Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocumentation_Regular_Tab 08A_02/11/1999~. ~ MEMORANDUM i :~ ~~ ~4 To: Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager v From: Scott D. Ladd, Director of Community Development Date: February 3, 1998 Subject: Ordinance No. 377 Landscape Waiver Request Community Appearance Board Project Recommendation PROJECT: Villager Apartments 360 Fiesta Avenue Robert F. Cromwell, et al., Owner Donaldson Hearing, Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., Landscape Architect Tom, attached are 18 packets and plans for the above subject project which were reviewed by the Community Appearance Board, on October 23, 1996 and November 18, 1998. These plans were originally submitted for review by the Community Appearance Board on October 23, 1996. The Board discussed the four waivers listed on the application and added a fifth waiver for native percentage (22% provided) which had not been listed. A good portion of the discussion centered around the size of the parking spaces with the applicant stating that the 10' spaces were needed because "60% of the buildings population was older than sixty and it was a real problem". The application was tabled so that the applicant could take afl of the ideas back to the owner for consideration of the overall cost and practicality and possibly return with a revision to the plan. Plans revised in accordance with the CAB recommendations from the October 23, 1996, meeting were finally submitted on October 20, 1998, and went back to the Board for review on November 19, 1998. The Board had the following comments/concerns: o The Board was advised that space for parking was very limited on this site and there was concern with making the parking spaces smaller because there were so many elderly residents who typically needed larger parking spaces; however, the sizes had been reduced to 9.5' X 20'. ~ The Board discussed the use of mahogany trees in the four new landscape islands being added along Fiesta Avenue. They were told that the mahogany trees thrived much better than oaks in confined locations and would grow much quicker than oaks in this location. ~ The Board noted that Ilex Shilling was shown on the plan at the south end of the building but was not listed on the plant list. They requested that some. of the flex Shilling be relocated to the new landscape islands. Page 2 CAB Project Recommendation Motion to approve the proposed landscaping and waivers as submitted with the following modifications: 1. That a number of the Ilex Shilling currently shown on the south end of the property be relocated onto the terminal parking islands along the west side of the property, the number to be determined by the Landscape Architect and his contractor (probably ten to twelve); 2. That the approval shall include the original dumpster plan or Alternative A, as shown on the landscape plan. Vote on the motion: 5-0 to approve. Parking for this property is calculated at two parking spaces per unit: 110 parking spaces required / 90 parking spaces provided. Existing % of property devoted to landscaping: 29% Proposed % of property devoted to landscaping: 29.6 % (Adding 4 6' X 20' landscape islands = 480 square feet of additional landscaping.) Staff recommends approval subject to the Community Appearance Board requested modifications. JMB MAILING ADDRESS: 1070 E Indiantown Rd/Suite 402 Jupiter, F1. 33477 PHONE NUMBER: (HOME) <BUSINESS)(407) 747-6336 LOT/PARCEL ADDRESS: The Villager Apal:tmer~ts FzQSta Avenue LOT: BLOCK: SUBDIVISION: PROPERTY CONTROL NUMBER: NATURE OF WAIVER: tDESCRIBE GENERALLY THE NATURE OF THE WAIVER DESIRED) i,andscaning & Parking imnrovPmPni-c were mac3P where nnssihle. We are asked for a waiver in onlx those areas o the site trat_c-mould not be improved to meet the requirements of Ord.377 JUSTIFICATION OF WAIVER: (SUPPORTING DATA, WHY APPLICANT FEELS WAIVER SHOULD BE GRANTED) Due to site limitationG i O~n X77 will r~rovP...~L.~Gic-ally imnnGGib1P anr3/nr im=n^a/a l~anrichir~ case, without waivers being granted. NOTE: APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WITH THIS APPLICATION: 1. APPLICATION FEE OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE (6125) DOLLARS. 2. CURRENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING ALL STRUCTURES, SETBACKS. PARKING AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS. 3. DRAWINGS TO SCALE OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY. 4. WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM PROPERTY OWNER. 5. ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION PERTINENT TO THIS APPLICATION. 6. TWENTY-TWO (22> OF SUBMITTALS. ~J~p APPLICANT SIGNATURE: (+" T (DATE) Recycled Paper NAME OF APPLICANT: Cotleur Hearing v a~- WAIVER REQUEST LIST /KEY ~VoJKey Required Proposed 1) Ordinance 377 (H) (2) (c) '1. 1-A 10' Landscape Buffer 0' Landcape Buffer 1-B 10' Landscape Buffer 0' Landcape Buffer 2) Ordinance 377 (H) (2) (c) 2. a. 0 650 L.F. Plant hedge 24" height 0 L.F. Plant hedge 24" height at time of pla nting at time of planting 2-B 600 L.F. Plant hedge 24" height 0 L.F. Plant hedge 24" height at time of pla nting at time of planting 3) Ordinance 377 (N) (2) (C) 3. 0 22 trees 20 trees 1 trees 6 trees Trees required in perimeter landscape buffer North 3 East 22 South 5 West 20 Trees provided in perimeter landscape buffer North 5 East 1 South 5 West 6 50 17 SITE DATA SITE AREA. BUILDING ;4REA PARKING/PAVED AREA LANDSCAPE/OPEN SPACE REQIRED LANDSCAF~E/OPEN SPACE PROVIDED TOTAL DWELLING UNITS .PARKING F~EQUIRED C2/DU) PARKING PROVIDED (EXISTING so sP /LOSS 0 sP) TOTAL TR~:ES REQUIRED TOTAL TRE'~ES PROVIDED EXISTING TREES 8 TREES EXISTINQ PALMS (17x3) 8 TREES PROPOSED ~"REFS 28 TREEB PROPOSED 'ALMS (8a3) 2 TREES Ic, °ALM CTYP.) E~ 78,836.2 SF 27,655.0 SF 27,864.0 SF 3,650.9 SF 23,317.2 SF 55 DU 110 SP 90 SP 59 TREES 2 42 TREES 3 A a~ ,. DUMPSTER I~/ ~= 15 Q U. °~ v ~ ~ CL ~~ 3 li Cotleur & Hearing Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants December 30, 1998 Mr. Scott Ladd Village of Tequesta P. O. Box 3273 Tequesta, FL 33469-0273 V1LLA.~E O~ TEQI.~iraT~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ 1999 CiEI~hN i ~E@dT ~F C4MMtJ~9TY t3Eb'ELOPMENT Re: Villager Apartments Landscape Plans for Ordinance 377 Compliance CH Project #95-0804 Dear Scott: In response to your letter dated December 3, 1998, please find enclosed 23 sets of Landscape Plans for the Village Apartments that have been revised in accordance with the Community Appearance Board's recommendation for approval. The modification to the plans includes the relocation of Ilex vomitoria from the south end of the property to the four parking islands along Fiesta Avenue. It is my understanding that upon receipt of the requested documents this matter will be placed on the Village Council agenda for approval of the landscape plan. Should you have any questions or need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to receiving your notice of the Villager Apartments placement on the Village Council's agenda. For scheduling purposes I will be out of town from January 16th through 23rd, 1999. Enclosures cc: Robert F. Cromwell William F. Shannon Maplewood Professional Center 1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-747-6336 FAX 561-747-1377 http: /www.cotleur-hea ri ng. co m f: \proj ectdoc\divo sta\v i I lageraprtl tr-6. doc VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPAR'TTvff~NI' OF CO1~~IIvItJNrIY DEVELOPMENT' Post Office Box 3273 357 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 (561) 575-6220 Fax: (561) 575-6239 December 3, 1998 Mr. Donaldson E. Hearing Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. 