HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 09_01/11/2018 ORDINANCE NO. 1-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF
TEQUESTA, FLORIDA, AMENDING ITS COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ADOPT EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REVIEW ("EAR") BASED AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION
163.3191, FLORIDA STATUTES, WHICH PROVIDES FOR AN
EVALUATION AND FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS DETERMINED TO BE
NECESSARY; WHICH INCLUDES REVISED TEXT AND MAPS
NECESSARY TO UPDATE THE DATA AND ANALYSIS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PROVIDING THAT THE
TEXT AND MAPS, AS AMENDED OR REVISED, SHALL BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR AND REPLACE IN FULL THE EXISTING TEXT
AND MAPS IN ALL AMENDED ELEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR
TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY;
PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE AND FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature of the State of Florida has mandated that all
municipalities evaluate their comprehensive plan at least once every seven (7) years; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Tequesta has completed its required evaluation, and has
determined that amendments are required in order to reflect changes in state requirements and to
provide thorough and consistent planning with regard to land within its corporate limits; and
WHEREAS, all amendments to the comprehensive development plan must be adopted in
accordance with detailed procedures which must be strictly followed; and
WHEREAS,the Village of Tequesta, Florida, has carefully prepared an amendment to its
comprehensive development plan to update it pursuant to Sec.163.3191,Florida Statutes, in order
to provide text and map amendments or revisions in conformance with the Evaluation and
Appraisal Review; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Tequesta has held all duly required public hearings; both prior
to submission of the proposed amendment of the plan to the Department of Economic Opportunity
and after the proposed amendment of the plan was returned to the Village of Tequesta, in
accordance with Chapter 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes; and
1
WHEREAS, the Village Council desires to adopt the amendment to the current
comprehensive development plan to guide and control the future development of the Village, and
to preserve, promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA,AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by
adopting this amendment to its current Comprehensive Plan; which amendment is attached hereto
as Exhibit"A"and made a part hereof and of the current Comprehensive Plan. This amendment
specifically provides comprehensive amendments to all elements of the Comprehensive Plan in
conformance with the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Review described therein which affects
the pagination of certain elements; all as specifically set forth on Exhibit"A". The text and maps
adopted in Exhibit"A"shall be substituted for and replace in total the previously adopted text and
maps in the amended elements.
Section 2: A copy of the comprehensive development plan, as amended, shall be kept
on file in the office of the Village Clerk.
Section 3: The Village Manager is hereby directed to transmit three (3) copies of the
amendments to the current comprehensive development plan to the State Land Planning Agency,
along with a copy to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and to any other unit of local
government who has filed a written request for a copy,within ten(10)working days after adoption,
in accordance with Section 163.3184(4),Florida Statutes.
Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict be and the same are hereby
repealed.
Section 5: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof,
any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 6: The effective date of this plan amendment shall be the date a final order is
issued by the Department of Economic Opportunity or Administration Commission finding the
2
amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(4)(e)5., Florida Statutes,
whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent
on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of
noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission,this amendment may nevertheless be
made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status,a copy of which resolution
shall be sent to the Department of Economic Opportunity, Division of Community Planning, Plan
Processing Team.
3
x`
. j' '•. or t�Y
VILLA
TEQU
y ,MIT
r
4!?
4 � ..1
2017updateR E H E N S I
�'
sr�. •
- VE-1.110.+.
PLANr >
THE VILLAGE OF
f rt t v i L L AG G O
O
w
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
2017
update
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives, &
Policies
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acronvms......................................................................................................iv - vi
Comprehensive Plan Elements
FutureLand Use...........................................................................................1 -11
Transportation...........................................................................................13-19
Housing......................................................................................................... 21-24
Utilities
SanitarySewer..........................................................................................25 - 27
SolidWaste...............................................................................................28 - 29
PotableWater..........................................................................................30 - 35
Stormwater Management......................................................................36 - 38
Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge..............................................39
Conservation...............................................................................................41 -
Recreation & Open Space..........................................................................57 - 60
Intergovernmental Coordination..............................................................61 - 65
Coastal Management................................................................................67 - 77
Capital Improvement................................................................................79 - 88
Map Series
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I iii
ACRONYMS
AAA
Adaptation Action Areas
ACS
American Community Survey
AMI
Area Median Income
BEBR
Bureau of Economic and Business Research
BFE
Base Flood Elevation
CCCL
Coastal Construction Control Line
CHHA
Coastal High Hazard Area
CIS
Capital Improvement Schedule
CPA
Community Planning Act
CRS
Community Rating System
DCA
Department of Community Affairs
DEO
Department of Economic Opportunity
EAR
Evaluation and Appraisal Review
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
FAC
Florida Administrative Code
FAR
Floor Area Ratio
FAU
Florida Atlantic University
FBC
Florida Building Code
FCO
Florida Coastal Office
FDEP
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FDOT
FL Department of Transportation
FEC
Florida East Coast Railroad
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
FS
Florida Statutes
FWC
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission
FWS
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
iv I VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
GHG
Greenhouse Gas
GPCD
Gallons per capita per day
HUD
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
ICWW
Intracoastal Waterway
IPARC
Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee
IRL
Indian River Lagoon
IRLAP
Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve
ISWMP
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan
LDR
Land Development Regulations
LECWSP
Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan
LEED
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LMS
Local Mitigation Strategy
LRECD
Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District
LRTP
Long range Transportation Plan
MGD
Millions of Gallons per Day
MPO
Metropolitan Planning Organization
MSL
Mean Sea Level
NFIP
National Flood Insurance Program
NMFS
National Marine Fisheries Service
NOAA
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association
NPDES
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
ONA
Outstanding Natural Area
PBC
Palm Beach County
PBCSWA
Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority
SFWMD
South Florida Water Management District
TCRPC
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
TSM
Transportation System Management
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I v
UPWP Unified Planning Work Program (MPO)
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
vi I VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
T-E -LAG! Cr
n
PREHENSIVE
fait V 40--:
P L A N
POLICY DOCUMENT
f.
Goals, Objectives,
& Policies
r �
a �• . V
it
01
t. r ,
ke,
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Provide for the development and redevelopment of suitable and
compatible land uses which will preserve, enhance, and promote
strong sense of community efe within the established character of
the Village of Tequesta, which will encourage sustainability and
protect its natural resources.
Objective: 1. 1. 0 Coordinate all future land use decisions with the appropriate
topography and soil conditions, the availability of facilities and services
and land use designations as per the Future Land Use Map.
Policy: 1.1.1 Continue to maintain regulations (subdivisions, zoning, signage etc.)
which guide future land use configurations so as to preserve topog-
raphy and soils; require facilities and services; and, protect against
seasonal and periodic flooding.
Policy: 1.1.2 The Village's Land Development Regulations shall conform to, and
implement, the use, density and intensity standards as outlined on
Table FLU-1 below:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11
Table FLU-1. Future Land Use Districts, Density and Intensity Standards
Residential units
Residential units
5.4 units per acre
12 units per acre
Activities related to the sale, lease or
distribution of products and/or the Floor Area Ratio of 2.0
provision of services
Active or passive recreational uses Floor Area Ratio of .10
Land and structures owned, leased or
operated by a government entity, Floor Area Ratio of 2.0
and/or privately owned but used for a
public purpose
Public or private facilities or
institutions such as churches, schools, Floor Area Ratio of 2.0
fraternal organizations, and nursing
homes
Land used for the conservation and Floor Area Ratio of. 10
preservation of natural resources
18 dwelling units per acre, 18
dwelling units per acre in an
Adult Congregate Living
A mix of: single and multi -family
Facility. Maximum Floor
residential uses; small scale retail
Area Ratio of 4.2 for non -
sales and services, business services
residential uses and mixed
and professional services primarily
use buildings. Residential
designed to serve residential
uses shall comprise no less
neighborhoods, and; recreation and
than 20 percent and no more
open space
than 80 percent of a mixed -
use district. 8 Units per acre
for Rehabilitation Facility
a'
(Ord. 2-14)
2 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.1.3 Coordinate and support Palm Beach County and Martin County in the
protection of potable water well fields, and in the implementation of
applicable well field protection programs.
Objective: 1.2.0 Continue to monitor conditions in the Village in order to identify &n4
redevelopment and infill areas.
Policy: 1.2.1 There are no residential blighted areas within the Village of Tequesta.
However, the Village will, wherever and whenever appropriate,
cooperate with other local governments in these efforts to redevelop
and renew such areas in their respective jurisdictions.
Policy: 1.2.2 Encourage redevelopment of commercial plazas to support economic
development efforts and sustainable planning practices.
Policy: 1.2.3 Support mixed use designations on main corridors to promote a
vibrant economy and walkability.
Objective:1.3.0 Prohibit land uses which are inconsistent with the community's
character and future land uses.
Policy: 1.3.1 Through the implementation of planned unit development, mixed -use
and other innovative regulations, encourage the development of
housing types within a physical setting that permit both comfortable
and creative living, while affording both privacy and sociability.
Policy:1.3.2 Maintain the quality of existing single family neighborhoods by
prohibiting commercial and high density residential development in
these areas.
Policy:1.3.3 Support consistent quality of design and protect existing
neighborhood integrity, character and environmental resources.
Policy: 1.3.3_4 WiataiR Continue to monitor aesthetic and architectural initiatives
eithrough ' the
e the Planning and Zoning Board and ether applicable local
regulations.
Policy:1.3.4.5 Implement height limitations in accordance with the Land
Development Regulations.
Policy:1.33.6 Maintain residential densities in accordance with the standards
prescribed in Table FLU-1 and the Land Development Regulations.
Policy:1.3-6.7 Require adequate parking, suitably arranged and attractively
landscaped, in all developments.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
Policy: 1.34.8 Commercial developments shall be developed in a manner that will
compatibly serve the community's needs by restricting their location
to those areas indicated on the Future Land Use Map.
Policy: 1.3-4.9 Strive for compatible developments and redevelopments that will
benefit the Village and compliment the aesthetic character of the
community.
Policy:1.3-4.10 Require signs that are visually attractive and low-key through
implementation of Village sign regulations.
Policy:1.34-9.11 Require parking areas that are generously landscaped and
appropriately lighted by implementing provisions within the Zoning
Ordinance.
Policy: 1.344.12 Respect the privacy associated with the existing open space.
Policy: 1.344.13 As part of the Site Plan Review process, compatibility with adjacent
land uses shall be demonstrated. Compatibility is defined as
consistency with the Future Land Use Map and compliance with
Village land development regulations.
Objective: 1.4.0 Ensure the protection of natural resources and historic resources.
Policy: 1.4.1 Utilize orientations to water, to the fullest extent.
Policy: 1.4.2 By 201-9 the Village will, where applicable,- Identify, designate, and
protect historic, archeological and cultural resources that may be
located within its boundaries by conducting a survey to identify such
resources, if any, and adopting appropriate protection mechanisms
into the Code of Ordinances.
Policy: 1.4.3 Implement an ordinance requiring a land development permit prior to
commencement of development activities to protect natural
resources.
Policy: 1.4.4 The trimming or removal of mangroves should be consistent with
Sections 403.9321-403.9333 of the Florida Statutes and subject to
approval of the Village.
Policy: 1.4.5 The Village shall continue to support the U.S. Department of Interior,
Bureau of Land Management/ Palm Beach County Environmental
Resource Management Department Land Stewardship Memorandum
of Understanding to provide for joint management of the Jupiter Inlet
Natural Area. The Village shall support preservation of native plant
and animal species on Eco-Site #61, a 52 acre parcel located east of
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
US-1 and north of County Road 707 (Beach Road), as a component of
this effort.
Policy: 1.4.6 The Village will protect mangroves within Tequesta by deferring the
regulation of mangroves in proposed development and redevelop-
ment areas to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for
enforcement and protection under Sections 403.9321-403.9333 of the
Florida Statutes. This shall be made a part of the Village Site Plan
Review Process.
Policy: 1.4.7 The Village shall protect potable water wellfields by allowing only the
land uses encompassed within the wellfield drawdown zones of
influence shown on the Future Land Use map.
Objective: 1.5.0 Require, through the land development review process that suitable
land is made available for infrastructure facilities necessary to support
all proposed development and which are consistent with locally
adopted level of service standards.
Policy: 1.5.1 Implement standards for future land use development in accordance
with the density, intensity and use standards outlined in Table FLU-1
of this Element.
Policy:1.5.2 The Village shall ensure that public facilities and services meet
adopted levels of service, and are provided concurrent with
development impacts.
Policy: 1.5.3 The Village shall continue to condition the issuance of permits on the
availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed
development.
Policy: 1.5.4 The approval and authorization of land use development within the
Village shall be concurrent with the provision of utility service.
Policy: 1.5.5 Apply the standards and requirements of the adopted hurricane
evacuation and civil defense regulations where applicable.
Policy: 1.5.6 Provide for drainage and storm water management, open space, and
safe and convenient parking and on site traffic flow by applying the
site plan review requirements of the current land development
regulations within the Village.
Policy: 1.5.7 Ensure that adjacent land uses are protected by strictly enforcing
setback, height, landscaping and signage provisions within the Village
land development regulations.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15
Policy: 1.5.8 D SigRat Village sW4 peFSOR to The Building Official is designated
as the Floodplain Administrator for the Village of Tequesta. The
Floodplain Administrator shall coordinate the impacts of all new
development and redevelopment within the coastal zone against
existing hurricane evacuation plans.
Policy: 1.5.9 Electric substations shall be permitted in all Future Land Use Districts
except Conservation.
Policy:1.5.10 The Village shall implement land development regulations to
accommodate and protect existing and future energy efficient electric
power generation and transmission systems, including right-of-way
protection, allowing substations and transmission lines in Future Land
Use and zoning districts, and other mechanisms. The Village prefers
and shall encourage the provision of underground utility lines where
feasible.
Policy: 1.5.11 The Village of Tequesta, through the Land Development Regulations,
will coordinate current land uses and any future land use changes with
the availability of water supplies and water supply facilities.
Objective: 1.6.0 Coordinate with any appropriate resource planning and management
plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and
approved by the Governor and Cabinet.
Policy: 1.6.1 The Village will coordinate its future planning and development with
the South Florida Water Management District by requiring the
issuance of a Surface Water Management permit, as appropriate,
prior to issuing a site plan approval.
Objective: 1.7.0 Development within Flood Insurance Rate Map zones shall be subject
to restrictions implemented through the Village of Tequesta's Flood
Damage Prevention Ordinance, flood resistant construction reauire-
ments of the Florida Building Code, land development regulations and
other provisions of the Code of Ordinances.
Policy: 1.7.1 The Village should keep abreast of federal requirements to assure
resident's eligibility for flood insurance in the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA's) National Flood Insurance Program
NFIP .
Policy: 1.7.2 The Village Floodplain Administrator
pFeeess shall review all development applications and plans in flood
hazard areas to comply with the requirements of the Village of
Tequesta's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and the flood
resistant construction requirements of the Florida Building Code
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.7.3 The Village shall continue to operate within FEMA's NFIP a^^'�,-the CR-S
pfegfaFnsT Community Rating System (CRS) and continue to work
toward maintaining and improving its CRS status WithmA
PF9gfa+As.
Policy: 1.7.4 A minimum finish first floor elevation above mean sea level (MSL) for
all new construction, additions and substantial sea level, or 18 inches
above the crown of any road, street, cul-de-sac or highway, or meet
the requirements of the Code of Ordinances pertaining to flood hazard
areas, whichever is most stringent. (Ord. 22-11)
Objective: 1.8.0 All proposed new development and redevelopment within the special
flood hazard areas shall be subject to site plan review. Delineation of
flood hazard areas, floodway boundaries and flood zones, and design
flood elevations, shall be shown on preliminary and final plats.
Policy: 1.8.1 The Village should Floodplain Administrator shall examine the latest
land use control criteria relating to flood zone development for
inclusion in site plan review process to ensure such development
proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage and
be reasonably safe from flooding.
Policy: 1.8.2 The Village should to discourage high intensity land uses and public
facilities in the Flood Insurance Rate Map zones and the Coastal High
Hazard Area.
Objective: 1.9.0 The Village shall continue to enforce sheuid fieilew regulations found
in the Florida Building Code a4stiny building &e4e- requiring new
construction, additions, renovations, and substantial renovations or
substantial repairs in the Flood Insurance Rate Map zones and Coastal
High Hazard Area to utilize the latest wind damage and flood
prevention techniques.
Policy: 1.9.1 The Village shall continue to maintain should make provisions for the
utilization of these latest techniques and building standards through
the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances of the Village of Teguesta
for all development located in the Flood Insurance (Rate Map zones
and Coastal High Hazard Area.
Objective: 1.10.0 Encourage local residents within the hurricane flood areas to utilize
and participate in the NFIP. develeped by the
Policy: 1.10.1 All structures in the Flood Insurance Rate Map zone and Coastal High ,f
Hazard Area should be protected by the NFIP flood insurance, where
possible.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
Policy: 1.10.2 The Village shall continue to support the requirements of the
NFIP for community participation .
Objective: 1.11.0 Implement innovative development and redevelopment concepts such
as Planned Unit Development, overlay zoning, transit oriented
development, and mixed use development through the land
development regulations and other appropriate mechanisms in order
to reduce automobile dependency and greenhouse gas emissions,
increase energy efficiency, reduce sprawl, and promote more efficient
development patterns.
Policy:1.11.1 The Village shall continue to support beautification efforts and
streetscape improvements on commercial corridors by promoting
pedestrian and bicycle friendly design.
Policy: 1.11.2 The Village shall promote mixed use development, defined as a
mixture of residential and non-residential land uses in a design -
unified, pedestrian friendly environment with multi -modal transporta-
tion connectivity to other areas, at appropriate locations. A major
purpose of mixed -use development shall be to provide opportunities
to live, work, shop and recreate in a walkable area, and to reduce
automobile dependence and greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy:1.11.3 The Village shall encourage the implementation of low impact
development techniques and green building standards that reduce the
negative environmental impacts of development and redevelopment
by: locating building sites away from environmentally sensitive areas;
promoting the preservation of natural resources; providing for on -site
mitigation of impacts (i.e. retention and treatment of stormwater
runoff, water reuse, Master Stormwater Management Systems);
promoting energy conservation through design, landscaping and
building techniques (i.e. solar power, increased tree canopies);
promoting water conservation through landscaping and building
design; ensuring environmentally friendly building practices (i.e. use
of environmentally friendly building materials, recycled materials),
and; considering the development of a Green Building Ordinance and
a related I rmRP Green Certification programs for development and
redevelopment, including the development of a Neighborhood
Development Rating System that integrates the principles of smart
growth, urbanism and green building.
neighb9Fhe9d design.
Objective 1.12.0 Special land use policies shall be developed by the Village of Tequesta
„- when necessary to address site specific land development issues.
Policy: 1.12.1 Areas designated Mixed Use shall provide for single and multi -family
residential uses; small scale retail sales and services, business services
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
and professional services primarily designed to serve residential
neighborhoods, and; recreation and open space.
Policy: 1.12.2 The Village should pursue all avenues for grants and other assistance
in developing its future areas, especially for those planning areas with
special needs and concerns.
Policy 1.12.3 Public Educational Facilities of the School District shall be an allowable
use within the "Other Public Facilities" land use category on the Future
Land Use Map. Moved here from Page 10 below.
Objective 1.13.0 The Village shall continue to review hurricane evacuation and
emergency management plans to ensure that they adequately address
its evacuation and emergency management needs, and are
compatible with coastal planning area population densities and
regional emergency management.
Policy: 1.13.1 The hurricane evacuation plan for the Village shall consider the
densities and intensities prescribed on the Future Land Use Map.
Objective: 1.14.0 The Village, as appropriate and feasible, shall encourage the elimina-
tion or reduction of uses that are not consistent with interagency
hazard mitigation reports or hazard mitigation goals.
Objective: 1.15.0 The Village should consider annexation of neighboring areas that are
consistent with the character of the community, which can be provided
facilities and services consistent with the levels of service standards
established by the Village, and which discourage urban sprawl.
Policy: 1.15.1 The annexation of future areas into the Village shall discourage the
proliferation of urban sprawl consistent with standards contained
within Chapter 9J-5.006 (5), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
Policy:1.15.2 Annexation of unincorporated enclave areas shall be pursued
consistent with Florida Statutes ensuring the provision of Village
services.
Policy 1.15.3 In the event of a future annexation that has sufficient land area to site
schools or co -locate schools with public facilities such as; parks,
libraries and community centers, prior to the amendment to incorpo-
rate the area into the Village Comprehensive Plan, the Village shall
coordinate with the Palm Beach County School Board to determine
the need to site a school in the annexed area. Moved here from Page
10 below.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Objective:1.16.0 The Village shall protect and support its urban forestry to care and
manage its tree population for the purpose of maintaining and
enhancing the urban environment and the character of the Village.
Policy: 1.16.1 The Village shall consider its street trees as infrastructure to preserve
and protect them as communitv assets.
Policy:1.16.2 The Village shall protect existing trees by creating mitigation
provisions in its land development regulations for its residential and
commercial land use districts.
Policy: 1.16.3 The Village shall encourage additional planting of trees to strengthen
the character and aesthetic of its residential neighborhoods and
commercial areas.
Policy:1.16.4 All development and major renovations shall be encouraged to
provide shade trees along sidewalks to promote pedestrian activity,
and create scenic corridors in neighborhoods and commercial
rlittrictt
Policy:1.16.5 The Village shall consider providing incentives to developers to
preserve trees and natural resources and to encourage additional tree
plantings and green areas.
Policy: 1.16.6 The Village shall continue to promote and enhance the Village's Tree
and Landscape Ordinance as a key element in retention and provision
of private plant materials to support sustainable development
principles of tree preservation, and minimize impacts to the existing
site resources.
The following two policies were relocated to the FLUE policies shown below:
rr.� anr�ersins�r�R���:�•r�:Trxsrxs�asi��.��nwe�:+n
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
No Text
''• _ Tat WLL r
L
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives,
& Policies
7
TRANS,PORTATI
ELEMENT
t•`
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Provide a sustainable, safe, convenient, accessible and efficient multi -
modal transportation system (a system that provides for pedestrian-
ism, bicycles, automobiles, watercraft, and transit) for the citizens of
Tequesta.
Objective: 1.1.0 Continue to provide an energy efficient multi -modal transportation
system that is efficiently managed, circulates traffic safely and
conveniently within the Village, reduces greenhouse gas emissions
through strategies to reduce the number of vehicle miles travelled, and
provides for the safe separation of vehicular and nonvehicular traffic.
Policy:1.1.1 Provide safe and convenient on -site traffic flow through the
implementation of the parking regulations in the land development
regulations.
Policy: 1.1.2 Construct or encourage the provision of multi -modal transportation
facilities as feasible and appropriate in the implementation of
transportation improvements, and require sidewalks in areas of new
development.
Policy: 1.1.3 Promote traffic safety through the use of proper traffic control devices
and street design improvements.
Policy:1.1.4 Restrict fast through traffic to major or minor arterial roads.
Policy:1.1.5 The Village shall ensure the provision of multi -modal transportation
alternatives by requiring that facilities for bicycles and pedestrians are
provided for in future development and redevelopment proposals, and
incorporating these requirements into the site plan review process.
Policy: 1.1.6 The Village shall coordinate with the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) in the implementation of strategies to reduce per
capita Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and discourage single occupant
vehicle trips, recognizing that these programs assist in reducing
emissions, traffic congestion, and the consumption of fuel.
This can be accomplished through municipal representation on the
MPO and providing for Tri-Rail, alternative fuels, ride sharing,
alternative work hour programs, public transit, parking management
and other transportation control measures that are being continually
developed as part of a Countywide effort.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 113
Policy:1.1.7 The Village shall consider intermodal terminals and access to
intermodal facilities, where applicable, in its assessment of future
transportation needs.
Policy: 1.1.8 Support Transportation Systems Management (TSM) strategies that
include optimization of traffic signal systems, turning lanes, ride sharing
and other innovative transportation system management activities
that are implemented by the appropriate agencies within Palm Beach
County.
Policy: 1.1.9 The Village shall seek to limit greenhouse gas emissions through the
implementation of strategies to reduce the number of vehicle miles
travelled. These strategies may include but not be the promotion of
mixed use development that provides for a mixture of residential and
non-residential land uses in a pedestrian friendly environment with
multi -modal transportation connectivity to other areas; promoting the
use of alternate transportation modes as specified herein, including
mass transit, bicycles, and pedestrianism, and; requiring
Transportation Demand Management Programs as a condition for
development approvals.
Objective:1.2.0 The transportation system shall be consistent with the future land uses
shown on the Future Land Use Map, population and densities,
employment patterns, and the transportation modes and services
provided for in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements.
Policy: 1.2.1 Control the connections and access points of driveways and private
roads to roadways by requiring visibility triangles that are free and clear
of obstruction.
Policy:1.2.2 The Village shall construct road and street improvements and/or
expansions which are consistent with the 5-year Schedule of
Improvements, and require developers to develop other roads
required to serve their development.
Policy: 1.2.3 Use signage, enforcement and other traffic control techniques to
minimize the impact of "bypass" traffic on Village streets.
Policy: 1.2.4 Continue to use the development plan review process to control
roadway access points and on -site traffic flow; amend the Village's
code provisions where necessary.
Policy:1.2.5 Encourage future land uses which promote public transportation in
public transportation corridors.
Policy:1.2.6 Require land use, building and site design guidelines to provide for
accessibility to public transit, where appropriate.
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Objective: 1.3.0 Village shall coordinate its plans and programs with the plans and
programs of.•
a. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT),
b. The Palm Beach Eby
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO),
c. The Palm Beach County Engineering Department (Traffic
Engineering Division),
d. The Martin County MPO and
Engineering Department, and
e. Adjacent municipalities.
Policies: 1.3.1 The Village hereby adopts the following Level of Service (LOS)
standards for each listed facility type:
Village Collector Roadways — LOS Standard C, Peak D, except for
Country Club Drive, and Seabrook Road which will be LOS Standard C,
Peak C; Urban Minor Arterials Geller— LOS Standard C, Peak D;
Urban Principal Arterials — LOS Standard C, Peak D.
Policy: 1.3.2 The Village shall review updates to Palm Beach GewRty MPO's Long
Range Transportation Plan LRTP Unified Planning Work Way Program
UPWP and other transportation plans as appropriate, and amend its
Comprehensive Plan as needed to address these plans.
Policy: 1.3.3 The Village shall continue to identify projects to support and fund
mobility, enhance alternate modes of transportation, and ensure
connectivity in its Capital Improvements Schedule, in accordance with
State requirements. These projects shall include Village -funded
projects and projects funded by other agencies that will demonstrably
impact its roadway Level of Service standards.
Objective: 1.4.0 Provide for the protection of existing and future rights -of -way from
building encroachment.
Policy: 1.4.1 Establish and maintain measures for the reservation and preservation
of existing and future rights -of -way and corridors by requiring such
reservations and/or preservation in the site plan review process and by
abiding by the Palm Beach County Right -of -Way Protection plan.
Objective: 1.5.0 Encourage the use and provision of mass transit facilities in Palm Beach
County by supporting efforts established in the Transportation Element
of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, and by implementing
the following Policies.
Policy: 1.5.1 The Village shall continue to work with the County and support toe
' MPO} efforts to increase the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 115
presence and use of mass transit services in the County through
modification of the existing route system, increasing services in key
areas and other strategies as appropriate.
Policy: 1.5.2 The Village shall support
{MPO}efforts to investigate the use of transit services to promote more
efficient urban development patterns.
Policy: 1.5.3 The Village shall not object to the County's effort to encourage the
future location of Palm Tran bus routes with new developments.
Policy: 1.5.4 The Village shall not object to t4e MPO's efforts to encourage the use
of rail modes of transportation, as Tequesta could be favorably
impacted by these efforts.
Policy: 1.5.5 The Village shall support efforts of FDOT, to the extent possible, in the
development and implementation of the South Florida East Coast
Corridor Study.
Policy: 1.5.6 The Village impacts regarding All Aboard Florida /
Brightline high speed rail service railroad initiative to assure the well-
being of the community.
Objective: 1.6.0 Encourage Palm Beach County Palm Tran to provide public paratransit
transportation services to eligible persons who qualify under the
"Americans with Disabilities Act" (ADA).
Policy: 1.6.1 The Village shall support efforts of Palm Tran to maintain an adequate
fleet of sedans, vans, and mini -buses for individuals who qualify for
ADA paratransit.
Policy: 1.6.2 The Village shall support efforts of Palm Tran to maintain services for
eligible riders with disabilities by providing paratransit services.
Objective: 1. 7. 0 Support the MP04s coordinating responsibilities regarding
transportation services for the transportation disadvantaged t
Policy: 1.7.1 Support the MPO MetFepelitaR WaRRiRg QFgaRizatien in its efforts to
make services available for individuals qualifying under Chapter 427- e#
tie, Florida Statutes, by managing and monitoring a system of
transportation operators and by coordinating provider organizations.
Policy: 1.7.2 Support the MPO in its efforts to
maximize the use of public school transportation and public fixed route
or fixed schedule transit service for the transportation of the
transportation disadvantaged.
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.7.3 Encourage the County, through the MPO, to coordinate with the School
Board in the utilization of the School Board's vehicles for the transport
of the transportation disadvantaged, when those vehicles are not
transporting students (per Chapter 427, Florida Statutes).
Objective: 1.8.0 The Village shall promote the increased use of the bicycles and walking
as viable alternate means of transportation through implementation of
the Policies below.
Policy:1.8.1 Bikeways shall be given full consideration in the planning and
development of Village roadways and transportation facilities and
programs, and in the Site Plan Review Process.
Policy:1.8.2 The Village shall provide for and encourage the development of
pedestrian scaled mixed use, multi -use, and planned unit
developments that incorporate and integrate transit stops, bicycle and
sidewalk connections.
Policy: 1.8.3 The Village shall require all new mixed -use, commercial and residential
developments or redevelopment projects to address connectivity to
adjacent uses.
Policy: 1.8.4 The Village shall review the recommendations of the Palm Beach
GewAty's MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan LRTP the Unified
Planning Work Wae Program (UPWP), and other transportation plans
regarding bicycle and pedestrian facilities, shall assist in the
implementation of key recommendations as feasible and appropriate.
Policy: 1.8.5 The Village shall work toward increased mobility in the community by
providing for increased amounts of bicycle paths and sidewalks in new
development and re -development areas.
Policy: 1.8.6 The Village shall work toward increased Mobility in the Community by
providing for increased amounts of bicycle paths and sidewalks in new
development and re -development areas.
Objective: 1.9.0 The Village shall coordinate its transportation plans and programs with
its land use plans and the relevant transportation and land use of other
agencies on a continuing basis.
Policy:1.9.1 The Village shall continue to participate in and utilize
intergovernmental programs, such as the Countywide Intergovern-
mental Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) and the Multi -
Jurisdictional Issues Forum, to implement the Goal, Objectives, and
Policies of the Village's Transportation Element.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 117
Policy: 1.9.2 To ensure the availability of adequate transportation facilities, the
Village's transportation system shall be coordinated with adjacent local
governments' comprehensive plans to reflect the demand created by
anticipated development.
Policy:1.9.3 The Village shall continue to work with Palm Beach and Martin
Counties, the Town of Jupiter, and the Town of Jupiter Inlet Colony in
order to coordinate transportation related issues, such as: (1) the
locations and dimensions of thoroughfare rights -of -way; (2) strategies
to address multi -jurisdictional traffic impacts to assure maintenance of
acceptable Level of Service standards on the transportation network;
(3) the future transit needs and delivery services, and; (4) the provision
and operation of non -vehicular modes as they relate to intercounty
travel.
Policy: 1.9.4 The Village shall continue to coordinate with FDOT, MPO, DZ-A,, DEO,
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Governor's Commission
for a Sustainable South Florida, and other municipalities to promote
sustainable transportation principles within Palm Beach County.
Policy: 1.9.5 Encourage connectivity of roadways and cross connection of property
with similar or compatible land uses in the Villaee to reduce congestion
on arterial and collector roads, including bicycle and pedestrian
connections, and utilize traffic calming techniques to minimize the
traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods.
Obiective: 1.10.0 The Village shall promote "Complete Streets" network to increase
mobility and accommodate all users, including motorized vehicles,
bicyclists, public transportation, and pedestrians of all ages and
abilities.
Policy: 1.10.1 The Village shall review all proposed street modifications to ensure that
the proposals are consistent with and support the Village's Transpor-
tation Vision of providing for Complete Streets.
Policy: 1.10.2 The Village shall support the implementation of the US Hwy 1 Corridor
Plan in coordination with FDOT and the Palm Beach MPO.
Policy: 1.10.3 The Village shall continue to beautify the pedestrian and bicycle paths
by promoting scenic corridors in neighborhoods and commercial
districts.
Policy: 1.10.4 The Village shall prepare a pedestrian path and sidewalk network
master plan to provide for a safe and comfortable environment for its
different users_
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.10.5 The Village shall prepare a bikeway network master plan in
coordination with the Southeast Greenways and Trails Plan.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 119
TN! VILLAGE O/
COMPREHENSIVE
r
PLAN
'ter=
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives/
r & Policies
_ `t s
1
s-
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 To assure the availability of sustainable, decent, safe, sanitary, and
affordable housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents.
Objective: 1.1.0 To c^ —ve maintain existing standard condition housing, prevent
substandard housing conditions, and assure that new residential
construction is of the same high quality as the existing housing stock by
strictly enforcing adopted building, construction and housing codes.
Policy: 1.1.1 Continue enforcement of the Florida Building Code and International
Property Maintenance Code, and adopt updated additions thereof as
they become available, in order to: (1) assure new building materials
and techniques are allowed within the Village in order to reduce
construction costs; and (2) maintain existing housing stock.
Policy: 1.1.2 Continue to develop, implement, and enforce other ordinances and
programs (e.g., landscaping code) to assure that the quality of
residential neighborhoods is maintained and improved as needed.
Policy:1.1.3 Continue to develop and enforce administrative and enforcement
procedures, as necessary, to implement minimum housing regulations
through code enforcement, in accordance with the following
definitions:
Standard Condition — A residential structure meeting all minimum
standards for basic equipment and facilities, as set forth in the
International Property Maintenance Code.
Substandard Condition — A residential structure which does not
meet all minimum standards for basic equipment and facilities, as
set forth in the International Property Maintenance Code, where
the costs of rehabilitation, renovation or code compliance are
valued at less than 50% of the total value of the structure.
In Need of Replacement — A residential structure which does not
meet all minimum standards for basic equipment and facilities, as
set forth in the International Property Maintenance Code, where
the costs of rehabilitation, renovation or code compliance are
valued at greater than 50% of the total value of the structure.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
Policy:1.1.4 Encourage housing construction that is compatible with existing
dwellings located within the Village and adjacent unincorporated areas,
by strictly enforcing the Village land development regulations.
Policy:1.1.5 Require land developers to comply with review and approval
procedures and regulations C ^•d iR_;#e %•^*h the DIaRAiRg and ZeRiRg
AdyiseFy 13eaFd during the design and construction of residential
developments by strictly enforcing provisions to assure that housing
characteristics of the Village are maintained.
Policy:1.1.6 The Village should encourage neighborhood improvement and
beautification programs to improve the condition of houses and quality
of neighborhood life.
Objective: 1.2.0 To provide for adequate and affordable housing to all existing and
projected segments of the Village population.
Policy: 1.2.1 Support,otieTpolicies and initiatives which will facilitate affordable
and workforce housing alternatives.
Policy: 1.2.2 Encourage programs to alleviate housing problems in Palm Beach
County, including continued interlocal participation in federal, State
and local housing programs, and associated ,r, initiatives.
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village shall encourage the provision of a diversity of housing units
and types that are affordable to residents of all income and special
needs groups at levels that are reflective of existing and projected
demand.
Policy: 1.2.4 The Village shall continue supporting housing for the elderly reataf
uRits by ^ FA44i g deyelepmeRt 9f iRdepe.,deRt suppeFtiye allowing
congregate living facilities within the Mixed -Use areas at up to a
maximum of 18 dwelling units per acre, ^• 18 ' welliRg W RitS ^
., Ad-ult C=9Rg Fegat^ 1 i g Cart Ct., (QFd 2014)
Policy:1.2.5 The Village shall enable the elderly to remain in their own
neighborhoods as their needs change by considering the use of
accessory dwelling units associated with a principal dwelling unit,
smaller homes. shared housine and co-housine for the elderlv.
Policy: 1.2.6 The Village shall coordinate its strategies and policies with the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) to provide affordable and
workforce housing.
22 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.2.7 The Village shall consider allowing auxiliary dwelling units associated
with a principal dwelling unit to increase the supply of affordable and
workforce housing in new residential developments and
redevelopment areas, where appropriate.
Objective: 1.3.0 To require residential design that implements the objectives and
policies of other Comprehensive Development Plan elements and
supports green design.
Policy: 1.3.1 Continue to phase residential development with the availability of
urban services and infrastructure in accordance with the Concurrency
Management System.
Policy: 1.3.2 Continue to institute policies which minimize adverse environmental
effects of residential development. Utilize those management
practices which will alleviate residential water pollution problems.
Special attention should be given to the environmentally sensitive
areas abutting the Loxahatchee River, Intracoastal Waterway and the
Atlantic Ocean.
Policy: 1.3.3 Minimize traffic on local residential streets by instituting site plan
controls which will limit traffic generated by the commercial areas from
directly accessing local residential streets.
Policy: 1.3.4 Maintain the current character of the Country Club area by continuing
to designate the golf course as a recreational use on the Future Land
Use Map.
Policy: 1.3.5 Require housing in newly annexed undeveloped areas to be consistent
with the existing character of housing within the Village by assigning
compatible zoning districts.
Policy:1.3.6 Encourage new residential development and redevelopment to
incorporate energy saving design and construction features, such as
adequate insulation, solar power, less heat -absorbent roofing
materials, and increased tree canopies, into design, construction and
site development plans.
Policy: 1.3.7 Encourage the use of renewable building materials in the construction
of new or redevelopment of existing housing.
Policy:1.3.8 The Village shall consider the development of a Green Building
Ordinance and a related I PPD Green Certification Program for
development and redevelopment, including the development of a
Neighborhood Development Rating System that integrates the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 123
principles of smart growth, urbanism and green building into a national
system for neighborhood design.
Objective: 1.4.0 Continue to rely upon the private sector to provide the limited "in fill"
housing that the Village can accommodate while providing incentives
such as zoning code amendments and mixed -use regulations to
promote the provision of housing that is affordable to residents of all
income and special needs groups at levels that are reflective of existing
and projected demand.
Policy: 1.4.1 Utilize the Future Land Use Element and zoning map to assure a
diversity of housing.
Policy: 1.4.2 Group homes shall be accommodated in accordance with State law.
Group homes of three unrelated individuals six units or less are
allowable in all residential and mixed -use zoning districts. Group
homes of more than six-P;s three unrelated individuals may be
permitted as a Special Exception Use in residential and mixed -use
zoning districts.
Policy: 1.4.3 By =2 2019 the Village will consider the need to designate any
housing structures as historically significant and in need of special
consideration by conducting a survey to identify such resources, if any,
and adopting appropriate protection mechanisms into the Code of
Ordinances.
Policy: 1.4.4 Require that reasonably located, standard housing, at affordable cost,
is available to persons displaced through any public action prior to their
displacement.
24 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
?ft9 VILLACt OF
.. COMPREHENSIVE
�. PLAN
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives,
Policies
UTI LIT
ELEMI
FPPWW--
�m
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UTILITIES ELEMENT, SANITARY SEWER SUBELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Ensure the provision of sustainable and quality wastewater collection
and treatment systems.
Objective: 1.1.0 Support the development of, wastewater collection and treatment
systems that are sustainable and cost-effective, consistent with the
plans of the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District (LRECD),
and sea level rise considerations, and discourage the provision or
extension of service in a manner that encourages urban sprawl.
Policy: 1.1.1 The use of septic tanks in areas where sanitary sewer systems are not
available shall be governed by Palm Beach County Environmental
Control Rule I, Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, and
c-Chapter 31-13, Florida Administrative Code and ChapteF 17PIGFi a
^dmunw4r rive Gede. Further, the Village shall require that all new
development and existing uses connect to and utilize the central
system in areas where sanitary sewer systems are available.
Policy: 1.1.2 The Village should consult with the Loxahatchee River Environmental
Control District LRECD the Village's service provider, in determining
the most effective and efficient wastewater systems for use in
Tequesta.
Policy: 1.1.3 The Village should continue to request that Loxahatchee River Distriet
LRECD submit comments on proposed projects/developments
regarding wastewater system requirements prior to, or as a part of, the
site plan review process.
Policy: 1.1.4 The Village should request Loxahatchee Ri.,e. Dist." -+ LRECD's
approval, or approval with conditions, of proposed projects/
developments prior to the issuance of building permits.
Policy: 1.1.5 The Village should request that Loxahatchee o;.,,,. Pistrica LRECD
submit evidence of acceptance of the wastewater system to serve
proposed projects/developments and evidence that contractual
obligations placed on the developer regarding the wastewater system
are being met prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
Policy: 1.1.6 The use of existing properly constructed and functioning septic tank
systems within the Village is acceptable only in areas where sanitary
sewer facilities are not available; however, when analysis indicates that
septic tank systems are adversely impacting the environment according
to State Water Quality Standards for surface water, groundwater and
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 125
- j
sP's.
bathing places and that public health standards are endangered, septic
tank systems causing the situation will be repaired or replaced.
Policy: 1.1.7 When a central sanitary sewer system becomes available to areas
currently on septic tanks, hook-up to the central system shall be
required consistent with State requirements.
Policy: 1.1.8 The Village shall consider supporting an evaluation of sanitary sewer
facilities and infrastructure at risk from sea level rise within the LRECD's
wastewater master plan.
Objective: 1.2.0 Annually participate in the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control
District's facilities planning effort and consider promotipq the resiliency
of existing and planned sanitary sewer infrastructure or retrofits from
the impacts of sea level rise.
Policy: 1.2.1 Annually, at the time of the Village budget process, request a written
assessment by LRECD of wastewater facilities serving Tequesta,
including a statement of deficiencies and required improvements, costs
of improvements and a schedule for implementation.
Policy: 1.2.2 The Village should encourage and support local membership on the
LRECD board by concerned and qualified residents of Tequesta and/or
the District.
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village shall consider encouraging LRECD to identify sanitary sewer
facilities and collection and disposal infrastructure at risk from sea level
rise and other related impacts and update this assessment every 5
years.
Policy:1.2.4 The Village shall
support LRECD design
for additional
capacity in
accordance with
Section 62- 600.405,
FAC; and the
impacts of
increased coastal flooding, considering
sea level rise,
saltwater
intrusion, and
other potential future
impacts, and
plan for
infrastructure replacement
and relocation as needed.
Policy: 1.2.5 The Village shall consider encouraging LRECD retrofit of existing and
construction of new sanitary sewer facilities and collection systems in
coastal areas that are identified to be potentially impacted by sea level
rise by 2040.
Objective: 1.3.0
'1
Policies: 1.3.1
Coordinate with developers to ensure that wastewater collection and
treatment needs are met in the planning and phasing of development.
The Village, in coordination with LRECD and to the extent appropriate
and feasible, shall incorporate into local plans, codes and ordinances
various land use and wastewater systems design and construction
26 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
criteria that will minimize point and non -point discharges into surface
waters in accordance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit NPDES .
Policy: 1.3.2 The Village should encourage preliminary meetings with developers
prior to the initial stages of site plan preparation and review to alert
developers to the requirements and standards set forth in local codes
and ordinances relating to wastewater systems.
Policy: 1.3.3 LRECD shall be included in the pre -application meeting to make
appropriate comment on specific wastewater systems needs and
requirements.
Policy: 1.3.4 The Village Level of Service Standards for central wastewater service is
108 gallons per capita per day.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 127
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UTILITIES ELEMENT, SOLID WASTE SUBELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Ensure the provision of sustainable, adequate and efficient solid
waste services and facilities meeting the needs of the population and
providing for their health, safety and general welfare.
Objective: 1.1.0 Ensure the provision of a responsive and cost effective solid waste
system.
Policy: 1.1.1 The Village should maintain a close liaison with its contracted private
hauler in order to ensure the provision of responsive service to
residents and businesses.
Policy: 1.1.2 When in the public interest, institute competitive bidding procedures
in the letting of all new contracts for collection and disposal service to
ensure the lowest possible cost to Tequesta taxpayers relative to the
highest level of service.
Policy: 1.1.3 The following solid waste Levels of Service are established by the
Village:
Residential Collection: Twice per week garbage collection,
Twice per week yard waste collection,
Once per week recyclable collection
Non -Residential Collection: Private contracts
Disposal Capacity: 7.13 lbs. per person per day
Policy: 1.1.4 Hazardous materials management concerns should be addressed by
the Village's Wait Mat HAZMAT Response Group.
Policy: 1.1.5 In accordance with State requirements, the Village shall include Palm
Beach County Solid Waste Authority capital projects that will impact
achievement of its Solid Waste Level of Service Standard in the Capital
Improvement Schedule, as it is annually updated.
Objective: 1.2.0 Maintenance of collection service that best serves the residents and
businesses of Tequesta.
Policy: 1.2.1 In a continued effort to avoid potential sanitation and health hazards
` w created by containers being upset and waste materials subsequently
being scattered about, the Village should continue to enforce
_ regulations which require residents to place solid waste materials at
r curbside at a reasonably determined time prior to collection.
28 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.2.2 As a part of the site plan review process, continue to require new
multiple family living areas to consider utilizing single large containers
for ease and time savings in collecting solid wastes by requiring that the
applicant coordinate with the private hauler to assure containers are
provided that the hauler can service. Evidence must be provided by the
applicant as part of the site plan review process.
Objective: 1.3.0 To continually ensure that a sanitary means of solid waste disposal
exists for Tequesta's use.
Policy: 1.3.1 Maintain a liaison with the Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County
in order to ensure the Village input to the management of existing
landfill sites and the purchase/development of future landfill sites.
Policy:1.3.2 Continue to implement recycling programs in accordance with all
applicable laws.
E-
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 129
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UTILITIES ELEMENT, POTABLE WATER SUBELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 To provide a sustainable, safe and sufficient potable water supply and
distribution network.
Objective: 1.1.0 Maintain water supply and distribution systems which utilize water
resources in a safe, economical manner.
Policy: 1.1.1 The Village water systems should be managed and operated consistent
with local plans, as well as any regional or area -wide plans affecting the
Village water systems, including the Lower East Coast Water Supply
Plan.
Policy: 1.1.2 The Village should investigate alternative sources/water systems and
methods of treatment for providing and upgrading water supplies, in
accordance with the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan and its Water
Supply Work Plan.
Policy: 1.1.3 Land use plans and development regulations should be consistent with
the findings and recommendations of the Lower East Coast Water
Supply Plan.
Policy:1.1.4 The Village should carefully consider all municipal potable water
system expenditures and revenues when determining the cost and
benefit of development proposals. A clear statement of costs and
benefits should be prepared for the Village before any determinations
are made.
Policy: 1.1.5 The Village shall continue to protect existing wellfields, surface or
subsurface storage facilities, control structures, water treatment plants
and transmission infrastructure from increased coastal flooding,
considering sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, and other potential
future impacts, and plan for infrastructure replacement and relocation
as needed to maintain the Village's potable water LOS.
Policy: 1.1.6 The Village shall consider identifying water infrastructure at risk from
sea level rise projections and other related impacts and update this
assessment every 5 years.
Objective: 1.2.0 Environmental impacts of growth in developing areas should not result
in the degradation of water resources and water treatment systems,
and prevent irreversible damage to the ecological balance of
environmental resources.
30 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.2.1 Village land development regulations should provide for the protection
and availability of water resources.
Policy:1.2.2 Future wells should be located where the potential for saltwater
intrusion into the surficial aquifer and existing well fields in periods of
drought is minimized.
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village shall require site plans which incorporate innovative urban,
architectural, and/or engineering design of impervious areas (e.g.
parking lots) to maximize the retention of rainfall in these areas in a
manner that increases groundwater recharge and reduces stormwater
runoff.
Objective: 1.3.0 Continue a program for the conservation of potable water resources
within the Village which includes the utilization of available non -potable
water for purposes other than human consumption when neither the
health of the population nor the environment will be adversely affected.
Policy: 1.3.1 In an effort to conserve the use of water in irrigation, the Village's land
development codes and ordinances should make will continue
supporting provisions for the use of native vegetation using xeriscape
concepts and the Florida Friendly Landscaping provisions.
Policy:1.3.2 The Village shall implement, enforce and cooperate fully with
emergency water conservation measures mandated by the South
Florida Water Management District.
Policy: 1.3.3 The Village shall continue to actively enforce all existing potable water
planning policies, as well as continue to research and develop
additional planning policies for the conservation of potable water
resources within the Village's service area.
Objective: 1.4.0 Establish criteria necessary to maintain adopted Levels of Service
Standards for public water facilities within the Village's designated
service area.
Policy: 1.4.1 The Village drinking water systems should conform to the standards set
forth in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Public Law 93-523.
Policy: 1.4.2 The Village shall continue to: coordinate with Palm Beach County in the
implementation of the Wellfield Protection Ordinance, and; Will
regulate land use activities within the travel time contours of its
wellfields, as they are delineated on the Future Land Use Map. - f
t
Policy: 1.4.3 Expansion to the Village's water supply and distribution systems shall
be constructed to the most current engineering and design standardss .
t � S
7�
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 131
to meet acceptable federal, State, County fire flows and water quality
requirements.
Policy: 1.4.4 The looping of dead-end water mains within the Village's potable water
service area shall be made a priority in planning improvements and new
construction of the Village's potable water distribution system.
Policy:1.4.5 The Village Water Department shall continue testing water and
replacing meters to control system water loss by flow measurement.
This program is designed for improved accuracy of flow measurement
and accountability of water loss.
Policy: 1.4.6 The potable water Level of Service standards set forth in the Capital
Improvements Element are hereby adopted estimating the availability
of facility capacity and demand generated by a proposed development
project for the Village of Tequesta's portion of the overall Village
system:
Maximum Day Water Consumption
• Residential: 180 gallons/capita/day
• Non -Residential: 3030 gallons/acre/day
• Includes irrigation
Policy: 1.4.7 The Village shall continue to review, improve and enhance its Computer
Billing System.
Policy: 1.4.8 The Village shall collect data on an on -going basis to differentiate
between residential and nonresidential uses.
Objective: 1.5.0 The Village shall incorporate and annually update its schedule of public
water facilities capital improvement needs into its Capital
Improvements Schedule. Capital Improvements needs are defined as
(1) those improvements necessary to correct existing deficiencies in
order to maximize the use of existing facilities, or
(2) those improvements necessary to meet projected future needs
without encouraging urban sprawl,
(3) those improvements necessary to achieve or maintain the adopted
Level of Service standards;
3 (4) those improvements necessary to replace worn-out or obsolete
facilities, and, (5) improvements that will otherwise assist in the
L I achievement of Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies.
�J'714r� y f
32 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy:1.5.1 The Village shall maintain a permitting procedure to ensure that
adequate facility capacity exists or will exist concurrently with
development to maintain adopted Level of Service Standards.
Policy: 1.5.2 Extension of service to any area within the Service Area is dependent
upon approval of both the Water Department and the Village Council
based upon:
• Availability of existing capacity as determined by the Water
Department;
• Cost effectiveness of provision of service on a long term basis; and
• The best interest of the Village.
Policy: 1.5.3 The Village shall maintain its on -going monitoring and maintenance
program for the potable water system as administered by the Water
Department.
Policy: 1.5.4 Proposed potable water facility capital improvement projects will be
evaluated and ranked according to the following priority level
guidelines:
Level One— whether the project is needed to (a) protect public health
and safety in order to fulfill the Village's legal commitment
to provide facilities and services; (b) to preserve or achieve
full use or efficiency of existing facilities; or achieve or
maintain the Level of Service Standard.
Level Two— whether the project: (a) prevents or reduces future
improvement costs; or (b) provides services to developed
areas currently lacking full service or promotes in -fill
development.
Level Three —whether the project represents a logical extension of
facilities and services within a designated Village Planning
Area.
Objective: 1.6.0 Seek to achieve an average potable water consumptive use of 175
gallons per capita per day (defined as the total amount of water used
by all consumers in the Village divided by the Village's population)
through the implementation of voluntary programs for existing
development and mandatory programs for new development and
redevelopment.
Policy: 1.6.1 The Village continues to design and implement the following water
conservation education water conservation education programs:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 133
• Increase public awareness by water bill messages, the Village
website, monthly newsletters, education programs at local schools,
meetings with homeowners and associations and other innovative
means.
• Provide literature racks at Village buildings for public information
purposes.
• Provide updates of water conservation goals, the success of on-
going programs, and new water -saving techniques and strategies.
Such updates should be coordinated with changes in season and
recommend appropriate irrigation adjustments.
• The Village Water Utilities Department will have a knowledgeable
employee who will be available for consultations on water
conservation strategies that may be used in site development plans
and in residential and non-residential buildings.
Policy: 1.6.2 The Village shall continue to meet individually with major water users
to identify and agree upon the implementation of specific water
reduction programs and goals which may include:
• The identification and use of alternative (non -potable) water
sources, where available.
• Specific operational changes which will reduce the amount of
water consumed in activities such as dish washing, building
maintenance, and vehicle washing.
• Limiting the number of days, time of day and/or length of time in
which irrigation systems are operated.
• Retrofitting existing systems such as shower heads, sink faucets,
toilets, and wash basins with new water -saving devices.
• Retrofitting existing irrigation systems with water saving devices
such as drip lines, timers, and tensiometers.
In all cases, expenditures made by the water consumer shall be
reasonable in terms of the benefits received as measured by the actual
amount of water saved, the dollar amount saved and the public
recognition received. However, a cost benefit ratio of 1.0 shall not
constitute the sole definition of reasonable. All consumers that are a
part of this program shall receive quarterly updates on their progress
toward the agreed upon goal.
Policy:1.6.3 Implement the following regulations which shall apply to new
development and redevelopment:
1 j • The use of xeriscape and native vegetation on a portion of
" development sites.
'� L ^ `: I • The use of soil tensiometers or similar control mechanisms in all
s irrigation systems.
34 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• The use of in -home water saving plumbing devices such as low
volume showerheads and toilets.
Policy: 1.6.4 As part of the required Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) the
Village shall specifically evaluate the effectiveness of all on -going water
conservation programs, and shall consider additional water
conservation techniques as appropriate and feasible.
Objective: 1.7.0 The Village of Tequesta shall update its 10-year Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan (Work Plan) as required by section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S. within
18 months after the geve;ning beGr-d T*he Seuth Pena 141 *o.
n A...,..gengent Dist-iet (FIoV449) „ e d 46 -1„-W-pr &a# Geigl;t 144gtom
Su P;)P!Gn (L€GWS Wpdete en Septemberl2, _2�313. T�IWIGye pi
pewble w_oter dlenae;,'ls; avGlyatethe SewrGi-25Gn6i &GP^G6i4Brel
,
USiRg Gil 69-94-9ble t-e-oh...,iegies, neeessGFyto n9 „t theyJl..ge4 W Gte
Policy 1.7.1 The Village shall amend its Comprehensive Plan and Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan. as required by section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S. within
18 months after the governing board of the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) approves its Lower East Coast Water
Supply Plan (LECWSP) Update. The last LECWSP update was approved
on September 12, 2013 by the SFWMD's governing board.
Policy 1.7.2 The Village of Teguesta's Work Plan is designed to assess current and
projected potable water demands; evaluate the sources and capacities
of available water supplies; and, identify those water supply projects,
using all available technologies necessary to meet the Village's water
demands for a ten-year period.
Policy: 1.743 Comply with Incorporate by reference the 10 Year Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan adopted by the Village Council by Ordinance 20-14
dated February 12, 2015.
th C,,..,PFehensiye Pl-;;n. EAR -based Amendment
Policy: 1.744 Coordinate appropriate aspects of the Comprehensive Plan with the
South Florida Water Management District's Regional Water Supply Plan
adopted September 12, 2013 and with the Palm Beach County 10-Year
Water Supply Work Plan adopted in 2015. The Village shall amend its
Comprehensive Plan and Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. as required
to provide consistency with the District and County plans.
a` Lj=i y
A69 -
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 135
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UTILITIES ELEMENT, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUBELEMENT
Goal:1.0.0 Economical, sustainable, efficient and effective networks of
stormwater drainage facilities and services.
Objective: 1.1.0 The Village shall incorporate and annually update its five-year schedule
of stormwater drainage capital improvement projects into its Capital
Improvements Schedule. Capital Improvements needs are defined as:
(1) those public drainage improvements necessary to correct existing
deficiencies in order to maximize the use of existing facilities while
maintaining the adopted Level of Service, or (2) those public drainage
improvements necessary to meet projected future needs based upon
the adopted Level of Service without encouraging urban sprawl, and/or;
(3) improvements that will otherwise assist in the achievement of
Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies.
Policy:1.1.1 The Village Stormwater utility shall maintain a 10-year Capital
Improvements schedule for storm water facilities as a guideline for
planning facilities over the long term.
Policy: 1.1.2 Expansion of drainage areas shall be based on ability to serve new
customers in a cost-effective manner without any reduction in the
adopted Level of Service within the drainage area for the present and
future customers.
Policy: 1.1.3 The Village shall implement capital projects to provide stormwater
drainage in accordance with its adopted Level of Service standard, and
shall include these projects in its Capital Improvements Schedule, as it
is annually updated. The Capital Improvements Schedule shall also
include capital projects being implemented and funded by other
agencies, such as the Jupiter Inlet District, to the extent that these
projects impact the Village's ability to achieve its Level of Service
Standard.
Objective:1.2.0 Village stormwater drainage regulations, incorporated within the
appropriate Village land development regulations, shall provide for
protection, and where possible, enhancement of natural drainage
features and ensure that future development utilizes storm water
management systems to protect the functions of recharge areas and
natural drainage features.
1
► Policy: 1.2.1 The Village shall continue to actively enforce its existing landscaping
and open space requirements for new development with emphasis on
preserving native vegetation and the reduction of impervious areas.
36 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy:1.2.2 The Village shall continue its efforts to increase on -site
retention/detention capacity of drainage basins in order to minimize to
the extent possible stormwater runoff to the Loxahatchee River and
Intracoastal Waterway.
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village shall require new developments to limit post -development
runoff rates and volumes to pre -development conditions.
Policy:1.2.4 The Village shall protect and preserve water quality by use of
construction site Best Management Practices (BMP's) and the
incorporation of techniques such as on -site retention and/or detention,
use of pervious surfaces, native vegetation and Xeriscape Landscaping
practices when considering all proposals for development and/or
redevelopment.
Policy: 1.2.5 The Village shall maintain levels of pollutants at all outfalls within its
jurisdiction into the North and Northwest Forks of the Loxahatchee
River as part of its "Wet Weather" Sampling regulations of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permitting
Program.
Policy:1.2.6 The Village shall maintain levels of pollutants at all dry weather
sampling areas (areas with three (3) days of no rain) as part of its "Dry
Weather" Sampling regulations of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Stormwater Permitting Program.
Policy: 1.2.7 The Village shall maintain water quality standards consistent with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program on an
ongoing basis.
Policy: 1.2.8 The Village shall consider evaluating the influences of sea level rise on
the storm water system and consider adopting environmental, and
technically feasible strategies to adapt to sea level impact and optimize
hanafitc
Objective: 1.3.0 The Village shall ensure through the land development approval process
that, at the time a building permit is issued, adequate public drainage
capacity is available or will be available at the time of occupancy.
Policy: 1.3.1 Protection from the degree of flooding that would result from a twenty-
five (25) year frequency, twenty-four (24) hour duration storm event is
hereby adopted as the Village's Level of Service Standard for
stormwater drainage facilities, and shall be used as the basis of
estimating the availability of capacity and demand generated by a
proposed development project.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 137
Policy: 1.3.2 All development and/or redevelopment activities shall be undertaken
in a manner consistent with adopted Level Service standards.
Policy: 1.3.3 All development and/or redevelopment activities associated with on -
site drainage facilities shall be designed and reviewed to maximize non-
structural techniques (i.e. on -site retention and/or detention, use of
pervious surfaces, swale areas, native vegetation and Xeriscape
landscaping) in combination with structural drainage facilities (i.e.
underground drainage facilities) to reduce storm water runoff,
maintain local recharge and protect water quality.
Policy: 1.3.4 The Village shall continue its routine maintenance program through the
inspection of catch basins, culverts, outfalls and retention areas as a
preventative measure against any major system failure, as required by
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Program Stormwater
Permitting Program.
38 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UTILITIES ELEMENT, NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUBELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 The functions of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within
the Village will be protected and maintained.
Objective: 1.1.0 The Village shall develop an active program that provides for the
protection and maintenance of natural groundwater recharge areas,
including natural drainage features, within the Village to ensure or
enhance groundwater recharge to the surficial aquifer.
Policy: 1.1.1 The subdivision regulations shall include standards for inclusion of
recharge areas in open space preservation requirements.
Policy:1.1.2 The stormwater drainage regulations shall require will continue
requiring retention of stormwater runoff to maximize groundwater
recharge potential.
Policy: 1.1.3 The Village shall coordinate the development and implementation of
aquifer recharge area protection programs to meet national, State,
regional and local objectives.
Policy: 1.1.4 Continue to encourage and work closely with the Loxahatchee River
Environmental Control District (LRECD) to facilitate Irrigation Quality
water systems for irrigation usage.
Policy: 1.1.5 The Village shall consider supporting SFWMD efforts to maintain and
expand the regional groundwater monitoring network to assess the
movement of the saltwater front and ensure adequate data for
modeling progression of sea level rise and saltwater intrusion.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 139
.4..
k4w,,
. .
?We VALLa6! O/
COMPREHENSIVE,
PLAN
1AA POLICY DOCUMENT
TO
1 4e'. Goals, Objectives,
"` •- ��r � • _ &Policies
,,.; •'� , ,: ; r. -.•' see'
CON
1 •;�. ;..
ELEMIE'
' t
-1411101p
r r .y
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 .
Sustainable growth and development will be accommodated in the
Village of Teguesta without compromising the biodiversity and
intrinsic value of its natural resources through conservation,
protection, enhancement and management of these resources to
ensure a high quality natural environment.
Objective: 1.1.0 T , n-&2 *Gke . s to he49 ,,ehieye czengplionrce with F-ed ,..,i gir
The Village shall manage growth and development
to ensure that air quality within the Village shall meet or exceed the
minimum air quality standards in compliance with the National
Ambient Air Standards.
Policy: 1.1.1 Continue to landscape public areas and continue to require landscaping
as a part of new private development.
Policv: 1.1.2 The Villaee shall cooperate with Florida Deoartment of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to
in the efforts of these agencies to enforce all standards and regulations
pertaining to the maintenance of air quality standards.
Policy: 1.1.3 Applicable FDEP and EPA permits for required pollution control devices
shall be obtained prior to construction of any project receiving a
building permit.
Policy: 1.1.4 The Village shall require all land areas exposed during construction be
treated with mulch, spray, grass or other appropriate methods to
minimize air pollution.
Policy: 1.1.5 The Village shall reduce the potential for vehicular emissions pollution
by the following means:
(a) Adopt and enforce provisions of the Tree Protection Ordinance to
protect and enhance the tree canopy to filter, collect and absorb
airborne pollutants;
(b) Provide more opportunities for alternative transportation modes
and support Complete Streets principles.
(c) Require the installation of bicycle racks in all new nonresidential
projects requiring, at a minimum, 20 or more parking spaces and
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 141
the construction of pedestrian sidewalks in multi -family and
commercial protects.
(d) Provide where feasible bicycle racks in public parking facilities.
(e) Support the expansion of transit service and promote the
expansion of bicycle lanes, bicycle and pedestrian paths
throughout the Village.
Objective: 1.2.0 Require future development to restrict off -site runoff of stormwater
pollutants in accordance with drainage criteria established by the South
Florida Water Management District and the Urban Best Management
Practices established by area wide plans.
Policy:1.2.1 The Village shall maintain on -site stormwater retention/detention
criteria established by Chapter 62-302, F.A.C. and as administered by
the South Florida Water Management District and Palm Beach County
as part of its land development regulations.
Objective: 1.3.0 The Village shall continue implementing Florida Friendly Landscaping
regulations that provide for the preservation of a
minimum 50% F8°6 native vegetation that is indigenous to South Florida
on all new development and re -development sites.
Policy: 1.3.1 The Village shall support the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of
Land Management/ Palm Beach County Environmental Resource
Management Department Land Stewardship Memorandum of
Understanding, to provide for joint management of the Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area. The Village shall support
preservation of native plant and animal species on Eco-Site #61, a 15-2-
49.9-acre parcel located east of US-1 and north of County Road 707
(Beach Road) within the Village boundaries, as a component of this
effort.
Policy: 1.3.2 Continue to review all development applications in the context of the
pervious cover and landscaping provisions of the development code;
be particularly diligent in the review of any coastal zone projects such
as any development in mangrove areas.
Policy: 1.3.3 Work with Palm Beach County and State park officials to assure that
any park improvements are sensitive to the mangrove and other
vegetative/wildlife/marine habitats.
42 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Objective: 1.4.0 The Village shall require preservation of existing mangroves except
where the proposed use is for a water -dependent or water -related land
use deemed to be in the public interest in its mangrove protection
regulations.
Policy: 1.4.1 The Village shall require preservation or mangrove mitigation (i.e.
replanting) through implementation of its adopted mangrove
regulations.
Policy: 1.4.2 Discourage development in coastal mangrove systems, except in cases
shown by assessment of all pertinent factors to be not contrary to the
public interest.
Policy: 1.4.3 Notwithstanding the intent of Objective 1.4.0 of this element, the
Village shall continue to restrict public works projects from disturbing
existing mangroves except where such work is essential to the
continued health, safety and welfare of the public.
Objective: 1.5.0 The Village shall protect natural wildlife areas and environmentally
sensitive lands by implementing the following policies.
Policy:1.5.1 Continue to preserve all existing wetland areas identified on the
Coastal Zone & Conservation Map by adopting regulations that require
the protection of existing native wetland vegetation buffers adjacent
to the Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon estuaries.
Policy: 1.5.2 The Village shall restrict development activities that may adversely
affect the survival of endangered and threatened wildlife species and
provide for the mitigation of development impacts on their habitats
and food sources by requiring an environmental assessment at the time
of a development or re -development proposal as part of the site plan
review process.
Objective: 1.6.0 To expressly prohibit new construction to take place Oceanside of the
designated coastal construction setback line or in an area that would
threaten the stability of either the primary dune or the beach itself,
except as may be approved by the state.
Policy: 1.6.1 No construction should be allowed that would threaten the stability of
either the dune systems or the beach itself. All new construction
should be restricted to areas landward of the primary dune line, except
as may be approved by the state.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 143
Policy:1.6.2 The Village should prohibit new development east of the State
designated coastal construction setback line, except as may be
approved by the State, or unless the Village establishes more restrictive
provisions at the local level. In such cases, the local provisions should
be adhered to.
Policy:1.6.3 The Village should establish new setback lines in local codes or
ordinances if the state setback lines prove to be inadequate.
Objective: 1.7.0 The Village shall, through its landscape regulations, require the use of
native vegetation to stabilize the dune system identified in the Coastal
Zone & Conservation Map as described in the support documentation.
Policy: 1.7.1 In the areas where beaches and dunes are being eroded, the Village
should continue to encourage a multijurisdictional approach to
stabilization and restoration projects, preferably by using native
vegetation as a stabilizing medium.
Policy: 1.7.2 Where appropriate, previously disturbed indigenous vegetation areas
should be renourished and replanted.
Objective: 1.8.0 The Village shall require the dedication of public access easements for
new developments in the coastal area.
Policy:1.8.1 When appropriate, the Village should seek means and innovative
techniques to allow proper access to beaches while protecting the
integrity of the dune system in such future beach acquisitions.
Objective: 1.9.0 Prevent certain motorized vehicles from driving on the primary dunes
except in emergency situations.
Policy: 1.9.1 Village ordinances and regulations should delineate which motorized
vehicles are to be prohibited from driving on the primary dunes.
Objective: 1.10.0 To consider adopting and implementing strategies which increase
community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural
and natural resources from the impacts of climate change, including
sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, and extreme weather events.
Policy: 1.10.1 The Village of Teguesta shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach
County, other agencies, local governments, and the private sector to
develop initiatives and goals to address climate change.
44 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.10.2 The Village of Tequesta shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach
County to integrate consideration of climate change impacts, and
adaptation and mitigation strategies, into existing and future system-
wide planning, operations, policies, and programs.
Policy: 1.10.3 The Village of Tequesta shall consider implementing climate change
adaptation and mitigation measures to the extent practical.
Policy: 1.10.4 The Village of Tequesta shall consider the use of mitigation strategies
to increase energy efficiency and conservation, and to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. These could include, but are not limited to,
land use and transportation strategies such as encouraging compact
residential development, providing incentives for mixed use and
redevelopment that maximize internal trip capture, improving access
to transit, improving non -motorized movement, requiring
interconnectivity among adjoining parcels, and providing incentives for
green building methods.
Goal: 2.0.0 The complete consideration of identified use limitations in future
coastal zone planning and management decisions by the Village.
Objective: 2. 1. 0 The Village Code of Ordinances shall provide for the continued
conservation and protection of the quality and quantity of waters that
flow into estuarine or oceanic waters within its jurisdiction by providing
for the review of all development activities in or impacting the coastal
area as part of its development review process.
Policy: 2.1.1 The Village shall continue to require, as part of its development review
process, the submittal of a drainage/environmental statement
describing how the proposed development will affect the estuarine
water quality of the Class III waters of the Village by amending its Code
of Ordinances.
Policy: 2.1.2 The Village shall continue to review all proposed developments within
the coastal area for consistency with on -going planning efforts for the
Loxahatchee River Estuary and the Indian River Aquatic Lagoon Aquatic
Preserve by cooperating with the Palm Beach County Department of
Environmental Resource Management and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.
Policy: 2.1.3 The Village shall continue to protect water quality and quantity by
restricting activities and land uses known to adversely affect identified
water sources such as natural ground water aquifer recharge areas and
wellhead protection areas.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 145
Objective: 2.2.0 The Village shall recognize the unique estuarine environment of the
Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve and prohibit development along
its shores that will destroy or disturb the vital sea grasses within its
jurisdiction through its Code of Ordinances.
Policy: 2.2.1 The Village shall continue to prohibit development or modification of
the shoreline within the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve, with the
following exceptions: 1) water -dependent and water -related land uses
such as marinas, provided that the siting of such shall be consistent
with the Marina Siting ordinance; 2) modification or development
deemed necessary for the continued health, safety and welfare of the
public.
Objective: 2.3.0 The Village shall provide for the protection of the Indian River Lagoon
Aquatic Preserve by prohibiting development in the area that will
degrade or otherwise adversely affect the water quality or wetlands of
this unique estuarine environment through its Code of Ordinances.
Objective: 2.4.0 The Village shall a€ncourage local residents within the hurricane flood
areas to utilize the flood insurance programs developed by the Federal
Insurance Administration, such as the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP).
Policy: 2.4.1 The Village shall continue to make available to Village residents and
developers information on flood zones, flood rates and flood insurance.
Objective: 2.5.0 The Village shall review its internal drainage system and analyze its
capability of providing proper relief from flooding. Based upon this
analysis, the Village shall provide for necessary improvements to the
existing system through updates to the Capital Improvements Program.
Policy:2.5.1 The Village shall implement capital projects to provide stormwater
drainage in accordance with its adopted Level of Service standard, and
shall include these projects in its Capital Improvements Schedule, as it
is annually updated. The Capital Improvements Schedule shall also
include capital projects being implemented and funded by other
agencies, such as the Jupiter Inlet District, to the extent that these
projects impact the Village's ability to achieve its Level of Service
Standard.
Policy: 2.5.2 The Village shall continue to maintain land development regulations
that limit the amount of impervious area permitted in the development
of flood prone areas by enforcing minimum green space requirements
pursuant to a master drainage plan for the coast area.
Objective: 2.6.0 The Village shall m44aintain, create and expand outdoor recreational
facilities in the coastal zone.
46 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 2.6.1 The Village shall continue to encourage public access easements to the
beaches and shoreline in the coastal area through its Code of
Ordinances.
Policy: 2.6.2 coastal areas should provide opportunities for appreciation of and
education about coastal and wildlife resources, while not degrading or
negatively impacting these resources.
Objective: 2.7.0 The Village shall a€stablish and maintain land use controls that will
encourage recreational -oriented development and allow for future
expansion of recreation facilities in desired areas of the jurisdiction.
Policy:2.7.1 The Village should consider lease arrangements of public areas to
private entities to develop recreational facilities, when appropriate.
Objective: 2.8.0 The Village shall a€ncourage air monitoring programs to continue
throughout the area by local pollution control agencies.
Policy: 2.8.1 The Village should continue to support efforts of local pollution control
agencies to monitor air quality in the Village.
Policy:2.8.2 The Village should coordinate and cooperate with local pollution
control agencies to assure appropriate local input.
Objective: 2.9.0 The Village shall maintain water conservation measures to provide for
emergency conservation of water services.
Policy: 2.9.1 The Village -;hall maiptaiR measuFeS „lati g the FA ent F
Waa-a-M-e-Us *es ^d ^„teFiais. (Relocated below) The Village will
continue to cooperate with the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) in its efforts to restrict the unnecessary consumption
of potable water, particularly as it relates to irrigation, lawn watering,
and car washing during periods of draught, supply reduction, and other
emergencies.
Objective: 2.10.0 The Village shall maintain measures regulating the management of
hazardous wastes and materials.
Policy: 2.10.1 The Village shall maintain an ordinance regulating the storage and
disposal of hazardous wastes and materials.
Policy: 2.10.2 The Village shall provide for the management of hazardous wastes to
protect natural resources through its local Haz-Mat team.
Policy: 2.9�.10.3 The Village shall maintain measures regulating the management of
hazardous wastes and materials.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 147
Objective:2.11.0 TtgUeStG will The Village shall protect and conserve mangroves,
wetlands and seagrasses to ensure that there will be no net loss of the
existing natural resources within the Village.
Policy: 2.11.1 Mangrove, wetlands and seagrass areas within the Village shall be
deemed environmentally sensitive, in recognition of their many natural
functions and values, and shall be protected from incompatible land
uses. The Village shall afford protection to all these resources
regardless of size.
Policy: 2.11.2 The definition of mangroves and wetlands to be used for regulatory
purposes by the Village shall be the most comprehensive definitions
used by the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Representatives of these agencies will be contacted for
assistance in identifying the location of all wetland areas within the
Village.
Policy:2.11.3 The location of mangrove and wetland areas shall be identified by
survey at the time of site development review on a site -by -site basis.
The Village shall not issue a development order or permit for a parcel
until all wetland areas on that parcel or immediately adjacent to the
proposed development have been identified and located.
Policy: 2.11.4 No development, including residential development, shall be permitted
within mangrove or other wetland areas unless project alternatives
that would avoid mangrove and wetland impacts are unavailable and
mitigation is provided by the applicant to offset adverse impacts. For
purposes of this policy, sufficient mitigation is as required by Flef+da
Adt +_tFat +ve—G-AdP em s 17 312.Roo thre,gh 1:7 9!2.g98
Sections 403.9321-403.9333 the "Mangrove Trimming and
Preservation Act". It is intended that all standards in these citations are
to apply to all new development and redevelopment and that any
exemptions or exceptions in these citations, including project size
thresholds, are not applicable.
Policy: 2.11.5 The Village shall permit the following within mangrove, seagrass and
wetland areas: elevated piers, docks, and walkways of no more than
five feet in width, unless vehicular access in the form of a golf cart or
similar vehicle is necessary, in conjunction with a permit from the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, pursuant to Ghaptef
17-27, F.A C Sections 403.9321-403.9333 the "Mangrove Trimming
and Preservation Act."
48 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy:2.11.6 Within mangrove, seagrass and wetland areas, all piers, docks and
walkways shall be constructed on pilings.
Policy: 2.11.7 No pier, dock or walkway shall be located on submerged land which is
vegetated with seagrasses except as is necessary to reach waters at a
depth prescribed by the state Department of Environmental
Protection. The docking terminus shall not be located over a seagrass
bed.
Policy: 2.11.8 Bulkheads and seawalls shall be permitted only to stabilize disturbed
shorelines or to replace deteriorated existing bulkheads and seawalls.
Riprap shall be placed at the toe of all replaced bulkheads and seawalls.
Policy: 2.11.9 No dredging or filling shall be permitted within mangrove and wetland
areas or on seagrass beds in the Village unless project alternatives that
would avoid mangrove, wetland and seagrass impacts are unavailable
and sufficient mitigation is provided by the applicant to offset adverse
impacts. For purposes of this policy, sufficient mitigation is as required
Sections 403.9321-403.9333 the "Mangrove Trimming and
Preservation Act". It is intended that all standards in these citations are
to apply to all new development and redevelopment and that any
exemptions or exceptions in these citations, including project size
thresholds, are not applicable.
Policy: 2.11.10 Drain fields for septic tanks shall not be permitted in mangrove and
wetlands areas.
Policy: 2.11.11 Graywater discharge shall not be permitted in mangrove and wetlands
areas except as may be required by the Loxahatchee River
Environmental Control District (LRECD) and as permitted pursuant to
Flerida Ad„ ,;,;Tstfat+ve—Code, Gh. 17�18 end 1�&11,
Sections 403.9321-403.9333 the "Mangrove Trimming and
Preservation Act", and with Village approval.
Policy:2.11.12 Require a buffer zone of native upland edge vegetation around
mangrove and wetland areas to protect these areas from the impacts,
including stormwater runoff, of adjacent development. The buffer
zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation, including canopy,
understory and ground cover. If there is no native vegetation on the
site, a planted vegetative buffer shall be required. The buffer zone shall
begin at the upland limit of any mangrove or wetland area, including
the transitional vegetation zone, and shall be no less than twenty-five
(25) feet in width at any point unless otherwise not achievable due to
platting, right-of-way easements, utility easements, or existing access
easements existing at the time of adoption of this comprehensive plan.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 149
Policy:2.11.13 The Village shall continue to implement the Wetlands Protection
Section of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code and
shall continue to review and comment on wetland alteration
applications being reviewed by other agencies to ensure that no
activity results in the net loss of wetland values and functions. Ensure
that the following steps are taken, in order, when assessing proposed
activities that may result in wetlands impact: 1. Avoidance of wetland
impacts, 2. Minimization of unavoidable wetlands impacts and 3.
