HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Miscellaneous_Tab 03_10/20/1993 ,
/
� � I
' VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
��i"`. � Post Officc Box 3273 • 357 Tcqucsta Drivc
� �' Tcqucsta, Florida 33469-0273 • (407) 575-6200
' a Fax: (407) 575-6203 '
s 'c
s �
`' �M COVN�
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Thomas C. Hall, Water System Manager
Scott D. Ladd, Building Official
,7oann Manganiello, Admin. Asst./Village Clerk
Gary Preston, Director of Public Works & Recreation
FROM: Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager ,� ���
,,---
DATE: October 4, 1993
SUBJECT: Country Club Drive Riqht-of-Way Abandonment and Level of
Service Comprehensive Plan Amendment Outline
Attached hereto, please find the above referenced which has been
prepared in response to Councilmember Capretta's request for the
same. Please review the Outline closely to become fully aware of
your responsibilities under the same. �
Please mark your calendars for our staff ineeting to review this
subject scheduled f�r October 18, 1993 at 2:30 P.M. In the
interim, should you have any questions regarding any aspect of this .
Outline, please contact me.
By copy of this memo to Ms. Rim Bodinizzo, Administrative
Secretary, she is' requested to schedule the Finance and
Administrative Commi;ttee Meeting on or about October 20th as
referenced herein. !
i
TGB/cm
c: Village Council,�w/attachment
John C. Randolph, Village Attorney, w/attachment �
Jack Horniman, PZanning Consultant, w/attachment
Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson, w�attachment
Fred Schwartz, P:.E., Kimley-Horn, w/attachment
Rim Bodinizzo, Admin. Secy., w/attachment
Recycled Paper
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY AHANDONMEN�' AND LEVEL OF
SERVICE COMPREH�NSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT OUTLINE �
O1) 10/13/�j3 Public Works Director completes determination
af time frame for completing�l�gal description,
including utility and landscape easements, if
needed, for each parcel of land to be
abandoned.
02) 10/15/93 Village Manager completes property data for
each parcel abutting street.
03) 10/18/93 Meeting with Building Official, Director of
Public Works, Water System Manager and Village
Manager per Administrative Policy 1-90/91 to
identify problems and questions. Review need
for landscaping/tree planting easement. .
04) 10/19/93 Public Works Director initiates written contact
with each applicable public utility to advise
of Tequesta proposed action and to solicit
utility comments.
05) 10/20/93 Property data, Pert chart and draft letter �o
property owners reviewed by Finance &
Administration Committee.
06} 10/25/93 Letter to property owners mailed inviting them
to attend public information meeting for more
info and questions
07) 11/08/93 Comprehensive Plan Coordinator (Ladd) initiates
necessary Text and Map Amendments to the Comp
Plan and Co�p Plan Support Documentation for
consideration by the Local Planning Agency and
. the Village Council per the JLH Associates
letter outlining same dated 07/15/93. Work
product to be completed by 12/02/93. Comp Plan
Coordinator to also prepare draft Resolution of
' Transmital to be reviewed by Village Attorney.
Resolution should follow format of Resolution
No.26-91/92, copy attached. Resolution to be
. completed by 12/02/93. Resolution to be
reviewed by LPA for adoption re.commendation at
LPA Public Hearing on 12/09/93. �
All legal ads associated with Comp Plan
amendment process to be scheduled, planned and
coordinated with the Village Clerk by Comp Plan
Coordinator per outline herein, as amended. See
� legal ad attached to Resolution No. 26-91/92 as
ad model.
08) 11/09/93 Public Information Meeting � 7:00 PM Village
Hall.
a9) 11/10/93 Public Works Director instructs engineering
firm to proceed with legal descriptions,
utility easements and landscape easements, if
needed, for each parc�l to be abandoned. Work
product to be completed by 12/O1/93 and
coordinated with Village Attorney for
Resolution of �bandonment, if needed.
10) 11/10/93 Building Official, with input from the Village
Attorney, prepares advertisement providing
legal notice of intent to abandon portion of
right-of-way. Ad to be run two weeks prior to
Public Hearing to abandon, tentatively planned
for 12/09/93 Village Council Meeting. .
11) 11I15/93 Village Attorney prepares appropriate
Resolution of Abandonment to be transmitted to
Village Manager no later than 12/02/93 for
inclusion with Aqenda packets for the 12/09/93
� Village Council Meeting�.
12? 11/25/93 Ad providing for legal notice of intent to
abandon right-of-way appears in appropriate
newspaper of required circulation.
13) 12/02/93 Resolution of Abandonment submitted to Village
Manager by Village Attorney and Text and Map
amendments submitted by Comp Plan Coordinator
to Village Manager.
14} 12/03/93 Village Manager transmits Resolution of
Abandonment to Village Council with agenda for
12/09/93 Villaqe Council Meeting. Also,
Villaqe Manager transmits Text and Map
amendments to Local Planning Agency with agenda
for Public Hearing to be held same evening as
Village Council Meeting on 12/09/93. See
attached LPA 08/13/92 Agenda as model.
i
15) 12/09/93 Village Council Meeting � 7:00 PM wherein
Public Heariny is conducte� to abandon right-
. of-way via adoption of Resolution of
Abandonment and Loral Planning Agency Public
Hearing to consider Te�t and Map amendments to
Comp Plan and Support Dociimentation with
Resolution of Trans•mittal.
