HomeMy WebLinkAboutPension General_Documentation_Tab 04_05/05/2008
Tequesta General employees'
Pension Fund
~ -.-_`.~
~~#~
.~.P,~
,~
:~~
As of March 31, 2008
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^^^^^^^^~
PERFORMANCE
^^^^^^^^^r^^r^^^~r^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^
1 Account Profile
Investment Objectives: Obtain a reasonable total rate of return, with reasonable consistency
while attempting to protect the assets against the inroads of inflation.
Performance over 3-5 year market cycle to be in excess of composite
indices. Managers performance to be in the top 40% of Mobius
Universe. Total Return to be equal to actuarial earnings assumption
and equal or exceed CPI plus 3% over 3-5 year cycle.
Comparative Indices: 60% S&P 500
40% Lehman Govt/Credit Intermediate
Investment Restrictions: Not more than 5% of funds assets invested in any one issuing
company or aggregate investment in one company exceed 5% of
outstanding capital stock of the company.
Equity: Investments in stock not to exceed 60% at cost or 70% at
market.
Listed on National Exchange
Fixed: Standard & Poor's Investment Grade or Moody's
Investment Grade.
Value of bonds in single corporation shall not exceed 10%
of the total fiend.
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
2
^^^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sources of Portfolio Growth
~a.
Since Inception
~,
10-3-OS to 3-31-08
:R~;
Dana Beginning Market Value
Dana Contributions
Dana Withdrawals
Dana Investment Return
Dana Investment Ending Market Value
Custodian Ending Market Value
Bogdahn Ending Market Value
1,336,256
-406,303
111,178
$1,041,132
$1,033,067
$1,033,067
Each entity above uses different sources for pricing securities and because bonds are a
negotiated market each pricing source will have a slightly different prices. The minor
differences above are within a tolerable range of± .25%.
Custodian & Bogdahn does not propely show the Altreia spin offof Phillip Morris
International. Missing 134 shares of Phillip Morris $ 6,778.
Dana balance is trade date based while Custodian & Bogdahn are settlement date.
Difference of $ 1,288.
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
3
^^^~^^^^^^^^f~~^^^^s~^r^^^^^^~^^
.
~
~
~
y"~e., ~,..
, i4 vy .:. ]
i'yJ
ri t,
IDY
~A;
f
. ek4:° N
Performance vs Comparables (Gross of Fees)
Total Retunl Through 3-31-08
Bonds Equities Total Portfolio
1st Qtr Fiscal Year- 1st Qtr Fiscal Year- 1st Qtr Fiscal Year-
Average Annual
Since Inception
2008* to-Date 2008* to-Date 2008* to-Date 10-03-OS
Tequesta General Employees 3.25% 5.92% -9.41% -11.72% -4.80% -5.29% 6.73%
Lehman Govt/Corp Intermediate 3.00% 5.99%
S&P 500 -9.45% -12.46%
Blend:
60% S&P 500 -4.47% -5.08% 5.29%
40% Lehman G/C Intermediate
* Unannualized
Fiscal Year 9-30
Current Asset Allocation
Bonds Stocks Cash
39% 58% 3%
"The information set forth above is based upon inforiilation believed to be accurate and reliable but we do not. guarantee its accuracy."
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
4
^^r^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^
Bond Characteristics vs Comparables
Portfolio Characteristics
Current Annualized Effective
Credit Quality Yield to Maturity @ Average Coupon Duration
Market
Tequesta General Employees AAA 3.68% 5.21 % 3.50
LB G/C Intermediate AA+ 3.51 % 5.03% 3.83
"The information set forth above is based upon information believed to be accurate and reliable but. we do not guarantee its accuracy."
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
5
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^r^^^
OUTLOOK
Treasury Yield Curve
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
03 Months
^ Dec 31, 2006 5.04
-~-Dec 31, 2007 3.24
-0-Apr 16, 2008 1.11
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
06 Months 02 Years OS Years 10 Years 30 Years
5.06 4.79 4.68 4.68 4.79
3.39 3.05 3.44 4.02 4.45
1.46 1.86 2.72 3.62 4.46
6
Current Economic Environment
Y Housing will stop subtracting from GDP in 2008.
