HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Local Planning Agency_01/23/1997~~
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
Post Office Box 3273 357 Tequesta Drive
Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (407) 575-6200
Fax: (407) 575-6203
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
VILLAGE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
WORKSHOP
(VILLAGE COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY)
MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 1997
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Tequesta Local Planning Agency held a meeting at the
Village Hall, 357 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on
. Thursday, January 23, 1997. The meeting was called to order
at 7:08 P.M. by Mayor Ron T. Mackail. A roll call was taken
by Joann Manganiello, Village Clerk. Councilmembers present
were: Mayor Ron T. Mackail, Vice Mayor Elizabeth A. Schauer,
Carl C. Hansen and Joseph N. Capretta. Also in attendance
were: Village Manager Thomas G. Bradford, Village Clerk
Joann Manganiello, and Department Heads. Councilmember
Michael R. Meder was absent.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Vice Mayor Schauer made a motion to approve the Agenda as
submitted. Councilmember Hansen seconded the motion. The
vote on the motion was:
Ron T. Mackail - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Carl C. Hansen - for
CJ
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the Agenda
was approved as submitted.
Recycled Paper
Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 2
III. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS)
There were no communications from citizens.
IV. INTRODUCTION OF OUTLINE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Planning Consultant Jack Horniman explained that the Village
had adopted a Comprehensive Development Plan in 1989 which
had been evaluated the previous summer. Results had been
successful with the Department of Community Affairs finding
the Evaluation and Appraisal Report submitted to them as
sufficient, meaning the municipality could proceed to update
their plan. The Village is required to update their plan
under planning laws once every five years. No government
funds were available to offset a portion of the costs
involved, as in the past. Mr. Hornimann presented a letter
which if approved by the Village Council, would be mailed
the next day requesting a 6-month extension in order to have
additional time for planning and to provide two fiscal years
over which to spread the cost. Mr. Hornimann requested that
the Council approve the request.
Vice Mayor Schauer made a motion to accept the letter dated
January 24, 1997 to Mr. Roger Wilburn, giving Scott D. Ladd
approval to send the letter. Councilmember Hansen seconded
the motion. During discussion of the motion, Mr. Hornimann
responded to questions regarding the process of updating the
Comprehensive Plan and what would be expected from Village
Councilmembers. Mr. Hornimann presented a schedule of
meetings and explained that the workshops would proceed
while waiting for approval of the extension, which was
expected to be granted, and which would provide a total of
18 months to complete the update. Mr. Ladd explained that
this would allow time to spread the cost and to iet the
Village Councilmembers examine and make in-depth changes if
desired. Councilmember Capretta questioned which elements
were only housekeeping and which would need further review,
. and discussed the need to examine attitudes which had
existed at the time the plan was formulated versus the
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 3
------------------
attitudes regarding issues today. An example used by
Councilmember Capretta was a proposed plan for an office
complex. at the corner of Tequesta Drive and Old Dixie
Highway by Gary Van Brock, which was contrary to the
original residential land planning concept envisioned by the
Village Council for that area. Mr. Hornimann reported that
he, Mr. Ladd, and Mr. Peduto had reviewed the plan elements
and identified current issues which they felt the Village
Council would like to discuss, and invited the
Councilmembers to bring up any new issues which they wished
to discuss which were not already in the plan. Mr.
Hornimann explained that the plan for tonight's meeting was
to review the outline for update of the plan, to tell the
Councilmembers what each element consisted of, and to gain
input from the Councilmembers as tp their current thinking
on each element. Mr. Horniman Commented that the failure of
• the annexation attempt put a whole different focus on the
Village regarding how they could grow in the future, and how
they could pay for growth. Councilmember Hansen commented
that all fourteen issues presented deserved attention from
the Village Council.