16) 12/10/93 Village Attorney's Office to record adopted
Resolution of Abandonment in Palm Beach County
Public Records and providing recorded originals
to Villaqe Clerk. Village Clerk will provide
copy of same with memorandum of transmittal ,
noting date bf Village Council action, to
applicable Departments and to each affected
property owner abutting Country Club Drive.
17) 12I20/93 Village Clerk provides a recorded copy of the
Resolution of Abandonment to the County
Engineer's Office, County Administrator's
Office and others, as may be necessary,
including all utilities listed in Section
I.C.3. of Tequesta Administrative Policy No.
1-90/91. ,
18) Ol/1�3/94 Village Council Meeting 7:00 PM wherein Village
Council�considers Resolution of Transmittal if
same is recommended by LPA on,l2/09/93.
19) 01I14/94 Comp Plan Coordinator transmits Resolution and
10 sets of proposed Text and Map amendments to
DCA in Tallahassee for commencement of
Objections, Recommendations and Comments
process.
20) O1/17/94 DCA receives proposed Comp Plan Amendments.
21) O1/21/94 DCA transmits proposed Comp Plan Amendments to
� local governments for comments.
22) O1124/94 Local governments receive proposed Comp Plan
amendments from DCA for comments(ORC's).
23) 02/24/94 DCA receives local government comments.
24) 03/24/94 Tequesta receives DCA ORC report with 60 days
to adopt.
�5) 0�/14/9�l Village Coi�nc:il M�Pting witll first_ r�ading to
adopt Ordinaiic�t� am�nding Comp Plan.
26) 0-�/15/93 Villaye Clerk places ad for second reading of
Ordinance on 05/12/9�.
27) 05/12/9� Village Council Meeting Wl,t�l second reading to
adopt Ordinance amending Comp Plan.
28) 05/13/93 Ordinance adopting Comp Plan Text and Map
Amendments transmitted to DCA for Completeness
Review for 45 days.
29) 07/O1/94 DCA finds Comp Plan Amendments to be in
compliance, hopefully.
� ASSOCI.� TE'�
�
. � � o � ti
.
_�enninq E zornng • perm�tt�ng • s�'e pior.n�nc •�c�d deve�oarent resec►c* 6 , �� ��i
�
e ✓ � �A
� �� 9 79 2
. �IA�F �
MA NqG
July 15, 1993 � , Of�� �S �
.�„� ,�"� '� �
Mr . Scott Ladd, euilding Of f icial
Village of Tequesta Building Official
P.O: Box 3273
Tequest FL 33477 "
Dear d:
As the Villaqe studies and re-assesses the future of Country Club
Drive, you have requested that I review and present back to you a
presentation on two (2) specific areas of concern regarding this '
issue. First, I have been asked to relate what Comprehensive
Development Plan text amendments, map amendments and any other
changes required by law will be necessary if the Villaqe proceeds
with changinq the level of service ( LOS � on Country Club Drive f rom
LOS D to LOS C. Secondly, I have been asked to prepare an outline
indicatinq what steps vill have to be followed, with appropriate
estimates of ti.meframes, in order to complete the c�rehensive
' plan amendment process. The followinq ia presented ,for your revie.�
and conaideration pursuant to discussioas with yon and Tom
Bradford, Village Manager, a r�view of the Fred Schwartz, P.B:
� (T.E.I.) report entitled "Tequesta Drive/County Club Drive Corridor
• Analysis", discussions with M�. Schwartz, Village of Tequesta, a
. review of Ch. 163, F.S., the State Planninq Lnw, and its most '.
recent amendments per the ELMS III Leqislation, and a review of the
Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Development Plan.documents and
auaps .
Text and Map Amendments and other Chanaes: The Villages's requeat
is to investiqate the necessity of chanqinq the level of service
on Country Club Drive from LOS D to LOS C. Apparently there is
some confusion reqardinq this issue, because the Villaqe of
Tequesta Comprehensive Developmeat Plan currently has adopted LOS
C AADT {Averaqe Annual Daily Trips) and LOS D peak hour for all
collector roadways in Tequesta. Policy 1.3.1 (P. T-2f in the
Traffic Circulation adopts this standard. Country Clnb Drive along
with Seabrook Road and Tequesta Drive of the city street system and
CR 707, Old Dixie Hiqhway, and County Line Road of the Couaty road
system are claseified �as urban collectors. What the Village should
do is reexam.ine road classification sources to determine whether
Country Club Drive and any other collector roads could be
appropriately reclassified with volume thresholds that are
acceptable to meet your needs. Therefore, this approach wae •
researched and the followinq information is presented.
. ,
2�- Cct,-: Sveet 5�•:e 100i • li;es: g�� Eeoch R 33401 '.40i: C55-�OQ4 •
. ��
�
Mr. Ladd
` July 15, 1993 ,
Page 2
After review of the report entitled "Tequesta Drive/Country Club
Drive Corridor Analyaie" by Fred Schwartz, it is apparent that Mr.
