Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 01_07/12/2018 G � � Retirement P:954.527 1616 F:954 525 0083 �^nvw br5consultinb.com Consulting lune 8, 2018 Ms. Kerry Dutton Resource Centers, LLC 4360 Northlake Boulevard, Suite 206 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Re: Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund Supplemental Actuarial Valuation Report Dear Kerry: As requested,we have prepared the enclosed 30-year projections showing the financial impact on the Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund of the proposed Plan changes detailed below. ■ Scenario 1(Updated Baseline)—These are the updated baseline results, reflecting the benefit changes adopted in the most recent collective bargaining agreement for police officers. The Pension Plan would be re-opened for police officers. The 12 current police officers who currently participate in the 401(a) Plan would not receive credit for service earned prior to entering the Pension Plan. The benefit multiplier for new members would be equal to 2%for the first three years of service, 2.35% for the next three years of service,and 2.75%for each year of service thereafter. The member contribution rate for these members would be 6%of pensionable earnings. ■ Scenario 2—Same as Scenario 1 except the benefit muttiplier would be equal to 2.75%for each year of service. ■ Scenario 3—Same as Scenario 2 except the 12 police officers who currently participate in the 401(a) Plan would receive credit for both future service and service earned prior to entering the Pension Plan. The 401(a) Plan balances for these 12 police officers would be transferred to the Pension Plan. This transfer amount would be equal to the Village contributions to the 401(a) Plan for these 12 members plus the contributions these members would have paid to the Pension Plan, including interest. We have estimated the transfer amount to be$269,284. Under this scenario, we have assumed the Plan would be eligible to receive future annual Chapter 185 revenue. We have assumed that the full amount of annual Chapter 185 revenue($157,450 was allocated for FYE 2017)would be used as an offset to the Village required contribution, but this would be subject to negotiations between the Union and the Village. ■ Scenario 4—Same as Scenario 3 except we assume the Plan would also receive the annual Chapter 185 revenue that was allocated, but not received,for FYE 2014—2017. The unreceived Chapter 185 revenue for these years totaled$471,094. We have assumed that this full amount of previously unreceived Chapter 185 revenue would be used as an offset to the Village required contributions. ��'�'` • � � :�� � Ms. Kerry Dutton June 8, 2018 Page 2 Under all scenarios,the remaining benefits for these police officers are assumed to be the same as the current Pension Plan provisions for police officers. Under each of these scenarios,we have assumed that all 12 police officers would transfer to the Pension Plan. If there are any police officers that do not transfer to the Pension Plan,the Division of Retirement would need to determine if the Chapter 185 revenue would still be available to the Plan. We recommend that this be confirmed in writing before any final decision is made. Additionally, under all scenarios,the calculations do not include an allocation of the accumulated unused balance of Chapter 185 money of$333,315. The use of this reserve is subject to negotiations between the Union and the Village. The funds can be used for share accounts,to offset the Village's contribution,or other uses defined by the parties. It