Compensation for wetland impacts through mitigation; Require, for
any wetland that is degraded or destroyed, that mitigation be provided
through the creation of new wetland habitat, through the restoration
of degraded habitat, or through the enhancement of functions and
values provided by existing habitat. Mitigation efforts that include
creating new wetland habitat shall be designed, constructed, and
maintained in a manner which will reflect the habitat being altered,
degraded or destroyed; Designate appropriate and inappropriate uses
for wetlands, including the use of wetlands for wastewater treatment,
to ensure that the functions and values of existing wetland systems are
maintained or enhanced; do not allow activities that would diminish
the functions and values of wetlands by altering the quantity or timing
if water availability to existing wetlands or altering their water regimes;
Require, when reviewing development activities adjacent to or within
wetland areas, that a buffer zone of native vegetation, which may
include canopy, understory and ground cover, as appropriate, be
provided and maintained around all wetlands. The area requirements
for the buffer zone shall be consistent with the Treasure Coast Strategic
Regional Policy Plan; and support wetland creation, restoration,
enhancement, and preservation and shall encourage public and private
sector initiatives for these efforts.
Policy:2.11.15 The Village shall conserve and protect wetlands by directing
incompatible future land uses away from wetlands; or where
incompatible uses are allowed, mitigation shall be a means to
compensate for loss of wetlands functions and consistent with Policy
2.13.4 of this element.
Objective: 2.12.0 The Village shall implement measures to identify and protect native
wildlife and their habitats, including state and federally protected plant
and animal species (endangered, threatened and species of special
concern), within proposed development sites, and protect these natural
resources from the impacts of development.
Policy: 2.12.1 Require the evaluation and proper management of native wildlife and
vegetative communities including endangered, threatened, and
species of special concern by requiring that all proposed development
sites of 5 acres or more, regardless of use, be surveyed by an ecologist,
biologist or other similar professional for the presence of State and
federally protected plant and animal species. Criteria for site surveys
50 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
shall be specified in the Village's land development regulations and are
to be professionally accepted techniques for such surveys. Site surveys
shall address the size and distribution of the native habitat, wildlife and
listed species populations within a proposed development site, the
feasibility and viability of on -site protection and management, whether
the proposed development site includes a wildlife corridor, and the
feasibility of maintaining the wildlife corridor. The survey shall also
address the appropriateness of mitigation to an acceptable off -site
location in the event that on -site mitigation is shown to be ineffective.
Protection of any wildlife and protected plant and animal species found
on the site and their habitat will be required as part of the overall
development plan submitted for development approval.
Policy: 2.12.2 The Village shall request the assistance of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, or other applicable state or
federal agency in the implementation of recovery programs for state
and federally protected plant and animal species as part of the
development plan for sites of 5 acres or more in size; or for sites less
than 5 acres that are identified by state or federal agencies.
Policy:2.12.3 For development on sites less than 5 acres, the Village's land
development regulations shall require the retention and use of native
vegetation on -site to fulfill part of the landscaping requirements;
require the protection of specimen trees (specimen trees shall be
defined as those trees which have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of
twelve inches or more); require the use of tree protection barriers
during the time heavy construction equipment is used on -site for land
clearing and delivery of building materials; and, require site
development design using such techniques as clustering and locating
driveways and roadways on the least environmental sensitive portion
of the site.
Objective: 2.13.0 The Village shall require the conservation and use of native plant
species in the developed landscape and prohibit the spread of exotic
nuisance species such as Australian pines, melaleuca, Brazilian pepper
and other species as set forth on the most current list supplied by Palm
Beach County.
Policy:2.13.1 The Village shall require the use of native plant species in the
landscaping of new development projects and additions to existing
projects and require the removal of exotic nuisance plants from the
sites of new development.
Policy: 2.13.2 The Village shall maintain and distribute a recommended native plant
list and other educational materials to increase public awareness of the
need to utilize native plant species in the developed landscape and
eliminate exotic nuisance plants from exiting developed areas.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 151
Policy: 2.13.4 The Village shall maintain its program to plant native trees in public
rights of -way and other public lands, whenever practical, thereby
adding to the Village's aesthetic appeal and providing habitat for urban
wildlife.
Policy: 2.13.5 The Village shall develop programs on Village -owned or leased lands to
eliminate exotic nuisance plant species.
Objective: 2.14.0 The Village shall seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve
energy resources.
Policy: 2.14.1 The Village shall promote mixed use development, defined as a mixture
of residential and non-residential land uses in a design -unified,
pedestrian friendly environment with multi -modal transportation
connectivity to other areas, at appropriate locations. A major purpose
of mixed -use development shall be to provide opportunities to live,
work, shop and recreate in a walkable area, and to reduce automobile
dependence and greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy:2.14.2 The Village shall encourage the implementation of low impact
development techniques and green building standards that reduce the
negative environmental impacts of development and redevelopment
by: locating building sites away from environmentally sensitive areas;
promoting the preservation of natural resources; providing for on -site
mitigation of impacts (i.e. retention and treatment of stormwater
runoff, water reuse, Master Stormwater Management Systems);
promoting energy conservation through design, landscaping and
building techniques (i.e. solar power, increased tree canopies);
promoting water conservation through landscaping and building
design; ensuring environmentally friendly building practices (i.e. use of
environmentally friendly building materials, recycled materials), and;
considering the development of a Green Building Ordinance and a
related LEED Certification Program for development and redevelop-
ment, including the development of a Neighborhood Development
Rating System that integrates the principles of smart growth, urbanism
and green building into a national system for neighborhood design.
Policy: 2.14.3 The Village shall seek to limit greenhouse gas emissions through the
implementation of strategies to reduce the number of vehicle miles
travelled. These strategies may include but not be the promotion of
mixed use development that provides for a mixture of residential and
non-residential land uses in a pedestrian friendly environment with
multi -modal transportation connectivity to other areas; promoting the
use of alternate transportation modes as specified herein, including
mass transit, bicycles, and pedestrianism, and; requiring
Transportation Demand Management Programs as a condition for
development approvals.
52 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Objective: 2.15.0 The Village shall implement the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan to
ensure that adequate water supplies and public facilities are available
to serve the water supply demands of any population growth the Town
may experience.
Policy: 2.15.1 The Village shall coordinate the planning of potable water and sanitary
sewer facilities, water supply sources, demands, other services and
level -of -service standards with the Loxahatchee River Environmental
Control District (LRECD), Palm Beach County, Martin County, South
Florida Water Management District, and through the Lower East Coast
Water Supply Plan Update, as necessary.
Policy: 2.15.2 The Village will cooperate with the 1-em ,hate-hee o,,,,,rQk#ri1# (LRECD)
to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually
updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that
sufficient capacity to serve development exists.
Policy:2.15.3 If in the future there are issues associated with water supply,
conservation or reuse the Village will immediately contact the
bea is#ee Riwpr Dil# �+ LRECD to address the corresponding
issue(s). In addition, the Village will follow adopted communication
protocols with the ' ^mahatehee River Distriet (LRECD) communicate
and/or prepare an appropriate action plan to address any relevant
issue associated with water supply, conservation or reuse.
Policy:2.15.4 The Village will encourage the use of high efficiency toilets,
showerheads, faucets, clothes washers and dishwashers that are
Energy Star rated and WaterSense certified in all new and retrofitted
residential projects.
Policy:2.15.5 The Village will encourage the use of Florida Friendly Landscape
guidelines and principals; gutter downspouts, roof runoff, and rain
harvesting through the use of rain barrels and directing runoff to
landscaped areas; drip irrigation or micro -sprinklers; and the use of
porous surface materials (bricks, gravel, turf block, mulch, pervious
concrete, etc.) on walkways, driveways and patios.
Policy: 2.15.6 The Village will participate, when warranted, in the SFWMD's Water
Savings Incentive Program (WaterSlP) for large-scale retrofits as
recommended by the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan.
Policy:2.15.7 The Village shall cooperate and comply with Palm Beach County's
Wellfield Protection Ordinance for existing and future public water
wells.
Policy:2.15.8 The Village shall consider the recommendations of the Southeast
Florida Reeional Climate Chanee Compact to reduce the impact of Sea
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 153
Level Rise (SLR) and salt water intrusion into the aquifer feeding
Village's wells.
Policy: co4-4.462.15.9 The Village shall seek ways to optimize the integrity of its recharge
areas and minimize future degradation affecting water supply quality
and quantity by limiting adverse usage, adding additional recharge
areas, and/or alternate water supply areas.
Policy: 6.'�62.15.10 The Village shall consider the recommendations of the Southeast
Florida Regional Climate Change Compact to reduce the impact of Sea
Level Rise (SLR) and salt water intrusion into the aquifers feeding
Village's wells.
Policy: 6 =7 -92.15.11 The Village shall consider conservation initiatives addressing sea
level projections as adopted by the southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Compact.
PoIicy:64,9412.15.12 The Village shall work to protect existing wellfields and water
supplies, and plan for infrastructure replacement and wellfield
relocation as needed in accordance with state rules, water policy, and
in consideration of potential increased coastal flooding sea level rise
saltwater intrusion, and other potential future climate change impacts.
Policy: 64-349 2.15.14 The Village, in cooperation with the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) and the SFWMD, shall establish source -water (wellfield)
monitoring and protection programs.
Policy: 64—4 2.15.15 The Village shall protect the Surficial Aquifer System by controlling
land uses and preventing any use that might contaminate or reduce the
quality level of the aquifers.
Policy: &.4-.3,2=2.15.16 To further protect and conserve the Surficial Aquifer, and protect
against sea level rise and future climate change impacts. the Village
shall consider pursuing projects that enhance aquifer recharge and
investigate utilization of alternative water resources to supplement
and broaden the Village's future water supply sources. These potential
sources include but are not limited to, Aquifer Storage and Recovery
(ASR), desalination, capture and storage of excess storm water,
appropriately treated reclaimed water, and other technologies
addressed in the 2013 Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update of
the SFWMD.
Policy:., 2.15.17The Village shall continue to enforce the land development regulations
that require a minimum of fifty (50) percent of all required trees to be
native vegetation and twenty-five (25) percent of all other required
plants to be native vegetation species to satisfy landscaping
requirements as a condition of development or permit approval.
54 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 64 4:g 2.15.18The Village shall maintain and seek to expand the Village's inventory of
green permeable open space so as to provide maximum area for
shallow aquifer recharge and Stormwater filtration/percolation
oxygen production, visual buffer and wildlife habitat. This shall be
accomplished through implementation of land development
regulations, additional parks and open space.
Policy: 64-A.7 2.15.19The Village shall implement land clearance regulations requiring the
removal of invasive exotics plants and the preservation and
reestablishment of native vegetative communities to the greatest
extent practicable, considering climate adaption needs and strategies
for assisting in natural migration, thereby enhancing wildlife habitat.
Policy: &4-.4.8 2.15.20The Village shall consider the climate adaption needs of native plants
and animal species, and consider strategies for assisting in their natural
migration.
Policy: 644-42.15.21The Village shall consider promoting species diversity, the planting of
native landscapes, and sustainable urban forest landscape practices in
order to protect the health and resiliency of our natural resources from
the impacts of climate change.
Policy: 6 1 4-10 2.15.22 The Village shall consider assessing the vulnerability of specific
species, habitats, landscapes, and ecosystem functions that may be
sensitive to climate change and develop coping strategies and
contingency plans for their adaptation, such as identifying habitats that
may be viable during climate disturbances and could potentially serve
to give refuge to and sustain at -risk species.
Objective: �.5-2.16.0 The Village shall work locally and cooperate regionally to improve
energy conservation, reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from
government operations and the community, and work to minimize air
duality and ecosystem impacts in order to reduce the carbon footprint
4w and enhance economic and community resiliency.
Policy: 2.16.1 The Village shall consider establishing a Climate Control Board that will
identify specific strategies to guide energy efficiency accounting for
existing and future electric power generation and transmission
systems; and that reduce greenhouse gas emissions with specific
targets for Public Facilities.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 155
rffe VITLAae or
COMPREHENSIVE
f_
PLAN
POLICY DOCUMENT
.ice ••,.;: : 'r
• a_1� �
` 11ti • •
�.e
►` •� �'
.11
mow •
3�AGoals, Objectives,
�,a,� &Policies
:1
lu W�
ILI
1LEM
AI -
owl.
�r
low,
j ,"
s
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 The development of a sustainable recreation and open space system
that adequately provides for the current and projected recreational
needs of the Village and enhances its built and natural environment
by providing active and passive recreation opportunities.
Objective: 1.1.0 Maintain community and neighborhood parks and facilities meeting the
current and future needs of all age groups in Tequesta.
Policy: 1.1.1 Provide recreation facilities which offer sufficient choice and variety for
all age groups.
Policy: 1.1.2 Continue the implementation of recreation programs for Tequesta Park
that complement and enhance the use of the Village's recreational
facility assets, with periodic evaluations of how these programs are
meeting the recreation needs of the Village.
Objective: 1.2.0 As part of the development approval process, require that recreation
areas be provided as a part of the development, or accept a recreation
fee in lieu of land, where and when appropriate, in order to maintain a
sustainable recreation system for the community.
Policy: 1.2.1 The Village shall continue to zone all properties utilized or targeted for
recreation and open space purposes as R/OP, Recreation/Open Space.
Objective: 1.3.0 Continue to coordinate development which allows safe and easy access
to recreational facilities outside and within the Village's corporate limits
in a manner that is consistent with the Transportation Element of this
Plan and the Village of Tequesta Capital Improvement Program.
Policy: 1.3.1 The Village should provide for safe access to recreation areas by making
road improvements and pathway improvements compatible with
surrounding development patterns and consistent with the Village
Capital Improvement Program and Transportation Element.
Policy: 1.3.2 Existing roads and thoroughfares should be considered as primary
locations for the accommodation of bicycle traffic when they lead to
the Village's park and recreation facilities, and encourage bicycle paths
in the parks.
Policy: 1.3.3 Obtain easements or use road rights -of -way for bicycle and pedestrian
paths well in advance of development where they are desired
consistent with Complete Street principles.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 157
Policy: 1.3.4 In providing pathways with safe access to recreational areas, the Village
should coordinate this activity with surrounding involved governments
by reviewing Comprehensive Plans and Capital Improvement Programs
of adjacent governments as part of the annual budgetary process.
Objective: 1.4.0 Continue to expand recreational facilities with the growth of the Village
to meet the needs of the residents and Level of Service Standards.
Policy: 1.4.1 Preserve currently allocated recreational areas within the Village by
zoning those parcels and properties R/OP, Recreation/Open Space
district.
Policy: 1.4.2 Strive to meet minimum standards for recreation open space, service
areas, and facilities as established in the Policy 1.4.5 of this Element.
Policy: 1.4.3 Encourage the use of private recreation facilities within the Village and
work cooperatively with the private sector to provide public recreation
areas in future developments as part of the site plan review process.
Policy: 1.4.4 Through cooperative arrangements, encourage the use of existing
school and publicly owned recreation facilities in the North County area
to meet the recreation needs of Village residents.
Policy: 1.4.5 The following Level of Service Standards, " ^Fleeting °,'m Q^-, .ti Cei wty
standards, shall apply to recreation and open space facilities within the
Village of Tequesta.
Eeant Level F Sta.p. d—air dr Tatile, f.e
r v^, �eTRCe �CQI�QQTQTZTDiGT�r CT�CICSCa
2 acres/1,000
2 acres/1,000
....
.. .... ....
58 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.4.6 The Village shall continue maintaining and enforceing landscaping
regulations which establish landscaping and open space definitions,
standards and regulations consistent with Florida Friendly Landscaping
requirements.
Policy: 1.4.7 The Village should continue to work cooperatively with the Federal
Government and Palm Beach County to direct the development of the
Coast Guard property north of CR 707 for future recreation/open
space, culture/civic and/or other appropriate public use. Since there is
similar federally owned property south to CR 707 within the corporate
limits of the Town of Jupiter, the Village should investigate
coordination with their work toward similar development of the entire
area.
Objective: 1.5.0 Consider utilizing methods of obtaining additional land to increase the
community and neighborhood recreational facilities within the
corporate limits of Tequesta when necessary.
Policy: 1.5.1 Establish methods for the use of and/or purchase of privately owned
lands suitable for recreation in order to increase the existing inventory
of recreation areas and open space facilities.
Policy: 1.5.2. The Village shall consider seeking land donations from property owners
and financial contributions from the private sector for the development
of recreational opportunities.
Policy: 1.5.3 The Village shall coordinate ways and means for private developers to
provide public recreation facilities within their developments.
Policy: 1.5.4. The Village shall encourage co-sponsorship of recreational and cultural
events, such as races, greenmarkets, festivals and athletic events, using
Village facilities as a location for these events.
Objective: 1. 6. 0 Continue to receive and consider citizen input in determining
recreational needs of the community.
Policy: 1.6.1 Encourage citizen participation in determining recreation facility needs
for the various existing and future neighborhood recreation
developments by adhering to the public participation procedures
established by this Plan.
Policy:1.6.2 Maintain citizen input in the planning of additional recreational
facilities within the Village by adhering to the public participation
procedures established by this Plan.
Objective: 1.7.0 Encourage the protection and supplementation of the existing tree
canopy, a vital community and environmental asset, in order to sustain
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 159
the resource and maintain the environmental benefits provided by
mature tree canopies.
Policy: 1.7.1 Consider acquiring and preserving open space lands for purposes of
recreation, habitat protection and enhancement.
Policy: 1.7.2 Consider the community's street trees as infrastructure and strive to
preserve and protect these trees as a community and private property
asset.
Policy: 1.7.3 The Village shall encourage Tree and Landscape Ordinances to support
sustainable development principles of tree preservation as a key
element in retention and provision of plant materials, and minimize
impact to the existing site resources.
Policy: 1.7.4 The Village shall support Public/Private beautification efforts on public
property and encourage private maintenance agreements.
Objective: 1.8.0 Coordinate with the Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails
Plan, the Village's greenway and trail initiatives throughout its
geographical boundary and along its waterfront areas,
Policy: 1.8.1 Consider adopting Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails
Plan to coordinate the development of a future greenways and trails
network within the Village that connects to County trails and facilities.
Policy:1.8.2 Seek funding opportunities for acquisition, development and
maintenance of sites for greenway corridors.
Policy: 1.8.3 Utilize future park and open space acquisition opportunities to connect
the Village's existing park and open space into a coordinated greenway
and trail system
60 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
r THE VILLAGE or
ILI
COMPREHENSIVE
_ �_._-
r P L A N
0
4
t�
POLICY DOCUMENT
7=_W
fiili� -I ��
IVA
INTERGC
COOR'Di
ELEMENJ
Ili Goals, Objectives,
& Policies
ENTAL
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Coordinate with other governmental entities for the purpose of
maintaining a sustainable and the high quality of life for the residents
of Tequesta and achieving to-arhieae mutually beneficial goals.
Objective:1.1.0 The Village of Tequesta shall participate in intergovernmental
coordination processes with neighboring municipalities, Palm Beach
County, Martin County, the Palm Beach County School Board, and other
agencies charged with planning and review activities to ensure that full
consideration is given to the extra jurisdictional impacts of proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments and development requests, and that
such impacts are appropriately mitigated and addressed.
Policy: 1.1.1 The Village of Tequesta shall (identify those development activities
which affect other jurisdictions, and evaluate the impacts of such
activities at the time of development and as part of the site plan review
process. Conversely, the Village of Tequesta shall coordinate with
adjacent local governments to ensure that they consider the impacts
of development occurring within their boundaries on the Village of
Tequesta, and ensure that these impacts are adequately considered
and addressed.
Policy: 1.1.2 The Village of Tequesta shall Rrecognize that planning and zoning
initiated by the Village can have diverse effects on neighboring
jurisdictions and develop procedures by which such external effects
can be addressed as part of the site plan review process established in
the Village Zoning Code ^wee. Conversely, the Village of Tequesta
shall recognize that planning and zoning initiated by surrounding
jurisdictions may affect the Village, and urge these jurisdictions to
address these external effects through the appropriate development
review procedures and mechanisms.
Policy: 1.1.3 The Village of Tequesta shall coordinate its Comprehensive Plans, land
development regulations, and planning programs with the plans and
programs of surrounding jurisdictions, including Martin County, to
provide for greater compatibility and the achievement of mutually
beneficial goals.
Policy:1.1.4 The Village of Tequesta shall continue to participate in the
Intergovernmental Planning and Review Committee (IPARC) process
with its fellow municipalities e4ies, County, School Board, South Florida
Water Management District and various special districts that opt to
participate in order to implement a countywide intergovernmental
coordination program for reviewing proposed changes to
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 161
comprehensive plans of adjacent local governments and the plans of
other units of local government providing services but not having
regulatory authority over the use of land.
Policy: 1.1.5 The Village of Tequesta shall continue to participate in the "Multi -
Jurisdictional Issues Coordination Forum Interlocal Agreement" with its
fellow cities, County, School Board, South Florida Water Management
District and various special districts that opt to participate in order to
implement a multi -jurisdictional issues forum to facilitate the
identification and possible resolution of countywide issues by providing
a vehicle for consensus building through the joint research and
discussion of issues.
Policy: 1.1.6 Although there are no schools that are part of the State University
system located or planned to be located in the Village of Tequesta at
present, in the event that such a school is located in the Village in the
future, the Village shall coordinate with the school regarding the
development of campus master plans or amendments thereto, in
accordance with Section 240.155, F.S.
Policy: 1.1.7 The Village of Tequesta shall coordinate with agencies charged with
planning and/or review responsibilities at all levels of government in
order to address issues of mutual concern, and achieve mutually
beneficial goals.
Policy: 1.1.8 The Village of Tequesta shall Ccommunicate with adjacent jurisdictions
regarding projected impacts of new developments, redevelopment
and changes in local government.
Policy: 1.1.9 The Village of Tequesta shall Rrespond in a prompt and thorough
manner to review and comment requests from other governments and
agencies.
Policy: 1.1.10 The Village of Tequesta shall C-coordinate with other governments
entities and agencies including the Town of Jupiter, Jupiter Inlet
Colony, Martin and Palm Beach Counties, the Palm Beach County
School Board, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Agency, and the
State by reviewing their comprehensive plans, proposed amendments,
and/or other planning documents.
Policy: 1.1.11 The Village of Tequesta shall C-coordinate the Comprehensive Plan with
the Treasure Coast Strategic Regional Policy Plan, and utilize the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ' dispute
-u resolution process to resolve conflicts with other local governments,
VILLA&! uu regional agencies, and private interests on planning and growth
management issues. EAR -based amendment
62 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.1.12 The Village of Tequesta shall 4notify potentially affected entities,
jurisdictions and/or service providers of actions that may create an
impact on public facilities and services in other jurisdictions.
Policy: 1.1.13 The Village of Tequesta shall enter into interlocal agreements with
neighboring entities, jurisdictions and/or service providers in order to
address how the cost for impacts to public facilities and services will be
borne, and by whom, when the impacts are imposed upon other
entities, jurisdictions and/or service providers. Interlocal-Agreements
and the IPARC Process will be used to identify and implement joint
planning areas, when deemed to be appropriate.
Objective:1.2.0 To consider strengthening existing interlocal mechanisms which
provide a means of discussing and implementing sea level rise, social,
environmental and service programs for mutual benefit.
Policy: 1.2.1 The Village of Tequesta shall PFemete the PUFpeses and participate in
the of SurCh and cooperate with area wide organizations as
the' ^mahatehee Ge neal ef. Caevemme^+s '^ the Loxahatchee River
Environmental Control Ddistrict, the R^^^h^r, ;;Ad Sheres G^. 4, the
Palm Beach County Lea7ue of Cities, Inc. Muniewpal ' eag e, and the
Countywide Intergovernmental Coordination Program.
Policy: 1.2.2 The Village of Tequesta shall cooperate with agencies and municipali-
ties serving to protect the resources of the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserve (Intracoastal Waterway) by actively coordinating with the
development of estuarine policies that shall be, at a minimum,
consistent with present management plans through coordination with
agencies including, but not limited to, the ' ewah,+^hee of
Jupiter Inlet District, and Martin County and the Palm
Reach G91i .+.,Wi de Beaehpq ;;Ad ch. rp,; r^„rr.il
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village of Tequesta shall continue to participate as a cooperative
and coordinating partner in the Palm Beach County National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Program.
Objective:1.3.0 To continuously develop alternative mechanisms, strategies and
methods for obtaining funds through intergovernmental coordination.
Policy: 1.3.1 The Village of Tequesta shall €ensure that opportunities for acquiring
funding or other forms of assistance through intergovernmental
relations with municipalities, Palm Beach County, Martin County, the
State, and/or the federal government are fully explored.
Policy: 1.3.2 The Village of Tequesta shall 9direct or indirect contact should be
maintained with federal, state and local agencies in order to monitor
opportunities for grant and funding opportunities. .�
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 163
Objective: 1.4.0 To maintain high standards in the execution of service agreements by
reviewing all agreements prior to renewal to assure that all terms of
the service agreement have been met. If the terms have not been met,
adjust the agreements through negotiation.
Policy:1.4.1 The Village of Tequesta shall Aassess the impacts of rezoning,
annexation, and development activities on interlocal agreements
which exist between the Village and other jurisdictions to determine
any effects on the ability to provide the services which are the subject
of the agreements.
Objective:1.5.0 To Ccoordinate with other agencies having maintenance and/or
operational responsibility of facilities within and affecting the Village in
the establishment of Level of Service standards for such facilities.
Policy: 1.5.1 On an ongoing basis, the Village of Tequesta shall evaluate the Level of
Service standards for facilities within the Village operated by Palm
Beach County, the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District,
the Florida Department of Transportation, neighboring jurisdictions,
and other service providers to determine the compatibility of these
standards with the Village's planning efforts.
Policy: 1.5.2 The Village of Tequesta shall coordinate the adopted Comprehensive
Plan with the plans of school boards, regional water supply authorities,
and other units of local government providing services but not having
regulatory authority over the use of land, and with the comprehensive
plans of adjacent municipalities, the State Comprehensive Plan, and
the South Florida Water Management District's Regional Water Supply
Plan.
Policy: 1.5.3 The Village of Tequesta shall continue to coordinate the planning of
potable water and sanitary sewer facilities, water supply sources,
demands, other services and level -of -service standards with the
Loxahatchee River Water Environmental Control District, Palm Beach
County, Martin County, South Florida Water Management District, and
through the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update, as necessary.
Objective: 1.6.0 To Ccoordinate with the appropriate State and federal agencies having
locational, maintenance and operational responsibilities in the
designation of new dredge spoil disposal sites, if any are to be located
within the limits of Tequesta in the future.
Policy:1.6.1 The Village of Tequesta shedJd shall work cooperatively with
-�m appropriate State and federal agencies in providing for the
`UAA "111 identification of dredge spoil disposal sites.
64 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.6.2 If a conflict arises between the Village of Tequesta and an agency with
locational maintenance and operational responsibility seeking a dredge
spoil disposal site, the conflict should shall be resolved through the
Coastal Resources Interagency Management Committee's dispute
resolution process.
Obiective 1.7.0 To consider adopting and implementing strategies which increase
community resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural
and natural resources from the impacts of sea level rise, changes in
rainfall patterns, and extreme weather events.
Policy: 1.7.1 The Village of Tequesta shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach
County, other agencies, local governments, and the private sector to
develop initiatives and goals to address sea level rise and other
changes.
Policy: 1.7.2 The Village of Tequesta shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach
County to integrate consideration of sea level rise, climate change
impacts, and adaptation and mitigation strategies, into existing and
future system -wide planning, operations, policies, and programs.
Policy: 1.7.3 The Village of Tequesta shall support Palm Beach County's participation
in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Initiative through a
four county Compact. The County shall collaborate to increase regional
resilience by sharing technical expertise, participating in annual sum-
mits, assessing regional vulnerabilities, advancing agreed upon mitiga-
tion and adaptation strategies, and developing joint state and federal
legislation policies and programs.
Policy:1.7.4 The Village of Tequesta shall consider coordinating with the
Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District and other applicable
agencies regarding sea level rise adaptation and mitigation measures
and shall provide technical support to the extent practical.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 165
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives;
COAST-E��
MANAGI
ELEM
& Policies
EN
T,,,
F yyy``r�arr
At
-
t .
1 �
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Protect, conserve and enhance coastal resources while providing for
water -dependent land uses in a manner consistent with the general
health, safety and welfare of Village residents and visitors.
Objective: 1.1.0 Protect and enhance coastal and estuarine environmental quality and
other natural resources by maintaining specific ordinances or revising
existing code provisions related to water quality, shoreline stabilization,
wetland preservation and wildlife and habitat protection.
Policy: 1.1.1 The Village shall cooperate with agencies and municipalities serving to
protect the resources of the Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon
Aquatic Preserve by actively participating in the development of
estuarine policies that are consistent with present management.
Policy:1.1.2 Preserve all existing wetland areas identified on the Coastal
Management/Conservation Map by adopting regulations that require
the protection of existing, native wetland vegetation buffers adjacent
to the Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon. Exceptions shall be
provided for water -dependent and water -related land uses that have
been determined to be consistent with management plans for these
estuaries or when modification of said wetlands is necessary for the
continued health, safety and welfare of the public.
Objective: 1.2.0 The Village shall continue to provide for the protection of estuarine
water quality and resources in its Code of Ordinances.
Policy: 1.2.1 The Village shall continue to restrict urban stormwater run-off from
entering the Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon estuaries and
maintain its landscape regulations to promote vegetative filtering of
stormwater pollutants.
Policy:1.2.2 The Village shall cooperate with the Palm Beach County Health
Department and Department of Environmental Resource Management
to continue to monitor water quality at sampling stations located
within the Village, and shall continue to incorporate substantiated
water quality controls (e.g. drainage) into the development review „
process to ensure that future development in the coastal area does not
contribute to the degradation of estuarine water quality.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 167
Objective: 1.3.0 The Village shall continue to preserve and protect existing coastal
resources while providing for future water -dependent and water -
related land uses by implementing the Policies below.
Policy:1.3.1 The Village shall continue to maintain beach and beach access
requirements as a component of its adopted Level of Service Standard
for recreation and open space, and associated concurrency
requirements.
Policy: 1.3.2 The Village shall preserve and protect existing sea grass areas as a vital
food source for manatees and a nursery for estuarine species by
prohibiting dredging and filling activities in or near these areas except
where expressly provided for in the development of water -dependent
land uses or where it is necessary for the general health, safety and
welfare of the public.
Policy: 1.3.3 The Village, through its land development regulations and continued
compliance with and adherence to the Palm Beach County Boat
Facilities Siting Plan, shall ensure that marinas are sited to minimize
impacts on coastal and estuarine resources.
Policy: 1.3.4 The Village shall regulate the siting of marinas through the Palm Beach
County Boat Facilities Siting Plan, which addresses land use support,
compatibility, availability of upland support services, hurricane
contingency planning, protection of water quality, water depth,
environmental disruptions and mitigation actions, availability of public
use and economic needs and feasibility.
Objective:1.4.0 Continue to coordinate with the Jupiter Inlet District to achieve
adequate beach renourishment to the south of the Jupiter Inlet,
otherwise continue to protect the beach and dune system.
Policy:1.4.1 Continue to coordinate with the Jupiter Inlet District to ensure
adequate renourishment of the beach area south of Jupiter Inlet and
continue to support County efforts to implement the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers plan of providing additional sand pumping capability by
implementing a coordinated, multi -jurisdictional plan in cooperation
with the Council of Governments, Jupiter Inlet District, Palm Beach
County, and the Corps of Engineers.
awPolicy:1.4.2 Continue to use land use controls to prevent construction that
adversely impacts the dune and its vegetation system.
68 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Objective: 1.5.0 The Village shall continue to avoid increases in infrastructure capacity
that promote population growth and additional development beyond
that currently provided for in the Comprehensive Plan in the Coastal
High Hazard Area unless public safety so requires. The Village has shall
defined its coastal high hazard area as the area below the elevation of
the Category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake and
Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge
model. The Coastal High Hazard Area shall be shown on the Future
Land Use Map series (Category 1 and higher surge areas, Figure 10-1).
Policy:1.5.1 The Village shall review and appropriately address any infrastructure
capacity increase that would induce and subsidize development in the
Coastal High Hazard Area beyond that currently provided for in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy:1.5.2 The Village Floodplain Administrator shall not amend the
Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map to increase the
maximum allowed densities and intensities on lands within the Coastal
High Hazard Area.
Objective: 1.6.0 The Village shall require dedication of public access easements to those
privately -owned shoreline areas that receive public funds for beach
renourishment and shoreline stabilization projects.
Policy: 1.6.1 The Village shall continue to work with Palm Beach County to maintain
general public parking and access via the Coral Cove Park.
Policy: 1.6.2 The Village shall continue to coordinate with Palm Beach County in the
operation, maintenance and development of plans for Coral Cove Park.
Goal: 2.0.0 To preserve and enhance the significant natural features in Tequesta.
Objective: 2.1.0 The Village shall continue to review and analyze its internal drainage
system to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing urban stormwater
pollutants from entering the estuaries and groundwater within its
jurisdiction.
Policy: 2.1.1 The Village shall continue to review development plans in order to
require on -site detention of a substantial portion of stormwater, in
coordination with the South Florida Water Management District.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 169
Policy: 2.1.2 The Village shall continue to utilize its development review procedures
to reduce non -point source pollutant loading to the Loxahatchee River
and Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve in accordance with its NPDES
Permit, and review its current drainage system in terms of design
criteria established by the South Florida Water Management District.
Objective: 2.2.0 The Village shall maintain provisions for the protection of existing
native vegetative communities and wildlife habitats in its Code of
Ordinances.
Policy: 2.2.1 Continue to review all development applications in the context of the
pervious cover and landscaping provisions of the development code;
be particularly diligent in the review of any coastal area projects such
as any development in mangrove areas.
Policy: 2.2.2 Work with Palm Beach County and State park officials to assure that
any park improvements are sensitive to the mangrove and other
vegetative/wildlife/marine habitats.
Policy: 2.2.3 The Village shall support the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of
Land Management/ Palm Beach County Environmental Resource
Management Department Land Stewardship Memorandum of
Understanding to provide for joint management of the Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (ONA)
Afea. The Village shall support preservation of native plant and animal
species on Eco-Site #61, a 1-52 49.9-acre parcel located east of US-1 and
north of County Road 707 (Beach Road), which is the northern portion
of the ONA, as a component of this effort.
Policy:2.2.4 The Village shall maintain its landscape regulations to require the
removal of exotic species on the beach and dunes during
renourishment, stabilization or revegetation projects and the
substitute replanting of native dune and beach vegetation.
Policy: 2.2.5 In the event that publicly -owned spoil islands are located within the
Village in the future, they will be designated as "Conservation" on the
Future Land Use Map to ensure their future as protected wildlife
habitats.
Policy:2.2.6 The Village shall continue to coordinate with Palm Beach County,
coastal municipalities and the marina industry to implement a manatee
protection program.
70 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy:2.2.7 The Village shall continue to participate in Palm Beach County's
manatee protection program.
Policy: 2.2.8 The Village shall continue to participate in Palm Beach County's sea
turtle protection program.
Goal: 3.0.0 The protection of preservation areas to the maximum degree possible,
while continuing to recognize and respect private property rights.
Objective: 3.1.0 The Village shall avoid or minimize adverse impacts upon coastal
mangrove systems that might result from public works activities such
as transportation, mosquito control, and drainage activities.
Policy: 3.1.1 The Village shall continue to prohibit the public expenditure of funds
that will adversely affect existing mangrove areas or sea grass.
Objective: 3.2.0 The Village shall expressly prohibit new construction seaward of the
coastal construction setback line or in an area that would threaten the
stability of either the primary dune or the beach itself, except as may be
approved by the state.
Policy:3.2.1 The Village shall prohibit new construction seaward of the coastal
construction setback line and modification to the existing dune system,
except as may be approved by the state. All access from upland areas
to the beach will be by way of dune walkover.
Objective: 3.3.0 The Village shall maintain its landscape regulations to require the use
of native vegetation for dune stabilization.
Policy: 3.3.1 In areas where beaches and dunes are being eroded, the Village should
encourage a multi -jurisdictional approach to stabilization and
restoration projects as appropriate.
Policy: 3.3.2 Where appropriate, previously disturbed indigenous vegetation areas
should be renourished and replanted.
Policy: 3.3.3 The Village shall maintain its landscape regulations to encourage the
removal of exotic vegetative species and the substitute replanting of
native species.
Policy: 3.3.4 The Village shall continue implementing Florida Friendly Landscaping
principles ..,-*Awa,.. its lal; Sr=ape „lati,..AS + the Use-4 0011
XeFiseape (plaRtS that tele-F-Ae e;r ave;idd %vatear streass) mateFials, w IN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 171
possible and identify which non-native plants ',�sE;apiRg might be
appropriate for landscaping use in the Village.
Objective: 3.4.0 The Village shall support programs that will ensure adequate access to
public beaches while maintaining dune stability.
Policy: 3.4.1 When appropriate, the Village should utilize innovative techniques to
provide proper access to beaches while protecting the future integrity
of the dune system.
Objective: 3.5.0 The Village shall prohibit all private motor vehicles from driving on the
beach and dune. An exception shall be provided for emergency vehicles
and those associated with beach restoration and cleanup, provided that
the latter are restricted to the area adjacent to the mean high-water
line and meet the specific provisions of the Palm Beach County Sea
Turtle Protection Ordinance.
Policy: 3.5.1 Village ordinances and regulations should delineate which motorized
vehicles are to be prohibited from driving on the primary dunes.
Goal.4.0.0 The complete consideration of identified use limitations in future
coastal zone planning and management decisions by the Village.
Objective: 4.1.0 The Village will continue to prohibit the disturbance of the sensitive sea
grass beds and productive mangrove and high marsh areas adjacent
and within the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve, except when
necessary for the continued health, safety and welfare of the public.
Policy: 4.1.1 The Village shall continue to require a twenty-five (25) foot landscape
buffer zone along the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve in
accordance with its participation in the Palm Beach County Mangrove
Protection Program.
Objective: 4.2.0 The Village shall limit development, redevelopment, and infrastructure
in the coastal high -hazard area in accordance with statutory
requirements.
Policy:4.2.1 The Village should keep abreast of federal requirements to assure
residents' eligibility for flood insurance.
Policy: 4.2.2 The Village should carefully scrutinize all developments in flood zone
areas as part of the planning and review process.
72 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 4.2.3 The relocation, mitigation or replacement of infrastructure within the
coastal high hazard area shall be prioritized as follows when State
funding is anticipated to be needed: 1. When the general health, safety
and welfare of the community is directly impacted; 2. When the general
health, safety and welfare is not directly impacted, mitigation of
infrastructure can be considered, while relocation of infrastructure
shall be given the lowest priorities.
Goal: 5.0.0 Protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas subject to
destruction by natural disasters.
Objective: 5.1.0 The Village shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development
in coastal high -hazard areas, except for restoration or enhancement of
natural resources.
Policy:5.1.1 The Village shall discourage the expenditure of public funds in the
coastal high -hazard area, unless funds are to be used to upgrade
existing facilities or infrastructure, or to replace damaged
infrastructure.
Policy: 5.1.2 The Village shall continue to identify areas needing redevelopment,
including the elimination of unsafe conditions and inappropriate uses,
in the coastal high hazard area.
Policy: 5.1.3 The Village Floodplain Administrator shall periodically review existing
coastal construction regulations to determine the need for revisions
based on natural disaster mitigation techniques formulated by State
and County agencies and the Village post -disaster redevelopment plan,
as it may be amended from time to time.
Objective: 5.2.0 The Village shall maintain hurricane evacuation procedures that will
maintain or reduce hurricane evacuation times.
Policy: 5.2.1 The Village shall periodically review hurricane evacuation methods and
keep abreast of procedures regarding integration into the regional
evacuation plan.
Policy:5.2.2 The Village shall consider hurricane contingency planning as a
component of the marina siting criteria and procedures referenced in
Policy 1.3.3 of this Element. „
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 173
Objective: 5.3.0 The Village shall provide for post -disaster redevelopment plans which
reduce or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private
property to natural hazards.
Policy: 5.3.1 The Village shall distinguish between immediate repair and clean up
actions needed to protect public health and safety and long term repair
and redevelopment activities by abiding by the following criteria and
procedures: 1. Mobilize Village crews, contractors, and appropriate
entities to assess and re -activate essential services (e.g. power, water,
sewer, roads, cable, telephone, etc.) as part of the immediate repair
and clean-up activities; 2. Issue press release to establish a hotline for
impacted residents and businesses to assess post -disaster damages
and send out "Disaster Relief Information Forms" directly to residents
and businesses to help assess same; 3. Cooperate and coordinate with
FEMA, DCA, and the PBC Department of Public Safety Division of
Emergency Management to perform on -site inspection of damages; 4.
Based on the previous activities perform the final repair and re-
development of damaged facilities and; 5. The Village shall seek post -
disaster redevelopment funds to offset local costs of post -disaster re-
development activities.
Policy:5.3.2 The Village shall provide for removal, relocation, or structural
modification of damaged infrastructure, as determined appropriate by
the Village, but consistent with federal funding provisions and unsafe
conditions. Priority shall be given to immediate clean-up actions and
replacement service, and maintenance of infrastructure in the coastal
high -hazard area, including but not limited to, roadways, drainage and
utilities.
Policy: 5.3.3 The Village shall restrict redevelopment in the coastal high -hazard area
as part of a post -disaster redevelopment plan and discourage the
expenditure of public funds for the construction of new facilities and
infrastructure. Where possible, economical and feasible, further, the
Village shall relocate public infrastructure and facilities outside of the
coastal high -hazard area where feasible, appropriate, and economical.
Objective: 5.4.0
Policy: 5.4.1
The Village shall protect and preserve historic resources by establishing
an archaeological and historic resource review procedure in the Village
Code of Ordinances.
The Village shall prohibit development and/or redevelopment of sites
that may be determined to have archaeological or historic significance
74 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
by amending the Village development codes to provide for a review
process by State and local agencies and, if appropriate, the
requirement to conform to a preservation plan.
Goal: 6.0.0 Continue to provide for the sustainable use of the natural resources of
the Village, and nsure that adequate services are available to serve
Village residents and the public to the coastal area, and consider
supporting sea level rise mitigation strategies.
Objective: 6.1.0 The Village shall consider investigating and adopt and implement
appropriate and cost-effective strategies which increase community
resiliency and protect property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural
resources from the impacts of climate change, sea level rise, changes in
rainfall patterns, and extreme weather events.
Policy: 6.1.1 The Village shall utilize best practices and initiate mitigation strategies
to reduce the risk of flooding in coastal areas that may result from high
tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and shall
consider the related impacts of sea level rise. [Section 163.3178, F.S
(Chapter 2015-69, Section 1)]
Policy:6.1.2 The Village shall collaborate with Palm Beach County to increase
regional resilience by sharing technical expertise, participating in
annual summits, assessing local vulnerabilities, advancing agreed -upon
mitigation and adaptation strategies, and developing joint state and
federal legislation policies and programs.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 175
Policy: 6.1.3 The Village shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach County, other
local governments, federal, state and regional agencies and private
sector to develop initiatives and goals to address sea level rise.
Policy: 6.1.4 The Village shall consider the feasibility of the use of Adaptation Action
Areas as provided by Section 163.3177(6)(g)(10), Florida Statutes, to
identify areas vulnerable to coastal storm surge and sea level rise
impacts.
Policy:6.1.5 The Village of Tequesta shall consider sea level adaptation and
mitigation measures to the extent practical.
Policy: 6.1.6 The Village of Tequesta shall consider coordinating with Palm Beach
County to integrate consideration of sea level impacts, and adaptation
and mitigation strategies, into existing and future system -wide
planning, operations, policies, and programs.
Policy: 6.1.7 The Village shall evaluate opportunities to protect coastal investments
and infrastructure, as necessary and feasible, from the impacts of
climate change. Specifically, the Village shall maintain shoreline
protection and erosion control by:
al Continuing the appropriate use of beach nourishment and sand
bypassing;
b) Facilitating the installation and maintenance of native beach dune
vegetation along appropriate areas of beach;
cl Considering hard structures, such as seawalls, only when
alternative options are unavailable.
Policy: 6.1.8 The Village shall continue the use of mitigation strategies to increase
energy efficiency and conservation, and to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. These could include, but are not limited to, land use and
transportation strategies such as encouraging compact residential
development, providing incentives for mixed use and redevelopment
that maximize internal trip capture, improving access to transit,
improving non -motorized movement, requiring interconnectivity
among adjoining parcels, and providing incentives for green building
methods.
Policy: 6.1.9 The Village shall consider working to ensure that adaptation to climate
change impacts, especially sea level rise, is incorporated into the
planning, siting, construction, replacement and maintenance of public
76 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
infrastructure in a manner that is cost-effective and that maximizes the
use of the infrastructure throughout its expected life span.
Policy: 6.1.10 The Village shall consider making the practice of adapting the built en-
vironment to the impacts of climate change an integral component of
all planning and capital improvement processes.
Objective: 6.2.0 The Village shall continue and enhance its participation in programs
that reduce flood insurance premiums for residents including but not
limited to then National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating
S sy tem.
Policy:6.2.1 The Village will continue its participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program's Community Rating System, and strive to improve
its score, resulting in reductions in flood risk and insurance premiums
for residents.
Policy: 6.2.2 The Village shall prioritize public outreach and education to residents
and the business and development community on the importance and
benefits of mitigating flood risk, and how the Village's participation in
these efforts results in reduced flood insurance premiums.
FYI
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 177
THE VILLAGE OF
4 �=
MCOMPREHENSIVE
.0
PLAN
r'OLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives,
& Policies
C
ELEM
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Goal: 1.0.0 Undertake actions necessary to: (1) keep present public facilities in
good condition, (2) accommodate new sustainable development and
redevelopment; (3) maximize the use of existing facilities and
promote orderly sustainable municipal growth, and; (4) achieve
adopted Level of Service Standards. Further, decisions to finance
public facilities improvements shall be based upon the use of sound
fiscal policy oriented to minimizing Village debt service liabilities.
Objective: 1. 1. 0 Capital Improvements will be provided to: (1) correct existing
deficiencies; (2) accommodate desired future growth, and/or (3)
address consideration of sea level
rise impacts.
Policy: 1.1.1 The Village shall include all projects identified in the policies of the
various elements of this Comprehensive Plan
elatm ely laFg . sGale and high 69St ($19 nnn ., „ateF)as capital
improvements projects for inclusion within the 5-Year Schedule of
Improvements. Provision of Ccapital improvements so defined shall be
implemented through procedures outlined in policies 1.1.2 — 1.1.4 and
1.4.1-1.4.4 of this Element. A capital improvements project is defined
to include land and/or improvements, plus any studies oriented to
defining the initial need for land and/or facilities.
Policy: 1.1.2 The Village shall, as a matter of priority, schedule for funding any capital
improvement projects in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule
CIS which are designed to correct existing public
facility deficiencies, and or that are needed to maintain or meet
adopted Level of Service Standards. In addition, the Capital
knffeyeme^t< <^hpd,--I^ CIS shall list projects funded and implemented
by other agencies that will impact the Village's ability to meet its Level
of Service standards.
Policy: 1.1.3
Village ci Pina'pce and Ildministratien .,eFRFAittee, the Village
""aRag^..,,,d- the FiRaRGe DiFeGteF The Village shall annually evaluate
and rank proposed capital projects in order of priority pfejec-ts
ffepesed for inclusion in the 5-Year CIS.
thFeUgh the !'G.. PFeheRsiye clap R dm eRt . EAR -based
Amendment
Policy: 1.1.4 Proposed capital projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of
priority according to the following guidelines:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 179
• Whether the proposed project is financially feasible;
• Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety,
fulfill the Village's legal commitment to provide facilities and
services, or to achieve the full use and efficiency of existing
facilities;
• Whether the project prevents or reduces future improvement
costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service, or
promotes in -fill development;
• Whether the proposed project is consistent with plans of State
agencies and the South Florida Water Management District.
Policy:1.1.5 The Village, in conjunction with Palm Beach County, other
municipalities and partner agencies, shall consider working to ensure
that adaptation to sea level rise is incorporated into the planning,
siting, construction, replacement and maintenance of public
infrastructure in a manner that is cost-effective and that maximizes the
use of the infrastructure throughout its expected life span.
Policy: 1.1.6 The Village in conjunction with Palm Beach County, other municipalities
and partner agencies shall consider making the practice of adapting the
built environment to the impacts of sea level rise an integral
component of all planning and capital improvement processes.
Policy: 1.1.7 The Village, in coordination with Palm Beach County, shall consider
designating Adaptation Action Areas (AAA), per Florida State Law, in
order to:
a) Identify areas that are vulnerable to the impacts of rising sea level;
b) Identify and implement adaptation policies to increase community
resilience;
c) Enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation
protects.
Objective: 1.2.0 Village expenditures in high hazard coastal areas shall be-liaa+tedte
igo%_ e,1C include those post -disaster improvements costs for facilities
over which Tequesta has operational responsibility (e.g.: potable water
systems and public streets and recreational facilities).
Policy: 1.2.1 The Village shall expend funds in high hazard coastal areas for the
replacement and renewal of public facilities over which the Village has
operational responsibility.
Policy: 1.2.2 The Village shall continue to expend funds to maintain existing facilities
and services under the jurisdiction or Tequesta at their existing Levels
of Service.
80 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy: 1.2.3 The Village shall coordinate with other agencies providing infrastruc-
ture and services in the programming and implementation of projects
that impact the achievement of its adopted Level of Service standards.
Objective: 1.3.0 Future development and redevelopment shall bear a proportionate cost
of facility improvements in order to maintain adopted Tequesta Level of
Service standards. Proportionate costs are defined to mean 100% of
that amount necessary to assure that Tequesta Level of Service
standards are maintained as a result of development approval for those
facilities over which Tequesta has operational control.
Policy: 1.3.1 The Village shall require new development to provide for local street
drainage, sewage collection, and potable water distribution system,
recreation open space, bear=h�^^ss, and other capital improvements
required to address their Level of Service impacts.
Policy: 1.3.2 Defined Recreation Facility needs may be met by any of the following
means: (1) on -site provision of public or private facilities; (2)
dedications; or (3) fees in lieu thereof. Planned expansion for potable
water and sewer systems shall be accommodated by charges
administered by the Village and the Loxahatchee River Environmental
Control District. Major road improvements shall be accommodated by
participating in the County's Fair Share Road Impact Fee program. Solid
waste collection and disposal improvements shall be accommodated
by the fee schedule annually levied by the private hauler (Note: Tipping
fees are levied by the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority).
Policy: 1.3.3 Determination of needed public facility improvements shall be made
prior to the time that a Building Permit is issued.
Objective: 1.4.0 The Village shall manage its fiscal resources to ensure the provision of
needed capital improvements at a level equal to, or exceeding, the
adopted Tequesta Level of Service standards.
Policy: 1.4.1 Prior to the issuance of certificates of Occupancy, the Village shall
require that all public facilities are available to serve development for
which development orders were previously issued. Development
orders for future development and redevelopment shall not be issued
unless the Village has demonstrated either of the following: (1)
Compliance with Tequesta Level of Service Standards; or (2) Provision
of needed public facilities in compliance with the adopted 5-Year
Capital Improvement Schedule .
Policy:1.4.2 In providing capital improvements, the Village shall limit general
obligation debt to an amount equal to or less than 5% of the property
tax base.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 181
Policy: 1.4.3 The Village will continue sly updating annually +fie —the 5-Year
capital Improvement Schedule Mall «,'e
(;9FAPFehe__R_r,ive PIaA amepdmept, in accordance with Florida Statutes.
Modifications to update the 5-year capital improvement schedule may
be accomplished by ordinance and may not be deemed to be
amendments to the local comprehensive plan. The Fe-Sults of this
.,.late shall be Fate._ %yithiR pital budget as aFt of tL..,
Village b.u.dgetiRg P . EAR -based Amendment
Policy: 1.4.4 Efforts shall be made to secure grants or private funds, whenever
available, to finance the provision of capital improvements.
Policy: 1.4.5 Appropriate mechanisms will be developed and adopted with the
South Florida Water Management District, the Loxahatchee River
Environmental Control District, Palm Beach County, Martin County,
Jupiter Inlet Colony, Jupiter Island, Rolling Hills Subdivision and
Jonathan Dickenson State Park in order to assure that adequate water
supplies are available to all water users. Prior to approval of the
building permit or its functional equivalent, the Village of Tequesta
shall consult with the Village's Water Utilities Department to determine
whether adequate water supplies to serve the new development will
be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a
certificate of occupancy. Furthermore, the Village will be responsible
for monitoring the availability of water supplies for all water users and
for implementing a system that links water supplies to the permitting
of new development.
Policy: 1.4.6 The Village shall incorporate capital improvements affecting Village
levels of service by referencing the Capital Improvements Schedules of
Palm Beach County, Martin County, Loxahatchee River Environmental
Control District, State agencies, regional water supply authorities and
other units of government providing services but not having regulatory
authority over the use of land into its 5-Year Capital Improvement
Schedule of Capital ImprevemeRts,. The Schedule shall be maintained
and updated annually.
Objective: 1.5.0 Decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits
shall be based upon coordination of the development requirements
included in this Plan, the Village land development regulations, and
availability of necessary public facilities needed to support such
development at the time needed.
Policy: 1.5.1 Prior to issuing a development order or building permit, the Village shall
use Level of Service (LOS) Standards adopted in the various elements
of this Comprehensive Plan to review the impacts of new development
and redevelopment on public facility provision. The Village shall not
issue a development order or building permit which results in a
reduction in service for affected public facilities below these Level of
82 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Service Standards. The Village of Tequesta A ,; LOS Standards is
exhibited are listed on Table CI-1.
Table CI-1. Village of Tequesta Level of Service Standards
108 gallons/capita/day
7.13 lbs./person/day.
Residential: 180 gallons/capita/day
Non -Residential: 3030 gallons/day
Storage capacity: 2.75 MG
Design Storm: 25 Year, 24 Hr. duration
Collector Roadways: LOS C, Peak D
Urban Minor Arterials: LOS C, Peak D
Urban Principal Arterials: LOS C, Peak D
Neighborhood parks: 2 acres/1000
Community Parks: 2 acres/1000
Policy:1.5.2 The Village shall maintain a Concurrency Management Ordinance
requiring that, at the time a development order is issued, adequate
facility capacity is available, or will be available upon occupancy of the
development, based upon the application of the Tequesta Level of
Service Standards.
Policy: 1.5.3 Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the
following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would:
• Contribute to any condition of public hazard as described in the
UTILITIES and COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS;
• Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits,
as described in the TRANSPORTAION ELEMENT; UTILITIES
ELEMENT; and RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT;
• Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by
capacity increases planned in the 5-Year Schedule of
Improvements; and
• Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use
Map of the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, and public facility
availability as described in UTILITIES ELEMENT.
If public facilities are developer -provided, they shall accommodate
public facility demands based upon adopted LOS standards.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 183
If public facilities are provided, in part or wholly, by the Village, financial
feasibility shall be demonstrated subject to this element.
Effects upon appropriate State agency and/or Water Management
District facilities plans shall be evaluated.
Objective: 1.6.0 The Village shall maintain a concurrency management system to ensure
that public facilities services to support development are available
concurrent with the impact of development.
Policy: 1.6.1 For sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water facilities,
the Village shall meet the following standards to satisfy the
concurrency requirements:
• A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition
that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent, the necessary facilities are in place ad
available to serve the new development; or
• At the time the development order or permit is issued, the
necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable
development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida
Statutes, or an agreement and development order issued pursuant
to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place and available to
serve a new development at the time of issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or its functional equivalent.
• A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition
that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new
development are scheduled to be in place or under actual
construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate
of occupancy or its functional equivalent as provided in the
adopted local government 5-year capital improvement schedule of
or
• At the time the development order or permit is issued, the
necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed
agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to
serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate
of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
• At the time the development order or permit is issued, the
necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable
development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida
Statutes, to be in place or under actual construction not more than
one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent.
Policy: 1.6.2 For transportation facilities (roads and mass transit designated in the
adopted Village Comprehensive Plan), at a minimum, the Village shall
84 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
meet the following standards to satisfy the concurrency requirement,
except as otherwise provided in subsections (4) — (7) of this section.
• At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary
facilities and services are in place or under construction; or
• A development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions
that the necessary facilities and services to serve the new
development are scheduled to be in place or under construction
not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or its functional equivalent as provided in the local
government five-year capital improvement scheduleef a4
The schedule of capital improvements may
recognize and include transportation projects included in the first
three years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of
Transportation five-year work program. The Capital Improvements
Element must include the following policies:
a. The estimated date of commencement of actual
construction and the estimated date of project completion.
b. A provision that a plan amendment is required to
eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road or mass
transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the
adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-
year schedule of capital improvements; or
• At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary
facilities and services are the subject of a binding, executed
agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to
serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction no more than three years after the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
• At the time a development order of permit is issued, the necessary
facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable
development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida
Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant
to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place or under actual
construction not more than three years after issuance of a
certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
Objective: 1.7.0 The following Capital Improvements Schedule, as it is annually updated
in accordance with State gFewth maRagement FeqwiFemeRts Florida
Statutes, includes all projects scheduled to meet or improve the
adopted Level of Service Standards during the five-year planning
period, and other projects that further implementation of this
Comprehensive Plan and its goals, objectives and policies.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 185
00
rn
m
O
T
m
m
p
c
m
to
D
Cl
O
v
m
2
m
Z
VI
m
r
D
Z
i•
�
7
•
o
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 187
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE
FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022
FY 2017/2018 FY 2018/2019 FY 2019120201 FY 202012021 FY 20121/20221 TOTAL 5 YEAR
ACCOUNT NAME COST
VILLAGE CLERK - DEPT. 120
COMP'.NFR EQUIPMENT
0
28 3001
0
i]
0
38.ODD
TOTAL:l
ol
30,D001
II
a
D
FINANCE - DEPT. 130
664 6Cl - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
15 000
0
0
U
0
15 000
TOTAL:
15,0001
ol
ol
16,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-DEPT. 150
664.601 - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
1 (11
❑
HI
0
ol
0
TOTAL:I
ol
ii
ol
ol
0
0
MANAGER- DEPT. 110
664 801 -COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
I ol
ol
0
0
0
0
TOTAL:
1 01
ol
ol
al
ol
0
HUMAN RESOURCES- DEPT. 111
664.001-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
150001
ol
0
0
cli
15 DOC
TOTAL:
i
ol
ol
ol
0
15000
GENERAL GOVERNMENT - DEPT. 180
664.001 - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
4 300 10 OD01 Ili 00D
15.000
12 x0
136 300
TOTAL:l
4,3001 10,000 75,000
16,000
32,000
138.300
POLICE DEPARTMENT- DEPT.'S 176
664.600. MACHIEQUIPMENT
I ao wol
BO,GOOI
80 onol
80.t100
85 000
405 000
664SI)l - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
82 000
5 000
:5 oul
7 500
16 :MID
185,00
654.602- VEHICLES
0
105AMI
105 r3ool
105,6001
ol
316.800
ToTAL:I
162,0D0
190'awl
260,6001
193,1001
101,OD0
907,300
FIRE -RESCUE - DEPT.'S
191-192
664.000-MACH/EQUIPMENT
22. COO]
_`�10
28,200
16.000
35.000
226200
664.601-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
3. 1001
5700
75.000
T500
16. 000
10606M
664.002 - VEHICLES
0
':0 700
0
35.OW
0
65 ODD
664.603- FURNITURE.FIXTURES B EQUIl
U
3
4.500
24. 600
0
29,1DO
664.605-FIRE VEHICLES
0
1
225.000
0
850.DOD
1075.000
T07AL:
25,100
'60,000
33Z700
83,100
901,000
150/
BUILDING - DEPT. 180
664.801 -COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
oI
0
0
0
0
TOTAL:
1 01
0
ol
ol
O
PARKS
AND RECREATION - DEPT. 2M
684.001 - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
0
0
663.600 Im-emerms other than Bld2s
30.000
451100
50.000
200.000
200.000
525.
654.OW MacNEquipment
14.000
0
0
0
20 000
3400(
B Construction
0
2.000.000
0
0
0
2,000.
664.607 E u merY - Tech
20.000
0
0
0
0
20.001
TOTAL:
64000
2,045,0W
60000
200000
220
PUBLIC WORKS - DEPT. 210
fi64.601- COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
0
fi64.602 - V EHICLES
0
-
450MI
0
450010
TOTAL:
0
0
46000
ol
45.000
GENERAL FUND TOTAL:
Z443,6001
716.300
635200
1,W4,0001
5237.500
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND CAPITAL PROJECTS - FUNDS = AND 303
301.663.652 - PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTJ
2500001
416 9881
3898251
1754291
1500001
1 382 241
3016133 657 - ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
3206000
320.000
320. 000
320.000
320,000
1 fi00.000
301.6W 660 - STREETLIGHTS
O
0
0
0
00
3G3,317 532- MICH.6 ENGIN. IREC CENIERI
200.000
0
0
0
0
200000
CAPITAL IMP & PROJECTS TOTAL:
rmooioIl
738
709,825
411E 429
470 ODO
3,182,241
WAT®t UTILITY - FUND 401
1362.632 - ARCHITECT 8 ENGINERRING
150,000
150,000
150.000
150.000
150 000
750,000
662 640 - WATER MAIN R&R
150.000
100.000
100.000
100 000
100.000
550.
710 - WA R PLANTENf
580 000
300.
300.ODD
300 000
1.780.0001
664600- MACH/EQl11PM
85.000
50.D00
50000
50000
50. D00
285.
684.802 - VEHICLES
75.000
40.000
40 D00
0
40. 000
195.
664.001-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
23OD
10000
10.000
10000
10.000
WATM UTILITY TOTAL:
1,047,300,
aWmi
B60
610000
660000
3
STORM WATER UTILITY - FUND 403
1163.863 - DRAINAGE IMPR-SWALES
250 000
300.000
2000001
200.000
200. 300
1,150.
6'64.1302 -VEHICLES
0
0
0
0
0
0
--1-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
0
0
!]
STORM WATER UTILITY TOTAL: 1
250
300000
200000
200000
200,D00
1,150.000
GRAND TOTAL: I
Z347,70D
4130587.E
2278125
1,941,628.5
2,574000
1.1,172041
88 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Ar
THE VILLAGE OF
67� N4:.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
POLICY DOCUMENT
Goals, Objectives,
& Policies
A
MAP SER
• A
f
A,,_
? t� yt� ��1` ,�.,:_ ,�,RP°" 6 �i i" - • I I 0. ..... � � �4 tj�j _ � �` f�; •a
-•__. rL/.L"". %w,.e �0` ya i., 6` t !!� ..� �1f. -x .,..i.wl `;t,F'�i..�q• T� '•� _ �
_ Y
y + ,
34!_-yl Fs"� '.\ 4, �j oo. �Tl�j ""-•~� S ' �Tewj-
_:.
44 7 71r
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY (MAAIMUM ... D.U.'S PER ACRE)
MEOIUM DENSITY (S.. - .2.0 D.u.'S PER ACRE1
MIXED USE (m... la D.0 :./n�.R)•
COMMERCIAL
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
CONSERVATION
OPUBLIC
BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
OOTHER
PUBLIC FACILITIES
CORPORATE LIMITS
ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES IALF'S)5/AEf1E
MA%. SR D.U: S/ACRE
1100 o SS. -- 2200
1 inch = 1100ft.
Village of Tequesta
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
FIGURE 2
AUGUST 2017
Legacy
Surveying and Mapping, Inc.
112 N. U.S. NLphray N0. 1
requests, FL. 33469
Phone: (5611 746-8424
MINESS LICENSE: LSM 8130
WWI,
a -6—A
AAA
-car.
w
7,
Al N
IAN
ed vvt�
k v
�:t
AV ITM 'I.
'jet
I fla
-f
, I L 1 2
ly
kh—
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY (MAXIMUM SA D.U.-S PER ACRE)
MEDIUM DENSITY IS.4 - M. D.U.'S PER ACRE)
MIXED USE (mAx. LaD.u.-VAv)-
COMMERCIAL
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
®
CONSERVATION
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES
VACANTLAND
CORPORATE LIMITS
Wam "M"PMR<Ege "w owo:"°R` oFT
• ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES (ALF-S) --"'+........ 2AE
MAX. L. D.U.'S/ACRE
m.
L
i -•yam
4�:
-,tA d
�
Eta
u
11D0 O 550 lim 2-
1 inch = 1100ft.
N
s
— 7
t
�
r:
.1
Village of Tequesta
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
FIGURE 1
AUGUST 2017
Legacy
Surveying and Mapping, Inc.
112 N. U.S. HpRway No. 1
TFq-11. FL. 33468
'._: ;5611 146 8424
BUSINESS LICENSE: LBO 8130
IAP
mmldt,�N,- 7� OZA
LEGEND
ARENTS - URBAN LAND COMPLEX
BASINGER FINE SAND
BEACHES
LMMOKALEE FINE SAND
MYAKKA - URBAN LAND COMPLEX
PALM BEACH - URBAN LAND COMPLEX
PAOLA SAND -O to B%SLOPE
QUARTZIPSAMMENTS, SHAPED
St. LUCIE SAND
St. LUCIE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX
TIDAL SWAMP
URBAN LAND
CORPORATE LIMITS
wt
r3 r
1100 11 550 .- 2200
1 inch = 1100ft.
N
f
iu r •i
,X
'�aF"ru y
eh
.F
Village of Tequesta
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
GENERALIZED SOILS MAP
FIGURE 5
AUGUST 2017
Legacy
b
Surveying and Mapping, Inc.
112 N. U.S. How ay No. I
TegeeNe, FL, 33486
Phone: (561) 746-0 24
BUSINESS LICENSE: LBO BIN
� � � nj#•rfiflis�i+�� �P.
r awsi, \ia 9 'mayI'Im r
:� tom"'-'"�
f j
L
jlf$.:"..''IeE ..L[�t
'ALPA HE,�,CII CUUN I Y
LOXAHATCHEE RIVER
NORTHWEST FORK
1
LEGEND
TOWN OF IUPITER/JUPITER INLET COLONY
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
• POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS
A: ANCHORAGE POINT AND IUPITER MANORS
B: IUPITER MANORS AND BERMUDA TERRACE
C: RIVERSIDE ON THE LOXAHATCHEE, RIVERSIDE PINES, RIVER PINES AND UNPIATTED
O: IUPITER RIDGE, NORTH RIVER PLANTATION, RIVERCREST, WENDIMERE HEIGHTS AND WINDSWEPT PINES
E: IUPITER CRESTA AND UNPLATTED
F: TEQUESTA HILLS AND TEQUESTA VILLAS
G: BROADVIEW, IUPITER HEIGHTS. SANOPOINTE BAY, SCRIMSHAW ON THE BAY AND UNPLATTED
H: BEACH SOUND, CARLYLE, CLARIDGE, GOMEZ GRANT. LANDFALL. OCEAN SOUND. PASSAGES AND SEAWATCH
I: WATERWAY VILLAGE
I: UNPLATTED POCKET
IFS I1 Y 3+!. . /.. �• K JJw'
r '
. a vklm
1201
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IINatlll � .
IIIIIIYI U IIIIIIII I a
IIIIIIIII�II IIIIIIII�I �(
'a u��tln�l nliil�m a � t
nnn nnmm
u1 mnme
nn uun n � -
W-
fEic ., F..}: MA—rR�IyAG L_ m
fig• ,.{ . r ^� Jq� n,.
1300 O 55. 3100 2200
1 Inch = 1100ft.
Village of Tequesta
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
POTENTIAL ANNEXATION
AREAS
FIGURE 3
AUGUST 2017
Legacy
Surveying and Mapping, Inc.
112 N. U.S. Highway No. 1
WY Tequeeta, FL. 33488
Numor Phone: (561) 746-8424
BUSINESS LICENSE: L8B 8130
Pol'
It9
� � ■.. y r w• l a,• 1 � rya 1
,► x !ss nor,
�♦ a.. �� 17ki � '�'ii. � � � � + r N `T�"-� • rri rl!�>Ii�iEY �1` I" s v�r
c � J�s,yl�. .wi i �'�-fir •;;ic" v�. �.. I�'9�,.�. V,
��` ;� �+ " '�. rV uN r+ .� ..A r�'
!►i fie► . � � t � � ,�q � � +a^�:_. ,� - .'l i ,e'�'
ol
riff
s eati. ®^ xw�'
.. r •'� iiy^♦yy`!{-. ..N artua�rf.
a } ^'•yit K� } '. :,•j� • vs
\l
Ali ..- -tl".1 �r r` rn n r r r1 t.�.A+Lr �1�sic'i'Y i, ►'..R • .a�
si`f •r" .
' + Y
f
p�
7 JIF
Its
tt -:7rfT �
THE VILLAGE OF
Em/
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
2017
update
TECHNICAL DOCUMENT
Data & Analysis
DATA & ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This document provides background information concerning the location, historical development
and socio-economic data of the Village of Tequesta. In addition, this chapter serves as the
framework for developing the Village of Tequesta's 2017 Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR)
based Comprehensive Plan update.
Per Florida Statutes, Chapter 163.3177 "the comprehensive plan shall provide the principles,
guidelines, standards, and strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social,
physical, environmental, and fiscal development of the area that reflects community
commitments to implement the plan and its elements. These principles and strategies shall guide
future decisions in a consistent manner and shall contain programs and activities to ensure
comprehensive plans are implemented."
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3191, Florida Statutes (F.S.), local governments are required to evaluate
their local comprehensive plan every seven years to determine if plan amendments are necessary
since the last update of the Comprehensive Plan, and notify the State Land Planning agency as to
its determination. In 2016, the Village of Tequesta determined it necessary to conduct a review
and evaluation of its current Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes in state requirements,
current Village's conditions, challenges and future community trends.
The vision and guiding principles of the Village of
Tequesta Comprehensive Plan embrace the following
"sustainable community" concept: An urban area with
a long-term planning and management vision that
incorporates a multi -modal transportation network;
walkable, mixed use patterns of development; denser
development where infrastructure exists; civic spaces
and interconnected open spaces for recreation;
economic vitality and job choices; choices in housing
price and size, a robust educational system, and a
unique identity. As indicated in the adjacent
illustration, the Village's sustainable community
concept serves as an umbrella under which all the
elements of the Comprehensive Plan are developed.
Comprehensive Planning Process — Evaluation and Appraisal Review
The purpose of this EAR is to examine the Comprehensive Plan over the past years since the last
update to the Comprehensive Plan, and to assess how well the Plan is serving the Village. This
EAR will identify what changes have occurred and propose how the Plan can be modified to
accommodate them. Specifically, the Purpose is to:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
• Identify major local issues that are important to the Village;
• Assess how the Comprehensive Plan has guided planning, growth and redevelopment
since the last EAR -based amendments;
• Identify changes that have occurred in Tequesta and past Village or other
governmental actions that have prompted changes in the community;
• Identify and evaluate changing conditions and trends as they relate to the major issues
identified;
• Assess both successes and shortcomings of the Plan;
• Identify what changes need to be made to the Plan to reflect current conditions and
direction;
• Determine financial feasibility of the Village Comprehensive Plan and determine to
what extent adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standards have been met;
• Respond to changes in Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code in regard
to growth management and development;
• Respond to changes to the State Comprehensive Plan and the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council Strategic Regional Policy Plan as it affects Tequesta's Comprehensive
Plan;
• Prepare updated population estimates and projections;
• Assess the success or failure of coordinating residential development in Tequesta with
school capacities and in the siting of public school facilities; and
• Identify changes to the Plan to effectively manage growth, redevelopment, and
anticipated impacts into the future.
The history of the Village's Comprehensive Plan dates back to its original adoption in October
1988, with subsequent revisions adopted in September, 1989, pursuant to the 1985 Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (Florida Statues,
Chapter 163). Next, the Village prepared and adopted an EAR -based Comprehensive Plan
amendment in August, 1996. Ordinance No. 541 (adopted July 22, 1999) amended the
Comprehensive Plan by incorporating new, revised and/or updated text, tables, maps, figures,
analysis, as well as goals, objectives and policies in various elements of the Plan. Since these
major revisions in 1999, the Village adopted a new Public School Facilities element in 2001 with
subsequent revisions. Furthermore, various amendments to the Future Land Use element were
adopted in 2002, 2004 and 2005.
The last EAR -based update to the Village's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in February 2009,
per Ordinance No. 16-08. The existing Village's Comprehensive Plan encompasses the following
ten (10) elements:
• Future Land Use
• Transportation
• Housing
• Infrastructure
- -- .._-.----- -- - - -- - --- - ----- - -
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Coastal Management
• Conservation
• Recreation and Open Space
• Intergovernmental Coordination
• Capital Improvement
• Public School Facilities (Per F. S. this is an optional element)
Most recently, in 2016, the Village determined it necessary to conduct a review and evaluation
of its current Comprehensive Plan. A notification letter was transmitted to the Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO) in January, 2016.
The current proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is based on in depth review of
each element including required legislation, demographics data, information that reflects
existing Village's conditions, and future community trends. Additionally, the adopted 2009
Evaluation and Appraisal Report, updated census, and planning and policy provisions provided
the basis for preparing amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan. The subject
Comprehensive Plan amendment also includes an update of the following map series:
• Future Land Use
• Existing Land Use
• Transportation Map
• Coastal Soil and Conservation
• Soil
• Flood Zone
• Hurricane Surge
One of the proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan is the removal of the Public School
Facilities Element, an optional element per Florida Statutes. There are no existing or planned
public school facilities within the Village limits, and the existing and projected population will not
have an impact on school attendance. The Village is concurrently requesting to be exempt from
joining the Public Schools Interlocal Agreement for Coordinated Planning, pursuant to criteria set
forth in Chapter 163.31777(3), F.S. Detailed information on this topic is presented in the
Intergovernmental Coordination Element's data and analysis section.
This EAR -based amendment to the Village's Comprehensive Plan is subject to the State
Coordinated Review process, pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), F.S. A summary of this process is
outlined below:
1. After initial local hearings (Local Planning Agency and Village Council) approving the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, the Village is required to
transmit the complete proposed plan amendment to the State Land Planning Agency.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
2. Next, within 60 days of receiving the complete amendment proposal, the State Land
Planning Agency issues an Objection, Recommendation, and Comments Report
(ORC) to the local government.
3. The Village is required to hold a second public hearing to adopt the amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The complete adopted Comprehensive Plan amendment must then be submitted
back to the State.
5. Finally, within 45 days of receiving the complete adopted plan amendment, the State
Land Planning Agency issues a Notice of Intent to find the plan in compliance or not
in compliance, which is posted on their website.
As part of the Village's community participation process, a number of workshops were held to
discuss the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Planning & Zoning Board, sitting as
the Local Planning Agency (LPA) Board, had a total of two workshops prior to the LPA transmittal
hearing. One took place September 21, 2017 and a second was held November 16, 2017. In
addition, the Village Council also had two workshops which took place October 30, 2017 and
December 4, 2017.
Next, public hearings are required to transmit the proposed amendments to the State Land
Planning Agency, including a Local Planning Agency (LPA) hearing followed by a Village Council
hearing. The LPA hearing is scheduled for December 21, 2017, followed by the Village Council
transmittal hearing on January 11, 2018.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Village of Tequesta is located in the northern portion of Palm Beach County along the
County's eastern seaboard. Incorporated in 1957, the Village encompasses 2.3 square miles
(2014) bounded by: Martin County to the north; the Town of Jupiter, Town of Jupiter Inlet County,
unincorporated Palm Beach County, and the Loxahatchee River to the south; the Atlantic Ocean,
incorporated Palm Beach County, and the intracoastal waterway to the east, and; the northwest
fork of the Loxahatchee River to the west.
.......�.+► --r
4
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 1: Village of Tequesta Location
a ems"'
History and Development
The information contained in this section was taken direction from the History of Tequesta 25
Year Anniversary and History of Tequesta 50 Years Anniversary publications, which can be found
on the Document Center accessed through the Village's website.
Our Indian Story
The following excerpts are from an intriguingly thorough study on Indians of the area as they
relate to the election of the name Tequesta" for our Village. The material is part of a
comprehensive manuscript by Gwyn Corbett. Contrary to popular belief, the Tequesta Indians
never lived here permanently. That bit of folklore which led to the selection of the charming
name for the Village seems to be historically disproved.
The Tequesta Indians were a southern Florida aboriginal tribe that occupied most of the present
Dade County and as far north as Pompano in Broward County. To the west and south their lands
merged with the Calusa and boundaries wavered from time to time as that more powerful tribe
dominated Tequesta settlements." At various times the Tequesta were also in the Keys. They
occupied the Everglades only around the edges. Their preference was the Miami area, with the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15
largest settlements on Biscayne Bay (Chequesha). They liked to live at the mouth of streams,
inlet, and among coastal beaches.
The Jaega and the Jobe (Hobe) are of the same tribe. A small group comprised of three villages,
not industrious or powerful, they were spring -offs from the major sophisticated Argonomic
Timucuan Indians. They lived as semi -nomads relying entirely on wild foods. The largest
settlement in this area was located on the South side of the Jupiter Inlet, where the Dubois
homestead is located.
Florida was the home of more than 100,000 Indians when Christopher Columbus first sailed to
the new world in 1492. The Indians were descendants of nomadic Indian hunters who had
entered the state in search of game at least 10,000 years earlier. But today there are no living
descendants of these first Floridians. European diseases, warfare, and enslavement completely
destroyed these aboriginal people during the 200 years following the founding of St. Augustine
in 1565. By 1720, the northern Florida Indian was non-existent and by 1763 the south Florida
Indian had also disappeared. Indians who survived were taken by the Spaniards on ships to Cuba
for slavery.
Historic Jupiter-Teguesta
Archeologists tell us that Jupiter on the lower east coast of Florida has been inhabited for nearly
2,500 years. The name Jupiter Inlet has appeared on early Florida maps since 1770. Certainly this
place, with its winding rivers and blue-green tides, has a warm, lived-in atmosphere and a feeling
of antiquity that has an unfailing attraction for new residents and holds the old ones wedded to
its charms.
Since the name is odd and intriguing, many people are interested in its origin, which dates back
to the first Spanish explorers who visited the coast of Florida. The Herrera account of Ponce de
Leon's first voyage in 1513 seems to indicate he came into Jupiter inlet for wood and water, and
to investigate the Indians. Menendez visited the inlet in December and January of 1555-1556.