Core inflation remains above the Fed comfort level.
~ Overall CPI has reaccelerated.
Housing correction and tighter consumer credit will have an effect on consumer
spending.
y Rate cuts will soften economic landing, but lenders are demanding higher rates to
compensate for risk.
The Fed has opened the discount window to primary broker dealers in order to provide
adequate liquidity.
A GDP will likely turn negative during 2008.
- Q1 corporate earnings likely to disappoint.
Apri12008
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
7
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Building Permits in Thousands
2300
2050
1800
1550
1300
1050
800
0 0 o c
0 0 0 0
N N N N
Q ~ F 0.
~ ~
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
g
v vi ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
°0 0 °0 0 °0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0
N N N N N N N N O O O O O O
N N N N N N
~] ~ ti V1 Q~" ti ~ Q `-~i ~ ~ ~N t~V
^^^^^^^^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Card LPI {trailing twelve months)
3.00
2.75
2.50
2,25
2.00
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
M ~
O ~
o °o °o ~
N N N N O
N N
"~ Q~ ti ~ `~
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
l~ ~ [~ ~ 00 00
O O O
O O O p O O
N N N N N N
9
~f) V1 V1
0 0 0 ~ o o ~
O O O O O O O
N N O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
CPI
5.00
4.75
4.50
4.25
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.25
3.00
2.75
2.50
2.25
2.00
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
N N M M
O p O O
O p p O
N N N N
a ~ ~ c
v1 q ~
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
10 I
M ~ Vl ~ h V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r r n r 00
~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N ~ ~ NO NO N N
a ~ ~ ~ CL U s. C P. V t.
a¢i` a~i ~ C R. U t.r. Q Ci. v ti..
vi q ~ ~, ~ q ~ ti ~ q ~ ti ~ Q ~, ,~ ~ Q `~
U.S. C~allar Index.
u .~
130
110
90
70
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
11
GO 00 O~ O~ O~ O~ O O O O '-+ '--~ '--{ '--+ N N N N M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ U1 U1 Ul ~-r1 ~ `D ~ ~ [~- [~- [~- [~- GO
O~ O~ Q~ O~ O~ O~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O~ O~ Q~ O~ O~ Q~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
'--+ r-+ .--a '--+ •--~ r-+ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Q., ~ 3.• ~ Q. v ~.• ~ p. ~ s-. ~ Q., v s.• ~ Q. ~ ~-• ~ ~., v ~ ~ Q. v ~-• ~ Q., v ~. ~ p. v s.. ~ p„ v s..
~ ~ cu ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ a~ ca ~ ~ a~ cd ~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cc ~ ~ ~ cu ~ ~ a~ ~
cn Q ~ ^ cn Q '~ ~-, ~ Q ~ ~-, cn Q ~ ^ cn Q ~ cn Q ~ ~-, cn Q ~ ~, ~ Q ~ ^ cn Q ~ ^ ~ Q ~
Worldwide equity markets started the fourth quarter of 2007
^ with positive momentum, but by late November, most domes-
tic equity indices had corrected 5-7% from their starting points.
Foreign markets fared slightly better, but also fell 1-2% during
the same time frame. The markets experienced a modest re-
bound in late December, but this was not enough to prevent
most U.S. and foreign equity indices from showing negative
^ returns in Q4.
The news is more positive when looking at annual returns for
2007, as the S&P 500 provided a positive total return
(including dividends) of roughly 5.5%. Small cap stocks did
not fare as well, as the Russell 2000 finished the year down
almost 2%.
From a style perspective, 2007 marked a significant inflection
^ point in the performance of growth vs. value oriented shares.
Growth indices such as the Russell 1000 Growth and Russell
2000 Growth returned +11.8% and +7.0% respectively in
2007. Meanwhile, value indices struggled, as the Russell
1000 Value and Russell 2000 Value had negative returns of
(.2%) and (9.8%) in 2007.
The table at left helps illus-
S&P 500 Laggards in 2007 trate why there was such a
dramatic divergence in
Home Builders -59.6°io performance of growth vs.