is important to note that potential effects on other benefit plans were not considered in this study. This study does not reflect the Village's savings in the 401(a) Plan for police officers who would join the Pension Plan. Under Scenario 3,the required Village contributions would decrease as compared to the updated baseline results. The decrease is based on the Plan receiving future Chapter 185 revenue. The Village required contribution for FYE 2018 would also be reduced by the Chapter 185 revenue received in August 2018. Under Scenario 4,the required Village contributions would decrease as compared to the updated baseline results. The net required Village contributions are projected to be$0 for the fiscal years ending 2019 through 2022. The decrease is based on the Plan receiving future Chapter 185 revenue as well as the previously unreceived Chapter 185 revenue for FYE 2014—2017. We have assumed that the previously unreceived Chapter 185 revenue of$471,094 would be applied as an offset each year starting in FYE 2019 to reduce the required Village contribution to$0 until the balance is fully used. The Village required contribution for FYE 2018 would also be reduced by the Chapter 185 revenue received in August 2018. We have assumed that Chapter 185 revenue would remain level at$157,450 for the fiscal years ending 2017 through 2019 then increase by 2.5%each future year. Administrative expenses are also assumed to increase by 2.5%each future year. The projections are deterministic, meaning throughout the projection period, Plan experience is expected to match the assumptions used during all future years beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, including the assumed investment return of 7.25%each year. Ret�rement G R Cons�lting Ms. Kerry Dutton June 8, 2018 Page 3 Additional Disclosures This report was prepared at the request of the Board of Trustees and is intended for use by the Pension Plan and those designated or approved by them. This report may be provided to parties other than the Plan only in its entirety and only with the permission of the Board. GRS is not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. This report is intended to describe the financial effect of the proposed plan changes. No statement in this report is intended to be interpreted as a recommendation in favor of the changes,or in opposition to them. Except as otherwise noted, potential effects on other benefit plans were not considered. The calculations in this report are based upon data provided by the Village covering the 12 police officers currently in the 401(a) Plan as well as information furnished by the Plan Administrator for the October 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation concerning Plan benefits,financial transactions, plan provisions and active members,terminated members, retirees and beneficiaries. We reviewed this information for internal and year-to-year consistency, but did not audit the data. We are not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by the Plan Administrator. The calculations are based upon assumptions regarding future events,which may or may not materialize. They are also based on the assumptions, methods,and plan provisions outlined in this report. Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements(such as the end of an amortization period or additional cost or contribution requirements based on the plan's funded status);and changes in plan provisions or applicable law. If you have reason to believe that the assumptions that were used are unreasonable,that the plan provisions are incorrectly described,that important plan provisions relevant to this proposal are not described,or that conditions have changed since the calculations were made,you should contact the author of the report prior to relying on information in the report. Jeffrey Amrose and Trisha Amrose are members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinions contained herein. The undersigned actuary is independent of the plan sponsor. This report has been prepared by actuaries who have substantial experience valuing public employee retirement systems.To the best of our knowledge the information contained in this report is accurate and fairly presents the actuarial position of the Plan as of the valuation date. All calculations have been made in conformity with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices,and with the Actuarial Standards of Practice issued by the Actuarial Standards Board and with applicable statutes. G R S Retiremen[ Consulting Ms. Kerry Dutton June 8,2018 Page 4 We welcome your questions and comments. Sincerely yours, C� ���� �e�-�_ Je re mrose, EA, MAAA Trisha Amrose, EA, MAAA eni Consultant&Actuary Consultant&Actuary Enclosures This communication shall not be construed to provide tax advice, legal advice or investment advice. cc: Bonni Jensen G �C Retirement , Consulting Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund 30-Year Projection of Required Village Contributions for Police Officers Scenario 1(Updated Baseline) Scenario 2 Required Contribution Funded Ratio Required Contribution Funded Ratio Cost/(Savings) Fiswl Year Pensionable Total State Net Vllage Net Village on Valuation Total State Net Village Net Village on Valuatio� Ending Payrall $Amourrt $Amount $Amount %of Payroll Date $Amount $Amount $Amount %of Payroll Date $Amount %of Payroll 2019 1,168,605 244,355 0 244,355 20.91% 147% 253,470 0 253,470 21.69% 147% 9,115 0.78°k 2020 1,223,041 256,390 0 256,390 20.96% 139% 266,347 0 266,347 21.78% 138% 9,957 0.82% 2021 1,288,879 251,750 D 251,750 19.53% 136% 263,641 0 263,641 20.46% 135% 11,891 0.93% 2022 1,357,448 264,030 0 264,030 19.45% 135% 276,844 0 276,844 2039% 135% 12,814 0.94% 2023 1,428,891 276,705 0 276,705 1937% 134% 290,477 0 290,477 2033% 133% 13,772 0.96°� 2024 1,501,149 289,871 0 289,871 19.31% 133% 304,797 0 304,797 2D.30% 132% 14,926 0.99% 2025 1,564,948 303,059 0 303,059 19.37% 131% 319,155 0 319,155 2039% 130% 16,096 1.02°,U 2026 1,625,756 311,294 0 311,294 19.15% 130% 326,924 0 32b,924 20.11°� 129% 15,630 0.96% 2027 1,648,688 315,151 0 315,151 19.12% 129% 332,396 0 332,396 20.16% 128% 17,245 1.04% 2028 1,659,703 315,100 0 315,100 18.99% 128% 334,Z18 0 334,218 Z0.14% 127% 19,118 1.15% 2029 1,743,793 313,680 0 313,680 17.99% 128% 331,407 0 331,407 19.�% 127% 17,727 1.01% 2030 1,810,897 328,571 0 328,571 18.14% 128% 347,435 0 341,435 19.19% 127% 18,864 1.05% 2031 1,891,001 337,177 0 337,177 17.83% 128� 355,822 0 355,822 18.82% 127% 18,645 0.99°� 2032 1,981,242 350,393 0 350,393 17.69% 127% 369,745 0 369,745 18.66% 126% 19,352 0.97°� 2�33 2,075,391 365,864 0 365,864 17.63% 127% 386,153 0 386,153 18.61% 126% 20,289 0.98% 2034 2,145,630 382,043 0 382,043 17.81% 127% 403,296 0 403,296 18.80% 126% 21,252 0.99% 2035 2,240,1Q3 390,706 0 390,706 17.44% 127% 413,608 0 413,608 18.46% 126% 22,902 1.OZ% 2036 2,326,239 406,639 0 406,639 17.48% 126% 430,577 0 430,577 18.51% 125� 23,938 1.03% 2037 2,413,486 420,069 0 420,069 17.41% 126% 444,766 0 444,766 18.43% 125% 24,696 1.02% 2038 2,424,697 434,001 0 434,001 17.90% 126% 459,604 0 459,604 18.96% 125% 25,603 1.06% 2039 2,411,807 433,366 0 433,36fi 17.97% 