Here, they found a tribe of Jaega Indians who called themselves Jobes, living on a high shell -
mound near the inlet. It was custom to name rivers for the nearest Indians, sot he river flowing
into the Inlet became Jobes Rivers, pronounced by the Spaniards "Hoe -bay". The town 8 miles
north of Jupiter is still known as Hobe Sound. When the English arrived in 1763, the Hoe -bay
seemed the Spanish version of Jove, which they in turned changed to Jupiter, from which it has
never been altered.
An iconic Jupiter landmark is the red brick lighthouse which stands at the junction of the Indian
and Loxahatchee Rivers and the Jupiter Inlet channel. The busy traffic of the Inland Waterway
passes before it and there is a breathtaking view from a 105-foot tower. The three branches of
the Loxahatchee River winding best, the Indian River and the Jupiter Island Resort on the north,
the Atlantic Ocean on the east, the inland waterway, Juno and West Palm Beach south, present
a panorama encompassing one of the most beautiful parts of Florida.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The lighthouse was built shortly before the Civil War and celebrated the centennial of its first
lighting July 10, 1960. It stands on a 61 acre tract, which was part of the 9,088 acres of Fort Jupiter
Reservation, set aside after the Seminole Indian War. One of the engagements of the war was
fought on the Loxahatchee river on January 24, 1838.
To most pioneers, the 1890's when the Jupiter area was the transportation center of southeast
Florida, and Juno was the county seat of Dade County, had all the enchantment of a Rovers and
Hammerstein musical. Indian River steamers docked across from the Lighthouse. Another
steamer, found too large to navigate the shallows was tied up here and became a floating hotel.
The steamers were met by a narrow gauge train knows from its stations of Jupiter, Juno, Venus
and Mars, as the Celestrial Railroad.
Tequesta is Chartered —1957
After an early, but abortive, attempt to create an all -encompassing "Village of Jupiter Beach,"
Charles Martyn and friends moved to incorporate the confines of the present day Tequesta
Country Club community. (Jupiter Beach would have included all land north of Jupiter proper to
the Martin County line, and from the middle of the Loxahatchee River to the Atlantic Ocean.)
Hence, under "Chapter 57-1915, House Bill No. 1492," The Village of Tequesta was created. It
was merely a piece of legislation enacted by the State of Florida, which "became as law without
the governor's approval," an inauspicious but legally acceptable beginning.
Immediately after following the July 4, 1957 incorporation date, the Village began getting
organize and adopting regulations.
The Sixties
Initially developed as a
retirement golf community,
the Village eventually
expanded beyond this
original vision. Though
development was slower in
the beginning, it increased
more rapidly throughout
the first decade. The 1960's
saw the rapid development
of the Country Club
Community and
surrounding pockets of
county land. Pratt &
Whitney was in its prime,
Tequesta street map from a 1960's brochure designed to sell property in the newly
formed Village. ,,w.re'k.:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
which drew numerous families to the area for new job opportunities when they relocated to
northern Palm Beach County from Connecticut.
By 1967, the Tequesta Country Club was already expanding its facilities to better serve the
community. By the end of the decade, the Village had a bowling alley, two movie theaters, and a
growing number of families.
The Seventies, Eighties, Nineties, and New Millennium
In the 1970's more merchants opened for business. By this time, Tequesta had a movie theater
and a K-Mart in a shopping plaza. There were also two grocery stores, a hardware store, a variety
store, and many other shops to accommodate the needs of a growing community.
By the 1980's, the Village of Tequesta continued to attract families to the area and was rapidly
evolving as a community. The first "skyscraper' was built on US Highway One, which remains the
only building of this sort. County Line Plaza was built, which drew large anchor stores to this
location.
The urban fabric of the Village evolved in the Nineties, as new multi -family developments
appeared, offering a more affordable living option for the younger generation. Older, outdated
shopping centers were replaced with newer plazas and office complexes.
Today
Over the past 58 years, the Village of Tequesta has transformed from a crude, at best, settlement
of strong-willed and strong -bodied pioneers to a thriving, modern small Village. Today, Tequesta
boasts a population of over 6,500, including seasonal residents, still small in comparison to the
neighboring Jupiter, with over 50,000 residents. As of 2014, the median age was 49.3 years,
considerably less than when the Village was incorporated, as it was originally developed as a
retirement golf community.
Although small in size, the Village of Tequesta continues to stand out in Palm Beach County and
around the state. In 2017, the Village was the recipient of three awards related to the Village of
Tequesta U.S. Highway 1 (US-1) Master Plan and Complete Streets Project. This $3.2 million
project includes resurfacing and safety improvements along a 1.4 mile stretch of U.S. Highway 1,
which is further detailed in the Transportation Element of the Data and Analysis document
provides more detail of this project.
During the October 121h, 2017, Village Council meeting, Michael Busha, Executive Director of
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, presented Mayor Abby Brennan with three awards.
The awards included "Outstanding Infrastructure Award" from the Florida Planning & Zoning
Association; Award of Merit: Best Practices Category from the Florida Chapter of the American
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Planning Association; and an Innovation Award from the National Association of Development
Organization.
The Village is committed to making Tequesta a safe and enjoyable community for both residents
and visitors. This important transportation project will transform a major corridor into a safe,
accessible, and aesthetically pleasing roadway which will accommodate all users, whether on
foot, bike, bus, private vehicle, or other mode of transit.
Land Use
With its extensive waterfront property,
high quality residential development,
extensive park system, and natural
beauty, the Village of Tequesta offers its
residents a high quality of life and small-
town ambiance in a major metropolitan
region. Within the five, ten, and twenty
year planning periods, the Village does
not project significant new
development or redevelopment to
occur within its boundaries, or
significant population growth.
Redevelopment needs are minimal, and
are primarily limited to the remaining
handful of vacant parcels and
streetscape improvements in the
commercial areas along U.S. Highway 1.
Because of these factors, no major
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
issues were identified in the Evaluation and Appraisal Review. The amendments are generally
intended to update dates and references, delete obsolete objectives and policies, provide new
or amend existing objectives and policies to address new statutory requirements or addressing
changing conditions and improve readability and organization.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Population
Table 1, Historic Population Trends, presents historic population trends for the Village of
Tequesta. Palm Beach County data is also presented for comparison. Incorporated in 1957, the
Village experienced rapid growth during the sixties and seventies. Large industries arrived to this
northern area of Palm Beach County during this time, which resulted in the development of
multiple subdivisions to accommodate new job opportunities.
Throughout the 1980, 1990s, and 2000s, Village experienced a steady population increase.
However, the growth rate was on a steady decline, as the Village became almost fully developed.
Multi -family developments during this time mark some of the last developments in the area, as
the Village became almost fully built -out. Besides potential development opportunities on the
few remaining vacant lots, the population is not expected to see much more significant increases
to the population from new development. According to the Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEER) of the University of Florida, the population of the Village had increased to 5,665
people by 2015. Additional population analysis and estimates of permanent and seasonal
population 2015-2040 are presented at the end of this document.
Table 1. Historic Population Trends
' •
199
-
-
228,106
-
-
2,642
2,443
1227.6%
348,993
120,887
53.0%
3,685
1,043
39.5%
576,863
227,870
65.3%
®'
4,499
814
22.1%
863,518
286,655
49.7%
5,273
774
17.2%
1,131,186
267,668
31.0%
5,629
356
6.8%
1,320,241
189,055
16.7%
5,756
68
1.2%
1,397,710
77,469
5.9%
5,665
-
-
1,378,417
-
-
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau;
1980 & 1990 Decennial Census; Bureau of Economic and Business
Research
(BEER), University of Florida.
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
2010 U.S. Censu
According to the U.S. 2010 Census, there were an estimated 5,629 people, 3,257 housing units,
and 1,567 families residing in 2,490 households in the Village of Tequesta. The racial makeup of
the Village was 90.4% White, 0.6% African American, 0.00% Native American, 1.8% Asian,
0.00% Pacific Islander, 0.8% from other races, and 0.9% from two or more races. Hispanics or
Latinos of any race were 6.3% of the population.
Of the 2,490 households, 23.7% included children under the age of 18, 51.4% were married
couples living together, 7.9% were female householders with no husband present, and 37.1%
were non -families. 16.6% of the households had a person living alone who was 65 years of age
or older, 2.2% being 85 years and older. The average household size was 2.27 and the average
family size was 2.89.
In the Village, the population included 17.6% under the age of 18, 82.4% 18 and over, 5.5% from
15 to 19, 4.1% from 20 to 24, 7.0% from 25 to 34, and 16.6% who were 65 years of age or older.
The median age was 49.3 years. The population consisted of 52.7% females and 47.3% males.
Characteristics of the Population
This section examines the socioeconomic characteristics of the population. The following analysis
is based on the American Community Survey (ACS) of the U.S. Census Bureau which includes
estimates based on a sample of households over a 5-year period. The data provided by the ACS
allows an in depth analysis of socioeconomic variables and trends. The following tables reflect
the most recent data provided by the ACS and are organized in columns, each representing a 5-
year period: the first provides data from 2006-2010, and the second from 2010-2014.
Households
Table 2 presents the number of households and persons per household according to the
American Community Survey (ACS) from the U.S. Census Bureau. A household is defined as the
person or persons occupying a dwelling unit.
As the average household size decreases, the number of households or required dwelling units
increases relative to the population. Due to several factors, average household size is decreasing
throughout the United States. These factors include families having fewer children and delaying
the birth of children; young adults no longer living with parents but moving out on their own, and
older persons living longer independently and not returning to their children in their later years.
Combined, these factors have led to a decrease in the average household size.
Conversely, the average household size in the Village of Tequesta as almost remained the same,
with a slight increase from 2.27 to 2.28 between 2010 and 2014, as indicated in Table 2. These
numbers are slightly lower than the 2014 Palm Beach County average household size of 2.51
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
persons. In 2014, there were an estimated 2,519 households in the Village, with the majority
(62.3%) of those households being families, while 37.8% were non -family households.
Similarly, of Palm Beach County's estimated 529,729 households, 61.9% were family households
and 38.1% were non -family households. The Village has a higher percentage of households with
one or more people 60 years and over, 44.7%, compared to Palm Beach County, which has 38.6%.
Between 2010 and 2014, the percentage of married -couple families in the Village decreased from
51.4% to 43%, while the number of single -parent households increased during this time.
Table 2. Households by
Total2,490
(X)
2,519
(X)
529,729
(X)
householdsFamily
1,567
62.9%
1,566
62.3%
327,716
61.9%
With own children under 15 years
590
23.7%
609
24.2%
126,113
23.8%
Married-couple1,281
51.4%
1084
43.0%
239,754
45.3%
'Wj�thown children under 18 years
438
17.6%
367
14.6%
80,469
15.2%
I
Male householder, no wife
present, family
90
3.6%
156
6.2%
23,840
4.5%
50
2.0%
51
2.0%
11,117
2.1%
With own children under 1S years
Female h-iluseholder, no husband
196
present, family
7.9%
326
12.9%
64,122
12.1%
102
4.1%
191
7.6%
34,527
6.5%
With own children under 1S years
Nonfamily households
923
37.1%
953
37.8%
202,013
38.1%
Hilusehilder living alone
824
33.1%
877
34.8%
166,476
31.4%
65 years • over
414
16.6%
358
14.2%
83,902
15.8%
Households
people
653
26.2%
675
26.8%
139,762
26.4%
Hausehtlds with one or more II
1,021
41.0%
1126
44.7%
204,327
38.6%
people
•
2.27
(X)
2.28
(X)
2.51
(X)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau;
2006-2010 5-Year American
Community
Survey
& 2010-2014 5-Year
American Community Survey.
Population Age
Table 3 shows the numerical and percentage breakdown of the Village's population by age in
2010 and 2014 according to the American Community Survey (ACS) from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The 45-54-year-old age group is the largest in both years (16.7% and 20%). In both 2010 and
2014, the second largest age group was 65-74-year-olds. However, the population in this age
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
group decreased between 2010 and 2014, from 15.5% to 12.9%. Overall, Tecluesta's population
65 and over has decreased, with the most growth seen in the 45 to 59-year age groups.
Palm Beach County's 2014 population trends reflect a growing younger population, with the
largest percentage of the population between the ages of 45-54 years (14%); the second largest
age group was 35-44 years (12%); and 11.4% was between 25 to 34 years of age.
Table 3. Population Age
5,642
(X)
5,756
(X)
1,359,074
1,359,074
2,669
47.3%
2,842
49.4%
657,406
48.4%
2,973
52.7%
2,914
50.6%
701,668
51.6%
106
1.9%
256
4.4%
70,776
5.2%
366
6.5%
235
4.1%
74,723
5.5%
381
6.8%
365
6.3%
76,842
5.7%
310
5.5%
338
5.9%
80,236
5.9%
230
4.1%
161
2.8%
78,467
5.8%
393
7.0%
375
6.5%
154,437
11.4%
642
11.4%
635
11.0%
163,625
12.0%
941
16.7%
1,153
20.0%
190,337
14.0%
465
8.2%
580
10.1%
89,148
6.6%
301
5.3%
373
6.5%
79,773
5.9%
872
15.5%
743
12.9%
141,317
10.4%
512
9.1%
432
7.5%
105,232
7.7%
123
2.2%
110
1.9%
54,161
4.0%
49.3 (X) 49.3 (X) 43.9 (X)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
Population Race
Tables 4 and 5 present the racial characteristics of the Village's population according to the
American the Community Survey (ACS) from the U.S. Census Bureau. At 92.8%, the largest
portion of the population in the Village of Tequesta is White. While the White population
decreased between 2010 and 2014, the second largest race population, Hispanic or Latino of any
race, increased from 6.3% to 10.2%. The Village's Asian population increased from 1.8% to 4.4%
between 2010 and 2014, which is higher than that of Palm Beach County. Palm Beach County
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
data reflects a slightly different racial breakdown. At the county level, 75.5% percent of the
population was white (including persons of any origin) in 2014. Hispanic or Latino of any race
accounted for 20% of the population, while Black or African American was 17.7%.
Table 4. Population Race
• ' • • 5,642
W
5,756
W
1,359,074
1,359,074
5,412
95.9%
5,343
92.8%
1,025,542
75.5%
Blackor African American 35
0.6%
92
1.6%
241,136
17.7%
American Indian and
0
Alaska Native
0.0%
0
0.0%
2,506
0.2%
' 101
1.8%
252
4.4%
33,688
2.5%
II
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
702
0.1%
Other Pacific Islander
Some 43
0.8%
0
0.0%
28,167
2.1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010
American Community
Survey & 2010-2014
5-Year
American
Community Survey.
Table S. Population Origin and Race
5,642
-
5,756
-
1,359,074
1,359,074
5,100
90.4%
4,764
82.8%
793,341
58.4%
35
0.6%
92
1.6%
234,736
17.3%
355
6.3%
588
10.2%
271,524
20.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1,543
0.1%
Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 608 0.0%
aloneAsian 101 1.8% 252 4.4% 33,506 2.5%
�.. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,048 0.4%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
---...........
---
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Education
Table 6 indicates the education attainment level of the Village's population according to the
American Community Survey (ACS) from the U.S. Census Bureau. Achievement levels are broken
down into different categories. The college level groups are further broken down to show those
that had some college (no degree), an associate's degree, a bachelor's degree, and a graduate or
professional degree. Achievement levels recorded are the highest level (years completed)
reached by an individual.
According to Table 6, 93.8% of the population had a high school diploma or higher educational
level in the 2006-2010 period. The Village of Tequesta experienced a small increase to 94.4 % in
the period 2010-2014. That figure is just slightly higher than the 87.7% of the population in Palm
Beach County who had a high school diploma or higher education level. The number of
individuals with a graduate or professional degree increased from 11.8% in 2010 to 15.8 % in
2014 in the Village, compared to 12.3% in 2014 for Palm Beach County.
Table 6. Educational Attainment
4,249
(X)
4,401
(X)
978,030
(X)
97
2.3%
198
4.5%
57,704
5.9%
165
3.9%
48
1.1%
63,572
6.5%
1,087
25.6%
1,047
23.8%
256,244
26.2%
941
22.1%
665
15.1%
199,518
20.4%
287
6.8%
462
10.5%
81,177
8.3%
1,169
27.5%
1,285
29.2%
199,518
20.4%
503
11.8%
695
15.8%
120,298
12.3%
(X) 93.8% (X) 94.4% (X) 87.7%
(X) 39.4% (X) 45.0% (X) 32.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
Employment
Tables 7 and 8 provide employment and occupation data according to the American Community
Survey (ACS) from the U.S. Census Bureau. Between 2010 and 2014, the Village's population that
was in labor force increased from 59.8% to 64.8%. Countywide, 60.2% of the population was part
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
of the labor force in 2014, while 39.8% were not in the labor force. The Village labor force
unemployment rate in 2010 was 1.8% which increased to 3.2% in 2014, compared to 6.5% in
Palm Beach County.
In 2010, 34.2% of the labor force was engaged in management, business, science, and arts
occupations, which increased to 50.1% in 2014. Service occupations increased from 14.5% to
17.1%, while natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations experienced an
increase from 9.9% to 12.5%. Other occupations in the village decreased between 2010 and 2014.
Sales and office occupations decreased from 35.4% to 19.2%; Production, transportation, and
material moving occupations saw a decline from 6% to 1.1%. In 2014, 35.4% of the labor force
in Palm Beach County was engaged in management, business, science, and arts occupations,
which was lower than that of the Village. Palm Beach County had a higher percentage of the
population engaged in sales and office occupations at 26.4% than the Village, which saw a
decrease in this occupation between 2010 and 2014.
Table 7. Employment Status
In labor force 2,828
59.8%
3,134
64.8%
675,048
60.2%
Civilian labor force■, 2,828
59.8%
3,134
64.8%
674,589
60.2%
• • 7 • 2,745
58.0%
2,980
61.7%
601,783
53.7%
Unemployed83
1.8%
154
3.2%
72,806
6.5%
Armed . 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
459
0.0%
• ;+ ,,.,.�_,, po 1,902
40.2%
1,699
35.2%
445,793
39.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community
Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
1�'f►yr� o
rn-gs'
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 8.Occupation
165 6.0% 33 1.1% 43,051 7.2%
material moving occupations I
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
ji
i
J10 r
_ .1=
Table 9 presents top employers in Palm Beach County according to Palm Beach County's 2014
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
Table 9. Palm Beach County Principal Employers
Palm Beach County School Board
21,449
Palm Beach County Government
11,626
Tenet Healthcare Corp
6,100
NextEra Energy (Florida Power & Light)
3,804
G4S (Wackenhut Corp)
3,000
Florida Atlantic University
2,980
Hospital Corporation of America (HCA)
2,714
Veterans Health Administration
2,700
Bethesda Memorial Hospital
2,643
Boca Raton Regional Hospital
2,250
Source: Palm Beach County's 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Income
Table 10 shows income and benefits data according to the American Community Survey (ACS)
from the U.S. Census Bureau. The median income per household declined between 2010 and
2014, possibly due to the economic downturn that characterized the great recession years. The
median household income in the Village declined between 2010 and 2014, from $63,800 to
$54,787. However, the mean household income increased from $82,843 to 87,390 during this
time. In Palm Beach County, the 2014 median household income was $52,878, while the mean
household income was $80,961.
During the 2006-2010 time period, 20.9% of total households in Tequesta earned an income
between $50,000 and $74,000. However, by 2014, an estimated 18% of the total households
earned an income between $100,000 and $149,999, which was the highest percentage of all
income levels. As for Palm Beach County, the highest percentage of total households, 17.3%,
earned $50,000 to $74,999, while 12.5% of total households earned between $100,000 and
$149,999, in 2014.
Between 2006 and 2010, 6.2% of the population of the Village earned more than $200,000, which
increased to 8.1% during the 2010-2014 period. This percentage is higher than the 6.4% earning
more than $200,000 in Palm Beach County during the same period. Overall, the Village of
Tequesta household income was higher than that of Palm Beach County between 2010 and 2014.
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 10. Income and Benefit
2,490
(X)
2,519
(X)
529,729
(X)
106
4.3%
73
2.9%
34,021
6.4%
131
5.3%
131
5.2%
27,469
5.2%
183
7.3%
234
9.3%
58,443
11.0%
191
7.7%
268
10.6%
56,755
10.7%
346
13.9%
395
15.7%
74,889
14.1%
521
20.9%
358
14.2%
91,492
17.3%
323
13.0%
292
11.6%
60,504
11.4%
412
16.5%
454
18.0%
66,224
12.5%
122
4.9%
109
4.3%
26,179
4.9%
155
6.2%
205
8.1%
33,753
6.4%
63,800 (X) 54,787 (X) 52,878 (X)
82,843 (X) 87,390 (X) 80,961 (X)
ter- -. __ _ - ,�
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
Poverty Level
Table 11 presents the percentage of families and people whose income in the past calendar year
was below the poverty level. Federal poverty levels are used to determine eligibility for certain
programs and benefits. Poverty level is a measure of income level issued annually by the
Department of Health and Human Services. The economic downturn and high level of
unemployment during the great recession impacted income and raised the number of families
and people under poverty level in Tequesta as experienced elsewhere.
Overall, the Village of Tequesta has lower poverty levels than Palm Beach County. However, the
number of families and people below the poverty level in the Village increased from 2010 to
2014. All families below the poverty level increased from 1.6% to 3.9%; and all people from 3.4%
to 5.4%. As for Palm Beach County, 10.5% of all families, and 14.6% of all people were below the
poverty level in 2014. On the contrary, the number of families in the Village with female
householders (no husband present) decreased from 10.7% to 5.8% during this time period,
whereas 26.2% of these families were below the poverty level in Palm Beach County. In both the
Village and the county, more families with female householders (no husband present) were
under the poverty level in comparison with married couple families.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
Table 11. Poverty Level
1.6%
3.9%
10.5%
3.8%
5.5%
17.8%
0.0%
0.0%
17.2%
0.0%
3.9%
5.8%
0.0%
4.8%
9.2%
0.0%
0.0%
6.6%
husband present
10.7%
5.8%
26.2%
8.0%
34.7%
relatedWith children under18.6%
relatedWith children under0.0%
0.0%
38.1%
' '' • •
3.4%
5.4%
14.6%
Under 18 years
3.1%
6.0%
22.3%
Related children under3.1%
6.0%
22.0%
Related children under0.0%
0.0%
25.3%
Related children 5 to 17 years
3.4%
7.8%
20.8%
18 years • over
3.5%
5.3%
12.6%
18 to •' years
2.9%
5.6%
14.1%
65 years • over
4.8%
4.6%
8.8%
People in families
1.3%
4.2%
12.5%
Unrelated individuals 15 years and over
12.1%
10.0%
21.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 American
Community Survey & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
Population Projections
As indicated in Table 12, the most recent estimate of the permanent population for the Village is
6,119 residents for 2040, according to the Shimberg Center for Housing Studies Clearing, which
are based on University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEER) and the
center's housing data. Seasonal population presented an actual increase of 325 people between
the last decennial censuses. That represented a 54% increase in seasonal residents. That growth
coincided with a peak in Condo construction where the majority of seasonal residents own or
rent property today. Since then, the Village has essentially reached a built -out status. It has been
assumed that seasonal population may continue to grow but at the same pace of the permanent
population. Table 12 presents a total population, including seasonal, of 7,128 people for the year
2040.
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Therefore, both permanent and seasonal population are expected to remain stable over the next
20 years given the built -out status mentioned above, unless the Village chooses to pursue a new
major annexation program, which has been rejected in the recent past by residents of those
areas, or attract considerable higher density redevelopment in the future. Although the
University of Florida's BEBR is projecting a 358,117 increase in the number of permanent
residents living in Palm Beach County between 2015 and 2035, it is unlikely that the Village's
growth will be impacted without some significant change in anticipated conditions.
In conclusion, Table 12 presents actual population growth increase between the last two
decennial censuses. Since then, the Village has experienced very little population growth, which
is estimated to continue, as shown in the projected population 2015-2040. A factor that has
certainly contributed to the Village's slowing growth rate include the lack of available land for
new development, since the Village is basically built out. Future estimated population growth
could be accommodated in the remaining vacant land, potential annexation of unincorporated
enclaves scattered throughout the Village or potential higher density redevelopment of existing
areas.
While the Village of Tecluesta's growth rate has decreased overtime, Palm Beach County's
population is projected to increase steadily over the next 20 years, reaching an estimated
1,736,534 people by 2035, as indicated in Table 13.
Table 12. Projected Total Population, Village of Tequesta, 2015-2040
5273
5629
5665
5808
5916
5977
6063
6119
603
928
934
958
976
986
1000
1009
5876
6557
6599
6766
6892
6963
7063
7128
Sources: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Population Projections; U.S.
Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Decennial Census; Palm Beach County Planning Zoning & Building
Department: 2016 County Profile-2010 Seasonal figure for Tequesta; Shimberg 2010-40 projections,
Accessed Nov 28, 2017.
Table 13. Projected Total Population, Palm Beach County, 2015-2035
Sources: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Population Projections; U.S.
Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Decennial Census.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
REFERENCES AND SOURCES
History of Tequesta 25 Year Anniversary (Village of Tequesta Document Center)
History of Tequesta 50 Years Anniversary (Village of Tequesta Document Center)
University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research.
U.S. Census Bureau, 1980 & 1990 Decennial Census
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey; 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
22 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents an inventory and analysis of background data for preparation of the Land
Use Element and Future Land Use Map for the Village of Tequesta pursuant to Section
163.3177(6), Florida Statutes. This Data and Analysis document provides the framework for
evaluation of key land use issues and preparation of the Future Land Use Map and goals,
objectives, and policies presented in the Policy Document.
The purpose of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan is to influence existing and
future land use patterns by designating appropriate locations for future land uses and
establishing a policy framework for managing future growth and development to accommodate
anticipated employment and population. These policies focus not only on the location of land
uses and the density and intensity of these uses, but also on the form and character of the
physical development.
Long range sustainable community planning recognizes the interrelationship between land use,
housing and transportation (Figure 1-1). The Future Land Use Element provides the policy
mechanism to coordinate these three factors to provide a mix of housing and land uses that will
satisfy demand and support a balanced, inclusive community.
Figure 1-1. Relationship between Land Use, Housing and Transportation
Land Use
Housing Transportation
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
The Land Use Element is the critical policy mechanism for integrating the policies and strategies
of the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan into a coherent and consistent set of land use
goals, objectives, and policies. As such, the element must be consistent with all other elements
of the Comprehensive Plan and incorporate the concepts and principles of these elements in its
land use policies in a manner that minimizes impacts on natural and historic resources, provides
and maintains public services and facilities at adequate levels of service, enhances community
character and the quality of life of the Village's residents, businesses, and visitors.
The Future Land Use Map and policies of this element provide the policy framework and rationale
basis for Village's land development regulations and programs to implement the Comprehensive
Plan. Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.), all land development regulations and
development permitting actions are required to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element
and other elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Land Uses
The current land uses within the Village of Tequesta reflect its historical development pattern.
The total acreage for existing land uses, including vacant lands and rights -of -way is 1,172.26
acres. Not included in this total are the 296.19 acres within the Village limits that are occupied
by open water. Therefore, the Village limits cover approximately 2.29 square miles. The
distribution of existing land uses by acreage are tabulated in Table 1-1 below.
Table 1-1. Existing Land Use 2016
3,019,685
69.32
4.70%
351,962
8.08
0.60%
19,367,578
444.62
30.30%
3,090,493
70.95
4.80%
3,937,361
90.39
6.20%
613,396
14.08
1.00%
898,132
20.62
1.40%
9,529,489
218.77
14.90%
9,134,927
209.71
14.30%
12,902,044
296.19
20.20%
1,120,494
25.72
1.80%
• 63,965,561 1,468.45 100.00%
Sources: Community Development Department, Existing Land Use Map, Village of Tequesta, 2016.
Residential
Residential land use constitutes 35.10% percent of the land acreage within the corporate limits
and is the major land use within the village. The residential land use category contains single-
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
family, duplex, and multi -family units. This category does not include motels, hotels, or mixed
residential -commercial projects.
Of the total land in residential use, 30.30 percent is in single family use. The maximum net density
(including right-of-way) for single-family use 5.4 units per acre.
Multi -family uses, which include duplex and multiple dwellings on a single parcel/lot, account for
4.80 percent of total residential acreage. The maximum net density for multi -family uses is 12
units per acre. Not included in this category are residential units mixed with commercial uses,
but included are condominium projects that include dwelling units occupied for seasonal and
transient residential uses.
Commercial
Commercial uses account for 4.70 percent of total existing land use acreage. Major commercial
uses are located mainly in linear strips along U.S. Highway 1 (US-1), the major commercial
corridor in Tequesta. Minor commercial uses are located along Old Dixie Highway, Tequesta
Drive and Cypress Drive.
Commercial uses include retail/personal sales and services, finance, insurance, real estate,
professional and legal administrative offices.
Transportation
Transportation accounts for 14.30 percent of total existing land use. The vast majority of this
acreage is occupied by local roads.
M IYPH I ICP
Mixed residential and commercial uses constitute 6.20 percent of total land use acreage in the
Village. The Mixed Use area is located east of Old Dixie Highway, west of U.S. Highway 1, largely
between Bridge Road and Village Boulevard. There are 90.39 Mixed Use acres just north of
Village Boulevard boarding Old Dixie Highway. The Mixed Use category includes a mix of single
and multi -family residential uses; small scale retail sales and services, business services and
professional services primarily designed to serve residential use buildings; and recreation and
open space
Public Buildings and Grounds
This land use category includes land and structures owned, leased or operated by a government
entity, and/or privately -owned but used for a public purpose. 2.62 acres; 1.40 percent.
--------------
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3
Other Public Facilities
Public or private facilities or institutions such as churches, schools, fraternal organizations, and
nursing homes. 14.08 acres; 1.00 percent
Recreation and Open Space
Recreation and open space areas, which account for 14.90 percent of total land use in the Village,
include active or passive recreational use. Public parks and facilities include Tequesta Park,
Constitution Park, the Skate Park, and Tequesta Recreation Center. A private golf club, The
Tequesta Country Club Golf Course, accounts for a large portion (125.36 acres) of the total 218.77
acres in this category. At 50.89 acres, the U.S. Government Lighthouse Reservation is another
large tract in the Recreation and Open Space category.
Conservation
Conservation lands (8.08 acres) account for 0.60 percent of total existing land use and includes
land used for the conservation and preservation of natural resource.
vacant
Those lands that are not currently developed are classified as vacant land. Approximately 8.10
percent of land use acreage in the Village is in this category.
Change in Land Area
In 2011, the Village of Tequesta developed an Annexation Strategic Plan Analysis (ASPA) to guide
the process of annexing surrounding properties, both commercial and residential. The ASPA
provided the Village with critical information for making decisions regarding the future growth
of the Village of Tequesta. The final purpose of the annexation analysis was to evaluate the costs
and benefits of annexing potential adjoining areas, and to define a suitable implementation
strategy to annex specific areas. The ASPA identified ten (10) unincorporated surrounding pocket
areas as presented in Figure 1-2.
On August 27, 2013 there was an annexation special election for residents located in Area C and
Sandpointe Bay Condominium; neither initiative was successful since the majority of residents
voted not to be annexed into Tequesta. Prior to the referendum, the Village conducted extensive
community outreach efforts that consisted of a series of informational workshops where
residents had the opportunity to ask Village staff and elected officials questions about services,
applicable taxes and fees related to joining the Village.
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 1-2. Map of Potential Annexation Areas
Lt4lMU
Village of Tequesta
PN M RF ftrm rrHINTY. Fj rmir-A
PC ETJTIAE ANNE%ATICN
AREAS
GI �1.lFi 1
LegacV
This effort was supported by communication through direct letters, an annexation brochure, web
site, social media, and articles in newsletters (hard copy and e-mail based).
Throughout this proactive approach, the Village hosted the following Informational Annexation
Workshops with residents of Area C in 2012 and Sandpointe Bay in 2013:
• Riverside Pines (Colette Drive and Nicole Circle) — August 13, 2012
• River Pines and Unplatted Area — October 22, 2012
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 5
• Riverside on the Loxahatchee — October 24, 2012
• Sandpointe Bay —April 4, 2013
Table 1-2 presents annexation trends from 1996 to 2016. The present analysis focuses on
annexation initiatives conducted since 2007. Four (4) annexation actions were initiated between
2007 and 2016 comprising 5.5642 acres.
Table 1-2. Annexation Trends 2007 to 2016
Parcel generally known as the Zainos property located at
801 U.S. Hwy. 1, just south of Canal Court
0.660
Parcel generally known as the Rood property located at
4546 County Line Road.
15.230
Parcel generally known as the Morgan property located at
19654 N. Riverside Drive
0.290
Parcel generally known as the Glendenning property
located on the north side of Riverside Drive just south of
0.340
the Rood property.
Parcel generally known as Turtle Beach located east of
U.S. Hwy. 1 between Palm Court N. and Harbor Road.
0.495
Parcels located east of U.S. Hwy. 1 just north of Canal
Court
1.330
One (1) parcel on US Highway 1 (American Legion) 1.58
Four (4) Parcels on County Line Road
1.463
(Single Homes and Lift Station Site)
Three (3) Parcels on US Highway 1 (Budget Rental and
0.7278
Judy's Cafe)
Three (3) Parcels on County Line Road (Bella Villagio) 1.7934
23.91
The American Legion parcel (1.58 acres) located at 725 US Highway One was annexed into
Tequesta on January 11, 2007. A "Commercial" land use designation was officially applied to this
site in 2009. This action constituted a small-scale amendment to the Future Land Use element
and Map (Ordinance 4-09).
On June 14, 2012, five (5) parcels located on County Line Road were annexed into Tequesta; four
of them were single family homes and one was a lift station owned by the Loxahatchee River
District.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
This annexation was conducted as an Enclave Interlocal Agreement between Palm Beach County
and the Village. The parcel located at 4518 County Line Road returned to Palm Beach County in
2013. A "Low Density Residential" land use designation was applied to 4412 and 4480 County
Line Road; a "Medium Density Residential" land use designation was applied to the 4534 and
4518 County Line Road parcels. These actions constituted a small-scale amendment to the Future
Land Use element and Map (Ordinances 10-12 and 12-12 respectively).
On October 11, 2012, three (3) parcels located on US Highway One were annexed into Tequesta:
Budget Rental and Judy's Cafe. This annexation was through a voluntary/involuntary process
where more than 50% of land owners agreed to annexation. A "Commercial" land use
designation was officially applied to this site in 2009. This action also constituted a small-scale
amendment to the Future Land Use element and Map, (Ordinance 12-12).
The most recent annexation was a 1.7934 acre area of land located on County Line Road. It was
a voluntary annexation to develop a condominium initiative called "Bella Villagio." This area was
annexed in November 13, 2014. The Village classified this property "Medium Density Residential"
through the small-scale amendment process (Ordinance 21-14).
The Village of Tequesta has extensively analyzed a number of unincorporated pocket and enclave
areas lying adjacent to its corporate limits for potential annexation into the Village. Consultants
and staff have worked cooperatively with Palm Beach County in these efforts. Cost/benefit
analyses have been prepared for each of the potential annexation areas for presentation to the
respective neighborhood groups and for Village Council consideration. Efforts toward annexation
of these identified areas have not come to fruition as of this date.
a
The Village has adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standards in its Comprehensive Plan and land
development regulations which are utilized in the site plan review and building processes to
ensure that adequate facilities and services will accommodate proposed growth and
development. The annexation of enclave and adjacent areas would not only "square off" the
Village corporate boundaries, but allow for more efficient provision of various urban facilities and
services.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7
The Village has developed and coordinated relationships with Palm Beach County, neighboring
municipalities, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD), Loxahatchee River District (LRD), and a other
entities/jurisdictions in reviewing land use and annexation issues of common interest. These
agencies and entities continue to be included in the land use decision -making process, where
applicable, through the Village's development review processes.
Vacant Land Available for Future Development
There are only 25.723 acres currently Vacant and available for future development within the
existing corporate limits of Tequesta. This compares to 84.5 acres reported as Vacant in 1996.
Vacant lands are defined as those lands that are currently undeveloped (including parcels with
development order approval, but have yet to commence development) and which do not carry
any other land use designation (such as Conservation use) as of the December 2016 Existing Land
Use survey conducted for this EAR.
Vacant lands currently represent 1.8% of the total land area in Tequesta. This is down from the
nearly 6% reported in 1996. This decrease in vacant lands is explained by increased development
in the Village and also by changes in the way land uses are reported in the current December
2016 existing land use analysis. For example, some lands located between Tequesta Drive and
Bridge Road, and between Old Dixie Highway and U.S. Highway 1, while reported as Commercial
use in 1996 are now classified as Vacant. Likewise, some lands fronting U.S. Highway 1 at the
north end of the Village (e.g. old car dealership) were also reported as Commercial in 1996, but
this use has since been discontinued and these lands are currently designated as Vacant.
Infill development of existing residential and commercial areas and extensive development of
the Mixed Use designated areas are responsible for the substantial decrease in vacant lands
reported in Tequesta today. For example, the residential area located along Cypress Drive North
has developed substantially since the 1996 existing land use analysis was conducted.
There has been in -fill of single family lots in established residential areas such as the Country
Club, Tequesta Pines and the older established neighborhoods in Tequesta. There has been some
limited, new Commercial development such as the Palm Court office complex located at the
northeast corner of Cypress Drive North and Tequesta Drive; the gas station/convenience store
at County Line Road and U.S. Highway 1; and the Commercial office portion of the Casa Del Sol
mixed use development located south and west of the gas station/convenience store facility just
cited.
The remaining new Residential and Commercial development has occurred in the annexation
areas discussed above. The most significant development of previously vacant properties,
however, has been in the Mixed Use designated area in the Village. Since 1996, the following
major residential developments have been located within the Mixed Use area:
• Tequesta Oaks (158 units);
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Sterling House (84 units;
• Tequesta Terrace (100 beds),
• Tequesta Trace (134 units);
• Lighthouse Cove (192 units);
• Tequesta Cay (58 units);
• The Crossings site was redeveloped as a Rehabilitation Facility "Futures of Palm Beach"
(75 units) in 2011.
Most recently, on
January 12, 2017,
Village Council
approved a 96-unit
adult congregate
living facility to be �� A
located on a vacant 8 � • � �'' 1
acres site on County OW..
Line Road (Key
Estates Senior
Housing Living),
which is pictured --
here. �' • "
TRENDS AND
CHALLENGES
Changes in Land Use
Residential Land Use
There has been a very modest change in total land area of the Village of Tequesta. Today, there
are approximately 1,468.44 acres within the corporate limits of Tequesta including a 296.19 acres
of water of bodies. As reported above annexations have added just over twenty (23) acres to the
municipal limits.
The largest use of land in the Village continues to be Residential. Residential use increased from
approximately 473 acres in 1996 to 515.56 acres in December 2016. This represents an 8.9%
increase in Residential land use over that time period. In 2016, Residential areas represent
35.10% the total land area of the Village.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Most Residential development continues to be single family, low density development
(maximum 5.4 dwelling units/acre). About 444.62 acres of the 515.56 acres of Residential use is
single family, low density development. The amount of land occupied by medium density
Residential development (maximum 12 dwelling units/acre) has not changed significantly.
Approximately seventy one-71 acres are currently used for medium density Residential, as
compared to 65.4 acres in 1996.
A substantial amount of Mixed Use development in Tequesta has been Residential. There are
over ninety (90.39) Mixed Use acres in the existing land use analysis reported in Table 2-1. Much
of the Mixed Use acreage is developed primarily and exclusively for residential purposes. The
residential density in the Mixed Use category allows up to a maximum of eighteen (18) dwelling
units/acre thus representing the highest -density residential areas in the Village.
All development in the Village continues to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the
Official Zoning Map of the Village. Commercial and high density residential are prohibited from
locating in low density residential areas. This trend and direction should continue in the future.
Commercial Land Use
The amount of Commercial acreage in Tequesta has actually decreased since 1996. The current
existing land use analysis as indicated in Table 2-1 reports 69.32 acres of Commercial
development in Tequesta, which is down from the 97.5 acres reported in the 1996. The reason
for this difference is easily explained. The area (approximately 15 acres) occupied by the
Tequesta Oaks residential area today was an older major commercial shopping center. Likewise,
there were nearly five (5) acres reported in the downtown area that no longer exists, while a car
dealership on U.S. Highway 1 has been discontinued and closed, as well. Only 4.7 % the total
land area in Tequesta is occupied by Commercial development.
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
!i
y
Recreation Land Use
TRY TRNTI. GALLEIM
1
i
The amount of Recreation and Open Space acreage has increased since the 1996 land use
analysis. The increase comprises certain private open space areas (1.26 acres); a Village -
maintained detention area on Cypress Drive North (approximately 0.4 acres); an open area on
Point Drive; nearly eighteen (18) acres within the FEC Railroad right-of-way; and the addition of
the green open space in Seabrook Road (Remembrance Park) in 2012. The existing total
Recreation and Open Space is 218.76 acres representing 14.9 percent of the total land area
(December 2016).
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11
The major recreational areas in Tequesta are: the Tequesta Country Club, a 120 acre private golf
course; Coral Cove park, a County -owned and maintained beachfront community park on the
Atlantic Ocean; Village Green Park, a neighborhood park owned by the Village and located at the
Village Hall complex on Tequesta Drive; Constitution Park, another neighborhood park; and,
nearly fifty (SO) acres of State-owned land located north of CR 707 and east of U.S. Highway 1.
Conservation Land Use
The amount of land identified as Conservation use has not changed since the last update. There
are 8.08 acres of Conservation use designated in the Village which represents only 0.6 % of the
total land area within the Village (Table 2-2). Conservation uses consist of one upland areas which
are identified as areas of environmental concern, and the beaches and shoreline areas
throughout the Village. Conservation is discussed in greater detail under in the Conservation
element.
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Public Buildings and Grounds
The amount of land used for Public Buildings and Grounds has changed minimally since the last
update. The change in area is the result of a land use designation change to the Palm Beach
County Fire Rescue site which was previously designated as low density residential, and the
Village Recreation Center that was previously designated in the Other Public Facilities category.
Otherwise, the land uses for Public Buildings and Grounds has remained relatively the same.
There are approximately twenty one (21) acres in the Village used for these purposes,
representing 1.4% of the total area.
Other major Public Buildings and Grounds uses include the Tequesta Police and Fire Department
facility, the U.S. Post Office, and the Library.
Other Public Facilities
The amount of land areas utilized for Other Public Facilities has not changed. This land use
classification includes uses for churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, educational uses and
other similar uses. There are approximately fourteen acres (14.08) in the Village used for these
purposes, representing 1 % of the total area.
Roads
Transportation use has increased slightly with the annexation and development of new areas.
The acreage dedicated to public rights -of -way for roads and streets accounts for the slight
increase in acreage for transportation purposes. Approximately 209.71 acres, or 14.3% of the
total area of the Village are dedicated to streets and roadways (Table 2-2).
Water Bodies
There are nearly 300 acres of Water Bodies located within the corporate limits of Tequesta.
Water Bodies represent over 20% of the developed and total area of the Village. The North and
Northwest Forks of the Loxahatchee River, a portion of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW); and
canals serving residential areas lie within the boundaries of Tequesta. This has not changed since
1996 land use inventory.
Vacant Land
The amount of vacant land in the Village has decreased significantly. There are only 25.723 acres
currently Vacant and available for future development within the existing corporate limits of
Tequesta. This compares to 84.5 acres reported as Vacant in 1996. It is expected that the
remaining vacant lands will be entirely build -out within the long range planning period of the
Comprehensive Plan update. On January 12, 2017, Village Council approved a 96-unit adult
congregate living facility to be located on a vacant 8-acre site on County Line Road (Key Estates
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
Senior Housing Living). As of November 2017, the parcel is still vacant and the applicant is
considering a time extension. As a result, the property was considered as vacant for this analysis.
There are no agricultural or industrial land uses in Tequesta. These uses are strictly prohibited
since neither the Future Land Use Map nor the Village's Official Zoning Ordinance provide for
such uses.
There are no public school facilities, recognized historic sites, or areas of critical state concern in
the Village of Tequesta. The Village has been found to be "exempt" from State school siting and
co -location requirements by the Palm Beach County School District. Even though the School
District does not have any plans for locating any public school facilities within the corporate limits
of Tequesta during the short term (5-Year) or long term (10-Year) planning periods of the updated
Comprehensive Plan, the Village has adopted Objective 2.1.0 and Policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in the
Future Land Use element in the unlikely event a school facility may be deemed necessary in
future planning periods or as a result of future annexation.
Future Land Use Projections
Table 1-3 and Figure 1-3 present Future Land Use designations acreage and percentages.
Because there is very little land that is currently Vacant and available for future development
within the Village of Tequesta (25.72 acres, or 1.8% of the total land area); future development
in Tequesta will be limited. Most future low -density residential development will be in -fill
development of individual single-family lots. Likewise, there is an insignificant amount of land
available for medium density development. There are less than five (5) acres within the Mixed
Use area that has not yet been developed that could potentially be developed at the higher
densities allowed in the Mixed Use district. So, little difference is anticipated in the short (5-Year)
and long (10-Year) term land use projections for new Residential development.
Table 1-3. Future Land Use
3,367,752
77.313
5.30%
353,359
8.112
0.60%
19,758,505
453.593
30.90%
3,555,040
81.612
5.60%
4,099,194
94.105
6.40%
620,676
14.249
1.00%
892,083
20.479
1.40%
9,281,981
213.085
14.50%
9,134,927
209.709
14.30%
12,902,044
296.190
20.20%
63,965,561
1,468.447
100.00 %
There is land available within the commercially zoned areas for some new commercial
development in US Highway One (North of County Line Plaza). It is not expected that Recreation
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
and Open Space (parks, beaches, eco-sites), Conservation, Public Buildings and Grounds, Other
Public Facilities (churches, clubs, homes for the aged and infirm) uses will increase in the future
within the existing corporate limits. It is not expected that Transportation (roads, streets, railroad
rights -of -way) and Water Bodies will change in the near or long term planning periods either.
Redevelopment or subdivision of land that would cause a substantial change in land use is not
anticipated within the Village.
Figure 1-3- Future Land Use
Future Land Use
■ Commercial
■ Conservation
a Low Density
■ Medium Density
■ Mixed Use
Other Public Facilities
■ Public Buildings and
Grounds
It is projected that build -out within the existing corporate limits of Tequesta will occur within a 5
to 10-Year planning period of the updated Comprehensive Plan. Based on this analysis, future
land use projections as presented in Table 1-3 are reasonably predictable and will be the same
for the short-term (5 to 10 years) and long-term (30 years) planning periods of the updated Plan.
However, annexation of surrounding pocket areas could impact residential land use designations
and acreages. The Future Land Use Map is presented as part of the Map Series.
Infill & Redevelopment
The Village of Tequesta could accommodate infill and redevelopment growth. Commercial and
mixed use developments along US Highway One are potential areas to be redeveloped in the
future. For example, Tequesta Shoppes was redeveloped in 2013. The initiative improved the
aesthetics of the commercial plaza by upgrading building elevations, landscaping, parking
resurfacing and signage.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
Infill & redevelopment should promote superior projects within the village' urban landscape.
Propose buildings are encouraged to be mixed use, energy efficient, appropriately landscaped,
and aesthetically pleasing. Limitations upon the land; lot size, parking requirements, height
restrictions, etc. should be flexible and not a hindrance in superior design. Infill redevelopment
should allow flexible design while maximizing the potential use of a building or site.
The very nature of infill redevelopment promotes higher and best uses while discouraging
sprawling development upon green space, suburban, and rural land. Infill redevelopment
encourages the following positive planning characteristics:
• Existing infrastructure use
• Conserving natural land instead of sprawl
• Reduced commuting time
• Minimized traffic congestion
• Physical activity and healthy lifestyles
• Increased property values
• Open space preservation
• Vacant land rehabilitation
• Energy conservation
• Public/Private partnerships
• Workforce housing for teachers, police officers,
and fire fighters
VIC
Infill redevelopment is positive in numerous aspects, however, becomes unachievable due to
some of the following:
• Inflexible building and development code regulations
• Neighborhood opposition
• Prolonged permit processes
• Financial challenges
• Acquisition and land assembly
Creative design and the anticipation of healthier lifestyles create superior infill redevelopment
projects. The ability to live, work, and play within one's own neighborhood is vital for infill
redevelopment's success. The use of energy efficient appliances, environmentally friendly
materials, superior architecture, and native landscaping provide the foundation for infill
redevelopment initiatives.
The US Highway One reconfiguration project that will commence in 2017 will encourage
significant redevelopment activity in that corridor. The Village supports for complete street
concept encourages redevelopment and sustainable initiatives. For example, the BB&T Bank is
currently undergoing redevelopment of its site by demolishing the existing building and
proposing a new structure and providing a more significant landscaping on site.
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Urban Forestry
The Village of Tequesta will benefit by embracing urban forestry policies in its residential
neighborhoods and commercial areas. Urban forestry is the careful care and management of tree
populations in urban settings for the purpose of improving the urban environment. Urban
forestry advocates the role of trees as a critical part of the urban infrastructure. Urban foresters
plant and maintain trees, support appropriate tree and forest preservation, conduct research and
promote the many benefits trees provide.
Urban forests bring many environmental and economic benefits to cities. Among these are
energy benefits in the form of reduced air conditioning by shading buildings, homes and roads,
absorbing sunlight, reducing ultraviolet light, cooling the air, and reducing wind speed — in short
improvement of the microclimate and air quality.
There are also economic benefits associated with urban trees such as increased land, property,
and rental value. Well -maintained trees and landscaped business districts have been shown to
encourage consumer purchases and attract increased residential, commercial and public
investments. Numerous studies have shown the direct relationship between home value, public
health, and street trees. In her article "City Trees and Property Values," Kathleen L. Wolf writes
that there is a home price increase between 6-9 percent when there is good tree cover in a
neighborhood, and a 10-15 percent increase when there are mature trees in a high income
neighborhood.
Urban forests also improve air quality, absorb rainwater, improve biodiversity and potentially
allow recycling to 20% of waste which is wood -based Many cities today are dealing with
stormwater management system issues where their existing systems can no longer hold the
volume of water that falls in storms. One sustainable solution to this is planting street trees with
grates underneath them to hold water. Trees and their soils work to filter runoff pollution and
soil contaminants by absorbing them and processing them into less harmful substances. They
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
also collect water in their limbs and release it back into the atmosphere over time. This makes
trees a solution to stormwater runoff issues and urban heating issues.
Urban forestry can be subject to NIMBY (not in my backyard) arguments as people occasionally
experience trees as a nuisance or as a cause for disputes between neighbors. Frequent citizen
complaints include too much shade; leaf litter; low hanging and falling branches; undesirable
seeds, pods or fruits; and bird droppings. Many of these objections can be overcome by good
educational efforts and by careful selection, placement, and routine maintenance of trees. The
benefits of trees in our communities far outweigh any real or perceived inconveniences.
Another area of concern is the damage to homes and buildings that can result from tree roots or
falling trees. Cases of damage to building foundations from invasive roots are typically the result
of improper siting of trees and buildings relative to each other. The young sapling planted by the
front door today will be the giant oak of tomorrow with roots damaging walkways and
foundation. Proper education about site and species selection is critical. Falling trees often result
from unstable root systems and/or severe storms. It is important understand regional soil types
and the routine maintenance necessary to promote healthy root systems and to reduce the other
circumstances that would cause a tree to fall (disease, rotten wood, a too -heavy crown, etc.)
Nonetheless, the damage from trees remains low in proportion to the number of trees and the
many direct and indirect benefits they provide.
The following should be considered when formulating
codes and standards for Urban Foresting:
• Include clear and concise definitions of key
terms
• Include risk assessment evaluation
requirements
• Define minimum landscape standards and
mitigation requirements
• Specify what type of trees are required in
certain locations
• Provide incentives or penalties to developers,
landscape architects, etc.
• Provide educational opportunities for the
community
A number of cities in South Florida supports Urban Forestry and they also qualify as a Tree City
USA community. The following cities are Tree Cities in the state of Florida: Boca Raton, Boynton
Beach, Delray Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, Royal Palm Beach and Lantana.
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The sustainability and long term quality of life of the community will benefit by including urban
forestry policies and code language in the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations.
[,raan Rnnfe
On hot summer days, the surface temperature of a vegetated rooftop can be cooler than the air
temperature, whereas the surface of a traditional rooftop can be up to 907 (50*C) warmer
(Environmental Protection Agency).
Green roofs prohibit the majority of ultraviolet radiation from penetrating the rooftop which
equates to air conditioning savings and longer roof replacement periods. They also provide
habitat for butterflies and birds while filtering the rooftop water and creating less strain on storm
water systems. Vegetated roofs use and filter the excess water while traditional roofs typically
acquire pollutants and contribute to nonpoint source pollution which ultimately goes into the
Atlantic Ocean. Green roofs can be used to mitigate storm water runoff requirements while
providing for an aesthetically pleasing built environment. Basic green roof systems can be
installed with little or no additional engineered structural support and add about 80-150
pounds/sq. ft. for intensive green roofs while extensive green roofs add about 12-50
pounds/square feet.
Green roofs have been successful at several locations throughout Florida. The photos below
include projects in Jacksonville (Breaking Ground Contracting Green Roof & Rooftop Garden);
Orlando (Orlando Health MD Anderson Cancer Center Labyrinth Vegetated Roof Garden);
Clermont (Honda Headquarters); and Miami (FIU College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Modesto
A. Maidique Campus).
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
r
Sea Level Rise Considerations
Adaptation and Resiliency
L
Sea level rise has long been recognized by the South Florida Water Management District and by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as an increasing threat to low lying, porous South Florida.
Organizations such as the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact have provided reports and
publications that have increased awareness and expanded the knowledge of the impacts of sea
level rise on coastal communities in South Florida.
Rising sea levels due to the melting of the polar ice caps contribute to greater storm damage;
warming ocean temperatures are associated with stronger and more frequent storms; additional
rainfall, particularly during severe weather events, leads to flooding and other damage; an
increase in the incidence and severity of wildfires threatens habitats, homes, and lives; and heat
waves contribute to human deaths and other consequences.
Given the geography of Florida, coastal communities in Southeast Florida have long known how
to incorporate hazard mitigation with long-term planning to reduce the loss of life and property
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
and lessen the impact of disasters (hurricanes, severe weather events, flooding, etc.). The
challenge of adaptive planning for sea level rise goes beyond hazard mitigation. Rather than
preparing for a specific disaster or event, a resilient community is one that can face an array of
unpredictable challenges and disturbances with minimal long-term impacts. Certain
communities, especially in coastal areas, must be prepared for future conditions that may not
allow the same development intensity, location, type, or access. Through the use of innovative
tools and strategies it is possible to transition these economies and the built environment into
resilient communities that adapt to these adverse impacts.
With the currently accepted sea level rise projections and known climate impacts, long-range
planning must now incorporate resiliency strategies that balance mitigation and adaptation for
the protection of the natural systems and to sustain the socio-economic characteristics of the
community. Understanding how mitigation and adaptation act as interconnected relationships
to building resilient and sustainable coastal communities is vital for adaptive planning.
Due to impacts from sea level rise, the following initiatives are encouraged to address sea level
rise and promote sustainable growth:
• Conserve, reuse, recycle
• Walk, bike, carpool, or use mass transit
• Building `green' energy efficient buildings
• Encourage mixed land uses
• Provide incentives for business/residential responsibility
• Sustain water quality
• Limit dependence on oil
• Educate individuals on the aforementioned items
Many states, including Florida, and businesses within the state, have incentives and programs
available for residents, businesses, governments, non -profits, schools, institutions, etc. The
funds can be used to install energy efficient products such as the following; photovoltaic cells,
solar hot water heaters, solar pool heaters, and fuel cells. The incentives generally pay by
kilowatt hour for installed products which will conserve electricity over the lifetime of the
product.
So far, the effects of sea level rise have been most visible in Fort Lauderdale, Miami Beach, and
in the Florida Key. Moreover, even nearby Delray Beach is already seeing "King tide" flooding.
Portions of Fort Lauderdale experiences flooding and has built "Adaptation Action Areas" (AAA)
into their planning process.
Due to its southern location, Miami Beach is experiencing problems with severe flooding, which
has led to an aggressive sea level rise prevention and adaptation program. Understanding this
vulnerability has allowed for the development of both short-term and long-term adaptation
strategies that would further strengthen this city's resilience.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
One such strategy is the Miami Beach Rising Above Resiliency Strategy, which will guide the
community as it survives, adapts, and grows amidst both chronic stresses, including sea level rise,
coastal erosion, transportation, and lack of affordable housing, and occasional shocks, such as
hurricanes, infrastructure failure, coastal flooding, rainfall flooding. Miami Beach will prioritize
actions that provide benefits and results from investments to make us both resilient and
sustainable day to day and in the face of disruptions. Based on data and expertise, and including
employees, committees, residents, businesses, peer cities, and the Compact, the strategy will be
built on the City's own unique successes, strengths, capabilities, challenges, and gaps.
The ultimate goal of these actions is to leverage existing resources to develop a mutually -
beneficial solution that helps combat sea level rise challenges in Miami Beach and other coastal
municipalities.
With higher sea levels, stormwater systems no longer drains as quickly, increasing the frequency
and depth of flooding in some streets. The threat of salt water intrusion into the aquifer is
another important and growing concern. As sea level continues to rise, salt water from the sea
pushes further inland, coming ever closer to contaminating surficial drinking water wells.
Scientists and engineers predict that within 40 to 50 years, Florida could be inundated with
problems related to sea level rise.
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact was executed by Broward, Miami -Dade,
Monroe, and Palm Beach Counties in January 2010 to coordinate mitigation and adaptation
activities across county lines. The Compact represents a new form of regional climate governance
designed to allow local governments to set the agenda for adaptation while providing an efficient
means for state and federal agencies to engage with technical assistance and support. It is in that
spirit that this plan provides the common integrated framework for a stronger and more resilient
Southeast Florida starting today and for tomorrow.
In order to better coordinate local planning, the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact (the Compact) developed unified regional sea level rise projection for Southeast Florida.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (unified projections) were originally prepared in 2011 by
the Compact's Sea Level Rise Technical Advisory Group, comprised of representatives from
county governments, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association (NOAA), United States Geological Survey (USGS), the South Florida
Water Management District, and climate scientists from Florida Atlantic University and University
of Miami.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projections are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely.
22 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 1-4. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, 2015.
Unified Sea Level Rise Projection
(Southeast Flerida Regional Climate Change Compact, 20151
PCC AR5 USACE High NC1AA High
/e 7r
Figure 1 Unified Sea level Rise Prolection these protections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key We%t tide gauge the protect ton
includes three global curve% adapted for regional application the median of the IPCC AR5 RCPB 5 icrnarm as the loweit boundary (blue dashed
curvet the USACt High curve s% the upper boundary for the short term for use until 1060 (solid blue llnol, and the NOAA High curve as the
4pprrmr)%t boundary for medium and long trim USG IorangP ;ohd Curve) the Incorporated table lists the projection Values at rears 10.10. 2060
and 1100 the USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediatr tow curve Is dhplavrd on the rr{lure for teferrnce (green dashed curve{ This scenario
would require ugndtcant reduction in greenhouse gas emission in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emititons trend%
Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015.
Florida Senate Bill (SB) 1094
Recognizing the priority to integrate sea level rise into local government planning, Florida
Governor Rick Scott signed S.B. 1094 in May 2015, amending the state comprehensive planning
laws (F.S. 163.3178(2)(f) that had stipulated local governments, required to have a coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan, include a redevelopment component to
"eliminate inappropriate and unsafe development in coastal areas".
Furthermore, SB 1094 requires coastal management plans to include the reduction of flood risks
and losses. It also creates new requirements related to flood elevation certificates, and revises
requirements related to flood insurance.
Specifically, SB 1094, Section 1, amends s.163.3178(2)(f), F.S., to require local governments when
drafting their comprehensive coastal management plans to:
• Include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions
that reduce the flood risk in the coastal zone which results from high -tide events, storm
surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 123
• Encourage the use of best -practices development and redevelopment principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real
property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
• Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to
flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state.
Local Flood -Related Ordinances
The Village seeks to develop techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to flooding
and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. In addition to state agencies,
the Village's Building Department regulates the building of structures in flood -prone areas so that
flood damage can be minimized or avoided. The Village has continued to support these programs
and work with residents and businesses in regard to program requirements. Moreover, the
Village recently passed an ordinance related to FEMA's updated flood zone maps and is
considering passing an ordinance related to flood hazard prevention techniques that will increase
the "freeboard" height requirements, as detailed below.
On July 13, 2017, the Village of Tequesta Council adopted Ordinance 7-17 providing that the
Federal Emergency Management Agency has revised and reissued the Flood Insurance Study and
Flood Insurance Rate Map for Palm Beach County, Florida, and Incorporated Areas, effective
October 5, 2017. The Village of Tequesta participates in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) and the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta desires to continue to meet the
requirements of Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 59 and 60, necessary for
participation.
As discussed in the previous section, NFIP provides federally backed flood insurance within
communities that enact and enforce floodplain regulations. The Community Rating System (CRS)
is a national program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). To be
covered by a flood insurance policy a property must be in a community that participates in the
NFIP. To qualify for the NFIP, a community adopts and enforces a floodplain management
ordinance to regulate development in flood hazard areas. The CRS Program recognizes,
encourages and rewards communities that go beyond the minimum required by the NFIP. Under
the CRS, the flood insurance premiums of a community's residents and businesses are
discounted. A community receives a CRS classification based upon the total credit for activities
such as Public Information; Mapping and Regulations; Flood Damage Reduction; and Warning
and Response. The Village of Tequesta is part of the CRS Program, "Class 7" rating which allows
residents to receive 15% discount of their flood insurance.
24 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 1-5: Adjusted Base Flood Elevation, Accounting for Sea Level Rise
The same home under an adjusted Base Flood
Elevation IBFE) accounting for sea Level Rise
(SLR); structure is now non•compllant, under a
greater and more frequent threat, and will cost
more to insure
• F froeboard
Recalculated Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
accounting for San Level Rise
NAVD88 reference
Currently, the Village of Tequesta is reviewing a potential ordinance amendment to Chapter 14
of the Village's Code of Ordinances to require 18 inches of freeboard above the base floor
elevation in flood zone areas. This provision will contribute to mitigating sea level rise flooding
effects that continue to threaten coastal areas Tequesta.
Freeboard refers to the height of a building above the Base Flood Elevation for a specific site.
Florida regulations often require at least one -foot of freeboard for elevated buildings. Each foot
of freeboard (up to a maximum of three feet), lowers flood insurance rates significantly. Since
elevations on FIRMS do not include sea level rise, freeboard will help keep structures above
floodwaters as storm surge elevations increase, thus reducing flood insurance premiums. The
graphic below shows an example on how to implement this concept.
The Village of Tequesta contains several parcels on the barrier island that contain multi -family
condominium developments. While there are not currently any single family homes along the
ocean front within Tequesta, the freeboard technique could be considered for future
development or redevelopment in this area.
Adaptation Action Areas (AAA)
The Community Planning Act (CPA) made changes to the state's growth management laws in
2011, including the optional adaptation planning for coastal hazards and the potential impacts of
sea level rise. The Adaptation Action Area, as defined in the CPA, is an optional comprehensive
plan designation for areas that experience coastal flooding and that are vulnerable to the related
impacts of rising sea levels for prioritizing funding for infrastructure and adaptation planning.
Local governments that adopt an adaptation action area may consider policies within the coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan to improve resilience to coastal flooding.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 125
Criteria for the adaptation action area may include: areas below, at, or near mean higher high
water; areas which have a hydrological connection to coastal waters; or areas designated as
evacuation zones for storm surge.
Florida Statute (163.3164(1)) states, "Adaptation action area" or "adaptation area" means a
designation in the coastal management element of a local government's comprehensive plan
which identifies one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and
storm surge, and that are vulnerable to the related impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of
prioritizing funding for infrastructure needs and adaptation planning."
Florida Statute (163.3177(6)(g)(10)) states, "At the option of the local government, develop an
adaptation action area designation for those low-lying coastal zones that are experiencing
coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge and are vulnerable to the impacts of
rising sea level. Local governments that adopt an adaptation action area may consider policies
within the coastal management element to improve resilience to coastal flooding resulting from
high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and related impacts of sea -level
rise. Criteria for the adaptation action area may include, but need not be limited to, areas for
which the land elevations are below, at, or near mean higher high water, which have a hydrologic
connection to coastal waters, or which are designated as evacuation zones for storm surge."
FINAL REMARKS
Based on the present analysis, the Village should continue to implement specific strategies and
policies to encourage and promote compact development patterns, which include the following:
• Promoting infill and redevelopment in appropriate locations in major commercial
corridors and increased flexibility in the Village's land development regulations;
• Promoting walkable and connected neighborhoods that provides for a mix of uses at
urban densities and intensities that support a range of housing choices and a multi -modal
transportation system;
• Improving non -auto dependent connectivity between residential, shopping,
entertainment and employment areas through the provision of interconnected sidewalks,
bike lanes/paths and expanded transit service;
• Directing future economic growth and associated development to areas of the Village in
a manner that does not have an adverse impact on and protects natural resources and
ecosystems through specific policies in the Comprehensive Plan and implementation
through the Village's zoning and land development regulations;
• Continuing supporting green and energy efficient policies;
• Continue promoting and implementing techniques and strategies that reduce the risk of
flood hazards and enhance stormwater management facilities;
• Supporting urban forestry policies and land development regulations; and
• Continuing proactive annexation approach.
26 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Village of Tequesta is committed to providing safe and efficient street network while
maintaining the identity of Tequesta. The purpose of the transportation element is to focus on
all local transportation -related improvements and accommodate for future transportation needs
of the Village. This chapter examines existing conditions, identifies trends and future
transportation challenges, and provide specific recommendations to address them.
Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, all land development regulations and development
permitting actions are required to be consistent with the Transportation Element and other
elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
This document provides the relevant data, inventory and analysis of transportation conditions in
support of the Village's Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, as described in
Florida Statutes (FS) 163.3177(1)(f). This information was considered in developing the Goals,
Objectives and Policies in the Village's Transportation Element.
W
EXISTING CONDITIONS
To effectively guide and direct future transportation plans within the Village of Tequesta, it is
necessary to have a clear understanding of existing transportation conditions. This section
examines the existing transportation conditions including an inventory of complete streets,
public parking, bicycle facilities, transit service, functional classification, and jurisdiction. This
information was used to identify existing levels of service for the roadways.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
Jurisdiction
Tequesta is served by a network of state, county, and local roads which range from U.S. Highway
1(US-1) to local neighborhood streets. The jurisdiction refers to the "ownership" of the roadway.
For example, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has the responsibility to maintain
roadways within their jurisdiction, and also must control access to these roads. Palm Beach
County and the Village have similar responsibilities for roads within their jurisdiction. It should
be noted that the Village has the authority to establish the level of service standard for all roads
within its municipal boundaries, regardless of jurisdiction. In addition, jurisdictions can be
transferred between FDOT, Palm Beach County and the Village upon the parties reaching
agreement as to the transfer.
Functional Classification
With regard to the Village's transportation, the roads within the municipal limits of Tequesta
accommodate for daily travels from Jupiter through Tequesta as well as connect Martin County
to Palm Beach County.
All roadways within Tequesta are assigned a Functional Classification based on the agreement of
the Florida Department of Transportation, the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) and the Federal Highway Administration. Functional classification is the process when
streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, per the character of service they
provide. The designation of functional classification is made at least once every 10 years following
the decennial Census. Five functional classification categories are common to roadways: Principal
Arterial, Major Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Local Street.
The roadways within the Village are classified as either "Principal Arterials" or "City Urban
Collectors." Additionally, the Village contains local streets, found mostly in its neighborhoods.
Principal Arterial roads are typically major or main roads with high volume of travelers. City Urban
Collector roads, often known as distributor roads, experience low -to -moderate capacity and
move traffic from local streets to arterials. The Village also contains both major and minor
collectors, referred to as "urban" collectors and "city" collectors, respectively.
Principal Arterials
Primary north -south access to, from and
through various portions of the Village
continues to be provided by US-1, CR
707, Old Dixie Highway, Seabrook Road
and Country Club Drive.
US-1 carries the most volume of traffic
and continues to be classified as an .
"urban principal arterial". US-1 is a L_
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
State owned and operated roadway which continues to be a six -lane divided facility. US-1
traverses Tequesta and continues in a north -south direction through Palm Beach County and the
entire State of Florida.
Citv Urban Collectors
Old Dixie Highway, County Line Road, and CR 707 (Beach Road) all continue to be categorized by
the federal functional classification system as "urban," or major, collectors, which carry much
less traffic than US-1. Similarly, Tequesta Drive, Country Club Drive, and Seabrook Road are
classified as "city," or minor, collectors.
Old Dixie Highway has been expanded since last
reported in the 1996 EAR and subsequent Plan
amendments. Today, Old Dixie Highway is a four -
lane, undivided roadway between Tequesta Drive
and CR 707, with a left hand turning lane at its
intersection with Tequesta Drive. North of
Tequesta Drive, Old Dixie Highway continues as a
four -lane undivided roadway until Village
Boulevard where it continues north to County
Line Road as a two-lane, undivided road. There is
also a left turn lane on Old Dixie Highway where it
intersects Tequesta Drive from the north.
County Line Road, which constitutes the
boundary between Palm Beach and Martin
Counties, continues to be a two-lane, undivided
road running in an east -west direction at the
north end of the Village. County Line Road
extends westward from US-1 approximately one
mile before it turns north and extends into
Martin County.
W966*--.
a
CR 707 continues to be a two-lane, undivided
road within the corporate limits of Tequesta.
CR 707 intersects with US-1 at the Village's
southern boundary and extends easterly a
short distance then northerly up the Atlantic
coast into neighboring Martin County. Old
Dixie Highway lies west of and runs parallel to
US-1.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 3
Tequesta Drive, Seabrook Road and Country
Club Road continue to be identified as "City
Collectors", a minor collector. Tequesta Drive
provides the primary east -west access
through the Village. Tequesta Drive remains a
four (4) land, divided road from US-1 west to
Old Dixie Highway, then narrowing to a two -
lane, undivided road from there west to
Country Club Drive.
Seabrook Road is still a two-lane undivided
roadway extending between County Line Road
and Tequesta Drive, while Country Club Drive
remains the westerly most north -south city
collector running from Tequesta Drive north
into Martin County.
U.S. Highway 1 Corridor
A 1.4-mile portion of US-1 passes through the Village of Tequesta, serving as the community's
principal commercial corridor. In its current configuration, this section of US-1 is a six -lane
thoroughfare with narrow sidewalks and no bicycle facilities.
In late 2014, the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT) was in the
process of evaluating the roadway for
a resurfacing and safety improvement
project planned for implementation
in fall of 2018, when both the Village
and the Palm Beach Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) noted
an inconsistency between current
capacity needs and roadway design.
Further research revealed long-term
growth projections did not
necessitate a six -lane roadway design.
As a result, the Village of Tequesta requested FDOT delay completion of its resurfacing plans to
allow an opportunity to evaluate the possibility of reconfiguring the road into a multi -modal thor-
oughfare, while also engaging the public in the decision -making process.
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
While the FDOT supported reconsideration of the corridor design, the planning process was
already underway at the time of the Village's request. In effect, the Village was provided a narrow
window of time to complete its evaluation. The full extent of the resurfacing project included a
small portion of the corridor to the south located within the Town of Jupiter and concluded to
the north at the border with Martin County.
The Village directly engaged the Town of Jupiter, Town of Jupiter Inlet Colony, Palm Beach County
and both the Palm Beach and Martin Metropolitan Planning Organizations as part of the process.
To coordinate among multiple jurisdictions and agency interests, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council was also engaged to lead the re-evaluation effort within an aggressive schedule,
with reconfiguration proposal to be received by FDOT by March 31, 2015, in order to maintain
the project's planned construction timing.
Figure 2-1. US Highway One within Village of Tequesta
Current Conditions
US-1 traverses the Village of Tequesta, connecting Martin County to the north to the Town of
Jupiter to the south. In its current configuration, the road has six vehicular travel lanes with
alternating turn lanes in each direction, center medians with sporadic landscaping, and fairly
consistent sidewalks on both sides. Bicycle facilities are not provided in the current right-of-way
configuration.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 5
Traveling southbound from Martin County,
the road changes at County Line Road from
a four -lane thoroughfare with a 55-mph
speed limit to a six -lane road with a posted
speed limit of 45 mph within the Village. In
addition, Martin County has bike lanes
which do not continue into the Village of
Tequesta.
Crossing Beach Road to the south, US-1
narrows back to a four -lane road before the
Jupiter Federal Bridge. The bridge is
scheduled for reconstruction in FY 2021
with plans that maintain four vehicular
travel lanes and add bicycle lanes.
1 A
Citizen Involvement with Village of Tequesta US-1 Project
%11
On January 10, 2015, the Village of Tequesta held a public workshop focused on the US-1
Corridor. The objective of the workshop was to receive community feedback regarding
opportunities, design ideas and concerns. The workshop was held in the Village of Tequesta's
Village Hall and had approximately 80 people in attendance. The workshop allowed residents,
staff, elected officials and others to voice their opinions as well as draw out their individual ideas
and thoughts.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
There were six (6) major topics that the
participants discussed during the workshop.
These six items include:
• The number of lanes
• Beautification
• Bike Lanes
• Troubling Intersections
• Need for Street Lights
• Concern about Cost to the Village
In addition to street lights and median
landscaping, other enhancements to improve
both safety and aesthetics were considered.
The Village is located close to the coast and
should change the traffic signal poles to mast
arms to better withstand future windstorms.
Changing the pavement color and texture of
crosswalks provides visual cues to drivers to
watch for pedestrians. In the event that lanes
are eliminated, narrowing the crossing
distance at main intersections through the
use of curb extensions could improve
pedestrian comfort and shorten crossing
times.
Based on cost and impact considerations, the
ultimate decision for the corridor design is a
4-lane road with buffered bike lanes, curb
extensions and cross walk enhancements at
the major intersections, additional street
lighting and landscaping, and the expansion
of the sidewalk along the JILONA property to
a multi -use path.
Summary of tlic Recommendations
1) Number of Lanes
• Differing Opinions on 4 vs. 6 Lanes
• Concerns About Congestion
• Want Turn lanes into Main Destinations
?) Beautification
• Less Landscaping in Medians (Visibility Concerns)
• Pretty and Park -like
• Low Maintenance Costs
• Appearance of Businesses (More Cohesive & Neater)
• Should Know When You've Arrived in Tcyuesta!
3) Bike Lanes
• Should be Separated from Pedestrians
• Should he Separated from Czars
4) Troubling Intersections
• US 1 & Beach Rd
• US & Tcyuesta Dr
• Alt A I A & Old Dixie Hwy
• County Line Rd & Old Dixie Hwy
�1 Need for street Lights
• Concerns about Safety
• Speed. Visibility & Access
6) Concern about Cost to the Village
On February 12, 2015, the Village of Tequesta
unanimously approved a resolution to pro-
ceed with the request to FDOT for a lane
elimination on US-1. Similarly, the Town of Jupiter unanimously approved a resolution supporting
the request to FDOT for a lane elimination on US-1 on February 17, 2015.
On June 15, 2015, the Florida Department of Transportation sent notices to both municipalities
stating a multi -disciplinary process had determined no adverse impact would result from the lane
elimination and that the request was approved.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
With regard to the US-1 improvement project, plans are moving forward in 2017. FDOT is
expecting to initiate construction in November 2017 which should be completed by fall 2018,
weather permitting. This $3.2 million project includes lane elimination, widening turn lanes,
adding buffered bike lanes and patterned pavement crosswalks, milling and resurfacing of the
roadway, sidewalk and drainage improvements, pedestrian lighting, and installation of
pedestrian mast arm signalization, vehicle detection systems, and signage and pavement marking
upgrades.
The rendering below was provided by FDOT in preparation for an open house event in the Village
of Tequesta
SR 5 i US-1 FROM BEACH ROAD TO COUNTY LINE ROAD
nIV rW.1Q;f 1.7Tmw� I^YW*7 fiI;S:YY,:.
am
The photos below illustrate a potential "existing" and "proposed" design scenario of the US-1
and Tequesta Drive intersection.
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1
Thus far, the Village of Tequesta US-1
Master Plan and Complete Streets
Project has had a positive impact on
the community. During the October 12,
2017, Village Council meeting, the
Village was recognized for its
commitment to this innovative project.
Michael Busha, Executive Director of
Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council (TCRCP), presented Village
Mayor Abby Brennan with three
awards related to the Village of
Tequesta US-1 Master Plan and
Complete Streets Project.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
The awards included "Outstanding Infrastructure Award" from the Florida Planning & Zoning
Association; Award of Merit: Best Practices Category from the Florida Chapter of the American
Planning Association; and an Innovation Award from the National Association of Development
Organization.
The Village is committed to making Tequesta a safe and enjoyable a community for both residents
and visitors. The US-1 Master Plan and Complete Streets Project will transform this major
corridor into a safe, accessible, and aesthetically pleasing roadway which will accommodate all
users, whether on foot, bike, bus, private vehicle, or other mode of transit.
• Vft-W-WT.%wsbus ,:Mires. Pi—
•yNlk�iLX%)2017
�j
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
COMPLETE STREETS
Complete Streets are a natural complement to sustainability efforts, ensuring benefits for
mobility, community, and the environment. Complete Streets is a nationally recognized term
referring to streets and sidewalks that are designed, operated and maintained to enable safe and
convenient access and travel for all users — pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and people of all
ages and abilities, as well as freight and motor vehicle drivers.
Complete streets that have utilized road diets have been proven to be safer, increase walking
and connectivity. A road diet, also referred to as lane reduction/elimination is when the average
daily trips and the predicted daily trips are calculated and determine whether or not the number
of traveling lanes and widths are effective.
Characteristics of Complete Streets
• Pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks; traditional and raised crosswalks; median
crossing islands; which are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) including
audible cues for people with low vision, pushbuttons reachable by people in wheelchairs, and
curb cuts; and curb extensions.
• Traffic calming measures to lower speeds of automobiles and define the edges of automobile
travel lanes, including a road diet, center medians, shorter curb corner radii, elimination of
free -flow right -turn lanes, angled, face -out parking, street trees, planter strips and ground
cover.
• Bicycle accommodations, such as protected or dedicated bicycle lanes, neighborhood
greenways, wide paved shoulders, and bicycle parking.