Schwartz feels that it would be appropriate and acceptable under
State Planninq law, (Ch.163, F.S.) that the traffic volume
threahold entries listed on the "Generalized Annual Averaqe Daily
Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas" by FDOT could be used for
urban collectors of the City's atreet system because Tequesta lies
within the West Palm Beach urbanized area. Since Country Club�
Drive is identified in the Tequesta Comprehensive Development Plan
and Suppo=t Dxumentation as an urban collector, then the entry
entitled "Non-State Roadways, Major City/County Roadways" could be
used to classify traffic volume thresholds on collector roads in
Tequeata. Therefore, the accompanyinq level of service thresholds
could be employed; Level of Service C AADT - 10,900 vehicles per
day and I,evel of Service C, peak hour - 990 vehicles'per day
instead of Level of Service D, peak hour thresholds. To make this
change, the followinq revisions would have to be made to the
, Comprehensive Plan documents:
I. Supnort Documentation to the Villace of Tequesta
Comnrehensive Development Plan.
A. P.4-7, last paraqraph needs to be revised to reflect .
new traffic volumes identified by Fred Schwartz'e
traffic volumes presented in the.report entitled
"Tequesta Drive/Country Club Drive Corridor
Analysis". Appropriate source should be added, as
well. This paraqraph should probably be rewritten
by l�lr. Schwartz to properly describe his findinqs.
� B. P. 4-12 should be revised in paraqraphs 2 and 3 to
reflect that the "Generalized Annual Average Daily
Volumes for Florida's Drbanized (FDOT) is a
second source used for identifyinq traffic
� thresholds on urban collectors of the city street
system in Tequesta as "major city/county roadways".
C. TABLES 4-4 (p.4-13) and 4-5 (p.4-14� should be
revised to change the two-lane collector columns to
reflect the traffic volume thresholds from the
"Generelized Annual Average Volumes for Florida's
Urbanized Areas", Non-State Roadways, "Major
City/County RoadwayB". A delineation should aleo
be included in Column 2 to differentiate between
urban collectors of the city street system and the
County road system. The source should be revised
. appropriately.
Mr. Ladd.
' July 15, 1993
Paqe 3
D. TABLES 4-6 (p.4-16), 4-9 (p.4-22) and 4-10 (p. 4-
23) should be reviewed by Mr. Schwartz, P.E. to
determine if the Country Club Drive and Seabrook
Road now need appropriate revisions per his study
resulta. �
E. Section 4.3.2. Analysis of Exieting Deficienciee (P.
4.1? ) of the Traffic Circulation element; first� line
should be revised to recommend that LOS C be adopted
by.the Village aa the acceptable atandards for all•
collectors and arterials �rithin its jurisdiction.
F. Section 4.4 Analvsis of Projected Needs of the �
Traffic Circulation element should be reviewed for
. potential changes; particularly paragraph 1 on paqe
4.20 where Seabrook Road traffic volumes are
referenced.' lrlr. Schwartz's new traffic volumes
should be inaerted in this Section.�
G. Section 4.5, ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES (P.4 and
Sub-Section 4.5.4, Adiacent Martin County
Consideration (P.4-26) of tbe Traffic Circulation
element should be expanded to express the concern
about a cooperative effort witb Martin County
reqardinq future impact on Countrp Club Drive. A
clear Village position for the future should be
stated here as a basis for� inclusioA in the
. Comprehensive Development Plan.
It should be noted that Ch. 163, F.S. does aot require that
amendments to the Support Documentation be adopted by the local
government; however, you will be required to send theae proposed
chanqes to DCA with the proposed Comprehensive Plaa amendmente. �
DCA will need this information to determine that the appropriate
� backqround and research have been perform�d to justify the proposed
amendments. �
II. ComDrehensive Development Plan.
A. Since the Country Club Drive issue is primarily one
of interqovernmeatal�coordinativn, most proposed
revisions are suqgested for inclusion in that
element of the Villaqe of Tequesta Comptehensive
Development Plan. However, there are some minor
revisions and comments presented ia reqards to the
. � Traffic Circulatioa element. For clarification
. purposes, Policy 1.3.1 (P. T-2) of the Traffic
Mr. Ladd
` July 15, 1993
Paqe 4
Circulation element should be amended to reflect LOS
C for all classifications of roadways identified in
the Policy (i.e. Collector Roadways, Urban Minor
Arterials and Urban Principal Arteriala).
B. Two additional comments are offered in reference to
the Traffic Circulation Element:
1. Policy 1.4.1. (p. T-2) refers to abidinq by the
Palm Beach County R.O.W Protection Plan. It
is my understanding that Country Club Drive is
on this map, but the County says it is a
mistake. Double-check to be sure of it's
status, then determine whether Policy 12.1
requires revision.
2. If the Village is going to change the riqht-
of-way designation on County Club Drive from
� SO feet to 60 feet, a Policy should be added
to the Traffic Circulation element recommendinq
this change. Althouqh this is not absolutely
necessary, a specific Policy statement always
adds credence to a specific action.