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance -51.2°~° value shares. Almost all of
Real Estate Management -36.4% the worst performing in-
Department Stores -35.2% dustry groups in 2007
have a higher representa-
Motorcycle Manufacturers -33.7°~° tion within value-oriented
Regional Banks -31.5% VS. grOWth portf0110S.
Apparel & Accessories -31.0% Meanwhile, the best per-
Home Improvement Retail -2g.7% forming StOCkS were clus-
tered within the Aero-
Consumer Finance -29.6%
space/Defense, Oilfield
Diversified Financials -29.5% Service, Computer Soft-
Source: Bloomberg ware & Internet industries,
all of which have higher
representation within in t he growth indices.
Consumer Discretionary and Financials were the only sectors
within the S&P 500 that experienced negative returns in 2007.
Energy led the S&P 500 last year, up over 32%, and four other
sectors produced positive returns of 15% or more.
The divergence in the performance of the sectors within the
S&P had a material impact on the overall composition of the
index. Financials representation within the index has fallen by
5% in just one year. Meanwhile, Energy has risen by almost
3%, and the Technology and Consumer Staples also grew
^ their representation by 1 % or more in 2007.
Investors should be aware that the S&P 500 has clearly be-
come a "growthier" index in a rather short period of time.
This will probably have positive implications for the near-term
performance of the S&P 500, as the index now has higher
weighting towards some of the sectors that are likely to post
the stronaest and most consistent earnings growth in 2008.
S&P 500 Sector Breakdown
Comparison of Beginning vs. End of Year 2007
Sector Sector Change
Weight % 2007 Weight % in Sector
12131106 Performance 12131107 Weight
Energy 9.8% 32.38% 12.9% 3.1%
Materials 3.0% 19.99% 3.3% 0.4%
Utilities 3.4% 15.81% 3.4% 0.0%
Information Technology 15.1% 15.53% 16.8% 1.6%
Consumer Staples 9.3% 11.60% 10.3% 1.0%
Industrials 10.9% 9.83% 11.5% 0.6%
Telecommunications 3.5% 8.45% 3.6% 0.1%
Health Care 12.0% 5.90% 12.0% 0.0%
Consumer Discretionary 10.6% -14.32% 8.5% -2.1%
Financials 22.3% -20.84% 17.7% -4.8%
Total 100.0% 5.49% 100.0%
Dana Equity Strategies
Most of Dana's equity strategies navigated the volatile mar-
Total Return through 12-31-07*
Dana Large Cap
Dana Large Growth
Dana Large Value
Dana All Cap
Dana Small Cap
Dana Socially Responsible
Dana Int'I ADR
* Preliminary as of 1-21-08
Q4 YTD 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
-3.55% 5.34% 10.93% 14.85%
0.82% 15.40% 13.12% 17.13%
-4.10% 4.87% 11.19% 16.51
-4.79% 3.11 % 9.35% 15.19%
-9.70% -7.51 % 4.27% 14.45%
-4.45% 7.64% 10.98% 18.15%
2.04% 10.70% tWA WA
kets of 2007 fairly well, while a few had a more difficult time.
Small caps did not join the party in 2007, and the small cap
market also experienced an escalation in volatility. Dana's
Small Cap strategy mirrored these trends. The Small Cap
portfolio's tilt towards value stocks also weighed on perform-
ance. The Russell 2000 Value index returned -9.8% in 2007,
while the Russell 2000 Growth index was up over 7%. Our
team is presently focusing on companies with international
exposure, attractive growth characteristics and a history of
positive earnings surprises along with appealing valuations
and improving fundamentals.
i^
.Dana's Large Value, Large Growth and Socially Responsible
strategies generated strong absolute and relative returns for
.the year.
The Large Value and Social strategies derived their strongest
relative performance contribution from holdings within the
Financial sector. Our team's quantitative and fundamental
models began to flash caution signs on many financial stocks
last summer. We responded by reducing our portfolios' expo-
sure to those stocks deemed most vulnerable if the U.S. resi-
dential housing market continued to deteriorate. For exam-
ple, State Street Bank (STT), which derives most of its earn-
ings from asset management and investment custody ser-
vices, was added to a number of our equity strategies during
the year. State Street appreciated over 20% in the fourth
.quarter of 2007. Several other financials added to portfolios
In the latter half of the year also generated positive returns.