1070 E. Indiantown Road, Suite 402 Jupiter, FL 33477 RE: Community Appearance Board Action, Landscape Plans for Ord. 377 Compliance Dear Mr. Hearing: This letter is to confirm the action of the Village of Tequesta Community- Appearance Board at their November 18, 1998, meeting approving as submitted your application for The Villager Apartments located at 360 Fiesta Avenue with the following modification: Relocate from the. south end of the property to the two parking islands along the west side of the property, ten (10) to twelve (12) Ilex Schilling plants per each terminal parking island. This approval is also subject to the inclusion of the original dumpster plan or the alternative "A" dumpster plan. As you are aware, these projects must be reviewed by the Village Council for approval of the requested landscape waivers and will be placed upon the agenda of a Council meeting upon receipt of 23 revised plans as approved by the Community Appearance Board. Very truly yours, Scott D. Ladd Clerk of the Board /jeh cc: Robert F. Cromwell, The Villager Apartments Sgt. John Irovando, Code Enforcement Officer Recycled Paper • CO~NITY APPBARANCR BOARD ~BTING ~dINVT$S November 18, 1998 page 3 2. Tabled from October 23, 1996, as applicatioa from Cotleur ~ Hearing, Ina., for review of landscape plans f.or Ordinaace #377 compliaace for The. Villager Apartments, 360 Fiesta Avenue. Mr. William Shannon, Attorney for the applicant, explained that Landscape Architect Donaldson Hearing was on his way and that this matter had been tabled at the October 26, 1996 meeting for revisions to the landscape plan. Attorney Shannon reported those revisions and additional revisions as requested had been submitted by the applicant. Mr. Hearing arrived at 9:42 a.m. Mr. Hearing reviewed the additional revisions which had recently been made to the plans, and explained that space far parking was very limited on this site and commented there had been concern with making parking spaces smaller because there were so many elderly residents who typically needed larger parking spaces; however, the sizes had been reduced. Mr. Hearing explained that four new landscape islands had been added along Fiesta Avenue with mahogany trees planted in each island. Alternative arrangements had also been provided on the plans for the dumpster. Mr. Hearing advised the Board that as plant materials required replacement they would be replaced with native plants. In response to a question regarding why mahogany trees had been used, Mr. Hearing explained that mahogany trees thrived much better than oaks in a confined location adjacent to lime rock and would grow much quicker than oaks in this location. The mahogany trees were to be installed at 12'-14' with a 6' spread which would reach a 20' to 40' canopy over time. Sod was proposed for the base planting. Chair Cook suggested a larger tree height at planting. Mr. Hearing explained that would increase the cost, which was a concern to the owners. Boardmember Coben expressed his opinion that this plan represented a significant improvement and addressed the October 1996 Board requests. During discussion of ficus at the rear of the building, Mr. Hearing explained .those had been removed. Vice Chair Strahan pointed out that Ilex shown on the south end of the building was not listed. Mr. Hearing wrote in on two COMMUNITY AppgARANCB BOARD a~BTINC~ MINVTSS November 18, 1998 Page 4 sets of plans the following addition: Ilex Schilling in No. 3 pots 12" x 18" overall, with spacing of 2~. Vice Chair Strahan requested some of the Ilex Schilling which was to be planted on the south end of the building be relocated to the islands. During ensuing discussion, Boardmember Walker requested the Ilex not interfere with opening of car doors. Mr. Hearing explained there would be a sod strip next to the island edge. Vice Chair Strahan questioned what should be done about the alternative plan for the dumpster, to which Mr. Ladd responded the Board could approve either way and that the alternative to be used depended on the actions taken by the adjacent property owner. Vice Chair Strahan made a motion to approve the application from Cotleur & Hearing, inc., for landscape plans for Ordinance #377 compliance for The Villages Apartments, 360 Fiesta Avenue, as submaitted pith the modification that a number of the Ilex Schilling plants currently shopn in the south end of the property be relocated onto the terminal parking islands along the pest side of the property, the number to be determined by the Landscape Architect and his contractors and that approval shall include the original dumpster plan or alternative A. Boardmember Cobea seconded the