126% 460,632 0 460,632 19.10% 125% 27,266 1.13% 2040 2,385,169 427,746 0 427,746 17.93% 127% 456,945 0 456,945 19.16% 125% 29,199 113% 2041 2,478,529 420,819 0 420,819 16.98% 127% 451,120 0 451,120 18Z0% 126% 30,302 1.22°,6 2042 2,522,183 435,575 0 435,575 17.27% 128% 466,932 0 466,932 18.51% 127% 31,357 114% 2043 2,623,939 441,743 0 441,743 16.84% 129% 474,821 0 474,SZ1 18.10% 127% 33,079 1.26% 2044 2,551,076 458,507 0 458,507 17.97% 12996 492,980 0 492,980 19.32% 128% 34,473 1.35% 2045 2,587,923 447,393 0 447,393 17.29% 130% 483,799 0 483,799 18.69% 129% 36,407 1.40% 2046 2,681,099 454,524 0 454,524 16.9596 132% 491,855 0 491,855 1835% 130% 37,331 1.40% 2047 2,772,613 470,047 0 470,047 16.95% 133% 508,691 0 508,691 18.35% 131% 38,643 1.40% 2048 2,862,288 485,426 0 485,426 16.96°6 134% 525,327 0 525,327 18.35% 132°/a 39,901 1.39% Totel 11,031,993 0 11,031,993 11,723,784 0 11,723,784 691,791 Total Present Value 4,233,977 0 4,233,977 4,471,772 0 4,471,772 237,795 5 Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund 30-Year Projection of Required Village Contributions for Police Officers kenario 1(Updated Baseline) kenario 3 Required Contribution Funded Ratio Required Contribution Funded Ratio �a�/(Savings) Fiswl Year Pensionable Total State Net�Ilage Net Village on Valuation Total State Net Village Net Village on Valuation Ending Payroll $Amaunt $Amourrt $Amount %of Payroll Date $Amount $Amaunt $Amoum %of Payroll Date $Amount %of Payroll 2019 1,168,605 244,355 0 244,355 20.91% 14796 250,783 157,450 93,333 7.99% 135% �151,022) (12.92�% 2020 1,223,041 256,390 0 256,390 20.96% 139% 263,756 161,386 102,369 837% 134% (154,020� (12.59�% 2021 1,288,879 251,750 0 251,750 19.53% 136% 261,156 165,421 95,735 7.43% 132% (156,015) (12.1D�% 2022 1,357,448 264,030 0 264,030 19.45% 135% 274,293 169,556 104,737 7.72% 131% (159,294) (11.73�% 2023 1,428,891 276,705 0 276,705 1937% 134% 288,072 173,795 114,277 8.00% 130% (162,428) (1137�% 2024 1,501,149 289,871 0 289,871 19.31% 133% 302,374 178,140 124,234 818°� 129% �165,637) (11.03�% 2025 1,564,948 303,059 0 303,059 19.37% 131% 307,174 182,594 124,581 7.96% 128% (178,478) (i1.41�% 2026 1,625,756 311,294 0 311,294 19.15% 130% 320,766 187,159 133,608 8.22% 127% (177,686) (10.93�% 2027 1,648,688 315,151 0 315,151 19.12% 129% 326,179 191,838 134,342 8.15% 126% (180,810) (1D.97�% 2028 1,659,703 315,100 0 315,100 18.99% 128% 327,806 196,633 131,172 7.90% 126% (183,928) (11.09�°� 2029 1,743,793 313,680 0 313,680 17.99% 128% 324,649 201,549 123,100 7.06% 125% (190,580) (1Q.93�% 2030 1,810,897 328,571 0 328,571 18,14% 128% 340,512 206,588 133,924 7.40% 125% (194,647) (10.74�% 2031 1,891,001 337,ll7 0 337,177 ll.83% 128°6, 348,753 211,753 137,000 7.24% 125% (200,177) (1Q.59�% 2032 1,981,242 350,393 0 350,393 17.69% 127% 362,426 217,047 145,380 7.34% 125% (205,013) �1035�% 2033 2,075,391 365,864 0 365,864 17.63% 127% 378,607 222,473 156,135 7.524'0 125% �209,729) (10.11�% 2034 2,145,630 382,043 0 382,043 17.81% 127% 395,600 228,035 167,566 7.81% 124% (214,477) (10.00�°� 2035 2,240,103 390,706 0 390,706 17.44% 127% 407,258 233,735 173,523 7.75% 124% (217,183) (9.69�4'0 2036 2,326,239 406,639 0 406,639 17.49% 126% 421,792 239,579 182,213 7.83% 124% (224,426) (9.65�% 2037 2,413,486 420,069 0 420,069 17.41% 126% 438,159 245,568 192,591 7.98% 124% (227,478) (9.43�% 2038 2,424,697 434,001 0 434,001 17.90% 126% 452,830 251,707 201,122 819YO 124% (232,679) (9b1�% 2039 2,411,807 433,366 0 433,3b6 17.97% 126% 453,883 258,000 195,883 8.12% 124% (237,483) (9.85)% 2040 2,385,169 427,746 0 427,746 17.93% 127% 450,9U6 264,450 186,456 