^As a result, Dana's equity portfolios we were largely able to
avoid the collapse in many of the financials that fared the
.worst from the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market.
Another factor that was accretive to the performance of many
strategies was the recognition of the market's shift in prefer-
ence from value towards growth-oriented companies. We
were able to "tilt" many of the portfolios towards growth while
still maintaining our strict relative valuation discipline. It also
became clear that the continuation of the weak dollar would
likely have a positive impact for many large U.S. multi-
nationals and other export-related companies.
~~
~I
1
~~
~'';
~c~~n~, Glok-a1
S~F firms ccly ire air iarcigo sale= ter °6ire? st,sic~grsh l.1.5~.
~&.P FOQI In3errlatioea[ ra~renues*
~..
'~
,f -
~pr+'aiiry~ i7j FFi1 G
I~terfratl sales. t r : nc1"r
;~.~ .~:
r}~;.,
ei= , ~,
~~.~.! .
,,~, ;r
' -1 ' t >! tsrap
',tea;. a r~ atia. a=;~o be~nryr=ti
As a result, we placed a higher priority on investing in compa-
nies with strong or rapidly growing foreign revenue streams.
Companies with a high percentage of foreign sales, such as
~Halliburton, Intel, IBM, Johnson Controls, Lockheed Martin,
National Oilwell, Nike, Textron and United Technologies, all
shad a strong positive impact on overall portfolio performance
for those equity strategies that held them in 2007.
Large Core, our largest strategy in terms of assets under
.management, delivered returns slightly above the S&P 500 in
2007.
Energy, Materials, Telecom & Utilities returned in excess of
20% for the year. Energy holdings were up almost 27%, but
this was actually a slight drag on relative performance as the
S&P 500 Energy sector was up over 32%.
Our Allcap strategy exceeded the returns for its benchmark,
the S&P 1500 Composite, by roughly one percentage point.
The strongest relative performance was generated from Indus-
trial and Financial sectors. Energy holdings within the Allcap
strategy also returned 35.7% for the year.
Investment Outlook
Many of the problems that fueled the past year's worries have
not subsided, especially weakness in the housing market, sub-
prime mortgages, uncertainty over the direction of the econ-
omy, inflation and corporate earnings growth.
It is hard to handicap whether the U.S. economy will enter a
recession in 2008. We can say with more certainty, however,
that corporate earnings growth is facing a number of escalat-
ing pressures. Corporate profit margins are being squeezed
by a combination of lower revenue growth coupled with rising
costs across a number of fronts, including raw materials, en-
ergy & utilities, wages & employee benefits and shipping
costs.
Uncertainty tends to fuel volatility, so it is likely equity investors
will be forced to endure another volatile year. The good news
is that worldwide growth remains solid, which should continue
to help U.S. companies doing business overseas. The Fed-
eral Reserve has also signaled their resolve to support domes-
tic economic growth, which bodes well for an eventual accel-
eration in economic activity sometime later this year.