• Public transit accommodations, such as Bus Rapid Transit, bus pullouts, transit signal priority,
bus shelters, and dedicated bus lanes
• Roundabouts which allow pedestrians to have a safer crossing and lower the amount of
crashes.
The table below summarizes common elements of complete streets:
Table 2-1. Common Elements of Complete Streets
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
The following figures illustrate possible components of complete streets:
Figure 2-2. Complete Street Component Examples
w"Wt P t "c.`""�°
1R�V6 '� fENV
,� VIC usrn "�-•
I rt•fw . � -. '
r
A/f*q.,'-. _—
_.__—.__._.—_-- '`
r 1 r I
!•i1 Yr uw•p(•
v+ ors •t F
�
� `'`� 1
�
wra•
r.rf ..
�
. �
,1
— • s�d.cp t�
uwrra...-or
tlta i.li•ea(5
'ai aovjh AI
IL �R p sverrystor TRi11fIwAr
a� A hrnl1 r.ftv #*Nam*
• Multimodal • Street furniture
• Pedestrian oriented • On -street parking
• Dedicated bicycle lanes • Shaded walkways
• Shade tree landscapes • Transit stops
Figure 2-3. Complete Street Concept Rendering Example
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Traffic Calming Techniques and Cross Connections
Traffic conditions on residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability. When streets
are safe and pleasant; the quality of life is enhanced. When traffic problems become a daily
occurrence, the sense of community and personal well-being are threatened.
Traffic calming techniques may be designed to be sensitive to emergency vehicle access and
maintain cross -connectivity. Traffic calming techniques are aimed toward reducing vehicular
speeds, promoting a safe and pleasant condition for motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and
residents, improving the livability and multi -modality of the street, improving real and perceived
safety for non -motorized users, and discouraging the use of residential streets by cut -through
vehicular traffic.
The following techniques are the common examples of traffic calming:
• Bike Lanes. A portion of the roadway is designated for the preferential or exclusive use of
bicyclists.
• Bulb outs/neck downs/chokers. Curb extensions at intersections reduce curb -to -curb
roadway travel lane widths so that pedestrians have fewer lanes to cross traffic.
• Center islands. Raised islands located along the centerline of a roadway that allow
pedestrians a chance to cross a single direction of traffic and stop safely in the center and
observe the opposite direction before completely crossing.
• Chicanes/lateral shifts. Curb extensions that alternate from one side of the roadway to
the other, forming S-shaped curves that are affective at slowing down traffic.
• Diverters and forced turn lanes. Raised islands located on approaches to an intersection
that block certain movements.
• Median barriers. Raised islands located along the centerline of a roadway and continuing
through an intersection to block cross traffic.
• Police Enforcement. Employing law enforcement techniques, such as posted speeds and
traffic signal/signs.
• Realigned intersections. Changes in alignment that convert T-intersection with straight
approaches into curving roadways meeting at right angles.
• Roundabouts and traffic circles. Barriers placed in the middle of an intersection directing
all traffic in the same direction
• Speed humps. Rounded raised pavement devices placed across roadways to slow vehicle
speeds or discourage cut- through traffic.
• Speed tables/textured pavement/raised crossings. Flat topped speed humps often
constructed with a brick or other textured material to slow traffic in areas that
pedestrians typically cross the street.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
Bicycle, Pedestrian Network and Parking
As bikeways, pathways and sidewalk plans are implemented, they will include signing and
marking to delineate the limits of these facilities particularly where interaction between various
modes of transportation occur. Signing and marking shall be in conformance with the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices, FDOT, and other state, county, and local standards.
Roundabouts and Traffic Circles
Several features of roundabouts and traffic circles promote safety. At traditional intersections
with stop signs or traffic signals, some of the most common types of crashes are right-angle, left -
turn, and head-on collisions. These types of collisions can be severe because vehicles may be
traveling through the intersection at high speeds. With roundabouts and traffic circles, these
types of potentially serious crashes essentially are eliminated because vehicles travel in the same
direction. Installing roundabouts and traffic circles in place of traffic signals can also reduce the
likelihood of rear -end crashes and their severity by removing the incentive for drivers to speed
up as they approach green lights and by reducing abrupt stops at red lights. The vehicle -to -
vehicle conflicts that occur at roundabouts and traffic circles generally involve a vehicle merging
into the circular roadway, with both vehicles traveling at low speeds — generally less than 20
mph in urban areas and less than 30-35 mph in rural areas.
Several studies have concluded that roundabouts and traffic circles have several benefits:
• Reduce incident of all crashes, and at an even greater rate crashes that cause injury.
(Reduction of approximately 80% of injurious accidents)
• Significant traffic flow improvement. Reduction of vehicle delays (reduced by 30- 90%
reduction of average vehicle delay depending on design type, volume and speeds)
• Increased safety for non -motorized users, due to effects related to proper traffic
• Calming design and decreased number of potential accident conflict points.
Benefits of Complete Streets Strategies
Complete streets provide the following benefits:
• Grow economy and enhance tax base — Transportation options increase access to shops,
restaurants, and jobs and raise property values by creating more inviting communities.
• Improve safety and mobility — Streets designed for multiple modes of transportation are
safer for all users and increase mobility by allowing everyone including children, the
elderly, and residents with disabilities to travel with the same level of safety and
convenience.
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Improve health — Complete streets promote physical activity and decrease the number
of cars on the road thereby improving air quality.
• Lower transportation costs —Transportation options allow families to spend less of their
income on gasoline thereby increasing household savings and/or disposable income.
• Ease congestion and increasing road capacity — Complete streets reduce short -distance
car trips thereby increasing the street's overall capacity to accommodate more travelers.
• Decrease overall municipal budget — Complete streets can incorporate green infrastruc-
ture features that reduce stormwater runoff and lower overall transit costs by reducing
usage of short -distance curb -to -curb transit service.
Examples of Complete Street Policies & Guidelines
Major cities throughout the US have implemented complete street policies and guidelines to
have safer roads and transportation. Cities such as: Boston, San Francisco, New York, Chicago,
Atlanta, Portland, Minneapolis and Louisville are examples of complete streets implemented
correctly.
A popular city notorious for complete streets is the City of Boston. Boston has the following:
• Electric Vehicle Charging Stations support the adoption of a new generation of clean -fuel
vehicles. Linked to smart electric grids that use alternative energy sources such as solar
and wind, they will help reduce dependence on fossil fuels and combat climate change.
• Ease of Maintenance informs the design of roadways and sidewalks, favoring durable
materials and maintenance agreements for special features to enhance the life and
upkeep of Boston's streets.
• Accessible Surfaces with smooth slip -resistant materials for sidewalks and crosswalks
create comfortable walking environments that make streets welcoming for people of all
ages and abilities.
• Bus Lanes and Transit Prioritization at intersections improve the reliability of routes with
high passenger volumes. Shelters with amenities and next bus information improve
convenience for passengers.
• Intelligent Signals and Traffic Cameras manage traffic flow in real-time. They facilitate
vehicle progression and reduce wait times, improving fuel efficiency and reducing GHG
emissions.
• Permeable Surfaces for roadways and sidewalks help reduce flooding and erosion and
preserve capacity in storm drains and combined sewers.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
• Bicycle- and Car -Share Stations provide the convenience of personal transportation, low
costs, and energy savings without the need for car ownership.
• Smart Meters that accept prepaid cards, payment by mobile phones, and allow for
variable pricing facilitate more efficient use of limited curbside space.
• Minimum Lane Widths assist in the accommodation of pedestrians and bicyclists when
the available public right-of-way is limited in width. Narrower roadways also result in safer
vehicle speeds.
• Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks create a citywide network that increases safety and
encourages more people to bicycle.
• Rain Gardens and other greenscape elements at key locations divert stormwater directly
to the soil. Maintainable rain gardens can filter pollutants, improve air quality, and
provide greenery on the street.
• Digital Tags and Information Panels integrated with street furniture and building facades
enable wayfinding, community bulletin boards, trip planning, and place -based social
networking.
• Wide Sidewalks with unobstructed accessible pathways encourage walking. When
combined with proper lighting, street trees, and vibrant street walls, they are inviting,
safer, and contribute to placemaking.
• Street Trees with sufficient rooting volume to thrive provide shade and beauty, support
wildlife habitat, and reduce air pollution and energy consumption.
Complete Street Examples in Florida
There are also many examples of municipalities within the state of Florida that have implemented
complete street design. In Tallahassee, the city implemented a complete streets policy and
utilized a road diet for Robinson Street. Robinson Street was a 4-lane street which was reduced
to a 3-lane cross section providing turn lanes. This reduced the amount of side swipe accidents,
speed reduction, and overall road safety.
In South Florida, the City of Fort Lauderdale has also implemented complete streets policies, in
an effort to create a mobility system that will realize long-term cost savings in terms of improved
public health, reduced fuel consumption, reduced demand for single occupancy motor vehicles,
and increased public safety through the implementation of this Complete Streets Policy. In
addition, implementing complete streets techniques will contribute to walkable, livable
neighborhoods which can build community and create a sense of community pride and improved
quality of life.
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City will plan for, design, construct, operate and maintain appropriate facilities for
pedestrians, bicyclists, motor vehicles, transit vehicles and transit riders, freight carriers,
emergency responders, and adjacent land users. All users will experience a safe, functional, and
visually appealing environment while traveling safely and conveniently on and across all surface
roadways in Fort Lauderdale. This policy will apply to all development and redevelopment in the
public domain.
The City will use the Complete Streets Design Manual to guide the design of new and modified
streets in Fort Lauderdale while ensuring a context sensitive approach to unique circumstances
of different streets and communities. All relevant city plans, manuals, rules, regulations and
programs will incorporate Complete Streets Design Principles.
The City will also:
(A) Provide well -designed pedestrian
accommodations on all streets and
crossings. Pedestrian
accommodations can take
numerous forms, including, but not
limited to, traffic signals, access
management, lighting, enhanced
crosswalks, roundabouts, bulb -
outs, curb extensions, sidewalks,
buffer zones, shared -use pathways,
and perpendicular curb ramps,
among others.
(B) Provide well -designed bicycle
accommodations along all streets.
Bicycle accommodations can take
numerous forms, including, but not
limited to, the use of bicycle lanes,
sharrows, shared use paths, slow
speeds, education, enforcement,
bicycle storage, traffic calming,
signs, and pavement markings,
among others.
(C) Where physical conditions warrant,
landscaping shall be planted or
other shading devices installed whenever a street is improved (such as the addition of
medians or wider sidewalks), newly constructed, reconstructed, or relocated. An
emphasis shall be placed on the addition of native trees that provide shade for
pedestrians.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
(D) Provide transit amenities when transit services are provided on the corridor including
shelters, bus bulb -outs, safe pedestrian and bike access, benches, and bike racks, etc. An
emphasis shall be placed on provided connectivity between transit stops and
destinations.
FINAL REMARKS
Complete Streets
As discussed in the previous section, complete streets are streets that are meant for everyone
and are designed to accommodate all users of the roadway: pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists,
and transit riders. There is no specific characteristic of a complete street because each is unique
and is developed to respond to the needs of the community. However, some common elements
of a complete street in a downtown area may include sidewalks (with adequate lighting and
width), bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), public transportation, pedestrian refuge islands,
road diets, bulb -outs, streetscapes, on -street parking, buildings framing the street, crosswalk
signage, and various forms of landscaping.
Municipalities throughout the nation, including many in South Florida, are incorporating
complete street principles into their planning processes and visions. By establishing and
implementing complete streets, the Village's roadway network can simultaneously
accommodate users (pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists) of all ages and abilities,
improve public health and safety, active mobility and environmental quality.
To best identify the implementation strategies, locations, and types of complete streets, a
Complete Streets Policy is recommended. As such, The Village should consider adding a new
policy requiring the development of a Complete Streets Policy. A Complete Streets Policy should
include strategies for identifying the locations of complete streets, a strategy for determining
which components are appropriate, identification of potential funding sources, and strategies for
determining the retrofitting of existing streets and implementation concurrent with new
development.
REFERENCES AND SOURCES
Corey Zehngebot & Richard Peiser. Complete Streets Come of Age. America Planning
Association. Web Accessed Sept. 2017.
https://www.planning.org/planning/2014/may/completestreets.htm
National League of Cities. Complete Streets Policies. Web Accessed Oct. 2017.
http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.org/topics/transportation/complete-streets
Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency. Complete Streets. Web Accessed Oct. 2017.
http://www.paImbeachmpo.org/complete-streets
Village of Tequesta Website. Web Accessed Feb. 2017. http://www.tequesta.org
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents an inventory and analysis of housing in the Village of Tequesta. The purpose
of the housing element is to guide the preparation of plans and policies necessary to assure the
availability of safe, sanitary, affordable and otherwise adequate housing for projected growth
and future needs of the Village. This chapter examines existing conditions and identifies
projected demand in the supply of housing and provides an analysis of the internal and external
factors affecting the Tequesta housing market.
Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, all land development regulations and development
permitting actions are required to be consistent with the Housing Element and other elements
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Housing in Tequesta
Tequesta is a coastal community located on Florida's East Coast, along the northern border of
Palm Beach County. The area is popular among retirees which results in a low average number
of persons per household. Tequesta is also a popular resort and second -home community.
The Village of Tequesta is almost entirely built out. The Village is 98.2% developed at the present
time, Vacant lands currently represent 1.8% of the total land area in Tequesta. This is down from
the nearly 6% reported in 1996. The amount of Vacant land in the Village has decreased
significantly.
There are only 25.723 acres currently vacant land available for future development within the
existing corporate limits of Tequesta. This compares to 84.5 acres reported as Vacant in 1996. It
is expected that the remaining Vacant lands will be entirely build -out within the long-range
planning period of the Comprehensive Plan update. On January 12, 2017, Village Council
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
approved a 96-unit adult congregate living facility to be located on a vacant 8-acre site on County
Line Road (Key Estates Senior Housing Living). As of November 2017, the parcel is still vacant and
the applicant is considering a time extension. As a result, the property was considered as vacant
for this analysis.
The largest use of land in the Village continues to be Residential. Residential use increased from
approximately 473 acres in 1996 to 515.57 acres in December 2016. This represents an 8.9%
increase in Residential land use over that time period. In 2016, Residential areas represented
35.10% the total land area of the Village.
Most Residential development continues to be single family, low density development
(maximum 5.4 dwelling units/acre). About 444.62 acres of the 515.57 acres of Residential use is
single family, low density development. The amount of land occupied by medium density
Residential development (maximum 12 dwelling units/acre) has not changed significantly.
Approximately seventy-one (71) acres are currently used for medium density Residential, as
compared to 65.4 acres in 1996.
It is projected that build -out within the existing corporate limits of Tequesta will occur within 5-
Five to 10-Year planning period of the updated Comprehensive Plan. Based on this analysis,
future land use projections. With the limited amount of growth and development projected in
the Population Estimates and Projections section of this Report, very little change is expected in
the mix, and type of residential units over the 5- and 10-Year planning periods of the updated
Comprehensive Plan. However, annexation of surrounding pocket areas could impact residential
land use designations and acreages.
The 2003-2005 nationwide "housing bubble" caused a meteoric rise in home prices that resulted
in a severe imbalance between housing supply and demand in South Florida. Palm Beach
County's affordable housing shortage was largely due to several key factors:
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Inflationary housing values that exceed the income of most County residents;
• substantial loss of multi -family rental housing through condominium conversions;
• rising interest rates, construction costs and materials; and
• increasing costs associated with homeownership (taxes, insurance, etc.).
After the "bust," the housing market was impacted by the foreclosure crisis, more stringent
requirements from lenders to qualify for mortgages because of sub -prime mortgage meltdown,
slowing of the economy, increased rate of unemployment, and high gas prices.
Generally, a high number of foreclosures creates several problems. First, foreclosures create
housing affordability problems for those whose homes are foreclosed on. Second, foreclosed
properties often are not maintained, turning into eyesores, and adversely affecting the value of
properties in the surrounding neighborhood. Third, foreclosed properties usually sell at lower -
than -actual -value which also devalues properties in the surrounding neighborhood. Finally,
foreclosures impact banks and lending institutions which often reduce the credit available to
individuals and businesses. Overall, foreclosed properties negatively impact the entire
community as well as the owners of those properties.
In general, in Palm Beach County, with the recent decrease in housing costs, the focus has shifted
to very -low and low-income households, with less emphasis on moderate income households
and workforce housing. This allows resources to be concentrated on a smaller segment of the
population, resulting in a higher percentage of that smaller segment receiving assistance.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
EXISTING CONDITIONS
In order to effectively guide and direct future land uses within the Village of Tequesta, it is
necessary to have a clear understanding of existing housing conditions. This section examines
the characteristics of existing housing in Tequesta, and presents an inventory of all housing -
related data as required by Chapter 163 Florida Statutes.
The following analysis is based on the American Community Survey (ACS) of the U.S. Census
Bureau which includes estimates based on a sample of households over a 5-year period. The data
provided by the ACS allows an in-depth analysis of housing variables and trends. The following
tables are organized in columns, each representing a 5-year period from 2006-2010 or 2010-
2014: the first two columns provide data for Tequesta during two 5-year periods, and the third
column focusses on Palm Beach County.
HOUSING CONDITIONS
This analysis recognizes that "Housing is most Americans' largest expense. Decent and affordable
housing has a demonstrable impact on family stability and the life outcomes of children. Decent
housing is an indispensable building block of healthy neighborhoods, and this shapes the quality
of life... better housing can lead to better outcomes for individuals, communities, and American
society as a whole. In short, housing matters." Bart Harvey, 2006, Joint Center of Housing Studies
of Harvard University.
Occupancy and Tenure
As summarized in Table 3-1, in 2014 there were 3,194 housing units in Tequesta, a decrease from
3,326 housing units in 2010. Of that number, 2,519 (78.9 percent) were classified as occupied,
compared to 79.2 percent in Palm Beach County. The percentage of vacant housing units in
Tequesta (21.1 percent) was similar to that of the County (20.8 percent) in 2014.
Table 3-1. Housing Occupancy
Tacant tor sale 4.9 W 0.4 W 2.7
• 20.5 W 8.1 W 8.5
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 3-2 indicates that between 2010 in 2014, Tequesta saw a slight shift in the number of
owner -occupied and renter -occupied units. Owner -occupied units decreased by 2.8 percent,
while renter -occupied units increase by 2.8 percent during that time. By 2014, 79.6 percent of all
occupied housing units in Tequesta were owner -occupied, in contrast with 20.4 percent occupied
by renters. This trend is consistent with the County where there are more owner -occupied units
than renter -occupied units. The average number of persons per household, both owner- and
renter -occupied, is slightly over two (2.25 and 2.39, respectively) in Tequesta, which is just barely
lower than in Palm Beach County (2.47 and 2.67). This is consistent with the larger concentration
of retirees and "empty nesters" in Tequesta.
Table 3-2. Housing Tenure
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Type of Housing
Table 3-3 shows that in 2014, 52 percent of Tequesta's housing supply were single-family units,
while 48.1 percent were duplexes and multifamily units. Between 2010 and 2014, the number of
single-family units in Tequesta increased by 5.4 percent. The larger proportion of single-family
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 5
home units in Tequesta is consistent with the County where single-family homes are 56.3 percent
of all housing units.
Table 3-3. Number of Units in Structure
Total3,326
100%
3,194
100%
668,464
100%
® detached . 1,366
41.1%
1,506
47.2%
308,555
46.2%
1-unit, attached 184
5.5%
154
4.8%
67,811
10.1%
®_■ 33
1.0%
56
1.8%
19,758
3.0%
3 or 4 units 160
4.8%
212
6.6%
46,528
7.0%
�-5-to 9 units 382
11.5%
353
11.1%
41,317
6.2%
10 to 19 units'.- 449
13.5%
457
14.3%
41,329
6.2%
20 or more units M 739
22.2%
456
14.3%
124,293
18.6%
Mobile Home ,1 13
0.4%
0
0.0%
18,644
2.8%
Boat, RV, van, etc. .1 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
229
0.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Number of Bedrooms and Overcrowdine
As shown in Table 3-4, three -bedroom units make up the largest supply of housing in Tequesta
(44 percent), whereas the majority of housing in Palm Beach County (39.5 percent) are two -
bedroom units. In Tequesta, 60.5 percent of the housing units have more than two bedrooms,
while 48.8 percent of the County's total housing units have more than two bedrooms.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Overcrowding is indicated by the presence of more than one person per room. Table 3-5 shows
that the number of overcrowded units within the Village is negligible, with 99.8 percent of the
units having no more than one person per room. This is consistent with figures for the County
(97.1 percent). In 2014, Tequesta had only 5 units or 0.2 percent overcrowding, in contrast to the
County's 15,344 units or 2.9 percent overcrowding.
Table 3-4. Number of Bedrooms
Total3,326
3,326
3,194
3,194
668,464
• • • 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
8,253
• • • ■ 87
2.6%
191
6.0%
70,724
bedrooms 1,323
39.8%
1,071
33.5%
263,810
• • • 1,521
45.7%
1,404
44.0%
226,968
• • 339
10.2%
515
16.1%
75,501
3 - 56
1.7%
13
0.4%
23,208
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American
Community Survey.
Table 3-5. Occupants per Room and Overcrowding
• 2,490
2,490
2,519
2,519
529,729
1.00 or less 2,490
100.0%
2,514
99.8%
514,385
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
11,538
1.51 or 0
0.0%
5
0.2%
3,806
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community
Survey.
As summarized in Table 3-6, the majority of Tequesta's housing supply (28 percent) was built in
the 1970s. Founded in 1957 as a country club community, Tequesta witnessed rapid growth
throughout the next two decades, due to the expansion of the golf community and surrounding
neighborhoods, as well as new job opportunities brought to the area by Pratt & Whitney and
other companies. Approximately 49 percent of Tequesta's housing was built after 1979.
In contrast, the largest percentage (28.3%) of the County's housing supply was built during the
1980s, and 65 percent was built prior to 1980. Less than four percent of Tequesta's housing stock
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 7
was built prior to 1960, which means that those structures have been in the housing market for
more than 55 years. In contrast, 8.1 percent of the County's housing stock was built prior to 1960.
Table 3-6. Year Structure Built
EVIFIN a
3,326
100%
3,194
100%
668,464
100%
Builtor later'
20
0.6%
0
0.0%
3,069
0.5%
Built 2000 to '
397
11.9%
563
17.6%
112,229
16.8%
Built 1990 • ' 9
358
10.8%
495
15.5%
118,507
17.7%
Built 1980 1989
575
17.3%
511
16.0%
188,862
28.3%
Built iu
• 0 to 1979
1,026
30.8%
919
28.8%
134,345
20.1%
Built 1960 to 1969
724
21.8%
581
18.2%
56,614
8.5%
B 1950
" 187
5.6%
95
3.0%
34,866
5.2%
Built 1940 to 1949■
28
0.8%
30
0.9%
8,948
1.3%
Built • -
11
0.3%
0
0.0%
11,024
1.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Table 3-7 indicates that 100 percent of the housing stock in the Village includes plumbing and
kitchen facilities, as does nearly all of the County's: 99.6 % with complete plumbing facilities and
99.3% with complete kitchen facilities.
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 3-7. Plumbing and Other Services
Occupied housing units 2,490 2,490 2,519 2,519 529,729 529,729
Lacking complete plumbing i
facilities
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,915 0.4%
completeLacking 10 0.4% 0 0.0% 3,792 0.7%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Housing Cost and Affordabili
Table 3-8 indicates the value of owner -occupied housing. The value of housing continues to be
higher in Tequesta than in Palm Beach County as a whole. In 2014, approximately 30.6 percent
of the homes in Tequesta were valued at less than $200,000, compared to 51.2 percent at the
County level. However, over 20 percent of the Village's homes were valued at over $500,000,
compared to approximately 11 percent in Palm Beach County. These numbers are consistent
with the 2014 median home values, which were higher in the Village ($287,400) than in the
County ($194,600).
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Table 3-8. Housing Value
•
2,053
2,053
2,004
2,004
371,761
371,761
25
1.2%
54
2.7%
34,834
9.4%
50
2.4%
224
11.2%
55,156
14.8%
79
3.8%
103
5.1%
50,153
13.5%
233
11.3%
233
11.6%
50,054
13.5%
624
30.4%
459
22.9%
73,507
19.8%
802
39.1%
527
26.3%
65,407
17.6%
to $999 99
180
8.8%
322
16.1%
29,890
8.0%
$1,000,000 or more
60
2.9%
82
4.1%
12,760
3.4%
Median• •
303,500
(X)
287,400
(X)
194,600
(X)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey
The majority of owner -occupied housing units in Tequesta are mortgaged. Table 3-9 indicates
that in 2014, 40.3 percent of owner -occupied housing units in the Tequesta did not have a
mortgage, while 59.7 percent of housing units did have a mortgage. Between 2010 and 2014, the
number of housing units with a mortgage increased by 4.7 percent. These figures are comparable
with the County's housing mortgage status where 58.2 percent of the housing units have a
mortgage, and only 41.8 percent are without a mortgage. The Village's housing mortgage status
is consistent with the demographic and socio-economic characteristics presented in Chapter 1.
Approximately 29 percent of the population was over 60 years old in 2014. Age structure and
higher income levels impact the Village's ownership status.
Table 3-9. Mortgage Status
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Table 3-10 indicates a median contract rent of $1205 for Tequesta, compared with $1158 for the
County in 2014. In Tequesta, 31.3 percent of occupied rental units cost less than $1,000 in 2014,
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
compared to 34.8 percent in the County. . At 68.6 percent, the majority of rental housing units
in the Village have rental values higher than $1,000, which is comparable to those in Palm Beach
County (65.3 percent). These figures are consistent with the age of the housing stock in Tequesta.
Table 3-10. Gross Rent
paying rent
423
423
488
488
150,748
150,748
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1,180
0.8 %
Less than $211,,,,,■
$200 to • '
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
2,083
1.4%
0
0.0%
26
5.3%
3,855
2.6%
1 �
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
13,540
9.0%
33
7.8%
127
26.0%
31,661
21.0%
$1,000 to ' ' IIIIIIII■
263
62.2%
203
41.6%
60,530
40.2%
5
127
30.00%
132
27.0%
37,899
25.1%
No rent paid
14
(X)
27
(X)
7,220
(X)
1,318
(X)
1,205
(X)
1,158
(X)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
Table 3-11 shows the percentage or proportion of income that households pay for housing in
Tequesta. Based on the definition of affordable housing, a housing unit is affordable if a
household's monthly housing expenses do not exceed 30% of the household's gross income. For
owner -occupied households, housing cost includes principal, interest, taxes, and insurance.
Table 3-11. Selected Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income (SMOCAPI)
Aousing units with a mortgage1,129
1,129
1,184
1,184
214,765
Less thanW.1, percent 163
14.4%
255
21.5%
60,348
20.0 to 24.0 percent 144
12.8%
222
18.8%
29,766
25.0 to 29.9 percent 183
16.2%
141
11.9%
24,161
30.0 to 34.9 percent 99
8.8%
70
5.9%
17,738
35.11, percent or more 540
47.8%
496
41.9%
82,752
Not 0
(X)
13
(X)
1,619
Source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
In 2014, an estimated 47.8 percent of
Tequesta homeowners spent more
than 30 percent of their income on
housing cost, in comparison with 46.8
percent in the County. These figures
are consistent with the Village's higher
median value for housing ($287,400)
compared to the County's ($194,600).
k:�3U3,5UU).
Table 3-12 indicates that 69.9 percent of Tequesta renters spent more than 30 percent of their
income toward rent in 2014, compared to 60.5 percent at the County level.
Table 3-12. Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income (GRAPI
(excluding423
cannotcomputed)
423
488
488
147,766
147,766
88
20.8%
60
12.3%
11,352
7.7%
Tess than 15.0 percent
15.0 to 19.9 percent
91
21.5%
14
2.9%
14,116
9.6%
20.0 to 24.0 percent
7
1.7%
73
15.0%
17,290
11.7%
25.0 to 29.9 percent
2
0.5%
0
0.0%
15,713
10.6%
30.0 to 34.9 percent
46
10.9%
52
10.7%
12,958
8.8%
35.0 percent more
189
44.7%
289
59.2%
76,337
51.7%
-or
Not
14
W
27
W
10,202
W
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 & 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey.
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS SUMMARY
According to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), households
spending more than 30 percent of income for housing costs are considered to be "cost -
burdened." Households spending more than 50 percent are considered to be "severely cost -
burdened." Housing is generally considered to be affordable if the household pays less than 30
percent of income for housing costs.
As a summary indicator of local affordable housing need, the Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse,
Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, provides the number of households that are low-income
(incomes below 80% of area median) and severely cost -burdened (paying 50% or more for
mortgage costs or rent) for each
county and jurisdiction. The �p ,
Clearinghouse provides estimates
a
and projections %J the number of
these households by tenure for
the years 2010-2040.
This indicator encompasses a
broad range of households likely
experiencing distress because of
their housing costs. With their low
incomes, the large portion of
income taken up by housing costs is likely to limit these households' ability to afford other
necessities. Moreover, the 80% of median income figure is a traditional measure of eligibility for
programmatic housing assistance. For example, all beneficiaries of the federal public housing
program and federal HOME program must have incomes below this amount.
The need indicator serves as an
approximation of the total number of
households that would benefit from some
type of housing assistance, particularly if
homeless and migrant households are
added. Such assistance could include the
construction of new affordable housing
units, but it could also include the provision
of subsidies to make current units more
affordable.
- In addition to this summary level of
information, a more detailed understanding
of the presence of low-income and cost -
burdened households can help local governments plan for and target assistance. The following
supplemental tables provide this additional level of detail for Tequesta. Note, however, that the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
number does not include homeless individuals and families, as they are not included in household
enumerations. It also does not include the many migrant farmworker households missed by
Census counts.
As Table 3-13 indicates, the number of severely cost -burdened households with income less than
80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) is greater for owner -households, than for renter -
households at present and for each five-year projection. As a whole, a minimal increase is
projected in the number of severely cost burdened households over the next 20 years for both
owner- and renter -households in Tequesta.
Table 3-13. Affordable Housing Need Summary 2010-2040 in Tequesta
• 348 353 355 368 378 389
176 175 175 182 186 188
Source: Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse. Shimberg Center for Housing Studies.
While the summary indicator provides a measure of overall housing need, targeting housing
assistance appropriately requires more detail about income variation within the total number of
low-income, severely cost -burdened households, for two reasons:
1) If needs are to be addressed through construction of new units, income variation within
low-income households means that not all new rent- or price -restricted units will be
affordable to all households. For example, a household at 30% Annual Median Income
(AMI) would still pay more than half of its income for rent in an apartment with rent set
for households with incomes of 60% AMI.
2) A number of housing programs, such as the Low Income Housing Tax Credit and, in most
cases, Section 8 Housing Vouchers, set income limits below 80% of area median.
The following tables provide more detail on the income categories that make up the summary
need indicator.
Table 3-14 indicates that the largest number of renter -households is projected to be at or below
incomes of 30% AMI at each five-year interval. There are significantly fewer (less than half) cost -
burdened households with projected incomes between 30.1% and 50% AMI, and fewer still
between 50.1% and 80% AMI. This data suggests that Tequesta's affordable housing initiative
would be best targeted at the cost -burdened and the severely cost -burdened households, even
though they represent a relatively smaller number of total renter -households.
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 3-14. Affordable Housing Need Detail 2010-2040 in Tequesta (Renter)
0% AMI or less 108
107
107
ill
115
118
119
117
i ' , 41
41
41
42
42
40
42
42
50.1-80%AMI 27
27
27
29
29
30
31
31
Total176
175
175
182
186
188
192
190
Source: Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse. Shimberg Center for Housing Studies
Table 3-15 indicates that, similar to renter -households, the greatest number of owner -
households is projected to be at or below the 30% AMI. However, cost -burdened households
with incomes between 30.1% to 50% AMI and severely cost -burdened owner -households with
incomes of 50.1% to 80% AMI, are a much larger portion (roughly one third) of total owner -
households than in renter -households. These numbers reflect the larger concentration of elderly
households in Tequesta.
Table 3-15. Affordable Housing Need Detail 2010-2040 in Tequesta (Owner)
0% AMI or less 138 141
142
148
152
159
160
163
0' 110 112
113
117
121
125
127
128
80'.AMI 100 100
100
103
105
105
106
106
• M 348 353
355
368
378
389
393
397
Source: Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse. Shimberg Center for Housing Studies.
Table 3-16 shows that in Tequesta, only 15.8% of households headed by the elderly are cost -
burdened, which is lower than the 19.8 percent Countywide. This may be attributed to the higher
proportion of homes owned, as opposed to rented, by the elderly.
Table 3-16. Households with Cost Burden Above 30% and Income Below 50% AMI —
Elderly -Headed Only, 2014
CountyPalm Beach 40,921 19.8%
• 177 15.8%
Source: Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse. Shimberg Center for Housing Studies.
As Table 3-17 indicates, 1018 households in Tequesta (38.4%) were headed by a person age 65
or older in 2014; of those elderly households, 420 (41%) paid more than 30% of income for rent
or mortgage costs. By comparison, 29.4% of households statewide were headed by elderly
persons during the same year. In Tequesta, 905 (88.9%) of elderly households owned their
homes in 2014.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
Table 3-17. Elderly Households by Age and Cost Burden, 2014 in Tequesta
• 598 179 241
Table 3-18 presents population not living in households and classified as living in group quarters.
Group quarters are facilities such as domestic violence shelters or youth shelters that would not
be counted as households in the Census.
Table 3-18. Group Quarters Population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010-2014 5-Year American Community Survey
The Goals, Objectives and Policies for this Housing Element include additional provisions for
addressing the Village's affordable/workforce housing needs.
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
It is projected that build -out within the existing corporate limits of Tequesta will occur within 5-
Five to 10-Year planning period of the updated Comprehensive Plan. With the limited amount of
growth and development projected in the Population Estimates and Projections section of this
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Report, very little change is expected in the mix, and type of residential units over the 5- and 10-
Year planning periods of the updated Comprehensive Plan. However, redevelopment of existing
parcels; and, annexation of surrounding pocket areas could impact residential land use
designations and acreages.
The Village of Tequesta could accommodate infill and redevelopment growth in the future.
Commercial and mixed use developments along U.S. Highway 1 are potential areas to be
redeveloped in the future accommodating residential initiatives. Infill and redevelopment should
promote superior projects within the Village's urban landscape.
Proposed buildings are encouraged to be mixed use, energy efficient, appropriately landscaped,
and aesthetically pleasing. Limitations upon the land, lot size, parking requirements, height
restrictions, and more, should be flexible and not a hindrance to superior design. Moreover, infill
redevelopment should allow flexible design while maximizing the potential use of a building or
site.
Housing and Supportive Services for Elderly and Special Need Residents
An age -sensitive community is a people -sensitive community. A balanced community will ensure
that alternatives are made available to the entire population. Local governments that are serious
about meeting the housing needs of older people must recognize that most prefer to age in place
within their own homes rather than move to specialized housing where they have to comprehend
an unfamiliar environment in a new community.
Aging in place is more feasible where land -use patterns enable walking and transit use as
alternatives to driving and where alternatives in housing are offered such as multifamily housing,
accessory apartments. A community that offers these alternatives will provide an environment
that is supportive of a wide range of individual and household needs including young couples
with limited income, young professionals, and persons with disabilities.
The aging of the population creates an increasing need for housing that is accessible for
occupants as well as visitors. The census Bureau reports that the U.S. population 65 years and
older is expected to double with 25 years. By 2030, 72 million people (1 out of 5 Americans) will
be 65 years and older.
Approximately 18% of all elderly households in Florida (65 years of age and older) live at or below
the poverty level (U.S. Census, 200). According to the Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing,
Florida Housing Finance Corporation 2004 Rental Market Study of the 174,316 lower income,
cost -burdened, (renter households paying more than 30% of their income on housing with
incomes at or below 60 percent of area median) aged 55 and over in Florida, 62% are paying
more than 50% of their income toward housing costs.
Accessibility can be improved with the concept of "visitability" and universal design. "Visitability"
is a housing design strategy to provide a basic level of accessibility for single family housing
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
allowing people of all abilities to interact with each other. "Visitability" standards do not require
that all features be made accessible. Universal design incorporates features that make homes
adaptable to persons who require handicapped access without negatively impacting curb appeal
or value.
Affordable housing is also needed by people with physical or mental disabilities. These
populations may be the very lowest income in a community. For example, a person living on
supplemental security income may be living on less than $7,700 per year. There are a number of
non-profit organizations throughout the state of Florida in the business of providing housing in
partnership with other for these special needs populations. The developers of affordable housing
whether for profit or nonprofit will usually include a mix of units in a development to meet the
needs of a continuum of extremely low to low income families.
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or "granny flat" is a residential unit that is secondary to the
primary residence of the homeowner. It can be an apartment within the primary residence or it
can be an attached or freestanding home on the same lot as the primary residence.
Section 163.31771 (2)(a), F.S., defines an accessory dwelling unit as "an ancillary or secondary
living unit, that has a separate kitchen, bathroom, and sleeping area, existing either within the
same structure, or on the same lot, as the primary dwelling unit."
An accessory dwelling unit creates affordable housing in two ways: the "granny flat" is a small
rental unit that will became an affordable rental; and the rental income form the accessory
dwelling unit can provide extra income to the primary residence owner.
ADUs are well suited for lower income elderly because in addition to increasing affordability, the
elderly homeowner may also obtain companionship and needed services from the tenant in the
ADU.
Regulatory barriers and public perception prevent accessory dwelling units from being built.
Removing land use barriers can have an impact in providing affordable housing; for example,
review traditional zoning that prohibits more than one single residence on a platter lot.
Promoting public education awareness can provide a decisive positive influence toward
neighborhoods accepting accessory dwelling units in their community.
Green Housing Solutions
Sustainable housing refers to the ability to provide housing options which meet the needs of
present citizens without compromising the needs of future citizens while at the same time
facilitating the social, environmental, and economic vitality of the community.
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Integrating basic building strategies that consider easy access to jobs to minimize commuting,
building orientation, water and energy efficient appliances, and appropriate landscaping will help
make housing more affordable by increasing savings on transportation, operational, and
maintenance costs.
Energy efficient goals and green building standards need to be included in guidelines that impact
the design and construction of all new residential development or adaptive reuse developments,
including affordable housing. The Village's Land Development Regulation will be reviewed to
include green building standards and redevelopment friendlier regulations to supports green
design.
The Village will consider the development of a Green Building Ordinance and a green building
certification programs, such as LEED, Florida Green Building Coalition (FGBC), Green Globes,
Living Building Challenge, for development and redevelopment. The ordinance may include the
development of a Neighborhood Development Rating System that integrates the principles of
smart growth, urbanism and green building into a national system for neighborhood design.
The State of Florida and private energy companies such as FPL have incentives and programs
available for residents, businesses, governments, non -profits, schools, institutions, etc. The
funds can be used to install energy efficient products such as the following; photovoltaic cells,
solar hot water heaters, solar pool heaters, and fuel cells. The incentives generally pay by
kilowatt hour for installed products which will conserve electricity over the lifetime of the
product.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
FINAL REMARKS
Based on the present analysis, the Village should continue to implement specific strategies and
policies to encourage and promote compact development patterns, which include the following:
• With regard to housing diversity and sustainability, the Village will promote infill
development, redevelopment, and flexible zoning regulations, and designate adequate
sites and appropriate land use designations to ensure a diverse housing stock for all its
residents.
• The Village will continue to support neighborhood enhancement projects. Mixed -use
zoning will be promoted to provide the flexibility necessary to stabilize and revitalize older
neighborhoods while protecting those neighborhoods from incompatible uses and
encouraging compatibility through context -sensitive building and site design.
• The Village will continue to promote resource conservation programs and energy -
efficient construction. Proximity to transit services and pedestrian and bicycle
interconnectivity will be emphasized. Furthermore, the Village will consider providing
development incentives for projects that meet or exceed the Green Building standards.
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 4: UTILITIES ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Utilities element of the Comprehensive Plan contains the sub -elements of Sanitary Sewer,
Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge. Each sub -section is addressed separately below.
Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, all land development regulations and development
permitting actions are required to be consistent with the Utilities Element and other elements of
the Comprehensive Plan.
SANITARY SEWER
The purpose of the sanitary sewer sub -element is to guide the preparation of plans and policies
necessary to assure the availability of capacity, treatment and disposal of wastewater for
projected growth and future needs of the Village of Tequesta. This sub -element will analyze the
Village's existing sanitary sewer collection system and facilities, and also discuss future
generation levels. The Village Level of Service Standards for central wastewater service is 108
gallons per capita per day.
It is noted that references are made throughout this Sanitary Sewer sub -element of the EAR to
the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District, or ENCON as it consistently appears in the
currently adopted Comprehensive Plan of the Village. Since the last EAR and subsequent
amendments to the Plan, the name of ENCON has been officially changed to the "Loxahatchee
River District", or "LRD". The title Loxahatchee River District (LRD) is used in this discussion when
referring to current situations and for future planning purposes.
The Village does not own or operate a central sanitary sewer system. The Loxahatchee River
District (LRD) owns, operates and maintains the sanitary sewer system serving Tequesta.
Wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal services are provided to the Village
by the LRD. After the sewer service expansion of the Tequesta Country Club and surrounding
areas that previously did not have collection and transmission facilities available to them, central
service is now available to the entire Village.
Due to limitations of the physical location of Tequesta, expansion of its boundaries is limited;
therefore, the future possibility of urban sprawl type development is almost non-existent.
Tequesta cannot expand northward into Martin County by annexation because it is not allowed
by Florida Annexation law. East/west expansion of the Village limits is constrained by adjacent
water bodies (ICWW and Northwest Fork of the Loxahatchee River, respectively), and the
southern boundary of Tequesta abuts either the Loxahatchee River or a portion of the Town of
Jupiter lying north of the River. This physiography allows for the efficient provision of sanitary
sewer service throughout the Village.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
Even though central sanitary sewer facilities are available, not all properties in the Village have
connected to the system and still utilize septic tank systems (less than 20 residences). The
predominant soil type in the septic tank areas is the St. Lucie sand. While St. Lucie sand is well
drained and has slight limitations to transmissivity, it has few organics that retain bacteria to
provide the needed treatment as leachate passes through the soil. The sand and gravels typical
of this soil type have slight limitations to the use of septic tanks.
The Village continues to utilize the LRD in the site plan review and permitting process, requesting
comments from the LRD on new proposed projects and developments regarding wastewater
system requirements, as part of its site plan review requirements. Also, the Village requests
LRD's approval, or approval with conditions, of proposed projects and developments prior to the
issuance of building permits.
The site plan review and building processes established by the Village and the requirements
established in the Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, provide an effective way to coordinate
with developers in the planning and phasing of development to meet wastewater collection and
treatment needs.
The Village does encourage and make themselves available for preliminary/pre-application
meetings to inform developers of code requirements. Developers are encouraged to meet with
LRD representatives in the preliminary stages to clarify LRD requirements and standards. These
opportunities are on -going practices of both the Village and the LRD, and they continue to be
available to developers.
The LRD Federal and State standards to regulate the central sanitary sewer system serving
Tequesta and septic tank systems are regulated by the Palm Beach County Health Department,
which is a State agency. Discharges into surface waters are monitored and reported through the
Village's participation in the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System)
Stormwater Permitting Program.
SOLID WASTE
The purpose of the solid waste sub -element is to guide the preparation of plans and policies
necessary to assure the availability of solid waste resources for projected growth and future
needs of the Village of Tequesta. This sub -element will analyze the Village's existing solid waste
and hazardous waste management services and facilities, project future waste generation levels
and provide alternatives to lower waste generation per capita.
The majority of solid waste in Tequesta continues to be generated by residential areas. The
Village of Tequesta is developed primarily as a residential community. Therefore, the residential
population in Tequesta continues to be the primary generator of wastes in the Village.
Commercial and other uses are not as significant a factor to overall solid waste generation as are
the residential uses.
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Since population projections indicate that there will be modest growth in Tequesta during the 5
and 10-Year planning periods, it is projected that there will be modest increases to the solid
wastes generated in the Village. The Village continues to be provided solid waste disposal
services by the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority (PBCSWA). Their North County Regional
Resource Recovery and Solid Waste Disposal Facility satisfies the disposal needs of the entire
County, including Tequesta. The Village also continues to contribute a minor share of the total
solid waste disposed of at this Regional facility. The Village continues to maintain an effective
liaison with the PBCSWA, and also continues to implement a successful recycling and resource
recovery program.
The PBCSWA has adopted an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan (ISWMP) that secures
sufficient county -wide landfill capacity in the foreseeable future. The adopted County -wide
average disposal capacity sufficient for a per capita generation rate of solid waste delivered to
Authority facilities is 7.13 lbs. per person per day. Although the county -wide solid waste
generation is higher, significant quantities of recyclable materials, particularly construction and
demolition debris and vegetation are diverted to private recycling facilities. The above figure
includes only the portion of the waste stream the Authority reasonably expects to receive based
on decades of projections.
Solid wastes continue to be collected by a private hauler who is granted the right, privilege and
franchise by the Village to collect residential (both single family and multiple family
developments) garbage, trash and other wastes within the Village limits. Waste Management is
currently providing service to the Village. A new contract to continue providing service was
awarded on August 10, 2017 by the Village Council, which will be effective on October 1, 2017.
Commercial and other uses in Tequesta contract privately for collection services.
Under terms of the franchise agreement the contractor makes two (2) weekly collections from
single family residences. Per terms of the agreement, collection of garbage, yard and other trash
is collected at the street line between the side lot lines of single family residences. The location
of waste collection facilities continues to be scrutinized for ease and safety in access in the site
plan review process for multiple family developments.
Accordingly, he following solid waste Levels of Service for residential and non-residential
collection have been established by the Village:
Residential Collection: Twice per week garbage collection,
Twice per week yard waste collection,
Once per week recyclable collection
Non -Residential Collection: Private contracts
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
The Village's private hauler focuses on sustainability and recycling policies. In doing so, they
are contributing to a more sustainable world by:
• Advancing technologies to
reduce waste
• Increasing recycling and reuse
• Creating even safer treatment
and disposal options
• Developing sources of renewable
energy
• Sharing the benefits of learning
and innovation with their clients
and collaborators
Capital improvements are identified in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule presented in
the Capital Improvement Element. Capital improvements related to the provision of solid waste
collection and disposal services are not the responsibility of the Village. Instead, these
responsibilities lie with the private contract hauler and PBCSWA.
Recycling
"Recycling" refers to any process by
which solid waste, or materials which
would otherwise become solid waste,
are collected, separated, or processed
and reused or returned to use in the
form of raw materials or products.
Generally accepted items include:
• Tin cans
• Aluminum cans
• Steel cans
Generally accepted items include:
• Office paper
• Magazines
• Flattened cardboard
• Newspaper
• Phonebooks
• Flattened cereal boxes
• Junk mail
• Paperboard
Bin
!'+ x+sr P r onE oaee� ; mxua atm M�o1
�. 4lt)
1 Con"stad
twooua tu••m r a C&
..... ft ra - o/ita MW lru.n. b
ft-= NULA
lung
HICK Of
aostl�lia•q.etaetnt :a :s :.. is m �,•..: '1aa. awa araew.s •a
Rnurn/a raw !!nnal.�nrartra �tr�+ts
iaai ztie
*row
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Generally accepted items (cont'd): *
• Flattened snack boxes
Generally accepted items include: *
• Food containers and jars
• Soft drink and beer bottles
• Wine and liquor bottles
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
77 7
,ecydiMj
The Florida Legislature has
established a neat statewide
recycling goal —reduce the disposal
of rec%clables 75% bti 2020
The purpose of this sub -element is to analyze the Village's natural conditions that affect the quantity
and quality of stormwater runoff, and the existing stormwater collection and treatment system.
The drainage/stormwater management system serving Tequesta continues to rely on a
combination of surface water discharge and natural infiltration by the use of swales and retention
and/or detention areas for handling stormwater runoff.
The Village's drainage and stormwater management system has been constructed in a piece-
meal fashion over time with the majority of the system having been constructed between 1961
and 1978. Therefore, the major portion of the stormwater drainage system was constructed
prior to any discharge regulations.
There are three (3) main water bodies to which the Village discharges stormwater: The Northwest
Fork of the Loxahatchee River, the North Fork of the Loxahatchee River and the Intracoastal
Waterway (ICWW). The Dover canal located along the southern limits that runs in an east/west
direction to the North Fork of the River that is tidally influenced. Another drainage canal located
on the north side of Tequesta Drive carries stormwater runoff from the Bermuda Terrace-
Tequesta Drive area east to the North Fork of the River. Additionally, land developers have
provided secondary drainage systems within their respective developments. There are also four
(4) parcels in the Village that are dedicated to drainage and retention/detention purposes. They
are referred to as parcels B, C, Russell Road and Unit of Development #39 Cypress Drive North
that is still active. There is also a drainage easement located in the Bayview area.
Minimum landscape and open space requirements are established in each zoning district while
preservation of native vegetation and the amount of allowable impervious areas are established
in the site plan review process and requirements. All of these requirements continue to be
strictly enforced and scrutinized in the site plan review and building processes.
As a general drainage requirement, each proposed development project and/or site in the Village
must maintain 95% of all stormwater runoff on -site. This requirement is established in the Site
Plan Review section of the Village's Official Zoning Ordinance (Ref. Division 2. Site Plan Review,
Sec.78-331 required; development standards; required facilities and infrastructure (8) (c)) and in
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15
the Subdivisions Ordinance (Ref. Article V. Design Standards, Division 1. Generally, Sec. 66-161
General Standards; level of service standards (g) (2)). Limiting post -development runoff to pre -
development conditions is also a requirement of site plan review and subdivision requirements.
Protection from the degree of flooding that would result from a twenty-five (25) year frequency,
twenty-four (24) hour duration storm event has been adopted as the Village's Level of Service
Standard for stormwater drainage facilities, and shall be used as the basis of estimating the
availability of capacity and demand generated by a proposed development project.
The Village of Tequesta is a co-permittee in the Countywide NPDES (National Pollution Discharge
and Elimination System) Stormwater Permitting Program. The Stormwater Management sub -
element must be consistent with any requirements of this program. The Village has participated
in the NPDES program since its inception in the early 1990's, and Policies have been added to the
sub -element to address some of the NPDES program issues.
All of the practices and requirements cited in the Policies above are implemented and presented
in the Village's NPDES Annual Report. These represent on -going activities and requirements of
the NPDES program.
POTABLE WATER
This sub -section will analyze the Village's existing potable water distribution system, project
future demand levels, and analyze the existing facilities.
Background History
The Village owns and operates a central potable water system. Since 1968, the Village of
Tequesta has served its residents and businesses with facilities for the withdrawal, treatment and
distribution of potable water. Prior to 1968, the central water system was owned and operated
by Jupiter Utility Company, Inc. The Village purchased the water system to provide a quality
service to the customers within the Village and franchise area. The entire Village of Tequesta is
provided central potable water service, and all properties are connected to the system.
Village of Tequesta Service Area
The Tequesta water system service area extends beyond the Village corporate boundaries. The
present service area encompasses more than 2500 acres. The current Village water system serves
portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County north of the Loxahatchee River and south of the
Martin County line; a portion of Southern Martin County including north to Jonathan Dickinson
Park including Jupiter Hills, Rolling Hills and a part of southern Jupiter Island; and, the entire Town
of Jupiter Inlet Colony, a peninsula lying adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jupiter Inlet and
Atlantic Ocean.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Village service area is not expected to expand its physical boundaries through the Year 2030.
The Village service area boundaries are indicated in Figure 4-1, which was sourced from the
Village of Tequesta 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, 2015.
Village of Tequesta Water System
The Village water system consists of public wells, a distribution system and treatment facilities.
The composition of the overall Village water system has changed significantly since reported in
the last EAR and subsequent Plan updates. The existing well facilities, as most recently described
in the Village of Tequesta Water Use Permit (WUP) Renewal Application, Permit No. 50-00046-
W, October 2011, include: seven (7) active surficial wells on the eastern peninsula (well numbers
18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 7 and 8); three (3) active surficial wells on the western peninsula (well numbers
25, 26 and 27); and, four (4) active Floridan wells on the eastern peninsula (1R, 2R, 3R, and 4R).
There are also two (2) other proposed wells, all located on the eastern peninsula as follows: Well
28 (surficial, proposed future) and, Well 5R (proposed future). The easements for these two wells
are already in place.
In addition, the Village is subject to, and a participant in, the Palm Beach County Wellfield
Protection Ordinance. This Countywide Wellfield Protection Ordinance regulates land use
activities within travel time contours of the Village's wellfields. These travel time contours (zones
of influence) are identified and overlaid on the Coastal Zone and Conservation Map in the
Comprehensive Plan.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
Figure 4-1. Village of Tequesta Service Area Boundary
_ L
tit I i
�t
tl
_ J try
_ MNATHAN DCWJWN
STATE PARK
I
1 d
1
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
ARCADIS E"T HAv.!:E? ffaf TSEM ar Ha:E E Ka LE- ia =4CF HERE
T. 1Et�EN T JE`.SE`
4m VIE T I 'HA E NW-F, W,
ALLAGE CF TEQUESTA T. 'TEFFER
25^I '.13D Fi?KAAv SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES Mr,t EJ raIRK19 ia;.rchC. tt.Hr4p
WEST +MH 'fAf K R .+'<r i
1FL '_ut—E97_7000, FAY- 69'-7193
�.� RF05—I06.14 FIG. 3-1
�.nn=r- •m Enrba 7917
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Village of Tequesta Water Supply Strategy
The Village had historically been dependent on the Surficial Aquifer for potable water supply. The
potable water allocation for the Tequesta water system is increasingly dependent on the Floridan
Aquifer coupled with the continued use of the Surficial Aquifer. The Village has taken significant
steps and incurred substantial expense over the past thirty (30) years to reduce its use of the
Surficial Aquifer. These steps included: abandonment of seven (7) wells on the eastern peninsula;
construction of a western peninsula wellfield; construction of four (4) Floridan Aquifer wells, and
construction of a reverse osmosis treatment facility.
The Village has worked cooperatively with the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) in developing this long-term program. The Village realizes that a permanent, albeit
proportionately reducing dependency on the Surficial Aquifer is needed in order to achieve a
suitable finished water quality and, not insignificantly, to be fiscally responsible to its water
customers.
The Water Use Permit Renewal Application stated that it was reasonable to conclude that the
Surficial Aquifer allocation over the previous permit cycle had not yielded any indication of
saltwater intrusion on either peninsula or that conductivity levels for all Surficial Aquifer
monitoring wells have remained within acceptable ranges. Monitoring of potential saltwater
intrusion is an ongoing program of the Village. The Water Use Permit renewal anticipated that
the proposed allocation would be adequate through the year 2031. More detailed information
on the Water Use Permit (WUP) is presented later in this document
Water Treatment Facilities
The Village operates two (2) plants at the water treatment plant site. The plants share some
common elements and function as a single facility, but the two (2) processes are rated separately.
The pressurized filter plant treats all of the water from the Surficial Aquifer and is rated at 2.7
MGD. The reverse osmosis plant has a current capacity of 3.6 MGD with three (3) trains.
Section 78-143, Schedule of Site Regulations, of the Village's Code of Ordinances, establishes site
regulations within each zoning district to provide for increased impervious areas which, in turn,
are established to protect groundwater quality and water resources (e.g. maximum lot coverage,
minimum landscape and open space and yard requirements). The site plan review process is
utilized to review proposed systems to assure that maximum retention of rainfall and stormwater
runoff are retained on site.
Other best management practices are employed by the Village in the site plan and development
approval processes to ensure that the quality of water resources is protected and recharge to the
groundwater supplies are maximized.
The Tequesta potable water supply and central system must meet strict standards The Village
continues to adhere to, and be subject, to various standards of other agencies and levels of
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
government. The Village potable water system must meet the standards established in the
Federal Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Public law 93-523, Florida Administrative Code, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, and the Local Department of Health.
The Village Water Department also requires that certain industry design standards that meet
acceptable fire flow and water quality requirements be met in the construction of and/or
expansion of water supply and distribution systems.
Water Conservation
The Village currently has in effect a multi -element water conservation program. This program
has been in place over most of the previous Water Use Permit period (20 years). Moreover, the
Village of Tequesta instituted a water conservation rate structuring program that charged
incrementally higher rates for higher usage of the potable water system. The improvement since
2000 has been materially impacted by the implementation of this water conservation rate
structuring. It is anticipated that the success of the program will continue, and the Village is
committed to the vigorous pursuit of all efforts toward water conservation.
The Village continues to implement a leak detection program. The program is based on the
concept of comparing the volume of water produced for consumption and the volume billed.
This calculation is performed monthly and the yearly results are submitted to the SFWMD. Action
levels have been established. As part of the program and to improve the accuracy of the
calculations, the Village has adopted a residential and commercial meter replacement program.
The Village has adopted, and continues to implement various regulations that improve water
conservation. The Village has adopted water protection and conservation measures in Article VI.
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Water Protection and Conservation of Chapter 50, Natural Resources Protection in the Village
Code of Ordinances. Specifically, Article VI, Sec. 50-187 requires the use of low volume plumbing
fixtures and Article VI, Sec.50-189 requires rain sensor overrides for all irrigation systems and
recognizes SFWMD criteria related to limiting irrigation hours for lawns and ornamentals.
The use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes is an effective water conservation measure.
The Village does not own or operate a wastewater treatment facility and, as such, does not
manufacture reclaimed water. The Village, however, is located within the LRD service area, and
the LRD does produce reclaimed water. The Village continues to work with the LRD to encourage
its use. There are customers within the Village water service area that currently use reclaimed
water for these purposes.
The Village makes water conservation literature available to all customers. In addition, the
Village improves public awareness of water conservation through distribution of related
information in water bill messages, the Village Newsletter and other literature displayed in
information racks at Village buildings. There are some water conservation related issues
addressed in the Coastal Management element of the Village's Comprehensive Plan which are
addressed in the Coastal Management.
Potable Water Level of Service
The Village's current level of service standards for potable water facilities are presented bellow in
Table 4-1.
Table 4-1. Potable Water Level of Service Standard
Village of Teguesta Water Use Permit and Water Supply Plan Information
The Village is currently permitted under SFWMD Water Use Permit (WUP) number 50-00046-W
to withdraw a total annual allocation of 1,594 million gallons (MG) and a maximum monthly
allocation of 230.11 MGM. The WUP allows the Village to withdraw raw water from both the
Surficial and Floridan aquifers. Currently, there are a total of ten (10) active surficial aquifer wells
and four (4) active Floridan aquifer wells. The allocations also include a provision of one
additional surficial well (No. 28) and one Floridan aquifer well (No. 5R) at some point in the future,
as warranted. A summary of the existing raw water supply wellfield's and permitted capacities
based on the current WUP are provided in Table 4-2.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
Table 4-2: SFWMD WUP: Raw Water Supply Wellfield & Permitted Allocations through 2031
The annual withdrawal allocations from both the surficial aquifer and Floridan aquifer represent
a decrease from the previous Water Use Permit. It should be noted that the total (i.e. surficial
plus Floridan) annual and maximum month raw water allocations are less than the sum of
the requested annual and maximum month allocations irrespective of the aquifer source.
The approved WUP was based on the population projections shown in Table 4-3, which indicates
population and potable water demand projections by each local government or utility.
Table 4-3. Projected Populations of the Service Area — WUP 50-00046-W.l
6146
2153
318
99
3230
11946
6565
2194
391
20
3461
12631
6946
2296
391
20
3478
13128
7293
2345
391
20
3495
13544
7598
2390
391
20
3513
13912
Table 4-4 presents population and finished water demand according to the 2013 Lower East Coast
Water Supply Plan (LEC-WSP) update adopted by SFWMD on September 12, 2013. The data
presented below is included in Chapter Six, "Water Supply Development Status and Projects," of
the LEC-WSP)
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 4-4. Village of Tequesta: 2013 LEC-WSP Updates — Tequesta Service Area — Population
and Finished Water Demand
SFWMD WATER USE PERMITTED (50-00046-W) ALLOCATION (MGD)
POTABLE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
NONPOTABE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
The permit in effect in 2010 did not have annual or monthly source limits for the SAS or FAS. The
numbers shown here are maximum day allocations, which are further limited by the total annual
allocation or both sources of 4.84 MGD.
Table 4-5, on the following page, presents the population projection based on the 2010 US
Census, the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEER), the Palm
Beach County Water Supply Plan, and the Martin County MPO.
Table 4-6, on the following page, presents projections for both the service area boundary
population as well as the potable water demand through the year 2030.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
Table 4-5: Projected Populations of the Service Area
5,629
2,176
400
27
4,011
12,243
6,061
2,199
411
28
4,151
12,850
6,196
2,228
416
29
4,371
13,240
6,344
2,264
422
30
4,567
13,627
1
6,522
2,310
433
31
4,745
14,041
Source: Village of Tequesta 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, 2015.
Table 4-6: VOT - Population and Potable Water Demand Projections
12,850
13,240
13,627
14,041
247
247
247
247
90,155
90,155
90,155
90,155
1,158
1,193
1,228
1,265
97
99
102
106
112
117
120
125
Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (NGAR)
The Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge sub -element analyzes
the Village's existing quality and
quantity of natural groundwater,
project future demands, and
analyze the existing facilities.
The Surficial Aquifer continues toJv
provide most of the groundwater
supply used in Palm Beach
County, including Tequesta; FAO
however, as revealed in the
Potable Water sub -element of h
this Element, the Village is
experiencing an increasing
dependence on the Floridan
Aquifer. The Village of Tequesta Water Use Renewal Permit Application (Permit No.50-00046-
W), October 2011, recognizes a phased -in increasing dependence on the Floridan Aquifer
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
coupled with, and supplemental to, continued use of the Surficial Aquifer. The Village realizes
that a permanent, albeit proportionately reducing dependency on the Surficial Aquifer is needed
to achieve a suitable finished water quality.
The Village of Tequesta is situated on the coastal ridge which parallels the Atlantic Ocean.
Elevations across most of the Village range from five (5) to ten (10) feet msl; however, elevations
in isolated areas can be twenty-five (25) feet, or more. Specifically, these elevations occur along
the crest of the coastal ridge west of U.S. Highway 1 (US-1). These basic topographic features
have not changed since the last EAR and subsequent Plan amendments.
As identified in the Sanitary Sewer sub -section of this Element, there are a few isolated properties
in the Village remain without the capability to connect to the central sewer system. General soil
types within the Village are relatively favorable for septic tank use. They consist primarily of
deep, well drained sands and gravels and have a high rate of water transmission. Therefore,
there continues to be no major detrimental impacts created by the use of septic tanks (that are
in proper operating condition) either to the soils or to the groundwater aquifer recharge
capability.
Wellfield protection is important to preserving the quality of groundwater supplies. As described
in more detail in the Potable Water sub -section, there are currently seven (7) active surficial wells
on the eastern peninsula, three (3) active surficial wells on the western peninsula and four (4)
active Floridan wells on the eastern peninsula. The Village continues to be a participant in, and
subject to, the Palm Beach County Wellfield Protection Ordinance, which regulates existing and
new non-residential uses, handling, storage and production of hazardous and toxic materials
within zones of influence of the major potable water wellfields throughout the County, including
Tequesta.
The source of groundwater recharge continues to be predominantly rainfall. All undeveloped
and open space surfaces are considered recharge areas for the surficial aquifer. Some additional
recharge is provided by the wetlands located to the north of Tequesta because their location is
up gradient of the Tequesta wellfields. The wetland recharges, however, are also controlled by
rainfall.
Figure 4-2 on the following page illustrates the location of the Village's Floridan and surficial
wells, as well as groundwater storage facilities within the context of the Village's utility service
area boundaries. This map was taken from the Village of Tequesta 10-Year Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan, 2015.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
Figure 4-2. Village of Tequesta Utility Facilities (Wells, Groundwater Storage) Location Map
A.
�.
o
1
I
'O7 TNAN 'JC.K:NSON J-- I \
SIAIL PARK
i 1
11
1
'11
I t,
\ I
n 9
1. +� .}r, o 1b� - __ -•a]
VII LAGE OF TEOUESTA SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
Efl WELL SITE (SURFICIAL WELLS)
I
WELL SITE I FLORIk AN WELLS
ARCADIS nZ''E� Id-N•EtDE'=RT11EiT IRA\d,Eq LE-*GESvA 79 GFECNEL BY
T .E%GEA T IEND I=L,SLEY
SIFfT TIME TASK PHOSE NUVRER NXNN RY
atrritF n s , I VILLAGE OF TEQUETA .20031 T. 13 UK6
WI P£f•+. -. -' _. P ac:T NIHIREF. <A.WYJ , N•.I.WO
TEL v�'rTJ -e K ,FA� ,; FACILRIES LOCATION MAP
RF05-106.'4 FIG.3.2
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
REFERENCES AND SOURCES
Village of Tequesta 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, 2015.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Conservation Element is to promote the responsible use, protection, and
restoration of the Village of Tequesta's natural resources. Pursuant to Chapter 163.3177 Florida
Statutes (F.S.), the Village of Tequesta is required to provide a Conservation Element. The
protection and conservation of natural resources is of paramount importance in maintaining and
improving the high quality of life that Village residents demand.
This chapter of the data and analysis document focuses on natural resources and contains
guidance and strategies necessary for, or related to, the protection and preservation of such
resources. The natural features and resources assessed in this document include: surface waters
and the estuarine system; wetlands and the coastal system; floodplains; air quality; aquatic and
wildlife habitats; landscape and recreational opportunities of the natural features; and, other
associated features. A description of these resources and their significance to the Village, as well
as the region, is also presented. The Conservation Element was developed from the data and
analysis of existing and future conditions regarding the Village's natural communities and
resources.
In addition to this Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Village has adopted various
ordinances and regulations in its Code of Ordinances that address protecting and conserving the
environmental resources and systems identified in the Objectives and Policy cited above.
Chapter 50, Natural Resource Protection of the Village's Code of Ordinances contains regulations
to protect and conserve coastal resources. The Village has adopted by reference Palm Beach
County's Coastal Protection Ordinance, which establishes measures to protect and conserve the
coastal environment and is subject Palm Beach County Boat Facilities Siting Plan. Additionally,
other natural resource -related Ordinances and regulations are discussed later in this section that
further protect and conserve the natural resources in Tequesta.
The Coastal Zone & Conservation Map, which is shown as Figure 6-1 on the following page,
identifies water bodies, wetlands, upland vegetation communities, submerged lands and various
other natural resources found within the Village.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
[ ° 7a S� C.l�A:il� � r P F i"i � s a . , . • r � t' �j ;a -
_
� a. ,-�#- r �:� � Fly �R ►-cs- � `'' .4
Fir
47
'-. w a�.lu�t a �..` -.,�,. � � `fir►- ..� _ 4 � � �.
V � wj, ads � } � � �. P a �[• t
s� 66,, - � ,�� rl ABM( fi��r; a, y'� t• , i ,• � t..���'Y ��;
t�r> 1 ►ems! t r .�.��i. '� I.e �1�7 '"1' `i :�
l'�' s � ,L �}, to R F a � � i'
v-
s i
—1.�y.l[
�Le,if. i t►>. Yeif
t- c r 4-
LEGEND
a' •. x �4 ` ��y Via_ ' i✓_ + 4 - �Yjr i.�1
UPLAND AREAS -t k.,
k �
'r N
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Village of Tequesta is part of Palm Beach County, and enjoys the subtropical climate available
on the Southeastern coast of Florida. The summers are hot and humid, but somewhat tempered
by Gulfstream breezes, while winters are generally very mild.
Tequesta hosts a variety of natural resources, which provide habitats for numerous fish and
wildlife species. The Atlantic Ocean, Indian River Lagoon (IRL) and Intracoastal Waterway
(ICWW), Loxahatchee River, and the other lakes, rivers, and canals that flow into them, the
associated shorelines and wetlands, and other communities throughout the Village comprise the
robust system of ecological communities that reside in the Tequesta area. A full discussion of
these valuable resources and their significance to the Village and region is provided in this
Element's data and analysis.
ABIOTIC FEATURES
Abiotic features are the non -living chemical and physical parts of the environment. For the
purposes of this Comprehensive Plan these features include the following: topography, soils, and
soil erosion; shoreline erosion; and minerals.
Topography
The Village is situated on the "coastal ridge" which parallels the Atlantic Ocean. Although the
Village is smaller in land area (1,453 acres or 2.3 square miles), there is some variation in
elevations throughout Tequesta. Elevations generally range between ten and fifteen feet above
sea level (msl); however, higher elevations occur in isolated areas. The coastal ridge is bisected
by the Loxahatchee River and the Jupiter Inlet. Land areas east of the coastal ridge slope gradually
to the Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW), with most areas at less than five feet above sea level.
Soils
The land beneath the Village consists of five basic soil associations: Indicated in orange, St. Lucie
sand comprises the majority of the soil in the Village. Areas of fine sand known as, Bassinger,
Lmmokalee, and Paola are located elsewhere throughout the Village. There are also areas of
urban land complex, known as Arents, Myakka, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie. Other soil types include
beaches, tidal swamps, shaped quartz, and urban land. The approximate locations of these soil
associations are shown on the Soils Map in Figure 2.
Soil Erosion
It is likely the only significant erosion in the Village would be due to water flow, but there is no
data regarding this phenomenon. The South Florida Water Management District reports the
same. Also, there is no significant agricultural use of land in the Village.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
In addition, the Village's Code of Ordinances contains regulations to address potential soil erosion
resulting from development activities.
Shoreline Erosion
Shoreline erosion occurs as a result of the natural processes of the Atlantic Ocean on shoreline
beaches and dunes. This erosion is further exacerbated by hurricanes and other storm events. As
of 2014, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection had designated eight critically
eroded area, spanning 33.6 miles, in Palm Beach County. The County also contains two non -
critically eroded areas (0.9 mile) and one critically eroded inlet shoreline (0.8 mile).
Per FDEP's rule 6213-36.002 (5), "critically eroded shoreline" is defined as "a segment of the
shoreline where natural processes or human activity have caused or contributed to erosion and
recession of the beach or dune system to such a degree that upland development, recreational
interests, wildlife habitat, or important cultural resources are threatened or lost. Critically eroded
areas may also include peripheral segments or gaps between identified critically eroded areas
which, although they may be stable or slightly erosional now, their inclusion is necessary for
continuity of management of the coastal system or for the design integrity of adjacent beach
management projects".
Erosion is "critical" if there is a threat to or loss of one of four specific interests — upland
development, recreation, wildlife habitat, or important cultural resources. Many areas have
significant historic or contemporary erosion conditions, yet the erosion processes do not
currently threaten public or private interests. These areas are therefore designated as non -
critically eroded areas and require close monitoring in case conditions become critical. In
contrast, in some areas the erosion processes are not particularly significant, except to the extent
that adjacent public or private interest may be threatened. If there is no threat to interests in
need of protection, then an erosion condition is not critical. The listings of critically and non -
critically eroded areas in this report are identified by the Department's reference monument
system (R numbers) or by virtual stations (V numbers).
The area of critically eroded shoreline in northern Palm Beach County includes Coral Cove Beach
and the other beachfront properties in Tequesta, occurring between monuments R1 through
R10. A full discussion of beach and dune nourishment programs in Palm Beach County, along with
information regarding the regulation of erosion setbacks, including the Coastal Construction
Control Line (CCCL), are discussed in the Coastal Management Element.
Minerals
There are no known sources of commercially valuable minerals within the Village limits of
Tequesta.
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
r
r
D
Gl
m
0
T
m
m
A
c
m
N
D
n
O
3
m
rn
2
m
Z
N
m
M
_T
C0�
C
m
01
N
d
m
O
m
C
m
OJ
G1
m
3
O1
N
m
O_
O
H
9
d
13
WATER RESOURCES
The Village of Tequesta has a number of major water resources. The Atlantic Ocean meets the
Village's eastern boundary along Jupiter Island. The Intracoastal Waterway/Indian River Lagoon
separate a portion of Tequesta's mainland from the barrier island. The North Fork of the
Loxahatchee River separates the mainland into two large areas, while the Northwest Fork of the
River creates the Village's western boundary. The Village also contains canals and lakes that flow
into these larger water bodies. These water resources and their impact of the Village of Tequesta
are discussed in further detail throughout this section.
Class II & III Waters
The Village contains both
Class II and Class III water
within its jurisdiction. Class II
waters are those coastal
waters which have either
actual or potential capability
of supporting shellfish
propagation and harvesting.
Class II waters are the most
stringent water -law+�
classification. The portion of '
the Loxahatchee River
located within the Village of
Tequesta, and its tributaries,
are classified as a Class II y=-•
water system. Portions of the Loxahatchee River that flow through the Village have been
designated as Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) by the State. The North Fork of the River
traverses the Village with the Tequesta Country Club are lying to the west and the mainland of
Tequesta to the east. The Northwest Fork of the River flows adjacent to the western corporate
limits, also along the Tequesta Country Club area. The State has designated the Loxahatchee
River and its tributaries Class II waters based on the extensive support it provides to a variety of
wildlife, shellfish propagation and sport fishing.
Class III waters include all coastal and inland waters not otherwise classified. The Intracoastal
Waterway (ICWW) and the mouth of the Loxahatchee River at the Jupiter Inlet are classified Class
III waters. These waters continue to be used extensively for recreational activities.
Surface Waters & Estuarine System
Besides Class II and Class III water, the Village also contains surface waters that are designated as
aquatic preserves. Aquatic preserves represent exceptional biologically, aesthetically,
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
educationally and/or scientifically valuable waters set aside by the State for special management
purposes. The Loxahatchee River and the ICWW continue to be designated Aquatic Preserves.
The ICWW and a portion of the Loxahatchee River at its confluence with the ICWW are located
within the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve (IRLAP). The Village recognizes the importance
of preserving the unique estuarine environment of the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve and
prohibits development along its shores that would destroy or disturb the vital sea grasses within
its jurisdiction through its Code of Ordinances. Management plans for the Indian River Lagoon
Aquatic Preserve are discussed in more detail in the following section.
Water Quality
Water quality is important in protecting estuarine and oceanic sources, and must be protected
to avoid detrimental impacts to the natural environment. New developments or site plan
modifications to lands within the Village are subject to the site plan review process which
requires drainage statements and environmental statements/assessments for proposed
developments to determine potential impacts on Class III waters. In addition, the Village restricts
activities and land uses known to adversely affect the quality and quantity of identified water
sources such as natural ground water recharge areas and wellhead protection areas. The Village
has identified wellfield cones of influence and their travel time contours, which are illustrated in
Figure 1: Coastal Zone & Conservation Map.
Point Source and Non -Point Source Pollution
Threats to water quality come from a variety of sources that can fall within two categories: point
source pollution or non -point source pollution. Point source pollution includes sources where
discharge is usually through an identifiable point, such as wastewater management treatment plants.
Non -point source pollution is typically the result of stormwater runoff entering the Indian River
Lagoon through overland or stream flow. As discussed throughout several elements of the
Comprehensive Plan, managing stormwater runoff and flood zones is imperative to managing water
quality.
Wetlands and Coastal System
Aside from the aquatic preserve, other surface water resources applicable to the Village are the
isolated wetlands that are associated with the Lagoon, ICWW, and Loxahatchee River, as well as
those on the mainland. Wetlands have many functions which include providing essential habitat and
breeding grounds for a variety of terrestrial and marine species, serving to filter many pollutants that
may enter the Lagoon, and helping to absorb floodwaters and protect adjacent lands from flooding
and storm surges.
Though wetlands are most often associated with waterfowl and bird species, they provide essential
habitat for a wide variety of species, such as birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and insects,
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
many of which are rare and endangered. Loss of wetlands has contributed to the endangered status
of many species.
Tequesta will protect and conserve mangroves, wetlands and sea grasses to ensure that there
will be no net loss of the existing natural resources within the Village. Many Village policies and
regulations concerning mangroves, wetlands, sea grasses and other estuarine system issues
directly emanate from the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code and Mangrove
Protection Ordinance.
In regard to wetlands protection, the Village continues to implement the Wetlands Protection
Section of the Unified Land Development Code. The Village further regulates the construction of
all piers and docks within the Village through Article XIII, Uniform Waterway Control in Chapter
78, Zoning of the Village's Code of Ordinances. These regulations concern the construction of
piers, docks and walkways over submerged lands containing mangroves wetlands and sea
grasses. Construction in such sensitive areas must have minimal impact and be code compliant
in order to protect and conserve these natural resources.
In order to further conserve and protect wetlands, the Village must also direct incompatible
future land uses away from wetlands; or where incompatible uses are allowed, mitigation shall
be a means to compensate for loss of wetland function. The site plan review and land
development processes continue to scrutinize the conservation and protection of all natural
resources, including wetlands.
6
c
W.'r, 3�►
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Wetlands identified on the current Coastal Zone & Conservation Map have been preserved as
intended in the related policies. Ecosites #61 is recognized as a low hammock area on the Coastal
Zone & Conservation Map and Ecosite #63, which is technically to is identified as scrub
vegetation.
The Village has adopted, and continues to enforce, an environmentally sensitive lands Ordinance
in Article II, Environmentally Sensitive Lands under Chapter 50, Natural Resource Protection of
the Village's Code of Ordinances. Also, the site plan review process continues to be utilized to
require an environmental assessment of a proposed development area to assure that natural
wildlife habitats are protected, if such endangered and threatened habitats exist at the site.
Mangrove Protection
As illustrated in Figure 6-1,
Coastal Zone & Conservation
Map, coastal mangrove stands
are found in various locations
along the ICWW and Northwest
Fork of the Loxahatchee River.
Mangrove areas provide habitats
for numerous birds and other
wildlife and are a vital part of the
food chain from aquatic
organisms to man himself. In
addition to the mangrove's
contribution to the food chain,
they provide a habitat for birds.
Mangroves also contribute greatly to stabilizing the shoreline by providing a buffer against wave
erosion and allowing sedimentation to occur.
The Village has adopted the Palm Beach Count Mangrove Ordinance in Article IV, Mangrove
Protection under Chapter 50, Natural Resource Protection of its Code of Ordinances as the
mangrove protection Ordinance for the Village. Article IV, Mangrove Protection specifically
adopts the Palm Beach County Mangrove Protection Ordinance as the mangrove protection
ordinance of the Village with the additional restriction to Section 5 of that Ordinance prohibiting
the disturbance of mangroves in high marsh areas adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserve except when necessary for public health and safety. This ordinance also restricts public
works projects from disturbing existing mangroves except where such work is essential to the
continued health, safety and welfare of the public
Seagrass Protection
Seagrass plays an important role in marine habitats, providing benefits for a variety of areas,
including biodiversity, coastal shoreline protection, regulation of nutrient cycling and water
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
quality, fisheries, climate regulation through carbon sequestration, social and cultural value, and
tourism and recreation.