Village Manager Bradford explained that the Village Council
would need to spend time on the future land use element, on
the traffic circulation element because of Country Club
Drive, on the sanitary sewer element because of the ENCON
issue, on the potable water element because of reverse
osmosis and anticipated independence from Jupiter in
approximately nine years, and on the drainage element
because of the new Stormwater Utility. The housing element,
solid waste element, the conservation, recreation open
space, and intergovernmental coordination elements would be
more or less housekeeping matters, with a footnote on
intergovernmental coordination regarding mediation. The
natural groundwater aquifer recharge could be housekeeping,
however, septic tanks and their beneficial aspects for
recharge should be touched upon. Village Manager Bradford
commented that citizen participation, an item not on the
list, should be discussed at tonight's meeting so that if
• visioning was to be a part of this process, it would need to
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 4
be added to the schedule of hearings. Pillage Manager
Bradford read aloud a response to the Village's request for
ideas for a vision of the future from residents Gene and
Evelyn Smith, 364 Tequesta Drive, which has been attached to
and made a part of these minutes. The vote on the motion
was:
Ron T. Mackail - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Carl C. Hansen - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted.
Councilmember Hanson expressed his opinion that residents
• should participate in a visioning process.
Mayor Mackail questioned whether requirements for updating
the Comprehensive Plan would be relaxed for small
municipalities since funding had been cut off, to which Mr.
Hornimann responded that during the coming year a push would
be made to have legislation adopted to address that matter.
Mr. Hornimann spoke about how important the develapment of
the Village Center plan was in light of the failure of
annexation since the growth potential for the Village was
now the development of the downtown area, and a plan was
needed to obtain the highest and best use from that land.
During discussion of the downtown area, Mr. Hornimann
stressed the need for thinking to remain flexible to
accommodate new ideas, and commented that a public building
would generate traffic which could have a beneficial spinoff
effect on some of the commercial activities. Creating
another linkage to Bridge Road in order to revitalize the
area was discussed by Mr. Hornimann, possibly by extending
a main street from Village Boulevard to Tequesta Drive on
through the Felhaber property to Bridge Road; and correcting
drainage problems could also contribute. Councilmember
Capretta commented that the conclusion had been reached that
• residential development was mare desirable than commercial
development since there were already so many commercial
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 199?
Page 5
------------------
concerns which generated traffic in the Village. A problem
existed in that the land was too valuable for residential
development and no one could afford to build residential
units on such valuable land. Councilmember Capretta
commented that ACLF's were only built on cheap land,
therefore, one would never be built in the downtown area.
Councilmember Capretta commented that the only reason Mr.
DiVosta had built the Tequesta Oaks development with 158
residential units was because he got the land at a bargain
price after it had been foreclosed by a bank, which allowed
him to build units on lots that only cost him $8,000 each.
Councilmember Capretta speculated that Sterling House would
be able to get land for another ECF behind their present
location since there was no practical use for that parcel.
Councilmember Capretta stated that a Comprehensive Plan
could not work if it were not economically feasible. Mr.
Capretta commented that the Village had wanted residential
development to increase the tax base and to supply customers
for businesses; and that the value of whatever was built on
the Dorner property, the most valuable five acres in the
Village, must be worth $100,000,000 in order to increase
the tax base sufficiently, Mr. Capretta commented that it
was ridiculous to force residential development on the
Dorner property. Mr. Hornimann questioned whether the
scenarios described could be accomplished through the mixed-
use provisions adopted by the Village. Mr. Ladd verified
that the mixed-use zoning would accommodate a variety of
uses such as a six-story office building, a civic center,
retail specialty shops, etc. Mr. Capretta commented that
the tax base of the Village could not be increased
sufficiently with one-story residential units, but must be
done with buildings of more than one story. Village Manager
Bradford commented that people must be in residence in order
to justify building something such as a six-story office
building.
