HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Special Meeting_Tab 10_12/08/2005VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA
SPECIAL MASTER CODE ENFORCEMENT HEARING MINUTES
• SEPTEMBER 22, 2005
PRESENT: Special Master Lars. Donlon
Code Enforcement Officer David Cooper
Village Clerk Gwen Carlisle.
The hearing was called to order at 10:02 a.m.
A. Approval of Minutes
Special Master Donlon approved the minutes of the July 28, 2005, Special Master Hearing as
submitted.
B. Fine Imposition Hearings:
Case No. OS-22729 Steven Willie
36 Yacht Club Place Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Tequesta REPL LT 599 & S 70.56 FT
Of ABND 30 Ft. Tequesta Drive LYGE of & ADJTO
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-2560
Violation of Code of Ordinances
Chapter 78, Article lX, Division 11 sec. 644
Page CD 78:114-115
• RIA Parking /Pick up trucks
The Respondent, Steven Willie was not present at the hearing. This case was continued to the
October Meeting to allow for proper notice of hearing.
Case No. OS-17656 Bruce Fleming
324 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Jupiter in the Pines, Sec. D LT 1 BLK 35
PCN: 60-43-40-30-04-035-0010
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 30 Article II, Sec. 30-33
Page CD 30:5
Prohibited Conditions
Chapter 30, Article II, Sec. 30-32
Page CD 30:5
Excessive accumulations prohibited
The Respondent, Bruce Fleming was not present at the hearing. This case was continued to the
October Meeting to allow for proper notice of hearing.
Case No. OS-22730 Anthony Stumpp
80 Yacht Club Place, Tequesta, FL 33469
• Legal: Tequesta LT 505
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-5050
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644
Page CD 78: 114-115
• RIA Parking/Pick up trucks
The Respondent, Anthony Stumpp was not present at the hearing. This case was continued to
the October Meeting to allow for proper notice of hearing.
Case No. 05-22630 David Kyle
229 Golf Club Circle, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Tequesta TH PT of LTS 185 & 186 as in
OR2061P203
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-1850
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644
Page CD 78: 114-115
RIA Parking. Pick up trucks
The Respondent, David Kyle was not present at the hearing. This case was continued to the
October Meeting to allow for proper notice of hearing.
Case No. OS-22664 Kathleen Fitzpatrick
15 Chapel Circle, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Chapel Court SEC 2 as in
PB47P196 LT 25
PCN: 60-42-40-25-32-000-0250
• Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Sec. 78-643
Page CD78: 113-114
R-1, R-2 and R-3 districts
The Respondent,. John Fitzpatrick, was present at the hearing and there was a finding of proper
notice. The Tequesta Code Enforcement Officer testified and produced photographs of the
violation.
Conclusion of Law is that Respondents John and Kathleen Fitzpatrick are in violation of Chapter
78, Article IX, Sec. 78-643, Page CD 78: 113-114, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of
Tequesta.
The Special Master ordered that Respondents, John and Kathleen Fitzpatrick shall comply with
Chapter 78, Article IX, Sec. 78-643, Page CD 78: 113-114, of the Code of Ordinances of the
Village of Tequesta by the 21St day of December, 2005.
If Respondent's do not comply within the time specified, Respondent shall be assessed a fine of
up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per day until the property is in full compliance.
A Fine Assessment Hearing will be held before the Special Master on the 26`~ day of January,
2006, at 10:00 a.m., at the Village of Tequesta, Code Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook Road,
• Tequesta, Florida.
A Certified copy of this Order may be recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, and, once recorded, shall constitute a lien against the property of the original amount
upon which the violation existed and upon any other real or personal property owned by the
Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes for the original amount.
• Case No. OS-24154 Arika Perry
283 Country Club Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: TEQUESTA LT 208
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-2080
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644
Page CD 78: 114-115
RIA Parking/Pick up trucks
The Respondent, Arika Perry, was present at the hearing and there was a finding of proper
notice. The Tequesta Code Enforcement Officer testified to the violation. The Respondent
produced a photograph of the violation.
