HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 06g_05/13/2004 • #
111 � 1 O l�'d 11 C�. L 1111
Date: 5/7/2004
To: Michael R. Couzzo, Jr., Village Council
From: Mary Miles, Village Clerk �,�.
RE: Sign Application
At the Planning and Zoning Meeting of Apri121, 2004, the Board
recommended to approve three circular wall signs with white
backgrounds and green lettering, with less than 7 square feet or area, at
Indeco, Inc., North Cypress Drive (see attached suYnmary and minutes).
I,t aE� now being brought before you for final approval.
>
,
, t
�
�
,
��
:,:
i
1
� :rN
. emorandum rf
: �P G�� �
� �., �►
9
To: Planning and Zoning Board Members, �� x . ���
. Midr�lCava�yV�4�eM�', :�.'� .
J��Ne�ell,D'ae�rofCatunui$y� a �/ � ' .
r3 �� f f �
From: Carol Lux, Village Planner p .
. Date: 4/14/2004 � �� ~ ' ' �v �
Re: Indeco, Inc. Wall Signs cy COt3ll��
Wali Sign Application fran Indeco Inc.
The Pla.nning Board will, from time to time, as applications are received, be
reviewing sign applica.tions. Ea.ch sign will be reviewed based on iYs visual �
appearance, number of signs, placement on the building and on the site as well as
any other factors that the Planning and Zoning Board and the Village of Tequesta.'s
Zoning Codes require.
. The sign application will be reviewed for cornpleteness as well as for compliance
with code requirements. You will receive a staff.memo regazding the application,
pointing out important factors to consider, and summarizing the applicable codes.
The Boazd will make the decision to approve, approve with conditions, or
� disapprove the application. You will not need to review the installation procedure
(i.e. the 150 M.P.H. rating, installation materials, type of installation or construction
etc.) as the building inspector and building. ofFicial will be reviewing the plans
taking into consideration these items subsequent to your approval. �
� Included in this package is a printout of the Sign Regulations, Section XII of the
Village of Tequesta.'s Code of Ordinances, for your convenience. The applicable ,
section for wall signs not within a shopping center (as is the case with this
application) can be found in section (K) Technical Requirements, (2) Signs in zoned
districts C-1, C-2 and C-3. This section of the code indicates that a building in
zoning district C-2 (subject site) can have:
� , 2) Signs in zoned commercial districts Gl, C-2, and C-3.
(a)Signs on buildings: �
1. One (1) sign per establishment shalt be permitted on the
buitding or structure not to exceed sixiy (60) square feet in
area.
April 94, 2004
� 2. Multiple wald signs on a building frontage or tenant area
� may be permitted upon approval by the building official and
the communiry appearance board that do not exceed the
� maximum square foot area allowed and have uniformity with
respect to color, style and type of sign material.
The applicant is requesting approval for three (3) circulaz signs with white
backgrounds and green lettering. The three signs will have less than 17 square feet
of area. Therefore based on the above information, the square footage requirements
� have been met.
2
. Village of Tequesta. � � � �� S
Department of Community Develo�ment � � �'
250 Tequesta Drive, Suite 305 � f �� a, '�
. � Tequesta FL 33469
(561) 575-6220 FAX (561) 575-6224 � .
Sign Application .
�N���� Q � � Applicant's Address: ���' Applicant's Phone #:
`� `3� �� �p�' �-�s�c�.�
`��r+s � ����tl�S �rJC ��� t�(l. . � _
. �rOPertY Owner's Name: � Properiy Owner's Address: Pro
t ��� t � . perty Owner's Phone #:
t 3�� No�c� C:��+e,�S /�/', �`f `�`� 31 O .
� Project Address: Pr�ject Lot, Block & Subdivision: Zoning District; .
� ���L� .
Type of Sign(s): (Wa11, Free _ Position of Sign(s) on Lot and/or Total Square Footage of Display
Standing, Monument, etc.): Bwlding: Area:
�ac.�.. 5� ,.� � ,vd� l�ou���sr
`'� S �2��v,e-n.�s 1 Z � t�C-� .
,
.�E � �{ t- . � = l?
Description of Sign(s): Sign(s} Height and Widtiz: Landsc,ape affects;
o a �/ h�' /'�� F` '[�',�-'!'� � c, H C2 , .
�G " C�) v�� �
�,,em/�,...��s �►�� 3� ��� , NoNE �
/3r�sr�.�"' ,o.���� ,opp � �� �' ��
� � .
: All signs must be approved by the Community APPeazanee Board (CAB). A Community
�PP��ce Boaz'd meeting will be scheduled after submittal and administrative review of
the applicarion. The CAB meets, as requined, on a Wednesday at 8:30 am. at the
Tequesta Recreabion Center, Councii �hambers, 399 Seabrook Road. The applicant will
' .. be infonned by letter of the meeting date. The Communit� Appearance Board reviews the
application for compliance with zonicig regulations as well as constiuction quality and
' aestheaa. Altached to d�is form is� a copy of the V'illage of Tequesta.'s Sign Regulativns.