motion. During discussion of the motion Vice Chair Strahan comdmeated to abr. Hearing to move just enough of the Ilex Schilling pleats to the islands to make a significant difference, to phich ate. Hearing responded that probably ten to tpelve vrould be moved to each island. The vote oa the motion was: Leslie Cook - for vic Strahan - for Paul Coben - for asoliy McCormick - for Sharon Walker - for The motion pas therefore passed and adopted. FILE COPY Cotleur & Hearing Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmenrol Consultants October 20, 1998 Mr. Scott Ladd Village of Tequesta P. O. Box 3273 Tequesta, FL 33469-0273 Re: Villager Apartments CH Project #95-0804 Dear Scott: VILLAGE OF TEGIUESTA 0 CT 2 2 1998 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT On behalf of Robert F. Cromwell we are pleased to submit to you 15 copies of the proposed Landscape Plans for the Villager Apartments. The plans have been revised in accordance with our meeting earlier this month. We have incorporated all of the requested modifications as outlined in your May 28. 19981etter regarding the same. Based on our meeting it is our understanding that you will be recommending that this plan be adopted by the Beautification Committee and the Village Council. As you are aware the Villager Apartment matter has been forwarded to the Code Enforcement Board and is scheduled to be heard by the Special Master on October 29, 1998. While it is our understanding that we have an agreement on the proposed improvements to satisfy the requirements of Village Ordinance 377 we would like to go on record with the Special Master that you will be recommending our plan to the Village for final approval. If you could provide correspondence in this regard we would be greatly appreciative. In reviewing the plans you will note that we have provided an alternative configuration for the northeast corner of the property. It is my understanding that you have had some conversations with the property owner concerning the potential of relocating the existing dumpster into the alley. If this is possible, it would enable us to provide an additional 3 parking spaces on the site and assist in further mitigating the parking problems that exist. We are aware that the Village is currently discussing this area with the adjacent property owner. We thought that it would be more efficient to provide an alternative configuration Maplewood Professional Center 1934 Commerce Lane -Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561-7476336 FAX 561-747-1377 http:/www.cotleur-hearing.com {}8~8 REVIEWED e:\projectdoc\divosta\vi I lageraprtltr-S.doc Mr. Scott Ladd Villager Apartments October 20, 1998 Page 2 as opposed to processing a plan modification in the future. Your consideration in this regard would be greatly appreciated. Again, please find enclosed 15 copies of the revised Landscape Plan. Should you have any questions or need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, ~l ~'~11~ Donaldson Hearing DH:nt Enclosures cc: Robert F. Cromwell William F. Shannon VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA DEPARTMENT OF COA~IMLiMTY DEVELOPMENT Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (407)575-6220 Fax: (407) 575-6239 24, 1996 Mr. Donaldson Hearing Cotleur Hearing 1070 E. Indiantown Road, Suite 402 Jupiter, FL 33477 Dear Mr. Hearing: RE: Community Appearance Board Action The Villager Apartments, 360 Fiesta Avenue, Tequesta This is to confirm the action of the Village of Tequesta Community Appearance Board at their meeting of Wednesday, October 23, 1996 tabling your application for review of landscape plans for Ordinance 377 compliance for The Villager Apartments for further study by the applicant. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, ~~ ~~ Scott D. Ladd Clerk of the Board JMc encl. T~jis G~/~,; f~~ ~,;~f /~cr~e~ul ~c ~~o~ t~ ~-~~ , ~. cc: Mr. Robert Cromwell Mr. William Shannon Recycled Paper Community Appearance Board Meeting Minutes October 23, 1996 Page 7 -------------------------- Paradise. Boardmember Nielson made a motion to modify the landscape plans for The BRITT Building to remove the existing oleander and replace it with a native hedge such as cocoplum; to change the driveway opening from 28' to 24' to eliminate one waiver, and to extend the landscaping into the 4' that would become available. Boardmember McCormick seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Paul Coben - for Claudette Dalack - for Molly McCormick - .for Marsha Nielson - for The motion was therefore passed and adopted. Boardmember Parker rejoined the Board. 5. An application frgm Cotleur Hearing, Inc., for review of landscape plans for Ordinance #377 compliance for The Villager Apartments, 360 Fiesta Avenue. (Rescheduled from September 11, 1996 meeting) Donaldson Hearing, agent, introduced Mr. Robert Cromwell, owner; Mr. John Pearson, building manager; and the owner's representative, Mr. William Shannon, Esquire. Mr. Hearing commented that Code required 110 parking spaces, and that only ninety 10' x 20' spaces were provided, which were existing. Mr. Hearing explained that smaller spaces had not been used because most of the residents were elderly and needed to use the front spaces because the rear parking was a dead end with potholes where water stood for several days after a rain. Mr. Hearing reviewed the requested waivers which he indicated were requested because of lack of room for the required plantings: 1. 10' Landscape buffer required on front and rear property lines, 0 proposed. :ance Board 96 2. 650 L.F. Plant hedge 24" height at time of planting required at front and rear, 0 proposed. 3. 22 trees required in rear, 20 trees required in front, 0 proposed. 4. Terminal islands required, none proposed. Mr. Hearing explained that the fourth waiver for relief from providing terminal islands, was requested because of the need to provide as many parking spaces as possible in an area already short of the number required by Code, and therefore would not be practical or reasonable with the elderly population of the building. Mr. Hearing commented that the plan proposed addition of 28 trees and several shrubs, and addressed areas visible from the streets. Mr. Hearing explained that power .lines in the rear also were a problem. Acting Chairman Coben questioned the percentage of native plants, to which Mr. Hearing responded that the plants which were proposed to be planted included in excess of 60% native plant material; however, because of existing oleander and viburnum hedges, the total native requirement would not be met; however, the native tree requirement would be met. The net percentage would be approximately 20% native. Mr. Hearing explained that all trees proposed to be added would be native with the exception of one tabebuia to be used for accent, which was a xeriscape plant. Acting Chairman Coben pointed out that the native percentage had not been listed as a waiver, and would be a fifth waiver. Boardmember Nielson commented that existing landscaping was not consistent. Mr. Hearing explained how consistency would be achieved with the additional trees proposed. Acting Chairman Coben commented on the 10' x 2Q' parking spaces, and suggested that changing only 1!3 of the Comanunity Appearance Board Meeting Minutes October 23, 1996 Page 9 spaces to 9-1/2' width could provide room for islands; or giving up an average of 3" per space could provide room for two or three islands--which would be a small price to pay to provide some green space within the expanse of asphalt. Acting Chairman Coben explained that the Board was not trying to impose rigid standards, but that the intent of Ordinance 377 had been to correct things just like this parking lot, to get some green in the lot. Mr. Hearing responded that economics was not the concern, but that 60~ of the buildings' population was older than sixty and it was a real problem. Boardmember Dalack questioned what the problem was with the population being elderly. During ensuing discussion,. Acting Chairman Coben commented that only some of the cars were large, and that the Board was not proposing 9' wide spaces, even though that was the new standard, but that if each space was changed from 10' to 