Mayor Mackail commented that the Village must take a pro-
active approach or lose out because Abacoa would be built
within the next few years, and Tequesta must create an
attraction before that happened so that people would want to
come . Mayor Mackail commented that the Village had been
• working for a year with Lighthouse Gallery, which brought in
40,000 people a year to the community and which was
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 6
------------------
requesting Village leadership and direction to help them in
obtaining a new 40,000 square foot facility. The Mayor
explained that Camelot, Coastal Players, and Lighthouse
Gallery all needed and wanted a home in Tequesta and that
other towns could entice them away from the Village if
Tequesta did not act to help them; and commented that a lot
of money was available in grants from the State for cultural
endeavors.
Mr. Hornimann commented that the Village had done some
unique things by establishing the Village Center plan, which
had been developed to encompass a mix of residential and
commercial, giving that area an advantage of being vested
under the County's traffic performance standards; and had
established a drainage district to help with future
financial burdens. Mr. Hornimann expressed his opinion that
Tequesta could do something similar to the Thursday night
activities on Clematis Street which had created a thriving
area. Vice Mayor Schauer commented that the tone should be
set for what was wanted for the downtown area. The Vice
Mayor expressed the opinion that if the Village lost
Lighthouse Gallery that Tequesta would be in trouble because
the gallery was a unique feature of the Village.
Councilmember Hansen commented that cultural organizations
should be helped since they were a draw for the businesses;
and that a shared vision should be developed to see what
residents wanted. Mayor Mackail commented that the Village
was out of space and that there was no question that new
facilities must be developed either now or in the future,
which could be done in conjunction with needed cultural
facilities. The Mayor commented on the loss of BRITT
because the Village did not act, and expressed the opinion
that future annexation would occur as people realized the
advantages of services offered by the Village over County
services.
Mr. Hornimann explained that in the future land use plan a
direction was needed; that a policy statement should be made
that the Village still wanted to pursue annexation if that
was their desire; and that development of an attitude was
needed which could be accomplished by stating that the
• Village was willing to enter into public/private
partnerships if that was truly the case. Such statements
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 7
------------------
would make clear to the residents the direction and attitude
of the Village. Mayor Mackail expressed agreement, and
cited examples of accomplishments by other towns in similar
situations. In response to an inquiry by the Vice Mayor,
Village Manager Bradford discussed a remark made by County
Commissioner Karen Marcus offering to help by providing
grant money, and explained that in order to obtain the
grants a specified number of new jobs must be provided
according to the dollar amount of a project, which was not
the intent of the Village's concept of a cultural center,
and therefore was not applicable. Mayor Mackail commented
this Village Council was very committed, as evidenced by the
upcoming fundraiser for the Police and Fire Departments
under the supervision of the Vice Mayor. Councilmember
Capretta commented that the proposed strip of specialty
shops proposed by Mr. Van Brock would mean the end of the
Felhaber shopping center, and that in considering any new
• development the impact on existing facilities must be taken
into account. Village Manager Bradford commented that there
had been lack of planning and foresight by past Village
Councils; however, the Village had been fortunate that
enough good things had happened to offset that, which was no
longer the case; and it was the responsibility of the
Village Council to make long-range plans for the future of
the Village if they believed in planning. Mayor Mackail
expressed his opinion that Mr. Van Brock would only talk
about development and never really do it.
Mayor Mackail questioned whether the Village Council had
provided enough information for Mr. Hornimann to create a
model, to which Mr. Hornimann responded that a policy
statement was needed to establish an attitude since the
Village wanted to be partners in development which could be
controlled through regulatory processes. Village Manager
Bradford suggested that the area for future redevelopment be
pinpointed as the Felhaber parcel and all parcels along
Bridge Road. Mayor Mackail commented that the Village
Council had helped induce development and redevelopment by
expediting the site plan review process and waiving some
impact fees, and might provide further inducement by letting
it be known that the Village desired to participate in
development. Village Manager Bradford commented that the
Village was willing to spend a combination of their own
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 8
------------------
money and to secure grant funds to totally revamp the
appearance of Bridge Road in the public rights-of-way,
including but not limited to on-street parking, landscaping,
sidewalks, curbs and gutters, streetlights, benches,
plantings, etc., including the expenditure of public money
to have a positive effect on the infrastructure (storm
drainage system) on Bridge Road, since there was no existing
drainage system at that location.