This is not an all- in.dusive document and the regulations spe�c to your zoning district
� � should also be researched, please be sure to check with the Departinent of Community
Development for any additional requirements �iat ma,y apply, .
. 'I�e applicant will supply the V'illage of Tequesta. with the following docuinents:
• Ten (10) sets of professionally prepared. site plans showing all existing and
proposed structures, setbacks ( for the structtues and par�cularlyfor the proposed signs),
parku�g and loading layout, ingress and egress, sidewalks and walkways, exterior lighting
layout, dimensions of street frontages and property lines, and parlicularly the locabions and
. �
descxiption of all proposed and existing signs including those of any adjoining properties �
that may be within 10 feet of the properiy. �
�• Ten (10) sets of multi-dimensional color renderings and/or photographs. `lhe CAB �
. � needs to see an exact (as possible) rendering of what is to be placed �on the site. Color
� photographs or prints as close to the actual colors to be used must be supplied. Since color
. printers often do not display the correct color, it is best to bring.samples of the paint chips
to be used, as well as a sample of the support materials (i.e. canvas, wood, metal etc.)
•� Ten (10) sets of professionally prepared dra,wings that outline the stiuctural and
.� � _ electcicai details, including side sectional views showing wiring and elec�ical components,
construction materials used, attachments, support and footings. �f the sign is to be lighted,
underground and interior electricai details should be outlined. Include a surninaiy of the
sign's structural elements including siress sheets, dead load and wind pressure
:� requirements (die V'illage of Tequesta requires a one hundned fifiy (150J mile per hour
ratu�. The dimensions of the sign(s), s�iould be sununarized, paying parlicular a�tention to .
iPs height, width and tAbrl: displa.y size, (�OSS check yotu� dimensions with the regiilations
• for your zoning distiict.
' � � Written approval from the ptopeity owner if other tlian the applicant � �.
� + Any odier docvments that may heip clazify the position of the applicant
. �. • FF,E; $75.00
� . Interpretation of Rules:
� �� CO���Y APP�"�� �anl consists of five members (and two altemates), who are
� citizens of the Village of Tequesta, They have been appointed by the Village Council to
� represent them in matters concernu�g the appearance and aesthe�ic qualities of shuctures
pla�ced within the V'illage of Tequesta. In essence they are most concemed about protecting
� the character ancI quality of the visual landscape within the V'illage. If you provide theni
�� with a thorough knowledge base from which to make a decision, the process will go
' � S�oodilY and quickiy. Ttie more clear, concise, oxg��ized and professional you present �
� �. youiself die simp d quicker the process will become.
. �Applicant's Sign . - /fiY�'L D� �{ 2 � �o
. . ' ��r' L . /cg Z�,�,ucvS
. NOTE:1�ll renderu�gs, models, drawuigs, photos, etc. submitted to the Village will become
� the property of the Village of Tequesta. .
2
5 . BU ILD�� ��-� G�z�
Q �Q� s,� 0.�1 w r��
O �
�v : :: ; �
� �
� � w ■■ ■■ .■ [z''
� Q ■■ ■■ ■■ �
■■ ■■ ■■
_\ � O �
��
�
��
�6��' ��'�to
�c�`
0 4 '�
� � �o
�' � t�zl u u ■ �
p ■a ■ t� �
ii i■ 1�
�� G�
DE
,�a�t � s�� ��6�s
. . .
,
�a��fr-t �-/� �i� � � � �N��-- Cj . , —
0
j1NG��� �"'�'�Gt�l� Gjcl.�n �'��r�r� 1,.c�c�d`� �' �
�y S�F9L-� �� I t `Z. t ` 'i�}tC.l�- j8 ��' CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
�� �� � ��}� y��,�j ��� � SIGNS & GRAPHICS, INC.
134Toney Penna Drive
('},J c.�.� l�'C�- . �v h o5 hTu f� f'�cs'tM'FL_� Jup'iter, FL 33458
56l-575-0020
� �� `'7M�� ��i ���� �� 0 � Fax 575-0787
cdsigngraphics@aol.com
�r�1 �A ��1 t�E.v� . �
��
, ; �r
,;, ��
� ��s ,
��,.-:;�:;,
.�, -,.
- ::�.," � ��:��.
- :,,,;
. e .,'< ..�,
� _' �. _
t ' ,- -
.,��`� � L . ,
s
.��5�. . ":: �' . : ._ . ' . . _ . . .. . :�::. :
.. ��. . �� .. ,..... . � ' o �: r �ti
x .� � • �, � , ` , (� . . �
t ' ���.�-.-�'
, .�� .
i� _
, ,
;
. ._ - � d.
y .�
, .