9'8", no one could tell the difference, and there would be space for three islands. Clerk of the Board Scott D. Ladd commented that double striping 9' spaces helped, since people would center on double lined spaces, but would cross-park on single lines. It was pointed out that the spaces on the Publix parking lot were less than 10', were double lined, and were ample. Mr. Ladd suggested that if 60°s of the population was elderly, then the lot could be restriped to make 600 of the spaces 10' wide. Mr. Hearing explained that when it rained all of the elderly people needed to park in front, and there was not room. Boardmember McCormick questioned who was responsible to correct the drainage problem. Mr. Ladd commented that the drainage would be addressed by the Village through the new Stormwater Utility. Mr. Hearing explained that the younger people parked in the rear. Acting Chairman Coben suggested that islands could be placed in line with existing water lines; that he did not feel it appropriate to coerce the applicant into adjusting the size on all of the parking spaces, but that he believed it was insulting to the residents to say that some of them could not handle 9-1/2' parking spaces. Boardmember Parker recommended that islands be placed right across from the buildings to provide a buffer. Community Appearance Board Meeting Minutes October 23, 1996 Page 10 Attorney Shannon, representing the owner, Commented that the ideas offered had not been considered by the applicant and that he would like to take all of the ideas back to the owner for consideration of the overall cost and practicality. Attorney Shannon stated that the applicant's position was that 10' wide parking spaces were the minimum practical; however, perhaps 9'8" would be possible, and that the fire wall must be considered in making any changes. Attorney Shannon requested that this application be continued to the next meeting so that the applicant could possibly return with a revision to the plan. Boardmember Nielson made a motion to table the application from The Villager Apartments until the next meeting. Boardmember Dalack seconded the motion. The vote on the. motion was: Paul Coben - for Claudette Dalack - for Molly McCormick - for Marsha Nielson - for Steve Parker - far The motion was therefore passed and adopted. Boardmember Parker recommended that islands within the north and south parking lots be centered in front of some of the buildings and contain palms and oak trees, which would grow to be large. This would break up the parking lot as well as soften the buildings. 6. An application from Cotleur Hearing, Inc., for rQview of a revised landscape plan for the McCarthy's Restaurant portion of the Tequesta Oaks Development, 187 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta. Rick Green, employee of the DiVosta organization and agent for Tequesta Oaks Development, explained that when the Community Appearance Board had approved the Tequesta Oaks landscape plan that they had made eight suggestions for the applicant's consideration. Mr. Green stated that CO;N~it~NITY APPEARANCE BOARD REVIEW ~~ J~OI LANDSCAPE ORD. X377 G , S /7~ DATE: 1/26/96 ~ /~ J.~~ T er Apartments Villa Th CONTACT: Don Hearing : PROJEC g e DRESS enue A t PHONE: (407) 747-6336 : AD v a Fies LANDSCAPE FIRM: Cotleur Hearina 1070 E. Indiantown Rd. Jupiter, Florida 33477 CONTACT: David Lockmiller PHONE: (407) 747-6336 SUBMITTALS: TWO (2) PRELIlviINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS (MIN. SCALE OF I" = 30') INDICATING THE FOLLOWING: x • All existing structwes and parking. NA • All existing landscaping, including a tree inventory survey identifying all trees of three (3) inches in diameter or greater. waivers • All proposed trees, shrubs, ground cover, required landscape strips, planting islands and Requested other landscape areas and treatments required by Ord. 377. x • Graphically indicate the quantities, types, sizes at planting and at five (S) years maturity, and spacing of same and other qualitative data for all required plan t~.i.a,ls, including botanical and common names. ~..,~, ~ `E..