In addition, seagrass serves as a prime nursery forfish and other marine life, it provides substrate,
habitat, and protection from predators for fish and invertebrates. It also provides food for
herbivores and the detritus food web. Aside from the many benefits listed above, seagrass is an
indicator of the Lagoon's health. According to 2009 data by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission, the estimated economic value of seagrass is $16,594 per acre per
year.
As discussed in the Conservation element of this document, the Village implements the Wetland
Protection Section of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code, which requires
the protection of sea grasses.
Floodplains
Flooding in Florida can come at any time with little warning. Flooding in Tequesta comes from
different sources, including tidal surges from hurricanes and tropical storms, heavy rains, and
clogged or blocked drainage pipes and ditches.
Storm surge caused by hurricane systems poses the greatest threat to life and property. All
coastal property and inhabitants are subject to severe damage and loss of life resulting from
flooding caused by tidal surge associated with hurricanes and tropical storms. Inland flooding can
accompany any hurricane due to the low elevation of much of the Village. During extended
periods of heavy rainfall, certain low-lying neighborhoods within the Village are subject to
considerable flood damage and isolation caused by inability of natural and mechanical drainage
systems to effectively remove the water.
The Village of Tequesta is identified as a flood hazard area by the Federal Insurance
Administration under the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The FEMA Flood
Zones Map illustrates those areas within the Village that can expect to have a one percent chance
of flooding in any given year.
Both the wetland areas along the Intracoastal in the Village of Tequesta and buffer areas adjacent
to open spaces help reduce flood damage because floodwaters in a natural floodplain are
permitted to spread over a large area and open spaces provide flood water storage. These natural
areas also filter nutrients and impurities from stormwater runoff and promote infiltration and
aquifer recharge. By preserving natural floodplain areas, fish and wildlife habitats are protected
to provide breeding and feeding grounds.
Flood Zones
Flooding poses a huge threat to coastal communities. The Village contains various flood -prone
areas with the majority being located along the Atlantic Ocean on the barrier island, the ICWW
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
and fringe areas along the North and Northwest Forks of the Loxahatchee River, which are subject
to inundation during the 100-year flood event. The only VE Zone within or contiguous to the
Village limits continues to be along the Atlantic beaches, while Zone AE is located along the ICWW
and Loxahatchee River at the fringe areas of the western peninsular and small portions in
Tequesta Pines subdivision and the east part of the North Fork within the Village limits.
Local Flood -Related Ordinances & Programs
The Village seeks to develop techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to flooding
and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. Residents and businesses in
flood -prone areas are encouraged to utilize the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the
Community Rating System (CRS).
More specifically, the NFIP is a federal program enabling property owner(s) to purchase flood
insurance. It is based on an agreement between the Village of Tequesta and the federal
government, which states that the Village will adopt and enforce floodplain management
regulations that at least meet minimum federal requirements, and in return, the federal
government will make flood insurance available to the citizens of the Village. Essentially, all
development is required to comply with existing Federal and State laws related to flood prone
areas. A full description of floodplain development and the Village's involvement with flood
protection programs is provided in the Coastal Management Element.
In addition to state agencies, the Village's Building Department regulates the building of
structures in flood -prone areas so that flood damage can be minimized or avoided. The Village
has continued to support these programs and work with residents and businesses in regard to
program requirements. Moreover, the Village recently passed an ordinance related to FEMA's
updated flood zone maps and is considering passing an ordinance related to flood hazard
prevention techniques that will increase the "freeboard" height requirements, as detailed below.
On July 13, 2017, the Village of Tequesta Council adopted Ordinance 7-17 providing that the
Federal Emergency Management Agency has revised and reissued the Flood Insurance Study and
Flood Insurance Rate Map for Palm Beach County, Florida, and Incorporated Areas, effective
October 5, 2017. The Village of Tequesta participates in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) and the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta desires to continue to meet the
requirements of Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 59 and 60, necessary for
participation.
As discussed in the Coastal Management Element, NFIP provides federally backed flood insurance
within communities that enact and enforce floodplain regulations. The Community Rating
System (CRS) is a national program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA). To be covered by a flood insurance policy a property must be in a community that
participates in the NFIP. To qualify for the NFIP, a community adopts and enforces a floodplain
management ordinance to regulate development in flood hazard areas.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
The CRS Program recognizes, encourages and rewards communities that go beyond the minimum
required by the NFIP. Under the CRS, the flood insurance premiums of a community's residents
and businesses are discounted. A community receives a CRS classification based upon the total
credit for activities such as Public Information; Mapping and Regulations; Flood Damage
Reduction; and Warning and Response. The Village of Tequesta is part of the CRS Program, "Class
7" rating which allows residents to receive 15% discount of their flood insurance.
Currently, the Village of Tequesta is reviewing a potential ordinance amendment to Chapter 14
of the Village's Code of Ordinances that would require 18 inches of freeboard above the base
floor elevation in flood zone areas. This provision will contribute to mitigating sea level rise
flooding effects that continue to threaten coastal areas Tequesta.
As illustrated in the following graphic, freeboard refers to the height of a building above the Base
Flood Elevation for a specific site. Florida regulations often require at least one -foot of freeboard
for elevated buildings. Each foot of freeboard (up to a maximum of three feet), lowers flood
insurance rates significantly. Since elevations on FIRMS do not include sea level rise, freeboard
will help keep structures above floodwaters as storm surge elevations increase, thus reducing
flood insurance premiums. The graphic below shows an example on how to implement this
concept.
Figure 6-3. Adjusted Base Flood Elevation, Accounting for Sea Level Rise.
The same home under an adjusted Base Flood
Elevation (BFE) accounting for Sea level Rise
(SLR); structure is now non -compliant, under a
greater and more frequent threat, and will cost
more to insure
--------- --a -- - - ----------------------------------------------
+1' freeboard
---------------- Recalculated Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
accounting for Sea Level Rise
Ele n;a!: ei
_ — — NAVD88 reference — — — —
The Village of Tequesta contains several parcels on the barrier island that contain multi -family
condominium developments. While there are not currently any single family homes along the
ocean front within Tequesta, the freeboard technique could be considered for future
development or redevelopment in this area.
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Stormwater Management
Adopting and maintaining standards and criteria to provide proper relief from flooding and
restricting off -site of stormwater pollutants are important elements of proper stormwater
management. Pollutants from stormwater and runoff adversely affect water quality and aquatic
ecosystems, which is why effective management of stormwater is so important.
In its Policies, the Village specifically requires that minimum off -site runoff of stormwater
pollutants and on -site stormwater retention/detention criteria, established by the SFWMD, be
restricted. These criteria are analyzed in the site plan review and land development processes,
and evidence must be provided that these criteria will, and can, be met. Additionally, Landscape
Requirements as they related to stormwater management are discussed further under the
Landscape Regulation section of this element.
Indian River Lagoon
The Indian River Lagoon is one of the most biologically diverse estuaries in the Nation. One of
the 28 estuaries in the country in Environmental Protection Agency's National Estuary Program,
the Indian River Lagoon is the only estuary on the east coast of Florida. The Lagoon supports
seagrass beds, mangroves, drift algae, salt marshes, oyster bars, tidal flats, and spoil islands which
serve as important spawning and/or nursery grounds for commercial important species including
shrimp, grouper, snapper, and drum.
It is important to note the quality and resource values of the Lagoon as they relate to
conservation efforts. Because it is in an urban area, the Lagoon is subject to impacts from both
urban and agricultural stormwater runoff. The Lagoon is an important recreational and
commercial resource for the community. It is also a significant habitat area for fish and wildlife.
As an aquatic preserve, it is accorded a high degree of protection, second only to drinking water
supplies.
Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve System Management Plan
Information in this section is based on the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Management
Plan (IRLAP). Developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) Florida
Coastal Office (FCO), the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Management Plan aims to
preserve and protect this invaluable aquatic resource and estuarine system in the midst of
increasing development, recreation, and economic pressures along the coast.
As a guide to minimizing potential negative impacts, management plans for the aquatic preserves
are essential to preserving the health and viability of ecosystems within these areas. The Indian
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
Figure 6-4. Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserve System
River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Management
Plan strives to incorporate, evaluate and
prioritize all relevant information about the site
into a cohesive management strategy, allowing
for appropriate access to the managed areas
while protecting the long-term health of the
ecosystems and their resources.
As shown in Figure 6-4, this management plan
focuses on the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserves System (IRLAP System), which
encompasses four aquatic preserves: IR-
Malabar to Vero Beach, IR-Vero Beach to Ft.
Pierce, Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet, and
Banana River aquatic preserves. The IRLAP
Management Plan provides individual plans for
each preserve. The Village of Tequesta contains
portions of the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Island
aquatic preserve, which is further detailed in
this section and shown in Figure 6-6.
i Florida's expansive coastline and wealth of
aquatic resources has attracted millions of
residents and visitors, and the businesses that
Map 63 serve them. Florida's submerged lands play
important roles in maintaining good water
quality, hosting a diversity of wildlife and
habitats (including economically and
ecologically valuable nursery areas), and
Map 3b supporting a highly valued quality of life for all.
Any threat to or degradation of the condition
" `M1 IRLAP System, may also pose economic impacts
to the state and region, as this system is a major
L-Ae �, attraction for both tourists and recreational
Ckeeclabee Tequesta activities. As illustrated in Figure 6-1, Coastal
Zone & Conservation Map, the Village of
Tequesta offers an abundance of aquatic resources, including access to the IRLAP, and must take
necessary steps to maintain the health of the lagoon, while also sustaining economic growth and
development.
Governing Entities & Statutes
In the sixties, as Florida was experiencing rapid growth along the coast and in sensitive,
ecologically important areas, it became apparent that science -based resource protection and
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
management for such areas
would be necessary. In order to
provide extra protection for
certain exceptional aquatic
areas such as the IRLAP, state
legislators designated them
"aquatic preserves." Now
established by law, aquatic
preserves are submerged lands
of exceptional biological,
aesthetic, and scientific values
as sanctuaries that are to be
maintained in their natural or
existing conditions, for the
benefit of future generations.
Figure 6-5. State Structure for Managing Aquatic
Preserves
5ECRETARY
rwptrfv SArrwfary oppity Secrnfary Ctapury Uovlary S{tsc4►t Catalan
f VIA, Mry Prttgntrrn EC FW6kW Owr i ArrA A Rermpfiort WNW M•wry A
I tofpl ARn,rn
.L • . +:.. ...... . II C dbowl
Anarm Wrgn,
r4',r b. SLNn
•...... lfro MOW
F1 ocyn 41,11, Afaraqannnr
jl.w�l,;Ur,y Hnc,nalron JCJ+�t�Mta
ur•, •,try. R Pawl
W nl ttr
K'rl'nr Hersu^rr n P7e71Qtatl(tr'
�'rttr lrl JnrrlN .r AntNntartr rt
The IRLAP must be managed
and treated as a system by the
NaGnnal r f• +1 *m Cant) Hpel Ilnnrla Koyn Nrdtaial
entities which have jurisdiction AaaWtr w CnnomM-onPrtx{,rvn ManneSnnrtunry
relative to maintaining its ik,rn:a FUrrrta ('natal Mint Cor"otntnal
quality. Today, The Florida cl tAartaNnntnittProytant 9tte11
Department of Environmental Aquatic Preserves
I
Protection's Florida Coastal
Office (FCO) acts as the Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
management agency for the
IRLAP System Management Plan. This provides for a system of significant protections to ensure
that the Indian River Lagoon and other sensitive areas are managed with strategies based on local
resources, issues and conditions. This section provides information regarding [key governing
entities and legislature related to the development, maintenance, and enforcement of the IRLAP
Systems Management Plan.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The DEP is the lead state agency for
environmental management and stewardship, and is dedicated to protecting Florida's air, water
and land. The DEP protects, conserves and manages Florida's natural resources and enforces the
state's environmental laws.
The chart from the IRLAP System Management Plan, Figure 6-5, illustrates the role of key entities
in developing management plan for aquatic preserves.
Florida Coastal Office (FCO): The FCO is the unit within DEP that manages more than four million
acres of submerged lands and select coastal uplands, which include 41 aquatic preserves, three
National Estuarine Research Reserves (NERRs), the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and
the Coral Reef Conservation Program. FCO manages sites in Florida for the conservation and
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
protection of natural and historical resources and resource -based public use that is compatible
with the conservation and protection of these lands.
Aquatic Preserve Program: Established by the Florida Aquatic Preserve Act and managed
through the FCO, this program has the following long-term goals:
1. "To protect and enhance the ecological integrity of the aquatic preserves;
2. To restore areas to their natural condition;
3. To encourage sustainable use and foster active stewardship by engaging local communities
in the protection of aquatic preserves; and
4. To improve management effectiveness through a process based on sound science,
consistent evaluation, and continual reassessment."
Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (the Trustees): Per F.S. 253.03, the
Trustees are charged with governing use of public lands, including aquatic preserves: "The Board
of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the state is vested and charged with the
acquisition, administration, management, control, supervision, conservation, protection, and
disposition of all lands owned by, or which may hereafter inure to, the state or any of its agencies,
departments, boards, or commissions..."
Acquisition and Restoration Council (ARC): A 10-member group with representatives from four
state agencies, four appointees of the Governor, one appointee by the Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWC), and one appointee by the Commissioner of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (DACS). The ARC is responsible for the evaluation, selection and ranking of
state land acquisition projects on the Florida Forever priority list, as well as the review of
management plans and land uses for all state-owned conservation lands.
Key State Statutes & Legislature
State statutes and regulations are enforced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission law enforcement and local law enforcement agencies. Enforcement of
administrative remedies rests with FCO, DEP Districts, and Water Management Districts.
Additionally, other Florida Statutes play a role in site management.
Florida Aquatic Preserve Act of 1975: The Aquatic Preserve Act (F.S. 258.35-258.46) officially
established a Florida Aquatic Preserves Program under the FDEP. Essentially this statute helped
bring existing preserves under a standard set of management criteria to ensure that the natural
condition of aquatic preserves will be preserved for future generations
Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C): The mandate for developing aquatic preserve management
plans is outlined in Section 18-20.013 and Subsection 18-18.013(2) of the F.A.C. As discussed in
the IRLAP System Management Plan, Chapters 18-18, 18-20 and 18-21, F.A.C., are the three
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
administrative rules directly applicable to the uses allowed in aquatic preserves specifically and
sovereignty lands generally, and are intended to be cumulative.
IRLAP Plan Structure & Key Components
The Management Plan is a collaboration between FCO managers and staff, area stakeholders,
and the general public, who collect and analyze data, information, and input from various
sources. Next, threats and potential weakness are identified in the site, boundaries, and
surrounding areas. Initial drafts of such management plans are developed by FCO staff and
reviewed by an advisory committee comprised of key stakeholders. Staff then conducts multiple
public meetings to gather feedback and further develop the plan. The final draft is reviewed by
the Acquisition and Restoration Council and the Trustees for final approval.
The Management Plan follows four comprehensive management programs, which each contain
information specific to a site, as needs or issues typically vary from one location to another. These
management programs are:
• Ecosystem Science
• Resource Management
• Education & Outreach
• Public Use
The following chart, taken from the IRLAP System Management Plan, summarizes these four
management programs.
There is a very large and committed group of research institutions and agencies that
conduct extensive monitoring, research, and modelling in the Indian River Lagoon. The
Ecosystem
aquatic preserve fosters strong working partnerships with these research institutions
Science
and agencies, and assists with equipment and staff as needed to support research and
monitoring projects. These programs provide the basis for making sound resource
management decisions.
Resource
Continue to focus on protecting natural resources by restoring altered areas that
Management
contribute to reduced water quality and implementing management practices that
maintain or improve viable habitats and populations within the aquatic preserve.
Continue volunteer island enhancement work days, Eagle scout projects, Adopt -A -Spoil
Education &
Island Program, volunteer shoreline planting and oyster reef deployment events.
Outreach
Improve signage at boat ramps. Continue participation in the Indian River Lagoon
Envirothon for middle and high school classrooms and Adopt -A -Mangrove workshops.
Rapid population growth is expected to return to coastal areas of Florida. Information
and data contained within this Plan is intended to assist aquatic preserve managers,
Public Use
working closely with other state entities and local governments, to make decisions that
will assure a balance between sustainable resource protection and waterway
management.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
In addition, unique local and regional issues are
identified, and goals, objectives and strategies are
established to address these issues. Finally, the
program and facility needs required to meet these
goals are identified. These components are all key
elements in an effective coastal management program
and for achieving the mission of the sites.
Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve
According to the IRLAP Systems Management Plan,
the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Aquatic Preserve stretches
37 miles and encompasses 22,000 acres through three
coastal counties, which include St. Lucie, Martin, and
extreme northern Palm Beach County, which
encompasses Tequesta and Jupiter Inlet Colony.
Figure 6-7. Land Use in Jensen Beach to Jupiter
Inlet Aquatic Preserve Watershed
TequE
am io•t1- IKa.h 1� hmtw ' 1 p9��aPr gnerw
I �IIIr1 r/N
-1.1LI• flhhpinul
•y11tr�IL. N.1.IIr.1.
� Ixrlrr r ulrr•.A N'rl.�
BMW.
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 6-6. Jensen Beach to Jupiter
Inlet Aquatic Preserve
® x.ac,- Ecxn n dvc.� �r» qua weiere N
MIEy lilruY� 297i
The aquatic preserve is accessible from the west by U.S. Highway 1 (US-1) and from the east by
Beach Road. Despite the length of the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve, public
access points are more restricted in this preserve, than the other three preserves in the IRLAP
System.
The IRLAP System is separated from the Atlantic Ocean by a barrier island chain that is currently
intersected by five inlets that have been either stabilized or man-made, and which represent the
only connection between the IRLAP System and the Atlantic Ocean. Located just south of
Tequesta's boundary, the Jupiter Inlet is the only historically natural connection to the ocean.
As indicated on the Land Use map
Figure 6-8. Conservation Lands adjacent to Jensen in Figure 6-7, most of the land use
Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve (South Section) within the Village and along the
coast is developed and
'?. designated as urban, aside from a
few natural upland and wetland
areas. The majority of urban areas
sta appear along the coast and IRLAP,
which is why it is so essential to
support efforts to preserve and
_ protect these important natural
resources. In addition, agricultural
land use areas within the IRLAP
watershed can also affect water
quality.
I� Jensen Beach to Jupiter Iniet Aquatic Preserve . :
Adjacent Conservation Lands
® Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge ,
0 Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area
State Parks (St. Lucie Inlet and Seabranch) a
Managed by Martin county +�+i
0 Managed by Palm Beach County
Blowing Rocks Preserve ' NN
0 0.5 1 2 3 N_
Mites May Zfl !� //VV
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
Teque
Conservation Lands
I
i' As indicated in Figure 6-8, there
-' are three designated
conservation lands within or
adjacent to the Village. These
areas include, Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse Outstanding Natural
Area (Ecosite #61 and #63), Coral Cove Park,
and Blowing Rocks Preserve, which are
discussed in further detail below.
Significant wetland losses and alterations
occur along the shorelines of all counties in
the IRLAP System, which is why protection
and enhancement of the remaining
functional upland -wetland -lagoon linkages is
critical to the long-term protection of the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
quality and biological resources of the IRL. However, management of these critical habitats can
prove difficult since many of these are privately owned. The simplest way to ensure proper
management of these areas is through property acquisition or easements. Passage of the
Preservation 2000 Act in 1990, along with acquisition initiatives funded by local interests, Water
Management Districts, and the Conservation and Recreation Lands program greatly
strengthened the state's ability to acquire endangered lands. Local governments within the IRLAP
System responded to this funding availability by passing local land acquisition referendums.
Conservation lands within or adjacent to the Village are described below.
Federal Conservation Lands
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding
Natural Area: Located in two large
parcels to the north and south of
Beach Road, the 120-acre site contains
lands owned by the U.S. Department
of the Interior, Bureau of Land
Management; the U.S. Coast Guard;
and the Town of Jupiter. The northern
parcel is located within Tequesta
limits, while the southern parcel is
located in the Town of Jupiter and
contains the historic 1860 Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse and Museum, the George
Washington Tindall Pioneer House,
and the Town of Jupiter Lighthouse
Park.
Palm Beach County manages 78 acres of the natural area under a cooperative agreement with
the Bureau of Land Management, with the assistance of the Village of Tequesta. The managed
area contains Florida scrub, maritime hammock and mangrove swamp natural communities.
Volunteers planted more than 6,000 mangrove seedlings as part of a two -acre tidal wetland
restoration project on the north side of Beach Road. The entire 120-acre site has received federal
designation as an outstanding natural area through the Bureau of Land Management's National
Landscape Conservation Area Program.
Private Conservation Lands
Blowing Rocks Preserve: Blowing Rocks Preserve began in 1969, when residents of Jupiter Island
donated 73 acres of their island to The Nature Conservancy. The preserve was named for its rocky
shoreline — the largest on the U.S. Atlantic coast. During extreme high tides and after winter
storms, seas break against the rocks. The preserve runs for one mile from north to south and
connects the Atlantic Ocean to the IRL on the west. Today, the restored preserve reflects what
South Florida barrier islands looked like a century ago. Native habitats include beach dune,
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
coastal strand, mangrove swamp and tropical hardwood hammock. Facilities include an
education center, native plant demonstration garden, hiking trails, boardwalks, and restrooms.
Lands Managed by County
Coral Cove Park: Located within
the Village of Tequesta and
managed by Palm Beach
County, Coral Cove Park
continues to be an asset to the
community. The park provides
access both to the ocean as well
as to the IRLAP/ICWW. In
addition, the park provides
public facilities, including a
parking lot, playground,
restroom facilities, picnic tables,
and boardwalks.
4V
Natural Communities in Tequesta within IRLAP
As shown on the Natural Communities Map in Figure 6-9, the main natural resource in the IRLAP
area within Tequesta is seagrass beds, with areas of consolidated composite and unconsolidated
substrate and mangrove swamp. Sea grass beds serve as a food source and nursery for many
species, including manatees. Water pollutants, turbid waters, dock or pier structures, and boat
propellers are just a few of the threats that seagrasses face. Without proper light, seagrass cannot
complete photosynthesis, which can be detrimental to seagrass beds.
Similarly, mangroves also provide habitats for numerous birds and other wildlife and are a vital
part of the food chain from aquatic organisms to humans. Mangroves also contribute greatly to
stabilizing the shoreline by providing a buffer against wave erosion and allowing sedimentation
to occur.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
Figure 6-9. Natural Communities in Jensen Beach to
Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve
........... ..s.'....................... Map 13a match line
I�
I
I
1
1
I
I
I 3
I
I
1
1 I
I
I
0 Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve
Natural Communitios I
Consolidated, Composite
& Unconsolidated Substrate Tequesta
Seagrass Beds 1 I
Samwater Marsh N 1
Mangrove Swamp n _
Exotic Dominated
0 0.g 1 2 3Miles May 2014
'Seagrass beds are based on a multiyear composite
of historical seagrass coverage from 1 W to 1999.
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
As discussed earlier, both agriculture
and urban land uses within the IRLAP
System watershed can affect water
quality. Runoff associated with these
land uses is characterized by high
turbidity, high nutrients and low
dissolved oxygen.
Agriculture stormwater runoff is
diverted to the IRL System by way of
large conveyance canals. Urban
stormwater runoff is diverted to the
IRLAP System through local drainage
canals and stormwater collection
systems. In both cases, untreated
stormwater runoff has heavily
impacted the IRLAP System by
introducing unwanted pollutants and
impacting water quality.
The importance of these particular
resources and others is further
described throughout this Element.
Impacts of Sea Level Rise on IRLAP
Resources
Due to the low elevations of the
mangrove and marsh systems (100-
year floodplain) of the IRLAP System,
predicted trends such as global
warming or increasing ocean water
levels, will influence the habitat
structure and species distribution in
the lagoon.
Sea level rise threatens to inundate many coastal wetlands, with little room to move inland
because of coastal development. Rising sea level would allow saltwater to penetrate farther
inland and upstream. Increasing salinity could cause an up -estuary advance of marine and
estuarine species and a retreat of freshwater species. Sea level rise is discussed in more detail
later in these element.
22 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Public Access to Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve
While public access is most limited within the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve,
future public access must continue to be closely scrutinized. Rapid population growth rates of
coastal areas in Florida are expected to continue. Throughout the lifetime of this plan, decisions
vital to the balance between sustainable resource protection and waterway management will
need to be made by IRLAP managers working closely with other state entities and local
governments.
It is beneficial for staff to stay actively engaged in the local planning processes when new marine
facilities such as boat ramps, marinas, mooring fields and similar siting decisions are being
considered by local government and municipalities. IRLAP staff involvement early in planning
processes for marine siting can aid local government by providing expertise in permitting
requirements and result in less environmental impact to the IRLAP System.
Teguesta's Support of IRLAP System Management Plan
The Village has ordinances in place to ensure the preservation and protection of this valuable
aquatic preserve, which are briefly described here. The Village shall provide for the protection of
the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve by prohibiting development in the area that will
degrade or otherwise adversely affect the water quality or wetlands of this unique estuarine
environment through its Code of Ordinances.
More specifically, development or modification of the shorelines within the Indian River lagoon
Aquatic Preserve shall be prohibited, unless this modification or development is necessary for
the continued health, safety and welfare of the public. Development that provides for water -
dependent and water -related land uses such as marinas, are acceptable, provided that the siting
of such shall be consistent with the marina siting ordinance upon application to the Village.
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES
Aquifer System
Most counties along the Indian River Lagoon utilize both the Floridan Aquifer and surficial aquifer
through wells as their source for obtaining potable water. However, due to the brackish nature
of the southern portion of the Floridan Aquifer, Palm Beach County must rely on only the Surficial
Aquifer System for its potable water supply. Thus, impact to wetlands, saltwater intrusion, and
other threats to water quality are major concerns for the Tequesta-Jupiter area, as such impacts
could also jeopardize the potable water supply.
The primary source for potable water use in Tequesta is the Surficial Aquifer System, which is
sometimes referred to as the "Turnpike" aquifer. The term "Turnpike" is derived from the flow
pattern of this aquifer. In southeastern Palm Beach County, groundwater flows eastward from
the Turnpike towards the coast.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 23
The most productive portion of the Surficial Aquifer System is the zone of secondary
permeability, which is composed of limestone, cemented shell, and sandstone in which much of
the cementing materials have been dissolved. The zone generally extends from about 45 feet to
137 feet below sea level. The water quality in the Surficial Aquifer System is usually best in this
zone of secondary permeability.
The Surficial Aquifer System is generally recharged from local rainfall and it has a high recharge
potential. Approximately 10" of rain annually, directly recharges to the Surficial Aquifer System.
Water from this source is generally treated before use by the Tequesta's Water Utilities. There is
no significant agricultural or industrial use of water in the Village.
Below the Surficial Aquifer System lies the Floridan Aquifer System, which is composed of
limestone dolomite. Water quality is poor with dissolved solids generally greater than 3000 mg/I.
The Floridan Aquifer System is now used as a secondary source of blend water in the Village and
is treated by the Village's Water Treatment Plant.
Despite the threat of saltwater intrusion or groundwater pollution within the wellfields, the
Village seems well suited to adapt to any potential influence, as described in the Natural
Groundwater Recharge Sub -Element.
Current and Projected Water Needs
The Village's current and projected water needs are based on data provided by the Village's
Utilities Department. Currently, 14 wells within the service area provide the water source for the
Village's Water Treatment Plant (see Utilities Element). Additionally, the average water demand
is 120 gallons per capital daily (gpcd). The Village's water is regularly analyzed using
Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Environmental Regulation approved
methods, and conforms to Florida Administrative Codes.
Projections demonstrate that if the population of Tequesta increases minimally, as anticipated,
then the average amount of finished water will have to increase very little for each of the next
five year increments. The amounts of raw water being supplied by the Village's well systems
would also be sufficient for the next ten year period, other than for reasons of extensive
annexation or for replacing deteriorating wells.
Currently, there are no significant agricultural or industrial uses in the Village, and none are
expected in the future.
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
The following information is taken from the Village's 10 Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan,
which was adopted February 12, 2015. The Village has been proactive in the practice of water
conservation for a number of years through the enactment of multiple Village ordinances,
24 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
institutional controls and community outreach and education programs. The Village's current
water conservation plan consists of the following elements:
• Permanent Irrigation Ordinance: An ordinance which restricts landscape irrigation to the
hours of 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m., seven days per week has been in effect for several
years within the Village service area. This ordinance is enforced along with any irrigation
restrictions imposed by the SFWMD.
As a new requirement since the last Work Plan update, the Village has implemented
the Mandatory Year -Round Irrigation Conservation Measures as detailed in 40E-24
Florida Administrative Code. The Village of Tequesta's Code of Ordinances includes
requirements for restrictions on water use during times of an "emergency situation" as
declared by SFWMD or when the Village of Tequesta Council determines a reduction in
water consumption is necessary to alleviate a local water shortage within the Village of
Tequesta's water system. Water restrictions may include reduction of hours and days
allowed for irrigation, washing of vehicles, washing of outdoor surfaces, operation of
ornamental fountains, operation of air conditioning without a recirculation system,
limitations on filling and use of swimming pools, limitations on leakage of water
through defective plumbing, restrictions on hotels and restaurants as to the minimum
amount of water necessary to conduct operations and other restrictions as necessary.
• Florida -friendly Landscaping Ordinance: An ordinance which requires the use of Florida -
friendly landscaping materials and the minimum percent of required pervious area that
must follow the principles of Florida Friendly Landscape provisions as set forth in the
SFWMD's Xeriscape Plant Guide II. The Village of Tequesta adopted Ordinance No. 6-12
"Florida Friendly Landscaping" on April 12, 2012.
• Ultra -Low Volume Plumbing Fixture Ordinance: An ordinance which requires ultra -low
volume plumbing fixtures on all new construction is in effect for the Village service area.
As a new requirement, the Village has adopted the Florida Building Code (FBC) which
contains plumbing flow restriction requirements. The Village of Tequesta's Building and
Inspection Services Division also includes in their provisions for new construction to have
water conservation control devices installed per the Florida Plumbing Code, as a condition
for granting certificates of occupancy.
• Rain Sensor Device Ordinance: An ordinance which requires any person who purchases
and installs an automatic lawn sprinkler system to install, operate and maintain a rain
sensor device or automatic switch which will override the irrigation system with
the occurrence of adequate rainfall is in effect for the Village service area.
• Water Conservation Rate Structure: The Village has a conservation -based rate structure
which includes an increasing block rate structures as a means of encouraging users to
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 125
minimize water usage.
Leak Detection Program: The Village has an unaccounted for water and leak detection
program. The program includes water auditing procedures, in -field leak detection efforts
and repair. The average annual estimated unaccounted for water loss, for the years 2009-
2013 was approximately 8.0 percent.
Water Conservation Education Program: The Village regularly distributes flyers to
employees and customers. Information signs, press releases and messages regarding
water conservation are also printed on customer bills.
As a new requirement, the Village of Tequesta has to provide an Annual progress Report
to the District by November 15th of each year. The Village's Annual Consumer
Confidence Report (2012) is presented as Exhibit 3-1.
Reuse Water: Wastewater treatment within the service area is provided by either onsite
septic systems or the Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District (the District). The
District provides reuse water to several golf courses within the Village service area. A
discussion of the reuse system is provided under subsequent sections of this Work Plan.
Water Conservation
Village ordinances maintain that the Village shall maintain water conservation measures to
provide for emergency conservation of water services. Additionally, the Village shall develop its
water utilities rate structure to provide for a surcharge for heavy users of water and institute a
program designed to cooperate with the South Florida Water Management District in times of
water conservation emergencies through its Code of Ordinances.
Similar water conservation issues are discussed in the Potable Water sub -section of the Utilities
Element of the Plan.
WILDLIFE HABITATS & ECOLOGOICAL COMMUNITIES
Palm Beach County is enriched by a diversity of upland and wetland ecological communities that
vary in composition, extending from the Atlantic Ocean and Indian River Lagoon westward to the
western county limits. These wildlife habitats and ecological communities found in Palm Beach
County and potentially Tequesta are described in the following sections.
Many Village policies and regulations concerning the protection of native wildlife habitats and
environmentally sensitive lands are consistent with the Palm Beach County regulations. In
addition, the site plan review process for potential developments require an in-depth evaluation
of the site conditions, including an updated environmental assessment of the site to ensure that
existing wildlife habits or environmentally sensitive areas will be protected.
26 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Natural Habitats
With regard to these natural habitats, the Village intends to preserve all existing wetland areas
identified on the Coastal Management/Conservation Map through the adoption of regulations
that require the protection of existing native vegetation buffers adjacent to the Loxahatchee
River and Indian River Lagoon estuaries.
For example Ecosites #61 and #63 described in the support documentation and identified in the
Coastal Zone and Conservation Map are designated as environmentally sensitive lands, which is
enforced by Village Code of Ordinances to provide for their protection and preservation.
Major habitats that support the growth and development of a various of common, rare,
threatened and endangered species include cypress swamp, pine uplands and scrub, freshwater
marshes, hardwood hammock, mangrove swamp, seagrass beds, oyster reefs or beds, estuary
(lagoons and inlets), coastal dunes.
The Village shall restrict development activities that may adversely affect the survival of
endangered and threatened wildlife species and provide for the mitigation of development
impacts on their habitats and food sources by requiring an environmental assessment at the time
of a development or redevelopment proposal as part of the site plan review process.
Vegetative Communities
Most of the Village's acreage is developed and there are remains only a single extensive area of
natural vegetative cover, which is the federally -owned Ecosite #61 that cannot be developed.
Existing vegetative coverage is typical of most South Florida cities. Numerous trees and shrubs
populate neighborhood streets and provide shade and natural beauty around dwelling units.
Predominant trees, plants and shrubs including those located along streets, parks, and
throughout residential areas may include, but are not limited to:
Cypress (Cupressus)
Mangrove (Rhizophora)
Gumbo Limbo (Bursera simaruba)
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris)
Live Oak (Quercus virginiona)
Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii)
Caribbean Pine (Pinus caribaeo)
Australian Pine (Casuarina)
Melaleuca (Melaleuca)
Fern (Nephrolepis)
Banyan (Ficus)
Sea Grape (Coccoloba uvifera)
Cabbage Palm (Saba) palmetto)
Laurel Oak (Quercus lourifolia)
Royal Palm (Roystonea elata)
Chinese Fan Palm (Livistona chinensis)
Malayan Palm (Cocos nucifera)
Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia)
The parks and other landscaped areas that constitute areas of vegetative cover throughout the
Village are shown on indicated Recreation and Open Space Map, and discussed in the Recreation
and Open Space data and analysis document. The protection of native vegetation and wildlife
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 27
habitats is a major focus of the
Coastal Management and
Conservation elements of the
Village's Comprehensive Plan.
Trees are a vital component of the
infrastructure in our community and
provide many environmental and
economic benefits. These benefits
include cleaner air, soil and water
conservation, climate moderation,
energy conservation, human health
and longevity, increased property
values, traffic calming, enhanced biodiversity, and many more.
The two predominant causes for loss of tree vegetation include land development and disease.
Some South Florida communities including the Village require preservation or replacement of
existing trees, especially those indigenous to the area, when development occurs.
With regard to invasive species, Brazilian Pepper, Australian Pine, and Malaleuca are among such
species in the area and have been mostly eradicated from the South Florida region, including the
Village of Tequesta. However, a few trees remain in certain areas. When the opportunity arises,
these invasive species are replaced with a native alternative.
The urban forest is a resource
that provides services to the
Village and its residents and
businesses. Because the
canopy consists of living
organisms that grow, change
and respond to
environmental factors, this
valuable natural resource
requires management to
thrive. Therefore, urban
forestry encourages the care
and management of single
trees and tree populations in
an urban setting and seeks to embrace trees as a vital part of urban infrastructure. The concept
of urban forestry is further described in Trends and Challenges of this Element.
In summary, the Village intends to regulate the removal, relocation, and replacement of trees
and to prevent the abuse of the trees within Village limits to ensure the adequacy and
improvement of Tequesta's tree canopy. The Village's commitment to improving its tree canopy
28 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
is further reflected in its interest in urban forestry, which encourages the care and management
of single trees and tree populations in an urban setting and seeks to embrace trees as a vital part
of urban infrastructure. The Village's goals in urban forestry are discussed in the Conservation
and Future Land Use Elements.
Local Landscape Regulations
Since the last update to the Comprehensive Plan, the Village has added ordinances that regulate
the installation and maintenance of landscaping within the Village. This also includes the
preservation and protection of trees for new developments and redevelopments. The Village
intends to regulate the removal, relocation, and replacement of trees and to prevent the abuse
of the trees within Village limits in order to ensure the adequacy and improvement of Tequesta's
tree canopy. The Village's commitment to improving its tree canopy is further reflected in its
interest in urban forestry, which is described later in this document.
With regard to development, the Village Code specifically states that amount of impervious area
permitted per site is limited. The landscape regulations establish maximum ground coverage and
minimum landscape and open space area requirements to minimize impervious areas. Limiting
impervious areas helps contain water on -site which minimizes stormwater runoff.
In addition, native
landscaping indigenous
to South Florida should
be preserved or installed
for new developments or
redevelopments, so that
it comprises at least 50%
of the total landscaping.
Landscape materials and
design should follow
Florida -Friendly
Landscaping guidelines.
While preserving native
species, the spread of
exotic species should be
prohibited.
The Village Code provides the principles of Florida -friendly landscaping: planting the right plant
in the right place; efficient watering; appropriate fertilization; mulching; attraction of wildlife;
responsible management of yard pests; recycling yard waste; reduction of stormwater runoff;
and waterfront protections. Additional components of Florida -friendly landscape include
planning and design, soil analysis, the uses of solid waste compost, practical use of turf, and
proper maintenance.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 129
The landscaping regulations adopted in the Village's Zoning Ordinance require the use and
preservation of native vegetation. Specifically, Sec.78-402, Chapter 78, Zoning in the Village's
Code of Ordinances requires the use of native vegetation as referenced in the South Florida
Water Management District Waterwise Guide. These landscape regulations require, and the
Village continues to enforce, a minimum 50% native landscaping be provided that is consistent
with the Waterwise Guide.
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (Ecosite #61)
The Village continues to preserve
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse OUstanding
Natural Area (Ecosite #61) by
implementing appropriate zoning
regulations. Ecosite #61 is identified
on the Future Land Use Map as
Recreation and Open Space and
designated on the Village's Official
Zoning Map as R/OP, Recreation and
Open Space. The Village also identifies
any public -owned spoil islands as
conservation areas on the Future Land
Use Map. The spoil island located in
ICWW right-of-way just north of the CR
707 (Beach Road) bridge to the barrier island is identified as Conservation use on the Future Land
Use Map.
Fisheries
The Florida Fish and Wildlife and Conservation Commission (FWC) indicates the following fish
species are commonly present in Palm Beach County: Largemouth/Sunshine/Butterfly Peacock
Bass; Black Crappie; Bluegill; Redbreast/Redear/Spotted Sunfish; Warmouth; Channel/White
Catfish; Brown/Yellow Bullhead; Longnose/Florida Gar; Chain Pickerel; Mayan Cichlid; Blue
Tilapia; and Bowfin.
Marine and Estuarine fish species are found in the multiple water bodies within or adjacent to
the Village. These include, but are not limited to, the Atlantic Ocean, Indian River
Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway, Loxahatchee, and canals.
Atlantic Ocean
As discussed in the Coastal Management data and analysis document, nearshore and offshore
reefs in the Atlantic Ocean provide habitat for diverse fish species. These oceanic reef habitats
found off the coast of Palm Beach County are known to accommodate a variety of Caribbean
tropical fish, commercial fish, and shellfish types. Fish species include a variety of sport and
30 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
commercial fish, such as grouper, snapper, mackerel, bluefish, dolphin, kingfish and jack. The
Coastal Management Element further details oceanic fish species found around offshore and
nearshore reefs near Tequesta.
Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway
Recent studies indicate that there are over 700 documented fish species in the Indian River
Lagoon. Some of these species live permanently in the Lagoon, while others migrate through the
rivers and inlets towards oceanic waters. The Lagoon's protected waters make it an ideal location
for fish breeding and nursery grounds. Moreover, the broad range of salinity within the IRL
coupled with the emergent vegetation and red mangroves create productive nursery habitat for
commercially important fish species.
Fish species commonly found throughout the area include grey (mangrove) snapper (Lutjanus
griseus), common snook (Centropomus spp.), Atlantic tarpon (Megalops atlanticus), mullet
(Mugilidae), drum (Sciaenidae), sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), spotted seatrout
(Cynoscion nebulosus), pompano (Carangidae), jack (Carangidae), barracuda (Sphyraena
barracouta), sea catfish (Ariopsis), mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.), and lookdown fish (Selene
vomer). Some of these species are carried from the Gulf Stream in the ocean into the Lagoon
through the inlets. Freshwater species in the upper reaches of tributaries include black crappie
(Pomoxis nigromaculatus), bass (Centrarchidae), and sunfish (Lepomis spp.).
Loxahatchee River
In addition to the Lagoon, a variety of fish species are also present in the Loxahatchee River.
Common species found in the river include, common snook (Centropomus spp.), grey (mangrove)
snapper (Lutjanus grisseus), mullet (Mugilidae), bass (Micropterus), Atlantic tarpon (Megalops
otlanticus), and jack (Carangidae).
1 nvprtohrntPc
Data collected in the Lagoon indicates that the distribution of the most abundant species of
shrimp and crabs in Tequesta was related to the distribution of vegetative communities,
especially seagrass, found at certain collection and monitoring stations. Common species include
the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), cinnamon river shrimp (Machrobrochium acanthurus),
penaeid shrimp (pink (Farfantepenaeus duorarum), brown shrimp (F. aztecus), and white shrimp
(Litopenaeus setiferus).
Impact of Development on Natural Resources
Existing Uses of Natural Resources
The Atlantic Ocean, Indian River Lagoon and Intracoastal Waterway, the Loxahatchee River, and
related canals and water bodies are used for fishing, boating, and other recreational activities.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 31
Small-scale direct habitat loss also occurs in the IRL and Loxahatchee River and the cumulative
impact of such damage is significant. One example is prop scarring of slow -growing seagrass beds
by motorized watercraft. Increased utilization of the lagoon by recreational users exposes
sensitive, vital habitats to accidental damage.
Through policies and regulations, the Village strives to provide for the continued use of the
natural resources in the community, and ensure that adequate services are available to serve
Village residents and the public, especially in areas surrounding these sensitive natural resources.
Future Uses of Natural Resources
Based on a projected development of future land uses in accordance with the Village's current
land use map and zoning map, its present and desired future character, no additional adverse
effects on the Village's natural resources are expected. Population growth, especially in the more
sensitive coastal and intracoastal areas, is projected to proceed at a low rate, according to recent
trends and the fact that the Village is basically built -out, and is not expected to be accompanied
by rapid development.
Development Impact
Village policy requires coordination with the County and State regarding impacts of development,
as they may affect the Loxahatchee River Estuary and Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve.
Similarly, coordination among these entities is also required to ensure that any park
improvements or other development projects are sensitive to the mangrove and other
vegetative, wildlife, and marine habitats.
There are several sources of direct habitat loss within the Lagoon. Development of the Indian
River Lagoon shoreline has sometimes necessitated the removal of mangrove stands, salt marsh
vegetation, or seagrass meadows. Various state permitting processes aim to minimize such
habitat loss. In addition, the Village continues to coordinate with the State and County to assure
32 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
that development regulations are enforced in all areas in an effort to protect vegetative, wildlife
and marine habitats.
In the Coastal Area, the
coastal construction
setback and coastal high
hazard area are two
techniques that are
meant to protect and
preserve the Village's
natural and built
resources, while also
planning for the safety
of residents and visitors.
With regard to
groundwater resources, land use activities within the travel time contours are subject to
restrictions established in Article V, Wellfield Protection under Chapter 50, Natural Resource
Protection of the Village's Code of Ordinances. Similarly, the Village has adopted the Palm Beach
County Wellfield Protection Ordinance by reference.
Land use and development impact are discussed in more detail throughout this element,
including coastal construction limitations, development limitations around the IRLAP, the
impacts of sea level rise on development, and land use and development issues in sensitive
natural areas.
RARE THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
The Indian River Lagoon, Loxahatchee River, and Atlantic Ocean provides a habitat for many
endangered and threatened species, including Florida manatees, sea turtles, and seagrass. These
species are sensitive to activities such as shoreline development, dredging, filling, and even some
recreational activities.
While dominant species of wildlife in the Village of Tequesta have not been identified, probable
endangered and threatened species and species of special concern that occur along the
shorelines, in nearshore and offshore area, and within Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal
Waterway and Loxahatchee River within Palm Beach County, have been identified by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC).
These species are identified in Tables 6-1 and 6-2 below by species, habitat, designated status as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Species of Special Concern (SSC), and agency of jurisdiction.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 133
Table 6-1. Status of Threatened and Endangered Flora Species in Palm Beach County
us(
Johnson Seasgrass ((Halophila johnsonii)) E
Okeechobee gourd (Cucurbita okeechobeensis) E
Beach jacquemontia (Jacquemontia reclinata) E
Tiny polygala (Polygala smallii) E
Four -petal pawpaw (Asimina tetromera) E
Sources: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC); US Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS)
Table 6-2. Status of Threatened and Endangered Fauna Species in Palm Beach
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) T (S/A)
American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) T
Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta coretta) T
Atlantic Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas) E
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) E
Atlantic Hawksbill Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate) E
Kemp's ridley (Leoidochelvs kempid E
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus) SSC
Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) T
Least Tern (Sternula antillarum) T
Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii dougallii) T
Southeastern Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus) T
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)
T
Arctic Peregrine Falcon (Galco peregrinus)
E
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)
T
Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger)
T (State)
American oystercatcher (Hoemotopus palliates)
T (State)
Other
Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea)
T (State)
Tricolored Heron (Tricolored Heron)
T (State)
Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana)
T
Kirtland's Warbler (Dendroica kirtlandii)
E
Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus)
Whooping Crane (Grus Americana)
E
Florida Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis)
T (State)
34 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)
T
Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia)
SSC
Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
E
Finback whale (Balanenoptera phsalus)
E
Humpback whale (Megaptera novaengliae)
E
Right whale (Eubalaena glacialis)
E
Sei whale (Bolaenoptero borealis)
E
Sperm whale (Physeter catadon)
E
Intracoastal
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus monotus)
T
�....FI'orida
panther (Puma concolor coryi)
E
Sources: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC); US Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS)
*Note: The designated status abbreviations for the above species are defined as follows:
• E=Endangered: as designated by the FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is
so few or depleted in number, or so restricted in range or habitat due to any man-made or natural
factors that it is in imminent danger of extinction, or extirpation from the state, or which may
attain such a status within the immediate future.
• T=Threatened: As designated by the FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is
acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration. Declining in number at a rapid rate, or whose
range or habitat is declining in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence, is destined or very likely
to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future.
• T(S/A)=Threatened due to similarity of appearance
• SSC=State Species of Special Concern: As designated by FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated
population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an
inherent significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human
disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its
becoming a threatened species; may already meet certain criteria for designation as a threatened
species but for which conclusive data are limited or lacking: may occupy such an unusually vital
and essential ecological niche that should it decline significantly in numbers, or distribution other
species would be adversely affected to a significant degree; or has not sufficiently recovered from
past population depletion.
*in 2010, the FWC revised its imperiled species management system to abolish the species of
special concern (SSC) category once all species on that list are reclassified as State -designated
Threatened, found to not meet any of the State's listing criteria, or become Federally listed. Until
then, the FWC will continue to maintain a separate Species of Special Concern list.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 35
Birds
Loss of breeding and feeding habitat to urban
development of saltmarsh and freshwater
wetlands has stressed recovering colonial
waterbird species. Many of these waterbirds are
listed as SSC and include little blue heron,
tricolored heron, reddish egret (Egretta rufescens),
snowy egret, and white ibis. Threatened or
endangered species include the sandhill crane,
peregrine falcon, and wood stork.
The wood stork, both federally and state listed as
threatened, primarily uses the IRLAP System as a
breeding ground from February through July each
year. The brown pelican (SSC) uses the mangroves
in the IRLAP System as a roosting and nesting
ground. Current recreation on and around islands
and shoals in the IRLAP System and surrounding
areas continue to negatively impact waterbird
colonies.
Other bird species commonly found around the
Loxahatchee River areas include osprey, limpkin,
and various owl species.
Manatees
Manatees inhabit shallow
coastal waters, bays, lagoon,
estuaries, rivers and lakes
throughout its range. These
animals prefer warmer
temperatures and tend to
migrate to the warm water
discharge area at the Florida
Power and Light Rivera Beach
Power Plant, which is located
approximately 16 miles south
of the Village. Otherwise,
manatees are commonly
found in shallow coastal
waters and seagrass beds.
36 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Collisions of boats and barges with manatees has historically been one of the major causes of
manatee injury and death. Within the Indian River Lagoon and throughout the ICWW in Palm
Beach County, boating slow speed limits are posted in order to protect the manatee population
from injury.
The IRL and associated water bodies provide a critical habitat for the West Indian Manatee.
Although original population levels of manatees in Florida are unknown, studies indicate that
peninsular Florida has been the center of the manatee's range in the continental United States.
Current data by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission indicates the Florida manatee population
has grown to over 6,000 animals today.
In order to further restore and protect manatee populations, the PBC Manatee Protection Plan
(MPP) was incorporated into the County's Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The MPP provides
guidance to PBC and municipalities in developing policies and guidelines for comprehensive
manatee protection in local waterways.
Sea Turtles
The Palm Beach County ocean shoreline is a
major nesting area for sea turtles, with
approximately 2,000,000 sea turtles hatching on
its beaches every year. Palm Beach County has
more sea turtle nests per mile than anywhere
else in the United States. The 2016 sea turtle
counts provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission indicated there were
33,892 loggerhead nests, 1,582 green turtle
nests, and 377 leatherback nests, which totals to
35,851 documented sea turtle nests on the
County's beaches.
Four species of sea turtles commonly found in
the County's coastal waters, reefs, and the
lagoon. Three species are considered
endangered and include green, leatherback, and
hawksbill sea turtles. The loggerhead sea turtle
is considered threatened, and is the most
common sea turtle found in the area. The
majority of sea turtle nests found in PBC are
loggerhead nests. The sea turtle nesting season
in PBC is from the first of March through the end
of October.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 137
The Lagoon provides a developmental habitat for endangered and threatened sea turtles,
especially juvenile green turtles. Turtles often use the Lagoon waters for several years before
migrating to other feeding grounds. Because sea turtles can function as an indicator species of
habitat conditions, it is important to know the characteristics of the sea turtle population utilizing
the IRL.
Seagrass
Seagrasses act as ecological engineers in coastal waters, providing valuable ecological services to
the marine environment. These services include provision of physical habitat structure/shelter,
alteration of water flow, nutrient cycling, organic carbon production and export, sediment
stabilization, enhancement of biodiversity, trophic transfers to adjacent habitats, and food web
structure.
While seagrass does provide a valuable food source for endangered species such as manatees
and sea turtles, it may be more important to the food web when it decomposes. Dead, decaying
plant matter forms the base of the food chain and is an important food source for crustaceans,
worms, mollusks, and mullet.
Mangroves
Mangroves serve very important functions in the ecology
of the Indian River Lagoon, Loxahatchee River, and
surrounding waterways. Mangroves have a high
ecological role as nursery grounds and as a physical
habitat for a wide variety of vertebrates and
invertebrates. They recycle nutrients and the nutrient
mass balance of estuarine ecosystems. Mangrove leaves,
wood, roots, and detrital material provide essential food
chain resources and provide habitat for many wildlife
including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and
arthropods.
a
: Q4►i1 i
Moreover, they have a special ecological function for
endangered species, threatened species, and species of
special concern. They also serve as storm buffers; their -
/J
roots stabilize shorelines and fine substrates, reducing
potential turbidity and enhancing water clarity. One of the greatest values of mangroves swamps
in Florida is their aesthetic appeal.
Although much of the mangrove habitat, which once dominated the Lagoon's shorelines, has
been replaced with seawalls, multiple restoration efforts have implemented to restore this
valuable resource and mangrove coverage continues to increase as a result of these efforts.
38 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Regulations to protect mangroves are enforced by several agencies including, the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection and the Village's Land Development Regulations.
AIR QUALITY
Air quality conditions in Palm Beach County, including Tequesta, continue to be rated generally
as good. Air quality is monitored at various locations throughout the County and various air
monitoring programs are encouraged throughout the area by local pollution control agencies in
an effort to preserve air quality. For example, the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) measures and provides means to reduce automobile emissions while the
Palm Beach County Health Department measures and provides means to reduce emissions from
fixed sources.
In order to maintain proper air quality, the Village should continue to support air quality
monitoring efforts of local pollution control agencies, and should coordinate and cooperate with
local pollution control agencies to assure appropriate local input.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Village seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve energy resources.
Greenhouse gases pose a threat to the environment as they trap heat in the air, which then
warms the planet and can negatively impact natural habitats. With human activity largely
responsible for increasing greenhouse gas emissions, the largest source of emissions in the U.S.
is from burning fossil fuels for electricity, heat, and transportation. By promoting mixed use
developments, low -impact development techniques, greed building standards, and strategies to
reduce reliance on vehicles for transportation, the Village seeks to increase energy efficiency and
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Mixed use developments, defined as a mixture of residential and non-residential land uses in a
design -unified, pedestrian friendly environment with multi -modal transportation connectivity to
other areas, at appropriate locations, provide opportunities to live, work, shop and recreate in a
walkable area, and to reduce automobile dependence and greenhouse gas emissions.
Aside from mixed use developments, low impact development techniques and green building
standards are also instrumental in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These techniques and
standards reduce negative environmental impacts of development and redevelopment by:
• Locating building sites away from environmentally sensitive areas; promoting the
preservation of natural resources;
• Providing for on -site mitigation of impacts (i.e. retention and treatment of stormwater
runoff, water reuse, Master Stormwater Management Systems);
• Promoting energy conservation through design, landscaping and building techniques (i.e.
solar power, increased tree canopies);
• Promoting water conservation through landscaping and building design;
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 139
• Ensuring environmentally friendly building practices (i.e. use of environmentally friendly
building materials, recycled materials), and;
• Considering the development of a Green Building Ordinance and a related LEED
Certification Program for development and redevelopment, including the development
of a Neighborhood Development Rating System that integrates the principles of smart
growth, urbanism and green building into a national system for neighborhood design.
Transportation, including cars, trucks, trains, ships, planes, and other vehicles, is a leading source
of greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency greenhouse gas
emissions website, private automobiles, such as passenger cars, light -duty trucks, pick-up trucks,
and minivans account for over half of the emissions from the transportation category.
Through the implementing strategies to reduce the number of vehicle miles travelled, the Village
seeks to limit greenhouse gas emissions. These strategies may include the:
• Promoting mixed use developments that provide for a mixture of residential and non-
residential land uses in a pedestrian friendly environment with multi -modal
transportation connectivity to other areas;
• Promoting the use of alternate transportation modes as specified herein, including mass
transit, bicycles, and pedestrianism, and;
• Requiring Transportation Demand Management Programs as a condition for
development approvals.
Encouraging walkable communities, alternative transportation, energy efficient design
techniques, water conservation practices, and enforcing green building standards and
techniques, will benefit the community, natural resources, and the overall health well-being and
of residents and tourists in Tequesta and surrounding areas.
Hazardous Materials & Waste Management
The Village maintains regulations and measures to manage hazardous wastes and materials,
which includes an ordinance regulating the storage and disposal of hazardous wastes and
materials. The Village has adopted, and enforces, Article V, Toxic and Hazardous Materials under
Chapter 30, Environment of the Village's Code of Ordinances whose purpose is to, "...properly
regulate the use, handling, storage and disposal of toxic and hazardous substances and materials
within the Village.." In order to protect natural resources, the Village's Haz-Mat team provides
management of hazardous wastes.
Although the Village does not have any industrial land uses and, thus, does not generate the
typical hazardous wastes associated with such land uses, many of the common household and
commercial waste products requiring care in disposal are generated including car batteries,
pesticides, degreasing solvents and petroleum waste products. In addition, service stations and
marinas are potential sources of fuel and solvent waste products and leaks. Any developments
proposed for land that has potential contamination concerns must go through a rigorous process
40 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
during the site plan review phase to ensure these contaminants will be properly mitigated prior
to obtaining project approval.
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
SEA LEVEL RISE CONSIDERATIONS
Adaptation and Resiliency
Sea level rise has long been recognized by the South Florida Water Management District and by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as an increasing threat to low lying, porous South Florida.
Organizations such as the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact have provided reports and
publications that have increased awareness and expanded the knowledge of the impacts of sea
level rise on coastal communities in South Florida.
Rising sea levels due to the melting of the polar ice caps contribute to greater storm damage;
warming ocean temperatures are associated with stronger and more frequent storms; additional
rainfall, particularly during severe weather events, leads to flooding and other damage; an
increase in the incidence and severity of wildfires threatens habitats, homes, and lives; and heat
waves contribute to human deaths and other consequences.
Given the geography of Florida, coastal communities in Southeast Florida have long known how
to incorporate hazard mitigation with long-term planning to reduce the loss of life and property
and lessen the impact of disasters (hurricanes, severe weather events, flooding, etc.). The
challenge of adaptive planning for sea level rise goes beyond hazard mitigation. Rather than
preparing for a specific disaster or event, a resilient community is one that can face an array of
unpredictable challenges and disturbances with minimal long-term impacts. Certain
communities, especially in coastal areas, must be prepared for future conditions that may not
allow the same development intensity, location, type, or access. Through the use of innovative
tools and strategies it is possible to transition these economies and the built environment into
resilient communities that adapt to these adverse impacts.
With the currently accepted sea level rise projections and known climate impacts, long-range
planning must now incorporate resiliency strategies that balance mitigation and adaptation for
the protection of the natural systems and to sustain the socio-economic characteristics of the
community. Understanding how mitigation and adaptation act as interconnected relationships
to building resilient and sustainable coastal communities is vital for adaptive planning.
Although many other Florida cities and towns have yet to experience damage, scientists and
engineers have predicted that within 40 to 50 years, Florida will be inundated with problems
related to sea level rise.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 141
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (SEFRCCC) was executed by Broward,
Miami -Dade, Monroe, and Palm Beach Counties in January 2010 to coordinate mitigation and
adaptation activities across county lines. The Compact represents a new form of regional climate
governance designed to allow local governments to set the agenda for adaptation while providing
an efficient means for state and federal agencies to engage with technical assistance and support.
It is in that spirit that this plan provides the common integrated framework for a stronger and
more resilient Southeast Florida starting today and for tomorrow.
In order to better coordinate local planning, the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact (the Compact) developed unified regional sea level rise projection for Southeast Florida.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (unified projections) were originally prepared in 2011 by
the Compact's Sea Level Rise Technical Advisory Group, comprised of representatives from
county governments, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association (NOAA), United States Geological Survey (USGS), the South Florida
Water Management District, and climate scientists from Florida Atlantic University and University
of Miami. Moreover, this provision of the unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast
region allows for consistent long-range planning by the more than 115 local governments within
the Lower East Coast of Florida.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projections are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely. This unified sea level rise projection has been formally adopted
by Palm Beach, Broward, Miami -Dade and Monroe Counties and is now being used to inform
planning process and project design throughout the region.
The 2012 NOAA Technical Report, Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States National
Climate Assessment noted that given the past few decades of increased the height of storm surge
and wind -waves, assessing the combination of different weather events combined with scenarios
of sea level rise is crucial in developing hazard profiles for emergency planning and vulnerability,
impact, and adaptation assessments.
The 2015 update of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's Sea Level Rise
Work Group made date changes to the starting point of the projections to use local tide station
data and stay consistent with the current guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) and extended the
projections out to 2100 in recognition of the need for longer range guidance for major
infrastructure and other long term investments now being planned.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning
purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to
both short and long-term planning horizons and infrastructure design in the Southeast Florida
42 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
area. The authors also note that Sea level rise in South Florida has been of similar magnitude over
the same period (NOAA, 2015) but is anticipated to outpace the global average due to ongoing
variations in the Florida Currents and Gulf Stream. Given the uncertainty of all the factors
affecting the rate of sea level rise in climate models and the limitations of current climate models
to predict the future, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection
include three curves, in descending order, the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve and a
curve corresponding to the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to
how and when they should be used in planning.
These scenarios provide a useful tool for coastal managers in assessing vulnerability, impacts,
and adaptation strategies when coupled with local and regional specific information on climatic,
physical, ecological, and biological processes and on the culture and economy of coastal
communities.
Figure 6-10. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, 2015
Unified Sea Level Rise Projection
(Southeast flcnda Regional Climate Change Cor-ipact, 2015)
IPCC ARS
Year
Median
—
(inches)
2030
6
2060
14
2100
31
USACE High `10AA High
linchesl
10
26
61
esr
Flute I Unified Sea level Rtse Projection These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide kaugf the projection
includes three global curves adapted lot regional applicationthe median of the IPCC AM RCPS S scenario as the lowrtt boundary (trlue dashed
curve) the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060 tsold blue linel. and the NOAA High curve as the
uppermost boundary for medium and long term usp lorangp solid curve) The incorporatpd table 00% the projection values at years 20110, 2060
and 2100 ►he USACF Intrrmedtalp or NOAA Intermediate tow curve is displayed on the figure for reference lilrern dashed curvel This scenario
would reduur siRnihcant reductlons in greenhouse gas emHsions in order to be pWusible and does not reflect current envwiom trends
Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projections are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 143
In summary, this Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida updated in 2015 projects
the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 6-10).
The projection highlights three planning horizons:
1) Short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level,
2) Medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean sea
level,
3) Long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea
level.
The following are examples of overarching strategies that local governments within the
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (Palm Beach, Broward, Miami -Dade and
Monroe Counties) have now adopted.
• Ensure a sustainable, adaptive and resilient community
• Incorporate the best available data and science, into policy and planning decisions for
infrastructure
• Protect coastal buffers, natural recharge areas to create a resilient environment
• Improve resiliency through the development of adaptation strategies for vulnerable areas
• Create and maintain effective intergovernmental coordination and on -going
communicating that supports sustainability and resource protections while maintaining
flood protection
• Conduct vulnerability and risk analysis for; public infrastructure and facilities, economic,
land use and natural systems
• Incorporate sea level rise impacts, indicators, benchmarks and targets in planning
elements and land use development reviews and capital development projects
• Adopt Overlay Zones, Adaptation Overlay Districts or Adaptation Action Areas in a Coastal
Management Element to improve resilience to coastal flooding resulting from high -tide
events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and related impacts of sea level rise
• Provide 5 yr. review of the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida
Florida Senate Bill 1094 (S.B. 1094)
Recognizing the priority to integrate sea level rise into local government planning, Florida
Governor's Rick Scott signed (May, 2015) S.B. 1094 amending the state comprehensive planning
laws (F.S. 163.3178(2)(f) that had stipulated local governments were required to have a coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan, including a redevelopment component to
"eliminate inappropriate and unsafe development in coastal areas".
Florida S.B. 1094, which became effective on July 1, 2015, requires coastal management plans to
include the reduction of flood risks and losses. It also creates new requirements related to flood
elevation certificates and revises requirements related to flood insurance.
44 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
This new law now includes "sea -level -rise":
"1. Includ[ing] development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and
engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which results
from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the
related impacts of sea -level rise."
- S81094 (emphasis added)
Specifically, S.B. 1094, Section 1, amends s. 163.3178(2)(f), F.S., to require local governments
when drafting their comprehensive coastal management plans to:
• Include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions
that reduce the flood risk in the coastal zone which results from high -tide events, storm
surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise.
• Encourage the use of best -practices development and redevelopment principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real
property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
• Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to
flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state.
As discussed earlier in the document, the Village recently updated its Code of Ordinances to
reflect FEMA's updated Flood Insurance Maps and to increase its freeboard requirements, a
technique to reduce losses and claims related to flooding.
In addition to the consideration of related impacts of sea level, SB 1094 amendment of s
163.3178 (2) (f), F.S. also includes the following effective changes:
• Encourage the use of best practices development and redevelopment principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real
property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
• Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to
flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state.
• Be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements
in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth
in 44 C.F.R. part 60.
• Require construction activities seaward of the coastal construction control lines
established pursuant to s. 161.053, F.S., be consistent with Ch. 161, F.S.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 145
• Encourage local governments to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Community Rating System administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their residents
Related Florida Statutes
To support the implementation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and
the Regional Action Plan, and recognizing the importance of integrating sea level rise directly into
municipal and county planning, the Regional Climate Action Plan (RCAP) Workshop #10:
"Essential Tools: Integrating the Southeast Florida Sea Level Rise Projections into Community
Planning" was held in July, 2016 in Broward County. The report, Integrating the Unified Sea Level
Rise Projection into Local Plans that followed this workshop is available at the SEFRCC website.
The following legislative history is taken directly from that report.
Support for using these sea level rise projections exists currently with Florida State laws requiring
that comprehensive plans use "relevant and appropriate data," according to Statute
163.3177(1)(f):
"All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan
amendments must be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an
analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to,
surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the
time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment."
Relevant data that may have been used to write the plan is not considered formally adopted and
embedded in the plan unless it is included directly in the planning document:
"Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive
plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as
a part of it."
- Florida Statute (163.3177(1)(f)1
Additionally, coordination and alignment between local comprehensive planning efforts is an
explicit goal of Florida state law:
"Coordination of the local comprehensive plan with the comprehensive plans
of adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region; with
the appropriate water management district's regional water supply plans
approved pursuant to s. 373.709, and with adopted rules pertaining to
designated areas of critical state concern must be a major objective of the local
comprehensive planning process."
- Florida Statute (163.3177(4)(a)
46 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely.
Coastal High Hazard Areas
In response to devastating hurricanes and coastal storms in 2005 and 2005, bills were introduced
to address the permitting processes, levels of service thresholds and to revise the definition of
the Coastal High Hazard Areas. This changed the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area from
the category 1 hurricane evacuation zone to "the area below the category 1 storm surge line as
established by the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm
surge model." The SLOSH model combines topographic and bathometric data with hurricane
models to delineate land areas that are prone to storm surge inundation.
A 2008 report, Assessment of Redefining Florida's Coastal High Hazard Area reviewing the
consequences of this change recommended a more holistically consideration of the
environmental, hazard mitigation, land use, and economic development issues related to coastal
planning. This report called for broadening the application of CHHA to embrace diverse aspects
of natural hazard mitigation.
Per the above definition for a CHHA, the Village considers all areas below the category 1 storm
surge line within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The category 1 storm surge area is indicated on
the Hurricane Surge Map, which is presented in the Coastal Management Element. This criteria
is intended to guide future development and redevelopment in an effort to further protect
Tequesta's residents and its natural, economic, and cultural resources.
Adaptation Action Areas
In addition to designating a Coastal High Hazard Area, defining Adaptation Action Areas (AAA)
are another step local municipalities can take to protect areas in their communities that are
especially vulnerable to flooding due to sea level rise. While the Coastal High Hazard Area is
standardized delineated area, there is no standard boundary for Adaptation Action Areas. The
Coastal High Hazard Area considers current coastal flooding conditions while the Adaptation
Action Area encourages planning for future vulnerability.
The Community Planning Act (CPA) made changes to the state's growth management laws in
2011, including the optional adaptation planning for coastal hazards and the potential impacts of
sea level rise. The Adaptation Action Area, as defined in the CPA, is an optional comprehensive
plan designation for areas that experience coastal flooding and that are vulnerable to the related
impacts of rising sea levels for prioritizing funding for infrastructure and adaptation planning.
Local governments that adopt an adaptation action area may consider policies within the coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan to improve resilience to coastal flooding.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 147
Criteria for the adaptation action area may include: areas below, at, or near mean higher high
water; areas which have a hydrological connection to coastal waters; or areas designated as
evacuation zones for storm surge.
"(1) "Adaptation action area" or "adaptation area" means a designation in the
coastal management element of a local government's comprehensive plan
which identifies one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to
extreme high tides and storm surge, and that are vulnerable to the related
impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of prioritizing funding for
infrastructure needs and adaptation planning."
- Florida Statute (163.3164(1))
"At the option of the local government, develop an adaptation action area
designation for those low-lying coastal zones that are experiencing coastal
flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge and are vulnerable to the
impacts of rising sea level. Local governments that adopt an adaptation action
area may consider policies within the coastal management element to improve
resilience to coastal flooding resulting from high -tide events, storm surge, flash
floods, stormwater runoff, and related impacts of sea -level rise. Criteria for the
adaptation action area may include, but need not be limited to, areas for which
the land elevations are below, at, or near mean higher high water, which have
a hydrologic connection to coastal waters, or which are designated as
evacuation zones for storm surge."
- Florida Statute (163.3177(6)(g)(10)),
In future hazard mitigation planning initiatives, the Village should consider designating areas that
are particularly susceptible to flooding and other sea level rise impacts as Adaption Action Areas.
These may include areas along the water front, properties in the Tequesta Country Club
neighborhood, where many properties would be at risk for flooding during a category 4 or 5
hurricane, and other areas that are within a hurricane surge area.
Urban Forestry
The Village of Tequesta will benefit by embracing urban forestry policies in its residential
neighborhoods and commercial areas. Urban forestry is the careful care and management of tree
populations in urban settings for the purpose of improving the urban environment. Urban
forestry advocates the role of trees as a critical part of the urban infrastructure. Urban foresters
plant and maintain trees, support appropriate tree and forest preservation, conduct research
and promote the many benefits trees provide.
Urban forests bring many environmental and economic benefits to cities. Among these are
energy benefits in the form of reduced air conditioning by shading buildings, homes and roads,
absorbing sunlight, reducing ultraviolet light, cooling the air, and reducing wind speed - in short
improvement of the microclimate and air quality.
48 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
There are also economic benefits associated with urban trees such as increased land, property,
and rental value. Well -maintained trees and landscaped business districts have been shown to
encourage consumer purchases and attract increased residential, commercial and public
investments. Numerous studies have shown the direct relationship between home value, public
health, and street trees. In her article "City Trees and Property Values," Kathleen L. Wolf writes
that there is a home price increase between 6 to 9 percent when there is good tree cover in a
neighborhood, and a 10 to 15 percent increase when there are mature trees in a high -income
neighborhood.
Urban forests also improve air quality, absorb rainwater, improve biodiversity and potentially
allow recycling to 20% of waste which is wood -based. Many cities today are dealing with
stormwater management system issues where their existing systems can no longer hold the
volume of water that falls in storms. One sustainable solution to this is planting street trees with
grates underneath them to hold water. Trees and their soils work to filter runoff pollution and
soil contaminants by absorbing them and processing them into less harmful substances. They
also collect water in their limbs and release it back into the atmosphere over time. This makes
trees a solution to stormwater runoff issues and urban heating issues.
Urban forestry can be subject to NIMBY (not in my backyard) arguments as people occasionally
experience trees as a nuisance or as a cause for disputes between neighbors. Frequent citizen
complaints include too much shade; leaf litter; low hanging and falling branches; undesirable
seeds, pods or fruits; and bird droppings. Many of these objections can be overcome by good
educational efforts and by careful selection, placement, and routine maintenance of trees. The
benefits of trees in our communities far outweigh any real or perceived inconveniences.
Another area of concern is the damage to homes and buildings that can result from tree roots or
falling trees. Cases of damage to building foundations from invasive roots are typically the result
of improper siting of trees and buildings relative to each other. The young sapling planted by the
front door today will be the giant oak of tomorrow with roots damaging walkways and
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 149
foundation. Proper education about site and species selection is critical. Falling trees often result
from unstable root systems and/or severe storms. It is important understand regional soil types
and the routine maintenance necessary to promote healthy root systems and to reduce the other
circumstances that would cause a tree to fall (disease, rotten wood, a too -heavy crown, etc.).
Nonetheless, the damage from trees remains low in proportion to the number of trees and the
many direct and indirect benefits they provide.
The following should be considered when
formulating codes and standards for Urban
Foresting:
• Include clear and concise definitions of key
terms
• Include risk assessment evaluation
requirements
• Define minimum landscape standards and
mitigation requirements
• Specify what type of trees are required in
certain locations
• Provide incentives or penalties to
developers, landscape architects, etc.
• Provide educational opportunities for the
community
A number of cities in South Florida supports Urban Forestry and they also qualify as a Tree City
USA community. The following cities are Tree Cities in the state of Florida: Boca Raton, Boynton
Beach, Delray Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, Royal Palm Beach and Lantana.
The sustainability and long term quality of life of the community will benefit by including urban
forestry policies and code language in the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations.
50 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Green Building and Sustainable Practices
The Conservation Element is an integral component to fulfilling the green building concept.
Green building standards furthermore encourage quality site design measures including
clustering to allow for the preservation of the natural areas that may exist on that promote mixed
use developments with multi -modal transportation opportunities. The Village of Tequesta should
consider integrating green building standards into its Comprehensive Plan and Land
Development Regulations, through promoting and providing incentives for energy efficient
developments.
Infill development and redevelopment will play an important role in the future of Tequesta's
growth and development, as discussed in the Future Land Use Element. Altogether, infill and re-
development and mixed -use development should promote superior projects within the cities'
urban landscape. Infill redevelopment should allow flexible design while maximizing the potential
use of a building or site. The very nature of infill redevelopment promotes higher and best uses
while discouraging sprawling development upon green space, suburban, and rural land.
Creative design and the anticipation of healthier lifestyles create superior infill redevelopment
projects. The ability to live, work, and play within one's own neighborhood is vital for infill
redevelopment's success. The use of energy efficient appliances, environmentally friendly
materials, superior architecture, and native landscaping provide the foundation for infill
redevelopment initiatives.
On -site water quality can also be significantly improved by infill redevelopment. Surface water
from impervious surfaces (rooftops, sidewalks, and parking lots) currently is diverted to water
retention and/or detention areas. Developers are capable of reversing the negative effects by
heavily planting these areas with natural and colorful vegetation which filters water biologically.
These types of treatment areas are aesthetically pleasing, cleaner, absorb cancerous heavy
metals, limit algal blooms, and increase property values by the use of wetland/aquatic and
upland/land plants. Infill and redevelopment can offset these types of environmental issues
while providing quality urban buildings in context with their neighbors.
Green Roofs
Green roofs prohibit the majority of ultraviolet radiation from penetrating the rooftop which
equates to air conditioning savings and longer roof replacement periods. They also provide
habitat for butterflies and birds while filtering the rooftop water and creating less strain on storm
water systems. Vegetated roofs use and filter the excess water while traditional roofs typically
acquire pollutants and contribute to nonpoint source pollution which ultimately goes into the
Atlantic Ocean. Green roofs can be used to mitigate storm water runoff requirements while
providing for an aesthetically pleasing built environment. Basic green roof systems can be
installed with little or no additional engineered structural support and add about 80-150
pounds/sq. ft. for intensive green roofs while extensive green roofs add about 12-50
pounds/square feet.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 151
Green roofs have been successful at several locations throughout Florida. The photos below
include projects in Jacksonville (Breaking Ground Contracting Green Roof & Rooftop Garden);
Orlando (Orlando Health MD Anderson Cancer Center Labyrinth Vegetated Roof Garden);
Clermont (Honda Headquarters); and Miami (FIU College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Modesto
A. Maidique Campus).
I .11r.7
FINAL REMARKS
■
I
Due to its location along the coast, the Village of Tequesta and its resources are vulnerable to
various natural disasters. This element provides insight into the Village's coastal resources and
emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining a resilient community to preserve and
protect these resources and associated areas.
Seal Level Rise
Increasing sea levels are expected to significantly challenge regional long-term planning for
coastal communities in South Florida, including Tequesta. In order to minimize the threat
52 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
imposed by these challenges, it is imperative the Village take necessary steps in adaptive planning
and work to develop a policy framework that is integrated into the local planning system.
Steps to take include adding goals and policies that address adaptation or sustainability issues
into existing plans, ensuring consistency across all municipal operations and their guiding plans
and programs, and even educating residents and visitors on the importance of the challenges
posed by impacts of sea level rise, and how to work as a community to lessen the impact. These
steps lay the foundation toward building a more resilient community, and together with informed
public and committed elected officials, reaching the community's established goals and
strategies are achievable.
Sea level rise remains a significant threat to the coastal communities in South Florida as rising
sea levels are expected to significantly challenge regional long-term planning for these areas.
These challenges include:
• Increased flooding and drainage problems,
• Destruction of natural resource habitats,
• Higher storms surge, increased evacuation areas and evacuation time frames,
• Increased shoreline erosion,
• Saltwater Intrusion, and
• Loss of infrastructure and existing development.
Throughout the extensive review of recent climate data and rising sea levels, the importance of
adaptive planning has been abundantly clear. And while adaptation planning strategies may be
developed into differently for differently effected communities, working to develop a policy
framework that is integrated into the local planning system is imperative. Future steps to take
include; adding goals and policies that address adaptation or sustainability issues into existing
plans, developing a new "Sustainability" or similar element within the comprehensive plan,
and/or ensuring consistency across all municipal operations and their guiding plans and
programs.
Moreover, the following initiatives are encouraged to address these impacts and promote
sustainable growth:
• Conserve, reuse, recycle
• Walk, bike, carpool, or use mass transit
• Building 'green' energy efficient buildings
• Encourage mixed land uses
• Provide incentives for business/residential responsibility
• Sustain water quality
• Limit dependence on oil
• Educate individuals on the aforementioned items
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 153
These steps lay the foundation toward building a more resilient community and together with
informed public and committed elected officials, reaching the community's established goals and
strategies are achievable.
Stormwater Management
A number of guidelines should be incorporated as Village -wide policies to be implemented in
conjunction with neighborhood contact organizations, property owners, residents, and
businesses. These actions, consistent with the constraints on the Village's financial and personnel
resources, should include:
• Water quality protection and improvement for discharges to the Indian River Lagoon,
Loxahatchee River, and canals consistent with state water quality standards and numeric
nutrient criteria
• Flood control and relief of nuisance problem areas
• Aquifer recharge to protect and replenish potable groundwater supplies and to reduce
salt water intrusion
• Harvesting and reuse of stormwater
• Multi -benefit solutions for parks, roads and green area restoration.