Mayor Mackail commented that in order to become the catalyst
and help Lighthouse Gallery that the Village must own the
land and have a use for that land in order to obtain
cultural grants, and that Lighthouse Gallery considered the
Felhaber parcel as the gateway to Tequesta. Mayor Mackail
reported that Mr. DiVosta was very enthusiastic about a
proposed cultural center and had offered to have his
architects work on the project.
• The following policy statement was suggested by Village
Manager Bradford to establish direction: The Village is
willing to explore the expenditure of public dollars to
secure property for cultural facilities within the central
business of Tequesta. Village Manager Bradford explained
that would mean the Village was willing to participate if
the proper return on their investment could be realized.
Mayor Mackail stressed the importance of knowing when that
return would be realized and expressed his opinion that the
three local cultural organizations needed the leadership to
obtain cultural grants which could be provided by the
Village. The Mayor stated that exploration of obtaining
grants should be pursued to the end, and if it were learned
that grant money could not be obtained to have cultural
facilities in Tequesta then another concept would have to be
formulated. The Village Council agreed that the Village
would put their own resources into securing grants to
accomplish the items under discussion. Councilmember Hansen
commented that Abacoa would create a need for new housing
and increase Tequesta real estate values in the next 3-4
years, and this was an excellent time to do the planning for
what would be provided in the new downtown.
• Mr. Hornimann summarized the discussions as a desire by the
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 9
------------------
Village Council to put forth a public/private partnership in
visioning, willingness to consider different alternatives,
streamlining processes as inducements, establishing a
cultural/civic focal point, working with individual
landowners; and continuing interest in annexation. Mr.
Hornimann commented that based on those points, he would
formulate statements for the future land use policy.
Village Manager Bradford questioned the outline provided and
the order of items to be addressed in future meetings, and
suggested that the traffic circulation element be discussed
at one of the last meetings after the current negotiation
process was finished.
During ensuing discussion, Councilmember Capretta suggested
that Mr. DiVosta, Mr. Felhaber, and Mr. Van Brock be invited
to attend a meeting to tell them Village plans and gain
their input. Councilmember Capretta suggested a 3-point
plan which asked whether Lighthouse Gallery was capable of
and willing to hold fundraisers to raise $2,000,000; whether
the Village Manager was willing to work on getting grants;
and whether the Village was willing to condemn the Felhaber
building. Village Manager Bradford suggested attracting a
movie theater to Tequesta. The Village Manager commented
that school sites must be included in the future land use
plan, to which Mr. Hornimann responded that the Florida
legislature planned to address that further, and whatever
must be done in regard to the plan would be done.
Mr. Hornimann discussed new rules for affordable housing
needs assessment, including using certain terminology for
low income, middle income, etc., and reported that Mr.
Peduto had put together a community block grant funds
application and had qualified using the proper terminology.
Discussion was held regarding what would be discussed at the
next meeting. Councilmember Hansen suggested that the
consultants let Village Manager Bradford know the agenda
items ahead of time so that he could notify the
Councilmembers so that they would have sufficient time to
research the items to be discussed. It was pointed out that
discussion of sewers should be held to the end of these
• workshops because of pending lawsuits. Mr. Ladd suggested
that the policies formulated based on input from tonight's
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 10
------------------
meeting be a part of the next meeting.
