HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Special Master_02/25/2016 MINUTES
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
SPECIAL MAGISTRATL � FEBRUARY 25, 2016
CODE ENFORCEMENT
HEARING
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The hearing was called to order at 10:00 a.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Special Magistrate Kevin Wagner. Present were: Special Magistrate Kevin Wagner,
Code Enforcement Officer Joe Petrick, Village Attorney Keith Davis and Village Attorney
Jack Rice.
The following cases were heard by the Special Magistrate.
FINE ASSESSMENT HEARING
1. Case Number: 2015-00146
Dean Koravos
86 Fairview East
Tequesta, FL 33469
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-5240
Legal Description: TEQUESTA LTS 524 & 525
Chapter 14 Article VI Section: 14-152; Building Permits
Findings of fact were the Respondent was the owner of the above-described property.
The Respondent was not present at the hearing; however, there was a finding of proper
notice. In the "Order Finding Violation," dated February 10, 2016, the Special Magistrate
ordered the Respondent to comply with Section 14-152 of the Code of Ordinances of
the Village of Tequesta by February 24, 2016. As of February 25, 2016, the property
was still in violation of Sections 14-152, 78-612, 22-53, and 30-33 of the Code of
Ordinances of the Village of Tequesta. Based upon the evidence, pi�tures and
testimony presented at the hearing on February 25, 2016, the Special Magistrate found
that the property remained in violation of Section 14-152, Village Code of Ordinances. ,
Conclusions of law were that the above stated facts constituted a continuing violation of
Section 14-152 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Tequesta.
It was the Order of the Special Magistrate that a Fine of one hundred fifty dollars was
hereby assessed, at a rate of one hundred fifty dollars per day, for the violations
which had existed on the property beginning February 24, 2016 through February 25,
2016, a period of one day; and the fine amount shall continue to accrue at a rate of one
hundred fifty dollars per day until compliance is achieved.
Minutes — Special Magistrate 2/25/16
Page 2
The Respondent also was assessed one hundred eighty,six dollars and ninety-eight
cents for administrative costs incurred by the Village prior to February 25, 2016.
A cert�ed copy of this Order may be recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida, and, once recorded, shall constitute a lien against the property upon
which the violation exits and upon any other real or personal property owned by the
Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
VIOLATION HEARINGS
NOTE: The agenda did not include Case No. 2015-198; had the wrong address and
PCN for 2015-197 (the address and PCN listed was actually for the 2015-198 case, not
the 197 case).
2. Case Number: 2015-00197
Bozzuto Capitol Management Inc.
19600 US HWY 1
Tequesta, FL 33469
PCN: 60-43-40-30-02-004-0010
Legal Description: JUPITER HEIGHTS LTS 1 TO 4 INC &
ABND 40 FT S TRIP LYG & ADJ THERETO BLK 4
Patm Beach County DRC Certification 96-122
This Stipulated Order Finding Violation befinreen the Village of Tequesta (the Village)
and Bozzuto Capital Management, Inc. (Respondent) resolves the code enforcement
case ident�ed above in a fair and amicable manner. The Village and Respondent agree
and stipulate to the following:
1. In 2012, the above addressed property was voluntarily annexed into the Village
of Tequesta. Prior to said annexation, the above addressed property had
received certain development approvals from Palm Beach County. Said
development approvals remain appticable and enforceable by the Village of
Tequesta following said voluntary annexation.
2. On February 25, 2016, the Village of Tequesta Code Enforcement Special
Magistrate held a hearing regarding alleged violations of the above referenced
development approvals. Respondent was present and represented by legal
counsel. There was a finding of proper notice. The site plan documents and
county approvals were accepted into evidence by the special magistrate, made
part of the record for this matter, and are contained in the evidentiary case file for
this matter.
3. Based on the foregoing approvals, as well a site visit that occurred prior to the
February 25, 2016 hearing, Respondent has stipulated to �he existence of the
following violations and correction action:
Minutes — Special Magistrate 2/25/16
Page 3
A. Existing e�ltration trench needs to be properly maintained in accordance
with county standards from 1997 approval throughout all parking lot
improvements.