,, � �� ��, �
� :F E
-s � �; �� � z '
. ,.
., , , , _ _ � , -- k;
� � ;<�,
�- � ( � ��;
�rls .I h � � •
;,;,., �, � — . - � . ._ _ � a � .
.. �• , � �::
. ,�:,
;::�
..
B_�:�.�.��-
_ ;,.. _ _
�-� --.+ --... .. . � „- . . �� � �
,v
•::
�.+� .'�"� a �.. u si>n � -�..+.�xs +ay � i.::: �+u-..
I :.-,., . .�, ' _ �T,�'.� ..� ....� ................e ��. ��,y:.=1 - '^ 4 ' , . ^+.�"`�+�
� P.r < � :. � � r �_,..w �.� ��?�_a � � �� • • • ��
��S q t qu„r... ' t � t s �� � , S ' s �y � . . ..,
��a .:. � . ; ,�- ..� Q, ��a� �
..,z � t
„� ,, ;?' 1 ,.� �
�� a °'' ' ';�.� r� �y � �ie.-, � t'
� t. ..l�S �':�` � (����� � .e...'.. ' ���i�.� �.1� ���� ����� •
� .� � .'R �,� 3 � ��� ��EP'iUAtOF
, + y ' /� G
j} ., 1 7� . L. ;A x�` .\ \J � ��� }� - r � N ��� ���f u� ���
i P�� �� r � ,� ��� 1 : �, i � "�c' -�.. i Lrti/��..1I� i
� �1 � i� � � � .. l� �� =�� .� � ' t Q_
���'��y��' :� t g t r e f • �{'. t\��x �V5
� - �,�� � -,� � � � a . � 4 ���,� ,: ��:.� , rap�
� '�;,,: '\ �,. �� ! � ,c � � � � .:` �F�. .F .;•a � Otry a3�
�� , i , f �r _,a .� �.,.�,._ � . �ban�lmai
[►,�� � � �& 1 � ."M � `�' ;s ' .
1 ". S y�
oc•j \ '. S � ' i: ; . , y ' � ; . .. �
. v e ` � � � � � q $ � � t ..... � ,�� •,1 ' � �
. `�4 � �� ! �, °i8} � � y"��-����� Pt , � '
• � �� T i
t t.
�a .l � t: -2_ ,_ ��....�' � �� • �
�'' �r. � �� � � � .� � ��c." �`' ._ �•
� � � � � �, � 1 � .+. . ♦ • �� _ r
'=�� � j. A s• -_ . � 1 1 1
n e � f '�. � Y' �, 1 ! ^ � � ' • � ...:t
-+ ` _, �'� � %'r' �`"'r ;� t ` K + - V :`� I
�' � n r-=' t�y?'
f"t � ��� r . •,. i� • . � . • • • •
3a u
4�- ,,,; :
•
,.
. Internatxanal Develapm��t Corporation
Developers � Buildezs • Brokers
Mar�h 31, 2404
To: Village of tequesta
Re: CQmmercial Office Buiiding Signs
To Wham #t May Concern, �
WQ hereby autharize Conceptual Des�gn Signs 8� Graph�cs to apply for�
� aCquire permit far, a�d inStali signs an our office building Iar.a�ed a# 399
North Cypress Drive in Tequesta.
Should you have any questians, or require any additiona! information, please
do not hes�tat� to contact aur offices. �
.�!, .
Sincere
t �� � � �� "�^ .
,�
Andre R. Baura�sa �
President "
State of �lorida
Caunty of Palm Beach
Sworn to {or atfirm�d� and subscribed before me this 31� day of March
20Q4, by Andr,�, ourassa� who is personafiy known to me.
�' :� � ���su��r�
� $� ned �'�.. �- � / j� ` _j .•�'`� �.c H r y��.,
g ��,' �� G ��'"�' 7 ..` � , / '•,
�� �
L� ��: 'apTq •.`�� �-
s:tir_ • � �
.. � . My CoRr+�. Exp+'� : 70 =
� ��?riE 12. 2�06 • .
� r,o. �cnaaror :
�+�ci�l;•-' Q'q�,��
f� I����������� �` ,� .
�`� F �F Fi-Q ����
' ��• , �r�� «+�`
II�iDECO, Inc. • 394 Nurt�i Cypress Drive • T�uesta, F1o�ti�da 33469 U.S..A,-
. Phone (Sbl) 746-5320 • Fa� (561} 744-7219 • www.indecvinc.com
t...�r'f'i�""�Z. 0 2
t.��o -
. ..___------- �
. ������.., . . __. ._ : . -
� ._: .__ ___. _
� � � . .. � . �o�- . ,�
_ . -- � 2 . Tt�h � � .r._�r_-�-f�--_ .