Dana Large Cap Portfolio Characteristics
.a,
Ariunl ('umpoa„e Cl,ara~,<r,s i,~n as vl U..emoe, 11. -OU'/
• Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. is an independent federally registered investment adviser providing equity and fixed income investment management services to a broad range of clients. The returns pre-
sented have keen prepared and presented in accordance with the AIMR PPS Standards. AIMR has neither endorsed the presented pertormance, nor is AIMR affiliated with Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. in
. any way. All tee-paying accounts utilizing similar investment strategies t° !hose discussed herein were included in the composite performance returns presented. Total firm assets for the period ending 12-31-
06 were $2,814,940,000. The number of portfolios contained in the Dana Large Cap Equity and Small Cap Equity Strategies were 296 and 51 respectively. The percentage affirm assets in 2006 represented in
the Dana Large Cap Equity Strategy was 21.71; with an annual 2006 return dispersion of 0.82 % .The percentage of firm assets in 2006 represented in the Dana Small Cap Equity Strategy was 2.2%; with an
annual 2006 return dispersion of 0.75%. To receive a complete list and description of Dana Investment Advisor, Inc.'s composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the AIMR-PPS standards, contact Nick
Berich at Tel. (262) 782-3631. All data Is presented in U.S. Dollars. Portfolio characteristics reflect Dana equity strategy holdings as of market close on the date indicated. Returns presented are exclusive of
^ investment management and custodial fees, and net of transaction costs. Investment management fees would reduce the returns presented, for example: on aone-million dollar portfolio with an advisory fee
of .75 % earning a 10 % return, the total compounded advisory fee over a five year period would he $50,368. The resulting average annual return for the period would therefore be 9.17°/ .All returns were
calculated on a time weighted total return basis. Performance does include the accrual of income and the reinvestment of dividends and interest received. Indexes shown were selected because they demon-
. strafed similar characteristics to the Dana strategy to which they were compared. During various market cycles, the strategies discussed herein have demonstrated portfolio characteristics and returns that
have been both more and less volatile than that of the comparable index. While data contained herein was gathered from sources deemed reliable, the accuracy of the data presented cannot be guaranteed.
Past performance is not indicative of future returns.
M
.--i
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ i ^ i ^ ^ ^ ~
ASSET ALLOCATION
^ ^ ~ ^ ^ t ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ! i ! ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Asset Allocation as of 3-31-08
.~ .~
Federal Agencies
$9c
9~
Bond Funds
$26,772
3%
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
Government Bonds
$139,337
13%
J
Money Market
$32,102
3%
Fixed Rate Mtg Pools Accnied & Receivables
$50,012 $5,515
5% ~ 1%
l
I
\ ~ ~%
Dana Large Cap Core
$271,651
14
Corporate Bonds
Dana Large Cap Growth
$92,370 Dana International $256,423
9% $76,616 25%
7%
Large Cap Core Sectoi Distiribution as of 3-31-08
1 s°i°
16%
l4%
12%
10%
I;%
~%
4%
2%
0%
Financials Info Tech Energy Health Care Industrials Cons Staples Cons Disc Materials Utilities Telecom
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS. INC.
15
Large Cap Growth Sector Distribution as of 3-31-08
30% ~
28%
26%
24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
~%
4%
2%
0%
Into Tech Health Care Industrials Cons Disc Cons Staples Fa~ergy Fn~ancials Materials Utilities Telecom
DANA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC.
16
^^^^^^^^^^^i^^~^^^^^i^^^^^^^^^^r
CURRENT HOLDINGS
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^i^^^^^^^r^^^^^^^
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Market Pct.
Quantity Security Price Value Assets
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
Cash -Money Fund 32,102.48 3.1
32,102.48 3.1
COMMON STOCK
Dana Large Cap
191 AT&T Inc. 38.30 7,315.30 0.7
102 Abbott Laboratories 55.15 5,625.30 0.5
94 Airgas Inc. 45.47 4,274.18 0.4
141 Akamai Technologies 28.16 3,970.56 0.4
104 Alliance Data Systems Corp. 47.51 4,941.04 0.5
276 Altera Corporation 18.43 5,086.68 0.5
134 Altria Group Inc. 22.20 2,974.80 0.3
236 Amphenol Corp Class A 37.25 8,791.00 0.8
92 Apache Corp 120.82 11,115.44 1.1
31 Apple Computer Inc. 143.50 4,448.50 0.4
161 BMC Software Inc 32.52 5,235.72 0.5
113 Bank of America Corporation 37.91 4,283.83 0.4
100 Bank of New York Co. Inc. 41.73 4,173.00 0.4
139 Becton Dickinson & Co 85.85 11,933.15 1.1
111 Best Buy Inc. 41.46 4,602.06 0.4
240 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 21.30 5,112.00 0.5
267 CVS Corporation 40.51 10,8]6.17 1.0
213 Charles Schwab Corp. 18.83 4,010.79 0.4
421 Cisco Systems 24.09 10,141.89 1.0
79 Coca-Cola Company 60.87 4,808.73 0.5
61 Conocopbillips 76.21 4,648.81 0.4
193 DIRECTV Group Inc. 24.79 4,784.47 0.5
56 Deere & Company 80.44 4,504.64 0.4
57 Diageo PLC 81.32 4,635.24 0.4
280 Disney Walt Company Holding Company 31.38 8,786.40 0.8
90 EDISON INTERNATIONAL 49.02 4,41 1.80 0.4
94 Ecolab Inc. 43.43 4,082.42 0.4
92 Emerson Electl-ic Co. 51.46 4,734.32 0.5
79 Express Scripts Inc 64.32 5,081.28 0.5
68 Exxon Mobil Corporation 84.58 5,751.44 0.6
61 FPL Group
1 62.74 3,827.14 0.4
17
^^^^^^^^^^^^^r^^^^^^^^^^^a^^^^^^
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Quantity
65
98
78
30
11
283
114
63
113
92
154
137
499
55
146
92
344
83
61
64
174
92
341
83
142
59
142
111
553
68
92
67
134
61
71
171
260
Security
Genentech Inc.