B. Parking lot striping must be installed, including ADA space, per the site plan.
This will also require permits and building official sign-off.
C. Landscaping must be installed and maintained in accordance with the site
plan, which specifies 4 interior trees, 12 interior shrubs, 19 perimeter trees
and 200 perimeter shrubs. 50% of these to be Florida native species.
D. Although the surFace condition of the parking area in general was not
specified as a violation in this case, Respondent may (but is not required, as
a condition for compliance) re-surface same prior to re-striping.
E. Respondent may (but is not required, as a condition for compliance),
modify/enhance the required perimeter landscaping in order to even further
screen from view the parking area from surrounding properties with Village
approval.
F. All vehicle parking must be contained to striped spaces. Parking outside of
striped spaces is prohibited at all times. Respondent stipulates to past
parking violations on the following dates, as depicted in the evidentiary case
file for this matter: November 26, 27 and 30; December 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 15, 16
and 27; January 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 31; February 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 10, 12, and 15. �
G. Respondent shall immediately cease and desist parking any vehicles in any
location on the above addressed property except in striped spaces. Further
Respondent shall have 120 days from February 25, 2016 to bring the other
above referenced matters into compliance.
4. The parties presented additional evidence and argument to the Special
Magistrate on the issue of rental trucks being permitted to be parked on this
property. Based on the evidence, testimony and argument presented, the
special magistrate finds no violation exists from the parking of rental trucks in
properly striped and designated spaces in the parking lot on the above
addressed property.
5. The Village is entitled to recover its administrative costs incurred from the
bringing of this matter to hearing. The amount of administrative costs to be
assessed shall be heard by the Special Magistrate at a future hearing as set forth
below.
6. The matter of fine assessment for the above referenced parking violations, as
welt as any future non-compliance with this Stipulated Order Finding Violation
shall be heard by the Special Magistrate at a future hearing as set forth below.
7. This matter is hereby set for a Fine Assessment Hearing/Status Hearing on June
23, 2016 at 10:00 am, at the Village of Tequesta Council Chambers, 345
Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469.
8. Upon complying in any code compliance matter, it is always the
responsibility of the Respondent to contact the Code Compliance Division
at (561) 768-0506 to request a re-inspection of the property.
�Vlinutes — Special Magistrate 2/25/16
Page 4
The following case was added to the agenda for action:
Case Number: 2015-00198
Linda Bozzuto 8� Agnes Longnecker
19578 US HWY 1
Tequesta, FL 33469
PC N : 60-43-40-30-02-004-0090
Legal Description: JUPITER HEIGHTS LTS 9 TO 12 INC &
ABND 40 FT S TRIP LYG & ADJ THERETO BLK 4
Palm Beach County DRC Certification 96-122
This Stipulated Order Finding Violation between the Village of Tequesta (the Village)
and Linda Bozzuto 8� Agnes Longenecker (Respondents) resolves the code
enforcement case identified above in a fair and amicable manner. The Village and
Respondents agree and stipulate to the following:
1. In 2012, the above addressed property was voluntarily annexed into the Village of
Tequesta. Prior to said annexation, the above addressed property had received
certain development approvals from Palm Beach County. Said development
approvals remain applicable and enforceable by the Village of Tequesta following
said voluntary annexation.
2. On February 25, 2016, the Village of Tequesta Code Enforcement Special
Magistrate held a hearing regarding alleged violations of the above referenced
development approvals. Respondents were present and represented by legal
counsel. There was a finding of proper notice. The site plan documents and county
approvals were accepted into evidence by the special magistrate, made part of the
record for this matter, and are contained in the evidentiary case file for this matter.
3. Based on the foregoing approvals, as well a site visit that occurred prior to the
February 25, 2016 hearing, Respondents have stipulated to the existence of the
following violations and correction action:
A. Landscaping with canopy trees 10' to 12' in overall height, plus 30� to 36"
hedge shall be installed and maintained as required by the site plan (this is
primarily on the east and north sides of the property).
B. Vehicle washing is permitted (no other maintenance activity is permitted) but
shafl be limited to the vehicle bay in the rear of the building.