�,'DV • � �� �hrr'Y �-k�.Dv.. -: . "
. _.
�.�_ : ,.
. .
. .
. _ tG, �� . _,:
;
. ; � �t,.�. � ��- ��--
- _.� � �� .. �
��P���� �
� � �°��� ��e�cc, - -
� N�� �a�-� _
�- . ��- .�
. ,
- :. �� K
� _� f� �c �- � -� .
,
:._ ��
�`/ ` , -_ _ ... _.. -•...�-" V f/ r. ... _.._ .__.
' �� ` `~��� ! //` � ' �} ._ .
`� ��� � '�'"��V•:
'Stl,ll.�a'NC�: �(� . ' .
���`f , �TtJ G�
� � � ��� � ��� .
, `"�
� � i ! t G�.?�l j� �j�j�?,NIO .
�j `�' '�'.`rY1 �� .
� , CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
` SIGNS & GRAPHICS, INC.
S �G �� � 134Toney Penna Drive
o jupiter„ FL 33458
_ � 0 561-5�75=0020
� 'Fax 575-0787 �
� cdsi'gngraphics@bellsouth.net
Rw
LEGEND
E 2ER0 �OT LINE SIDE OF UN1T
FO�ND 5/8' IqON ROU/CAP LB • 279g
SET 5/B• IHON R00ICAP LB 2799
O-> POMER POLE 6 GVY
�`� ASPHALT P C. PONNi
� COV. COVEHEO
' CONC, CONCREiE • �
• EIEY. ELEVA7IDN /� '
� I f.f, FINISH FLOOR � y -
FPiI FLORIDA POMER C IIGHT
. n �+ Cn NN NATER METER
6 �� ��� OJ W � C7�. Jt/ 1 C SSCD SANITARY SEMEN CIEANTOUT
� ALSO FOUNO BST BElLSOUTH TEIEPHONE .
;- IRON FiOD ACCESS EASEMENT cNe CHORO BEARING
SET MAG/NAIL
0.3' N 0.3' E — ��ORB. BOOK 6303 PG. 913) DISG2799 ceo CHOADDISTANCE
4 W � ( F.E.C. B,N. FIORIDA EAST COASi HA1� HOAD
¢ P.O. C. POINi Of CONNENCEMENT
; � � � � � I �; XIRE FENCE
� W♦ I � I ASPHALT I I I m Q �� ."'Oa WOOD FENCE
s I \
O ' � ��! E%ISTINO EIEVAT�ON
o -- `\ � A � � I Q L EGA L DESCR l P T I ON
- 6 3. 8 0' � I O � AS P FOLLONS F L A N D I N S E C T I ON 30-40-43, MORE PAqTICULARLY OESCRIBED
ASPHALT \ No,�p��7,�/p�vv J 3
_ (n FFOM THE INiERSECiION OF THE NESTEHLY PIGHT OF MAY LINE OF THE
T � �'1� �- FLORIDA EAST COAST RA RAOAD NITH THE NOR7HERLY RIGNT OF WAY
— — � N - � 4 (f� LINE OF TEOUESTA DRI4E AS SHONN ON THE PLAT OF JUPITEH�IN THE
� I -- �Y.� � � x PINES, SECTION C' RECOROED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE !9, PUBLIC
ni o � � i LV RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PROCEEO
\ m ` � SOU7H 67• 32' 09• NEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY pIGHT OF NAY LiNE OF
\ 1 STORY � �d �� NORTH MEST� SAED NESTERLY RIGHT OF MAY
p ��, 3• CBS BUILOING � e� � LINE OF iHE FLORIDA EA51 COAST RAILROAD, A DISTANCE Of 210 FEET TO
_ 8. D0' �iST ��vM��� � COV, N '�.. THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTM 22• 4S' 5S' HEST,
U ALONO SAID PARALLEL LIHE, A OISTANCE OF 90 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 67• 32' 09' MEST, A DISTANCE OF l62.5 FEET TO TFiE EASTERIY LINE
I I I I MOOD o Z OF RIOGENOOD HOME5. SECTION 2 AS RECOROED IN PLAT 800K 27. PAGE
DECK °� lB7, SAID PUBLIC RECOROS; THE�10E SOUTH 22• 41' 51• EAST ALONG SAID
S EASTERLY LINE, A D�STANCE OF 90 fEET; THENCE NORTH 67• 32' 09' EAST,
'i I I I 6 RqMP N I'�a'A"1 �FL�Lf/Wl ALSO FOUNO A DISTANCE DF l62.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF 9EGINNING.