~ ~' + • ~~ y~; x • Indicate conformance with Xeriscape requirements: ~ 3 - Drought tolerance J,q~ ~ d - Hardiness zone V/t - " ~ ~a - Salt tolerance $~-~~~ S C!~ _ Wind tolerance TA ~FPr x • Indicate required percentage requirements: - 60% indigenous to South Florida - 15% minimum gross parking area landscaped x • Locate oti plan each area where a waiver is being requested and specify degree of non-conformity. (i.e., l0' landscape buffer required, 6' proposed.) ORDI`A~1CE x0.377 COAIPLIAtiCE CHECK LIST 1. PERIMETER LANDSCAP[:VG: [ ] 10' inside property line where vehicular use areas abut public or private streets NA North, NA South, ~_East, ~ West) [ ~ S' inside property line where vehicular use areas abut adjacent land uses NA North, NA South, NA East, NA West) ff PeziMeter landscaping Requized Walllfence Residential Use Property Line io- Parking Ares (open land use) Gorwezciai nuildin' Public/Pzivate Right-of-Vay [ ) 5' off -street parking to off-street parki g ( NA North, NA South, ~ ~" East, _~West) .ti. ~• '~• Co~r~ereial Co~nezcisl 5. s. Building Building .. ,~ ., raperty Lines !'''ter Public/Pzivate Right-of-Vay ~'ri Pezineter Landscaping Requized (X J 1 canopy tree per 30 linear feet of landscaped area (12' high / 5' clear trunk) OR [X ] 3 palm tree cluster per 30 linear feet of landscaped area (12' gray wood) (x ] Only fifty (50%) percent of all trees provided in landscape plan shall be palms [x ] 2' min. in height at planting hedge to grow to min. 4' /max. 6' [x ] Balance of planter strip provided with grass or other ground cover material ..___~_~....~..... ..s Qariw~rar Landscape Reouire~+encs 30"Max--~ `.::. • ~ + ~ ::: 12 ' jai n iii ::. iii i i i 5'Min hedge 2'at plant-in9 Commercial properties abutting and/or immediately adjacent to residential: [ Np] Hedge not more than 6' from residential property line [Np] Planted min. 2' on center and maintained at min. 6' i max. 10' [Np] 5' min. ! 6' max. solid opaque fence and,~or wall Buffer Raauired at Cownercial/Resident-ial Abuttr~ent S-6'opaque ~_1~• call/fence h•dv~ Residentia ' Co~wenoial 1 ^ 'win. . ^planling area ^ • Prouerts- Llne - 2 - 2. INTERIOR LA\DSC.-~P1NG CO1f;~1ERClAL PARk1NG AREAS: WAIVER [ ) 6' X 20' landscaped islands at each end of parking row groundco~er/sod/snzubs I one ln[erior fsland per 10 barking spaces 1 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 canopy tree-nin 1 per island WIAIVER [ ] 6' X 20' landscaped island every ten (10) parking spaces or fraction thereof [ X] 1 tree planted in each island [gyp;) 5' divider median between abutting rows of parking spaces and rows of parking spaces and driveways ~vAJ 1 canopy tree or 3 palm trees per ~i0 linear feet between abutting parking rows and rows of parking spaces and driveways [ X ] balance of island landscaped with grass, ground cover, shrubs, or a combination of same ~'~in K~ 2e~ ~~ N1 A ~~ 45' Min 3. LANDSC APIIr'G SL'~ RROUNDL'~IG PRL~ICIPAL STRUCTURES: [ X] Pari4ing rows and traffic aisles separated from principal structures on the side and front by a landscape strip of at least 4' in width. (Where a building fronts on two (2) streets, all sides, except for designated loading areas, must by around sides and front of primary structure Side, Side, Front) - 3 - 4. ACCESS (INGRESS /EGRESS): waiver [ ] Access ways from public rights-of-~vay max. 24' in width 5. XERISCAPE REQUIREMENTS: [ x ] Moderate drought tolerant [ x ] Very drought tolerant [ x ] Non-invasive. species [ x ] Hardiness zone (other than Tropical} [ x ] Salt tolerant [ x ] Medium or high wind tolerance 6. ADDITIONAL REQUIRE~~IENTS: ~,vcr X 60% landscaping indigenous to So. Florida C ~d !~ ~ UVCrA~~ G~ [ ] waiver [ ] 15% min. gross parking area landscaped [ x J Automatic irrigation facilities provided [ N~ Tree survey indicating all trees of three (3) inches in diameter or greater [ N~ Prohibited landscaping identified for removal [ x ] Graphically indicate quantities, types, sizes at planting and at five (5) years maturity [ X ] Indicate botanical and common names 7. COMPATIBILITY WITH STREETSCAPES: [ N~, U.S. One [ N~ Tequesta Drive I~ - 4 - ~~c Page is too large to OCR.