General Mills Inc.
Genzyme Corp.
Goldman Sachs
Google Inc. Class A
Halliburton Co.
Harris Group
Hartford Financial Services
Hewlett Packard Company
Honeywell International Inc.
Hospitality Properties Trust
Infosys Technologies - SP ADR
Intel Corporation
International Business Machines Corp
J. P. Morgan Chase & Company
Johnson & Johnson
Johnson Controls Inc.
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
MEMO Electronic Materials Inc.
McKesson Corp.
MetLife Inc
Microsoft Corporation
National Oilwell Varco Inc
Nike Inc. Class B
Noble Energy
Nokia Corp-Sponsored ADR
Omnicom Group
Oracle Corporation
PPG Industries Inc.
Parker Hannifin Corp.
Pepsico Inc
Philip Morris International
Praxair Inc.
Procter & Gamble Company
Ross Stores Inc.
Saint Jude Medical
Market Pct.
Price Value Assets
_ _ _
81.18 - --
5,276.70
0.5
59.88 5,868.24 0.6
74.54 5,814.12 0.6
165.39 4,961.70 0.5
440.47 4,845.17 0.5
39.33 11,130.39 1.1
48.53 5,532.42 0.5
75.77 4,773.51 0.5
45.66 5,159.58 0.5
56.42 5,190.64 0.5
34.02 5,239.08 0.5
35.77 4,900.49 0.5
21.18 10,568.82 1.0
115.14 6,332.70 0.6
42.95 6,270.70 0.6
64.87 5,968.04 0.6
33.80 11,627.20 1.1
64.55 5,357.65 0.5
99.30 6,057.30 0.6
70.90 4,537.60 0.4
52.37 9,112.38 0.9
60.26 5,543.92 0.5
28.38 9,677.58 0.9
58.38 4,845.54 0.5
68.00 9,656.00 0.9
72.80 4,295.20 0.4
31.83 4,519.86 0.4
44.18 4,903.98 0.5
19.56 10,816.68 1.0
60.51 4,114.68 0.4
69.27 6,372.84 0.6
72.20 4,837.40 0.5
50.58 6,777.72 0.7
84.23 5,138.03 0.5
70.07 4,974.97 0.5
29.96 5,123.16 0.5
43.19 1 ] ,229.40 1.1
2
18
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Market Pct.