7.82% 124% (241,290) (10.11�°� 2041 2,478,529 420,819 0 420,819 16.98% 127% 438,209 271,061 167,147 6.74% 125% (253,672) (1014�% 2042 2,522,183 435,575 0 435,575 1717% 128% 454,564 277,838 176,726 7.01% 126% (258,849) (1D.26�% 2043 2,623,939 441,743 0 441,743 16.84% 129% 456,195 284,784 171,411 6.53% 127% (270,331) �10.31�% 204A 2,551,076 458,507 0 458,507 17.97% 129% 468,335 291,903 176,431 6.92% 128% (Z8Z,075) (11.05�°h 2045 2,587,923 447,393 0 447,393 1719% 130% 485,305 299,201 186,104 7.19% 129% (261,289� (10.10�% 2046 2,681,099 454,524 0 454,524 16.95% 132% 494,355 306,681 187,674 7.00% 130% �266,851) (9.95�% 2047 2,772,613 470,047 0 470,047 16.95% 133% 510,910 314,348 196,562 7.09� 131% (273,485) (9.86)% 2048 2,862,288 485,426 0 485,426 16.96% 134% 527,801 322,207 205,594 718Y 132% (279,832) (9.78)% Total 11,031,993 0 11,031,993 11,533,409 6,912,481 4,620,928 (6,411,065) Total Present Value 4,233,977 0 4,233,977 4,399,017 2,641,693 1,757,325 (2,476,652) 6 Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund 30-Year Projection of Required Village Contributions for Police Officers Scenario 1(Updated Baseline) kenaria 4 Required Contribution Funded Ratio Required Contribution Funded Ratia Cost/(Savings) Fis�al Year Fensionable Total State Net�Ilage Net Village on Valuation Total State Net Village Net Village an Valuation Ending Payroll $Amount $Amount $Amount %of Payroll Date $Amount $Amount $AmouM %of Payroll Date $Amount %of Payroll 2019 1,168,605 244,355 0 244,355 20.91% 147% 250,783 250,783 0 0.00% 135% �244,355) (20.911°� 2020 1,223,041 256,394 0 256,390 20.96% 139% 263,756 263,755 0 0.00% 134% (256,389) (20.96�% 2021 1,288,879 251,750 0 251,750 19.53% 136% 261,156 261,156 0 0.00% 132% (251,750) (19.53)% 2022 1,357,448 264,030 0 264,030 19.45% 135% 274,293 274,293 0 0.00% 131'Yo (264,031) (19.45�% 2023 1,428,891 276,705 0 276,705 1937%, 13496 288,072 248,715 39,357 2.75% 130% (237,348) (16.62�°� 2024 1,501,149 289,871 0 289,871 1931% 133% 302,374 178,140 124,234 818°rG 129% (165,637) (11.03�% 2025 1,564,948 303,059 0 303,059 19.37% 131% 307,174 182,594 124,581 7.96% 128% (178,478) (11.41�% 2026 1,625,756 311,294 0 311,294 19.15% 130% 320,766 187,159 133,608 8.22% 1274'0 (177,686) (10.93�% 2�27 1,648,688 315,151 0 315,151 19.12% 129% 326,179 191,838 134,342 8.15% 126°k (180,810) �10.97�% 2028 1,659,703 315,100 0 315,100 18.99% 128% 327,806 196,633 131,172 7.90% 126% (183,928) (11.09�°k 2029 1,743,793 313,680 0 313,680 17.99% 128% 324,649 201,549 123.100 7.06% 125% �190,580) �10.93�% 2030 1,810,897 328,571 0 328,571 18.14°� 128% 340,512 206,588 133,924 7.40% 125% (194,647) (10.74�°rG 2031 1,891,001 337,177 0 33J,177 17.83% 128% 348,753 211,753 137,000 7.24% 125% (200,177) (10.59�% 2032 1,981,242 350,393 0 350,343 17.6996 127% 362,426 217,047 145,380 7.34% 125% (205,013) (10.35�% 2033 2,075,391 365,864 0 365,864 17.63% 127% 378,607 222,473 156,135 7.52% 125% (209,729) (10.11�% 2034 2,145,630 382,043 0 382,043 17.81°� 127% 395,6� 228,035 167,566 7.81% 124% �214,477) (10.00�% 2035 2,240,103 390,706 0 390,706 17.44% 127% 407,258 233,735 173,523 7.75% 124% (217,183) (9.69�% 2036 2,326,239 406,639 0 406,639 17.48% 126% 421,792 239,579 182,213 7.83% 124% (Z24,426) (9.65�% 2037 Z,413,486 420,069 D 420,069 17.41% 126% 438,159 245,568 192,591 7.98% 124% (227,478) (9.43�% 2038 2,424,697 434,001 0 434,001 17.90°� 126% 452,830 251,707 201,122 8.29% 124% (232,879) (9.61�% 2039 2,411,807 433,366 0 433,366 17.97% 126% 453,883 258,000 195,883 8.12% 124% (237,483) (9.85�`Y 2040 2,385,169 427,746 0 427,746 17.93% 127% 450,90fi 264,450 186,456 7.82% 