Conclusion of Law is that Respondent, Arika Perry, is in violation of Chapter 78, Article IX,
Division 11, Sec. 644, Page CD 78:114-115, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of
Tequesta.
The Special Master ordered Respondent, Arika Perry shall comply with Chapter 78, Article 1X,
Division 11, Sec. 644, Page CD 78:114-115, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of
Tequesta by the 22°d day of October, 2005.
• If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, Respondent shall be assessed a fine
of up to two hundred fifty dollazs ($250.00) per day until the property is in full compliance.
A Fine Assessment Hearing will be held before the Special Master on the 27~' day of October,
2005, at 10:00 a.m., at the Village of Tequesta, Code Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook Road,
Tequesta, Florida.
A Certified copy of this Order may be recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, and, once recorded, shall constitute a lien against the property of the original- amount
upon which the violation existed and upon any other real or personal property owned by the
Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes for the original amount.
Case No. OS-24152 Robert Fritz
80 River Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: TEQUESTA LT 433
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-4330
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644
Page CD 78: 114-115
RIA Parking/Pick up trucks
The Respondent, Robert Fritz, was not present at the hearing. The Village requested a
continuance.
•
The Special Master ordered that this matter is continued and a Hearing will be held before the
Special Master on the 27`~ day of October, 2005 at 10:00 am at the Village of Tequesta, Code
• Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida.
Case No. OS-24153 Anthony Utter
275 Country Club Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: TEQUESTA LT 206
PCN: 60-42-40.26-01-000-2060
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644
Page CD 78: 114-115
RIA Parking/Pick up trucks
The Respondent, Anthony Utter, was not present at the hearing, however, there was a finding of
proper notice. The Tequesta Code Enforcement Officer testified to the violation.
Conclusion of Law is that Respondent, Anthony Utter, is in violation of Chapter 78, Article IX,
Division 11, Sec. 644, Page CD 78:114-115, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of
Tequesta.
The Special Master ordered that Respondent, Anthony Utter, shall comply with Chapter 78,
Article IX, Division 11, Sec. 644, Page CD 78:114-115, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village
of Tequesta by the 5:00 p.m., on the 23`d day of September 2005.
If Respondent does not comply within the time specified, Respondent shall be assessed a fine of
• one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day until the property is in full compliance.
A Status/Fine Assessment Hearing will be held before the Special Master on the 27~' day of
October, 2005 at 10:00 am, at the Village of Tequesta, Code Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook
Road, Tequesta, Florida.
A Certified copy of this Order may be recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, and, once recorded, shall constitute a lien against the property of the original amount
upon which the violation existed and upon any other real or personal property owned by the
Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes for the original amount.
C. Status Hearings
Case No. OS-199909 Hattie Siegel
498 Dover Road, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Jupiter in the Pines, Sec. B LT 6
BLK 15
PCN: 60-42-40-25-06-015-0900
Repeat Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 30, Article II, Sec. 30-33
Prohibited conditions
Chapter 30, Article II, Sec. 30-32
• Page CD 30:5
Excessive accumulations prohibited
The Respondent, Hattie Seigel, was not present at the hearing, however, there was a finding of
proper notice. The Tequesta Code Enforcement Officer testified to the violation. The Village
• requested a continuance.
The Special Master ordered that this matter is continued and a Hearing will be held before the
Special Master on the 28`~ day of November, 2005 at 10:00 am at the Village of Tequesta, Code
Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida.
Case No. OS-18663 Donna Leffler
475 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: 25-40-42, S 130 Ft OF N 260 Ft
of E 238.13 FT Of W 635 FT of NE '/. of SE '/. (Less
W 75 FT, ELY 45.88 Ft. Seabrook
PCN: 60-4Z-40-25-00-000-5160
Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 78 Article IX Division 9, Sec 78-586
Page CD 78:112
Above ground pools prohibited
The Respondent, Donna Leiller, was not present at the hearing, however there was a finding of
proper notice. The Village and the Respondent agreed to an extension of time.