Quantity Security Price Value Assets
98 Sempra Energy 53.28 5,221.44 0.5
130 State Street Corp. 79.00 10,270.00 1.0
230 TD Ameritrade 16.51 3,797.30 0.4
134 Terex Corp. 62.50 8,375.00 0.8
164 Textron Inc. 55.42 9,088.88 0.9
102 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 56.84 5,797.68 0.6
69 Transocean Inc. 135.20 9,328.80 0.9
85 Union Pacific Corp. 125.38 10,657.30 1.0
149 United Technologies Corp 68.82 10,254.18 1.0
98 UnitedHealth 34.36 3,367.28 0.3
72 V F Corporation 77.51 5,580.72 0.5
80 Valero Energy Corp. 49.1 1 3,928.80 0.4
148 Verizon Communications 36.29 5,370.54 0.5
121 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. 52.68 6,374.28 0.6
130 Wells Fargo & Company 29.10 3,783.00 0.4
100 XTO Energy Inc. 61.86 6,186.00 0.6
523,640.69 50.3
Dana Small Cap
96 Investment Technology Group 46.18 4,433.28 0.4
Mutual & Exchange Traded Funds
156 iShares MSCI EAFE Growth Index 72.28 11,275.68 1.1
Dana International ADR
195 Aegon NV ADR 14.64 2,854.80 0.3
125 Allianz SE ADR 19.66 2,457.50 0.2
51 BT Group PLC ADR 43.10 2,198.10 0.2
81 Canon ADR 46.37 3,755.97 0.4
148 Cemex ADR 26.12 3,865.76 0.4
182 Danske Bank A/S - Unspons ADR 18.50 3,367.00 0.3
59 E.ON AG ADR 62.15 3,666.85 0.4
86 Endurance Holdings ADR 36.60 3,147.60 0.3
142 KT Corporation ADR 23.75 3,372.50 0.3
108 Marks & Spencer Group PLC ADR 15.35 1,657.80 0.2
271 NTT DoCoMo ADR 15.25 4, 132.75 0.4
60 Petrobras CL A ADR 84.69 5,081.40 0.5
3
19
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Market Pct.
Quantity Security Price Value
-- Assets
88 Sanofl Aventis ADR 37.54 3,303.52 0.3
134 Telecom Italia S.P.A. CL A ADR 16.52 2,213.68 0.2
95 Telefonos de Mexico ADR 37.60 3,572.00 0.3
34 Toyota Motor Corp - Spon ADR 100.89 3,430.26 0.3
43 Woori Finance Holdings ADR 52.05 2,238.15 0.2
186 Woseley PLC ADR 10.65 1,980.90 0.2
110 Yara International ADR 57.80 6,358.00 0.6
85 Zurich Financial Svcs -ADR 31.60 2,686.00 0.3
_ 65,340.54 6.3
604,690.19 58.1
CORPORATE BONDS
5,000.00 Cit Group Inc. 94.00 4,700.00 0.5
4.750% Due 08-15-08
5,000.00 CSX Corp 101.27 5,063.45 0.5
6.250% Due 10-15-08
6,000.00 Deutsche Bank Financial 103.61 6,216.66 0.6
7.500% Due 04-25-09
5,000.00 Target Corp. 102.77 5,138.35 0.5
5.375% Due 06-15-09
5,000.00 Intl Lease Finance Corp 100.06 5,003.25 0.5
5.000% Due 04-15-10
5,000.00 Capital One Bank 99.23 4,961.26 0.5
5.750% Due 09-15-10
5,000.00 Lehman Brothers Inc. 95.67 4,783.57 0.5
5.000% Due 01-14-11
5,000.00 Kohls Corporation 102.40 5,119.90 0.5
6.300% Due 03-01-11
5,000.00 Bank One Corp 106.09 5,304.60 0.5
5.900% Due 11-15-11
5,000.00 Gannett Co Inc. 103.21 5,160.40 0.5
6.370% Due 04-01-12
5,000.00 Avon Products Inc. 100.65 5,032.65 0.5
4.620% Due OS-15-13
5,000.00 Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 100.77 5,038.65 0.5
5.250% Due 10-15-13
4
20
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Market Pct.