C. As stated above, the Country Club Drive iesne ie
� really one of interqovernmental coordination and
what could or should be accomplished with Martin
County to this end. When Section 28 (Northfork
Development) in Martin County was beinq considered
for development as a Residential PUD, the Villaqe
offered some very specific comments to Martin Countp
for their consideration when reviewinq the proposed
Master Plan for this development. (Reference letter
dated April 10, 1992 to Harry Ring, Actinq Growth �
Manaqement Director, 1lartin County from Tom
Bradford, Villaqe Manaqer, Tequesta.) In that
letter, it was suqqested that Martin County amend
its Comprehensive Plan to require� that interlxal
. aqreements between appropriate entitiea,
jurisdictions and/or service providers be secured
prior to the issuance of development orders when the
action of one lxal qovernment, may crate an impact
on a neighboring jurisdiction's public facilities
and services. The purpose of this proposal was to
involve all "potentially affected" jurisdictions in
the review process prior to issuance of development
orders to assure proper interqovernmental
coordination and efficiency. A Policy under
,
Mr. Ladd
' July 15, 1993
Page 5
Objective 1..2.0 in the Interqovernmental
Coordinat�on element should be added to address this �
issue and that addresses all affected jurisdictions,
entities and/or service providers. A Policy 1.2.6
. on P. 1GC-2 wvuld be an appropriate placement of
this Policy. The Policy should direct�the Villaqe
to seek interqovernmental coordination and
cooperation from its affected neiqhborinq
jurisdictions, aqencies, service providere to secure �
such interlxal aqreements. Objective 1.2.0 (P.IGC-
1) should be revised to read "To coordinate with
neiahboring jurisdictions and aqencies ....." An
appropriate Policy under Objective 1.10 in the
Interqovernmental Coordination element should be
added, as well, to assure that Tequesta would offer
the same opportunities to affected jurisdictions in
terms of interqovernmental coordination if, through
its own actioas, approved development that would
impact on neighborinq jurisdictions or agencies
provision of public facilities and servicea. Add
a Policy 1.1.5 to accompliah this on P. IGC-1.
In the letter of April 10, 1992, it was also
suqqested that interlocal aqreemeate referenced
above should address how the cost for impacts to
public facilities and aervices would be borne, and
by whom, when the impacte are imposed upon other �
entities, jurisdictions and/or service providers.
A Policy should be added to the Interqovernmental
Coordination element that addresses this issue and�
which seeks the cooperation of neiqhborinq
jurisdictions, aqencie• and service providers
throuqh interlxal aqreements and intergovernmental
coordination. This Policy could be added as Policp
1.2.7 in the Intergovernmental Coordination element.
Likewise, a Policy should be added to the element,
that offers the same opportunities to affected
jurisdictions, aqencies or service providers that,
if throuqh Villaqe action, creates similar cost
impacts. This Policy could be added as Policy 1.1.6
in the Interqovernmental Coordination element.
D. Capital Improvements Element, TABI,E CI-1 should be
revised to reflect proper I,OS. standarda.
III. Map Amendments.
A. Neither the Existing Traffic Circulation Map, Figure
4-i Support Documentation nor the Future Traffic
Mr. Ladd
. July 16, 1993
Page 6
Circulation Map, Figure 4-2, of the Village of
Tequesta's Comprehensive Development Plan require
revisiona pursuant to the Country Club Drive iseue.
Timeframee and Schedulinq: The ELMS III Amendment to the
Comprehensive Planning Program (Ch. 93-206, Laws of Florida) passed
during the 1993 Legislative Session will create changes to the
timeframes established in the current Planning Law for
Compreher.sive Plans and Amendments. There are now three (3)
different timeframes established within the Law that could be
followed dependinq on the nature of the Comprehensive- Plan
Amendment request.
When a lxal government transmits its Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
it � request that DCA perform an official review of the proposed
amendment. When this is requested by the local qovernment, a
specific timeframe is established to accomplish the review. When
a local qovernment transmits a proposed amendment to DCA and does
not request a review of the proposed amendment, then, it leaves the
review decision in the hands of DCA and/or review aqencies in the
prxese. If DCA decides that no review and preparation of an
Objections, Review and Comments (ORC) Report is necessary for the
amendment, then, a second timeline scenario is created. If any of
the review aqencies after distribntion and review of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests that an ORC be performed on
the amendment, then a third timeline scenario is created. Pursuant
to the Amendments cited above, the followinq three (3) time line
scenarios for Comprehensive Plan Aa►endments are created:
ComQrehensive Plan Amendment Time Frames
. (In Days)
Scenario 1/ Scenario 2/ Scenario 3/ Old
. Local Gov't No ORC Late Request
Requests �
H earinq........... * * * *
Tranamit:
To DCA.......... � :
To DCA+......... '
Completeness...... * * * *
Review Decision... 0 45 45
Mail to Review • '
� Agencies.......... * * *
Mr. Ladd
' July 15, 1993
Page 7
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Time Frames
(In Days)
Scenario 1/ Scenario 2/ Scenario 3/ Old
Local Gov't No ORC Late Request
Requests
ORCs to DCA....... 30 , 30 45
ORC to Local
Government........ 30 30 45
Adoption 8earinq.. 60 60 60 60
Effective......... 154
Complete Review... 45 45 45 45
Sub-Total......... 165 150 150 195
App eal............ 21 21 21 � 21
Total ............. 186 171 � 231 216
The three (3� scenarios above� are compared to the timeframes
established under the Planninq Law when Tequesta's Comprehensive
Plan wae oriqinally adopted (Column Labelled OLD). Basically,
Scenario 1 shortens the review time by DCA and its review.aqencies
from 45 days to 30 days and shortens the time to prepare aa ORC
from 45 to 30 days also. The adoption hearinq still mnst be held
within 60 days upon receipt of the ORC. The Plan Amendment no
longer becomes effective upon adoption, but after it has received
its completeness review and found in "Compliance" (another
potential 45 days after the adoptioa hearing), there is a 21 dap
appeal period that must be added to the total timeframe brinqinq
the total potential time for a Plan Amendment Review of 186 days.