Water Quality
• Continue the water quality ambient monitoring program in the IRL for baseline purposes
and trend analysis
• Increase focus on decreasing inputs of suspended materials, and nutrients from point and
non -point sources
• Identify and reduce anthropogenic loadings of fecal contaminants and other pathogens
• Increase additional sanity sewer, wastewater, and stormwater retrofit projects
• Manage sediments
Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Program — Indian River Lagoon
The targets within the next five years are to restore the area's natural resources including,
seagrass, tidal marsh, oyster reef, artificial reef, and to protect and enhance the lagoon's existing
mangrove and seagrass areas. These goals may be accomplished through enhancement,
restoration and monitoring concepts, which may include the following projects:
• Restore and enhance seagrass beds, oyster habitat, emergent mangrove wetlands,
coastal hammock habitat, and protective upland buffer zones.
• Add Living Shorelines to vertical seawalls to reduce wave -generated sediment
resuspension and provide additional upland buffer zones
54 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Construct artificial reefs that provide juvenile, intermediate and adult habitats required
by the life cycle of estuarine and marine dependent fish and invertebrate species
• Evaluate the status and protect sea turtles, manatees, and other endangered, threatened,
and rare species, and species of special concern using the IRL.
REFERENCES AND SOURCES
Barbara Powell. Adaptive Sea Level Rise Planning: Introduction, Resource Tools, Southeast
Florida County Policy Development. 2017.
Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
https://www.epa.Rov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-Rases
Florida Atlantic University. Indian River Lagoon Fact Sheet. Web Accessed Oct. 2017.
https://fau.edu/hboi/meh/iRL.Fact.Sheet.pdf
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Florida Coastal Office. Indian River Lagoon
Aquatic Preserves Systems Management Plan. 2015, 2017. Web Accessed April. 2017.
http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/CAMA/plans/aquatic/Indian-River-Lagoon-AP-System-
Management-Plan.pdf
Indian River Lagoon Council. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. Web Accessed Oct.
2017. http://www.irlcouncil.com/
Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District. 2010 Seagrass Mapping. Web Accessed Oct.
2017. http://Ioxahatcheeriver.org/pdf/SeagrassMaps2010.pdf
Matiyow, Knudson, Stearns. SB 1094: Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement: Florida Senate.
2015.
National Hurricane Center. Web Accessed Mar. 2017. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
Nature Conservancy. Blowing Rock Preserve. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
https://www.nature.org/ourin itiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/florida/place
sweprotect/blowing-rocks-preserve.xml?redirect=https-301
Palm Beach County. Environmental Resource Management: Environmental Sustainability. Web
Accessed Mar. 2017.
http://discover.pbcgov.org/erm/Pages/Environmental-SustainabiIity.aspx
Palm Beach County. Environmental Resource Management: Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse
Outstanding Natural Area. Web Accessed Aug. 2017.
http://discover.pbcgov.org/erm/NaturalAreas/Jupiter-Inlet.aspx
Palm Beach County Land Development Regulations. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
https:/IlibrarV.municode.com/fl/palm beach county/codes/code of ordinances
Southeast Florida Regional Compact Action Plan: Integrating the Unified Sea Level Rise
Projection into Local Plans. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/SLRGuid
ance-Doc.pdf
University of Florida. Florida Friendly Landscaping Program. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
http://fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/
Village of Tequesta Water Utilities. Consumer Confidence Report. 2016. Web Accessed Oct.
2017. http://www.teguesta.org/DocumentCenter/View/9475
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 155
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 6: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Village of Tequesta Parks and Recreation Department is committed to providing safe, state-
of-the-art park and recreation facilities to enhance the quality of life for the Village's residents
and visitors. The Department offers leisure, educational, and physical activities to promote
cultural, community and family fellowship.
Recreation and open spaces are vital to making the Village of Tequesta a desirable place to live,
work, play, and visit. Besides their intrinsic functional value for leisure time pursuits or passive
enjoyment, recreation and open spaces provide opportunities to improve the health and fitness
of residents, enhance the Village's aesthetic quality, and promote resource protection and
development management. For instance, the acquisition of sites required for habitat protection
and stormwater management can also be used for passive or compatible active recreational
purposes.
The two components of Recreation and Open Space, produce different benefits and meet
different needs. The recreation component relates to recreation sites and facilities which meet
the recreational needs of the Village's permanent and seasonal population, while the open space
component is oriented to meeting quality of life issues and enhancing the Village's aesthetic
quality. Therefore, this Recreation and Open Space Element includes guidelines for the
development of recreation and open space facilities.
This chapter also provides an inventory of existing recreation and open sites and facilities,
identifies applicable standards and guidelines, and assesses current and projected needs for
recreation and open space. The data and analysis provide the framework for identifying and
establishing specific goals, objectives, and policies to ensure that an adequate system of parks,
recreational facilities, and open space is available for Village residents and visitors both now and
in the future.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND INVENTORY
The Parks and Recreation Department oversees and manages the recreation program and park
facilities of the Village of Tequesta. The Village offers a wide range of leisure, educational and
physical activities and programs, such as:
Community Wide Special Events
After School Programs
Athletic Programs
Tequesta Fest
Movies in the Park
Food Truck Pow Wow
Passive and Active Parks
Inventory of Public Recreation and Open Space Parks
OdIP
The Goal of the Recreation and Open Space element of the current Comprehensive Plan is the
"development of an open space system that adequately provides for the recreational needs of
the Village and enhances the overall environmental characteristics of the area". There is an array
of recreation and open space opportunities available within and outside of the corporate limits
of Tequesta. This section contains an inventory of the Village's existing recreation and open space
sites and facilities which provides the basis for analysis and assessment of the Village's recreation
and open space system needs and opportunities. These sites and facilities are classified
according to type and function. Figure 7-1 below illustrates the location of the public parks that
serve the Village population:
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Tequesta County)
Open Space/
Recreation Areas
s Tequesta
Park
'
Ueata
�I n
ount
Club Golf
1 irir
t .... rl �r A
�
Linear
M-
�� ST
Park ,..,
Remembrance
+ 11
_-
Tequesta Coin
Club Boat
Ramp/Recreation
Area
I &G&Nu
_ iLRYS AMP OOrAr SJUCr
� Constitu-
(on.
_- — Park .
Village 1
- Green Paradise '
Ve
^�Park
Point Drive Open
Space/ RecreationArea -t
The Village of
isTEQUESTA
.iLM 1JEA11:11 4Yoi s*n e 10RILA
I'AHMS AINL) QIIE N ;SIF AC E
JA.SUA1:Y rii:-
-egacy
_T
170�
C
fD
V
F-�
Cr
M
0)
H
7
a
'C
rD
N
0)
n
fD
Classification of Parks and Recreational Facilities
In addition to the Village's current open space and recreation system, there are an array of
recreation and open space opportunities available within and outside the corporate limits of
Tequesta. That may include "mini -parks", "eco-oriented facilities" and general open space areas,
in addition to neighborhood and community parks. Standards and guidelines for all existing and
potential parks and recreational facilities will be analyzed in this section. Recreation areas and
facilities provided by the Village today are classified as either "active" or "passive" and as
"neighborhood" or "community" facilities.
"Active" facilities often require specially constructed fields, courts or other apparatus which lend
themselves to a particular user -oriented activity. "Passive" recreation facilities require a resource
base, either natural or man-made, with which the user interacts. Oceans, beaches, woodlands
and other natural areas offer a variety of passive recreational experiences. "Neighborhood" parks
are facilities that typically are located within or near residential areas, and are primarily designed
to serve Village residents. "Community" facilities are designed to serve, both Tequesta residents
and the non-resident population. The Village strives to maintain community and neighborhood
parks and facilities to meet the current and future needs of all age groups in Tequesta.
Mini -Parks (Tot -lots and pocket parks)
Mini -parks are small facilities that serve a
concentrated or limited population, and when
designed with a tot -lot, are geared toward
toddlers. Mini -parks are designed to serve the
needs of a neighborhood within a radius of up to
six (6) blocks. A minimum of one half (1/2) acre for
each stand-alone park is recommended. Mini -
parks primarily offer passive recreation and
typical facilities provided include playground
areas, benches, open space, picnic tables, shade
trees and landscaping.
Private mini -parks could be required within planned residential neighborhoods. Since most of the
neighborhood and community parks offer the facilities typically found in mini -parks on a larger
scale, the Village has not established a level of service standard based on population for this
category of park. Adequate provision of mini -parks could be measured through requirements for
new development and redevelopment.
Neighborhood Parks
The neighborhood park is a "walk to" park generally located along streets where people can walk
or bicycle without encountering heavy traffic. It serves the population of a neighborhood in a
radius of up to one-half mile and generally has 2 acres for each 1,000 population.
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Village owns, leases, or has easements from other agencies for neighborhood parks. The
three Village -owned parks include the Village Green, Constitution Park, and Remembrance Park.
The Village Green is a one- acre passive park located adjacent to the Village Hall complex. The
park is softly lighted and features walkways, benches, a fountain, and a monument honoring First
Responders. Another Village -owned neighborhood park, Constitution Park, offers a variety of
passive and active activities on a 3.94 acre, including playgrounds, basketball courts, nature trails,
a skate park, a putt -putt course, a picnic pavilion, benches, and shade trees. Surrounded on all
sides by a residential area, Remembrance Park is a small, passive neighborhood park that has not
yet been fully developed. The Village should consider adding more defined park elements, such
as a trail, benches, or a pavilion in order to maximize the functionality of the park to better
accommodate neighborhood residents.
The Village received an easement from the FEC Railroad to utilize a portion of its right-of-way for
a linear park. Now known as Linear Park, this passive park includes sidewalk facilities,
landscaping, and a pergola located at the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and Village Boulevard.
A majority of the remaining portion of the FEC Railroad right-of-way is reserved as open space.
A small portion of the easement, south of Tequesta Drive and abutting Old Dixie Highway, is
retained for Commercial use.
Aside from the five neighborhood parks mentioned above, the Village also owns various lands
that serve specific neighborhoods, including an open space area and a boat ramp.
Country Club, and two recreation and open space areas in both Bayview Terrace and Point
Drive neighborhood areas.
-.t
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 5
t
i
NEIGHBORHOOD
o.
7 1 PARKS
ilk
�fr
4 AL
r •.
•. -
� '•ter r - �- •�
J>,
tv;
:.
. a`� i� •� .•�'_" fir•-
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARKS
5.
,4
Community Parks
A community park is a "ride to" park located near major streets or arterials. It is designed to
serve community residents within a radius of up to three miles. Multi -modal access to community
parks is strongly encouraged. Multi -modal access can be enhanced by bike paths and pedestrian
walkways.
Typical facilities found in community parks are designed to serve the entire family and include
both passive and active recreation opportunities such as playground areas, recreation buildings,
sports fields, paved multipurpose courts, picnic areas, open or free play areas, swimming pools,
and landscaping. Adequate off-street parking may be needed to contain parking overflow. Just
as a neighborhood park fulfills the recreation needs of a neighborhood, a community park is
designed to meet the recreation needs of an entire community and generally has 2 acres for each
1,000 population.
The Village operates Tequesta Park, a 45-
acre community park located outside the
Village, in southern Martin County. It
includes a variety of community facilities:
tennis courts, basketball courts, baseball
and softball fields, a multi -purpose field
that can accommodate activities such as
soccer or football, a walking trail, a dog
park, and a picnic pavilion. This facility is
leased from the State Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP). Tequesta
operates the facility and directs the
recreation programs at the park.
Paradise Park is the only Village -managed community park located within the Village boundaries.
The Village leases this privately -owned property and utilizes as park. This centrally located, two -
acre park accommodates several Village -sponsored events throughout the year. The Village may
consider purchasing this property in the future.
Coral Cove Park is a County -owned and operated community park located within the corporate
limits of Tequesta. This park is a 6.21-acre beachfront park located on the barrier island portion
of Tequesta. Coral Cove Park was annexed into the Village in 1985. The park has 955.5 feet of
beach, one mile of nature trail, a fishing site, a picnic table area, and a playground.
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 7-2: Public & Private Beach Frontage
Coral Cove Park
too 14 !
Eco Site #61
i
t
14791t i
As illustrated in the Figure 7-2, Tequesta also
has public and private beach frontage along
the Ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway. As
indicated in Table 7-1 below, there are 3271
linear feet of public beach frontage within the
Village limits, and a total of 5173 linear feet of
private beach frontage.
Table 7-1. Beach Frontage Assessment
Beach Frontage Assessment: Village of Tequesta 0
Beach Frontage L(L gth (miles) Length Notes
Measured
Private Beach 1703.1 0.32 along
shoreline
Measured
Public Beach 955.5 0.18 along
shoreline
Total Beach Front: 2658.6 0.50
Measured
Private Intracoastal 3470 0.66 along
shoreline
Measured
Public Intracoastal 2315.5 0.44 along
shoreline
Total Intracoastal Front: 5785.5 1.10
Beach Access 15 access
easements
Total public frontage:
(Beach & Intracoastal) 3271 0.62
Total private frontage:
5173.1 1.00
(Beach & Intracoastal)
TOTAL FRONTAGE: 8444.10 1.60
The photos shown on
the left and right depict
the County's Coral Cove
Park located within the
Village boundaries.
Selected pictures of the
Village's Community
Parks are shown on the
next page.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Paradise Park
�^s
aJse � ' 1• �sJ� ,
1 -
to
cap ! -
�- 1
� y
A
COMMUNITY
PARKS
Paradise Park and Tequesta
Park are the two Village's
Community Parks that
provide active and passive
recreational spaces.
Open Space Areas
Open space is defined as any land or water surface that affords unobstructed physical movement,
and is relatively free of human -made structural mass, except for structures indented to serve the
use of the open space for passive recreation. Open space can be classified in two ways, as either
green open space or as urban open space. Green open space may include greenways, Eco-
Oriented parks, or private Golf Courses
Urban open space, on the other hand, exists principally to intersperse congested urban
environments with aesthetically pleasing buffer areas, to protect natural resources, and to
provide passive recreation opportunities. Urban open space may include plazas, squares,
courtyards, linear parks, and also the area covered by lakes, streams and canals. These areas are
typically located within built-up areas and, in some cases, may offer benches, commemorative
structures, art in public places, trails, or paths.
Either type of open space can be publicly or privately owned. Since open space is a fundamental
element in land classification, as well as land use planning and resource management, these areas
are not considered public parks but have been included in the level of service standard
calculations as part of the overall recreation and open space.
In addition to the parks identified above, there are various other public recreation and open
space areas in Tequesta. Pictures of these areas and facilities are provided on page thirteen.
a. A 50-acre natural area with trails owned by the U.S. Department of Interior, located east
of U.S. Highway 1 and north of CR 707, which is the
north portion of the 120-acre Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (ONA). This is
one of three ONA's in the United States. This area +
includes a nature trail that winds throughout a
portion of the property along the river. This site is
shown in the Village's Zoning Map as Ecosite #61. .
The Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse (ONA) is part of the
Bureau of Land Management's 27-million-acre
National Conservation Lands; and the only - --
complete unit east of the Mississippi River. In close
proximity to several million people, and embedded
in Florida's urbanized Treasure Coast, the 120-acre
site in northern Palm Beach County is so recognized
for its remarkable array of natural and cultural p
resources. Its location at the confluence of the
Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon, just_ --
one and a half miles from the Atlantic Ocean, has
made the site a popular and strategic site of human occupation for the past 5,000 years.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
The ONA designation was established by Congress primarily to protect unique scenic,
scientific, educational, and recreational values. The Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse ONA is one of
three sites afforded this designation. Congress established Oregon's Yaquina Head in
1980; the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse and the Piedras Blancas Light Station in California were
established in May of 2008. Besides visiting the historic Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse, the ONA
offers a variety of other visitor experiences. The area includes a hardened trail and
boardwalk though native and restored Florida coastal habitats, and exciting interpretive
programs regarding the site's unique military history and its important role in World War
II.
b. There are three open space easements established in the Tequesta Country Club area off
of River Drive, abutting the Northwest Fork of the Loxahatchee River. One of these
easements includes a doc and boat ramp, while the other easements provide access to
the River for passive recreational use.
c. In addition, an open space area in the Bayview Terrace and Shady Lane neighborhood
provides a passive recreation space for residents, with a paved walking trail that leads to
the waterfront. Another open space area along Point Drive, also located in the Shady Lane
neighborhood, is officially titled to the Village. This greenspace contains a large Banyan
Tree and serves as a passive recreation area for the neighborhood residents.
d. There are four additional parcels in Tequesta, identified as parcels B, C and Russell Road,
which are retained as open space and used for drainage retention/detention purposes.
In addition, a parcel on Cypress Drive North, also used for drainage and
retention/detention purposes, which was dedicated to the Village since the last EAR.
Coral Cove Park
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Recreation Area
7•ril i r1 �! 7
DdyVICW 1 C110.0 m Jllcluy
Lane Open Space/ Recreation
Area
Tequesta Country Club
Neighborhood Open Space/
Recreation Areas
Tequesta Country
f'111h Rnat Ramn
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
Recreation and Open Space Inventory
Beach Parks and Beach Access
Beach parks and access areas are natural -
resource based or open space lands. These
are lands that are valuable to the
community for a number of reasons, all of
which should be used as criteria in the
evaluation of potential beach access areas.
The majority of beaches and beach parks
within the Village of Tequesta are owned
and managed by other entities, as discussed
ahead in this document. Coral Cove Park
with access to the Ocean and the
Intracoastal Waterway is owned and
managed by Palm Beach County. There are several private beaches and access areas to the
Loxahatchee River and the Intracoastal Waterway in the Tequesta Country Club.
Eco-Oriented Park
The Village recognizes the importance of protecting the diverse ecosystem, while embracing the
natural resources available to our residents. Eco-oriented parks provide residents enjoyment and
awareness of our natural environment and shall utilize eco-friendly design to minimize the impact
to the environment. These sites are unique in function and location; therefore, these sites vary
widely in size and number of residents served. The major natural area within Village limits is
known as "Ecosite #61", which is actually the northern portion of the federally owned and
managed "Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (ONA)". For those reasons, the
Village has not established a level of service standard based on population for this category of
park.
The most important aspect of an
eco-oriented park is its relationship
to the natural environment, thus
providing awareness to our
residents about our natural
environment. Eco-oriented parks
may include recreation activities
(such as kayak rental facilities, hiking
and biking trails and learning
centers), so long as the impacts on
the surrounding eco-system are
limited.
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
Inventory and Level of Service
Because of the limited amount of land available for future development in Tequesta, the
opportunity for expansion of recreational and open space lands is limited. Table 7-2 below lists
the existing Village and County -owned recreation and open space parks in Tequesta, which are
grouped according to type of park or activity area.
Table 7-2. Existing Inventory
Constitution Park 3.94
Village Green Park 1.50
Remembrance Park 1.76
Linear Park 7.12
Point Drive Open Space/Recreation Area (Banyan Tree) .46
Total 14.78
Tequesta Park 45.00
Paradise Park 2.21
Total 47.21
Village Green Park
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Level of Service Analysis
The following tables analyze current demand and available capacity, comparing current level of
service standards for existing and projected population. According to the Village Comprehensive
Plan the Village adopted a Level -of -Service (LOS) standard of two (2) acres of park space for every
1,000 population for both community and neighborhood parks.
The demand and capacity for community and neighborhood parks and other activity areas is
calculated in Table 7-3 below, which shows the Village's current park area/activity demand and
capacity according to a total population estimate of 6,599 (US Census Quickfacts dated July 1,
2015 and NZ Consultants).
Table7- 3. Demand* and Capacity for Current LOS Standards
*Supply based on the Village's direct ownership and or management of parks. County and Federal parks
are not included.
Table 7-4 depicts the demand and capacity for projected 2040 population. While current LOS
standards are equivalent to Palm Beach County's, this update to the Comprehensive Plan
provides an opportunity to assess these standards and propose standards that are more realistic
for Tequesta's population. These changes will enable the Village to accurately assess its strengths
and weaknesses to properly accommodate future growth demands for parks and open space.
Table 7-4. Demand* and Capacity for Proposed LOS Standards
*Supply based on the Village's direct ownership and or management of parks. County and Federal parks
are not included.
Current and future demand are based on population estimates discussed in detail in the overall
Introduction to the Data & Analysis documents. Existing supply of Village -owned and managed
parks, continue to show a sufficient surplus of park area, particularly for community parks.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
Level of Service Conclusions and Recommendations
As previously discussed, parks and open spaces owned and managed by other entities, were not
included in the park LOS analysis. Specifically, the open space area known as Eco Site No. 61,
which corresponds to the approx. 50-acre north portion of the federally owned and managed
120-acre Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area (ONA), which is located within the
Village boundaries. This federally -owned open space area provides a walking trail and beach
frontage along the Intracoastal Waterway, which is used by Village residents and non-residents,
including tourists.
Likewise, Coral Cove Park is a County -owned and operated community park located within the
corporate limits of Tequesta. This park is a 6.21-acre beachfront park located on the barrier island
portion of Village. The park has 955.5 feet of beach, one mile of nature trail, a fishing site, a
picnic table area, and a playground, and is used by Village residents and non-residents as well.
There are also private beach front areas along the ocean and the Intracoastal Waterway, which
do not provide public access.
The Village may consider the feasibility of utilizing portions of the Community Parks to develop
additional neighborhood parks, given their surplus of 32.91 acres, if future changes in demand
require the construction of additional neighborhood parks. The Village could also explore
potential small sites for the construction of mini -parks (tot -lots and pocket parks) in the future,
with the purpose of enhancing the quality of life of residents.
Private Park and Recreation Facilities
While the Village provides residents and visitors with abundant recreational opportunities, the
private sector also has provides numerous recreational facilities. The private sector offers an
array of recreational opportunities in certain areas for the population it serves. Private
developments often include recreational amenities, although these facilities are typically not
available to the general public.
The Village's primary
private recreational
facility is the 120-
acre Tequesta
Country Club which
offers an 18-hole golf
course, tennis and
other club activities;
however, it is only
available for use by
members of the
Club.
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
In addition, several health and fitness clubs located throughout the Village are available to the
public with memberships open on a monthly fee basis.
Commitment to Greenways, Blueways and Preserving Natural Areas
The State of Florida is encouraging the creation and strengthening its greenway and blueway
trails as nature -based tourist attractions and economic development engine for local
governments. This trend could offer many opportunities for the Village, and this section will focus
on current initiatives and upcoming challenges regarding these two forms of recreation and open
space initiatives.
Florida
Greenways & Trails
System
Plan
Greenways & Trails
By definition, greenways are "corridors of undeveloped land preserved for recreational use or
environmental protection" (Merriam -Webster). Greenways are designed to provide connectivity
between parks, nature reserves, cultural and historic sites, and waterfront areas as an alternative
means of transportation for bicyclists, pedestrians, and others. Additionally, greenways and trail
systems can connect to state and regional trail systems.
The Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has taken major steps to facilitate
the coordination between local, state, and regional trail systems in Palm Beach County and
surrounding areas. Developed by the Palm Beach MPO with assistance from the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council, the Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan, often
referred to as "The Plan," intends to serve as a conceptual guideline for the Palm Beach MPO and
others in planning efforts to develop an integrated network of non -motorized connections
throughout the region. As discussed in the Plan, greenways and trails are a growing part of multi -
modal transportation networks across Florida and the U.S. This Plan provides a desired vision for
a greenways and trails system in Palm Beach County with consideration of the Southeast Florida
regional context (from Indian River County to Monroe County).
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
As indicated in the Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan, the Palm Beach MPO
encourages local governments and agencies to adopt this Plan, in order to collaborate on the
implementation of regional facilities that extend from Palm Beach County into adjacent counties,
which can produce multi -county facilities and provide an enhanced return on these investments
for the traveling public. Accordingly, Tequesta's location in the northeast corner of Palm Beach
County, allows it to serve as the gateway between Palm Beach and Martin Counties and the
surrounding areas. As shown in Figure 7-3, the Plan proposes a paved multi -use trail that runs
north -south, adjacent to U.S. Highway 1 (US-1) in Tequesta. This corridor will connect to other
trails systems located north and south of the Village.
This Plan provides an excellent guideline for Tequesta to connect to the existing county and
regional greenways and trails system. Developing a local system of its own will enhance the
Villages' connectivity, circulation, recreation opportunities, and potential economic
development. Residents living in the western area of the Village could utilize greenway corridors
to safely cross the Village to access the parks and beach access areas on the eastern side.
Similarly, an organized, developed trail system would enable residents to walk or bike to
restaurants, businesses, schools, churches, and park and open space areas. Such a greenway and
trail system would offer an alternative form of transportation for residents and visitors alike, not
only within the Village, but the County and region, as well.
With regard to economic benefits, the Plan indicates that trail development stimulates local
economies, increases local tax revenue, attracts visitors seeking new recreational opportunities
and revitalizes business districts. In addition, residential and commercial property values located
near the trail system or park areas are likely to rise, as multi -use trails are considered critical
amenities for home buyers and business owners. Moreover, communities that offer trails and
open space are more attractive to businesses and corporations when choosing where to locate
or expand (Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan).
Tequesta's adoption of the Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan would not only
provide a safe transportation network for pedestrians, bicyclists, and others, but it would also
provide environmental, health, and economic benefits for the Village and its residents.
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Figure 7-3. Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan
Southeaat FIcr!da
II\111
B ai$ 95 14MM
UuW-Ufe 6 Hiklne Fscifffles I 1
MmUn
lb
—+ L
.r
t � o;
� r a
a- a
1
t
1 PtF/
Palm Beach a asv�w
1 a {
.ate 1 ,
1 °
s s .
1 r
may.
-imp;
1
Broward
Arwmwed by Palm Beam, 04K)
Ilecemtmf 7, 2015
Blueway Trails
Proposed Fae/lilies Earst/ng FaciNtles qry WIAlm it
- - - MIJIU-11 r pawl - 161A/11-41v Faved
f.Ui10-1 lsru t,np.3yM MiI11-usc, llrgy;lvft)
airs Aa.e.b.. r..n daa.rawn... r.aa
n,..oa..:!u.a s w=+a...-•rr..+ rrr .,ram 4 wv>•v a.+.
Hiking, I Inpavfd Htking. Onpaved
hwsv.w P,y.rl.p.-wr M
]Nr�rrr••mrO P..!R1r o.r Parwoor.er
Palm Beach County
PRI Ac-eage CalcnmtPnICaTW= P836. NFNA. Oceamb-I.As Habrq Tra
PIC A~n70eA1A-:,orOS PB37 NIB" Ocrian In -Labe T•alComadr
PBJ seems H]Q°waY cond r FW6 NENA Ocean In Labe JeaalD Tra
M4.Boynton LanenceCana• PB'f9 NEM Pmum Irmtt:4mdw
P'es C 1710 Late Put Corrdm 0940 %'eirr.!t/7 rare ;;e mqn
Me ConWal Own Candy PW I-almraooa F•ed
Cart"Scd
PB7Cart"PBC arobnwa, rrMN P847 natcr, Rooltrall
FBB Coraress PSLaes PB43 PSAGarclms Conmr
WM uesm aver In Lmns P941 Prot a N•n.t!ey rral
n810. � - I Traf rAurty lne 9845 R,:Iwe owe
P811 Dowoloor nPB '646 Rrv.)r9rdPpriveQlerdd
P$12 EasfCoaatCirrlm.lp PPA7 SAacreu romilw
P913 F Rio Tmi nelra. Tr fiat P84S Sherwood FaW
PSIA f33m Wdan PBa3Srm Rona TTryl NSepman
PS 15 EraOlad°siLM!!aa FF14B SSa7s RPaa t?raI SSegmenl
PB ed r F 001 SFR TARR Lo,JM M51. o1dmnng Casndmr
Pg, 7:ts.or P.cfOofnnn gentle P952 t-%. r3xr Scn RM
:!819. F landa Mango to'Ned Pyre P963 I he Sugar t ral Cancbr
r!8!9. Fryngr uw Lon" P064 yamaaa Road CQm"
M.,a GorlRoadiSW :1rd Aft 60JR4W r.trsdcr
PS21 �+rsxto Csal l:antla
f'B72 M SbrK JI10-teI-10-anhSA ti
P&'l HpMtr H.v TIW
PBII Lotter Com o,
M'S L also 04"Cra0G4 b-Lo.ataLno Contlor
PBu Lab. OaeKnanse Scene •ref
PB2T lake Usooune Connor
FWR La.anatcnw MMR'NSOCOMW
F925 Lara!atcnee Sl°tgn,Orrax@zrral
P830 LYans=lob AnsWr
PB!!. N Cant Co.ndoi
P872. Wck C!N Rojo Trbl
M1 NENA-Blrreg.11 TrAI
PB34 IWFKA- FvargNdes Rim try
P836 NENA Lye Ibee Scent Tm
The blueway trails are intended for paddling activity and guest's leisure and entertainment could
be part of the Village's economic development engine to attract tourist and visitors throughout
the year. The Village should further support its existing blueways (Loxahatchee River,
Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean) by considering joining the Florida Paddling Trails
Association that promotes communities to participate in the Florida Paddling Trails Blueway
Community Program. Since Tequesta offers basic tourism amenities, then FPTA can help to
market the Village's resources to outdoor recreation enthusiasts as a nature -based tourism
destination, resulting in local economic stimulus and increased public awareness of natural
Florida.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
For a community to apply for Florida Blueway Community status, key criteria include:
• Proximity to a Florida paddling trail or Blueway
• Availability of accommodations, from hotels to B&Bs to
campgrounds
• Availability of restaurants and places to eat
• Additional outdoor recreation opportunities such as
hiking and biking trails, birding, boating, fishing,
beaches or traditional visitor draws such as historic
districts, museums, shopping and major attractions
The process of being designated a Blueway Community
begins by bringing together local community leaders,
tourism affiliates, business leaders, and members of the
Florida Paddling Trails Association to discuss the
communities' nature -based tourism ideas and needs.
by worKing togetner on
promotional products, educational
M.� resources and special events, FPTA
., and the Blueway Community can
J � I
increase the ability to apply for
targeted grants to assist in the community's efforts towards nature -
based tourism development, economic development, and trail related
"f d 1
Florida Paddling Trails
Blueway Community
In rastructure eve opment. FPTA provide the know-how and
volunteer support, and the Village provides the destination and community support.
Based on the above information, the Village should consider conducting an analysis in terms of
the Village's role and participation on the South East Regional Blueway Trails and how this
initiative becomes an opportunity for economic development as nature -based tourist attraction.
Church and Recreation Facilities
Some churches and youth centers provide neighborhood -oriented recreation facilities and
programs in the Village. Many of the churches provide playgrounds and offer recreational
programs on a limited basis for their congregations.
Regional Public Park and Recreation Facilities
There are numerous public facilities outside the Village of Tequesta which offer a variety of
recreational opportunities to Tequesta residents as well as the general public. Jonathan
Dickinson State Park and Blowing Rocks Preserve are located just north of the Village, in southern
Martin County. In the Jupiter-Tequesta area, recreation and open space facilities include Jupiter
Beach Park, DuBois Park, Carlin Park, Burt Reynolds Park, Jupiter Island Park and Lighthouse Park,
22 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
all within close proximity to each other. To the south, in the Juno Beach area, park and recreation
facilities include Loggerhead Park, Juno Park, Juno Beach Park, and Bert Winters Park. Even
further south, Phil Foster Park and Ocean Reef Park also offer a variety of recreational
opportunities. There are also a number of public and private golf courses in close proximity to
Tequesta.
Village Recreation Department and Funding
The Village of Tequesta Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for providing
recreational services and programs and operating the Village's recreational facilities. The Village
encourages citizen participation and continually assesses citizen needs and develops its
recreation programs accordingly. The Village should seek alternative means to expand facilities
to accommodate the needs of the community.
Adapting Open Space Areas for Climate Resiliency
In order to sustain and develop a healthy environment, it is important that municipalities ensure
necessary actions are taken to reduce the negative impact of environmental changes.
Maintaining and preserving parks, open space, and natural areas enhances the Village's green
infrastructure system, an important element in developing the community's climate resiliency. A
community's level of climate resiliency is not only important for a healthy environment, but also
for economic sustainability.
Tequesta should develop and maintain a green infrastructure system to protect the community
against inevitable negative environmental impacts. Such a system would strengthen the Village's
resiliency and economic stability by providing natural flood management, lowering building
energy demands, lowering water management costs, and protecting coastal areas. In addition,
the Village should encourage developers to incorporate green infrastructure practices into their
site designs. [See the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) websitej.
FINAL REMARKS
With the modest population growth
projected for Tequesta in the 5- and 10-Year
planning periods, the combination of Village -
owned neighborhood and community parks,
County -owned and operated Coral Cove Park,
Tequesta Park, other public recreation and
open space facilities available nearby for use
of Village residents, and other facilities
provided by churches and the private sector
provides recreation and open space facilities
adequate to meet future needs of the
community.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 123
However, there are several considerations regarding recreation and open space facilities that the
Village should explore in order to further enhance its overall parks and recreation system. Such
considerations include, but are not limited to:
1. Adding more defined park elements:
Adding defined park elements such as trails, benches, or a pavilion, help to maximize the
functionality of the park so that it can better accommodate neighborhood residents.
2. Purchasing property for public recreation areas:
Purchasing property for public recreation purposes will enable the Village to enhance its
already adequate park and recreation system, while also allowing the Village more control
over these properties.
3. Developing additional neighborhood parks & pocket parks:
The Village may consider the feasibility of utilizing portions of the Community Parks to
develop additional neighborhood parks, given their surplus of 32.91 acres, if future
changes in demand require the construction of additional neighborhood parks. The
Village could also explore potential small sites for the construction of mini -parks (tot -lots
and pocket parks) in the future, with the purpose of enhancing the quality of life of
residents.
4. Adopting the Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan:
Adopting this plan would not only provide a safe transportation network for pedestrians,
bicyclists, and others, but it would also provide environmental, health, and economic
benefits for the Village and its residents.
5. Participation in the South East Regional Blueway Trails initiative:
With its proximity to three major water bodies in the area, the Village should explore
future participation in this initiative for economic development opportunities as a nature -
based tourist attraction.
REFERENCES
Gil Schamess, ISTEA & Trails: Enhancement Funding for Bicycling and Walking, 1995
Merriam -Webster Online Dictionary. Greenway. Web Accessed 2017.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greenway
Southeast Florida Regional Greenways and Trails Plan. Web Accessed 2017.
http://www.paImbeachmpo.org/plans-resources/greenways-trails
US Census Bureau, July 1, 2015 QuickFacts. Web Accessed 2016.
http://www.census.Rov/quickfacts/table/`PST045215/1271525
US Census Bureau
Village of Tequesta Website. Web Accessed 2017.
http://www.teguesta.org
24 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 7: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 163.3177, Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires that the various comprehensive plans of local
governments within the State of Florida be coordinated between the state and various public
agencies. This coordination would minimize incompatible endeavors, and promote cooperation
and efficiency. This statute requires each comprehensive plan to include a formal
Intergovernmental Coordination Element, or chapter. It is the purpose of the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element to "identify and resolve incompatible goals, objectives, policies and
development proposed in local government comprehensive plans and to determine and respond
to the needs for coordination processes and procedures" with Palm Beach County, adjacent
municipalities and various quasi -public, private, regional and state agencies which provide
services to the Village of Tequesta's residents.
The primary purpose of this element is to formulate improved coordination processes among
local governments, and with local, regional, state and federal agencies that make direct or
indirect decisions influencing land use decisions in the Village of Tequesta. The establishment,
maintenance and utilization of channels of communication between governmental bodies, for
information exchange and problem resolution is basic to the planning process. This element will
establish the necessary relationships and provide principles and guidelines for use in effective
coordination between the Village of Tequesta and governmental bodies with which the Village
shares common boundaries and/or common planning interests.
The Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to State planning law, must be consistent
with the State Comprehensive Plan, which states, "the State Comprehensive Plan should be
reviewed to determine if it implies a need for intergovernmental coordination at the local level."
At the time of the last EAR amendment and subsequent amendments, it was determined that
the Village Comprehensive Plan was consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. Since there
has been no changes to the State Comprehensive Plan that affects Tequesta, the Village of
Tequesta Comprehensive Plan is still consistent with the State plan.
Also, pursuant to State planning law, the Village's Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with
the regional plan of its area. The Village of Tequesta is located within the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council (TCRPC) jurisdiction and must consider regional goals and objectives during the
land development decision -making process. At the time of the last EAR and subsequent
amendments, it was determined that the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Plan was consistent
the TCRPC regional plan. Since there have not been any changes to the TCRPC Strategic Regional
Policy Plan that affects Tequesta, the Village's Plan is still consistent with the regional plan.
According to Section 163.3177(6)(h), Florida Statutes, the Intergovernmental Coordination
Element must show relationships and provide guidelines to be used in coordinating the Village's
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
Comprehensive Plan with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities and, the plans of
school boards and other units of local government providing services but not having regulatory
authority over the use of land, and the plans of regional agencies and the state.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Village of Tequesta operates a Council -
Manager form of government. Authority is
vested in an elected governing body of the
Village consisting of a five member Village
Council responsible for enacting ordinances,
resolutions and regulations governing the
Village, adopting budgets, determining
policies, as well as appointing the members
of various advisory boards and the Village
Manager. The Village Manager executes the
laws and administers the government while
also tending to the day-to-day affairs of the
Village.
The Village is one of 39 independent
municipalities within Palm Beach County. In
addition to portions of unincorporated Palm
Beach County, the Village is surrounded by
two other municipalities including: Town of
Jupiter to the south, Martin County to the
north. Tequesta is largely surrounded by
bodies of water, including the Atlantic
Ocean, Loxahatchee River, and Indian River.
When appropriate, the Village of Tequesta elected and appointed officials and staff interact and
coordinate with the county and the municipalities regarding various issues of mutual concern. In
addition, there are other governmental jurisdictions which interact with the Village. Federal,
state, regional, and local agencies have legislative authority to carry out various activities in the
Village. These agency functions may be regulatory, jurisdictional, or advisory. These agencies are
involved at different levels and are divided into primary agencies and other agencies and
jurisdictions.
Many formal and informal networks of information and coordination currently exist between the
Village of Tequesta and other governmental units and agencies. The Village will continue to
participate in and cooperate with the Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee
(IPARC) for the sharing of its comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies. These units and
agencies often participate in some phase of planning involving land use and/or provision of
services necessitating coordination with the Village. For example, primary agencies are those
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
governmental bodies having jurisdiction and responsibilities within the Village limits that provide
services or permitting affecting land development or land dependent development.
The following table provides a list of various local, regional, and State governmental units or
agencies identified as interacting with the Village. Many of these are multifunctional with
continually changing responsibilities.
Table 8-1: Federal, State, Regional, County, and Local Agencies
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC)
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC)
Loxahatchee River District (LRD)
Palm Beach County (PBC)
Palm Beach County Public Safety
Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management (ERM)
Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority
Palm Beach County Property Appraiser (PAPA)
Village of Tequesta Water Utilities
Federal Agencies
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE): The COE is responsible for maintenance of the Intracoastal
Waterway including regulating construction, dredging, and filling in navigable waters and
alteration of estuarine wetlands.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS): The FWS, along with the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission, is involved in the protection and preservation of wildlife and
endangered species. Of importance to the Village, this agency approves habitat conservation
plans for marine turtles, Florida Scrub Jays, and other managed species, while also overseeing
the maintenance of these plans.
State Agencies
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT): The Village's transportation system is
coordinated with Federal Department of Transportation, FDOT, County, and other
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
municipalities through the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which is
discussed further under the Regional Agencies sub -title. Countywide transportation planning
is coordinated by the Palm Beach County MPO, which maintains agreements for
transportation planning with FDOT, the county, and all municipalities in the County.
In addition to its responsibilities in the regional transportation planning process, FDOT maintains
and constructs state roads and provides fiscal assistance in the construction of major road and
airport facilities.
The FDOT also issues permits for drainage, median and driveway cuts, and sidewalks in FDOT
rights -of -way. For development projects, those FDOT permits must be issued before a building
permit is issued.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP): The FDEP is responsible for regulating
and issuing permits for development within the coastal construction control line, dredging and
fill, construction of docks and other structures over sovereign state waters, air quality, wells, and
wetlands under five acres in area, and beach stabilization/re-nourishment.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC): This commission is responsible for
protecting the state's wildlife resources through issuance of hunting and fishing licenses and
permits for protected and managed species such as the gopher tortoise, manatee, sea turtles,
and other species.
Regional Agencies
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC): TCRPC is a not -for -profit organization created
by and for local governments to provide planning and technical assistance services and assist in
carrying out Florida's growth management programs. It was established in 1976 through an
interlocal agreement between Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach counties.
Membership includes all four counties and 50 municipalities. Regional planning councils are
recognized as Florida's only multipurpose regional entity in a position to plan for and coordinate
intergovernmental solutions to growth -related problems on greater -than -local issues, provide
technical assistance to local governments, and meet other needs of its communities. Chapter
186.502 (4) Florida Statutes.
The responsibilities of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council are to ensure that future
growth within the region occurs in a manner consistent with state and regional planning
objectives and that a high quality of life be maintained. For implementation of plans and
programs which address regional issues and problems, the council acts as an information
clearinghouse and an intergovernmental data source, conducts research for the purpose of
developing and maintaining regional goals, objectives, and policies, and assists in the
implementation of local, state, and federal programs. To guide its policy decisions the TCPRC
4 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
developed a Strategic Regional Policy Plan. According to state laws, local comprehensive
plans must be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Regional Plan.
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD): The South Florida Water Management
District is a regional governmental agency that manages the water resources in the southeastern
part of the state. Created in 1949, the agency is responsible for managing and protecting water
resources of South Florida by balancing and improving flood control, water supply, water quality
and natural systems. This special taxing district has the power to collect property taxes and other
sources such as state appropriations; federal and local revenue; licenses; and permits for the
operation and maintenance of drainage facilities.
The Florida Legislature established the South Florida Water Management District to manage and
protect water resources in our region. The District's work fits broadly into four categories: flood
control, water supply planning, water quality improvement, and ecosystem restoration. The
types of permits issued by this agency are listed below:
• Environmental Resource Permits
• Consumptive Water Use Permits
• Well Construction Permits
• Everglades Works of the District (EWOD) Permits
• Right of Way (ROW) Permits
• Key Permit Access
The FDEP and water management districts issue a variety of permits to manage and protect
Florida's water resources. These resources include wetlands, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds,
estuaries, coastal systems, springs, groundwater and surface water supplies.
Authorizations may be needed for activities including construction or abandonment of wells and
systems, large volume water usage, development or new construction, stormwater management
and wastewater discharges and activities in, on or near wetlands and other water resources.
Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): The Village of Tequesta is a member of
the Palm Beach MPO, which plans, prioritizes, and funds transportation projects and programs.
Every five years, the MPO updates a Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) that forecasts
transportation demands and identifies cost -feasible projects for the next 25 years. The MPO then
annually adopts a 5-year funding program that allocates federal and state transportation dollars
to the projects in the LRTP that are most important to the MPO.
The MPO is responsible for transportation planning in Palm Beach County, Florida. Each urban
area in the United States is part of an MPO which acts as a liaison between local communities,
their citizens, and the state and federal departments of transportation (DOTs). MPOs currently
operate under the FAST Act (Fixing America's Surface Transportation).
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15
Below is a list of the goals which guide the MPOs' efforts:
1. Provide an efficient and reliable vehicular transportation system;
2. Prioritize an efficient and interconnected mass transit system;
3. Prioritize a safe and convenient non -motorized transportation network;
4. Maximize the efficient movement of freight through the region; and
S. Preserve and enhance social and environmental resources.
The Palm Beach MPO maintains relations with various federal, state, regional, and local agencies,
which include, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT),
Southeast Florida Transportation Council (SEFTC), Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
(TCRPC), South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), and Palm Beach County (PBC).
Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC): In order to establish a
countywide Comprehensive Plan Amendment Coordinated Review process in Palm Beach
County, the Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) was formed. A
process was developed that is designed to provide coordination of proposed plan amendments,
cooperation between affected local governments and service providers, and opportunities to
resolve potential disputes only within the Plan Amendment Process with the least amount of
infringement upon existing processes, without undue processing delays and without the
necessity of significant staffing or consultant costs. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Coordinated Review Process will accomplish the following:
1. Proposed plan amendments shall have sufficient distribution and dissemination to ensure
that initial transmittal and final approval will not occur without adequate notice to local
governments and service providers who may be adversely affected by the action.
2. An avenue for discussion and evaluation of the proposed plan amendments is created so
that the governing body is aware of objections, the basis for them, and the
reasonableness of the objection.
3. An opportunity is created for conflict resolution of an item which, if approved, may result
in a potential problem for another local government or service provider.
4. The comprehensive plan amendment coordinated review process does not diminish or
transfer existing authority with respect to planning and implementation decisions of the
participants.
The Village entered into interlocal agreement with other municipalities, the County, special
districts and service providers to assure mutual coordination among entities in the
comprehensive planning process. IPARC oversees two programs, including participation in the
"Comprehensive Plan Amendment Interlocal Agreement", and the "Multi -Jurisdictional Issues
Coordination Forum Interlocal Agreement".
The Village entered into the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Interlocal Agreement in 2003.
Under this agreement, it is the purpose of IPARC to review proposed amendments to
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
comprehensive plans of adjacent local governments and the plans of other units of local
government providing services, but not having regulatory authority over the use of land. The
Village shall continue to participate in this Agreement.
In 2003, the Village is also entered into the Multi -Jurisdictional Issues Coordination Forum
Interlocal Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is for cities, the County, SFWMD and
special districts to participate in a formalized effort to create a multi -jurisdictional issues forum
which facilitates the identification, and possible resolution, of Countywide issues by providing a
vehicle for consensus building through the joint research of issues and debate on same.
Loxahatchee River District (LRD): Formerly known as the Loxahatchee River Environmental
Control District (ENCON), the Loxahatchee River District is an Independent Special District created
by the Florida Legislature in 1971. It is governed by a five -member publicly elected Governing
Board. The LRD operates an award -winning facility that collects wastewater from the community
and recycles it for irrigation needs, preserving fresh water supplies for the environment. By
engaging the public with relevant and compelling environmental education opportunities, such
as the River Center and Busch Wildlife Sanctuary, this agency fosters stewardship among
residents and visitors. As the leading authority on the Loxahatchee River, it also spearheads
ongoing water quality studies and collaborate on river restoration projects.
Within the Village, the LRD owns, operates, and maintains the sanitary sewer system service, and
also provides wastewater collection, transmission, treatment, and disposal services.
Palm Beach County Agencies
Palm Beach County (PBC): The Village is a participant in the County's road concurrency process
with the County serving as the administrator of the process. All proposed projects that require a
traffic impact study are submitted to the County for concurrency purposes. The County
maintains certain roads, drainage systems and rights -of -way under its jurisdiction within the
Village limits.
There are several existing committees that have representatives from the Village, County, and
the other municipalities. Additionally, the Village supports the efforts of many of these entities.
These include, but are not limited to the following: the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the
Economic Development Council, the Beach and Shores Preservation Advisory Committee, the
Palm Beach National Lagoon Estuary Program, the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group.
Palm Beach County Public Safety: Palm Beach County Public Safety Department coordinates and
dispatches Fire and Emergency Medical Services, in response to fire, flood, and natural disasters.
The Department of Public Safety's Division of Emergency Management seeks to minimize the
impact of emergencies and disasters to our community through education, planning, and
response by coordinating information and resources. In addition, this Division is responsible for
requisitioning equipment and supplies that support daily and disaster operations, maintaining
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
equipment and facilities for Palm Beach County's Division of Emergency Management, and
coordinating points of distribution and logistics staging areas.
Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management (ERM): ERM administers a range of
environmental programs designed to protect, preserve, and enhance Palm Beach County's
natural resources, both on land and water. ERM programs help assist in the following areas
including fresh drinking water, unpolluted waterways, a large tree canopy, and controlling
mosquito populations, providing for outdoor experiences to snorkel and dive, visit sandy
beaches, fresh or saltwater fish, kayak waterways, hike in the woods all while viewing wildlife in
their natural habitat. From Lake Okeechobee to the Atlantic Ocean, ERM's programs cover the
County.
Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority: The Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County
(SWA) is the governmental agency responsible for providing an economical and environmentally
conscious Integrated Solid Waste Management System for Palm Beach County, Florida. The SWA
provides solid waste disposal and recycling services and programs to residents and businesses
throughout the County. The agency engages in processing permit applications for new facilities
and ensuring that existing facilities are operated in conformance with permit requirements and
in compliance with water quality objectives.
Local Agencies
Village of Teguesta Water Utilities Department: Since 1968, the Village has owned and operated
a central potable water system, that's serves residents and businesses within its service area
boundaries for the withdrawal, treatment, and distribution of potable water. The service area
boundary extends beyond the Village limits and encompasses over 2,500 acres. Aside from
providing service to residents, businesses, and other uses located within the Village, the water
system also serves portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County, north of the Loxahatchee
River and south of the Martin County line; a portion of southern Martin County, stretching north
to Jonathan Dickinson Park, including Jupiter Hills, Rolling Hills, and a part of southern Jupiter
Island; and the entire Town of Jupiter Inlet Colony, the peninsula lying adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway, Jupiter Inlet, and the Atlantic Ocean.
Agencies Involved with Land Development
At the local level, the Village coordinates with several state agencies with respect to site plan
review and permitting. Through the permitting process, an applicant must secure appropriate
permits from applicable federal and state review agencies or obtain an exemption letter.
As part of its natural resource protection regulations, the Village closely coordinates with the
following agencies: Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and others.
8 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
With regard to development that affects roads and rights -of -way within Village boundaries, the
Village must coordinate with FDOT or the County, if another agency has jurisdiction over the
right-of-way.
Many of these state and federal agencies have more technical expertise in their particular area
of responsibility than the Village, a factor resulting in coordination even when formal permitting
is not required. Therefore, the Village staff consults with these agencies in matters beyond its
expertise as necessary in the development review process.
Intergovernmental Coordination Agreements
Intergovernmental agreements serve as coordination mechanisms in cases where the Village
receives a service from another unit of local government or provides a service to a unit of local
government outside the Village's jurisdiction. The Village has numerous interlocal coordination
agreements with state, regional, county, and local agencies, many of which are identified in Table
8-1. Additionally, the Village has agreements with FDOT and the County regarding maintenance
of state roads and rights -of -way.
Dispute Resolution
Section 186.509, F.S. requires each regional planning council to establish a dispute resolution
process to reconcile differences on planning and growth management issues between local
governments, regional agencies, and private interests. It also requires that the dispute resolution
process bring intergovernmental disputes to closure in a timely manner. The Village shall
continue to participate in the Palm Beach County IPARC Process and shall cooperate with the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) and all other local governments in TCRPC's
dispute resolution process, for the purpose of facilitating intergovernmental coordination. As
necessary, the Village shall defer to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's process in this
Plan as the preferred process to use in mandatory dispute resolutions, as required by
163.3177(6)(h)(1)(c).
Intergovernmental Relations and the Comprehensive Plan
The Village has entered into interlocal agreement with other municipalities, the County, special
districts and service providers to assure mutual coordination among entities in the
comprehensive planning process.
The Village of Tequesta provides a full range of services to its residents, businesses, and service
areas, including police and fire protection; the construction and maintenance of streets and other
infrastructure; recreational and cultural activities; water and stormwater utilities and contracts
for sanitation services. The Village's basic operating unit is in the form of departments, which
concentrate their activities on various functions including, general government, public safety,
transportation, and leisure services.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9
The Village continues to provide and receive certain essential services to and from other
jurisdictions/entities. The following analysis provides an overview of intergovernmental
coordination relations between the Village, County, surrounding municipalities, and other
governmental entities. Moreover, it focuses on specific intergovernmental issues and
opportunities related to many elements presented in the Village of Tequesta's Comprehensive
Plan.
Future Land Use
In order to promote orderly development and redevelopment, including annexation, the Village
will need to identify future planning areas in coordination with Palm Beach County and adjacent
municipalities and ensure that services to be provided will be consistent with existing level of
service standards. In addition, Village shall continue to regulate the compatibility of land
developments and redevelopments with existing and surround uses, in order to ensure the
Village's infrastructure has the capacity to expand and meet future needs.
With regard to the provision of essential services to other jurisdictions, the Village has effectively
maintained high standards in the execution of service agreements over the years. To this end
when considering a development or redevelopment proposal, the Village of Tequesta is
committed to assessing the effect of rezoning, annexation and development activities on existing
interlocal agreements which exist between the Village and other jurisdictions, in order to
determine any effect on the ability to provide the services which are the subject of the interlocal
agreements. Affected jurisdictions are contacted and requested to comment on any
development activities as part of the site plan and building review processes if such development
matter affects the provision of services to them.
Similarly, the Village utilizes its site plan review process to inform and coordinate with
neighboring or affected jurisdictions/entities of proposed development and any potential
impacts. Developers are required to submit a number of copies of site plan proposals so that
they may be distributed to affected jurisdictions/entities for review and comment in the site plan
and development approval processes.
As necessary, the Village should also facilitate necessary studies and citizen surveys to determine
the optimum approaches for redevelopment. To this end, opportunities for public involvement
in redevelopment projects should also be provided to local residents, business owners, and
interested citizens.
Transportation
In order to ensure the overall transportation system effectively meets the needs and level of
service standards of the Village and surrounding areas, the Village must continue coordinating
with county and regional agencies regarding transportation management. Such agencies include,
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
but are not limited to, Palm Beach County, Treasure Coastal Regional Planning Council, Palm
Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization, as well as the Florida Department of Transportation.
In order to remain consistent with FDOT regulations, the Village shall establish right-of-way
dedication requirements for arterial and collector streets which are consistent with those
established by FDOT.
With regard to transportation related projects throughout the Village, various levels of
coordination between agencies are required, depending on the project scale and location. On a
regional level, the Village will support regional multimodal transportation systems through
coordinating routes and schedules, with Palm Tran and Tri Rail, and with participation in the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and in coordination with adjacent municipalities.
With regard to development projects within the Village, all new nonresidential development,
rezoning for nonresidential uses, and change of use of existing structures for nonresidential
purposes will include obtaining letters of compliance with Palm Beach County's Traffic
Performance Standards.
As for roadway maintenance, interlocal agreements have been established between the Village's
Grounds Maintenance Division and the FDOT or the County, for the maintenance of medians and
right of ways, many of which are not owned by the Village or are out of the Village limits.
Housing
Housing is another area where the development decisions of the County and municipalities may
impact each other. Coordination with state and federal agencies is a significant element in any
strategy as these are a major sources of tax credits and funding for affordable housing and
supporting infrastructure projects.
Adult congregate living facilities, group homes, housing for low and moderate -income
households, mobile homes, and foster homes shall be located in a manner consistent with State
Laws and in conformity with Florida Statutes, and where applicable, near supporting institutional
and other uses, appropriate for the clientele served by the facilities.
Currently, there is no identified need to provide housing for low and moderate -income
households in Tequesta. However, if the need should arise in the future, the Village may
coordinate with Palm Beach County in identifying housing needs, determining how these needs
may be met, and developing mechanisms to mitigate impacts.
Infrastructure
Managing and maintaining the Village's infrastructure requires coordination between Village
utilities departments and various county, regional, and state agencies. The means for this
coordination shall include review of documents, formal and informal meetings and letters of
objection/no objection to proposed policies, activities or annexations and through the IPARC
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
(Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee) process for plan amendments and use
of the Countywide Issues Forum. The Utilities Director is responsible for the operation of the
system and coordination with those jurisdictions that it serves.
Tequesta will coordinate through Palm Beach County and/or neighboring jurisdictions with all
local governments within the Village's designated utility service areas to ensure that their
comprehensive plans and development permit procedures are compatible with Village policies.
Additional agencies and programs with which coordination is necessary include: United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
FEMA, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), FDEP TMDL Program As
required by Section 303 (d) of the Federal Clean Water Act, US EPA/FDEP Numeric Nutrient Rules,
SFWMD and FDEP Unified Statewide Stormwater Rule.
Solid Waste Management: Solid waste collection services for garbage, trash and other wastes,
continue to be provided by a private hauler. The Village has granted an exclusive franchise to the
hauler for collection of solid wastes in Tequesta. The Village Manager is the local official
responsible for its administration.
Likewise, solid waste disposal services continue to be provided by the Palm Beach County Solid
Waste Authority (PBCSWA) at their facilities. The PBCSWA was established by special act of the
Legislature and is responsible for providing these facilities to serve the entire County. The Village
Manager is the liaison with the Authority.
The Village will continue to work with PBCSWA, to implement an effective recycling and resource
recovery program, ensure adequate regional landfill capacity for future disposal of oversized or
special waste materials, and provide hazardous waste collection points accessible to the Village
Sanitary Sewer: As identified in the Sanitary Sewer sub -element of the Comprehensive Plan, the
Loxahatchee River District (LRD) provides central sanitary sewer service to Village residents,
businesses and other users. The LRD is established as a special district that was created by the
Florid Legislature with the legislative authority to provide central sanitary sewer service within
its identified service area. Central sewer is now available to the entire Village although some
individual properties are still utilizing septic tanks. Coordination and liaison with the LRD lies
primarily with the Utilities Director.
With regard to the establishment of Level of Service standards for such facilities, the Village shall
continue to coordinate with other agencies having maintenance and/or operational
responsibility of facilities within and affecting the Village. As stated in the Sanitary Sewer and
Solid Waste sub -sections, the Village will continue review the LOS Standards currently established
for sanitary sewer and solid waste for current applicability with the LRD and the PBCSWA,
respectively, and will revise those LOS Standards, as necessary in the update to the
Comprehensive Plan.
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Potable Water: As indicated in the Potable Water sub -section, the Village continues to provide
certain essential services to other jurisdictions, including the withdrawal, treatment, and
distribution of potable water. The Village Water Utilities Department provides central water
service to portions of unincorporated Palm Beach and Martin Counties, and the Town of Jupiter
Inlet Colony.
The Tequesta potable water supply and central system must meet strict standards The Village
continues to adhere to, and be subject, to various standards of other agencies and levels of
government. Specifically, the Village potable water system must meet the standards established
in the federal Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Public law 93-523. Additionally, the Village is
subject to, and a participant in, the Palm Beach County Wellfield Protection Ordinance. This
Countywide Wellfield Protection Ordinance regulates land use activities within travel time
contours of the Village's wellfields.
In order to effectively manage and conserve its water resources, the Village has worked
cooperatively with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in developing a long
term water supply program focused on reducing dependency on the Surficial Aquifer.
Stormwater Management: The Village's stormwater system is regulated by federal, state, and
local agencies, making it a significant governmental concern. Therefore, any modifications or
improvements to the Village's stormwater system need to be developed following the applicable
regulatory framework and regulations.
As noted in the Stormwater Management sub -section, the Village is a co-permittee in the
Countywide National Pollution Discharges Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permitting
Program. The Village should continue to be a cooperative and coordinating partner in this
program in the future.
Conservation and Coastal Management
Land use decisions of the County and municipalities can impact the coastal and environmental
resources of another jurisdiction or shared by many jurisdictions. Coordination is needed to
mitigate, restore, and manage natural resources and to avoid land use and development
decisions that may adversely affect these resources.
Given its proximity to the Loxahatchee River, Intracoastal Waterway, and Atlantic Ocean, the
Village will need to be cognizant of and plan for climate change and sea level rise. The Village
can begin mitigating sea level rise, in part, through cooperation with Southeast Florida Regional
Climate Change Compact, which was executed by Broward, Miami -Dade, Monroe, and Palm
Beach Counties in January 2010 to coordinate mitigation and adaptation activities across county
lines. The Compact represents a new form of regional climate governance designed to allow local
governments to set the agenda for adaptation while providing an efficient means for state and
federal agencies to engage with technical assistance and support.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
The Village, in cooperation with appropriate local agencies, shall evaluate water and stormwater
management operation strategies in the context of sea level rise, in order to lessen negative
impacts to open spaces, wetland mitigation areas, and natural systems, improve the ability of
these systems to adapt to climate change, and optimize the ability of these systems to create
additional benefits to the Village's residents and visitors.
Land use decisions may produce impacts on then atura I resources on another jurisdiction, such as
impacts affecting environmentally sensitive lands, water quality, endangered species, and aquifer
recharge areas in another jurisdiction. As such, the Village may take steps to cooperate in the
monitoring of various environmental areas such as air and water quality, greenhouse gas
emission and sea level rise with governmental entities including the Palm Beach County Health
Department, Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and South Florida Water Management District.
The Village shall continue to work locally and cooperate regionally to improve energy
conservation, reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from government operations and the
community, and work to minimize air quality and ecosystem impacts in order to reduce the
carbon footprint and enhance economic and community resiliency.
Various land use or environmental planning and permitting activities within the Village continue
to require coordination with State planning agencies. Tequesta is mandated to prepare this EAR
and Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act (LGCP/LDRA)". Likewise, any development of unique environmental
features often requires obtaining permits from appropriate State environmental planning and
permitting agencies. In those instances, the appropriate Village staff person is assigned to
coordinate activities depending on the particular program or activity being pursued.
Emergency Management: Another major area for intergovernmental coordination is emergency
management, which is also discussed in the Coastal Management Element of this Plan. As
detailed in the Coastal Management Element, natural disasters in the form of and severe weather
disturbances including hurricanes, floods, and droughts are generally intra-jurisdictional. Other,
typically manmade threats, such as hazardous material spills, terrorism, vehicle/airplane crashes,
may overwhelm the Village's resources. Both natural and manmade calamities typically require
coordination with adjacent localities, County, State and Federal agencies, and other stakeholders,
through mutual aid and/or stand-by agreements, which are necessary to successfully locate,
deploy, and coordinate use of resources.
The Village continues to provide fire protection and emergency medical services to the Town of
Jupiter Inlet Colony, which is formalized through an interlocal agreement. With regard to
emergencies, the Village Code of Ordinances designates the Fire Chief as the Emergency
Management Director. The Fire Chief, Village Manager, and the Mayor will accomplish all
coordination, direction, and implementation of all disaster management functions cooperatively
to maintain continuity of government.
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Village of Tequesta Emergency Operations Center will serve as the nerve center for the
coordination and control of the Village's response and recovery efforts. As necessary, the Village
of Tequesta will support the County and the American Red Cross by assigning security and
emergency medical personnel, if needed, to shelters as they are opened by the County.
When necessary, evacuation of certain areas of the Village will be initiated following a decision
by the local governing body in accordance with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive
Emergency Management Manual. In addition, the Village coordinates its emergency plans and
procedures with the Palm Beach County Office of Emergency Management. Furthermore,
Hurricane evacuation planning is coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
and other jurisdictions within the council's jurisdiction.
Recreation and Open Space
The Village, Palm Beach County, other municipalities, and state agencies can impact the
recreation and open resources of each other through land use and zoning decisions and
development approvals. Such impacts include adverse impacts on sensitive natural resources
from a development project or increased demand on recreational facilities in an adjacent
jurisdiction from a development project approved in another jurisdiction. Additionally, the
establishment of trails, greenways and even blueways that cross jurisdictions will require coordination
with adjacent municipalities, county, regional and state agencies. The Village could also benefit by
identifying and applying for federal recreation grant opportunities for funding of recreation
facilities.
Moreover, the Village shall coordinate the provision of recreational services and facilities with
public and private organizations and enter into appropriate interlocal and license agreements, as
appropriate. The development and maintenance of recreation facilities must comply with
Chapter 553 Florida Statutes and the Accessibility Requirement Manual of the Department of
Community Affairs, in order to ensure that neighborhood park facilities provide access ways for
pedestrians and handicapped persons where feasible.
Capital Improvement
Aside from the Elements discussed above, intergovernmental coordination is also important
when developing the Village of Tequesta's Capital Improvement Plan and implementing related
projects.
The Village shall, in conjunction with other affected parties, evaluate the Capital Improvements
Element when it is undergoing annual review to determine if current funding is proportional to
services rendered. In doing so, the Village should continue to coordinate level of service
standards regarding state, county, or regional public facilities within Village boundaries. The
Village can accomplish this through meeting with local governments within the area of concern
and, communicating with applicable state agencies to coordinate level of service standards for
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
shared or adjoining facilities, to determine how to deal with differences in level of service
standards for these public facilities
Public Schools Interlocal Agreement
The School District of Palm Beach County is responsible for public education throughout the
county. To fulfill that responsibility, the School District must occasionally site and construct new
schools or expand existing facilities in the Village, in compliance with local comprehensive plans
and local zoning regulations. Moreover, the state encourages public school planning between the
county, municipalities, and school district and has outlined a formal coordination mechanism for
school planning, site selection, and concurrency.
In 2015 the Palm Beach School district adopted a Public Schools Interlocal Agreement. While a
number of municipalities adopted the subject agreement by resolution, Chapter 163.31777(3),
F.S., Public Schools Interlocal Agreement, provides criteria for municipalities to qualify for
exemption, if applicable. According to these criteria, a municipality is exempt from the
requirements of subsections (1) and (2) if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for
having no significant impact on school attendance.
In order to qualify for exemption, the Village is required to demonstrate that it met the criteria
set forth in section 163.31777(3) and obtain approval from various agencies including, the
Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), Department of Education, and Palm Beach County
School District. However, final determination is ultimately determined by the DEO, upon final
review.
The Village has followed necessary steps through a series of phone and email correspondence to
verify that the Village qualifies for exemption from entering the Public Schools Interlocal
Agreement. A summary of this process is provided below.
In April 2017, the Village's Director of Community Development contacted Florida's Department
of Economic Opportunity (Adam Biblo, Regional Planning Administrator, Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity; Dan Pennington, Community/Environmental Planner) indicating that the
Village met the criteria to be exempt from entering the subject interlocal agreement, and
requested approval for exemption status. Next, the DEO reached out to the Department of
Education (Tracy Suber, Educational Facilities Construction Planning and Training Manager,
Florida Department of Education) and the Palm Beach County School District (Joyce Cai, Senior
Planner, School District of Palm Beach County; Kristin Garrison, Planning Director, School District
of Palm Beach County) to confirm the opinion that the Village could qualify for exemption.
At the request of these agencies, the Village provided an explanation and supporting
documentation which addressed each of the criteria set forth in Chapter 163.31777(3), F.S. The
subject criteria are indicated in italics below, followed by an explanation from the Village, which
demonstrates the Village's qualifications for exemption from the agreement.
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Florida Statutes Chapter 163.31777:
(3) A municipality is exempt from the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) if the municipality
meets all of the following criteria for having no significant impact on school attendance:
(a) The municipality has issued development orders for fewer than 50 residential dwelling
units during the preceding 5 years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25
additional public school students during the preceding 5 years.
The Village of Tequesta is almost built -out (98.2%), and records indicate that the Village has
issued fewer than 50 residential dwelling units in the last 5 years. Specifically, Village records
show that only twelve building permits for new construction single family homes have been
issued since 2012. Moreover, a 16-unit condominium development is currently under
construction within the Village. In total, 28 residential dwelling units (12 single family homes and
16 condominium units) have been added to the Village in the past five years.
With regard to public school students, information provided by the Palm Beach County School
District shows that the Village has generated fewer than 25 additional public school students
during the preceding 5 years, with the number of students actually having decreased since 2012.
The table below, which was provided by the County School District, indicates the number of
students residing in the Village of Tequesta during a five year period, from 2012 to 2017.
Table 8-2: Students Residing in the Village of Tequesta — SY 2012-13 — SY 2016-17
646 636
!4
.. 624 618
r �£� 619 616
687 685
691 683
Source: Palm Beach County School District
While the Village recognizes that the number of public school students has increased slightly
since SY2014-15, by a total of 27 PK-12 students and 20 K-12 students, the overall number of
students has actually decreased since 2012. As indicated in the table above, the number of
students has decreased from 691 to 646 for PK-12 students (45 total) and from 683 to 636 for K-
12 students (47 total), since the 2012-13 school year.
Due to the fact that the Village is almost completely built -out, the Village does not expect that
any future development of the remaining 25.72 acres (1.80%) of vacant land to affect public
school attendance, as most of this land is designated as commercial on the both Future Land Use
and current zoning maps. Additionally, while the 16-unit condominium development is not age
restricted as housing for older persons, data from the Palm Beach County School District,
presented in the table above, projects that any student generation from this development will
not affect nearby schools.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
(b) The municipality has not annexed new land during the preceding 5 years in land use
categories that permit residential uses that will affect school attendance rates.
In 2014, the Village of Tequesta annexed 1.54 acres in the R-2 Multiple Family Dwelling district,
which is currently under construction as a 16-unit condominium development, as described
previously. However, this will not affect the school attendance rate.
(c) The municipality has no public schools located within its boundaries.
As confirmed by the Palm Beach School District, there are no public schools located within the
Village of Tequesta, nor are there any planned during the 5- or 10-Year planning periods of the
updated Comprehensive Plan.
However, if in the future it is deemed necessary for the Village to enter into the Public Schools
Interlocal Agreement, it will comply with Chapter 163.31777 accordingly. In doing so, the Village
would also revise its Comprehensive Plan and coordinate with public schools within its
jurisdiction regarding their development, in accordance with Section 240.155, F.S. Local
government signatories of the agreement are required to incorporate annually the School Board
5-Year Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plans without any funding obligation;
coordinate and share information for planning purposes, including school's population
projections and local governments' development and redevelopment proposals.
(d) At least 80 percent of the developable land within the boundaries of the municipality has
been built upon.
As indicated in the table below, the Village of Tequesta includes approximately 2.29 square miles
and is almost completely build out (98.2%), with only 1.80% or 25.72 acres of vacant land
available.
Table 8-3. Existing Land Use 2016
3,019,685
69.32
351,962
8.08
19,367,578
444.62
3,090,493
70.95
3,937,361
90.39
613,396
14.08
898,132
20.62
9,529,489
218.77
9,134,927
209.71
1,120,494
25.72
63,965,561
1,468.45
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
4.70%
0.60%
30.30%
4.80%
6.20%
1.00%
1.40%
14.90%
14.30 %
1.80%
100.00%
With regard to potential future development of vacant properties, the Future Land Use Map
identifies the majority of vacant land uses as commercial, located along US Highway One, while
a smaller percentage (approx. 5-6 parcels) are designated as single family residential, located in
existing single family neighborhoods.
Once the Palm Beach County School District had received and reviewed the Village's explanation
and supporting documents, a representative (Joyce Cai, Senior Planner, School District of Palm
Beach County) provided a response to the Village's request for consideration:
"Please be advised that the School District has reviewed the request to provide
opinion as to whether the Village of Tequesta meets the criteria for exemption.
Based on our enrollment record and the information you have provided, the
School District offers an opinion that the Village of Tequesta qualifies for
exemption from the Public Schools Interlocal Agreement, as provided at Section
163.31777(3), Florida Statutes."
While the School District offered the opinion that the Village met the criteria for exemption, the
final determination must be provided by the DEO.
In closing, there are no existing or planned public school facilities within the Village limits, and
the existing and projected population will not have an impact on school attendance. The Village
Is concurrently requesting to be exempt from joining the Public Schools Interlocal Agreement
pursuant to criteria set forth in Chapter 163.3777(3), F.S.
FINAL REMARKS
In summary, the Village of Tequesta should continue to coordinate and collaborate with
appropriate federal, state, regional, local governmental agencies, along with other public and
private agencies, to establish and resolve goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan, to develop and maintain public facilities and utilities, to coordinate land development and
redevelopment, and to strategically manage the future expansion of the Village.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 8: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Coastal Management Element is to plan for, and where appropriate, restrict
development activities where such activities would damage or destroy coastal resources. Where
it is determined the coastal resources would be damaged or destroyed by this development,
appropriate measures will be suggested for limiting or removing these negative impacts. This
element is also required to formulate guidelines which protect human life from storm events and
limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by natural disasters.
The Village of Tequesta is located along the coastline of the Intracoastal Waterway, also known
as the Indian River Lagoon, which is an estuary between the barrier island of Jupiter Island and
the mainland. The Village limits also include a portion of Jupiter Island with direct access to the
Atlantic Ocean beaches and natural resources. Therefore, the Village of Tequesta is required
under Chapter 380.24, Florida Statutes (F.S.), to include a Coastal Management Element in its
Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to Chapter 163.3178. The Coastal Management element shall set
forth the principles, guidelines, standards, and strategies that shall guide the local government's
decisions.
Because coastal resources are highly affected by man's activities, this element is significantly
related to current and future land use, infrastructure (including stormwater management,
transportation and utilities), recreation and open space, conservation, economic considerations
and intergovernmental coordination. Besides those items, the coastal management element also
addresses coastal issues relating to water -dependent and water -related uses, marina/boat
facilities siting, the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), and contingency planning for hurricane
evacuation and post -disaster redevelopment.
Coastal management and coastal management -related issues are addressed in both the Coastal
Management and Conservation elements of the existing Comprehensive Plan, and many of the
common issues are discussed in this section.
This Coastal Management section of the EAR
should be reviewed in conjunction with the
Conservation section. PM. e"PT
There are six (6) separate goals established in
the current Coastal Management element of
the Comprehensive Plan. Many of the
objectives and supporting policies of the
Coastal Management goals interface with each
other and with corresponding objectives and
policies in the Conservation element. Each of
the goals are discussed herein.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
THE COASTAL ENVIRONMENT
Barrier Islands
The portion of the barrier island located within the Village of Tequesta is called Jupiter Island.
Jupiter Island is approximately two miles in length within Palm Beach County and over half a mile
within Village boundaries. As components of the barrier island, the nearshore Atlantic and
beach/dune systems dissipate wave and wind energy, forming the first line of defense against
coastal storms. In addition, the barrier island environment provides a variety of recreation
opportunities and aesthetic qualities for the enjoyment of Village residents and visitors.
Coastal Zone
The Village's Coastal Zone is defined to include:
1. The land uses and facilities dependent upon or related to the Indian River Lagoon and
Loxahatchee River;
2. The Village's marine and estuarine wetlands, including the waters and submerged lands
of the Indian River Lagoon estuary, Loxahatchee River, and the Atlantic Ocean;
3. The living marine resources supported by the Village's marine and estuarine wetlands;
4. The portion of Jupiter Island, a coastal barrier island, within the Village's municipal limits,
including the coastal construction zone;
5. The shorelines adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and land uses and facilities dependent upon
the ocean; and
6. The Village's coastal high hazard areas and category 1 storm surge zone.
The Coastal Zone is based on the hurricane surge potential and generally coincides with the
shoreline areas along the Atlantic Ocean, Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway, and
Loxahatchee River. Specifically, all upland areas, shoreline, submerged lands, and waters within
the jurisdiction of the Village of Tequesta that are contained in the category 1 storm surge zone
shown in Figure 5-1, Hurricane Surge Map, are considered to be within the Coastal Zone.
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
As discussed, the category 1 surge line defines one of the boundaries of the Coastal Zone. The
northern and southern boundaries of the Coastal Zone are generally congruent with the
municipal limits in these areas. Other boundaries of the Coastal Zone are coterminous with the
jurisdictional limit of the Village along the ocean shoreline and waters.
In addition, the "coastal area" is referred to throughout this section. In general, the coastal area
refers to the Coastal Zone and directly adjacent areas that may extend just beyond the category
1 surge level.
Coastal Zone & Shoreline Land Uses
As shown in the Figures 5-1 and 5-2, the coastal zone of the Village consists primarily of upland
areas, wetland areas, and coastal resource areas. Oceanfront uses are limited to multi -family
residential developments and a public recreation area, Coral Cove Park. There are no commercial
uses located in the coastal zone.
The residential uses located along the
Village's Intracoastal Waterway and
Loxahatchee River shorelines, are almost
entirely single-family with a couple multi-
family residential parcels. Other major uses
in these areas include Recreational and
Open Space, which includes Ecosite #61, and L .
various neighborhood parks located in the
Tequesta Country Club and Bayview Terrace
neighborhoods. There are no conflicts among these existing land uses on the barrier island and along
the shoreline.
Intergovernmental Coordination with Jupiter Inlet District is required throughout a portion of the
coastal zone and conservation area to ensure proper management and regulated development
in coastal areas.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
t ir'iri _3 i'
r M 1. er
Jr
low
it
- �a•.� , �,.� ��R. « r r'; »4 � �" ��: �i�.�-fit. ,
M • i s� �
.44
414
} '7� yr� 1w.•� �;—"� r��' /PQ1i��r /` L�. �.. ;�^. � 1�. •'VI
,ri�
�, `�� i�s� +'. , •. ��r '' �'�•:. _ �� ...�� .fir
Aff
7t,
Water -Dependent & Water -Related Uses
Water -dependent uses are defined by Chapter 163, F.S., as activities that can be carried out only
on, in, or adjacent to water areas because the uses require access to the waterbody for one of
the following purposes: waterborne transportation, including ports and marinas; recreation;
electrical generating facilities; or, water supply.
Water -related uses are defined as activities that are not directly dependent upon access to a
waterbody, but provide goods and services directly associated with water -dependent or
waterway uses.
The beach and shoreline recreational uses, including the J.I.B. Yacht Club and Marina facilities,
are the only water -dependent and water -related uses within the Village. There are no ports,
electrical generating facilities, or water supply utilities dependent on surface waters, or other
water -related uses in the Village. This circumstance has not changed since the last EAR or in
subsequent Comprehensive Plan amendments. At this time no future water -dependent or
water -related uses are planned for either the short or long-range timeframes of the updated
Comprehensive Plan.
Public Access Facilities in Coastal Zone
Public access as used in this element, is defined as the ability of the public to physically reach or
use recreation sites, including beaches and shores. Facilities such as marinas, boardwalks, boat
ramps, waterside parks and fishing piers allow residents to enjoy the advantages of coastal living.
The resources of the Tequesta's coast and shoreline are readily accessible to the Village's
residents and visitors.
There are 15 public access easements to the beaches and shoreline areas within the Village. Coral
Cove Park is Tequesta's only public beachfront park. The Village continues to coordinate with the
County to ensure that adequate parking, access and other related issues are mutually addressed
where necessary. Also, the Village continues to provide police protection services to the Park
area.
Additionally, there are multiple access points to the Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway
opposite Coral Cove Park. Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area, referred to on the
map as Ecosite #61, is also situated along the western shoreline of the Intracoastal Waterway.
Other neighborhood parks in Tequesta provide access to the River, including three open space
areas in the Tequesta Country Club subdivision and a small park in the Shady Lane and Bayview
Terrace subdivision. One of these neighborhood parks in the Tequesta Country Club has a boat
ramp available for residents of the subdivision.
Aside from the aforementioned facilities, there are no marinas, public docks, private property open
to the general public, or other public access facilities located within the Coastal Area of the Village.