F 'a i 43.50' l9.3' IRON OD/CA�
a 28.30' � r LB 4569
i F �... .5' EAST � 2 ' °� 2 ' IE SURVEYOR' S NOTES:
,.--- /� �
t N67� ��� OJ� E �[JG. 5O FENCE I !) UTIIITIES. SHONN HEREON ARE VIS18LE ABOYE GROUND
ALSO FOUND P. O. B. ' 4 WEST FEATUPES. ADU I T I ONAL SUB-SIIRFACE UT 1 L I T I ES
,� � IHON R00 . W o I OR STRUCTURES MAY EXIST.
D. 2' N 0. 2' E U y
z 2) NO TITLE POLICV Op CONMITMENT AFFECTING TITLE Ofi BOUNOARY TO
� � . 4� O THE SUBJECT PpOPERTY NAS BEEN PROVIDEO. DEE05 AND EASEMENTS.
N . RECOHDEO OR UNRECORDEO. MHICH COULD AFFECT THIS BOVNDARY SUR4EY
p NAY EXIST.
i NDECO LLC A FLORI DA L I M1 TED L lAB1 L( TY COMPANY 3) NO RESPONS I B I l I TY IS ASSUMED BY TH I S SURVEY FOH THE CONSTRUCT ION
� GARY L. AOBlNSON AND SHARON L. ROBINSON P, O� C� ¢ OF IMPROVEMENTS, FqOM BUILDING TIES SHONN HEfiEON.
ATTOANEYS' TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, fNC. Q
� DAVERSA AN� MAATYN, P. A.
I HEREBY CERTIFY TD EACH OF THE ABDVE THAT A SURVEY OF THE PROPENTY OESCR�BEO u
� HEREON MAS NAOE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE SURVEY MEETS TME 25.2. 5' W
MINIMUM TECMNICAL STANDAROS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOAqD OF PNOFESSIONAI. D IVE �i
LAND SUHVEYOFS IN CHAPTER 6lG17-6, FLOR�IDA AONINISiRATIVE COOE, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 172.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. On�M+�w n[v�aioMS: BOUNDARY 6/20/03--
(INTEq-CPFICE U9E ONLY) _
MAY ?,0� zoo�____ DAIL�Y SCALE: �•.zo•
. DA7E OF FIELD SURVEY JAME 0' R EN -���---�- TYPE OF BUpYEY: BOUNOARY
. FLOREDA NON ELEYATION pATUM: N.O. V. D. l929 ANDA3SOCIATES.INC. oR�MN Br: ,i. o 'B/B. F.
SURVEYING 6 MAPPFNG FIELO BOOK: AT7. TO MORK
THE pROPERTY DESCAIBED HEREON IS AS FURNISHED ANQ NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC fL00D ZONE: 'C' l2022B 000! C 1l2 N. U.S. HIGMNAY No, {
RECORDS OR OEVELOPNENT REGULATIONS HAS BEEN MAOE BY iHIS OFFI�CE. THIS SURVEY TEO�ESTA, iIONIDA 3]JBB JDB N0. O3 S P S
1$ N07 VALID UNLESS SEALED MITH AN EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAI. BA818 OF BEARINO: NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL PHONE: (56f) 7�8
BEINO: 887'�32'09•M BUSINESS LICENS :
Memorancfi�n T�
� G�v'� ,. :. ,..,::. ..
� �
To: Michael Couzzo, Village Manager
CC: JeffNewell • ,¢
: ��
From: Cazol Lux � �
�� �� �� �
Datie: 5/3/04 � , p
� �r
Re: Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Results �9C .�
CO
Result�s from the Planning and Zoning Boanl of Apri121, 2004
T'hree items were discussed at the P&Z Boazd Meeting held at 6:30 on Wednesday, Apri121, 2004.
l. The third item on the agenda was moved to the first item. T'his item was an application by
Concepmal Design Signs and Graphics, Inc. on behalf of Indeco Inc, of 399 Cypress Drive,
Tequesta FL. Indeco Inc. was applying to install three wall signs on their building at Cypress
Drive. The white signs with green lettering were approved by the Board with no changes.
2. The second agenda item handled was the Public Hearing and Recommendation to the
Village Council by the Local Planning Agency of Ordinance No. 587. This ordinance
amends the Comprehensive Plan to apply a comnnercial land use classification to a portion
of real property located on the east side of U.S. Highway One between Palm Court and
Harbor Road South known as the Turtle Beach Construction site containing .495 acres. The
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, approved the revision of
the Village's Future Land Use Map; providing for codification, severability, and providing
an effective date. This proposed revision will go before the Village Council for second
reading in May.
3. The final item to be heazd by the P&Z Boazd was the Public Hearing and Recommendation
to the Village Council of Ordinance No. 588. This ordinance applies a wning designation to
the Turtle Beach Construction site noted above. The zoning classification approved to be
applied to the site was C-2, Community Commercial. This proposed zoning application will
go before the Village Council for second reading in May.