C. Although the surface condition of the parking area in general was not
specified as a violation in this case, Respondents may (but are not required,
Minutes — Special Magistrate 2/25/16
Page 5
as a condition for compliance) re-surface same prior to re-striping. Re-
striping of approved parking spaces is required as a condition of compliance.
D. Respondents may (but are not required, as a condition for compliance),
modify/enhance the required perimeter landscaping in order to even further
screen from view the parking area from surrounding properties with Village
approval.
E. All vehicle parking must be contained to striped spaces. Parking outside of
striped spaces is prohibited at all times. Vehicles may also be parked in the
designated vehicle washing area while being washed. Respondents stipulate
to past parking violations on the following dates, as depicted in the evidentiary
case file for this matter: November 26, 27 and 30; December 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 15,
16 and 27; January 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 31; February 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 10, 12, and 15.
F. Respondents shall immediately cease and desist parking any vehicles in any
location on the above addressed property except in striped spaces. Vehicles
may also be parked in the designated vehicle washing area while being
washed. Further Respondents shall have 120 days from February 25, 2016
to bring the other above referenced matters into compliance.
4. The Village is entitled to recover its administrative costs incurred from the
bringing of this matter to hearing. The amount of administrative costs to be
assessed shall be heard by the Special Magistrate at a future hearing as set forth
below.
5. The matter of fine assessment for the above referenced parking violations, as
well as any future non-compliance with this Stipulated Order Finding Violation
shall be heard by the Special Magistrate at a future hearing as set forth below.
6. This matter is hereby set for a Fine Assessment Hearing/Status Hearing on June
23, 2016 at 10:00 am, at the �Ilage of Tequesta Council Chambers, 345
Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida 33469.
FINE REDUCTION HEARINGS
3. Case Number: 2015-00003
ALS North America Inc.
Brookdale Tequesta
205-211 Village Blvd
Tequesta, FL 33469
PCN: 60-43-40-30-46-001-0000
Legal Description: ALS PLATOF VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA PT
OF TR A LYG E OF 8� ADJ TO PAR 2, TRS B THRU J& NOT
LABLED AREAS A/K/A PAR 1
Chapter 14 Article VI Sec. 14-152; Building Permits
Chapter 78 Article IX Sec. 78-612; Other Uses
Chapter 22 Article II Sec. 22-53; Powers and Duties
Minutes — Speciai Magistrate 2/25/16
Page 6
Chapter 30 Article II Sec. 30-33; Prohibited Conditions
Findings of fact were based upon the December 14, 2015 "Order Assessing Fine" for
the above-referenced case number, the Special Magistrate assessed a fine of
$1,500.00, which continued to accrue at a rate of $100 per day until compliance was
achieved, and administrative costs of $218.88. Respondent achieved compliance on
February 5, 2016. The total fine for the period of noncompliance was $7,900.00. The
Respondent's Representative requested a hearing in writing to seek a reduction of the
lien amount assessed. At the hearing on February 25, 2016, the Respondent's
Representative, Nicole Plunkett of Cotleur & Hearing, and the Village proposed an
Agreed Order Reducing fine (in writing), which was attached to and memorialized by
this order. Respondent and the Village agreed to reduce the fine of $7,900.00 to
$1,500.00 and costs of $218.88 from the December hearing, which shall be paid by
March 17, 2016 or the fine shall revert back to the original amount of $7,900.00.
Conclusions of law were that the penalty amount previously imposed be reduced from
$7,900.00 to $1,500.00 and costs of $218.88. The Respondent was hereby ordered to
pay this mfigated fine amount by March 17, 2016 or the fine would automatically revert
to the original amount.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Special Magistrate Wagner approved the minutes of the January 28, 2016 hearing.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further cases, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Lori McWilliams, MMC
Village Clerk
ATT€ST:
�
C Enf rcement Officer
APPROVED:
Minutes — Special Magistrate?J25�j 6
Page 7 •�, ..,===,
• , . � � . ;� �..._ -
, ;-- � �C� (�
Special Ma � Date Approved
v
�.- � �