Conclusion of Law is that Respondent, Donna Leffler, remains in violation of Chapter 78,
Article IX Division 9 Sec. 78-586, Page CD 78:112, of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of
Tequesta.
• The Special Master ordered that an ext ~
ension of tune is granted from the 28 day of September,
2005 through the 28~' day of November, 2005. The Respondent, Donna Leffler, shall comply
with Chapter 78, Article IX, Division 9, Sec 78-586, Page CD 78:112, the above listed code
sections of the Code or Ordinances of the Village of Tequesta, by November 28, 2005.
If Respondent does not comply within the time specified, a fine of up to two hundred fifty dollars
($250.00) per day shall be assessed for each day the violation continues to exist.
A Fine Assessment Hearing will be held before the Special Master on the 15`~ day of December,
2005, at 10:00 am, at the Village of Tequesta, Code Compliance Division, 399 Seabrook Road,
Tequesta, Florida.
A Certified Copy of this Order may be recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, and once recorded, shall constitute a lien against the property of the original amount
upon which the violation existed and upon any other real or personal property owned by the
Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes for the original amount.
Case No. OS-20123 John Rich
282 Golfview Drive, Tequesta, FL 33469
Legal: Tequesta LT 276
PCN: 60-42-40-26-01-000-2760
• Violation of Code of Ordinance
International Property Maintenance Code
Sec. 303.2, Page 9
Exterior Structure
• Violation of Code of Ordinance
Chapter 30, Article II, Sec. 30-33
Page CD 30:5
Prohibited Conditions
This hearing was deleted from the agenda.
Status Hearing -None
Fine Reduction Hearings -None
Foreclosure Authorization -None
There being no further cases, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
wen Cazlisle
Village Clerk
•
APPROVED:
Special Master
Date Approved
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
• MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Village of Tequesta Boadd of Adjustment held a regularly scheduled meeting at the
Tequesta Recreation Center, 399 Seabrook Road, Tequesta, Florida, on Monday, November
15, 2004. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. A roll call was taken by Village
Clerk Gwen Cazlisle. Boadd Members present were: Chair Vi Laamanen, Vice Chair Paul
Brienza, Boadd Member Steve Pullon, and Board Member Jon Newman. Also in attendance
were Village Attorney John Randolph and Village Planner Carol Lux, sitting in for Clerk of
the Board Jeff Newell.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Board Member Newman moved to approve the Agenda as submitted; seconded by
Vice Chair Brienza; motion passed 4-0.
III. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
MOTION: Board Member Newman moved to approve the Minutes of the Apri119, 2004 Meeting
• as submitted; seconded by Board Member Pullon; motion passed 4-0.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
1. An application from Richazd S. Kozell, owners of the property located 119 Point
Circle, Part of Lots 32 &34 and all of Lot 33, Tequesta Country Club, requesting a
variance to the terms ofthe Official Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance ofthe Village
of Tequesta, Ordinance No. 355, as amended, Section VII. Schedule of Regulations
and Application of Regulations, Subsection (C) , Schedule of Site Requirements, R-
1 A District, Front Yard Setback, to allow for the construction of a house located
forwazd of the Building Lme which establishes the required lot width of 100' (feet),
and as defined in Section IV. Definitions, (47) Building Line. A line on a lot,
generally, but not necessarily, parallel to a lot line or road right-of--way line, located a
sufficient distance there from to provide the minimum yazds required by the zoning
code. The building line delimits the azea in which buildings aze permitted subject to
all applicable provisions of the zoning code.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
Ms. Lux read the application request into the record.
• A. Swearing-In of Witnesses
• Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2004
Page 2
Acting Clerk of the Board Cazol Lux swore in all those intending to speak for this
application.
B. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications
Ex-parte Communications -Chair Laamanen, and Boazd Member Newman
mentioned they had not spoke with anyone regazding this matter. Vice Chair Brienza
and Board Member Pullon mentioned they had visited the site, but had not spoken
with anyone regarding this matter.
C. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination
Board Member Newman questioned whether the applicant was going to demolish the
existing structure and build a new residence. Ms. Theresa Kozell, applicant
responded in the affirmative. Chair Laamanen questioned whether there would be any
difference in the land coverage than the current structure. Ms. Kozell indicated she
did not have house plans at this time, but intended on using the setbacks allowed by
code. Boazd Member Newman commented this was very similar to something the
• Boazd had previously reviewed, and felt the request was a preexisting situation for a
lot under 100'. He noted based on the code requirements, Ms. Kozell was seeking a
variance. Board Member Newman questioned the age of the current home. Ms.
Kozell indicated the home was probably built in the 1960's.
Vice Chair Brienza questioned whether the house would be moved forward on the lot
more than the adjacent homes. Ms. Kozell indicated she was not planning on
encroaching or moving the house forward on the lot. Chair Laamanen noted the
applicant had not submitted any elevations, or plans for approval. Board Member
Newman indicated those were not required. Ms. Lux indicated the structure would
have to be in compliance with all the setbacks and lot coverage requirements. She
reviewed the required setbacks and noted the lot coverage would be 37%. Board
Member Newman stated the applicant usually provided more information, and the
Board Members were apprehensive since they could not see the full scope of the
project. He noted he did not have any reservations in granting the application. He
indicated the applicant did meet the hardship associated this project. Chair Laamanen
stated she would like to know the existing percentage vs. the proposed percentage of
lot coverage. She felt the Board should know what the applicants were proposing,
and suggested more information be provided on these requests. Vice Chair Brienza
questioned whether the house would be one or two stories. Ms. Kozell indicated it
could be two stories. Chair Laamanen questioned the height requirement for the area.
Ms. Lux indicated 30 feet for two stories was the maximum allowable height. Board
• Member Pullon noted with the 37% lot coverage, and if she stayed within the
setbacks, she could not build too big. He felt the height should be monitored. Vice
Chair Brienza cautioned Ms. Kozell that if anything changed she may need to come
• Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
November 15, 2004
Page 3
back before the Boazd.
D. Finding of Fact Based on Competent Substantial Evidence
MOTION: Board Member Newman moved to approve the variance, since the applicant had met
the criteria as a preexisting situation with the dimensions of the lot, subject to
meeting the rules and requirements of the building codes; seconded by Vice Chair
Brienza; motion passed 4-0.
Vi Laamanen For
Paul Brienza For
Steve Pullon For
Jon Newman For
2. An application from Richard J. Berube, owner of the property located at 4 Country
Club Cr., Lot 13 Block 1, Country Club Point, requesting a variance to the terms of
the Official Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Tequesta, Ordinance
No. 355, as amended, Section VII. Schedule of Regulations and Application of
Regulations, Subsection (C), Schedule of Site Requirements, R-1 District, Rear Yard
• Setback, to allow for the construction of a 25'x20' one story workshop addition to
extend within the 20' rear setback. The addition is to extend 3.8 feet into the rear
yard setback for a total proposed reaz setback of 17.2 feet.
Ms. Lux read the application request into the record.
A. Swearing-In of Witnesses
Acting Clerk of the Board Carol Lux swore in all those intending to speak for this
application.
B. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications
Ex-pane Communications -Chair Laamanen, Vice Chair Brienza, and Board
Member Pullon stated they had visited the site, and indicated they had no
conversations regazding this matter. Board Member Newman indicated he had no
disclosures on this matter.