D°�
r �
:a.
� "�` ILL �,�1� C�� T]E��JESTA
•�� Pi>st CSf�ie• .#3�x ;27:a • 25U'i'eque�ca 17�ive, Suite 300
r ��,
� T:�ij�:sw. F'lc?rida 33�+b9_€)'273 • (56 P 1 5'i5-fi200
a �'�t�: (�cl) 575-6L�3;;
, � ' 44
y
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
PLANNING AND ZONING ADVISORY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 21, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR LOCAL PLANNING
AGENCY AND PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
The Village of Tequesta Planning and Zoning Advisory Board held a regulazly
scheduled meeting at the Tequesta Recreation Center, 399 Seabrook Road,
Tequesta, Florida, on Wednesday, April 21, 2004. The meeting was called to
order at 6:30 P.M. by Chair Elizabeth Schauer. A roll call was taken by
Recording Secretary Betty Laur. Board members present were: Chair Elizabeth
Schauer, Vice Chair Steve Okun, Board member Jeff Robbins, and William
Wilder. Also in attendance were Village Planner Cazol Lux and Clerk of the
Board Jeff Newell. Board member Leslie Cook arrived at 6:33 p.m.
Chair Schauer requested that if a member of the board had a question that they
address her and she would recognize the person to which the question should be
directed. Chair Schauer requested that all cell phones be turned off.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION
Vice Chair Okun moved approval of the agenda as amended to change item
C under New Business to item A and renumber the subsequent items under
New Business; also, to add discussion of e-mail received by Jeff Newell to
Any Other Matters. Board member Robbins seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous 5-0 vote. The motion was therefore passed and
adopted and the Agenda was approved as submitted.
III. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
Vice Chair Okun moved approval of the minutes of the meeting of March 30,
2004 as submitted. Board member Wilder seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous 5-0 vote.
. N.l .. , i i .��`�'v..
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes
Page 2
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. Recommendation to Villa�e Council (Pc�Z)
A request by Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc., on behalf of
Indeco, Inc. (property owner) for approval of two (2) 24" wall signs, one
to be placed on the north elevation and one to be placed on the south
elevation; and one (1) 36" wall sign to be ptaced on the east elevation,
for the commercial office building located at 399 North Cypress Drive in
Tequesta, Florida.
Village Planner Carol Lux presented the request and advised that the
requested signs met all Village regulations. John Burroughs of
Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics, Inc., spoke on behalf of the
applicant.
MOTION:
Board member Cook made a motion to recommend to Village Council
approval of the request from Conceptual Design Signs and Graphics,
Inc., on behalf of Indeco, Inc. for approval of two 24" wall signs, one
to be placed on the north elevation and one to be placed on the south
elevation; and one 36" wall sign to be placed on the east elevation, for
the commercial office building located at 399 North Cypress Drive in
Tequesta, Florida. Vice Chair Okun seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous 5-0 vote.
B. Public Hearing and Recommendation to �Ilage Council (LPA)
Ordinance No. 587 — An Ordinance of the Village Council of the Village
of Tequesta, Palm Beach County, Florida, amending the
Adopted Village Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 9J-S and 9J-II, Florida Administrative Code,
applying a commercia[ land use classification to a portion of real
property located on the east side of U.S. Highway One between Palm
Court and Harbor Road South, containing approximately 0.495 acres,
providing for a revision to the Village's Future Land Use Map;
providing for codification, severability, and providing an effective date.
The Board was now sitting as the Local Planning Agency for this
agenda item.
Community Development Director Jeff Newell, Clerk of the Board read
Ordinance No. 587 by caption and no ex-parte communication was
reported.
Chair Schauer declared the public hearing open.
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes
Page 3
Bryan Chekas, Cotleur and Hearing, spoke on behalf of the applicant, who
would like to locate their corporate offices to the Village.
Board member Cook commented she knew the people who were running
this company and they did a beautiful job, so she was sure the project
would be beautiful, and stated she was in agreement with this change.
Vice Chair Okun also stated agreement. Boazd member Wilder
commented this property was zoned commercial by the county, and there
was no reason the Village should not have it zoned commercial. Board
member Robbins and Chair Schauer stated they had no problems with this
request.
Hearing no other comments, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION
Board member Cook moved that approval of Ordinance 587 be
recommended to the Village Council. Vice Chair Okun seconded the
motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote.
C. Public Hearing and Recommendation to �llage Council (P&Z)
Ordinance No. 588 —An Ordinance of the Village Council of the �Ilage
of Tequesta, applying a Zoning Designation to a portion of real property
located on the east side of U.S. Highway One between Palm Court and
Harbor Road South containing approximately 0.495 acres, to C-2
Community Commercial; making certain findings of fact; providing for
revrsion of the Village Zoning Map; providing for severabitity, an
effective date, and for other purposes.