Mr. Hornimann discussed the traffic circulation element,
which he explained must be totally rewritten to address such
new requirements as mass transit. Level of service
standards for all utility elements would have to be
reconsidered to be sure they were still adequate based on
capacities. Village Manager Bradford requested that when
the Stormwater Utility system was addressed that a
consistent level of service standard be adopted. Mayor
Mackail expressed concern that the MPDES mandate for future
funding could be exorbitant, and that this should be
mentioned, possibly in the drainage element. Mr. Hornimann
explained that there were new requirements for coastal high
hazard areas which would need to be addressed, however, the
requirements might be changed again. Recreation open space
was discussed. Village Manager Bradford commented that one
• of the issues in the lawsuit between Donald Trump and the
Town of Palm Beach was that the town discriminates against
his club because they count in their recreation and open
space element the amount of space that people can
theoretically get from private clubs on the island, and that
Tequesta counted private golf club space in their recreation
and open space element, which might need to be addressed.
It was pointed out that Constitution Park and DiVosta's
Tequesta Oaks were new areas which could be included in
neighborhood parks. Twenty-seven years were remaining on
the Tequesta Park 50-year lease from DEP, major improvements
had been made in 1994, and shared use by Martin County had
been granted by the Village but Martin County had never paid
their fair share. Mr. Hornimann questioned what was going
to be done with the Coast Guard property. Village Manager
Bradford commented that the Village Council had adopted a
resolution stating that cultural and/or recreation could
take place there.
Joe Hall questioned what could be done so that the people
could have access to the Coast Guard property. Village
Manager Bradford responded that the Bureau of Land
Management had adopted a management plan for the property
which included cutting and burning a lot of the pine to
• allow more native plants to thrive and to have passive
nature trails through the property.
. Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 1997
Page 11
Mr. Hornimann explained that the Capital Improvements
element and the Intergovernmental Coordination element would
be the last discussed since they would include funding and
costs implications and governmental lease arrangements,
etc., from all other elements. Mr. Hornimann suggested that
at the next meeting proposals be presented to the Village
Council for items discussed tonight regarding future land
use and that recreation open space be discussed, as well as
other elements to be decided upon. Village Manager Bradford
requested that Mr. Ladd and Mr. Peduto plan now for
management of the document itself and use the scanner to
download the existing plan.
V. ANY OTHER MATTERS
There were no other matters to be addressed by the Local
• Planning Agency.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Hansen made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
The motion was seconded by Mayor Mackail after passing the
gavel. The vote on the motion was:
Ron T. Mackail - for
Elizabeth A. Schauer - for
Joseph N. Capretta - for
Carl C. Hansen - for
The motion was therefore passed and adopted and the meeting
was adjourned at 8:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ `~~~
Betty our
Recording Secretary
• Village Local Planning Agency Workshop
Meeting Minutes
January 23, 199'
Page ~ 12
ATTEST:
Jo nn Manganie to
Village Clerk
DATE APPROVED:
~ 3 ig97
•
.,
•
C
^^
TEQUESTA - A VISION FOR THE FUTURE
'(7Ur ";~!!11~'1-'nf,. [;:ougnCS. Ord ,aea5 on yCUr ~~1~!5ivri `Or L~'~ F,JLUr~ V'
T:~;~u'r,ta" ar~;rno~r~~efGOt~~°d 2ndappreGiated. 1I17I97
Dear Pillage Council;
We have lived here for 27 yrs. this coming 3une 6th
do are very proud of our neighborhood. We would like to
see the speed limit enforced more do the repair of the
Gallery Square South's entrance's ~ driveways repaired.
They are an eye sore to our beautiflal street. Also xe ____
would like to see the litter law enforced.
A walking trail behind our Tequesta Dr.pgrk for the young
8c old . to enjoy exercising. iie are proud of our policemen.
our firemen do our city workers.The should be commended
for the fine work they are doing.
Cn a more serious note~We wish that people walking their
dogs would tarty a poopy bag as ire do to pick up their
leavings from the sidexalk & other peoples yards.
There should be a fine for this matter do enforced.
Jean de Evelyn Smitha-364 Tequesta '~~age of Tequesta
Please ~nsil or delive o:
Viliage Council ,lAN 2 2 1997
Yillege of Tequeste Adn~inist five Offiees
357 Tequesto Driy Village 1~•ianaher~s Office
Tegaesta, Florid' 33469