Quantity Security Price Value Assets
5,000.00 US Bank NA 108.42 5,421.00 0.5
6.300% Due 02-04-14
5,000.00 HSBC Finance Corp. 98.68 4,934.01 0.5
5.250% Due 04-15-15
5,000.00 Lowe's Companies Inc. 100.36 5,018.25 0.5
5.000% Due 10-15-15
5,000.00 Wachovia Bank NA 96.41 4,820.32 0.5
5.600% Due 03-15-16
5,000.00 Kimberly Clark 1.08.85 5,442.28 0.5
6.125% Due 08-01-17
5,000.00 J.P. Morgan & Co. Inc. 104.22 5,211.10 0.5
6.000% Due 10-01-17
92,369.71 8.9
FEDERAL AGENCY SECURITIES
10,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 100.12 10,012.50 1.0
5.750% Due 04-15-08
10,000.00 *Federal National Mortgage Association 102.37 10,237.50 1.0
5.250% Due 01-15-09
10,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 103.37 10,337.50 1.0
5.750% Due 03-15-09
10,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 104.31 10,431.30 1.0
5.375% Due 08-15-09
5,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 105.91 5,295.30 0.5
4.750% Due 12-15-10
7,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 108.16 7,570.92 0.7
5.500% Due 03-15-11
10,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 107.09 10,709.40 1.0
5.000% Due 10-15-11
3,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 105.66 3,169.68 0.3
4.500% Due 01-15-13
5,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. 107.37 5,368.75 0.5
4.875% Due 11-15-13
8,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 108.11 8,648.72 0.8
5.000% Due 04-15-15
5
21
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^s^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dana Investment Advisors
POR'T'FOLIO APPRAISAL
Tequesta General Employees' Pension Funds
Mai°ch 31. 2008
Market Pct.
Quantity Security Price Value Assets
8,000.00 Federal National Mortgage Association 106.89 8,551.28 0.8
5.000% Due OS-11-17 _
90,332.85 8.7
GOVERNMENT BO NDS
20,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 101.00 20,200.00 1.9
4.120% Due 08-15-08
10,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 104.50 10,450.00 1.0
5.500% Due OS-15-09
15,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 100.81 15,121.50 1.5
2.000% Due 02-28-10
15,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 106.67 16,000.78 1.5
4.250% Due 10-15-10
10,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 109.08 10,907.81 1.0
4.625% Due 10-31-11
15,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 101.53 15,229.69 1.5
2.750% Due 02-28-13
10,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 109.02 10,901.56 1.0
4.250% Due 08-15-13
5,000.00 US Treasury Notes 108.22 5,410.94 0.5
4.125% Due OS-15-15
5,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 109.02 5,450.78 0.5
4.250% Due 08- 15- 15
5,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 114.03 5,701.56 0.5
5.120% Due OS-15-16
15,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 109.91 16,485.94 1.6
4.625% Due 02-15-17
7,000.00 U.S. Treasury Notes 106.81 7,476.87 0.7
4.250%Due I1-15-17
139,337.44 13.4
FIXED RATE MORTGAGE POOLS
FNMA
12,196.64 FNMA 884093 5-1-06 102.50 12,501.56 1.2
6.000% Due OS-Ol -36
22
^^r^^~^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^^^~~~^^^^^
Dana Investment Advisors
PORTFOLIO APPRAISAL
Teyuesta General Employees' Pension Funds
March 31, 2008
Quantity Security
FHLMC
11,401.79 FHLMC C90939 12-1-OS
5.500% Due 12-01-25
11,809.79 FHLMC GOLD C90978 7-1-06
6.000% Due 07-01-26
13,201.47 FHLMC C90983 8-1-06
5.500% Due 08-01-26
Market Pct.
Price Value Assets
102.78 11,718.66 1.1
103.67 12,243.68 1.2
102.62 13,547.73 1.3
37,510.07 3.6
50,011.63 4.8
Bond Funds
Mutual & Exchange Traded Funds
242 iShares Lehman 3-7 Year Treasury
Accnied Income
Dividends Receivable
Interest Receivable
TOTAL ACCRUED AND RECEIVABLE
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
110.63 26,772.46 2.6
26,772.46 2.6
4,396.01 0.4
1,040.49 0.1
78.67 0.0
5,515.17 0.5
1,041,131.93 100.0
The market prices shown on these pages represent the last reported sale on the valrcation date as to listed securities or the
bid price i~n the case ofover-the-counter quotations. Prices on bonds and some other investments are based on round lot
price quotations and are for evaluation purposes only and may not represent actual market values. Bonds sold on an odd lot
basis (less than $I million) may have a dollar price lower than the round lot quote. Where no regular market exists,
prices shown are estimates by sources considered reliable by Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. While the prices are obtained
from sources we consider reliable, we cannot guarantee them.
7
23