Community Development Director Jeff Newell, Clerk of the Board
Chair Schauer declared the Public Hearing open. Clerk of the Board
Newell read Ordinance No. 588 by caption. T'here was no-ex-parte
communication reported.
Mr. Newell presented the staff presentation, stating the Village would
apply a commercial zoning classification; and pointed out the location of
the C-2 district on a zoning map. Mr. Newell explained that the purpose
of the C-2 district was to provide zoning for businesses fronting along
U.S. Highway One. The county's designation for this land was C-5,
which Mr. Newell explained was intensive commercial zoning.
Discussion ensued. Chair Schauer explained that when the Board
reviewed the site plan for this property they would look at landscaping,
building design, etc., and could make changes; tonight the Board was just
reviewing the parcel. It was noted that the Village property was more
heavily landscaped than that in the county. Mr. Okun asked if rezoning
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes
Page 4
would have any effect on minimizing the use of this property. Mr. Newell
explained that size and other controls would come into play; that the small
size of the parcel limited certain uses, such as a lazge car dealership. Mr.
Okun asked by applying the Village designation as opposed to the
county's designation whether it would be minimized or maximized, to
which Mr. Newell responded in his opinion it would be maximized.
Building height on this parcel was discussed, and Mr. Newell explained
this was only half an acre so could not support a high building. Board
member Cook asked if property owners had been conta.cted. Mr. Newell
reported that although not required, all property owners within 300' in
Jupiter Heights had been notified at the request of the Village Council.
Brian Chekas of Cotleur and Hearing spoke on behalf of applicant Turtle
Creek Construction.
Frank Sardina commented he lived behind the property and had met with
the developer, who was working on his concerns. Mr. Sardina commented
the Board seemed concerned with comparing the Village zoning to the
County's zoning, and advised that the County had very specific ordinances
when commercial backed up to residential, which the Village might want
to consider adopting. Chair Schauer advised that the Board was not
considering site plan issues at this time- just going over the ordinance to
make a recommendation to Village Council--and at site plan review they
would go over buffering and whether the proposed project would be
conducive to the azea. Chair Schauer advised that this Board would make
a recommendation to Village Council, and the Village Council could still
make additional changes, but this Board would be doing most of the heavy
work before the Village Council considered approval. Mr. Sardina
commented he had brought this up because in the County's CG zoning
there was a whole different level of consideration because it backed up to
residential, and the Village might want to consider similar zoning in the
future since they were one of the few municipalities who did not have
transitional zoning.
Faye Kochnano commented although it was not required it would be nice
if the 60-70 homes on Harbor Road were notified.
Hearing no further comments from the public, Chair Schauer declaxed the
public heazing closed.
MOTION
Vice Chair Okun moved that approval of Ordinance 588 be
recommended to the Village Council. Board member Robbins
seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5-0 vote.
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes '
Page 5
IV. COMMUNICATION FROM CITIZENS
Mayor VVatkins welcomed the board members and thanked them for volunteering
their time for this Board.
V. ANY OTHER MATTERS
Chair Schauer read into the record an e-mail forwarded from Mr. Newell which
he had received from the Village Manager, stating that in regard to the Planning
and Zoning Board the only person who could contact the attorney would be
Village Manager Couzzo. Chair Schauer sta.ted unless she had read the ordinance
incorrectly, Mr. Newell was Clerk of the Board. Mr. Newell stated that was
correct--he was Clerk of the Board for the Planning and Zoning Board and as such
was responsible for their administrative affairs and to be able to research to
provide answers to questions from members of the Board. Chair Scha.uer
commented that although at the last meeting the attorney had invited board
members to contact her with questions, Chair Schauer assumed no board member
would ever contact the attorney unless they first went through Mr. Newell. Mr.
Newell advised board members were not prohibited from contacting the attorney
or directing him to contact the attorney for some specific purpose, although there
were budget considerations. Chair Schauer clarified that the Board was to address
their main concerns to Mr. Newell as Clerk of the Board. Chair Schauer asked
the amount budgeted for the Planning and Zoning Board for attomey's fees. Mr.
Newell responded that the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning
Board were currently not budgeted but in fiscal year 04/OS these boards would
have a budget. Chair Schauer commented to the Board that if they directed Mr.
Newell to contact the attorney to clarify an item, they needed to realize they had
no budget; but if Mr. Newell felt he needed to contact the attorney he would do
so; however, so far he had been able to answer her questions.
Chair Schauer expressed concern that in reading the e-mail she felt it was trying
to take Mr. Newell out of the loop with the Board. Mr. Newell sta.ted as before
that he was the Clerk of the Board and worked at the direction of the Board, and
as far as the Village Manager's position, the Manager should answer that to the
Board.
