Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_Regular_04/26/1990I• VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA Post Office Box 3273 • 357 Tequesta Drive Tequesta, Florida 33469-0273 • (407) 575-6200 FAX: (407) 575-6203 ~' I L Il A G F. O F T E Q li E S T A ~- I L L A G E C O ti N C` I L M E E T I N G M I N U T E S A P R I L 2 6, 1 9 9 0 I. The Tequesta Village Council held a regularly scheduled meeting at the Village Hall, 3~'7 Tequesta Drive, Tequesta, Florida, on Thursday, April 26, 1990. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Joseph N. Capretta. A roll call was taken by the Recording Secretary. Councilmembers present were: Mayor Joseph N. Capretta, Vice-Mayor Ron T. Mackail, William E. Burckart, and Earl L. Collings. Edward Howell. was out of town. Village Officials present were: Thomas G. Bradford, Village Manager; Bill C. Kascavelis, Finance Director, and Department Heads. Also present was Village Attorney, John C. Randolph. •Ii. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice-Mayor Mackail gave the Invocation and led those in attendance to the Pledge of Al1_egiance to the American Flag. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Capretta asked that the following items be added to the Agenda under Item IX. ANY OTHER MATTERS: A) Mr. Bradford to brief the Council on Tequesta's fire protection contract with Palm Beach County; B) Status of interviewing a Public Safety Director; C) Discussion of decision required by May 1, 1990 by letter received from County Commissioner, Karen Marcus, regarding location of a new, proposed library in Tequesta; D) Plans for managing the downtown development area, once the charter for the Downtown Development Task Force e~pi.res at the end of April, 1990; \J Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 • Page 2 ------------------------ E1 Mr. Bradford to brief the Council on the Ft. Pierce field trip by the Downtown Development Task Force to investigate the possibilities of a Community Redevelopment Agency. Councilmember Burckart moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Councilmember Collings seconded that motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the motion was therefore passed and the Agenda was approved as amended. IV. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered routine and • will be enacted by one motion. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND REPORTS *A) Community Appearance Board Meeting- March 28, 1990; *B) Code Enforcement Board Meeting - April 3, 1.990; *C) Public Safety Committee Meeting Meeting - April 9, 1990; *D) Village Council Meeting - April 12, 1990; *E) Village Manager's Report - April 9 - April 20, 1990; Councilmember Burckart moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Vice Mayor Mackail seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the motion was therefore passed and adopted. Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 • Page 3 ------------------------ VI. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS Many citizens were in attendance to discuss Item VII. A). Their remarks were received under that item. VII. DEVELOPMENT MATTERS A) Consideration of Application for Subdivision Review. Lot 8, Block 2, Country Club Point. JARA, Inc. Attorney for applicant, Ron Kolins, Esq., of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Sheehan, P.A., explained applicant.'s position: Applicant is interested in subdividing the above- referenced 1_ot, .leaving two lots, one with approximately 10,734sf and the other with approximately 13,120sf. Applicant has met all Village requirements for replatting. Applicant's technical representatives met with Village staff. Under Village rules, the final approval of this type of application lies in the hands of the Village Council. • Mayor Capretta asked why this application had come directly before Council, as opposed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment? Attorney Randolph responded that this application comes directly to the Council under the Village Subdivision Code which requires that, upon the division of a lot into two or more lots, or upon the replatting of a subdivision, the Council shall give consideration to the application. The issue would only go before the Zoning Board of Adjustment i_f a variance was required. The Village Building Department reviewed the application and made a. determination that it meets the zoning requirements. Therefore, it does not require a Zoning Board approval. TIM GOLDSBURY, President, Tequesta Country Club Point. Property Owners Association (the Association): The Association reviewed the application and felt the applicant was proposing to establish a subdivision in an already existing subdivision, to which the Association objects. The Association also felt the Subdivision Rule was intended to create a subdivision and not re-divide it. Mr. Goldsbury presented a petition signed by nearly all residents of Country Club Point, which read, "As a resident of Country C~ Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 • Page 4 ------------------------------- Club Point, I am opposed to the subdivision of Lot 8, Block 2. It is clearly stated in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Tequesta, that the intent is to provide no more than one dwelling per platted lot. This becomes more important consi.d.ering that the residences in Country Club Point cannot. be connected to a sewer line. Further, we feel the lot cannot be divided in keeping with the Zoning