C. Testimony of Witnesses and Cross Examination
• Mr. Richard Berube, applicant distributed a revised survey. He noted the room and
the distances of the proposed building were included on the revised survey. He
pointed out the attached letters of the neighboring residents, within 300 feet, having
Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
• November 15, 2004
Page 4
no objections to the project. He explained for clarification his original plans showed
a gazage, but he indicated the revised plan was for a workroom for his hobby, cabinet
making. He stated he wanted it to look like a house not a garage, including French
doors, instead of a garage door. He noted the construction would encroach into the
20-foot setback, and indicated Staff was questioning whether it was a side setback or
front setback. He noted the house was originally built facing Country Club Drive, and
due to the placement of the driveway he was now dealing with a reaz setback instead
of side setback.
He mentioned he could have arranged the building to be long and narrow, but it
would have moved it out towazds the side-yard on Country Club Circle. He felt that
would break up all the houses as you turn the corner and come down the street, the
room would stick out 5 feet beyond every structure. He noted he could go back to the
south with it, but that would block the bedroom window of his residence. He stated it
makes sense to arrange the room the way he has proposed, and was asking to
encroach 4.19 feet.
Chair Laamanen questioned where he would pazk his boat. Mr. Berube responded on
the other side of the house, behind a 6 foot fence. Board Member Newman
• questioned the proposed site location and whether the 4.19 feet was to correct the
15.9 feet as proposed. Mr. Berube indicated that was the difference, and the surveyor
had not subtracted the difference from the setback requirements. Board Member
Newman questioned whether the actual difference from the property line to the wall
was 15.9 feet. Mr. Berube responded in the afFirmative. Board Member Newman
noted that would be in lieu of the required setback of 20 feet. Mr. Berube agreed.
Boazd Member Pullon asked that the StaffReport and the handwritten letters be read
into the record so the applicant and the Boazd Members were awaze of the situation.
Ms. Lux read the Staffreport. Mr. Berube stated Ms. Lux had called him two or three
weeks ago and told him he needed another survey that showed other features. He
questioned why she was requesting the information when he had submitted his plans
over three months. He noted the next day after the phone call he contacted his
surveyor and ordered the revised survey. He mentioned he did not receive the revised
survey until last Thursday. He explained Ms. Lux wanted to debate which was the
front or the side of the house, and whether it was a garage or workroom. He stated
she was requesting the plans state if it was a garage or workroom. He felt that request
was unique to him. Ms. Lux indicated he was required to have a finished floor
elevation, and suggested that in the motion that if the workshop is to be converted
anytime in the future to livable space, that it had to meet the regulations of the
Village. Board Member Newman indicated the original survey did not show the
impact or the elevations, and he felt in order for the Board to ascertain whether the
• impact was correct, a revised survey was needed. Board Member Newman felt the
policy should be rewritten to state exactly what was needed of the applicant so the
impact was shown on the survey. Ms. Lux agreed the application should be more in-
Boazd of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
• November 15, 2004
Page 5
depth. Board Member Newman indicated a site overlay takes time, because it needed
to be drawn into the survey. He noted a proper site survey should have ground
elevations, so it did not become an issue in the future. Attorney Randolph questioned
whether the application received stated the 4.19 feet encroachment into the setback.
Ms. Lux stated no. Board Member Newman indicated the new request was over and
above by 1 foot. Attorney Randolph questioned whether the 4.19 feet was advertised.
Ms. Lux indicated the additional amount of the encroachment had not been
advertised.
Attorney Randolph explained the Boazd could vote on what was advertised, but could
not vote on the 4.19 feet, because the surrounding property owners had not be
notified of the increase. Board Member Newman suggested tabling the item to give
Stafftime to advertise and notify the surrounding property owners. Ms. Lux asked the
Boazd to keep their packets for the next meeting.