124% (241,290) (10.11�°� 2041 2,478,529 420,819 0 420,819 16.98% 127% 43B,208 271,061 167,147 6.74% 125% �253,672) (1014�% 2042 2,522,183 435,575 0 435,575 ll.27% 128% 454,564 277,838 176,726 7.01% 126% (258,849) (10.26�% 2043 2,623,939 441,743 0 441,743 16.84% 129% 456,195 284,784 171,411 6.53% 127% (270,331) (1031�% 2044 2,551,076 458,507 0 458,507 17.97°� 129% 468,335 291,903 176,431 6.92% 128% �282,075) (11.05�°� 2045 2,587,923 447,393 0 447,393 1719% 130% 485,305 299,201 186,104 7.19% 129% (261,289) (10.10�% 2046 2,681,099 454,524 0 454,524 16.95% 132% 494,355 306,681 187,674 1.00% 130% (266,851) (9.95)% 2047 2,772,613 470,047 0 470,047 16.95% 133% 510,910 314,348 196,562 7.09% 131% (273,495) (9.86�% 2048 2,862,288 485,426 0 485,426 16.96% 134% 527,801 322,207 205,594 7.18% 132% (279,832) (9.78)% Total 11,031,993 0 11,031,993 11,533,409 1,383,575 4,149,834 �6,882,159� Total Present Value 4,233,977 0 4,233,977 4,399,017 3,055,229 1,343,788 (2,840,189) 7 Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund 30-Year Projection of Required Village Contributions for Police Officers �oo,000 f5cenario 1(Updated Baseline) ��� —�—Scenario 2 --�Scenario 3 o -�—Scenario 4 �. 3 � 4pp,ppp �L M C 0 V d m IE ' ���� � W a u d �0 � a Z��,� 1��,� � . _ ---- - ti� titi ti� ti� ti� ti� 3ti 3� 3h 3� 3� �ti �� �� �� �,0 �,0 �,0 �,o �,o ,�o �,o ,�o ,�o �,o ,�0 tio ,�0 �,0 �,0 Fiscal Year End 8 Village of Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund 30-Year Projection of Funded Ratio for Police Officers 150% 145% 14096 0 « � 1359'0 - � a � � 130% LL � 71 a a 125% 'o � a 120% —f-Scenario 1(Updated Baseline) 115% —�—Scenario 2 110% —�Scenario 3 �Scenario 4 105% 10(P/ ti� ti°' titi �,'� tih �,� �,0 �ti �'� �� �� ,�A p,ti p,3 p,h ,ti0 �0 �,0 �,0 �,0 �,0 ,�0 �0 �0 ,�0 �0 ,ti0 �0 ,�0 �0 Valuation Date 10/1 9 Lori McWilliams From: Bonni Jensen <bonni@robertdklausner.com> Sent: Monday,July 2, 2018 6:36 PM To: Lori McWilliams; bsjteam Cc: Raymond Korkowski;Abby Brennan; Ed Sabin (Ed.Sabin74@gmail.com); Raymond Giblin;lohn Terzakis Qohn@jterzakis.com); 'kylekennethstone@gmail.com'; Jeffrey.Amrose@grsconsulting.com; Dulce Zapata-Escalante; Anna Klausner Parish Subject: RE:Tequesta Public Safety Plan Projection Study 6-8-2018.pdf Attachments: Mimecast Attachment Protection Instructions;Tequesta Public Safety Plan Projection Study 6-8-2018 (00108786xBC171).pdf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Lori, This is a matter that the Pension Board has been working on with the Village since the end of March. Below is the background on this matter. The recent collective bargaining agreement has a provision that the officers hired on or after February 1, 2013 who are in the 401(k) plan have the option to move into the Tequesta Public Safety Officers Pension Trust Fund,the defined benefit program, and begin to accrue future service. Upon receiving the information that up to 11 new officers will be moving into the plan,the actuary and I began working together to determine whether there is a possibility that the Pension Fund could again become eligible for the 185 money. If the Village's Police Pension Plan can participate again,there is also at least an argument to be made that the Pension Fund is eligible for the 185 money that was missed during the years that the plan was not compliant. It is unknown how that would turn out, but the Municipal Police and Fire office is still holding those funds. The Pension Fund asked the actuary to calculate the cost impact of coming into compliance with the requirements of Chapter 185 of the Florida Statutes. See the attached