Public access facilities are further addressed in the Recreation and Open Space Element.
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Recreational Facilities
The Village must balance the maintenance and expansion of the outdoor recreational facilities in
the coastal zone with the need to establish and maintain appropriate land use controls for such
expansion of these facilities. Park and recreational areas in the Village are designated, and are
being preserved, as Recreation and Open Space areas on the Future Land Use Map. These areas
are also zoned R/OP, Recreation and Open Space on the Village's Official Zoning Map to assure
their preservation. The Recreation and Open Space element of this EAR speaks in more detail to
the recreational value of these areas.
Coastal Resource Use Limitations
The Village considers use limitation in coastal zone planning and management decisions to
ensure the protection of mangroves, sensitive sea grass beds and other wildlife habitat through
native landscaping requirements and other regulations. This is discussed in detail in the
Conservation Element of this plan.
The Village enforces Article IV, Vehicles on Beaches, Chapter 46, Motor Vehicles and Traffic in its
Code of Ordinances which prohibits the use of motor vehicles on the beaches and dune area with
the exception of emergency vehicles in the performance of their duties.
In addition, the Village supports protection of preservation areas to the maximum degree
possible while consistent with private property rights. The protection, conservation and
maintenance of coastal resources and the coastal environment must be balanced with, and
consistent with, private property rights and property values to the maximum degree possible.
The Village has not taken any action since the last EAR and subsequent amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan that would affect or diminish individual property rights or the value of
property within the CHHA of Tequesta. Neither residential densities nor non-residential
intensities have been amended, decreased or in any way changed that would directly affect or
diminish said property rights or property values.
Coastal Economy
The economic base of the Coastal Area is
now and will continue to be primarily
oriented toward tourism and recreation.
Condominiums throughout the area host
both permanent and seasonal residents.
Retail and service establishments serve
the needs of both residents and tourists,
as well.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17
Primary Coastal Attractions
The water resources of the Village are the
primary attractions of the Coastal Area. Coral
Cove Park and its rocky beaches is an
important attraction for both residents and
visitors to Tequesta throughout the year. In
addition to the beach, the Indian River
Lagoon, Loxahatchee River, and other
recreational opportunities along these
shorelines also contribute to the economy of
the Coastal Area.
Coastal Area Infrastructure
Infrastructure is defined by Chapter 163, F.S., as those man-made structures which serve the
common needs of the population, such as: sewage disposal systems, potable water systems,
potable water wells serving a system, solid waste disposal sites or retention area, stormwater
systems, utilities piers, docks, wharves, breakwaters, bulkheads, seawalls, bulwarks, revetments,
causeways, marinas, navigation channels, bridges and roadways. A detailed inventory and
analysis of the sanitary sewer, potable water supply, and stormwater drainage systems is
presented in the Utilities Data and Analysis document.
A brief inventory and analysis of the traffic circulation system in the Coastal Area is presented
later in this section. More detailed analysis is presented in the Transportation Data and Analysis
document. The only major transportation facilities or causeways within the coastal or shoreline
areas are the Beach Road Bridge that connects the mainland with the barrier island, and the
Tequesta Bridge that connects the Tequesta Country Club neighborhood to the mainland.
Additionally, a brief discussion of the Intracoastal Waterway, (a navigable channel), is presented
below. Shore protection structures and other coastal access structures of the Coastal Area are
discussed elsewhere in this document. There are currently no public docks, wharves or marinas
within the Coastal Area. There are multiple private docks on individual homes and developments
located along the Intracoastal Waterway.
The Village intends to avoid an increase in infrastructure capacity unless public safety should
require it. In doing so, densities in the defined coastal zone shall be maintained so as not to
jeopardize hurricane evacuation times.
Coastal Area Roadways and Bridges
One of the most vulnerable roadways within the Village of Tequesta Coastal Area is Beach Road,
which connects the barrier island residents to the mainland, and Tequesta Drive, a central east -
west corridor which connects residents to other major roadways including U.S. Highway One and
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Old Dixie Highway. These roadways serve not only the Village Coastal area, but are important
elements in the traffic circulation system serving the Village and the surrounding communities.
A full discussion of these roadways is provided in the Transportation Element.
Navigation Channels: Intracoastal Waterway
The Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW) is within Indian River Lagoon adjacent to the Village of
Tequesta. The ICWW was dredged for the purpose of navigation and connects the coastal basins
or lakes of Palm Beach County. The Intracoastal Waterway System was authorized by Congress
in 1939 for use as a navigable channel between the barrier islands of the east coast of Florida and
the mainland. In 1942, the US Army Corps of Engineers began dredging a deep channel for water -
based transportation.
The ICWW is a mixed -use transportation corridor in Palm Beach County used by commercial and
recreational boaters sailing in large ships and small boats as well as freight carriers operating
barges. The entire length of the corridor extends from north of Jacksonville south to Key West, a
total of 370 miles. The portion of the ICWW in Palm Beach County is 43 miles long. This federally -
maintained waterway provides between seven and fifteen feet of water depth; however, ongoing
dredging programs aim to keep the waterway north of Miami at its federally authorized depth of
twelve feet.
The inlets serving to connect the ICWW and the Atlantic Ocean are the Jupiter Inlet, just south of
Jupiter Island and Tequesta, Lake Worth Inlet, located at the northern tip of the Palm Beach
Island, and the South Lake Worth Inlet, also referred to as the Boynton Inlet, located at the
southern tip.
WATER QUALITY
The Village of Tequesta encourages the protection and enhancement of its estuarine
environment and natural resources. In order to adequately accomplish these goals, it is
imperative that the Village take steps to the protection and proper management of the quality
of its water bodies.
Due to its location within an urban area, the Lagoon is subject to impacts from urban stormwater
runoff. However, it is also subject to the impacts of runoff from the agricultural lands in the
interior of the County. These types of runoff are the major sources of water quality degradation
in the Lagoon, and because of its shallow, narrow configuration with limited flushing
characteristics, the Indian River Lagoon is vulnerable to nutrient eutrophication. High nutrient
inputs to the waters of the Lagoon ecosystem also result, in part, from seeping septic and drain
field wastewater disposal systems.
Decline in water quality is visibly characterized by loss of seagrass coverage and depth, algal
blooms, and decrease in the amount and diversity of wildlife. The Indian River Lagoon
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Management Plan, which is described in the subsequent sections, aims to address water quality
issues in order to protect the future of Lagoon habitat.
In order to continue protecting the water quality of the estuarine environment, the Village is a
participating member in the Palm Beach County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Program. The major goal of this program is to monitor stormwater runoff into surface
waters and to implement measures to assure that runoff entering surface waters meets State
Water Quality Standards.
Surface Water Classification System
The Clean Water Act requires that the surface waters of each state be classified according to
designated uses. The Indian River Lagoon and the Intracoastal Waterway are classified as Class III
Waters according to the State's surface water classification system, per Chapter 62.302, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C). Class III Waters, which include all of the Atlantic coastal waters, are
intended to be use for swimming, fishing, boating and other recreational uses. Their water quality
should be maintained at a level that is suitable for recreation and the propagation of fish and
wildlife.
Point and Non -Point Source Pollution
Threats to water quality come from a variety of sources that can fall within two categories: point
source pollution or non -point source pollution. Point source pollution includes sources where
discharge is usually through an identifiable point, such as wastewater management treatment
plants.
Non -point source pollution is typically the result of stormwater runoff entering the Indian River
Lagoon through overland or stream flow. Unlike pollution coming from a factory or water
treatment facility, non -point source pollution cannot be traced back to a single point of origin. It
includes the dilute discharges of contaminant -laden water from residential and agricultural
sources, nutrient inputs from septic drainage fields, and pollutants carried to the lagoon as
stormwater runoff. As discussed throughout several elements of the Comprehensive Plan,
managing stormwater runoff and flood zones is imperative to managing water quality.
Water Quality Rating System
The Florida department of Environmental Protection monitors Class III water quality according to
the following system: A water quality rating of "Good" indicates that waters can fully support the
uses for which they are classified; a rating of "Fair" indicates that waters can only partially support
the uses for which they are classified; and a rating of "Poor" indicates that waters cannot support
the uses for which they are classified.
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Indian River Lagoon
The Indian River Lagoon is one of the most biologically diverse estuaries in the Nation. One of
the 28 estuaries in the country in Environmental Protection Agency's National Estuary Program,
the Indian River Lagoon is the only estuary on the east coast of Florida. The Lagoon supports
seagrass beds, mangroves, drift algae, salt marshes, oyster bars, tidal flats, and spoil islands which
serve as important spawning and/or nursery grounds for commercial important species including
shrimp, grouper, snapper, and drum.
It is important to note the quality and resource values of the Lagoon as they relate to
conservation efforts. Because it is in an urban area, the Lagoon is subject to impacts from both
urban and agricultural stormwater runoff. The Lagoon is an important recreational and
commercial resource for the community. It is also a significant habitat area for fish and wildlife.
As an aquatic preserve, it is accorded a high degree of protection, second only to drinking water
supplies.
Historic Trends in Estuarine Water Quality: Indian River Lagoon
Human activities over the past 100 years have degraded the Lagoon's habitat and water quality.
Examples include the construction of permanent inlets, dredging and filling of wetlands along the
shoreline, channel dredging, wastewater discharges, and the construction of seawalls, canals,
bridges, causeways, docks, marinas, the port, and power plant. While the Lagoon faces many
challenges, significant natural resources remain that are worth preserving, enhancing, and
restoring. The following sections will detail restoration projects in and near Tequesta focused on
shoreline restoration and water quality treatment.
Until the 1970's, the water quality of the Intracoastal waterways of Palm Beach County were in
a state of decline due to sewage discharge and runoff from surrounding communities. During the
1970's clean-up campaign, all sewage was required to have secondary treatment prior to
discharge. Since then, the water quality of coastal lagoons and the Intracoastal Waterway has
generally improved. However, a lack of historical data may preclude definition of a trend in water
quality for specific locations in the Intracoastal system.
The health of estuaries is threatened by land use changes, habitat loss, pollution, resource
conflicts and other issues. In 1987, Congress established the National Estuary Program (NEP) as
a non -regulatory, community -based program to protect and restore the water quality of
estuaries. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administers the NEP, identifies
Estuaries of National Significance and supports the development of comprehensive management
plans to assure that estuaries maintain their ecological integrity.
The Indian River Lagoon was nominated as an Estuary of National Significance and joined the NEP
in 1990 under the sponsorship of the St. Johns and South Florida Water Management Districts.
The Program's Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) was published in
1997 and updated in 2008.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
Current Trends in Estuarine Water Quality: Indian River Lagoon
For many decades, human activity has greatly increased the amount of freshwater that drains to
the IRL. A network of agricultural and drainage canals has been created that discharges large
volumes of freshwater, such that the lagoon currently receives two -and -a -half times more
freshwater than the system was naturally required to handle. The natural volume and timing
freshwater inputs to the lagoon have been greatly altered and the health of the estuary has been
measurably impacted.
Moreover, the most serious threats to the health of the IRL include reduced water quality due to
manmade hydrologic changes, non -point source pollution, loss and fragmentation of habitats,
overuse/overharvest of resources, and the threat of invasive exotic species.
Today, the IRL National Estuary Program is sponsored by the IRL Council, which was established
in February 2015 as a special district of Florida. The IRL Council includes representatives of five
counties bordering the lagoon (Volusia, Brevard, the Indian River County Lagoon Coalition, St.
Lucie and Martin counties), the St. Johns River and South Florida Water Management Districts,
and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The U.S. EPA provides guidance
to the Council.
The primary goal of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program (IRLNEP) is to protect this
ecologically significant estuary that is threatened by degradation caused by human activity.
IRLNEP coordinates watershed management at the local level, building community -based
processes to implement protection programs with specific actions to address environmental
problems. The IRL is also designated as an aquatic preserve, an Outstanding Florida Waterway,
and a Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program Water Body.
Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve System Management Plan
Information in this section was derived from the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve
Management Plan. Developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP)
Florida Coastal Office (FCO), the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Management Plan aims to
preserve and protect this invaluable aquatic resource and estuarine system in the midst of
increasing development, recreation, and economic pressures along the coast.
As a guide to minimizing potential negative impacts, management plans for the aquatic preserves
are essential to preserving the health and viability of ecosystems within these areas. The Indian
River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Management Plan strives to incorporate, evaluate and prioritize
all relevant information about the site into a cohesive management strategy, allowing for
appropriate access to the managed areas while protecting the long-term health of the
ecosystems and their resources.
As shown in Figure 5-3, this management plan focuses on the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserves System (IRLAP System), which encompasses four aquatic preserves: IR-Malabar to
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Vero Beach, IR-Vero Beach to Ft. Pierce,
Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet, and Banana
River aquatic preserves. The IRLAP
Management Plan provides individual plans
for each preserve. The Village of Tequesta
contains portions of the Jensen Beach to
Jupiter Island aquatic preserve, which is
further detailed in this section, which is
shown in Figure 5-5.
Florida's expansive coastline and wealth of
aquatic resources has attracted millions of
residents and visitors, and the businesses that
serve them. Florida's submerged lands play
important roles in maintaining good water
quality, hosting a diversity of wildlife and
habitats (including economically and
ecologically valuable nursery areas), and
supporting a highly valued quality of life for
all. Any threat to or degradation of the
condition IRLAP System, may also pose
economic impacts to the state and region, as
this system is a major attraction for both
tourists and recreational activities. As
illustrated in Figure 5-2, Coastal Zone &
Conservation Map, the Village of Tequesta
offers an abundance of aquatic resources,
including access to the IRLAP, and must take
necessary steps to maintain the health of the
lagoon, while also sustaining economic
growth and development.
Governing Entities & Statutes
In the sixties, as Florida was experiencing
rapid growth along the coast and in sensitive,
ecologically important areas, it became
apparent that science -based resource
protection and management for such areas Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
would be necessary. In order to provide extra
protection for certain exceptional aquatic areas, such as the IRLAP, state legislators designated
them "aquatic preserves." Now established by law, aquatic preserves are submerged lands of
exceptional biological, aesthetic, and scientific values as sanctuaries that are to be maintained in
their natural or existing conditions, for the benefit of future generations.
Figure 5-3. Indian River Lagoon Aquatic
Preserve System
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
The IRLAP must be managed
and treated as a system by the
entities which have jurisdiction
relative to maintaining its qual-
ity. Today, The Florida Depart-
ment of Environmental Protec-
tion's Florida Coastal Office
(FCO) acts as the management
agency for the IRLAP System
Management Plan. This pro-
vides for a system of significant
protections to ensure that the
Indian River Lagoon and other
sensitive areas are managed
with strategies based on local
resources, issues and condi-
tions. This section provides
information regarding key
governing entities and legis-
lature related to the develop-
ment, maintenance, and en-
forcement of the IRLAP Sys-
tems Management Plan.
Figure 5-4. State Structure for Managing Aquatic Preserves
fbytdy Secrer*ry
Rep,arabry ProQrxrrn
4, ✓•1„a xota,
AImlaer,rnarle ,.
Wd iM
N�nA �nrnr i •
E
1NR)14v 1, vy
W,ow itn:a �rt n R
Manulprrnrr,l �
Nat -onto Eatt.ar-ne
A"Warcn Fla-larw
FM/11U* (kawts A
CuaaW Caunu+
5ECRErARY
f T_
Dep,Ry secretary
Eco AastoratPon
Deptry Srcreraq 3;Woof C(urtw•l
t and A NermOwl Wafter PrAcy A
t e{Jal A!/a1n
CaDmM W+reM
AMan.3 P.14cy
S;arn
I W01 Mow
,�fnr�,JnrT,nrlf
Nnr•rn*lurn CA�BK;t�
Flonrttt Kayo Naterntal
4lanne Sanctuary
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
Qt11ar Cor4mm fal
;till*"
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): The DEP is the lead state agency for
environmental management and stewardship, and is dedicated to protecting Florida's air, water
and land. The DEP protects, conserves and manages Florida's natural resources and enforces the
state's environmental laws.
Florida Coastal Office (FCO): The FCC) is the unit within DEP that manages more than four million
acres of submerged lands and select coastal uplands, which include 41 aquatic preserves, three
National Estuarine Research Reserves (NERRs), the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and
the Coral Reef Conservation Program. FCO manages sites in Florida for the conservation and
protection of natural and historical resources and resource -based public use that is compatible
with the conservation and protection of these lands.
Aquatic Preserve Program: Established by the Florida Aquatic Preserve Act and managed through
the FCO, this program has the following long-term goals:
1. To protect and enhance the ecological integrity of the aquatic preserves,
2. To restore areas to their natural condition;
3. To encourage sustainable use and foster active stewardship by engaging local
communities in the protection of aquatic preserves, and
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
4. To improve management effectiveness through a process based on sound science,
consistent evaluation, and continual reassessment.
Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (the Trustees): Per F.S. 253.03, the
Trustees are charged with governing use of public lands, including aquatic preserves: "The Board
of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the state is vested and charged with the
acquisition, administration, management, control, supervision, conservation, protection, and
disposition of all lands owned by, or which may hereafter inure to, the state or any of its agencies,
departments, boards, or commissions..."
Acquisition and Restoration Council (ARC): A 10-member group with representatives from four
state agencies, four appointees of the Governor, one appointee by the Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWC), and one appointee by the Commissioner of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (DACS). The ARC is responsible for the evaluation, selection and ranking of
state land acquisition projects on the Florida Forever priority list, as well as the review of
management plans and land uses for all state-owned conservation lands.
Key State Statutes & Legislature
State statutes and regulations are enforced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission law enforcement and local law enforcement agencies. Enforcement of
administrative remedies rests with FCO, DEP Districts, and Water Management Districts.
Additionally, other Florida Statutes play a role in site management.
The Florida Aquatic Preserve Act of 1975: The Aquatic Preserve Act (F.S. 258.35-258.46) officially
established a Florida Aquatic Preserves Program under the FDEP. Essentially this statute helped
bring existing preserves under a standard set of management criteria to ensure that the natural
condition of aquatic preserves will be preserved for future generations
Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.): The mandate for developing aquatic preserve management
plans is outlined in Section 18-20.013 and Subsection 18-18.013(2) of the Florida Administrative
Code (F.A.C.). As discussed in the IRLAP System Management Plan, Chapters 18-18, 18-20 and 18-
21, F.A.C., are the three administrative rules directly applicable to the uses allowed in aquatic
preserves specifically and sovereignty lands generally, and are intended to be cumulative.
IRLAP Plan Structure & Kev Components
The Management Plan is a collaboration between FCO managers and staff, area stakeholders,
and the general public, who collect and analyze data, information, and input from various
sources. Next, threats and potential weakness are identified in the site, boundaries, and
surrounding areas. Initial drafts of such management plans are developed by FCO staff and
reviewed by an advisory committee comprised of key stakeholders. Staff then conducts multiple
public meetings to gather feedback and further develop the plan. The final draft is reviewed by
the Acquisition and Restoration Council and the Trustees for final approval.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
The Management Plan follows four comprehensive management programs, which each contain
information specific to a site, as needs or issues typically vary from one location to another. These
management programs are:
• Ecosystem Science
• Resource Management
• Education & Outreach
• Public Use
The following chart, taken from the IRLAP System Management Plan, summarizes these four
management programs.
There is a very large and committed group of research institutions and agencies that
conduct extensive monitoring, research, and modelling in the Indian River Lagoon. The
Ecosystem
aquatic preserve fosters strong working partnerships with these research institutions
Science
and agencies, and assists with equipment and staff as needed to support research and
monitoring projects. These programs provide the basis for making sound resource
management decisions.
Continue to focus on protecting natural resources by restoring altered areas that
Resource
contribute to reduced water quality and implementing management practices that
Management
maintain or improve viable habitats and populations within the aquatic preserve.
Continue volunteer island enhancement work days, Eagle scout projects, Adopt -A -Spoil
Education &
Island Program, volunteer shoreline planting and oyster reef deployment events.
Outreach
Improve signage at boat ramps. Continue participation in the Indian River Lagoon
Envirothon for middle and high school classrooms and Adopt -A -Mangrove workshops.
Rapid population growth is expected to return to coastal areas of Florida. Information
and data contained within this Plan is intended to assist aquatic preserve managers,
Public Use
working closely with other state entities and local governments, to make decisions that
will assure a balance between sustainable resource protection and waterway
management.
In addition, unique local and regional issues are identified, and goals, objectives and strategies
are established to address these issues. Finally, the program and facility needs required to meet
these goals are identified. These components are all key elements in an effective coastal
management program and for achieving the mission of the sites.
Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve
According to the IRLAP Systems Management Plan, the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Aquatic Preserve
stretches 37 miles and encompasses 22,000 acres through three coastal counties, which include
St. Lucie, Martin and extreme northern Palm Beach County (Figure 5-5). The aquatic preserve is
accessible from the west by U.S. Highway 1 and from the east by Beach Road. Despite the length
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
of the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve,
public access points are more restricted in this
preserve, than the other three preserves in the IRLAP
Figure 5-5. Jensen Beach to Jupiter
Inlet Aquatic Preserve (South Section)
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17
As indicated on the Land Use map in Figure 5-6, most of the land use within the Village and along
the coast is developed and designated as Urban, aside from a few natural upland areas. According
to the IRLAP System Management Plan, land use in the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic
Preserve watershed is 19 percent urban, 37 percent agriculture, and 37 percent natural upland
and wetlands. The majority of urban areas appear along the coast and IRLAP, which is why it is
so essential to support efforts to preserve and protect these important natural resources. In
addition, agriculture land use areas within the IRLAP watershed can affect water quality, as well.
Figure 5-7. Conservation Lands adjacent to Jensen Beach to Conservation Lands
Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve (South Section)
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
18 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
As indicated in Figure 5-7,
there are three designated
conservation lands within or
adjacent to the Village.
These areas include, Jupiter
Inlet Lighthouse
Outstanding Natural Area
(Ecosite #61 and #63), Coral
Cove Park, and Blowing
Rocks Preserve, which are
discussed in further detail
below.
Significant wetland losses
and alterations occur along
A
the shorelines of all counties
4 in the IRLAP System, which is
why protection and
enhancement of the
remaining functional
upland -wetland -lagoon linkages is critical
to the long-term protection of the quality
and biological resources of the IRL.
However, management of these critical
habitats can prove difficult since many of
these are privately owned. The simplest
way to ensure proper management of
these areas is through property
acquisition or easements. Passage of the
Preservation 2000 Act in 1990, along with
acquisition initiatives funded by local
interests, Water Management Districts,
and the Conservation and Recreation
Lands program greatly strengthened the
state's ability to acquire endangered lands. Local governments within the IRLAP System
responded to this funding availability by passing local land acquisition referendums. Conservation
lands within or adjacent to the Village are described below.
Federal Conservation Lands
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding
Natural Area: Located in two large
parcels to the north and south of
Beach Road, the 120-acre site contains
lands owned by the U.S. Department
of the Interior, Bureau of Land
Management; the U.S. Coast Guard;
and the Town of Jupiter. The northern
parcel is located within Tequesta
limits, while the southern parcel is
located in the Town of Jupiter and
contains the historic 1860 Jupiter Inlet
Lighthouse and Museum, the George
Washington Tindall Pioneer House and
the Town of Jupiter Lighthouse Park.
Palm Beach County manages 78 acres of the natural area under a cooperative agreement with
the Bureau of Land Management, with the assistance of the Village of Tequesta. The managed
area contains Florida scrub, maritime hammock and mangrove swamp natural communities.
Volunteers planted more than 6,000 mangrove seedlings as part of a two -acre tidal wetland
restoration project on the north side of Beach Road. The entire 120-acre site has received federal
designation as an outstanding natural area through the Bureau of Land Management's National
Landscape Conservation Area Program.
Private Conservation Lands
Blowing Rocks Preserve: Blowing Rocks Preserve began in 1969, when residents of Jupiter Island
donated 73 acres of their island to The Nature Conservancy. The preserve was named for its rocky
shoreline — the largest on the U.S. Atlantic coast. During extreme high tides and after winter
storms, seas break against the rocks. The preserve runs for one mile from north to south and
connects the Atlantic Ocean to the IRL on the west. Today, the restored preserve reflects what
South Florida barrier islands looked like a century ago. Native habitats include beach dune,
coastal strand, mangrove swamp and tropical hardwood hammock. Facilities include an
education center, native plant demonstration garden, hiking trails, boardwalks, and restrooms.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 19
Lands Managed by County
Coral Cove Park: Located within
the Village of Tequesta and
managed by Palm Beach
County, Coral Cove Park
continues to be an asset to the
community. The park provides
access both to the ocean as well
as to the IRLAP/ICWW. In
addition, the park provides
public facilities, including a
parking lot, playground,
restroom facilities, picnic tables,
and boardwalks.
Natural Resource Description
W
4f -
Hydrology & Watershed: Tequesta is located within Loxahatchee Watershed, with St Lucie
Watershed to the north. As discussed in the IRLAP System Management Plan, much of the
western watershed of the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Preserve region historically flowed into
the Okeechobee basin. As a result of major water control projects, the Jensen Beach to Jupiter
Inlet Aquatic Preserve watershed now extends up to 30 miles west. Approximately 60 percent of
the watershed has been artificially expanded.
Tidal flow helps flush pollutants out of the rivers, and prevents nutrients and sediment build-up
that can negatively impact existing natural conditions. Tidal flow is present everywhere in Jensen
Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve, with tidal action most pronounced within three to five
miles of the Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie and Jupiter inlets.
Water pollutants: As mentioned earlier, both agriculture and urban land use within the IRLAP
System watershed can affect water quality. Runoff associated with these land uses is
characterized by high turbidity, high nutrients and low dissolved oxygen. Agriculture stormwater
runoff is diverted to the IRL System by way of large conveyance canals. Urban stormwater runoff
is diverted to the IRLAP System through local drainage canals and stormwater collection systems.
In both cases, untreated stormwater runoff has heavily impacted the IRLAP System by
introducing unwanted pollutants and impacting water quality.
Groundwater & Wells: Most of the counties along the IRLAP utilize both the Florida Aquifer and
surficial aquifer through wells as their source for obtaining potable water. However, due to the
brackish nature of the southern portion of the Florida aquifer, Palm Beach County must rely on
only the surficial aquifer system for its potable water supply. Thus, impact to wetlands, saltwater
intrusion, and other threats to water quality are major concerns for the Tequesta-Jupiter area,
as such impacts could also jeopardize the potable water supply.
20 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Natural Communities in Tequesta
within IRLAP: As shown on the Nat-
ural Communities Map, the main
natural resource in the IRLAP area
within Tequesta is seagrass beds,
with areas of consolidated compo-
site and unconsolidated substrate
and mangrove swamp. Sea grass
beds serve as a food source and
nursery for many species, including
manatees. Water pollutants, turbid
waters, dock or pier structures, and
boat propellers are just a few of the
threats that sea grasses face. With-
out proper light, seagrass cannot
complete photosynthesis, which can
be detrimental to seagrass beds.
Mangroves provide habitats for nu-
merous birds and other wildlife and
are a vital part of the food chain from
aquatic organisms to humans Man-
groves also contribute greatly to sta-
bilizing the shoreline by providing a
buffer against wave erosion and al-
lowing sedimentation to occur. The
importance of these particular re-
sources is further described through-
out the Coastal Management and
Conservation Elements.
acts of Sea Level Rise on IRLAP
Resources
Figure 5-8. Natural Communities in Jensen Beach to
Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve (South Section)
••••••••••• ••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• Map 18a match line
r
0 Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve
Natural Communities
Consolidated, Composite Tequesta
& Unconsolidated Substrate
Seagrass Beds
Saltwater Marsh N
Mangrove swamp Exotic Dominated A .'
0 0.5 1 2 3 I
Miles May 2014 � I
'Seagrass beds are based on a multiyear composite
of historical seagrass coverage from 1943 to 1999.
Source: IRLAP System Management Plan, 2015
Due to the low elevations of the mangrove and marsh systems (100-year floodplain) of the IRLAP
System, predicted trends such as global warming or increasing ocean water levels, will influence
the habitat structure and species distribution in the lagoon.
Sea level rise threatens to inundate many coastal wetlands, with little room to move inland
because of coastal development. Rising sea level would allow saltwater to penetrate farther
inland and upstream. Increasing salinity could cause an up -estuary advance of marine and
estuarine species and a retreat of freshwater species. Sea level rise is discussed in more detail
later in these element.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 121
Public Access
While public access is most limited within the Jensen Beach to Jupiter Inlet Aquatic Preserve,
future public access must continue to be closely scrutinized. Rapid population growth rates of
coastal areas in Florida are expected to continue. Throughout the lifetime of this plan, decisions
vital to the balance between sustainable resource protection and waterway management will
need to be made by IRLAP managers working closely with other state entities and local
governments.
It is beneficial for staff to stay actively engaged in the local planning processes when new marine
facilities such as boat ramps, marinas, mooring fields and similar siting decisions are being
considered by local government and municipalities. IRLAP staff involvement early in planning
processes for marine siting can aid local government by providing expertise in permitting
requirements and result in less environmental impact to the IRLAP System.
Tequesta's Support of IRLAP System Management Plan
The Village has ordinances in place to ensure the preservation and protection of this valuable
aquatic preserve, which are briefly described here. The Village shall provide for the protection of
the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve by prohibiting development in the area that will
degrade or otherwise adversely affect the water quality or wetlands of this unique estuarine
environment through its Code of Ordinances. More specifically, development or modification of
the shorelines within the Indian River lagoon Aquatic Preserve shall be prohibited, unless this
modification or development is necessary for the continued health, safety and welfare of the
public. Development that provides for water -dependent and water -related land uses such as
marinas, are acceptable, provided that the siting of such shall be consistent with the marina Siting
Ordinance upon application to the Village.
COASTAL AREA NATURAL RESOURCES
Intergovernmental coordination is imperative to the success of protecting, preserving, and
conserving natural coastal resources in the community and surrounding areas. The Village
continues to cooperate with the appropriate agencies and adjacent municipalities in
implementing and maintaining management plans and policies for the protection of the
Loxahatchee River and Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve (IRLAP).
The current Comprehensive Plan establishes LOS Standards for beach access, infrastructure, and
water -dependent and water -related land uses, which have been incorporated in both the Zoning
and Subdivision Ordinances of the Village. LOS Standards are identified in Division 2., Site Plan
Review, Article IX, Supplemental Regulations of Chapter 78, Zoning and in Sec. 66-161, General
standards; level of service standards, Division 1, Generally, Article V, Design Standards of Chapter
66, Subdivisions in the Village's Code of Ordinances. These LOS Standards are identified in the
Recreation and Open Space element.
22 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Vegetative Cover
Most of the Village's acreage is
developed and there are remains only a
single extensive area of natural
vegetative cover, which is the federally -
owned Ecosite #61 that cannot be
developed. Existing vegetative
coverage is typical of most South
Florida coastal municipalities. Trees and
shrubs have been planted along
residential streets and provide shade
and natural beauty around dwelling
units. The parks and other landscaped
areas that constitute areas of
vegetative cover within the Coastal area are shown on the Recreation and Open Space Map.
Predominant trees located along streets, parks, and throughout residential areas may include,
but are not limited to:
Cypress(Cupressus)
Mangrove (Rhizophora)
Gumbo Limbo (Bursera simaruba)
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris)
Live Oak (Quercus virginiana)
Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii)
Caribbean Pine (Pinus caribaea)
Australian Pine (Casuarina)
Melaleuca (Melaleuca)
Fern (Nephrolepis)
Banyan (Ficus)
Sea Grape (Coccoloba uvifera)
Cabbage Palm (Sabal palmetto)
Laurel Oak (Quercus laurifolia)
Royal Palm (Roystonea elata)
Chinese Fan Palm (Livistona chinensis)
Malayan Palm (Cocos nucifera)
Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia)
The parks and other landscaped areas that constitute areas of vegetative cover throughout the
Village are shown on indicated Recreation and Open Space Map, and discussed in the Recreation
and Open Space data and analysis document. The protection of native vegetation and wildlife
habitats is a major focus of the Coastal Management and Conservation elements of the Village's
Comprehensive Plan.
Trees are a vital component of the infrastructure in our community and provide many
environmental and economic benefits. These benefits include cleaner air, soil and water
conservation, climate moderation, energy conservation, human health and longevity, increased
property values, traffic calming, enhanced biodiversity, and many more. The two predominant
causes for loss of tree vegetation include land development and disease. Some South Florida
communities including the Village require preservation or replacement of existing trees,
especially those indigenous to the area, when development occurs.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 123
With regard to invasive species, Brazilian Pepper, Australian Pine and Melaleuca are invasive
species and have been mostly eradicated from the South Florida region, including the Village of
Tequesta. However, a few trees remain in certain areas. When the opportunity arises, these
invasive species are replaced with a native alternative.
The Village's landscape regulations
require the maintenance of pervious
areas and the removal of exotics to
protect mangrove areas and beach
and dune systems. As indicated in
the Conservation element, the
Village landscape regulations
prohibit certain non-native or
invasive species, and require a
minimum 50%of all vegetation to be
species native to the South Florida
area. Also, the Village Zoning
Ordinance establishes a minimum landscape and open space requirement that will preserve
pervious areas in all developments.
In summary, the Village intends to regulate the removal, relocation, and replacement of trees
and to prevent the abuse of the trees within Village limits to ensure the adequacy and
improvement of Tequesta's tree canopy. The Village's commitment to improving its tree canopy
is further reflected in its interest in urban forestry, which encourages the care and management
of single trees and tree populations in an urban setting and seeks to embrace trees as a vital part
of urban infrastructure. The Village's goals in urban forestry are discussed in the Conservation
and Future Land Use Elements.
Mangroves
With regard to mangrove protection,
the Village works with County and
State park officials to assure any park
improvements are sensitive to the
mangrove and other vegeta-
tive/wildlife/marine habitats. More-
over, the Village coordinates with
other agencies, including the
Department of Environmental
Protection, to ensure local
regulations are enforced in the
development or redevelopment of
any areas.
24 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Additionally, the Village aims to protect mangroves
from public works activities such as road and drain-
age improvements. The Village also expressly prohib-
its the expenditure of public funds on projects that
would adversely impact existing mangrove areas. As
indicated on the Coastal Zone and Conservation Map,
The Village's mangrove areas are located in already
developed areas along the fringes of the ICWW and
the Northwest Fork of the Loxahatchee River; thus,
the protection of these mangrove areas is assured.
As discussed earlier, it is also important that the
Village maintain landscaping regulations to require
the use of native vegetation, such as mangroves,
which helps with dune stabilization and preserving natural resources.
Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Natural Outstanding Area (Ecosite #61)
The Village continues to preserve Ecosite #61 of the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Natural Outstanding
Area by implementing appropriate zoning regulations. Ecosite #61 is identified on the Future
Land Use Map as Recreation and Open
Space and designated on the Village's
Official Zoning Map as R/OP, Recreation
and Open Space. The Village also
identifies any public -owned spoil islands
as conservation areas on the Future Land
Use Map. The spoil island located in
ICWW right-of-way just north of the CR ;
707 bridge to the barrier island is `
identified as Conservation use on the
Future Land Use Map.
Wetlands
Wetlands refer to land where the water table is usually at or near the surface. Some wetlands
contain water year-round; others may remain relatively dry for months, becoming moist only
during periods of heavy rain. Wetlands are vital habitats for many species of plants and animals
and are protected by local, state, and federal regulations.
The wetlands of the Village of Tequesta Coastal Area primarily include the marine wetlands of
the Atlantic Ocean and shoreline and the estuarine wetlands of the Indian River Lagoon and
Loxahatchee River. The riverine wetlands of the canal drainage system occur primarily in areas
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 125
west of the Coastal Area as defined, but are discussed here because of their impact on coastal
estuarine waters.
Marine Wetlands
The marine wetlands of the Coastal Area occur along the Atlantic shoreline of Palm Beach Island
and include intertidal wetlands [with unconsolidated bottom that are regularly or irregularly
flooded or exposed. Along a major portion of the
Atlantic Shore there are also subtidal wetlands
containing rooted vascular aquatic beds.
Estuarine Wetlands
The estuarine wetlands of the Coastal Area occur
along the shores of the Indian River Lagoon. Within
the lagoon there are also intertidal wetlands with
unconsolidated bottoms that are flooded irregularly.
Riverine Wetlands
The main riverine wetlands of the region's coastal
area are the major canals of the Lower East Coast
Area Water Management System, which are
maintained by the South Florida Water Management
District and the associated smaller drainage canals,
which are maintained by local water conservation
districts.
Wetland Protection Programs
The environmental quality of wetlands and estuaries is protected by a number of existing and
proposed regulatory programs. The following federal, state, regional and local programs seek to
protect wetland and estuaries through permitting procedures regulation land uses and activities
that could adversely impact environmental quality
26 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Federal Programs
The federal government implements wetland regulations through section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
both have active roles in implementing the Clean Water Act.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters
of the United States. The goal of this section is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical,
and biological integrity of the nation's waters", which includes all rivers, streams, lakes, wetlands,
and coastal waters. Before conducting any activity that will result in the discharge of dredged or
fill material, a Section 404 Permit usually must be obtained from the US Army Corps of Engineers
prior to beginning activity.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: USCOE has regulatory authority and jurisdiction over dredge, fill
and construction activities that occur within all inland (non -tidal) waterways used for transport
of interstate commerce (currently, in the past or potentially in the future). The Corps jurisdiction
extends to all navigable waters of the United States, and any adjacent wetlands and tributaries
that have surface water or hydrologic connection to any navigable waters.
Review of application for permits that would allow alteration, degradation or destruction of
wetland habitats is based on evaluation and balancing of the probable short-term and cumulative
impacts of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Generally, permits
that would result in destruction of wetlands are not granted unless the benefits of the proposed
activity are deemed to outweigh the damage to the wetland resource. Although mitigation of
damage is not required as a matter of policy, it is often necessary where wetland loss is involved
in order to shift the balance of the impact evaluation in a more favorable direction.
State Programs
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP): The FDEP regulates wetlands under its
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Program. Part IV of Chapter 373 of the applicable state
statutes covers the State's surface water regulatory program. In addition, FDEP has regulatory
authority and jurisdiction over dredge, fill and construction activities and activities affecting
water quality that occur within wetlands defined to be waters of the state pursuant to Chapters
17.3 and 17.4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
The FDEP performs inspections, delineates jurisdictional wetland boundaries, and enforces state
wetland regulations on parcels of land less than five acres in area. For parcels larger than five
acres, wetland delineations, inspections, and enforcement responsibility has been delegated by
FDEP to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
The FDEP may deny or limit permission for activities within navigable waters that would
negatively impact water quality or habitat value. Within tributaries or wetlands connected to
navigable waters, the FDEP's authority is limited to activities affecting water quality. Review of
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 27
applications for permits that would allow alteration, degradation or destruction of wetlands is
based on water quality and habitat impacts, including cumulative impacts on the environment.
Permits are not generally granted for activities that would destroy wetlands, but wetland loss can
occur due to jurisdictional limitations, public interest considerations and mitigation. Mitigation
of habitat loss or degradation of water quality is often required by the FDEP on a case -by -case
basis.
Similarly, the FDEP has regulatory and jurisdiction over coastal construction and use of lands
owned by the State, including submerged lands. Most of these lands are also within the
jurisdiction of the USCOE. Review of proposed activities is based on conformance it the guidelines
and policies of the State's land management plans. Activities that would have significant negative
impact on habitat value, the natural environment or recreational use ae generally not permitted.
Mitigation is not considered by the FDEP as a basis for allowing activities that would destroy
habitats and is not required as a matter of policy.
Regional Programs
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD): The SFWMD has jurisdiction over Palm
Beach, Martin, and St. Lucie Counties. The District has regulatory authority over the following
activities that could impact wetlands:
1. Construction of surface water management systems;
2. Construction of stormwater management systems;
3. Certain activities affecting water quality (as delegated by DEPaO; and
4. Withdrawal of groundwater.
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC): The Wetland and Deepwater Habitat Policy
of the TCRPC seeks to go beyond existing federal, state, and regional programs in protection of
the region's valuable wetland habitat resources through the development of Regional Impact
Review process and through advisory comments to agencies, entities persons with implementing
capability. The policy outlines the regulatory proposals relative to each existing regulatory
program as follows:
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE)
1. To address wetland areas not within the jurisdiction of the USCOE; and
2. To require mitigation in all cases where protected habitats are altered, degraded or
destroyed, and where functions and values of regional significance are lost.
• Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
1. To address wetland areas not within the jurisdiction of the FDEP; and
2. To determine the extent to which mitigation would be required for lost wetland
functions and values.
28 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Water Management Districts
1. To prohibit removal of vegetation or clearing of habitats unless approved by
exception;
2. To consider all wetland habitats as regionally important until proven otherwise; and
3. To prohibit consideration of mitigation as a basis for allowing an activity within
regionally important habitats.
Local Programs
Palm Beach County: Palm Beach County has broad authority to regulate development and use of
land, including wetlands, through local ordinances, building codes and the County's
Comprehensive Plan. Through its Department of Emergency Resource Management, it
administers a range of environmental programs designed to protect, preserve, and enhance Palm
Beach County's natural resources, both on land and water. Fresh drinking water, unpolluted
waterways, a large tree canopy, and controlling mosquito populations provide a welcoming
outdoor tropical experience to snorkel and dive, visit sandy beaches, fresh or saltwater fish, kayak
waterways, hike in the woods all while viewing wildlife in their natural habitat.
Regarding dredge and fill permits issued by the USCOE, the County's recommendation is that no
such activities be allowed within estuarine marsh areas.
Under the current Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, marine grass beds, mangrove areas,
and the Intracoastal have been identified as specific natural resource areas requiring careful
management and conservation. The policies of the County's current Conservation and Coastal
Zone Element include recognition of the significance of coastal zone resources and provide for
their protection, enhancement, restoration and management.
Village of Teguesta: The Village's Land Development Regulations contains requirements for
development review of the projects impacting wetlands. Where mitigation is required, the Village
also defers to federal, state, and regional agencies in determining mitigation for wetlands.
Marine Wildlife Habitats and Living Marine Resources
The Village of Tequesta contains a number of
water -based wildlife habitats that support
mammals, reptiles and a variety of shore and
wading birds. The main habitats are the marine
habitats of the Atlantic Ocean and beaches and
the estuarine habitats of the Indian River
Lagoon and the Intracoastal Waterway. The
most important living marine resources of the
coastal area are the endangered and
threatened species whose habitats along the
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 129
Southeast Florida Coast are central to their habitat range in the State or in the United States.
Marine Wildlife Habitats and Species
Beach Fauna
The Atlantic beaches along the Palm Beach County Coast are typical of other sandy beaches.
While the diversity of beach fauna on such beaches is low, the populations of individual species
may often be very great. These species include specialized types, such as coquina clams, ghost
shrimp, annelid worms, and mole crabs that are adapted to the harsh environment of a beach
subject to the full force of ocean waves. Because these populations certain small, short-lived
organisms, they recover quickly from most environmental disturbances.
Nearshore Reefs
Low profile nearshore rock reefs occur at various locations along Palm Beach County's coast.
These rock reefs were formed during the Anastasia period. Commonly known as coquina rock,
this rock formation consists of a conglomeration of sand and shell fragments. Characterized by
numerous crevices and providing varying degrees of relief, these reefs provide a habitat for
diverse flora and fauna. The reefs provide nursery grounds, feeding locations and protective
niches for juveniles or smaller fishes. The sabellarid worm (Phragmatopoma lapidosa), which
requires hard substrate for attachment, constructs honey -combed, wave -resistant colonies
commonly called worm -rock reef. In addition to being utilized by over 80 species of tropical and
commercially valuable fish, nearshore reefs else provide habitats for the species listed in Table
5-1, shown below.
Table 5-2. Nearshore Reef Species
Menippe mercenaria
Callinectes sapidus
Scyllarides aequinoctialis
Panularis argus
Siderastrea radians
Siderastrea sidereal
Favia fragum
Diploria strigosa
Campanularia sp.
Millepora alcicornis
Cliona celata
(Various species)
(Various species)
30 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Offshore Reefs
Several offshore reef ridges occur along the County's Atlantic shoreline beginning south of Jupiter
Inlet. They are found in water depths ranging from 35 to 40 feet out to a depth of 100 feet.
These deep reefs support a diversity of benthic fauna, including hard corals, seawhips, seafans,
and sponges. In addition, the reefs offer a wide range of habitats for almost all known Caribbean
tropical fish and shellfish types, including the species that also utilize nearshore reefs. Fish
species include a variety of sport and commercial fish, such as grouper, snapper, mackerel,
bluefish, dolphin, kingfish and jack. Offshore reefs also provide shelter and food sources for three
species of sea turtles that are endangered or threatened, which include the Green (Chelonia
mydas), Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea).
Both nearshore and offshore reefs in the Atlantic Ocean provide habitat for diverse fish species.
These oceanic reef habitats found off the coast of Palm Beach County are known to
accommodate a variety of Caribbean tropical fish, commercial fish, and shellfish types. Fish
species include a variety of sport and commercial fish, such as grouper, snapper, mackerel,
bluefish, dolphin, kingfish and jack.
Estuarine Wildlife Habitats and Soecies
The Village of Tequesta interacts with two major estuarine environments, including the Indian
River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway, and the Loxahatchee River. These important estuarine
habitats are discussed in detail below.
Like all estuaries, the Indian River Lagoon is a semi -confined water body characterized by a
mixture of saltwater from the ocean and freshwater from upland sources. Water is exchanged
between the IRL and Atlantic through five ocean inlets, which are cuts in the barrier island chain.
The salinity, tidal influence, and degree of flushing characteristic of a particular portion of the
lagoon depend in large part on its proximity to an inlet and to freshwater inputs from streams,
rivers, ditches, and canals. Within the Lagoon is the deep channel of the Intracoastal Waterway.
Evaluation of the characteristics of this complex habitat by the US Fish and Wildlife Service
indicates that it is home to a variety of aquatic species.
Due to its location between a warm, temperate climate to the north and a subtropical climate to
the south, the IRL has been cited as among the most biologically diverse estuaries in North
America. The influence of these two distinct biogeographical provinces is one of the factors
underlying the spectacular biodiversity found within the Lagoon. High biodiversity is also fostered
by the presence of a number of distinct habitats that serve as home to the plants and animals of
the IRL. Seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, and saltmarshes are foremost among IRL habitats
whose continued health is essential for a healthy lagoon.
The IRL watershed is home to over 2,100 different species of plants and more than 2,200 animal
species, including some 700 fish species and 310 bird species. Furthermore, approximately 50
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 131
threatened or endangered species can be found in the IRL regional, including 12 plants and 36
animals.
Aside from the Indian River Lagoon, the Loxahatchee River Watershed also has a wide variety of
habitats and is home to many rare and endangered species, such as the manatee and woodstork.
This 260 square mile ecosystem includes the communities of Jupiter, Tequesta, Juno Beach,
Jupiter Island, Jupiter Inlet Colony, Jupiter Farms, Hobe Sound and Palm Beach Gardens. One of
Florida's most unique treasures, the Loxahatchee River meanders through freshwater creeks,
down into a brackish estuary, and finally empties through the Jupiter Inlet into the Atlantic
Ocean.
A brief description of aquatic communities that have been determined to be present in or near
Tequesta, are provided below.
Benthic Communities
A benthic community refers to the community of animals living in and on the bottom sediments
of a body of water. Benthic macroinvertebrates have specific habitat preferences, limited
mobility, and provide important ecological functions. These characteristics allow benthic
macroinvertebrate communities to serve as bioindicators of estuary health, providing
information on habitat degradation associated with anthropogenic sources.
The creation of intertidal habitats carry an ecological importance with regard to food web
functions. Benthic communities are an important food source for shorebirds and other species.
Sediment and muck build-up from adjacent canals and other sources can negatively impact
benthic organism, and the species that rely on them. Restoration projects aim to improve water
quality and benthic habitats by reducing sediment and nutrient loading into the IRL and
Loxahatchee River.
Phytoplankton
The productivity of phytoplankton is the basis of the estuarine food chain. Its maintenance is
essential to populations of fish and crustacean larvae.
Fish
The Florida Fish and Wildlife and Conservation Commission (FWC) indicates the following fish
species are commonly present in Palm Beach County: Largemouth/Sunshine/Butterfly Peacock
Bass; Black Crappie; Bluegill; Red breast/Redear/Spotted Sunfish; Warmouth; Channel/White
Catfish; Brown/Yellow Bullhead; Longnose/Florida Gar; Chain Pickerel; Mayan Cichlid; Blue
Tilapia; and Bowfin.
32 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway
Recent studies indicate that there are over 700 documented fish species in the Indian River
Lagoon. Some of these species live permanently in the Lagoon, while others migrate through the
rivers and inlets towards oceanic waters. The Lagoon's protected waters make it an ideal location
for fish breeding and nursery grounds. Moreover, the broad range of salinity within the IRL
coupled with the emergent vegetation and red mangroves create productive nursery habitat for
commercially important fish species.
Fish species commonly found throughout the area include grey (mangrove) snapper (Lutjanus
griseus), common snook (Centropomus spp.), Atlantic tarpon (Megalops atlanticus), mullet
(Mugilidae), drum (Sciaenidae), sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), spotted seatrout
(Cynoscion nebulosus), pompano (Carangidae), jack (Carangidae), barracuda (Sphyraeno
barracouta), sea catfish (Ariopsis), mojarras (Eucinostomus spp.), and lookdown fish (Selene
vomer). Some of these species are carried from the Gulf Stream in the ocean into the Lagoon
through the inlets. Freshwater species in the upper reaches of tributaries include black crappie
(Pomoxis nigromaculatus), bass (Centrarchidae), and sunfish (Lepomis spp.).
Loxahatchee River
In addition to the Lagoon, a variety of fish species are also present in the Loxahatchee River.
Common species found in the river include, common snook (Centropomus spp.), grey (mangrove)
snapper (Lutjanus griseus), mullet (Mugilidae), bass (Micropterus), Atlantic tarpon (Megalops
otlonticus), and jack (Carongidae).
Invertebrates
Data collected in the Lagoon indicates that the distribution of the most abundant species of
shrimp and crabs in Tequesta was related to the distribution of vegetative communities,
especially seagrass, found at certain collection and monitoring stations. Common species include
the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), cinnamon river shrimp (Machrobrachium acanthurus), penaeid
shrimp (pink (Farfantepenaeus duorarum), brown shrimp (F. aztecus), and white shrimp
(Litopenaeus setiferus).
SeaRrass
Seagrasses play an important role in marine
habitats, providing benefits for a variety of areas,
including biodiversity, coastal shoreline
protection, regulation of nutrient cycling and
water quality, fisheries, climate regulation
through carbon sequestration, social and cultural
value, and tourism and recreation.
W)
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 133
Seagrass is a prime nursery for fish and other
marine life, it provides substrate, habitat, and
protection from predators for fish and
invertebrates. It also provides food for herbivores
and the detritus food web.
Additionally, seagrass is important in nutrient
cycles and helps to stabilize sediments. According
to 2009 data by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission the estimated '
economic value of seagrass is $16,594 per acre per year.
As discussed in the Conservation element of this document, the Village implements the Wetland
Protection Section of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code, which requires
the protection of sea grasses.
Threatened and Endangered Species and Species
of Special Concern
The Indian River Lagoon, Loxahatchee River, and
Atlantic Ocean provides a habitat for many
endangered and threatened species, including
Florida manatees, sea turtles, and seagrass. These
species are sensitive to activities such as shoreline
development, dredging, filling, and even some
recreational activities.
Endangered and threatened species and species
of special concern that occur along the shorelines,
in nearshore and offshore area, and within the
water bodies named above have been identified
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS),
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC).
These species are identified in Table 5-2 below by
species, designated status as Endangered (E),
Threatened (T) or Species of Special Concern
(SSC), and agency of jurisdiction.
34 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 5-2. Threatened and Endangered Coastal Species in Palm Beach County
GROUP• •
Status (FWC,
Lakes and Ponds
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) T (S/A)
American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) T
Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) T
Atlantic Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas) E
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) E
Atlantic Hawksbill Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate) E
Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) E
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus) SSC
Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) T
Least Tern (Sternula antillarum)
T
Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii dougallii)
T
Southeastern Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus)
T
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)
T
Arctic Peregrine Falcon (Galco peregrinus)
E
Red Knot (Colidris canutus rufa)
T
Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger)
T (State)
American oystercatcher (Hoematopus palliates)
T (State)
Other
' Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea)
T (State)
Tricolored Heron (Tricolored Heron)
T (State)
Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana)
T
Kirtland's Warbler (Dendroica kirtlandii)
E
Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus)
Whooping Crane (Grus Americana)
E
Florida Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis)
T (State)
Environment/Other
Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)
T
Burrowing Owl (Athene cuniculoria)
SSC
Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
E
Finback whale (Balanenoptera phsolus) E
Humpback whale (Megaptera novaengliae) E
Right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) E
Sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis) E
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 135
Sperm whale (Physeter catadon)
Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi)
Sources: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC); US Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS)
*Note: The designated status abbreviations for the above species are defined as follows:
• E=Endangered: as designated by the FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is
so few or depleted in number, or so restricted in range or habitat due to any man-made or natural
factors that it is in imminent danger of extinction, or extirpation from the state, or which may
attain such a status within the immediate future.
• T=Threatened: As designated by the FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is
acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration. Declining in number at a rapid rate, or whose
range or habitat is declining in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence, is destined or very likely
to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future.
• T(S/A)=Threatened due to similarity of appearance
• SSC=State Species of Special Concern: As designated by FWC, a species, subspecies, or isolated
population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an
inherent significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human
disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its
becoming a threatened species, may already meet certain criteria for designation as a threatened
species but for which conclusive data are limited or lacking: may occupy such an unusually vital
and essential ecological niche that should it decline significantly in numbers, or distribution other
species would be adversely affected to a significant degree; or has not sufficiently recovered from
past population depletion.
*In 2010, the FWC revised its imperiled species management system to abolish the species of
special concern (SSQ category once all species on that list are reclassified as State -designated
Threatened, found to not meet any of the State's listing criteria, or become Federally listed. Until
then, the FWC will continue to maintain a separate Species of Special Concern list.
Habitats of Threatened and Endangered Species
Sea Turtle Nesting Areas
The Palm Beach County ocean shoreline is a major nesting area for sea turtles, with
approximately 2,000,000 sea turtles hatching on its beaches every year. Palm Beach County has
more sea turtle nests per mile than anywhere else in the United States. The 2016 sea turtle
counts provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission indicated there were
33,892 loggerhead nests, 1,582 green turtle nests, and 377 leatherback nests, which totals to
35,851 documented sea turtle nests on the County's beaches.
36 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Four species of sea turtles
commonly found in the County's
coastal waters, reefs, and the
lagoon. Three species are
considered endangered and
include green, leatherback, and
hawksbill sea turtles. The
loggerhead sea turtle is
considered threatened, and is the
most common sea turtle found in
the area. The majority of sea
turtle nests found in PBC are
loggerhead nests. The sea turtle
nesting season in PBC is from the
first of March through the end of
October.
West Indian (Florida) Manatee Critical Habitat
11
Manatees inhabit shallow coastal waters, bays, lagoon, estuaries, rivers and lakes throughout its
range. These animals prefer warmer temperatures and tend to migrate to the warm water
discharge area at the Florida Power and Light Rivera Beach Power Plant, which is located
approximately 16 miles south of Tequesta. Otherwise, manatees are commonly found in shallow
coastal waters and seagrass beds.
Collisions of boats and barges with manatees has historically been one of the major causes of
manatee injury and death. Within the Indian River Lagoon and throughout the ICWW in Palm
Beach County, boating slow speed limits are posted in order to protect the manatee population
from injury.
The IRL and associated water
bodies provide a critical habitat
for the West Indian Manatee.
Although original population
levels of manatees in Florida are
unknown, studies indicate that
peninsular Florida has been the
center of the manatee's range in
the continental United States.
Current data by the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Commission
indicates the Florida manatee
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 137
population has grown to over 6,000 animals today.
In order to further restore and protect manatee populations, the PBC Manatee Protection Plan
(MPP) was incorporated into the County's Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The MPP provides
guidance to PBC and municipalities in developing policies and guidelines for comprehensive
manatee protection in local waterways.
Coastal Area Historic Resources
Historic resources and sites are defined by Chapter 163, F.S., as areas listed on the Florida Site
File on the National Register of Historic Places, or those designated by the local government as
historically, architecturally or archeologically significant.
While no historic preservation or historic resource sites have been identified within the Village
of Tequesta, the site plan review process is available to review such archaeological and historic
resources, if the need arises in the future.
Existing Uses of Natural Resources
The Atlantic Ocean, Indian River Lagoon and Intracoastal Waterway, the Loxahatchee River, and
related canals and water bodies are used for fishing, boating, and other recreational activities.
Small-scale direct habitat loss also occurs in the IRL and the cumulative impact of such damage is
significant. One example is prop scarring of slow -growing seagrass beds by motorized watercraft.
Increased utilization of the lagoon by recreational users exposes sensitive, vital habitats to
accidental damage.
Through policies and regulations, the Village strives to provide for the continued use of the
natural resources in the community, and ensure that adequate services are available to serve
Village residents and the public in the coastal area.
Future Uses of Natural Resources
Based on a projected development of future land uses in accordance with the Village's current
land use map and zoning map, its present and desired future character, no additional adverse
effects on the Village's natural resources are expected. Population growth, especially in the
designated Coastal Area, is projected to proceed at a low rate, according to recent trends and
the fact that this area Coastal Area is basically built -out, and is not expected to be accompanied
by rapid development.
Potential residential and non-residential additional development is not expected to interfere
with the Coastal Area, and therefore, should not have any impact on the Coastal Area natural
resources.
38 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Impact of Development on Natural Resources
The Village "Works with the County and State park officials to assure that any park improvements
are sensitive to the mangrove and other vegetative/wildlife/marine habitats". The Village also
coordinates with other governments to assure that development regulations are enforced in all
areas in an effort to protect vegetative, wildlife and marine habitats.
There are several sources of direct habitat loss within the Lagoon. Development of the Indian
River Lagoon shoreline has sometimes necessitated the removal of mangrove stands, salt marsh
vegetation, or seagrass meadows. Various state permitting processes aim to minimize such
habitat loss.
Coastal Construction Control Line
The coastal construction control line was established for the Palm Beach County coastline by the
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) pursuant to Chapter 161.053, Florida Statutes.
Establishment of the line was based on study and analysis of historical data and a field program
that collected current data on the effects of tides, winds, and waves on the shoreline. The
objective of setback line analysis was to prevent beach encroachment that would endanger the
existing beach and dune systems and to help prevent existing and future structures from being
unreasonably subject to great or irreparable harm.
This analysis considered measured topographic factors, including dune elevations, foreshore and
offshore slopes, beach widths and adjacent profiles, and upland development and vegetation
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 139
bluff lines and computed dynamic factors, including storm surge elevations, erosion trends, wave
uprush and fluctuations of beach profiles.
The State administers the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) program and 30-year erosion
setback through the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores. FDEP
regulates all development seaward of the CCCL to ensure that the proposed development has
minimal impact on the beach and dune system and can survive a major storm.
As part of the coastal construction permitting process, 30 years' worth of erosion must be
considered, and Florida law prohibits (with limited exceptions) construction of buildings that will
be in the water in 30 years. FDEP's jurisdiction is limited to areas seaward of the CCCL. In most
cases, the CCCL now runs through, or west of the majority of beach front structures in the State.
The adjacent graphic
provides the location of
the CCCL, indicated by a
red line, within the
municipal boundaries of
the Village of Tequesta,
which are indicated by a
solid yellow line. As
depicted, the CCCL runs
through the beach front
properties along the
barrier island.
The Village prohibits
construction seaward of ,
the State -designated �r
coastal construction i
control line (CCCL), except 4 ,
as may be approved by the
state (FDEP), in order to
preserve and protect the
existing natural habitats,
while also preventing
future development in
these sensitive areas. The �- -'-•
Village's Comprehensive
Plan contains policies that
encourage the Village to establish new setback lines if the State lines prove to be inadequate.
Also, it is recommended that coastal construction regulations be reviewed from time to time
based on natural disaster mitigation techniques and redevelopment plans.
40 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Coastal High Hazard Area
Pursuant to Ch. 163.3178(3)(c)(2), F.S., the coastal area was redefined as the "coastal high hazard
area" (CHHA) which refers to the area below the category 1 storm surge line. The barrier islands
of Palm Beach County, including in portion of Jupiter Island within the Village, may be expected
to experience storm tide flooding or storm surge, and possible damage during storms of
hurricane strength. Similarly, areas along the North and Northwest Forks of the Loxahatchee
River in Tequesta could experience similar flooding.
The existing land uses in the CHHA in Tequesta are primarily residential and recreation uses. The
only recreational facility located in the CHHA within the Village continues to be Coral Cove Park.
Some residential areas that abut the Forks of the River and ICWW lie in the CHHA and are subject
to coastal construction regulations of the Village. The coastal high hazard area is discussed in
greater detail in the "Natural Disaster Planning" and "Sea Level Rise" sections of this document.
Stormwater Management & Flood Control
Stormwater runoff and associated flooding problems are compounded in urbanized areas. In
undeveloped portions of the watershed, rainfall percolates down into porous soil and nutrients
and other contaminants are mechanically and biologically filtered out before stormwater reaches
the lagoon. As more and more land is de -vegetated and paved over, this important natural
process is lost.
Through various policies, the Village encourages proper stormwater management practices in
order to preserve and enhance Tequesta's significant natural features. These policies aim to
reduce stormwater runoff, require development to retain/detain substantial portion of runoff
on -site, and reduce non -point source pollutant loading to the Loxahatchee River and ICWW. The
NPDES Program discussed above and in other parts of this document, is aimed at maintaining a
stormwater management system that meets State Water Quality Standards by reducing
pollutants into the surface waters within Tequesta. The Village requires that a minimum 95% of
stormwater emanating from developments be retained on -site. The Village also maintains four
(4) drainage easements (Parcels A and B, Russell Street and N. Cypress Drive) for
retention/detention purposes.
Flood control in Palm Beach County is dependent on a complex, integrated system of canals,
waterways and flood control devices operated by the South Florida Water Management District,
20 drainage districts, and thousands of privately owned canals, retention/detention lakes and
ponds. The County's drainage system is designed to handle excess surface water in three stages.
The "neighborhood or tertiary drainage systems" (made up of community lakes, ponds, street
and yard drainage grates or culverts, ditches and canals) flow into the "local or secondary
drainage system" (made up canals, structures, pumping stations and storage areas) and then into
the "primary flood control system" (consisting of South Florida Water Management District
canals and natural waterways and rivers), ultimately reaching the Atlantic Ocean.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 141
BEACH & DUNE SYSTEMS
Beaches are defined by Chapter
163, F.S., as the zone of
unconsolidated material`
extending from the mean low
water line to the place where
there is a marked change in
material or physiographic form,
or the or to the line of
permanent vegetation, usually
the effective limit of storm
waves. For the purposes of the _
Coastal Management Element, j+
beaches are limited to oceanicand estuarine shorelines. Dune is
defined as a mound or ridge of loose sediments, usually sand -sized sediments, lying landward of
the beach and extending inland to the landward toe of the dune which intercepts the 100-year
coastal storm surge.
The Atlantic beach and dune systems of Tequesta extend approximately half a mile along the
length of the Village's eastern corporate limit on Jupiter Island. The general conditions of the
beaches and dunes are discussed in the sections that follow.
General Overview
Beaches define the coastline of the barrier island. The half mile of Atlantic Coast shoreline within
Tequesta municipal limits is almost entirely dedicated to residential and both public and private
recreational uses. Subject to winds, tides, waves, and currents, a beach is a constantly changing
boundary. Its primary value to the barrier island is its capacity to absorb and dissipate wave
energy, thus stabilizing the coastline. The beach consists of sand and shell materials with some
vegetation in the dunes. Beaches are subject to constant change due to the continual drift and
movement of sand. Littoral drift is the sand which is moved by the process of being washed away
by waves and redeposited downdrift of its origin. When this process is interrupted, for example
by jetties and groins, the sand is deposited unevenly in one area and eroded in others.
Dunes are divided into two zones, the primary dune (foredune) and secondary dune (backdune).
The primary dune extends landward of the backshore. It varies in height and may be only slightly
higher than the backshore. The dune community, while tolerant of environmental stresses such
as desiccation and salt spray, is particularly sensitive to physical alteration. The dune flora is
intolerant of trampling, requiring long periods of stabilization before complete recovery.
42 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Even more destructive to dune
integrity is the historic practice of
dune -line construction, which de-
stroys the native dune flora and',
ultimately fauna, and the 4 `-
', ..`a,.
beach -dune structure itself. ` w,
Attempts to stabilize dunes with r `"
such features as bulkheads often
accelerate dune erosion because
wave energy is no longer dissipateds,;
over a dune -fed beach, but o =_
concentrated at the 4,
wave -bulkhead interface. Due to
the expense of beach nourishment
or alternative shore stabilization techniques, it is imperative that beach -dune communities be
preserved or redeveloped.
Historic Shoreline Changes in Palm Beach County
The major forces in the shaping of the Palm Beach County coastline are the combined effects of
the wind, waves, tides and sea level rise. During storm conditions, these forces increase and pose
a threat to structures and property bordering beaches of insufficient width and slope to provide
natural protection. In addition, coastal currents and inlet dynamics exacerbate the erosion
problem.
Comparison of Palm Beach County beach and offshore surveys between the years 1929 and 1977
show substantial recession and advance of the shoreline, with advance occurring primarily as a
resort of impoundment north of the county's four inlets and as a result of local beach
nourishment projects. In 1986, in an attempt to address growing concerns of beach erosion
throughout the state, the FDEP, Division of Water Resource Management was charged with the
responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which were critically eroding and to develop
and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. An initial list of
erosion areas was developed and continues to be updated and maintained, as necessary.
According to PBC's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan updated in 2016, 58 storms of
hurricane intensity have passed within 125 miles of the County since 1886. Hurricanes and
tropical storms that have directly impacted Palm Beach County and Tequesta are detailed later
in this document.
Today, various plans are in plan to manage coastal areas and protect dunes and beaches,
including the PBC Shoreline Protection Plan, FDEP's Strategic Beach Management Plan, Southeast
Atlantic Coast Region, PBC's Shoreline Enhancement and Restoration Program, and various other
programs and studies. These initiatives identify critical areas and prioritize and develop action
plans to enhance and restore areas that are at risk.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 43
Public Beach Access
Level of Service standards for public beach access are established in the Recreation and Open
Space element of the Comprehensive Plan which establishes standards for all recreation and
open space facilities. Public beach access is somewhat limited in the Village, however Coral Cove
Park provides access to both the ocean and ICWW. Limited access to coastal resources helps
protect conservation lands and allows for dune stability as these areas are not disturbed as
frequently.
Inlet Dynamics and Inlet Protection Structures
Trends in accretion and erosion of the Palm Beach County shoreline have been profoundly
affected by inlet dynamics and the structures erected to stabilize inlet locations. All of the
County's four inlets have been stabilized and improved in order to support navigation and
circulation. The structures erected in this effort have had a major impact on adjacent shorelines
both to the north and south of the inlets because of their interruption of the natural littoral drift
of sands. Inlet protection structures generally increase accretion of beaches on the north side
and erosion of beaches on the south side of the inlets. Jetties and other structures erected to
stabilize inlets act as a barrier to the natural littoral drift of sand, which is normally distributed
evenly along the coast by means of a sandbar.
In Palm Beach County, the dominate littoral drift is to the south the effect of inlet protection
structures is the impoundment of sand on the north side of the inlet and a corresponding loss of
sand on the south side. An inlet sandbar system creates a "shadow" effect around the inlet,
creating littoral drift towards the inlet on both north and south sides.
The impoundment of sand on the north side of an inlet in effect deprives the south side of the
inlet of its normal share. The critical problem area is the reach directly downdrift of the inlet,
which may extend from 1,000 to 2,000 feet or more to the south. The limit of this "shadow" zone
is often determined by the location where the inlet sand bar reconnects to the shore. The zone
is characterized by a nodal point from which the direction of net littoral drift is outward, creating
an area of beach that continuously loses sand. Thus, downdrift beaches are always in a state of
sediment deficit.
Jupiter Inlet
The Jupiter Inlet,
which is maintained
by the Jupiter Inlet
District, connects the
Atlantic Ocean to the
waters lying behind
the coastal barrier
islands. The 0.8 miles
44 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
of inlet shoreline to the north and south of Jupiter Inlet have been designated as critically eroded
inlet shoreline. This inlet, like Palm Beach County's three other inlets, has been stabilized in order
to support navigation and circulation. The structures erected in this effort had a major impact on
adjacent shorelines and the natural littoral drift of sands.
Coastal and Shore Protection Structures
In addition to inlet protection structures, coastal and shore protection structures also have an
effect on beach erosion. Coastal and shore protection structures are defined by Chapter 163, F.S.,
as revetments, rock mounds, seawalls, bulkheads, retaining walls and sandbags.
Generally, seawalls and bulkheads are erected along the dune line to protect upland areas and
structures. While these structures are successful in protecting the lands behind them, they do
not create or maintain bathing beaches along the shore. Many protective structures have an
adverse effect on the natural beaches by depriving them of their natural defenses, including
sediment material and dune vegetation. When built close to the ocean, seawalls and bulkheads
are subject to direct attack by high waves. When reflected back, these high energy waves result
in a lowered beach profile and accelerated erosion of the beach.
Trends in Erosion and Accretion on Jupiter Island
The potential impacts of erosion on recreational beaches, dune habitat, or upland public property
is the primary consideration used to determine project limits. Erosion can be a long term process
resulting from a combination of sea level rise and high frequency/low intensity storms, or it can
be a short term response to seasonal weather changes or major storm events. Generally, beach
nourishment (usually with a dune restoration component) is proposed where long term erosion
causes a reduction of sand volume in the beach profile. Dune restoration projects are typically
recommended where erosion events have resulted in the loss of the dune or when potential
environmental impacts preclude the use of extensive fill.
Palm Beach County's forty-six (46) miles of ocean shoreline has been subjected to coastal erosion
for many years due to the stabilization of inlets, residential and commercial development, and
natural forces. The coastal strand ecosystem is one of the most threatened natural systems in
Florida due to over -development. Presently, 31 of the County's 46 miles are listed as critically
eroded by Florida's Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Florida's Department of
Natural Resources studies show erosion losses for many sections of Jupiter Island, including areas
in northern Palm Beach County in Tequesta and Jupiter Inlet Colony.
However, even while erosion losses have been reported, aerial surveys have shown an accretion
of shoreline dimensions in some areas. The indication is that offshore erosion is occurring, with
the offshore beach profile becoming steeper. This steepening of the offshore profiles contributes
to the increasing vulnerability of upland structures to storm damage. The FDEP has found that
the impact of a ten-year coastal storm would involve damage to 13.3 miles of Palm Beach Island
structures.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 145
Beach and Dune Nourishment & Restoration
Beach erosion has longed plagued coastal communities, and Palm Beach County is no stranger to
these challenges. In light of increasing beach erosion documented in the 1950s, Palm Beach
County took action towards the restoration and preservation of its beaches. Beginning in the
1980s Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) prepared studies for the development of beach
nourishment plans for Palm Beach County.
Palm Beach County and
other agencies continue
to work together to
protect and manage the ` {
future of its dune and t ;
beach resources. While y t
there is no one solution to,
beach erosion, several
methods are utilized by
Palm Beach County, each
with its own merits and
drawbacks. The first ,y
approach is to facilitate
sand transfer at the inlets in order to restore the natural flow of sand. The second approach
includes protecting the existing dunes and beaches and restoring the portions of shoreline that
are already degraded. The last approach includes evaluating erosion control structures for use
along beaches that may not qualify for a traditional beach fill project or may experience an
erosional hot spot.
All approaches include environmental monitoring of the resources to ensure that our effort to
restore sand is accomplished in a manner that protects the natural environment to the greatest
extent possible. Through the Shoreline Enhancement & Restoration Program, the County is able
to provide publicly accessible beaches, support the tourist -based economy, restore beach habitat
and protect upland property.
Beach Nourishment
To date, 14.5 miles of shoreline within Palm Beach County are managed with beach nourishment.
Another 5 miles is maintained by dune restoration. In order to supplement the natural littoral
transport of coastal sediments, the County and its municipal partners maintain a feeder beach
system. The planning, engineering, design, construction, monitoring and funding of a multi-
million dollar beach nourishment project is a long process that can take from four to seven years
to complete.
46 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Dune Restoration
Sand dunes provide additional protection to the upland from the sea by acting as buffers against
high storm surge and waves, protecting upland areas from flooding. In addition, they provide a
reserve supply of sand to replenish the beach during times of severe erosion. Where feasible, the
County re-establishes viable dune systems planted with native vegetation. Native, salt -resistant
dune vegetation traps wind-blown sand, collects it around the plant, and builds up the dune and
surrounding beach. Dunes also provide a habitat for sea turtle nesting and other wildlife. To date,
112 acres of dune have been restored at Coral Cove Park, Jupiter Beach Park, Carlin Park, Juno
Beach, Loggerhead Park, Singer Island, Riviera Beach, Lake Worth, South Palm Beach, Lantana
Municipal Beach, Ocean Inlet Park, Ocean Ridge, Gulfstream Park and South Inlet Park.
Coral Cove Dune Restoration Proiect
Palm Beach County's dunes are vulnerable to severe storm impacts, human activity, and invasive
nonnative vegetation. In order to address these issues, Palm Beach County works with
appropriate entities to develop a solution, which typically includes adding sand to damaged
dunes, stabilizing dunes with native vegetation, removing invasive nonnative vegetation, and
creating beach access with dune crossovers to minimize disturbance.
Coral Cove Beach is located in the Village of
Tequesta, approximately one mile north of the
Jupiter Inlet, at monuments R5-R7.6. Over the
years, this area has suffered from the effects of
storm surge and hurricanes. In 1989, Coral Cove
Dune Restoration was first initiated. This
initiative included removal of nonnative
vegetation, filling dine with sand to restore
natural dune elevation, installation of 9.6 acres
of native dune vegetation, and construction of
4 dune walkovers.
a
Subsequent dune restoration was completed in 1993, 2005, 2013, and most recently in 2017 after
Hurricane Matthew. Armoring has since been constructed along private development in
Tequesta. Following the 2004 hurricane season, emergency protective berms were constructed
in 2005. Similarly, after Hurricane Sandy in 2012, approximately 35,000 tons of sand was used to
rebuild the dune, which was completed in 2014. Native vegetation was also installed to stabilize
the dune slope and limit erosion. The photos show Coral Cove Beach both before and after the
dune restoration project that took place as a result of Hurricane Sandy. Hurricane Matthew
caused damage to the dunes in this area as well, and dune restoration plans for affected beaches
are once again in place.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 147
Potential Biological Imoacts of Beach Nourishment
In order to design and construct beach projects with minimal environmental impacts, PBC staff
are responsible for developing and implementing extensive environmental monitoring programs
for beach projects. Monitoring efforts include, but are not limited to, taking annual coastal aerial
photos, measuring the amount of exposed nearshore reef, obtaining beach profiles, tracking the
County's threatened and endangered nesting sea turtle populations and performing pre & post
storm beach assessments.
Recommendation for approval and construction of erosion control projects will be based not only
upon the amount of erosion evidenced in a given reach of the study area, but also the potential
biological impacts of beach nourishment measures. Following design of the project, permit
applications are submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and
the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). These agencies in turn seek input from the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS).
Potential short-term and long-term impacts associated with beach nourishment proposals
include alteration of specific area, including nearshore and borrowing sites within each proposed
nourishment project reach, as a resort of dredging activities. Drastic alterations in these areas
48 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
could create adverse environmental impacts resulting in reduction of fish populations and
damaged or destroyed soft and hard coral reef communities.
The resuspension of silts and clays winnowing from dredged material could continue to produce
turbidities after construction. Such turbidities could cause the degradation of water quality and
possibly smother or stress organisms such as corals, sponges and polycheates. Turbidities could
also reduce the amount of sunlight available to photosynthetic plants that are essential to the
functioning of the community food chain.
Proposed beach nourishment projects will be closely monitored and possibly modified, if
necessary, in order to address the following specific potential impacts:
1. Burial of nearshore reef systems;
2. Short-term and long-term water quality impacts;
3. Sea turtle nesting impacts;
4. Mechanical damage to patch reefs and deep reefs; and
S. Elimination of infaunal communities in borrow sites.
NATURAL DISASTER PLANNING
The goals and policies in this section are designed to strengthen coastal resiliency in the region
in order to protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by
natural disasters.
Local Mitigation Strategies (LMS)
According to state law, local governments are required to prepare Local Mitigation Strategies
(LMS) to identify actions that permanently reduce or eliminate the long term risk to people and
property from the different types of hazards faced by Florida residents. Mitigation planning
allows communities to consider the vulnerability of land that is currently undeveloped but may
be developed in the future, as well as the risk to people and property on existing developed land.
The consideration of the potential for damage to properties in vulnerable areas and
implementation of actions to reduce the impact can go a long way towards eliminating the
disruption a disaster occurrence creates in the community.
As such, the Village of Tequesta is also a part of and subject to, the Palm Beach County LMS. The
original PBC LMS was formally adopted by the County, municipalities, and the LMS Steering
Committee in 1999, and most recently adopted the 2016 revisions. The LMS was established and
continues to operate in accordance with prevailing federal, state, and local guidelines and
requirements. The purpose of the LMS is to develop and execute an ongoing strategy for reducing
the community's vulnerability to identified natural, technological, and human caused hazards.
The strategy provides a rational, managed basis for considering and prioritizing hazard -specific
mitigation options and for developing and executing sound, cost-effective mitigation projects.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 149
Additionally, the LMS provides a basis for justifying the solicitation and use of local, state, federal,
and other funding to support hazard mitigation projects and initiatives.
The Palm Beach County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group and sub -committees are
coordinated by the Palm Beach County Department of Public Safety's Division of Emergency
Management. The LMS Working Group is comprised of county, municipal, private sector, and
community partners, including the general public, that prepare and promote local strategies and
projects to reduce long-term risks to life and property from natural, technological, and human
caused disasters. The resulting pre- and post -disaster mitigation strategies and projects are
supported by a variety of state and federal programs and funding sources, in accordance with
the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
Mitigation projects carried on the LMS Prioritized Project List (PPL) may be eligible for funding
under a variety of programs, such as the Pre Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program, Public
Assistance (PA), Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program, and Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program (HMGP). The PPL is updated at least twice a year in anticipation of funding
opportunities.