Boazd Member Pullon reviewed some options for the applicant to consider: 1) The
Board could approve the 3.8 feet as advertised this evening or otherwise the applicant
would have to wait a month for the additional foot; 2) consider reducing the room
down 4 feet so the applicant would not have to come back to the Board, and if within
• the setbacks the applicant could move forwazd; and 3) consider raising the fmished
floor elevation up 6 inches, so the applicant did not have to address the finished floor
elevation so in the future it could be livable. Mr. Berube indicated he was not willing
to give up the additional footage, and stated it would cost him more money to go
back and change it. Attorney Randolph stated the Board should not vote on this
matter this evening, but could give the applicant an indication of how they felt
regazding the additional amount of encroachment.
Boazd Member Newman noted he typically did not give a 4-foot encroachment into
an easement or setback. He noted the determination of what was the front yard would
have a role in his decision. He suggested the applicant review the code. Vice Chair
Brienza questioned whether the room would have doors or windows. Boazd Member
Newman felt the reason Staff was requesting the floor elevation was because there
was bathroom. Mr. Berube mentioned the elevation was the same so there would not
be a step up to the workroom. Boazd Member Pullon reviewed the code requirements
regazding raising the finished floor elevation. Boazd Member Newman questioned
whether there would be a height requirement since he had proposed a bathroom. Mr.
Berube indicated he had spoke with Mr. JeffNewell, the Community Development
Director and he indicated having a bathroom should not change the requirements.
Ms. Lux agreed.
Vice Chair Brienza mentioned concerns regarding the noise level of woodworking in
• regazds to the neighbors. Mr. Berube indicated there were minimal windows, and the
room would be well insulated. Chair Laamanen indicated she did not put much
weight on the letters by the surrounding neighbors regazding additions, because even
Boazd of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
• November 15, 2004
Page 6
the objectionable neighbors sometimes did not come forwazd since everyone had to
live in harmony. She preferred to address the facts of what was currently there and
what was being proposed. She mentioned she did not like small sidelines, and
mentioned concerns with the 4.19 feet. She felt the size of the building was large for
a woodworking shop. Mr. Berube explained the size of building was not large by
woodworking standazds. He noted on a freestanding building the setback was 10 feet,
and he could build the room 10 feet from the neighbor's house without a variance. He
pointed out since it was attached to his house the setback was 20 feet. Board Member
Pullon commented that the Boazd did not make the rules. Mr. Berube suggested the
code needed to be reviewed.
Mr. Berube indicated he would wait another month for approval of the 4.19 feet. He
felt the elevation would not be an issue, but noted he would look into the higher floor
elevation.
Chair Laamanen suggested moving the Boazd of Adjustment Meeting up eazlier in
the schedule by having a Special Meeting. Boazd Member Pullon noted his schedule
was fairly open. Vice Chair Brienza noted his schedule was open. Chair Laamanen
mentioned she would be out of town if the Board waited to the regularly scheduled
• meeting in December. Board Member Pu11on indicated he might know someone
interested in serving on the Boazd of Adjustment.
Boazd Member Newman indicated the Board would not be voting on this matter, and
requested Staff do the proper advertising. Ms. Lux indicated she would notify the
surrounding property owners, and set a date for the next Meeting. Mr. Berube asked
what information would he need to provide for the next Meeting. Boazd Member
Newman mentioned a corrected survey that denotes the impact and the setbacks. Ms.
Lux indicated she would send an email out notifying the Boazd of the Meeting date.
Chair Laamanen mentioned she could pick up her packet at the Clerk's Office.
MOTION: Board Member Newman moved to approve deferring the vote, and convening at a
Meeting date set by Staff via email; seconded by Vice Chair Brienza; motion passed
4-0.
Vi Laamanen For
Paul Brienza For
Steve Pullon For
Jon Newman For
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None
• VI. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS -None
Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
• November 15, 2004
Page 7
VII. ANY OTHER MATTERS
There were no other matters to come before the Board.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Board Member Newman moved to approve adjournment;, seconded by Board
Member Pullon, motion passed 4-0.
The Meeting was adjourned at 7:SSP.M.
Respectfiilly submitted,
Gwen Cazlisle, Village Clerk
•
•