as opposed to the county's designation whether it would be minimized or maximized, to which Mr. Newell responded in his opinion it would be maximized. Building height on this parcel was discussed, and Mr. Newell explained this was only half an acre so could not support a high building. Board member Cook asked if properly owners had been contacted. Mr. Newell reported that although not required, a11 property owners within 300' in Jupiter Heights had been notified at the request of the Village Council. Brian Chekas of Cotleur and Hearing spoke on behalf of applicant Turtle Creek Construction. Frank Sardina commented he lived behind the property and had met with the developer, who was working on his concerns. Mr. Sardina commented the Board seemed concerned with comparing the Village zoning to the County's zoning, and advised that the County had very specific ordinances when commercial backed up to residential, which the Village might want to consider adopting. Chair Schauer advised that the Board was not considering site plan issues at this time- just going over the ordinance to make a recommendation to Village Council--and at site plan review they would go over buffering and whether the proposed project would be conducive to the area. Chair Schauer advised that this Board would make a recommendation to Village Council, and the Village Council could still make additional changes, but this Board would be doing most of the heavy work before the Village Council considered approval. Mr. Sardina commented he had brought this up because in the County's CG zoning there was a whole different level of consideration because it backed up to residential, and the Village might want to consider similar zoning in the future since they were one of the few municipalities who did not have transitional zoning. Faye Kochnano commented although it was not required it would be nice if the 60-70 homes on Harbor Road were notified. Hearing no further comments from the public, Chair Schauer declared the public hearing closed. MOTION Vice Chair Okun moved that approval of Ordinance 588 be recommended to the Village Council. Board member Robbins seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. � Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 5 IV. COMMUNICATION FROM CITIZENS Mayor Watkins welcomed the board members and thanked them for volunteering their time for this Board. V. ANY OTHER MATTERS Chair Schauer read into the record an e-mail forwarded from Mr. Newell which he had received from the Village Manager, stating that in regard to the Planning and Zoning Board the only person who could contact the attorney would be Village Manager Couzzo. Chair Schauer sta.ted unless she had read the ordinance incorrectly, Mr. Newell was Clerk of the Board. Mr. Newell stated that was correct--he was Clerk of the Boaxd for the Planning and Zoning Board and as such was responsible for their administrative affairs and to be able to reseazch to provide answers to questions from members of the Boaxd. Chair Schauer commented that although at tlie last meeting the attorney had invited board members to contact her with questions, Chair Schauer assumed no board member would ever contact the attorney unless they first went through Mr. Newell. Mr. Newell advised board members were not prohibited from contacting the attorney or directing him to contact the attorney for some specific purpose, although there were budget considerations. Chair Schauer clarified that the Board was to address their main concerns to Mr. Newell as Clerk of the Board. Cha.ir Schauer asked the amount budgeted for the Planning and Zoning Board for attorney's fees. Mr. Newell responded that the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Board were currently not budgeted but in fiscal year 04/OS these boards would have a budget. Chair Schauer commented to the Board that if they directed Mr. Newell to contact the attorney to clarify an item, they needed to realize they had no budget; but if Mr. Newell felt he needed to contact the attorney he would do so; however, so far he had been able to answer her questions. Chair Schauer expressed concern that in reading the e-mail she felt it was trying to take Mr. Newell out of the loop with the Board. Mr. Newell stated as before that he was the Clerk of the Board and worked at the direction of the Board, and as far as the Village Manager's position, the Manager should answer that to the Board. Board member Cook expressed her opinion that since this Board was only advisory, it would not be necessary for them to contact the attorney. Chair Schauer stated she preferred that each member address their questions to Mr. Newell and let him contact the attorney. Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 6 Vice Chair Okun asked if the Village Council ha.d a different attorney than the one who had come to this Board at the last meeting, and commented if there were legal issues that they should be addressed to the Chair and passed on to Mr. Newell so that communication would be clean arid cost effective. Mr. Robbins indicated he thought the intent was to streamline the flow of communication. Mr. Newell explained that his concern was the Board was going to ask him to inquire about a legal issue and according to the e-mail he would not be contacting the attorney, it would have to be done by the Village Manager. Mr. Okun commented Mr. Newell was the conduit for the Board and if he needed to conta.ct the Village Manager to get dispensation, he could then funnel information back to the Board. Mr. Okun stated he was uncomfortable with the attorney inviting communication. Chair Schauer asked if there was a reason this Board had a different attorney than the Village Council and shouldn't they have the same attorney. Mr. Newell responded that Ms. Roselli was giving a better rate than Jones Foster, but the Board was not obligated to Ms. Roselli. Chair Schauer commented if Ms. Roselli had a different concept of something than the Village Attorney she would have to consult with him and there would be two bills for legal fees. Vice Chair Okun expressed his opinion the same attorney should be used for continuity. MOTION: Vice Chair Okun moved for better continuity, better communication, and for more cost effective legal representation, understanding that the Planning and Zoning Board is an advisory board, that they request the services of the same Counsel that services the Village of Tequesta and the Village Council. Board member Cook seconded the motion. During discussion of the motion, Board member Wilder commented it was apparent that the Village Manager wanted to be the only one to contact the attorney; that she may have been appointed becaase of her knowledge of planning and zoning and the Manager might fear there the Board was going to contact the attorney too much, but this way the Board had to talk to Jeff and he had to talk to the Village Manager, which was a roundabout way of doing things. Vice Chair Okun indicated his concern that the Board's attorney could be in direct contradiction with Counsel for the Village Attorney and both sides would have to be paid instead of supporting the Village Council, and if Ms. Roselli had been hired because of her expertise he was sure it did not exceed that of the Village Attorney. Mr. Newell advised that Mr. Randolph was a land use and zoning attorney, so Jones Foster had expertise in this field. Motion carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. Councilmember Ed Resnik commented he was trying to understand the differences in the attorneys, if the attorney for the Board was uses for guidance day to day; but expressed his opinion that the attorney for this board should be the same one as for the Village Council. Councilmember Resnik commented he Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 7 thought the Board would get some issues on which they would like legal confirmation and he did not think the Village Manager would object to using the same attorney used by the Village Council. Councilmember Resnik commented that when the Village Council got a recommendation from this Board they would probably accept it as gospel. Board member Cook asked if anyone had ever heard of an advisory board having an attorney, to which the response from Mr. Newell was yes, and Chair Schauer commented the Board would need one. Councilmember Resnik commented this Board did not want to advise the Village Council of something that the Village Attorney would say was not right, and he had no objection to information coming through Mr. Newell, through the Village Manager, and through the same attorney used by the Village Council. Chair Schauer asked if Councilmember Resnik would ask for a consensus of the Village Council at their next meeting, which Councilmember Resnik said he would do. Mr. Newell commented to clarify the need for this Board having an attorney that when the Board began revision of ordinances they would have to be checked for legal substance. Chair Schauer suggested that instead of providing copies of ordinances to the Board that Mr. Newell could just refer to the section and page in the code book. Village Planner Li� explained that the information in the new code books did not fall on the same pages as in the version being used; Mr. Newell commented it was reformatted and the section numbers changed. Vice Chair Okun commented it would be better for staff to provide the Board with a clean document generated by staff and also available to the Board. Councilmember Resnik commented there were no substantive changes made in the new book of ordinances, it was just updated in accordance with State law and time frame, etc. Vice Chair Okun stated he would feel more comfortable with a clean document provided by staff. Mr. Newell advised that the Village Council would adopt it and Muni Code would change the website, and it would be the new book. Wade Griest commented the Village now had five attorneys and it would be much simpler if this funneled to Mr. Couzzo. Chair Schauer announced that the next meeting of the Planning and Zoning Advisory Board was scheduled for Wednesday, May 19, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. V. ADJOURNMENT Upon rriotion by Vice Chair Okun, seconded by Board member Wilder, and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. i Planning and Zoning Advisory Board 4/21/04 Meeting Minutes Page 8 Respectfully submitted, Betty Laur Recording Secretary