Please note that the total ti.me required�in this.scenario and in
the other scenarios is measured from the time of transmittal of the
Plan Amendment. There is additional time required before this
timeframe to prepare the actual Plan Amendments, to advertise
properly for the transmittal hearinq and any other requirements of
your lxal qovernment. Therefore, Scenario 1 could be stretched
out another three {3) to seven (7) weeks realisticaily based on
unique local requirements (e.q. agenda submittal timeframes for
Council meetings or other in-house adminiatrative requirements�.
Mr. Ladd
• July 15, 1993
Paqe 8
Scenario 2 preaents the ahortest timeframe fo�r a Plan Amendment.
This Scenario is based on DCA makinq the determination that no
review of the proposed Plan Amendment is required. In this
instance, DCA must make this determination and notify of this
decision within 45 days after their review for completeness of the
transmittal. The normal maximum 60 days from this time to the
adoption hearing is still required and the 45 day compliance time
is still applied. The 21 day appeal time period is also applied
brinqing the total Plan Amendment review time to 171 days. The
upfront, lacal timeframes and requizements prior to the transmittal
hearing must also be considered in addition to the 171 days.
Scenario 3 creates the longest Plan Amendment review timeframe.
This is caused by a review aqency requesting DCA to review the
proposed Plan Amendment late in the review timeframe after DCA has
distributed the Plan Amendment to its review agencies. Under this
scenario, the 30 day timeframe for comments from review agencies
is applied as well as the 30 day requirement for DCA to prepare the
ORC report. After the local government adopts its Plan Amendment,
the 45 day time frame to determine compliance or non-compliance
and the 21 day appeal period brinqs the total review time to 231
days. Again, please remember that this timeframe is measured from
the ti.me of transmittal and does not include pre-transmittal
timeframes and requirements.
Baeed upon the review of these Scenarios, it becomes apparent that
there still is substantial time required under the Law for Plan
Amendments even with the ELMS III Amendmenta to the Planninq Law.
The be,st case scenario (Scenario 2) realistically will require �
approximately sia (6) to seven and a half (7 1/2j months (190-220
daye) when applyinq upfront local requirements. Scenario 1 would
probably require si.x and a half to eight months (207-235 days)
while Scenario 3 would consume eiqht and a half ( S 1/2 j to nine and
a half (9 1/2j months at best. The effective date of the Plaa
Amendments qets pushed back, however, until after the compliance
review instead of at the time of adoption of the aa�endment. You
can see that substantial time is still required for Comprehensive
Plan Amendments.
Sunmiarv Comments: It has been proposed that thresholds listed in
the �"Generalized Annual Averaqe Dailp Volume for Florida Drbanized
Areas" by FDOT be utilized to define Country Club Drive as well as
other urban collectors of the city street system ( Seabrook Road and
Tequesta Drivej as "Major City/County Roadways". Please understand
that makinq this chanqe will not necessarily�change the traffic
Mr. Ladd
° July 15, 1993
Page 9
on the roadway, but will state the obvious intent of the Villaqe
to establi$h a more restrictive traffic volume standard for Country
Club Drive. Further understand that if the Villaqe decides to take
��another courae of action than that requested and responded to in
this correspondence, different revisions to the Comprehensive Plan
documents may be required.
. If you have any questions regardinq this submittal o= =equire
additional information, please feel free to coatact me.
Sin rely,
� .
� Ja�c I,. Horniman,
' Planninq Consultant .
cc: Tom Bradford, Villaqe Manaqer
Fred Schwartz, Rimley Born and Associates, Inc.
° ' 1
� , VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
`�° Post Officc Boz 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive
' � Tcqucsta, Florida 33469-0273 • (40� 575-6200
" ' � ` Fax: (40�) 575-6203 '
s o
• �.,
�Ch CQ M l
a
L O CAL PLANN = NG AG ENCY
PUBL = C. HEAR = NG AG ENDA
THURSDAY� ALJGUST 13 � 1992
7: O O P_ M.
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL •
II. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(William E. Surckart, Village Councilmember)
III. PUBLIC HEARING
, A) Consideration of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(Change of Land Use) Pursuant to Chapter 163.3161, Et.
Seq., Fiorida Statutes, and Transmittal to the State of
Florida Department of Community Affairs.
1) Review. and Discussion of Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
2) Review of Proposed Resolution No. 26-91/92
- -• - _y... _. . . •.� ..�,..�._�,.,�.,_ .