Board member Cook expressed her opinion that since this Board was only
advisory, it would not be necessary for them to contact the attorney.
Chair Schauer stated she preferred that each member address their questions to
Mr. Newell and let him contact the attorney.
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes
Page 6
Vice Chair Okun asked if the Village Council had a different attorney than the
one who had come to this Board at the last meeting, and commented if there were
legal issues that they should be addressed to the Chair and passed on to Mr.
Newell so that communication would be clean and cost effective. Mr. Robbins
indicated he thought the intent was to streamline the flow of communication. Mr.
Newell explained that his concern was the Board was going to ask him to inquire
about a legal issue and according to the e-mail he would not be contacting the
attorney, it would have to be done by the Village Manager. Mr. Okun commented
Mr. Newell was the conduit for the Board and if he needed to contact the Village
Manager to get dispensation, he could then funnel information back to the Board.
Mr. Okun stated he was uncomfortable with the attorney inviting communication.
Chair Schauer asked if there was a reason this Board had a different attorney than
the Village Council and shouldn't they have the same attorney. Mr. Newell
responded that Ms. Roselli was giving a better rate than Jones Foster, but the
Board was not obligated to Ms. Roselli. Chair Schauer commented if Ms. Roselli
had a different concept of something than the Village Attorney she would have to
consult with him and there would be two bills for legal fees. Vice Chair Okun
expressed his opinion the same attorney should be used for continuity.
MOTION:
Vice Chair Okun moved for better continuity, better communication, and for
more cost effective legal representation, understanding tbat the Planning and
Zoning Board is an advisory board, that they request the services of the same
Counsel that services the Village of Tequesta and the Village Council. Board
member Cook seconded the motion. During discussion of the motion, Board
member Wilder commented it was apparent that the Village Manager
wanted to be the only one to contact the attorney; that she may have been
appointed because of her knowledge of planning and zoning and the
Manager might fear there the Board was going to contact the attorney too
much, but this way the Board had to talk to Jeff and he had to talk to the
Village Manager, which was a roundabout way of doing things. Vice Chair
Okun indicated his concern that the Board's attorney could be in direct
contradiction with Counsel for the Village Attorney and both sides would
have to be paid instead of supporting the Village Council, and if Ms. Roselli
had been hired because of her expertise he was sure it did not exceed that of
the Village Attorney. Mr. Newell advised that Mr. Randolph was a land use
and zoning attorney, so Jones Foster had expertise in this field. Motion
carried by unanimous 5-0 vote.
Councilmember Ed Resnik commented he was trying to understand the
differences in the attorneys, if the attorney for the Board was uses for guidance
day to day; but expressed his opinion that the attorney for this board should be the
same one as for the Village Council. Councilmember Resnik commented he
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes '
Page 7
thought the Board would get some issues on which they would like legal
confirmation and he did not think the Village Manager would object to using the
same attorney used by the Village CounciL Councilmember Resnik commented
that when the Village Council got a recommendation from this Boazd they would
probably accept it as gospel. Board member Cook asked if anyone had ever heard
of an advisory board having an attorney, to which the response from Mr. Newell
was yes, and Chair Schauer commented the Board would need one.
Councilmember Resnik commented this Board did not want to advise the Village
Council of something that the Village Attorney would say was not right, and he
had no objection to information coming through Mr. Newell, through the Village
Manager, and through the same attorney used by the Village Council.
Chair Schauer asked if Councilmember Resnik would ask for a consensus of the
Village Council at their next meeting, which Councilmember Resnik said he
would do. Mr. Newell commented to clarify the need for this Board having an
attorney that when the Boazd began revision'of ordinances they would have to be
checked for legal substance.
Chair Schauer suggested that instead of providing copies of ordinances to the
Board that Mr. Newell could just refer to the section and page in the code book.
Village Planner Lux explained that the information in the new code books did not
fa11 on the same pages as in the version being used; Mr. Newell commented it was
reformatted and the section numbers changed. Vice Chair Okun commented it
would be better for staff to provide the Board with a clean document generated by
staff and also available to the Board. Counci7member Resnik commented there
were no substantive changes made in the new book of ordinances, it was just
updated in accordance with State law and time frame, etc. Vice Chair Okun
stated he would feel more comfortable with a clean document provided by staff.
Mr. Newell advised that the Village Council would adopt it and Muni Code would
change the website, and it would be the new book.
Wade Griest commented the Village now had five attorneys and it would be much
simpler if this funneled to Mr. Couzzo.
Chair Schauer announced that the next meetir�g of the Planning and Zoning
Advisory Board was scheduled for Wednesday, May 19, 2004 at 630 p.m.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Upon motion by Vice Chair Okun, seconded by Board member Wilder, and
unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board '
4/21/04 Meeting Minutes '
Page 8
Respectfully submitted,
Betty Laur
Recording Secretary