report.The report concludes that if the Pension Plan comes into compliance with Chapter 185 and is eligible to receive the excise premium tax revenue sharing again,there will be a cost savings to the Village. Whether the Plan is in compliance will need to be determined by the State, but at a minimum will require: • The plan to be reopened beginning February 1, 2013; • To provide those members with a 2.75% multiplier; and • To dissolve the 401(a) plan and deposit those assets into the defined benefit plan. We are not sure of the impact if less than all of the officers opt to become pension fund members. I have confirmation that the Union is interested in pursuing a determination from the State. Confirmation of interest is needed from the Village to go forward as this would require a change to the already settled collective bargaining agreement. Should the Village agree to move forward, 1 would draft an amendment to the Plan that would bring the Plan into compliance and then submit it to the state for a ruling on whether the Plan is once again compliant with Chapter 185. This may be the one opportunity for the Village to once again participate in receiving the 185 money, so the actuary and I brought this forward to the Pension Fund. We did not want this potential income opportunity to pass by without notice. 1 TRUSTEES: IF YOU RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL, PLEASE BE SURE NOT TO HIT REPLY ALL AS OTHER TRUSTEES ON YOUR BOARD ARE COPIED ON THIS EMAIL. You may respond to the others on this email,just not the other trustees on your Board. To expedite the handling of your email, please be sure to copy bslteam@robertdklausner.com on your emails. Bonni 5. Jensen Klausner, Kaufman,lensen & Levinson 7080 N.W. 4`h Street Plantation, Florida 33317 Telephone: 954-916-1202 Facsimile: 954-916-1232 bonni(a�robertdklausner.com R / � CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is confidential, may be privileged and is meant only for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender ASAP and delete this message from your system. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:To the extent that this message or any attachment concerns tax matters, it is not intended to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law. From: Lori McWilliams<Imcwilliams@tequesta.org> Sent: Monday,July 02, 2018 9:58 AM To: Bonni Jensen<bonni@robertdklausner.com>; bsjteam <bsjteam@robertdklausner.com> Cc: Raymond Korkowski <rkorkowski@tequesta.org>; Abby Brennan <abrennan@tequesta.org> Subject: FW:Tequesta Public Safety Plan Projection Study 6-8-2018.pdf Good morning Bonni, Ray Korkowski was in my office this morning inquiring as to why the pension board agenda item was not on tonight's workshop agenda. I don't know where the breakdown took place, but this was the first I have heard of this request. With that said,the Mayor has agreed to place this on the 7/12 agenda as a Presentation (no action to be taken) so Council can determine how it wishes to proceed further. Ray sent me the attached report for inclusion, however, if you can provide me with a memo on where you stand working with the State on obtaining the 185 back it could only help your case. I am on a tight deadline so I will need this memo today, please. Thank you, Lori McWilliams 2 From: Raymond Korkowski Sent: Monday,July 2, 2018 9:36 AM To: Lori McWilliams<ImcwilliamsC�tequesta.or�> Subject:Tequesta Public Safety Plan Projection Study 6-8-2018.pdf Sgt. Korkowski 30 yr pension cost/savings survey. _._ __ This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast com 3