LMS Working Group meetings serve as the primary mechanism and forum for exchanging
information, planning implementation of updating the Palm Beach County Local Mitigation
Strategy, and mobilizing the vast experience and resources of the community. Public attendance
and comments are welcomed and encouraged.
Coastal High Hazard Area
As discussed in a previous section, in response to devastating hurricanes and coastal storms in
the past 15 years, state bills were introduced to address the permitting processes, levels of
service thresholds, and to revise the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area.
Thus, the definition of Coastal High Hazard Area changed from the category 1 hurricane
evacuation zone to "The area below the Category 1 storm surge line as established by the Sea,
Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model." The
SLOSH model combines topographic and bathometric data with hurricane models to delineate
land areas that are prone to storm surge inundation.
Establishing coastal high hazard areas is an important component to hazard mitigation planning,
as it enhances life safety of residents and visitors and guides future development and
redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding from storm surge.
Per the above definition for a CHHA, the Village considers all areas below the category 1 storm
surge line within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The category 1 storm surge area is indicated on
the Hurricane Surge Map, presented in Figure 5-1 of this Element. This criteria is intended to
guide future development and redevelopment in an effort to further protect Tecluesta's residents
and its natural, economic, and cultural resources.
50 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Floodplain Development
Flooding in Florida can come at any time with little warning. Hurricane season runs from June 1st
through November 30th. Flooding in our Village can come from different sources, including tidal
surges from hurricanes and tropical storms, heavy rains, and clogged or blocked drainage pipes
and ditches.
Storm surge caused by hurricane systems poses the greatest threat to life and property. All
coastal property and inhabitants are subject to severe damage and loss of life resulting from
flooding caused by tidal surge associated with hurricanes and tropical storms. Inland flooding can
accompany any hurricane due to the low elevation of much of the Village. During extended
periods of heavy rainfall, certain low-lying neighborhoods within the Village are subject to
considerable flood damage and isolation caused by inability of natural and mechanical drainage
systems to effectively remove the water.
Natural and Beneficial Functions of Floodplains
Wetland areas along the Intracoastal in the Village of Tequesta and buffer areas adjacent to open
spaces help reduce flood damage because floodwaters in a natural floodplain are permitted to
spread over a large area and open spaces provide flood water storage. These natural areas also
filter nutrients and impurities from stormwater runoff and promote infiltration and aquifer
recharge. By preserving natural areas, fish and wildlife habitats are protected to provide breeding
and feeding grounds.
All development within the Village is subject floodplain regulations and must comply with the
Village's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 78, Article XII, Flood Damage Prevention. This
chapter includes requirements for all development wholly within or partially within any flood
hazard area to safeguard the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize public
and private losses due to flooding through regulation of development in flood hazard areas. This
article is intended to be administered and enforced in conjunction with the Florida Building Code.
Where cited, ASCE 24 refers to the edition of the standard that is referenced by the Florida
Building Code.
Flood Protection Programs
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
The U.S. Congress established the NFIP with the passage of the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968. The NFIP is a Federal program enabling property owners in participating communities to
purchase insurance as a protection against flood losses in exchange for State and community
floodplain management regulations that reduce future flood damages. Participation in the NFIP
is based on an agreement between communities and the Federal government. If a community
adopts and enforces a floodplain management ordinance to reduce future flood risk to new
construction in floodplains, the Federal government will make flood insurance available within
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 151
the community as a financial protection against flood losses. This insurance is designed to
provide an insurance alternative to disaster assistance to reduce the escalating costs of repairing
damage to buildings and their contents caused by floods.
The Village of Tequesta participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In return for
NFIP making flood insurance available to property owners, the Village is required to adopt
ordinances to manage development within 100-year floodplains to prevent increased flooding
and minimize future flood damage. Flood Insurance Rate Maps, published by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), are used as the basis for delineating the 100-year
floodplain and identifying regulated land. To this end, the Village adopted two ordinances in 2017
related to FEMA's updated flood insurance maps and flood hazard prevention, which are
discussed in detail later in this document.
Development in flood zone areas must also meet the requirements of the NIFP. The Village
contains various flood -prone areas (Zones A and V) with the majority being located along the
Atlantic Ocean on the barrier island, the ICWW and fringe areas along the North and Northwest
Forks of the Loxahatchee River.
Community Rating System (CRS)
The NFIP's CRS was implemented in 1990 as a program for recognizing and encouraging
community floodplain management activities that exceed the minimum NAP standards. Palm
Beach County joined the National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Community Rating System
(CRS) in 1991. The CRS is the County's primary floodplain management program. It is a voluntary
incentive program that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities
that exceed minimum NFIP requirements.
Resident flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting
from community actions that: (1) reduce flood losses; (2) facilitate accurate insurance rating;
and (3) promote the awareness of flood insurance. Palm Beach County has recently qualified for
a Class 6 rating, placing it in the top 10% of programs nation-wide. By virtue of its ratings
increase, the residents of Unincorporated Palm Beach County will see a 20% annual savings in
insurance premiums.
Under the CRS, flood insurance premium rates are adjusted to reflect the reduced flood risk
resulting from community activities that meet the three goals of the CRS:
1) Reduce flood losses;
2) Facilitate accurate insurance rating; and
3) Promote the awareness of flood insurance.
There are ten CRS classes: Class 1 requires the most credit points and gives the largest premium
reduction; Class 10 receives no premium reduction. The CRS recognizes 18 creditable activities,
organized under four categories numbered 300 through 600: Public Information, Mapping and
52 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Regulations, Flood Damage Reduction, and Flood Preparedness. Through various flood plain
management activities and coordination with FEMA, the Village of Tequesta has lowered its CRS
class to 7 and will continue to participate in activities to comply with NAP requirements.
Local Flood -Related Ordinances
The Village seeks to develop techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to flooding
and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. Residents and businesses in
flood -prone areas are encouraged to utilize the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the
Community Rating System (CRS), which are briefly discussed below.
In addition to state agencies, the Village's Building Department regulates the building of
structures in flood -prone areas so that flood damage can be minimized or avoided. The Village
has continued to support these programs and work with residents and businesses in regard to
program requirements. Moreover, the Village recently passed an ordinance related to FEMA's
updated flood zone maps and is considering passing an ordinance related to flood hazard
prevention techniques that will increase the "freeboard" height requirements, as detailed below.
On July 13, 2017, the Village of Tequesta Council adopted Ordinance 7-17 providing that the
Federal Emergency Management Agency has revised and reissued the Flood Insurance Study and
Flood Insurance Rate Map for Palm Beach County, Florida, and Incorporated Areas, effective
October 5, 2017. The Village of Tequesta participates in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) and the Village Council of the Village of Tequesta desires to continue to meet the
requirements of Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 59 and 60, necessary for
participation.
As discussed in the previous section, NFIP provides federally backed flood insurance within
communities that enact and enforce floodplain regulations. The Community Rating System (CRS)
is a national program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). To be
covered by a flood insurance policy a property must be in a community that participates in the
NFIP. To qualify for the NFIP, a community adopts and enforces a floodplain management
ordinance to regulate development in flood hazard areas.
The CRS Program recognizes, encourages and rewards communities that go beyond the minimum
required by the NFIP. Under the CRS, the flood insurance premiums of a community's residents
and businesses are discounted. A community receives a CRS classification based upon the total
credit for activities such as Public Information; Mapping and Regulations; Flood Damage
Reduction; and Warning and Response. The Village of Tequesta is part of the CRS Program, "Class
7" rating which allows residents to receive 15% discount of their flood insurance.
Currently, the Village of Tequesta is reviewing a potential ordinance amendment to Chapter 14
of the Village's Code of Ordinances that would require 18 inches of freeboard above the base
floor elevation in flood zone areas. This provision will contribute to mitigating sea level rise
flooding effects that continue to threaten coastal areas Tequesta.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 153
As illustrated in the following figure, freeboard refers to the height of a building above the Base
Flood Elevation for a specific site. Florida regulations often require at least one -foot of freeboard
for elevated buildings. Each foot of freeboard (up to a maximum of three feet), lowers flood
insurance rates significantly. Since elevations on FIRMS do not include sea level rise, freeboard
will help keep structures above floodwaters as storm surge elevations increase, thus reducing
flood insurance premiums. The graphic below shows an example on how to implement this
concept.
Figure 5-9. Adjusted Base Flood Elevation, Accounting for Sea Level Rise.
The same home under an adjusted Base Flood
Elevation (BFE) accounting for Sea Level Rise
(SLR); structure is now non -compliant, under a
greater and more frequent threat, and will cost
more to insure
--- -- F7 -- ----------------------------------------
• 1' hNbwrd
- -------------- ------------------ Wicikulitidsasi1F1i dE6'viik;J&f1j
accounting for See LeW Rbe
_ — — — — — — NAVDgB reference — — — —
Sea Level Rise (SLR)
The Village of Tequesta contains several parcels on the barrier island that contain multi -family
condominium developments. While there are not currently any single family homes along the
ocean front within Tequesta, the freeboard technique could be considered for future
development or redevelopment in this area.
Flnnri 7nnnc
The following table presents a brief description of flood zones found in the Village of Tequesta,
based on FEMA Flood Zone Maps. The descriptions include updates to the designated flood zones
since the latest FEMA flood map updates.
54 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Table 5-3. Village of T
[EL. 5: 1% annual change flood (100 year flood)]
Zone AE Areas subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood event. Because detailed
(EL. 5) hydraulic analyses have not been performed, no Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or flood
depths are shown.
[0.2% chance flood (100 year flood)]
Moderate risk areas within the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, areas of 1% annual
chance flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1% annual chance
Zone X flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, and areas
protected from the 1% annual chance flood by a levee. No BFEs or base flood depths are
shown within these zones.
(Zone X is used on new and revised maps in place of Zone B.)
[Areas of minimal flooding — outside the 0.2% annual chance (100 year flood)]
Zone X Minimal risk areas outside the 1% and 0.2 % annual chance floodplains. No BFEs or base
flood depths are shown within these zones.
(Zone X is used on new and revised maps in place of Zone C.)
[EL. 10: Coastal flood zone — wave action]
Zone VE Areas along coasts subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood event with
(EL. 10) additional hazards due to storm -induced velocity wave action. BFEs derived from
detailed hydraulic coastal analyses are shown within these zones.
(Zone VE is used on new and revised maps in place of Zones V1—V30.)
[EL.12: Coastal flood zone — wave action]
Zone VE Areas along coasts subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood event with
(EL.12) additional hazards due to storm -induced velocity wave action. BFEs derived from
detailed hydraulic coastal analyses are shown within these zones.
(Zone VE is used on new and revised maps in place of Zones V1—V30.)
Source: FEMA Flood Zone Descriptions
The beachfront areas on Jupiter Island are within VE Zones, EL. 10 & EL. 12, while the areas along
the Indian River Lagoon/Intracoastal Waterway and Loxahatchee River shoreline are in Zone AE,
EL. 5. Zone X, indicated in yellow on the Flood Zone Map (Figure 5-10), includes portions of the
Tequesta Country Club neighborhood peninsula, especially areas adjacent to Zones VE and AE, as
well as interior areas north and south of Tequesta Drive.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 155
1, T-
�
r
r f 7,
iOIL 0
IC
ob 1 i
+ir.,...OE
MAI'
t_;�.,;`
IS
- � y
i
�: �� ma's.'"" �"t • ��- � -
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
The Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) establishes the framework to ensure
Palm Beach County will be adequately prepared to respond to, and recover from any hazards
that threaten the lives and property of residents and visitors to the area. The CEMP outlines the
responsibilities and coordination mechanisms of County agencies, municipalities, and
constitutional officers.
The CEMP is the guiding document for the County's response to and recovery from a disaster. It
is supported by additional plans and procedures including the Local Mitigation Strategy, Disaster
Recovery Plan, Post Disaster Redevelopment Plan, Section Coordinating Procedures, Hazard
Specific Plans, Incident Support Plans, program plans, and Standard Operating Guides. Together,
they provide the framework for all phases of emergency management.
In addition, the CEMP establishes the official emergency policies for those municipalities that
have not developed and attained approval of their own CEMP in accordance with Rule 9G-6 and
9G-7 pursuant to Chapter 252 of the Florida Statutes. Accordingly, the Village of Tequesta is also
a part of and subject to, the Palm Beach County CEMP.
Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
Florida is the most vulnerable state in the nation to the impacts of hurricanes and tropical storms.
South Florida is particularly exposed to the dangers presented by hurricanes, due to its
topography. The region is largely a flat, low lying plain. Moreover, the potential for property
damage and human casualties in PBC has been increased by the rapid growth and development
over the past few decades, particularly along the coastline. As discussed earlier in this document,
about 58 storms of hurricane intensity have passed within 125 miles of PBC, which represents an
average of one hurricane every two years.
Hurricanes are tropical cyclones with winds that exceed 74 mph and blow counter -clockwise
about their centers in the Northern Hemisphere. They are essentially heat pumping mechanisms
that transfer the sun's heat energy from the tropical to the temperate and polar regions. This
helps to maintain the global heat budget and sustain life. Hurricanes are formed from
thunderstorms that form over tropical oceans with surface temperatures warmer than 817
(26.5°C).
The ambient heat in the sea's surface and moisture in the rising air column set up a low pressure
center and convective conditions that allow formation of self-sustaining circular wind patterns.
Under the right conditions, these winds may continue to intensify until they reach hurricane
strength. This heat and moisture from the warm ocean water is the energy source of a hurricane.
Hurricanes weaken rapidly when deprived of their energy source by traveling over land or
entering cooler waters. When a hurricane threatens the coast, advisories are issued by the NHC.
The storm's current location and intensity are described along with its projected path.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 157
In addition to advisories, the NHC may issue a hurricane watch or warning. A Hurricane Watch
is issued 48 hours in advance of the anticipated arrival of tropical -storm force winds. A Hurricane
Warning is issued 36 hours in advance of the anticipated onset of tropical -storm -force winds.
Advisories and hurricane watches and warnings will frequently refer to the category of a storm.
Saffir/Simpson Hurricane Scale
The Saffir/Simpson Hurricane scale is utilized by the National Weather Service to provide an
initial and continuing assessment of potential wind and storm -surge damage from a hurricane in
progress. The scale numbers are first made available when a hurricane is within 72 hours of
landfall are revise regularly based on new observations. The categories of the scale are based on
maximum sustained winds in miles per hour, as shown in Table 5-4 below.
Table 5-4. Hurricane Category Descriptions
Sustained winds 74 to 95 mph
Sustained winds 96 to 110 mph
Sustained winds 111 to 129 mph
Sustained winds 130 to 156 mph
Category 5 Sustained winds of 157 mph or
higher
Source: National Hurricane Center (NOAA)
Potential Hurricane Damage
DAMANGE
Very dangerous winds will produce some
damage
Extremely dangerous winds will cause
extensive damage
Devastating damage will occur
Catastrophic damage will occur
Catastrophic damage will occur
Hurricane damage occurs through two means — high winds and storm surge. Generally it is the
wind that produces most of the property damage associated with hurricanes, while the greatest
threat to life is from flooding and storm surge. Although hurricane winds can exert tremendous
pressure against a structure, a large percentage of hurricane damage is caused not from the wind
itself, but from flying debris. Tree limbs, signs and sign posts, roof tiles, metal siding, and other
loose objects can become airborne missiles that penetrate the outer shells of buildings,
destroying their structural integrity and allowing hurricane winds to act against interior walls not
designed to withstand such forces. Once a structure's integrity is breached, the driving rains
associated with hurricanes can enter the structure and completely destroy its contents.
Tropical storm/hurricane events can have the following potential impacts within a community:
Excessive wind; Excessive water; Soil/beach erosion; Electric power outage; Surface and air
transportation disruption; Navigable waterway impairment; Potable water system loss or
disruption; Sewer system outage; Telecommunications system outage; Human health and safety;
Psychological hardship; Economic disruption; Disruption of community services;
Agricultural/fisheries damage; Damage to critical environmental resources; Damage to identified
historical resources; Fire; Toxic releases; and Stormwater drainage impairment.
58 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Additionally, floods are one of the most common and widespread of all natural disasters,
accounting for ninety percent of all presidentially declared natural disasters. Florida, and
especially PBC, are highly susceptible to localized flooding. In Palm Beach County, the most
common forms of flooding are rain -induced inland flooding and storm driven coastal storm surge.
Palm Beach County averages over 60 inches of rain per year and encounters over 130 rain days.
Due to the flat topography of the region, with most areas at or only slightly above sea level, even
moderate rains can accumulate quickly.
Vulnerable Communities
All communities within Palm Beach County are highly vulnerable to hurricanes, but they are not
all vulnerable for the same reasons. The barrier island communities, including Jupiter Island, are
obviously highly vulnerable to both wind and storm surge damage from hurricanes. The
communities fronting on Palm Beach County's estuaries and rivers, such as the Village of
Tequesta, are also highly vulnerable to flooding associated with hurricane winds and storm surge.
Inland communities may have less hurricane vulnerability from flooding but more hurricane
vulnerability from wind damage due to their older or less substantial type of construction.
The Village coordinates with Palm Beach County in hurricane planning and management efforts.
These on -going management and coordination efforts continue to be refined, as necessary, and
have been implemented several times in recent years.
Areas Historically Experiencing Storm Damage in Palm Beach County
Storms can have devastating effects on shorelines since they redistribute large volumes of sand
in a short period of time. Palm Beach Island has experience severe damage from hurricanes in
the past. One of the most violent storms to strike coastal Florida was the hurricane in September
1928. It made landfall in the vicinity of the Town of Palm Beach, just south of Tequesta and
Jupiter, and resulted in 1,700 deaths in Palm Beach County. Damages were estimated to be in
the range of $11.5 to $25.0 million. The mid-century saw damaging hurricanes as well, that had
a detrimental affect along the coast of Palm Beach County.
Since then, coastal communities around Palm Beach County have experienced even more
damaging hurricanes and tropical storm events. Since the year 2000, Palm Beach County has
endured the direct impact of three major hurricanes. In 2004, Hurricanes Frances (Category 2)
and Jeanne (Category 3) both made landfall just north of Palm Beach County within the same
month. The following year, Hurricane Wilma, a Category 3 storm, impacted the already battered
beaches of Palm Beach County. Natural recovery of the beaches has been slowed by the
numerous tropical and nor'easter storm events that have occurred since 2004. Subtropical Storm
Andrea, which impacted County beaches in 2007, required an emergency declaration due to the
extent of the erosion. Within the County's Jupiter Beach Park, a maintenance building and 1.3
acres of a healthy dune system were lost and the Park's parking lot was breached.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 159
It is these tropical storms and more common winter storms that produce high seas for days at a
time, with considerable cumulative effects. The Shoreline Enhancement & Restoration program
is designed to respond to emergency response scenarios, however substantial damage cannot
always be addressed through emergency measures and often alters long term planning.
Hurricanes that have impacted Palm Beach County's coastline since the seventies are listed
below.
• 1979: Hurricane David
• 1984: Thanksgiving Day Northeaster
• 1992: Hurricane Andrew
• 1999: Hurricane Irene
• 2004: Hurricane Frances, Hurricane Jeanne
• 2005: Hurricane Wilma
• 2007: Tropical Storm Andrea; October Northeasters (unnamed); Tropical Storm Noel
• 2008: Tropical Storm Fay; September Storm (unnamed); Tropical Storm Hannah
• 2011: Hurricane Irene (swell only)
• 2012: Hurricane Sandy
• 2016: Hurricane Matthew
• 2017: Irma
Most of these storms resulted in significant increases in the amount of critically eroded beaches
in PBC and surrounding coastal counties.
Regional Hurricane Hazards
The lower southeast Florida region has been identified by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration as one of the most hurricane -vulnerable areas in the country. Hurricane -strength
storms have impacted this region about once every three years since 1900. The hurricane season
lasts from June to November, with most events occurring during the months of September and
October.
Local Hurricane Hazard
Located along the Intracoastal Waterway and on a coastal barrier island, the Village of Tequesta
contains areas subject to hazards during storms of all categories. Local hurricane hazards have
been determined in regional hurricane contingency and evacuation studies.
Hurricane Response & Evacuation Procedures
With regard to response procedures for hurricanes and other natural disasters, the County and
Village can implement post -disaster redevelopment plans which reduce or eliminate the
exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards. The Village will
continue to coordinate with the County in hurricane and disaster planning and management
60 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
efforts. In addition, these ongoing management and coordination efforts continue to be
redefined, as necessary, and have been implemented several times in recent years.
Official Hurricane Warning System
The official warning process for an approaching hurricane begins with issuance of a hurricane
watch by the National Hurricane Center. A hurricane watch, alerts residents of a specified area
to the potential of a hurricane and advises them to monitor hurricane advisories, which are issued
every six hours. A hurricane watch suggests that residents begin preparations for a possible
evacuation. Some residents will evacuate when a hurricane watch has been issued, based on
previous experience in hurricane situations.
The second step in the warning process is issuance of a hurricane warning for a large geographical
area. A hurricane warning is issued when a hurricane is expected to make landfall within 24 hours
with sustained winds of 74 miles per hour or more and/or dangerously high water or a
combination of high water and high waves. Many residents begin evacuating after issuance of a
Municipal officials in low-lying or barrier island areas may issue local evacuation orders when a
hurricane warning has been issues for their area.
Hurricane Evacuation Order
Issuance of a hurricane evacuation order is the most important step in the hurricane warning
system. Determination of the appropriate time for issuance of an evacuation order is critical to
safe and effective evacuation of threatened area. The earlier an order is issued, the more time
residents will have to evacuate. But if an order is issued too early, there is a possibility the storm
will change course, making the evacuation unnecessary or putting evacuees in a more hazardous
location.
The legal authority for ordering and coordination evacuations in the State of Florida resides with
the Governor. The Governor has delegated this authority to local governments. Thus, an
evacuation order may be issued by a municipality in the absence or an order by a higher level of
government. However, an order issued by a higher level of government takes precedence.
Activation of County Emergency Response Plan
If a disaster threatens prior to the Governor's decision to issue an Executive Order of
Proclamation of a State of Emergency, the Emergency Management Director, or his designee,
may activate this plan, subject to Board approval; this may be followed by a declaration of a local
State of Emergency as outlined in Palm Beach County's Code of Ordinances. In this situation, the
DEM will coordinate any emergency response actions that may be necessary for the immediate
protection of life and property.
When an emergency or disaster has occurred or is imminent, the Governor may issue an
Executive Order or Proclamation of a State of Emergency, activating the emergency response,
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 161
recovery, and mitigation aspects of state, local, and interjurisdictional disaster plans that apply
to the state, local, and interjurisdictional disaster plans that apply to the affected areas. Such
orders or proclamations are needed for the deployment and use of state personnel, supplies,
equipment, materials, and/or facilities that are available.
The Palm Beach County Evacuation Plan is part of the County's Peacetime Emergency Plan,
administered by the Division of Emergency Management. Under the current Hurricane
Evacuation Plan, an Emergency Operations Center is activated upon issuance of a hurricane
warning by the National Hurricane Center, as described previously.
Village of Tequesta Procedure & Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
Chapter 18-33 of the Village Code of Ordinances designates the Fire Chief as the Emergency
Management Director. The Fire Chief, Village Manager, and the Mayor will accomplish all
coordination, direction, and implementation of all disaster management functions cooperatively
to maintain continuity of government. When necessary, evacuation of certain areas of the Village
will be initiated following a decision by the local governing body in accordance with the Palm
Beach County Comprehensive Emergency Management Manual.
The Village of Tequesta will support the County and the Red Cross by assigning security and
emergency medical personnel, if needed, to shelters as they are opened by the County. The
Village of Tequesta Emergency Operations Center will serve as the nerve center for the
coordination and control of the Village's response and recovery efforts. The EOC will be
activated by the Emergency Management Director upon determination of a significant and
immediate threat to life and property.
Evacuation Order Time
Evacuation order time is the time in hours prior to hurricane eye landfall by which an evacuation
order must be issued in order to allow all evacuees to reach their chosen destinations.
Determining the appropriate time to issue an evacuation order involves not only calculation of
total evacuation time, or clearance time, but also consideration of the following:
The Palm Beach County Hurricane Evacuation Plan provides a mechanical "Evacuation Order
Time Calculator" and an Implementation Guide by which the appropriate evacuation order time
for a given storm a scenario can be determined. The first step in calculating the evacuation order
time is evaluation of the storm's path, wind velocity, forward speed and maximum wind radius.
Then the time concepts described above are calculated, with modifications as necessary. The
calculator also provides "Action Guides" to aid public officials in the appropriate timing of actions
that must be taken prior to issuance of an evacuation order.
62 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Hurricane Shelters
Palm Beach County, in cooperation with the American Red Cross (ARC), currently operates 15
hurricane evacuation shelters. All hurricane evacuation shelters meet current ARC 4496 design
standard to withstand hurricane force winds, including window strength and protection, wind
and debris exposure, and storm surge inundation. Shelter capacity is continuing to expand as new
high schools and select middle schools are built to ARC 4496 standards and Enhanced Hurricane
Protection Area Standards.
Red Cross public shelter assignments are subject to change and are announced by the Red Cross
when appropriate. It should also be noted that in some cases, these shelters serve more than
one evacuation zone. However, using a capacity formula of 20 square feet per evacuee as
required by the Red Cross, it has been determined that these shelters would not experience a
deficit in the event of the evacuation of the high hazard area.
The number of persons requiring public hurricane shelter varies depending upon the preferences
of evacuees and their opportunities to reach their desired destinations. According to staff at the
Palm Beach County Emergency Operations Center, shelter demand is equal to about 10 percent
of the evacuation population.
Special Needs of the Elderly and Handicapped
The large elderly and disabled population residing in this region presents special problems in that
these residents do not always receive preparedness instructions because of hearing or other
disabilities. Furthermore, they may be unable because of physical limitations to effect evacuation
within the required amount of time.
Local disaster preparedness agencies are required to provide for voluntary registration of
disabled citizens who require special assistance for evacuation. Accordingly, the Village of
Tequesta cooperates with and assists the Palm Beach County program for voluntary registration
and early evacuation of the disabled.
Protected Impact of Future Population Density
The projected impact of the future population density of the Village is minimal since the
projected population growth in the designated Coastal Area is relatively low. The additional
persons who will be at risk and required to evacuate in the future should not add significantly to
local evacuation times.
Post Disaster Redevelopment
Request for Federal and State Assistance
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 163
When disaster effects become such that the resources of Palm Beach County and/or its
municipalities are inadequate to fulfill the needs of the citizens, then aid and assistance may be
requested from the State of Florida and the Federal Government. Such requests for State and
Federal assistance will be made through the Palm Beach County Emergency Management
Division to the Florida Division of Emergency Management. Assistance required may be in the
form of information, technical expertise or substantial financial material or resource needs. A
Declaration of State of Local Emergency is a prerequisite to received State and Federal disaster
assistance.
When the County is under a warning or threatened by an impending disaster, emergency workers
will be relieved in shifts to prepare their families and property. While no special provisions have
been made for the safety and welfare of families of emergency workers, they have been
encouraged to develop their own family disaster plan. The Emergency Management Director, or
his designee, is responsible for establishing a liaison with the state response and recovery
agencies and teams. ESFs will interface with State RIAT and RRTs to assist in the impact
assessment and rescue/recovery operations.
In accordance with Palm Beach County Emergency Management Division and the Palm Beach
County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, evacuation routes for the County have
been identified, including the Village of Tequesta, and is available on the County website.
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
Sea Level Rise Considerations
Sea level rise has long been recognized by the South Florida Water Management District and by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as an increasing threat to low lying, porous South Florida.
Organizations such as the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact have provided reports and
publications that have increased awareness and expanded the knowledge of the impacts of sea
level rise on coastal communities in South Florida.
Rising sea levels due to the melting of the polar ice caps contribute to greater storm damage;
warming ocean temperatures are associated with stronger and more frequent storms; additional
rainfall, particularly during severe weather events, leads to flooding and other damage; an
increase in the incidence and severity of wildfires threatens habitats, homes, and lives; and heat
waves contribute to human deaths and other consequences.
Given the geography of Florida, coastal communities in Southeast Florida have long known how to
incorporate hazard mitigation with long-term planning to reduce the loss of life and property and lessen
the impact of disasters (hurricanes, severe weather events, flooding, etc.). The challenge of
adaptive planning for sea level rise goes beyond hazard mitigation. Rather than preparing for a
specific disaster or event, a resilient community is one that can face an array of unpredictable
challenges and disturbances with minimal long-term impacts. Certain communities, especially in
coastal areas, must be prepared for future conditions that may not allow the same development
64 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
intensity, location, type, or access. Through the use of innovative tools and strategies it is possible
to transition these economies and the built environment into resilient communities that adapt
to these adverse impacts.
With the currently accepted sea level rise projections and known climate impacts, long-range
planning must now incorporate resiliency strategies that balance mitigation and adaptation for
the protection of the natural systems and to sustain the socio-economic characteristics of the
community. Understanding how mitigation and adaptation act as interconnected relationships
to building resilient and sustainable coastal communities is vital for adaptive planning.
Adaptive planning in response to global impacts begins with a 'Top -Down' approach that relies
on broad climate data and scientific forecasting models from which climate scenarios are
developed. While the 'Bottom -Up' approach focuses on understanding and managing the
community's level risk and vulnerability to these external drivers. To effectively implement
adaptive planning, both must work together to inform decision -makers, and potential
stakeholders with information that may influence their communities' adaptation priorities.
Although many other Florida cities and towns have yet to experience damage, scientists and
engineers have predicted that within 40 to 50 years, Florida will be inundated with problems
related to sea level rise.
Federal Agencies Initiatives
The U. S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) was mandated by Congress in 1990 and has
been advancing Earth system science and growing the knowledge base needed to respond to a
changing climate by providing the world's largest scientific investment in the areas of climate
science and global change research. There are thirteen Federal entities that conduct or use
research on global change and its impacts on society.
The United States' President's Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience was
established by Executive Order 13653 on November 1, 2013 and outlined the President's Climate
Action Plan (CAP). In November 2014, the Task Force released a 49 pg. Report that invoked, in
part, the critical role of U.S. Global Change Research Program (USCRP) in developing sound
science to manage climate change impact.
Within the report, 35 key recommendations are organized into seven cross -cutting themes:
• Resilient communities;
• Infrastructure resilience;
• Natural resources resilience;
• Human health and population resilience;
• Climate -smart hazard mitigation,
• Disaster preparedness and recovery;
• The economics of resilience; and
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 165
• Building capacity for resilience.
In addition, the White House released Climate Resilience Toolkit website in 2014, to provide
access to dozens of tools cities can use to better understand climate change impacts on their
communities.
The development of these planning tools, using current data reflective of the changing climate
conditions and sea level rise has been integrated into many Federal and State Programs that work
together to reduce hazards and to build more resilient communities. The following section
outlines this integration.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
FEMA identifies flood hazards, assesses flood risks, and partners with States and communities to
provide accurate flood hazard and risk data to encourage communities to take mitigation actions.
Maps identifying flood hazards provide citizens with flood risk information and enable
communities to make informed development decisions. With this information, communities are
able to adopt and enforce minimum floodplain management regulations that reduce the loss of
life and property. Flood mapping information and resources are available on the FEMA website.
Flood hazard mapping is an important part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
(established in 1968) as it is the basis of the NAP regulations and flood insurance requirements.
FEMA maintains and updates data through Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) and risk
assessments.
U.S. Department of Transportation
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has also submitted a Climate Adaptation Plan
pursuant to Executive Orders No. 13514 and 13653, as well as Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) Implementing Instructions. DOT recognizes sea level rise and climate change present
threats to the transportation system and infrastructure to U.S. including roadway deterioration,
flooding, limited waterway access, and weakened structures. Severe conditions may reduce the
life of capital assets and increase operational disruptions. Rising sea level can directly affect
transit agencies on the US coasts. These systems may experience more downtime due to
flooding, requiring system users to be rerouted and possibly making obsolete earlier
transportation investments in low-lying coastal areas.
Federal Highway Administration
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has several initiatives designed to develop
information, tools, and procedures necessary to support the consideration of the impacts of
climate change on the development of transportation projects. FHWA has provided seed funding
to State Departments of Transportation (DOTS), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs),
and Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) to pilot approaches to conduct climate change
66 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
and extreme weather vulnerability assessments of transportation infrastructure and to analyze
options for adapting and improving resiliency.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) developed a Sea -Level Change Calculator to assist in
developing information to support its sea -level change policy which supports the USACE
overarching climate change adaptation policy. This tool has been modified to NOAA scenarios to
help people rapidly assess what the coming changes could look like. The USACE undertakes
climate change preparedness and resilience planning, in consultation with internal and external
experts and implement the results of that planning using the best available — and actionable —
climate science and climate change information. The USACE also works with other agencies to
develop the science and engineering research on climate change information into the actionable
basis for adapting to climate change impacts.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office had
published a report about global sea level rise with a synthesis of the scientific literature on global
sea level rise, and a set of four scenarios of future global sea level rise. The report was produced
in collaboration with twelve contributing authors from ten different federal and academic science
institutions including NOAA, NASA, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography, the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Columbia
University, the University of Maryland, the University of Florida, and the South Florida Water
Management District.
Figure 5-11. Global Sea Levels
GLOBAL SEA LEVEL HITS NEW RECORD HIGH
.X
E 80
E
a
L 7�/
V
E
2 4ri
O
v
C
u _0
`u
C
_20
1995
20X 2005
Source: NOAA, State of Climate, 2015.
I �h� �
�,�9
_rtn 2C'S
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 167
Annual summaries on global climate are also provided by NOAA with the most recent 2015 State
of the Climate Report confirming that 2015 surpassed 2014 as the warmest year since at least
the mid -to -late 19th century and noted that most indicators of climate change continued to
reflect trends consistent with a warming planet. Several markers, such as land and ocean
temperatures, sea levels, and greenhouse gases, broke records set just one year prior.
The graph below shows yearly global sea level since 1993 compared to the 1993-1999 average
line (gray line at zero). Sea level has risen at an average rate of 0.33 centimeters (0.1 inches) per
year since the satellite altimeter record began in 1993, which is faster than the rate of rise in the
early part of the twentieth century.
State (Florida) Agencies Initiatives
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact
The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (SEFRCCC) was executed by Broward,
Miami -Dade, Monroe, and Palm Beach Counties in January 2010 to coordinate mitigation and
adaptation activities across county lines. The Compact represents a new form of regional climate
governance designed to allow local governments to set the agenda for adaptation while providing
an efficient means for state and federal agencies to engage with technical assistance and support.
It is in that spirit that this plan provides the common integrated framework for a stronger and
more resilient Southeast Florida starting today and for tomorrow.
In order to better coordinate local planning, the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change
Compact (the Compact) developed unified regional sea level rise projection for Southeast Florida.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (unified projections) were originally prepared in 2011 by
the Compact's Sea Level Rise Technical Advisory Group, comprised of representatives from
county governments, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association (NOAA), United States Geological Survey (USGS), the South Florida
Water Management District, and climate scientists from Florida Atlantic University and University
of Miami. Moreover, this provision of the unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast
region allows for consistent long-range planning by the more than 115 local governments within
the Lower East Coast of Florida.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projections are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely. This unified sea level rise projection has been formally adopted
by Palm Beach, Broward, Miami -Dade and Monroe Counties and is now being used to inform
planning process and project design throughout the region.
The 2012 NOAA Technical Report: Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States National
Climate Assessment noted that given the past few decades of increased the height of storm surge
and wind -waves, assessing the combination of different weather events combined with scenarios
68 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
of sea level rise is crucial in developing hazard profiles for emergency planning and vulnerability,
impact, and adaptation assessments.
The 2015 update of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's Sea Level Rise
Work Group made date changes to the starting point of the projections to use local tide station
data and stay consistent with the current guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) and extended the
projections out to 2100 in recognition of the need for longer range guidance for major
infrastructure and other long term investments now being planned.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning
purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to
both short and long-term planning horizons and infrastructure design in the Southeast Florida
area. The authors also note that Sea level rise in South Florida has been of similar magnitude
over the same period (NOAA, 2015) but is anticipated to outpace the global average due to
ongoing variations in the Florida Currents and Gulf Stream. Given the uncertainty of all the factors
affecting the rate of sea level rise in climate models and the limitations of current climate models
to predict the future, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection
include three curves, in descending order, the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve and a
curve corresponding to the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to
how and when they should be used in planning.
These scenarios provide a useful tool for coastal managers in assessing vulnerability, impacts,
and adaptation strategies when coupled with local and regional specific information on climatic,
physical, ecological, and biological processes and on the culture and economy of coastal
communities.
The Unified Sea Level Rise Projections are the only regionally -coordinated and locally -specific sea
level rise projections for the Southeast Florida region. The projections are updated regularly by a
qualified group of scientists and experts, so planners should consider the projections to be both
scientifically sound and timely.
In summary, this Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida updated in 2015 projects
the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 5-12).
The projection highlights three planning horizons:
1) Short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea
level,
2) Medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean
sea level,
3) Long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea
level.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 169
Figure 5-12. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, 2015. South Florida
Regional Climate Change Compact
Untfled Sae level R" Projection
(Southeast Florida Rajponal Climate Change Compact. 201S1
IPCC ARS USACk High .+,g•
Year Medten
linchesl GnchNl r.,.
2030 6 10 12
2060 14 26 34
2100 31 61 al
r.jw. 1 Unttied U4 tevel Now ittol.tbun Thew pralnttul., are referent" to mood. wa lev.l at the Ilev Wolf Ude lacy. the Mal.,1—
Intlud.t three 44obAl Curve, adapted for rgla. Al .ppin at+un the medwn of the IP(C AR1 11c PIN tcenarla as the lawett baandary (blue dathed
t ,Mite) thtt V)A(t With twve at the upper boundary tot tow mart term for ¢w unto JOW Lund blue line and the NOAA Mail curve As the
uppvrt u %t boundary to, medatnr and 4My rotor ot. Iorange ohd towel th.-torpareted table Litt, the proNrtian vatu" at yea. 2010. JOW
and JIW the UWk Intermediate or 140AA Intermediate Cow curve it do tp1441d on the riaure for rder tnce Igreen datf+ad tune) This venter o
would renutie uttn+hcam redwlwnt In atee.hatne TiAt entr,tlitn, lit order to be plautihle and doet not reOett torrent emr,tl4n, trend,
Source: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015
Florida Senate Bill 1094 (S.B. 1094)
Recognizing the priority to integrate sea level rise into local government planning, Florida
Governor Rick Scott signed S.B. 1094 in May 2015, amending the state comprehensive planning
laws (F.S. 163.3178(2)(f) that had stipulated local governments, required to have a coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan, include a redevelopment component to
"eliminate inappropriate and unsafe development in coastal areas".
Florida S.B. 1094, which became effective on July 1, 2015, requires coastal management plans to
include the reduction of flood risks and losses. It also creates new requirements related to flood
elevation certificates and revises requirements related to flood insurance.
This new law now includes "sea -level -rise":
1. Including development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and
engineering solutions that reduce the flood risk in coastal areas which
results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff,
and the related impacts of sea -level rise.
—SB 1094 (underline added)
70 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Specifically, S.B. 1094, Section 1, amends s. 163.3178(2)(f), F.S., to require local governments
when drafting their comprehensive coastal management plans to:
• Include development and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering solutions
that reduce the flood risk in the coastal zone which results from high -tide events, storm
surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise.
• Encourage the use of best -practices development and redevelopment principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real
property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
• Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to
flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state.
As discussed earlier in the document, the Village recently updated its Code of Ordinances to
reflect FEMA's updated Flood Insurance Maps and to increase its freeboard requirements, a
technique to reduce losses and claims related to flooding.
In addition to the consideration of related impacts of sea level, SB 1094 amendment of F.S.
163.3178 (2) (f), F.S. also includes the following effective changes:
• Encourage the use of best practices development and redevelopment principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real
property from flood zone designations established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
• Identify site development techniques and best practices that may reduce losses due to
flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state.
• Be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements
in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth
in 44 C.F.R. part 60.
• Require construction activities seaward of the coastal construction control lines
established pursuant to s. 161.053, F.S., be consistent with ch. 161, F.S.
• Encourage local governments to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Community Rating System administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their residents
Related Florida Statutes
To support the implementation of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and
the Regional Action Plan, and recognizing the importance of integrating sea level rise directly into
municipal and county planning, the Regional Climate Action Plan (RCAP) Workshop #10:
"Essential Tools: Integrating the Southeast Florida Sea Level Rise Projections into Community
Planning" was held in July, 2016 in Broward County. The report, Integrating the Unified Sea Level
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 171
Rise Projection into Local Plans, that followed this workshop is available at the SEFRCC website.
The following legislative history is taken directly from that report.
Support for using these sea level rise projections exists currently with Florida State laws requiring
that comprehensive plans use "relevant and appropriate data," according to Statute
163.3177(1)(f):
All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan
amendments must be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an
analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to,
surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the
time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment.
Relevant data that may have been used to write the plan is not considered formally adopted and
embedded in the plan unless it is included directly in the planning document:
Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive
plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as
a part of it.
—Florida Statute (163.3177(1)(f)1
Additionally, coordination and alignment between local comprehensive planning efforts is an
explicit goal of Florida state law:
Coordination of the local comprehensive plan with the comprehensive plans of
adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region; with the
appropriate water management district's regional water supply plans
approved pursuant to s. 373.709, and with adopted rules pertaining to
designated areas of critical state concern must be a major objective of the local
comprehensive planning process.
— Florida Statute (163.3177(4)(a)
Local Mitigation Initiatives
In light of these adopted projection, long-range (50 yrs.) adaptive measures have taken the
forefront for many local governments planning initiatives. To effect this planning in a meaningful
way, the community must work together to understand the short and long-term costs and risks
associated with the establishment of coastal protection. Planners should be proactively setting
(and communicating) appropriate level of service for maintaining services for the community's
infrastructure services under projected sea level rise. The establishment of Goals, Objectives and
Policies with measurable and tangible outcomes in local government Comprehensive Plans (that
have the force of law in Florida) provides for an effective means of avoiding conflicts, and
maximizing key resources that build a resilient community.
72 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Thus far, the effects of sea level rise have been most visible in Fort Lauderdale, Miami Beach, and
in the Florida Keys; however, even nearby Delray Beach is already seeing "King tide" flooding.
Portions of Fort Lauderdale are experiencing flooding and the Village has incorporated
"Adaptation Action Areas" (AAA) into their planning process. AAA's will be discussed in more
detail in the following sections. Miami's initiatives regarding sea level rise are discussed in more
detail in the Future Land Use Element.
With higher sea levels, cities have seen that their stormwater systems no longer drain as quickly,
increasing the frequency and depth of flooding in some streets. In addition, saltwater intrusion
into aquifers is another important and growing concern, particularly in the wells located near
water bodies, such as the Intracoastal Waterway. As sea level continues to rise in the future, the
threat of salt water contamination even further inland becomes a major challenge.
Although many other Florida cities and towns have yet to experience damage, scientists and
engineers have predicted that within 40 to 50 years, Florida will be inundated with problems
related to sea level rise. With Tequesta being surrounded by various bodies of water, the Village
should continue to develop and implement stormwater management strategies to effectively
maintain water quality standards and minimize potential damage from flooding and storm surge.
Coastal High Hazard Areas
Coastal High Hazard Areas have been discussed in detail throughout this Element, due to their
importance in coastal communities like Tequesta, which contains a large number of waterfront
properties. Moreover, the Village is unique in that it interfaces three major water bodies,
including the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, and Loxahatchee River.
Adaptation Action Areas
In addition to Coastal High Hazard Areas which have been discussed in detail in previous sections,
Adaptation Action Areas (AAA) are another step local municipalities can take to protect areas in
their communities that are especially vulnerable to flooding due to sea level rise. While the
Coastal High -Hazard Area is standardized delineated area, there is no standard boundary for
Adaptation Action Areas. The Coastal High -Hazard Area considers current coastal flooding
conditions while the Adaptation Action Area encourages planning for future vulnerability.
The Community Planning Act (CPA) made changes to the state's growth management laws in
2011, including the optional adaptation planning for coastal hazards and the potential impacts of
sea level rise. The Adaptation Action Area, as defined in the CPA, is an optional comprehensive
plan designation for areas that experience coastal flooding and that are vulnerable to the related
impacts of rising sea levels for prioritizing funding for infrastructure and adaptation planning.
Local governments that adopt an adaptation action area may consider policies within the coastal
management element in their comprehensive plan to improve resilience to coastal flooding.
Criteria for the adaptation action area may include: areas below, at, or near mean higher high
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 173
water; areas which have a hydrological connection to coastal waters; or areas designated as
evacuation zones for storm surge.
Florida Statute (163.3164(1)) states:
"Adaptation action area" or "adaptation area" means a designation in the
coastal management element of a local government's comprehensive plan
which identifies one or more areas that experience coastal flooding due to
extreme high tides and storm surge, and that are vulnerable to the related
impacts of rising sea levels for the purpose of prioritizing funding for
infrastructure needs and adaptation planning.
Florida Statute (163.3177(6)(g)(10)) states:
At the option of the local government, develop an adaptation action area
designation for those low-lying coastal zones that are experiencing coastal
flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge and are vulnerable to the
impacts of rising sea level. Local governments that adopt an adaptation action
area may consider policies within the coastal management element to improve
resilience to coastal flooding resulting from high -tide events, storm surge, flash
floods, stormwater runoff, and related impacts of sea -level rise. Criteria for the
adaptation action area may include, but need not be limited to, areas for which
the land elevations are below, at, or near mean higher high water, which have
a hydrologic connection to coastal waters, or which are designated as
evacuation zones for storm surge.
In future hazard mitigation planning initiatives, the Village should consider designating areas that
are particularly susceptible to flooding and other sea level rise impacts as Adaption Action Areas.
These may include areas along the water front, properties in the Tequesta Country Club
neighborhood, where many properties would be at risk for flooding during a category 4 or 5
hurricane, and other areas that are within a hurricane surge area.
Palm Beach County Policy Development
As written in the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan (9/22/2016), Palm Beach County shall
adopt, implement, and encourage strategies which increase community resiliency and protect
property, infrastructure, and cultural and natural resources from the impacts of climate change,
including sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, and extreme weather events.
Village of Teguesto Policy Development
As part of the Village's 2017 Comprehensive Plan update, proposed goals, objectives, and policies
regarding sea level rise are proposed for adoption.
74 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FINAL REMARKS
Due to its location along the coast, the Village of Tequesta and its resources are vulnerable to
various natural disasters. This element provides insight into the Village's coastal resources and
emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining a resilient community to preserve and
protect these resources and associated areas.
Seal Level Rise Considerations
Increasing sea levels are expected to significantly challenge regional long-term planning for
coastal communities in South Florida, including Tequesta. In order to minimize the threat
imposed by these challenges, it is imperative that the Village take necessary steps in adaptive
planning and work to develop a policy framework that is integrated into its local planning system.
Steps to take include adding goals and policies that address adaptation or sustainability issues
into existing plans, ensuring consistency across all municipal operations and their guiding plans
and programs, and even educating residents and visitors on the importance of the challenges
posed by storm surge and major flooding from rising sea levels, and finally, how to work as a
community to address these challenges. These steps lay the foundation toward building a more
resilient community, and together with informed public and committed elected officials, reaching
the community's established goals and strategies are achievable.
Sea level rise remains a significant threat to the coastal communities in South Florida as
increasing sea levels are expected to significantly challenge regional long-term planning for these
areas. These challenges include:
• Increased flooding and drainage problems,
• Destruction of natural resource habitats,
• Higher storms surge, increased evacuation areas and evacuation time frames,
• Increased shoreline erosion,
• Saltwater Intrusion, and
• Loss of infrastructure and existing development.
Throughout the extensive review of recent climate data and rising sea levels, the importance of
adaptive planning has been abundantly clear. And while adaptation planning strategies may be
developed into differently for differently effected communities, working to develop a policy
framework that is integrated into the local planning system is imperative. Future steps to take
include; adding goals and policies that address adaptation or sustainability issues into existing
plans, developing a new "Sustainability" or similar element within the comprehensive plan,
and/or ensuring consistency across all municipal operations and their guiding plans and
programs.
Moreover, the following initiatives are encouraged to address these impacts and promote
sustainable growth:
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 175
• Conserve, reuse, recycle
• Walk, bike, carpool, or use mass transit
• Building 'green' energy efficient buildings
• Encourage mixed land uses
• Provide incentives for business/residential responsibility
• Sustain water quality
• Limit dependence on oil
• Educate individuals on the aforementioned items
These steps lay the foundation toward building a more resilient community and together with
informed public and committed elected officials, reaching the community's established goals and
strategies are achievable.
Stormwater Management
A number of guidelines should be incorporated as Village -wide policies to be implemented in
conjunction with neighborhood contact organizations, property owners, residents, and
businesses. These actions, consistent with the constraints on the Village's financial and personnel
resources, should include:
• Water quality protection and improvement for discharges to the Indian River Lagoon,
Loxahatchee River, and canals consistent with state water quality standards and numeric
nutrient criteria
• Flood control and relief of nuisance problem areas
• Aquifer recharge to protect and replenish potable groundwater supplies and to reduce
salt water intrusion
• Harvesting and reuse of stormwater
• Multi -benefit solutions for parks, roads and green area restoration.
Water Quality
• Continue the water quality ambient monitoring program in the IRL for baseline purposes
and trend analysis
• Increase focus on decreasing inputs of suspended materials, and nutrients from point and
non -point sources
• Identify and reduce anthropogenic loadings of fecal contaminants and other pathogens
• Increase additional sanity sewer, wastewater, and stormwater retrofit projects
• Manage sediments
76 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
REFERENCES AND SOURCES
Barbara Powell. Adaptive Sea Level Rise Planning: Introduction, Resource Tools, Southeast
Florida County Policy Development. 2017.
Florida Atlantic University. Indian River Lagoon Fact Sheet. Web Accessed Oct. 2017.
https:Hfau.edu/hboi/meh/IRL.Fact.Sheet.pdf
Indian River Lagoon Council. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. Web Accessed Oct.
2017.
http://www.iricouncil.com/
Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District. 2010 Seagrass Mapping. Web Accessed Oct.
2017.
http://Ioxahatcheeriver.org/pdf/SeagrassMaps2010.Ddf
Matiyow, Knudson, Stearns. SB 1094: Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement: Florida Senate.
2015.
National Hurricane Center. Web Accessed Mar. 2017
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
Palm Beach County Land Development Regulations. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
https://Iibrary.municode.com/fl/palm beach county/codes/code of ordinances
Palm Beach County. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. 2016. Web Accessed Mar.
2017.
http://discover.pbcgov.org/publicsafety/dem/Publications/Comprehensive-EM-Plan.pdf
Palm Beach County Emergency Management. Community Rating System. Web Accessed Mar.
2017.
http://discover.pbcgov.org/publicsafety/dem/Sections/Planning-CRS.aspx
Palm Beach County. Local Mitigation Strategy. 2015. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
http://discover.pbcgov.org/publicsafety/dem/Publications/Local-Mitigation-
Strategy.pdf
Southeast Florida Regional Compact Action Plan: Integrating the Unified Sea Level Rise
Projection into Local Plans. Web Accessed Mar. 2017.
http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/SLRGuid
ance-Doc.pdf
Treasure Coastal Regional Planning Council. Florida Statewide Regional Evacuation Study
Program. 2009. Web Accessed Aug. 2017.
http://www.tcrpc.org/special pro jects/RES/Disc%201%20Text%20Documents/Volume
%207%20-%20Atlas/Atlas Book3 Palm%20Beach%2OCounty.pdf
Village Tequesta Building Department: Attachments A, B, C, D. Web Accessed Oct. 2017.
http://www.teguesta.org/1263/Flood-Information
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 177
DATA & ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) is a required element of a municipality's Comprehensive
Plan. The CIE is a central component in the Comprehensive Plan as it enables a municipality to
set forth its capital improvement program, including construction, extension, and capacity
increases in public facilities and services necessary to support development concurrent with the
impacts of said development.
The Capital Improvement Element identifies capital improvements needed to implement the
comprehensive plan and ensure that the adopted level of service (LOS) standards are achieved
and maintained for concurrency related facilities, and to implement specific objectives and
policies of this Comprehensive Plan.
As stated in Section 163.3177(3), F.S., the Capital Improvement Element is intended "to consider
the need for and location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient use of such
facilities."
The data and analysis contained in this chapter provide the basis for specific amendments to the
existing set of goals, objectives, and policies (GOPs) in this Comprehensive Plan update, and to
prepare the annual Capital Improvement Schedule (CIS) as explained later in this document.
Purpose and Components of the Capital Improvement Element
The Village's Capital Improvement Element is used as a means to assess the Village's public facility
deficiencies or arrange for others to provide capital improvements necessary to correct
deficiencies in existing public facilities; to serve projected future growth; and to replace obsolete
and worn-out facilities, in accordance with an adopted Capital Improvement Schedule.
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Element is to:
• Evaluate the need for facilities identified in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and
as defined in the applicable definitions for each type of public facility;
• To estimate the cost of improvements for which the Village of Tequesta has fiscal
responsibility;
• To analyze the fiscal capability of the Village to finance and construct improvements;
• To adopt financial policies to guide the funding of improvements; and
• To schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to
ensure that capital improvements are provided when required, based on needs
identified in other plan elements.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1
Components of the Capital Improvement Element
The Capital Improvement Element contains the following components as stipulated in Chapter
163.3177(3)(a), F.S.:
• An outline of the principles for construction, extension, or increase in capacity of public
facilities;
• An outline of principles for correcting existing public facility deficiencies
• A review and evaluation of the concurrency management system needed to ensure that
the LOS standards are maintained.
• Identification of needed capital improvement projects to maintain LOS standards and
implement specific Comprehensive Plan policies for stormwater, solid waste, sanitary
sewer, potable water, and roads.
• A schedule of capital improvements which may include any publicly funded projects of
federal, state or local government (County, School District, water supply plan projects,
etc.), and which may include privately funded projects for which local government has no
fiscal responsibility. Projects to make sure LOS standards are met in the 5-Year planning
period.
• The schedule also must include transportation improvements included in the County MPO
and for County roads, to the extent that those projects are relied upon to meet the LOS
standards.
The CIE and its Capital Improvement Schedule (CIS) must be reviewed annually by each local
government.
In 2011, the Florida Legislature adopted major revisions to Chapter 163, F.S. regarding the CIE
that were incorporated in this update to the Comprehensive Plan and this element. The required
annual update of the five-year CIS must no longer be adopted and transmitted to the Department
of Economic Opportunity as a comprehensive plan amendment. Instead, it now may be
accomplished by ordinance and not as a comprehensive plan amendment.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Through its Capital Improvement Element and related plans, the Village of Tequesta seeks to
undertake capital improvement necessary to keep the Village's present public facilities in good
condition and to accommodate new development guided by sustainable and sound fiscal
practices.
Village of Tequesta Capital Improvement Plan Update
The Village has developed a 5-year Capital Improvement Schedule for fiscal years 2018-2022,
which includes projects supported by the General Fund, Capital Project Fund, Water Utility Fund,
Storm Water Utility Fund, and Fiduciary Funds.
2 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
As defined in the Policy Document of the Comprehensive Plan, capital improvement projects
refer to those projects that may include land and/or improvements and any studies oriented to
defining the initial need for land and/or facilities. In addition, priority is given to projects in the
Capital Improvement Schedule which are designed to correct existing public facility deficiencies.
The Village provides capital improvements to:
1. Correct existing deficiencies;
2. Accommodate desired future growth; and/or
3. Replace worn-out or obsolete facilities.
Furthermore, capital improvement policies specifically indicate how capital improvement will be
evaluated, ranked and what conditions must be met. The evaluation and prioritization of capital
improvement projects is a part of the normal budgetary and capital improvement programming
process.
At the end of each fiscal year another year of projected capital improvements will be added to
the end of each short and long-term planning period. This logical progression will utilize the same
parameters and requirements established in the CIE of the Comprehensive Plan. This practice
will, in turn, provide the Village with an on -going current projected schedule of improvements.
Beginning in December, 2007 State planning law requires that capital improvement program be
updated on an annual basis. Both the short range (1-5 Years) and long range (6-10 Years)
estimated schedules are provided as an Addendum to this CIE section.
Capital Improvement Project Overview
The current CIE of the Comprehensive Plan established a five (5) year CIP for the General Fund,
Capital Projects Fund, the Village Water Department, as well the Fire Rescue Department. The
capital improvement projects identified in the Village Capital Projects Fund are related to
transportation facilities (roads, bridges and landscaping), stormwater management facilities, and
recreation facilities. Many of these projects were accomplished while others were carried over
to subsequent years.
The majority of the projects in the CIS are contained in three departments, most notably Public
Works, Water Utilities, and Fire Rescue. Most of these departments have developed individual 5-
year Capital Improvement Schedules to ensure the needs of the community and level of service
(LOS) standards continue to be met.
Major infrastructure systems including sanitary sewer, potable water, stormwater management
facilities, roadways, solid waste, and recreation and open spaces are currently in place to meet
existing demands. With the limited growth projected for the 5 and 10-Year planning periods,
these public facilities are expected to meet future needs of the community, as well. There
continues to be no public -school facilities located in Tequesta and none are planned for the
future.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13
As previously discussed in this EAR, the Village is dependent on other entities for the provision of
central sanitary sewer service, solid waste disposal facilities, the maintenance and operation of
County and State roads and in the provision of public schools. The major capital improvement
responsibilities of the Village are in the operation and maintenance of its local road network,
stormwater/drainage system, Village -owned buildings and facilities, Police and Fire facilities,
recreation facilities and public works.
Not all capital improvements will incur Village costs. Village regulations require that future
development bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements in order to maintain adopted
Tequesta Level of Service Standards". The Village has established a variety of impact fees in its
land development regulations that the developer must pay as part of the development process.
Chapter 38, Impact Fees of the Village's Code of Ordinances establishes impact fees for Fire
Rescue, Police, and Park and Recreational Services.
Similarly, the Village requires local street, drainage, sewage collection, and potable water
distribution systems improvements, as required by the application of the Tequesta Level of
Service Standards, of any development necessitated by such development. This has been, and
continues to be, standard procedure for new development.
With regard to facilities in coastal areas, Village expenditures in high hazard coastal areas shall
be limited to 100% of those post disaster improvement costs for facilities over which Tequesta
has operational responsibility (e.g. potable water systems and public streets and recreational
facilities).
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Level of service standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or
proposed to be provided by, a public facility based on and related to the operational
characteristics of the facilities.
The continued goal of the Village is to maintain a consistently high quality of services to the
residents, while protecting the assets, the level of service, and the quality of life that the residents
have come to expect.
The Village's Capital Improvement Schedule includes facilities that promote public health and
safety and all facilities for which the level of service standard has been adopted: sanitary sewer
facilities; solid waste facilities, stormwater facilities, potable water facilities, transportation
facilities, and park facilities. The Capital Improvement Schedule may also include other facilities
that enhance the quality of life for Village residents.
The following level of service standards should be adopted and used as the basis for determining
the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. For each facility,
LOS is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and capacity of the facility.
4 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Capacity is measured differently for each type of facility. These LOS Standards are presently
established in the CIE of the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Plan.
Concurrency Requirements
The State of Florida Legislature made significant
changes in 2011 to the Growth Management
Act of 1985. Sections 9J-5 and 9J-11.023, of the
Florida Administrative Code were repealed,
with portions of both rules incorporated into
the new 2011 Community Planning Act. Among
the changes, "concurrency" was made
voluntary. Palm Beach County decided to
continue with concurrency, including traffic
concurrency, which applies county -wide, and
several municipalities have opted to continue
with some components of concurrency,
including the Village of Tequesta.
Concurrency requires that each facility within
the geographic scope of a proposed project's
impact have sufficient capacity to
accommodate the project's demand. If capacity
is not available, the project cannot be
approved. The Village has adopted, and
continues to enforce, a concurrency
management system that is contained in Article IV, Adequate Facilities and Concurrency
Management in Chapter 62, Planning and Development of its Code of Ordinances. Developers
must exhibit that all requirements of this Article can be met and that the LOS Standards adopted
in this Article and in the Comprehensive Plan will be satisfied before any development order or
permit will be issued by the Village.
In order to maintain an adequate level of service for Village facilities, the Future Land Use Plan,
financial analyses, and level of service standards should serve as the basis for reviewing
development applications. LOS standards affect the timing and location of development by
guiding development to areas where facilities have sufficient capacity and away from areas with
insufficient capacity. The standards are administered through the concurrency management
system. The LOS standards are depicted in Table 9-1.
Moreover, no development permit shall be issued unless the public facilities necessitated by the
project (in order to meet level of service standards) will be in place concurrent with the impacts
from the development. During the site plan review process developers are required to provide
evidence that service providers have available capacities to serve the proposed development.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15
Letters from those service providers must be provided as part of the application and review
process.
Table 9-1. Level of Service Standards
108 gallons/capita/day
7.13 lbs./person/day.
Residential: 180 gallons/capita/day
Non -Residential: 3030 gallons/day
Storage capacity: 2.75 MG
Design Storm: 25 Year, 24 Hr. duration
Collector Roadways: LOS C, Peak D
Urban Minor Arterials: LOS C, Peak D
Urban Principal Arterials: LOS C, Peak D
Neighborhood parks: 2 acres/1000
Community Parks: 2 acres/1000
Source: Village ofTequesta, PBCSWA, 2017
(1): Per PBCSWA County -wide Average
Prior to the issuance of a development order or a building permit, the Concurrency review shall
establish the following:
• Finding on the impacts created by the proposed development
• Finding as to whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management
System will be available concurrent with the impacts of new development at the adopted
Level of Service
• Finding of facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the finding of
concurrency; and
• Finding of the entity responsible for the implementation of all required facility(s)
improvements or additions
Only sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage (stormwater management facilities), and potable
water are subject to the voluntary statutory concurrency requirements. The Village, along with
Palm Beach County and other municipalities in the county, has opted to continue concurrency
requirements for transportation and for other components of the concurrency management
system.
The School District of Palm Beach County (SDPBC) and the County decided to terminate school
concurrency. Therefore, it is no longer addressed in this element.
Instead of School Concurrency the SCPBC, the County and qualified municipalities decided to sign
a Public Schools Interlocal Agreement for Coordinated School Planning. Chapter 163.31777(3),
6 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
F.S., Public Schools Interlocal Agreement, provides criteria for municipalities to qualify for
exemption. According to these criteria, Tequesta believes it is qualified for this exemption and
has initiated a request with extensive documentation to the appropriate authorities. Detailed
discussion and supporting data has been included in the Intergovernmental Coordination
Element Data and Analysis. Final approval will come from the Department of Economic
Opportunity, upon review of the Comprehensive Plan.
SUMMARY OF MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS AND FACILITIES
The following sections provide a summary of major capital improvement projects for the 5-year
planning period FY 2018-2022. The projects are organized according to capital facilities in the LOS
Standards Table.
Sanitary Sewer Facilities
The Sanitary Sewer LOS Standards shall be reviewed with the Land Development Regulations and
revised, if necessary, in the updated Sanitary Sewer sub -element and CIE of the Comprehensive
Plan. The central sanitary sewer system serving Tequesta is owned and operated by the
Loxahatchee River District. This system and service is available to all of Tequesta; however, some
properties have not yet connected to the central system and remain on individual septic tank
systems.
The Sanitary Sewer LOS Standards should be reviewed with the Land Development Regulations
to assure that there will be adequate facilities to serve the limited growth and development
projected for Tequesta in the next 5 and 10-Year planning periods of the updated Comprehensive
Plan. Those properties still using septic tanks must meet Palm Beach County Environmental
Control Rules for septic tank usage. In addition, septic tank systems must also meet State Water
Quality standards or else they will be required to connect to the central sanitary sewer system.
The Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority (PBCSWA) has indicated to the Village that, for
comprehensive planning purposes, there are adequate capacities at their disposal facilities to
meet the solid waste disposal needs of the entire County for the 5 and 10-Year planning periods.
Solid Waste Facilities
As discussed in the Solid Waste Sub- Element, at the current solid waste generation rate, the
amount of garbage generated is expected to increase minimally, tempered by increased efforts
to reduce waste through recycling and other waste management alternatives.
The future demand of solid waste should be adequately handled by current Village staff and
equipment. However, any significant changes in growth, annexation, or development would
require re-evaluation of existing resources to adequately handle projected demand.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7
Stormwater Management Facilities
The Stormwater Management Design Storm LOS Standards established in the Comprehensive
Plan may be reviewed by the Village Utilities Department for current applicability and revised, if
appropriate, for inclusion in the updated Stormwater Management sub -element and CIE of the
updated Plan. Protection from the degree of flooding that would result from a twenty-five (25)
year frequency, twenty-four (24) hour duration storm duration LOS continuous to be an adequate
standard for development in Tequesta.
Potable Water & Groundwater Facilities
The Village shall review the LOS Standards for Potable Water adopted in the Comprehensive Plan
for current applicability and revised, if necessary, in the update process. As identified in the
Portable Water sub -section of this EAR, the Village owns and operates its own central potable
water system. The Village not only serves all properties in Tequesta, but it also serves certain
unincorporated areas of Palm Beach and Martin Counties, as well as, the entire Town of Jupiter
Inlet Colony. The only use of private individual wells is exclusively for irrigation purposes.
As a water supplier to a service area that extends beyond its own corporate boundaries, the
Village will be required to coordinate with the other jurisdictions that it serves in updating LOS
Standards for inclusion in their respective Comprehensive Plans and to provide assurances that
future capacities will be available to serve their areas. When the SFWMD Lower East Coast
Regional Water Supply Plan is adopted, the Village will have to coordinate regional water supply
issues with SFWMD and those jurisdictions that it serves (See Regional Water Supply section in
this EAR).
Renewal & Replacement Program: While the Village does not expect any expansion projects in
the current five-year planning period, it is preparing for ongoing renewal and replacement
program for its water utilities system.
• Jupiter Inlet Pipe Replacement ($1.5 million) - 2016
• Water Well and Treatment Improvements
• Ongoing Utility Plan Replacements
• New Meter Replacements
• Large Valve Replacements
Transportation Facilities
The LOS Standards for roadways are established in the Transportation element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The LOS Standards established for State and County roadways should be
reviewed against their respective standards and nomenclatures for arterials and collectors, and
revised, if necessary, in the Transportation element and CIE of the updated Plan.
8 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
U.S. Highway 1 (US-1) is currently identified in the Village of Tequesta Comprehensive Plan as a
State FDOT-owned and maintained arterial roadway, while CR 707 (Beach Road) and Old Dixie
Highway are categorized as County -owned and maintained county urban collectors. Local streets
and city collectors are the responsibility of the Village.
Transportation projects planned for the Village include various roadway and sidewalk
improvements, as well as street maintenance, throughout Tequesta. Maintenance of the
transportation network requires collaboration between the various entities that have jurisdiction
over these roads and right-of-ways. The Village coordinates traffic improvements planning with
Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of Transportation in order to accomplish the
improvements needed to attain a future LOS standard of Level D for streets within Village
municipal limits.
The Public Works Department provides general maintenance for Village roadways, pathways,
buildings, right-of-ways, medians, and signage, which includes repairing potholes, milling,
resurfacing, and paving. The maintenance is provided both by Village staff and through
contractual services. The Department has an annual program to asphalt overlay the Village
streets. New landscaping is added annually through Capital Improvement projects.
The limited growth and development potential for the 5 and 10-Year planning periods of the
updated Comprehensive Plan will create insignificant traffic impacts on the existing local roads
serving Tequesta. Additionally, growth outside of the corporate limits could create more
significant impacts on the arterial and collector roads serving the Village.
Roadway Resurfacing Projects: Under leadership and supervision of the Village Public Works
Department, plans for milling, paving, resurfacing, and striping of roadways is in place for various
roads throughout the Village. This seven-year phased project began in 2013. The maps below
indicate the location and type of repairs needed.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19
Figure 9-1. Roadway Improvement Projects: Years 1 through 2
O AKADIS . . ' • .
Figure 9-2. Roadway Improvement Projects: Years 3 through 7
MRI'1{1I7 .Itt I IN •'
• rw• • .
10 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
5-Year Sidewalk Rehabilitation & Repair Plan: A 5-year Sidewalk Rehabilitation & Repair plan was
developed for FY 2018-2022. plans for sidewalk repair and ADA improvements are in place for
sidewalks in the project area which includes Tequesta Drive, Country Club Drive, and Willow
Drive. The map below provides an overview of the condition of the Village's sidewalks. The
different color dots represent various sidewalk defect categories. According to the map legend,
red indicates a trip hazard, orange indicates ADA issues, yellow represents sidewalk degradation,
lime green indicates a non-structural issue, and dark green represents other miscellaneous
issues. In total, 453 defects were recorded throughout the project area, with the majority of them
categorized as trip hazards.
Figure 9-3. Sidewalk Inspection: Defect Assessment
e
...••
r
d! • •yam».
"
l .�.. �
J(}{
a
i •. • ago. yam.. ! ..�•y ` 0
r1 1 t i l
N
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 11
The following map provides detail on the highest priority sidewalk repairs needed.
Figure 9-4. Sidewalk Inspection: High Priority Repairs
a�zes.e a. • .scrat a•c m.. •. - F ' tf` S
LV
i 1
'' tit.: �.- .. _ ..,.�.� -•cw:.
. - �, ttt��o�>ntnq •VA - .� v_ �w•aW -•i •aa I
• Pam• •xT :. 7: f _3 a �r ,>- � ^TaueA �c+a
.. _-_ -- \ . [n v�>.e+• s+b ed+r.>••i x>c wn taa! �• a•v4
-- - .--+•:.:r• < f �'a.� ���.v r rw_ ter« +er_�r � av
•ram ��N_—�`� ` r^~, � ...• —_-_ -1
+ •?[ arm a1u n a.� y •a• x>•aa .•r• 0•6
• 1 C ,��� '7r>!r �iK+re V?•e�C>•.t .0. 'V." :r'ts'•- j;
Due to the particularly poor condition of asphalt sidewalk sections which contained the majority
of defects, it was recommended that all asphaltic sidewalk material be replaced with concrete at
one time. This mitigates all risk hazards associated with identified defects that fall within the
replaced sections, regardless of priority level.
12 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Right -of -Way Enhancements: Right-of-way (ROW) enhancements will provide standard
maintenance and improvements along the Village's main corridors, in order to maintain Level of
Service standard requirements. Generally, these improvements include implementing traffic
calming techniques, enhancing streetscapes (landscaping), and installing signalized crosswalks to
create a safe environment for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Tequesta Bridge Lighting
Improvements: In 2017, the
Public Works Department
installed new LED lights on the
columns on the Tequesta Drive
Bridge. Additionally, inline fuses
were added to the recessed
junction boxes on the walk -way to
protect the column lights from
surges. This will protect the LED
lamps and reduce the need to
utilize the boat for repairs.
Boaters will no longer be able to
tie off to the lights or adjust them
downward. All of the existing
lights were broken beyond repair
and replaced with LED lights that
have a 5-year warranty.
For this project, a total of eight (8) lights were installed in the following locations:
• Outer columns: 2 blue lights (each side of the bridge)
• Center columns: 2 clear lights (each side of the bridge)
Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program
In addressing the maintenance of LOS standards for roads within Village limits, Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, requires that not only Village -sponsored capital road projects must be included
in the annual CIS, but also projects from the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) five-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that are relied upon to meet
concurrency. The TIP identifies transportation improvements funded by Federal, State and local
sources in order to assist local governments within the Palm Beach MPO area with their
transportation planning efforts.
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a staged program encompassing a five-year
period consisting of all regionally significant transportation improvements to all modes of travel
in Palm Beach County. The most recent TIP for fiscal year 2018-2022 was adopted June 15,
2017. The TIP is developed through a continuing, cooperative, comprehensive and coordinated
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 13
effort involving the Florida Department of Transportation, the Board of County Commissioners,
the Port of Palm Beach, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (Tri-Rail) and
municipalities within the County. Consultation is also carried out with the Miami -Dade and
Broward MPOs during the TIP process.
The TIP contains transportation projects funded by Federal, State and local sources located
primarily on the State Highway System. The TIP is based on and reflects the Florida Department
of Transportation's FY 2017-2021 Five -Year Work Program for Palm Beach County, and generally
moves forward the projects in the time frame from previous Work Programs. The County Five -
Year Road Program is also included. Since projects are subject to limited change due to
unforeseen issues, the DOT program and the TIP may be modified throughout the year.
The Transportation Alternatives Program is one of twelve major project categories of the TIP.
Active transportation projects are submitted to the MPO annually by local agencies and
prioritized through the Bicycle Trailways Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BTPAC). One of these
projects is located within Tecluesta's municipal boundaries along its most prominent corridor,
US-1.
U.S. Highway 1 Master Plan & Complete Streets: As discussed in the Transportation Element,
this complete street project encompasses a 1.4 mile stretch of U.S. Highway 1 (from Beach Road
north to the Martin County Line. The scope of work for the entire project includes resurfacing
and safety improvements along U.S. Highway 1, which is further detailed in the Transportation
Element of the Data and Analysis document provides more detail of this project. Lead by Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT), a portion of the U.S. Highway 1 Master Plan & Complete
Streets Project will be funded in FY 2018 by the Transportation Alternatives Program.
SA 5 VS I FAG.M AFACH r;GAo ro COl;NT• ; MF 4CAJ
With regard to the U.S.
Highway 1 improvement
project, plans are moving
forward in 2017. FDOT is
expecting to initiate
construction in November
2017 which should be
completed by fall 2018,
weather permitting. This
$3.2 million project
includes lane elimination,
widening turn lanes,
adding buffered bike lanes
and patterned pavement
crosswalks, milling and
resurfacing of the
roadway, sidewalk and
14 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
wo
r=
drainage improvements, pedestrian lighting, and installation of pedestrian mast arm
signalization, vehicle detection systems, and signage and pavement marking upgrades.
Recreation & Open Space Facilities
The Village's public park and open space
system is comprised of both passive and
active parks with a developing greenway and
bikeway network that intends to connect the
park system throughout the Village. From
established parks, to sports fields, to
greenways and sidewalks, to bike lanes, to
pocket parks, to neighborhood parks, to
plazas, and beyond, these recreation and
open space facilities are a valuable asset to
the community.
The Recreation and Open Space element
establishes LOS Standards for recreation
and open space facilities in Tequesta. These
standards were updated as part of this
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
The current five-year planning period (FY
2018-2022) includes improvements to
Tequesta Park sports fields, tennis courts,
basketball courts, and facility bathrooms.
Public Works — Miscellaneous Projects
As described previously, the Village's Public Works department is responsible for
LED Street Lights: Cities around the world are switching to LED lights as a way to save both
money and energy. LEDs use approximately 80-90% less energy compared to their high-pressure
sodium luminaries' predecessors. LEDs provide better service reliability and lower maintenance
costs. Additionally, the old lights on Village streets are approaching the end of their useful life
and need replacing.
5-Year HVAC Capital Expense Plan: This plan provides an assessment of HVAC systems
throughout Village facilities for FY 2018-2022. It describes the estimated life of different parts of
the system, and provides an estimated repair and replacement schedule based on the
assessment.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 15
Village Building Facilities:
Improvements to various Village
building facilities are necessary to
maintain high quality standards for
residents and Village staff. These
regulatory tasks include roof repair
and replacement, HVAC repair and
renewal, painting, and flooring repair,
as necessary, throughout all Village
facilities.
REVENUES & FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
1
Overall priority for fiscal planning shall be those projects that enhance residential neighborhoods,
compatible business activities, and redevelopment initiatives, as described in the Future Land
Use Element. Priority should also be given to projects that address major safety concerns.
In setting priorities for expenditures to be included in the Capital Improvement Element, the
Village should use the following criteria:
1. Public safety implications: A project to address immediate threats to public safety will
receive first priority.
2. Level of service or capacity problems: Next in priority would be projects needed to
maintain the stated Levels of Service.
3. Ability to finance: A third criterion is the budgetary impact.
4. Quality of life projects: The next level of priority shall be given to those projects not in
categories 1 or 2 but that would enhance the quality of life for residents of Village.
The plan for capital improvements must be affordable and within the realm of the Village's ability
to finance. This section recognizes the various forms of revenue presently available to the Village
as well as potential future sources of revenue during the five-year planning period. The major
source of revenue identified in the General Fund continues to be generated from taxes. Ad
valorem (property) taxes is, by far, the major tax revenue generated in the Village.
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
The continued goal of the Village is to maintain a consistently high quality of services to the
residents, while protecting the assets, the level of service and the quality of life that the residents
have come to expect. It is the result of hard work by the Village staff, and fiscally sound,
responsible decisions by the Village Council that allows the Village to meet service demands while
minimizing the financial burden on its residents.
16 1 VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Village's primary focus is providing exceptional municipal services to its residents in the most
efficient and cost effected manner possible. Continued economic challenges require innovative
approaches on both sides of the balance sheet. Efforts to expand contractual services to generate
additional revenue should continue to be considered.
In order to ensure level of service requirements for Tequesta's public facilities can accommodate
existing and project population demands, it is important that the CIP be reviewed by the local
government on an annual basis. Modifications to update the five-year capital improvement schedule
may be accomplished by the standard ordinance amendment or adoption process.
In addition, the Village should prepare to reassess the LOS standards in the future as it grows and
evolves. With potential future development or redevelopment, the Village must prioritize capital
improvement projects in this area to ensure the Village's public facilities will continue to meet LOS
requirements.
With regard to capital improvement planning, major initiatives include:
• To fully develop and implement a 6-year capital improvement/capital replacement plan
• To keep on track with maintenance and improvements outlined in a utility revenue
sufficiency and rate adequacy study to meet the Village's objectives for a sustained high -
quality utility service by providing a stable funding plan.
• To develop plans and specifications for the construction of the new Community Center.
• To Implement 5- year automatic read meters and technology for the Village Water Utility.
FINAL REMARKS
A comprehensive Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan affords the Village the opportunity to
strategize on how best to implement and execute capital projects. Furthermore, the CIP
constructively reflects current critical needs and projects future critical needs of the Village to ensure
level of service standards and other needs continue to be met as the Village grows and evolves. The
development of this plan requires collaboration between the Village Manager's Office, Village
departments, and Budget Team. Additionally, the Village must coordinate certain projects with the
County and State.
Annual updates to the Village's CIP and CIS will help to ensure level of service standards of public
facilities continue to be met and any issues that arise be addressed, as the Village grows and evolves.
VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 17