3) Local Planning Agency and Public Comments �
4) Local Pianning Agency Recommendation to the Viliage
Council Regarding Resolution No. 26-91/92 and the
Proposed Comprehensive Pian Amendment.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
��Ie �e yt ,
V= L LAGE COUNC = L MEET = NG
� AGENDA
THURSDAY� AUGUST 13 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDB — �J-''� � 1L
,
` J •
Recycled Pape�
Village Council Aqenda
August 13, 1992
Paqe 2-
----------------------
IIZ. PUHLIC HEARING
1) Special Exception Public Hearing Reviewing an
Application For Special Exception Use (Accessory Pre-
. School Facility) Within the R-1 Single-Family Dwelling
District of the Village of Tequesta by the Church of the
Good Shepherd, 400 Seabrook Road; Reverend Robert S.
Taylor.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motiQn. There will be
no separate discussion •of these items uniess a Village
Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda of business and considered
ia its normal sequence on the agenda. �
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND REPORTS
�*A) Board of Ad�ustanent; June 15, 1992
*B) Code Enforcement Board; July 7, 1992
*C) Village Council Workshop Meeting; July 7, 1992
*D) Village Council Workshop Meeting; July 9, 1992
*E) Village Council Meeting; July 23, 1992
*F) Viliage Manager's Report; July 20-August 7, 1992
VI. COIrIIrIITTEE REPORTS
A) Finance and Administration Committee Meeting; �
July 14, 1992
VII. COMMENTS, KUDOS AND CAUTIONS (Mayor Earl L. Collings)
VIIZ. APPOINTMENTS •
A) Designation of Viilaqe Council Nominee for the
. . • Countywide Intergoverrunentai Coordination Program Task
Force Appointments.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
_ . .as-_...._ _ • ...�..�--...__ .
� A) Resolution No. 26-91/92 - Proposing to Transmit to the
� State of Florida,��� Department of Community Affairs, An
Amendment to the Comprehensive Pian Adopted October 12,
' 1989, As Amended, Authorizing the Village Manager to
Transmit the Pian Amendment to the Department of
Community Affa3rs for Review Pursuant to Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes. �
Rs80LOTI0i x0. ��-qt�o�
11 RESOLUTION OF THE VILL7IGE COUNCIL OF THE
VII.L7IGE OF TEQUSSTJI, PLORIDII, PURSUIINT TO
CH]1PTER 163.3161, ET SEQ. f.S., PROPOSING TO
TRl1NSMIT TO THE ST71TE OP FLORID]1, DEPIIRTMENT
OF C01�4t[71�lITY 11FF�IRS, AN �TIENDlIENT TO THE
COI�REHENSIVE PLi1Ii ADOPTED OC'POBEIt 12, 1989,
AS 11�EKDEO, 11VPHORIZING THE VILL�IGE bWii71GER TO
TRl1PiSl�IT THE PL�1li �ID!ffiiT TO THE DEPl1RTMENT
OF COI�IIYlUNITY AFFIIIRS FOA REVIEfi PURSUI�NT TO
CA7IPTER 163, FL71. STAT.
wHERE113, the Villaqe of Tequosta adoptad by Ordinance No. 391
ita Comprahenaiv� Plan pursuant to Plorida Statusa Chapter 163 on
October 12, 1989; and
WHERE718, tho Villaq� ot Toquosta propoaQa to tranamit a plan
amendmant to its Campr�hansive Plan pursuant to section
163.3184(15), Florida Statutes; aM
WHEREAB, pursuant to Ssction 163.3184(iS), Fla. Stat., the
procedure !or tranamittal of a proposed plan amendment shall be by
an aftiraativo vota o! not l�a� than the majority ot the total
membership o! the governinq body; ared
WHERF.AIS, it has besn determined by the Villaqe Council of the
villaqn o! Tequesta that transaittal ot the proposed plan amendment
attached herato and incorporatad by rePerenco as a part o! this
. resolution is in the beat interasts of the citizans ot tha Villaqe
o! T�ueata.
NOW, THffitSFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THB 1/II.i�i�iGB COIINCIL OF TSE
VILLAGB OF TEQUESTI►, FLORIWI, as followe: �
Section i. By publication J►ugust 6, 1992, 1n the Pala
Beach Poat, thQ citizsns ot' tha Villaqa o! Taquasta and all otDer
interested partiea war� notitiad that th� Villaq� o! Tequesta
proposed to transmit a plan a=endment to its Compretsensive Plan on
this dato.
�ec�ion 2. The plan aaendaent proposed to be transmitted
is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated by reference as part
of this Resolution as i! lvlly set Lorth herein.
Section 3. The Villaga Kar�aqer a�i villaqQ olficials as
required are hereby authorized to w�dertake the necessary measures
� to transait the plan amendment pursuant ta Chapter 163, Fla. Stat.
�sstion 4. This Resolution shall take eilect immediately
upon its adoption.
Section 5. Ten (10) copies o! the aubject plan amendment
ahall be transaitted to tha StatQ o! Florida, Department of
Cammunity ]lffairs.