Ordinance for. the required minimum of R-1 distri_ct." Many residents were in attendance to support this petition. John Avery, Esquire, attorney for the Country Club Point Association also wrote a letter to the Village Manager disputing and opposing the application. BILL KIRKLAND, Chairman, Zoning Board of Adjustment, felt this issue should have been presented before the Zoning Board of Adjustment before coming before the Village Council. He also felt it was wrong to divide a lot already within a sub- division and felt this would require a variance from the Zoning Board. . Attorney Randolph explained to Council it, was the feeling of the homeowners and their attorney that the lot in question did not meet the zoning requirements. The position of the Village Building Official is, indeed, that it does and the overhead drawing presented for Council shows the lot width. Scott Ladd, Building Official, reiterated that the 75 feet of frontage is there, and therefore does not require a variance. Mr. Kirkland explained he was a licensed civil engineer, registered in four states, and was highly competent at. surveying. Mr. Hickey, Village resident, and a mathematics major graduated from Notre Dame read the definition of the Village Zoning Ordinance, page 22, paragraph 192, dated August 25, 1987: "the mean horizontal distance between the side lot lines, measured at right angles, to those side lot lines at the building line. Where there is only one side lot 1_ine, lot widths shall be measured between such lot lines and the opposite lot line for future right-of-way line". This was given to five different people who all expressed different interpretations: Bill Adere, Engineering, Rose Hupman Institute of Technology; John Woodruff, Physics, Yale University; Mr. Swello, Engineering, University of Miami; Mr. Hickey, Mathematics, Notre Dame; and Mr. Kirkland, Engineering, University of California. Mr. Hickey contended the above-referenced definition was vague, and if so, i_t is subject to opinion. Mr. Kirkland stated that since the lot • line is an arc, the lot width cannot be measured as stated in the Ordinance. Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 .Page 5 ------------------------------- Scott Ladd explained the overhead drawing of the lot plan: Lot 8A, at the street, has a combination of 65.29 feet and 20.18 feet, and Lot 8B has the cul de sac edge as 59.62 feet. Mr. Ladd explained one could not stop with the definition for lot width, because it reads "mean horizontal distance between the side lot line measured at right angles to those side lot lines at the building Line." The definition of building line says, "A line on the lot, generally parallel to a lot line or road right-of-way...", parallel in this case, being the arc that everyone seems to be having trouble with, "...located sufficient distance therefrom to provide the minimum yardage required by this Ordinance" (25 feet). Measuring 25 feet from the street provides 93.79 feet on Lot 8A and 89.43 feet on Lot 8B, and that meets the zoning code technical requirements of the Village of Tequesta. Councilmember Collings stated it appeared to him that any • small lot that is substandard would only have to put a little arc on their property and, through that, would meet the requirements to have sufficient distance. Mr. Ladd answered that was correct. Mayor Capretta asked Scott Ladd what, the rules were regarding septic tanks within the buildable area? Mr. Ladd answered the applicant merely had to apply to the Palm Beach County Health Department, which, in the past, has never denied lots of this size. He stated he was in receipt of a letter from Rick Dent, Executive Director of Encon, dated April 4, 1990, stating that sewer service can be made available to this property. Mr. Goldsbury stated Encon informed him sewer service was NOT available.. KEN NORTHAMER: Encon installed sewer lines 12-13 years ago down the street at Tradewinds Circle, as well as Country Club Circle. Those lines were never hooked up and are now, according to Encon, too old to be used. BILL CLIFTON, 15 Leeward Circle, stated he recently moved to Tequesta because of the aesthetics the area offered. and would not like to see the community robbed of those aesthetics via a precedent set. by the dividing of this property under discussion. • Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 6 U KEN ANDERSON explained. he has lived next door to the property in question for 23 years. He would not like to see that lot divided into two lots, and would not like to see a precedent SP.t. Vice-Mayor Mackail asked how an already platted property in a subdivision could be divided again, and was it possible for someone to opt out of the covenants of the subdivision? Attorney Randolph responded that the covenants DO run with the land and they apply across the board, 100q to everyone within the subdivision. However, that is not the issue presently before Council. If there was a provision within the Homeowners Declarations which stated a lot could not, be subdivided, then that would be a civil matter to be enforced. between the applicant and the property owners association, but not one which the Village enforces. The question of whether the restrictions do not allow the subdivision of the land is a legal question. There may be good argument to be made that the subdivision regulations are not applicable to this particular property. However, that determination is not up to the Village Council. By implication, if one would read. the definition of a subdivision, i.e., "either the division of a parcel of land into two or more lots, or resubdivisions of land heretofor divided or platted into lots, sites, or parcels" it would imply that a person does have the right to re-subdivide a parcel of land previously divided or platted into lots. For. that reason, this issue is appropriately before the Village Council. Mr. Kirkland gave examples of other applications which have come to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for their jurisdiction and review, but those were all examples of subdivisions which were initially platted, where it was clear that variances were required. This present case is distinguished from those in that a determination was made by Village staff that no variance is required. L.D. SLEPOW, Vice President of the Country Club Point. Homeowners Association, stated he moved to Tequesta 8 years ago from Coral Gables because Tequesta, like Coral Gables, had strong zoning codes. He would not like to see those codes relaxed. r L_ Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 • Page 7 ------------------------------- DOTTIE CAMPBELL, Tradewinds Circle resident, stated that just because something is legal, and meets all the requirements, does not make it right. If this subdivision was allowed, she felt the Village would be opening a "Pandora's Box". What qualifies JARA, Inc. to become a, subdivider, and do they have the right to come into an established community and change the living? Attorney Randolph responded that JARA, Inc. is required to go through the approval process as set forth i.n the Village Subdivision Code. They would have to show that the public utilities exist, that roads can be put to their property which meet the requirements, etc. The difference in this case is that most of those items are in place and therefore not quite as great a burden. Applicant has to go through the plat approval process as any developer would. In this particular case, subdivision approval is required by the Council for the subdivision of two or more lots. The State Statute relating to subdivision of properties only requires subdivision where a property is subdivided into three or more lots. Therefore, the Village is more strict than the State. • Attorney Kolins stated: 1) Applicant has received from the Health Department the approval for septic; 2) No variance is involved in this issue and the issue is before the right. body; 3) The property being dealt with does not come under the Country C7_ub Point Homeowners Association. The Association is only adjacent to the property. The covenants and declarations that do relate to the property under discussion do not preclude the action that is proposed. Attorney Kolins addressed three areas: 1) Citizen's remarks: "It's obvious the citizens, because of the great number in attendance, care enough about this issue to make an appearance at the Village Council meeting to protest. After listening to everyone's remarks, I fail to discern what the concern is really about. Attorney Avery's letter, with the threat of litigation, should not dissuade Council from what it must do tinder the law. The citizens' fear of a precedent being set by the allowance of this subdivision should not be a concern, since property cannot just "willy-nilly" be chopped up. There are rules that must be followed. After the proposed replat is done, there will be two lots, each of which, individually, is considerably larger than a substantial majority of the lots already in the subdivision. • Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 8 ------------------------------- 2) Relationship between what is proposed and the citizens in the Village: "We heard some statements by a number of "self- styled" engineering experts who say they calculate things differently. The calculation has to be done according to the Village Code. The Code is not vague, just because someone thinks it's vague. However, if it were vague, the law in the State of Florida states "vague things are decided in favor of the landowner". 3) Legal issues: "Though it's not easy for Council to make the difficult decision, in the face of protesting citizens, with the political and emotional pressure, they must do what is right. However, it is legal, meets all requirements, and Council is obligated to approve the application. I truly believe that this single division of one lot into two will, in no way, impact or harm the residents." TIM GOLDSBURY submitted a document to Council for its review stating, in fact, the Country Club Point Homeowners Association is a "corporation". • Councilmember Collings stated Attorney Kolins may, or may not, be right. Because Mr. Collings wass disquieted by some of the things he was hearing, he moved to table the issue until the next Council meeting in two weeks. Councilmember Burekart seconded the motion. Vice-Mayor Mackail stated it appeared to him that Council may be obligated to approve the application, but failed to understand exactly to what the homeowners were actually opposed to, and would appreciate the Building Official's review of the application one more time. If there are issues of contention, Council should be made aware of those issues. Mayor Capretta stated he had looked over the area and found no need for a variance, and therefore could find no reason to deny this application. Council has no legal basis to deny the application, but would agree to table the issue for two weeks to give citizens and the Village an opportunity to look into the application further to be certain there is no reason it should be denied. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for • William Burckart _ for Vice Mayor Mackail for the motion was therefore passed and adopted. Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 9 VIII. NEW BUSINESS A) Ordinance No. 397 - First Reading - Amending the code of Ordinances of the Village of Tequesta by Providing for Chapter 14 Land Development Regulations. • Attorney read Ordinance No. 397 by title: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA BY PROVIDING FOR CHAPTER 14, "LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS"; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION, PURPOSE AND TITLE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING VILLAGE AND COUNTY CODES AND REGULATIONS BY REFERENCE HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Village Manager Bradford explained the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the Village has many goals, objectives and policies within each element of the Plan. Florida Statute 163 requires that the Village must adopt Land Development Regulations consistent with the Plan. Ordinances 397, 398, 399, and 400 are the first of a series of Ordinances which will come before Council to provide the Land Development Regulations that would be required per the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No. 397 basically amends the Code of Ordinances to simply provide a section within the Code for a Chapter called "Land Development Regulations" which someone can simply refer to for all items relevent to land regulations within that Chapter. Vice-Mayor Mackail moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 397. Councilmember Collings seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the motion was therefore passed and adopted. • Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 . Page 10 ------------------------------- B) Ordinance No 398 - First Reading - Providing for a New Comprehensive Subdivision Ordinance. Attorney Randolph read Ordinance No. 398 by title: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 56, AS AMENDED, IN ITS ENTIRETY BY PROVIDING FOR A NEW COMPREHENSIVE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGULATING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA; PROVIDING FOR DECLARATIONS OF PURPOSE, JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS; PROVODING FOR PROCEDURES FOR PLAT APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR PLAT REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR IMPROVEMENTS PRE-REQUISITE TO FINAL APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATIONS AND VARIANCES IN EVENT OF HARDSHIP; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." . Vice-Mayor Mackail moved to approve Ordinance No. 398. Councilmember motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the first reading of Collings seconded the the motion was therefore passed and adopted. C) Ordinance No. 399 - First Reading - Creating the Village of Tequesta Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance. Attorney Randolph read Ordinance No. 399 by title: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, CREATING REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS WITHIN THE VILLAGE; PROVIDING FOR TITLE; APPLICATION AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING REVIEW PROCEDURES; PROVIDING APPROVAL CRITERIA; PROVIDING FOR APPEALS; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES; PROVIDINGx FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF LAWS IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES;" Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 • Page 11 ------------------------------- Councilmember Burckart stated that though he understands what this Ordinance is designed to accomplish, it appeared to him it was making it tougher for St. Jude's Church to do anything with the five acres of vacant property owned by the Church. Attorney Randolph stated that only 25q of that area needed to be set aside for environmentally sensitive species. This Ordinance will be published and the Church will have opportunity to address the issue. Councilmember Burckart asked that Village staff make certain the Church is made aware of this Ordinance. Councilmember Collings moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 399. Councilmember Burckart seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for • the motion was therefore passed and adopted. D) Ordinance No. 400 - First Reading - Creating the Village of Tequesta Toxic and Hazardous Substances and Materials Ordinance. Attorney read Ordinance No. 400 by title: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, CREATING REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE USE, HANDLING, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; PROVIDING FOR TITLE AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR, PROHIBITION; PROVIDING AN AMNESTY PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE FINES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Councilmember Collings moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 400. Councilmember Burckart seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the motion was therefore passed and adopted. Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 12 ------------------------------- E) Acceptance and Approval of Fiscal Year 1988/89 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Bill C. Kascavelis, Finance Director. Village Manager Bradford explained that Council had been provided with a copy of the above-referenced Report, as well as the reply to the Auditor General for the State of Florida regarding the Village's independent auditor's comments. In order for the Annual Financial Report to be officially accepted, the Village Council should formally accept same by motion. Councilmember Burckart moved to accept the Fiscal Year 1988/89 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Councilmember Collings seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for . the motion was therefore passed and adopted. IX. ANY OTHER MATTERS A Dottie Campbell stated Village Manager. Bradford would be receiving a letter soon from St. Mary's Hospital regarding the mobile mamogram van, a van which goes out into Palm Beach County and performs mamograms for considerably less money than the fee charged by hospitals and doctors. Council was asked permission for parking the van at the Gallery Square North parking lot to perform these mamograms, without paying a license fee. This is a non-profit organization. Scott Ladd explained that according to the way the Village Ordinance is written describing "not-for-profit", certain items are spelled out: there is a `catch-all' phrase that. states that the Village will issue a fee-exempt license if the County will issue a fee-exempt license. • Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 13 Councilmember Collings moved that permission be granted for the mamogram van to be parked at Gallery Square North parking lot, with all the provisions of the above-referenced Ordinance being met. Councilmember Burckart seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for the motion was therefore passed and adopted. B) Briefing to Council on Tequesta's fire protection contract. with Palm Beach County: Mr. Bradford explained he met this week with fire/rescue staff and reviewed the contract. There are one or two outstanding items which are presently sent to the Village Attorney for review regarding some cancellation language. The basis of the Agreement as written today allows the Village time until February 1, 1991 to cancel the • contract effective October 1, 1991. Thereafter the County has to submit its budget to the Village on May 1 of each year. The Village will have until September of each year to review the budget and may cancel the contract at that time, effective the following fiscal year. C} Status of Interviewing Public Safety Director: Mr. Bradford explained that all of Council had submitted their comments regarding top Safety Director applicants to him. Council and the applicants will. be called for scheduling for the most convenient time t,o do the interviews. Mr. Bradford feels it would be best to hold the interviews over a two-day period, two applicants each day. D) Letter from County Commissioner, Karen Marcus, requiring a May 1, 1990 decision by Vi]_lage Council regarding 1_ocation of proposed new library for Tequesta: Councilmember Collings stated it was his underst.and.ing that May 1 was a `soft.' date. E) Plans for managing the downtown development area, once the Charter for the Downtown Development Task Force expires at the end of April, 1.990: Mr. Bradford explained. the Task Force has scheduled a meeting for April 30 to prepare their report to the Council and. plans are that will. be submitted to Council b3- Mai- 10. Councilmember Collings rPCOmmended that. after Council's review of this report, a c~-orkshop be • schedl.~led so that a committee can be designated to take o~rer the funct.i.on of the Task Force. One of the first assignments Village Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 1990 Page 14 ------------------------------- of this committee would be to decide the location of the new County Library. F) Council briefed on Ft. Pierce field trip by Downtown Development Task Force to investigate possibilities of a Community Redevelopment Agency: Mayor Capretta that stated one interesting point of the Ft. Pierce trip was that Ft. Pierce had to acquire monies for a downtown development organization by getting money out of taxes that would have otherwise gone to the County and other taxing authorities. Mr. Bradford explained that Mayor Capretta was referring t,o a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) which has the power to create a Board. The Board can either be an appointment of other people, or the Council. A CRA has the power to use tax increment financing techniques to have the development occur, the power of eminent domain to condemn properties, to secure properties, in accordance with a redevelopment plan. This is used in Ft. Pierce where a significant amount of monies are now coming in: $75,000 this fiscal year. Councilmember Collings asked if the CRA compared favorably • with the proposal of the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control. District (NPBWCD)? Mayor Capretta and Mr. Bradford felt the two plans were far different. Mayor Capretta felt NPBWCD's proposal was far better. NI. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Collings moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Burckart seconded that motion. The vote on the motion was: Mayor Capretta - for Vice Mayor Mackail - for Earl Collings - for William Burckart - for the motion was therefore passed and the meeting was adjourned at. 9:110 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ . Fran Bitters Recording Secretary • Bill C. K scavelis Finance Director/VIllage Clerk DATE APPROVED : i o~ / 9 ~o