� THE 1rOR�GOING RESOLUTIOli va� o!l�r�d by Councilmomb�r
�tackail , vho �ov�d its adoption. Th� R�solution
vas s�con y Counc �abar and
upon b�inq put io a vot�, th� vota vas as !o ows:
FOR �DOPTION �GLINST �DOPTION
Earl L. CO11inA5
Edvard C. Howell •
w; ��; am F= R��rekait
TnePnh N_ ('a�rett3
Rnr T \larkai 1
Tho Iiayor thoraupon daclarod tha Resolution duly passed and
adoptad thia 13th day o! lluqust, 1992.
?f71Y0 F TEQUESTII
• ' �
. � . C 1 B
lNl'PES'r:
' lawil qe Clerk .
ac�t3lss-ot�.�s
s • •
. �
NOTICB OF CBANaB OF LAND OSE
TO ALL CITIZENB Ot T88 VILL7IGE OF T$Q088T� .
TO ALL PARTIEB IN INTEREBT AND TO l�I.L 1PHOl�i IT MAY CONCERN:
The Villaqe of Tequesta proposes to chanqe the use o! land within
the area shown in the map in this advertisement by means ot a
comprehensive plan amendment chanqinq the land use for said area
from low density (maximum of 5.5 dwellinq units per acre) to medium
density (5.5 to 12 dwellinq units per acre).
A Public Hearinq on the proposal will be held before the Villaqe of
Tequesta Local Planning Aqency and the Villaqe Council on Thursday,
Auqust 13, 1992, at 357 Tequesta Orive, Tequesta, Florida 33469.
The Local Planninq Aqency will consider the proposed plan amendment
and approve a recommendation to the Villaqe Council commencinq at
7:00 p.m. The Villaqe Council shall consider the recommendation of
the Local Planninq Aqency and approve or disapprove a Resolution
transmittinq the proposed plan amendment to the Department of
Community AffairB at 7:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter
may be heard. Prior to the above referenced hearings, any
interested person may inspect a copy of the proposed plan amendment
and application at the office of the Villaqe Clerk of the Villaqe
of Tequesta, at 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida.
PL8A88 TA1CB NOTICB A11D BB ]1DVI8ED, that if any interested person •
desires to appeal any deciaions made by the Villaqe Council with
� respect to any matters considered at this meetinq, such interested
persons will need a record of the proceedinqs, and for such
purposes will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedinqa ie made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
VII�LAGB OP TEQIIg8T11, BL08ID]1 '
Joaaa lsanqaniello
Viilaqe Clerk �
w��3ts3-ot�w�.woT
�
. •
O — � �'� `����'
�,..:�
� S �� �,
�'2� � � �
--- .��:.�:�_ ��� ��`�
o �� � ,�,: �: �:
�t
.
,,
;
;
�
� o
.
0
o �
o �;G,h
��( ��I;;;;��
�i�,i
r �, +�.:rn+ � ��R�
. < <,;:, z, �
,it''u��ri ��i'l�'''�
?�`�c> ,�i��� ;.� if �I'�� i'
' iC`A. o'.`..✓� ���'���..��t;:�
� sax �f. � `1!�!!r.-I�t:; � �`� ��.;
e �:.�'3.;`�;�s� r,.: r% .'�i�` n f!ii�j�:i
�6„�,, . . �.. ,c�..,r,�����; � i,.
�;:. , x,�,. � ° ��,r ,,,;;;�ua�i,"+�'' ; �iif��i! ; u;l;;,�
i .,� �,;� �; � s:: ,. i� i• i, i�� �1; I ill�j �,�
� � � ;x :. � ,,�:��je� �Gi�.��.' �,�.�� , � �!� f„i��, �
:� �;: .' J , �.
,�►' Z §:� ,�':'`'�•'' +'i ���'i:,•+!'
t� �'� � `���```��' �>' '�' j � ! � �
— _ � ....r Y1' i�.� l� �I �'4 e :,�;�� �i!(j�i �!!)�'
�'�, �RS��!; r�t��'(� � ! �, 1.
� Y £ �-: •;±jj, �:
.�;�.�° F,r����.;,�,p ��
� � ,����
a.� `.
$`�i��,Ij,,
O � y, :::;1.��
. ��
i/.
t.� �
i� d � r ����-� ur� . ��. ��.,�;:
0 f� C �
� � � '/'�U;�.L..
� �� ••�,� 'Fl��i��$�..y.�l''c-'r�.�;; ���;:�;o';:y��":
� � '' i:�n '.Y�..�?P �� � �C.{;g5�"�:
���:,�:�., . ��'=
Q � ,� � ������ A �
c� ���� ,� . �� $.
� la�s/� : ��`� ��.�� ...
e� � o � ��� ;; ,
� � �i�uN�► ' �.���
� a e� � �::��
� � ������� a��,.
�z�.�4� ���r <� �
, ;�:�>,�`�� :w�,�=`��;�
t� 0 r : � °
��� . r� r �. ,. x �.� v,
��h�� �� � � �����
� � �:� �r'�'����'�,� sa �: t 1: Y�>�.,
�E ' .� x., �w.ua;,.:.a., as:;a,
►r1"•t:Jt „� �... � �. �.^Yc(sfs�r�vr+�.-7�
� � �
�a�����������^'������� �'.� � } ����,'��>����� t Q � �
r; � t .' ^v i.�;:: r �• >g Q'� �', k� � J� i
��=�� ,
����� � � •���� • � � ���e �1��.
_ �i � ��'� + � � y �a� ,��`� y
`i s �!��s' '� 1 �A 't�� �d,�.,e a� n , r � �� y Y �
Zf� —��'—��—�=: ��v. #� aCZ�,`i S�. r � '^ !+� / � , ` � � � i� 4 '� .d 1.a x't�>} � �,,5j (\�.• " �' V• ) .
� � �� � � � ��+�1 ��A4 b�y.L'i ��'�`� �y� � �P� �� d C*2Y �v 6, r �.�k, � �,� �i
. . - _ �: yi v�, `� >� *� ������z�� � :r�£�c �`,�-� eK�.�` S `wF_' �e"�1��� c �.,.,' <
� � � � � �
.
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
e ., .,.. •.
:
.
� LOW DENSITY (MAXIMUM b.5 D.U.'S PER ,
. ... ,
��'�'= ;':�:�:�:�: MEDIUM DENSRY �5•s -� 2.0 �.u.� PER ACR
:•.�: •••••
� � COMMERCIAL
�
�
: � RECREATION A�11D QPEN SPACE
�
PUBLIC BUiLDiNGS AND GROUNI
, ••• � : � i:"= i'✓ ' w...�: ^ ...� ~ ��'1:% •
, `'� ��'���w.�..` :.'•S�•.�L. � O
, : NSERVATlQN
:�:; : �: °�= �: .�:^;.;? �,a :
:•t=
� VACANT LAND
OTHER PUBLl� FACILITIES
TRANSPORTATION FAClLITY NAME
WATER REFERENCE: FIQURE 8-t
nu i ��t ut t;MAMGE OF LAND USE ��-
�
TO ALL dTIZEPIS Of TM! YKLAW Of T[OUESTA ''�
� � TO ALL ►ARTIES IN INTEREST AND 10 ALL WHpM R MAY CONC�Nj �
TM Villoq� of T�quMo proposes to chanp� 1hs us� oi land wiThin 1M ana �hown in da mop in Ihii odvwtise+n�nt bq n+�an� 0 6"'
eomp��l+N+siw plan am�ndm�m cfi�yinq 11�� lond us� (or ioid ano from bw dsmiy (moximum of S.S dvwflinp rnil� pM «n) b
m�dium d�nsily (S.S to 12 dwdliny uniM p�r acn)-
A Public Heorinq on Ih� proposal will b� held bsfon 1h� Yllop� of T�que�to L«al Wonnir,y AQ�nry artd f� Y -~
Thvndor� Auqust 13. 1992, ct 3S7 T�qunto D►M, Tpu�sta. Horido 33469. TM locol p�onninq Aq�r ������
� P oPo+�d Plon an�ndmeM ood approv� a ncomm�ndalion to Ih� Ydloq� Cow+c1 comm�eKinq af 7:00 p.m. Th� Ylbqs Coune�l•
shall consid�r th� ncommendotion of 1h� locol Planninq Aysnc�r ond �P�o� pr disopprovs o Resolution hansmiltinq 1Fi�
p►oposed plon om�ndment to �M pepertmsM of Communi�y Affain of 7:30 p.m. w o� ���� �*� �� ��
hwrd. Prior to 1ht abow refenncsd hearinps, a�, mte�Kt�d p��� ���y a copr of Ihe proposed plon art�ndm�t �
'. aPplica�ion aa th� offic� of th� Ylloq� Ckrk of fh� �Ilay� of T�questa, a� 337 Tpvesta D.iv�, T�qussta. Florida. �
� rIEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVJSED; fhot if any i�xested p�non desires to � a
Cou�cil wilh rospect to mgr mofr�n�considerod af this �� ��� �����•
�q, wch intarestsd p�rsoni v„ill need o record of fhe p rocs�d' � n p r, a n d�
fw wch p u � p o s� v n' l l n e e d t o � n wre t h a f o � e r b o t im reca d o f 1h� proceed'nqs n mod�, which record inctudss tM t�stirta"r ani�:
widena upon which 1he app�d a b b� bossd.
MK
hw►aE oF Tc�w��►, aoeic� �
��� �� ��
wna�. a.� .
P�blish: August 6, 1994 .
s �~
� ......... ... N � ' ..
i � —
_ _. ,�
` M
r� yy 1 %I
, � � NORTB sw
I • _ . _ � i EST � PJ►S? ri
�
SOOTH u
�
r• '
„� O •' • M.W�
�� ! �� !'aA �
�'�
� r � .� • � ''. �fV� �
v
.r �
I � ` � �� —..�
.wr � ` 1 . t �ie
. i i �w�
_�. � - � s��t
� it ' ' w M
.,
' � � '
pM��� � � -
s .
c:;;=�::;::; �
� r �: � a:s�::�' �
.........Z j ,._.,.• � � � ` ....
(-O ''� '
.... - -
� C, �
� '
� � �
r
. ' � ' t. . • ;'
.j
' • C
I `
�
. � -
_ . , ,�
••7 � � i •
� � ^• �+ �
. � • -
� ; l .
..�au